Speaker 1: You know a world of deceit. Telling the truth is
Speaker 1: a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the twenty fourth
Speaker 2: of February. You're of our Lord twenty twenty six. Well,
Speaker 2: nothing says tyranny like cracking down on free speech. And
Speaker 2: we have governments all over the world that are obsessing
Speaker 2: about how they are going to control access to the
Speaker 2: Internet to end anonymity so they can end free speech.
Speaker 2: And it's here at home. It's not just in the UK.
Speaker 2: In Colorado, they have proposed an initiative that could essentially
Speaker 2: not just attack free speech, but could essentially concentrate more
Speaker 2: power into the hands of a few big tech companies
Speaker 2: and stop open source operating systems that people are going
Speaker 2: to increasingly. So we're going to begin with that. We're
Speaker 2: also going to take a look at what's going on
Speaker 2: with the Iran war as they are ramping up for this,
Speaker 2: and Huckabee has done everything he can but intentional not
Speaker 2: to make sure that there will not be any assistance
Speaker 2: from anyone in this war. And you have a high
Speaker 2: ranking general Dan Caine saying we don't have any allies
Speaker 2: in the region that are going to help us, and
Speaker 2: we've basically depleted our material. Why are we doing this?
Speaker 2: One answer? We know, we'll be right back. Well, it
Speaker 2: is in Colorado that a Senate bill would require Apple
Speaker 2: and Google to embed ID checks and operating systems, and
Speaker 2: again this is about this will ultimately result in eliminating
Speaker 2: competition from open source operating systems like Linux. With the
Speaker 2: kinds of things that Microsoft is doing. You could call
Speaker 2: this the Microsoft Protection Act if you wanted to. But
Speaker 2: also Apple and so they want to enact this at
Speaker 2: the operating system level. We've seen these types of moves
Speaker 2: in the past. Again, it was Microsoft who organized the CCPA.
Speaker 2: That's not the Chinese Communist Party of America, but it
Speaker 2: might as well be. That's the Coalition for Content Providence
Speaker 2: and Authentication. So they're going to mark you as a
Speaker 2: coalition of hardware and software and news organizations. So the
Speaker 2: CPU and the applications would be the ones that would
Speaker 2: be marking the content that you made. Whether it was
Speaker 2: text or a meme, an image, or whether it was
Speaker 2: video or audio, it would mark that, and you would
Speaker 2: have the news organizations it would determined that you were
Speaker 2: a banned person, and they would mark your stuff and
Speaker 2: make sure that it was not able to be uploaded. Well,
Speaker 2: they found a better way to do it. And again,
Speaker 2: you know, when you look at Microsoft at the very
Speaker 2: center of that effort, I think they're probably the center
Speaker 2: of this as well, because it certainly is going to
Speaker 2: work out well for their business model. And this is
Speaker 2: something that Colorado has tried several times. You know. It's
Speaker 2: kind of interesting. Colorado run by a lot of liberal Democrats,
Speaker 2: and there's a radio station there, khn C that were
Speaker 2: very interested in having me after I left Info Wars.
Speaker 2: We did that for a short period of time, but
Speaker 2: the issue was the money, but there wasn't any Yeah,
Speaker 2: they wanted to try to syndicate this thing, but I
Speaker 2: didn't have the means to support it as it is
Speaker 2: going on. A lot of people thought, oh, well, he's
Speaker 2: on radio, he doesn't need any support for the podcast.
Speaker 2: Simply wasn't true. But anyway, I was very much appreciated there,
Speaker 2: just as I am in Washington and Oregon and other
Speaker 2: places where there's a great deal of authoritarianism, leftist authoritarianism.
Speaker 2: They feel pretty isolated. They're looking for somebody who sees
Speaker 2: the world their way and can put that information out there,
Speaker 2: but they're targeting the operating system and it's something that
Speaker 2: they would do by both phones and laptop computers or desktops.
Speaker 2: They require the operating system providers to collect your data
Speaker 2: birth when you create an account and follow you along
Speaker 2: because it's so much easier to do that than to
Speaker 2: push it out the apps or to push it out
Speaker 2: for the hardware or the software. The age check becomes
Speaker 2: embedded in the infrastructure before you ever reach the application itself,
Speaker 2: so they don't have so many moving parts. They only
Speaker 2: have to work with a couple of controllers. See how
Speaker 2: that works. I think this is a very dangerous approach
Speaker 2: that will probably be copied in a lot of areas,
Speaker 2: probably copied by the federal government as well. This is
Speaker 2: a structural change from what Colorado has tried before. They've
Speaker 2: had a couple of bills that came out last year.
Speaker 2: One of them passed out of committee but ultimately lost.
Speaker 2: Required website hosting material to be deemed harmful to children
Speaker 2: to run their own age verification. This is always the
Speaker 2: canard should say, the mcguffin of saying we've got to
Speaker 2: protect the children. And again we go back to this.
Speaker 2: You need to have ID for everybody, and in annymity
Speaker 2: because of children. Are these children going out and buying
Speaker 2: these computers and paying for the monthly bills on these things?
Speaker 2: Or is it parents? Why can't the parents control this?
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, there are applications that give
Speaker 2: parents control over phones and other things like that. They
Speaker 2: have the ultimate control. They could say you don't have
Speaker 2: one of these. I mean the parents are buying these
Speaker 2: things for the kids. There was just an article repeating
Speaker 2: yet again there's Peter Thiele saying at this time Steve
Speaker 2: Jobs had just dropped it many years ago, saying no, no, no,
Speaker 2: don't let my kids have iPhones and iPads. I wouldn't
Speaker 2: do that. And I get to say, you just don't
Speaker 2: realize how harmful that is to the kid's development. They
Speaker 2: need to have physical, tangible things. Not getting it. I
Speaker 2: mean people talk about how you hand some of these
Speaker 2: kids a book in school and they start pinching it
Speaker 2: to try to zoom on it. These are not essential skills.
Speaker 2: The future is going to belong to kids who can
Speaker 2: manipulate the real world. You know, get them used to
Speaker 2: using a screwdriver or something like that, do something real
Speaker 2: don't get your kids down the path to live in
Speaker 2: a virtual prison society, because that's what a virtual society
Speaker 2: will be, it will be a digital prison. Get them
Speaker 2: involved in the real world, get them to learn real things.
Speaker 2: That's what's important. And so maybe you don't even want
Speaker 2: to have your kids have a phone or an iPad,
Speaker 2: limit their use to a computer, and there's all kinds
Speaker 2: of tools to do that. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: it's already embedded in the Apple systems, their iOS and
Speaker 2: other things where you can set up parental controls about
Speaker 2: the hours that they can use the computer and things
Speaker 2: like that. It is already there, and so this is
Speaker 2: just a mcguffin to try to end anonymity so they
Speaker 2: can end free Beach. Then they came up with another
Speaker 2: Senate bill in Colorado. Because at first one got a
Speaker 2: lot of pushback from similarities group groups. Tech experts pointed
Speaker 2: out the state mandate could not easily reach websites that
Speaker 2: were hosted outside of Colorado, so I didn't go anywhere. Practically,
Speaker 2: it wasn't going to be workable. Then a new Senate
Speaker 2: bill tried platform level requirements instead, making social media companies
Speaker 2: determine user age categories, and I think this is the
Speaker 2: basis of the American opposition, the federal government's opposition in
Speaker 2: the White House, as they're responding to social media sites.
Speaker 2: And of course Trump's got his own social media site,
Speaker 2: but Elon Musk and others, they don't want to have
Speaker 2: that onus on the social media sites. It saw Zuckerberg,
Speaker 2: you know, push his way over to Trump immediately to
Speaker 2: make sure these types of onerous things out of the
Speaker 2: UK and Europe were not going to be put on them. However,
Speaker 2: if they were to do this at the operating system,
Speaker 2: I think level well, I think that the White House,
Speaker 2: the American government would basically cave on this. That's my opinion. Anyway,
Speaker 2: now we have this new one moving enforcement to the
Speaker 2: operating system layer means a defined compliance target with a
Speaker 2: limited number of companies to regulate. You've only got a
Speaker 2: couple because when you look at something like Linux, it's
Speaker 2: open source and a lot of people are moving to
Speaker 2: that because they don't like the controls that are put
Speaker 2: on these other ones. Already, any law that tried to
Speaker 2: impose universal age verification across the open web would require
Speaker 2: something far more radical, either mandatory identity verification, for Internet access,
Speaker 2: which would end anonymous browsing entirely. Bingo. That's it, that's
Speaker 2: what they're after all. The rest of this stuff is
Speaker 2: a mcguffin. It's just the their happy story that they
Speaker 2: want to tell you to get what they want. And so,
Speaker 2: as they point out this article from Reclaim the Web,
Speaker 2: that it would be on Apple and Google. They'd be
Speaker 2: very easy to control, and you need only two of them,
Speaker 2: but would also cement the dominance of these few big
Speaker 2: tech companies against any competition against anything that is open
Speaker 2: source and free. The constitutional train here is unstable, says
Speaker 2: Reclaim the Net. Federal courts reviewing age verification laws in
Speaker 2: other states have scrutinized whether such laws are narrowly tailored
Speaker 2: and where the less restrictive alternatives exist. Well, the less
Speaker 2: restrictive alternative is there. It's called parental controls. As they
Speaker 2: point out, major platforms already offer device level and account
Speaker 2: level filtering tools that parents can configure voluntarily. The courts
Speaker 2: have noticed, and it's not just the stuff that's built
Speaker 2: in the operating system already. As I said before, the
Speaker 2: parents are buying the phone. The parents are paying the
Speaker 2: monthly bill for the phone. They have control over that
Speaker 2: the rest of us should not be held hostage for this.
Speaker 2: And yet as we look at what is happening in
Speaker 2: the UK, there's an interesting article from from Steve Watson,
Speaker 2: The Watson Brothers and Modernity, Trump declares war on European censorship,
Speaker 2: portraying Trump as a hero of free speech. I kind
Speaker 2: of see this is one of the most clueless, sycophantic
Speaker 2: takes on the Trump administration I've seen from anybody what
Speaker 2: Watson is doing here. We all know how Trump despises
Speaker 2: free speech. How he threatens broadcasters, he threatens to take
Speaker 2: their license, he sues the print media and everything, but
Speaker 2: the most minor things. I don't like the way you
Speaker 2: edited that interview with La La Harris. I think you
Speaker 2: made her look too good. I'm going to sue you,
Speaker 2: and I'm going to control you. Because you want to
Speaker 2: sell CBS. We'll see about that. I don't know that
Speaker 2: my guys will approve that sale unless you capitulate on
Speaker 2: this lawsuit, for example. And when you look at the
Speaker 2: other things that the Trump administration is doing, absolutely despises
Speaker 2: free speech. Look at what he's done for Israel for example.
Speaker 2: You know, again, like DeSantis and the Republicans in Florida.
Speaker 2: Anybody that says anything that criticizes the government of Israel
Speaker 2: and Benjamin net Is Netnyah, who is an anti Semite,
Speaker 2: and you have to be punished as a racist and
Speaker 2: canceled and so forth. They absolutely hate free speech. In
Speaker 2: the Trump administration, Mark Levin bragging, Yeah, we canceled this guy,
Speaker 2: and we canceled it. We cancel PAP you can, and
Speaker 2: we can cancel Tucker Carlson anybody we want. It's disgusting,
Speaker 2: Absolutely disgusting. I gotta say, you know, it's one thing
Speaker 2: to have strong opinions, and we can all argue about opinions,
Speaker 2: but we all need to be able to argue, can't
Speaker 2: we You have to support free speech. And anybody that
Speaker 2: wants to cancel somebody else, I don't care if they're
Speaker 2: left or right. I don't care if they're jew or Gentile.
Speaker 2: I'm against them. And that's no excuse. As European governments
Speaker 2: ramp up on their assault on online freedom, Trump administration
Speaker 2: is striking back hard with freedom dot gov, a portal
Speaker 2: that's designed to equip European and British systems with tools
Speaker 2: to shatter digital barriers. Imposed by overreaching bureaucrats, rights Watson.
Speaker 2: And so they're going to they have these that looks
Speaker 2: like they're going to push tools like VPNs and other
Speaker 2: things like that. But of course the UK is so
Speaker 2: held end on censorship, they're talking about canceling VPNs as well.
Speaker 2: A government insiders say the freedom dot gov portal may
Speaker 2: feature a VPN of virtual private network. What that does,
Speaker 2: if you don't know, is it shields where you are
Speaker 2: coming from, so they can't tell what country you're coming from.
Speaker 2: To allow European users to bypass domestic controls and claim
Speaker 2: that its use will not be tracked. That's the other thing.
Speaker 2: Do you really trust the American government? I mean, you
Speaker 2: know they've got their five Eyes program, you know, the
Speaker 2: five Spies program. I guess we could say the five
Speaker 2: English speaking countries US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and
Speaker 2: they share intelligence. I don't trust I would trust the
Speaker 2: government to cover my VPN. I would think they'll probably
Speaker 2: betray you at some point or the other. So the
Speaker 2: US State Department is developing this online portal to enable
Speaker 2: people in Europe and elsewhere to see content banned by
Speaker 2: their own governments, including alleged hate speech and terrorist propaganda,
Speaker 2: sources told Ruters, and Routers tweeted that out. Now, Watson
Speaker 2: portrays this as heroic to the midnight Ride of Paul Revere.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, he says, when you go
Speaker 2: to their homepage features an animated logo of Paul Revere
Speaker 2: on his midnight ride warning people of the British coming. Well, absolutely,
Speaker 2: that is the you know that has been Actually that
Speaker 2: was Alex's logo at Free Speech System. It's Paul Revere.
Speaker 2: And and yet you know, what if what if Paul
Speaker 2: Revere gets turned by the British like Alex Jones, what
Speaker 2: if he starts spewing out lies. Don't worry. The vaccines
Speaker 2: are okay, the vaccines are okay. There's sugar water. There's
Speaker 2: sugar water. Don't worry about it. So again, pay attention
Speaker 2: to who you're listening to. And if somebody is going
Speaker 2: to portray this is a litmus test, folks, for gullibility
Speaker 2: and for intelligence. Just to when you've got an article
Speaker 2: that portrays Trump as a hero of free speech. Yeah,
Speaker 2: just like he's the hero of people who are opposed
Speaker 2: to the COVID shots and the vaccine and the pandemic.
