Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the tenth of October.
Speaker 1: Ye have our lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're
Speaker 1: going to take a look at Milton. As I said yesterday,
Speaker 1: one of the key issues that we always have with
Speaker 1: us is the fact that we have people who are
Speaker 1: hyping this to the nth degree, and that gets people
Speaker 1: to stay in dangerous way. But fortunately we don't know,
Speaker 1: well we don't know exactly what the damage has been.
Speaker 1: But fortunately it came down extensively and came in in
Speaker 1: a much different area than they said. So we're going
Speaker 1: to take a look at that, and we're going to
Speaker 1: take a look at both the left and the right
Speaker 1: pushing panic about weather. No weather like this has ever
Speaker 1: happened before. This is the most important election of our lifetime.
Speaker 1: And on a new study, a couple of studies have
Speaker 1: come out looking at plastics in your brain. Interestingly they
Speaker 1: come to the nose. I wonder how that could have happened.
Speaker 1: Who knows. As we'd say, right, we'll be right back. Well,
Speaker 1: Marjorie Taylor Green is still being attacked by the mainstream
Speaker 1: media for saying that there was such a thing as
Speaker 1: Joe engineering, and of course we all know there is.
Speaker 1: The question is was that involved in what happened with
Speaker 1: the Hurricane Helene? And so as she's being attacked, she
Speaker 1: puts out a post and says, yes, they can control
Speaker 1: the weather. Here is Obama's CIA director John Brennan talking
Speaker 1: about it. Anyone who says they don't or makes fun
Speaker 1: of this is lying to you. By the way, the
Speaker 1: people know it. These the people know it, and they
Speaker 1: hate all of you who try to cover it up.
Speaker 1: And of course Brennan and others hate us as well.
Speaker 1: It's kind of a mutual mutual thing. Here's the clip
Speaker 1: that she put up.
Speaker 3: Another example is the array of technologies often referred to
Speaker 3: collectively as geo engineering, that potentially could help reverse the
Speaker 3: warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained
Speaker 3: my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection or SAI, a
Speaker 3: method of seeding intryosphere with particles that can help reflect
Speaker 3: the Sun's heat and much the same way that volcanic
Speaker 3: eruptions do. An SAI program could limit global temperature increases,
Speaker 3: reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the
Speaker 3: world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. This
Speaker 3: process is also relatively inexpensive. The National Research Council estimates
Speaker 3: that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about ten
Speaker 3: billion dollars yearly. As promising as it may be moving forward,
Speaker 3: an SAI would also raise a number of challenges for
Speaker 3: our government and for the international community. On the technical side,
Speaker 3: greenhouse gas emission reductions, which still have to accompany SAI
Speaker 3: to address other climate change effects such as ocean acidification,
Speaker 3: because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
Speaker 3: On the g political side, the technology is potential to
Speaker 3: alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions of the world
Speaker 3: at the expense of other regions, could trigger sharp opposition
Speaker 3: by some nations. Others might seize on sai's benefits and
Speaker 3: back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions, and
Speaker 3: as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are
Speaker 3: lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI and others.
Speaker 1: Yeah, of course, this is nothing new. He's there, by
Speaker 1: the way, at the Council on Foreign Relations. And if
Speaker 1: you say that these people are subversive globalist. Well, then
Speaker 1: your conspiracy theory there is right, Yeah, they are, and
Speaker 1: so as the CIA. The CIA were the people who
Speaker 1: are always pushing this idea of peak oil of fossil fuels.
Speaker 1: You know, they were the ones pushing this narrative, I'm
Speaker 1: sure behind the scenes to Time in Newsweek, who foolishly
Speaker 1: sat in nineteen seventy nine, we're going to be out
Speaker 1: of oil and gas by the middle nineteen eighties, and
Speaker 1: so we've got to have something else. We've got to
Speaker 1: have power. Now they're not saying got to have power,
Speaker 1: they're saying, you don't need power. You're not going to
Speaker 1: get power. Artificial intelligence is going to get all the power.
Speaker 1: We're going to pretend that nuclear energy is clean and
Speaker 1: doesn't have any issues, and we're going to let these
Speaker 1: corporations build it themselves and do it as fast as possible,
Speaker 1: no concern about safety. Right. But look, the issue has
Speaker 1: been and I've talked about this over a decade ago.
Speaker 1: They decent and still do have annual jew engineering conferences,
Speaker 1: and at one of them, I remember reading on air
Speaker 1: a paper from a paper that was put there, and
Speaker 1: they said, well, of course, and this is a decade ago.
Speaker 1: We know we can modify the weather. The question is
Speaker 1: who gets to control the thermostat? And I joked about it.
Speaker 1: I said, you know this issue between men and women,
Speaker 1: this is always too cold or too hot, And I said,
Speaker 1: you know that's and that's exactly what he said. Much
Speaker 1: more it gets to control the thermostat. Essentially, here's the deal.
Speaker 1: Maybe we could keep our cars and issue VSE and
Speaker 1: maybe they could get rid of heart right, or that'd
Speaker 1: be a good trade off. You see. The reality is
Speaker 1: the media is weaponizing this more than the Pentagon is.
Speaker 1: Quite frankly, they're weaponizing the weather. That's what the green
Speaker 1: agenda is always about. It is weaponizing the weather. And
Speaker 1: now I'm starting to see it on the right because
Speaker 1: now everything that happens, everything that's unusual, anything that can
Speaker 1: be perceived as an anomaly, whether it is an anomaly
Speaker 1: or not. Now you've got the right wing people out
Speaker 1: there saying it's geo engineer. They're putting this up just
Speaker 1: like the other people. Soon as there's a storm, if
Speaker 1: it's hot, if it's cold, if it rains, if it
Speaker 1: doesn't rain, it's climate change. And now the same thing
Speaker 1: is being done by the right because they can grab
Speaker 1: headlines with it. Left pushes men may climate change. The
Speaker 1: right is now pushing jew engineering. Well, I just got
Speaker 1: to say that fortunately if well, I mean that it
Speaker 1: did hit some other people, but think it hit a
Speaker 1: less populated area and there have been casualties in the
Speaker 1: area where it landed, So I'm not trying to minimize that.
Speaker 1: But the reality is is that if they were steering
Speaker 1: these hurricanes, they need to work on their they're steering ability. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's it's kind of like the Tesla self driving cars.
Speaker 1: You can see that it came in down around Brandon, Bradenton.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, yeah, Brandon, it's dark Brandon now it's power outage.
Speaker 1: But it went into Bradenton rather than into Tampa, and
Speaker 1: of course one of the reasons that and it also
Speaker 1: de intensified, so when it hit it was one hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty miles per hour, and so that made it
Speaker 1: Category three and it landed about seventy miles south of Tampa.
Speaker 1: One of the big issues was that if it came
Speaker 1: into Tampa did a great deal of damage, course higher
Speaker 1: population center there, but if it damaged the port of Tampa,
Speaker 1: that was a critical part of the fuel infrastructure for
Speaker 1: the entire state coming in by water through Tampa Bay's port.
Speaker 1: And so from that standpoint when we look at it,
Speaker 1: it has a significantly further south track. It's going to
Speaker 1: miss Orlando in terms of the eye of the hurricane,
Speaker 1: and it is now diminished. As of five o'clock this morning,
Speaker 1: when I checked, it was eighty five miles an hour,
Speaker 1: So it's down to a tropical storm. It's not no
Speaker 1: longer hurricane. And it was still over land, I believe,
Speaker 1: about to head out into Atlantic, and so maybe Walt
Speaker 1: Disney put in a call to the Pentagon got But
Speaker 1: in terms of dollars, in terms of the number of
Speaker 1: people that were exposed to this, and in terms of
Speaker 1: the intensity, all of it was much less than they
Speaker 1: had said. And as I said, growing up in Florida,
Speaker 1: I heard this my entire life. You know, this is
Speaker 1: going to be the worst storm we've ever seen. It's
Speaker 1: going to directly hit us and all the rest of
Speaker 1: the stuff. And that's not to minimize what happens with it,
Speaker 1: but they always would overhype it, and it would always
Speaker 1: lose steam just as it was getting to the coastline.
Speaker 1: In most cases, it would or rapidly lose steam here.
Speaker 1: And so you know, we were hearing stuff like this
Speaker 1: is forever going to change the coastline. This is going
Speaker 1: to cost hundreds of billions of dollars. This may cost
Speaker 1: as much as we sent to Ukraine, and all the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff. You will if you stay in
Speaker 1: your home, that will be your tomb. That's what the
Speaker 1: mayor of Tampa was doing, a Democrat. But anyway, they
Speaker 1: were even saying, we got to when it was out
Speaker 1: in the Atlantic and it was oscillating back and forth,
Speaker 1: twenty other class a category four, in a category five,
Speaker 1: We're going to have to have another category. You've got
Speaker 1: to have a category six. This type of thing. And
Speaker 1: so the hysteria from both the left and the right
Speaker 1: about this, and again it does not match the hurricanes
Speaker 1: that we know about one hundred and fifty years ago
Speaker 1: or a century ago, that type of thing, So the
Speaker 1: climate change thing is not true. And then the next
Speaker 1: part of this, Okay, this is in the anticipation anticipation
Speaker 1: of it. The tornadoes that were coming in, and the
Speaker 1: tornadoes are very serious. As I said, we went through
Speaker 1: so many hurricanes near and far when I was in Florida.
Speaker 1: But the most devastating thing to us personally was a tornado.
Speaker 1: I never saw anything like that, and it hit our
Speaker 1: house at one point in time, we were hit by
Speaker 1: a tornado. Now this was put up. I took a
Speaker 1: screenshot of this because you need to see what was
Speaker 1: said by somebody named concerned citizen. I don't know who
Speaker 1: this person is. This is an anonymous account. And they
Speaker 1: said two tornadoes, picture two tornado. Yeah, that's right. And
Speaker 1: it's been reported that multi numerous tornadoes today across Florida,
Speaker 1: estimated at over fifty When has this ever happened before?
Speaker 1: And they put up a video and notice, and this
Speaker 1: is what I really appreciate that Twitter has done. This
Speaker 1: is one improvement that Elon Musk has made. Even though
Speaker 1: I'm shadow band, this community notes here reader has added
Speaker 1: this context. This is not even a video of tornadoes
Speaker 1: formed by Hurricane Milton. This is a video of a
Speaker 1: storm in Nebraska in twenty fourteen. When has this ever
Speaker 1: happened before? Well, it happened in Nebraska in twenty fourteen,
Speaker 1: That's when it happened before. Look, tornadoes are frequently spun
Speaker 1: off of hurricanes, and they can be the most damaging
Speaker 1: aspect of it. But everybody, all the conservatives and the again,
Speaker 1: the geo engineering people. And I'm not saying that geo
Speaker 1: engineering is a fraud. It absolutely is not a fraud.
Speaker 1: But when you come in and you've got people, I
Speaker 1: don't know if who this is. This is an anonymous account,
Speaker 1: are they some kind of a you know, false flag troll?
Speaker 1: You know that happens. That's a real thing with anonymous
Speaker 1: accounts like that, especially the ones that are promoted by
Speaker 1: the social media accounts. Concerned Citizen Is that a CIA account? Yeah,
Speaker 1: what is that? I don't know. Put your name out there.
Speaker 1: You know, we have seen this type of thing before. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: if you go back and look at Hurricane Andrew that
Speaker 1: went through a homestead, it was horrific and it was
Speaker 1: primarily a wall of her of tornadoes before the before
Speaker 1: the hurricane. That was in nineteen ninety two. And one
Speaker 1: of these quotes that has put into the article that
Speaker 1: was put up by W and D W and D
Speaker 1: trying to tell you this is geoengineering, we'd never seen
Speaker 1: anything like this before. They become as ridiculous and as
Speaker 1: over the top as the climate change people on the left.
Speaker 1: One person says, I've lived in Florida for thirty six years,
Speaker 1: and I've never seen anything like this, have you? Well,
Speaker 1: if you've lived there for thirty six years, thirty two
Speaker 1: years ago, in nineteen ninety two, Hurricane Andrew hit, there
Speaker 1: are many many tornadoes. As I said, I went through
Speaker 1: home homestead, and that type of thing the most expensive
Speaker 1: by far a hurricane that had hit Florida at that
Speaker 1: point in time. And that was after this person, four
Speaker 1: years after this person moved there. So I don't know
Speaker 1: what the deal is, But when has it ever happened before? Well,
Speaker 1: in Nebraska ten years ago, that was where that picture
Speaker 1: came from. You see what I'm saying. Let's stick to
Speaker 1: what's real, folks. All of this climate change and jew
Speaker 1: engineering is a distraction from FEMA. FEMA needs to be
Speaker 1: what we focus on and what we shut down and
Speaker 1: cut off. We got to focus on the institutions, not
Speaker 1: on the histrionics. It's hysterical people on the left and right.
Speaker 1: And then this. Okay, we've got you know, friends from college.
Speaker 1: One of them has really veered off to the extreme
Speaker 1: left because of a lifetime as a teacher in government schools,
Speaker 1: and it has really radicalized her, and so yesterday she
Speaker 1: was all about Thetis DeSantis de Santis, this criminal. It's
Speaker 1: almost as if he had engineered this storm, and actually
Speaker 1: he did a lot to prepare for it. But I said,
Speaker 1: if you want to criticize government's role in the storm,
Speaker 1: just take a look at how the road is jammed
Speaker 1: and how people can't get out of there. And part
Speaker 1: of the problem is that the government, all governments don't
Speaker 1: want to build roads anymore, and it's become so corrupt
Speaker 1: and so ineffective and impotent in their road building stuff
Speaker 1: that they can't build anything anymore. The whole process has
Speaker 1: become such insider corruption that they can't and they won't
Speaker 1: build roads. And so imagine if they had had adequate roads.
Speaker 1: And I mean, we're typically you're not near capacity, which
Speaker 1: is the situation in Florida, and these arteries that are
Speaker 1: like this. Those roads are very seventy five and been
Speaker 1: down there for quite some time, and I imagine it's
Speaker 1: a lot more grounded than it was last time I
Speaker 1: was there, but it was near capacity. They should have
Speaker 1: expanded it, but they don't. And so one thing that
Speaker 1: they did is a testimony to this, is that they
Speaker 1: opened the road shoulders so that more, you know, they
Speaker 1: have wider facilities, But how about putting some money into
Speaker 1: the infrastructure of our roads. And they don't do it
Speaker 1: because they all know, Republican and Democrat, that the plan
Speaker 1: is to make sure that people don't have private vehicles.
Speaker 1: Think about the fact that if we didn't have private vehicles.
Speaker 1: We talked about this yesterday. You know, what are you
Speaker 1: going to do? Worst case scenario is Jason Barker point
Speaker 1: out your electric vehicle, and I said, yeah, brings all
Speaker 1: new meaning to range anxiety, doesn't it. You're trying to
Speaker 1: get out of an area because you think something's coming
Speaker 1: and you don't have the range to get out of there.
Speaker 1: The gas stations were closing down, especially around those areas
Speaker 1: right there at the center, about seventy percent of them
Speaker 1: were closed on Tuesday. Had no gas in that type
Speaker 1: of thing. But that really would not be that big
Speaker 1: a difference issue if you didn't have to set in
Speaker 1: traffic for so long, if you could get to where
Speaker 1: you wanted to go, that would alleviate a lot of that.
Speaker 1: And of course, as I pointed out, this has been
Speaker 1: a long term known problem. As Joel Scousen pointed out
Speaker 1: his book Strategic Relocation. He said, be careful about Florida.
Speaker 1: You know, whenever there's some kind of emergency or something,
Speaker 1: you're going to be stuck in there because there's only
Speaker 1: a few major highways going north and south to try
Speaker 1: to get out of there, and so you know, that's
Speaker 1: the road capacity is something you criticize the government for.
Speaker 1: But that's not what she's criticized. She's all about the
Speaker 1: green age and the LGBT and other things like that.
Speaker 1: Milton reached a maximum intensity of one hundred and eighty
Speaker 1: miles per hour when it was out in the water.
Speaker 1: That's not unusual. The part of the issue is that
Speaker 1: we have so much monitoring equipment and we can monitor
Speaker 1: it so far out for so long. That helps to
Speaker 1: get people fraight in there on the side of caution.
Speaker 1: I understand that. But when you've gone through a lot
Speaker 1: of these different storms, you see two things. As I said,
Speaker 1: you see it being overhyped by the weather people. The
Speaker 1: government then jumps in and makes mandatory evacuation issues orders
Speaker 1: and things like that, and then you wind up with
Speaker 1: FEMA and other government agencies that stop you from getting
Speaker 1: back to your home. All these people left their homes,
Speaker 1: and I mean these neighborhoods are empty. Is it going
Speaker 1: to be looting?
Speaker 4: Know?
Speaker 1: How a they going to get back? Because what I've
Speaker 1: seen in the past, you know, the coast of North
Speaker 1: Carolina and other places after FEMA really gathered strength like
Speaker 1: a hurricane. FEMA keeps people from going back to their homes.
Speaker 1: So you had the mayor Jane cast in Tampa. I
Speaker 1: can say, without any dramatization whatsoever, if you choose to
Speaker 1: stay in one of those evacuation areas, you are going
Speaker 1: to die. Well. Fortunately she was wrong about that. DeSantis
Speaker 1: did quite a bit of preparation. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: he brought in utility workers and linemen in advance to
Speaker 1: to restore the electricity. So we'll see how quickly that happens.
Speaker 1: The moral of the story of all this stuff is,
Speaker 1: don't believe the weathermen, especially, don't believe them when they
Speaker 1: start talking about what the weather's going to be like
Speaker 1: years from now, decades from now. That is something I
Speaker 1: have harped on, no pun intended, for many many years.
Speaker 1: These people who can't predict the weather are telling you
Speaker 1: what's going to happen decades from now, and now that
Speaker 1: they've been lying to us for fifty years. We have
Speaker 1: a long string of failed prophecies from these people, and
Speaker 1: we got to take them outside the camp and stone
Speaker 1: them rather than listening to them. But anyway, the preparations
Speaker 1: that were done, and again I'm not criticizing him for
Speaker 1: doing this. You have to be be prodent if you
Speaker 1: didn't do it right. Over fifty thousand linemen, the largest
Speaker 1: state jing have you totally workers in lignment and advances
Speaker 1: the storm at any time in American history, and this
Speaker 1: is what Dessantas was able to put together. So we've
Speaker 1: signed an additional six hundred ambulances currently in operation helping
Speaker 1: in the effort. The National Guard is deploying six thousand
Speaker 1: Florida National Guardsmen as well as another three thousand National
Speaker 1: Guardsmen from other states. They have thirty four search and
Speaker 1: rescue aircraft, five hundred tactical vehicles, including one hundred and
Speaker 1: eighty high water vehicles. This is the largest Florida National
Speaker 1: Guard search and rescue mobilization in the entire history of
Speaker 1: the state of Florida. And again, fifty thousand linemens, some
Speaker 1: of them from as far away as California, So send
Speaker 1: them up to North Carolina and Tennessee, because I think
Speaker 1: that there's certainly going to be things that need to
Speaker 1: be done there, but with that number of people, they
Speaker 1: should be able to accomplish that, I think fairly quickly.
Speaker 1: So Lala Harris, who wants to have all eyes on her,
Speaker 1: and that includes the eye of the hurricane, She's got
Speaker 1: to put herself at the very center of everything. And
Speaker 1: even though nobody was asking for her opinion, she called
Speaker 1: in to CNN to whine about Dysantis, and not even
Speaker 1: about Dysantis, but about Trump and his dangerous uh involvement
Speaker 1: in all of this stuff. Right, She said she doesn't
Speaker 1: like the fact that he's criticizing FEMA, which she thinks
Speaker 1: is just great, So she called in to CNN. She
Speaker 1: bashed Trump for his comments about FEMA's response to the storms.
Speaker 1: She said, this is dangerous. His speech is dangerous, His
Speaker 1: speech is unconscionable. Anybody who says that, folks is dangerous,
Speaker 1: unconstitutional and unconscionable, uncomfortable. She said. It will mislead desperate
Speaker 1: people to the point that those desperate people would not
Speaker 1: receive the aid to which they're entitled. Wait a minute,
Speaker 1: you're saying, because Trump criticizes FEMA, that these people aren't
Speaker 1: going to get the aid. Why is FEMA going to
Speaker 1: get its feelings hurt and walk away. You're not going
Speaker 1: to do anything, are you. You're out there talking about
Speaker 1: how you're going to have fifty seven million dollars to
Speaker 1: Lebanon and bragging about the fact that seven hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty dollars to the people who are there. As I said,
Speaker 1: the mayor of one of those towns that was wiped
Speaker 1: off face of the earth, his daughter implied to get
Speaker 1: that they wouldn't give her the full seven to fifty.
Speaker 1: They gave her three hundred. He said, that doesn't even
Speaker 1: cover the groceries she lost in the refrigerator. She goes
Speaker 1: on to say it's dangerous, This is dangerous, and this
Speaker 1: gamesmanship has got to stop. Yes, it does. She's the
Speaker 1: one who's doing it, as a matter of fact. Dangerous
Speaker 1: for her to criticize speech, dangerous for her to try
Speaker 1: to gaslight us with lies about what's happening with FEMA.
Speaker 1: It's not Trump that we're listening to. We're listening to
Speaker 1: the people who are there, and so it'll be good
Speaker 1: when she is removed off of the scene in thirty days,
Speaker 1: I hope. Anyway, she said, let's let the folks who
Speaker 1: are on the ground do the work that they need
Speaker 1: to do right now, in real time. That's right. You
Speaker 1: keep your FEMA people away from them. Okay, that's the
Speaker 1: way that happens. Where was FEMA, by the way, did
Speaker 1: they do any preparation for Milton like DeSantis did? A
Speaker 1: matter of fact, yesterday I talked about the fact some
Speaker 1: of these Christian missions they drive from a long way.
