Speaker 1: This woman got a bunch of beer, but let go on,
Speaker 1: even though she's probably pregnant.
Speaker 2: It's the mother God is now. You don't pray to al.
Speaker 1: I'm going crazy. The final Document of Amazons sent On
Speaker 1: is out and holy crap, it's garbage. It's full of
Speaker 1: pantheism and pagan Mother Earth bs. It totally is globalist.
Speaker 1: It creates eco sins, It allows Mary priests and calls
Speaker 1: for the study of ordination of female deacons to come soon.
Speaker 1: It forces governments to segregate. This is a random dude,
Speaker 1: but it's indicative of attitudes out there. Yes, it's run
Speaker 1: by the NGOs. We already called that last week, two
Speaker 1: weeks ago. We've done streams on this already. Everything we've
Speaker 1: said is vindicated. What the heck went wrong? Well, I've
Speaker 1: been telling you what went wrong in Rome for many years,
Speaker 1: and it's because I put a large part of my
Speaker 1: life into this stuff. Was not worshiping Pata Mama enough. No,
Speaker 1: of course it's not. Because this is motivated by the
Speaker 1: spirit of Antichrist. That's why we title this stream that.
Speaker 1: Not trying to say that Francis is the final anti
Speaker 1: Christ revealed. That says Mike Oldamon final Antichrist revealed. By
Speaker 1: the way, he has a video. They have an old
Speaker 1: magazine and DVD where they said that John Paul the
Speaker 1: Second was that final anti Christ revealed, and they went
Speaker 1: after anybody who doubted that. Oh but wait, oh, but wait,
Speaker 1: we're now two anti popes passed, John Paul the Second.
Speaker 1: Oopsh oh oops, uh oh. The trag cults, trag cults
Speaker 1: on suicide Watch, trad cults on suicide Watch. And how
Speaker 1: does our bra on f this. I'm going Orthodox that
Speaker 1: don't bring idols in their churches. Uh ooh, let's do
Speaker 1: some of the greatest hits of the Vatican Vatican classics. Yeah,
Speaker 1: remember when tried Rat Singer when he went inside that
Speaker 1: what remember when Tad rat Singer he went inside that
Speaker 1: mosque and he prayed towards Micca. Yeah he's a mad
Speaker 1: dog Chad. Yeah, he's so tad. He prays with them
Speaker 1: mean moms. Yeah, mm hmmm mm hmmmmm. Yet and then
Speaker 1: when John Paul, who was also tadd, he don't kiss
Speaker 1: that Colerahan. It's oh so tad. There's old Tad. Now
Speaker 1: remember in the Middle Ages, Now things was a little
Speaker 1: bit different. We had a half crusades. But because doctrine involves,
Speaker 1: religion involves.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's like a tree growing into a giant apostate tree,
Speaker 3: like a seed, a little apostasy seed that grows into
Speaker 3: a giant apostate tree.
Speaker 1: But that's okay because it doesn't have to make sense.
Speaker 1: You can have a crusade in the Middle Ages. God
Speaker 1: wanted you to have a crusade, and now he wants
Speaker 1: you to go to that mosque. Even though we say
Speaker 1: Jay's a freemason and a c I, a KGV guy,
Speaker 1: the head of our church acts just like a freemason
Speaker 1: with all the religions as one of the poo poo poo. Now,
Speaker 1: in one sense again I've vindicated. In another sense, it
Speaker 1: is tragic we're gonna talk about all that. This is
Speaker 1: an appeal. This isn't appeal. It's okay to be wrong, guys.
Speaker 1: It's okay to be wrong. I've been wrong many times.
Speaker 1: It's okay to get things wrong. It's okay to have
Speaker 1: a change of view. Now, this one's a little bit funny. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't know what's happening now, but it's just real funny.
Speaker 4: Now, get a little line of coke over that.
Speaker 1: Shoe gonna help you get through the Chipotle son with
Speaker 1: Eric Ebarra, and then you can walk down from that
Speaker 1: buffet to the Amazon Center and you can grub on
Speaker 1: that little belly of Pacha Mama. We are gonna get
Speaker 1: the real documents. I'm just acting silly right now. We're
Speaker 1: just doing some meme review. We're gonna get to the
Speaker 1: Pacha Mama. That's a good meme meme squad. What's up?
Speaker 1: He's from working church, excuse him and falling away Michael vores. Oh,
Speaker 1: and then there's all the Roman top prelates and apostates
Speaker 1: praying to Pacha Mama. Yeah, we're gonna float down the
Speaker 1: tib and now with our little bitty idols, outright total
Speaker 1: idol worship. But that's But don't worry, because there's a
Speaker 1: bunch of formalisms and legalisms that still make the apostate
Speaker 1: valid papal authority. You still have to follow him. We'll
Speaker 1: figure it out, bro, just trust us. So what have
Speaker 1: we been vindicated in in the last four months? The
Speaker 1: Vatican stuff. By the way, they are these eighteen, nineteen
Speaker 1: twenty one year old trads. They don't know anything about geopolitics.
Speaker 1: They don't know how the world works. They don't know that.
Speaker 1: We've been here talking for years about the trafficking, the Satanism,
Speaker 1: and the Vatican. Stuff that has been known for decades.
Speaker 1: The trads have written books about for decades. Lucifer's Lodge
Speaker 1: by William Henry Blood on the Altar by Craig Hein Bickner.
Speaker 1: I mean I read those books in two thousand and four.
Speaker 1: Nineteen year old trads twenty. They don't know anything, They
Speaker 1: don't know what they're talking about. This stuff has been
Speaker 1: going on for a long time. So we've been vindicated
Speaker 1: on the Vatican. We've been vindicated on Epstein Hollywood in
Speaker 1: the last few months. We've been vindicated on mk Ultra
Speaker 1: from NPR in the last few months. We've been medicated
Speaker 1: on the Finders two days ago. Dude, I've been talking
Speaker 1: about the Finders for years.
Speaker 2: People, So you're making up stuff. Who you're making it up?
Speaker 2: You don't conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Thus, Nope, just got vindicated two days ago. Almost every
Speaker 1: person that I've done a video critique on, I've been
Speaker 1: vindicated on fake news. Just had another fake news story
Speaker 1: this week or last week. The Kentucky Knob Creek gun
Speaker 1: Range fake news. We've been talking about fake news for
Speaker 1: the last five years straight. I don't know how many
Speaker 1: videos I made, how many videos, how many interviews with
Speaker 1: Patrick did I do? At twenty first, since your are
Speaker 1: I've lost count Everything that we said ten years ago
Speaker 1: about the fake Orthodox people, that's all come true. Let's
Speaker 1: let's talk a little bit about that. Let's see where
Speaker 1: it does. Put that meme at bopy doobie doop. It's
Speaker 1: been a tweet storm today. Where is my tweet? Doo
Speaker 1: do better turned that down for it? Give me a copyright,
Speaker 1: Be sure and smash like if you would. While I
Speaker 1: pull these up here it does so. Here is so
Speaker 1: I read this ten years ago, and it was when
Speaker 1: I was starting to have issues with Orthodox. This is
Speaker 1: from the Greek Orthodox Greek Orthodox Archidiocese Handbook, right, so
Speaker 1: these are the bfs with Francis here and this says
Speaker 1: this is page two thirty six. The experience of being
Speaker 1: subject to massive proselytizing efforts has caused the formulation of
Speaker 1: a multifaceted policy. First, it is meant that Orthodox has
Speaker 1: sought to influence other churches, primarily through ecumenical movement, to
Speaker 1: renounce systematic proselytizing programs. The opposition to such organized sheep
Speaker 1: stealing programs has been generally accepted by the ecumenical movement.
Speaker 1: There you go. So there's the Greek Orthodox argie. He's
Speaker 1: telling you to stop converting people. I'm sorry, you are
Speaker 1: not Orthodox if you don't believe in converting people. This
Speaker 1: is a travesty to Saint Mark of Emphasis and all
Speaker 1: the people that we hold to be saints, Saint Alexis Toth,
Speaker 1: who converted thousands and thousands of Uniates. This is nothing
Speaker 1: but a mockery of them. The Orthodox do not practice proselytism,
Speaker 1: Oh yes we do. All the church fathers practice proselytism.
Speaker 1: I practice proselytism. So that is a straight up lie,
Speaker 1: total lie, as if all of those councils weren't about
Speaker 1: bringing heretics back to the church. So there is the
Speaker 1: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese manual outright saying, don't convert anybody, don't
Speaker 1: proselytize anybody, leave them in their darkness and heresy, total nonsense.
Speaker 1: So don't give your money to the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese.
Speaker 1: Don't give your money to the Greek and Church because
Speaker 1: they're now siding with the schismatics. And I could have
Speaker 1: told you that they would do that ten years ago
Speaker 1: because I've followed their acumenist path for many, many years. Now.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean everybody in the Greek churches is bad, right.
Speaker 1: We don't have this black or white virus view of
Speaker 1: you're automatically damned if you're you know, all you have
Speaker 1: is a Greek church around you, you do, we are
Speaker 1: going to have to eventually, you know, there's going to
Speaker 1: need to be excommunications. There's going to need to be
Speaker 1: statements made that you can't like, we're not supposed to
Speaker 1: go to communion at those places, right, So if I
Speaker 1: visit Athos, I don't think I can take communion at Athos.
Speaker 1: I don't think now that the Greek Church has gone
Speaker 1: into excuse them. I think that's correct, although I'm not
Speaker 1: exactly sure if they fully have decided yet or they're
Speaker 1: just still debating it and talking about it. So, but
Speaker 1: that's part of the wait for the I didn't follow
Speaker 1: the Cumanist path. I just disagreed with ecumenism. What are
Speaker 1: you talking about? I mean, I've been writing articles against
Speaker 1: ecumenism for years. Look at my I wrote an article
Speaker 1: that got quite a few views several years ago. I'll
Speaker 1: pull it up for you, guys. I did multiple live
Speaker 1: streams on this topic of the CIA and ecumenism and
Speaker 1: Bartholomew calling out Bartholomew. I've been here doing it for
Speaker 1: years and when I actually I did it a long
Speaker 1: time ago. I did it ten years ago before I
Speaker 1: was And this is part of the reason it took
Speaker 1: me a long time become Orthodox. Was there in the
Speaker 1: Chat is my long my old essay on CIA, NATO Acumenism.
Speaker 1: I can't read the Chat. I have to make it bigger, right,
Speaker 1: So nobody's denying that the Orthodox Church has problems. But see,
Speaker 1: our whole church is not built on one dude, and
Speaker 1: the Roman Church is. And that's precisely why it's so
Speaker 1: easy to utilize these examples to refute the Roman system,
Speaker 1: because it's a man made religion. It's a mix of
Speaker 1: true and false. Right, So they have aspects of what's
Speaker 1: Orthodox because they do share part of the first millennium
Speaker 1: with us. And then they have all their innovations, which
Speaker 1: are easy to document. We've been documenting these innovations specifically
Speaker 1: in the last six months. Hardcore and even the Roman
Speaker 1: Catholics are noticing, you know, they're they're they're making cartoons
Speaker 1: of their own church. These are trad cartoons they're making
Speaker 1: about their church. Right, But the Roman Catholic Church is
Speaker 1: not the church. It's a man made institution. So we're
Speaker 1: gonna go through some of that today. We're going to
Speaker 1: talk about some of these documents and texts. And here's
Speaker 1: a sad one. Actually this is not sad. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is kind of what has to happen. This one
Speaker 1: here it reads, I met a priest on the Borgo
Speaker 1: po He said he had just been to look at
Speaker 1: the Tiber, and the pope obviously considered that for the
Speaker 1: forty years he wasted his life in obedience to the church,
Speaker 1: he considered jumping in pray for the despairing priests. Well,
Speaker 1: you don't have to despair, because the Church is not
Speaker 1: built on some Frankish Borgia mobster who claims to be
Speaker 1: God on earth. The Church is built on the faith
Speaker 1: of the apostles, the scriptures, and the succession of all
Speaker 1: the bishops, not just on Peter. And everything that was
Speaker 1: said to Peter in chapter eighteen is said to the
Speaker 1: College of the Apostles when Jesus breathed on the apostles.
Speaker 1: Did he breathe on Peter and say, go breathe on
Speaker 1: everybody else? Now, No, he breathed on all of them.
Speaker 1: When the Holy Spirit came at Pentecost, Did it come
Speaker 1: on Peter and then spill out to everyone else in
Speaker 1: tongues of fire? No, it came on all of them.
Speaker 1: It's a college of bishops, right. And the latest of
Speaker 1: the crazy trads is to say total sophistry is to
Speaker 1: say that when Paul rebuked Peter, it was a different Peter. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's the only response to that as it
Speaker 1: just laugh because the Roman Catholic apologists for millennia have
Speaker 1: not used this argument. They've been arguing forever that it
Speaker 1: was Peter. It's just a made up, nonsense, tried argument.
Speaker 1: And by the way, they relied for centuries and centuries
Speaker 1: on forgeries. So let's look at some of the news
Speaker 1: that's coming out about Oh by the way, So so
Speaker 1: if you want more on that, I'll go ahead and
Speaker 1: put that in here. Because every day people are asking
Speaker 1: about the issues in the Orthodox Church. We've covered it many,
Speaker 1: many times in old podcasts. So let me pull that
Speaker 1: up because people just lie and say, you know, talk
Speaker 1: about you'll talk bubs in your church. Yes, we do.
Speaker 1: This one has had eleven thousand views. It's a live
Speaker 1: stream I did a year ago. Here is a live
Speaker 1: stream I da a year ago with eleven thousand views
Speaker 1: on Bartholomew. I supposted my essay in the chat. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna go ahead and put this under here too, so
Speaker 1: that we understand that that all right, it's playing my
Speaker 1: old talk. So there's that one. There's another one that
Speaker 1: I did on the Ukraine, Ukraine situation, Masonry, ecumenism, a
Speaker 1: different one with another eleven ten eleven thousand views. You
Speaker 1: can you can watch this one.
Speaker 2: Why are you covering this? Why don't you talk about these?
Speaker 1: There you go, there's that one. I'm go ahead and
Speaker 1: put my essay here in the chat too, because they'll
Speaker 1: be like, you didn't really write essay, You didn't really
Speaker 1: do that.
Speaker 2: You didn't do that. It's just a CIA agent.
Speaker 1: By the way, If I'm a CIA agent, how a
Speaker 1: my KGB agent. They're gonna say CIA and KGB are
Speaker 1: the same, to which I'm gonna say, well, then your
Speaker 1: whole Roman Catholic Church is disproven because in the Cold War.
