WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.040 --> 00:00:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Today, I want to tell you about a journey that

2
00:00:01.600 --> 00:00:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I've been on for most of my life. Ever since

3
00:00:03.919 --> 00:00:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, I've heard tales of bigfoot and

4
00:00:05.839 --> 00:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>wild men while spending time with my friends and family.

5
00:00:09.039 --> 00:00:11.439
<v Speaker 1>As I grew older and read more about the paranormal,

6
00:00:11.599 --> 00:00:14.679
<v Speaker 1>my interest in encryptids and other things strange only deepened.

7
00:00:15.240 --> 00:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm so excited to share with you what

8
00:00:17.199 --> 00:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I've personally become involved with the Untold Radio Network. The

9
00:00:21.719 --> 00:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Untold Radio Network is a live streaming podcast network that

10
00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:29.359
<v Speaker 1>airs a new show every day across all podcast platforms, YouTube,

11
00:00:29.359 --> 00:00:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and more. They have eight different shows on all sorts

12
00:00:32.159 --> 00:00:36.119
<v Speaker 1>of exciting topics such as bigfoot, cryptids, UFOs, aliens, and

13
00:00:36.200 --> 00:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>much more. I even have my own show called Weird Encounters,

14
00:00:39.479 --> 00:00:42.439
<v Speaker 1>where I talk about all things strange. This is more

15
00:00:42.479 --> 00:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>than just a podcast network. It's a community that allows

16
00:00:45.320 --> 00:00:47.759
<v Speaker 1>me to meet so many amazing people who share their

17
00:00:47.799 --> 00:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>stories and experiences with strange. If you're interested in hearing

18
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>more of these stories and learning more about the paranormal

19
00:00:53.960 --> 00:00:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and encryptids, make sure you check out the Untold Radio

20
00:00:56.759 --> 00:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Network for all kinds of exciting shows. It's free to subscribe.

21
00:01:00.679 --> 00:01:04.439
<v Speaker 1>So what are you waiting for visit www dot untold

22
00:01:04.519 --> 00:01:06.519
<v Speaker 1>radionetwork dot com today.

23
00:01:06.760 --> 00:01:11.599
<v Speaker 2>Open up to annot a s are there something in

24
00:01:11.640 --> 00:01:17.719
<v Speaker 2>the woods? Anato to what you're about to see? Or

25
00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:22.799
<v Speaker 2>something in the woods? Knock in the park contanger ry

26
00:01:23.000 --> 00:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>The ooman said, non, go outside, there's something in the

27
00:01:26.159 --> 00:01:26.920
<v Speaker 2>woods tonight.

28
00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I hear rim knocking, shaking bushits.

29
00:01:29.280 --> 00:01:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Footprints howling on my lung.

30
00:01:31.359 --> 00:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Open up to anat a.

31
00:01:32.920 --> 00:01:34.959
<v Speaker 2>S something in the woods.

32
00:01:35.560 --> 00:01:38.599
<v Speaker 1>Before I release my exclusive sit down interview with Ron

33
00:01:38.680 --> 00:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Moorehead where we discussed the unreleased Sierra Sounds, the recording setup,

34
00:01:43.400 --> 00:01:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and other compelling evidence that Ron and his team gathered

35
00:01:46.239 --> 00:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at their remote campsite, I wanted to share something fascinating

36
00:01:49.680 --> 00:01:53.159
<v Speaker 1>with you. For those of you unfamiliar with the Sierra Sounds,

37
00:01:53.400 --> 00:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they are some of the most famous and hotly debated

38
00:01:55.959 --> 00:02:02.239
<v Speaker 1>audio recordings of purported Bigfoot vocalizations ever captured. Researchers, skeptics,

39
00:02:02.239 --> 00:02:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and believers alike have analyzed these sounds for decades, attempting

40
00:02:06.239 --> 00:02:10.719
<v Speaker 1>to determine their authenticity and origin. But today I want

41
00:02:10.759 --> 00:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>to highlight a particularly intriguing study that applies advanced signal

42
00:02:14.680 --> 00:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>processing techniques to analyze these vocalizations in a scientific manner.

43
00:02:20.439 --> 00:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>This study, conducted by r. Lynn Kurlin and LASSA. Hurdle,

44
00:02:24.439 --> 00:02:28.039
<v Speaker 1>focuses on estimating pitch and vocal tracked length from these

45
00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>recordings to determine whether the sounds could have come from

46
00:02:30.800 --> 00:02:34.759
<v Speaker 1>a human or an unknown species. Their findings are nothing

47
00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:38.599
<v Speaker 1>short of astonishing. Curlin and Hurtel received a tape recording

48
00:02:38.639 --> 00:02:41.719
<v Speaker 1>in the spring of nineteen seventy seven containing what was

49
00:02:41.759 --> 00:02:46.479
<v Speaker 1>described as vocalizations of an unknown creature. The recordings were

50
00:02:46.479 --> 00:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>originally captured on October twenty first, nineteen seventy two, by

51
00:02:50.599 --> 00:02:52.879
<v Speaker 1>journalist Al Berry and a group of others at an

52
00:02:52.919 --> 00:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>isolated campsite in the High Sierras of northern California for night.

53
00:02:58.479 --> 00:04:37.079
<v Speaker 2>They are dish means of this. He bay today. That's

54
00:04:37.199 --> 00:04:44.800
<v Speaker 2>les rum. That's right job. Don't know where we got

55
00:04:44.839 --> 00:05:05.600
<v Speaker 2>protection after sure he wo yoo.

