WEBVTT

1
00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome to Talk Nerdy. Today is Monday,

2
00:00:16.120 --> 00:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>July twenty seventh, twenty twenty six, and I'm the host

3
00:00:19.920 --> 00:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of the show Doctor Kara Santa Maria, and as I

4
00:00:22.800 --> 00:00:25.519
<v Speaker 1>mentioned last week, I am traveling right now with the

5
00:00:25.760 --> 00:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>sgu the other podcast I work on, The Skeptics Guide

6
00:00:28.519 --> 00:00:33.679
<v Speaker 1>to the Universe. We are visiting Sydney, Australia, the North Island,

7
00:00:33.759 --> 00:00:36.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of all over of New Zealand, and then christ

8
00:00:36.759 --> 00:00:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Church on the South Island and making appearances at conferences

9
00:00:41.119 --> 00:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in both Sydney and christ Church. So I'm recording this

10
00:00:44.640 --> 00:00:48.079
<v Speaker 1>in advance, and I'm not going to give a shout

11
00:00:48.119 --> 00:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>out to the patrons this week because I don't know

12
00:00:50.000 --> 00:00:52.079
<v Speaker 1>if my list will be up to date, but we

13
00:00:52.119 --> 00:00:56.039
<v Speaker 1>will continue that once I am back at my computer,

14
00:00:56.240 --> 00:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>so I say we just get into it. This week

15
00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I had the opportunity to chat with doctor Valerie Friedland.

16
00:01:05.159 --> 00:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>She is a professor of linguistics in the English Department

17
00:01:08.640 --> 00:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Nevada, Reno. She also writes a

18
00:01:13.040 --> 00:01:16.519
<v Speaker 1>language blog on Psychology Today called Language in the Wild

19
00:01:17.159 --> 00:01:20.599
<v Speaker 1>and did a Great Courses series, So for those of

20
00:01:20.599 --> 00:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you who love the Great Courses, you can look her

21
00:01:22.640 --> 00:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>up there. She also previously wrote a wonderful book called

22
00:01:26.719 --> 00:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Like Literally Dude, Arguing for the Good in Bad English.

23
00:01:31.239 --> 00:01:33.519
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to talk today about her newest book,

24
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:38.599
<v Speaker 1>Why We Talk Funny, The Real Story Behind Our Accents.

25
00:01:39.480 --> 00:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a really fun one. So, without any further ado,

26
00:01:42.599 --> 00:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>here she is doctor Valerie Friedland. Well, Valerie, thank you

27
00:01:48.239 --> 00:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining me today.

28
00:01:50.200 --> 00:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Of course, I'm so excited to be here in chat

29
00:01:52.239 --> 00:01:52.519
<v Speaker 2>with you.

30
00:01:53.120 --> 00:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to be talking about your work and

31
00:01:55.640 --> 00:01:59.359
<v Speaker 1>of course your new book, Why We Talk Funny The

32
00:01:59.400 --> 00:02:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Real Story Behind Our Accents. I'm so excited to have

33
00:02:02.760 --> 00:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this conversation. I am obsessed with accents. I love them.

34
00:02:06.120 --> 00:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I find them fascinating. I'm also really obsessed with just

35
00:02:09.560 --> 00:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>like regional colloquialisms and all the different ways that individuals

36
00:02:14.280 --> 00:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>who share a similar language still have subcultures within it.

37
00:02:21.319 --> 00:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But first, before we get into the book itself, I

38
00:02:24.319 --> 00:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>want to talk a little bit about you, about your scholarship.

39
00:02:27.719 --> 00:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So you're a professor of linguistics. Is linguistics usually in

40
00:02:32.280 --> 00:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>an English department, you.

41
00:02:34.039 --> 00:02:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Know it varies. Linguistics is usually in whatever department we

42
00:02:37.960 --> 00:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>feel most safe that will survive the budget cut so

43
00:02:42.039 --> 00:02:44.719
<v Speaker 2>wry to say it. So typically it's sort of in

44
00:02:44.840 --> 00:02:48.879
<v Speaker 2>traditional linguistics departments, they've been separate departments, but in the

45
00:02:48.960 --> 00:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>last twenty or so years they often go on the

46
00:02:51.639 --> 00:02:54.479
<v Speaker 2>chopping block because they tend to be pretty small departments.