Speaker 2: People are opposed to the childhood schedule vaccines. Trump's going
Speaker 2: to save us from all that, just like he's going
Speaker 2: to save us from glyfaset and fluoride and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this, Just like he's going to stop funding
Speaker 2: Planned parented. He didn't do any of that. He said
Speaker 2: he was going to do it, He didn't do any
Speaker 2: of it. He did exactly the opposite. I mean, he's
Speaker 2: compelling the production of glyphasset, he's giving them liability protection.
Speaker 2: How many times does he have to do exactly the
Speaker 2: opposite of what he said he was going to do.
Speaker 2: He's going to be Andy globlast and look at what
Speaker 2: he did with a pandemic, and look at what he's
Speaker 2: doing with the Epstein files. There's a lot of people
Speaker 2: who are going to jail, a lot of people who
Speaker 2: are in other countries, a lot of people whose careers
Speaker 2: have been ended, not in this country, not for Trump,
Speaker 2: not for Clinton, not for Steve Banner. None of these
Speaker 2: people have any consequences. And so the only way that
Speaker 2: such restrictions could be enforced effectively would be for VPN
Speaker 2: providers to require all users to undergo age assurance measures.
Speaker 2: Oh no, that's not it be at the OS level. Uh,
Speaker 2: and that's really what they're gonna do. And when they
Speaker 2: do it at the OS level, what do you think
Speaker 2: Trump's going to do? I mean, is he going to
Speaker 2: if they say you're not going to be able to
Speaker 2: have Microsoft operating systems or buy Apple computers in the UK?
Speaker 2: Now would that work? I don't know what the people
Speaker 2: there would do, but they seem to have been beaten
Speaker 2: down to the extent that they're not going to do
Speaker 2: anything about whatever the British government does. John Clees say,
Speaker 2: I expect to be arrested at any moment now. I
Speaker 2: am definitely I definitely fit the profile of a domestic terrorist.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, this article came up this
Speaker 2: is something's going on on Ash Wednesday, which kicked off
Speaker 2: at the beginning of Ramadan. A boy was told to
Speaker 2: wipe the Ash Wednesday cross off of his forehead at school?
Speaker 2: Why because it was offensive to the Muslims. On gb
Speaker 2: News this morning, a young boy was told by a
Speaker 2: teacher to remove his Ash Wednesday mark. You can already
Speaker 2: see the double standard. Christianity gets policed while other faith
Speaker 2: expressions are treated as untouchable. The schools cannot respect Christian
Speaker 2: children in a Christian country is not a Christian country anymore.
Speaker 2: Then something has gone badly wrong, and it has gone
Speaker 2: badly wrong as a matter of fact, because the Muslims
Speaker 2: do fasting. They said that the Christian kids couldn't eat
Speaker 2: anything either, So we don't have enough teachers to do
Speaker 2: these superate things. Then they wound up hiring special teachers
Speaker 2: just to keep the Muslim students happy. They wound up
Speaker 2: having special teachers for the preferential treatment. Is absolutely amazing,
Speaker 2: the two tier system that they have set up there,
Speaker 2: and this is all a part of it. So how
Speaker 2: will this be policed? Well by making everyone prove their
Speaker 2: age to the internet with a digital idea, and how
Speaker 2: about letting parents aside what their kids have access to. Yeah, exactly,
Speaker 2: But let's understand this is not just a European issue.
Speaker 2: It is a big European issue. You had Emmanuel Macron
Speaker 2: come out just last week saying free speech is complete bs.
Speaker 2: It has absolutely nothing but contempt for free speech. Well,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we
Speaker 2: will be right back. Just to remind you, this has
Speaker 2: been going on for quite some time in the in
Speaker 2: the European halls of.
Speaker 3: Power, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Yet LAOS, your annual Global
Speaker 3: Risk report makes or is stunning and sobering read for
Speaker 3: the global business community. The top concern for the next
Speaker 3: two years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation
Speaker 3: and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within our societies.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. You are listening to the David Knight.
Speaker 2: Shows from listeners on Rumble Jason Barker, you know where
Speaker 2: this is headed. Next will require biometric loggin to use
Speaker 2: the Internet. That's absolutely right. Yeah, and they shutting down everything.
Speaker 2: I mean, you look at three D printing. That is huge,
Speaker 2: That is a big deal. And I know that Jason
Speaker 2: has covered that a lot nicest storm going out to
Speaker 2: three D printing. The name of stopping quote unquote ghost guns.
Speaker 2: They've invented this little catchphrase. It sounds very scary. Scounds
Speaker 2: scarier even than assault weapon. Wish they never defined either,
Speaker 2: but they want to make sure that you're not able
Speaker 2: to use three D printers. You could use a three
Speaker 2: D printer to keep your tractor going, or your old
Speaker 2: cars going, or something we can't have that. You've got
Speaker 2: to be completely dependent on us as not only planned obsolescence,
Speaker 2: it's planned control and replacement. Wali Walras says, have you
Speaker 2: guys heard anything about Trump and RFK Junior trying to
Speaker 2: make glases that's protected against lawsuits for national security? Yes,
Speaker 2: as a matter of fact, I talked about that a
Speaker 2: little bit yesterday. Maybe I didn't get into it too much,
Speaker 2: but the I got more about it. What he did
Speaker 2: was he compelled through the Defense Act or what I
Speaker 2: forget name of it now, I don't have it in
Speaker 2: front of me, but it's the same thing that he
Speaker 2: use to compel the production of ventilators at the beginning
Speaker 2: of the fake pandemic. And remember we did see an
Speaker 2: increase and excess deaths. It was nothing compared to what
Speaker 2: happened when the vaccine, when I saw gigantic, straight up spike.
Speaker 2: But they did see an increase in deaths because they
Speaker 2: were using things like ventilators on people, and you had
Speaker 2: about ninety percent of the people who were put on
Speaker 2: ventilators died. It was something, as one pulmonologist said, I've
Speaker 2: never seen this done in my career, that you put
Speaker 2: people on ventilators, as it makes no sense, and somebody
Speaker 2: comes from the respiratory disease. By the way, it's in
Speaker 2: the car the other day listening to Pandora, which using it,
Speaker 2: listening to the free Pandora, So there's ads in it.
Speaker 2: And they just kept hitting us with ads from the
Speaker 2: CDC trying to scare you about how dangerous respiratory diseases are.
Speaker 2: So you know the implications. You've got to go get
Speaker 2: your ask your doctor what you can do to prevent
Speaker 2: yourself from getting respiratory disease. Well, you know what that
Speaker 2: answer is, right, it's the vaccine, right, get your flu shot,
Speaker 2: get your COVID shot, all the rest of stuff. Anyway,
Speaker 2: he used that same defense nonsense to compel the production
Speaker 2: of ventilators, then rewarded the hospitals, gave them thirty nine
Speaker 2: thousand dollars if they'd put somebody on a vendilator, and
Speaker 2: the ventilator only costs fifty thousand dollars, and they'd already
Speaker 2: gotten thirteen thousand dollars for pointing at somebody saying you
Speaker 2: got COVID. So you put somebody, you point somebody, say
Speaker 2: you got COVID, and now you got to go on
Speaker 2: a ventilator fifty two thousand dollars. You've you know, paid
Speaker 2: for your machine, and now you get to charge them
Speaker 2: on a daily basis with the use and you get
Speaker 2: a twenty percent bonus because they're a COVID patient. You
Speaker 2: see how the money works. Anyway, that was the same
Speaker 2: thing that he used for that. Now they want to
Speaker 2: use it for life.
Speaker 1: Is that?
Speaker 2: Why is this a security issue? You got the Republicans
Speaker 2: in Congress cheering what Trump did because they are representing
Speaker 2: Big Agra. Big Agrid doesn't care if there's poison in
Speaker 2: your food. They just want to sell you massive quantities
Speaker 2: of it. They can actually increase production with glyphysts, and
Speaker 2: they don't care that it's poison it. They don't care
Speaker 2: that they've basically taken a poison pill for their business.
Speaker 2: They've poisoned their soil so that they will only be
Speaker 2: able to grow Monsento's genetically modified plants, seeds that can
Speaker 2: handle the glyphyst. They have set them up so they
Speaker 2: can handle it. It kills everything else except for the seeds
Speaker 2: that they sell you. That had a tragic result in India. Nevertheless,
Speaker 2: a big agg wants it, and Big Egg and the
Speaker 2: Republican Party and Trump and Democrats is what, don't really
Speaker 2: care whether you're getting poisoned or not. Come in, you
Speaker 2: can take it. It's like it's like Alex Jones telling
Speaker 2: people about the Trump shot. It's got a little bit
Speaker 2: of aluminium in it and a little bit of mercury.
Speaker 2: But you can inject that in your veins. That's no problem.
Speaker 2: Do it for Trump. And so that's what's behind that.
Speaker 2: But the immunity that's there, the legal immunity that's there,
Speaker 2: that's built into that Defense Act thing. So it's a
Speaker 2: double whammy. Not only is he going to compel them
Speaker 2: and subsidize them, but he's also in again give them
Speaker 2: liability protection, just like he gave the ventilator manufacturers liability protection.
Speaker 2: So all that is wrapped up in there. As many
Speaker 2: people have been saying, the biggest betrayal that the people
Speaker 2: who voted for Trump because of this Maha nonsense, the
Speaker 2: biggest betrayal that they could have possibly had. Betrayal after
Speaker 2: betrayal after betrayal. What does it take for these people
Speaker 2: to wake up from their stupor of double think? They
Speaker 2: will make an ex excuse for everything self patriot, thank
Speaker 2: you very much for the tip, He says. The plan
Speaker 2: is to completely track, surveil and control us, so we
Speaker 2: cannot challenge their power. We're only needed by them as chattel,
Speaker 2: that's right, And they really don't need us for that.
Speaker 2: I mean as they as they developed their developing these
Speaker 2: robots to replace the menial tasks and labor, so they
Speaker 2: don't need the mass of humanity. That the mass of
Speaker 2: humanity is a threat to them. Out of all the
Speaker 2: people out there, you know, who's to say that some
Speaker 2: poor person isn't going to be an incredibly smart person
Speaker 2: that might rise up against them, right, and you know
Speaker 2: from humble beginnings. Where did you know? Did Napoleon come
Speaker 2: from a rich family? Now? How about Beethoven or these
Speaker 2: other people? They don't want to risk that, so they're
Speaker 2: going to kill us all. Basically Guard Goldsmith, liberty, conspiracy.
Speaker 2: Get to see Guard, he said. Feds, I have an idea.
Speaker 2: Let's trick Europeans to use our data portal and tell
Speaker 2: them that it protects their privacy. Wink wink, Yeah, I
Speaker 2: would you can trust the State Department to protect your privacy?
Speaker 2: Going to trust them not to give you up DG eight,
Speaker 2: Thank you very much, for the tip. He says, David,
Speaker 2: Alex Jones is pathetic attacking Massy? Is he really? He's
Speaker 2: attacking Massy now? He is really pathetic. I've never seen
Speaker 2: anybody such a sellout as Alex Jones. This guy has
Speaker 2: betrayed everything that he did. All these people are saying, well,
Speaker 2: I got to respect Alex. He woke me up, and
Speaker 2: it's like, well, then you need to wake up from
Speaker 2: Alex at this point. If you agree with the things
Speaker 2: that he said ten twenty years ago, you need to
Speaker 2: oppose the Alex Jones at twenty twenty six. He is
Speaker 2: antithetical to everything that he told you. He's a liar
Speaker 2: and a backstabber right now, just because of money. That's
Speaker 2: all he cares about. So he's attacking Massy over the
Speaker 2: Epstein client list of all things. He just put out
Speaker 2: a thing saying Alex Jones was right. He was telling
Speaker 2: everybody about the pedophile rings decades ago, and I put
Speaker 2: that clips where he was talking about it. He's like,
Speaker 2: that's right, And what is he doing now? He's protecting
Speaker 2: the people who are protecting the pedophiles. Just amazing. So
Speaker 2: he's defending Trump's cover up. Then, yeah, Alex has zero credibility.
Speaker 2: Actually it's pathetic. Do you still talk to Greg Greas? Yeah?
Speaker 2: I worked there and I didn't really know Greg. I
Speaker 2: came in very early to do my program, and I
Speaker 2: was out like about, you know, lunchtime, and so I
Speaker 2: would just see him passing in the halls or whatever.
Speaker 2: I really never knew Greg Grease, but I understand he's
Speaker 2: still doing some work. I don't know what his take
Speaker 2: is on all this stuff. I haven't seen his reports either.
Speaker 2: Let's talk a little bit about what Cash Mattel is doing.
Speaker 2: He is acting like an influencer, says this article from
Speaker 2: Media Eye. And of course you had the hockey game
Speaker 2: for the gold medal. I think that's I saw it
Speaker 2: up on the news that it was tied at one
Speaker 2: point it was the US versus Canada, and I said, oh,
Speaker 2: this is going to be kind of a hot spot
Speaker 2: there with with Trump creating this animal with Canada from
Speaker 2: the very beginning, I think, from the looks of it,
Speaker 2: the US one. I didn't go back and look at it,
Speaker 2: but we saw this from cash Mattel. There he is.
Speaker 2: He took an FBI private jet all the way to Europe,
Speaker 2: and there he is partying with the hockey team and
Speaker 2: they put a metal around his neck and he's got
Speaker 2: a bottle of beer in his hand. The director of
Speaker 2: the FBI, What a joke these people are. He's got
Speaker 2: to get right in the center of it, like a
Speaker 2: frat boy or something. You know. Somebody put up this
Speaker 2: show him passed out with a metal around his neck. Uh.
Speaker 2: Our men fatally shot at Marlago and the FBI director
Speaker 2: has passed out drunk with bottles of beer all around
Speaker 2: him as he's on a luxury private jet that belongs
Speaker 2: to the government. As a matter of fact, over the weekend,
Speaker 2: we had Pam Bondy, another clown from the Trump administration,
Speaker 2: put up a giant banner at the Department of Justice.
