Speaker 1: All right, welcome to sixty Agenda. We're back again. I'm
Speaker 1: here with my man Justin and uh I'm Andrew, your host.
Speaker 1: We talked about what they want. Uh yeah, thank you
Speaker 1: for the recent review on Apple, mister conspiracy Carpenter. I
Speaker 1: shouldn't have said mister, because you could be a woman
Speaker 1: carpenter and never know. But hey, we appreciate you a lot.
Speaker 1: Thanks for the love there. You know, we're gonna try
Speaker 1: to keep bringing you the best. You know, we're trying
Speaker 1: to improve every time. We're new to this, but as
Speaker 1: we go, it'll get better. Jenny the Alchemist is always
Speaker 1: great input. Peter TiAl seems like he's trying to prevent
Speaker 1: the Antichrist, but as you said, he is creating it.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to clear clarify that. But yeah, other
Speaker 1: than that, thanks for the compliment. Definitely, you know, we
Speaker 1: try to do what we can. And you know, if
Speaker 1: you didn't see her comic, go read the rest because
Speaker 1: she's always got great input. On YouTube and Jenny the Alchemist,
Speaker 1: I don't know if you're only on YouTube, but we
Speaker 1: do have more episodes on Spotify. They are just audio
Speaker 1: that we did not post onto YouTube, just so you
Speaker 1: know and any of our YouTube listeners. All right, so
Speaker 1: we got some crazy stuff planned. I think we're gonna
Speaker 1: do another Chill pod. I've got a little guest spot
Speaker 1: after this on the outside Minds, So hopefully you guys
Speaker 1: can check that out this week and enjoy that. But
Speaker 1: first off, I figured, you know, we talked about the
Speaker 1: Samsung White papers recently with William Ramsey, and I realized, like,
Speaker 1: we haven't even talked about this on our show enough,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean we talked about the Internet things
Speaker 1: and the Internet bodies, but we should have kind of
Speaker 1: went into that. But that's okay because as I was
Speaker 1: planning on doing that, I saw a bunch of new
Speaker 1: patents that just kind of came out from these tech companies.
Speaker 1: So I think we should go through those, go through
Speaker 1: the Samsung White and you know, put it all together. Sure.
Speaker 1: So yeah, there's been a weird, weird patents going on.
Speaker 1: We'll start off with the Microsoft one, and apparently teleportation
Speaker 1: is gonna be a thing. According to this patent. Microsoft
Speaker 1: filed a patent for teleportation. It's like a holographic one though,
Speaker 1: because so kind of like Star Wars, right, not literal
Speaker 1: human teleportation, but aims at simulating presence anywhere in the
Speaker 1: world using real time high holographs. Holography hollow portation form
Speaker 1: a three D capture and transmission of a person's likeness
Speaker 1: for use in virtual or augmented reality. So, if you
Speaker 1: remember the Cardish Jarvin Curtis Jarvin Accelerationist episode, we talked
Speaker 1: about how he wanted to. He said, we could put
Speaker 1: people in a simulation or virtualize them. That this is
Speaker 1: very reminiscent of that. It's crazy. Hey, it's a real
Speaker 1: patent there, it is. These are all gonna be legit patents.
Speaker 1: You can look up and we can get deeper on
Speaker 1: some of these two as we go. But yeah, essentially
Speaker 1: it's just augmented reality. Teleportation interactive experiences kind of reminds
Speaker 1: me like what Meta is trying to do, like Mark
Speaker 1: Zuckerberg whenever he first came out with that.
Speaker 2: But I think it's this whole vast virtual ecosystem.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, exactly. I wonder if it's going to be
Speaker 1: like your actual person. It says your likeness, so I
Speaker 1: guess it wouldn't be like how his was where it
Speaker 1: was like at Avatar, right, it'd be your actual like
Speaker 1: straight up Obi wan Kenobi. You know I need you,
Speaker 1: you know kind of thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, it's gonna be crazy. It's gonna be pretty wicked.
Speaker 1: That is very wicked. I love it. Yeah, that's a
Speaker 1: good word for it. Uh. So we got another one.
Speaker 1: Meta has came out with a mind reading interface. This
Speaker 1: one's really creepy. It's a uh pretty much patented technology
Speaker 1: to read your brain signals and convert thoughts into commands
Speaker 1: for AR or VR virtual reality or augmented reality aka
Speaker 1: no typing talking and uh you're thinking it happens kind
Speaker 1: of like the neuralink situation. This is my my Cardinals cup.
Speaker 2: You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: I'm not a sports fan, but this is a badass
Speaker 1: sturdy mug.
Speaker 2: That is a nice mug, dude. One can always appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Good mug. You got to coffee. Coffee's life, all right?
Speaker 1: So AI did he kill language from the brain? I mean,
Speaker 1: that's who it's where we're headed. Now. We're just telling
Speaker 1: you about these patents because we're gonna talk about the
Speaker 1: Samsung white papers too. And I just you know, the
Speaker 1: Samsung white Papers is the vision of the future. But
Speaker 1: I want to show you that the patents are here
Speaker 1: as of today. So we got another dream monitoring and
Speaker 1: controlling patent from Samsung.
Speaker 2: Monitor.
Speaker 1: Yeah, dream monitoring and controlling from Samsung patent, you could
Speaker 1: look that up. But so we're gonna be talking about
Speaker 1: Samsung white papers and the six G technology that they're
Speaker 1: going to be unveiling, So this is going to be
Speaker 1: part of it for sure. So they file patents patents
Speaker 1: for wearable devices that monitor an influence dreams and neurofeedback
Speaker 1: and maybe even customize your dreams for the future, kind
Speaker 1: of like alter your dreams to where they can control it.