47
00:02:54.520 --> 00:02:58.560
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of linguists have found refuge in English departments.

48
00:02:58.560 --> 00:03:00.680
<v Speaker 2>So it is not uncommon for there to be a

49
00:03:00.719 --> 00:03:03.960
<v Speaker 2>separate program in linguistics in English departments, but it's not

50
00:03:04.039 --> 00:03:06.520
<v Speaker 2>necessarily the standard either.

51
00:03:06.919 --> 00:03:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Gotcha, And so you know, really probably it's important to

52
00:03:10.719 --> 00:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>drill down on what linguistics actually is. How is it

53
00:03:14.639 --> 00:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>different than what most people think of when they think

54
00:03:17.039 --> 00:03:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of English or English class.

55
00:03:19.319 --> 00:03:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a great question, because most people think

56
00:03:21.879 --> 00:03:23.360
<v Speaker 2>of a number of different things when they hear the

57
00:03:23.400 --> 00:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>word linguist, and it's typically not either the same thing

58
00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:31.639
<v Speaker 2>as an English professor or an English teacher, nor as

59
00:03:31.719 --> 00:03:34.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of the common folk understanding of what a linguist

60
00:03:34.680 --> 00:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>is or memes. So first, just to discriminate between sort

61
00:03:38.560 --> 00:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>of the traditional Grammarian English teacher and the linguist that

62
00:03:43.439 --> 00:03:46.639
<v Speaker 2>might happen to be an English department, we're really more

63
00:03:46.960 --> 00:03:51.039
<v Speaker 2>the social science version of someone who studies language. So

64
00:03:51.039 --> 00:03:56.400
<v Speaker 2>we're actually interested in the principles, both articulatory and cognitive,

65
00:03:56.719 --> 00:04:01.039
<v Speaker 2>that drive our ability to speak as humans human beings.

66
00:04:01.039 --> 00:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>We're not really interested in any kind of prescriptive rules.

67
00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:07.759
<v Speaker 2>So the social rules that get attached over time to

68
00:04:07.919 --> 00:04:10.199
<v Speaker 2>the way that we're supposed to write English, and then

69
00:04:10.360 --> 00:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>often that leaps off the page to the way we're

70
00:04:13.039 --> 00:04:17.399
<v Speaker 2>supposed to speak. So the type of experience you have

71
00:04:17.480 --> 00:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>in English class where you're learning about nouns, verbs, and

72
00:04:20.879 --> 00:04:23.639
<v Speaker 2>you know those person, place, thing kind of thing. There

73
00:04:23.680 --> 00:04:26.920
<v Speaker 2>certainly is some linguistics in that, because the categories that

74
00:04:26.959 --> 00:04:31.040
<v Speaker 2>we call nouns are linguistically real to us. Babies recognize

75
00:04:31.120 --> 00:04:34.120
<v Speaker 2>nouns first before other things, so those do have some

76
00:04:34.480 --> 00:04:37.759
<v Speaker 2>linguistic legitimacy. But the idea that there are a person, place,

77
00:04:37.800 --> 00:04:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and thing, for example, is kind of a description rather

78
00:04:40.680 --> 00:04:44.759
<v Speaker 2>than an actual rule of how those distribute, or the

79
00:04:44.839 --> 00:04:46.839
<v Speaker 2>rules like don't set in a sense with a preposition

80
00:04:46.879 --> 00:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>those kinds of things. Those are not real rules in

81
00:04:49.199 --> 00:04:53.079
<v Speaker 2>terms of cognitive rules for language. Those are social rules

82
00:04:53.079 --> 00:04:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that arose in the eighteenth century. So that's the kind

83
00:04:56.000 --> 00:04:58.079
<v Speaker 2>of thing that you get in English class. What you