56
00:05:09.160 --> 00:05:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Oo oo.

57
00:05:14.120 --> 00:05:14.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, hope to.

58
00:05:14.759 --> 00:05:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Do m.

59
00:05:19.000 --> 00:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, oh, m oh yes, yes, oh yes, oh.

60
00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:52.279
<v Speaker 2>A lot of money.

61
00:05:55.639 --> 00:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Or there's two of them across the creek at the

62
00:06:02.079 --> 00:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>big rocks.

63
00:06:09.240 --> 00:06:10.319
<v Speaker 2>It's so hard act to fall.

64
00:06:13.079 --> 00:06:14.759
<v Speaker 1>He sounds like he talked to ars and they talk

65
00:06:14.800 --> 00:06:15.199
<v Speaker 1>to each other.

66
00:06:15.560 --> 00:06:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Fair wow. That Why did you do that, Yah, that

67
00:06:45.720 --> 00:06:46.319
<v Speaker 2>don't go fore?

68
00:06:55.439 --> 00:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Wow?

69
00:06:56.519 --> 00:06:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Who's whom?

70
00:07:00.240 --> 00:07:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Character This remote location, situated at eight thousand, five hundred feet,

71
00:07:07.879 --> 00:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>was miles from the nearest road and only accessible by

72
00:07:11.079 --> 00:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>an arduous hike. Previous and subsequent recordings were made at

73
00:07:15.160 --> 00:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the same location, but the tape from this particular night

74
00:07:18.319 --> 00:07:21.959
<v Speaker 1>stood out due to its exceptional quality, allowing for direct

75
00:07:22.040 --> 00:07:26.879
<v Speaker 1>processing of the vocalizations without excessive filtering. The recorded sounds

76
00:07:26.920 --> 00:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>were varied and included speech like articulation, moans, whines, growls, grunts,

77
00:07:32.439 --> 00:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and even whistles, some of which no known primate other

78
00:07:36.040 --> 00:07:40.079
<v Speaker 1>than humans can produce. The researchers sought to analyze these

79
00:07:40.120 --> 00:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds using well established techniques to determine their authenticity and

80
00:07:44.360 --> 00:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>whether they could have been hoaxed. The first step in

81
00:07:47.279 --> 00:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>their analysis was to estimate pitch frequency, essentially the rate

82
00:07:51.519 --> 00:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>at which the vocal cords open and close. In general,

83
00:07:55.319 --> 00:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>lower pitch frequencies correlate with larger vocal cords, suggesting a

84
00:07:59.439 --> 00:08:03.199
<v Speaker 1>larger physical size of the speaker. The second key parameter

85
00:08:03.319 --> 00:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>they examined was the length of the vocal tract, which

86
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:10.639
<v Speaker 1>can be estimated from speech resonances known as formants. Vocal

87
00:08:10.720 --> 00:08:14.959
<v Speaker 1>tract length serves as another indicator of body size. When

88
00:08:15.040 --> 00:08:18.519
<v Speaker 1>they plotted these characteristics in comparison to human vocal ranges,

89
00:08:19.000 --> 00:08:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the results were striking. To further validate their findings, the

90
00:08:22.959 --> 00:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>researchers used multiple methods to estimate the vocal tract length.

91
00:08:27.360 --> 00:08:31.519
<v Speaker 1>These included measuring resonance frequencies in vowel sounds and applying

92
00:08:31.600 --> 00:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>statistical modeling based on known human vocal tract proportions. Using

93
00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>these techniques, they determined that the vocal tract length estimates

94
00:08:40.000 --> 00:08:43.919
<v Speaker 1>were significantly beyond human norms, pointing to a speaker of

95
00:08:44.039 --> 00:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>much greater size. The data extracted from the recording suggested

96
00:08:48.440 --> 00:08:52.759
<v Speaker 1>an astonishing conclusion. Based on pitch and vocal tract length,

97
00:08:53.120 --> 00:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the beings behind the vocalizations could be estimated to range

98
00:08:56.399 --> 00:08:59.519
<v Speaker 1>in height from six feet four inches to an incredible

99
00:08:59.559 --> 00:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>eight feet two inches. To ensure accuracy, the researchers tested

100
00:09:04.039 --> 00:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of tape speed alterations. If the tape had

101
00:09:07.720 --> 00:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>been slowed down, it would affect both pitch and vocal

102
00:09:10.519 --> 00:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>tract length estimates in a predictable way. However, their analysis

103
00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>found no evidence of such manipulation. The articulation rate remained

104
00:09:19.399 --> 00:09:22.639
<v Speaker 1>consistent with natural speech, and there were no anomalies that

105
00:09:22.639 --> 00:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>would suggest tampering with playback speed. Among the most intriguing

106
00:09:27.200 --> 00:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>elements of the recordings were whistle exchanges between the human

107
00:09:30.639 --> 00:09:35.399
<v Speaker 1>hunters and the unidentified creatures. While human whistling typically lacks

108
00:09:35.480 --> 00:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>formants or harmonics, some of the whistling on the tape

109
00:09:38.639 --> 00:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>exhibited unusual format structures, suggesting that if authentic, these beings

110
00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:46.559
<v Speaker 1>may have been capable of whistling using only a portion

111
00:09:46.720 --> 00:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of their vocal tract, a feature not observed in known primates. Alternatively,

112
00:09:52.519 --> 00:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the sounds could have been produced by an unknown musical

113
00:09:55.399 --> 00:09:59.159
<v Speaker 1>like instrument, though there is no evidence supporting that explanation.

