WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that more and more people are getting interested

2
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.759
<v Speaker 1>in staking they hear about it. I mean Robinhood's mass

3
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.439
<v Speaker 1>market product. So I think as people see the yield

4
00:00:12.480 --> 00:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that they're getting and kind of share the concept with

5
00:00:15.839 --> 00:00:21.359
<v Speaker 1>their friends, I think it'll be hard to maintain control

6
00:00:21.399 --> 00:00:25.879
<v Speaker 1>of assets on a centralized platform, particularly unless you're giving

7
00:00:25.920 --> 00:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>some exposure to that yield.

8
00:00:32.840 --> 00:00:35.039
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by Propy, which is

9
00:00:35.159 --> 00:00:38.679
<v Speaker 2>leading to charge in putting real estate on chain. Propy

10
00:00:38.799 --> 00:00:41.240
<v Speaker 2>is a game changer. You can buy and sell real

11
00:00:41.320 --> 00:00:45.399
<v Speaker 2>estate with cryptocurrencies using the Property platform, which is powered

12
00:00:45.439 --> 00:00:48.119
<v Speaker 2>by a blockchain of course, and they have a native

13
00:00:48.119 --> 00:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>token call pro and I've been an investor in the

14
00:00:51.439 --> 00:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Propy token since twenty eighteen. So Propy is a licensed

15
00:00:54.920 --> 00:00:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Web three pioneer operating since twenty seventeen. They have facilitated

16
00:00:58.799 --> 00:01:02.479
<v Speaker 2>over four billion dollars and transactions. They're putting titles and

17
00:01:02.520 --> 00:01:06.200
<v Speaker 2>deeds on chain. They use Coinbase for their crypto escro service.

18
00:01:06.560 --> 00:01:09.280
<v Speaker 2>So this is a great platform and once again they

19
00:01:09.319 --> 00:01:11.159
<v Speaker 2>are ahead of the curve when it comes to putting

20
00:01:11.159 --> 00:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>real estate on chain. And they just launched a great

21
00:01:13.879 --> 00:01:16.599
<v Speaker 2>campaign where you can earn some of the Propy tokens,

22
00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:20.239
<v Speaker 2>and it's simply by doing tasks such as sharing their

23
00:01:20.319 --> 00:01:23.640
<v Speaker 2>vision video, signing up, and inviting a friend, and much

24
00:01:23.719 --> 00:01:26.159
<v Speaker 2>more so. If you'd like to learn more about Propy,

25
00:01:26.400 --> 00:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>visit the link in the description. Hey, folks, welcome into

26
00:01:29.159 --> 00:01:31.799
<v Speaker 2>the Thinking Crypto podcast. I'm your host Tony Edward and

27
00:01:31.879 --> 00:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>we are recording at Station three in New York's Financial

28
00:01:34.519 --> 00:01:37.719
<v Speaker 2>District today and my guest is Vlad Tenev, who's the

29
00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:41.640
<v Speaker 2>co founder and CEO of Robinhood. Lad, awesome to have

30
00:01:41.719 --> 00:01:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you on.

31
00:01:42.200 --> 00:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, Tony. Good to be here, Glad.

32
00:01:44.799 --> 00:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>This is so awesome. I've been a user of the

33
00:01:47.719 --> 00:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>robin Hood platform for many years. It made me want

34
00:01:50.519 --> 00:01:53.799
<v Speaker 2>to get into investing because as an immigrant kid, I

35
00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:57.319
<v Speaker 2>never really thought about investing in stocks. But Robinhood came along.

36
00:01:57.439 --> 00:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>It made it so easy. You know, what's your vision

37
00:02:01.640 --> 00:02:04.239
<v Speaker 2>for the company as it continues to grow and it's

38
00:02:04.239 --> 00:02:05.159
<v Speaker 2>had all this success.

39
00:02:05.959 --> 00:02:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so a Robinhood. I like to think of it

40
00:02:09.080 --> 00:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>as financial super app. But right now we're still primarily

41
00:02:15.719 --> 00:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>US based and still primarily retail, and I think over

42
00:02:19.400 --> 00:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the long run, we should be a platform that can

43
00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>help you with all of your financial needs, whether you're

44
00:02:26.199 --> 00:02:29.199
<v Speaker 1>in the US or anywhere else in the world, whether

45
00:02:29.240 --> 00:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you're an individual or a business or institution, we should

46
00:02:32.840 --> 00:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just be central to all of your financial needs.

47
00:02:36.080 --> 00:02:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it feels like the world is heading that way,

48
00:02:38.199 --> 00:02:40.960
<v Speaker 2>where everything is on this smartphone. And then with crypto,

49
00:02:41.400 --> 00:02:44.039
<v Speaker 2>it's not even account based anymore, it's more wallet based.

50
00:02:44.240 --> 00:02:47.159
<v Speaker 2>So do you see the direction being not only an

51
00:02:47.199 --> 00:02:49.439
<v Speaker 2>app but a wallet for the future.

52
00:02:50.120 --> 00:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that there's definitely some benefits to having

53
00:02:56.280 --> 00:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a wallet experience. I think one of the main benefits

54
00:02:59.240 --> 00:03:04.199
<v Speaker 1>that is off an overlooked actually is that with non

55
00:03:04.240 --> 00:03:09.719
<v Speaker 1>custodial wallets, you're basically in complete control of your assets.

56
00:03:10.439 --> 00:03:15.719
<v Speaker 1>So that makes you less reliant on the broker as

57
00:03:15.719 --> 00:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a construct. If you're unhappy with the broker, you can

58
00:03:19.039 --> 00:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>easily switch your assets to another provider. I mean, as

59
00:03:23.439 --> 00:03:26.039
<v Speaker 1>long as the blockchain is up and running, you have

60
00:03:26.120 --> 00:03:28.159
<v Speaker 1>control over your assets, and I think that's a very

61
00:03:28.199 --> 00:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>powerful thing. I mean, we're in the traditional brokerage space

62
00:03:33.199 --> 00:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as crypto, and we've been a net beneficiary

63
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of asset transfers so more. I mean this quarter we

64
00:03:41.159 --> 00:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>announced for many quarters running, we're net We're getting net

65
00:03:45.879 --> 00:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>transfers in from pretty much all of our brokerage competitors,

66
00:03:51.240 --> 00:03:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and so we see how crufty it is. We'd like

67
00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:56.039
<v Speaker 1>to make that process better. We think that it should

68
00:03:56.080 --> 00:03:59.199
<v Speaker 1>be as easy as possible to move your assets, to

69
00:03:59.240 --> 00:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>have control of your assets, and you know, if you're

70
00:04:02.879 --> 00:04:07.719
<v Speaker 1>unhappy with the service, we should compete over quality of service,

71
00:04:07.800 --> 00:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>not make it as difficult as possible to move your

72
00:04:10.479 --> 00:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>your assets out. I think a lot of our competitors

73
00:04:12.960 --> 00:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>will probably disagree with that, but that mindset lends itself

74
00:04:16.319 --> 00:04:21.319
<v Speaker 1>well to self custody, where ultimately you're leveraging public infrastructure

75
00:04:21.360 --> 00:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for more and more of financial services, and you know

76
00:04:27.199 --> 00:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the wallet providers or the brokers differentiate on service quality.

77
00:04:32.279 --> 00:04:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Sure, So before I get ahead of myself, I do

78
00:04:36.439 --> 00:04:39.959
<v Speaker 2>want to discuss you know, some success and amazing numbers

79
00:04:40.040 --> 00:04:42.439
<v Speaker 2>you've had from a quarterly standpoint and year of the

80
00:04:42.519 --> 00:04:44.800
<v Speaker 2>year revenues up forty five percent year of a year.

81
00:04:45.680 --> 00:04:50.920
<v Speaker 2>We also have your net deposits of thirteen point eight

82
00:04:50.959 --> 00:04:55.959
<v Speaker 2>billion on your third highest quarter on record. Amazing accolades,

83
00:04:56.000 --> 00:04:58.920
<v Speaker 2>amazing numbers. What do you think about the growth and

84
00:04:59.040 --> 00:05:01.720
<v Speaker 2>is it because the mar gets are growing the world's

85
00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:04.519
<v Speaker 2>becoming more financialized and things like that, well.

86
00:05:04.399 --> 00:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>We like to look at the leading indicators of growth

87
00:05:07.160 --> 00:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>because these are downstream metrics. You know, if you think

88
00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:16.519
<v Speaker 1>about it, the path to producing earnings per share and

89
00:05:16.720 --> 00:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>revenue is get more customers. Make the customers as happy

90
00:05:21.199 --> 00:05:23.639
<v Speaker 1>as possible so that they put more assets onto the

91
00:05:23.680 --> 00:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>platform and use a lot of your products. And then

92
00:05:26.279 --> 00:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the more products they use, the higher their wallet share is,

93
00:05:29.279 --> 00:05:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the higher their account is. That drives net deposits, which

94
00:05:32.680 --> 00:05:36.399
<v Speaker 1>ultimately drives revenue. And we like to focus as upstream

95
00:05:36.439 --> 00:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>on the funnel as possible, so getting more customers, we

96
00:05:39.879 --> 00:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>have a lot already, making sure they're as happy as possible.

97
00:05:43.560 --> 00:05:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Our NPS is at a four year high, and that's

98
00:05:48.319 --> 00:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>really what's been leading to the net deposit growth and

99
00:05:52.959 --> 00:05:56.199
<v Speaker 1>the market share gains across all of our businesses. And

100
00:05:56.240 --> 00:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we think there's more tailwinds, you know, we think that

101
00:06:00.319 --> 00:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we're moving fast. The product velocity. The product velocities perhaps

102
00:06:04.079 --> 00:06:07.519
<v Speaker 1>the leading indicator of everything because that's the rate at

103
00:06:07.600 --> 00:06:11.319
<v Speaker 1>which we're improving our products and services, and that's what

104
00:06:11.439 --> 00:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>we found drives customer satisfaction and NPS. So we see tailwinds,

105
00:06:16.240 --> 00:06:18.959
<v Speaker 1>we think we can we can continue and I look

106
00:06:19.000 --> 00:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>at the product, and I still see all the ways

107
00:06:21.360 --> 00:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's clunky and could be better, and I don't

108
00:06:24.560 --> 00:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>think we're close to done.

109
00:06:26.399 --> 00:06:29.959
<v Speaker 2>Well. The user interface and the UX right now, it's

110
00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:32.199
<v Speaker 2>pretty great. Like I said, I'm a user of the product,

111
00:06:32.279 --> 00:06:35.199
<v Speaker 2>and I can't wait to see what additional features you

112
00:06:35.240 --> 00:06:38.040
<v Speaker 2>guys roll out. Like I know it seems really silly,

113
00:06:38.079 --> 00:06:39.839
<v Speaker 2>but like I love when I deposit money and it

114
00:06:39.879 --> 00:06:42.480
<v Speaker 2>does this little graphical movement and it's like this lightning.