Speaker 1: They knew that the storm was coming in somewhere, and
Speaker 1: they set up a camp that was north of were
Speaker 1: quite a bit north of where they thought it was
Speaker 1: going to hit, and had everything ready, so as soon
Speaker 1: as the storm passed by, they went right in. Why
Speaker 1: didn't FEMA do that? So these Christian volunteers societies did that.
Speaker 1: The Santists didn't do that, or did that? Did that?
Speaker 1: But FEMA didn't do that. Right, So the Christian societies
Speaker 1: do it. DeSantis does it. They prepare in advance. They
Speaker 1: stage this stuff nearby, not FEMA, not FEMA. When asked
Speaker 1: if Congress should return to Washington to pass more funding
Speaker 1: for a disaster relief, Harris responded FEMA has what they
Speaker 1: need right now. Sounds just like Biden, the two of
Speaker 1: them flying over the area, shutting down rescue missions, coming back, Well,
Speaker 1: what needs to be done about the storm? Storm? What storm?
Speaker 1: Said Biden? Oh, oh, oh, that storm. They've got everything
Speaker 1: they need already and they're very happy. Well, you want
Speaker 1: to talk about something somebody that's dangerously out of touch.
Speaker 1: So Biden is criticizing Trump because it's all about gamesmanship.
Speaker 1: It's all about politics, and that's what they're projecting onto
Speaker 1: other people. And going after Marjorie Taylor Green because she
Speaker 1: talked about geoengineering. She responded, and this is in AOL.
Speaker 1: Doesn't even mention that clip of Brennan they talk about.
Speaker 1: So she wrote on Twitter on x yes they can
Speaker 1: control the weather, but they failed to mention that she
Speaker 1: put a clip in there of John Brennan, saying that
Speaker 1: that's how dishonest they are. Biden says that Ron DeSantis
Speaker 1: has his direct number, again, undercutting Lala Harris, who is
Speaker 1: so desperate for attention she's calling in to people. Let
Speaker 1: me let me read the script that somebody wrote for me.
Speaker 1: Let me read that's over the phone to you. I
Speaker 1: can't handle a personal appearance, because that just gets a
Speaker 1: bit too dodgy. As a matter of fact, if we
Speaker 1: look at what happened with her in sixty minutes. Everybody
Speaker 1: is talking about this clip.
Speaker 4: Teams said Prime Minister Netanya, who is not listening.
Speaker 5: Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted
Speaker 5: in a number of movements in that region by Israel
Speaker 5: that were very much prompted by or a result of
Speaker 5: many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen
Speaker 5: in the region.
Speaker 1: But it seems that let's try it well, that this
Speaker 1: is their edited clip.
Speaker 5: Not listening, We're not going to stop pursuing what is
Speaker 5: necessary for the United States to be clear about where
Speaker 5: we stand on the need for this war to end.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, we've got to be clear about where we stand.
Speaker 1: So let me do that again, okay. And the problem
Speaker 1: was that sixty minutes put out both versions. Put out
Speaker 1: one of the versions. In the first version it's part
Speaker 1: of their promo, I think, and the second one came
Speaker 1: out as part of the actual interview. So everybody's saying,
Speaker 1: we'd like to see the transcript, see just how much
Speaker 1: you have edited this. Trump was wise not to go
Speaker 1: on with him. It was obvious that CNN was laying
Speaker 1: in wait for him, just as CNN tried to rig
Speaker 1: the debate of the vice presidential debate. But again Biden says,
Speaker 1: DeSantis has got my direct now. DeSantis can handle this right.
Speaker 1: DeSantis in terms of LA laws whining about the fact
Speaker 1: that I tried to call him and her thing, it's like, well,
Speaker 1: go call CNN, they'll put you on. I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: put you on now. But he said, I didn't know
Speaker 1: that she had called. I'm not sure who they called.
Speaker 1: They didn't call me. Biden's got my number, she doesn't.
Speaker 1: Their characterization of it was something that they did. It
Speaker 1: wasn't anything that anybody in my office did. In terms
Speaker 1: of saying that it was political, he said. My approaches,
Speaker 1: she says, my approach is about new ideas, new policies
Speaker 1: that are directed at the current moment. And also, to
Speaker 1: be very honest with you, which she is right. My
Speaker 1: focus is very much on what we need to do
Speaker 1: over the next ten twenty years to catch up to
Speaker 1: the twenty first century. That's what she said on September thirteenth,
Speaker 1: and then this week when she went on the view,
Speaker 1: they said, what would you have done differently than Biden
Speaker 1: did the past four years. Well, nothing comes to mind.
Speaker 1: I don't know what to say. See, Lala is not
Speaker 1: just a liar, She's a stupid liar. That's the best
Speaker 1: high because it's pretty obvious what they're doing. So again
Speaker 1: she is. She goes on with a view and tries
Speaker 1: to blame Trump for what is happening with FEMA, and
Speaker 1: she gets hammered by everybody except the people in the view.
Speaker 1: She said, trumpets himself before the needs of others. I
Speaker 1: feel that he feared that he really lacks empathy. Duh.
Speaker 1: Whoever said that Trump's got empathy for any anybody? That's
Speaker 1: the most narcissistic politician you've ever seen in your life.
Speaker 1: Of course he doesn't have empathy. That is beside the point.
Speaker 1: It's your FEMA that you're out there bragging about. You're
Speaker 1: bragging about sending one hundred and fifty seven million dollars
Speaker 1: to Lebanon while you give seven hundred and fifty dollars
Speaker 1: to people in the area that's hit. So one person said.
Speaker 1: In Today's dose of unrivaled stupidity, Lala blames Trump for
Speaker 1: the FEMA failure with Hurricane Helene. She directed the FEMA
Speaker 1: funds to pay for the illegals. That's citizen free press.
Speaker 1: Another person comments and says, why is LA LA blaming
Speaker 1: Trump for FEMA's response with Hurricane Trump left office three
Speaker 1: and a half years ago. She's on the view instead
Speaker 1: of helping people who are impacted by this. And if
Speaker 1: I was going to blame Trump for something to do
Speaker 1: with FEMA, I would blame him for not getting rid
Speaker 1: of it. FEMA is unconstitutional. We never had FEMA until
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy eight. We don't need FEMA. I was twenty
Speaker 1: three years old before FEMA ever existed, went through a
Speaker 1: lot of hurricanes. We happened to manage it without having
Speaker 1: somebody block us out of our homes, and people want
Speaker 1: to stay behind and write out the storm only got
Speaker 1: much worse because of FEMA high handed efforts. So she
Speaker 1: did the same thing she went on with Colbert. Have
Speaker 1: you no empathy, man, she said, for the suffering of
Speaker 1: other people? How arrogant, how she is projecting this. Have
Speaker 1: you no sense of purpose if you purport to be
Speaker 1: a leader, to understand that being a leader means lifting
Speaker 1: people up in a time of need and not manipulating them.
Speaker 1: She's not raising tens of millions of dollars in Hollywood
Speaker 1: while all this stuff was happening. In the aftermath of it,
Speaker 1: you want to talk about empathy. So they open up
Speaker 1: and have a beer there on Stephen Colbert's program. You know,
Speaker 1: I guess they could maybe have her dress up like
Speaker 1: hypodermic need. No, that was men with Harry Leggs that
Speaker 1: they did that after they did the cartoon stuff. What
Speaker 1: a pathetic cheerleader. This guy is of everything evil. I
Speaker 1: can't stand Stephen Colbert. There are so many things that
Speaker 1: are funny about the vacts, as in weird and strange
Speaker 1: and scary, right, but that's not funny him. Fisted propaganda
Speaker 1: that gets people injured and killed is not funny, Cobert.
Speaker 1: Let's also not forget that while Americans are begging for help,
Speaker 1: she appeared on a sex podcast and then goes and
Speaker 1: raises money in Hollywood. Of course, but again it is
Speaker 1: appropriate for her to do that. She is, after all,
Speaker 1: a sex worker. It shows that even a prostitute can
Speaker 1: become president in the United States. And of course, you know,
Speaker 1: she is essentially the combination of two of the world's
Speaker 1: oldest professions, politicians and prostitutes. And being a prostitute first
Speaker 1: actually helps you a great deal with your politician profession.
Speaker 1: It's almost a kind of training, isn't it. Meanwhile, we
Speaker 1: got hotels in Florida and Georgia starting to raise their
Speaker 1: price yesterday from ninety five dollars to seven hundred dollars
Speaker 1: a night. Is that amazing? And some of these wearing Gainsville.
Speaker 1: I looked at this and say, Gainesville's only one hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty miles north of Tampa. If they're saying it's
Speaker 1: coming in Tampa, I mean they missed the landing spot
Speaker 1: by seventy miles, So I don't know what's going on.
Speaker 1: They have in this particular article from Daily Mail, they
Speaker 1: took screenshots of a lot of these different hotels. Hampton
Speaker 1: in and Suits and Brunswick, Georgia offered a room Wednesday
Speaker 1: night for sixty one, six hundred and seventeen dollars. I'm
Speaker 1: sorry this small print and I almost thought that was
Speaker 1: a question mark. It's questionable to charge those kind of prices.
Speaker 1: And I don't know. I just that's that's what you
Speaker 1: see happening, and they need to pass that around so
Speaker 1: people remember that hotel there La La meanwhile, raised fifty
Speaker 1: five million dollars in California, while North Carolinians lost everything.
Speaker 1: As she goes to the people in Hollywood, all of
Speaker 1: her friends, it was the entrance fee, was said. Nothing
Speaker 1: says out of touch like a ritzy gala in San
Speaker 1: Francisco where the elites come in for an entrance fee
Speaker 1: of nine hundred and twenty six six hundred dollars. This
Speaker 1: is restoration news. And then, in addition to the nearly
Speaker 1: a million dollars entrance fee to see her, if you
Speaker 1: want to picture with her, one hundred thousand dollars upon well,
Speaker 1: I don't know. You know, you talk about price couching.
Speaker 1: It couldn't happen to better. Look, I'd rather pay a
Speaker 1: thousand dollars to stay in a motel six than one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars for a picture of Lalla with La La. Well,
Speaker 1: she said as she was there, sounding very much like
Speaker 1: Dorothy and the Wizard of Oz who's just had a
Speaker 1: near miss with a tornado. Right, it's good to be home.
Speaker 1: It's good to be home, as she clicked her heels
Speaker 1: and her ruby slippers. She doesn't have ruby slippers, but
Speaker 1: she is bedecked with jewels everywhere else. She goes around
Speaker 1: and she's got expensive jewelry. At the same time that
Speaker 1: Harris was collecting chicks in San Francisco, Ashville was completely underwater,
Speaker 1: with debris ballun trees cutting off countless North Carolina towns
Speaker 1: from help. Where is the empathy? Yeah, you're in charge here.
Speaker 1: Oh so you're going to go fundraise at least sixty
Speaker 1: four deaths. The current toll is now over two hundred
Speaker 1: untold millions without power or sell service. Yeah, empathy. She
Speaker 1: goes fundraising as an elderly Ashville couple and their seven
Speaker 1: year old grandson swept off a collapsing roof by the currents,
Speaker 1: leaving behind his mother, the family's sole survivor. She said,
Speaker 1: my grief is unfathomable. Georgia Governor Brian Kemp described the
Speaker 1: carnage in western Georgia as looking like a bomb went off.
Speaker 1: But La La was too busy whisking off to sunny
Speaker 1: La and a bevy of Hollywood actors awaiting her there
Speaker 1: to comment. By the way, if you she had a
Speaker 1: lunchtime special, I guess it's like the early bird special.
Speaker 1: If you want to go for lunch, it wasn't nine
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty six six hundred dollars you could get
Speaker 1: in for a mere two hundred and fifty thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: I guess that's where the elderly, uh Hollywood celebrities go
Speaker 1: for that one, the Early Bird Special. At the same time,
Speaker 1: Helene's totrential downpour was just beginning to subside. By that time,
Speaker 1: the picturesque towns of Chimney Rock and Lake Loure, thirty
Speaker 1: five miles from Asheville, had ceased to exist, but Harris
Speaker 1: was doing public photo ops for one hundred thousand dollars apiece.
Speaker 1: She's literally put illegal aliens above Americans, steering over a
Speaker 1: billion dollars away from FEMA emergency service to migrants illegally
Speaker 1: crossing our wide open borders, says Restoration News. And of course,
Speaker 1: North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper is no better. Another Democrat,
Speaker 1: He's done very little to help people. Actually, DeSantis had
Speaker 1: already sent up part of National Guard to help people.
Speaker 1: And then where is Hollywood, The people who are given
Speaker 1: fifty five million dollars to La La getting their pictures
Speaker 1: taken with her and so forth, Well, Hollywood is not
Speaker 1: anywhere to be found totally a wall on Hurricane Helene,
Speaker 1: and in this article from Hollywood into Into two dot com,
Speaker 1: they contrast this with what happened in the wake of Katrina.
Speaker 1: Katrina had massive casualties, about fourteen hundred people who died,
Speaker 1: but they heavily politicize that us His idea, he says,
Speaker 1: I think that was heavily politicized. If these people really cared,
Speaker 1: don't you think they would contribute a little. But they're
Speaker 1: not contributing anything, and you're legally what happened in the
Speaker 1: wake of Katrina in New Orleans. Hollywood took less than
Speaker 1: a week to officially respond to that crisis. In two
Speaker 1: thousand and five, scores of musicians and Hollywood celebrities, according
Speaker 1: to mpr rallied to raise funds for those impacted by
Speaker 1: the natural disaster. You had a concert for hurricane relief.
Speaker 1: Can be best remembered for Kanye West's race based attack
Speaker 1: on George W. Bush. Hollywood's charitable efforts extended to the
Speaker 1: corporate level as well. In addition to the multiple telethons
Speaker 1: and fundraising events, media companies like Disney, dream Works, ge
Speaker 1: parent company of NBC, Universal News Corps, Fox News, Revolution Studios, Sony, Time, Warner, Viacom.
Speaker 1: All of them were matching contributions to charitable organizations. So
Speaker 1: where's Hollywood this time when they point out, You've got
Speaker 1: a country music superstars, Luke Combs and Eric Church of
Speaker 1: Announcer's going to have a benefit concert for people who
Speaker 1: are victims of Hurricane Helen. Dolly Parton, as I mentioned before,
Speaker 1: had contributed a million dollars of her own money and
Speaker 1: a million dollars from her corporations, and Morgan Whalen wrote
Speaker 1: very large checks. I don't know the amount that he wrote.
Speaker 1: They said, compare that to all the musicians who are
Speaker 1: responding to Hurricane Katrina. You had Green Day, Beast Boys,
Speaker 1: Pearl Jam Harry Connick Junior and Wynton Marcellis, Tim McGraw,
Speaker 1: Faith Hill, Bono, Kerrie, Kelly Clarkson, Neil Young, the Foo Fighters,
Speaker 1: Mariah Kelly, Paul Simon, Garth Brooks, Diddy, jay Z, Patti LaBelle,
Speaker 1: and on and on. That's just a partial list, and
Speaker 1: I didn't even read the full partial list that they have.
Speaker 1: Didn't read the full partial list. Some of the big
Speaker 1: name actors who came out to help people after Hurricane
Speaker 1: Katrino Sean Penn, Brad Pitt, John Travolta, Morgan Freeman, Jamie Fox,
Speaker 1: Oprah Winfrey, Matthew McConaughey, Richard Gear, Mike Myers, Claire Danes,
Speaker 1: Leonardo DiCaprio, Chris Rock. Again, that's just a partial list.
Speaker 1: Why the massive disparity between that catastrophe in this one, Well,
Speaker 1: Hollywood into said. First of all, corporate media is trying
Speaker 1: to downplay the hurricanes aftermath because they don't want to
Speaker 1: embarrass Biden and law but they wanted to play it
Speaker 1: up to come after Bush for political purposes, as we
Speaker 1: would see for the speeches that they would make. And
Speaker 1: then the other reason is that it is even more sinister.
Speaker 1: Any outsized hurricane relief would draw attention to the effeckless
Speaker 1: response from FEMA and the Biden administration. MAJORCA has said
Speaker 1: FEMA is out of money, even though they continued to
Speaker 1: feed and house illegal aliens. Biden's tone deaf response, Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: they're very happy what storm. Imagine if Bush had said
Speaker 1: something like that, and yet the mainstream media doesn't even
Speaker 1: talk about it. Well, Disney contributed a lot of money.
Speaker 1: People were suspecting that Disney might face a two hundred
Speaker 1: million dollars hit. As I said, it seems to have
Speaker 1: diminished significantly by the time it hit short and rapidly
Speaker 1: diminished after that. And so they dodged that one. They
Speaker 1: were talking about how it might face a two one
Speaker 1: hundred million dollars hit, but that did not happen. And
Speaker 1: then there was also projection yesterday before it was hitting
Speaker 1: it said Milton could trigger one hundred and seventy five
Speaker 1: billion dollar worst case damage scenario. Always everything was the worst,
Speaker 1: the worst, the worst case, and maybe even over the
Speaker 1: top of the worst case. And that's why I say
Speaker 1: the media and the politicians and the weathermen, they always exaggerate,
Speaker 1: and it is it makes it more dangerous, especially when
Speaker 1: you have situations and I think you know the situation
Speaker 1: with Helene as well as with Hurricane Frien when we
Speaker 1: were in North Carolina. You know, having watched the media
Speaker 1: and the weatherman Krai Wolf for so long, I looked
Speaker 1: at this, It's like, where's so far inland that's not
Speaker 1: going to be anything. And yet because we had about
Speaker 1: as much rain as the worst case scenario on the
Speaker 1: coast of Florida got out of Milton, we have about
Speaker 1: that much rain with friend, even though we were all
Speaker 1: the way in and around the Raleigh area, and it
Speaker 1: caused trees to come down all over the place, even
Speaker 1: though there wasn't that much rain. So you never know
Speaker 1: what it's going to be. And we still don't have
Speaker 1: any information about what is going on with that, and
Speaker 1: we hope again we've kept our prayers Grammy for God.
Speaker 1: Hope that she made it through this. She may not
Speaker 1: have any power, right, you've not seen any comments from her. Okay,
Speaker 1: she may not have any power. But pray for her
Speaker 1: and the other people in the way of this hurricane,
Speaker 1: and we can be glad that these scenarios look like
Speaker 1: they're not going to be a situation. Nevertheless, as they're
Speaker 1: talking about all of this money, you have an article
Speaker 1: from vax saying just how doomed is home insurance. It says,
Speaker 1: not just the people before this happens that say we're
Speaker 1: going to have one hundred and seventy million billion dollars
Speaker 1: worth of damage or something like that, but the insurance
Speaker 1: industry will use everything to raise rates, just like they
Speaker 1: do with cars. Right, They're always looking for some excuse
Speaker 1: to raise rates. And so this is an article from
Speaker 1: Vox talking about the poor insurance company, how they just
Speaker 1: you know, I'm sure they don't want to raise rates
Speaker 1: at all, but they just have to. It's going to
Speaker 1: be harder than ever to ensure your home another reason
Speaker 1: to get you out of your home, just like car
Speaker 1: insurance is a reason to get you out of your car.
Speaker 1: And there's a partnership between the government and the insurance companies,
Speaker 1: especially when they required and of course I don't think
Speaker 1: that they have insurance requirements for your home, but if
Speaker 1: you've got a mortgages most people do, it's going to
Speaker 1: be required by your bank. So whenever you got something
Speaker 1: that is a required a requirement like that, whether it's
Speaker 1: a vaccine or whether it is insurance, whether or not
Speaker 1: you want it, or whether or not it's any good
Speaker 1: price is going to skyrocket because they're going to use
Speaker 1: any excuse to raise the rates. It's just like the
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical companies. It has no bounds. And you know, we're
Speaker 1: not looking we're looking at this. We're not looking at
Speaker 1: insurance rates taking off because of climate change. We're not
Speaker 1: looking at it taking off because of hyperinflation. This is
Speaker 1: hyper greed they're really talking about. So Florida homeowners already
Speaker 1: pay the highest rates on average, more than ten thousand
Speaker 1: dollars per year, well above the national average of about
Speaker 1: twenty four hundred dollars per year. US home insurance rates
Speaker 1: jumped eleven zero point three percent on average over the
Speaker 1: entire United States. Do you think these insurance companies are
Speaker 1: on the verge of going out of business? Of course not.
Speaker 1: I mean they took a big hit after the Trump
Speaker 1: shots killing people. That's like a once in two hundred
Speaker 1: year vent. I mean, we're more than three standard deviations
Speaker 1: away from me. And what's going on with this? It
Speaker 1: must be we know that nobody is dying if they
Speaker 1: get the vaccine. And even though these deaths, said the
Speaker 1: guy with the insurance company Indiana One America. He said,
Speaker 1: even though we're being told that these excess deaths are
Speaker 1: not COVID all kinds of other things like blood clots
Speaker 1: and heart attacks and stuff, we know that it's COVID.
Speaker 1: Even though they're saying it's not COVID. We know that
Speaker 1: it's COVID. And the other thing that we know is
Speaker 1: that nobody dies if they get the vaccine. Therefore, I say,
Speaker 1: and this is what the guy actually said, it's unbelievable. Therefore,
Speaker 1: we know that the people who are dying are dying
Speaker 1: of COVID and they're unvaccinated people who are dying of COVID.
