Speaker 1: The legacy media covered for the crimes of their masters,
Speaker 1: the ruling class. Okay, got it.
Speaker 2: I mean that's what they exist to do.
Speaker 1: That's why we have NBC News, That's why Yes, no,
Speaker 1: I totally that's why Fox is here. But to see
Speaker 1: people in independent media doing that, one of the questions
Speaker 1: I still can't answer is why is it that all
Speaker 1: the neocons are the ones leading the screaming and anyone
Speaker 1: who asked questions about Charliekirk's death when Charlie Kirk was
Speaker 1: an enemy of the neocons, so for the neocon whom
Speaker 1: he at best didn't trust and mostly really didn't like.
Speaker 1: I never talk about what I think Charlie fuck because
Speaker 1: it feels so weird be gone. But I just have
Speaker 1: to say this, they're the ones leading the charge on
Speaker 1: shut up, don't ask any questions, like you tell me
Speaker 1: what this is.
Speaker 2: Well that's I'm not going to take orders from them.
Speaker 1: Who are these people?
Speaker 2: Anyway?
Speaker 3: I can hardly put into words how happy it made
Speaker 3: me to see Tucker Carlson one having Dave Smith back
Speaker 3: on again my home boy, but two talking about the
Speaker 3: independent media and how compromised they are, how not independent
Speaker 3: The independent media is and three talking about why myself
Speaker 3: and so many others have been pontificating and investigating and
Speaker 3: diving deep on the Charlie Kirk assassination. Because it's like
Speaker 3: everyone that hated or opposed Charlie Kirk in life has
Speaker 3: become his most ardent defender in death. Whereas people like
Speaker 3: myself or Ian Carroll or other people who had disagreements
Speaker 3: with Charlie when it came to foreign policy, we seem
Speaker 3: to be the ones that were most interested in finding
Speaker 3: out who actually took Charlie Kirk out, Whereas simultaneously, people
Speaker 3: like Ben Shapiro or Mark Levin and all these guys
Speaker 3: are trying to convince you that there's nothing to see here,
Speaker 3: that it's absolutely not worth investigating any further. And you
Speaker 3: have to ask yourself, if you're thinking at all critically,
Speaker 3: why is it that the people who didn't even like
Speaker 3: Charlie didn't like him at all? In many cases, Charlie
Speaker 3: was their overt enemy. They are the ones who are
Speaker 3: trying to craft and control the narrative about his untimely demise.
Speaker 3: And we're going to get to that, but first I
Speaker 3: want to talk a little bit about Trump's speech last night,
Speaker 3: and I could go through and I could show you
Speaker 3: clips of his speech, or we can watch the entire
Speaker 3: thing together and we can comment on it. But I'm
Speaker 3: not going to because there's genuinely no purpose in it.
Speaker 3: There's only one thing of note that was said, and
Speaker 3: it's really just evidence of how much of a liar
Speaker 3: he's become.
Speaker 4: Regime change was not our goal. We never said regime change,
Speaker 4: but regime change has occurred. But we also won regime change.
Speaker 4: I said. I spoke with the we have really regime change.
Speaker 4: You know, this is a change in the regime. But
Speaker 4: the Washington Post said, what do you mean you have
Speaker 4: regime change, you'd have regime change. I said, no, we
Speaker 4: took out the first regime one hundred percent. That was Komani.
Speaker 2: Again, we have had regime change, So.
Speaker 4: I never say I wanted it. So I never talked
Speaker 4: about regime change, but we got it.
Speaker 3: One of those clips was from yesterday morning where he's saying, yeah,
Speaker 3: we want regime change, and then in the speech the
Speaker 3: very same day, but at night he says that that
Speaker 3: was never part of their actual intended goals, and it's like, okay,
Speaker 3: so that's the reason that I'm not going to play
Speaker 3: you much of his speech because it's just utterly pointless.
Speaker 3: He gives you everything that you want to hear and
Speaker 3: a bunch of things you don't want to hear, and
Speaker 3: you have no idea what to make of it. And ultimately,
Speaker 3: I'm not even sure that they really know what the
Speaker 3: timeline is or what they're doing at all. It seems
Speaker 3: more to me like they are essentially trying to create
Speaker 3: a clip farm by which they can just clip out
Speaker 3: portions of it and then whatever the ultimate result of
Speaker 3: the war in Iran is, they can say, look, he
Speaker 3: said this, and then this is what ended up happening,
Speaker 3: whereas you can also pick other portions of the very
Speaker 3: same speech and it'll be demonstrated in a few weeks
Speaker 3: or a few months or a few years, depending on
Speaker 3: how badly this goes, and you can you can say
Speaker 3: none of that happened, literally none of it. So I
Speaker 3: think that's what they're doing.
Speaker 5: He said four to six weeks, six to eight weeks, three,
Speaker 5: it could be any particular number, but we would never
Speaker 5: reveal precisely what it is because our goal is to
Speaker 5: finish those objectives, and we're well on our way, and
Speaker 5: the Chairman, and I look at this every single day.
Speaker 5: It will be the president's determination and the president's determination alone,
Speaker 5: when those objectives are complete and when it serves the
Speaker 5: interest of the American people to cut that deal.
Speaker 3: So, as Pete hegg Seth clarifies there as the head
Speaker 3: of the Department of War, basically, the goals are whatever
Speaker 3: Trump says they are. The timeline is whatever Trump says
Speaker 3: it will be, and the exit strategy is whatever, and
Speaker 3: whenever Trump decides to take it. So, yeah, we don't
Speaker 3: know anything. We learned nothing, and the stock market is
Speaker 3: reacting and responding accordingly, down over a percent across all
Speaker 3: indices over the past day.
Speaker 4: Thanks to the progress we've made, I can say tonight
Speaker 4: that we are on track to complete all of America's
Speaker 4: military objectives shortly, very shortly. We are going to hit
Speaker 4: them extremely hard over the next two to three weeks.
Speaker 4: We're going to bring them back to the Stone ages
Speaker 4: where they belong.