115
00:06:42.519 --> 00:06:45.160
<v Speaker 2>But like, just stuff like that is like rewarding as

116
00:06:45.160 --> 00:06:47.120
<v Speaker 2>a user. I don't know if that makes sense, just

117
00:06:47.160 --> 00:06:48.800
<v Speaker 2>like a dopamine hit.

118
00:06:48.839 --> 00:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Almost well, we want to make sure that each moment,

119
00:06:53.600 --> 00:06:56.199
<v Speaker 1>especially the big ones that are that are meaningful to you,

120
00:06:56.360 --> 00:06:59.439
<v Speaker 1>like depositing money into that account, we take a little

121
00:06:59.439 --> 00:07:02.399
<v Speaker 1>bit extra care and precision to make you feel like

122
00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the people building the products actually care about the experience.

123
00:07:07.600 --> 00:07:10.639
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think the experience is an important bit.

124
00:07:10.759 --> 00:07:13.759
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the things that differentiates us relative to

125
00:07:13.800 --> 00:07:16.879
<v Speaker 1>our peers. But there's still problems that we need to fix.

126
00:07:16.959 --> 00:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things we've been thinking about

127
00:07:18.680 --> 00:07:21.279
<v Speaker 1>lately is we have all these products, we have all

128
00:07:21.279 --> 00:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>these accounts. Now it's not just a trading app for stocks,

129
00:07:25.680 --> 00:07:28.959
<v Speaker 1>but we've got retirement accounts, We've got joint accounts for

130
00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:32.759
<v Speaker 1>your spouse bankings coming in there. We've got a great

131
00:07:32.800 --> 00:07:37.399
<v Speaker 1>credit card offering. And you know, we've been thinking all

132
00:07:37.519 --> 00:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>right now that we've moved from a single account, how

133
00:07:40.360 --> 00:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>do we how do we make sense of all these

134
00:07:42.040 --> 00:07:44.959
<v Speaker 1>accounts and products. So you might have seen some interface

135
00:07:45.079 --> 00:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>changes to make it easier to discover our new products

136
00:07:48.079 --> 00:07:50.959
<v Speaker 1>to sort of like organize your assets into new accounts,

137
00:07:52.560 --> 00:07:54.759
<v Speaker 1>but that that's kind of the next area that we're

138
00:07:54.800 --> 00:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to simplify for our customers.

139
00:07:57.240 --> 00:07:58.879
<v Speaker 2>In line of what we were talking about earlier with

140
00:07:58.959 --> 00:08:03.279
<v Speaker 2>the wallet base and set up for the future of finance.

141
00:08:03.680 --> 00:08:06.279
<v Speaker 2>You have all these suites, this full suite of products.

142
00:08:06.639 --> 00:08:10.639
<v Speaker 2>You're disrupting many big players on Wall Street and tradfi.

143
00:08:11.439 --> 00:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel you have a targeting your back that

144
00:08:13.120 --> 00:08:15.279
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of going to look to launch something similar

145
00:08:15.319 --> 00:08:17.279
<v Speaker 2>to what you're doing, or you have this head start

146
00:08:17.519 --> 00:08:18.680
<v Speaker 2>they may not be able to catch up.

147
00:08:18.879 --> 00:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be tough to catch up

148
00:08:22.600 --> 00:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're an incumbent, because we're not only further ahead.

149
00:08:27.879 --> 00:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I think in most of the areas that I believe matter,

150
00:08:31.800 --> 00:08:37.039
<v Speaker 1>but we're also moving much faster and so by the

151
00:08:37.039 --> 00:08:39.559
<v Speaker 1>time they catch up to where we're at now, we'll

152
00:08:39.600 --> 00:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>probably be two or three steps ahead. So I worry

153
00:08:42.639 --> 00:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>less about those firms. I think the real competition at

154
00:08:46.559 --> 00:08:47.799
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day is going to be the

155
00:08:47.840 --> 00:08:50.639
<v Speaker 1>AI firms. That's who we're competing with for talent, and

156
00:08:50.679 --> 00:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the leading indicator of all. And if

157
00:08:53.600 --> 00:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I had to think about, you know, what are the

158
00:08:55.720 --> 00:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>new platform shifts, I think we've gone through mobile and

159
00:08:59.519 --> 00:09:03.759
<v Speaker 1>cloud and Robinhood I believe is emerged the winner of

160
00:09:03.799 --> 00:09:08.279
<v Speaker 1>that platform shift. But then there's another one with artificial

161
00:09:08.320 --> 00:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and crypto. So we have these two platform shifts

162
00:09:11.879 --> 00:09:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that are that are happening simultaneously, and I think most

163
00:09:15.679 --> 00:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of my attention is making sure we navigate those well

164
00:09:18.840 --> 00:09:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and we actually emerge the category leader as a result

165
00:09:22.919 --> 00:09:26.279
<v Speaker 1>of those platform shifts. And you know, we have some

166
00:09:26.440 --> 00:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>assets to bear that should help us, which is we've

167
00:09:30.360 --> 00:09:33.799
<v Speaker 1>got scale. We still move fast despite our large scale

168
00:09:33.840 --> 00:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and user base. But yeah, I think the bigger sort

169
00:09:40.360 --> 00:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of like thing to watch out for is companies that

170
00:09:43.399 --> 00:09:47.799
<v Speaker 1>are unencumbered by legacy technology. Web three companies, companies and

171
00:09:47.799 --> 00:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>founders that are AI native and basically have like a

172
00:09:51.679 --> 00:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>clean slate to build, So that that's probably what we

173
00:09:55.679 --> 00:09:57.279
<v Speaker 1>spend most of our time thinking about.

174
00:09:57.559 --> 00:10:00.879
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely, you mentioned AI. It's going to play a

175
00:10:00.879 --> 00:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>big part in markets and in our lives in different ways.

176
00:10:04.039 --> 00:10:07.399
<v Speaker 2>I envision one day logging into Robinhood and have an

177
00:10:07.399 --> 00:10:10.399
<v Speaker 2>AI agent and says, hey, Tony, how are you good morning.

178
00:10:10.799 --> 00:10:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Here are some stock picks, here's some crypto picks. Here's

179
00:10:13.120 --> 00:10:15.639
<v Speaker 2>how your portfolio is doing, Here's how the market's doing,

180
00:10:15.639 --> 00:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Here's what the FED is doing. And just giving me

181
00:10:17.600 --> 00:10:19.879
<v Speaker 2>all that information customized to me and what I like

182
00:10:19.919 --> 00:10:21.240
<v Speaker 2>to invest in and things like that.

183
00:10:21.840 --> 00:10:25.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm guessing you're a gold member. Yeah, you've got

184
00:10:25.519 --> 00:10:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a Robinhood gold account. Are you have you had Cortex

185
00:10:29.799 --> 00:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>rolling out to you yet?

186
00:10:31.279 --> 00:10:33.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so, And I honestly have not checked

187
00:10:33.720 --> 00:10:35.879
<v Speaker 2>it in the past couple of months because I've been traveling.

188
00:10:36.200 --> 00:10:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you should check it more regularly, because then what

189
00:10:40.840 --> 00:10:44.759
<v Speaker 1>you'll see is actually front and center on every stock

190
00:10:45.279 --> 00:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you have Cortex digests, And basically what that does is

191
00:10:49.639 --> 00:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it answers the question of what's going on with this stock?

192
00:10:52.600 --> 00:10:54.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes you have a stock that's moving up

193
00:10:54.720 --> 00:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>five percent down five percent. You don't really know what's

194
00:10:57.320 --> 00:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>driving it. And I think one of the best use

195
00:11:00.320 --> 00:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>cases of AI is to just give you that answer

196
00:11:03.120 --> 00:11:06.039
<v Speaker 1>in words, and so we have that that's very front

197
00:11:06.080 --> 00:11:09.799
<v Speaker 1>and center. Behind the scenes, we have customer support that's

198
00:11:09.840 --> 00:11:14.879
<v Speaker 1>basically mostly driven by AI at this point, and we've

199
00:11:14.919 --> 00:11:18.039
<v Speaker 1>been we've been able to actually increase customer satisfaction while

200
00:11:18.039 --> 00:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing this shift, which has been awesome to see.

201
00:11:21.399 --> 00:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think I think in the future, AI

202
00:11:23.679 --> 00:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>will be imbued across all the relevant services in the app.

203
00:11:29.240 --> 00:11:31.639
<v Speaker 1>We're going to start with the biggest, most important ones,

204
00:11:31.679 --> 00:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but then it'll it'll just expand from there.

205
00:11:36.240 --> 00:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>In the world, we're headed to where we're going to

206
00:11:38.159 --> 00:11:41.440
<v Speaker 2>have twenty four to seven markets because of tokenization. Do

207
00:11:41.480 --> 00:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>you think AI agents and AI bots if you want

208
00:11:45.480 --> 00:11:47.320
<v Speaker 2>to call them, that will play a big role in

209
00:11:47.360 --> 00:11:50.080
<v Speaker 2>helping us maintain our portfolio because we can't stay up

210
00:11:50.120 --> 00:11:52.279
<v Speaker 2>till three am trading markets and things like that.

211
00:11:52.759 --> 00:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that, Yeah, it's interesting question. I

212
00:11:59.679 --> 00:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>think there will be some of that. I think a

213
00:12:02.279 --> 00:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of traders that I talk to that are actively

214
00:12:05.120 --> 00:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>managing their portfolios really like to have full control over everything.

215
00:12:11.919 --> 00:12:13.759
<v Speaker 1>And I think there there's a little bit of an

216
00:12:13.759 --> 00:12:19.159
<v Speaker 1>open question in the AI industry itself about what the

217
00:12:19.159 --> 00:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>bigger opportunity is from augmentation to replacement. And you're seeing

218
00:12:24.559 --> 00:12:29.519
<v Speaker 1>that encoding in particular right encoding, which is actually at

219
00:12:29.519 --> 00:12:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the frontier of AI applicability. You have kind of these

220
00:12:34.679 --> 00:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>two thoughts. One is I just tell my agent you

221
00:12:37.879 --> 00:12:42.639
<v Speaker 1>know what I want done, Versus I'm kind of in charge.