Speaker 2: Take a look at this, and this is like something
Speaker 2: out of the Soviet Union or North Korea, isn't it.
Speaker 2: Giant banner of Trump scowling at people on the front
Speaker 2: of the Department of Justice, or they are putting it
Speaker 2: up and somebody said, here, let me fix this for you.
Speaker 2: They they photoshopped a giant banner of Trump and Epstein.
Speaker 2: Because that's what it's really about. And this is something
Speaker 2: that Pam Bondy has been seen doing before. She is
Speaker 2: one of the worst of the suck up flatterers and
Speaker 2: sycophants in the Trump administration. Here's Pam Bondy when she
Speaker 2: first got to the Department of Justice, and of course
Speaker 2: they do it is ordinary that they would put up
Speaker 2: pictures of the president who over the current president is
Speaker 2: in these various government buildings. However, she puts a picture
Speaker 2: of Trump up. I think it's a little bit larger,
Speaker 2: a little bit more prominent, and draws his attention to it.
Speaker 2: Look at this clip. Look at that I put a
Speaker 2: picture of you up. It's much such a nice person.
Speaker 2: That's a rough picture. That's a rough picture. We're waiting
Speaker 2: on JD's to get. That's good.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Just an amazing sick of it. That is one of
Speaker 2: the things that is just so I could never stand
Speaker 2: that in a corporation. I could never get into politics
Speaker 2: because I really despise that kind of suck up person
Speaker 2: that's there, and that's exactly what she is. So we've
Speaker 2: got cash, matel Pam Bondi and uh, just to remind
Speaker 2: you of the FBI. As a matter of fact, Media
Speaker 2: Eye is just wringing their hands and saying, you know,
Speaker 2: we've lost all respect for the FBI. It's like you
Speaker 2: really think that it deserved the gravitas that it created.
Speaker 2: You really think that Jagger Hoover wasn't an influencer. He
Speaker 2: was just better at it than cash. Pttel so I said.
Speaker 2: The issue isn't just a few isolated moments, it's the pattern.
Speaker 2: Leaders at this level are judged over time and increasingly
Speaker 2: by the images that they generate. When those images lean
Speaker 2: towards spectacle, self serving, obsequiousness, and fame, the burden falls
Speaker 2: on the institution to convince a skeptical public that nothing
Speaker 2: fundamental has changed. Let me tell you something, these people
Speaker 2: have reached all new levels of obsequiousness. I've never seen
Speaker 2: a like the Pambondi Department of Justice or the train
Speaker 2: wreck frat boy FBI frat boys investigating, and that's what
Speaker 2: you call the FBI. Right frat boy investigator. Patel appears
Speaker 2: to be operating inside the same attention driven culture that
Speaker 2: has reshaped much of American public life. Well, you know,
Speaker 2: the thing is, Jagger Hoover was a trainee, He was
Speaker 2: a cross dresser. From all reports, he just kept a
Speaker 2: private and he was really an influencer as a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, anybody, I'm sure if you are of a
Speaker 2: certain age, you remember the program the FBI with f
Speaker 2: from Zimblist Junior. That was a production of QM Q,
Speaker 2: but actually it was Jaggar Hoover had a heavy hand
Speaker 2: in that, the FBI.
Speaker 4: QM production Sorry from Zimblist Jr. Also starring Philip Evn't I.
Speaker 2: Knew Lynn Laurie anyway? From that to this, I think
Speaker 2: they've lost some gravitas, haven't they. Of course, Actually, you
Speaker 2: know what Cash Hotel is doing there is probably not
Speaker 2: as ridiculous as Jaggar Hoover prancing around in heels and
Speaker 2: address like Rudy Giuliani did with Donald Trump. Folks, that's
Speaker 2: the kind of people that rule us. This has been
Speaker 2: going on a lot longer than the Epstein Files. That's
Speaker 2: just the most in your face, disgusting, degenerate instance of
Speaker 2: it so far.
Speaker 5: And the thing I just want to say is apparently
Speaker 5: Cash Mattel is a lifelong hockey fan. He's played hockey forever.
Speaker 5: And to me, all I can see here is somebody
Speaker 5: that is just desperate. You know, oh, I could have
Speaker 5: gone pro if X. This is just one of those
Speaker 5: guys that. You know, if I hadn't blown my knee
Speaker 5: out in high school, I'd be in the NFL. Like
Speaker 5: I guarantee you, he's so excited to be there because
Speaker 5: this was his dream. This is what he wanted.
Speaker 2: Did he get it between the eyes with a hockey puke?
Speaker 2: Is that why he looks the way he does.
Speaker 5: He wanted to be a sports hero, a legend, but no,
Speaker 5: that's not what he got. Yeah, he wanted to force
Speaker 5: these people to hang out with him because he's FBI director.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Well again, when you look at it,
Speaker 2: Jaggar Hoover was a master influencer. He just did it
Speaker 2: in a much more sophisticated way and which I guess
Speaker 2: made it more dangerous than Cashptel. You know, he got
Speaker 2: his start in the Palmer Raids, the infamous Palmer raids,
Speaker 2: and that was the Attorney General at the time was
Speaker 2: named Palmer. He had presidential aspirations and so he wanted
Speaker 2: to make a name by himself for himself by staging
Speaker 2: a bunch of raids. But he put Jaggar Hoover in
Speaker 2: charge of it, and Jaggar Hoover took all the credit
Speaker 2: and made himself a household name, and then got them
Speaker 2: to create a Federal Bureau of Investigation federal police, which
Speaker 2: is not in the constitution, by the way, folks. And
Speaker 2: then he got black mail files on everybody. He was
Speaker 2: the Jeffrey Epstein of his day. And I don't know
Speaker 2: how much of that stuff involved honey pot traps of
Speaker 2: sexual nature, but he was the Epstein of his day.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, a leadership style that resembles
Speaker 2: influencer era visibility. Well, you know, I think it's a
Speaker 2: sign of our time. I think it's a sign of
Speaker 2: our society. We're not a serious society anymore. Jagger Hoover
Speaker 2: knew that he had to set up a program like
Speaker 2: the one I just played for in order to influence society. Now,
Speaker 2: these guys think they can do it, and they're right.
Speaker 2: They can do it without any of that stuff. Audi
Speaker 2: modern richro mrr. Thank you so much. That's very generous.
Speaker 2: Good to see you there. I hope things are going
Speaker 2: well for your program, your broadcast. Say thank you for
Speaker 2: all you do, David. The DK team is keeping a
Speaker 2: lot of folks sane. Well, thank you for trying. There's
Speaker 2: a bigger picture here, folks, There really is irs machine gun.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much. He said, Pam could put a
Speaker 2: bigger picture of Trump on her desk. Yeah, now that
Speaker 2: she must have a pretty huge desk as a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, and it's still pretty cluttered, evidently because she
Speaker 2: doesn't want to let go of any of those things.
Speaker 2: Speaking of we're going to get into the drug war
Speaker 2: issue here what's happening in Mexico. But just to remind
Speaker 2: you of the impact here at home, you know, we
Speaker 2: look at all these things going on with Ice and
Speaker 2: all the rest of stuff. It's like this is just
Speaker 2: a continuation and extension, a growth of what we've been
Speaker 2: seeing with the drug war all along. We've got to
Speaker 2: pull back against this police state. That's the only good
Speaker 2: thing that could come from this. Sometimes I think it
Speaker 2: was Grant, President Grant who said the best way to
Speaker 2: get rid of a bad law is to rigorously enforce it.
Speaker 2: Maybe the best way to get rid of the drug
Speaker 2: war is to rigorously enforce it. I hope that people
Speaker 2: wake up. I don't know. Drug tests being done by
Speaker 2: police are notoriously unreliable. Reason has a very long article.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to go into all this, but as
Speaker 2: a man who's wrongly charged with trafficking Fentinel. They're doing
Speaker 2: these roadside tests and they come up with something which
Speaker 2: is inaccurate, and then they set it aside and they
Speaker 2: send it to the state drug lab, and they got
Speaker 2: a backlog of months or year and a half or
Speaker 2: something in this guy's case, and meanwhile his life was
Speaker 2: turned upside down into a living health They say roughly
Speaker 2: thirty thousand people every year getting wrongfully arrested, according to
Speaker 2: one estimate, on paper, the sky fit the profile of
Speaker 2: a drug mule. Cheff's deputies pulled him over. He was
Speaker 2: driving a car without a state plates. They didn't know
Speaker 2: when they pulled him over, but he had a suspended
Speaker 2: driver's license. The company pulled him over said well, just
Speaker 2: so that you know, the reason I pulled you over
Speaker 2: was because of your window tenting. Give me a break.
Speaker 2: You know, I've been pulled over so many times for
Speaker 2: such nonsense from these guys. It's unbelievable. Anyway, he was
Speaker 2: nervous because his driver's license was suspended, so he was
Speaker 2: actually shaking, and his story was a little bit confusing,
Speaker 2: so they asked him if they could search his car,
Speaker 2: eager to prove that he had nothing to hide, eager
Speaker 2: to prove that he was. Oh, I'm perfectly innocent. This
Speaker 2: is the same mistake people make when child protective services
Speaker 2: come to your door. Never let them in your house.
Speaker 2: Always tell them get a warrant, and you get a
Speaker 2: phone and start recording what's going on. So anyway, he
Speaker 2: would have normally said nobody was hoping that they would
Speaker 2: give him a break on his license had he cooperated. Besides,
Speaker 2: he knew that he and his car were clean for
Speaker 2: the first time since he was nineteen years old and
Speaker 2: he was now forty one. He had achieved long term sobriety,
Speaker 2: he said. When they got me, I was a little
Speaker 2: over a year sober. I want to say about fourteen
Speaker 2: and a half months. The deputies found a prescription pill
Speaker 2: bottle in his luggage. They tested its contents using a
Speaker 2: notoriously unreliable kind of field test. They concluded that the
Speaker 2: test results are positive for the possible presence of fentanyl.
Speaker 2: Must have gotten it from Canada. Anyway, he spent fifteen
Speaker 2: days in jail, seven months on house arrest, tens of
Speaker 2: thousands of dollars in lawyer fees to clear his name, and,
Speaker 2: as he pointed out, one of the worst things about
Speaker 2: it was the fact, he said, when you look at
Speaker 2: these programs, they all say that, you know, it's very
Speaker 2: important to have people around you who said they put
Speaker 2: me in complete isolation. It took him a year, four months,
Speaker 2: twenty eight days to prove to the prosecutors that the
Speaker 2: suspicious blue pills in the bottle were exactly what the
Speaker 2: label said. It was prescription medication for irritable bowel syndrome IBS.
Speaker 2: Maybe that can also stand for investigative BS, which is
Speaker 2: what happened. Then in this pretty good case, a reason
Speaker 2: got that showed that around this time this happened to
Speaker 2: him in South Carolina, that around this time the backlog
Speaker 2: for the state drug lab was more than a year.
Speaker 2: They had a backlog of roughly or roughly eighteen thousand
Speaker 2: other cases while he was waiting to get his results,
Speaker 2: so I had to go back to the field. Test
Speaker 2: was bogus, and so they sent it to the lab,
Speaker 2: and it took the lab all that time to go
Speaker 2: through and actually say, yeah, this is really prescription medication.
Speaker 2: So not only they put me in jail, they took
Speaker 2: me away from the people who helped me get sober
Speaker 2: and my sponsorship family, I couldn't meet with my sponsor
Speaker 2: or my sponsor ee because I was through my steps.
Speaker 2: I'm sure that you've seen the ted talks and other
Speaker 2: stuff like that. The opposite of addiction is connection, right,
Speaker 2: they took connection away from me because I was locked
Speaker 2: up in my mom's house under house arrest. Well, that's
Speaker 2: the that's the essence of it. Again, what our government
Speaker 2: is doing is counterproductive in every regard. It's kunter productive
Speaker 2: for the attics, it's counter productive, especially for society. All
Speaker 2: of us have to pay for this. We have to
Speaker 2: pay for the private for profit prisons. We pay in
Speaker 2: the sense that we are at risk from these out
Speaker 2: of control militries police that we see everywhere. It is
Speaker 2: a horrific situation. It's been going on for more than
Speaker 2: fifty years. As a matter of fact, you know, we
Speaker 2: look at things like ice and it applies especially to
Speaker 2: the drug stuff. Yes, Speaker Johnson, who is a lawyer, right,
Speaker 2: he says, can you imagine we can't get warrants for
Speaker 2: this stuff? Imagine what would happen if we got warrants
Speaker 2: if evolved the constitution.
Speaker 6: Imagine if we had to go through the process of
Speaker 6: getting a judicial warrant, an additional warrant to go and
Speaker 6: apprehend people who we know are here illegally. How much
Speaker 6: time would that take. We don't don't have enough judges,
Speaker 6: We don't have enough time. It would take decades probably
Speaker 6: to do that. The people who are advocating for that
Speaker 6: don't want any immigration enforcement.
Speaker 2: They do not he doesn't want any constitution enforcement. Imagine
Speaker 2: if we had a Speaker of the House the support
Speaker 2: of the Constitution. I can't imagine that anymore. I've been
Speaker 2: I've seen so many Republicans and Democrats come through. I
Speaker 2: can't even imagine a Speaker of the House who supported
Speaker 2: the Constitution. I can't imagine that warrant. We don't need
Speaker 2: no warrant badges. We don't need those stinking badges. We
Speaker 2: do whatever we want right out. The mr News report
Speaker 2: on Copson, Tennessee reveal the police are expected to make
Speaker 2: a minimum of one hundred arrest this year. Man, I
Speaker 2: love this liberty and freedom in America. Yeah, that may
Speaker 2: be one of the reasons why the state Highway patrol.
Speaker 2: As one guy, I forget the numbers now, but it
Speaker 2: was something like forty faults arrests for intoxication and these
Speaker 2: people were sober. That's just one guy. Uh, there's a
Speaker 2: lot of people that are doing that in the Tennessee
Speaker 2: State Highway Patrol. It's pathetic what they're doing. And of
Speaker 2: course you give these guys quotas. That's why you see
Speaker 2: the kind of stuff like that, arresting sober people and
Speaker 2: charging them with drunk driving or the kinds of abuses
Speaker 2: that we see from ICE. It's because they've got quotas,
Speaker 2: quotas from people like Steven Miller, the u pee wee
Speaker 2: German is what they called him. We're gonna take a
Speaker 2: quick breakhot, We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 6: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 6: mobile device.