Speaker 3: The war that was briefly sold to us on the
Speaker 3: idea of liberating the poor Iranians has now pivoted into
Speaker 3: total demolition as usual. So even though we didn't want
Speaker 3: regime change, we got regime change and Ultimately, now we're
Speaker 3: going to liberate the Iranians by bombing them back to
Speaker 3: the Stone Ages. And woke up this morning to find
Speaker 3: out that we had blown up according to Trump on
Speaker 3: a true social post, which is always a fun way
Speaker 3: to find out about a war crime, is that we
Speaker 3: had blown up their largest bridge in Iran. Oh, and
Speaker 3: he continues to threaten to blow up their oil fields
Speaker 3: as well as their electrical facilities, which would clearly be
Speaker 3: a war crime, as well as the desalinization plant. So yeah,
Speaker 3: we're kind of playing with fire here, if I'm being honest.
Speaker 3: But the thing I found most notable was that he said,
Speaker 3: thanks to the regime change which we created by killing
Speaker 3: all of their top leadership, that we didn't actually want
Speaker 3: the regime change, but now we have regime change, and
Speaker 3: these new leaders are much more open to negotiation.
Speaker 4: The new group is less radical and much more reasonable.
Speaker 3: Well than a few hours after that speech, if not
Speaker 3: less than a few hours, it is reported that Israel
Speaker 3: once again took out the top negotiator for Iran by
Speaker 3: dropping a bomb on residential facilities, as is often the case,
Speaker 3: and in this instance for the first time out of
Speaker 3: the three attempts they did not kill him, They badly
Speaker 3: injured him and killed his wife. So I'm sure he'll
Speaker 3: be much more apt to negotiate with us now. Obviously
Speaker 3: I'm being sarcastic. He will almost certainly not be negotiating
Speaker 3: with us at all. And this is the third count
Speaker 3: them three times now that the Israelis have reportedly this
Speaker 3: one is brand new, so I'm gonna hold off judgment.
Speaker 3: Maybe it was the American military, but it certainly looks
Speaker 3: as if, based off initial reports, that this is the
Speaker 3: third time that the Iranian negotiators have been murdered mid
Speaker 3: negotiiation with America, and that ladies and gentlemen, is exactly
Speaker 3: what Joe Kent said when he resigned.
Speaker 6: Trump even said it today when he was up the
Speaker 6: Plan side. He was asked who are you talking with
Speaker 6: inside of Iran? And he said, I don't want to
Speaker 6: name them because then they might get killed.
Speaker 2: I don't want them to be killed.
Speaker 6: Well, they might get killed by the Israelis because the
Speaker 6: Israelis don't want us to have a negotiation.
Speaker 7: Essentially, you're saying we just need to tell them.
Speaker 6: No, and not just tell them no, you have to
Speaker 6: take things away from them. You're going to run any
Speaker 6: strikes by US. And also, you're not going on the
Speaker 6: offense anymore. You're done being on the offense. If you're attacked,
Speaker 6: we'll back you up. What takes place now in Iran,
Speaker 6: that affects US, that affects the GCC, that affects the
Speaker 6: straits of horror moves and world energy, You're done.
Speaker 7: We don't have a problem doing that to any other
Speaker 7: country in the world. Why do we have reluctancy to
Speaker 7: do it Toism? I mean, there's obviously the Israeli lobby factor.
Speaker 7: Mary Madelson gave I think one hundred million dollars to
Speaker 7: the Trump's campaign, and there's other really prominent donors that
Speaker 7: are very pro Israel, many of whom are dual citizens.
Speaker 3: Here looks to me like Joe Kent was telling the
Speaker 3: truth that yeah, Israelis don't want an exit ramp. They
Speaker 3: don't want there to be any avenue for peace, because
Speaker 3: that is not their goal. They intend to take this
Speaker 3: as far and as long and as viciously as humanly possible.
Speaker 3: A lah the clean break doctrine from the memo back
Speaker 3: in the nineteen nineties, that this is their entire plan.
Speaker 3: We don't need to make peace with the Palestinians because
Speaker 3: we're just going to actively assault aggressively any nation who
Speaker 3: lends them support. And this is obviously extended into the
Speaker 3: wider Greater Israel project. And what I find most remarkable
Speaker 3: about it is that despite the fact that it's so
Speaker 3: obvious to any keen observer, anybody who's actually paying attention
Speaker 3: to how this stuff is playing out, it's become crystal clear.
Speaker 3: Even if you don't believe Jill, can't just look with
Speaker 3: your own eyes, this is exactly what's happening. The guy
Speaker 3: who was trying to negotiate with the Iranians was JD. Vance,
Speaker 3: the Vice President of the United States. He was having
Speaker 3: communications with them through the Pakistanis and near hours, near
Speaker 3: hours after Trump's speech where he said, the new people
Speaker 3: that we're talking to are much more reasonable, they bombed
Speaker 3: him also. So you would think, given how egotistical Donald
Speaker 3: Trump is, given how much he wants to be viewed
Speaker 3: as the tough guy, the leader of the free world,
Speaker 3: the most powerful important man on the planet, if not
Speaker 3: in human history, we've never seen someone as powerful and
Speaker 3: as great as Donald Trump. That's what he wants you
Speaker 3: to believe, right, So why would he not absolutely drag
Speaker 3: bb netan Yahoo and the Israeli government and the Israeli
Speaker 3: military over their attack on the lead negotiator for a
Speaker 3: third time on the Iranian side, if if Trump is
Speaker 3: telling the truth about anything in his speech, and as
Speaker 3: much as I found his speech to be filled with lies,
Speaker 3: like the fact that we stopped them from getting a
Speaker 3: nuclear weapon and blah blah blah, I mean almost all
Speaker 3: of it was filled with lies. But the one aspect
Speaker 3: of the speech that you think he wouldn't dare have
Speaker 3: the audacity to lie about is that we are looking
Speaker 3: to exit in two to three weeks and that the
Speaker 3: new people we're talking to seem to be much more
Speaker 3: open to pe negotiations. And look how great I am.
Speaker 3: I've scared the Iranians into playing ball. And then the
Speaker 3: next day your allies scare quotes, blow up the guy
Speaker 3: you're talking to, and you've got nothing to say about it.
Speaker 2: JD.
Speaker 3: Vance, Hey, JD you got anything to say about this?
Speaker 3: But your twenty twenty eight presidential chances are calling. Oh yeah,
Speaker 3: your credit card just got declined. You're in serious trouble.