222
00:12:43.240 --> 00:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm writing the code, the agent is like boosting my

223
00:12:46.600 --> 00:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>output by one hundred x. And if the first paradigm

224
00:12:52.639 --> 00:12:58.399
<v Speaker 1>wins of like replacement of software engineer, you start to

225
00:12:58.399 --> 00:13:02.039
<v Speaker 1>think about, like what's going to happen. Software engineers in

226
00:13:02.080 --> 00:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that world would be eventually sort of like replaced, or

227
00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the job would change fundamentally. If you believe in the

228
00:13:09.639 --> 00:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>second world of augmentation, perhaps software engineers will be one

229
00:13:14.399 --> 00:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>hundred x is common. Everyone will be able to be

230
00:13:17.600 --> 00:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a software engineer. And I think it's very unclear what

231
00:13:21.480 --> 00:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the end state is. I mean, yeah, the folks that

232
00:13:25.039 --> 00:13:27.399
<v Speaker 1>are telling you that software engineers are going to be

233
00:13:27.399 --> 00:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>completely automated away are also paying hundreds of millions to

234
00:13:31.360 --> 00:13:34.799
<v Speaker 1>billions in packages for engineers right now. So if you

235
00:13:34.879 --> 00:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>believe that both of those things can't be true in

236
00:13:37.639 --> 00:13:40.919
<v Speaker 1>your mind. But I think with trading and financial services

237
00:13:40.919 --> 00:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future, I think that it'll be a

238
00:13:44.519 --> 00:13:47.799
<v Speaker 1>story of augmentation. So I think we'll have more traders,

239
00:13:48.000 --> 00:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>will build tools to make them more effective. Everyone will

240
00:13:51.279 --> 00:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to get the technology to do sophisticated things,

241
00:13:56.360 --> 00:13:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and I think Robinhood can can support and provide a

242
00:13:59.320 --> 00:14:02.039
<v Speaker 1>lot of that techno and make it usable in forms

243
00:14:02.080 --> 00:14:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that actually help our traders.

244
00:14:05.200 --> 00:14:08.759
<v Speaker 2>I heard someone recently say that these AI platforms and

245
00:14:08.799 --> 00:14:12.200
<v Speaker 2>so forth will make us be less doers and more directors.

246
00:14:12.519 --> 00:14:15.360
<v Speaker 2>So you can have multiple AI agencies along what you're saying.

247
00:14:15.720 --> 00:14:18.519
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I have an AI agent's focused specifically on crypto,

248
00:14:18.600 --> 00:14:21.720
<v Speaker 2>one on stocks, one on the goal market or whatever

249
00:14:21.720 --> 00:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>it is, and I'm directing, I'm monitoring, and they're doing

250
00:14:25.039 --> 00:14:26.039
<v Speaker 2>my bidding, so to speak.

251
00:14:26.879 --> 00:14:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I think if you ask someone one hundred years ago

252
00:14:32.000 --> 00:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate the state of like the modern workforce, they'd

253
00:14:36.039 --> 00:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>probably tell you everyone's directing, nobody's doing anything, because back then,

254
00:14:40.759 --> 00:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't actually like growing your own food and

255
00:14:45.120 --> 00:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, tilling your own soil and chopping your own wood,

256
00:14:50.399 --> 00:14:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you weren't doing anything right. That was sort of like

257
00:14:53.360 --> 00:14:57.799
<v Speaker 1>the dominant We were in an agricultural driven society back then,

258
00:14:58.440 --> 00:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So they probably look at all of our jobs as

259
00:15:02.480 --> 00:15:06.279
<v Speaker 1>not real work. And it'll be like podcasts. You're a

260
00:15:06.360 --> 00:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast hosts, so you just talk to people today and

261
00:15:09.519 --> 00:15:13.639
<v Speaker 1>other people listen, right, So yeah, I think I think

262
00:15:13.679 --> 00:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the true story is probably a little bit more complicated.

263
00:15:17.159 --> 00:15:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I think the jobs will change, but they'll still feel

264
00:15:20.600 --> 00:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like meaningful work, probably much more meaningful with much larger impact.

265
00:15:25.480 --> 00:15:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you can take a trader and augment

266
00:15:28.440 --> 00:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>their capabilities by one hundred x in the same way

267
00:15:31.240 --> 00:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can take a software engineer and give them

268
00:15:33.360 --> 00:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the tools to perhaps run an entire software company by themselves,

269
00:15:38.639 --> 00:15:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll have more entrepreneurs, more companies, you'll have

270
00:15:41.720 --> 00:15:46.519
<v Speaker 1>more traders, so and and I think at the time

271
00:15:46.559 --> 00:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll feel like real substantive work, is my guess.

272
00:15:50.840 --> 00:15:53.960
<v Speaker 2>When you say more traders, are you thinking not just

273
00:15:54.000 --> 00:15:57.639
<v Speaker 2>the US but globally because with tokenization of traditional assets

274
00:15:57.639 --> 00:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and much more, if you're in a country and Africa,

275
00:16:00.279 --> 00:16:03.480
<v Speaker 2>or you're somewhere in India, wherever New Zealand, you now

276
00:16:03.519 --> 00:16:07.879
<v Speaker 2>have the ability to access these markets trade them and

277
00:16:07.879 --> 00:16:09.279
<v Speaker 2>then do defining things like that.

278
00:16:09.639 --> 00:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean you look at a lot of these markets.

279
00:16:11.480 --> 00:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>People have access to crypto, they've been onboarded, they have

280
00:16:14.399 --> 00:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>crypto wallets, they're using stable coin, and when we get

281
00:16:17.919 --> 00:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>US stocks on chain in a much bigger way. I think,

282
00:16:22.600 --> 00:16:25.759
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that you know, customers in the

283
00:16:25.799 --> 00:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>past ten years in the US have increased their overall

284
00:16:31.240 --> 00:16:35.399
<v Speaker 1>exposure to equities relative to cash and other assets, I'd

285
00:16:35.480 --> 00:16:41.679
<v Speaker 1>expect customers overseas to increase their relative exposure of tokenized

286
00:16:42.120 --> 00:16:45.039
<v Speaker 1>equities and other assets relative to stable coin.

287
00:16:45.360 --> 00:16:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Sure, talk to us a bit about that. Because one

288
00:16:48.159 --> 00:16:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of your big crypto initiatives is tokenization of tradfy assets

289
00:16:52.519 --> 00:16:54.840
<v Speaker 2>like stocks. There are going to be people watching, listening.

290
00:16:54.960 --> 00:16:57.440
<v Speaker 2>This is a new concept to them, and they're gonna say, so,

291
00:16:57.519 --> 00:17:00.200
<v Speaker 2>what can access Tesla stock right now now?

292
00:17:00.559 --> 00:17:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

293
00:17:00.919 --> 00:17:02.600
<v Speaker 2>What will be your pitch to them to say, here's

294
00:17:02.639 --> 00:17:03.559
<v Speaker 2>why we're tokenizing.

295
00:17:03.799 --> 00:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the same argument as stable coin. Like

296
00:17:07.960 --> 00:17:10.799
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that stable coin puts fiat currency

297
00:17:10.920 --> 00:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like the US dollar on the blockchain, tokenizing stocks puts

298
00:17:15.480 --> 00:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>US stocks in the blockchain, and there's several benefits. In

299
00:17:20.400 --> 00:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the US, It's really about twenty four to seven trading.

300
00:17:24.279 --> 00:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It's about lower settlement times and the DeFi interoperability, the

301
00:17:30.440 --> 00:17:33.799
<v Speaker 1>fact that if your broker has an outage, you can

302
00:17:33.839 --> 00:17:38.319
<v Speaker 1>take your stocks to another provider and it's much more

303
00:17:38.440 --> 00:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>robust experience because you have control and access to your

304
00:17:42.240 --> 00:17:45.519
<v Speaker 1>assets as long as the blockchain is up, and you know,

305
00:17:45.559 --> 00:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>blockchains have proved to be generally quite robust. But then

306
00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:53.799
<v Speaker 1>there's the international component where you know, billions of people

307
00:17:54.200 --> 00:17:57.799
<v Speaker 1>right now overseas don't even have access to these assets.

308
00:17:58.519 --> 00:18:01.039
<v Speaker 1>And you know stable cooin did that for dollars. It

309
00:18:01.079 --> 00:18:03.519
<v Speaker 1>was hard to get dollars if you were in Latin

310
00:18:03.559 --> 00:18:07.759
<v Speaker 1>America or you know even in even in Asia. And

311
00:18:07.799 --> 00:18:11.799
<v Speaker 1>now with stable coins, because those customers have been onboarded

312
00:18:11.799 --> 00:18:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a crypto wallets, they can get exposure to stable coin,

313
00:18:15.599 --> 00:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and particularly in markets where the local currency has devalued

314
00:18:20.680 --> 00:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>very rapidly, you know, dollar stable coins have become the

315
00:18:24.400 --> 00:18:27.559
<v Speaker 1>best vehicle to get that type of exposure. And I

316
00:18:27.599 --> 00:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>think the same is true for token is stocks. They're

317
00:18:30.400 --> 00:18:34.839
<v Speaker 1>going to want exposure to the higher appreciation of these companies.

318
00:18:35.440 --> 00:18:38.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everyone's heard of the great American companies that

319
00:18:38.200 --> 00:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Tesla's Amazons Meta Nvidia and you know, yeah, it's humbling

320
00:18:45.039 --> 00:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to even be mentioned in that category for sure, But

321
00:18:48.440 --> 00:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the rest of the world is interested in

322
00:18:50.920 --> 00:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the American market. It's increasingly a global market, and so

323
00:18:55.559 --> 00:18:59.799
<v Speaker 1>that product as a delivery system to US equities, I

324
00:18:59.799 --> 00:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>think will work very well.

325
00:19:02.319 --> 00:19:04.880
<v Speaker 2>And with these new on rams being built, do you

326
00:19:04.920 --> 00:19:07.920
<v Speaker 2>expect tons of liquidity to come in and evaluations of

327
00:19:08.119 --> 00:19:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the SMP five hundred and NAZAC to go even higher

328
00:19:11.279 --> 00:19:13.559
<v Speaker 2>than we've ever seen it. Even the individual stock. So

329
00:19:13.640 --> 00:19:16.039
<v Speaker 2>let's say Tesla, A lot of people are bullish on

330
00:19:16.079 --> 00:19:18.240
<v Speaker 2>that and are like they're seeing what Elon's doing, and

331
00:19:18.240 --> 00:19:20.720
<v Speaker 2>then you have people from around the globe that can

332
00:19:20.759 --> 00:19:24.680
<v Speaker 2>now on ramp. It seems like this truly global market

333
00:19:24.799 --> 00:19:26.839
<v Speaker 2>and tons of liquidity that can come in.