Speaker 1: You didn't say that the CIA and the KGB were
Speaker 1: the same, and you fought the KGB supposedly win the
Speaker 1: CIA allied with the Pope. So news coming out of
Speaker 1: the Amazon Synod. Uh, let's see here. There's old Frank
Speaker 1: up there with his ugly it's not straight Granny minister,
Speaker 1: Bishop Bishop Granny. I'm not joking. He's friends with Bishop Granny.
Speaker 1: News coming out of the Amazon Synod. Amazon sentifinal document
Speaker 1: calls for when his ministry mass. Well, of course it does.
Speaker 1: Why wouldn't it. And there's Francis meeting with Bishop Granny,
Speaker 1: who is definitely a humble grandmother of four, no doubt there.
Speaker 1: What else is coming out of Amazon syn let's we're
Speaker 1: going to go through the document here in a minute,
Speaker 1: but we wanted to highlight some of these issues that
Speaker 1: I shared on my feed today, climate change, Pacha Mama,
Speaker 1: AOC level stuff. This is what's coming out of it now.
Speaker 1: Why is this? Well? What have we been saying here
Speaker 1: at my site for a long time? The reason, By
Speaker 1: the way, did you know that Pacha Mama, as I
Speaker 1: pointed out last night, is the same idol from Indiana
Speaker 1: Jones that kind of blew me away. I was cracking
Speaker 1: up with that, not Molaram. Although why can't we have
Speaker 1: thuggy level acumenism with Molaram. I think that it's discriminatory,
Speaker 1: not to right. There's Indiana Jones with Pacha Mama. Remember
Speaker 1: when he puts the sand up there to get the
Speaker 1: Pacha Mama. That's I'm not joking, it's actually Pacha Mama
Speaker 1: in Raised of the Lost Art. And then there's Molarama.
Speaker 1: Went how soon? How long until we get Molaram acumenism.
Speaker 1: I'm ready. I want to I want to go to
Speaker 1: a damn thuggy service because it looks hella fun. That's
Speaker 1: a real liturgy right there. It's also very trad the
Speaker 1: thuggy liturgy. It's super tried, dude. They follow the rights
Speaker 1: to the tea as long as you follow the rights
Speaker 1: to the tea, right, and that's tried. Yeah, super trid,
Speaker 1: thuggy liturgy. Go watch Temple of Doom. Did you know
Speaker 1: we lived in Temple of Doom. That's the real world.
Speaker 1: It actually the real world is actually Temple of Doom.
Speaker 1: Christmas trees are not idols. Yeah, foreign agent, so that's
Speaker 1: all they have. I love this like none of them
Speaker 1: will debate anymore. We've basically crushed the entire Roman apologetic
Speaker 1: sphere right the normy apologists they want debate. Novasorto Watch
Speaker 1: has blocked us. Classical Theis has blocked us. Taylor Marshall
Speaker 1: has blocked us. They won't debate. They can't debate. The
Speaker 1: Sadas won't debate. They can't because this is over. And
Speaker 1: by the way we're about to, we're gonna crush seta
Speaker 1: here in a little bit too. When we look at
Speaker 1: the set of a Constants Delusion by our friend John C. Pontrello,
Speaker 1: great book, former set of a contest who became Orthodox,
Speaker 1: who we helped come into the Orthodoxy. He's got some
Speaker 1: great chapters on how these stay to arguments don't work.
Speaker 1: The idea of Rome defecting sorry, bro doesn't work. This
Speaker 1: is what leads, of course to the sophistry, all the
Speaker 1: specious sophistical arguments about well, we don't have to follow
Speaker 1: the pope when it's.
Speaker 2: X y Z.
Speaker 1: Essentially, what it boils down to is I'm gonna follow
Speaker 1: the pope when I think he's Orthodox, and I'm gonna
Speaker 1: reject the Pope when i think he's not, which defeats
Speaker 1: the whole purpose of the pope, and it's contrary to
Speaker 1: what Vatican One and calvin Moral theology says about the
Speaker 1: office of the Pope. But they don't care. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter because this is a weird cult. And I know
Speaker 1: because I was in this weird cult for I don't
Speaker 1: know ten years, and I know all of the sophistry,
Speaker 1: and what do they have left? All they have left is.
Speaker 2: You're a KGB, You're an agent, You're a Putin, you
Speaker 2: work for Putin.
Speaker 1: That's all they have because they've lost and now the
Speaker 1: whole thing is crumbling. It's unraveling in real time. So
Speaker 1: let's take a little survey of the news. We're gonna
Speaker 1: read the actual document. I don't know that the final
Speaker 1: Wise document has come into English yet. Let's see, did
Speaker 1: you know the secret Pope that the new black Pope
Speaker 1: who presides at the Amazon sentat as Jeff Bezos. He's
Speaker 1: secretly a jo I'm Joe was a dumb joke news
Speaker 1: Amazon sent odd news. Let's see at the close of
Speaker 1: the Synod, Pope Francis warrens over, this is just mainstream news.
Speaker 1: This is great. Francis says, beware of the self righteous. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's talking about everybody who knows his stupid pagan synod
Speaker 1: is a complete action of apostasy. You can't be the
Speaker 1: head of the church if you're not a member. This
Speaker 1: is an aspect that the say does have right. They
Speaker 1: do have this correctly, that if your complete apostate, you
Speaker 1: can't have the office of the keys and jurisdiction and
Speaker 1: the power to emit sins as a complete apostate. That's preposterous.
Speaker 1: Even in Roman Catholic canon law. If you apostatize, even
Speaker 1: though they think you retain the indelible mark of the priesthood,
Speaker 1: you don't retain jurisdiction, you don't retain the office of
Speaker 1: the keys if you're an apostate. Duh, that makes no sense.
Speaker 1: So let's see what's the other news coming out saying
Speaker 1: they're voting to have married priests, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: their dumb church already said was okay at one period
Speaker 1: when the Seventh Council accepted the Canons of Trollo, because
Speaker 1: the Canons of Trollo accepted it, and I see it too,
Speaker 1: say you have to have and should have married priests.
Speaker 1: And the only reason that they got the main reason
Speaker 1: they got rid of it was because they wanted money.
Speaker 1: Because when a priest dies, he leaves his money to
Speaker 1: the church. A married priest loses money to his children.
Speaker 1: Synad votes to ordain married men and to protect the
Speaker 1: Amazon's indigenous rights, AOC level stuff. The Synod on the
Speaker 1: Pan Amazoning Region concluded it's work Sunday afternoon by proving
Speaker 1: all one hundred and twenty paragraphs of this the final document.
Speaker 1: There we go. So there you go. The whole the
Speaker 1: Roman Callolic Church is literally unraveling right before our eyes.
Speaker 1: Female deacons, married priests. Now you say, so what, well,
Speaker 1: duh dude, this is to prepare for female priests. This
Speaker 1: is why the EP and the Acumenists in the fake
Speaker 1: Orthodox circles, the fake Orthodox, they're trying to do the
Speaker 1: exact same thing. I wonder why. I wonder why the
Speaker 1: same people proposing deaconesses and all this other modernism while
Speaker 1: they're just doing it. They're proposing the exact same thing
Speaker 1: that Francis and his Amazon Center are proposing for Orthodoxy.
Speaker 1: And what does Bart Tholomew black Bart, what does he
Speaker 1: want so bad to take the Orthodox world back to Francis?
Speaker 1: You see, it's a giant acumenist fraud. It is one
Speaker 1: percent fraud. It is one hundred percent created, funded and
Speaker 1: caused by the big foundations. I've already done multiple streams,
Speaker 1: multiple shows, multiple interviews, multiple articles talking about this for years,
Speaker 1: but nobody listens to us. Well, some people listen to us,
Speaker 1: and the trads are in meltdown mode. Now again, we
Speaker 1: know that Trollo and allowed married priests, and we know
Speaker 1: that this the Seventh Council accepted the canons of Trollo,
Speaker 1: Quinnessex Council and even Rome accepted them for a time,
Speaker 1: and then the Pope said no, what not that canon
Speaker 1: that deals with uh married priests? We don't accept that.
Speaker 1: So again canons of councils don't matter. The Pope just
Speaker 1: later excises them. And as we've shown in the Orthrow
Speaker 1: bro chat with Snack about the Jesuits, we've seen many times, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is no new information for us.
Speaker 1: We know that the Romancolic Church changes its opinions and
Speaker 1: changed his views in the past. So what we want
Speaker 1: to show. Oh, by the way, I did want to
Speaker 1: show this. I'm not going to play the video because
Speaker 1: I don't want some stupid trad trying to copyright strike
Speaker 1: my video because that's what they would do. Like, that's
Speaker 1: the state that they're in if I was to play
Speaker 1: a video. So here is Francis, there's Pacha Mama, and
Speaker 1: if you watch that video, you can go find this video.
Speaker 1: Francis blesses Pachamama. He actually does. Now. Aquina says that
Speaker 1: if any man were to worship at the tomb of Muhammet,
Speaker 1: he would be an apostate. Francis and the whole Vatican
Speaker 1: two apparatus have done way more than that. They literally
Speaker 1: pray towards Mecca in mosques, They bless Pachamama. They promote
Speaker 1: the entire green agenda, just like Bartholomew does, as I've
Speaker 1: already covered for years, and so they're tools. There are
Speaker 1: tools of the you could say, the power structure of
Speaker 1: the global elite, whatever you want to whatever terms you
Speaker 1: want to use. That's that's who they serve. And the
Speaker 1: Ecumenist religion that they are creating, we have proven and
Speaker 1: documented is a creation of the Rockefeller family. That's who
Speaker 1: put the money into the Accumenist movement. They brag about
Speaker 1: it in their book The Rockefeller's Authorized Biography, Color and Horwitz.
Speaker 1: I covered that ten years ago. What in the world
Speaker 1: is Pachamama doing on top of Oh, just chill out, Moses.
Speaker 1: We didn't have indolagious intentions when we made the Golden Calf. Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: All this stuff just boils down to nonsense. Make sure
Speaker 1: I hit all the memes before we Yeah. So, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's not that hard to figure out, especially if you
Speaker 1: read David Wimhoff's book. Uh, let me grab that real quick,
Speaker 1: because every time I mentioned the book, people are like,
Speaker 1: they think I'm talking about them Hoff who freezes his
Speaker 1: butt unjustifying the scientific antarcticle. That's not how I'm talking about. Okay,
Speaker 1: talking about David wim Hoff, a book that I've said
Speaker 1: everybody should get like five thousand times, and nobody gets it.
Speaker 1: Let me grab that book real quick. I'll be right
Speaker 1: back because it explains all this all right, Okay, I
Speaker 1: want everybody to read with me, because every time I
Speaker 1: mentioned this book, nobody pays attention. Let's see the title
Speaker 1: John Quurteney Murray, Time Life Magazine and the American Proposition.
Speaker 1: How the CIA's doctrinal warfare program changed the Catholic Church
Speaker 1: by David wim Hoff, not them Hoff, wim Haff. You see, Okay,
Speaker 1: everybody got that. And there's John Courtney Murray who was
Speaker 1: tripping acid back in the fifties and sixties, working with
Speaker 1: the CIA, working with C. D. Jackson to turn the
Speaker 1: Romancolic Church into an institution that promoted Americanism. The whole
Speaker 1: Cold War is explained here. This is why the dumb
Speaker 1: trads think that I work for the KGB when everything
Speaker 1: that I'm telling you is in their own trad books.
Speaker 1: It's how low iq they are. The Roman Catholic Church
Speaker 1: capitulated to the wasp CIA establishment in the fifties and
Speaker 1: sixties under the guise of fighting the Cold War. Malachi
Speaker 1: Martin was one of these CIA dupe peritis periti right.
Speaker 1: And the goal here is to promote United States globalism,
Speaker 1: promote American US. The Jesuits played a key role in this.
Speaker 1: John Courtney Marie was a Jesuit. And so what this
Speaker 1: book will show you is what Taylor Marshall and all
Speaker 1: the trads and I understand because I was in their boats.
Speaker 1: I was in that trade position. I know what it's
Speaker 1: like to think like the trads think. And I used
Speaker 1: to think the KGB infiltrated the Roman Church, the KGB.
Speaker 1: We gotta stump the KGB. Yeah, one of the KGB
Speaker 1: bro Retradgian hope and one of those stupid documents that
Speaker 1: they always cite along with uribuzman Off, which is disinfo,
Speaker 1: is the ridiculous treatise, the ridiculous tract. This is this info.
Speaker 1: Can you guys not recognize this info? No? They can't.
Speaker 1: They don't understand how the world works AA one O
Speaker 1: two five. This is dis info. Now. Now, were their
Speaker 1: communists there? Were? Right? And we covered that at one
Speaker 1: the highest point that the largest number of actual communists
Speaker 1: in America was up to seventy thousand. That's it. Do
Speaker 1: you think that seventy thousand dumb college professors and Hollywood
Speaker 1: clowns were able to completely run and control and take
Speaker 1: over all the big banks and all the Fortune one
Speaker 1: hundred and the Fortune five hundred to promote what is
Speaker 1: now the organized plan across the whole planet of the
Speaker 1: New World Order? Do you think that? Do you think
Speaker 1: that these low level communist dupes pulled that off? No?
Speaker 1: Because the Cold War is a fraud. Now we understand
Speaker 1: why Malachi Martin wrote his giant book promoting the Cold
Speaker 1: War because he was a fraud, and his whole book
Speaker 1: Keys of this Blood is a fraud. Now it's useful
Speaker 1: because it's useful to understand this dis info. Now we've
Speaker 1: debunked us countless times, and the trades are too dumb
Speaker 1: to understand it. How many times do I have to
Speaker 1: show you? David Rockefeller's New York Times editorial, Let's do
Speaker 1: it one more time for the Trids. From its China Traveler.
Speaker 4: If you've never heard David Rockefeller talk, this is hell
Speaker 4: he talks.
Speaker 1: He sounds like the rich guy in the Simpsons. What's
Speaker 1: his name? This is how you blow the boomer trad's
Speaker 1: mind and they can never figure it out. Now, amazingly,
Speaker 1: there's a handful a few of the trads have figured
Speaker 1: it out, people like weim Hoff. How's that guy still tried?
Speaker 1: He probably doesn't know where else to go?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: From a China Traveler, nineteen seventy nine editorial, David Rockefeller,
Speaker 1: He sets up Chase Bank in China. And now, wait
Speaker 1: a minute, David Rockefeller, cold war capitalist? What does he
Speaker 1: say about Mao? The social experiment in China under Chairman
Speaker 1: Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful
Speaker 1: in human history. And then he talks about China opening
Speaker 1: up to the West. He loves that one child policy
Speaker 1: that controls society. And guess what bank was first in
Speaker 1: communist China? Oh, Chase Bank, David Rockfeller, he flew over
Speaker 1: there before Nixon. Yeah, exactly. Because the Cold War is
Speaker 1: a fraud, dummies, I've been telling you that for years.