84
00:04:58.079 --> 00:05:02.360
<v Speaker 2>would get if you take a linguistics course in a college,

85
00:05:02.399 --> 00:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>which is usually the first time you experience it. Is

86
00:05:04.600 --> 00:05:08.480
<v Speaker 2>also different than the layman conception of linguist, which is

87
00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:12.439
<v Speaker 2>really someone who speaks a lot of languages. I speak

88
00:05:12.680 --> 00:05:18.199
<v Speaker 2>really one, and that sometimes badly, which is English. But

89
00:05:18.360 --> 00:05:21.879
<v Speaker 2>I know a lot about the structure of other languages.

90
00:05:21.920 --> 00:05:24.160
<v Speaker 2>So though I really probably can't order a beer in

91
00:05:24.199 --> 00:05:26.680
<v Speaker 2>most of them or do anything useful when traveling there,

92
00:05:27.040 --> 00:05:30.839
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you about sort of their relationship to English,

93
00:05:31.000 --> 00:05:33.839
<v Speaker 2>the kinds of structures they tend to have, how they

94
00:05:33.839 --> 00:05:37.279
<v Speaker 2>differ where they're similar, What kinds of principles drive all

95
00:05:37.360 --> 00:05:42.079
<v Speaker 2>human language, How our brain perceives language. What are the

96
00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:44.079
<v Speaker 2>sounds that you're more likely to be able to hear

97
00:05:44.160 --> 00:05:47.319
<v Speaker 2>versus others that aren't. What are most common sounds across languages.

98
00:05:47.439 --> 00:05:49.519
<v Speaker 2>Those are the kinds of things that linguists like me,

99
00:05:49.600 --> 00:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>which are called theoretical linguist study. And then, to even

100
00:05:52.879 --> 00:05:56.399
<v Speaker 2>drill down a little more, I'm what's called a socio linguist,

101
00:05:57.319 --> 00:06:00.959
<v Speaker 2>which is a tongue twister to basically say, someone who

102
00:06:01.040 --> 00:06:04.639
<v Speaker 2>studies the linguistics of social life. So how are the

103
00:06:04.680 --> 00:06:07.480
<v Speaker 2>groups that we identify with the places we grow up

104
00:06:08.040 --> 00:06:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the class we belong to, the nations that we pledge

105
00:06:12.920 --> 00:06:16.319
<v Speaker 2>allegiance to. How are those things influential on the way

106
00:06:16.319 --> 00:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>that we will sound now and in the future. And

107
00:06:19.079 --> 00:06:21.480
<v Speaker 2>those are the kinds of things I study. Most of

108
00:06:21.480 --> 00:06:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the questions people have about language are really in the

109
00:06:24.040 --> 00:06:25.480
<v Speaker 2>realm of socio linguistics.

110
00:06:26.319 --> 00:06:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting. It's almost like the psychology, sociology, and

111
00:06:31.399 --> 00:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>cognitive science of language.

112
00:06:34.439 --> 00:06:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, it's very closely aligned with psychology. So you know,

113
00:06:37.879 --> 00:06:42.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of linguistics stems from both linguistic anthropology but

114
00:06:42.600 --> 00:06:45.560
<v Speaker 2>also social psychology. So I'd say it's a really a

115
00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:51.319
<v Speaker 2>melding of sociology, social psychology, and also some anthropology. But

116
00:06:51.480 --> 00:06:55.319
<v Speaker 2>then some linguists do a lot more cognitive psychology work

117
00:06:55.360 --> 00:06:58.079
<v Speaker 2>as well, so it's you know, kind of an overlapping field.

118
00:06:58.720 --> 00:07:02.519
<v Speaker 1>I love it all right, Well, we'll see if my

119
00:07:02.600 --> 00:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>doctorate in psychology is at all helpful.

120
00:07:05.319 --> 00:07:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Will see.