334
00:19:27.160 --> 00:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that if the number of startups and different

335
00:19:30.960 --> 00:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunities stayed the same, you would expect that to happen, right,

336
00:19:35.039 --> 00:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>greater demand for the same amount of supply. But I

337
00:19:38.519 --> 00:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>think one of the other benefits of tokenization is that

338
00:19:43.119 --> 00:19:46.599
<v Speaker 1>assets that typically have not been liquid or tradeable or

339
00:19:46.599 --> 00:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>even accessible, like private stocks like real estate. You know,

340
00:19:51.839 --> 00:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>these are attractive assets. A lot of people want to

341
00:19:53.960 --> 00:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>get their hands on real estate exposure, private stock exposure,

342
00:19:58.400 --> 00:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's very difficult right now. So we expect the

343
00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>supply to increase too, and not just the demand. So

344
00:20:05.119 --> 00:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll have more global money chasing these instruments, but the

345
00:20:10.519 --> 00:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>number of instruments will continue to increase.

346
00:20:13.640 --> 00:20:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Now part of the announcement with launching tokenized stocks and

347
00:20:16.920 --> 00:20:20.599
<v Speaker 2>so forth, I believe it's Arbitrum that you're using that blockchain.

348
00:20:21.079 --> 00:20:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Are you planning to use We're building our own, but

349
00:20:23.839 --> 00:20:26.039
<v Speaker 1>it's using the Arbitram stack.

350
00:20:27.799 --> 00:20:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Are you planning to integrate other blockchains have some interoperability

351
00:20:31.200 --> 00:20:33.440
<v Speaker 2>among the maybe the top chains and things like that.

352
00:20:34.079 --> 00:20:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, right now it's still early. We're focused

353
00:20:36.839 --> 00:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>on our own chain, but over time, I think we'll

354
00:20:40.160 --> 00:20:44.319
<v Speaker 1>have to as it gets up and running and interoperability

355
00:20:44.359 --> 00:20:47.799
<v Speaker 1>becomes more of a desired feature, we'll have to focus

356
00:20:47.839 --> 00:20:53.799
<v Speaker 1>on bridging and those types of technologies, or at least sponsoring, endorsing,

357
00:20:53.920 --> 00:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>helping out other companies that want to build these bridging technologies.

358
00:20:58.119 --> 00:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the great thing about it is so much

359
00:21:00.039 --> 00:21:03.559
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff is open source, and you really have

360
00:21:03.680 --> 00:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like community development of these public protocols. It's really public infrastructure, right,

361
00:21:10.039 --> 00:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't drive ethereum development. We probably could

362
00:21:15.359 --> 00:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>make suggestions, but ultimately we don't drive arbitrum development either.

363
00:21:19.920 --> 00:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And the goal would be, like over time the Robinhood

364
00:21:24.720 --> 00:21:27.559
<v Speaker 1>chain to be the best chain for real world assets

365
00:21:27.839 --> 00:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and to have a vibrant open source ecosystem and a

366
00:21:31.480 --> 00:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>vibrant developer ecosystem around it.

367
00:21:34.559 --> 00:21:36.799
<v Speaker 2>So is your vision for that chain to be public

368
00:21:36.960 --> 00:21:38.160
<v Speaker 2>or will it be permissioned?

369
00:21:39.200 --> 00:21:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Division? Is for it to be public? Yeah, full DeFi access.

370
00:21:43.200 --> 00:21:46.240
<v Speaker 2>That's great. I love that. And then some of your

371
00:21:46.279 --> 00:21:50.480
<v Speaker 2>other crypto initiatives. Obviously you have full crypto trading and

372
00:21:50.559 --> 00:21:52.440
<v Speaker 2>you added staking. Tell us a bit about that.

373
00:21:53.119 --> 00:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So in the US we have Staking, which has

374
00:21:57.440 --> 00:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>been off to a fast start. In the first month

375
00:21:59.720 --> 00:22:02.039
<v Speaker 1>since we've rolled it out for Ethan Soul, we have

376
00:22:02.079 --> 00:22:05.839
<v Speaker 1>about seven hundred and fifty million in steak dassets, which

377
00:22:05.839 --> 00:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>is actually significant percentage. Now we've looked if you look

378
00:22:09.279 --> 00:22:14.839
<v Speaker 1>at Europe where we launched Staking earlier, much higher percentage.

379
00:22:15.000 --> 00:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Over half of our assets are staked, and we think

380
00:22:18.960 --> 00:22:23.599
<v Speaker 1>over time, as we get more and more, as the

381
00:22:23.640 --> 00:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>word gets out that we have this offer, you should

382
00:22:26.000 --> 00:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>see the steak dassets increase even further and I think

383
00:22:29.960 --> 00:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it's good for customers. Obviously they get the yield, but

384
00:22:33.200 --> 00:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they also want to be a part of something bigger,

385
00:22:35.519 --> 00:22:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and they really it resonates with them to actually be

386
00:22:38.839 --> 00:22:43.559
<v Speaker 1>contributing to maintaining the networks that they're holding these assets in,

387
00:22:43.880 --> 00:22:47.279
<v Speaker 1>so that's been good. We launched a bunch of other

388
00:22:47.319 --> 00:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff besides tokenized besides stock tokens. In the EU, for example,

389
00:22:52.519 --> 00:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Perpetual Futures was announced to great fanfare, so people very

390
00:22:56.680 --> 00:23:00.279
<v Speaker 1>excited about about Perpetual Futures. I think the UI is

391
00:23:00.319 --> 00:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>really nice there and we're looking to bring that to

392
00:23:04.480 --> 00:23:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the US pending some regulatory clarity there. We have the

393
00:23:10.039 --> 00:23:13.319
<v Speaker 1>credit card, which has been very popular, and we're adding

394
00:23:13.319 --> 00:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a crypto value prop so customers can directly invest in

395
00:23:17.039 --> 00:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>crypto through their rewards, which will be very cool. And yeah,

396
00:23:22.400 --> 00:23:25.559
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the other thing is private markets.

397
00:23:26.000 --> 00:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We're really working hard. We heard a lot of demand

398
00:23:29.319 --> 00:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>from our event, not just for private market exposure in Europe,

399
00:23:33.319 --> 00:23:36.279
<v Speaker 1>which we demonstrated with the open AI and SpaceX giveaway,

400
00:23:36.640 --> 00:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>but also in the US. We had over twenty five

401
00:23:39.279 --> 00:23:42.839
<v Speaker 1>million people watch our livestream event, and a lot of

402
00:23:42.839 --> 00:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>those were in the US, so there's a lot of

403
00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>interest in getting private markets exposure, and we think there's

404
00:23:49.440 --> 00:23:52.839
<v Speaker 1>a path to making that possible here, and it might

405
00:23:52.880 --> 00:23:56.759
<v Speaker 1>not be tokenized at the onset, but you know, we

406
00:23:57.759 --> 00:24:00.759
<v Speaker 1>want to use whatever technology and regular toy structure is

407
00:24:00.759 --> 00:24:04.279
<v Speaker 1>available to give our customers the best experience.

408
00:24:04.480 --> 00:24:06.759
<v Speaker 2>On the staking front. This may be a hard question

409
00:24:06.799 --> 00:24:08.920
<v Speaker 2>to answer, but you know, right now, banks don't give

410
00:24:08.960 --> 00:24:11.880
<v Speaker 2>you any type of interest, right and folks are in

411
00:24:11.880 --> 00:24:14.559
<v Speaker 2>a hunt for yield. Do you think that there may

412
00:24:14.599 --> 00:24:17.119
<v Speaker 2>be this kind of black hole where crypto sucks in

413
00:24:17.440 --> 00:24:19.799
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people are moving their money into ether

414
00:24:19.920 --> 00:24:22.240
<v Speaker 2>or soul to steak, to earn that high yield and

415
00:24:22.279 --> 00:24:23.759
<v Speaker 2>earn that passive reward.

416
00:24:24.359 --> 00:24:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that more and more people are getting interested

417
00:24:27.559 --> 00:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in staking they hear about it. I mean Robinhood's mass

418
00:24:31.960 --> 00:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>market product. So I think as people see the yield

419
00:24:36.640 --> 00:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're getting and kind of share the concept with

420
00:24:40.039 --> 00:24:45.559
<v Speaker 1>their friends, I think it'll be hard to maintain control

421
00:24:45.599 --> 00:24:50.039
<v Speaker 1>of assets on a centralized platform, particularly unless you're giving

422
00:24:50.079 --> 00:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>some exposure to that yield. I don't see it necessarily

423
00:24:54.000 --> 00:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>competing with cash fields because people tend to think of

424
00:24:58.519 --> 00:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>these products very differently. Cash is like a you know,

425
00:25:02.799 --> 00:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>secure investment that holds its value. Cryptos, even the layer

426
00:25:09.720 --> 00:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>one chains, tend to be a little bit more volatile.

427
00:25:12.920 --> 00:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think the better analogy is probably to a stock.

428
00:25:16.079 --> 00:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>People think of it similarly to stocks, and like there

429
00:25:21.039 --> 00:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>are analogies to earning yield on stocks, like securities lending

430
00:25:25.160 --> 00:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>for instance.

431
00:25:26.119 --> 00:25:30.519
<v Speaker 2>Right, so, Vlad, it's twenty thirty, it's crypto the biggest

432
00:25:30.519 --> 00:25:32.519
<v Speaker 2>part of your business as far as revenue or do

433
00:25:32.559 --> 00:25:36.279
<v Speaker 2>you think it's on par with the equities market.

434
00:25:36.799 --> 00:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends on how you measure crypto. So

435
00:25:40.079 --> 00:25:44.279
<v Speaker 1>if crypto includes tokenization of real world assets like stocks,

436
00:25:45.680 --> 00:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that could grow rather large. I think at

437
00:25:50.200 --> 00:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, though, the majority of investment

438
00:25:54.400 --> 00:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>will be in assets that have fundamental utility, so real things,

439
00:25:59.079 --> 00:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's real estate, a private credit, private equity, public stocks,

440
00:26:05.640 --> 00:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or you know, things like art or collectibles even uh,

441
00:26:09.759 --> 00:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that should remain the majority and so. But

442
00:26:14.920 --> 00:26:18.079
<v Speaker 1>but if those are tokenized, then you can you can

443
00:26:18.119 --> 00:26:20.519
<v Speaker 1>probably categorize that as crypto revenue.

444
00:26:20.960 --> 00:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, Yeah, if it's bucketed that way, Yeah, that makes sense.

445
00:26:26.559 --> 00:26:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Us d G the stable coin Consortium. Why not launch

446
00:26:32.440 --> 00:26:36.000
<v Speaker 2>your own stable coin? Why be part of this consortium.