Speaker 1: And who did the Cold War? Who did they recruit?
Speaker 1: John Paul the second who helped bring down the Wall?
Speaker 1: John Paul people, they give him credit all the time
Speaker 1: for being, you know, part of this. Remember Nelson Mandela, Remember.
Speaker 2: Him, Nelson Mandela's are coming.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna beat that go go tread. I'm gonna beat
Speaker 1: that commie. I'm We're gonna put capitalism men. Who got
Speaker 1: that commie? Oh wait a minute, he's best friends. Well,
Speaker 1: Dave Roy, My worldview don't make no sense. I can't
Speaker 1: figure it out. What's going on.
Speaker 6: I know I know that Jay diar ain't right. Everything
Speaker 6: else is right except Jay Darr. Well, I'm just gonna
Speaker 6: be confused for the next twenty years. Dude, I'm gonna
Speaker 6: jump into tiber because I won't listen. Stop being hard headed.
Speaker 1: I know what I'm talking about. I'm an autistic nerd
Speaker 1: who has read this stuff for over twenty years. I
Speaker 1: know what I'm talking about. I've been listening to funk
Speaker 1: for like three days straight at the Funk station. All right,
Speaker 1: So next, let's move to the actual document. So we
Speaker 1: don't have the final English document. Who cares? We already
Speaker 1: know it's going to be a bunch of pagan gibber
Speaker 1: jabber gibber jabber. We're gonna put the true acumenism. This
Speaker 1: is the acumenism we really want. We want Thuggie acumenism,
Speaker 1: now we demand it. Hashtag Thuggie ecumenism. Hashtag Temple of Doom,
Speaker 1: the Traditional Temple of Doom. Right, that's right, that's the
Speaker 1: church I attend. Where do you go to church? Well,
Speaker 1: I'm a trad Are you a trad Catholic? Yes? And
Speaker 1: Francis has created the Traditional Temple of Doom? Right? The
Speaker 1: thuggy right?
Speaker 2: Bro?
Speaker 1: Have you heard the thuggy right in Latin? It's musical,
Speaker 1: It's sweet, bro. I like this Matt Trade meme of
Speaker 1: the Stalin Icons. This is a thing that the CIA
Speaker 1: funded fake ro core group ro O c A, which
Speaker 1: is like one hundred people in the world. CIA uses
Speaker 1: schismatic groups. Now remember how long I told you this,
Speaker 1: and now people are figuring it out. Yeah, how schismatic
Speaker 1: groups are being used by the US government CIA against Orthodoxy.
Speaker 1: Thank god to whoever wrote this article, thank you sincerely.
Speaker 1: It's this is a huge vindication for me. Do you
Speaker 1: know how long I've been called crazy? How many people
Speaker 1: have gone after me over this, tried to get me
Speaker 1: excommunicated over this, And thank god, people are figuring it out.
Speaker 1: People are figuring it out. It's not that hard to
Speaker 1: figure all this stuff out because it's all It all
Speaker 1: works the same way. The way that Rome has been
Speaker 1: subverted is no different than the way that they're going
Speaker 1: to subvert the Orthodox Churches and are subverting Orthodox They're
Speaker 1: splitting it down the middle on purpose excusmatics being used
Speaker 1: by the US State Department. It's US government against the
Speaker 1: Orthodox Church. Of course, they are pressure from above, pressure
Speaker 1: from below. It's a basic syops tactic. So I'm gonna
Speaker 1: put that in the chat here because that's a great
Speaker 1: article at Ortho Christian. Huge vindication for jays Nelson. I
Speaker 1: didn't even put that on the vindication list. By the way,
Speaker 1: Another vindication was what Elon Musk saying, time to get
Speaker 1: brain chips. We've been talking about that for I learned
Speaker 1: about that when I was eighteen. I knew they were
Speaker 1: going to start putting brain ships in US because I
Speaker 1: read tax Mars. Friends, have you read text smaller books?
Speaker 1: I read text Mars when I was eighteen, and he
Speaker 1: was right. They were going to start putting microchips and people.
Speaker 1: He was right about that, got a lot of other
Speaker 1: things wrong, but he was right about that.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 1: And I remember being called crazy. I was taught in
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety seven. I told people because of ninety eight.
Speaker 1: I first read his book on microchips in nineteen ninety eight,
Speaker 1: and I knew they were going to start putting microchips
Speaker 1: in people. And people literally called me insane. There were
Speaker 1: people who's saying I needed to be on antidepressants because
Speaker 1: I said that. I'm not joking. So it's like, it's
Speaker 1: very bizarre to me that you can be right about
Speaker 1: all this stuff. I knew about the New World Order
Speaker 1: in nineteen ninety eight, and yes, at that time, I thought, oh,
Speaker 1: it's commis you see, because I bought into the global
Speaker 1: left right bs that oh the Commis are gonna And
Speaker 1: then when you get into traditional Catholicism. I got into
Speaker 1: that about two thousand and two, two thousand and three.
Speaker 1: You get into that and you start thinking realizing, well,
Speaker 1: I wait a minute more, this is a deeper rabbit
Speaker 1: hole than I thought. And then you realize that the
Speaker 1: commis in Moscow, the Commis in China, they were aided
Speaker 1: and put in power by the West. Now, why didn't
Speaker 1: Mary mention that at Fatima? That's odd, seems like Fatima's
Speaker 1: not really telling the whole story. Why is that? Oh well,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, Maybe Fatima is part of psychological warfare operations.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, Is there any other precedent for intelligence agencies
Speaker 1: utilizing marry and apparitions for intelligent for psyops? Oh well, yes,
Speaker 1: Actually there's quite a bit of that when you study
Speaker 1: psychological operations, which I did my grad work on. So
Speaker 1: I happen to know a good deal about psychological operations.
Speaker 1: Francis is our mother Earth. It's green, has a beautiful
Speaker 1: green cover. It's sustainable. By the way, the last time
Speaker 1: that I ever attended the novs Orto was in two
Speaker 1: thousand six or seven. Now, the second to last last
Speaker 1: time I ever attended. Novs Orto was in two thousand
Speaker 1: and seven, and it was a hip hop mass, yes,
Speaker 1: literally a hip hop mass, yes, in Tennessee, in Tennessee
Speaker 1: of all places. But before that, the last place I
Speaker 1: attended was at my university, at the Calolic Church at
Speaker 1: the university, and I had to listen to a high
Speaker 1: school girl and flip flops do the readings of the Gospels.
Speaker 1: And I was like, I'm out of here. I'm done.
Speaker 1: But as I was leaving, they had here it is,
Speaker 1: they had devotionals that were about being green and sustainable,
Speaker 1: and I just so happened to know the girl who
Speaker 1: was at the Newman Center who was in charge of
Speaker 1: choosing this devotional, and I went to her and I said,
Speaker 1: why are you promoting a New Age green devotional at
Speaker 1: the church? Does making any sense? And she tried to
Speaker 1: get me thrown out. So that's what you get in
Speaker 1: these stupid fake churches. This is as well. We pointed
Speaker 1: this out in the stream on Exorcist. The Exorcist was
Speaker 1: made and concert with Jesuits and the CIA. This is
Speaker 1: mainstream psychological warfare history. An example of the work carried
Speaker 1: out by US sciops and foreign intelligence in the orchestrated
Speaker 1: exodus of Catholics from North to South Vietnam in the
Speaker 1: mid fifties, in collaboration with Tom Dooley, whom Willien Peter Bladie,
Speaker 1: author of The Exorcist, quotes in his book and others.
Speaker 1: An extensive campaign was carried out by the Catholic Relief
Speaker 1: Service that's a CIA front. The local Catholic leaders in
Speaker 1: American psychological warfare team combined to drive the peasants south
Speaker 1: of the de military zone by telling them the Virgin
Speaker 1: Mary had departed from the north and Christ has now
Speaker 1: gone to the south. As amateur as disappears now, the
Speaker 1: mass flight was admittedly the result of extensive, well conducted
Speaker 1: and in terms of objective, very successful American psychological warfare
Speaker 1: operations from mainline history, not a conspiracy book, The you
Speaker 1: Know China Story by Bantam Books. Oh yeah, exactly, And
Speaker 1: that just so happens to be everything that lines up
Speaker 1: with this book exactly. I didn't just study theology and philosophy.
Speaker 1: I studied psychological operations. I wrote my gride work on that.
Speaker 1: I'm published in peer review on that. Don't you think
Speaker 1: I know about this stuff? Go look up my peer
Speaker 1: Review on Psychological Warfare in James Bond and how Ian
Speaker 1: Fleming used it. Oh, you don't believe me.
Speaker 2: He's making it up. It don't exist. It don't.
Speaker 1: Let me show you, bro. Let me show you, bro.
Speaker 2: It don't exist. He's making it up. Who's a liar?
Speaker 2: But dud's a liar.
Speaker 1: Vindication, dude, dude, vindication. Dude, dude. Why didn't you just
Speaker 1: listen to me? Dude, dude, dude, do do do? He's
Speaker 1: critiquing Western psychological operations, and that means heason the C eight.
Speaker 1: No wait, I mean it means he works for Putin.
Speaker 1: No wait, I'm confused. What's it mean? Publishing peer review?
Speaker 1: Many layers up, double seven, American Journal of Economics and Sociology,
Speaker 1: Psychological Warfare, peer review. I know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 2: Do to the dude, I.
Speaker 1: Didn't just study philosophy, Do du also study the Bible,
Speaker 1: An theology and American literature? To the dude, By the way,
Speaker 1: we're gonna do some more streams on lit. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be lit when we do the streams on lit, because, uh,
Speaker 1: we've been thinking. I've been thinking about that. I got
Speaker 1: a bunch of lit books. I want to do, and
Speaker 1: we don't want to be, you know, just doing the
Speaker 1: same old stuff or another globalism Well, we will continue.
Speaker 1: Each one of these series doesn't have to end. You see,
Speaker 1: we can always do another globalism book. We can always
Speaker 1: do another theology topic. So here's what's gonna come, Lord
Speaker 1: Willing in the next few years, Yes, years, i am
Speaker 1: going to do a lecture series. I'm gonna start with Genesis.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna start with Genesis in the Abyss. Yes, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna start with Genesis, says old Protestant Bible. All that
Speaker 1: duct tape. That means you're a real Protestant. If you
Speaker 1: get a duct tape on your Bible, you were serious.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna lecture through the whole Bible. We're gonna start
Speaker 1: in Genesis. Now we've already done like Syric and some
Speaker 1: of the minor profits. Right, I'm gonna start with Genesis,
Speaker 1: and we are gonna lecture through the entire Bible. Probably
Speaker 1: be a two three year project, but that's okay. The
Speaker 1: globalism books were what a three year project, four year project,
Speaker 1: and we did thirty five plus of those. A lot
Speaker 1: of people are biblically ignorant, so it would be it
Speaker 1: would be an educational experience. A lot of people, I
Speaker 1: would say probably forty to fifty percent of the questions
Speaker 1: that come my way. I mean a lot of them
Speaker 1: are philosophic, A lot of them are globalist in nature. Well,
Speaker 1: what about this book? What? But probably fifty percent, forty
Speaker 1: to fifty are Bible related questions. Now, being that I
Speaker 1: was Protestant, I do happen to know the Bible pretty good,
Speaker 1: studied the Bible for at least twenty years. So why
Speaker 1: don't we engage in an educational endeavor to present the
Speaker 1: Bible faithful to orthodoxy for the advantage of people out there,
Speaker 1: people inquiring, people interested in orthodoxy. That way, everybody, we
Speaker 1: can all go.
Speaker 4: On a journey together. Is going in journey together?
Speaker 1: Sounds so evangelical and fluffy.
Speaker 4: Let's go on a journey together, a journey through the
Speaker 4: Bible together, to the heart of the Bible.
Speaker 1: They're capitalize on all that good evangelical stuff. And what
Speaker 1: will demonstrate is a superior approach, the approach of the fathers,
Speaker 1: superior to Carl Jung, superior to modernism. We will show
Speaker 1: that the Bible is coherent. We will show that the
Speaker 1: Church fathers don't allegorize the Old Testament into oblivion and
Speaker 1: into being a historical nonsense. We will show that they
Speaker 1: use the fourfold method, based on the historical historical historicity,
Speaker 1: building then upon that with the anagogical, building upon that
Speaker 1: with the allegorical right the tropological. So we'll show all
Speaker 1: four layers, which by the way Maximus talks about in
Speaker 1: his writings East and the West. By the eighth century,
Speaker 1: Maximus seventh, eighth, up those sixth seven eighth centuries, they
Speaker 1: were all agreed on the fourfold sense of scripture. And
Speaker 1: that's going to put to silence all these goofballs who
Speaker 1: don't know the church fathers who claim that they do
Speaker 1: represent so called Orthodoxy, and they sit there and tell
Speaker 1: you that the Old Testament is not history. It's just
Speaker 1: a bunch of made up allegories. In Galatians. For when
Speaker 1: Paul does his allegory, does he say that Abraham was
Speaker 1: a symbol? Yeah, but it's based on Abraham being a
Speaker 1: real historical dude. So we're gonna lecture that. In fact,
Speaker 1: I might just see these these trads think that they're
Speaker 1: like hurting me, that we're in cope mode, And no, no,
Speaker 1: bra you energize me. You guys energize me as do
Speaker 1: the fake Orthodox. They energize me too. So I think
Speaker 1: we're gonna enter into an endeavor to increase biblical literacy
Speaker 1: because now some people say, well, but why are you
Speaker 1: doing that, because why don't you like focus on the
Speaker 1: church councilors when we've already been doing talks for years now,
Speaker 1: We went through all of John Damascus, we did countless
Speaker 1: lectures on you know, Patristics in this stuff already. But
Speaker 1: I started thinking, well, now, if somebody doesn't believe the Bible,
Speaker 1: they're not gonna care about the councils, They're not gonna
Speaker 1: care about church fathers, right, So we're gonna start with that.
Speaker 1: We're gonna start with that because there's a lot of
Speaker 1: people in Orthodoxy. They don't they don't know anything about
Speaker 1: the bottle, especially people who try the ones that try
Speaker 1: to debate. They don't know what they're what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: And that's why it's like that easy to show how
Speaker 1: they're Marcianites, like bro Jesus says that Adam and Eve
Speaker 1: were historical. So now you're gonna disagree with the Gospels
Speaker 1: and they'll they'll be like yeah, some of them. They're like, yeah,
Speaker 1: the Gospels are full of air. But Jesus didn't know
Speaker 1: what he's talking about. Oh really, Jesus said that the
Speaker 1: law would not fail down to the jaw in the tittle.