Speaker 1: Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.
Speaker 5: Welcome back, folks. I want to remind you all that
Speaker 5: it is your support that keeps this program up and running.
Speaker 5: And if you'd like to donate directly, you can go
Speaker 5: to davidnightt News and see all the ways you can
Speaker 5: do that. There's cash app, zell, subscribe star and you
Speaker 5: can now go to substack and subscribe to us there.
Speaker 5: But I also want to take the time to plug.
Speaker 5: Some of our sponsors, A really good one to support
Speaker 5: is Homestead Products Dot shop. Yes, and right now they
Speaker 5: are having a sale on their first aid kit. You
Speaker 5: can see it here. It's marked down to twenty three dollars.
Speaker 5: It's great for camping, survival, readiness, preparedness and emergencies. They've
Speaker 5: got just about everything you would need for you know,
Speaker 5: the typical injuries you might experience.
Speaker 2: Bug out bag.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's always important to have a first aid kit,
Speaker 5: even just around the house. You never know when you're
Speaker 5: gonna cut yourself and need band aids and things like that.
Speaker 5: So check out Homestead Products Dot shop and as always,
Speaker 5: check out their hot sauce. It's really good. I can
Speaker 5: feeling that one because I stole it and I used
Speaker 5: all of it because it's delicious.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we love that. I like the idea of the
Speaker 2: tumbleweed firestarter for barbecue season.
Speaker 5: I think that's oh yeah, those are great too. Anytime
Speaker 5: I'm starting up a charcoal grill, I'm using a tumbleweed,
Speaker 5: no chemicals, and they get it started every single time.
Speaker 2: That's the key thing of chemicals, you know, when we're
Speaker 2: look at the chemicals, you can't you know, we can't
Speaker 2: imagine a world without these chemicals, and certainly it's not
Speaker 2: going to be a world without glycasset now thanks to
Speaker 2: Trump and RFK Junior. However, you can still have a
Speaker 2: world without cancer. Get that book from J. Edward Griffin,
Speaker 2: and you can get that at RNC store dot com
Speaker 2: ten percent off if you use the code night. And
Speaker 2: they have available B seventeen in both pill form as
Speaker 2: well as the natural apricot seeds. And so that's something
Speaker 2: you may want to think about when the government is
Speaker 2: looking at how many different toxic chemicals they can put
Speaker 2: out there. They're known carcinogens. There is something that you
Speaker 2: can do. You're not absolutely helpless about this. Well, let's
Speaker 2: take a look at what's happening in Mexico. And again
Speaker 2: we have seen these big gangs. We've had El Choppo.
Speaker 2: Now we got El mincho. I guess he's a minsch
Speaker 2: as the Jewish people. That's they I don't know what
Speaker 2: that means, what that name actually means. I don't know
Speaker 2: what El Chapo meant either. I don't know if that
Speaker 2: was a reference to his machete or what it was.
Speaker 2: But they're saying the US is bracing for spillover might
Speaker 2: spill over the border because this Hallisco gang is very
Speaker 2: large and they span multiple states. As they were saying,
Speaker 2: most of these gangs in the past have been kind
Speaker 2: of localized, but this one has gotten much larger. As
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, we're talking about the listing these
Speaker 2: organizations as terrorist organizations. There was a lot of talk
Speaker 2: about how these drug cartels that have been created by
Speaker 2: the War on drugs, they did not exist. They were
Speaker 2: a market response to our drug prohibitionion, which they never
Speaker 2: passed a constitutional amendment for like they did for alcohol.
Speaker 2: Why is that. It's because we don't care about the
Speaker 2: Constitution anymore right now. The eighteenth and twenty first Amendment
Speaker 2: testify to the fact that the Constitution is dead in
Speaker 2: modern America. And so we've had blowback from these operations
Speaker 2: in the foreign wars, and we may have spillover from
Speaker 2: this one. This Mexican president, shine Bomb, has been goaded
Speaker 2: by Trump to physically attack these cartels and not saying
Speaker 2: that they shouldn't do it in their own country. These
Speaker 2: cartels are horrific. The problem is the prohibition aspect of it.
Speaker 2: That's what created al Capone, and that's what created these
Speaker 2: cartels as a matter of fact. And then we have
Speaker 2: the CIA which is working with them. CIA is helping
Speaker 2: to get this thing kicked off. The CIA did the
Speaker 2: cracked cocaine, they developed it, they trafficked it so they
Speaker 2: could fund their secret war. They protected the poppy fields
Speaker 2: in Afghan Afghanistan. I mean, our government is so embedded
Speaker 2: in all this stuff, it's insane. And CIA especially the
Speaker 2: traffic everything, the traffic people, they're involved in the Epstein stuff,
Speaker 2: they're involved in the drug cartels. We have met the enemy,
Speaker 2: and the a is US or US, we should say,
Speaker 2: as in the United States. So officials say at least
Speaker 2: sixty two people dynasying various figures, have seen some that
Speaker 2: are over seventy. Some people say they arrested seventy people.
Speaker 2: So there's some confusion still about what's going on with this.
Speaker 2: They do have accounts said twenty five National Guard were
Speaker 2: killed in action and six separate attacks from the cartel.
Speaker 2: The cartel had thirty four people killed in action, and
Speaker 2: they have enacted two hundred and fifty roadblocks. The cartel
Speaker 2: has across twenty Mexican states. And how are they doing this?
Speaker 2: They've got burning vehicles at these intersections, so it is
Speaker 2: a tremendous amount of violence and chaos that is there.
Speaker 2: The Mexican government has deployed an additional twenty five hundred
Speaker 2: troops combined with the seven thousand troops already stationed there,
Speaker 2: now they have over ten thousand to stop further attacks
Speaker 2: from this particular drug gang. And it's not just a
Speaker 2: CIA in the American government and the Mexican government that
Speaker 2: are involved in all this stuff. Of course, it's the
Speaker 2: banks as well. I remember HSBC, and there was a
Speaker 2: whistleblower for them, Everett Stern I think was his name,
Speaker 2: if I remember correctly. But Matt Taibi at Rolling Stone
Speaker 2: also did articles about the Cinealoa cartel and the connection
Speaker 2: with HSBC, the Hong Kong Shanghai Bank of China, that's
Speaker 2: original name. And of course they kind of got their
Speaker 2: start with the opium wars that were there, but they had,
Speaker 2: as Matt Tabi pointed out as Rolling Stone article, HSBC
Speaker 2: had set up their own window just for the Cineloa
Speaker 2: cartel to come in and count cash. So very complicit
Speaker 2: in this, and they've been busted and convicted multiple times
Speaker 2: of working with cartels and terrorists and so Everett was
Speaker 2: hired as one of the requirements of one of their
Speaker 2: convictions that they had to do more in terms of
Speaker 2: interdiction and enforcement. So you need to hire some people
Speaker 2: to look at these massive transfers that are happening. And
Speaker 2: what he found was, he said, all the people that
Speaker 2: got hired, including him, had no experience in investigations. But
Speaker 2: he took his job seriously and he started looking, and
Speaker 2: he realized that when he looked at the database, they
Speaker 2: had done things like put an extra period here or there,
Speaker 2: or a space in their search terms to make sure
Speaker 2: that it didn't kick it out. You know, they were
Speaker 2: looking for particular names and places, names of institutions, names
Speaker 2: of people, and they put little kind of hidden things
Speaker 2: there to make sure they didn't get a match. It's
Speaker 2: the same thing the Department of Justice did with Trump
Speaker 2: and the Epstein files. Right, if you search for Trump,
Speaker 2: you wouldn't find it, I think, But if you searched
Speaker 2: for it wasn't. If you search for Trump space, you
Speaker 2: can find a match all over the place. So they
Speaker 2: did something to block that search inside the app that
Speaker 2: they set up for people. Anyway, greg Abbott ordered the
Speaker 2: state's Department of Public safety, to boost security operations to
Speaker 2: prevent spillover activity from Mexico in the US. I imagine
Speaker 2: what he's going to do is the same kind of
Speaker 2: virtue signaling nonsense he did before with the border open.
Speaker 2: He took a bunch of highway Protexas highway patrol people
Speaker 2: and had them lining up like a half dozen highway
Speaker 2: patrol cars along the border, went back and took a
Speaker 2: picture of it. It's like, you realize how long that
Speaker 2: border is, you know how many thousands of miles that is,
Speaker 2: And he's going to pretend that that's going to stop it.
Speaker 2: So anyway, maybe they could do that for this as well.
Speaker 2: So the US is providing intelligence on this. The violence
Speaker 2: spread into popular beach resort towns across Mexico as gunmen
Speaker 2: torched retail shops, gas stations, vehicles, and blockaded highways. This
Speaker 2: could spill over. Just imagine again the scenario that I
Speaker 2: see happening is, let's say that we go to war
Speaker 2: for Israel and go to war against Iran. You think
Speaker 2: Iran might pay these cartels to come in and do
Speaker 2: some of this kind of stuff. In the US very
Speaker 2: vulnerable to this. Major battles are being fought everywhere with
Speaker 2: the police. The tourist town of Puerto Velarta actually set
Speaker 2: on fires. American visitors watched in horror. Now they can't
Speaker 2: get out. Airlines have canceled flights to Guadalajara International Airport
Speaker 2: because of all the chaos. The region is scheduled to
Speaker 2: host four matches of a World Cup soccer match in June.
Speaker 2: The question is whether or not this cartel can survive,
Speaker 2: they said, depends on how quickly it can appoint a successor.
Speaker 2: If not, the cartel may fragment as an internal power
Speaker 2: struggles begin. Well, I think there'll be somebody who's going
Speaker 2: to emerge as the leader. There. Never in Mexico is
Speaker 2: there been an organization with the presence the territorial control
Speaker 2: or the political penetration that the Hallisco New generation cartel has,
Speaker 2: said former Mexican security official. The cartels we had in
Speaker 2: Mexico previously were more regional in nature, but again they've
Speaker 2: gone global and they just keep getting bigger and stronger
Speaker 2: thanks to the unlimited amount of money that are involved
Speaker 2: in the drug trade. You know the DEA's measure of
Speaker 2: success as well. We interdicted and took some of these
Speaker 2: drugs and look, we've seen the street price go up. Well,
Speaker 2: you know that doesn't hurt the cartels at all. It
Speaker 2: could serve as near terms spillover into the US. They
Speaker 2: said the Biden administration was lining the pockets of cartels
Speaker 2: like this one, paying thousands, sometimes tens of thousands per
Speaker 2: head to be smuggled in the United States. Well that
Speaker 2: is true. And again these guys are heavily armed. The
Speaker 2: cars burning, like I said, two hudred and fifty points
Speaker 2: spread across twenty Mexican states. Guadalajara was turned into a
Speaker 2: ghost town, school canceled everywhere. They have armored vehicles, rocket launchers,
Speaker 2: other arms or seas and they are a major trafficker offentanyl.
Speaker 2: And this is finally probably true. Has been accusing Canada
Speaker 2: and Venezuela and everybody of being feddinel trackers, and everybody said,
Speaker 2: it's all coming from Mexico, and it's coming from these guys,
Speaker 2: by the way, so they probably got it right. I
Speaker 2: would certainly expect that fentanyl is coming from Mexico, probably
Speaker 2: coming from these guys as well. This is signaling to
Speaker 2: the US that if we keep cooperating and sharing intelligence,
Speaker 2: Mexico can do it we don't need to have US
Speaker 2: troops on Mexican soil. They said, yeah, well, what about
Speaker 2: if we have cartel attacks on American soil. That'd be
Speaker 2: a useful distraction for the Trump administration. Wun't it?
Speaker 1: So?
Speaker 2: The US had put up a fifteen million dollar reward
Speaker 2: for his capture, and in the past, the Mexican President
Speaker 2: Shinbaum has criticized the Kingpins strategy of previous administrations that
Speaker 2: took out cartel leaders only to trigger explosions of violence
Speaker 2: as the cartels fractured and fought each other. Since Trump
Speaker 2: has taken officees been under tremendous pressure to show results
Speaker 2: against drug trafficking, so he wants to. I don't know
Speaker 2: why he is so hell bent on this war on
Speaker 2: drugs thing. I guess you know whoever it is that
Speaker 2: controls him CIA. They like their drug war stuff, so
Speaker 2: I guess that's the answer. The Hollistico cartel has been
Speaker 2: one of the most aggressive cartels in its attacks on
Speaker 2: the military, including on helicopters a Pioneer and launching explosives
Speaker 2: from drones and installing mines. In twenty carried out a
Speaker 2: spectacular assassination attempt with grenades and high powered rifles in
Speaker 2: the heart of Mexico City. Dea considers the cartel to
Speaker 2: be as powerful as the Sinaloa cartel, with a presence
Speaker 2: in all fifty states. So again, you know, with the
Speaker 2: kind of vulnerable infrastructure we've got, and of course Jack
Speaker 2: Lawson and his Civil Defense Manual actually Jack laws in books.
Speaker 2: Dot com is where you can find It's. One of
Speaker 2: the things you talked about was just how vulnerable our
Speaker 2: infrastructure is to any kind of terrorist attack. I mean,
Speaker 2: it could be Irani and terrorists coming through the open border.
Speaker 2: It could be the Mexican cartels that are hired by
Speaker 2: the Iranians, or it could be they're doing it for
Speaker 2: their own purposes. But we have a very, very vulnerable
Speaker 2: infrastructure here. So what they've done in the past, they've
Speaker 2: arrested people like you know, the they've got El Maya,
Speaker 2: El Mayo and El Chapo. They're both in US custody.
Speaker 2: I guess the executive order was hold l Mayo, and
Speaker 2: they did that. I guess. Uh. You know, the the
Speaker 2: people who arrested them very proud of that they held Mayo.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: Let's talk a little bit about what's going on with
Speaker 2: the Iran.