447
00:26:36.480 --> 00:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, uh, one one thing that we think

448
00:26:39.559 --> 00:26:41.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a little bit easier with a

449
00:26:41.359 --> 00:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>consortium is getting other companies to be on board and

450
00:26:47.880 --> 00:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>using our stable coin as a first class citizen. Yeah,

451
00:26:52.000 --> 00:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>because if you think about it, if I was offering you,

452
00:26:55.519 --> 00:27:01.039
<v Speaker 1>as you know, a crypto exchange or wallet operator robinhood coin,

453
00:27:02.200 --> 00:27:06.519
<v Speaker 1>your first reaction might be why would I have robinhood

454
00:27:06.519 --> 00:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>coin on my platform and why would I endorse that?

455
00:27:09.640 --> 00:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But if it's something that's collectively owned, then I think

456
00:27:14.000 --> 00:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that could be very very powerful if you could benefit

457
00:27:16.640 --> 00:27:21.079
<v Speaker 1>from robinhood being part of your network without it being

458
00:27:21.240 --> 00:27:24.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, termed a robinhood coin. And I think the

459
00:27:24.400 --> 00:27:29.079
<v Speaker 1>thing that we really liked about us d G, which

460
00:27:29.240 --> 00:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you know is unique relative to how other stable coin

461
00:27:32.440 --> 00:27:36.759
<v Speaker 1>consortiums like Circle have been set up, is the participants

462
00:27:36.960 --> 00:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>get to control the rewards in the yield and distribute

463
00:27:40.240 --> 00:27:46.279
<v Speaker 1>it accordingly. So if we bring more dollars into the network,

464
00:27:46.359 --> 00:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>admit more us DG, we get a disproportionate amount of

465
00:27:49.880 --> 00:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the awards based on what we bring. And so I

466
00:27:54.720 --> 00:27:58.839
<v Speaker 1>believe it has the benefits of our own stable coin

467
00:28:00.119 --> 00:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>with with sort of like limited downsides and I think

468
00:28:03.039 --> 00:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the great thing about it is, you know, we continue

469
00:28:05.279 --> 00:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to support you as d C, will support whatever stable

470
00:28:08.400 --> 00:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>coin customers want. But yeah, us d G, I think

471
00:28:14.279 --> 00:28:17.079
<v Speaker 1>has we think has a nice structure as a consortium

472
00:28:17.160 --> 00:28:19.279
<v Speaker 1>where we get the benefits of having our own coin

473
00:28:19.359 --> 00:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and limited limited downsides.

474
00:28:22.519 --> 00:28:25.519
<v Speaker 2>That absolutely makes sense. And then in addition to the distribution,

475
00:28:26.000 --> 00:28:31.720
<v Speaker 2>having you and other well known companies trusted brands being

476
00:28:31.799 --> 00:28:35.079
<v Speaker 2>part of that consortium, I would trust that more as

477
00:28:35.119 --> 00:28:38.359
<v Speaker 2>a consumer and a user versus let's say a startup

478
00:28:38.400 --> 00:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>stable coin that no one is really backing. It's out there,

479
00:28:41.480 --> 00:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>but I'm going to go with a trusted brand that

480
00:28:43.480 --> 00:28:43.680
<v Speaker 2>I know.

481
00:28:44.079 --> 00:28:46.359
<v Speaker 1>And I also think that, you know, one of the

482
00:28:46.400 --> 00:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>other criticisms of being in a consortium historically has been

483
00:28:50.759 --> 00:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that you don't really have as much control over the

484
00:28:53.759 --> 00:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>product development. And you know, we we do tend to

485
00:28:56.839 --> 00:28:59.319
<v Speaker 1>want to have a lot of control into what the

486
00:28:59.400 --> 00:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>end user is experiences. But for a stable coin, there's

487
00:29:04.039 --> 00:29:07.319
<v Speaker 1>just limited degrees of freedom. The thing has to work,

488
00:29:07.519 --> 00:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it has to be backed by dollars, it has to

489
00:29:10.400 --> 00:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>have some mechanism to generate yield, and if enough of

490
00:29:14.680 --> 00:29:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that is flexible, we feel like, you know, we're good

491
00:29:19.839 --> 00:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with the development. We don't think that there's going to

492
00:29:22.039 --> 00:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>be a huge downside to not steering that directly.

493
00:29:27.359 --> 00:29:29.480
<v Speaker 2>With the Genius Act that recently got passed into a

494
00:29:29.519 --> 00:29:32.359
<v Speaker 2>law to stave of aquin legislation. What do you think

495
00:29:32.400 --> 00:29:36.279
<v Speaker 2>that means for dollar adoption, dollar dominance, and just more

496
00:29:36.319 --> 00:29:38.160
<v Speaker 2>people using digital money.

497
00:29:39.160 --> 00:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think what the more powerful thing about

498
00:29:42.039 --> 00:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the Genius Bill is it's a demonstration that the US

499
00:29:46.119 --> 00:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>has not just the will but also the capability of

500
00:29:49.759 --> 00:29:54.359
<v Speaker 1>getting crypto legislation passed. So it was like a warm up.

501
00:29:55.000 --> 00:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the securities legislation through clarity is going to

502
00:29:59.960 --> 00:30:05.759
<v Speaker 1>be much more, much more meaningful. And also getting real

503
00:30:05.799 --> 00:30:10.839
<v Speaker 1>world asset tokenization set up in a coherent regulatory framework

504
00:30:10.880 --> 00:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that's on shore UH is going to be a big

505
00:30:14.680 --> 00:30:15.319
<v Speaker 1>thing as well.

506
00:30:16.640 --> 00:30:19.759
<v Speaker 2>The Market Structure Bill David Sachs said they should send it,

507
00:30:19.759 --> 00:30:23.640
<v Speaker 2>should have that pass in September. That's the meat and potatoes.

508
00:30:23.680 --> 00:30:26.240
<v Speaker 2>It covers a lot of different aspects of the crypto market.

509
00:30:26.559 --> 00:30:28.599
<v Speaker 2>If that gets past, what does that mean for Robinhood

510
00:30:28.640 --> 00:30:29.759
<v Speaker 2>and its crypto business.

511
00:30:30.160 --> 00:30:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I think there will be there will be much more

512
00:30:33.599 --> 00:30:40.119
<v Speaker 1>clarity on what assets should be CFTC regulated versus SEC

513
00:30:40.319 --> 00:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>regulated uh, and also what the mechanism is from jumping

514
00:30:46.319 --> 00:30:48.839
<v Speaker 1>from one regime to the to the other. And of

515
00:30:48.839 --> 00:30:52.279
<v Speaker 1>course we run both kinds of businesses right our brokers

516
00:30:52.279 --> 00:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>are SEC regulated. We've got a futures commissions merchant which

517
00:30:57.519 --> 00:31:01.319
<v Speaker 1>is our traditional futures business, but also predict markets that's

518
00:31:01.359 --> 00:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>CFTC regulated. And of course our current crypto business, which

519
00:31:05.680 --> 00:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is state by state, which I think is not ideal.

520
00:31:09.119 --> 00:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I think state by state increases complexity and cost, and

521
00:31:15.319 --> 00:31:18.599
<v Speaker 1>for something like crypto, there really should be a federal

522
00:31:18.640 --> 00:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>framework that unifies, sort of like the patchwork of regulations.

523
00:31:23.960 --> 00:31:28.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think too early to be seen, the final

524
00:31:28.200 --> 00:31:32.839
<v Speaker 1>draft may look different than what's out there now. But

525
00:31:32.880 --> 00:31:38.319
<v Speaker 1>if we get a comprehensive federal framework and also listing

526
00:31:38.559 --> 00:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>standards clarity for lack of a better word, I think

527
00:31:43.720 --> 00:31:46.039
<v Speaker 1>that should make it a lot easier to operate going forward.

528
00:31:47.279 --> 00:31:51.799
<v Speaker 2>So glad we have this soup of new technologies tokenization, DeFi,

529
00:31:51.880 --> 00:31:56.359
<v Speaker 2>stable coins, and everyone's pretty much online now right. The

530
00:31:56.400 --> 00:31:59.400
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure of the internet has gone global. Everyone has a

531
00:31:59.440 --> 00:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>smartphone for the most part. What does the future of

532
00:32:02.200 --> 00:32:05.720
<v Speaker 2>markets look like? Is it kind of madness? Like we're

533
00:32:05.839 --> 00:32:09.599
<v Speaker 2>staying up till four am trading or maybe not. Maybe

534
00:32:09.640 --> 00:32:13.240
<v Speaker 2>we just have more accessibility to assets and can better

535
00:32:13.279 --> 00:32:16.720
<v Speaker 2>our lives and can participate in the markets. There's more democratization.

536
00:32:17.559 --> 00:32:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of trends that are sort

537
00:32:20.160 --> 00:32:26.519
<v Speaker 1>of like hitting at the same time. One that I

538
00:32:26.519 --> 00:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>think is going to be a big one that we

539
00:32:28.279 --> 00:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about much as the Great Wealth Transfer. So

540
00:32:31.079 --> 00:32:33.119
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty four trillion, I think is the

541
00:32:33.200 --> 00:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>last number I saw of assets going from silent generation

542
00:32:36.680 --> 00:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and Baby boomers down to younger generations. And you know,

543
00:32:40.759 --> 00:32:47.519
<v Speaker 1>this is money moving from people that primarily did their

544
00:32:47.559 --> 00:32:52.079
<v Speaker 1>financial services in person at branches to younger people that

545
00:32:52.119 --> 00:32:55.799
<v Speaker 1>are much more digitally native that prefer to do their

546
00:32:55.799 --> 00:32:59.799
<v Speaker 1>financial services from their smartphone at home. And I think

547
00:32:59.839 --> 00:33:01.519
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to change a lot of things for

548
00:33:01.559 --> 00:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the better. I think obviously costs will be lower, You'll

549
00:33:05.720 --> 00:33:09.119
<v Speaker 1>get a lot more direct participation in these companies, which

550
00:33:09.119 --> 00:33:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I think is a big thing. I think we've gotten

551
00:33:11.799 --> 00:33:16.119
<v Speaker 1>very abstracted over the past few decades as more and

552
00:33:16.160 --> 00:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>more of the money has been going into funds, you know,

553
00:33:18.519 --> 00:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>pension funds, different things they're investing the money on behalf

554
00:33:22.279 --> 00:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of like large pools of capital. We've sort of moved

555
00:33:26.240 --> 00:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>away from buying a company because you believe that company

556
00:33:30.240 --> 00:33:33.599
<v Speaker 1>will do well. The dominant thing is like, what's the

557
00:33:33.640 --> 00:33:37.319
<v Speaker 1>sector doing, what's the macro doing? Where do tariffs stand?