Speaker 3: The entire GOP is so so terribly damaged by this
Speaker 3: obvious betrayal by this obvious fealty to a foreign government,
Speaker 3: none of which did we vote for. And obviously they
Speaker 3: want to blame that on the Pannikins and the black
Speaker 3: Pillars and the Candaeans and the Tucker Carlson's and Dave
Speaker 3: Smiths or me or whoever else, right, anybody who's not
Speaker 3: just an overt abject water carrier for the Trump administration.
Speaker 3: It's our fault because we're just not cheering loud enough
Speaker 3: as he betrays his bass. But let me remind you
Speaker 3: this is who he was when he was campaigning.
Speaker 4: I am the candidate of peace. I am peace.
Speaker 3: A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for a
Speaker 3: man who wants to end wars, not start them.
Speaker 5: We do not want war with Iran.
Speaker 8: We actually want peace.
Speaker 5: The Iranians are clearly not.
Speaker 8: Very good at war.
Speaker 5: Perhaps they should follow President Trump's lead and give piece
Speaker 5: a chance.
Speaker 4: Kamalaz campaigning with warmongers like Liz Cheney, how do you
Speaker 4: think that is? She picks Liz Cheney, whose father virtually
Speaker 4: destroyed the Middle East. You know Liz Cheney. She talks
Speaker 4: to me, go, oh, I want war. She always wants war.
Speaker 4: Every time I was with her in the White House.
Speaker 4: We should attack this nation, that nation, nations that people
Speaker 4: never even heard of. We should attack some big tough guy.
Speaker 4: She sits back in Washington. Oh, we ought to go
Speaker 4: and attack Iran, Iraq. We're gonna attack everybody. That's why
Speaker 4: I broke up with her. All she wanted to do
Speaker 4: is go to war with everybody. These warhawks, they want
Speaker 4: to draft your kids to die in wars and they
Speaker 4: will never fight themselves.
Speaker 3: These warhawks, they want to draft your kids to fight
Speaker 3: their wars and wars that they will never fight themselves.
Speaker 3: Thank you whoever. That was clearly not the guy in
Speaker 3: power today, that's for sure. And as much as the
Speaker 3: wasted money and the loss of life and all of
Speaker 3: the devastation obviously bothers me about all of this, in
Speaker 3: some ways, the moral depravity is what's even more disturbing.
Speaker 9: When the President says, more reasonable again, these folks are
Speaker 9: appearing more reasonable behind the scenes privately in these conversations
Speaker 9: than perhaps some of the previous leaders who are now
Speaker 9: no longer on planet Earth because they lied to the
Speaker 9: United States and they strung us along in negotiations, and
Speaker 9: that was unacceptable to the president, which is why many
Speaker 9: of the previous leaders were killed.
Speaker 3: That's Karenlyn Levitt on April thirtieth, just the day before
Speaker 3: his speech, where she's saying that, Yeah, these new negotiators
Speaker 3: are much more reasonable, and the reason that they're more
Speaker 3: reasonable is because the people that we were negotiating prior
Speaker 3: are no longer on this earth, as she says with
Speaker 3: a cross on her chest and smiles, about the murder
Speaker 3: of peace negotiators. And in many ways, I think that's
Speaker 3: exactly what has disturbed Tucker Carlson so much so that
Speaker 3: he became really an anti war activist over the past
Speaker 3: couple of years. As a Christian, as a moral person,
Speaker 3: it's very difficult to look at the leaders of your government,
Speaker 3: particularly people that Tucker Carlson campaigned for, that he spoke
Speaker 3: highly of, that he defended, that he helped usher into
Speaker 3: these positions of authority and power, and to hear them
Speaker 3: saying these things that are so obviously depraved. If you
Speaker 3: listen to Pete Hegseth, I mean he sounds like an
Speaker 3: absolute lunatic, blood thirsty psychopath for real.
Speaker 5: I did the same with his boss, a colonel with
Speaker 5: a heart the size of Texas and a beautiful deployment
Speaker 5: mustache to match. I witnessed lethality. I met a junior
Speaker 5: airman as the sun was going down and a chill
Speaker 5: was setting on the tarmac who when asked what they needed,
Speaker 5: she simply looked up at me with a sly smile
Speaker 5: on her face and said, more bombs, sir, and bigger bombs.
Speaker 2: We will happily oblige her.
Speaker 3: And then after Trump' speech last night, he tweets out
Speaker 3: blow them back to the Stone Age. It's like, these
Speaker 3: are the people that we were allegedly liberating just six
Speaker 3: weeks ago. And for the record, I think this is
Speaker 3: exactly why Tucker Carlson has railed particularly against Evangelicals, against
Speaker 3: Zionist Christians in America, and he has described them. Even
Speaker 3: though he's walked this back, I know exactly why he
Speaker 3: said it that these are the people that he hates
Speaker 3: the most because under the cloak of his religion, they
Speaker 3: are perpetuating death and violence and destruction all over the
Speaker 3: planet in the name of God. And as someone who
Speaker 3: genuinely believes in God, Tucker Carlson and many other heroic
Speaker 3: Christians have stood up and said, not in our fucking name.
Speaker 3: And I know I'm not supposed to cuss. Well I'm
Speaker 3: talking about biblical stuff. But sorry, it's necessary right now
Speaker 3: because otherwise you get you know, Trump's spiritual authority leader
Speaker 3: like PAULA.
Speaker 8: White now in the name of Jesus, fire fire, fire, fire, fire.
Speaker 6: Fire.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I think it's probably worth people of any
Speaker 3: moral stripe, Christians, any religion, honestly, who sees this for
Speaker 3: what it is, who sees it as the perpetuation of
Speaker 3: evil under the cloak of religiosity, has an obligation to
Speaker 3: speak up, to say loudly in unison, not in our name,
Speaker 3: not with our dollars, not with our blood, not with
Speaker 3: the future of our country hanging the balance. The answer
Speaker 3: is no. And Tucker did an entire show today on
Speaker 3: basically what he thinks these actions mean in terms of
Speaker 3: America's place as the leader of the free world.
Speaker 1: So the three headlines from the President's speech last night,
Speaker 1: at least in the short term ar no ground troops,
Speaker 1: didn't mention ground troops. Yes, we are getting out in
Speaker 1: some number of weeks by the end of April, and
Speaker 1: there's not going to be regime change. Regime change, as
Speaker 1: he said explicitly, is not our goal. So are those true? Well,
Speaker 1: of course you can't tell. You can't know at this point,
Speaker 1: as Trump himself said.