121
00:07:06.240 --> 00:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'm pretty clinical, so I'm like on

122
00:07:08.319 --> 00:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a one, very extreme end of psychology, but maybe we

123
00:07:11.319 --> 00:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>will see. So what made you want to sit down

124
00:07:14.879 --> 00:07:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and write this book? Is it your first or no,

125
00:07:17.480 --> 00:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not. You've actually written another big book before, like

126
00:07:20.839 --> 00:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>literally dude.

127
00:07:22.199 --> 00:07:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I wrote a book on all the speech Habits

128
00:07:24.720 --> 00:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>We Love to Hate, which was like literally dude, as

129
00:07:28.040 --> 00:07:30.279
<v Speaker 2>you can see from the title what it might be about.

130
00:07:31.040 --> 00:07:34.240
<v Speaker 2>And then this was really the book that was closest

131
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:37.040
<v Speaker 2>to the type of work I do in my research,

132
00:07:37.120 --> 00:07:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and also the experience I had growing up because I

133
00:07:40.160 --> 00:07:42.120
<v Speaker 2>grew up in the South, which a lot of people

134
00:07:42.120 --> 00:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>probably can't hear from my voice, but sometimes people will

135
00:07:44.800 --> 00:07:47.639
<v Speaker 2>pick up a little trick or two that I have

136
00:07:47.759 --> 00:07:51.639
<v Speaker 2>that's southern. But I also had parents that were not

137
00:07:51.759 --> 00:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>from the United States. They were both native French speakers,

138
00:07:54.639 --> 00:07:56.399
<v Speaker 2>and so growing up in the South at the time

139
00:07:56.439 --> 00:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I was growing up, I'm not going to admit how

140
00:07:58.040 --> 00:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>long ago it was, but it was a while. With

141
00:08:01.000 --> 00:08:05.240
<v Speaker 2>non native parents was certainly an experience, and it made

142
00:08:05.279 --> 00:08:07.920
<v Speaker 2>me aware at a very young age the power of accent.

143
00:08:08.240 --> 00:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>And you know, even though I had no idea at

144
00:08:10.680 --> 00:08:13.839
<v Speaker 2>eight i wanted to be a linguist, I probably was

145
00:08:13.879 --> 00:08:17.439
<v Speaker 2>thinking more like astronaut or doctor, you know, something more standard,

146
00:08:17.879 --> 00:08:21.279
<v Speaker 2>it did really interest me and fascinate me. The power

147
00:08:21.399 --> 00:08:23.519
<v Speaker 2>that the way that I spoke, the way that my

148
00:08:23.600 --> 00:08:26.040
<v Speaker 2>parents spoke, the way that I heard my friend speak,

149
00:08:26.480 --> 00:08:29.120
<v Speaker 2>had over the way that we reacted to each other.

150
00:08:29.199 --> 00:08:31.720
<v Speaker 2>And so in college, when I took a linguistics class,

151
00:08:31.759 --> 00:08:33.480
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, it was like the curtain was

152
00:08:33.519 --> 00:08:37.320
<v Speaker 2>pulled back on why and how, And that really drove

153
00:08:37.399 --> 00:08:40.679
<v Speaker 2>my interest in both pursuing linguistics as a field and

154
00:08:40.720 --> 00:08:45.200
<v Speaker 2>then finally unpacking that for non linguist audiences, because there

155
00:08:45.200 --> 00:08:47.440
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of mes in this world that have

156
00:08:47.559 --> 00:08:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that experience but didn't go on to get a doctorate

157
00:08:50.000 --> 00:08:54.200
<v Speaker 2>in linguistics that really wonder why their accents make them

158
00:08:54.240 --> 00:08:56.279
<v Speaker 2>stand out, or why they think of other people in

159
00:08:56.320 --> 00:08:58.679
<v Speaker 2>the ways they do with their accents, or even maybe

160
00:08:58.679 --> 00:09:01.480
<v Speaker 2>believe they have no accent at all. And part of

161
00:09:01.480 --> 00:09:04.279
<v Speaker 2>that is because we really have a dearth of linguistic information.

162
00:09:04.559 --> 00:09:07.759
<v Speaker 2>And so that kind of drove this book. I wanted

163
00:09:07.799 --> 00:09:10.320
<v Speaker 2>to unpack it for general audiences.