558
00:33:37.880 --> 00:33:41.279
<v Speaker 1>And less of like, Okay, this company's earnings I believe

559
00:33:41.279 --> 00:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to be higher in the future than now

560
00:33:43.200 --> 00:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>by this much, and so I'll buy it. And I

561
00:33:45.880 --> 00:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>think we're seeing a positive We're going to see a

562
00:33:48.240 --> 00:33:52.799
<v Speaker 1>positive reversion to direct investment, which I think is good.

563
00:33:53.319 --> 00:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>You have AI driven disruption, which I think is going

564
00:33:55.759 --> 00:33:59.599
<v Speaker 1>to be a big thing, and I think self directed

565
00:33:59.680 --> 00:34:01.559
<v Speaker 1>is going to be an increasingly big thing. I think

566
00:34:01.880 --> 00:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>customers are going to be self directing a greater percentage

567
00:34:06.000 --> 00:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of their finances and their lives.

568
00:34:09.440 --> 00:34:12.760
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying the RIA and wealth management business is

569
00:34:12.800 --> 00:34:14.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna reduce significantly.

570
00:34:14.880 --> 00:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the RIA business is likely to increase, but

571
00:34:19.920 --> 00:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the RIA relationship to customers will change fundamentally.

572
00:34:25.000 --> 00:34:28.079
<v Speaker 1>And actually we have we made a great acquisition of

573
00:34:28.079 --> 00:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a company called trade PMR, which is an RIA custody platform.

574
00:34:33.239 --> 00:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you should think of the RIA as I

575
00:34:36.960 --> 00:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>think in the future we'll have more entrepreneurs And if

576
00:34:40.440 --> 00:34:44.119
<v Speaker 1>you think about the Robinhood customer as many of them are.

577
00:34:44.239 --> 00:34:48.119
<v Speaker 1>As an entrepreneur, your RIA should be your CFO. So

578
00:34:49.159 --> 00:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>historically the RIA has been like, leave this to me.

579
00:34:52.960 --> 00:34:56.559
<v Speaker 1>I know what's best for you, you know. And I

580
00:34:56.599 --> 00:34:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think I think there'll be a trusted advisor. They'll be

581
00:34:59.760 --> 00:35:04.119
<v Speaker 1>able to help you with a lot more of your needs,

582
00:35:04.480 --> 00:35:08.199
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately they'll be there to help you achieve your goals.

583
00:35:08.360 --> 00:35:10.639
<v Speaker 1>So I think the relationship will shift to a much

584
00:35:10.679 --> 00:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>more client friendly one. And I think also arias will

585
00:35:13.719 --> 00:35:16.679
<v Speaker 1>be able to serve many more clients because they're going

586
00:35:16.719 --> 00:35:20.039
<v Speaker 1>to be earlier adopters of this technology as well.

587
00:35:20.960 --> 00:35:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll give it a bit of an anecdotal story just personally.

588
00:35:24.480 --> 00:35:28.079
<v Speaker 2>My wife and I we have a registered investment advisor

589
00:35:28.119 --> 00:35:31.280
<v Speaker 2>in one of the big firms. I'll name it Edward Jones. Yes,

590
00:35:31.360 --> 00:35:34.079
<v Speaker 2>we have a trad fy account, but they couldn't touch crypto.

591
00:35:34.360 --> 00:35:37.639
<v Speaker 2>But I was the risk taker in my family investing

592
00:35:37.679 --> 00:35:39.800
<v Speaker 2>in bitcoin in the early days, eth and so forth.

593
00:35:40.519 --> 00:35:44.639
<v Speaker 2>That portfolio has grown significantly more than the trad FI portfolio. Yeah,

594
00:35:44.679 --> 00:35:47.679
<v Speaker 2>and now when I speak to my ARIA, he's like,

595
00:35:48.039 --> 00:35:50.440
<v Speaker 2>how's your crypto portfolio doing? Because you can't touch it? Yet.

596
00:35:50.440 --> 00:35:52.199
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's just funny that.

597
00:35:53.119 --> 00:35:55.280
<v Speaker 3>They're telling you that they're working on it. Yes, they're like,

598
00:35:55.320 --> 00:35:59.320
<v Speaker 3>oh yeah, of course, yeah, it's so funny. And the

599
00:35:59.360 --> 00:36:01.679
<v Speaker 3>transition that's happening. I eventually they'll get there. A lot

600
00:36:01.719 --> 00:36:03.639
<v Speaker 3>of the Wall Street firms launching their own et aps

601
00:36:03.679 --> 00:36:04.360
<v Speaker 3>and things like that.

602
00:36:05.280 --> 00:36:07.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, what are your thoughts on how trad fi

603
00:36:07.800 --> 00:36:09.639
<v Speaker 2>And I would include robinhood in there. I think you

604
00:36:09.639 --> 00:36:12.239
<v Speaker 2>guys have been the disruptor of trad fi. But a

605
00:36:12.239 --> 00:36:15.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of these firms launching tokenize money market funds, etaps

606
00:36:15.920 --> 00:36:16.480
<v Speaker 2>and much more.

607
00:36:17.199 --> 00:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they're talking about it, but there's been a

608
00:36:20.000 --> 00:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of words and very little action in the form

609
00:36:23.400 --> 00:36:27.519
<v Speaker 1>of products that see the light of day and you

610
00:36:27.559 --> 00:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>can actually use. Yeah, I mean, most of the tokenization

611
00:36:31.960 --> 00:36:36.840
<v Speaker 1>initiatives have been on private blockchains where you don't actually

612
00:36:37.320 --> 00:36:40.519
<v Speaker 1>get the benefit of tokenization, so it sort of like

613
00:36:41.360 --> 00:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>works slightly less well than non tokenized equivalents. And I

614
00:36:46.840 --> 00:36:49.599
<v Speaker 1>think it's what happens when you have these large companies

615
00:36:49.840 --> 00:36:53.159
<v Speaker 1>that have an established business that they're really afraid to touch,

616
00:36:53.760 --> 00:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and so by design they kind of create these sandboxes

617
00:36:57.760 --> 00:37:01.519
<v Speaker 1>and think tags and research labs. If people over here

618
00:37:02.239 --> 00:37:07.039
<v Speaker 1>but it never makes its way into the full product.

619
00:37:07.800 --> 00:37:10.000
<v Speaker 2>This is a hard question to ask or if they

620
00:37:10.119 --> 00:37:13.320
<v Speaker 2>probably answer, and it's probably been controversial. With the rise

621
00:37:13.360 --> 00:37:16.800
<v Speaker 2>of platforms like Robinhood and this technology where people going

622
00:37:16.840 --> 00:37:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to have ownership do their own investing, so to speak,

623
00:37:20.199 --> 00:37:23.079
<v Speaker 2>with AI agents supporting them, are we going to see

624
00:37:23.639 --> 00:37:26.679
<v Speaker 2>the reduction of power of Wall Street bangs and the

625
00:37:26.719 --> 00:37:28.639
<v Speaker 2>Goldman sacks and so forth, that they're not going to

626
00:37:28.719 --> 00:37:33.159
<v Speaker 2>have the same amount of power and capital they've had historically.

627
00:37:33.760 --> 00:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think that if you think about

628
00:37:37.000 --> 00:37:41.800
<v Speaker 1>all of these trends, they're moving in the direction of

629
00:37:41.920 --> 00:37:45.119
<v Speaker 1>greater individual power. I mean, the tools that you would

630
00:37:45.159 --> 00:37:48.639
<v Speaker 1>have had to rely on an institution for in the

631
00:37:48.679 --> 00:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>past are now in your smartphone, and you know a

632
00:37:54.320 --> 00:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are increasingly being offered in a self custody,

633
00:37:58.039 --> 00:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>permissionless way. And I think that's an enduring trend. It's

634
00:38:02.400 --> 00:38:07.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be more individual for sure. Individuals will have

635
00:38:07.800 --> 00:38:13.159
<v Speaker 1>more power, whether institutions have less. I think demand depends

636
00:38:13.199 --> 00:38:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on how far and how aggressively the overall PI grows,

637
00:38:20.320 --> 00:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and I believe it'll grow quite significantly. So yeah, I

638
00:38:25.480 --> 00:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>see a world where the institutional market will also continue

639
00:38:29.760 --> 00:38:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to grow. I think you'll see more assets on an

640
00:38:32.280 --> 00:38:41.079
<v Speaker 1>absolute basis in institutional accounts, but individuals will become more

641
00:38:41.119 --> 00:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>powerful and will have more assets that are self directed.

642
00:38:44.199 --> 00:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of these individuals will also

643
00:38:46.960 --> 00:38:50.559
<v Speaker 1>become institutions, and so the lines will will tend to

644
00:38:50.599 --> 00:38:52.119
<v Speaker 1>blur between the two as well.

645
00:38:52.800 --> 00:38:55.119
<v Speaker 2>When you say these individuals will become institutions, do you

646
00:38:55.159 --> 00:38:58.679
<v Speaker 2>mean that because they have, to your point, more access

647
00:38:58.679 --> 00:39:01.599
<v Speaker 2>to data, trading, view, Bloomberg, terminal, things that were not

648
00:39:01.639 --> 00:39:04.719
<v Speaker 2>accessible before. They can look at charts, they can understand

649
00:39:04.760 --> 00:39:06.599
<v Speaker 2>what the feed is doing better because there's more knowledge

650
00:39:06.599 --> 00:39:10.199
<v Speaker 2>out there on the Internet. They have their AI agents,

651
00:39:10.239 --> 00:39:10.599
<v Speaker 2>they kind of.

652
00:39:10.599 --> 00:39:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Bul their AI agents, they have their own software, they

653
00:39:13.079 --> 00:39:15.639
<v Speaker 1>have tools like Robinhood, which I think will help them.

654
00:39:16.000 --> 00:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And then they'll manage money on behalf of others, right,

655
00:39:19.079 --> 00:39:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you'll probably have an increase in one

656
00:39:24.880 --> 00:39:28.760
<v Speaker 1>person hedge funds or one person rias or asset managers,

657
00:39:29.239 --> 00:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>which in all sense of the world, they look and

658
00:39:32.519 --> 00:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like institutions, but it's not hundreds of people in

659
00:39:36.840 --> 00:39:39.800
<v Speaker 1>an office. It's you know, one or two people that

660
00:39:39.840 --> 00:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are just managing a large book of business.

661
00:39:43.239 --> 00:39:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they'll have to be licensed, or they

662
00:39:44.880 --> 00:39:47.639
<v Speaker 2>can just do it with peer to peer type set up.