Speaker 1: So we need to push people to get vaccinated. Make
Speaker 1: that a requirement for insurance or something. Some Flaridians have
Speaker 1: seen their rates hike as much as four hundred percent
Speaker 1: over the past five years. So do you think this
Speaker 1: is hyper greed? I do? I do. And of course
Speaker 1: they're going to cover for them, and they're going if
Speaker 1: they say anything about it. And in their article what
Speaker 1: they do is they talk about, well, it's just climate change,
Speaker 1: just one of the effects. See how climate change is
Speaker 1: going to affect you. We've got a lot of comments
Speaker 1: here when we read these lt Oracle of True says,
Speaker 1: I'm in the Saint Augustine area and the Santas was
Speaker 1: in front of this storm all week. He's done an
Speaker 1: outstanding job. The main problem was all the gas stations
Speaker 1: ran out of gas during the evacuation. Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: nobody has done this kind of forward staging. It wasn't
Speaker 1: done by the federal government, wasn't done by FEMA. I mean,
Speaker 1: you can trust the fact that he's got fifty thousand
Speaker 1: people out there just to work on power, six hundred
Speaker 1: ambulances and all the rest of this stuff went. A
Speaker 1: week after what happened in Asheville and surrounding areas, FIMA
Speaker 1: hadn't done anything nothing. A week later he was doing
Speaker 1: all this stuff a week before the progress retort. Thank
Speaker 1: you very much for the tip. I sent you an
Speaker 1: email this morning and coded in Dennis Gassinch's campaign manager
Speaker 1: to set up an interview. Dennis has assisted with my
Speaker 1: local and evers and his congressional campaign. Can you scroll
Speaker 1: that up care? His congressional campaign is centered around peace. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'd be interested to talk to And I know that
Speaker 1: he worked significantly with Gerald Sealinti with that, and he's
Speaker 1: worked in the past with Ron Paul, So I'll take
Speaker 1: a look at that. Thank you. Jona and Awodi says
Speaker 1: FEMA is an extortion racket. All of government is. All
Speaker 1: of government is extortion and protection. And if you don't
Speaker 1: want their protection, they're like organized crime. No, no, you
Speaker 1: got to be protected from me. Right, you want to
Speaker 1: make sure your legs. I don't know what you breaks
Speaker 1: your leg they better pay me. It's an extortion racket
Speaker 1: for preferred vendors, and it fights to prevent any aid
Speaker 1: or assistance from unpreferred vendors. That's what we've seen as
Speaker 1: well in the past. Yeah, it is. That's a big
Speaker 1: part of why they shut the stuff down. But of
Speaker 1: course you also have people who are caught up in
Speaker 1: this beer mindset. I'm in charge here, right, like the
Speaker 1: little deputy sheriff, and so there's that aspect of it
Speaker 1: which makes it even worse. It's also corruption and the
Speaker 1: preferred vendors, and we've had people say, no, you're not
Speaker 1: allowed to bring this stuff in. You don't have you
Speaker 1: didn't have my permission. You don't have my permission, you're
Speaker 1: not on our preferred vendors list. Yeah, been that way
Speaker 1: for years. Corruption is going worse with each storm, absolutely true.
Speaker 1: And shame on Trump for not doing anything to shut
Speaker 1: it down or any of these previous presidents. You know,
Speaker 1: Reagan could have shut it down and should have shut
Speaker 1: it down. All of the assistance that you're going to
Speaker 1: get from government, All of this could be handled, which
Speaker 1: is block grants of money, right, can you scroll that down?
Speaker 1: Let's see them sellers. Did y'all see where they're allowing
Speaker 1: some through traffic in the Smoking Mountains National Park, but
Speaker 1: there's now checkpoints and the big rig trucks must travel
Speaker 1: at night. Did not see that. Yeah, that's one of
Speaker 1: the interesting things about Smoking mount In National Park. And
Speaker 1: it is visited by more people than it's about four
Speaker 1: times a little bit more than four times a number
Speaker 1: of people that visit the second and subsequent top ten.
Speaker 1: So it's because of its close proximity to a large
Speaker 1: part of the population. But it's also one of the
Speaker 1: earliest parks, and so there's a public road that runs
Speaker 1: through it. That's why they can't charge people for coming
Speaker 1: into it. So it has always been free until the
Speaker 1: Biden administration the last year or so puts some guy
Speaker 1: in that decided that he's going to block off where
Speaker 1: people park and you're going to have to have pay
Speaker 1: and get a ticket in order to know a little
Speaker 1: thing in order to go in there and stop. But
Speaker 1: they can't stop you because of the public road from
Speaker 1: going through. Now, if we had a decent Republican governor,
Speaker 1: which we don't, he would have stopped that because it
Speaker 1: was already an agreement that they would never charge to
Speaker 1: come in. So they're kind of getting around the edges
Speaker 1: of this stuff. But yeah, they have people who can
Speaker 1: drive through there. Well, we're going to take a quick
Speaker 1: break and we will be right back.
Speaker 6: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Let's take a look at some news. We have a
Speaker 1: trial that is going on now where the ATF is
Speaker 1: trying to extend its jurisdiction. Like every other bureaucracy, they
Speaker 1: metastasize like a cancer.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 1: Trump gave them a major play for power when he said, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're going to do this stuff by executive order. We're
Speaker 1: going to do it by the bureaucracy that is one
Speaker 1: hundred percent under the presidency. Yeah, they make it like
Speaker 1: it's some mysterious thing. We are going to drain the swamp. Well,
Speaker 1: the swamp is underneath the White House, all of it.
Speaker 1: But yeah, let's pull that up again. So we now
Speaker 1: have them as they're talking about gun stuff. You actually
Speaker 1: had in testimony the government lawyer said that government said
Speaker 1: that cap guns shoot bird shot. Yeah, they actually said that.
Speaker 1: Here's what they said. Justice Leidos is talking, well, you
Speaker 1: undergo a conversion, but before it's converted, it must be
Speaker 1: a weapon. Right, And then Preliger says, well, that's right.
Speaker 1: We certainly don't dispute that it has to be an
Speaker 1: instrument of combat designed and intended to be used in
Speaker 1: this way, and Congress made it clear in statutory history.
Speaker 1: The reason it was there terms because objects out there,
Speaker 1: toys and tools that have been well known non weapon use,
Speaker 1: but actually do expel projectiles through the action of an explosive.
Speaker 1: A cap gun is an example of this. That's right.
Speaker 1: Did you know that? Did you know that cap guns?
Speaker 1: This person has obviously never had a cap gun? What
Speaker 1: a deprived person childhood? This person that's had never had
Speaker 1: a cab gun. No, cap guns don't expel anything. I
Speaker 1: had so many cap guns are really big when I
Speaker 1: was a kid, had some man of those things. Are
Speaker 1: no projectiles in a cap gun. It's a roll of
Speaker 1: paper and as you're pulling the trigger pulls that roll
Speaker 1: around and it's got a little dot of a very
Speaker 1: very small dot of gunpowder. You know, when the hammer
Speaker 1: hits that, it explodes and makes this really neat smell.
Speaker 1: The kids like, that's really the smell of gun power.
Speaker 1: It's great. We've also got a Afghan man arrested by
Speaker 1: the FBI allegedly planning to attack crowds on election day. Now,
Speaker 1: what most of them don't tell you is that he's
Speaker 1: not just an Afghan man. He's also a CIA man.
Speaker 1: He worked for the CIA in Afghanist man. So I
Speaker 1: don't know what's going on. I mean, is this one
Speaker 1: of the situations where the FBI goes out and runs
Speaker 1: a patsy sets them up? Or is this reel and
Speaker 1: run by the CIA. Either one of these could be true.
Speaker 1: Na Sir Ahmad Tahiti of Oklahoma City told investigators after
Speaker 1: his arrest October the seventh that he had planned his
Speaker 1: attack to coincide with election day next month, and that
Speaker 1: he and his co conspirator expected to die as martyrs.
Speaker 1: According to charging documents, he arrived in the US September
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, had taken steps in recent weeks to
Speaker 1: advance his attack plans, including by ordering AK forty seven rifles,
Speaker 1: liquidating his family's assets, and buying one way tickets for
Speaker 1: his wife and child to travel home to Afghanistan, so
Speaker 1: he might actually be like a CIA plant instead of
Speaker 1: a patsy by the FBI. Fisch Will say that he
Speaker 1: also consumed Islamic state propaganda. That's probably how they identified him,
Speaker 1: wed to a charity that functions of the front for
Speaker 1: militant group and communicated with one person who the FBI
Speaker 1: determined from a prior investigation was involved in recruitment. And
Speaker 1: so he and this unnamed co conspirator. That's kind of
Speaker 1: interesting and suspicious, isn't it. Yeah, again, these things are
Speaker 1: never what they seem. Well, you got the FBI and
Speaker 1: the CIE fall who notes what's true here? This is
Speaker 1: like trying to figure out what's going on in the
Speaker 1: war in the Middle East. I mean, nobody's going to
Speaker 1: tell you the truth about anything. After the two advertised
Speaker 1: a sale of personal property on Facebook, the FBI listed
Speaker 1: an informant last month to respond to the offer and
Speaker 1: to strike up a relationship. He was already on their radar,
Speaker 1: according to them, because of his what he read online
Speaker 1: and who's associated with right, he has special intelligence and
Speaker 1: the social media and the Internet. That's what it was
Speaker 1: always designed for. By the way, the informant later invited
Speaker 1: them to gun range, where they ordered weapons from an
Speaker 1: undercover FBI official who was posing as a business partner
Speaker 1: of the informant. After he was arrested, he told investigators
Speaker 1: that he had planned the attack for election day and
Speaker 1: would target a large gathering of people, so you know
Speaker 1: who knows. But this is what I think is interesting.
Speaker 1: He worked as a CIA guard in Afghanistan, and two
Speaker 1: sources with knowledge of the matter told this to NBC News.
Speaker 1: This is mainstream media. This is not a conservative organization
Speaker 1: when asked to comment. When NBC asked the CIA to comment,
Speaker 1: they declined to comment. He entered the country in September
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, about a month after the US military
Speaker 1: completed its chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan after twenty years of
Speaker 1: being there. So he was working with the CIA. Then
Speaker 1: he comes here and he does this well part of
Speaker 1: what is happening in the aftermath of the hurricanes, and
Speaker 1: of course this has to do with both hurricanes. One
Speaker 1: in Helene, it shut down Baxter International in North Carolina,
Speaker 1: the largest IVY fluid manufacturer in the country, and then
Speaker 1: adding to that, Brawn Medical, the country's second largest maker
Speaker 1: of IVY fluids, announced Tuesday that it would temporarily close
Speaker 1: to its facilities in Daytona Beach, Florida. Those are going
Speaker 1: to be opening up right away. I'm sure Daytona Beach
Speaker 1: was quite a bit north of where the hurricane went.
Speaker 1: But nevertheless, I thought this is interesting because of the
Speaker 1: concentration of infrastructures. One of the problems when you got
Speaker 1: everything controlled by just a handful of corporations. Part of
Speaker 1: the consolidation of everything, you know, leads to this kind
Speaker 1: of what we're seeing around the mines that are in
Speaker 1: North Carolina as well.
Speaker 7: Well.
Speaker 1: Now that is there because of the geographical location of
Speaker 1: these resources, but you have other things like that that
Speaker 1: have happened. I remember years ago, and I mentioned this
Speaker 1: last week when I was talking about lithium mines and
Speaker 1: how there were floods in Thailand and all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: the supply of hard disk drives dried up, got very expensive,
Speaker 1: and that lasted for a few months because most of
Speaker 1: the world's supply of hard disk drives is made in
Speaker 1: this one little area of Thailand. Who knew, and then
Speaker 1: when that flooded, that happened. So this is again another
Speaker 1: example of how vulnerable our infrastructure is. So many things
Speaker 1: that we take for granted, we don't realize just how
Speaker 1: consolidated the infrastructure is. When we talked about infrastructure, we
Speaker 1: don't realize how dirty it is. In many cases as well,
Speaker 1: This is a company called Bruce Pack I've never heard
Speaker 1: of before, big meat producer. They've now recalled over nine
Speaker 1: million pounds of ready to eat meat and poultry because
Speaker 1: of listeria being found. These products were shipped to other
Speaker 1: establishments and distributors nationwide, then distributed to restaurants and to institutions.
Speaker 1: I guess they don't sell retail, maybe they sell wholesale.
Speaker 1: So nine million pounds of meat recalled due to listeria contamination.
Speaker 1: And this is not bores Head, and that's a separate one.
Speaker 1: SOS routine testing found listeria there and so far there
Speaker 1: have been no cases of anybody sick. This was ready
Speaker 1: to eat chicken was the source of the contamination, but
Speaker 1: we did have As we have seen cases of listeria,
Speaker 1: it can take a while for that to show up.
Speaker 1: Boar's Head, by the way, is facing multiple lawsuits related
Speaker 1: to death and illness. They said it can take up
Speaker 1: to it can take one to four weeks for listeria
Speaker 1: to show up, but it can sometimes present itself in
Speaker 1: the same day, and so Boar's Head is facing big,
Speaker 1: big lawsuits. I don't know if they're going to make
Speaker 1: it out of this or not. Because they've had people
Speaker 1: who have died from that listeria, and we have officials
Speaker 1: warning consumers to throw out millions of eggs as a
Speaker 1: recall has been upgraded. This is a farm known as
Speaker 1: Milo's Poultry Farms. They issued a recall. They're out of Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: They said there was a salmonella outbreak again. There have
Speaker 1: been no deaths. Sixty five people fell ill, twenty four
Speaker 1: were hospitalized with salmonella poisoning. The eggs were sold to
Speaker 1: stores and restaurants in Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan over the summer.
Speaker 1: But the cost of eggs, they said, has increased one
Speaker 1: hundred and forty seven percent since Biden took office. You've
Speaker 1: done a great job getting U eggs Canyway, we've got
Speaker 1: eggs coming out. We just took to people who were
Speaker 1: collecting supplies for a relief and everything. We took eighty
Speaker 1: four as down to which still got all over the place.
Speaker 1: But anyway, the cost of eggs have gone up one
Speaker 1: hundred and forty seven percent. And part a large part
Speaker 1: of that which I don't see in this article from
Speaker 1: bright Bark is all of the bird flu nonsense that
Speaker 1: is happening. And I guess we say, one bird flu
Speaker 1: over the cuckoo's nest. They're in Washington, DC as they're
Speaker 1: shutting everything down unnecessarily. Well, one person he doesn't have
Speaker 1: to worry about the skyrocketing costs of eggs is Michael Jordan.
Speaker 1: That's right. Take a look at Air Jordan and what
Speaker 1: it looks like now he's got a private jet. This
Speaker 1: thing is very impressive and very expensive. He just took
Speaker 1: delivery of a brand new twenty twenty four Gulf Stream.
Speaker 1: This is a G for those of you who are
Speaker 1: out there shopping for one. This is a G six
Speaker 1: fifty er, twenty two seats, seven dollars per hour to fly,
Speaker 1: it cost about a million per year and fixed expenses.
Speaker 1: It requires a flight attendant flying four hundred hours per year.
Speaker 1: The annual budget of three point nine million dollars before
Speaker 1: debt service. That's Michael Jordan there, And as I look
Speaker 1: at this, it makes me wonder if his unpleasant experience
Speaker 1: flying with Karen and I had anything to do. I
Speaker 1: think I've told this story before, maybe not. When I
Speaker 1: was looking to move back to the East Coast, had
Speaker 1: some job interviews and they flew me in that first
Speaker 1: the company I was interviewing with in Florida, flew me
Speaker 1: in and then data General flew me up to Research
Speaker 1: Triangle Park to the drop there. So we went through
Speaker 1: Atlanta and what had happened was the ACC Tournament had happened,
Speaker 1: and everybody that was the year that n C State
Speaker 1: and Jim Valvana won the tournament. They were the underdog
Speaker 1: the Cinderella Tournament. Everybody was so excited about that. They
Speaker 1: were there in Raleigh. But of course Research Trungle Park,
Speaker 1: you've got you know, Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill. And
Speaker 1: in those three cities you got in C State, Duke
Speaker 1: and UNC Chapel Hill that he played for. Well, they
Speaker 1: had been picked to win because they had Michael Jordan,
Speaker 1: and they unexpectedly lost and so they had to book
Speaker 1: in the last minute and fly commercial of all things.
Speaker 1: And so we were on that plane and they came
Speaker 1: in and they asked everybody to move if you had
Speaker 1: an aisle seat, and so Karen and I got split up,
Speaker 1: and these guys came in and I can't understand why
Speaker 1: they got their own private jets of thin can afford
Speaker 1: them because their legs were all over the place. I mean,
Speaker 1: they had to sit on the aisle, these long legs
Speaker 1: and they're thinking out. It was really comical. And I
Speaker 1: got moved, moved back, and the guy that I was
Speaker 1: setting with says, well, it's Michael Jordan. Said who's he?
Speaker 1: I had no idea who he was. And you know
Speaker 1: this is I didn't follow sports. I didn't follow college basketball.
Speaker 1: He was still in college. And he said, you don't
Speaker 1: know who Michael Jordan is because this guy is going
Speaker 1: to be unbelievably rich, and so, oh that's nice, you know,
Speaker 1: I didn't care. And so Karen is seated in a
Speaker 1: different place and the lady comes by with some drinks
Speaker 1: and Karen. She gave Karen something. He said, no, I
Speaker 1: want that other thing. So the stewardess gets kind of
Speaker 1: flustered and it's going back and forth and trips over
Speaker 1: some of the legs that are out in the aisle
Speaker 1: and it spills what was it? Was it? Coffee? Coke?
Speaker 1: Spills coke all over Michael Jordan. Oliver is back, okay,
Speaker 1: And I mean these guys were expecting win the tournament.
Speaker 1: They didn't win the tournament. They got packed into this
Speaker 1: plane and are flying and cramped commercial not commercial even
Speaker 1: there there Well, it's a commercial flight, but I mean,
Speaker 1: they're they're just they're back in, not even a first
Speaker 1: class or anything. I don't even know if the plane
Speaker 1: had first class. But so he gets this, you would
Speaker 1: expect that, you know, he might blow up, especially because
Speaker 1: some of these sports guys are Prima Donna's and he
Speaker 1: was so incredibly nice and understanding about it. That was
Speaker 1: what amazed me. That was what impressed me. Didn't care
Speaker 1: about the basketball stuff, but I thought that's a lot
Speaker 1: of character there. Karen eventually wound up teaching management organizational
Speaker 1: stuff at for Corporation, and his brother took one of
Speaker 1: her classes, and she said he was just the nicest
Speaker 1: guy as well. But that's our Michael Jordan's story. And
Speaker 1: I guess after that expense, that experience, he's willing to
Speaker 1: buy this incredibly expensive jet just to avoid that again.
Speaker 1: And then we have this, we have museum worker mistakes
Speaker 1: a beer can artwork for garbage and tosses it in
Speaker 1: the trash. Roger Scrutin would not be surprised. Roger Scrutin
Speaker 1: has talked for so long, well he's dead now, but
Speaker 1: he talked a great deal about the loss of beauty
Speaker 1: in art and architecture. Now we have art that is
Speaker 1: literally indistinguishable from trash. Only Musum said, well, we don't
Speaker 1: blame the person who's cleaning up. It does look like trash.
Speaker 1: But here knows how much this stuff cost. Hand painted
Speaker 1: cans created by a French artist in nineteen eighty eight,
Speaker 1: picked up as garbage and tossed into the can. French
Speaker 1: artist Alexandra Levey titled all the Good Times We Spent Together.
Speaker 1: It's displayed a museum showing what appears to be nothing
Speaker 1: more than two empty beer cans to the naked eye,
Speaker 1: you know, just like La La and Kobert left them
Speaker 1: or something, you know, after our interview. So yeah, it's
Speaker 1: you have to be a very sophisticated elite a fictionado
Speaker 1: to really discern the fact that this is not just
Speaker 1: beer cans, but it's really fine art. For those the
Speaker 1: rest of us, it just looks like a can of
Speaker 1: tough beer, doesn't it. So can you spot the elite
Speaker 1: art involved in all this? The person as a matter
Speaker 1: of fact that the museum said, well, in a way,
Speaker 1: it's actually a testament to the effectiveness of his art.
Speaker 1: Then it would be mistaken for trash. Speaking of trash
Speaker 1: and having opposing as off as some kind of artwork.
Speaker 1: The Amazon's version of the Lord of the Rings series,
Speaker 1: which Traviss really wanted to go, I said, well, you know,
Speaker 1: the thing debut a year ago. Yeah, but they've just
Speaker 1: done another season of it. Let's go back and watch
Speaker 1: the first one. And you know, we've seen the reviews
Speaker 1: about how wilke it was, but it was just unbelievably bad. Now,
Speaker 1: one of the people who is putting this show together
Speaker 1: for Amazon says that this take on The Lord of
Speaker 1: the Rings is really about climate change. Amazon's Lord of
Speaker 1: the Rings the Rings of Power streaming on their side,
Speaker 1: is now claiming the showrunner is that the Tolkien classic
Speaker 1: is about climate change. Patrick McKay, one of the Rings
Speaker 1: of Power showrunners, compared the destruction of the dwarf city
Speaker 1: of kazad Doom to climate change. The producers have chosen
Speaker 1: to make the fall of the Dwarf Kingdom and kazad Num,
Speaker 1: also known as Moria, a more protracted event. The fight
Speaker 1: over the subterranean city will stretch from season two, which
Speaker 1: has just ended into season three. In Tolkien's original works,
Speaker 1: the fall of the city is not described as having
Speaker 1: fallen over a long stretch of time. It has just
Speaker 1: said to have fallen to the monstrous dragon known as
Speaker 1: the Balrog, whose fiery wrath caused the Dwarfs to flee
Speaker 1: their great city. But the guy said this, he said,
Speaker 1: it's a thing where you know, how does societies fall?
Speaker 1: Usually it's gradually and then all at once. Where do
Speaker 1: you get that idea from? Yeah, that was that was
Speaker 1: Ernest Hemingway, he said, you know, in his novel, I
Speaker 1: think it was The Suntle also sets it's a really
Speaker 1: rich guy who's lost everything, said, how does somebody have
Speaker 1: that kind of money like you have? How do they
Speaker 1: go broke? And says, well, gradually then suddenly. And we've
Speaker 1: talked about that a great deal, and he is right,
Speaker 1: that's what happens to civilizations and empires and things like that.
Speaker 1: Really does. But that's not what happened in the book.
Speaker 1: Just another example of how they want to reinterpret it.
Speaker 1: And then, of course when he says that the gradually
Speaker 1: suddenly thing, or he says all at once, he says,
Speaker 1: if you want to use climate change as a metaphor,
Speaker 1: climate change is not an event. Climate change is a
Speaker 1: process that ebbs and flows it's always headed in a
Speaker 1: dark direction. No, it's just lies that come and go
Speaker 1: that have never been None of it has ever been proven.