Speaker 3: And I haven't had a chance to really talk much
Speaker 3: about what I see happening on a more macro scale
Speaker 3: and what I think we're witnessing in real time. What
Speaker 3: I think the truth is is that we simply don't
Speaker 3: have the military capability to take and hold the strait
Speaker 3: of hormones.
Speaker 2: Let me explain.
Speaker 3: Obviously, we have the ability to take the strait of
Speaker 3: hormone if we're willing to risk and probably lose thousands
Speaker 3: of soldiers' lives. So it's not really the taking that
Speaker 3: is the impossibility. It's the holding, which becomes very challenging,
Speaker 3: particularly if you do not intend to marshal a force
Speaker 3: of a half a million or a million American soldiers
Speaker 3: to invade and create a barrier where you can stop
Speaker 3: both drone and missile attacks and mine attacks and boat attacks.
Speaker 3: I mean, you have to have a serious force there,
Speaker 3: and it would have to be permanent if you intend
Speaker 3: to take and hold the straight up horn mouz. So,
Speaker 3: in my opinion, Trump has just decided we're not going
Speaker 3: to take it because we don't have the political capital
Speaker 3: to do so. So we're going to turn it on NATO.
Speaker 3: We're going to turn it on Europe. We're going to say, hey,
Speaker 3: you guys, use it. You guys need this oil more
Speaker 3: than we do. So it's now in your lap.
Speaker 10: How close are you to getting that?
Speaker 4: Well, we have a coalition formed, but they should have
Speaker 4: been up here a long time with them, and you
Speaker 4: know they're affected. The amazing thing is, we don't need
Speaker 4: the hormost straight. We don't need it.
Speaker 2: We don't need it at all. We have so much oil.
Speaker 4: Our country is not affected by this.
Speaker 2: We have more.
Speaker 4: We have twice the amount of oil as Saudi Arabia
Speaker 4: or Russia, and soon it'll be three times the amount.
Speaker 3: He then proceeded during that speech and many other times
Speaker 3: over the past couple months, if not the past couple
Speaker 3: of years, to threaten to exit NATO, which, as you
Speaker 3: guys probably know, I am in favor of. I think
Speaker 3: that NATO has been not so much a defensive alliance
Speaker 3: as much as it has been a mechanism for our empire. However,
Speaker 3: the reason you will not hear me supporting Trump in
Speaker 3: that is because I think this is a much more
Speaker 3: nefarious maneuver. And why do I think that, Well, because
Speaker 3: Israel hates Turkey and Turkey happens to be a NATO member. Urtawan,
Speaker 3: the leader of Turkey, came out very aggressively and cut
Speaker 3: off all diplomatic ties to the Israelis after the war
Speaker 3: in Gaza began, actually a year had already passed, so
Speaker 3: he stood idly by and he bit his tongue for
Speaker 3: a full year, and he let the Israelis just demolish
Speaker 3: the Palestinians. But after a year, given his Muslim population,
Speaker 3: he had to come out and say no more.
Speaker 2: This is crazy.
Speaker 3: Now, while it hasn't boiled over into overt hostilities or
Speaker 3: aggression in terms of military activity between the two nations,
Speaker 3: I'm of the opinion based off of You can go
Speaker 3: through all of my prior episodes if you want to
Speaker 3: see all of the reasons. I'm so convinced that Donald
Speaker 3: Trump is absolutely in the employee of the Israelis. That's
Speaker 3: the reason I believe that he's ultimately threatening to exit NATO,
Speaker 3: not because it's bankrupting US, not because he wants to
Speaker 3: end the empire, but rather he is dedicated almost entirely
Speaker 3: to bolstering and supporting the fledgling Israeli Empire to the
Speaker 3: detriment of the American Empire. Now, Turkey was never listed
Speaker 3: on the West Clark seven. And maybe I'll be proven
Speaker 3: to be wrong, and I hope I will be proven
Speaker 3: to be wrong, obviously, but it does seem to me
Speaker 3: like the consistent and increasing vitriol between Donald Trump and
Speaker 3: Europe is not so much about their unwillingness to get
Speaker 3: into wars that we started that hurt them, because why
Speaker 3: would an ally want to help out another ally as
Speaker 3: they are doing things that hurt their own countries unless
Speaker 3: they absolutely have to, unless, like Donald Trump, they were
Speaker 3: blackmailed or coerced or had their lives threatened in order
Speaker 3: to become in the employ of a foreign country. And
Speaker 3: the really important thing to understand about all this is
Speaker 3: that the reason that NATO doesn't lift a finger when
Speaker 3: it comes to the Strait of Horn Moves is because
Speaker 3: not because they don't need it. Trump's right about that,
Speaker 3: They absolutely do. They do need those resources, and it's
Speaker 3: not just oil and gas, it's also fertilizer and helium
Speaker 3: and all sorts of different minerals that come through that
Speaker 3: straight on shipping. But the primary reason that they don't
Speaker 3: feel as if they have to lift a finger, nor
Speaker 3: should they feel like they have to lift a finger,
Speaker 3: is because that's the whole deal, that's the whole game.
Speaker 3: That the American dollar is used in global trade because
Speaker 3: we ensure global shipping lanes will remain largely free. And
Speaker 3: if we refuse to do that, then ultimately, why should
Speaker 3: they be trading in the US dollar? And this gets
Speaker 3: into very high level finance and very very kind of
Speaker 3: woo woo, little tinfoil Hattie, and some of you are
Speaker 3: probably I'm probably going to lose some of you on this,
Speaker 3: to be honest, but I believe that Trump is being
Speaker 3: used to usher in the death of the US dollar
Speaker 3: as the reserve currency of the world. And the reason
Speaker 3: I believe that is because historically our actions in the
Speaker 3: Middle East had been predicated off of going after leadership
Speaker 3: in the Middle East who refused to play ball when
Speaker 3: it came to trading their oil in US dollars.
Speaker 2: We did that with.