Speaker 1: So what's to say? You know, the problem being addressed
Speaker 1: is a common one, the difficulty in accurately identifying and
Speaker 1: monitoring our rem sleep in real time. Traditional devices have
Speaker 1: struggled with this, okay, but they're talking about customizing it, okay,
Speaker 1: in a world shape by this technology, our understanding of
Speaker 1: sleep becomes more interactive and immediate. I just don't think
Speaker 1: it's that serious, you know. And also it's it's always
Speaker 1: under the guise of like convenience, you can know how
Speaker 1: much you sleep all the time. I wonder if it
Speaker 1: talks about the customization of your sleep on this because
Speaker 1: what I saw, did of course not. It's always like
Speaker 1: what it can do for your health.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So last one, this one's odd space based data centers
Speaker 1: from Amazon the u grandson of the creator of darpuk.
Speaker 1: So that's always, you know, trustworthy orbital data centers that
Speaker 1: store and being data from space to Earth, avoiding like
Speaker 1: earth limitations, you know, like cataclysm, CMEME whatever, heat, power,
Speaker 1: bandwidth issues. It doesn't have to worry about those either.
Speaker 1: Aws IS four is focused on processing data closer to
Speaker 1: where it's generated in space using cloud and machine learning
Speaker 1: services on orbiting satellites. Did you speaking of this while
Speaker 1: we're on the topic of satellites, So that one's weird.
Speaker 1: That's the last patent I saw. We'll get into the
Speaker 1: white papers. Did you see all those Starlink satellites went out? Yeah, dude,
Speaker 1: look at that. How many how many countries are without
Speaker 1: I mean I heard that they all hit airplane mode
Speaker 1: at the same time. And he put the see and
Speaker 1: that's the worry that people have about Elon Musks technology
Speaker 1: and he can just turn it off. He threatened to
Speaker 1: turn it off because this country didn't want to let
Speaker 1: him go there and like put a tesla there or
Speaker 1: some shit allegedly, but yeah, let's see, let's see, let's see.
Speaker 1: A global out of just starlink network lasting over two hours,
Speaker 1: was reported on July twenty fifth, attributed to an internal
Speaker 1: software failure. Additionally, SpaceX has acknowledged a higher than usual
Speaker 1: number of satellites falling out of orbit, potentially due to
Speaker 1: increased solar activity, because we've had a lot of CMME action.
Speaker 1: We've talked about that definitely leaving a solar maximum. How
Speaker 1: to shit? You got the ring of fire volcanoes going on?
Speaker 1: Is that real? So I've been seeing a lot of
Speaker 1: posts about like how all the the fire, like the
Speaker 1: volcanoes are getting active. Yeah, And I wonder how much
Speaker 1: of that is just like are they just fear mongering
Speaker 1: or is that real? Because you know, I looked into
Speaker 1: the Yellowstone animals and none of them are actually leaving
Speaker 1: according to the park rangers. So I'm like, all right, well,
Speaker 1: is it waking up or not? Because everybody's making big
Speaker 1: deal about all these volcanoes. Sometimes I wonder, man, is
Speaker 1: this a distraction from the fact that our president is
Speaker 1: probably in the Epstein files? Is this a distraction with
Speaker 1: the fact that he wrote a creepy birthday letter to
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein where they talked about how like a man
Speaker 1: needs secrets or something like that, Like you mentioned something
Speaker 1: about like needing secrets.
Speaker 2: They're trying their hardest to avoid that talk about it
Speaker 2: or talking about anything and everything, but.
Speaker 1: Guys like guys like us need secrets. Pretty sure he
Speaker 1: said something along those lines.
Speaker 2: And I think Shane Gillis made a joke about it
Speaker 2: in the SPS.
Speaker 1: Oh really, yeah, I didn't watch that. I saw he
Speaker 1: was on there and killed. I didn't watch it. He killed.
Speaker 2: It was funny, but the joke was, Oh, there was
Speaker 2: a joke about Epstein in here, but somehow it got deleted.
Speaker 2: And he was like, oh, yeah, we should just move
Speaker 2: on as a country and forget about that. Yeah yeah,
Speaker 2: and like, but that's exactly what they're trying to do.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, obviously that was the joke. But yeah, you know,
Speaker 2: they're doing a really good job at it, exactly, No,
Speaker 2: they really are.
Speaker 1: And I mean they ran on the Epstein files and
Speaker 1: now it's like, why are you still talking about that?
Speaker 1: And we mentioned we mentioned that that's crazy.
Speaker 2: And then within that there was like a Caitlin Clark
Speaker 2: joke that they blew up, and not that one.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh of course, yeah, yeah, yeah, blow up, the
Speaker 1: blow up, the racially blow up, the racial joke.
Speaker 2: But not the one that pertains the real It was like,
Speaker 2: when she retires, she's gonna go work at waffle house
Speaker 2: to continue doing what she does best best, fighting black women.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, okay, I might have seen something. It was
Speaker 1: pretty fucking funny, ridiculous dude. Okay, by the way, while
Speaker 1: we're talking about funny stuff, yo, and the last one, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, we got a little bit while we were
Speaker 1: just okay, so I want to explain that, you know,
Speaker 1: we weren't laughing at these people's debts. We were just
Speaker 1: laughing at the hypotheticals that we kind of initially came
Speaker 1: up with. And then whenever you extrapolate onto the next
Speaker 1: murders and you see how each one of these are
Speaker 1: so outright that it has to be some intelligence murder operation,
Speaker 1: it became to the point where you have to laugh
Speaker 1: at at how tragically awful it is, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, And that's kind of what it was. So
Speaker 1: I just want to, you know, just put that out there.