Speaker 1: Heaven and earth will pass away, but the Law will not.
Speaker 1: How is that possible? You're prost No, it's not Protestant.
Speaker 1: Not Protestant. Did you know? The Church Fathers almost all
Speaker 1: speak on the issue of inspiration. They do, so we're
Speaker 1: gonna get into that. And by the way, it won't
Speaker 1: just be me. I'm not gonna just sit here like
Speaker 1: a Protestant preatriant. We're gonna be using number one. We'll
Speaker 1: use Orthodox Study by well, obviously we'll we'll use the
Speaker 1: guides there, the notes in the Orthodox Study about we're
Speaker 1: about nine ninety five percent right. Every now and then
Speaker 1: there's a really stupid note. Sometimes they get things wrong.
Speaker 1: And we'll use the Church father And that's because pretty
Speaker 1: soon I'll have my entire library back, so we'll have
Speaker 1: all the Fathers at our disposal. We will be able
Speaker 1: to compare our theology with the Fathers. We'll be able
Speaker 1: to utilize as well fathered surf and Rose's justice, Creation
Speaker 1: and early Man. We'll be looking at Saint Simeon denuthed Theologian,
Speaker 1: the first created man. We'll be able to use Basils Hexamaron.
Speaker 1: I read Saint Basils Examaron ten years ago. I knew
Speaker 1: right away he's not teaching evolution. And there's people now
Speaker 1: that line say that he does. Unbelievable. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of liars out there, especially in the religious world, wearing costumes.
Speaker 1: They're not really Orthodox, they just wear costumes. Now a
Speaker 1: reminder to the fake Orthodox who want to become Roman Catholics.
Speaker 1: Many of them, yes, they want to. They're ecumenical, they
Speaker 1: want to join with Rome. David Bentley Hart, all these clowns.
Speaker 1: Remember the pillars of Orthodoxy, Like Saint Mark of ev
Speaker 1: they trample on the pope. It might have got mad
Speaker 1: that I said trample on the pope. It's just a
Speaker 1: pope kissing his feet. No, in some icons, it's trampling
Speaker 1: because the pillars of Orthodoxy destroy these heresies. What an
Speaker 1: insult to Mark of Ephesus, Saint Mark, to think that
Speaker 1: you can blend our church with that church. We don't want.
Speaker 1: We don't want a pope because as Saint Justin Popovitch says,
Speaker 1: the papacy is an institution of European humanism. No wonder
Speaker 1: it accepts all the rights and blessings and pagan rituals
Speaker 1: in all the religions. Of course it does. And it's
Speaker 1: been doing that, not just since Vatican two and the
Speaker 1: liberalism Vatican two, has been doing this all the way
Speaker 1: back to the Renaissance, as occult Renaissance Church of Rome
Speaker 1: demonstrates in six hundred straight pages, and that's the red
Speaker 1: pill that the trads can't take. Trads on suicide watch
Speaker 1: here in the I think it's Alexander the sixth, the
Speaker 1: one of the worst of the Borges, the most degenerate.
Speaker 1: He has the Isis and Hermistrisma justus in the papal apartment.
Speaker 1: It's okay, it's just his private apartment. Oh wait a minute,
Speaker 1: I thought the I thought all of this was holy,
Speaker 1: the Vatican was holy. Well no, no, no, no, no. You see,
Speaker 1: there's there's a there's a thomistic scholastic definition that we
Speaker 1: can invent to where it's no longer sinful, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: alma whatever. Dude, nobody's buying that anymore. Like the Sophistry
Speaker 1: is not working anymore. People are just like, yeah, this
Speaker 1: is this is bes dude, Just like I showed you guys, like,
Speaker 1: how many times do I have to show that Trad
Speaker 1: was cracking me up the other day when I showed
Speaker 1: that the two contradictory quotes in Denzier. Notice how none
Speaker 1: of them have even attempted to come after that. They don't.
Speaker 1: There's no there's no explanation for that. We covered that
Speaker 1: with David the real Medwhite. All right, let's look at
Speaker 1: the document. Let's see welcome, Oh four thirty one we got.
Speaker 1: It's a big audience tonight. I will be taking super chats.
Speaker 1: You guys want to challenge me, I'm sure we got
Speaker 1: a bunch of haters. I haven't been paying attention to
Speaker 1: the chat. But again, I want to make clear, I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that Francis is the final Antichrist. I'm saying
Speaker 1: that Francis is the spirit of Antichrist. If anything looks
Speaker 1: to me, just my opinion, the papacy would I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that we're necessarily in the last last days.
Speaker 1: I don't know when Clinton know that the Orthodox fathers
Speaker 1: and saints say that as we get closer to that
Speaker 1: time it will be evident and we will know, so
Speaker 1: we don't have to worry about that. It could be perhaps,
Speaker 1: but I would say, if anything, the papacy would be
Speaker 1: more like the fulfillment of the false prophet role. Right,
Speaker 1: I don't think that it would be, you know, the Antichrist.
Speaker 1: The Antichrist is obviously a political figure. So let's see
Speaker 1: what we have in the English documents so far. Let's see,
Speaker 1: I did have to save somewhere Amazon Synod document. See
Speaker 1: what the h alright? So final? They still haven't released
Speaker 1: the final document yet. The only thing Francis is worried
Speaker 1: about is the trads people fussing about it, so stop
Speaker 1: being self righteous. That's the only thing he cares about.
Speaker 1: Accept our globalist plan or else you're a self righteous butthole.
Speaker 1: Let's see, let's read the preparatory document. There it is,
Speaker 1: make my funk the p funk. I want my funk uncut.
Speaker 5: Make my funk the p funk.
Speaker 1: I want the bomb, I want the p funk. I
Speaker 1: wants my funk uncut. Make my funk. All right, let's
Speaker 1: see here here we go. I don't want to read
Speaker 1: this whole thing ough, seeing identity and the cries of
Speaker 1: the pan Amazonia. The Amazon Basin is one of the
Speaker 1: planet's largest reserves of biodiversity. Okay, so it sounds like
Speaker 1: something shit I read at Disneyland the other day when
Speaker 1: I was at Animal Kingdom. And then right away, oh, carbon,
Speaker 1: carbon sinks, carbon sink this biodiverse area. Suddenly it's really important.
Speaker 1: Did Leocaprio and AOC help write this? All? Right? So
Speaker 1: actually I already read this part of the other few
Speaker 1: months or like a month ago when this came out,
Speaker 1: I'm mns get past the eco crap blah blah blah.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 1: Oh, then it pulls the like the guilt trip thing,
Speaker 1: right then they go into the guilt trip about colonization.
Speaker 1: Feel guilty. It's a socio cultural diverse region. It sounds
Speaker 1: like Bill Gates wrote this world Wildlife Foundation. The demographic
Speaker 1: occupation of the Amazon Basin proceeds the process of colonization
Speaker 1: by many perhaps by thousands of years. Oh until colonization,
Speaker 1: they're feel bad. Amazonian populations were concentrated on the banks
Speaker 1: of large rivers. Blah blah blah, colonization, widespread practice of slavery.
Speaker 1: Here we go, here goes the guilt trips for what
Speaker 1: people did hundreds of years ago. You need to feel
Speaker 1: bad about it. Besides the historical circumstances, the people of
Speaker 1: the water, and then it goes into like indigenous views
Speaker 1: of the river and blah blah blah, the river is
Speaker 1: so important. Ah, they worship the river. I bet they
Speaker 1: don't mention human sacrifice in this, will they? I bet
Speaker 1: they won't. They're probably not gonna talk about Jesus either, right,
Speaker 1: Jesus versus the demons, Jesus versus human sacrifice. But they're
Speaker 1: quick to talk about oil spillspills. Really, by the way,
Speaker 1: do you know that oil comes out of the ground.
Speaker 1: It's not a fossil fuel. Oil is not ground up dinosaurs.
Speaker 1: Did you know that? Do you know that oil comes
Speaker 1: from the earth. It's not a toxic thing? Did you
Speaker 1: know that? Yeah? Anybody with half a brain knows that. Who't?
Speaker 1: Who can recognize basic propaganda? Oil is not toxic. Now
Speaker 1: maybe after all the processing, you know, you can't go
Speaker 1: around huff and gasoline. Maybe you can. But so the
Speaker 1: region is full of poverty, Yeah, okay, we know that
Speaker 1: socio environmental issues. Okay, yeah, yeah, we know. We're supposed
Speaker 1: to feel bad, all right, I got, I got the point.
Speaker 1: It's my fault, right. Seventy eight of the Amazonian region
Speaker 1: resides in urban areas. Most of these indigenous people are
Speaker 1: undocumented or irregular refugees hailing from riverside countries. So they
Speaker 1: had to flee into the cities because of the evil West. Basically,
Speaker 1: so they have lost the leading role in their local
Speaker 1: indigenous process of social, economic, cultural, ecological, religious transformation. Wait
Speaker 1: a minute, their religious their indigenous religions were demonic, So
Speaker 1: wait a minute, isn't it a good thing that they
Speaker 1: lost their indigenous I mean, does Mexico City need to
Speaker 1: go back to its indigenous practices? I thought there was
Speaker 1: a whole apparition that was highly revered right for supposedly
Speaker 1: helping to convert Mexico and Mexico City away from their
Speaker 1: indigenous practices that the evil colonizers took from them. Oh wait, now,
Speaker 1: maybe the Mola Ram religion is what we need to
Speaker 1: go back to, all right, So let's see the Missionary
Speaker 1: Indigenous Council Brazil other organizations blah blah blah have sought
Speaker 1: to protect free peoples in the region. Moreover, a new
Speaker 1: category of indigenous people has recently emerged. Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: These are the invisible people. Uh new slush. There's no
Speaker 1: such thing as the power of invisibility. Somebody told about it,
Speaker 1: and there aren't invisible people. Actually, in the Orthodox tradition,
Speaker 1: there are some people who feel like they've become invisible.
Speaker 1: I'm just making a joke. Apart from the threats that
Speaker 1: emerge within their culture's, indigenous people have experienced several external threats.
Speaker 1: The colonizers. Once again, here we go back to feel guilty.
Speaker 1: Can you believe it? The Roman Catholic Church guilt tripping people.
Speaker 1: It's shocker, right. I like how the Trads are coping
Speaker 1: too with the bad argument that the more cursed and
Speaker 1: degenerate their institution comes, the more it proves that God
Speaker 1: is with them. So when Francis, when the when the
Speaker 1: devil becomes pope and is eating you know, babies on
Speaker 1: in Saint Peter's Square, that'll be the greatest proof of
Speaker 1: Catholicism for them. All right, this is just total nonsense argument,
Speaker 1: like you can't just recognize that the institution's cursed with
Speaker 1: all this degeneracy an apostasy. But you see, that's how
Speaker 1: man made religions and cults work. If you got to
Speaker 1: see last night's stream that we did on OH Show,
Speaker 1: it's exactly what we saw with OH Show. A lot
Speaker 1: of similarities between OH Show and Francis and his eco
Speaker 1: pagan cult. Interesting exactly, it's the same man made structure,
Speaker 1: all right. So face with this integration process, the indigenous
Speaker 1: organizations are helping to people to Oh, they've got to
Speaker 1: protect human rights. Yeah, these are in that work for
Speaker 1: the CIA in the West and the global elite. Right now,
Speaker 1: this is funny because it's going to quote Pious the Tenth. Seriously,
Speaker 1: piss the Tenth is the guy who said that all
Speaker 1: the modernists are apostate. Could you imagine Pius the Tenth
Speaker 1: reading this? His mind would melt. And I'm not saying
Speaker 1: Pies the Tenth was orthodox. He was. He was an error,
Speaker 1: just like all the trads are. But it's just funny
Speaker 1: that in section four they're quoting Pis the Tenth. That's
Speaker 1: cracking me out. The Second Vatican Council strengthened the voice
Speaker 1: of the people through the process of evangelical values. Oh
Speaker 1: that sounds really sounds really good. And by the way,
Speaker 1: it is important to talk about what's their the whole
Speaker 1: Marxist Latin American Ecumenist Jesuit stuff comes out of social Gospel, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, was funded by the Rockefellers. There's a
Speaker 1: whole chapter in the Rockefeller's biography about their funding of
Speaker 1: the Social Gospel. Do you know that? Uh? And so
Speaker 1: the Latin American movements of Uh, I'm going blank, what's
Speaker 1: the term? I'm looking for the theology liberation theology right
Speaker 1: where you're replacing the Gospel with the errors of social reform,
Speaker 1: social gospel, Rockefellers Social Gospel. They'll always say, oh, it
Speaker 1: was the Marxists that did Oh, the Marxist Yeah, do
Speaker 1: you know who the Marxists are? The Marxists. It's not
Speaker 1: I'm not going to say what you think I'm gonna say.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna say what do you think I'm gonna say?
Speaker 1: Do you know who the Frankfurt School Marxists are? Do
Speaker 1: you know how they got to America? Do you know
Speaker 1: how they transformed the West? Guess what? They're not stalin
Speaker 1: US and they're not working with the KGB. Well, who
Speaker 1: brought those Frankfurt School Marxists into America to transform all
Speaker 1: of who brought who brought him over. How did they
Speaker 1: transform over?
Speaker 2: We thron institutions. He was a KGB, he was.
Speaker 1: Moscow drooling trads. Can't google five minutes to figure out
Speaker 1: it wasn't Moscow. Beat don't fail me now, Frankford School
Speaker 1: at war. The Marxist who explained nat Us to watching
Speaker 1: It was the OSS, the OSS. Can you hear me?
Speaker 7: Low aqu trats the CAGB with Moscow took over the Wales. No,
Speaker 7: it was the CIA.
Speaker 1: Who transformed Western civilization through the institutions, the Long March,
Speaker 1: the Long March, through the institutions. It wasn't Moscow. It
Speaker 1: was these dudes, the same people who changed Vatican. Do
Speaker 1: you think do you think John Courtney Murray was working
Speaker 1: with the KGB to change Vatican two, to make Vatican
Speaker 1: two along with the rest of the peritus peri tai. No,
Speaker 1: it was the Cia. You see. Have you actually listened
Speaker 1: to the full Uribezmanov lectures? Are you dumb? Triads? Have you?