114
00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Given the depth of analysis, Curlin and Hurtel addressed the

115
00:10:03.519 --> 00:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a human hoax. They considered whether a person

116
00:10:07.399 --> 00:10:10.919
<v Speaker 1>could have lowered their voice artificially, but found that maintaining

117
00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the deep pitches present on the recording at a consistent

118
00:10:13.759 --> 00:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>volume would be difficult for a human. The alternative pre

119
00:10:18.120 --> 00:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>recording speech and manipulating it through playback speed alterations was

120
00:10:22.320 --> 00:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>also ruled out due to the absence of certain expected anomalies.

121
00:10:26.919 --> 00:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Another theory was that the vocalizations were achieved through playing

122
00:10:30.000 --> 00:10:34.759
<v Speaker 1>a human speech recording backward at varying speeds. However, when

123
00:10:34.759 --> 00:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the researchers tested this by reversing the tape, no recognizable

124
00:10:38.759 --> 00:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>speech patterns emerged. Moreover, the data suggested the possibility of

125
00:10:43.600 --> 00:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>multiple speakers or even different species. Three distinct sets of

126
00:10:48.039 --> 00:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>footprints were found near the recording site the following morning,

127
00:10:51.519 --> 00:10:55.759
<v Speaker 1>further supporting this idea. Ultimately, the Curlin study found that

128
00:10:55.840 --> 00:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the vocal features on the tape did not match known

129
00:10:58.600 --> 00:11:02.039
<v Speaker 1>human speech patterns, nor did they fit within the expected

130
00:11:02.159 --> 00:11:06.519
<v Speaker 1>range of any known animal. The formant frequencies and vocal

131
00:11:06.600 --> 00:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>tracked lengths estimated from the recordings pointed toward at least

132
00:11:10.200 --> 00:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>one speaker of significantly larger size than a typical human male.

133
00:11:15.120 --> 00:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>While the possibility of an elaborate hoax cannot be entirely dismissed,

134
00:11:19.799 --> 00:11:23.919
<v Speaker 1>there was no clear evidence of manipulation. If these recordings

135
00:11:23.919 --> 00:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>are genuine, they could be one of the most important

136
00:11:26.360 --> 00:11:30.279
<v Speaker 1>pieces of evidence in the study of Bigfoot vocalizations. If

137
00:11:30.320 --> 00:11:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Bigfoot is ever definitively proven to exist, these recordings could

138
00:11:34.320 --> 00:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>offer a rare, invaluable glimpse into its communication and behavior.

139
00:11:39.399 --> 00:11:42.519
<v Speaker 1>As we prepare for my upcoming discussion with Ron Moorehead

140
00:11:42.600 --> 00:11:46.639
<v Speaker 1>on Friday's episode. Keep this analysis in mind. It adds

141
00:11:46.720 --> 00:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>yet another layer of credibility to the Sierra Sounds and

142
00:11:49.799 --> 00:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the mystery they represent. Another fascinating examination of the Sierra

143
00:11:54.559 --> 00:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>sounds came from retired US Navy crypto linguist Scott Nelson,

144
00:11:59.679 --> 00:12:04.279
<v Speaker 1>with extensive experience in deciphering unknown languages and coded transmissions.

145
00:12:04.840 --> 00:12:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Nelson applied his expertise to the Sierra sounds, aiming to

146
00:12:08.720 --> 00:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>determine if they contained elements of structured language. Nelson first

147
00:12:13.279 --> 00:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>became involved in the study after hearing the recordings and

148
00:12:15.960 --> 00:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>noticing patterns that resembled syntax and phonetic structure. He meticulously

149
00:12:21.320 --> 00:12:26.919
<v Speaker 1>transcribed portions of the recordings, identifying recurring sounds, potential syllables,

150
00:12:27.279 --> 00:12:31.519
<v Speaker 1>and rhythmic cadences that seemed to follow linguistic rules. His

151
00:12:31.639 --> 00:12:36.519
<v Speaker 1>analysis suggested that the vocalizations contained elements of morphology and syntax,

152
00:12:37.279 --> 00:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>leading him to propose that the creatures responsible for the

153
00:12:40.279 --> 00:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds might be communicating using a structured, albeit unknown language.

154
00:12:46.600 --> 00:12:50.399
<v Speaker 1>A crypto linguist is a specialized intelligence analyst who applies

155
00:12:50.519 --> 00:12:55.759
<v Speaker 1>linguistic skills to intercept, decipher, and interpret foreign communications, often

156
00:12:55.919 --> 00:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>encrypted or encoded. This profession is critical in military and

157
00:13:00.320 --> 00:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>intelligence operations as it aids in gathering and analyzing foreign

158
00:13:04.679 --> 00:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>signals intelligence to support national security efforts. Crypto Linguists primarily

159
00:13:10.559 --> 00:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>serve in branches such as the U. S. Army, Navy,

160
00:13:13.720 --> 00:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Air Force, and Marine Corps, working in classified environments, often

161
00:13:18.519 --> 00:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in conjunction with agencies like the National Security Agency, the

162
00:13:22.240 --> 00:13:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Defense Intelligence Agency, and the Central Intelligence Agency. They are