164
00:09:10.720 --> 00:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I love that so much because you're right. I loved

165
00:09:12.679 --> 00:09:14.799
<v Speaker 1>it when you said there's a lot of mes. Everybody

166
00:09:14.879 --> 00:09:17.919
<v Speaker 1>out there has their own kind of origin, and then

167
00:09:18.120 --> 00:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the culture or the pressures that they had as they

168
00:09:20.840 --> 00:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>were growing up. Some people were in one place most

169
00:09:23.240 --> 00:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of their lives. Other people traveled quite often. My own

170
00:09:27.320 --> 00:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>little anecdote that I have to share having also grown

171
00:09:30.200 --> 00:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>up in the South and people telling me all the

172
00:09:32.919 --> 00:09:34.919
<v Speaker 1>time that I don't sound like I'm from the South

173
00:09:35.039 --> 00:09:38.639
<v Speaker 1>until I say words like insurance an umbrella, then it

174
00:09:38.919 --> 00:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>comes out real heavy. But hearing my parents speak or

175
00:09:43.000 --> 00:09:44.759
<v Speaker 1>even my sisters speak and being like, how are you

176
00:09:44.759 --> 00:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>from the same family. I remember when I first moved.

177
00:09:47.759 --> 00:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I moved from Texas to New York and then to

178
00:09:51.159 --> 00:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>LA and I've been in LA since. I remember working

179
00:09:54.519 --> 00:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>as an adjunct professor at City University, New York, and

180
00:10:00.159 --> 00:10:04.039
<v Speaker 1>we had a lot of students from Long Island and

181
00:10:04.559 --> 00:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>one of my students saw my Texas tattoo and she goes, Professa,

182
00:10:08.600 --> 00:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't have an accent at wool Oh, this is currieus.

183
00:10:17.919 --> 00:10:20.840
<v Speaker 2>And what's so fascinating about that is it really reveals

184
00:10:20.879 --> 00:10:26.159
<v Speaker 2>a lot about the power dynamics behind accent. Because everybody

185
00:10:26.200 --> 00:10:29.080
<v Speaker 2>has an accent, we often don't hear our own accents,

186
00:10:29.159 --> 00:10:32.039
<v Speaker 2>and typically the people that don't think of themselves as

187
00:10:32.240 --> 00:10:34.679
<v Speaker 2>accented or believe in the sort of myth of non

188
00:10:34.720 --> 00:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>accent are those that are from groups in society that

189
00:10:37.519 --> 00:10:40.519
<v Speaker 2>have the most power, and therefore their form of speech,

190
00:10:40.600 --> 00:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>their style of speech, their accent, is the norm, and

191
00:10:44.120 --> 00:10:46.919
<v Speaker 2>that way because they don't deviate from that norm, they

192
00:10:47.000 --> 00:10:49.440
<v Speaker 2>think of themselves as having no accent. But if you

193
00:10:49.519 --> 00:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>leave your country of origin and you go to Britain,

194
00:10:51.720 --> 00:10:54.960
<v Speaker 2>for example, or of Australia, you do have an accent.

195
00:10:55.639 --> 00:10:56.679
<v Speaker 3>So all of us do.

196
00:10:56.720 --> 00:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>And there are also little things in everybody's speech that

197
00:11:00.320 --> 00:11:02.240
<v Speaker 2>who they are. And I think one of the things

198
00:11:02.320 --> 00:11:05.159
<v Speaker 2>that we haven't done a good job with as linguist

199
00:11:05.200 --> 00:11:07.320
<v Speaker 2>is getting the word out that accents are not just

200
00:11:07.399 --> 00:11:12.159
<v Speaker 2>about place. There are about anything social about us that

201
00:11:12.279 --> 00:11:16.759
<v Speaker 2>leads to fractures in social space. And sometimes that's geography.

202
00:11:17.200 --> 00:11:20.159
<v Speaker 2>So if we're divided by mountains or lakes or oceans,

203
00:11:20.200 --> 00:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>that will lead to differences in the way we speak.