Speaker 1: We take no enjoyment in the pain of anybody. Of course,
Speaker 1: it just was the hypothetical, just putting it out there
Speaker 1: because I just thought of it. I was like, I
Speaker 1: was like, eh, we went a little bit a little
Speaker 1: bit overboard. I almost had to cut it out. But
Speaker 1: it's okay, you know, it's okay. Ring. Yeah, So let's
Speaker 1: talk about the ring of fire volcanoes quick, and then
Speaker 1: we'll get over to the Samsung and we're just talking
Speaker 1: about current events.
Speaker 2: Little chill Pop.
Speaker 1: We don't worry. We're gonna be doing the rest of
Speaker 1: this Jesper series. We will be doing a subscription basis
Speaker 1: kind of premium deal going on here. Soon. We'll get
Speaker 1: into the details. That may include live shows with live interactions,
Speaker 1: some merch giveaway. We'll have some dope shirts that are
Speaker 1: like like think about operation in north Woods, you know,
Speaker 1: and then like instead of like have it like in
Speaker 1: Backwoods font you know, yeah, operation and then on a
Speaker 1: T shirt type shit, you know, something like that. You know,
Speaker 1: like it'd be cool to kind of get in it. So,
Speaker 1: you know, if you guys like the idea throwing some
Speaker 1: ideas you may have, I'm sure you guys are more
Speaker 1: creative than us with that. We'll get into the subscription
Speaker 1: premium page. We're gonna be doing. We'd love for you
Speaker 1: guys to hop on there whenever we get it up
Speaker 1: and going. We're gonna have bonus episodes, live feeds, live interaction, merch, giveaways,
Speaker 1: whole deal. It's gonna be for a bargain. You're gonna
Speaker 1: love it. We got to turn this into a business.
Speaker 1: We want to do this for your full time. So.
Speaker 1: The Ring of Fire is a horseshoe shaped zone around
Speaker 1: the Pacific Ocean known for a high volcanic and seismic activity.
Speaker 1: If you didn't know that, and apparently it's been getting
Speaker 1: a little, uh, it's been getting wild. It's been experiencing
Speaker 1: ongoing volcanic activity, with some volcanoes showing current eruptions and
Speaker 1: others under height and monitoring. So I don't know about
Speaker 1: Yellowstone because that's not even in the specific, but it's
Speaker 1: definitely had some stuff going on. Underwater volcano off the
Speaker 1: coast of Oregon, Axial Seamount is predicted to erupt in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: Sick, they're all fucking they're all talking about them being
Speaker 2: predicted to erupt though.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the Hawaii volcanoes, they got several volcanoes erupt in there.
Speaker 1: There's not good time to go there. Yeah, it's probably
Speaker 1: why Zuckerberg's over here expanding his land. I wonder if
Speaker 1: it has anything a movie about that.
Speaker 2: There's a movie about a family going to a vacation
Speaker 2: in Hawaii and then fucking volcano erupts.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, I haven't seen it.
Speaker 2: Well seether that or tsunami either way. Yeah, you want
Speaker 2: to Hawaii during something like that? Fucked don't do it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it is very don't, especially for the price. All right,
Speaker 1: well let's get into the Samsung white papers. There's a
Speaker 1: little detour current events kind of going on and crazy patents.
Speaker 1: Go look into those, man, those are nuts. Maybe you
Speaker 1: guys can find a little I just saw that right
Speaker 1: before we kind of got in here. I figured I
Speaker 1: throw it on here. So you guys, you know, if
Speaker 1: we got any self researchers, you know, we would love
Speaker 1: some independent research. You throw it at us. We gotta
Speaker 1: you know, Gmail in our description, get down in there
Speaker 1: and give us some love. So we've got our research
Speaker 1: white paper, Samsung's positions on holographic reality as a core
Speaker 1: pillar of future six G era experiences. Yeah, we can
Speaker 1: have you pull that up. I'm gonna go off my notes.
Speaker 1: They're twenty twenty six g white paper anticipates hyper connected
Speaker 1: services like immerse XR anti fidelity mobile holograms, and it's
Speaker 1: going to be commercialized, targeted for twenty twenty eight to
Speaker 1: twenty thirty. I wonder if we'll have time we can
Speaker 1: get into Agenda twenty thirty. You should put the Genda
Speaker 1: twenty thirty breakdown of it. Maybe you can find somebody
Speaker 1: that's done it, because yeah, dude, it's got a lot
Speaker 1: to do with this stuff. Okay. Technical innovations that they
Speaker 1: have planned are slim panel hollow displays. The researchers at
Speaker 1: Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology developed a slim panel holographic
Speaker 1: video display published in Nature Communications after eight years of prototype.
Speaker 1: This marks a leap of bulky lasers to realistic phase
Speaker 1: controlled holograms in compact form. So, in other words, that
Speaker 1: teleportation holographic stuff. I mean that could be this is
Speaker 1: the beginnings of that. But this is published in early
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, so maybe it's a little farther than
Speaker 1: the beginning. Protector and smart Glasses patent has came out.
Speaker 1: A recent patent reveals a portable projector paired with smart glasses.
Speaker 1: It's employing an LCD spatial light. It's got modular and
Speaker 1: background illumination waller ceiling mounted for extended reality visuals, real
Speaker 1: world demos and showcases. In London, Samsung launched a large
Speaker 1: scale holographic projection display marine live sports highlights and it
Speaker 1: always to promote a kind of like a Galaxy AI
Speaker 1: feature ahead of head of the unpacked I guess they
Speaker 1: call it, which is the new program they have for
Speaker 1: this holographic features. Pretty nuts, Okay, let's get into the
Speaker 1: weird shit though. Samsung visions hollow reality is a hallmark
Speaker 1: at six sheet requiring bandwidth from a sub THC or
Speaker 1: mm wave ultra low latency and AI native networks. So
Speaker 1: that's what requires which is why the big beautiful bill.