Speaker 1: Have you? Did you notice the things that Yuri Bezmanov
Speaker 1: says are a travesty? Have you noticed the freedoms that
Speaker 1: he says need to come to the Eastern European countries
Speaker 1: in Russia? Do you remember what freedoms jury Bezmanov says
Speaker 1: needs to come. Did you notice that youry Bezmanov neglects
Speaker 1: to mention that the OS has brought the Frankfurt school
Speaker 1: to the West. Did you notice that? Did you notice? Yeah? Exactly,
Speaker 1: because Rybezmanov is c I a dis info duh. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get back to this document, the voices of the
Speaker 1: Second Vatican Council process of blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: This as much a jibber jabber, echo jibber jabber more
Speaker 1: of this. You gotta feel bad for domination. Western countries
Speaker 1: have dominated and enslaved. John Paul the Second call this
Speaker 1: a holocaust. Where's that picture? Where's that cocaine snorting picture?
Speaker 1: At See? This is a Oh he's so humble, so humble?
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Can you you can't recognize a photo op? Come on, dude,
Speaker 1: I'll fall for this nonsense. It's a photo op. No,
Speaker 1: he's really that humble, Yeah right, yeah, the guy who
Speaker 1: claims to be God on Earth basically infallible God on Earth.
Speaker 1: Oh no, he's really humble, I promise. All right. Let's see.
Speaker 1: So this is just going on and on on about
Speaker 1: how You're supposed to feel guilty for stuff that you hate,
Speaker 1: to have anything to do with guilt trips. Classic trick
Speaker 1: of New World Order guilt trips. This is exactly what
Speaker 1: they do with the carbon footprint. Crap. Oh you want
Speaker 1: to have kids, You're guilty, Pope Francis. Justice, human rights. Okay,
Speaker 1: nothing about Christ, nothing about anything except you supposed to
Speaker 1: feel guilty human rights. All this jibber jabber, which is
Speaker 1: a tool of the elite. So here's the first mention
Speaker 1: of God. Here the Creator, the Creator, not Jesus the Creator. Okay,
Speaker 1: are we Masons here? Or is Jesus the Creator? What
Speaker 1: are we talking about here? The common Creator? I guess
Speaker 1: this is consistent with natural theology, isn't it? So? I'm
Speaker 1: on where am i at section five? And we have
Speaker 1: the Creator, the generic, generic theism Creator, the legacy of
Speaker 1: John Paul, the Second blah blah blah. Pope Francis wants
Speaker 1: to help people transmit their ancestral wisdom. This legacy is
Speaker 1: a promotes a harmonious, harmonious relationship between nature and the Creator,
Speaker 1: articulates belief that defense of the earth really the defense
Speaker 1: of the Earth and the Amazon synod is the most
Speaker 1: pressing issue right now in the Roman Catholic Church really
Speaker 1: really uh pedo crisis. Maybe is that maybe a little
Speaker 1: more pressing than this? Come on, how is it not
Speaker 1: obvious to people that the Roman institution is a tool
Speaker 1: of the global elite. I mean, it's like, there's no
Speaker 1: possible way for this to be more patently obvious. But
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. They're not They're not gonna accept it. Uh.
Speaker 1: The orphan this is not an orphaned land. It has
Speaker 1: a mother hence Mother Earth. It's an interesting quote on
Speaker 1: the This is Francis's epistle that they're sighting. The threat
Speaker 1: against the Amazonian territories also comes from the distortion of
Speaker 1: certain policies aims aimed at conservation of nature without taking
Speaker 1: into account men and women of the Amazonian land, the
Speaker 1: brothers and sisters who inhabit it. Maybe maybe he is
Speaker 1: I don't think he means that he's going to critique
Speaker 1: fake environmentalism, but maybe we'll see. Francis's guideline on this
Speaker 1: is clear. I believe that the central issue is how
Speaker 1: to reconcile the rights to development of the land socially
Speaker 1: and culturally and protect the particular characteristics of the indigenous people. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: nothing wrong with that. We would agree with that. At
Speaker 1: the same time, indigenous, rural and other populations have been
Speaker 1: building political and organizational processes around agenda's grounded in human
Speaker 1: rights based perspectives. Yeah. This is the fake in geo
Speaker 1: crap that's run by the think tanks and the big
Speaker 1: banks in the CI. Protecting the indigenous people is our
Speaker 1: concerned okay, yeah, whatever, spirituality and wisdom for the indigenous
Speaker 1: peoples of the Amazon Basin. By the way, did you
Speaker 1: notice that Mother Teresa, the supposed saint, that her order
Speaker 1: is involved in human trafficking? Ooh ouch, yeah, exactly. I
Speaker 1: learned about her being a fraud a long time ago. Yes,
Speaker 1: Mother Teresa's order involved in human trafficking mainstream news. By
Speaker 1: the way, it's important to point this out because I
Speaker 1: don't know why. I mean, there's Orthodox people who think
Speaker 1: she's a saint. Excuse me, No, you can't hallow heterodox saints.
Speaker 1: And by the way, she was bff with that demonic
Speaker 1: New Age cult leader John Roger, and she took money
Speaker 1: from John Roger. She took like twenty thousand dollars from
Speaker 1: that crazed cult leader. I'm not joking, and she would
Speaker 1: pray in Buddhist places of worship, and she said that
Speaker 1: her goal, she said in Time magazine, her goal was
Speaker 1: to make the Buddhist the better Buddhist, not to convert
Speaker 1: them to Jesus. That's in Time magazine. I think in
Speaker 1: eighty six. It's either eight or four eighty six. You
Speaker 1: can look up that Time magazine quote from Mother Teresa.
Speaker 1: And so there's your fake saints. Say you need fake
Speaker 1: saints for the fake church. I'll give the trads that. Yes,
Speaker 1: the Vatican two Apparatus has to has to canonize John Paul,
Speaker 1: Mother Teresa and all these ecumenist one World Religion saints.
Speaker 1: So here is and there's actual videos where John Roger
Speaker 1: is with. You can look these up on YouTube. Mother Teresa.
Speaker 1: Here she is with John Roger, the cult leader. She
Speaker 1: accepted her ten thousand dollars award from him. There she
Speaker 1: is with John Roger. Here's the video of her and
Speaker 1: John Roger together. She takes the money. Yeah, newsflash, Mother
Speaker 1: Teresa is a fraud. And all of you clowns that
Speaker 1: didn't know that you're getting played. And I'm not the
Speaker 1: bad guy for telling you that. Sorry, it's not my fault.
Speaker 1: That's not my fault. That and then there's another picture
Speaker 1: of her praying in a Buddhist thing. Let's see, I
Speaker 1: think this is her. Yeah, this is her in the
Speaker 1: Buddhist thing together with some goofy Buddhist monk or whatever.
Speaker 1: This is maybe Hindu, I don't know. I can't really tell.
Speaker 1: Looks like a Buddhist thing, but there she is praying there. Well,
Speaker 1: what do you expect? I mean, she's the saint of
Speaker 1: the coming fake religion, the fake world religion. Is there
Speaker 1: is one of her Gandhi's tomb, honoring the tomb of Gandhi. Yep,
Speaker 1: And the clown trads over at Tradition and Action who
Speaker 1: literally think that the KGB the boomer Cold War trads
Speaker 1: at Tradition and Action who think that the KGB literally
Speaker 1: think the KGB is running all of this operation to
Speaker 1: take down the Romancolic Church. Yeah. Really, there is Mother
Speaker 1: Teresa praying at the tomb of Gandhi. Come on, dude,
Speaker 1: give me a break. Yeah, hey, trads, read this book.
Speaker 1: He's a trad. He's on your team and he says
Speaker 1: everything I say. But what can we expect from the trads?
Speaker 1: All right? Back to this wise Mother Earth document. Okay,
Speaker 1: so then it talks about the prayers the wise elders
Speaker 1: of the indigenous people. Let's get some good generic theism
Speaker 1: going here with the wise indigenous people of the Amazon Basin.
Speaker 1: Let's not forget, by the way, these are human sacrifice cults.
Speaker 1: I thought, at least that's what the Catholic saints used
Speaker 1: to tell us about these regions that they evangelized. Right.
Speaker 1: Oh but wait, they're the colonizers who were extracting the
Speaker 1: poor Amazonian people and their resources. So these many spiritualities
Speaker 1: motivated the people to live in communion with soil, water, trees,
Speaker 1: and animals day and night. They're wise elder elders. I'm
Speaker 1: not jokings. What he says interchangeably called upon the maestras,
Speaker 1: the wajanga, and the chamanas to promote harmony. That's called animism.
Speaker 1: Those are called demons. So here's a great quote. There
Speaker 1: we go, section one of chapter six. That's a great one.
Speaker 1: So there you go, Trads. The uh Francis thinks that
Speaker 1: calling on the demons is a wise practice of the
Speaker 1: elders to be in communion with nature. Let's see Amazon
Speaker 1: basin human sacrifice, say with the wise elders. Now, now
Speaker 1: you see why I've got Mola ram here go, everybody
Speaker 1: go watch Temple of Doom later tonight. The Amazonian rainforest
Speaker 1: was once home to a gigantic human sacrifice called whoa
Speaker 1: chakra there? Huh, there's a whole Actually, it was this
Speaker 1: year that there was a whole bunch of articles on that.
Speaker 1: I remember reading like Smithsonian and right, wasn't it this year? Yeah, cannibalism, headhunting,
Speaker 1: and human sacrifice in the Amazon region. Yeah, eighty one
Speaker 1: new archaeological digs on Earth's let's see, this is news
Speaker 1: newsweek crap. Tried to be like they weren't really doing
Speaker 1: human sacrifice. They were. They were doing the traditional thuggy liturgy,
Speaker 1: the traditional right, which technically, if you translate the word
Speaker 1: human sacrifice, it's actually it actually just means goat sacrifice.
Speaker 1: It's not really a human You have to understand the.
Speaker 5: Word.
Speaker 1: All right, Well, there's a bunch of books on it.
Speaker 1: I can't find those archaeologists of human sacrifice Science mag
Speaker 1: hundreds of I think this is what I saw, Yeah,
Speaker 1: hundreds of skulls. Where was this is this Mexico? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's Mexico. Knew about that anyway. I've seen people arguing
Speaker 1: if anybody has any does anybody have any insight about
Speaker 1: the what the indigenous practices were. I'm pretty sure that
Speaker 1: they did do human sacrifice. I mean, I know all
Speaker 1: cultures did in some degree, but it seems like in
Speaker 1: response to the Amazon Synod, I've seen people saying that
Speaker 1: the Amazon Basin people did practice human sacrifice? Does anybody
Speaker 1: have any insight on that? In the chat? Yeah, I
Speaker 1: know that's Mexico. Does anybody have any indigenous people groups
Speaker 1: that did human sacrifice? I mean, I know they did,
Speaker 1: But what I'm saying is, do you know a do
Speaker 1: you have a link? Is what I'm asking for. They
Speaker 1: would they would sacrifice infants to Pacha Mama. Let's let's
Speaker 1: make sure on this patcha mom that's what I her.
Speaker 1: Pacha Mama did require human sacrifice. Let's make sure that
Speaker 1: that's true. Yes, so the INCA did offer human sacrifice
Speaker 1: to Pacha Mama. So Bolivia. I'm just trying to find
Speaker 1: a scholarly source because you know how these people are,
Speaker 1: They're gonna be like, oh, you're just making it up.
Speaker 1: There's no actual evidence out there. Yeah, right, whatever, dude, like,
Speaker 1: so you guys, you go to Wikipedia the whole dude.
Speaker 1: All it says about Pacha Mama is human sacrifice. Like
Speaker 1: people have rewritten that to make the Vatican look bad. Yeah, right,
Speaker 1: so Inca worship. Here we go. This is referenced in Okay,
Speaker 1: so there there are scholarly references for this in what's
Speaker 1: this book? So it's an Oxford print book on the
Speaker 1: religion of the Incas called Pacha Mama, uh, the Inca
Speaker 1: Earth Mother. I can't find the book. I can't tell
Speaker 1: what the title of the book is. Anyway, if you
Speaker 1: go to the Wikipedia article, it's it's linked right away. So, yes,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of baby sacrifice and well, no wonder
Speaker 1: Francis likes it. When are we going to have real
Speaker 1: acumenism with Mola rahm damn it? Why are we being so?
Speaker 1: By the way, Jamie and I just covered the Thuggie
Speaker 1: Why are we Why are we discriminating?
Speaker 5: Dude?
Speaker 1: Are we giving preference? Are we giving preference to the
Speaker 1: wisdom of the Amazon Basin people over against the great
Speaker 1: wise elders of the Thuggies. Mulla Ram Numbsiva, I'm Numbsiva,
Speaker 1: I'm numbsciva. I'm numb chiva. I want to see some
Speaker 1: hearts getting pulled out. If I don't see Francis pulling
Speaker 1: out hearts, then he is a bigot. So see some
Speaker 1: real thuggies. Here's some actual thuggy cult members. Ready to
Speaker 1: eat your heart, bro, where's your thuggies? That's the that
Speaker 1: those are the It's all good though, because they do
Speaker 1: the traditional thuggy right. They don't they don't do the
Speaker 1: liberal thuggy right where they like they substitute goats and
Speaker 1: the liberal thuggie right. They do the old school traditional
Speaker 1: uh cannibal right. So thuggie life, thug life, bro, thuggy
Speaker 1: li bro, they're the real trads. That's the legit tried
Speaker 1: Roman Catholicism is the thuggy right. Mol m molarm. Collie
Speaker 1: protectsas What's what does Indy say? Coli ma protects us?
Speaker 1: If you go to franciss if you were, if you
Speaker 1: were to go to Francis's liturgy, you come out of
Speaker 1: there like Indy does when they give him the black
Speaker 1: juice of Collie, and you'd be like, Francis protects us.
Speaker 1: So Indigenous Christians the Amazon region uh need to back off.
Speaker 1: Is basically what this goes on to say, stop trying
Speaker 1: to convert people. Oh, that's what the humanists will say,
Speaker 1: stop colonizer, evil colonizer, trying to convert people out of
Speaker 1: their healthy, indigenous ways, evil colonizer. How dare you trying
Speaker 1: to stop people from eating hearts? We are called to
Speaker 1: be instruments of God. No mention of Jesus his plan
Speaker 1: of peace. The dream of God brings about the realization
Speaker 1: within the family, the first community of our life. Oh,
Speaker 1: and the family stands against imperialism. Dude, this document is
Speaker 1: off the charts fake and hey fake, and hey it
Speaker 1: is fake and hey fake and hey to my heybales.
Speaker 1: So how do we preach the gospel? Here's the first
Speaker 1: mention of Jesus in Chapter seven, Jesus in the Amazon region.