204
00:11:22.679 --> 00:11:26.799
<v Speaker 2>But a lot of the power of speech changing over

205
00:11:26.840 --> 00:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>time is driven by other types of social distance that

206
00:11:30.440 --> 00:11:34.240
<v Speaker 2>forms between us. And that can be someone that is

207
00:11:34.360 --> 00:11:38.559
<v Speaker 2>from a different ethnicity and maybe there's less contact or

208
00:11:38.679 --> 00:11:42.279
<v Speaker 2>hostility between different ethnic groups and so they will sound different.

209
00:11:42.399 --> 00:11:44.639
<v Speaker 2>Or it can be class. Even in the same location.

210
00:11:45.159 --> 00:11:47.159
<v Speaker 2>A lot of times we can recognize someone who might

211
00:11:47.240 --> 00:11:50.559
<v Speaker 2>have more working class features and more middle class features.

212
00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Those are all accents too. It's not just about geography.

213
00:11:55.519 --> 00:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>It's so fascinating to think about, because in LA, my

214
00:11:59.279 --> 00:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>exposure is wildly different than it was in North Texas.

215
00:12:03.399 --> 00:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Right in North Texas, all my friends had shades of

216
00:12:08.120 --> 00:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>something similar unless they were sort of their parents or

217
00:12:14.360 --> 00:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they themselves were first or second generation American. But most

218
00:12:19.159 --> 00:12:22.519
<v Speaker 1>everybody who was like multi generation living in the South,

219
00:12:22.720 --> 00:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they kind of sound. There's like a Dallas sound, you know,

220
00:12:25.840 --> 00:12:28.159
<v Speaker 1>and I was from the urbs of Dallas. But living

221
00:12:28.159 --> 00:12:30.279
<v Speaker 1>in LA, it's like got you never know, you don't

222
00:12:30.279 --> 00:12:32.399
<v Speaker 1>know where anybody's from. And when somebody's like, oh, I'm

223
00:12:32.399 --> 00:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>a Native Angelino, you're like, what you exist?

224
00:12:34.799 --> 00:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I know. Yeah, in those big cities right a lot

225
00:12:37.639 --> 00:12:39.440
<v Speaker 2>of times, especially on the West coast because it's a

226
00:12:39.480 --> 00:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>relatively young region, it does feel like that. Even in Nevada,

227
00:12:43.639 --> 00:12:45.720
<v Speaker 2>where I'm from, where I'm not from, but where I

228
00:12:45.759 --> 00:12:49.120
<v Speaker 2>live in Reno, it's very surprising to find someone who's

229
00:12:49.159 --> 00:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>actually from here or from here for more than one generation.

230
00:12:52.960 --> 00:12:55.080
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think that's partially just being Western.

231
00:12:55.159 --> 00:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>It's also this sense of you know, urban urban life

232
00:12:58.360 --> 00:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>that's relatively recent, so you know, it hasn't been that

233
00:13:01.200 --> 00:13:04.440
<v Speaker 2>long that most of us lived in urban centers. That's

234
00:13:04.519 --> 00:13:09.399
<v Speaker 2>a relatively recent development in American history, and that radically

235
00:13:09.480 --> 00:13:12.399
<v Speaker 2>changes the people we come into contact with. And interaction

236
00:13:12.559 --> 00:13:15.320
<v Speaker 2>is really the bread and butter of accent. So it's

237
00:13:15.360 --> 00:13:18.799
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily the place you grew up or even the

238
00:13:18.840 --> 00:13:21.639
<v Speaker 2>way that your family speaks that will determine the way

239
00:13:21.679 --> 00:13:24.080
<v Speaker 2>you sound. It's the people that you interact with the

240
00:13:24.159 --> 00:13:28.279
<v Speaker 2>most and that sort of represent this goal or identity

241
00:13:28.399 --> 00:13:31.080
<v Speaker 2>that you want to have. And you know, you mentioned