Speaker 1: You have a lot of the infrastructure that they need
Speaker 1: with bandwidth and whatnot that was involved in that and
Speaker 1: how they were gonna essentially penalized states if they had
Speaker 1: tried to fight like the AI development and they scraped that,
Speaker 1: remember the ten year moratorium, but they still kept it
Speaker 1: in there where where it's not a ten year moratorium.
Speaker 1: But if you do try to fuck around as a state,
Speaker 1: they can still penalize you with the bandwidth, So I say,
Speaker 1: I hope my state fucks with them. Said way, they
Speaker 1: can't get the bandwidth that they need to create the
Speaker 1: six G holographic reality that they want to create. Like
Speaker 1: if I prefer our state just says fuck you guys.
Speaker 1: But they're actually building data centers here in our state.
Speaker 1: I wonder if they are in yours. You guys should
Speaker 1: tell us if you have new data centers being built
Speaker 1: in your state. I would look into it. I know
Speaker 1: Minnesota does, Texas does. Missouri's got a few that they're trying,
Speaker 1: but a lot of people are actually trying to fight it.
Speaker 1: And I recommend that you do because they're just trying
Speaker 1: to build the infrastructure to make this reality. Five years
Speaker 1: man twenty thirty. These holograms, used alongside alongside XR, digital
Speaker 1: twins and smart glasses, reflect deep integration into Samsung's broader
Speaker 1: metaverse and and augmented reality plans. So the next steps.
Speaker 1: In other words, just to break it down, the DHR
Speaker 1: initiative is strategically anchored in six G and XR technology.
Speaker 1: They've achieved breakthroughs in slim holographic panels and compact R
Speaker 1: augmented reality optics. They file patented patents on holograms, projectors
Speaker 1: and demonstrated large scale visuals and wearable devices. Still challenges
Speaker 1: remain and miniatureized processing bandwidth and consumer adoption. Now, this
Speaker 1: is just what they've done so far. So if we
Speaker 1: break down this bio signal sensing device that they've patented
Speaker 1: with Apple, you know, you could see that all of
Speaker 1: these companies are at different levels of what they've kind
Speaker 1: of achieved. Okay, so like Samsung seems like they're in
Speaker 1: a more rudimentary phase, and like they're focusing on holograms.
Speaker 1: I think some of these companies are focusing on certain
Speaker 1: things more than others. It is that they could bring
Speaker 1: it all together in a synergistic way, you see what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. So, like Apple is more focused on the
Speaker 1: wearable biosensing devices like your earbuds, your watches, right your
Speaker 1: Apple Watch and your phones. It's equipped with multiple electrodes
Speaker 1: that dynamically select which ones to activate. It can detect
Speaker 1: biological signals such as brain activity, muscle activity, or your
Speaker 1: heart rate, which we know that because of your watch
Speaker 1: if you have one. But yeah, uses AI to optimize
Speaker 1: this new patent though is totally different. It uses AI
Speaker 1: to optimize electrode uses based on signal strength or location.
Speaker 1: This one, I'm pretty sure is one that can read
Speaker 1: your thought thoughts. The AirPods, we'll get into it. I'm
Speaker 1: pretty sure this is the one. UH. The device architecture
Speaker 1: appears similar to Apple's AirPods retrofitted with biometric sensors, so
Speaker 1: it's AirPods, but they seem to have that tech. Implications
Speaker 1: are that the neural interfaces and surveillance is going to
Speaker 1: be possible with something like this. Of course here it
Speaker 1: is here, it is okay, so yeah. Brain signal sensing
Speaker 1: essentially is that they're they can read your passing thoughts,
Speaker 1: your emotion and detect Yeah, you're like mood via these earbuds.
Speaker 1: That's stupid.
Speaker 2: I don't want anything knowing my thoughts.
Speaker 1: No, AI selects electros based on this signal is strongest,
Speaker 1: effectively mapping or biology in real time. So this is
Speaker 1: all mixed together by the way one device UH emotion
Speaker 1: should add attention mapping, which I think ties into the
Speaker 1: first thing we talked about. With enough data neural correlate
Speaker 1: UH correlations of attention, anxiety, and arousal can be inferred,
Speaker 1: so they can like hit you with ads depending on
Speaker 1: like what it. Oh he this dude got a half
Speaker 1: chubb whenever we showed him this, you know this, or
Speaker 1: like he got pretty pissed off whenever we showed him this.
Speaker 1: You know. Oh that's nuts, that's nuts.
Speaker 2: Oh fuck, that's gonna be pretty fucking wild if you
Speaker 2: uh willingly you know, install that. That's pretty much what
Speaker 2: it is. You're installing that ship.
Speaker 1: And yeah, but now they're trying to make it to
Speaker 1: where like all right, if you don't take neuralink, just
Speaker 1: get the new earbuds, like, if you get the new AirPods,
Speaker 1: it's going to.
Speaker 2: Be doing it, you know neuralink dude, Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: So all this is going to be combined, and then
Speaker 1: this will give Apple's existing sensors, uh the ability to
Speaker 1: predictively predict your behavior, which kind of gets in with
Speaker 1: the Palanteer Like this is just one big data collecting service,
Speaker 1: so they can hand it over to Palenteer, which analyzes
Speaker 1: data and predicts behavior. But they're hitting you from multiple
Speaker 1: angles though. That's the freaky part.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's no escape from this shit. No, It's like
Speaker 2: they're they're implementing anything like they're they're plugging all the loopholes.