163
00:13:27.000 --> 00:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>trained in advanced language proficiency, cryptographic analysis, and pattern recognition

164
00:13:32.720 --> 00:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to break down messages that might be coded, encrypted, or

165
00:13:36.279 --> 00:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>deliberately obscured. To become a crypto linguist in the US military,

166
00:13:41.360 --> 00:13:46.879
<v Speaker 1>individuals typically undergo rigorous training, including language immersion. Many are

167
00:13:46.960 --> 00:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>trained at the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center in Monterey, California,

168
00:13:51.639 --> 00:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>where they learn strategic languages such as Arabic, Mandarin, Chinese, Russian, Farsi,

169
00:13:57.759 --> 00:14:01.519
<v Speaker 1>and others deemed critical to national security. Learning how to

170
00:14:01.600 --> 00:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>recognize encrypted patterns, identify hidden messages, and break down encoded communications.

171
00:14:08.279 --> 00:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Working with sophisticated interception technology to monitor foreign radio frequencies, transmissions,

172
00:14:14.480 --> 00:14:21.519
<v Speaker 1>and other communications. Advanced linguistic analysis beyond mere translation, crypto

173
00:14:21.600 --> 00:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>linguists analyzed syntax, dialects, colloquialisms, and cultural cues to interpret

174
00:14:27.559 --> 00:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>messages in their proper context. These specialists are often deployed

175
00:14:32.159 --> 00:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in combat zones, intelligence hubs, and strategic military bases, where

176
00:14:37.240 --> 00:14:41.679
<v Speaker 1>they monitor foreign adversaries communications and help decrypt intelligence that

177
00:14:41.759 --> 00:14:45.559
<v Speaker 1>could be crucial for national defense. With his background as

178
00:14:45.600 --> 00:14:49.039
<v Speaker 1>a Navy crypto linguist, Nelson became intrigued by the Sierra

179
00:14:49.200 --> 00:14:53.039
<v Speaker 1>sounds after his son played them for him. Skeptical at first,

180
00:14:53.240 --> 00:14:57.279
<v Speaker 1>he listened closely and quickly identified patterns and linguistic structures

181
00:14:57.320 --> 00:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that caught his attention. They tuned for more sasquatch ottesesy

182
00:15:01.799 --> 00:15:08.039
<v Speaker 1>will be right back after these messages. Here's how he

183
00:15:08.120 --> 00:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>approached the analysis. Nelson noted that the vocalizations followed distinct

184
00:15:13.159 --> 00:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>phonetic rules, syntax, and grammar, suggesting they were more than

185
00:15:17.840 --> 00:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>random animal calls. Unlike typical human speech, the recordings contained

186
00:15:23.080 --> 00:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>rapid shifts in pitch, speed and frequency, yet they still

187
00:15:27.039 --> 00:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>adhered to identifiable linguistic patterns. He observed tone, inflection and

188
00:15:32.559 --> 00:15:37.519
<v Speaker 1>cadence that indicated communicative intent rather than simple animalistic grunts

189
00:15:37.600 --> 00:15:41.399
<v Speaker 1>or calls. Nelson attempted to compare the phonetic patterns of

190
00:15:41.440 --> 00:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the recordings to known human and non human primate vocalizations,

191
00:15:45.679 --> 00:15:48.399
<v Speaker 1>concluding that they did not match any known language, but

192
00:15:48.519 --> 00:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>still exhibited key elements of structured language. Based on his findings,

193
00:15:53.320 --> 00:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Nelson proposed that the vocalizations represent a form of speech,

194
00:15:57.240 --> 00:16:02.559
<v Speaker 1>possibly from an unclassified species, coining the term Sasquatch language.

195
00:16:03.440 --> 00:16:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Nelson firmly believes that the Sierra sounds represent a form

196
00:16:06.759 --> 00:16:11.399
<v Speaker 1>of an unknown language. His analysis suggests that the speakers

197
00:16:11.440 --> 00:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have a cognitive ability to communicate in structured spoken language.

198
00:16:15.759 --> 00:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The sounds are not random, nor are they simply animal calls.

199
00:16:19.799 --> 00:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>The recordings could be evidence of an undiscovered primate species

200
00:16:23.200 --> 00:16:29.559
<v Speaker 1>capable of complex communication. However, Nelson's work remains controversial. Many

201
00:16:29.639 --> 00:16:32.559
<v Speaker 1>skeptics argue that the Sierra sounds could have been hoaxed

202
00:16:32.679 --> 00:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>or misinterpreted. Despite this, his expertise as a trained crypto

203
00:16:37.399 --> 00:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>linguist lends a unique credibility to his findings, making his

204
00:16:41.200 --> 00:16:44.279
<v Speaker 1>analysis one of the most intriguing examinations in the field

205
00:16:44.320 --> 00:16:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of crypto linguistics and cryptozoology. Scott Nelson's work has inspired

206
00:16:49.720 --> 00:16:53.919
<v Speaker 1>further study into the linguistic capabilities of non human primates

207
00:16:54.159 --> 00:16:59.039
<v Speaker 1>and the possibility of unknown intelligent species. His crypto linguistic

208
00:16:59.120 --> 00:17:01.519
<v Speaker 1>approach has been pro raised by some in the bigfoot

209
00:17:01.559 --> 00:17:06.079
<v Speaker 1>research community as it provides a methodological, analytical perspective on

210
00:17:06.160 --> 00:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the recordings rather than simple anecdotal accounts. His analysis of

211
00:17:11.279 --> 00:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the Sierra sounds continues to fuel debates as it challenges

212
00:17:15.200 --> 00:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>both mainstream science and skeptics to re examine the possibility

213
00:17:19.400 --> 00:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>that undiscovered primates might possess an advanced means of vocal communication.