Speaker 1: We're only like halfways have third of the way through
Speaker 1: this thing, the reality of the Amazon basin today. Blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. The Biblical account speaks of universal values. All
Speaker 1: men are made in God's image. We're all stewards of
Speaker 1: God's creation. We're all supposed to give thanks for the
Speaker 1: created world. We're supposed to have a harmonious relationship with nature.
Speaker 1: And it's a bunch of genesis and vacant two quotes.
Speaker 1: God makes covenant with human beings. Yeah we know that providence. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we know that God is the cause every creature possesses
Speaker 1: its unparticiars, tonism, natural theology, blah blah blah. Providence of God,
Speaker 1: which is this fullness in the incarnation of Christ Dave
Speaker 1: Urban secondmatican counsel or excuse me, godium aspez Santo Domingo
Speaker 1: and culturation. So here's our Jesuit approach to evangelization and culturation.
Speaker 1: Now we get to the death, burrel resurrection of Jesus
Speaker 1: already not yet? Okay, Yeah, that's fine. We agree with
Speaker 1: all that. How do we proclaim the gospel to the Amazonians?
Speaker 1: Evangelization began means being committed to the brothers and sisters
Speaker 1: and improving their community life. Is that what the gospel is?
Speaker 1: It sounds like social gospel. It sounds like liberation theology.
Speaker 1: Jesus told us to preach the human face, his human face.
Speaker 1: This is like skillobex type stuff, right to better people's
Speaker 1: living situation. Now, all those things attend the gospel, but
Speaker 1: those things aren't the gospel. This universal task of evangelism
Speaker 1: is this isn't the universal repentance from sins, putting away
Speaker 1: your idols. I mean, wouldn't that be the first thing
Speaker 1: that you would preach to the I mean, yeah, you
Speaker 1: should do the missionary tasks of you know, helping these
Speaker 1: people and all that. Sure, But I thought that Jesus
Speaker 1: commissioned us to preach repentance unto all nations, as in
Speaker 1: repent from worshiping demons. No mention of demons, no mention
Speaker 1: of idols in this at all. Nowhere redemption is the
Speaker 1: mission of the church. Evangelizing is to create social solidarity. No,
Speaker 1: this is not works of charity. Okay, that's not the
Speaker 1: gospel though, the social cosmic dimension of the church. Nothing
Speaker 1: about preaching repentance involves the interconnectivity of human life, ecosystems,
Speaker 1: and spirituality. Nothing about repentance, nothing about demons, nothing about
Speaker 1: wicked practices. Is it? If I ever read Romans one,
Speaker 1: do we recall what Romans one says. It's about the
Speaker 1: religions of the world and how they worship. Because you know,
Speaker 1: David says in the Psalms that the gods of the
Speaker 1: nations are demons. Moses says that the gods of the
Speaker 1: nations are demons. Athanasius wrote treatise as talking about the
Speaker 1: Heathen worshiping demons, namely add Gentees against the Heathen. We
Speaker 1: did a whole talk on that work. I'm not seeing
Speaker 1: the Athanasian approach to the gospel in the Care for Biodiversity.
Speaker 1: Here that Francis is into this sounds like Bill Gates Oprah.
Speaker 1: It sounds like Oprah gospel. Francis preaching an Oprah gospel.
Speaker 1: Everything's connected, man, that's literally what everything is connected. Uh
Speaker 1: so we want to open up dialogue. Uh huh. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I haven't seen anything about repentance yet. The Kingdom is
Speaker 1: everywhere present in us. Everything's connected. Yeah, the Kingdom of
Speaker 1: God is a church though. I mean yeah, there's a
Speaker 1: sense in which everything is in the Kingdom of God
Speaker 1: because it is cosmic and scope. But you can't enter
Speaker 1: the Kingdom without repentance in entering the church. Don't see
Speaker 1: that here hasn't been mentioned yet in the Amazon basin
Speaker 1: ecology into integral ecology is key. Well, what is that
Speaker 1: preserving biodiversity? This is just literally a club of Rome
Speaker 1: ecodocument that's all this is. It's literally taking the social
Speaker 1: gospel and Rockefeller funded liberation theology, not Moscow Rockefeller funded
Speaker 1: liberation theology and transforming it into social gospel. That's what
Speaker 1: this says. Threats come from a consumerism. Is that the
Speaker 1: threat consumerism? I thought the threat was Satan his demons Sin. No,
Speaker 1: not consumerism. I mean, consumerism is an effect of a
Speaker 1: bad worldview. It's a tool of social engineering. But consumerism
Speaker 1: isn't the threat. It's a symptom of another problem. The
Speaker 1: global economy is promoting consumerism. Yeah, but I mean this
Speaker 1: document just reads like basic bitch foundation funded Marxism. This
Speaker 1: doesn't read like anything. Could you imagine the Church Fathers
Speaker 1: saying this, this is laughable. Anybody who's rather the Church
Speaker 1: Fathers would know this is this is laughable. Integral ecology
Speaker 1: What is this? Well, he you're here, we're gonna get
Speaker 1: it a definition. Integral ecology tells us that we are
Speaker 1: connected between the environment and all of society. Oh it's
Speaker 1: a global villain. Okay, So Hillary Clinton global village, Rockefeller Soros, Okay,
Speaker 1: that's what it means the United Nations. Integral ecology tells
Speaker 1: us to have a conversion. Oh there's a new conversion
Speaker 1: for ecosins. Yes, okay, And this entails the recognition of
Speaker 1: our sins against God's creation. So we've got to repent
Speaker 1: of our ecosins. No, I'm sorry, I'm not repenting of ecosins.
Speaker 1: This is section eight down or nine, section eight orpent
Speaker 1: of your ecosins here. So notice how the gospel here
Speaker 1: is evolving and the Roman Charial the Church are just
Speaker 1: nothing but innovations evolving. Right. Go watch Father Josiah Trinham's
Speaker 1: lecture on YouTube about the evolving innovations of the Roman
Speaker 1: Caolic Church. It's about an hour or lecture where he
Speaker 1: just goes through what are called the Byzantine lists, which
Speaker 1: just list innovation after innovation after innovation after innovation after innovation,
Speaker 1: contrary to the ancient canons of the first millennium. And
Speaker 1: here you are a millennium later with ecosins. Bro, How
Speaker 1: could it be more clear to you that the Roman
Speaker 1: Catholic Church is an innovative, evolving thing and is not
Speaker 1: the real Orthodox Catholic Church. It's the counterfeit. How could
Speaker 1: it be more clear? If this doesn't wake you up,
Speaker 1: nothing will. And I would just say, if people after
Speaker 1: this are still clinging to this, move on, you're not.
Speaker 1: They're never gonna come out of that. They want this,
Speaker 1: they can have it, but there's a curse for this
Speaker 1: kind of stuff. So, I mean, you look at the
Speaker 1: degeneracy coming out with the pedo stuff in the Roman
Speaker 1: County Church. It's all examples of the curse. So you
Speaker 1: want to join yourself with that. I don't want any
Speaker 1: part of that. And if that's not enough to wake
Speaker 1: you up, then there's nothing that's gonna wake you up.
Speaker 1: It's like that. It's like the people who still think
Speaker 1: that there's not a new world order.
Speaker 7: It's like.
Speaker 1: What so And then it moves on to the sacramental
Speaker 1: dimension of the So basically it starts talking about animism
Speaker 1: and then pantheism, the sacramental dimension of preaching the Gospel.
Speaker 1: Oh so you see, now all things can be sacraments, right,
Speaker 1: Pacha Mama is a sacrament of the Roman Catholicy. All
Speaker 1: the religions are just kind of on a scale of sacraments. Right,
Speaker 1: So this is the new, the new way to do
Speaker 1: this since now Acumenism actually goes back way further. It's
Speaker 1: not a Vatican two things. Ecumunisms have been around for
Speaker 1: since the eighteen nineties. The Roman Catholic Church in nineteen
Speaker 1: twenty eight and the encyclical Mortalium Anemos twenty I think
Speaker 1: it's twenty eight. Anyway, Just read Mortalium Animos because it
Speaker 1: calls interfaith gatherings and ecumenical meetings apostasy in nineteen twenty
Speaker 1: eight apostasy. The Pope call it aposse. Now the Pope
Speaker 1: does it. You're not the church proof now on the coffin.
Speaker 1: But the way that they're they're sketching out this new
Speaker 1: sacramental view is that it's kind of like the chain
Speaker 1: of being where now you're some of you are going
Speaker 1: to have a problem with this, but I guarantee you
Speaker 1: this is where they're going with it. And even though
Speaker 1: I've been right about everything else, people are going to
Speaker 1: say you're wrong, you're an idiot, and yet I'm going
Speaker 1: to be right about this. Watch what I'm right about this.
Speaker 1: In five or ten years, look back on this video
Speaker 1: if it's still here, if I'm still here, and remember
Speaker 1: that I'm right about this five years from now. Hey,
Speaker 1: what's up? People? Five years from now? Remember when I
Speaker 1: told you this. Basically, I think what we're getting here
Speaker 1: is the movement.
Speaker 8: Towards they want to make the pope, the pope of
Speaker 8: all religions, like he's the head of Peter is really
Speaker 8: the head of all the religions.
Speaker 1: That's what is really going on. So it's like a
Speaker 1: chain of being, And like all the religions are a
Speaker 1: big pyramid. There's the monad, the generic theistic monad, not
Speaker 1: God the Father in the Orthodox Trinitarian doctrine, but the
Speaker 1: one which all the religions and pantheism are expressing, this
Speaker 1: great one, the great pumpkin of Charlie Brown. In this
Speaker 1: chain of being, the world religions are down here because
Speaker 1: they're expressing and closer to this pantheistic idea. But then
Speaker 1: the churches are kind of like a little higher up
Speaker 1: on the chain of being. They get a little more essence,
Speaker 1: a little more being going for them. And then at
Speaker 1: the top of this pyramid is the petrine office of being,
Speaker 1: the Pope of all the world religions. And then at
Speaker 1: the top of that is the Monad, the supreme simple
Speaker 1: essence that these false religions all worship. Now, watch if
Speaker 1: I'm not right about that in the next five to
Speaker 1: ten years, and then watched in five to ten years
Speaker 1: will still be coping. They'll still be trying to figure
Speaker 1: out how, Like Mola ram Is, like, what's this? What's
Speaker 1: the sacramental approach to the Thugies? How can we approach
Speaker 1: the Thuggee Temple of Doom liturgy with a sacramental and
Speaker 1: culturation approach? All right, so cosmic love man, so love,
Speaker 1: love love, nothing about repentance, yet, let's do it. Certain
Speaker 1: now again, I understand that this is not the final version.
Speaker 1: Yet do we have repentance? Is mentioned one time in
Speaker 1: this whole document about midway down and it says that repentance. Ah,
Speaker 1: I guess their repentance is for the evil colonizers. The
Speaker 1: only mention of repentance in this whole document is not
Speaker 1: anime stick, pantheistic, demonic religious traditions. It's you, you repent.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's the only mention of repentance. Let's maybe
Speaker 1: maybe the word repent comes up, let's say repent. Nope,
Speaker 1: the only mention is in the middle that you, the colonizer,
Speaker 1: has to repent. Now, the tribes are like, you have
Speaker 1: a uh, we agree, we agree. Francis is bad news.
Speaker 1: All but now wait a minute, now, just a minute,
Speaker 1: we're gonna look at we're gonna look at what Vatican
Speaker 1: one and Catholic moral theology says about whether you have
Speaker 1: the right to just pick and choose what aspects of
Speaker 1: Francis's magisterium you want to follow. Because I got news
Speaker 1: for you. You don't get to pick, bro, that's the tried view.
Speaker 1: You don't get to pick. You don't get to choose,
Speaker 1: cafeteria style chipotele Amazon Synod with Eric Obara on the
Speaker 1: cafeteria picking out all the things that you want to
Speaker 1: choose to believe, you don't get to Sorry, bro, all right,
Speaker 1: I lost my place where I was about Section ten
Speaker 1: the sacramento dimension of all the religions. Yeah, uh oh,
Speaker 1: here's Baptism and Eucharist. Okay, thank you. By the way,
Speaker 1: did you remember that John Paul the Second allowed Amazonian
Speaker 1: women to do liturgy bear breasted. I can't show you
Speaker 1: that image obviously. It looks it's very national geographic. You
Speaker 1: can go google it because I think it was an
Speaker 1: Amazonian women woman. Just go look up John Paul the
Speaker 1: Second's bare breasted liturgy during the liturgy, cut big old
Speaker 1: national geographics. Booby's bouncing around during the liturgy. I mean,
Speaker 1: you sure add there a joke. Dude, you guys are
Speaker 1: total hypocrites. Now, Francis is bad. Oh but wait a minute,
Speaker 1: what about John Paul the Great, John Paul, the covering
Speaker 1: up for the pedo's Great, John Paul the giving a
Speaker 1: knighthood to Jimmy Savile Great. Oh he let the big
Speaker 1: old Amazonian boobies bounce around during the liturgy. I'll but
Speaker 1: that's all right. Sorry, Oh but I don't have to
Speaker 1: follow that because I'm a state of a contest. Now, okay, sure,
Speaker 1: so cosmic love comes back. Nothing about demons, Nothing about
Speaker 1: repentance except that you have to repent for your eco sins. Literally,
Speaker 1: that's the only mention of repentance. Nothing about let's say,
Speaker 1: if there'snything about demons here? Oh guess what. The word
Speaker 1: demonize is used once, but it's saying that the colonizers
Speaker 1: demonize the indigenous cultures. Uh yeah, let me show you
Speaker 1: that the one mention of demon is not the inca
Speaker 1: human sacrifice to Pacha Mama. No no, no, no, no
Speaker 1: no no. We are having a field day with this.
Speaker 1: Trasrect Traces still exists of the colonizing project, which gave
Speaker 1: rise to attitudes that belittle and demonize indigenous cultures. That's
Speaker 1: because indigenous cultures worshiped demons, as even your Roman Catholic
Speaker 1: people said for a millennia, even as Rome taught for
Speaker 1: the first millennium. Now I lost my place because I
Speaker 1: went to that. Uh, the church must now think with
Speaker 1: an Amazonian face. The church must think with an Amazonian face.
Speaker 1: That doesn't even make sense. It's a bunch of gibberish
Speaker 1: rechards that write this stuff about it. The church must
Speaker 1: think with an Amazonian face. Do faces think the church
Speaker 1: must think with giant Amazonian boobies bouncing around in the liturgy?