Speaker 1: He said, I think a kingdom is great and as
Speaker 1: powerful as Kazan Dum does not fall in a moment,
Speaker 1: but maybe this guy's career will. It should Anyway, the
Speaker 1: fall is a product of many disasters over time, just
Speaker 1: like his career, and so yeah, it is. They actually
Speaker 1: have a quote here from from Tolkien. We used to
Speaker 1: always and that's one of the reasons I think Travis
Speaker 1: wanted to go back and look at it.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: I used to always get the family together and we
Speaker 1: would read The Lord and the Rings every fall. You know.
Speaker 1: Tolkien hated the idea that his book was about metaphor,
Speaker 1: But it's filled with Christian metaphor. I mean it just
Speaker 1: comes out of him. And it may not have been conscious,
Speaker 1: but unconsciously all over the place, perhaps more effective than C. S.
Speaker 1: Lewisu did it intentionally. Tolkien said, I didn't do any
Speaker 1: of that stuff as an allegory or metaphor anything. I
Speaker 1: don't like that I didn't do it. Well, you can
Speaker 1: see it all over the place. These people are consciously
Speaker 1: putting stuff in to push their religion, which is climate change.
Speaker 1: He unconsciously put it in with his Christianity, so, as
Speaker 1: they point out, it was nothing like the fall of us,
Speaker 1: as it had absolutely no parallels to climate change, as
Speaker 1: they quote from the Lord of the Rings. Thus they
Speaker 1: roused from sleep a thing of terror, the flying from
Speaker 1: thing Gordon had lain hidden in the foundations of the
Speaker 1: earth since the coming of the Host of the West
Speaker 1: a ball rog of more Goth Durham was slain by
Speaker 1: it in the year after that name the first his son,
Speaker 1: and then the Glory of Maria passed and its people
Speaker 1: were destroyed or fled far away. Not climate change. These
Speaker 1: people who did the climate change that they just can't
Speaker 1: help lying to us, can they. The entire production has
Speaker 1: been replete with virtues. Secondly, abound diversity and rates they choose,
Speaker 1: as we pointed out, And by the end of season one,
Speaker 1: the billion dollar production had lost sixty three percent of
Speaker 1: his audience. Is that all they lost? Dravis to me,
Speaker 1: about fifteen minutes into the first episode, I can't believe
Speaker 1: that they had thirty four percent of the people still
Speaker 1: sticking around at the end of the first season, and
Speaker 1: it's gone down a sharp drop off after season two
Speaker 1: as well. Well, you know, one of my big criticisms
Speaker 1: when we talked about it was just how bad the
Speaker 1: music wise, it was all a very bad imitation of
Speaker 1: the Lord of the Rings movies. And I said, you know,
Speaker 1: one of the things that really bothered me about it
Speaker 1: was Howard Shore had a great soundtrack and they're recognizable,
Speaker 1: many recognizable leak motifs in the music. Themes they you know,
Speaker 1: were melodically interesting themes and they were attached to different
Speaker 1: places or characters and things like that. And this person
Speaker 1: didn't do anything like that at all. It's just kind
Speaker 1: of fake, nondescript sounds that are there that are kind
Speaker 1: of orchestral and kind of you know, they'll have choruses
Speaker 1: that are singing or something like that. You know, film
Speaker 1: music is becoming like those beer cans in the museum
Speaker 1: and a bad imitation, something that is ugly. This was
Speaker 1: sent to me by docu Garden, as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: And this is from a guy. He does a lot
Speaker 1: of videos about music on YouTube. He's got a big following.
Speaker 1: I don't even know how to pronounce his name. I
Speaker 1: don't know if it is Rick Beato or Beato or
Speaker 1: whatever how he pronounces his name. But he does have
Speaker 1: interesting videos. I've seen them from time to time, and
Speaker 1: this was sent to me he said. You know what,
Speaker 1: I was talking to my young daughter and said, what
Speaker 1: is the we're thinking about that? Who is the most
Speaker 1: famous musician of all times? If you can figure it out?
Speaker 8: You know, I've been thinking about some of the videos
Speaker 8: I've made recently where I'm comparing you know, let's say
Speaker 8: the Taylor Swift versus the Beatles based on that New
Speaker 8: York Times article, or contemporary music versus music of the past.
Speaker 8: And I thought, you know, all this stuff of trying
Speaker 8: to compare who's bigger? Is Taylor Swift bigger than the Beatles?
Speaker 8: And comparing music from sixty years ago to music today
Speaker 8: is really kind of ridiculous. There's a person whose music
Speaker 8: is far better known than anyone from the Beatles or
Speaker 8: the Rolling Stones or Led Zeppeler, Jimmy Hendrix to Taylor Swift,
Speaker 8: to Beyonce to The Weekend to Drake to Kendrick Lamar
Speaker 8: put together, You're probably thinking, what, No, there's someone whose
Speaker 8: music is known in every culture in the world, in
Speaker 8: the United States, all through South America, all through Asia,
Speaker 8: all through Europe. This person's music is known by more
Speaker 8: human beings than any musician's music ever in the history
Speaker 8: of human beings. And you're like, come on, Rick, give
Speaker 8: me a break. So I'm not walking with my daughter
Speaker 8: Leilely yesterday, my eleven year old, and I said.
Speaker 6: Listen to this.
Speaker 8: So as soon as I started playing that, Leila is
Speaker 8: like John Williams. Who doesn't know John Williams. Everyone knows
Speaker 8: John Williams. Who doesn't know Star Wars. I know people
Speaker 8: that have never seen a Star Wars movie, none of
Speaker 8: them and know that theme.
Speaker 6: That theme is ubiquitous.
Speaker 8: It is everywhere, and it's been everywhere since nineteen seventy seven,
Speaker 8: just that theme. If you just think about this, everyone
Speaker 8: knows that theme.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It is interesting, isn't it. He has great themes,
Speaker 1: amazing orchestration. He really is a musician, unlike the MTV
Speaker 1: generation where they get somebody who's attractive and have them
Speaker 1: dance while they've got auto tunes stuff in the back
Speaker 1: that's not even music both. John Williams is going to
Speaker 1: go down as one of the greatest composers of all time,
Speaker 1: no doubt about it. Back in college, even before he
Speaker 1: did the bulk of his work. There was a guy
Speaker 1: that I knew that was in a music class, and
Speaker 1: he was saying that at that point in time, he said,
Speaker 1: who is the best twentieth century composer of serious music?
Speaker 1: Says John Williams without a doubt. When you look at it,
Speaker 1: it's not just how popular he's been because of what
Speaker 1: he did for the movies. And of course we're not
Speaker 1: going to see movies that are going to be as
Speaker 1: popular as they were because you don't have that kind
Speaker 1: of artistry anymore in the soundtracks. I always go back
Speaker 1: and look at the tribute that Steven Spielberg paid to
Speaker 1: him about Et, which I was not fond at all
Speaker 1: of that movie, but I did like the soundtrack. And
Speaker 1: so he shows the picture of Et flying on the bicycle,
Speaker 1: and he shows it silent, and then he plays it
Speaker 1: again with the music of John Williams, and there was
Speaker 1: like WHOA. That just made the whole thing come alive.
Speaker 1: You look at the careers of Stevens, film can feel
Speaker 1: like George Lucas were made by John Williams. So we're
Speaker 1: going to take a quick break. Here's a little bit
Speaker 1: more John Williams.
Speaker 6: Defending the American dream you're listening to the David Knight Show. Well,
Speaker 6: and thanks to docu Garden for subscribe Star. Subscriber who
Speaker 6: past that that cl along about John Williams. Appreciate that
Speaker 6: and thank you for supporting us on a subscribe star
Speaker 6: as well. Folks, if you would like to know how
Speaker 6: you can help us that would you know that is
Speaker 6: a very important part base of our support. A subscribe
Speaker 6: star helps us to know kind of where our budget
Speaker 6: is and so we really do appreciate people who have
Speaker 6: support us. And if you want to know how you
Speaker 6: can support this show, we don't put it behind a firewall,
Speaker 6: but we do have If you go to the Davidnightshow
Speaker 6: dot com you can see the links to various places
Speaker 6: where you can support us on ze on cash app
Speaker 6: and a subscribe star.
Speaker 1: And other places. So we really do appreciate your support.
Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about masks. It's all masquerade
Speaker 1: and all the mouse the masketeers that are out there.
Speaker 1: A new study has found that we have a tremendous
Speaker 1: amount of plastic in our body, especially in our brain.
Speaker 1: It is focused in the frontal line of our brain
Speaker 1: and they found a great deal of it in nasal
Speaker 1: passages as well. I wonder what it could be. What
Speaker 1: have people been putting over their noses lately? The Gold report. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's exactly what is happening. Microplastics are tiny shards of
Speaker 1: plastic anywhere from around five millimeters wide to just one
Speaker 1: nanometer wide. More specifically, have been found in the brain
Speaker 1: and the frontal cortex, the part of the brain thought
Speaker 1: to be responsible for higher human functions such as abstract thinking, creativity,
Speaker 1: decision making, which tells us, folks that the mask wears
Speaker 1: are never going to figure this out. It's too late.
Speaker 1: It's light. That's why I guess you still see some
Speaker 1: other people still wearing these things. Professor Matthew Kempin, author
Speaker 1: of the study, told media that the concentrations of plastics
Speaker 1: that he and his team discovered were around four micrograms
Speaker 1: per gram, meaning that they constitute about a half a
Speaker 1: percent of the brain. He noted that over the past
Speaker 1: eight years, the amounts of plastics researchers have been finding
Speaker 1: have increased quite considerably. Now here's the interesting thing. They
Speaker 1: do this study and they go back they said, well,
Speaker 1: well we compared it to brain samples from twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: I won't know why they went back to twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: Why not back to twenty twenty or something. Why not
Speaker 1: do some intermediate stuff. But they only have their data
Speaker 1: point is twenty sixteen and today. And when they I
Speaker 1: guess maybe when they sent Igor in to get the
Speaker 1: other brains, he dropped him or something. I don't I'll
Speaker 1: be normal here. Compared to autopsy brain samples from twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: that's about fifty percent higher. So they're not doing this
Speaker 1: every year.
Speaker 7: Again.
Speaker 1: We got a data point in twenty sixteen, another one
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. They also observe that the most
Speaker 1: common type of plastic found was polyethylene, widely used the
Speaker 1: packaging of all kinds, both hard plastics soft ones such
Speaker 1: as those used in bags. A few months past and
Speaker 1: then another study came out with a possible answer to
Speaker 1: the question of how plastics managed to enter the brain
Speaker 1: via the nose. Who knew the nose? New research from
Speaker 1: the University of South palo and the University of Berlin.
Speaker 1: They say the discovery of microplastics both in the nose
Speaker 1: and the all factory bulb located at the base of
Speaker 1: the brain. Researchers found that the most common plastic in
Speaker 1: the nasal passages was polypropylene like polyethylene she used for
Speaker 1: packaging food storage, both hard and soft plastics. And so
Speaker 1: one of the professors who did the study said, well,
Speaker 1: I think this is because people are breathing while indoors.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't do that, by the way, you know, you
Speaker 1: should only breathe when you're outdoors. But what do we
Speaker 1: do when they walk us indoors and tell us to
Speaker 1: put on a man How many times did Karen and
Speaker 1: I drive past the couple that were in a car
Speaker 1: with the windows rolled up, husband and wife, and they
Speaker 1: both got masks on, and we were writing in a
Speaker 1: convertible with no mask. Breathing within indoor environments could be
Speaker 1: a major source of plastic pollution in the brain. No,
Speaker 1: that's not what changed in eight years. Has there something
Speaker 1: happened in our environment, you know that has changed everything
Speaker 1: so that you would now all of a sudden start
Speaker 1: accumulating plastic in your brain and your nose and your
Speaker 1: olfactory bulb.
Speaker 9: No.
Speaker 1: The research team also noted that the plastic fragments that
Speaker 1: they found were quite large. Some of them had a
Speaker 1: diameter of ten microns, from which they concluded that the
Speaker 1: level of smaller nanoplastics which entered the human body is
Speaker 1: much higher than was previously thought. So the study mentioned
Speaker 1: higher concentrations of plastics also correlated with lower sperm counts.
Speaker 1: Everything that the globeless do is targeted towards population reduction,
Speaker 1: and so this article from the Gold Report says, it's
Speaker 1: the masks stupid. Yeah, it really is. Between twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: and twenty twenty four, there was no particular comment on
Speaker 1: why those years were chosen, but without wondering whether there
Speaker 1: could be some reason why from the years twenty twenty
Speaker 1: onward people's brains might suddenly be filling up a plastic
Speaker 1: via the nose. As the other study mentioned earlier noted,
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, so if she flutes, she's made of wood.
Speaker 1: Who are you so wise in the ways of science
Speaker 1: to figure that? Fortunately, yet another study, published in a
Speaker 1: quite obscure journal Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety in April of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, set out to examine the potential of
Speaker 1: face masks for the content and the release of inanimate toxins.
Speaker 1: This was quite an extensive piece of research, as it
Speaker 1: reviewed one thousand and three studies covering surgical textile and
Speaker 1: N ninety five masks. Researchers were very concerned at their findings.
Speaker 1: They said most studies, sixty three percent of them, showed
Speaker 1: alarming results with high micro and nanoplastics release exceedances could
Speaker 1: also be evidenced for volatile organic compounds xylene, acroline and
Speaker 1: fas things like that. So you know, again, we didn't know.
Speaker 1: I mean, we saw when all this stuff was happening.
Speaker 1: We saw people who were frantic about all this stuff.
Speaker 1: We could see how they were getting acne over their
Speaker 1: face where the face mask was. And I talked about
Speaker 1: at the time. I said, you know, this is the
Speaker 1: reason they call them face diapers, because your body eliminates
Speaker 1: waste through your mouth as well, and they're dirty diapers
Speaker 1: that you're wearing all day and you're getting a diaper
Speaker 1: rash on your face. Well, they say here, plenty of
Speaker 1: scientists knew that already, but they didn't tell you. The
Speaker 1: study conceded that masks do have their uses when it
Speaker 1: comes to filtering out large particles of dirt and other
Speaker 1: items that people don't want to inhale, but concluded that
Speaker 1: the risks of wearing them were considerable enough to be
Speaker 1: weighed against any benefit risk and benefits, risk and benefits.
Speaker 1: There's no way, no way that it is going. They're
Speaker 1: telling us that the viral particles which they were never
Speaker 1: able to isolate, but they're telling us that these viral
Speaker 1: particles that they imagine have a size that is so small.
Speaker 1: As I pointed out, the correct analogy is to say
Speaker 1: that you're going to put up a hurricane fence and
Speaker 1: to keep out mosquitoes and so. Well, no, it's because
Speaker 1: it's attached to spittle particles and that type of thing.
Speaker 1: It's like, well, that doesn't work either, because as a
Speaker 1: study in New South Wales or two thousand and two
Speaker 1: showed that after people wore these things for twenty minutes
Speaker 1: in a medical environment that's what they were studying, they
Speaker 1: found that most of about half of the doctors anything
Speaker 1: didn't even wear them during surgery. They didn't believe it
Speaker 1: was effective, but that those who did, after about twenty minutes,
Speaker 1: a mask became saturated and as a result, they would
Speaker 1: push out spittle particles that were smaller. Those smaller particles
Speaker 1: would travel farther than they would have normally and remain
Speaker 1: airborne longer. So none of it made any sense from
Speaker 1: the very beginning. According to our data, they said, they
Speaker 1: also carry risks these masks do depending on the application,
Speaker 1: a risk benefit analysis is necessary. You're being exposed to
Speaker 1: potentially harmful toxins which pose a significant health risk, especially
Speaker 1: as the toxins are right up against your noses and mouths. Undoubtedly,
Speaker 1: mask mandates have been generating an additional source so potentially
Speaker 1: harmful exposition to toxins with health threatening carcinogenic properties at
Speaker 1: population level with almost zero distance to the airways. They
Speaker 1: cited numerous other studies, most if not all of which
Speaker 1: have received no media attention. I've never seen anybody talk
Speaker 1: about this two thousand and two study anywhere alternative media.
Speaker 1: Either in New South Wales, they've drawne similar conclusions with
Speaker 1: regard to a long list of toxins found in face
Speaker 1: masks of all kinds. And by the way, that study
Speaker 1: in two thousand and two didn't exist in a vacuum.
Speaker 1: And the reason that came up was because New South
Speaker 1: Wales when they first came up with the SARS outbreak
Speaker 1: in Hong Kong and places that that everybody started wearing
Speaker 1: masks in Asia. The Australian government there New South Wales
Speaker 1: had a massive fine. So don't you tell anybody this
Speaker 1: is going to protect them against sars. And if you
Speaker 1: do something like one hundred thousand US trillion dollars if
Speaker 1: you sold these masks. That's why the mass say it's
Speaker 1: not going to protect you from anything. Right, there's a
Speaker 1: reason for that. There's a precedent for that. It goes
Speaker 1: back to two thousand and two. All this stuff was
Speaker 1: based on what they knew was a lie from the
Speaker 1: very beginning. They also noted that such close up and
Speaker 1: prolonged exposure to the toxins and the face masks could
Speaker 1: cause bacteria to multiply and encourage antibiotic resistance, and of
Speaker 1: course that you can see it as plain as the
Speaker 1: acne on their face. They pointed out that the dead
Speaker 1: space between the mask and the wearer's face is extremely
Speaker 1: unhelpthed the environment, even without the added presence of toxins
Speaker 1: and plastics. Humans inhale emissions from a mask at a
Speaker 1: nearly zero distance. They swallow water droplets originating from the
Speaker 1: moist dead space, enriched with mask ingredients. And by the way,
Speaker 1: one of the other studies I was talking about the
Speaker 1: fact that you know as you're breathing in the air.
Speaker 1: Same as that other studies said, Look, you're pushing out
Speaker 1: the particles that are smaller, remain airborne, longer, travel farther.
Speaker 1: Same thing is true in reverse, as you suck the
Speaker 1: air in, all of these toxins and everything are getting
Speaker 1: smaller and it travels farther and deeper down into your lungs.
Speaker 1: So it's bad for both exhaling and inhaling, both for
Speaker 1: other people as well as for you. They stress the
Speaker 1: difficulty in breathing through a mask leads many people to
Speaker 1: breathe through their mouth instead of their nose, which deprives
Speaker 1: them of the immune protection of the nasal passages. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: widely read medical journals, such as a British medical journal,
Speaker 1: are still pushing studies on the benefits of wearing face masks.
Speaker 1: They will never stop lying to you. Never it is,
Speaker 1: do we have Tony see you're going to join us? Okay,
Speaker 1: Guard Goldsmith, good to see your guard. Liberty Conspiracy. You
Speaker 1: can find him on substack as well as on rock
Speaker 1: Fin and Twitter Monday through Friday in the evenings at
Speaker 1: I think is at six o'clock, I think he says
Speaker 1: Darth Vader's theme is a mashup of Tchaikowsky's Slavic march
Speaker 1: and holsts. Yeah, the Mars, the planets. Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 1: But you know he's he's not totally original, but you know,
Speaker 1: you can look at the influences of a lot of
Speaker 1: different composers over a lot of different things.
Speaker 10: Uh.
Speaker 1: And we've got Tony who is ready for us. So
Speaker 1: we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we
Speaker 1: will be right back. The common Man. They created common Core,
Speaker 1: dumb down our shoulder. They created common Past to track
Speaker 1: and control us, their Commons project to make sure the
Speaker 1: commoners own nothing, and the communist future. The common man
Speaker 1: is simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us has worth
Speaker 1: and dignity created in the image of God. That is
Speaker 1: what we have in common. That is what they want
Speaker 1: to take away. And their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
Speaker 1: They desire to know everything about us, while they hide
Speaker 1: everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
Speaker 1: expose what they want to hide. Please share the information
Speaker 1: and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank
Speaker 1: you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't
Speaker 1: support us, financially. Please keep us in your prayers.
Speaker 7: The Davidknightshow dot Com.
Speaker 1: All right. Joining us now is Tony Ardaban of why
Speaker 1: is Wolf Gold? And Tony has kindly set up David
Speaker 1: Knight dot Gold that'll take you to wise Wolf and
Speaker 1: let him know that she came to us. It's a
Speaker 1: great place to get gold and silver. Now is a
Speaker 1: great time to accumulate gold and silver, as we've been
Speaker 1: talking about. We're going to talk a little bit more
Speaker 1: about that now. What is happening economically, and of course
Speaker 1: wolf Pack, which is something unique that Tony offers. It's
Speaker 1: a large buying group that you can help. Helps you
Speaker 1: to get a discount and also sign up for a
Speaker 1: fixed amount each month. Let you do cost averaging and
Speaker 1: gradually save and gradually start to get outside of this
Speaker 1: Fiat system. Thanks for joining us, Tony.
Speaker 4: It's great to be here, David.
Speaker 1: Good to see you, Good to have you on. Let
Speaker 1: you know I saw this the other day and I
Speaker 1: mentioned this to you when off air, Bablin b said
Speaker 1: Ron Paul has decorated for Halloween by putting up the
Speaker 1: spooky National Debt counter in his front yard. Someone said,
Speaker 1: I have trouble walking by his house alone anymore. I
Speaker 1: almost fainted when I saw the thirty five trillion dollars
Speaker 1: a couple hours ago this evening, and it's added even
Speaker 1: more while I've been standing here talking. It's scaring all
Speaker 1: the neighborhood kids. Well, they're the ones who are going
Speaker 1: to have to pay for it, aren't they. That's exactly right.
Speaker 10: It's the looming, demonic ghost of Christmas future, like a
Speaker 10: Christmas Carol. You know, you get that, that's the final ghost,
Speaker 10: the ghost of Christmas future. And you know, you look
Speaker 10: at statements from people like Dick Cheney, remember the deficits
Speaker 10: don't matter.
Speaker 4: Remember that statement back I think circa two thousand and four.
Speaker 1: So one of the pioneers of modern monetary theory, right there,
Speaker 1: Dick Cheney, who knew that he was such a genius.