214
00:17:25.160 --> 00:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>While his conclusions remain highly debated, his work highlights the

215
00:17:28.960 --> 00:17:33.279
<v Speaker 1>potential for military linguistic expertise to be applied in unexpected

216
00:17:33.359 --> 00:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and groundbreaking ways, perhaps even revealing new mysteries about the

217
00:17:37.440 --> 00:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>natural world. One of the key criteria for identifying language

218
00:17:41.519 --> 00:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is its adherence to syntax, meaning that words or sounds

219
00:17:45.279 --> 00:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>must follow an organized pattern rather than being random noises.

220
00:17:50.119 --> 00:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Nelson claimed that the Sierra sounds displayed structured repetition, identifiable phonemes,

221
00:17:55.839 --> 00:17:59.599
<v Speaker 1>and even potential grammatical elements, which led him to conclude

222
00:17:59.640 --> 00:18:04.279
<v Speaker 1>that the vocalizations were more than just animalistic calls. However,

223
00:18:04.680 --> 00:18:08.279
<v Speaker 1>skeptics argue that without a known translation, it is difficult

224
00:18:08.359 --> 00:18:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to definitively classify the sounds as language. While Nelson's work

225
00:18:12.960 --> 00:18:18.039
<v Speaker 1>provides compelling evidence of linguistic properties, mainstream linguists stress that

226
00:18:18.119 --> 00:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a lack of an established lexicon makes it challenging to

227
00:18:21.079 --> 00:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>confirm that these sounds are part of a fully developed

228
00:18:24.319 --> 00:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>language system. Some researchers believe the patterns could be attributed

229
00:18:28.519 --> 00:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to natural animal vocalizations or even the result of unconscious

230
00:18:32.559 --> 00:18:37.079
<v Speaker 1>human pattern recognition. Despite the debate, Nelson's findings have fueled

231
00:18:37.119 --> 00:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>further interest in the Sierra sounds, adding yet another layer

232
00:18:40.759 --> 00:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of mystery to these already enigmatic recordings. If these vocalizations

233
00:18:45.519 --> 00:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>do represent a form of language, it would suggest a

234
00:18:48.480 --> 00:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>level of cognitive complexity in the purported creatures that challenges

235
00:18:52.599 --> 00:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>current scientific understanding. One of the questions I asked Ron

236
00:18:56.759 --> 00:18:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Moorehead during our interview at his home was why Scott

237
00:18:59.880 --> 00:19:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Nelson had never submitted his findings for peer review. The

238
00:19:03.680 --> 00:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>peer review process is a critical step in validating scientific research,

239
00:19:08.000 --> 00:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>as it involves independent experts evaluating the work for accuracy, methodology,

240
00:19:13.240 --> 00:19:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and credibility. Without peer review, claims remain speculative and lack

241
00:19:18.400 --> 00:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>formal recognition within the scientific community. When it comes to

242
00:19:22.079 --> 00:19:27.279
<v Speaker 1>sasquatch research, very few peer reviewed studies exist. However, Some

243
00:19:27.480 --> 00:19:32.279
<v Speaker 1>notable exceptions include analyses of footprints, air samples, and supposed

244
00:19:32.400 --> 00:19:36.319
<v Speaker 1>DNA evidence. The most well known peer reviewed study in

245
00:19:36.400 --> 00:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>this field is the twenty thirteen paper by doctor Melba Ketchum,

246
00:19:40.559 --> 00:19:43.839
<v Speaker 1>which claimed to have identified anomalist DNA linked to an

247
00:19:43.960 --> 00:19:48.839
<v Speaker 1>unknown hominine species. While controversial, this study attempted to bring

248
00:19:48.960 --> 00:19:52.799
<v Speaker 1>scientific rigor to bigfoot research. However, it was met with

249
00:19:52.880 --> 00:19:57.279
<v Speaker 1>heavy skepticism due to concerns over methodology and the publication process.

250
00:19:58.279 --> 00:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the major controversies founding the Ketchum study was

251
00:20:01.720 --> 00:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the way in which it was published. After facing rejection

252
00:20:05.119 --> 00:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>from mainstream scientific journals, Ketchum acquired a journal, Denovo Scientific Journal,

253
00:20:10.720 --> 00:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and published her own research there. This raised immediate red

254
00:20:14.480 --> 00:20:17.759
<v Speaker 1>flags in the scientific community, as peer review is meant

255
00:20:17.799 --> 00:20:21.079
<v Speaker 1>to be an independent process free from influence by the

256
00:20:21.200 --> 00:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>authors of the study in scientific research, Owning the entity

257
00:20:25.519 --> 00:20:28.759
<v Speaker 1>that conducts the peer review of one's own work creates

258
00:20:28.799 --> 00:20:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a serious conflict of interest, as it eliminates the impartial

259
00:20:32.359 --> 00:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>scrutiny necessary to ensure credibility and objectivity. Critics argue that

260
00:20:37.720 --> 00:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this self publication tactic severely undermined the legitimacy of Ketchum's findings.