Speaker 5: Briefly, some people in chat are, you know, they don't
Speaker 5: trust any of the news coming out. My wife has
Speaker 5: some family in Mexico here and there. One of the
Speaker 5: places is Tijuana and it's her cousin. He lost his
Speaker 5: job because the company basically just said we're shutting down
Speaker 5: until things calm down. They closed their stores because everything
Speaker 5: is so chaotic. So you know, whatever you're seeing on
Speaker 5: social media may not be true, but there's a lot
Speaker 5: of things. It's a lot of chaos and it's pretty
Speaker 5: bad right now.
Speaker 2: Wow, yeah, Well, again, we have nobody to blame except
Speaker 2: ourselves because we created these cartels, just like we create
Speaker 2: al Capone with alcohol prohibition. That was you know, they
Speaker 2: started with tommy guns and writing on the running boards
Speaker 2: of the old cars and shooting each other up in
Speaker 2: any innocent bystanders. And that's basically what this is. This
Speaker 2: is just alcohol probition extended for another fifty years, and
Speaker 2: these guys have diversified into every kind of crime that
Speaker 2: is there. Well, if we look at what's happening with Iran,
Speaker 2: we've had a senior Pentagon official, General Dan Kine I
Speaker 2: should have looked up to see if he's a Joint
Speaker 2: Chiefs Staff, if he's the head of that, I don't remember. Anyway,
Speaker 2: he was publicly talking about the risks of war with
Speaker 2: Iran no help from allies there. We basically Trump has
Speaker 2: alienated everybody. He's neated the Europeans of NATO and everything.
Speaker 2: He's alienated all the other Arab states that have been
Speaker 2: the past been friendly to the United States, and Huckabee
Speaker 2: has done a great job of that the last couple
Speaker 2: of days here. And he also pointed out that we
Speaker 2: was short a lot of material because we've given so
Speaker 2: much of our weapons and ammunition to Ukraine used it
Speaker 2: to defend Israel. You know it's going to be a
Speaker 2: difficult war. Why are they picking this fight? Well, because
Speaker 2: they're the puppets of Nan Yahoo. And so we've got Iran,
Speaker 2: which is four times the size of Iraq, I think
Speaker 2: more advanced. Certainly at this point. You never had the
Speaker 2: accusations that Iraq was going to create a nuclear program.
Speaker 2: Have that with Iran. You had the Iran Iraq War,
Speaker 2: and that basically it was being won by Iran until
Speaker 2: Iraq got a lot of weapons from other people, and
Speaker 2: then it kind of turned and they wound up in
Speaker 2: a stalemate, and so you can look at this and say, well,
Speaker 2: if they are about comparable to Iraq, should be a
Speaker 2: walk in the park. But I don't think that's going
Speaker 2: to be the case. I think Iran has changed quite
Speaker 2: a bit since those early days Iraq used Saddam Hussein
Speaker 2: saw an opportunity to go after Iran after they had
Speaker 2: the revolution and they were in chaos. He thought he
Speaker 2: could make his move and it didn't work, and so
Speaker 2: it'd be interesting to see what happens with it. But
Speaker 2: Huckabee going on with Tucker Carlson and the key question,
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson asking and said, so you say that you've
Speaker 2: got a deed to all this based on a promise
Speaker 2: in the Bible to Abraham from God. And he goes, well,
Speaker 2: that land goes up and encompasses pretty much all the
Speaker 2: Middle East. And Huckabee said, yeah, I'm fine with that basically,
Speaker 2: and all the Middle East is not fine with that.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, the blowback was very swift.
Speaker 2: How could be declared to be fine if Israel took
Speaker 2: over the entire Middle East? Governments from Palestine, Egypt, Jordan,
Speaker 2: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Oman issued statements condemning the comments,
Speaker 2: joined by both the Organization of Islamic Corporation the Arab League,
Speaker 2: a rare moment of quick unity for these countries. Again,
Speaker 2: this is more of the gang that can't shoot straight.
Speaker 2: They can't even execute their own agenda. Well, it always
Speaker 2: winds up blowing back on them. And as I said,
Speaker 2: when you look at something, for example, like immigrat something
Speaker 2: needs to be done about immigration, Sending massed thugs door
Speaker 2: to door is not something that needs to be done,
Speaker 2: and it's going to blow back on us, those of
Speaker 2: us who would like to limit immigration, who would like
Speaker 2: to stop the welfare magnet and all the rest of stuff.
Speaker 2: Trump is basically poisoning the opportunity to do that by
Speaker 2: his gestapo tactics that he's got out of there. So
Speaker 2: he always does it in the wrong way, and he's
Speaker 2: always got people who were saying the wrong things, most
Speaker 2: notably close American ally. Saudi Arabia was among the first
Speaker 2: to blast Huckabee's provocative statement. Saudi Arabia called it reckless
Speaker 2: and irresponsible. Jordan, too, in a rare moment, lashed out
Speaker 2: at Washington. Their officials said, we reject these absurd, provocative
Speaker 2: statements which constitute a violation of diplomatic norms and assault
Speaker 2: on the sovereignty of the countries of the region, and
Speaker 2: a flagrant breach of international law and the Charter of
Speaker 2: the UN. Asked whether a passage from the Book of
Speaker 2: Genesis could be read as granting Israel the right to
Speaker 2: claim all the land between Egypt's Nile River and Syria's Euphrates.
Speaker 2: Huckaby didn't hedge. He bluntly and without apology, said that'd
Speaker 2: be fine if Israel and its military took over the
Speaker 2: whole Middle East. I'd be fine. It'd be fine if
Speaker 2: they took it all, said Huckabee. This led to a
Speaker 2: wide ranging conversation back and forth over whether the modern
Speaker 2: state of Israel is synonymous with the Israel written about
Speaker 2: in the Old Testament, stretching back thousands of years. And
Speaker 2: that is the key. What is Israel? What does the
Speaker 2: Bible mean when it says Israel. And by the way,
Speaker 2: you know, when you look at these promises that God
Speaker 2: gave the one that they usually quote out of Genesis twelve,
Speaker 2: I'll bless those who blessed thee, curse those who blessed
Speaker 2: who cursed thee, and that was said to Abraham, it
Speaker 2: wasn't said to a political nation state. Thousands of years later.
Speaker 2: That was a singular thee, which we've lost that accuracy
Speaker 2: in the language. It's there in the King James we
Speaker 2: used to have, and a lot of different languages used
Speaker 2: to be in English as well. THEE and thou and
Speaker 2: you you was plural. And I had a Quaker friend
Speaker 2: in junior high school and he would talk like that,
Speaker 2: and he said, yeah, we don't, you know, we use
Speaker 2: THEE and thou instead of you because if we use
Speaker 2: you to refer to a person, we're referring to them
Speaker 2: as you know, multitude of people or whatever. And you know,
Speaker 2: it's kind of like the royal we that the the
Speaker 2: you know they used in the UK, the Queen and
Speaker 2: all of them, you know, we all and all them used. Well,
Speaker 2: you're kind of you're making yourself a lot bigger, right,
Speaker 2: you know, I represent a whole bunch of stuff, and
Speaker 2: that is not the case with this. You know, God
Speaker 2: was very specific in terms of the you. I got
Speaker 2: to get your pronouns right, and so he's very specific
Speaker 2: about that. But later on, when you have Moses talking
Speaker 2: about the nation state of Israel, he's talking about how
Speaker 2: God is going to bless them. You know, they're there
Speaker 2: at Mount Sinai, and he's got Israel divided into two
Speaker 2: different groups. One of them is on one mountain, another
Speaker 2: one is on signing. He's given them the law and
Speaker 2: he says, you obey the law, God will bless you.
Speaker 2: If you disobey the law, God will curse you. God
Speaker 2: promised them the land, but he also promised to remove
Speaker 2: them from the land if they did not follow him.
Speaker 2: And that's why we see the commentary in the New
Speaker 2: Testament that those that not all of Israel was Israel.
Speaker 2: Israel was the covenant people, the people who followed God,
Speaker 2: the people who trusted God. Wasn't based on ethnicity. And
Speaker 2: that is the most Unchristian understanding of the Bible to
Speaker 2: say that ethnic identity is a determining factor with God.
Speaker 2: It is not.
Speaker 5: I know, I bring this up every time. But for
Speaker 5: people that truly believe that if you bless Israel, all
Speaker 5: bless you. You point to the blessings.
Speaker 2: Point to me.
Speaker 5: How America is being blessed right now? Is it the
Speaker 5: millions of babies dead from abortion? Is it the rampant homosexuality?
Speaker 5: Is it the transgenderism for children. Is it the pornography?
Speaker 5: Can you show me exactly? Is it the Sacklers scurrying
Speaker 5: back off to Israel after causing an opioid epidemic? Is
Speaker 5: that the blessing?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 5: Can you show it to me?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Well, and of course the central issue of that,
Speaker 2: it's more than just a pronoun of you and the
Speaker 2: and things like that. What they have done. What God
Speaker 2: was saying is to Abraham, is going to bless the
Speaker 2: world through Abraham, because that was where the Messiah, the
Speaker 2: Lord Jesus Christ, was going to come. And when you
Speaker 2: say that it's about Israel, what you have done is
Speaker 2: you replaced Christ with a political nation of Israel. That's
Speaker 2: your replacement theology. Folks that they say, well, you want
Speaker 2: to talk about God's chosen people being those who trust
Speaker 2: in Christ, those who trust in God in the Old Testament,
Speaker 2: those who trust in Christ later on, Yes, that is right.
Speaker 2: And they say, well, that's racist, that's anti Semitic, that's
Speaker 2: replacement theology. Well, what they're doing is they're replacing the
Speaker 2: Lord Jesus Christ with a political state, and that really
Speaker 2: is reprehensible. So Carlson said that according to the Old
Speaker 2: testament the boundaries would be basically the entire Middle East,
Speaker 2: and continues says Israel have the right to that land.
Speaker 2: Huckaby said in reply, not sure we'd go that far.
Speaker 2: It'd be a big piece of land. Carlson then pressed him, yeah,
Speaker 2: but does Israel have a right to that land. We'll
Speaker 2: be fine if they took it all, said Huckaby. I
Speaker 2: don't think that's what we're talking about here today. Carlson said,
Speaker 2: do you think you'd be fine if the State of
Speaker 2: Israel took over all of Jordan? It'd be fine if
Speaker 2: they took it all. He said. That's when Huckaby must
Speaker 2: have realized he was stepping in it. This is when
Speaker 2: I say that the people and the Trump administration just
Speaker 2: aren't ready for prime time, even with their own agenda.
Speaker 2: It's kind of like when the Trump administration was, you know,
Speaker 2: the Democrats put together Mark Kelly and the CIA senator.
Speaker 2: They put together a video saying that you must not
Speaker 2: obey illegal orders. The easiest thing in the world for
Speaker 2: the Trump administration would be to say, well, we haven't
Speaker 2: given any illegal orders. Name them. You know, because when
Speaker 2: Kelly and the other co producer of that video was
Speaker 2: asked that question on news programs, they said, Oh, we
Speaker 2: can't think of anything they did illegal. How pathetic. I
Speaker 2: can think. I kind a list of things that Trump
Speaker 2: administration did, just as the military that is longer than
Speaker 2: my arm. So that shouldn't be a problem at all
Speaker 2: to come up with something they did that was illegal.
Speaker 2: But you could have called their bluff. They could have
Speaker 2: said the same thing to them. They could say, well,
Speaker 2: name what we did that was illegal, or they could
Speaker 2: have just said we didn't do any issue any illegal orders.
Speaker 2: But they don't do that. And so here's how it
Speaker 2: could be basically saying, yeah, we want Israel to take
Speaker 2: over the entire Middle East, and he stepped in it
Speaker 2: and jumped up and down a couple of times. I
Speaker 2: guess condemnation from Middle East leaders has been swift and
Speaker 2: it'll probably just stop there, although some could pull their
Speaker 2: support for any anti Iran operations. So again, you got
Speaker 2: some countries that you know, the Arab and Muslim world
Speaker 2: is not monolithic. They've got their own rivalries, they've got
Speaker 2: their own competing governments and competing versions of Islam, and
Speaker 2: it would be possible to get some of them because
Speaker 2: some of them have been friendly to the US, you know,
Speaker 2: Jordan and Saudi Arabia, I guess to some extent, But
Speaker 2: you start doing this kind of stuff and they pull back,
Speaker 2: basically burning your bridges and your allies at the same time.
Speaker 2: So it's always a Trump regime and competence striking again,
Speaker 2: regardless of the right or wrong, they just can't seem
Speaker 2: to execute their own agenda, you know, from the Trump
Speaker 2: always changes orders, tariffs to the ice capades that they're doing.
Speaker 2: They're always shooting themselves in the foot, which is actually
Speaker 2: good for us. You know, we're glad to see what
Speaker 2: that they are shooting themselves in the foot because there
Speaker 2: their policies are absolutely awful. Well, Israel has said that
Speaker 2: there are planning unprecedented strikes and Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq as
Speaker 2: part of the US Iran war. So it's not just
Speaker 2: Takabi saying this. They're talking about a very broad war
Speaker 2: in the Middle East. The Israeli armies preparing to carry
Speaker 2: out massive unprecedented strikes against Iran bank resistance movements in
Speaker 2: the regions should they support Islamic Republican any way against Israel.
Speaker 2: This is reported by the This is Al shark Ol Offsalt,
Speaker 2: which is a Saudi owned paper. That's the irrelevant, not
Speaker 2: the pronunciation of the name, but military sources in Israel.
Speaker 2: They said Israel was preparing for possible strikes against Hesbelah
Speaker 2: in Lebanon, and in Yemen, and in Iraq and beyond. Right,
Speaker 2: Israel is currently pressuring Trump to initiate a new war
Speaker 2: against Iran. In January, Trump ordered an armada of US
Speaker 2: naval forces to West Asia preparation for a possible attack. Netanya,
Speaker 2: Who's set on Thursday, his military is making its own
Speaker 2: preparations for possible mission strikes in Iran alongside any US action.
Speaker 2: We are prepared for any scenario, he said, adding that
Speaker 2: if Iran attacks Israel, they will experience a response that
Speaker 2: they cannot even imagine. But I guess the US and
Speaker 2: Israel are free to attack Iran, right, that's not a problem.