663
00:39:48.119 --> 00:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I think depending on what type of business they do

664
00:39:51.440 --> 00:39:54.119
<v Speaker 1>and whether it's in the US or global, they'll they'll

665
00:39:54.119 --> 00:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>still have to get licensed, but you know, even that

666
00:39:57.119 --> 00:39:59.760
<v Speaker 1>process can be streamlined. I think there's a big push

667
00:39:59.840 --> 00:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>now to like make it easier to get licensure, to

668
00:40:05.000 --> 00:40:08.079
<v Speaker 1>at least clarify the process across a bunch of different

669
00:40:08.079 --> 00:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>fields of what it takes to get particular type of accreditation.

670
00:40:13.840 --> 00:40:18.039
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's there's been We've gotten into a

671
00:40:18.159 --> 00:40:23.599
<v Speaker 1>quagmire of regulations right that's become unsustainable to even parse.

672
00:40:24.679 --> 00:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And I guess there's one of two solutions. One is

673
00:40:27.480 --> 00:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we delete a whole bunch of the ones that don't

674
00:40:29.480 --> 00:40:32.599
<v Speaker 1>make sense and streamline it. The other is we just

675
00:40:32.679 --> 00:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like use AI to manage it for us and simplify

676
00:40:35.920 --> 00:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it and interpret it. And I think one of those

677
00:40:38.880 --> 00:40:41.559
<v Speaker 1>two definitely will happen, possibly a little bit of both.

678
00:40:42.320 --> 00:40:44.679
<v Speaker 2>On that note, do you think the accreditation laws need

679
00:40:44.719 --> 00:40:47.039
<v Speaker 2>to be updated given how markets are situated?

680
00:40:47.360 --> 00:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, the accreditation laws don't make any sense in

681
00:40:52.840 --> 00:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the current market. I mean two reasons, right, One is

682
00:40:57.000 --> 00:41:01.519
<v Speaker 1>you can invest in any meme coin that's like easy accessible.

683
00:41:01.639 --> 00:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>You can invest an unlimited amount of your capital and

684
00:41:04.480 --> 00:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>any meme coin and that's fully legal. But SpaceX and

685
00:41:08.599 --> 00:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>open ai is viewed as too risky. And historically the

686
00:41:14.880 --> 00:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>accreditation laws were intended to make up for a information gap, right,

687
00:41:21.119 --> 00:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and the thinking was, there's not very much information. These

688
00:41:24.880 --> 00:41:29.159
<v Speaker 1>companies aren't publishing reports or really much of anything. And

689
00:41:30.039 --> 00:41:32.840
<v Speaker 1>if you have, you know, a million dollars in net

690
00:41:32.840 --> 00:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>worth or certain threshold of annual income, you could hire

691
00:41:37.840 --> 00:41:40.079
<v Speaker 1>a person for you to like make sense of this,

692
00:41:40.559 --> 00:41:45.599
<v Speaker 1>a professional to make sure you know you're just making

693
00:41:45.639 --> 00:41:50.519
<v Speaker 1>reasonable decisions. I think nowadays there's lots more information, right.

694
00:41:52.000 --> 00:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>You have all sorts of information on social media, the Internet,

695
00:41:56.199 --> 00:41:59.280
<v Speaker 1>probably more than most people would care to read. We

696
00:41:59.400 --> 00:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>have AI models that are getting smarter that can probably

697
00:42:03.280 --> 00:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>replicate the functions of most of the advisors you would

698
00:42:06.400 --> 00:42:10.519
<v Speaker 1>have been able to hire in the eighties, right, at

699
00:42:10.559 --> 00:42:14.039
<v Speaker 1>lower cost and also make sense of the information. And

700
00:42:14.159 --> 00:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you juxtapose that against the current public company climate, where

701
00:42:19.119 --> 00:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten easier for a private company to raise capital

702
00:42:21.920 --> 00:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>from institutional investors in the private markets. Simultaneously the costs

703
00:42:27.079 --> 00:42:30.559
<v Speaker 1>and like the process complexity of going public has increased.

704
00:42:31.559 --> 00:42:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So all of this has created a perfect storm where

705
00:42:35.119 --> 00:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>retail investors can get exposure to some of these AI

706
00:42:38.079 --> 00:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>companies that are shaping the future, and the incentives are

707
00:42:41.800 --> 00:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of all simultaneously aligned to make that more difficult

708
00:42:46.840 --> 00:42:49.519
<v Speaker 1>rather than rather than easier. So I think we have

709
00:42:49.559 --> 00:42:52.199
<v Speaker 1>to start chipping away at it, and the accreditation laws

710
00:42:52.320 --> 00:42:55.320
<v Speaker 1>need to be reformed for sure, And actually there's a

711
00:42:55.360 --> 00:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of support for this. I think there's a good

712
00:42:57.480 --> 00:42:58.320
<v Speaker 1>chance it'll happen.

713
00:42:58.760 --> 00:43:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely. You mentioned meme coins. I have a love

714
00:43:01.960 --> 00:43:05.039
<v Speaker 2>hate relationship with meme coins. I don't believe in banning them.

715
00:43:05.079 --> 00:43:07.679
<v Speaker 2>I believe in the frame market, right, but there are

716
00:43:07.760 --> 00:43:11.159
<v Speaker 2>some platforms that take advantage of people doing these things.

717
00:43:11.360 --> 00:43:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel there needs to be some guardrails in

718
00:43:13.440 --> 00:43:15.679
<v Speaker 2>place that, Yes, you could take your money and go

719
00:43:15.719 --> 00:43:17.639
<v Speaker 2>invest in meme coins like you do at the casino,

720
00:43:17.719 --> 00:43:19.960
<v Speaker 2>you go to Vegas, right, throw it on black on

721
00:43:20.000 --> 00:43:22.719
<v Speaker 2>the roulette table, whatever, but there needs to be some

722
00:43:22.760 --> 00:43:24.119
<v Speaker 2>guardrails to protect people here.

723
00:43:25.000 --> 00:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if we need additional guardrails. I mean,

724
00:43:27.440 --> 00:43:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a firm believer that people should people should have

725
00:43:34.039 --> 00:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>freedom to do what they want with their money, and

726
00:43:36.559 --> 00:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it's hard. And any time that you create guardrails and

727
00:43:40.920 --> 00:43:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they're applied without really an understanding what the costs are,

728
00:43:46.159 --> 00:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you make it difficult for I think the vast majority

729
00:43:49.400 --> 00:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of people that know what they're doing. So some guardrails,

730
00:43:53.920 --> 00:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure, are necessary. But do we need more than

731
00:43:58.000 --> 00:44:00.679
<v Speaker 1>we have now? I'm not sure. And you kind of

732
00:44:00.760 --> 00:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>also juxtapose that with it's getting easier across the board

733
00:44:05.559 --> 00:44:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to spend your money, right, And I think increasingly the

734
00:44:10.639 --> 00:44:14.199
<v Speaker 1>way I've always looked at Robinhood is we're not really

735
00:44:15.360 --> 00:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, our main competitor isn't really the traditional brokerages

736
00:44:20.679 --> 00:44:25.079
<v Speaker 1>because most of our customers have Robbinhood accounts and they

737
00:44:25.079 --> 00:44:28.159
<v Speaker 1>don't really think about traditional brokerage accounts, even though we're

738
00:44:28.159 --> 00:44:31.239
<v Speaker 1>pulling assets from them at an increasing rate. But a

739
00:44:31.280 --> 00:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of these customers would otherwise not be investing, they'd

740
00:44:34.000 --> 00:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>be spending that money. And so I see us competing

741
00:44:37.039 --> 00:44:41.559
<v Speaker 1>for like the spending bucket, right, and I think the

742
00:44:41.599 --> 00:44:46.519
<v Speaker 1>spending bucket is formidable competition. So if you make it

743
00:44:46.599 --> 00:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>harder to invest in any way without making it harder

744
00:44:51.559 --> 00:44:54.199
<v Speaker 1>to spend, more and more of those assets will just

745
00:44:54.239 --> 00:44:58.679
<v Speaker 1>be consumed in sort of like discretionary expenditure. People will

746
00:44:58.719 --> 00:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>be buying more you know, entertainment, They'll be subscribing to

747
00:45:04.000 --> 00:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>more streaming services, They'll be buying more trinkets on Amazon.

748
00:45:08.039 --> 00:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, hard for me to sort of like call

749
00:45:12.119 --> 00:45:15.679
<v Speaker 1>for more restrictions on the investing side when I know

750
00:45:15.719 --> 00:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there's so many ways that you can spend your money

751
00:45:18.320 --> 00:45:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to ill effect too.

752
00:45:20.440 --> 00:45:24.159
<v Speaker 2>And on that note, would entertainment and the movement of tokenization,

753
00:45:24.480 --> 00:45:28.400
<v Speaker 2>do you see brands launching tokens like Starbucks. It's a

754
00:45:28.440 --> 00:45:30.719
<v Speaker 2>reward token, but it also trades in the open market.

755
00:45:31.000 --> 00:45:33.280
<v Speaker 2>A sports team, the New York Knicks. We're in New York.

756
00:45:33.440 --> 00:45:35.639
<v Speaker 2>They have a token. You hold that token, you get benefits,

757
00:45:35.679 --> 00:45:37.679
<v Speaker 2>but you can also trade it using in DeFi Taylor

758
00:45:37.719 --> 00:45:41.119
<v Speaker 2>Swift has our own economy. She creates a token, and

759
00:45:41.400 --> 00:45:43.519
<v Speaker 2>we're interacting in that way from a token.

760
00:45:43.239 --> 00:45:50.079
<v Speaker 1>Perspective, that's an interesting question. I think that that technology

761
00:45:50.400 --> 00:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>has been possible for some time, and not so many

762
00:45:55.320 --> 00:46:00.440
<v Speaker 1>people have sort of like adopted that and created brand

763
00:46:00.519 --> 00:46:03.599
<v Speaker 1>tokens even though it's been possible. I mean, you had

764
00:46:03.639 --> 00:46:08.320
<v Speaker 1>some things like I think the NBA did something a

765
00:46:08.320 --> 00:46:10.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. I forget what it's called. Yeah,

766
00:46:10.760 --> 00:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they did like their their NFT collection that had a

767
00:46:15.920 --> 00:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>moment for a bit. There was one interesting use case

768
00:46:19.480 --> 00:46:25.119
<v Speaker 1>of an NFT where someone was like selling advertiser time,

769
00:46:26.119 --> 00:46:29.559
<v Speaker 1>so each NFT represented like a minute of advertising time

770
00:46:29.599 --> 00:46:35.159
<v Speaker 1>on a popular podcast. But yeah, it almost It feels

771
00:46:35.199 --> 00:46:40.280
<v Speaker 1>like either the right combination of factors haven't come into

772
00:46:40.679 --> 00:46:43.280
<v Speaker 1>into play, or the products just aren't good enough to

773
00:46:43.320 --> 00:46:46.039
<v Speaker 1>make to make a compelling product there, so I would

774
00:46:46.119 --> 00:46:49.840
<v Speaker 1>like to think. So I'm surprised it hasn't been happening more.