261
00:20:43.200 --> 00:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Even though she maintained that the research adhered to rigorous

262
00:20:46.200 --> 00:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>scientific standards, the lack of an independent peer review process

263
00:20:50.720 --> 00:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>made it difficult for the broader scientific community to accept

264
00:20:54.160 --> 00:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>her conclusions. Furthermore, subsequent independent analyzes of the DNA samples

265
00:20:59.720 --> 00:21:05.759
<v Speaker 1>proved inconclusive results, further diminishing the study's credibility. The controversy

266
00:21:05.799 --> 00:21:08.799
<v Speaker 1>surrounding the Ketchum study serves as a cautionary tale for

267
00:21:08.920 --> 00:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>sasquatch research and other fringe scientific inquiries. Without transparent, unbiased,

268
00:21:15.240 --> 00:21:20.039
<v Speaker 1>and independent peer review, even potentially groundbreaking discoveries risk being

269
00:21:20.079 --> 00:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>dismissed outright. The situation underscores the broader challenge of legitimizing

270
00:21:25.039 --> 00:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>bigfoot research in mainstream science. Until formal studies are conducted

271
00:21:29.759 --> 00:21:33.079
<v Speaker 1>with proper peer review, much of the evidence, regardless of

272
00:21:33.119 --> 00:21:36.279
<v Speaker 1>how compelling it may seem, will struggle to gain acceptance

273
00:21:36.359 --> 00:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>within the scientific establishment. Scott Nelson's application of crypto linguistic

274
00:21:41.759 --> 00:21:44.799
<v Speaker 1>analysis to the Sierra sounds stands as one of the

275
00:21:44.839 --> 00:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>most methodical and serious attempts to study alleged sasquatch vocalizations.

276
00:21:50.920 --> 00:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>His background as a military crypto linguist provides a level

277
00:21:54.319 --> 00:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of analytical expertise that is rarely seen in the field

278
00:21:57.400 --> 00:22:02.279
<v Speaker 1>of cryptozoology, lending credibility to the argument that the vocalizations

279
00:22:02.319 --> 00:22:07.559
<v Speaker 1>captured in the recordings may represent a structured non human language. However,

280
00:22:07.960 --> 00:22:12.319
<v Speaker 1>despite his detailed and disciplined approach, Nelson's findings and indeed

281
00:22:12.680 --> 00:22:16.519
<v Speaker 1>all research related to sasquatch face an uphill battle for

282
00:22:16.640 --> 00:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>acceptance within the mainstream scientific community. This resistance is largely

283
00:22:21.799 --> 00:22:26.079
<v Speaker 1>due to a combination of lack of physical evidence, historical skepticism,

284
00:22:26.480 --> 00:22:30.519
<v Speaker 1>and the lasting impact of past scientific controversies within the field.

285
00:22:31.480 --> 00:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the most significant and detrimental controversies to date

286
00:22:34.799 --> 00:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>has been the Melbe Ketchum DNA study, which has not

287
00:22:38.200 --> 00:22:41.759
<v Speaker 1>only cast a shadow over sasquatch research, but could also

288
00:22:41.920 --> 00:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>impact the reception of future studies, including Nelson's work. These recordings,

289
00:22:46.799 --> 00:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>analyzed over the years by experts in acoustics and linguistics,

290
00:22:50.680 --> 00:22:54.799
<v Speaker 1>have fueled speculation about the existence of an unknown primate species.

291
00:22:55.599 --> 00:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But while audio analysis has offered compelling anomalies, the scientific

292
00:22:59.759 --> 00:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>community has often leaned on genetic evidence to validate or

293
00:23:03.240 --> 00:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>refute such claims. One of the most prominent attempts to

294
00:23:07.079 --> 00:23:10.079
<v Speaker 1>use DNA in the search for these elusive creatures was

295
00:23:10.200 --> 00:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>led by doctor Bryan Sykes, whose groundbreaking study sought to

296
00:23:14.039 --> 00:23:18.559
<v Speaker 1>bring genetic certainty to the mystery of Bigfoot. In twenty fourteen,

297
00:23:18.720 --> 00:23:22.799
<v Speaker 1>doctor Sykes, a geneticist at the University of Oxford, conducted

298
00:23:22.839 --> 00:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a comprehensive DNA analysis of thirty hair samples submitted from

299
00:23:27.079 --> 00:23:31.799
<v Speaker 1>various locations, including North America and the Himalayas. The goal

300
00:23:31.960 --> 00:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>was straightforward, determine whether any of the samples contained genetic

301
00:23:36.119 --> 00:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>markers of an unknown primate. Using mitochondrial twelve sRNA sequencing,

302
00:23:42.559 --> 00:23:45.319
<v Speaker 1>his team identified most of the samples as belonging to

303
00:23:45.440 --> 00:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>common animals such as bears, horses, and canines. However, two samples,

304
00:23:51.599 --> 00:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>one from Lodoc, India and another from Bhutan, yielded an

305
00:23:55.559 --> 00:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>unexpected result. Their genetic sequences closely matched that of an

306
00:24:00.359 --> 00:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>ancient polar bear species Ursus meritimus, believed to have lived

307
00:24:04.720 --> 00:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>around forty thousand years ago. This discovery sparked widespread speculation

308
00:24:10.920 --> 00:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was an unknown bear species roaming the Himalayas possibly the

309
00:24:15.039 --> 00:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>source of the Yeti legend. Or was there a flaw