Speaker 3: Gadafi, we went after Saddam Hussein. Basically, anyone that got
Speaker 3: in our way when it came to the petro dollar system,
Speaker 3: they died. But in this instance, it doesn't seem to
Speaker 3: be a concern at all. It seems to be collateral
Speaker 3: damage in a way that they're not even worried about it,
Speaker 3: which is totally mystified. And as I mentioned a couple
Speaker 3: weeks ago, the Iranians have now made a deal where
Speaker 3: anybody who kicks out the Israeli and American ambassadors from
Speaker 3: their country and is willing to trade in something other
Speaker 3: than the US dollar is welcome to have their ships
Speaker 3: sail through the Strait of Hormuz unattacked. Kick out the
Speaker 3: Israeli ambassador, kick out the American ambassador, trade in the Yuan,
Speaker 3: You're good to go. And I just don't think people
Speaker 3: understand how big of a deal that is. I mean,
Speaker 3: it is such a huge, huge deal. It is a
Speaker 3: paradigm shift that really goes above and beyond any of
Speaker 3: the things that Tucker Carlson even highlighted in his monologue,
Speaker 3: which was great, by the way, I'm not saying it
Speaker 3: wasn't good.
Speaker 2: It was great.
Speaker 3: But again, I think Tucker's weakness, and this is just
Speaker 3: my honest opinion, is that I think his weakness is
Speaker 3: that he doesn't understand Austrian economics, that he doesn't understand
Speaker 3: really what being the Empire of the world means, what
Speaker 3: is the underpinning to our mechanism for control. Tucker seems
Speaker 3: to believe that it is exclusively about military might, that's
Speaker 3: the secondary effect. Actually, the military might is only utilized
Speaker 3: to maintain our stranglehold on the global economy in terms
Speaker 3: of exclusively using the US dollar. And when you start
Speaker 3: a war in Iran on behalf of Israel and you
Speaker 3: destroy one of the most important, if not the most
Speaker 3: important straight when it comes to global trade, one that
Speaker 3: absolutely devastates your allies in Europe's economy. And after you've
Speaker 3: lit everything on fire, you turn around and you say
Speaker 3: to them, you deal with it. What do you think
Speaker 3: they're going to do next? You think that they're going
Speaker 3: to go and lose thousands of troops fixing the shit
Speaker 3: storm that you created and still trading the US dollar
Speaker 3: when they have a relatively stable currency in the Euro
Speaker 3: that they could use anyways.
Speaker 2: Why would they do that?
Speaker 3: So this is the thing that I can't really get
Speaker 3: my hands around. I don't understand what the long term
Speaker 3: game plan is because it seems as if what we're
Speaker 3: doing is we're kicking dirt in as many people's eyes
Speaker 3: as possible longtime allies, recent allies, I mean even the
Speaker 3: GCC who are recent allies. We allowed them to get
Speaker 3: badly damaged in this war that was against their will
Speaker 3: and not in their interests, and we didn't do anything
Speaker 3: to defend them. But we did everything in our power
Speaker 3: to defend the Israelis, who were ultimately the catalyst for
Speaker 3: this war in the first place. So what it looks
Speaker 3: to me like is that we are trading every single
Speaker 3: positive relationship we have with every other country on Earth
Speaker 3: and sacrificing all of it just to demonstrate our undying
Speaker 3: loyalty is not even the right word for it, fealty
Speaker 3: like absolute domination, that we will sacrifice everything we have,
Speaker 3: everything that built this country up, and our empire, even
Speaker 3: if you don't like the empire. We are sacrificing all
Speaker 3: of it on behalf of one country that's smaller than
Speaker 3: New Jersey.
Speaker 2: How the fuck is that possible?
Speaker 1: Believe I can say with certainty that Jeffrey Epstein was murdered.
Speaker 1: So I so, I mean, but of course I'm always
Speaker 1: open to counter reveiling evidence, always great my capacity for
Speaker 1: being wrong. But I can see if you could X
Speaker 1: ray my heart, you would find that I believe with
Speaker 1: total certainty he was murdered and the people in the
Speaker 1: US government knew that he was murdered. I don't want
Speaker 1: that to be true, but I believe it is true.
Speaker 1: So like it's going to take a lot, you're gonna
Speaker 1: have to show me that that's false.
Speaker 3: Now, Tucker will never say the part that I'm about
Speaker 3: to say, But my opinion is that given that Tucker
Speaker 3: Carlston had such a positive, really long lasting relationship with
Speaker 3: Donald Trump, was in communication with him right up until
Speaker 3: this war began, tried to prevent the war very loudly,
Speaker 3: very openly about it. And given that now that the
Speaker 3: war has begun and it's become a disaster, Tucker Carlson
Speaker 3: has not relented that he has continued to criticize it.
Speaker 3: And then, for you, you pair with that reality the
Speaker 3: fact that he's now willing to talk about the fact
Speaker 3: that he thinks that Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in prison,
Speaker 3: and now add into that that Donald Trump had a
Speaker 3: multi decade relationship with Epstein, and now add into that
Speaker 3: that it seems quite clear to me that Tucker Carlson
Speaker 3: believes that Donald Trump is compromised by the Israelis and
Speaker 3: if you just put all of those things together, well,
Speaker 3: he'll never say it.
Speaker 2: I don't think he'll ever say it.
Speaker 3: He might, but I don't think he's ever going to
Speaker 3: say But I think this is my opinion that Tucker
Speaker 3: Carlson believes that Donald Trump is compromised through the Epstein Network.
Speaker 11: You know, they say the most dangerous time for a
Speaker 11: woman to leave, the most dangerous time for an abused
Speaker 11: woman is when she tries to leave. Yeah, right, Like,
Speaker 11: that's when he might kill you. And that's kind of
Speaker 11: how I feel about the government right now.
Speaker 1: I think you're I think that's so first of all,
Speaker 1: so well put, and also so true because it can't
Speaker 1: actually last that much longer because the disparity in power
Speaker 1: is too great.
Speaker 2: Now. Dave was talking about himself us.
Speaker 3: He's talking about our danger living under a government that's
Speaker 3: kind of on its last legs, under an empire which
Speaker 3: is on its last legs. I personally see Trump in
Speaker 3: the same position that we all are in, And personally,
Speaker 3: I think there's two possibilities. I think either genuinely Trump
Speaker 3: has lost his mind and he genuinely cannot actually realize
Speaker 3: what the truth is, or how badly he's devastating his legacy,
Speaker 3: or how badly this war is going, or how badly
Speaker 3: he's impacting the global economy, or how badly the Epstein
Speaker 3: cover up hurt his image, the entire White House's image.