Speaker 10: Right, Well, we're going to test all of the Canesyan models.
Speaker 1: We're testing that right now.
Speaker 10: I mean, we've been in an experiment, a live experiment,
Speaker 10: since nineteen seventy one when we went off the gold
Speaker 10: standard free floating fiat currency. The live span of those
Speaker 10: currencies is generally twenty six years. We've doubled it because
Speaker 10: with the world's reserve currency. But again, every week we
Speaker 10: come on, we talk about dedollarization and that's happening rapidly
Speaker 10: or losing that status, so that won't go on forever.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that's right. And of course since we weaponized it,
Speaker 1: it isn't just I think things are going to accelerate
Speaker 1: because after Biden weaponized our financial system against his enemies.
Speaker 1: They're not my enemies, but against his enemies. Since he
Speaker 1: did that, they have been very focused on coming after
Speaker 1: our financial system because that is the federal government superpower.
Speaker 1: That's how they manipulate us here domestically, and it's how
Speaker 1: they manipulate things globally, and so that is you know,
Speaker 1: these people understand how vital that is to American power,
Speaker 1: and they're going to do everything they can to shut
Speaker 1: that down. I talked yesterday about somebody who went through
Speaker 1: hyperinflation in Lebanon and what a horrific experience that was.
Speaker 1: From a personal standpoint, I'm afraid we're looking at something
Speaker 1: like that. In that particular article, the guy who wrote
Speaker 1: it was a bitcoin aficionado, but you know, gold and silver,
Speaker 1: that is a physical way to get outside of a
Speaker 1: fiat system. And as he pointed out, and as you
Speaker 1: said so many times, all fiat systems are essentially going
Speaker 1: to go to zero at some point in time. It's
Speaker 1: just a question of when.
Speaker 4: In twenty twenty two, it seems to be the tipping point.
Speaker 10: You look back through the timeline Russia invades Ukraine, you
Speaker 10: can argue, if you know anything about history, that it
Speaker 10: was provoked. That's what that NATO wanted, the Western Powers wanted.
Speaker 10: As soon as they did that, the West moves with
Speaker 10: even more sanctions and seizing Russian assets, and that saw
Speaker 10: the dip of the rue bold and the ruble dip.
Speaker 10: For a while looked like was their currency was going
Speaker 10: to break, and then all of a sudden they made
Speaker 10: some announcements. One their finance minister said they were no
Speaker 10: longer take dollars. They said it was candy wrappers. And
Speaker 10: then they said they were going to back the ruble
Speaker 10: with so many grams of gold or some sort of
Speaker 10: gram gold system.
Speaker 4: Where you could turn it in for that.
Speaker 10: The ruble rebounded, and after that, really you saw the
Speaker 10: massive acceleration in d dollarization, which was I mean, went
Speaker 10: from like fifty five percent of global usage down to
Speaker 10: like forty two percent of global uses. For the dollar,
Speaker 10: and it was very quick and that cross border payments
Speaker 10: increased using gold, using crude oil. Since then, we've seen
Speaker 10: Saudi Arabia join bricks, the United Air Emirates, Ethiopia, several others,
Speaker 10: and there's got twenty five other countries that are in
Speaker 10: the periphery to join bricks. And that's because of the
Speaker 10: sanctions that were placed on countries like Russia. But it's
Speaker 10: like forty different sanctions on thirty six different countries. That's
Speaker 10: probably increased since I used that figure. I've been throwing
Speaker 10: it around for eighteen months, so it's probably increased since then.
Speaker 10: And we've given billions and billions of seized Russian assets
Speaker 10: to Ukraine. You know, this is supposed to be settled
Speaker 10: in the international court, and they're supposed to.
Speaker 1: Be do process and another that's all out the window.
Speaker 10: So the other countries took notice, and that's why they're
Speaker 10: forming these coali even inside bricks, which you know, India
Speaker 10: and China not friends in breath, right, you know, the
Speaker 10: enemy of my enemy is my friend. I think this
Speaker 10: the I think the bullying by the United States, the
Speaker 10: weaponization of the dollar has major blowback and the consequences
Speaker 10: we just we lost the petro dollar recently, which you
Speaker 10: and I have discussed.
Speaker 4: It didn't get a lot of coverage it should have.
Speaker 1: If Saudi's not going to exclusively take payment in the dollar,
Speaker 1: that's it. It's not. And they've started taking payment in
Speaker 1: other currencies, and so the petro dollar is dead, and
Speaker 1: so is Biden's policies, you know, the Biden cartel, with
Speaker 1: their sanctions and things like that. Russia responded, as you
Speaker 1: point out, by taking payment in gold, and then they said,
Speaker 1: and oh, by the way, you know, we will cut
Speaker 1: prices by thirty percent, and they still wound up making
Speaker 1: a lot more money and additional three hundred billion dollars
Speaker 1: more than they would have made for a very short
Speaker 1: period of time because the price of oil skyrocketed because
Speaker 1: the US's action. So they could cut their price thirty percent,
Speaker 1: take payment and gold instead of American dollars, and still
Speaker 1: have a windfall profit. And essentially the same thing has
Speaker 1: happened with natural gas. Even though they blew up those
Speaker 1: two pipelines going into Germany, there is still more natural
Speaker 1: gas coming from Russia than it is from the US.
Speaker 1: It's been an absolute failure. Everything that the American empire
Speaker 1: has done, has failed militarily and economically, and yet it's
Speaker 1: going to have tremendous blowback on us domestically.
Speaker 10: You know, the rest of the world isn't buying what
Speaker 10: we're selling. You know, buy and sell under our system.
Speaker 10: If you deviate, we punish you and you have to
Speaker 10: use this debt ridden US dollar that we continue to
Speaker 10: expand the money supply with to pay for our bloated empire.
Speaker 10: The rest of the world said no. And that's what
Speaker 10: bricks is all about. And you really see. I think
Speaker 10: the underlying current, and what doesn't get talked about a lot,
Speaker 10: is the massive move to commodities just in general, whether
Speaker 10: we're talking about gold or silver, about crude or oil, energy, copper,
Speaker 10: you know, mining all this. That's what the Belton Road
Speaker 10: initiative really was about, you know, natural resources. But that's
Speaker 10: what the other countries are doing. They're moving towards commodities.
Speaker 10: We continue to try to dominate, you know, hegemonic dominance
Speaker 10: with the US dollar and the American military, and that
Speaker 10: is waning. You could, it's really happening faster than than
Speaker 10: I thought, David. I thought we had some years and
Speaker 10: years left. I don't think we do. I mean, it's
Speaker 10: especially after losing the petro dollar, and there's something to
Speaker 10: that because nobody put up a fight in Washington. There
Speaker 10: was no like summit or can we fix this or
Speaker 10: you know, an extension or anything.
Speaker 4: It just literally just let it lapse.
Speaker 10: And you see the rest of the world they continue
Speaker 10: to grab up, you know, commodities, and that's that's really
Speaker 10: in the face of what's happening with fiat currency worldwide
Speaker 10: and especially the dollar.
Speaker 1: There's just a change. There's a change on there.
Speaker 10: And I think these other countries obviously they know that
Speaker 10: they're running the simulation.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, you know all these Western countries that kind
Speaker 1: of collectively comprise NATO, the Group of Seven and all
Speaker 1: the rest of them. You know, the US is nothing
Speaker 1: but a kleptocracy anymore. They wanted to steal all the
Speaker 1: Russian stuff, and even the European countries that no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: we're not going to dis confiscate all that will take
Speaker 1: will take the interest that's being earned and give that
Speaker 1: to Ukraine, but we're not going to take all those
Speaker 1: hundreds of billions of dollars out of that. But you know,
Speaker 1: the criminal US government, as we have seen with all
Speaker 1: of these European countries is weaponized against its own people
Speaker 1: and against its own system. You can look at this
Speaker 1: say this doesn't make any sense unless you realize what
Speaker 1: the bigger agenda is for the globalists, and that is
Speaker 1: to take down Western civilization, to return us back to
Speaker 1: some kind of a feudal system that is under the technocracy.
Speaker 1: That that is what makes sense. That's why they're not
Speaker 1: doing anything to try to stop this, and that's why
Speaker 1: you need to get out of their system. They're pushing
Speaker 1: everybody towards the system of austere poverty and total surveillance
Speaker 1: and control. That's why I like have physical, something that's physical,
Speaker 1: like gold and silver that's outside of their system. We
Speaker 1: have to have a little bit of that at least,
Speaker 1: can't get Yeah.
Speaker 10: And I think where we all get in trouble is
Speaker 10: we have normalcy bias, all of us do. I don't
Speaker 10: care how much you know about this or how much
Speaker 10: you research, because you've you've got muscle memory from living
Speaker 10: and you know the decades past. Unfortunately, all that's off
Speaker 10: the table, and we have to be a lot more nimble,
Speaker 10: a lot to have the ability to adapt faster. You know,
Speaker 10: my friend Charlie Robinson wrote a book called The Controlled
Speaker 10: Demolition of the American Empire along with Jeff Berwick.
Speaker 1: I've read that book and.
Speaker 10: I mean various students, very prescient because it was written
Speaker 10: a few years ago, and just see the acceleration of
Speaker 10: everything going on with the American Empire, the American dollar,
Speaker 10: of the American economy, and so you know, we have
Speaker 10: to to channel our buck Metster Fuller said, people cannot
Speaker 10: get out of the way of what they don't see coming.
Speaker 10: It doesn't look you know, if you if you're following mainstream,
Speaker 10: it just seems like well that you know, the stock
Speaker 10: market continues to be all time highs, and you know
Speaker 10: we've lowered interest rates, so you know, there's cheap money
Speaker 10: out there and every happy days are here again. I
Speaker 10: think what we have is to continue to inflate these
Speaker 10: bubbles larger and larger. And there was an interview by
Speaker 10: up on lou Rockwell dot Com with Doug Casey. He
Speaker 10: said the same thing, you know, at the end of
Speaker 10: the day, just continue to inflate this bubble so that
Speaker 10: when it pops with all of these uh you know,
Speaker 10: these metrics and models based off of earnings and all
Speaker 10: these things that I don't think are real. When that
Speaker 10: pops and when it when it collapses in on itself,
Speaker 10: we're going to see a real problem economically here in
Speaker 10: this kintry. It's going to start, I mean it's probably
Speaker 10: going to start in the periphery and it's going to
Speaker 10: come home and a lot of those dollars will be repatriated,
Speaker 10: will continue to lose purchasing power in the dollar.
Speaker 1: That's just a given.
Speaker 10: And again, the world's moving to commodities and we're still
Speaker 10: pumping up the stock market.
Speaker 4: I think there's gonna be a reckoning sooner or later.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And when you look at it, you talk about
Speaker 1: I don't believe these things are real. Just take a
Speaker 1: look at the jobs report, which is supposedly the basis
Speaker 1: for them saying, well, even though the Fed cut interest rates,
Speaker 1: we're going to raise mortgage rates, actually raise mortgage rates.
Speaker 1: How they justify it, Well, you know, we've got this
Speaker 1: Bureau of Labor Statistics. I think the L doesn't stand
Speaker 1: for labor. I think it stands for lying. And the
Speaker 1: Bureau of Lying Statistics, the people who told us that
Speaker 1: just told us that they had inflated the report by
Speaker 1: over eight hundred thousand jobs, the second largest false report
Speaker 1: that they've ever had, and of course they're always doing
Speaker 1: it as a false report and revising everything the next
Speaker 1: quarter to make trends look good. But they put out
Speaker 1: this jobs report and Wall Street is so excited about
Speaker 1: all of it. Zero Hedge says, if you look at
Speaker 1: the jobs report, you find that there's a record surge
Speaker 1: of government workers. So it's not even it's not even
Speaker 1: real growth is cidic growth, and it's a record growth
Speaker 1: of government workers. If that's even real. You know, they
Speaker 1: can lie about that and put that in there, but
Speaker 1: that's what they're lying about. And now you know, banks
Speaker 1: raise the interest rates yet again. Even though we've got
Speaker 1: this big spread in which they're as the Fed drops
Speaker 1: her interest rates, they keep raising the rates that they
Speaker 1: charge other people. And then you've got Wall Street all
Speaker 1: excited about this. It's absolutely fake to try to get
Speaker 1: people think that Bidenomics works, and you know, it's all
Speaker 1: just a stack of lies. It's absolutely amazing that it's
Speaker 1: having this effect.
Speaker 10: Well, maybe they'll bring back wasn't an FDR. Had the
Speaker 10: NRA the National Relief Authority or was it agency? I
Speaker 10: forget which one of the A stood for. But that's
Speaker 10: where they just had all these shovel ready jobs. And
Speaker 10: you know that they increase the money supply because Franklin
Speaker 10: Roosevelt said, turn in your gold and we'll replace it,
Speaker 10: will give you this, you know, twenty dollars. Turn in
Speaker 10: your twenty dollars goal piece, will give you twenty dollars
Speaker 10: in fiat currency. And then they sold all the gold
Speaker 10: or they got rid of it and went to Bosl, Switzerland,
Speaker 10: and they raised the price of goal from twenty dollars
Speaker 10: an out to thirty five dollars an out. So that's
Speaker 10: what happened to the money supply in nineteen thirty three
Speaker 10: into the Great Depression.
Speaker 4: How'd that work out?
Speaker 1: It didn't.
Speaker 10: Both again, they prolonged the depression. It went in until
Speaker 10: World War two. You know, they had basically inflated their
Speaker 10: way out of it. So you know, again, I think
Speaker 10: that's what the lessons learned by governments and you know
Speaker 10: Knesy and then the modern monetary theory is we'll.
Speaker 4: Just inflat our way out.
Speaker 10: If you don't understand, especially now that we don't, it's
Speaker 10: not even technically backed by anything like it was technically
Speaker 10: back by in nineteen thirty three to nineteen seventy one
Speaker 10: was gold. The dollar is going to lose massive purchasing
Speaker 10: power in all of these moves, these austerity moves, because
Speaker 10: they're going to have to keep remember what Bloomberg said,
Speaker 10: we got to figure out a way to keep them
Speaker 10: from putting this taking us to the guillotine, you know,
Speaker 10: so they know that they have to do something because
Speaker 10: there's going to be a massive loss of wealth here
Speaker 10: in the in the West.
Speaker 1: We're talking about FDR having shovel ready jobs. I think
Speaker 1: that's basically what's going on with these government workers. And
Speaker 1: you know what they're shoveling, don't you? Government workers. Sore
Speaker 1: is the most on record, and we've never seen anything
Speaker 1: like that. And so you know, when you look at
Speaker 1: what is happening as these things are starting to come back,
Speaker 1: there are things that are solid. There are ways that
Speaker 1: we can get make some preparations outside of this. And
Speaker 1: just as we see with the weather storms, these kind
Speaker 1: of financial storms, the wars, and also you know, going
Speaker 1: back to what is happening with CBDC and other things
Speaker 1: like that, Russia, Israel, others are still manically pursuing this
Speaker 1: cashless society. CBDC. But you talked about Russia and the
Speaker 1: fact that they're looking towards silver. Now more talk a
Speaker 1: little bit about that.
Speaker 10: This is a I think this is a major story
Speaker 10: that again I find all these little stories and I go, wow,
Speaker 10: I can't believe this isn't on every network. The Jerusalem
Speaker 10: Posts put it out, but it's Russia is set to
Speaker 10: boost silver reserves in major precious metals strategy shift. Russia
Speaker 10: shifts its precious metal strategy, adding silver to state reserves
Speaker 10: alongside gold, platinum, and palladium. By the way, they're buying
Speaker 10: all of those things, not just silver. But this is
Speaker 10: this has not happened in a very long time, David.
Speaker 10: If you read the history of precious metals like I do,
Speaker 10: you know at one time China was really the world's
Speaker 10: leader in silver. I mean, Mexico produces the most, but
Speaker 10: China was the world's leader in silver.
Speaker 4: They you know, they imported it, they use it as currency.
Speaker 1: It was very big.
Speaker 10: And then of course after the Communists takeover that a
Speaker 10: lot of that went out the window, and even gold
Speaker 10: was banned for for a long time in China. Mean,
Speaker 10: they still wanted it at the government, but it was banned,
Speaker 10: use to the people and used in the economy. So
Speaker 10: this is a major shift in my opinion. They must
Speaker 10: be looking obviously looking at the future like a lot
Speaker 10: of us look at, you know, the the metrics of
Speaker 10: silver itself.
Speaker 4: It doesn't make any sense the way it's priced right now.
Speaker 10: I mean, just given geologically historically, even the market caps
Speaker 10: of gold and silver don't make any sense. It takes
Speaker 10: what eighty five ounces of silver to make one ounce
Speaker 10: of gold. You go and look at another metric, which
Speaker 10: I think is even more interesting, which is about eight
Speaker 10: hundred and twenty four million ounces are mined in silver
Speaker 10: this year, so that's what it's estimated.
Speaker 4: That's down one percent over last year.
Speaker 10: So, you know, and most of silver mining is it
Speaker 10: just happens to be that they're mining copper and they
Speaker 10: pull silver. They're mining gold, they pull They're not going
Speaker 10: just after silver. So that and it's so it's so
Speaker 10: cheap that it's not profitable to mine. So you have,
Speaker 10: you know, a certain amount that hits the market every year,
Speaker 10: but what's been happening year after year is you have
Speaker 10: hundreds of millions of ounces that are deficits. So it's
Speaker 10: estimated to this year, it's going to be over two
Speaker 10: hundred million ounces again of deficit. So everything that's ordered
Speaker 10: on the market, they have to take two hundred million
Speaker 10: ounces out of the above ground supply. It's not coming
Speaker 10: out of new mining or new refining. So this is
Speaker 10: there's a reckoning happen. Even that article talks about that.
Speaker 10: I mean, just over and over again, you see the
Speaker 10: repetition that something's off about the silver market. So it
Speaker 10: looks like Russia is positioning itself to to reap the
Speaker 10: harvest of that. I mean, not only is of course,
Speaker 10: there's the green aspect or whatever you want to call it,
Speaker 10: with you know, being used in solar or electric cars, evs,
Speaker 10: all that stuff. You know, silver's the most thermo conductive metal.
Speaker 10: It's also used in the military industrial complex. We talked
Speaker 10: about five hundred ounces being in each Tomahawk missile, but
Speaker 10: it's used in medicine. It's just across the board. Silver
Speaker 10: has so many uses and it's super cheap. So I think,
Speaker 10: you know, if I'm a sovereign wealth fund, that sounds
Speaker 10: like a good idea to me.
Speaker 1: Russia's leading the way.
Speaker 10: What's say the US, how's our reserves? Is the government
Speaker 10: doing anything in the realms of precious metals.
Speaker 1: Doesn't that way. Yeah, when you look at what our
Speaker 1: governments are doing, you know, the US, the UK, European governments,
Speaker 1: they are not doing anything that is to the advantage
Speaker 1: of their people, unlike Russia and China. I mean, they're
Speaker 1: trying to make themselves more powerful militarily, geopolitically, economically, even
Speaker 1: though they're making some really bad decisions like we see
Speaker 1: in China, they're still trying to do things in their
Speaker 1: own interest, if not in the interests of their people,
Speaker 1: certainly the interest of the Central Committee that has got
Speaker 1: a vested interest in all of it. But our government
Speaker 1: has absolutely turned against us. It's kind of interesting to
Speaker 1: see that Poland now has more gold reserves than the UK. Again,
Speaker 1: Poland is not really a part of this globalist takedown
Speaker 1: thing because it's a fairly young government that just got
Speaker 1: out of after the Cold War. They got out of
Speaker 1: the from under the thumb of the Russians, and so
Speaker 1: they're starting to move in that direction terms of being
Speaker 1: puppets of the globalist but they are proud of the
Speaker 1: fact that they've accumulated more gold than the UK. As
Speaker 1: now that truly is amazing, isn't it. But of course
Speaker 1: the UK has the most expensive energy in the world.
Speaker 1: They've shut down their manufacturing. The country that got wealthy
Speaker 1: off of the Industrial Revolution is just evistrating itself politically.
Speaker 1: This is happening to them.
Speaker 10: Yeah, well, Poland knows a thing or two about crisis
Speaker 10: and knows about world wars, it knows about economic hardship,
Speaker 10: so of course they would I think they navigate towards gold. Yeah.
Speaker 10: You see, these are really interesting metrics. You know, the
Speaker 10: dollars supplanted the British pounds sterling after you know, World
Speaker 10: War two and something. Gor Vidal said that the British
Speaker 10: Empire and Great Britain basically became an aircraft carrier for
Speaker 10: the United States of America.
Speaker 1: But that's what happened. It was the nineteenth century.
Speaker 10: The gold standard was the British really held that that
Speaker 10: that title is being, you know, the world's reserve currency.
Speaker 4: That's really what you went to.
Speaker 10: And it was a The gold standard really served I
Speaker 10: think to bolster the Industrial Revolution and sound money and
Speaker 10: you know, budgeting. I think there was a lot of
Speaker 10: stability that was brought by the gold standard, and really
Speaker 10: all that went off the rails with World War One,
Speaker 10: and they you know, had a lot of governments, especially England,
Speaker 10: you know, made it stop trading in gold. You couldn't
Speaker 10: you know, get your notes redeemable and precious metals anymore.
Speaker 1: Other countries followed.
Speaker 10: They tried returning to the gold standard, uh, you know,
Speaker 10: after World War One, and Winston Churchill that was he
Speaker 10: was the Chancellor of the Exchequer and that blew up
Speaker 10: in his face.
Speaker 4: There was another political failure. They just couldn't do it.
Speaker 10: They'd expanded their money supply, they couldn't match it to
Speaker 10: the reserves of actual wealth.
Speaker 4: So again they were they were on they were really in.
Speaker 10: Decline after World War One and then not being able
Speaker 10: to go back on the gold standard. And eventually it
Speaker 10: was the United States that supplanted their currency. You know,
Speaker 10: the British pound sterling was right up until you know,
Speaker 10: nineteen thirty nine, going into nineteen forty as you know,
Speaker 10: was really used more than the dollar. And now that
Speaker 10: that was supplanted. So interesting to see history, you know move.