310
00:24:18.279 --> 00:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in the interpretation of the genetic sequences. Subsequent research suggested

311
00:24:23.200 --> 00:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that the samples likely belong to a variant of the

312
00:24:25.759 --> 00:24:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Himalayan brown bear. Ursus arctose is a belinus, not a

313
00:24:30.400 --> 00:24:34.839
<v Speaker 1>cryptid or hybrid species. While Sykes's study did not provide

314
00:24:34.880 --> 00:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>evidence of unknown hominins, it demonstrated how scientific inquiry could

315
00:24:39.480 --> 00:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>bring fresh perspectives to folklore and legend. But how does

316
00:24:43.480 --> 00:24:48.039
<v Speaker 1>this apply to the Sierra sounds? If genetic evidence remains elusive,

317
00:24:48.440 --> 00:24:52.759
<v Speaker 1>can auditory analysis provide a different path toward discovery. The

318
00:24:52.839 --> 00:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>studies conducted on the Sierra Sounds point to vocal characteristics

319
00:24:56.480 --> 00:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that challenge conventional explanations. The vocal range, frequency shifts, and

320
00:25:01.519 --> 00:25:05.759
<v Speaker 1>apparent linguistic complexity recorded in the Sierra Nevadas remain without

321
00:25:05.799 --> 00:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a definitive explanation. Some skeptics argue that until a physical

322
00:25:10.279 --> 00:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>specimen is obtained, no amount of audio evidence can substantiate

323
00:25:14.279 --> 00:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the existence of an unclassified species. Others believe that, much

324
00:25:19.039 --> 00:25:22.759
<v Speaker 1>like the DNA study, these sounds offer a scientific anomaly,

325
00:25:23.440 --> 00:25:28.039
<v Speaker 1>one that warrants deeper investigation rather than outright dismissal. We've

326
00:25:28.119 --> 00:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>extensively explored the Sierra sounds that many a tribute to

327
00:25:31.759 --> 00:25:36.039
<v Speaker 1>the elusive Sasquatch. But who is the man behind these recordings.

328
00:25:37.079 --> 00:25:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's delve into the life and work of Ron Morehead,

329
00:25:40.200 --> 00:25:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the adventurer and researcher who captured these mysterious sounds. Ron

330
00:25:44.880 --> 00:25:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Morehead's life has been characterized by a relentless pursuit of adventure.

331
00:25:49.559 --> 00:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>As a scuba diver, he swam alongside hammerhead sharks and

332
00:25:53.319 --> 00:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>was filmed riding giant manta rays in Mexico's Pacific Ocean.

333
00:25:58.000 --> 00:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>He also served as a safety diver during the filming

334
00:26:00.519 --> 00:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of Right Whales and Patagonia. As a private pilot, Moorhead

335
00:26:04.519 --> 00:26:07.599
<v Speaker 1>piloted his own aircraft from the Alaskan bush to the

336
00:26:07.720 --> 00:26:11.599
<v Speaker 1>jungles of Costa Rica. His explorations led him to ancient

337
00:26:11.720 --> 00:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Mayan civilizations in the Yucatan and remote areas of Chiappus

338
00:26:15.720 --> 00:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>southern Mexico, where he encountered remnants of Mayan culture. His

339
00:26:20.519 --> 00:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>journeys extended to Nepal's Cuclopana Wildlife Reserve to assess tiger populations,

340
00:26:26.160 --> 00:26:28.759
<v Speaker 1>and he explored Siberia in search of evidence of the

341
00:26:28.839 --> 00:26:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Russian Yeti. Morehead also made multiple trips to South America

342
00:26:33.519 --> 00:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>investigating enigmatic structures and non human remains of pre Inca civilizations.

343
00:26:39.599 --> 00:26:42.519
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen seventy one, during an expedition in the remote

344
00:26:42.599 --> 00:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Sierra Nevada Mountains of California, Morehead and a group of

345
00:26:46.279 --> 00:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>fellow hunters encountered a series of unexplained vocalizations. These interactions,

346
00:26:51.640 --> 00:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>which continued over several years, were meticulously recorded by Moorhead

347
00:26:56.039 --> 00:26:59.559
<v Speaker 1>and journalist Al Berry, resulting in what are now known

348
00:26:59.640 --> 00:27:03.799
<v Speaker 1>as the Sierra Sounds. As we have already discussed, these

349
00:27:03.880 --> 00:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>recordings have undergone extensive scientific analysis, with some experts suggesting

350
00:27:08.799 --> 00:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>they represent a complex form of communication, possibly indicative of

351
00:27:13.000 --> 00:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a previously undocumented species. Moore had chronicled his experiences in

352
00:27:18.079 --> 00:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the book Voices in the Wilderness, detailing his forty year

353
00:27:21.839 --> 00:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>journey researching these phenomena. Beyond his work with the Sierra Sounds,

354
00:27:26.400 --> 00:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he has produced two CDs featuring these vocalizations, providing context

355
00:27:31.359 --> 00:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and analysis of the interactions he and others had with

356
00:27:34.599 --> 00:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>these forest beings. His research has taken him worldwide, exploring

357
00:27:39.680 --> 00:27:45.559
<v Speaker 1>connections between Bigfoot and various archaeological findings, including those in Peru, Bolivia,

358
00:27:45.880 --> 00:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Lovelock Cave and the Minaret Skull. Over the years, Morehead

359
00:27:50.440 --> 00:27:54.279
<v Speaker 1>has been featured in numerous radio programs in television documentaries,