Speaker 3: Maybe he's just so out to lunch at this point
Speaker 3: that he can't recognize it. The alternative hypothesis that I hold,
Speaker 3: and one that I think is slightly more probable, is
Speaker 3: that Donald Trump, after Butler Pennsylvania, knows for a fact
Speaker 3: who took that shot, and he knows for a fact
Speaker 3: who has his number, and he is just trying to
Speaker 3: keep him and his family alive, and honestly, at the
Speaker 3: end of the day, you don't need to go into
Speaker 3: any sort of hypothesis along with me, I think it's
Speaker 3: fair to assume that if either of those options are
Speaker 3: true or false, it doesn't change the fact that Donald
Speaker 3: Trump betrayed his base, and he has done so egregiously,
Speaker 3: and that ultimately he needs to be removed from office,
Speaker 3: because ultimately, whatever you're reasoning or whatever you believe the
Speaker 3: justification is for his actions, for his betrayal, is really
Speaker 3: secondary to the actions themselves, and what have the actions
Speaker 3: done to benefit us? And the answer is not at all.
Speaker 3: It hasn't benefited us at all. It has hurt us terribly.
Speaker 3: I just looked at the gas station yesterday. It was
Speaker 3: five dollars and sixty cents for gas for premium. Now,
Speaker 3: granted I live in Miami, and I'm sure it's cheaper elsewhere,
Speaker 3: but my god, I mean that's two dollars per gallon
Speaker 3: up just in the past forty five days.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: I'm very fortunate in that I work from home and
Speaker 3: I don't drive very often, so it doesn't really impact me.
Speaker 2: But my god, for people who have a daily.
Speaker 3: Commute, for those that are in the trucking industry, I
Speaker 3: mean for businesses all over the country and all over
Speaker 3: the world for that matter. This is a headwind to
Speaker 3: the global economy that is far bigger than your opinion
Speaker 3: as to whether or not Donald Trump has lost his
Speaker 3: mind or whether or not Donald Trump is compromised by
Speaker 3: a foreign government. It doesn't matter. What he's doing is
Speaker 3: damaging us. He needs to go. And it's not just
Speaker 3: serious political analysts that are picking up on this betrayal
Speaker 3: and this insanity.
Speaker 2: It's also comedians.
Speaker 1: When you don't know, you don't know right, right, it's
Speaker 1: like the war and Iran right now, we don't know what.
Speaker 2: We don't know. We don't know why we're in. We
Speaker 2: don't know why we're going. I can give you some hints. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I know, but we're not a political show, yea. We
Speaker 2: don't want to talk about it. We're the same things Iran.
Speaker 2: I don't know what. I don't know why we're doing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no, no, no.
Speaker 6: Okay, that's subliminal enough.
Speaker 2: So we don't know why. We don't know why. Yeah,
Speaker 2: we don't know why.
Speaker 3: Yeah we do. Yeah, yeah, actually we do know why.
Speaker 3: And like I said, it doesn't matter if he's been
Speaker 3: coerced in that position, or if it's sincere or maybe
Speaker 3: he was an not from the jump.
Speaker 2: None of that matters.
Speaker 3: What matters is his actions. What matters are the consequences
Speaker 3: of his decisions, and his decisions have been catastrophic for
Speaker 3: us as a people. And that's why I've been so
Speaker 3: relentlessly antagonistic towards people like Dan Bongino and Cash Hotel
Speaker 3: or Pambondi, is that it doesn't matter why you're betraying us.
Speaker 3: I don't care. At the end of the day, your
Speaker 3: life's being threatened. If you're caught with compremont blackmail or
Speaker 3: you're just a trader from jump Folks.
Speaker 12: Is a difficult conversation for me because I really believed
Speaker 12: in this guy.
Speaker 2: I did.
Speaker 12: I supported him for a while, even when you know
Speaker 12: him and President Trump. But it heads been good on
Speaker 12: some issues. But I'm going to tell you some I
Speaker 12: have never been as disappointed in a human being in
Speaker 12: politics as I am in Tom Massey.
Speaker 3: For a second there, I thought Dan Bongino was talking
Speaker 3: about himself. No, he's talking about Thomas Massey. I have
Speaker 3: never been more disappointed in sown in politics than Thomas Massey.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 3: Or I don't know. Let me put on our thinking
Speaker 3: caps here and think this one through. Or could it
Speaker 3: be that Thomas Massey highlighted the fact that the J
Speaker 3: five pipe bomber that you framed was not actually the
Speaker 3: perpetrator where you covered up for a CIA asset was
Speaker 3: a Capitol Police officer and is now a CIA employee.
Speaker 3: Or could it be that Thomas Massey pushed through a
Speaker 3: law that forced the Epstein disclosure, which proved that you
Speaker 3: had lied through your teeth for an entire year about
Speaker 3: the nature and the size of those files. I'm going
Speaker 3: to say, it's probably the fact that he just highlighted
Speaker 3: your depravity. That's my guess, just guessing here. I don't
Speaker 3: think that he actually disappointed you so much that you've
Speaker 3: now hosted his primary challenger, which by the way, is
Speaker 3: funded by a bunch of Zionist billionaire donors and people
Speaker 3: that helped Trump get into power. I don't think Massey's
Speaker 3: unwillingness to go along with whatever ever Trump dictates is
Speaker 3: actually the reason that you oppose him, but rather the
Speaker 3: reason that you oppose him is because he won't go
Speaker 3: along with the cover up that you participated in on
Speaker 3: both J five and the entire Epstein operation. And I'm
Speaker 3: not gonna say this is a smoking gun, but ladies
Speaker 3: and gentlemen, we got There was a post yesterday a
Speaker 3: showdown between Dan Bongino and Thomas Massey that is one
Speaker 3: for the Ages, and in it, Thomas Massey lays out
Speaker 3: much of those things I already described to you, but
Speaker 3: he also identified that the phone calls that Dan Bongino
Speaker 3: said that he had with Thomas Massey, and how it
Speaker 3: was ultimately Thomas Massey's fault because he didn't pick up
Speaker 3: the phone. Well, Dan Bongino shared screen shots of those
Speaker 3: phone calls, and you won't believe what time zone those
Speaker 3: screenshots say he was making those phone calls in because
Speaker 3: Thomas Massey did the same thing. He screenshot at those
Speaker 3: calls on his end on the American end, posted those
Speaker 3: screenshots and then he juxtaposed them to Dan Bongino's screenshots,
Speaker 3: which said that those calls were happening seven hours later.