Speaker 1: How about that? That's better? Like that one? That one
Speaker 1: makes more sense anyway. There's about four more sections that
Speaker 1: you can go read if you want to. Now, again,
Speaker 1: this is the preparatory document. I don't think the full
Speaker 1: document has come out in English. It's not. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter because it's going to And it looks like the
Speaker 1: news is already saying that the worst parts have been affirmed.
Speaker 1: As if we needed this to know that the Roman
Speaker 1: institution was false. I mean, we don't need this. We've
Speaker 1: had like decades and ultimately a millennium of ecumenist type
Speaker 1: stuff all the way back to the Renaissance. We don't
Speaker 1: need this. We already know all the pedo stuff, pedo stuff,
Speaker 1: Amazon synon Vatican two, the documents of Vatican two total contrary,
Speaker 1: total contradiction to mortal mortalium anemos. Have the tries not
Speaker 1: read or mortalium animos that says that this stuff is apostasy.
Speaker 1: Your own pope says this is apostasy. That's the strongest
Speaker 1: argument I've ever found. I remember that I just when
Speaker 1: I was still going to the Novus Ordo, and I
Speaker 1: read all the papal and cyclicals of the twentieth century
Speaker 1: prior to Vatican Two, and then back into the eighteen hundreds.
Speaker 1: I went and read all those and then you and
Speaker 1: it's still not the Vatican website. I'm gonna put it
Speaker 1: in the chat for you. So here's mortalium animos. The
Speaker 1: pope says that inter faith prayer meetings are a rejection
Speaker 1: of the Gospel, they're apostasy. In nineteen twenty eight Pissed
Speaker 1: the eleventh, Yep, I was right. January sixth, nineteen twenty eight,
Speaker 1: Mortalian Animos of piss the eleventh. This is ordinary magister
Speaker 1: doctrinal teaching. Now, how is something that's apostasy in nineteen
Speaker 1: twenty eight the opposite of that is now orthodoxy in
Speaker 1: the Roman Catholic world. Yeah, exactly. That alone destroys the
Speaker 1: Roman call. Now still look at the tries in the Chat.
Speaker 1: All they have to do, all they can do is cuss,
Speaker 1: you're freaking tool. Yeah, because you just got demolished and
Speaker 1: you just got deleted too, all that pewtiles like yeah, like,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, it's all made up, right, But there's another
Speaker 1: trad coat. Lie, there's not really pedo stuff. It's made
Speaker 1: up by the liberal media. Yeah. Yeah, nobody believes that, dude,
Speaker 1: except you. Actually, I would say, yes, truth is relative
Speaker 1: to these people, to the tries, it is relative. You
Speaker 1: can't just say I trust the fathers. I mean which
Speaker 1: church fathers? Yeah, there's what else is there to figure
Speaker 1: it out? Like how if Mortalium Animos says the interfaith
Speaker 1: religious gatherings are apostacy in nineteen twenty eight, and that
Speaker 1: was the magisterial ordinary teaching, it can't be the case
Speaker 1: that the opposite is true in twenty nineteen. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's not rocket science to figure out that truth doesn't
Speaker 1: become the opposite of itself. You stupid trads, all right,
Speaker 1: and you can't fall back on some apocalyptic cult mentality. Oh,
Speaker 1: we're in the last days. Let's look at that next
Speaker 1: that's the next one. We're going to go to here,
Speaker 1: let me pull up my now it's covered in John
Speaker 1: Pontrello's excellent book for those of For the TRAbs are
Speaker 1: gonna be like, Oh, I'm going to go say to now,
Speaker 1: that's the only way out of this. Sorry. You can't
Speaker 1: be united to an invisible church, and yes, so to
Speaker 1: a contism is the invisible church heresy of John Calvin.
Speaker 1: There's no such thing as an empty seat of Peter
Speaker 1: that's been empty for decades that you're in union with
Speaker 1: because Vatican One says you have to be in union
Speaker 1: with the human successor in Rome, in the Sea of
Speaker 1: Peter that the world has accepted. That's who you have
Speaker 1: to accept, that the College of Cardinals has accepted, and
Speaker 1: that there will be a human successor in that office
Speaker 1: in perpetuity to the end of the world until Jews
Speaker 1: comes back. You can't accept this giant vacancy for sixty
Speaker 1: seventy eighty one hundred years which there will never be
Speaker 1: another pope. If that's true because all the College of
Speaker 1: Cardinals has apostatized. It's total idiocy. If you're at that point,
Speaker 1: it's time to rethink this religion. And Roman Catholicism is
Speaker 1: a man made religion. It has all the signs of
Speaker 1: man made religion. It's a man made cult. It's now
Speaker 1: falling into total demonism, and if you don't get out
Speaker 1: of that, it ends up in a curse. Do you
Speaker 1: understand Deuteronomy twenty eight, twenty nine, and thirty. The curses
Speaker 1: of God's Covenant still apply. Jesus applies those curses in
Speaker 1: Apocalypse two and three. I'm not your enemy. If you
Speaker 1: go along with this stuff, you get the curses of
Speaker 1: the Covenant. All of those Covenant curses Jesus applies to
Speaker 1: the seven churches in Asia Minor. Some of those churches
Speaker 1: in Asia Minor don't exist anymore because the Covenant curses
Speaker 1: were applied. You can't mix the cup of Ballial, the
Speaker 1: cup of Satan, the cup of Demons, and the cup
Speaker 1: of Christ. All of this stuff, all of this acumenism
Speaker 1: direct contrary to what Paul says, mixes the cup of
Speaker 1: demons and the cup of Christ in your face. It's
Speaker 1: all in everybody's face. The whole world can see that
Speaker 1: Francis is not He's not even a Christian, much less
Speaker 1: anything close to Orthodox. So it's not a joke. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is you know, this is real stuff here we're
Speaker 1: talking about. We're talking about curses like you. I don't
Speaker 1: want covenant curses. I mean, I've had God's chastisement before.
Speaker 1: I'm sure we all have. You guys have Covenant curses
Speaker 1: are not fun. Let's look at some of these statements
Speaker 1: about Vatican One, because all the Trads are gonna say, well,
Speaker 1: you know what, I just don't accept this. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna accept all of this. All the seeds
Speaker 1: of this go back to the Renaissance and all the
Speaker 1: seeds of Vatican too. We're in the Renaissance, and all
Speaker 1: the seeds of Amazon Synod, we're in Vatican two. It's
Speaker 1: just the logical progression. So, Trads, we're not your enemy.
Speaker 1: We're trying to help you out. We are your friends,
Speaker 1: and that's what you're going to have to accept. Pacha, Mama,
Speaker 1: ain't your friend. Francis is not your friend. Francis is
Speaker 1: the head of all the revolution, and Francis hates you.
Speaker 1: Francis hates trads. We don't hate trads. We want you
Speaker 1: to be on our side. We want you to be
Speaker 1: on the same team with us so that we can
Speaker 1: oppose these degenerates. Rome is your enemy, not me, not us.
Speaker 1: That's what you have to figure out. We aren't blessing
Speaker 1: pacha mama. There's no pacha mamas in Orthodox churches. We
Speaker 1: don't do clown masses. Even crappy liberal Orthodox churches don't
Speaker 1: do clown mass. Okay, here we go, So let's look
Speaker 1: at this first Vatican One statement about what you have
Speaker 1: to follow. Then thank you to snack Ortho bro on
Speaker 1: the perpetuity and the premiacy of the Blessed See of Peter,
Speaker 1: Princess Shepherd and the Prince and Great Shepherd of the Sheep,
Speaker 1: Jesus Christ established the Blessed Apostle Peter to secure the
Speaker 1: perpetual wre welfare of the church. It must, by the
Speaker 1: same institution, necessarily remain unceasingly in the church. You see that, Okay,
Speaker 1: The successors not just some invisible empty nestorian, non existent
Speaker 1: chair that you're in communion with. It's has no successors,
Speaker 1: but the actual successors is what this is talking about.
Speaker 1: And any Roman Catholic canon lawyer would tell you that
Speaker 1: founded upon the Rock of Peter, blah blah blah, this
Speaker 1: is this is the attitude of Vatican One. It will
Speaker 1: stand firm imperpetuity in the Latin. Actually the Latin shows
Speaker 1: imperpetuity to the end of the world. The successors in
Speaker 1: Rome are there to the end of the world. You
Speaker 1: see that, and they are in that chair the successors
Speaker 1: of Peter, and every church must be in communion with
Speaker 1: that see to have jurisdiction. And you can't reject that.
Speaker 1: Pontrello has two chapters where he absolutely proves that in
Speaker 1: his book. So you can't fall You can't get around
Speaker 1: this by saying, oh, I don't have to follow that. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be a trad but I'm not gonna follow that.
Speaker 1: That's that's not for me. I'm gonna choose my trad Catholicism,
Speaker 1: make it up as I go, pick which ones I
Speaker 1: want that's the same one, and pick a different one.
Speaker 1: So here's another one of these. These are Roman dogmatic
Speaker 1: statements on Peter by the way we teach them, declare
Speaker 1: that the appointment of Lord Jesus Christ, the Roman Church
Speaker 1: possesses a superiority over all the church, and that this
Speaker 1: power and jurisdiction of a Roman pontiff, which is truly episcopal,
Speaker 1: is immediate to which all whatever right and dignity of
Speaker 1: pastors and faithful, individually and collectively, are bound by their
Speaker 1: duty of hierarchical subordination to in obedience, true obedience, to submit.
Speaker 1: Not only in the matters of faith and morals. You
Speaker 1: don't just get to pick. Oh, I'll take the faith
Speaker 1: and morals, but I'm not going to submit my intellect
Speaker 1: and decision to the rest of it. No. No, also to
Speaker 1: the discipline and governance of the church. You have to
Speaker 1: submit to the universal ordin and non ordinary magisterial teaching.
Speaker 1: You have to submit. Now, you might privately think that
Speaker 1: the universal non ordinary magistrum is incorrect. You might privately
Speaker 1: think that and not be sinning in your conscience. But
Speaker 1: you have to submit with docility, as the canons and
Speaker 1: catechisms say so. You cannot deviate from this without the
Speaker 1: loss of your salvation. All right? Is that clear enough
Speaker 1: for you? Trads? Is that clear? What about doubting? Although
Speaker 1: not an assent of faith, a religious submission of the
Speaker 1: intellect and will must be given to a doctrine of
Speaker 1: the Supreme Pontiff or the College of Bishops, which they
Speaker 1: declare to be faith and morals when they exercise the
Speaker 1: authority even if they do not intend to proclaim it
Speaker 1: by a definitive act. That's called ordinary magisterium. Ordinary magisterium
Speaker 1: has two divisions, universal ordinary magisterium and ordinary non universal Magistrum.
Speaker 1: Universal ordinary Magisterium, according to batic In one possesses the
Speaker 1: patrine terrorism of infallibility, and you can't disagree with it.
Speaker 1: It's just as infallible as ex Cathedral Universal non ordinary
Speaker 1: or excuse me, non ordinary Magisterial teaching must be submitted
Speaker 1: to even though it could airr and it must be
Speaker 1: submitted to with docility. You see, so trads. You can't
Speaker 1: reject Francis's normative teaching. This is a trad myth. It's
Speaker 1: also a trad myth that ordinary magisterial teaching can be erroneous.
Speaker 1: This is why the SSPX is, well, we're not going
Speaker 1: to accept the canonization of John Paul. You can't reject
Speaker 1: canonizations gufas. If you could, you could reject all of
Speaker 1: the canonized saints. It's silly anyway. This whole system is
Speaker 1: collapsing right before us, right in front of our eyes.
Speaker 1: All right, let's move on to the super chats. We've
Speaker 1: been going for a good while now. Five hundred welcome. Everybody.
Speaker 1: Got a big audience tonight, over two hours. Josh Baker
Speaker 1: two dollars. I need the washcloth dabbing on the forehand.
Speaker 1: And one I get my own in my preacher, doing
Speaker 1: in my preachers doing in my preacher's voice. It's okay now,
Speaker 1: thank you, Josh Baker. D o Strabo. Can Pacha Mama
Speaker 1: be de idolized? No, Christmas trees aren't idols. Now maybe
Speaker 1: in some cultures they worship or Christmas tree, but having
Speaker 1: your Christmas tree does not mean that you're an idolater.
Speaker 1: B pays old ten dollars. I love your work, Joe.
Speaker 1: What's the best Orthodox work? The touch is on the
Speaker 1: notion of just war. Uh, there's a thing at roal
Speaker 1: course studies on war. Let me see. Yeah, here it
Speaker 1: is Metropolitan Anthony. Yep. So if you're still watching, I'll
Speaker 1: put that in the chat for you. There's the Metropolitan
Speaker 1: Anthony Christian Faith and War essay. Pretty well known shows
Speaker 1: that we don't teach pacifism. Got a bunch of bays
Speaker 1: Russians soldiers with the cross. I mean the bishops used
Speaker 1: to bless the Russian soldiers. I mean, come on, scilly,
Speaker 1: it's pacifism. The nonsense out of here road course studies
Speaker 1: Christian Faith and War. Great essay, Metropolitan Anthony. I recommend
Speaker 1: that a good question. Though the next question is Thomas,
Speaker 1: w estimate how many people you've converted to Orthodoxy. I
Speaker 1: wouldn't know how to estimate it. I would say it
Speaker 1: east in the hundreds, maybe a few thousand, but I
Speaker 1: wouldn't know how to estimate that. But by God's grace,
Speaker 1: we have a lot of people converting. You know, with
Speaker 1: all this stuff going on, a lot more people are
Speaker 1: going to convert. So hopefully we can be here to
Speaker 1: field everybody's questions to the best of our abilities. But
Speaker 1: I want to remind everybody that if you are interested
Speaker 1: in Orthodoxy, I would start with an orthodox study Bible.
Speaker 1: A lot of people are ignorant of the Bible, so
Speaker 1: we want to increase biblical literacy. That's not Protestantism. We
Speaker 1: want to understand the Bible in the Orthodox sense. So
Speaker 1: you want to understand Orthodoxy from the biblical perspective. You
Speaker 1: want to attend a good Orthodox church that's not being compromised.
Speaker 1: So I would say avoid Greek Orthodox Archdiocese, avoid Bartholomew churches.
Speaker 1: Find Russian, Serbian, Romanian, Antiochian. Those are still pretty solid.
Speaker 1: But again, that's in America, okay, So I'm not speaking
Speaker 1: everybody's experience, and every I can't. I don't know people's
Speaker 1: experiences in other countries. I'm speaking in the domain of America.
Speaker 1: Do you think that tossing the idols into the river
Speaker 1: may have had a ritualistic significance? Ancient Romans used to
Speaker 1: toss effigies into the Tiber. I didn't know that. I
Speaker 1: don't think so. I think that it was probably angry trads,
Speaker 1: you know, throwing Patamama in the river, Which is interesting.