Speaker 1: Pretty much, dude, every every company is aligned with it
Speaker 1: because you think, pardon me, you know, you think like
Speaker 1: black Rock has and State Guard and State treat Vandguard
Speaker 1: and then they all have like major steaks in each
Speaker 1: of these companies which are doing this, and then they
Speaker 1: each have major steaks in each other. So essentially there
Speaker 1: it's one big company, like super venture capitalist company. It
Speaker 1: owns everything, and then they have one agenda and then
Speaker 1: every company is doing the same agenda with their different objectives,
Speaker 1: right and then boom, it's crazy. It's like spider web,
Speaker 1: you know. Yeah, you think, like you know, at the
Speaker 1: core of it, you'll find those that kind of going on,
Speaker 1: and then you know, if you weren't looking at it,
Speaker 1: you'd be like, man, how come you know this company,
Speaker 1: this little company like Oreos or whatever, you know, owned
Speaker 1: by Nabisco, it's owned by this, it's on by that,
Speaker 1: you know, And then it starts to make sense why
Speaker 1: they're trying to kill you just like every other company,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, because it's all under one umbrella.
Speaker 1: But yeah, and we know that about food, but of
Speaker 1: course it's like that with everything, even technology.
Speaker 2: Everything is owned by a much larger company.
Speaker 1: In another tab and another tab, you should pull up
Speaker 1: a breakdown of Sam sam Altman's interview with THEO Vaughn.
Speaker 1: I think we should go over that as well. It's
Speaker 1: pretty much like chat EBT. They had a whole conversation
Speaker 1: about like our future with AI, and I think that
Speaker 1: this will go hand in hand with what we're talking
Speaker 1: about later, so I just want to have that tabbed
Speaker 1: up for later. So, yeah, that stuff is not science
Speaker 1: fiction that we were talking about. Pretty much all of
Speaker 1: it is a part of startups already, like Neurable, next Mind,
Speaker 1: and Kernel. So look those up and you'll see that
Speaker 1: they are already doing these EEG, AirPod crazy whatever. So Apple, Meta, Microsoft,
Speaker 1: Google all are developing BCEI adjacent technologies, which is obviously
Speaker 1: I didn't define that, but we'll break it down. Meta
Speaker 1: neurally controlled augmented reality interfaces, Microsoft with emotion AI, biofeedback patents,
Speaker 1: and Google with biofeedback and wearable platform. See how all
Speaker 1: these go together with the EEG and AirPods. And like
Speaker 1: I said, Blackrock, major institutional investor across all these companies,
Speaker 1: benefits from supports tech capable of mass psycho graphic targeting
Speaker 1: because they make money off these companies that are targeting
Speaker 1: you with these ads. And the more these ads are
Speaker 1: primed up and on point, the more that they make money.
Speaker 1: A step towards neural targeting advertising essentially, like I said,
Speaker 1: a passive cognitive monitoring system is going to be in place,
Speaker 1: and then the earbuds as new neural interface normalizing continuous
Speaker 1: biofeedback collections. So in other words, get wired headphones and
Speaker 1: get rid of your smart devices as far as like
Speaker 1: besides your phone, you know, like your watch and your headphones.
Speaker 1: It's all being used as this Internet of things for
Speaker 1: your Internet of bodies, where your wearables don't just track steps,
Speaker 1: it can map your brain wave patterns and emotional responses
Speaker 1: in real time. So yeah, Apple's patent, Okay, Okay, Trump's
Speaker 1: big beautiful bill. We'll get into that because I did
Speaker 1: touch on that and how that's kind of funding this
Speaker 1: forty five billion in the new DHS ICE infrastructure, including surveillance,
Speaker 1: AI data centers and biometric enrollment biometric expansion mandates like
Speaker 1: facial iris in DNA. There's gonna be smart border technology, sensors, drones,
Speaker 1: AI controlled surveillance towers. I mean, this is really going
Speaker 1: to get dystopy and very fast digital ID systems to
Speaker 1: sink private and governmental data. I'm not just listing things off.
Speaker 1: There's forty five billion dollars going into this infrastructure in
Speaker 1: the big beautiful bill, a fusion of center integration with
Speaker 1: the DHS, big tech for real time collaboration. So it's
Speaker 1: not about illegals, it's about codifying the AI police state,
Speaker 1: which has finally coming to fruition under national security pretenses
Speaker 1: which they always use. That We've talked about that before.
Speaker 1: You got to point at the enemy. Oh we got
Speaker 1: to watch out for that boogeyman, so let locked down
Speaker 1: the fucking country more. That's always what it ends up being.
Speaker 1: Domestic citizens under threat, monitoring, misinformation and mental health initiatives
Speaker 1: are going to be what we got to look out
Speaker 1: for with our citizenship past the illegals, because that's going
Speaker 1: to be how they get us. So just saying watch
Speaker 1: out for that shit, you know, because what if, because
Speaker 1: you know, you never know, man, the Alligator Alley might
Speaker 1: not be for illegals.
Speaker 2: They're fucking you know, dude, they're fucking coming for our asses.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and you know even if it was, you know,
Speaker 1: let's look a little deeper, you know, because I don't
Speaker 1: think it's just about ads, you know. They I feel
Speaker 1: like they let us know because we've already kind of
Speaker 1: like let it slide, yea that like, yeah, we're making
Speaker 1: patents so we can make better ads. You know, like
Speaker 1: what can you hate us? You know, you live in
Speaker 1: a capital society, right, But I think it's deeper than that,
Speaker 1: where it's a little bit darker, and that's the pre
Speaker 1: crime scoring shit where you just kind of know, you
Speaker 1: analyze and know everybody's behavior type and what they'll do
Speaker 1: and what they might not. You know, all that, you've
Speaker 1: got the mood instability, you can check the reactions to conflicts.