775
00:46:50.199 --> 00:46:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I think also creators don't really want to think about crypto.

776
00:46:55.079 --> 00:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, when they start thinking too much about crypto,

777
00:46:59.239 --> 00:47:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you get a little bit the adverse selection of I

778
00:47:03.360 --> 00:47:05.639
<v Speaker 1>want to I'm getting into this because I want to

779
00:47:05.639 --> 00:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>make money quickly, which which I think is the danger.

780
00:47:08.760 --> 00:47:12.599
<v Speaker 1>I think the crypto technology aspect of it has to disappear,

781
00:47:13.239 --> 00:47:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's just it just needs to be better ways

782
00:47:17.559 --> 00:47:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to do the things that they want to do anyway,

783
00:47:19.880 --> 00:47:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like communicate with their fans, reward their fans, you know,

784
00:47:23.320 --> 00:47:27.320
<v Speaker 1>give access to their music or catalogs, and there you're

785
00:47:27.360 --> 00:47:31.760
<v Speaker 1>actually competing with things like Spotify. You're competing with you know,

786
00:47:32.000 --> 00:47:36.159
<v Speaker 1>credit cards, their websites, which have you know, their social

787
00:47:36.159 --> 00:47:39.719
<v Speaker 1>media followings. So I think there needs to be a

788
00:47:41.280 --> 00:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>non crypto specific need that's met better with crypto technology.

789
00:47:46.559 --> 00:47:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with you. I think presenting it as

790
00:47:48.920 --> 00:47:51.800
<v Speaker 2>crypto turns off a lot of people because of headlines

791
00:47:51.840 --> 00:47:53.840
<v Speaker 2>they've read things that have happened in the early phase

792
00:47:53.840 --> 00:47:56.639
<v Speaker 2>of the market and technology. But if you say, here

793
00:47:56.679 --> 00:47:59.119
<v Speaker 2>is a reward token, it's very different from the traditional

794
00:47:59.199 --> 00:48:02.960
<v Speaker 2>reward model. It's in a self hosted wallet. If you

795
00:48:03.079 --> 00:48:05.920
<v Speaker 2>keep holding it over time, maybe you earn rewards like

796
00:48:05.960 --> 00:48:09.239
<v Speaker 2>staking rewards so to speak. You can also sell it

797
00:48:09.280 --> 00:48:12.320
<v Speaker 2>on the open market. There's a financial value and that

798
00:48:12.360 --> 00:48:15.519
<v Speaker 2>can drive the incentive because before it's just oh, here's

799
00:48:15.559 --> 00:48:18.360
<v Speaker 2>this reward token. I'll use it maybe when I want to.

800
00:48:18.400 --> 00:48:20.960
<v Speaker 2>But if there's a financial incentive of in the open

801
00:48:20.960 --> 00:48:23.199
<v Speaker 2>market it's valued at something, it can grow in value.

802
00:48:23.719 --> 00:48:25.599
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's a key.

803
00:48:25.679 --> 00:48:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's an interesting idea.

804
00:48:28.000 --> 00:48:30.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh, not a bad one. You'll give me credit, right, glad.

805
00:48:30.639 --> 00:48:34.039
<v Speaker 1>If you guys do, maybe I can collaborate on bringing

806
00:48:34.079 --> 00:48:36.800
<v Speaker 1>something like that. We can we can work with you

807
00:48:36.840 --> 00:48:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on a reward token on the run hood chain.

808
00:48:38.920 --> 00:48:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I would love that that'd be great as a user,

809
00:48:40.840 --> 00:48:42.719
<v Speaker 2>I would love that, or glad, I know we're coming

810
00:48:42.800 --> 00:48:45.639
<v Speaker 2>up on time. So it's twenty thirty. What does Robinhood

811
00:48:45.679 --> 00:48:46.000
<v Speaker 2>look like.

812
00:48:46.760 --> 00:48:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's not a very long time from now. Yeah,

813
00:48:49.280 --> 00:48:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if you look at our five

814
00:48:50.679 --> 00:48:56.760
<v Speaker 1>year plan, Robinhood should basically be your financial super app

815
00:48:56.760 --> 00:48:59.239
<v Speaker 1>of choice if you're in the US, so you should

816
00:48:59.239 --> 00:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to get your check into Robinhood. I think

817
00:49:01.440 --> 00:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>people will still have paychecks in twenty thirty. Some might

818
00:49:04.440 --> 00:49:08.079
<v Speaker 1>disagree with me. I don't know. Your paycheck will be

819
00:49:08.159 --> 00:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on Robinhood. You're checking in savings will be on Robinhood

820
00:49:11.400 --> 00:49:14.119
<v Speaker 1>getting a great rate, and by the way, Robinhood banking

821
00:49:14.239 --> 00:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>coming out soon, you'll be able to do all of

822
00:49:16.880 --> 00:49:22.639
<v Speaker 1>your spending through Robinhood cards. I still think credit cards

823
00:49:22.760 --> 00:49:24.960
<v Speaker 1>will be the dominant way that you spend money in

824
00:49:25.000 --> 00:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty stable coined People might disagree, but I'd be

825
00:49:30.519 --> 00:49:34.880
<v Speaker 1>surprised if the credit card is unseeded as an instrument

826
00:49:35.039 --> 00:49:38.159
<v Speaker 1>in the US by that time. And of course you're

827
00:49:38.199 --> 00:49:43.679
<v Speaker 1>investing your retirement portfolio and your discretionary portfolio, which includes

828
00:49:43.719 --> 00:49:48.079
<v Speaker 1>your crypto, should be well served at Robinhood as well.

829
00:49:48.760 --> 00:49:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think if we do that, we can help

830
00:49:51.400 --> 00:49:55.239
<v Speaker 1>manage your financial life, and we can sort of like

831
00:49:55.320 --> 00:50:01.039
<v Speaker 1>be this family office. The same service worth individual can

832
00:50:01.079 --> 00:50:03.239
<v Speaker 1>get from their family office should be available to the

833
00:50:03.280 --> 00:50:06.239
<v Speaker 1>mass market at very very low cost. So all of

834
00:50:06.239 --> 00:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>your financial stuff should be run smoothly with you being

835
00:50:10.159 --> 00:50:13.239
<v Speaker 1>in control. And I think that positions us well to

836
00:50:13.320 --> 00:50:17.199
<v Speaker 1>benefit from this great wealth transfer of one hundred and

837
00:50:17.239 --> 00:50:19.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty four trillion in assets, which is going to be

838
00:50:19.440 --> 00:50:23.559
<v Speaker 1>accelerating over time. And I think there's no reason why

839
00:50:24.480 --> 00:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a significant percentage of those assets can't be custodied at Robinhood.

840
00:50:29.440 --> 00:50:32.519
<v Speaker 1>I think we should be the primary beneficiary as a

841
00:50:32.760 --> 00:50:36.239
<v Speaker 1>company of that wealth transfer, and that should accrue to

842
00:50:36.639 --> 00:50:39.280
<v Speaker 1>our end user in the form of lower costs and

843
00:50:39.320 --> 00:50:40.159
<v Speaker 1>better products.

844
00:50:40.719 --> 00:50:42.719
<v Speaker 2>I love it. I'm looking forward to all of those

845
00:50:42.760 --> 00:50:46.119
<v Speaker 2>things you mentioned. Some wrap up questions. If you never

846
00:50:46.199 --> 00:50:48.480
<v Speaker 2>founded Robinhood, what do you think you might be doing.

847
00:50:50.039 --> 00:50:54.079
<v Speaker 1>Well. I was on a path to be a mathematics professor,

848
00:50:54.440 --> 00:50:58.079
<v Speaker 1>so I dropped out of my math PhD as a

849
00:50:58.159 --> 00:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>first year. After my first year, started my first company,

850
00:51:01.039 --> 00:51:03.760
<v Speaker 1>which was a hedge fund in New York actually, and

851
00:51:03.800 --> 00:51:07.760
<v Speaker 1>then that one ended up not being very successful. It

852
00:51:07.800 --> 00:51:10.760
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a quick failure, pivoted to an enterprise

853
00:51:10.840 --> 00:51:14.599
<v Speaker 1>software company again in finance, and then you know, ended

854
00:51:14.679 --> 00:51:19.360
<v Speaker 1>up starting Robinhood. But I like figuring things out. I

855
00:51:19.480 --> 00:51:23.360
<v Speaker 1>like having lots and lots of impact, and I liked

856
00:51:24.119 --> 00:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>wrestling with the big questions. So probably something to do

857
00:51:27.440 --> 00:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with math or physics.

858
00:51:28.800 --> 00:51:34.559
<v Speaker 2>Sure, some rapid fire questions. Favorite food, pizza, favorite musician

859
00:51:34.639 --> 00:51:37.719
<v Speaker 2>or band Pink Floyd, favorite.

860
00:51:37.360 --> 00:51:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Movie pulp fiction, favorite book brief History of Time?

861
00:51:44.000 --> 00:51:45.679
<v Speaker 2>And when you're not working at Robinhood, what are you

862
00:51:45.679 --> 00:51:46.239
<v Speaker 2>doing for fun?

863
00:51:47.159 --> 00:51:49.599
<v Speaker 1>I like to work out. I like to go for drives.

864
00:51:50.079 --> 00:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a family, so I like to hang out

865
00:51:51.880 --> 00:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with my kids watching movies or building legos or sometimes

866
00:51:57.480 --> 00:52:04.559
<v Speaker 1>even changing diapers. They do enjoy that. Yeah, And you know, honestly,

867
00:52:05.119 --> 00:52:10.400
<v Speaker 1>not much free time exists. It's like my sleep time

868
00:52:10.480 --> 00:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is very limited. Actually, it's like I have so little

869
00:52:12.960 --> 00:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>free time that sleep is like three to four hours

870
00:52:15.840 --> 00:52:20.039
<v Speaker 1>a night, no way pretty much? Yeah, wow, sometimes less.

871
00:52:20.320 --> 00:52:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, Well, you're a busy individual, and I thank

872
00:52:23.440 --> 00:52:25.360
<v Speaker 2>you so much for taking time to do this. I

873
00:52:25.400 --> 00:52:26.280
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate it.

874
00:52:26.639 --> 00:52:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thank you so much. It was a lot of fun.