Speaker 10: And I don't think, you know, we talk every week
Speaker 10: about the bricks, and I don't know that they're going.
Speaker 1: To come with some unifying currency.
Speaker 10: I just think all these countries are decentralizing and using commodities,
Speaker 10: and now we have new, you know, sophisticated cross border
Speaker 10: payment systems. The dollars just being phased out. I mean,
Speaker 10: like it or not. I don't like it, by the way,
Speaker 10: because I love my country. I think people that they
Speaker 10: don't know better, and I think it'll hurt them. You
Speaker 10: know that something's going to be something's done being done
Speaker 10: to their currency.
Speaker 1: But these are a horrific transition. But I mean on
Speaker 1: the other end of it, you know, if we can
Speaker 1: break this superpower of the Federal Reserve and their fiat currency,
Speaker 1: that would be something that long term would benefit Americans,
Speaker 1: I think. But as Brian and Dev McCartney point out,
Speaker 1: going from a debt based economy to an asset and
Speaker 1: that's why they're making these disasters in order to steal resources.
Speaker 1: And I think that's that's true. I mean, we look
Speaker 1: at all the stuff and how they've leveraged it, even
Speaker 1: in Poland as that they said, you know, symbolically we've
Speaker 1: passed what the Bank of England gold is and said
Speaker 1: that's always been kind of our point of reference and
Speaker 1: our goal is to have twenty percent of our currency
Speaker 1: reserves in gold, and we're just about there. So I
Speaker 1: guess a question is what do they know and why
Speaker 1: are they doing that? And why aren't you as an
Speaker 1: individual doing that type of thing. You know, we look
Speaker 1: at what the central banks are doing. These are the people.
Speaker 1: They got the fiat currencies everywhere, and they're moving away
Speaker 1: from all that stuff towards gold. Maybe we ought to
Speaker 1: do that individually as well well.
Speaker 10: I think it's a good idea if you look at
Speaker 10: those who control the world's wealth. I mean, that's what
Speaker 10: they're doing, and they're not telling you to do that.
Speaker 10: You kind of always watch what they do, not what
Speaker 10: they say. At the same time that these central banks
Speaker 10: and the banksters are accumulating record amounts of gold, they're
Speaker 10: also continuing to expand their tentacles into the reach of
Speaker 10: central bank digital currency.
Speaker 4: These two things are going on simultaneously.
Speaker 10: I would watch that closely because they have a plan,
Speaker 10: I mean, and I think a lot of this is
Speaker 10: bailing out golden parachute.
Speaker 1: Whatever you think, you know again, whatever.
Speaker 10: Your phrase asore, you know, to describe the you know,
Speaker 10: controlled demolition or them knowing before everything crashes.
Speaker 1: I think they've run the simulations in the math.
Speaker 10: And you know, we talked about three hundred and fifty
Speaker 10: trillion dollars worth of debt worldwide?
Speaker 4: Is there three hundred and fifty trillion dollars worth of assets?
Speaker 6: Really?
Speaker 10: I mean they estimated it's four hundred or whatever. And
Speaker 10: then I look and I see the market cap of
Speaker 10: gold is sixteen trillion.
Speaker 1: David. That doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 4: I mean, not an economist, but how can you.
Speaker 10: Have hundreds of trillions in supposed wealth when the market
Speaker 10: cap of gold is sixteen That doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 10: I think what you're looking at is is there's going
Speaker 10: to be again. They say, they call it a great reset.
Speaker 10: They're going to reset all currencies and commodity pricing, and
Speaker 10: that's what the US is in store for. I don't
Speaker 10: know what that means for the dollar, but it doesn't
Speaker 10: look good.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And of course you know this the great taking
Speaker 1: and all this leverage of derivatives and all the rest
Speaker 1: of the stuff. I mean, you look at what happened
Speaker 1: in two thousand and eight. Those derivatives were really weaponized
Speaker 1: against US paleo armory. So silver is a way to go.
Speaker 1: I can't afford that much gold at a time anyway,
Speaker 1: and silver outperformed goal from two thousand and eight to
Speaker 1: twenty eleven anyway, and it will this time too. The
Speaker 1: supply of silver goes down every year. That's what you
Speaker 1: were saying. There's just an article on zero Hedge about
Speaker 1: silver could be huge.
Speaker 10: They said, yeah, silver just mathematically doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 10: And again I don't give investment advice. I just look
Speaker 10: at history. I'm telling people, you know, geologically at seventeen
Speaker 10: ounces a silver to one ounce of gold, that's geologically estimated.
Speaker 10: History shows us ten to twenty to one maximum, all
Speaker 10: the way back to the Egyptians, so even the Romans,
Speaker 10: the Greeks, you know, the British Empire, ever, even the
Speaker 10: American we were sixteen ounces of silver to make one
Speaker 10: ounce of gold. Now it's eighty five ounces. But here's
Speaker 10: another tell. If you actually look at the market cap
Speaker 10: which I just mentioned gold, it's sixteen point four trillion
Speaker 10: or whatever it is. Silver's one point for so that's
Speaker 10: sixteen and so Hamilton had it, had it right after all,
Speaker 10: Alexander Hamilton, That's what he pegged it to at the
Speaker 10: end of the eighteenth century. So I think we're looking
Speaker 10: at a reckoning. So I think it's across the board.
Speaker 10: It's not just precious metals. I think all commodities. The
Speaker 10: way that we've been pricing and what truly represents wealth
Speaker 10: in the world is what I'm interested in because I
Speaker 10: see so much of it built on hype and fake
Speaker 10: and fiat and it's hard to know. I mean, you
Speaker 10: can still use a lot of that fake stuff to
Speaker 10: buy real things, at least for now. So that's what
Speaker 10: I'm looking towards, David, is a pricing reset. I don't
Speaker 10: know what it's going to be, but that's the trend,
Speaker 10: especially with news like Russia using in silver as a
Speaker 10: reserve asset well.
Speaker 1: And of course, you know, the other part of this
Speaker 1: that's we've never seen before is CBDC and the surveillance state.
Speaker 1: They made no secret about the fact that they intend
Speaker 1: to watch everything that we do and control everything that
Speaker 1: we're allowed to do and to purchase and so forth.
Speaker 1: That in and of itself is something that we've never
Speaker 1: seen before. When you look at gold and silver, all
Speaker 1: of the economic pointers are pointing to instability for the
Speaker 1: long term, but we've never seen that kind of stuff
Speaker 1: With the CBDC that we've seen before. So you've got
Speaker 1: to have something as a hedge, not just against the
Speaker 1: financial unrest and this house of cards that they've built,
Speaker 1: but you've got to have some kind of a hedge
Speaker 1: against what they're trying to enact, the surveillance state, and
Speaker 1: you know, this kind of mark of the beast type
Speaker 1: of system that really is to me the overriding thing.
Speaker 1: And you know, when I look at all this stuff,
Speaker 1: so right now, silver rather gold, I don't know what
Speaker 1: silver has done this last week, but I know that
Speaker 1: gold has gone down in the low twenty six hundreds now,
Speaker 1: I think, and again, these things go up and down,
Speaker 1: but all the fundamentals show that, you know, there's nothing
Speaker 1: fundamentally okay about any of the fiat currency, so we
Speaker 1: can expect to see what that's happening. One of the
Speaker 1: things I've talked about this last week, Tony, was the
Speaker 1: fact that instead of pricing everything in terms of the dollar,
Speaker 1: which is heavily manipulated, a lot of people have gone
Speaker 1: in and looked at the price of gold and a
Speaker 1: whole bunch of different foreign currencies, including Switzerland other places,
Speaker 1: and that you know, they're seeing a steady trend up.
Speaker 1: You see much more manipulation and volatility. If you look
Speaker 1: at gold priced and dollars, but if you look at
Speaker 1: it in these other foreign currencies, it's a much more
Speaker 1: consistent upward trend than even we've seen in the dollar.
Speaker 1: But the fundamentals are there everywhere, like.
Speaker 4: Well, absolutely, I mean it's across the board.
Speaker 10: I mentioned before, there's fifty two times more currency on
Speaker 10: Earth today than when I was born. It's probably increased.
Speaker 10: That's a metric from twenty four months ago. So this
Speaker 10: is only going to get worse. And basically gold against
Speaker 10: every fiat currency, gold wins over time. And you know,
Speaker 10: there was a period I think that gave people a
Speaker 10: false sense of reality. Usually you know, looking back at
Speaker 10: nineteen eighty to nineteen ninety nine, it was like a
Speaker 10: dead space for gold and silvers because of the you
Speaker 10: had Reaganomics, you know, the dollar dominating the world. It
Speaker 10: was the collapse of the Soviet empire. There was a
Speaker 10: lot of you know, globalization that was happening. What is
Speaker 10: it francists. Spookiyama said that he wrote the book is
Speaker 10: the end of history? Like the liberal democracy had triumphed
Speaker 10: and all these markets were raging at the dot com
Speaker 10: bubbles and gold and silver were flat. I mean, I
Speaker 10: think more in Buffett took silver for a while and
Speaker 10: then you know, decided not to go full hunt family
Speaker 10: and leave that alone. He probably got the call, don't
Speaker 10: do that because it exposes what's wrong with the dollar.
Speaker 4: So they didn't go anywhere.
Speaker 10: And you know, after the opening of the twenty first century,
Speaker 10: especially nine to eleven and the Global War on tear
Speaker 10: all the stuff, the move to make the Chinese most
Speaker 10: Favored Trading Status opening the wt O to them on
Speaker 10: December eleventh, two thousand and one, we've just seen a
Speaker 10: massive decline in the dollar.
Speaker 4: That's really what this is all about about.
Speaker 10: It's about money velocity, usage of the dollar, and purchasing
Speaker 10: power we could use to back that up with our markets.
Speaker 10: The world's just taken notice again. Two thousand and nine, David,
Speaker 10: the net purchasing of gold by central banks wasn't zero,
Speaker 10: but it was as close as you can get to it.
Speaker 10: They weren't buying, they were stocking their reserves and their
Speaker 10: banks with dollars. And now you fast forward to twenty
Speaker 10: twenty four, gold is second. It used to be the
Speaker 10: used to be the dollar, and there was about seventy
Speaker 10: percent and then it was the euro and then way
Speaker 10: down the bottom precious metals, gold, commodities, and after Basil three,
Speaker 10: when the Bank of International Settlements made gold a Tier
Speaker 10: one asset again, that's when everything changing. Central banks started
Speaker 10: buying gold at a record clip following two thousand and
Speaker 10: nine and the Great Recession and tart funds and all that.
Speaker 10: You know, Ben Berneki said they wouldn't do that again.
Speaker 10: Whatever is massively printed into oblivion. So that's the trend,
Speaker 10: if you want to look at the trend line. The
Speaker 10: trend is a race towards who has the gold and
Speaker 10: commodities and value in a world of fiat And that's
Speaker 10: where I'm going. I'm not saying I'm not sticking with
Speaker 10: the fake.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh absolutely, yeah. It's it's privacy is important, and
Speaker 1: you know, physical is important. And you know, when we
Speaker 1: look at the House of Cards they've create, it truly
Speaker 1: is amazing. And it is all about evis rating the
Speaker 1: West and empowering China. That's what the globals have been
Speaker 1: doing since Kissinger opened up the path to them, and
Speaker 1: they've just been a steady progression, iteratively moving in that direction,
Speaker 1: whether it's energy, manufacturing and all the rest of this stuff,
Speaker 1: and of course energy is going to drive the manufacturing
Speaker 1: if they've got it at a big advantage. But even
Speaker 1: in China they are getting very concerned, and you've got
Speaker 1: articles talking about the China doom loops. So we're looking
Speaker 1: at some very uncertain times and we know what the
Speaker 1: long term trend is. We can't predict the price any
Speaker 1: given point, but we know what this trend is going
Speaker 1: to be pretty pretty clearly. Tell us a little bit
Speaker 1: about what's coming up. You got your program's going to
Speaker 1: be following immediately following this one on Thursday. Tell people
Speaker 1: about that and give us an idea. What's happening with
Speaker 1: Wisewolf Gold.
Speaker 10: Yeah, every Thursday at Arto Born Radio Transmission. I used
Speaker 10: to do a daily show and I can't do what
Speaker 10: you do. And I've filled in for you one time,
Speaker 10: and I remember telling you like filling in on your
Speaker 10: show always like I'm going to borrow your car.
Speaker 1: It's a Cadillac. I'll bring it back.
Speaker 10: It's even nicer than when I borrowed it. I fill
Speaker 10: up the tank with gas, I clean it. And that's
Speaker 10: how I handle your show. My show, if you want
Speaker 10: to come watch it, it's like the Duke's of hazard.
Speaker 10: Car's gonna get a new one every week. I crash it,
Speaker 10: We'll see what happens.
Speaker 1: I've got.
Speaker 10: It's pair of politics and precious metal, kind of a
Speaker 10: hodgepodge stream of consciousness, and it's it's been fun.
Speaker 4: I try to be consistent with it.
Speaker 10: So yeah, come come check us out at eleven am
Speaker 10: Central Time on rock Fan on the America Unplug channel.
Speaker 1: And you're on Twitter as well, all right.
Speaker 10: Yes, on Twitter at Tony Rderburn. You can find me there,
Speaker 10: and go find me on Facebook and friend me. You know,
Speaker 10: I'm I got a little little meta blue check marks,
Speaker 10: you know I make. Maybe it'll make it harder on
Speaker 10: them to cancel me.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 10: I've had it for years, I really, you know, go
Speaker 10: find me over there. It's a good place to network
Speaker 10: for now. Anyway, I haven't been bothered that much in
Speaker 10: the recent years. So yeah, please do that. We stream
Speaker 10: over there. I have a really cool announcement. It's only
Speaker 10: half of the announcement. Next week I'll have something even cooler.
Speaker 10: But we have a new setup on wolf Pack. And
Speaker 10: so if you go to Davidknight dot Gold and you
Speaker 10: just hit the tab that says join wolf Pack. You'll
Speaker 10: take you to the Wolfpack dot gold. I wanted to
Speaker 10: thank you, Echo Yekas who works for me. She's my
Speaker 10: head trader. She put together and this has been my
Speaker 10: idea for a while. There's two separate tiers, so one
Speaker 10: is for gold, one is for silver.
Speaker 1: That's how we're starting. It's called wolf Picks. Okay, it's
Speaker 1: just called wolf Picks.
Speaker 10: And what it is is we every morning we set
Speaker 10: the price of gold and the price of silver. And
Speaker 10: if you go on there, it's no fees, free shipping,
Speaker 10: so you can't use a card, but you have to
Speaker 10: basically give us an email. We send you a payment
Speaker 10: link for a check. But we set the price of
Speaker 10: gold to the most competitive we can do it. We
Speaker 10: look across the board and all our competitors. We set
Speaker 10: a set price in the morning and then we take
Speaker 10: it down in the evening. And the same thing for silver.
Speaker 10: So if you want to get the best possible, now
Speaker 10: we don't know what that's going to be because a
Speaker 10: lot of stuff comes into the shop. I might buy
Speaker 10: a bar, I might buy a coin. You could get
Speaker 10: a graded Ammerican eagle, long as it's a long as
Speaker 10: it's a specified I want one ounce of gold, Tony,
Speaker 10: or I want you know, it's it's a minimum of
Speaker 10: ten ounces of silver. So if you lock the price,
Speaker 10: like right now, we just set the price at thirty
Speaker 10: five dollars an ounce on silver silver bullion, you could
Speaker 10: get American eagles, you could get sovereign coins. We don't know.
Speaker 10: We're going to fill those ten ounces with free shipping.
Speaker 10: Now you can go all the way up to ten thousand.
Speaker 10: So it's a way for you to lock in trades
Speaker 10: like the best possible deal, and then we take the
Speaker 10: prices down in the evening and reset them in the morning.
Speaker 10: Sometimes we may not it may to be too vultile
Speaker 10: even listed, but it's one of the ways that you
Speaker 10: can kind of a surprise too.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 10: It may be a may be a bar, it may
Speaker 10: be two bars. It may be something that I have
Speaker 10: to fill your order to give you an ounce.
Speaker 1: That's what I'm going to do.
Speaker 10: So it's it's a way that because we buy so
Speaker 10: much from the public, you know, like and a lot
Speaker 10: of that stuff doesn't go into a wolf pack because
Speaker 10: it's too expensive. Like no, there's not a tier really
Speaker 10: for an ounce of wolf Pack. So I just made one.
Speaker 10: You can you can do it. It's not all automatic,
Speaker 10: but you just go and buy one at a time.
Speaker 10: So that's cool.
Speaker 1: That's cool. I like what you do. You are constantly
Speaker 1: thinking of different ways that you're can help people. And
Speaker 1: so now in addition to wolf Pack, we got wolf
Speaker 1: pick on a daily basis setting a price for gold
Speaker 1: and silver based on the kind of things that you're
Speaker 1: bringing in in terms of buying gold and silver from people.
Speaker 1: That's a great idea. I really like that. Well, I
Speaker 1: just want to I've got to comment here, but we'll
Speaker 1: talk about that when we come back. It's not about
Speaker 1: gold or silver. Always great to have you on Tony
Speaker 1: and again, folks, right after this show, you can find
Speaker 1: the Artomen Radio transmission and join Tony there and he's
Speaker 1: going to talk to you some more about politics and
Speaker 1: about metals and all the rest of this stuff. And
Speaker 1: that's something that we really need to focus on, especially
Speaker 1: when we look at how this is a plan. This
Speaker 1: is a plan to take everything down. So you've got
Speaker 1: to try to get outside of their plan. It's not
Speaker 1: like they're just incompetent, No, they're unfortunately a bit too
Speaker 1: much competent combined with their plans. It's always great to
Speaker 1: have you on. Tony folks. Go to Davidnight dot gold
Speaker 1: and I'll take you to Tony Ardeman's wise. Well, thank you, Tony,
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Thank you, David folks. You're gonna take a
Speaker 1: quick break and we'll be right back. Here's a little
Speaker 1: bit of lalla for you.
Speaker 5: Let me tell you the David Night Show you can
Speaker 5: listen to with your ears.
Speaker 7: You can even.
Speaker 5: Watch it by using your eyes.
Speaker 1: In fact, if you can hear me.
Speaker 5: That means you're listening to the David Night Show right now.
Speaker 11: Yeah, good job.
Speaker 5: And you want to know something else, You can find
Speaker 5: all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to
Speaker 5: the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 1: That's a website, right And DJFS says, shoot, I just
Speaker 1: checked on another device, and your likes on this video
Speaker 1: are not being shown, it says zero after two hours
Speaker 1: of the show, and I already liked it. Everyone liked
Speaker 1: the show right now. I appreciate that. It is. You know,
Speaker 1: that's the frustrating thing about this, It really is. There's
Speaker 1: so much headwind and all this stuff. You know, people
Speaker 1: talk about, well, you know the government is conspiring to
Speaker 1: do this and conspiring to do that. I've that's been
Speaker 1: my life. It's to watch the government conspired to shut
Speaker 1: me down every which way they can. So I really
Speaker 1: do appreciate those of you who like the show while
Speaker 1: it's live and other things. It is interesting to see
Speaker 1: the different things that they will go to. Again, I
Speaker 1: have offended some of the powers that be, and I
Speaker 1: take that as a point of honor. Let's talk a
Speaker 1: little bit about what is happening. It's interesting stuff is
Speaker 1: happening with the Trump Bibles and also with homeschooling. And
Speaker 1: I mentioned this the other day, these homeschool moms. I
Speaker 1: keep seeing these articles brought up over and over again.
Speaker 1: They have a lawsuit that's going on because Arizona decided
Speaker 1: that they were going to give subsidies to people to homeschool.
Speaker 1: And I've always advised people to not take that money.
Speaker 1: Don't take the money. It always comes with strings attached,
Speaker 1: it always does. And so I've always said the argument.
Speaker 1: When we were doing homeschooling, everybody said, well, you know,
Speaker 1: we want to do sports, we want to do band
Speaker 1: or whatever, and we need to have a state money
Speaker 1: for this, and said don't do it. They're going to
Speaker 1: put standards and other things like that. So they were
Speaker 1: getting money from the government for pencils and for books
Speaker 1: and things like that, and now the government wants you
Speaker 1: to tell them and to justify you know, books especially,
Speaker 1: you know, the pencils, flash cards and erasers. They were
Speaker 1: using it for that, but they want to know what
Speaker 1: your curriculum is and they're going to set in judgment
Speaker 1: of that. And so the mothers who's suing said, the
Speaker 1: government is changing the rules and putting impossible burdens on me.
Speaker 1: Never saw backcoming, did we. That's what they always did.
Speaker 1: All of a sudden, we have a government telling us
Speaker 1: what we can and cannot teach. It's because you took
Speaker 1: the bribe. And I just mentioned this not to criticize them,
Speaker 1: but that's the nature of when are people going to realize.
Speaker 1: I've had this argument with people about Trump and his
Speaker 1: bribery as part of the lockdown stuff. People don't understand
Speaker 1: that's how the government operates. Trump understands that he's now
Speaker 1: making promises. I will withhold their money if they don't
Speaker 1: do what I want them to do. They always throw
Speaker 1: the money out there. They get you hooked on it,
Speaker 1: they pull it back. We've seen Obama do it, Biden
Speaker 1: do it, Trump do it. They all do it. So
Speaker 1: I've also talked about the fact that the state of
Speaker 1: Oklahoma has decided that they want to put Bibles in
Speaker 1: all of the schools and have teachers teach it. And
Speaker 1: I have also been adamant about the fact that this
Speaker 1: is something that I think is just too important. It's
Speaker 1: too important to outsource the raising of your children, the
Speaker 1: education of your children, especially about the most important things.
Speaker 1: What is an education for.
Speaker 6: As a matter of.
Speaker 1: Fact, I've talked many times about our old Dabney who
Speaker 1: after the Civil War, he said, you look at the
Speaker 1: government schools in Massachusetts. He said, I blame a civil
Speaker 1: war on them largely, you know, the kind of they
Speaker 1: were used as social engineering. And he said, how are
Speaker 1: we going to have government schools? Government school by its nature,
Speaker 1: if it's going to try to educate people, is going
Speaker 1: to be getting involved in the free exercise of religion.