Speaker 1: You've got group psychology where you put people inside of
Speaker 1: their little reality tunnels and then you know you can
Speaker 1: predict when they're going to turn into nut jobs, you know.
Speaker 1: So there's a program called Global Information Dominance Experiments that
Speaker 1: you should look into called Guide for Short GIDE Project,
Speaker 1: MAVEN Military AI Imagery Threat Scoring. So there's a lot
Speaker 1: of little projects going on, like cognitive modeling and emotion
Speaker 1: trapping with IARPA projects, which is like DARPA but it's LARPA.
Speaker 1: So yeah, geo fencing with earbuds six G and AI
Speaker 1: policy enforcement, you're scan for compliance to ideology in your brain.
Speaker 1: You can be scanned to make sure you're actually complying,
Speaker 1: like mentally to what you're being told. And then you
Speaker 1: could have biometric nudging become the normal, like dopamine whenever
Speaker 1: you like, you get a dopamine hit from these internal
Speaker 1: wearables or whatever, and then they kind of get you
Speaker 1: to kind of be a pavlo v in reaction to
Speaker 1: your mind control. It's really fucking crazy. So free thought
Speaker 1: becomes a risk monitored through brain wave and biofeedback loops.
Speaker 1: So in other words, even if you're acting like you're
Speaker 1: going with the flow, but in your head you're against it,
Speaker 1: they'll know. So just saying it's gide oh shit, Trump's
Speaker 1: build doesn't build a weapon, but it's gonna be. It's
Speaker 1: building the infrastructure for it, and all these tech bros
Speaker 1: and everything are gonna they've got it already, and the
Speaker 1: weapon will be a civilian biocloud of thought data, and
Speaker 1: it's gonna for forecast and control people. So, in other words,
Speaker 1: a new immigration bill, you got to worry about digital
Speaker 1: ID things like that. So whenever they're using national security
Speaker 1: for an issue, So for instance, whenever there's a new
Speaker 1: AirPod sensor that Apple's saying, oh check this out, you
Speaker 1: got to watch out for the biometric verification type technology
Speaker 1: that they might be sneaking into there, things like that.
Speaker 1: So it's always something underneath what they're trying to offer
Speaker 1: to you. All right, what have we got here? DoD
Speaker 1: Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office, So six Global Global
Speaker 1: Information Dominance Experiment. We're excited to enhance globally integrated operations
Speaker 1: through workflows that allow faster, more data informed, human in
Speaker 1: the loop decisions. So the artificial intelligence, it's strengthening industry
Speaker 1: integration and collaboration domestically and within our allies part as abroad.
Speaker 1: So wait, what do we uh? We aim to push
Speaker 1: the boundaries of our current systems to process this iteration leveraging.
Speaker 1: Who is it?
Speaker 2: What is it?
Speaker 1: Go down a little bit, sorry, we'll get we'll get
Speaker 1: down to it. Oh what the hell? Oh the Department
Speaker 1: of Defense? Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah yeah. So this is
Speaker 1: about them using AI for for our war fighters. That's
Speaker 1: what it is. I missed that at the top. Do
Speaker 1: they're integrate in the AI with the war Man. I'm
Speaker 1: telling you, I think that when was this posted, because
Speaker 1: this was supposed a couple of years ago. Dude, Yeah, dude,
Speaker 1: whenever they went to Iran and yeah, they we talked
Speaker 1: about how they used AI to predictively police or predictively
Speaker 1: yuh see if they were gonna have nukes or not.
Speaker 1: I think they were testing out this predictive you know,
Speaker 1: policing there. Okay, go up to the next tab, the
Speaker 1: open AI sam Autman. All right, So I watched some
Speaker 1: of this interview and Sam Olmon did a very good
Speaker 1: job at and I'm not trying to take anything away
Speaker 1: from him. He really could be a human. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying he's not human, but I'm just saying that the
Speaker 1: way he spoke seemed like maybe we could find a clip.
Speaker 1: It's just I guess he made it sound like this
Speaker 1: is gonna be a great future. We could probably use
Speaker 1: AI and robots to do everything for us, and he
Speaker 1: was thinking of all these different ways we could just
Speaker 1: get rich without being handed money, but having a stake
Speaker 1: in the future and things like that. But then whenever
Speaker 1: Theovanne started asking like real questions, kind of like I
Speaker 1: feel like the economic financial part of it is the
Speaker 1: one that doesn't make sense, and that's how is everybody
Speaker 1: going to have money? And also how like other countries
Speaker 1: things like that. He really didn't have an answer, and
Speaker 1: I think that they haven't really thought about it. And
Speaker 1: he even said, he's like, we don't know what's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: We just know we're making this and it's gonna go
Speaker 1: where it goes. It's a little freaky. So it says
Speaker 1: right here, people talk about the most personal shit in
Speaker 1: their lives to chat GBT. Young people especially use it
Speaker 1: as a therapist life coach, having these relationship problems and
Speaker 1: asking what should I do? And right now, if you
Speaker 1: talk to a therapist, lawyer, or doctor about those problems,
Speaker 1: there are legal privileges for uh, there's doctor patient confidentiality,
Speaker 1: there's legal confidentiality, and we haven't figured out yet for
Speaker 1: when you talk to chat GIBT. So in other words,
Speaker 1: there's no confidentiality and people are talking to this way
Speaker 1: too personal. And he also talked about how they're kind
Speaker 1: of getting they're going crazy a little bit. They're talking
Speaker 1: to it too much like it's their only friend, and
Speaker 1: he even worries about that now what I worry about
Speaker 1: is that they're going to try to censor what CHATCHBT
Speaker 1: says to you because of the psychosis that people are
Speaker 1: experiencing from talking to it about crazy shit, right, And
Speaker 1: I worry about and responses.