Speaker 2: And if the if Israel's got nuclear weapons, that's not
Speaker 2: a problem. Iran can't have them, and Iran can't defend
Speaker 2: itself from an attack, preemptive attack by Israel or by
Speaker 2: the US. We keep attacking them, and you know, I
Speaker 2: keep thinking back to the takeover the US embascy in
Speaker 2: Iran and how Americans just had no context for what
Speaker 2: the US government, specifically the CIA, had been doing in
Speaker 2: Iran for decades and training their secret police is horrific
Speaker 2: secret police that will go around and arrest people and
Speaker 2: torture them the Savak. They had no understanding or appreciation
Speaker 2: of that at all. Instead, what we had we had
Speaker 2: Nightline every night, you had Ted Kopple coming on a
Speaker 2: day fifty two of America held hostage. You know, that
Speaker 2: was you know, it was fifty two years ago that
Speaker 2: History in Iran started for the American public, and that
Speaker 2: program was so popular that it continued. After all the
Speaker 2: Iran hostage issue was resolved, they started a nightly news
Speaker 2: program and went for many years after that. But that
Speaker 2: was the point of the American consciousness when it all began.
Speaker 2: We weren't doing anything to Iran, right and all of
Speaker 2: a sudden, just out of the clear blue sky, they
Speaker 2: attack our embassy and keep these people hostage. By the way,
Speaker 2: then we later learned that it was Bill Casey. While
Speaker 2: Bill Casey, who was one of the key people in
Speaker 2: the OSS and one of the founders of the CIA,
Speaker 2: and he was Ronald Reagan's campaign manager, and that he
Speaker 2: went to Iran as part of the Iran Contra scam
Speaker 2: and told them, we will give you all the parts
Speaker 2: that you want for your fighter jets. You just don't
Speaker 2: release those hostages, and don't even release them after we
Speaker 2: win the election, wait until Ronald Reagan is sworn in,
Speaker 2: because we want the credit for them to be released.
Speaker 2: That is what the American people didn't see. And even
Speaker 2: with all the Iran Contra stuff, they still did it.
Speaker 2: Most of them have an awareness of that. So, according
Speaker 2: to Israeli media, Tel Aviv has delivered very clear warnings
Speaker 2: to the Lebanese resistance movement in Hesbelah. If it chooses
Speaker 2: to intervene in the war between Iran and Israel, the
Speaker 2: blow will be extremely painful. Hesbelah chief said that Hesbela
Speaker 2: and Iran, we're facing an aggression that does not distinguish
Speaker 2: between us. A war on Iran this time will ignite
Speaker 2: the region. We will choose at that time how to act,
Speaker 2: but we are not neutral in this, he said, And
Speaker 2: so again a Hesbelah organization in Iraq is also a
Speaker 2: warning of total war. Said that the quote forces of
Speaker 2: darkness are gathering to subjugate and destroy Iran, describing the
Speaker 2: country as the Fortress and Pride of Muslims. Well, the
Speaker 2: State Department is ordering the evacuation of non emergency US
Speaker 2: personnel from their embassy in Beirut. It looks like this
Speaker 2: is going to be imminent. The Department did not offer
Speaker 2: any details or reasons behind the evacua equation. Says Fox News,
Speaker 2: you want to take a guess as to what's going
Speaker 2: on with it. Meanwhile, we have Steve Whitcoff going on
Speaker 2: Fox News and being interviewed by the daughter in law
Speaker 2: of Trump, Laura Trump, and Witkoff says, wait for it,
Speaker 2: that Trump is curious why Iran has not capitulated, and
Speaker 2: he also repeats the usual lie that we've heard so
Speaker 2: many times from Benjamin net Yahoo that there is going
Speaker 2: to be a bomb and no time at all. Remember
Speaker 2: how many times we've heard that. Now, Witcoff says, it's
Speaker 2: about a week. We've been hearing this kind of stuff
Speaker 2: from Netanyaho for decades.
Speaker 1: Stopped. Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very
Speaker 1: short time. It could be a year, it could be
Speaker 1: within a few months.
Speaker 4: They have the wherewithal, the stored up preserved knowledge to
Speaker 4: make a bomb very quickly.
Speaker 2: If they wanted to do it. The Ran is so dangerous.
Speaker 1: Weeks away from having the fiscile material for an entire
Speaker 1: arsenal of nuclear bombs. They're very close.
Speaker 2: They're six months away from being about ninety percent of
Speaker 2: having the rich uranium for an Adam bomb. Iran is
Speaker 2: gearing up to have to produce twenty five bombs atomic bombs.
Speaker 2: That's two thousand and six. I should be reading these days,
Speaker 2: ladies and gentlemen, nineteen ninety running out. Iran will be
Speaker 2: kicking nineteen ninety five, albe without importing anything nuclear bombs
Speaker 2: within three to five years. He said that in nineteen
Speaker 2: ninety five. Well now Steve Woodcoff says it's a week now,
Speaker 2: pretty cent, there'll be minutes before we do this. Why
Speaker 2: under this sort of pressure, says Steve Woodcoff, with the
Speaker 2: amount of seapower, naval power that we have over there,
Speaker 2: why haven't they come to us and said, we profess
Speaker 2: that we don't want a nuclear weapon, so here's what
Speaker 2: we're prepared to do. Yet it's hard to get them
Speaker 2: to that point, is it. According to media reports, Iran
Speaker 2: has offered a deal, but would involve it suspending its
Speaker 2: uranium enrichment program for three to five years, and later
Speaker 2: restarting it as a civilian grade level far below the
Speaker 2: ninety percent needed for weapons grade. As part of a
Speaker 2: joint nuclear program with regional countries. Iran has also publicly
Speaker 2: offered to dilute its stockpile of uranium enriched at sixty percent,
Speaker 2: though it's likely buried underground following US air strikes. And
Speaker 2: so this is the other issue. I think witcough is
Speaker 2: telling everybody that you know, they're just a week away
Speaker 2: from it. So were these strikes that were done by
Speaker 2: Trump against their nuclear development sites that he said totally
Speaker 2: destroyed the nuclear program? Was that a lie? Or is
Speaker 2: this a lie? Or are they both lying both times?
Speaker 2: And is not nowho lying as well? Despite the US
Speaker 2: bombing those facilities, which coursibly suspended Iran's nuclear richment, Trump's
Speaker 2: insistence that the US obliterated Iran's nuclear program, whitcof made
Speaker 2: the fall claim that Iran could have uranium to make
Speaker 2: a bomb within one week. They're probably a week away
Speaker 2: from having an industrial bomb making material, he claimed, facing
Speaker 2: absolutely no pushback, of course, from Laura Trump. The bottom
Speaker 2: line is that the US and Israel are going to
Speaker 2: start this war, so there's anything that Iran can do
Speaker 2: to placate them. And they won a war, and they're
Speaker 2: going to get.
Speaker 5: A war than Iran. A geographical oddity two weeks from
Speaker 5: a nuclear bomb at all times.
Speaker 2: That's right, My brother were art all, Yeah, at this
Speaker 2: place is geographical lot thirty minutes from everywhere, and they're
Speaker 2: just a few days from a nuclear bomb all the time.
Speaker 2: And just Kee's going, it's I hate to see our
Speaker 2: country become so unjust that we are the ones who
Speaker 2: are constantly attacking people, constantly violating the constitution, our own laws,
Speaker 2: international way law, in God's moral law. That's the United
Speaker 2: States government. And if you look at what we've been
Speaker 2: doing with all the rest of the stuff, I guess
Speaker 2: the Epstein stuff is really not much of a surprise,
Speaker 2: is it. I guess we are the big Satan. Maybe
Speaker 2: Iran got that right. We're the big Satan and Israel
Speaker 2: is the little Satan. I think that is really what
Speaker 2: is going on here. Well, we're going to take a
Speaker 2: quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
Speaker 1: Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back from Blockchain to ball in chain. I've thought
Speaker 2: of the blockchain many times as being an instrument of control,
Speaker 2: and that is how they seek to use it with tokenization,
Speaker 2: and understand that tokenization is high on the list for
Speaker 2: people like Larry Fink of Black Rock, who's now the
Speaker 2: co chair interim co chair of their World Economic Forum
Speaker 2: now that her Klaus has kind of retired from that,
Speaker 2: and so they're trying to digitize the world and this
Speaker 2: is something that is happening at every level. They have
Speaker 2: also laid the foundation. Remember Senator Sena Frank nicely was
Speaker 2: talking about out how it's something of a trap that
Speaker 2: they're laying for people in terms of property values for
Speaker 2: farms here in Tennessee. You sign on to this program
Speaker 2: and it gets you into a situation where they can
Speaker 2: start to put you in one of these natural resource
Speaker 2: companies that are trading on the New York Stock Exchange.
Speaker 2: That's what these people have set up. They want to
Speaker 2: have representative securitization, same kind of stuff that they did
Speaker 2: with the real estate stuff. You know, just think about it.
Speaker 2: If they can do that with homes with real estate,
Speaker 2: if they can come up with schemes to manipulate it,
Speaker 2: and that's what these people are. We talked about that
Speaker 2: just the other day with maybe it is yesterday about
Speaker 2: Lucky Lutnick, and now he'd set up this scheme to
Speaker 2: sell hedge bets on whether or not companies would whether
Speaker 2: or not the tariffs would be overturned by the Supreme Court,
Speaker 2: where or not they get their money back. It's like,
Speaker 2: tell you what I'll give you. You paid X amount in
Speaker 2: terms of tariffs. I'll give you twenty to third percent
Speaker 2: of that in cash right now, and then if the
Speaker 2: tariffs are overturned, I get to cash them out and
Speaker 2: I keep the entire value of it. But you get
Speaker 2: twenty to thirty percent right now because you know this
Speaker 2: thing may not go through. They're always betting, and they're
Speaker 2: always coming up with some kind of a derivative scheme.
Speaker 2: When you look at it, and this is one of
Speaker 2: the biggest ones. Tokenization of nature and even of humanity
Speaker 2: represents a deliberate strategy by the world's most powerful financial institutions.
Speaker 2: Figures like Black Rocks CEO Larry Fink openly championed turning
Speaker 2: the planet's resources and increasingly aspects of human experience and
Speaker 2: to fractionalized tradable digital assets on blockchain based ledgers. This
Speaker 2: creates new avenues for elite profit and unprecedented control and surveillance.
Speaker 2: And this is the key thing, and this is why
Speaker 2: I lean so much to gold and silver. And again
Speaker 2: Tonya set up David KNIGHTO Gold to take you to
Speaker 2: wise Wolf Gold. Start accumulating that. We need to get
Speaker 2: into the physical world and understand that this virtualization, this tokenization,
Speaker 2: this move to try to isolate and surveil and control
Speaker 2: us as a trap. It's a huge trap, and we
Speaker 2: need to do everything we can to try to get
Speaker 2: out of that. Develop skills to be able to do
Speaker 2: things in the real world, to be able to develop
Speaker 2: skills to have physical possession of gold and silver. And
Speaker 2: again Tony can help you to do that on a
Speaker 2: regular basis, just accumulating a little bit at a time,
Speaker 2: dollar cost averaging if you do it that way, getting
Speaker 2: it set up on a monthly basis, to start a
Speaker 2: savings program. He can help you with your IRA as
Speaker 2: well to move that in. But it is a revolution,
Speaker 2: and we should have a revelation about this stuff. And
Speaker 2: look at the way that they have set up traps
Speaker 2: throughout various things. Look at the very underhanded secretive way
Speaker 2: that they've gone in and changed the UCC code to
Speaker 2: change the way that stocks and securities and even deeds
Speaker 2: are held, and putting themselves as brokers as the real owners,
Speaker 2: and just putting you in as somebody who is entitled
Speaker 2: to it, which is the same strategy that they did
Speaker 2: with gold and silver, paper gold and silver. They set
Speaker 2: these things up as ETFs. And if you buy paper
Speaker 2: gold and paper silver and stock exchanges gold or SLV.
Speaker 2: If you do that, what you're doing is you're buying
Speaker 2: a share of that organization, but you're not actually going
Speaker 2: to be buying a share of gold or silver. And
Speaker 2: so what happens to that organization if they go bankrupt, Well,
Speaker 2: you're low down on the list of creditors to get money.
Speaker 2: And that's the way it is with stocks and all
Speaker 2: the rest of stuff. Everything works just fine unless there's
Speaker 2: some kind of a global financial crisis, which is what
Speaker 2: is coming. If there is something like that in its
Speaker 2: liquidity crack for everybody, guess what, they start to go
Speaker 2: bankrupt and there is a priority of people who get
Speaker 2: paid off and you are at the absolute bottom. That's
Speaker 2: what the great taking is all about. And so they
Speaker 2: do these types of things with the UCC code. They
Speaker 2: tried doing that with CBDC, try to change it so
Speaker 2: that central bank digital currencies were going to be recognized
Speaker 2: by the UCC code as something that can be used
Speaker 2: in commercial transactions. People caught wind of it, and I
Speaker 2: started pushing back against it. So now they've got their
Speaker 2: own response to this. So you've got Lutnick as the
Speaker 2: Commerce Secretary. He's got his own stable coin, and then
Speaker 2: the Trump family's got their own stable coin. So the
Speaker 2: Lutnick family and the Trump family, this doesn't anything to
Speaker 2: do with the president of the Commerce Secretary. We don't
Speaker 2: know anything about it, right, isn't it amazing how Lutnik
Speaker 2: he denied doing the hedge derivatives for the tariffs. I
Speaker 2: don't anything about it. That besides, it was my family
Speaker 2: that did it, and we weren't actually doing that. But
Speaker 2: if we were doing it, it was my family, which
Speaker 2: is the same approach they took with the Epstein Island thing.
Speaker 2: I wasn't doing that. I didn't have any contact with
Speaker 2: this guy. And then when the emails showed that he
Speaker 2: actually was, Oh, it was my family with my kids
Speaker 2: and my nanny and everything. Well, same thing with this, right,
Speaker 2: he says, oh, we didn't do that, it's by the rumors,
Speaker 2: and they produced the emails and the letters and showed
Speaker 2: that yes, he really was, this company really was doing that.