Speaker 1: Because an education is not simply about reading, writing, and arithmetic.
Speaker 1: It's not about any kind of technical information as much
Speaker 1: as it is about establishing character and all the rest
Speaker 1: of the stuff. If you go to the homeschooling conventions
Speaker 1: as we did thirty years ago, began looking at it then,
Speaker 1: I guess it's still the same way. You can go
Speaker 1: back and you can find all the textbooks and things
Speaker 1: like that that were being used by parents by their
Speaker 1: associations of local school boards and everything. They were all
Speaker 1: based around character, they were all based around the Bible.
Speaker 1: They were based around Christianity, but that was what they
Speaker 1: were focused on. And so I'm not trying to purge
Speaker 1: Christianity out. I'm trying to purge government schools out. And
Speaker 1: you need to not entrust the most precious things that
Speaker 1: you have, your children and their souls and their minds,
Speaker 1: to the kind of people that we've seen running these institutions.
Speaker 1: Institutional corruption is just beyond belief, and I can't believe
Speaker 1: that people are still buying into it. Having said that,
Speaker 1: it gets even worse when you look at what is
Speaker 1: happening in Oklahoma. This is coming from Reason magazine, and
Speaker 1: they point out that the guy who is the head
Speaker 1: of schools there, Ryan Waller, alters strict stipulations make it
Speaker 1: clear that he's steering Oklahoma schools to purchase not just Bibles,
Speaker 1: but Donald Trump's Bibles. Oklahoma's pushed for Bibles and schools
Speaker 1: comes with a Trump sized price tag. And so when
Speaker 1: you look at his specifications for the Bible, well, first
Speaker 1: of all, he came in. This is Oklahoma state Superintendent
Speaker 1: of Public Instruction and he is a big supporter of Trump,
Speaker 1: Ryan Walters, and he says every teacher, every classroom in
Speaker 1: the state will have a Bible and will be teaching
Speaker 1: from the Bible in the classroom. How do you feel
Speaker 1: about that? Seriously? Do you want somebody that has a
Speaker 1: completely different understanding of the Bible teaching your children? Do
Speaker 1: you want people who have animosity towards the Bible as
Speaker 1: so many of these teachers we see TikTok. Dude, you
Speaker 1: want them teaching your kid from the Bible. I mean
Speaker 1: what we would do is I would teach my kids
Speaker 1: evolution because I would want them to understand the controversy,
Speaker 1: and we would teach both sides of it and would
Speaker 1: say here's why this is true and here's why that
Speaker 1: is false. And you know the teachers are going to
Speaker 1: be doing that with the Bible. There. We need to
Speaker 1: shut down public schools. It's an idea that has failed.
Speaker 1: But this kind of harkens back to its creation. As
Speaker 1: public education was created. It was created by a lot
Speaker 1: of people who said, well, we've got a lot of
Speaker 1: families out here who aren't teaching Christianity to their kids.
Speaker 1: So we're going to do it in the schools, and
Speaker 1: we're going to we're going to make these kids so
Speaker 1: that they are more we're going to have a more
Speaker 1: moral society, and we're going to have people who are
Speaker 1: ready to work and the workforce. We're going to prepare
Speaker 1: them for the corporations. That is, we've heard that at
Speaker 1: the very beginning of this that was a stated intention,
Speaker 1: and yet exactly the opposite has happened. We've got people
Speaker 1: who can't tie their shoes, and we've got godless schools
Speaker 1: that are grooming kids sexually and all the rest of
Speaker 1: the stuff. It's like straight out a Brave New World
Speaker 1: by Huxley. And so I think that is a fundamentally
Speaker 1: bad idea. But then at September's Oklahoma State school Board
Speaker 1: of Education meeting, Walter's requested an additional three million dollars.
Speaker 1: Total he wants is six million dollars for Bibles and
Speaker 1: their new King James version bibles is what he had
Speaker 1: to say. But then when the bids opened up last
Speaker 1: week for fifty five thousand Bibles, it went back to
Speaker 1: the King James version. Now, for those of you who
Speaker 1: don't know, King James version has been around for a
Speaker 1: very long time. There is no copyright on it. The
Speaker 1: only cost that you have is the cost of printing
Speaker 1: on it. Really, you have to pay anybody for it.
Speaker 1: Any of the newer translations, including the new King James version,
Speaker 1: and all the other translations have copyrights still associated with them.
Speaker 1: You might have a translation that is owned by, for instance, Zondervan,
Speaker 1: one of the Bible publishing things, and so that is
Speaker 1: a part of the cost. But if you're going to
Speaker 1: go to King James, the price should go down. But
Speaker 1: he specified change it from New King James to King James.
Speaker 1: And then he added this, it must include copies of
Speaker 1: the US Pledge of Allegiance, the US Declaration of Independence,
Speaker 1: the US Constitution, and the US Bill of Rights. Oh,
Speaker 1: and it must be bound in leather or leather like material. Well,
Speaker 1: as Reason pointed out, there's only one Bible that fits
Speaker 1: all those specifications. There's only one Bible that has got
Speaker 1: all of those political documents added to it. That's the
Speaker 1: Trump Bible. And so the Oklahoma reported on Friday that
Speaker 1: none of the twenty nine undred Bibles carried by Mardell
Speaker 1: Christian Bookstore meet Walter's qualifications, but the Trump endorsed God
Speaker 1: Bless the USA Bible fits the bill, fits the bill
Speaker 1: like a grift lined glove. A second bible that fits
Speaker 1: the request for proposal was also identified as the We
Speaker 1: the People Bible that is endorsed by Don Trump Junior. Oh,
Speaker 1: the junior, the grifter in training, right, isn't that amazing?
Speaker 1: And that's available for ninety dollars, And you can get
Speaker 1: the Trump Bibles for sixty dollars. Of course, if you
Speaker 1: want assigned one from Donald Trump, it'll cost you one
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. So what are they going to be paid for? Well,
Speaker 1: the superintendent's request is for six million dollars to buy
Speaker 1: fifty five thousand bibles. That breaks down to one hundred
Speaker 1: and forty dollars per bible. So what you could buy
Speaker 1: from the Trump Bible website for sixty dollars, Oklahoma is
Speaker 1: going to pay one hundred and forty dollars for that.
Speaker 1: And Walters thinks that he's come up with a way
Speaker 1: to send Trump his share of over three million dollars
Speaker 1: of tax payer money. Yeah, he really has the best
Speaker 1: interest of your children at heart, doesn't he. He just
Speaker 1: wants to teach them all about Jesus. But no, it's
Speaker 1: all about sending money to his messiah. This is disgusting
Speaker 1: and this is what we see all the time from
Speaker 1: these politicians. Like I said, you want to Mixian politics
Speaker 1: with religion, you're going to wind up with politics. Don't
Speaker 1: let other people teach your children the most vital things,
Speaker 1: you know, it's far more important. It was a big
Speaker 1: thing when we were homeschooling our kids. People get these
Speaker 1: bumper stickers and I have an honor student at such
Speaker 1: and such a school, Right, I said, Well, we need
Speaker 1: to get one made up and say I have an
Speaker 1: honorable student at and we had to have a name
Speaker 1: for our school. I have an honorable student at the
Speaker 1: name of our school. Isn't that really what we're trying
Speaker 1: to What good does it do to have somebody who
Speaker 1: has absolutely no moral character but is very smart and
Speaker 1: highly educated. That just makes them more dangerous, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: Do you really want your child to be like that?
Speaker 1: Former Oklahoma Attorney General said this RFP may violate state law.
Speaker 1: It appears to me that this bid is anything but competitive.
Speaker 1: The special binding, for example, and the inclusion of government
Speaker 1: documents will exclude almost all bidders except for one. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: I wonder what he had in mind. Who knows what
Speaker 1: these guys were up to. I think it's pretty clear. Well,
Speaker 1: here's then it gets even more interesting because it just
Speaker 1: came out yesterday that Trump has had his Bibles printed
Speaker 1: in China. And this is amazing on a number of
Speaker 1: different levels. People were talking about this in politics are saying, well,
Speaker 1: he's always criticized China. You know, we're losing all of
Speaker 1: our manufacturing to China. Well that's one aspect of it.
Speaker 1: But the other aspect of it is in China, the
Speaker 1: Christian persecution that goes on there is absolutely astounding. But again,
Speaker 1: just like Donald Trump, the Chinese Communist Party doesn't have
Speaker 1: any principles when it comes to money. They'll do anything right.
Speaker 1: They'll still continue to imprison Christians, will still use them
Speaker 1: for organ harvesting, removing the organs while they're alive, as
Speaker 1: they do so many other political and religious prisoners. But
Speaker 1: they'll make money shipping out Bibles. The estimated cost of
Speaker 1: three shipments from China was three hundred and forty two
Speaker 1: thousand dollars, which would mean that the bible costs less
Speaker 1: than three dollars each to manufacture in China. And that
Speaker 1: is not surprising at all. I mean, people give away
Speaker 1: King James Bibles. You get one that's got a cheap
Speaker 1: binding on it or something like that. People you know,
Speaker 1: you can pick those up retail, very very cheaply. And
Speaker 1: so the idea that he'd get these bibles printed is
Speaker 1: King James version. That is, he doesn't have to pay
Speaker 1: for that, it's only the cost of the printing. Get
Speaker 1: it printed in China, where the cost of printing is
Speaker 1: extremely low. The minimum price for the Trump backed Bible
Speaker 1: is sixty dollars, putting the potential sales revenue at about
Speaker 1: seven million dollars. But of course it's going to be
Speaker 1: twice as much as that for Oklahoma, more than twice.
Speaker 1: You can pick up a Trump Bible that cost him
Speaker 1: three dollars, you can get it for sixty. But hey,
Speaker 1: if it's filtered through his pal Is supporter in Oklahoma,
Speaker 1: well he can sell that three dollars bible for one
Speaker 1: hundred and forty dollars to the suckers in Oklahoma. Elmer
Speaker 1: gentry comes to mind some kind of a hustling door
Speaker 1: to or bible salesman. If it couldn't get any worse.
Speaker 1: This Bible is a reminder that the biggest thing we
Speaker 1: have to bring back in America and to make America
Speaker 1: great again is our religion. Says Trump, Well, what is
Speaker 1: his religion. There's a real question about that. I don't
Speaker 1: think his religion is my religion. Pretty much everything that
Speaker 1: he does is condemned for followers of Christ. And I
Speaker 1: don't think he believes Christ is the Messiah either. I
Speaker 1: don't think his family does. He was just this last week.
Speaker 1: He was going through rituals and praying to a dead
Speaker 1: Jewish messiah, the Shabbad Lubovich. Guys's Rabbi Schneerson or he is.
Speaker 1: They think that he's the Messiah and he's coming back.
Speaker 1: And Trump is there offering prayers and things on October
Speaker 1: the seventh. So our religion, I don't know what our
Speaker 1: religion is when he says it. But Trump didn't say
Speaker 1: where the God bless USA Bibles are printed, where they
Speaker 1: are or what they cost. And again, if you want
Speaker 1: to get a hand signed one from Trump. It'll cost
Speaker 1: you one thousand dollars. They also have a new version
Speaker 1: of the sixty dollars Bible that memorializes the July thirteenth
Speaker 1: assassination and picture of him I guess, and the phrase
Speaker 1: the day God intervened that's on the cover of the Bible.
Speaker 1: For years, Trump has castigated Beijing as an obstacle to
Speaker 1: America's economic success, slapping hefty tariffs on Chinese imports. But hey,
Speaker 1: maybe not on his Bibles. But the issue that AP
Speaker 1: is not going to talk about, of course, is the
Speaker 1: Christian persecution that's been going on by the Chinese Communist Party.
Speaker 1: They don't really care about that at all. They'll occasionally
Speaker 1: say something about Muslim persecution, but they're not going to
Speaker 1: talk about Christian persecution. Tim wild Smith Baptist minichester who
Speaker 1: reviews Bibles on his YouTube channel, so he quickly noticed
Speaker 1: the signs of a cheaply made book. When the God
Speaker 1: Bless USA Bible arrived wrapped in plastic inside of a
Speaker 1: padded mailer. He said it had a faux leather cover,
Speaker 1: words were jammed together on the pages, making it hard
Speaker 1: to read. He also found sticky pages that ripped when
Speaker 1: he pulled them apart, and there was no copyright page
Speaker 1: or information about who printed the Bible. Of course, is
Speaker 1: not going to be a copyright page. King James Bible.
Speaker 1: I was shocked by how poor the quality of it was.
Speaker 1: It says to me that it was about more about
Speaker 1: the love of money than he said the love of
Speaker 1: our country. Well, Bibles aren't about the love of our country.
Speaker 1: They're about the love of Christ. Larida is threatening a
Speaker 1: local TV station with prosecution over a dangerous pro choice ad.
Speaker 1: And again, folks, look, I'm all about the Bibles. I
Speaker 1: don't like to see this kind of thing being not
Speaker 1: and I'm all about protecting life. But the state of Farida,
Speaker 1: the Florida Department of Health, sent a cease and assist
Speaker 1: letter to a Florida news station after it aired an
Speaker 1: ad they claim that women with cancer would be unable
Speaker 1: to get abortions in the state. Now this is patently false,
Speaker 1: but this article from Reason points out that that doesn't matter,
Speaker 1: does it. I mean, do we really you know, we
Speaker 1: can look at this and the state can make a
Speaker 1: state a case that this is false. But false claims
Speaker 1: are the staple of political ads, aren't they. I mean,
Speaker 1: we always have one side saying something and contradicting the other.
Speaker 1: And it's rare if one side is telling the truth.
Speaker 1: Usually they're both lying. But the remedy to bad speech
Speaker 1: or to false speech is to have more speech, to
Speaker 1: have true speech. It's not censorship. And this is a
Speaker 1: problem that I have with DeSantis. Look, he's done a
Speaker 1: great job with a lot of things. He's done a
Speaker 1: great job with the storm preparation, as I mentioned, but
Speaker 1: woit does his administration have no understanding whatsoever about the
Speaker 1: importance of free speech. He enacted censorship laws and hate
Speaker 1: crimes and stuff like that, signed it and Israel because
Speaker 1: he's looking for money when he did that. And now
Speaker 1: we have the FARTA Department of Help coming after this
Speaker 1: advocacy group that is pushing for abortion. And again, you know,
Speaker 1: the issue is important, But if we lose our ability
Speaker 1: to be able to have free speech, if we're going
Speaker 1: to have government minders who are going to say you
Speaker 1: can say this, but you can't say that, and they're
Speaker 1: saying that now they're talking about well, that's dangerous speech.
Speaker 1: What you're saying about female You better shut up or
Speaker 1: pick any topic, right. I mean this has been my
Speaker 1: life for the last eight years. Can't say anything about this.
Speaker 1: I don't like what you're saying about that, So we're
Speaker 1: going to punish you, and it's going to get to
Speaker 1: the point very quick. Is already ramping up or seeing
Speaker 1: this happen in multiple nations in Australia, in the UK,
Speaker 1: others where they are locking people up now because they
Speaker 1: don't like your speech. It's not just kicking you off
Speaker 1: of social media or off of broadcasting. It's not even
Speaker 1: at the point where they're going to give you fines.
Speaker 1: They're going to actually lock you up put you in
Speaker 1: jail because of this. So there's this fantastasizing tyranny of
Speaker 1: free speech that is going to affect everything and it's
Speaker 1: going to keep us in the long term. It's just
Speaker 1: like when we talk about nationalizing the abortion laws, and
Speaker 1: the long term, what it's going to do is prevent
Speaker 1: you from helping to save the lives of babies, because
Speaker 1: what we're talking about here is a totalitarian government. The ad,
Speaker 1: produced by the advocacy group Thuridians Protecting Freedom, depicts a
Speaker 1: woman discussing how she was diagnosed a terminal stage four
Speaker 1: brain cancer while twenty weeks pregnant. In order to start
Speaker 1: treatment to prolong her life, she needed an abortion. The
Speaker 1: doctors knew that I did not end that if if
Speaker 1: I did not end my pregnancy, I would lose my baby,
Speaker 1: I would lose my life, and my daughter would lose
Speaker 1: her mother. Florida has now banned abortion even in cases
Speaker 1: like mine. I mean that four is going to protect
Speaker 1: women like me. Well, they responded, and they said that's
Speaker 1: absolutely not true. The department's letter says that to the
Speaker 1: news station says, you can't air this ad because its
Speaker 1: content is false and dangerous, therefore subject to the Florida
Speaker 1: law banning sanitary nuisances. Sanitary nuisances, do you see how
Speaker 1: this is going to be weaponized for things like vaccines
Speaker 1: and other germ games. We got laws against sanitary nuisance
Speaker 1: and so you got to shut up. Wow, Wow, anything
Speaker 1: that threatens the health or the lives of individuals. Now,
Speaker 1: that means all of what I have to say that
Speaker 1: they don't like. I mean, you know, I got kicked
Speaker 1: off of Vimeo because of misinformation about vaccines. Now I'm
Speaker 1: telling you the truth about vaccines. And if they don't
Speaker 1: think it's the truth, they ought to come out and
Speaker 1: say what they disagree with. They won't even say what
Speaker 1: they disagree with. And I know what they disagree with.
Speaker 1: They disagree with the fact that I criticize the pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 1: They disagree with the fact that I talked about how
Speaker 1: they have bought the media, and they have, and they've
Speaker 1: bought the people who censored me as well Vimeo. But
Speaker 1: if you don't agree with what I have to say,
Speaker 1: then fine, you know you've got a big platform. Why
Speaker 1: don't you put something out there and say what I
Speaker 1: got wrong? But they won't even specifically say you're just
Speaker 1: not allowed to criticize the pharmaceutical industry. And I do
Speaker 1: more than criticize them. I call them what they are, murderers.
Speaker 1: They're absolutely murderers. They'll do anything for money, and they
Speaker 1: love harming people. Because that's what the government wants out
Speaker 1: of this agenda. The Department argued that because Flarida's abortion
Speaker 1: law allows for abortions to prevent serious risk of quote
Speaker 1: physical impairment of a major bodily function, Caroline would have
Speaker 1: in fact been able to get an abortion under Florida's law.
Speaker 1: So yes, they are lying, But I don't want the
Speaker 1: government shutting down somebody because they are lying. Look, if
Speaker 1: you've got you've got remedies for defamation and other things
Speaker 1: like that. It is you know, they can sue them
Speaker 1: for that. Other people can sue them for what they
Speaker 1: have to say. But government censorship should never be allowed
Speaker 1: under any circumstances. As Reasons said, even if it were
Speaker 1: clearly true, the Caroline would have been able to obtain
Speaker 1: an abortion under Florida's law. And it is true, a
Speaker 1: state can't simply force a broadcaster to take down an ad,
Speaker 1: especially when it's political. That speech is squarely protected by
Speaker 1: the First Amendment, even if, as a state claims, it
Speaker 1: contains false information. Certain kinds of false speech fall outside
Speaker 1: the First Amendments protection like defamation and fraud. But what
Speaker 1: they're talking about here saying, well, you are you have
Speaker 1: of a speech that is false and dangerous. It is
Speaker 1: a sanitary nuisance that threatens the health or the lives
Speaker 1: of individuals. Wow Reason says, the Supreme Court has been
Speaker 1: clear that the First Amendment doesn't give the government free
Speaker 1: floating power to suppress speech merely based on its judgment
Speaker 1: that it is false or misleading. You see, that's the problem.
Speaker 1: The judgment of whether or not something is false or
Speaker 1: misleading has to belong and reside with we the people,
Speaker 1: not they the government. That's the difference between freedom and tyranny,
Speaker 1: Just that simple. If they're going to be the arbiters
Speaker 1: of what is true and pretend that they have to
Speaker 1: protect us from lives that we can't figure out, this
Speaker 1: is easily easily shown to be false, and it is
Speaker 1: easily shown that this approach is being taken by yet
Speaker 1: another Florida agency is going to ultimately lead to tyranny.
Speaker 1: There are you doing this who? There's Typically the state
Speaker 1: doesn't do it. Typically what the state does start doing
Speaker 1: it directly. In America, they do it through surrogates, through
Speaker 1: social media, through search engines, through YouTube, and things like that.
Speaker 1: That's typically how they operate. And so you see at
Speaker 1: the same time, DeSantis, for a reason that I would
Speaker 1: agree with to try to protect babies' lives, as saying
Speaker 1: you can't lie about what our pro life law says.
Speaker 1: We have USA today saying the paths, saying anything about
Speaker 1: hurricane paths and FEMA response spurs dangerous misinformation. USA today
Speaker 1: is saying this is dangerous and you can't say anything
Speaker 1: about what FEMA is doing. You see, they're going to
Speaker 1: gag you over this now while they push on climate change.
Speaker 1: Officials leading the recovery effort have had to fight more
Speaker 1: than just storm damage. Falsehoods and conspiracy theories about FEMA
Speaker 1: have spread widely online. Poor FEMA, Did you realize that
Speaker 1: the true victims of Hurricane Helene are FEMA. I wish
Speaker 1: we could wipe FEMA off the map. I wish we
Speaker 1: could sweep them away and a flood of public anger.
Speaker 1: That's what I'm trying to do. I'll tell you what
Speaker 1: my agenda is. My agenda is to just flush them
Speaker 1: down the river, that toxic waste that we call FEMA.
Speaker 1: But these efforts, FEMA's efforts, says USA today, are being
Speaker 1: complicated by false claims that the agency is not helping people,
Speaker 1: that they don't have the money to help, or that
Speaker 1: they're getting in the way. And listen to this to
Speaker 1: say that people affected by the storm are only getting
Speaker 1: provided seven hundred and fifty dollars in assistance. That was
Speaker 1: said by Lalla. So now you're telling us that La
Speaker 1: La line USA today doesn't really understand the the consequences
Speaker 1: of their propaganda. That's the logical conclusion is that lallallied.