Speaker 2: I mean, I don't even use it that often. I
Speaker 2: just use it to kind of prepare for the show.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that, you know, AI is not going
Speaker 1: to be this free for all you can use it
Speaker 1: for like insider trading or make money off of it,
Speaker 1: like he's trying to say, I think they're gonna censor
Speaker 1: it more. They're gonna treat it like the new Internet,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna get rid of the Internet, and then
Speaker 1: all of the information has been put on that Internet
Speaker 1: that has gotten away from them will be gone and
Speaker 1: it'll be controlled answers, programmable answers that stay within the
Speaker 1: guidelines and the boundaries of what they are willing to
Speaker 1: let you know. And that is, uh, that's worrisome.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I don't love the idea of.
Speaker 2: That they're gonna pick and choose. It's gonna be a funnel,
Speaker 2: not only goer to be certain information funnel to you.
Speaker 2: Everything else is gonna be left out on purpose. Oh, yeah, no.
Speaker 1: Exactly, so real quick, I'm gonna bounce back and forth
Speaker 1: a little bit. Yeah, I just think that, you know,
Speaker 1: you guys should go watch that for sure. You tell me.
Speaker 1: Do you think he was being sincere? Because he sounded
Speaker 1: sincere for a while, but then it got to a
Speaker 1: point where I was like, yeah, I think this guy's bullshiting. Man,
Speaker 1: there's some bullshit being speared. But hey, maybe I don't know. Shit.
Speaker 1: I just think that there was these different spots where
Speaker 1: I was like, oh that was he's Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't like, you've got the orb yeah everything that
Speaker 2: what everything I've seen, he just doesn't seem like that.
Speaker 2: He's not a trustable guy. I mean, ship he might
Speaker 2: be a child, dude, I don't know.
Speaker 1: But he talked about his kid. Dude, the part where
Speaker 1: he talked about his kid, and he was like, what
Speaker 1: do you love most about like being a dad and
Speaker 1: the kid? And he literally goes, you know, every day
Speaker 1: he just grows and learns more and more and explodes
Speaker 1: and growth in learning. And I'm like, that is how
Speaker 1: you would That's what you say about your AI all
Speaker 1: the time, Like you you're you're you're giving the same
Speaker 1: answer that you would give him about your AI, Like
Speaker 1: that's the type of answer that an AI person would give.
Speaker 1: You know what I'm saying, like that would be your
Speaker 1: first kid. Yeah, He's like, it's just explosion and learning
Speaker 1: and talk. And I'm like, dude, you're just thinking this
Speaker 1: term of which I get it. He might be biased
Speaker 1: towards the mental development and growth of his child. I
Speaker 1: get that, but also it's like, come on, bro, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't know, because he just he said that off
Speaker 1: the cuff. After he said he was getting real deep
Speaker 1: about how like, oh, it's just there's so many cliche
Speaker 1: things you could say about having a kid and this
Speaker 1: and that, And I was like, this guy's just trying
Speaker 1: so hard to be human. I don't know. I think
Speaker 1: these guys are trying to get out here and trying
Speaker 1: to be human for people to show that they're not
Speaker 1: the devil. And I think that, you know, they might
Speaker 1: be awkward, they might be whatever, and maybe it just
Speaker 1: comes off this way, but it seems to me disingenuous
Speaker 1: of just like, look, we're not really the bad guys,
Speaker 1: but there it feels like they're hiding something. Maybe it's
Speaker 1: out of their awkwardness of what they're trying to do.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think it is just because they're so awkward.
Speaker 2: It seems like they're hiding something. Yeah, because you could
Speaker 2: say the same for like Zuck too, Like any public
Speaker 2: appearance he has, he seemed he always seems like he's
Speaker 2: got some fucked information that he's trying to hold on
Speaker 2: to and he's can't let it go. I don't trust him,
Speaker 2: but he's like, I'm a cool guy.
Speaker 1: You sitting like this the whole time. They all dropped
Speaker 1: out of college. Every one of them dropped out of college.
Speaker 1: It's just as weird, like everybody's got the same exact story. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, it's like, yeah, it gets old. You know,
Speaker 1: it's the military, it is.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a classic dropped out, started this business, now
Speaker 2: I'm a billionaire.
Speaker 1: Yeah, great story.
Speaker 2: It is recycled a lot though.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But these guys, you know, these guys are being
Speaker 1: sworn into the military. Is like commanders, your colonels or something.
Speaker 1: All these tech guys are being sworn into the military.
Speaker 1: So what we just read the gid Defense Department letter.
Speaker 1: So a part of that is the fact that these
Speaker 1: tech guys are going to be a part of the military.
Speaker 1: No boot camp or anything. But they are going to
Speaker 1: be E one, e five whatever, so like a low
Speaker 1: military colonel whatever, because they're going to be using this
Speaker 1: in the military. So because they're going to need to
Speaker 1: be helping out or giving pointers to generals, they have
Speaker 1: to be a part of the military, I guess. But
Speaker 1: I just think that's so crazy. We're integrating them with
Speaker 1: the military. Unprecedented fascism at its highest level. I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't see how people don't see this. These are companies,
Speaker 1: beat billionaire CEOs now being a part of our government,
Speaker 1: in our military and have control of it. This is
Speaker 1: getting crazy. I don't know why.