Speaker 2: And then it's oh, it's not me, it's my family
Speaker 2: that's doing this, and Trump is saying, yes, not me,
Speaker 2: that it's trying to replace the US dollar. It's my sons,
Speaker 2: Don Junior and Eric and their World Liberty Financial, which
Speaker 2: is more accurately World Enslavement Financial. That's what it's really
Speaker 2: set up to be. And massive corruption right out in
Speaker 2: the open. That is the hallmark of the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: So nature is on the chopping block from forrests to
Speaker 2: fractional shares. And this is something people have been talking
Speaker 2: about for quite some time in terms of national parks
Speaker 2: and other assets like this. Going down into the Amazon
Speaker 2: companies like one, Amazon, which is tied to US intelligence
Speaker 2: and to crypto investors, plans to issue tokens backed by
Speaker 2: preservation deals and they cap the supply to make them scarce,
Speaker 2: like digital gold or something. Right, This is all a mguffin.
Speaker 2: This is about tokenizing everything, and this is the way
Speaker 2: that they combine all of these different streams together. This
Speaker 2: is justification for this stuff. Of course, they've been laying
Speaker 2: the foundation for the climate mcguffin. And we've got to
Speaker 2: watch and control the resources that everybody uses. You know,
Speaker 2: how much energy you do you use, how much food
Speaker 2: do you eat? What kind of food do you eat?
Speaker 2: You know, it's going to get to the point of
Speaker 2: Hitchhiker's Guy the galaxy, where they weigh you before and
Speaker 2: after you go to a particular or place and you better
Speaker 2: not be carrying out anymore than you took in. But
Speaker 2: this is the kind of real estate securitization and tragic
Speaker 2: consequences that we saw around two thousand and eight. This
Speaker 2: is for everything. You know, it worked so well, they
Speaker 2: want to do it with everything. So Tokenized nature initiatives
Speaker 2: like the Natural Asset Companies back by Intrinsic Exchange Group
Speaker 2: and the Rockefeller Foundation aim to list ecosystems on stock
Speaker 2: exchanges as new asset classes. And again this is the
Speaker 2: mindset of people like Lutnick and Epstein. Everything. It's all about,
Speaker 2: how can we pull this thing together and turn it
Speaker 2: into a casino where we can trade it and we
Speaker 2: can fool people about what is there? I mean, scheming
Speaker 2: and the conniving that goes on. It's just unbelievable. The
Speaker 2: world economic form is involved in turning nature into a
Speaker 2: commodity so that investors can use it to profit from
Speaker 2: and again always with you know, let's get derivatives here
Speaker 2: so we can hide what's really going on. Another example
Speaker 2: is Estonia's Single Earth, which tokenizes forests, swamps, and biodiversity
Speaker 2: to Backet's token that they call merit. There's probably merit lists.
Speaker 2: It allows companies to buy fractional ownership for carbon offsets
Speaker 2: while claiming to make nature the new gold. What they're
Speaker 2: doing is they're making it the new paper gold. Right.
Speaker 2: It's the same scam that is. There's one of the
Speaker 2: reasons why when I didn't realize that about paper gold
Speaker 2: and silver until gold started moving about ten years ago,
Speaker 2: and that's about the time I met Tony and I
Speaker 2: realized that this is a scam. You know, it really is.
Speaker 2: Now they want to do it to everything. They got
Speaker 2: one in Central Africa they call it the Sango Project,
Speaker 2: tokenizing land, timber, and diamond reserves there. And then they
Speaker 2: have traditional commodities that also being tokenized, things like oil
Speaker 2: and gas reserves or renewable energy sources. So again it's
Speaker 2: gone into Australia's National Bank has issued a green stable coin,
Speaker 2: so you know, you can set up a stable coin
Speaker 2: and you can back it with US treasuries, or you
Speaker 2: can back it with gold, or you can back it
Speaker 2: with some natural assets or something phony like carbon credits.
Speaker 2: That's what they're doing in Australia. And then you can
Speaker 2: take it to the ludicrous extreme and you can use
Speaker 2: human bodies and set them up as tracking because you know,
Speaker 2: they've talked about the Internet of Things, they've also talked
Speaker 2: about the Internet of Bodies IOB and now the financial
Speaker 2: scammers get involved in this. Personal information health records DNA,
Speaker 2: even daily actions get digitized, fractionalized and linked to digital
Speaker 2: IDs and programmable currencies that track and control spending. This
Speaker 2: is the constant thing that we see everywhere, even to
Speaker 2: the extent that we look at everything that course World
Speaker 2: Economic Form has done. But the US government, working with
Speaker 2: NATO and with Ukraine. I've played this video before Ukraine
Speaker 2: twenty thirty. This is their vision of how society should work,
Speaker 2: except it's not there. Okay, okay, well take my word
Speaker 2: for it. I've played that video before. They're talking about
Speaker 2: how you can do everything that you want, and it
Speaker 2: makes it so easy because all these government interactions to
Speaker 2: do things like get your driver's license, register your car,
Speaker 2: all the things that you didn't really want to do anyway.
Speaker 2: Now you can get this all streamlined. On this We've
Speaker 2: got an app for that. All the things that where
Speaker 2: the government intervenes and interjects it into unwonted ways into
Speaker 2: your life, now we can make it easy. It's all
Speaker 2: on a single app that is there. The blockchain is
Speaker 2: exactly what is needed to make the tokenization of human
Speaker 2: resources possible on a massive scale. Can slice up and
Speaker 2: trade fractions of somebody's skills, behaviors, or their biometric data,
Speaker 2: your work output, your health metrics, your social compliance all
Speaker 2: linked to your digital ID, and the elites can monitor
Speaker 2: value and manipulate them in real time. If we understand
Speaker 2: where this stuff is going, then we are sensitive to
Speaker 2: when we can discern what is happening when they start
Speaker 2: doing this nonsense like they're doing in Colorado, which is
Speaker 2: where I started the show, where they say that we've
Speaker 2: got to get an ID from you in order to
Speaker 2: use the Internet because we've got to protect the kids
Speaker 2: from pornography and their parents won't do it that type
Speaker 2: of thing. So if you know where this is going,
Speaker 2: if you know that everything they do is a bet,
Speaker 2: everything to do as a gamble, and everything they want
Speaker 2: to do to us in the future is basically permission
Speaker 2: society tracking and controlling everything that we do. Society looks
Speaker 2: like a giant database to them, where people own nothing tangible,
Speaker 2: just like the World Economic slogan suggests, it's all enforced
Speaker 2: through surveillance. Everyone has a digital ID, and you can't
Speaker 2: have access to a job, services, or even basic rights.
Speaker 2: Tokens represent shares in human capital markets that reward all
Speaker 2: this stuff, and again they're rapidly moving towards this. We
Speaker 2: look at the advances and robots and I think certainly
Speaker 2: the Boston Dynamics is not you know, their robots are
Speaker 2: very expensive, but they seem to be the true innovators
Speaker 2: and all this. Take a look at this dancing robot
Speaker 2: that they have for Boston Dynamics is very very fluid. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's right. And you got another one that came out
Speaker 2: last week. I didn't play the video of it was
Speaker 2: a robot. They're setting this up to be as human
Speaker 2: as they can. Soft skin tissue, even warm skin, tissue,
Speaker 2: ask yourself what that's there for, and setting it up
Speaker 2: with a skeleton that's very much human and a little
Speaker 2: bit smaller, but also setting up as a female as
Speaker 2: a companion for people. This is where these people are going.
Speaker 2: They want to replace us. They see us as their slaves,
Speaker 2: and of course the robots are just mechanical slaves. The
Speaker 2: world's billionaire elite already far beyond any need for more wealth,
Speaker 2: now crave absolute power and control because that's what it
Speaker 2: always is really about. Right, Like I said yesterday, They've
Speaker 2: got more money they could spend in a dozen lifetimes.
Speaker 2: And so what is you know, how much is enough?
Speaker 2: Is it just a little bit more? No, what they're
Speaker 2: actually after at this point is they're actually after power
Speaker 2: and control over other people. That really is what motivates
Speaker 2: them and what they choose to do. We're going to
Speaker 2: take a quick break, folks, we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Liberty it's your move, and now the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: Welcome back. You know, we had a comment from a
Speaker 2: listener about this Defense Production Act compelling the production of
Speaker 2: GLEIF that was signed in by Donald Trump, and the
Speaker 2: course a component of that was even giving them liability
Speaker 2: protection it's interesting to see rf K Junior defending that,
Speaker 2: defending that, and what does this tell you about the
Speaker 2: whole Maha thing and the people that Trump has put in.
Speaker 2: I got to say, to their credit, Children's Health Defense,
Speaker 2: which is the organization that RFK Junior created, Children's Health
Speaker 2: Defense has been holding his feet to the fire. They
Speaker 2: have not restrained from criticizing him when he has betrayed
Speaker 2: what he set that organization up to do. And it's
Speaker 2: interesting you see this happening all the time. You see
Speaker 2: it happening with Alex Jones and Info Wars. Sets up
Speaker 2: an organization, tells people the truth about this stuff, then
Speaker 2: he sells out to the other side. That's what's happened
Speaker 2: to r F K Junior. Trump's executive order spurring themestic
Speaker 2: production of glifasi. The Maha movement is reeling from the
Speaker 2: President's embrace of the chemical that they despise. This is
Speaker 2: coming from CNBC. I said from the very beginning, I
Speaker 2: didn't believe this is that they were going to do
Speaker 2: any of this stuff. I said, this Maha stuff ought
Speaker 2: to be spelled haha because it's a joke, and it
Speaker 2: really is now at this point, Kennedy said, Trump's executive
Speaker 2: order puts America first where it matters the most, our
Speaker 2: defense readiness and our food supply. Are you kidding me
Speaker 2: how pathetic that is. We must safeguard America's national security first.
Speaker 2: Let them eat poison, right, We've got to have production.
Speaker 2: I got to have massive amounts of whatever it is
Speaker 2: that I'm growing, and I don't care if it's laced
Speaker 2: with a carcinogenic chemical causes people to get non Hodgkins lymphoma.
Speaker 2: By the way, you know, like I said earlier, you know,
Speaker 2: go to RNC store. These people are not going to relent.
Speaker 2: There is no cavalry coming to the rescue. The closest
Speaker 2: you're going to get to that is Paul Revere telling
Speaker 2: you about a world without cancer. Again, go to RNC
Speaker 2: store dot com find out about that, because these people
Speaker 2: are really serious and they're expanding this quite a bit. So.
Speaker 2: This article from CNBC says, but Kennedy's MAHA coalition has
Speaker 2: supported Trump in the twenty twenty four presidential campaign. They
Speaker 2: hate glyphist just like they hated the vaccine right. But
Speaker 2: they just can't see it. They say, Glyphist has This
Speaker 2: is CNBC talking has been alleged to cause cancer and
Speaker 2: myriad lawsuits. Well, it hasn't been alleged. They have paid
Speaker 2: out billions of dollars because it is credible. Juries have
Speaker 2: over and over again looked at the evidence and decided
Speaker 2: that it does cause non Hodgkins lymphoma. As a matter
Speaker 2: of fact, I've told the story our dog died from
Speaker 2: that right about at the same time we had a
Speaker 2: friend who got it. And again I believe both those
Speaker 2: cases were involved the chemical life roundup. So when you
Speaker 2: look at how many times have they been betrayed, they've
Speaker 2: been betrayed over the lockdowns of the pandemic, of the
Speaker 2: mRNA vaccine, over the over wars. He was going to
Speaker 2: have peace, but now he's bringing us more and more wars.
Speaker 2: How about the Epstein stuff, that was a betrayal. Right,
Speaker 2: when you go to crypto instead of CBDC, Now we've
Speaker 2: got the crony capitalist digital currency, the cc DC that's
Speaker 2: going to be run by the Trump family. Surveillance, the
Speaker 2: police state in terms of digital currency, in terms of
Speaker 2: the federalized masked police cameras everywhere, pallanteer everywhere. Look at taxes.
Speaker 2: He does this major tax increase and he thinks that's
Speaker 2: his economic gift to America is higher taxes. The guy
Speaker 2: is a Democrat from New York. He's no better than
Speaker 2: Bernie Sanders. He thinks of economics in the same way
Speaker 2: as Bernie Sanders. You know, he's angry at the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court because a looting the treasury, as a Bernie Sanders
Speaker 2: said about tax cuts. He hates guns. Second Amendment. He
Speaker 2: told his voters that he was going to stop funding
Speaker 2: Planned Parenthood, said he was pro life. And what they do.
Speaker 2: They made a big production about stopping funding the Planned
Speaker 2: Parenthood in March of last year. Then they restored it
Speaker 2: quietly in December. This is the way it goes with Trump.
Speaker 2: And then you have artificial intelligence. His very first day
Speaker 2: in office, he wants to put together a big deal
Speaker 2: with banks and billionaires called Stargate, and it's going to
Speaker 2: be a combination of artificial intelligence and mRNA. Trump really
Speaker 2: loves that mRNA stuff, and he loves artificial intelligence. They
Speaker 2: want to make sure that state and local governments can't
Speaker 2: do any to protect themselves against artificial intelligence. An issue
Speaker 2: after issue after issue, he has betrayed everything his base beliefs.
Speaker 2: But they won't criticize them. Why is it was because
Speaker 2: just like that article from Watson earlier, they will hail
Speaker 2: him as a hero, even as he is the enemy
Speaker 2: of free speech. They portray him as a savior. It's
Speaker 2: just outright lies and twisting of the truth is what
Speaker 2: we're seeing with that. Elevating Glyphasset to a national security
Speaker 2: priority is the exact opposite of what MAHA voters were promised,
Speaker 2: said King Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group. He said,
Speaker 2: if Secretary Kennedy remains at HHS after this, it will
Speaker 2: be impossible to argue that his pasted warnings about Glefhassett
Speaker 2: were anything more than campaign rhetoric designed to win trust
Speaker 2: and votes. And that's what I said, isn't it. Remember
Speaker 2: when they got in, I said, when you look at
Speaker 2: what you know Kennedy is saying, what Cash Betel is saying,
Speaker 2: is that we want you to trust government now, right.