Speaker 1: If it's not just seven hundred and fifty dollars, well,
Speaker 1: then that's I guess she lied everybody, And essentially she did,
Speaker 1: because there's that one mayor who is being interviewed on
Speaker 1: on Fox News, Sarah Carter, and he said, yeah, this
Speaker 1: is an insult. Seven hundred fifty dollars. And he said,
Speaker 1: and then my daughter who lost everything, they would only
Speaker 1: give her three hundred dollars, and he said, that doesn't
Speaker 1: even cover the food that she lost in her freezer.
Speaker 1: So this USA Today article says, well, here's some of
Speaker 1: the hurricane related claims that USA Today has debunked. You
Speaker 1: know that harp was used to control the path of
Speaker 1: the hurricane Helene. Our rating is false and so forth.
Speaker 1: You know it is not possible to control weather. Well,
Speaker 1: I guess the CI director Brennan disagrees with you. Once
Speaker 1: you call Brennan a liar, on, don't you call Lala
Speaker 1: a liar? The Biden administration spent FEMA hurricane relief money
Speaker 1: on illegals faults. They said, well, I tell you know,
Speaker 1: I don't need I don't need government to come in
Speaker 1: and shut down. USA Today I know they're liars. I
Speaker 1: can look at this stuff and I can you know,
Speaker 1: I can look at what the people on the ground
Speaker 1: are saying. I know what experiences, I know what's been reported,
Speaker 1: I know what their own politicians and CIA people have said.
Speaker 1: USA today is lying to us. But I'm not calling
Speaker 1: for USA to be shut down. I'm calling for them
Speaker 1: to be ignored, just like I do some of the
Speaker 1: alternative mainstream media. It's like, just ignore what Alex is
Speaker 1: telling you. I'm not calling for him to be shut down.
Speaker 1: Just ignore it because he's misleading you. And so are
Speaker 1: these people as well. And in Australia, up to five
Speaker 1: years in prison for what they would call hate speech
Speaker 1: and they now redefined it. It used to be the
Speaker 1: hate speech in Australia was to hate somebody because of
Speaker 1: race and really religion. Now what they have added to
Speaker 1: race and religion is any speech that they would consider
Speaker 1: to be hateful about gender identity, sex, sex characteristics, sexual orientation,
Speaker 1: and on and on. So if you don't use their pronouns,
Speaker 1: you could literally go to jail. This is why what
Speaker 1: DeSantis is doing is support a pro life right. You know,
Speaker 1: these principles and these structures matter, and the end does
Speaker 1: not justify the means. Offline, these laws will apply to
Speaker 1: both public and private interactions and conversations. This is a
Speaker 1: rewrite of the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act. And why
Speaker 1: not because they've really got a new religion. That's what
Speaker 1: this truly is about. It's about their new religion. Well,
Speaker 1: Kirk Cameron is urging Christians to vote their values for
Speaker 1: a spiritual comeback. Don't you remember that and acts where
Speaker 1: Peter stands up and says, repent and vote for the
Speaker 1: salvation of your soul? Right? I don't remember that being
Speaker 1: in there, and maybe have to go back and check
Speaker 1: the Greek. I don't know. I don't think that's there.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's how we have a spiritual comeback. Look,
Speaker 1: and I like Kirk Cameron, and he's been very good
Speaker 1: in terms of exposing what's going on with this drag
Speaker 1: queen stuff. I don't want to criticize them too much.
Speaker 1: But it's not about the voting folks, it really isn't.
Speaker 1: It's about our kids. It's about schools, it's about taking
Speaker 1: responsibility for our lives. Get over this obsession that is
Speaker 1: shared by him and so many big preachers and religious
Speaker 1: leaders and all this stuff. They are so focused on
Speaker 1: politics and they don't and they're missing what needs to
Speaker 1: be done with themselves and with their family. Kirk Cameron
Speaker 1: is urging all Americans of faith to vote their values. Well,
Speaker 1: that's what I intend to do. That's why I won't
Speaker 1: vote for either la Law or Trump. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to vote for evil. I'm not going to vote the
Speaker 1: lesser of evil. There's good and there's evil. There's not
Speaker 1: fifty two shades of gray or whatever that movie was, right,
Speaker 1: is it fifty shades? I don't know what I want,
Speaker 1: but you know, it's black and it's white. Okay, it's
Speaker 1: not all these shades are great. There's no moral ambiguity here.
Speaker 1: It's pretty clear. And I could look at this stuff
Speaker 1: and I could make some kind of a judgment on
Speaker 1: it if we didn't have the things that happened in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty with a lockdown, the closure of churches. And
Speaker 1: so now I see these people who've fought the lockdown orders,
Speaker 1: who fought fauci, who hate the vaccine, who fought the
Speaker 1: vaccine mandate, now pushing for the people who created all
Speaker 1: this stuff, the lesser of two evils and we got
Speaker 1: people either. We've got a group called evangelicals for lalla
Speaker 1: all you talk about in oxymoron. But he says, I
Speaker 1: believe with all my heart, says Kurt Cameron, that it
Speaker 1: is and that God did not create us and rescue
Speaker 1: us through the Gospel to be cowards. Well, I agree,
Speaker 1: and Kurt has been very bold in terms of standing
Speaker 1: up to these people. He's done some very effective things.
Speaker 1: But I just think that if you really understand what's
Speaker 1: going on in Washington, you're going to see that you're
Speaker 1: wasting your time. You're wasting your time, You're looking at
Speaker 1: the wrong thing. He said, we have to realign the
Speaker 1: nation with Heaven's values. You're not going to do that.
Speaker 1: That's not within your power. You can realign yourself. You
Speaker 1: might have enough influence on your kids, maybe not always.
Speaker 1: You can't even reliably influence your kids. I have known
Speaker 1: so many people who have been strong Christians, who have
Speaker 1: worked so hard with their kids, and they don't go
Speaker 1: in that direction. You know it is, this is something
Speaker 1: between them and God. God has a hand in this.
Speaker 1: You can pray for it, but you can't realign even
Speaker 1: your own children, let alone the nation with Heaven's values.
Speaker 1: What we can do is we can be unashamed in
Speaker 1: declaring what Heaven's values are. That's really what the evangelical
Speaker 1: is about. It's about a proclamation. It isn't about winning
Speaker 1: the argument. It's about speaking the truth. And what a
Speaker 1: reproach it is to Christians to line up behind either
Speaker 1: Trump or La La as a reproach to christ. I
Speaker 1: would never associate the Lord Jesus Christ with either of
Speaker 1: those two people in any way, shape or form, let
Speaker 1: alone say that this is how we're going to restore
Speaker 1: the nation to Christian values. He says, in the words
Speaker 1: of Noah Webster, every civil government is based on some
Speaker 1: religion or philosophy of life. Absolutely, absolutely everything is downstream
Speaker 1: from your worldview, from your religion, everything in your life,
Speaker 1: everything in the society. He said, America, it's the foundational
Speaker 1: religion that was Christianity, and he said it was sewn
Speaker 1: into their hearts for two centuries through the home and school,
Speaker 1: public and private. Well, no, actually I think it is.
Speaker 1: I think it's sewn into your heart by God. And
Speaker 1: it's not home and school as parents taking their job
Speaker 1: to school their own children. When you walk with them
Speaker 1: in the way, when you walk within them. The way
Speaker 1: you teach them the principles, you point out what is
Speaker 1: happening and make that relevant. See what's happening over there,
Speaker 1: and see what's happening in society. The Bible has spoken
Speaker 1: about this, and we under stand what that's about. That's
Speaker 1: what you've got to do with your kids. He says,
Speaker 1: our foundation needs to be biblical, moral and spiritual values. Well, again,
Speaker 1: don't compromise those out of fear. Don't compromise those out
Speaker 1: of partisan loyalty. You see, the philosophy of life that
Speaker 1: your children are going to be getting in school is
Speaker 1: going to be a Marxist philosophy. It's going to be
Speaker 1: a fear of climate change. It's going to be the
Speaker 1: debauchery of LGBT. It's just when you look at what
Speaker 1: people do. Here's a good example. Billy Graham Evangelistic Association
Speaker 1: is threatening to sue again. They don't like speech, just
Speaker 1: like DeSantis. We don't like your lying about our pro
Speaker 1: life ad and we need to protect babies, and I
Speaker 1: agree with all that stuff. They are lying and we
Speaker 1: do need to protect babies. But they're going to intimidate
Speaker 1: the radio station and tell them no, you can't say
Speaker 1: anything that might put somebody's life at risk or something
Speaker 1: like that. Whatever the public health people are claiming. I
Speaker 1: just read it to you. But no, we don't want
Speaker 1: to have that system, and we don't want to have
Speaker 1: a system where the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association is threatening
Speaker 1: to see evangelicals over an anti Trump ad. And I
Speaker 1: want to play this for you. What it amounts to
Speaker 1: is you have they took these evangelicals for La La.
Speaker 1: I think we call them laala agelicals. They have absolutely
Speaker 1: no idea what their religion is, who they're following, what
Speaker 1: the Bible teaches. If they're supporting La La, they're laala agelicals.
Speaker 1: They're clueless about what's happening. They're just as clueless as
Speaker 1: she is. But what they did with this, with this commercial,
Speaker 1: it's actually pretty good. They took a short little statement
Speaker 1: that was made part of a sermon where Billy Graham
Speaker 1: is preaching and he's talking about you know, or Christian
Speaker 1: values and stuff like that. And what they do is
Speaker 1: they have him say something and then they have Trump
Speaker 1: doing exactly the opposite, okay, saying exactly the opposite. And
Speaker 1: when I look at that, so the Billy Graham Evangelism
Speaker 1: Evangelistic Association wants to sue to take that down. And
Speaker 1: I'll tell you the basis of why they say they
Speaker 1: want to sue after I play this for you. But
Speaker 1: it truly is crazy.
Speaker 9: But you must realize that in the last days, the
Speaker 9: times will be full of danger. Men will become utterly
Speaker 9: self centered and greedy for money.
Speaker 8: My whole life, I've been greedy, greedy, greedy. I gripped
Speaker 8: all the money I could get.
Speaker 1: I'm so greedy.
Speaker 9: They will be proud and abusive.
Speaker 10: You've called women you don't like fat pigs, dogs, slavs
Speaker 10: and disgusting animals, uncontrolled and violent.
Speaker 6: Like to punch him in the face.
Speaker 7: I'll tell you they.
Speaker 9: Will be treacherous, reckless, arrogant.
Speaker 7: I am the chosen one.
Speaker 9: Loving what gives them pleasure instead of loving God.
Speaker 8: You know, I'm automatically attracted to beautiful I just start
Speaker 8: kissing them.
Speaker 6: It's like a magnet.
Speaker 9: Maintain a facade of religion, but their lives deny the truth.
Speaker 6: Have you ever asked God for forgiveness?
Speaker 4: That's a tough question.
Speaker 6: I'm not sure I have. I don't bring God into
Speaker 6: that picture.
Speaker 9: I don't keep clear of.
Speaker 1: People like that. Okay, well you know what's wrong with that.
Speaker 1: See what needs to be done is we need to
Speaker 1: have I need to expand that and have Billy Graham
Speaker 1: say those true things. Then have the Trump quote, and
Speaker 1: then the La La quote, and the next one he
Speaker 1: says something, and then you have La La and then
Speaker 1: you have Trump. Both of them are completely at odds
Speaker 1: with Christian values. Now my question for the Billy Graham
Speaker 1: Evangelistic Association is are you backing away from the truth
Speaker 1: that Billy Graham was saying there? And I'm not a
Speaker 1: Billy Graham supporter. I mean, Billy Graham thinks he bought
Speaker 1: into this stuff a wideness in God's love type of things,
Speaker 1: the same stuff that you're hearing from the pope for example.
Speaker 1: You know, yeah, everybody's going to have that time. I
Speaker 1: don't believe that, frankly, and I'm not going to get
Speaker 1: people that kind of false assurance. But look, what he
Speaker 1: was saying there was absolutely right. So do they not
Speaker 1: like the fact that somebody is putting out what Billy
Speaker 1: Graham says right or they don't like the fact that
Speaker 1: they're criticizing Trump. Look, there's a lot more that you
Speaker 1: could put in there about Trump to bolster each and
Speaker 1: every one of those things. I mean, they didn't show
Speaker 1: him partying with Jeffrey Epstein. They just said, yeah, I
Speaker 1: see beautiful women. I'm just going to go over and
Speaker 1: kiss them. And they let you do that because you're
Speaker 1: a star, right. But they said, well, you can't show
Speaker 1: this because it is copyright infringement. No it's not. It's
Speaker 1: fair use. It's fair use. They're commenting on what he
Speaker 1: has done. And so are you ashamed of the truth
Speaker 1: that you're you know that Billy Graham is a Billy
Speaker 1: Graham association, ashamed of the truth that Billy Graham is
Speaker 1: saying there? Or are they just trying to support somebody
Speaker 1: who is the antithesis of everything that Billy Graham is
Speaker 1: promoting in that clip, the person who is the epitome
Speaker 1: of everything that Billy Graham and that clip is telling
Speaker 1: us we have to watch out for in the last
Speaker 1: days getting gone on and said lovers of self. I mean,
Speaker 1: that sums it all up pretty much for these politicians.
Speaker 1: It's a one million dollar ad campaign from the La
Speaker 1: lagelicals think that that's not all true of their sex
Speaker 1: worker candidate. Two ways, the school complex muzzles parents and students.
Speaker 1: This is from miss dot Org.
Speaker 6: Uh.
Speaker 1: Look, you know the Billy Graham Foundation, in my opinion
Speaker 1: on how to be fighting the public schools instead in
Speaker 1: public health. Instead, what they're fighting is free speech instead,
Speaker 1: what they're fighting for is Trump, right, man. I tell
Speaker 1: you this is why when I say you mix politics
Speaker 1: with religion, you wind up with politics. Let's not talk
Speaker 1: about the fact that Trump is doing all of those
Speaker 1: things their responsibility Graham Foundation. If they don't like that,
Speaker 1: they like Trump, what they do is they ought to
Speaker 1: do just just do one with La La, not one
Speaker 1: with La La and Benedete Donald. Just they could do
Speaker 1: the same thing with her. Be very easy. But I
Speaker 1: think the ideal thing is to put out a commercial
Speaker 1: that shows both of them and for what they really are.
Speaker 1: I object all this because they appear to be trying
Speaker 1: to set Trump up as some kind of a moral leader,
Speaker 1: and everything they do, he's anything but that. He's immoral
Speaker 1: as a leader, even if he were to hit the
Speaker 1: right policies. And you can't trust him on those policies.
Speaker 1: I said when he started doing the stuff that he
Speaker 1: was doing in twenty twenty, I said, what do you
Speaker 1: expect from somebody who has thrown out three women and
Speaker 1: bragged about it. And we saw him do that to
Speaker 1: everybody that was in his cabinet, pretty much, bring them in, Oh,
Speaker 1: this is the best person in the world for this
Speaker 1: or that, flattering them over the top, then throwing them
Speaker 1: out and mocking them and endlessly after he does that,
Speaker 1: And that's what he always did with his wives. But
Speaker 1: that's what he always did. That's what he did in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty with a constitution. And I said, do you
Speaker 1: think that somebody who won't pay attention to the oath
Speaker 1: that he took for his wife, you think he's going
Speaker 1: to pay attention to the constitution just as unfaithful to
Speaker 1: the constitution. He divorced the Constitution in twenty twenty. And
Speaker 1: from a secular standpoint, I can't support him. From a
Speaker 1: religious standpoint, I think these people are a reproach to
Speaker 1: support him, A Syrian girl says, And they will be
Speaker 1: teaching humanism from the Bible, not God's truth. That's right.
Speaker 1: Just imagine the twisted mess that will pour out of
Speaker 1: those teachers. Like today's kids, you can't speak, can't read
Speaker 1: every day English, will understand King James English that's right.
Speaker 1: It's like, uh, it's uh yeah. I was asked the
Speaker 1: other day, this is mesus. I was asked the other
Speaker 1: day white parents and students don't have more to say
Speaker 1: in their education in the government system. And my reply
Speaker 1: was simply because that's the goal. You have surrendered your
Speaker 1: kids to the state. What do you expect them to do?
Speaker 1: You think they're going to ask you, do you think
Speaker 1: just like FEMA wants your input, like FEMA wants you
Speaker 1: to be allowed to you protect yourselves and your neighbors.
Speaker 1: On No, you don't have my permission. Get out of here.
Speaker 1: You can't do this. You've got to do that type
Speaker 1: of thing. The system exists to perpetuate itself, just like FEMA,
Speaker 1: and to propagandize large numbers of children each year so
Speaker 1: they believe and pass on to their children the myths
Speaker 1: that permit government predation. The system and those in it
Speaker 1: have to quash individuality, says meses dot org. But even
Speaker 1: more importantly, they don't say this. They're there to quash
Speaker 1: your spirit, your connection to God. That's what they're there
Speaker 1: to quash. You want those people teaching your kids Bible.
Speaker 1: I don't want them teaching my kids anything. They can't
Speaker 1: even teach math and reading, phonics. They can't even do that.
Speaker 1: Over time, the system has expanded to include more than
Speaker 1: eighty percent of the children in the United States. This
Speaker 1: public school system, it is an abomination, just like the
Speaker 1: public health bureaucery see the public school system is an
Speaker 1: abomination Marxist totalitarian central government at its worst. These public
Speaker 1: systems eighty percent of the children in the US, three
Speaker 1: point two million teachers, ninety seven thousand, five hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty eight schools, an average of over five hundred students
Speaker 1: per school, and nearly one trillion trillion with a t
Speaker 1: and tax funds each year. Why you can never own
Speaker 1: your home, and it's only getting worse as kids are
Speaker 1: busted in from other countries for free education at your expense,
Speaker 1: at the expense of your home. A behemoth such as
Speaker 1: the one that has metastasized in this country, has innumerable
Speaker 1: ways to muzzle both parents and students, but two primary
Speaker 1: methods ensure compliance and uniformity in the system and its graduates.
Speaker 1: Compulsion and bureaucracy. Because, again going back to the nineteen twenties,
Speaker 1: there the planks of the Communist Party was to have
Speaker 1: compulsory school funded by taxes. They understood this. What do
Speaker 1: we have to do? We have to transcend this in
Speaker 1: our parallel society. It's just that simple. Don't going back
Speaker 1: to the very first article yet, do not ask these
Speaker 1: people for money. Don't make that Faustian bargain or that
Speaker 1: Faucian bargain. So this is from the center. America's days
Speaker 1: of Noah are here. After fifty seven hundred American children
Speaker 1: are mutilated in four years. Just think about that. I mean,
Speaker 1: when you look at that, just that one aspect, isn't
Speaker 1: that enough to disqualify sending your kids to school? Isn't
Speaker 1: that enough to disqualify the entire public school thing? Over
Speaker 1: a fifty seven hundred of Mirea children children have undergone
Speaker 1: gender affirming body mutilations between twenty nineteen and twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: Twenty nineteen, twenty twenty. That was under Trump, two years
Speaker 1: of Trump, three years of Biden. Irreversible permanent body altering
Speaker 1: operations like missectomies and genital reassignment. Talk about that mutilation
Speaker 1: Children who aren't even old enough to make responsible decisions
Speaker 1: about basic aspects of life. They can't vote, they can't
Speaker 1: join the military, they can't go to school field trip
Speaker 1: without parental consent. But they're being thrust into life altering
Speaker 1: surgeries by ideologically driven medical system. They just had some
Speaker 1: detransitioners kicked out of the Pediatricians of America conference. No,
Speaker 1: we don't want to hear it. Get out. I'm going
Speaker 1: to make money mutilating children, sterilizing children, and all the
Speaker 1: rest of this destroying their lives. A lot of these kids,
Speaker 1: you know, the genital surgery is so crippling, a lot
Speaker 1: of them have committed suicide. What's even more terrifying is
Speaker 1: the fact these children are being used as guinea pigs
Speaker 1: and what can only be described as a perverse, unholy
Speaker 1: sex experiment. It's everywhere and it's scary. But you know,
Speaker 1: the evangelicals are fighting over Trump and LA Law, aren't
Speaker 1: they right? The Billy Graham Foundation is not concerned about this.
Speaker 1: It's concerned about getting Trump in the White House. How
Speaker 1: pathetic these institutional Christians are. The scriptures are very clear
Speaker 1: that the binary distinction between male and female is not arbitrary,
Speaker 1: but foundational to God's design. Yet in rebellion against God,
Speaker 1: we now see a nation willing to amputate the sex
Speaker 1: organs of five year olds and a feutal attempt to
Speaker 1: erase God's design. The entire notion that miners who can't
Speaker 1: consent to vote or drive should be given the authority
Speaker 1: to decide to butcher their own bodies as pure madness.
Speaker 1: Where is the church on this? The EERLC holds conferences
Speaker 1: about racism and white supremacy, but they can't be bothered
Speaker 1: to hold a conference about facing the greatest evil according
Speaker 1: to scriptures that hit our planet since the days of Noah.
Speaker 1: Where is the passion youth conference that John Piper loves
Speaker 1: to talk about on Where is the cru They used
Speaker 1: to be called a crusade for Christ, but now we
Speaker 1: can't talk about Christ or crusade, so they call it
Speaker 1: cru These children are not being affirmed in any meaningful sense.
Speaker 1: They're being sacrificed on the altar of political correctness and
Speaker 1: adult sexual fetishes. But you know, let's fight for Trump
Speaker 1: or lalla. This is why we have the kind of
Speaker 1: society that we do. This is more than a cultural issue.
Speaker 1: This is a spiritual battle, and the churches and these
Speaker 1: institutions are just as awall as f Thank you for listening.
Speaker 11: The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
Speaker 11: If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The
Speaker 11: David Night Show, please do your part and try not
Speaker 11: to spread it. Financial support, or simply tell the others
Speaker 11: about the show causes this dangerous information to spread.
Speaker 2: Father people have to trust me, I mean trust the science.
Speaker 2: Wear you mask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions.
Speaker 6: Using freeze beach to free minds. It's the David Night Show.