Speaker 3: And then a bunch of Internet sluice started to think
Speaker 3: to themselves, well, what time zone would be seven hours
Speaker 3: further to the east. Then you know Thomas Massey's time zone,
Speaker 3: and it just happened to be Israeli time. So there's
Speaker 3: a couple possibilities there. Maybe maybe it's benign, it's just
Speaker 3: a glitch. Maybe Dan Bongino was on a plane and
Speaker 3: he had Wi Fi and that ultimately changed the time
Speaker 3: zone when he screenshot of those texts, But then he
Speaker 3: was just flying back to the good old US of
Speaker 3: a to be a red, white and blue, true telling,
Speaker 3: patriotic American. Or there's two other slightly more nefarious possibilities
Speaker 3: that as the Deputy director of the FBI, he has
Speaker 3: assets within Israel screenshotting that have access to his communications
Speaker 3: and are screen shotting his communications and feeding him talking
Speaker 3: points on how to attack Thomas Massey. That's a disturbing possibility.
Speaker 3: And the most disturbing possibility, and maybe most likely, I
Speaker 3: don't know, is that he just works for him.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 3: Maybe that's why you got to make sure your phone
Speaker 3: is on the same time zone as your boss's, right, Dan. Look,
Speaker 3: I don't know what to make of any of it,
Speaker 3: to be honest, but wow, I mean, these are historic
Speaker 3: moments we're living through.
Speaker 2: That's a fact.
Speaker 3: Oh and by the way, the former Capitol police officer
Speaker 3: who was being investigated, this is true, being investigated by
Speaker 3: the FBI when it came to the J five pipe
Speaker 3: bombing incident. She was put on a polygraph and according
Speaker 3: to the defense of the guy that they're claiming planet
Speaker 3: of those pipe bombs, she failed when she was asked explicitly,
Speaker 3: did you plant these bombs yourself? And she failed a polygraph, which,
Speaker 3: by the way, according to Kyle sarafin your immediate lee,
Speaker 3: not in contention or removed from power if you're in
Speaker 3: the CIA if you fail a polygraph. So, I don't know,
Speaker 3: it's interesting that after failing a polygraph. He was immediately
Speaker 3: hired by the CIA. Interesting, isn't that interesting? So in conclusion,
Speaker 3: I don't really care if you think I'm crazy. I
Speaker 3: have shown you all of my work for years how
Speaker 3: I've come to these conclusions. And I believe that Crooks, well,
Speaker 3: he may have been the gunman, I don't know. I
Speaker 3: think that there was an underlying motive for that attack
Speaker 3: on Donald Trump and Butler Pennsylvania. And I believe that
Speaker 3: he has demonstrated he is not the same person, and
Speaker 3: every day since then he has not been the same
Speaker 3: guy as he was prior to that. And I believe
Speaker 3: that every single cover up when it came to the
Speaker 3: Epstein operation just added more fuel to that conspiracy theory fire.
Speaker 3: And then Bby and net Yahoo coming over here, spending
Speaker 3: seven trips, seven fucking trips in a year to convince
Speaker 3: us to go to a war that they won it
Speaker 3: for thirty years, and you got the Secretary of State
Speaker 3: and Department of War guy and everybody else is saying
Speaker 3: Trump and too, Trump too, saying, yeah, we had to
Speaker 3: fight this war in defense of Israel, a war that
Speaker 3: Israel started, but we had to fight it to defend
Speaker 3: them war they start Oh, so we're just we're just
Speaker 3: their attack dog, okay. And then Joe Kent comes out
Speaker 3: and he says, yeah, we're fighting it for Israel. And
Speaker 3: then and you got people like JD Vance or Donald
Speaker 3: Trump himself saying that we're looking for peace negotiations that
Speaker 3: we're looking to leave in a couple of weeks, and
Speaker 3: just over and over and over again, the Israelis blow
Speaker 3: up the people that you're trying to negotiate with, and
Speaker 3: you don't say shit about it, you don't seem to
Speaker 3: be bothered about it at all. And then you know,
Speaker 3: at some point you just kind of have to conclude
Speaker 3: this guy ain't really fucking running shit.
Speaker 2: And that's my opinion.
Speaker 3: So you can get mad, you can yell at me,
Speaker 3: you can leave a comment down below say how stupid
Speaker 3: I am.
Speaker 2: That's fine.
Speaker 3: But I'm pretty confident, after years of analyzing this very deeply,
Speaker 3: that yeah, we're being played, that we've lost our sovereignty.
Speaker 3: And I'm not going to bite my tongue about it,
Speaker 3: and I'm not gonna dan bongino myself over it, and
Speaker 3: I'm not gonna pambonding myself over it. I'm going to
Speaker 3: tell you the truth By the way Pambondi got fired today.
Speaker 2: But if it makes you.
Speaker 3: Before you breathe a sigh of relief, does she get
Speaker 3: fired for covering up the Epstein operation? Does she get
Speaker 3: fired for not in prisoning Anthony Fauci? Does she get
Speaker 3: fired for not in prisoning or prosecuting anyone in the
Speaker 3: Deep State or the FBI that tried to frame Trump
Speaker 3: or the operation to frame the J five or the
Speaker 3: J sixers. Nope, No, Pambondi got fired because she leaked
Speaker 3: investigatory details about Eric Swalwell, who had an affair with
Speaker 3: a Chinese spy allegedly. So yeah, oh, and before you
Speaker 3: get any hope after off of that, you should also
Speaker 3: remember that this is the guy who is now replacing her,
Speaker 3: at least temporarily, Todd Blanche. Just to clarify, or is
Speaker 3: the public going to learn.
Speaker 8: The identities of the men who abuse the girls with
Speaker 8: the information that you're releasing?
Speaker 2: And if not, why not? And then I have a
Speaker 2: quick follow up.
Speaker 6: And you just baked in an assumption into your question
Speaker 6: that I have never said and I don't know to
Speaker 6: be true.
Speaker 12: Is the public going to learn about men that abuse
Speaker 12: these girls?
Speaker 6: Like?
Speaker 3: What does that mean?
Speaker 11: I understand what that means.
Speaker 2: So that's your new ag.