242
00:13:31.080 --> 00:13:34.159
<v Speaker 2>that you don't sound like your sister, and we wondered,

243
00:13:34.200 --> 00:13:36.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, how are we from the same family. Well,

244
00:13:36.200 --> 00:13:39.919
<v Speaker 2>in earlier research I did with my colleague who's was

245
00:13:39.960 --> 00:13:42.960
<v Speaker 2>at Duke, we looked at the same family that had

246
00:13:43.000 --> 00:13:47.840
<v Speaker 2>ten children and we ran different types of statistical simulations

247
00:13:47.840 --> 00:13:49.799
<v Speaker 2>on their speech. And we do this through you know,

248
00:13:49.919 --> 00:13:53.639
<v Speaker 2>we use instrumental analysis of their vowels, so it's technical.

249
00:13:53.679 --> 00:13:55.919
<v Speaker 2>We have numbers that basically go in there that measure

250
00:13:55.960 --> 00:13:59.519
<v Speaker 2>their acoustic wave forms. And we found that they were

251
00:13:59.559 --> 00:14:02.679
<v Speaker 2>no so more similar to each other than any other

252
00:14:02.799 --> 00:14:04.000
<v Speaker 2>ten random people.

253
00:14:04.600 --> 00:14:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow.

254
00:14:05.639 --> 00:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>So while they all had Southern accent, so they did

255
00:14:08.279 --> 00:14:11.519
<v Speaker 2>were more similar to people from the South, they were

256
00:14:11.559 --> 00:14:13.960
<v Speaker 2>not that similar to each other more than some other

257
00:14:14.120 --> 00:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>random Southerner, and that tells us that it's not the

258
00:14:17.200 --> 00:14:20.159
<v Speaker 2>people you're born to that really have the biggest impact

259
00:14:20.200 --> 00:14:22.440
<v Speaker 2>on your speech. It's the people you hang out with.

260
00:14:22.559 --> 00:14:25.279
<v Speaker 2>And so peer groups are really vital in the speech

261
00:14:25.360 --> 00:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and the accent that we will inhabit in later years.

262
00:14:28.960 --> 00:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting too, one of the things that

263
00:14:31.039 --> 00:14:32.799
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned when you were talking about how it's not

264
00:14:32.919 --> 00:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>always you know, the region, it's not necessarily the family

265
00:14:35.879 --> 00:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of origin, but all of these other influences that you have.

266
00:14:39.159 --> 00:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think if I didn't, I didn't make a note

267
00:14:42.000 --> 00:14:44.279
<v Speaker 1>with my pen, but I think you said something along

268
00:14:44.279 --> 00:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the lines of like and who you sort of choose to.

269
00:14:48.039 --> 00:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you didn't say emulate, but be near or like

270
00:14:50.759 --> 00:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a model.

271
00:14:51.879 --> 00:14:54.600
<v Speaker 2>That an identity you want to have, the one you

272
00:14:54.639 --> 00:14:57.320
<v Speaker 2>want to project, the one that you kind of look

273
00:14:57.399 --> 00:15:01.519
<v Speaker 2>to as something that is a style leader for you

274
00:15:02.080 --> 00:15:03.720
<v Speaker 2>is especially what we find.

275
00:15:04.200 --> 00:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I love it because I think about I had a

276
00:15:06.120 --> 00:15:09.919
<v Speaker 1>partner once and he grew up in a region of

277
00:15:10.039 --> 00:15:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Jersey and he has you know, that sort of what

278
00:15:13.600 --> 00:15:16.159
<v Speaker 1>lots of people would describe as the non accent accent

279
00:15:16.240 --> 00:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or the neutral accent or the whatever, you know, kind

280
00:15:19.039 --> 00:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of educated what is it like mid Atlantic. I don't

281
00:15:23.000 --> 00:15:23.639
<v Speaker 1>even know how.

282
00:15:23.679 --> 00:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>And we'll get into that New Jersey depends on which

283
00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:28.679
<v Speaker 2>side of New Jersey you're on, whether you constitute a

284
00:15:28.679 --> 00:15:30.759
<v Speaker 2>mid Atlantic or more northern accent.