Speaker 2: So that's why they put Trump in. That's why Trump
Speaker 2: puts in RFK Junior, people like Cash Betel and but
Speaker 2: Dan Bongino. Now you can trust government because now we've
Speaker 2: got Donald Trump, and he's got all these influencers in
Speaker 2: that are there, and you can trust them now. It's
Speaker 2: a trap. It's a trap. It's just like the the
Speaker 2: trust that just had a friends send me the article
Speaker 2: that I've talked about a lot of different times about
Speaker 2: the trust. The Stalin set up the trust and it
Speaker 2: was actually how they kept track of the how the
Speaker 2: Bolsheviks kept track of their enemies outside of Russia. They
Speaker 2: basically started an organization to oppose themselves and funded it,
Speaker 2: and then when people signed up and joined it, then
Speaker 2: they had all the information about him. It's kind of
Speaker 2: like probably what the State Department is doing with this
Speaker 2: VPN stuff. Trust you trust this come on and of
Speaker 2: course it's a true story and it's kind of interesting.
Speaker 2: They did a production of it. Sam Neil was the
Speaker 2: guy who played Sigmund Riley. It's called Riley Ace's Spies.
Speaker 2: Was based on historical book and the account of Lockhart,
Speaker 2: who was at the center of it. He was an
Speaker 2: ambassador for the US government and he was part of
Speaker 2: the movements trying to take out the Bolsheviks. Sigmund Riley
Speaker 2: was the ACE spy that Ian Fleming who worked with
Speaker 2: the intelligence agencies, and he wrote James Bond novels. Of course,
Speaker 2: he patterned James Bond off of Sigmund Riley. He was
Speaker 2: a master spy during World War One. He infiltrated the
Speaker 2: German high Command. He spoke all these different languages and everything.
Speaker 2: It was not anybody's fool but he got fooled by
Speaker 2: the Trust. They lured him into Russia and captured him
Speaker 2: and killed him, James Bond. That's how he ended in
Speaker 2: real life. The Trust, Trust, the Plan Felix Dzhinski, and
Speaker 2: the Cheka in the old Soviet Union under Stalin. The
Speaker 2: executive order came down one day after Bear imposed rather
Speaker 2: proposed paying seven billion dollars to settle a series of
Speaker 2: lawsuits claiming that roundup causes cancer and put in a
Speaker 2: settlement for future lawsuits. So regardless of having people get
Speaker 2: cancer moving on here, they are already set up and
Speaker 2: inoculated against that essentially. But Trump wants to give them
Speaker 2: full liability protection. So Marjorie Taylor Green knocked Trump for
Speaker 2: signing an executive order protecting cancer causing glycasset in our foods,
Speaker 2: she said, But the House Agriculture Committee Republicans said on
Speaker 2: Wednesday night, thank you, President Trump. This is a vital
Speaker 2: step forward and ensuring a domestic supply of this critical
Speaker 2: crop input. Again, Big ag is no different from big pharma.
Speaker 2: All they care about is the money they're going to
Speaker 2: make selling you stuff. They don't care if it is
Speaker 2: going to kill you or not. A House Agriculture Chair
Speaker 2: Republican Thompson out of Pennsylvania is trying to push a
Speaker 2: farm bill through Congress this year. He's also come under
Speaker 2: fire from MAHA recently for a provision and that bill
Speaker 2: that would block state and local pesticide regulations from differing
Speaker 2: from federal guidelines. And we've seen this over and over again,
Speaker 2: haven't we. And it's what they're trying to do with
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence. Look at if you look at I would
Speaker 2: say in general, almost everything that Trump does is an
Speaker 2: attack on the Tenth Amendment. He doesn't want any opposition
Speaker 2: from state and local, he doesn't want any opposition from Congress,
Speaker 2: of the courts. You know, he wants to be king
Speaker 2: and so he hates this division of power. He hates
Speaker 2: the separation of power, and everything he does is set
Speaker 2: up to destroy that. I think that he is the
Speaker 2: biggest anti Tenth Amendment guy that we have had. So
Speaker 2: again they've signaled liability protection for these pesticide makers. This
Speaker 2: is an article from Children's Health Defense, and they're not
Speaker 2: trying to please anybody. They're going to tell you the truth.
Speaker 2: And they've done this before. They've opposed RFK Junior in
Speaker 2: the past, so good for them. They said, Trump's order
Speaker 2: also grants legal immunity, and they laid out the case
Speaker 2: for it. They said, not only has Trump gone back
Speaker 2: on his word to go after pesticides, destroying the delicate
Speaker 2: trust that was built by the Maha movement, but he
Speaker 2: paved the path for Glefusset to continue destroying farmland, fertility,
Speaker 2: and our family's health for generations to come. And when
Speaker 2: they talk about destroying farmland, that's the key thing. You
Speaker 2: put this poison on your farmland. Now you can only
Speaker 2: grow the crops that are genetically modified by Monsanto, and
Speaker 2: they're going to charge you a lot as a hold
Speaker 2: a patent on those things. That's the whole point of it.
Speaker 2: They had Indian farmers who got caught in that trap.
Speaker 2: They couldn't grow anything else and they had to keep
Speaker 2: buying the seed from Monsanto, and it was expensive for them.
Speaker 2: They were going bankrupt. They lost everything. They even lost
Speaker 2: their land. They couldn't resell it. They are massive numbers
Speaker 2: of them committing suicide over that. In India, a toxicologist
Speaker 2: denounced the decision on x He said, the executive branch
Speaker 2: has just endorsed a carcinogen and enshrined it. It is
Speaker 2: outrageous and unacceptable. Glyfa Sate is a carcinogen, and the
Speaker 2: idea that promoting a carcinogen will make us stronger as
Speaker 2: a country is deeply misguided. Again, it's not really that
Speaker 2: much different than with the food and drugs, not that
Speaker 2: much different than what they did with the vaccines as well,
Speaker 2: inherently unsafe. So we've got to give them liability protection.
Speaker 2: So this is clearly designed to offer bammunity, says Children's
Speaker 2: Health Defense. The executive order states that it quote confers
Speaker 2: all immunity provided for in Section seven oh seven of
Speaker 2: the Act. The Act itself says, quote no person shall
Speaker 2: be held liable for any act resulting from compliance with
Speaker 2: an order issued under the law. So if you tell
Speaker 2: me I've got to create ventilators, or you tell me
Speaker 2: I've got to create gliphast, now nobody can do no
Speaker 2: matter what harm is done by that. I now have immunity.
Speaker 2: Is it interesting how they keep handing out immunity to
Speaker 2: their buddies. You know, they got absolute immunity for their
Speaker 2: ice thugs as well, Director of Governmental Affairs for the
Speaker 2: Center for Biological Diversity has filed multiple lawsuits challenging the
Speaker 2: EPA's approval of glyphast And of course I didn't mention before,
Speaker 2: but it's also fluoride. And it's also the Trump administration
Speaker 2: that is fighting the lawsuit those one against fluoride. So
Speaker 2: this guy said, I told The New York Times that
Speaker 2: Trump's order is quote alarming because it is clearly designed
Speaker 2: to offer a broad immunity. So from protecting pedophiles to
Speaker 2: protecting corporations that murder people for profit. That's really what's
Speaker 2: going on here, And we look at pharmaceutical companies, these
Speaker 2: chemical companies and then blocking it at the state level.
Speaker 2: Last week, Bear announced that Monsanto had reached a tentative
Speaker 2: agreement to settle tens of thousands of lawsuits for seven
Speaker 2: billion dollars. Again, since they have set a cap on
Speaker 2: the amount that the corporation will have to pay for
Speaker 2: damage in the future, that's one of the worst things
Speaker 2: about They're going to give a pittance if anything, to
Speaker 2: these people who are harmed by their product. Earlier this year,
Speaker 2: broad bipartisan coalition succeeded in eliminating a bear backed provision
Speaker 2: tucked into congressional appropriations bill that would have restricted the
Speaker 2: ability of people to sue the company for failing to
Speaker 2: warn of health risk. So they have tried not once,
Speaker 2: but twice in the last year to get Congress to
Speaker 2: enact this immunity. A bipartisan coalition has stopped this. So
Speaker 2: now what they do They go to Donald Trump and
Speaker 2: get him to issue an executive order saying that it
Speaker 2: is a defense issue and then giving him legal immunity.
Speaker 2: Through that they know where they can buy their crooks
Speaker 2: on sale. Yeah, when a product is dangerous and unsafe,
Speaker 2: like pharmaceuticals or chemicals, they go to the FEDS in
Speaker 2: order to protect them from state and local and then
Speaker 2: they go even further they get legal immunity like they
Speaker 2: did with the vaccine. And again there is no compensation
Speaker 2: for the victims, whether you're talking about big pharma, big chemicals,
Speaker 2: big pedo, right, no compensation, nothing, no consideration for the victims. There.
Speaker 2: You know, it's not just the Epstein situation where you
Speaker 2: got victims. It's people who are getting cancer from this stuff.
Speaker 2: They poison people with m RNA with fluoride, with life
Speaker 2: as it we're supposed to believe that RFK junior is
Speaker 2: there at HHS to make America healthy. Again, give me
Speaker 2: a break. It's really disgusting when you look at it,
Speaker 2: and when you look at the what is happening with
Speaker 2: the mRNA. It's actually even growing quite a bit. Doctor
Speaker 2: Sherry Tenpenny. It's been talking about a new RNA crop spray.
Speaker 2: That's a company called. This is up on technocracy dot
Speaker 2: news and Patrick Wood's comment was, this company called Taranta
Speaker 2: fuses nature's intelligence with machine intelligence to generatively design versatile
Speaker 2: RNA based solutions for every aspect of plant help from
Speaker 2: seed to stem. And think about this. I want to
Speaker 2: talk about nature's intelligence. You know, nature doesn't have any intelligence.
Speaker 2: God does. Intelligent design is one of the best arguments
Speaker 2: for God. And yet they continually go back and say, oh,
Speaker 2: we're designing this, We're working with our machine intelligence and
Speaker 2: with nature's intelligence. Nature doesn't have any intelligence. Again, in
Speaker 2: the beginning, there was information, there was logos, which is
Speaker 2: you know the word and also involves the larger concept
Speaker 2: of design which we can all see in nature. We
Speaker 2: can all see that nature has been designed and created.
Speaker 2: The more we learn in terms of science, the more
Speaker 2: obvious that truth becomes. It's like looking at a car
Speaker 2: and you don't say, wow, I wonder how that came
Speaker 2: together in the junkyard. No, you say who made this right?
Speaker 2: Good or bad? Who made that junk eeper? Who made
Speaker 2: this beautiful thing here? And so you know, you know
Speaker 2: that it's got a maker. And that's why it is
Speaker 2: foolish to say there is no God. But this is
Speaker 2: really a singularity of depopulation surveillance in the police state.
Speaker 2: In May twenty twenty three, doctor Tenpenny wrote an article
Speaker 2: what are they doing to Our Fruits and Veggies? Talking
Speaker 2: about what Bill Gates wanted to do with this coating
Speaker 2: that he called apel. Remember that going to preserve fresh
Speaker 2: fruit for a longer period of time. And you know
Speaker 2: that's our goal. We want to sell you this nice
Speaker 2: shiny red apple, you know, like snow whites. WI could
Speaker 2: step mother. That looks very appetizing. I just don't bite
Speaker 2: into it, you know. Company called Taranta Biosciences has now
Speaker 2: developed an RNA platform for agriculture. They say it fuses
Speaker 2: nature's intelligence with machine intelligence to design RNA based solutions
Speaker 2: for every aspect from plant health to seed to stem.
Speaker 2: As I said before, again, they know that there's intelligent
Speaker 2: design there. So there's some fundamental lies that center of
Speaker 2: this telling people don't worry, it's not it's only gonna
Speaker 2: it's going to be very precise, very surgical on how
Speaker 2: we do this. You know, we're smart, we know how
Speaker 2: to manipulate this, and we're going to manipulate the plants,
Speaker 2: genetically modify them, and we're also going to manipulate a
Speaker 2: spray that we put there and with RNA, and that's
Speaker 2: going to then change the DNA of the insects. But
Speaker 2: don't worry, it's not going to change your DNA or
Speaker 2: anything like that. That RNA doesn't change DNA, well, if
Speaker 2: it copies it. As I said from the very beginning,
Speaker 2: that's always been one of their lines. mRNA doesn't modify DNA,
Speaker 2: it just copies it. Think about that, right when you
Speaker 2: use a copy machine, if it doesn't do a good job,
Speaker 2: it's going to modify the DNA. But because it is copying,
Speaker 2: it has the potential to be designed. It can deliberately
Speaker 2: change the DNA as well. And in the summer of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, as all this stuff is going on, there
Speaker 2: was a research project that came out of Thomas Jefferson
Speaker 2: University that talked about that. They said, look, we've been
Speaker 2: able to modify DNA by using mRNA and I said, bingo,
Speaker 2: that's going to come about. That's why I call the
Speaker 2: trump shots GCI genetic code injection. Same thing here. While
Speaker 2: these people they talk out of both sides of their mounds.
Speaker 2: But you can understand if you look at what they're doing,
Speaker 2: you understand where they are headed. I know it's difficult
Speaker 2: for us to do something about it. The first thing
Speaker 2: you have to know is where they're headed. What is
Speaker 2: their plan, what is their design? How are they trying
Speaker 2: to pull all this stuff together? If you have an
Speaker 2: idea about that, that can give you a clue as
Speaker 2: to the dangerous things that they're trying to throw at
Speaker 2: us on the way. Have a good day. Thank you
Speaker 2: for joining us. The common math. They created common Core
Speaker 2: dumb down our children. They create a common past, track
Speaker 2: and control us. Their Commons project to make sure the
Speaker 2: commoners own nothing and the communist future they see the
Speaker 2: common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us
Speaker 2: has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
Speaker 2: That is what we have in common. That is what
Speaker 2: they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
Speaker 2: They desire to know everything about us, while they hide
Speaker 2: everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
Speaker 2: expose what they want to hide. Please share the information
Speaker 2: and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank
Speaker 2: you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't
Speaker 2: support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D
Speaker 2: Davidnightshow dot com