Speaker 2: Why.
Speaker 1: So within the big beautiful Bill, we got a couple
Speaker 1: more things, massive biometric and AI funding one hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty five billion in total to border and deportation enforcement
Speaker 1: with those drones and AI towers we talked about. There's
Speaker 1: also six billion for AI based systems like facial recognitions,
Speaker 1: drone towers, and network surveillance. Six hundred and seventy three
Speaker 1: million is earmarked as well for biometric systems scanners, which
Speaker 1: is going to go towards US as well. I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: So there's going to be air gap drones, a surveillance tower,
Speaker 1: non intrusive inspections, AI driven social media monitoring, uh oh,
Speaker 1: license plate recognition, predictive policing of threat behavior. This is
Speaker 1: on the Guardian nationwide Drone detection, surveillance five hundred million
Speaker 1: plus uas, towers, and CT imaging automated screening as well.
Speaker 1: So essentially all those little like you know cameras that
Speaker 1: you see that are on the highways and the roads
Speaker 1: and the stop lights, and then they say, oh, it's
Speaker 1: a stop light camera for if you run the light.
Speaker 1: And then eventually people got rid of them within their
Speaker 1: states because they're like, you can't even improve if I
Speaker 1: was the one driving, my friend borrowed the car. So
Speaker 1: they ended up being like, okay, fine, we're not gonna
Speaker 1: send you tickets. In a lot of counties they did that, right,
Speaker 1: but they left the cameras there. That's because they were
Speaker 1: for this. They weren't for that.
Speaker 2: You know what I just thought of, like, imagine you're
Speaker 2: fucking flying. You're in a park and you're just flying
Speaker 2: your drone and you just hear like a quick alarm
Speaker 2: and a pop in your drone just get shot out
Speaker 2: of the sky because unauthorized bro.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, you know, you have to have like an
Speaker 1: FAA license to be able to even fly those in
Speaker 1: the air. Stupid. Yeah, yeah, you have to be like
Speaker 1: fully licensed now to drive a drone in the air
Speaker 1: at all.
Speaker 2: Some dad just took his kid to the mall and
Speaker 2: bought a freaking seventy five dollars drone go flying in
Speaker 2: the park and it just gets shot.
Speaker 1: Out of the sky. Oh yeah, dude, I know. So
Speaker 1: pretty much. What we're driving at is we were walking
Speaker 1: into this technocratic world that we've been, you know that
Speaker 1: we're here to talk about and the normalization of you know,
Speaker 1: neuro surveillance through earbuds because people think it's just normal
Speaker 1: for it to check on your brain, make sure your
Speaker 1: mood's good, and then your watch can tell you to
Speaker 1: take a breath, you know. It's like, yeah, takes a
Speaker 1: little deeper. It's a little deeper than that though, because
Speaker 1: they're actually sending that shit to the data centers and
Speaker 1: following out your every move and your heart beats. It's
Speaker 1: it's very very much intrusive, centralized under AI system oversight
Speaker 1: consolidated at the federal level to bypass your protections, and
Speaker 1: then the predictive enforcement, behavioral and cognitive data for risk scoring,
Speaker 1: deviation flags and suspicion before any crimes. And we hammer
Speaker 1: it this a lot, but I just want to point
Speaker 1: this all out again because I believe that we're we're
Speaker 1: walking into it, dude. So this patent, if you want
Speaker 1: to know the Apple pattern is US twenty twenty three
Speaker 1: zero two two five six five nine A one on
Speaker 1: the dynamic Biosignal earbuds. You can look that up on
Speaker 1: Google Patents and we'll have justin put up a little
Speaker 1: picture of it. You know, we'll actually put it up
Speaker 1: just so you could see it and then you can
Speaker 1: look at it, pause the thing and look at it,
Speaker 1: or go look at yourself. Either way, this is real shit.
Speaker 1: So yeah, what else? We got one big beautiful bill
Speaker 1: funding breakdown. You can look that up on the Guardian.
Speaker 1: And then the AI moratorium surveillance mandates. You can look
Speaker 1: that up on the Verge and you can see that
Speaker 1: the moratorium did get striked, but it didn't fully get
Speaker 1: striked because if you do, you can get penalized. Still,
Speaker 1: it's just not a ten year moratorium, so it is different.
Speaker 1: That's the way they fuck around you with vocabulary. I'm
Speaker 1: telling you.
Speaker 2: So.
Speaker 1: It's been a short chill pod. We're doing a short one.
Speaker 1: Like I said, I'm going to be going on another
Speaker 1: pod after this. We're gonna be talking about a little
Speaker 1: bit of Theosophical Society Helena Bovatski type stuff. If you
Speaker 1: guys are interested, highly recommend checking that out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it'd be exciting.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it'll be out this week. Yeah, I'm excited about
Speaker 1: that as well. We'll probably put it out on our
Speaker 1: page as well, but you can check it on theirs
Speaker 1: as well if you want. Yeah. I hopefully you guys enjoyed.
Speaker 1: Broke down the Samsung white papers as well as a
Speaker 1: couple of tech patents that are going on right now.
Speaker 1: They're building the matrix system around us. The one big
Speaker 1: beautiful Bill has made that possible. Get out out there
Speaker 1: and say something. Man, get out there and talk to
Speaker 1: people about it. Get people aware. We'll see you next week. Hopefully,
Speaker 1: enjoy everything. We've got a lot of fun shit coming man,
Speaker 1: you guys, stay tuned.