Speaker 1: When are the trads going to storm the Vatican and
Speaker 1: throw Hermias trisma justus into the Tiber? That is that
Speaker 1: going to be scraped off the walls of the act.
Speaker 1: What about all the nudes in the Vatican, all the
Speaker 1: nude statues. Isn't that promote promoting mortal sin everywhere? With
Speaker 1: nudes everywhere? When is that going to be torn down
Speaker 1: some dude, Sam, five dollars? How come? How can you
Speaker 1: become an undocumented refugee simply by moving from a jungle
Speaker 1: to the city within the same country. That is a
Speaker 1: good question, Thank you, undocumented Sam. That's a great question
Speaker 1: that we could pose to Francis and his Amazonian Molaramian
Speaker 1: bishops Molaramian right thuggy traditional Latin right bishops. We can
Speaker 1: ask them how that's possible. And how do you think
Speaker 1: with an Amazonian face? That's another question I have thinking
Speaker 1: with the Amazonian face? Uh Don Trout five bucks Jr.
Speaker 1: Love you work? Flat Earth. No, I'm not convinced of
Speaker 1: flat Earth. I'm open to geocentrism. I think Robert S.
Speaker 1: Genis has some good arguments about that. I've looked at
Speaker 1: a lot of flat earth stuff. I do not find
Speaker 1: it convincing, So I know that makes a lot of
Speaker 1: people mad. Sorry, I'm not convinced, But as people know,
Speaker 1: I have changed my mind at times, and my mind
Speaker 1: can be changed. But I don't think I'm going to
Speaker 1: be convinced of the flat earth stuff. However, as you know,
Speaker 1: I don't believe most of the mainstream scientism vs. But
Speaker 1: I've watched a lot of the people. I mean, I
Speaker 1: watched Chris debate Jerinism for four hours. Chris had multiple
Speaker 1: debates with those guys. I've watched all those flatters people.
Speaker 1: I've seen tons and tons of the videos, and I've
Speaker 1: watched tons and tons of the people opposing them. I mean,
Speaker 1: I was watching this stuff when it came out. I
Speaker 1: watched what's his name? Who's Benny's friend that flew from
Speaker 1: Santiago to Sydney? Max? What's that guy's name? Benny's friend,
Speaker 1: Max Goska, He was at AV nine. What's his name?
Speaker 1: I can't believe. I'm going blank. I'm not trying to
Speaker 1: be mean to the guy. I'm going blank on him.
Speaker 1: He's got a giant YouTube channel. What's that guy's name?
Speaker 1: He he did the He videoed this Santiago Sydney flight.
Speaker 1: Max Egan, thank you. Yeah. Max Egan videoed that whole thing.
Speaker 1: And then all the replies were like, oh, you got
Speaker 1: caught in a wind tunnel. That sped you up. I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, this is silly anyway, And then they were saying, oh,
Speaker 1: Max Egan faked his come on, it's not fake. Chase
Speaker 1: Littlefield five dollars. E MJ will argue for Rome till
Speaker 1: eyes bleed. I like him. What is his deal?
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I can't speak to what other people's deals are Michael
Speaker 1: Sarah Larius five Bucks. Trad say Paul the Fourth taught
Speaker 1: that the sea could be vacant during an anti pope's
Speaker 1: fake papacy and com x apostolotis I think, uh snack No,
Speaker 1: the other or other French orthrow Bro actually responded to
Speaker 1: this today and he actually disproved it. He's debunked it.
Speaker 1: McLean now like I won't be able to find that tweet.
Speaker 1: Can somebody share the his tweet? Where? I think? Didn't
Speaker 1: he debunk this today? Was it comb x apostolt I'm
Speaker 1: familiar with that because I've seen But it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: because com x apostle comb ex officio officio. Uh, it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter because Vatican one says that there will be
Speaker 1: successors to the end. So it's true that in a
Speaker 1: vacant period, when the sea is vacant, it's true that
Speaker 1: you still have to be in union with Rome. The
Speaker 1: problem is that if said of a contism is true,
Speaker 1: there's been a vacancy since at least John the twenty third,
Speaker 1: maybe even some of them argue even earlier, right, and
Speaker 1: there's no way to ever have another papal office holder.
Speaker 1: And the problem is that the Church has therefore lost
Speaker 1: all jurisdiction. So the vacancy for an anti pope is
Speaker 1: not the same thing as sixty seventy eighty one hundred
Speaker 1: years of vacancy. And actually he shows that because that
Speaker 1: would mean that because the next argument that they use
Speaker 1: is they say, oh, well, we're in the end times, right,
Speaker 1: and Rome will aposticize and become the seed of Antichrist
Speaker 1: la soilette and blah blah blah blah blah. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: you can't have a loss of the successors of Peter
Speaker 1: for one hundred years before the return of Christ. It's says,
Speaker 1: in perpetuity until Christ returns, until the end of time.
Speaker 1: And again Pontrello demolishes this terrible say to argument. Get
Speaker 1: his book, it's on Amazon. He demolishes that argument in
Speaker 1: the last half of the book. It says that the
Speaker 1: human successors are uninterrupted, So that means that obviously at
Speaker 1: Vatican One they knew there were periods of vacancy, so
Speaker 1: they're not saying a period of vacancy between popes. They're
Speaker 1: talking about uninterrupted in perpetuity to the end of the world.
Speaker 1: And by the way, if this is true, then the
Speaker 1: whole set of a constans thesis crumbles. And it is
Speaker 1: and that's why John wrote his book. So in response
Speaker 1: to kum x Apostolatus Aficio, I would say, read read
Speaker 1: John Pontrello's book, because he covers that in the last
Speaker 1: few chapters, cyrec ten bucks a great point in curses
Speaker 1: in Deuteronomy. Yeah, a lot of people forget that. The
Speaker 1: New Testament covers continues over the Covenant curses, right, Paul,
Speaker 1: And when he's talking about the Lord's Supper, he says
Speaker 1: that you get the Covenant curses. That's the Covenant meal, right.
Speaker 1: The euchreus is the Covenant meal. And Paul says, you'll
Speaker 1: get the Covenant curses if you come to the table unworthily. Right.
Speaker 1: That's why we do confession before Eucharist. I mean it's
Speaker 1: a little different. Different Orthodox churches have a different practice
Speaker 1: on this, but like in the Russian Church, you know,
Speaker 1: there's usually confession before every Eucharist. In the Antiochians, they
Speaker 1: usually do it like twice once or twice a month,
Speaker 1: so it'll differ a little bit of church of church.
Speaker 1: But the point is that we want to be in
Speaker 1: a good state of mind before the Lord's Supper, because
Speaker 1: Paul says that if you eat unworthily, you can bring
Speaker 1: the curses upon you. And what is more cursed than
Speaker 1: a damn clown mass? What is more cursed than Francis's
Speaker 1: puppet masses? The Pope himself did puppet masses? Look them up,
Speaker 1: Michael cera Larius five bucks? Why do not the pope?
Speaker 1: Why don't the Orthodox redect the first among equals pope
Speaker 1: if they believe Rome is apostate and this see Peter Vacant. Well,
Speaker 1: actually there is a I think a Romanian Orthodox bishop
Speaker 1: in Rome. So the Orthodox have a bishop in Rome technically.
Speaker 1: And if you look at the pentarchy system, pentarchy isn't
Speaker 1: it's a conciliar thing from the council's right. So a
Speaker 1: city can rise or fall in pre eminence in church history,
Speaker 1: and that's not fundamental to the constitution of the church. Right,
Speaker 1: we don't have some magical view that anything that happened
Speaker 1: that a council is therefore always the case for the
Speaker 1: rest of history. For the rest of the time, because
Speaker 1: you can have patriarchates sever themselves from the church. So
Speaker 1: from the Orthodox perspective, Rome severed themselves outside the church.
Speaker 1: That's what Mark of Ephesus says that Florence about Rome
Speaker 1: and the Latins after he figure out what was really
Speaker 1: going on at the end of the conference, that's what
Speaker 1: he says. And so there's no vacancy of the seat
Speaker 1: of Peter because the Orthodox Church still exists and there's
Speaker 1: plenty of Orthodox churches in Italy and in Rome, so
Speaker 1: there are still Orthodox Roman bishops. We don't need a
Speaker 1: first among equals because actually, in the canonical privileges that
Speaker 1: fell next to Constantinople, and now Constantinople is acting like
Speaker 1: the pope and is going to fall under the same
Speaker 1: severeign He's already severed himself in my view from Orthodoxy.
Speaker 1: So Bartholemey is not Orthodox. I think it's a heretic
Speaker 1: and the rest of the world is gradually coming to
Speaker 1: see that that's the case. I mean, he's basically just
Speaker 1: the Orthodox version of Francis. So let's see what's the
Speaker 1: last one here and uh and again to people who
Speaker 1: aren't aware, like that's not devastating to our view. We aren't.
Speaker 1: The Orthodox Church is not a pseudo papal institution.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: Canon six of Nicia says that the position of Rome
Speaker 1: is according to custom and it's likened to the other patriarchates.
Speaker 1: And I don't care what Erbaara says about that. He's wrong,
Speaker 1: and that's why in our debate he was relying on
Speaker 1: forged documents. Orthodox Pilgrim, thank you Orthodox. Uh some point
Speaker 1: to the seven church in Revelation has proven of an
Speaker 1: invisible church or branch theory. No, it has absolutely nothing
Speaker 1: to do with Those are all visible, historic churches. So
Speaker 1: how anybody could get invisible church from that, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean I was a Calvinist, so I used to
Speaker 1: be a longtime proponent of the invisible church theory. But
Speaker 1: I don't see where how the seven Churches of Asia Minor,
Speaker 1: I mean those are historic churches. I mean doesn't I
Speaker 1: mean the Church of Epicius still exists. So, like, it
Speaker 1: would probably be one of the worst arguments for UH,
Speaker 1: for this kind of an argument, for this kind of
Speaker 1: a position. What is a good way to refute the
Speaker 1: Protestant view that they so basically yeah, like what's the
Speaker 1: Anglican branch theory. Well, the Protestant Church does not have
Speaker 1: the three stools, right. You could say the four marks
Speaker 1: of the church one Holy, Catholic, Apostolic. Right, Prosestant churches
Speaker 1: are not one. They're not holy, they don't have saints,
Speaker 1: they're not universal, they're not Catholic, they're not part of
Speaker 1: the ancient Oakumunae. They're not Apostolic. They don't possess apostock succession.
Speaker 1: The Orthodox Church of the first millennium gave the church
Speaker 1: it's leg of the If you think of a three
Speaker 1: legs stool apsoutic succession, scripture and tradition. Right now, only
Speaker 1: two possible churches can fulfill the four marks and the
Speaker 1: three stools three legs of the stool. It's either the
Speaker 1: Roman Colley Church or Orthoduxers. There's no other contenders. This
Speaker 1: stream demonstrates that it's not the Roman Calloay Church. So
Speaker 1: the easiest way to refute branch theory is to point
Speaker 1: out that Jesus' body is not a bunch of branches,
Speaker 1: it's one visible body. According to Paul all right, cool stream, guys, uh,
Speaker 1: thank you everybody. I don't see any more super chats.
Speaker 1: Bartholomew is a heretic. He has all the same types
Speaker 1: of he promotes all the same green stuff, writes books
Speaker 1: with Al Gore and all those people, just like what
Speaker 1: Francis is putting out. By the way, is it not
Speaker 1: obvious that they're putting out all the same stuff Francis
Speaker 1: putting out on the same stuff that Martholomew puts out
Speaker 1: about the eco crap. Blessing Pacha Mama, Pacha Mama is
Speaker 1: a human sacrifice deity. I mean, this is just reached
Speaker 1: total like dystopia crazy levels, right? Is it not obvious?
Speaker 1: All right? Thank you guys, Be sure to like, be
Speaker 1: sure to subscribe, be sure to share below. Next up
Speaker 1: is the Bible lectures. We're gonna lecture through the entire Bible,
Speaker 1: starting with Genesis. Probably take us three years, who knows,
Speaker 1: don't know how long it'll take, but it's gonna be
Speaker 1: hopefully a blessed educational endeavor. If you want to support
Speaker 1: Jays Analysis, you can subscribe at the website or you
Speaker 1: can subscribe here on YouTube, same content, just two different
Speaker 1: ways to subscribe, no different. If you subscribe to the website,
Speaker 1: you do get immediate access to all the archives. So
Speaker 1: thank everybody for the superchat. You can also support me
Speaker 1: by getting my books right. So I'm talking about the
Speaker 1: American Greek churches. There are some of those that are good.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying everybody in the Greek churches this. Everybody
Speaker 1: misunderstands this every time I say it. I've never been
Speaker 1: to Greece. The Church of Greece unfortunately, is siding with
Speaker 1: the schismatics. I'm not saying it immediately everybody because of
Speaker 1: that council is a cut off from Grace and Greece.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that. I'm not saying everybody who attends
Speaker 1: the Greek Orthodox Archidiocese church is necessarily damn. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying any of that. Don't put words in my mouth.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying that for people who are looking for
Speaker 1: in America. Again, I live in America. I know what
Speaker 1: the American experience is like. If you go to the
Speaker 1: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese, they'll tell you that they like Freemasons.
Speaker 1: They'll tell you don't convert people. They say it in
Speaker 1: their manual. Here's their manual saying don't make converts. Fucking
Speaker 1: make this work. So we have always been calling out
Speaker 1: in Cumanism. Here it's there are people lying when they
Speaker 1: say that we don't. It's just amazing, like the amount
Speaker 1: of opposition that we get, it's just crazy. There's the
Speaker 1: Greek Orthodox Archdiocese official manual telling you don't make converts.
Speaker 1: Page I'm not making it up. It's not a fake quote.
Speaker 1: As if this would be fake. It's obviously like it
Speaker 1: was this hard to believe or something, page two thirty six.
Speaker 1: Right there, All right there, you go to the trads
Speaker 1: in denial, read Mortalium Animals, and read John Pontrello's book.
Speaker 1: There's no other way to go. There's no other places
Speaker 1: to go. The Orthodox Church is the same church as
Speaker 1: the first millennium. We have all the correct triadic dogmas,
Speaker 1: we have all the correct christological dogmas, and by extension
Speaker 1: then we also have the correct ecclesiology. Your church has
Speaker 1: now left anything remotely close to Orthodoxy. There is no
Speaker 1: Roman Catholicism without Rome and the pope. Obviously. All right,
Speaker 1: God bless everybody, have a good night,