360
00:27:54.759 --> 00:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>including appearances on the BBC and other educational channels. He

361
00:27:59.599 --> 00:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was again speaker at the Darwin Museum in Moscow and

362
00:28:02.559 --> 00:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>has presented at various symposiums and conferences sharing his bigfoot

363
00:28:07.119 --> 00:28:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Sasquatch experiences and insights. His engaging storytelling and unique experiences

364
00:28:12.839 --> 00:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>have made him a sought after speaker in the field

365
00:28:15.200 --> 00:28:20.039
<v Speaker 1>of cryptozoology. Beyond his research and adventures, Morehead is a

366
00:28:20.079 --> 00:28:24.319
<v Speaker 1>successful businessman and father of four. He describes himself as

367
00:28:24.359 --> 00:28:28.759
<v Speaker 1>deeply spiritual, though not aligned with any specific organized religion.

368
00:28:29.599 --> 00:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>A gifted entertainer and musician, his diverse interests and free

369
00:28:33.240 --> 00:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>spirited nature have contributed to a life rich with extraordinary experiences.

370
00:28:39.079 --> 00:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>In his book The Quantum Bigfoot, Morehead explores the possibility

371
00:28:42.559 --> 00:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that quantum physics could explain some of the mysterious attributes

372
00:28:45.799 --> 00:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>often associated with sasquatch, such as their elusiveness and reported

373
00:28:50.279 --> 00:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>supernatural abilities. He suggests that understanding concepts like multiple dimensions

374
00:28:55.519 --> 00:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and quantum entanglement might shed light on these phenomena. However,

375
00:29:00.400 --> 00:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>These theories have attracted criticism from both the scientific community

376
00:29:04.240 --> 00:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and some bigfoot researchers. Critics argue that applying quantum physics

377
00:29:08.759 --> 00:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to explain sasquatch encounters lacks empirical support and veers into pseudoscience.

378
00:29:15.240 --> 00:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Some skeptics contend that such approaches may undermine the credibility

379
00:29:18.960 --> 00:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of cryptozoological research by introducing speculative concepts without substantial evidence.

380
00:29:26.000 --> 00:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>While the Sierra Sounds have intrigued many, they have also

381
00:29:29.400 --> 00:29:35.039
<v Speaker 1>faced skepticism. Some researchers, including the late anthropologist Grover Krantz,

382
00:29:35.440 --> 00:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have expressed doubts about the authenticity of the recordings and

383
00:29:38.799 --> 00:29:43.559
<v Speaker 1>associated evidence. Krantz noted that certain tracks presented alongside the

384
00:29:43.640 --> 00:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>audio recordings appear to be obvious fakes, leading him to

385
00:29:47.599 --> 00:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>question the legitimacy of the sounds themselves. Additionally, discussions on

386
00:29:52.279 --> 00:29:56.839
<v Speaker 1>platforms like Reddit have highlighted these concerns, with users referencing

387
00:29:56.960 --> 00:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Krantz's observations and debating the credibility of the Sierra sounds.

388
00:30:02.839 --> 00:30:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned for more Sasquatch odyesee, We'll be right back

389
00:30:05.680 --> 00:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>after these messages. Ron Moorehead's contributions to the study of

390
00:30:12.599 --> 00:30:18.039
<v Speaker 1>unexplained phenomena, particularly the bigfoot Sasquatch enigma, have been significant.

391
00:30:18.839 --> 00:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>His recordings remain some of the most compelling audio evidence

392
00:30:22.000 --> 00:30:25.039
<v Speaker 1>in the field, and his dedication to exploring the unknown

393
00:30:25.400 --> 00:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>continues to inspire both researchers and enthusiasts alike. Despite criticisms,

394
00:30:31.079 --> 00:30:34.759
<v Speaker 1>his willingness to explore unconventional theories has sparked discussions that

395
00:30:34.880 --> 00:30:38.759
<v Speaker 1>bridge the gap between science and spirituality in the quest

396
00:30:38.839 --> 00:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand these mysterious creatures. As science advances, it continues

397
00:30:44.000 --> 00:30:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to test the boundaries of what we know. If the

398
00:30:46.839 --> 00:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Sierra Sounds truly represent something beyond human ability, then they

399
00:30:51.000 --> 00:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>present a challenge to reconcile the limits of genetic testing

400
00:30:55.039 --> 00:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>with the possibility that not all evidence is found in

401
00:30:57.720 --> 00:31:02.079
<v Speaker 1>a laboratory. After more than five decades, the mystery endures,

402
00:31:02.799 --> 00:31:05.519
<v Speaker 1>and that's where you come in. I challenge you to

403
00:31:05.559 --> 00:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>answer these questions for yourself. Are the Sierra Sounds recordings

404
00:31:09.240 --> 00:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of an unknown species or simply a perplexing anomaly. Remember

405
00:31:14.680 --> 00:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>on Friday's episode, I'll be sharing my recent face to

406
00:31:17.319 --> 00:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>face interview with Ron Morehead himself, where I asked some

407
00:31:21.039 --> 00:31:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of the very questions we've explored Today, I'll also be

408
00:31:24.440 --> 00:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>sharing exclusive clips from previously unreleased recordings, Sounds that might

409
00:31:29.160 --> 00:31:31.599
<v Speaker 1>just change the way you think about this mystery forever

410
00:34:30.760 --> 00:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in b