Speaker 3: A guy who doesn't even understand the question are we
Speaker 3: going to be learned about who abuse these women? He's
Speaker 3: like abuse women? Where the fuck you, Ben Todd. It's
Speaker 3: been kind of the biggest story of the past couple
Speaker 3: of years.
Speaker 2: Anyways.
Speaker 3: Uh yeah, we are a compromised nation and compromise people,
Speaker 3: and we are ruled over by fake politicians with fake
Speaker 3: influencers which lie through their teeth to you every fucking day.
Speaker 3: They cash checks as they propagandize you to support things
Speaker 3: that devastate not just you but your children. These people
Speaker 3: are reprehensible on a scale that I really can't put
Speaker 3: into words.
Speaker 2: I'll try.
Speaker 3: They're the worst people on the planet. They are basement dwelling,
Speaker 3: low rent versions of Rachel Maddow or Sean Hannity or
Speaker 3: any of these other water carrying, hack fucking bastards who
Speaker 3: have lied you into wars and lied you into domestic
Speaker 3: strife and economic ruin. These people on social media get
Speaker 3: paid pennies to propagandize millions into supporting things that devastate
Speaker 3: you and them. They are reprehensible, and that's the one
Speaker 3: thing I would like to see Dave Smith and Tucker
Speaker 3: Carlson talk about a little bit more in depth because
Speaker 3: they touched on it today when it came to the
Speaker 3: lack of curiosity when it comes to Butler, Pennsylvania or anything, right,
Speaker 3: all these big stories that we've been talking about, but
Speaker 3: they didn't really dive deep on it. They didn't really
Speaker 3: just hammer out how and why these people are doing
Speaker 3: what they're doing, what is the mechanism for it. I've
Speaker 3: done episodes on it, so you guys are no project esther.
Speaker 3: These are things that are real. These are not just
Speaker 3: conspiracy theory nonsense. This is actually fucking happening. Before I
Speaker 3: get out of here, I gotta take one shot at
Speaker 3: my good friend Dave Smith. It jars me absolutely nuts.
Speaker 3: Dave comes on this show with me and I and Carrol.
Speaker 3: We're on here for two hours and we're trying to
Speaker 3: talk to him about Charlie Kirk. We're trying to talk
Speaker 3: to him about you know, Butler, all these all these
Speaker 3: you know, wild out there's anythings.
Speaker 2: That everybody obviously thinks is.
Speaker 3: You know, something's something's up, something's rotten in Denmark, right,
Speaker 3: And we're trying to have like really serious conversations. These
Speaker 3: are things that I've as you guys know, I've researched
Speaker 3: a lot, like I actually know what I'm talking about
Speaker 3: on these issues.
Speaker 2: And Dave is just like.
Speaker 10: Nah, he's just poo pulling us left and right. But
Speaker 10: he gets on there with Tucker Carlson, he goes on
Speaker 10: there with Rogan. It's just like, man, I think there's
Speaker 10: real reason to be asking these questions. And it's like, well,
Speaker 10: then what the fuck, Dave? So I guessed me and
Speaker 10: I and Carol aren't all that crazy now are we?
Speaker 2: Ah?
Speaker 3: Man, I love you, Dave, but I don't like it.
Speaker 3: I don't like it. I don't like how you play
Speaker 3: both sides of the fence. You go, you know these dudes,
Speaker 3: these dudes are wild. But then you get on with
Speaker 3: Tucker and Tucker's like, yeah, I think Epstein got whacked
Speaker 3: in prison, and I think Butler was not what we're
Speaker 3: being told it was. And I think that the reason
Speaker 3: that we're fighting an Iran is because Israel and da
Speaker 3: da da da da da. And he's like he lists
Speaker 3: all the things out that I agree with, and it's
Speaker 3: just like, now you agree with it.
Speaker 2: Look, I'm not on Tucker's level, So I guess.
Speaker 3: I'll accept that you don't take me as seriously as
Speaker 3: you take Tucker Crossing.
Speaker 2: But I'm your homeboy, so get it together. Dave.
Speaker 3: All right, no sponsors today because I love you so,
Speaker 3: so freaking much.
Speaker 2: But if you want to support my work, I would
Speaker 2: really mean a lot to me.
Speaker 3: You could start by hyping this video if you were
Speaker 3: watching on YouTube right now. I don't know what it does,
Speaker 3: but apparently it helps with virality. The last episode did
Speaker 3: like sixty thousand views, so the more you guys hype it,
Speaker 3: I think.
Speaker 2: The better it is for the autgo so I would
Speaker 2: really appreciate that.
Speaker 3: And if you don't want to do that, and by
Speaker 3: the way, I think you get three three a week,
Speaker 3: so if you can just save those up, I only
Speaker 3: do two episodes a week, so if you can save
Speaker 3: two of those up and hype every episode I put out,
Speaker 3: that would help a lot. And if you want to
Speaker 3: support my work in a more financial avenue, you can
Speaker 3: either pick up a faffo America First and fucking Only
Speaker 3: shirt link are down on the description Aaron Water Designs,
Speaker 3: or you can subscribe to me on x at Liberty
Speaker 3: lock Pot. I'll follow you back or Libertylockdown dot locals
Speaker 3: dot com. I appreciate you guys so much. Oh what
Speaker 3: a crazy world we're living in. Huh, we'll survive, but
Speaker 3: make sure that you pray for the gaze of hormones.
Speaker 13: Isn't it a little bit homophobics that we're so focused
Speaker 13: on the straits of home moves and not the gaze
Speaker 13: of homes?
Speaker 14: I agree, yes for sure.
Speaker 13: Why do you think something to leave the gaze of
Speaker 13: homoves behind?
Speaker 14: I think it's just history historically, Like you know, gays
Speaker 14: have always been very discriminated against, which is wrong on
Speaker 14: so many levels, even in war. Yeah, even in war.
Speaker 14: It just takes more reform in government obviously, and then
Speaker 14: also educating society.
Speaker 13: Just feel like, if we're gonna go and say we
Speaker 13: can't leave the gay people behind, I don't think we
Speaker 13: should go and say at all. But if we're going
Speaker 13: to is it a gaze of her moods? We could
Speaker 13: turn it in to Faia Island for sure.
Speaker 2: Subscribe to Liberty Lockdown, great podcast. Clint is Tight