285
00:15:30.840 --> 00:15:33.399
<v Speaker 1>But yes, well he did say that. When he was

286
00:15:33.399 --> 00:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>growing up, he would say things like woulda and like

287
00:15:35.799 --> 00:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>walk the door.

288
00:15:36.480 --> 00:15:38.559
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so he had the mid Atlantic because that's more

289
00:15:38.639 --> 00:15:39.879
<v Speaker 2>near the Philly accent.

290
00:15:39.960 --> 00:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then he had to kind of teach himself

291
00:15:42.080 --> 00:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to not talk like that by choice, like he chose

292
00:15:44.639 --> 00:15:47.879
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Whereas when I was growing up in Texas,

293
00:15:47.919 --> 00:15:51.159
<v Speaker 1>from all evidence I have from my folks, from looking

294
00:15:51.240 --> 00:15:55.679
<v Speaker 1>at videos and listening to recordings, I always kind of

295
00:15:55.759 --> 00:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just talked like this, even though the people around me,

296
00:15:59.320 --> 00:16:01.159
<v Speaker 1>well the people are me did too. I'm sure my

297
00:16:01.200 --> 00:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>peer group did, but my sister and my parents didn't.

298
00:16:05.320 --> 00:16:07.639
<v Speaker 1>And so I always was asking myself, did I make

299
00:16:07.679 --> 00:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it conscious or maybe it was an unconscious choice to

300
00:16:12.519 --> 00:16:14.639
<v Speaker 1>lean into certain styles of speech.

301
00:16:15.519 --> 00:16:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean, it's really an interesting question of how

302
00:16:18.759 --> 00:16:22.279
<v Speaker 2>conscious it is. But we don't really actively monitor our

303
00:16:22.320 --> 00:16:25.759
<v Speaker 2>speech that often, especially when we're young children. You know,

304
00:16:25.799 --> 00:16:27.679
<v Speaker 2>we might when we go into a job interview, or

305
00:16:27.759 --> 00:16:29.759
<v Speaker 2>even when we're at work. But you know, if we're

306
00:16:29.759 --> 00:16:32.759
<v Speaker 2>hanging with our friends at the bar, we're probably not saying, oh,

307
00:16:32.799 --> 00:16:34.919
<v Speaker 2>how am I going to pronounce this vowel? It doesn't

308
00:16:34.960 --> 00:16:37.240
<v Speaker 2>It just doesn't work that way. And also it's hard

309
00:16:37.320 --> 00:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>to understand how intricate the system of language is. I

310
00:16:40.759 --> 00:16:45.039
<v Speaker 2>don't think generally people understand that when we speak, it's

311
00:16:45.200 --> 00:16:48.759
<v Speaker 2>incredibly rual governed. So if I do something with my

312
00:16:49.120 --> 00:16:51.399
<v Speaker 2>ad vowel in one case, I will do it with

313
00:16:51.440 --> 00:16:54.440
<v Speaker 2>the ad vowel in every case. I say with that

314
00:16:54.559 --> 00:16:58.120
<v Speaker 2>vowel every word that it occurs with. Typically unlass, I

315
00:16:58.360 --> 00:17:01.279
<v Speaker 2>have a very unique dialect region like the mid Atlantic

316
00:17:01.279 --> 00:17:04.079
<v Speaker 2>that actually has some even funkier rules about it. So

317
00:17:05.000 --> 00:17:08.599
<v Speaker 2>how would I even know where to put on an accent? Consciously?

318
00:17:08.680 --> 00:17:13.079
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't, So it's probably a subconscious motivation or desire

319
00:17:13.119 --> 00:17:15.920
<v Speaker 2>we have to sound like certain people. But this starts

320
00:17:16.000 --> 00:17:18.880
<v Speaker 2>very young, so we're probably doing this as soon as

321
00:17:18.880 --> 00:17:21.559
<v Speaker 2>we hit kindergarten and get a peer group. And it's

322
00:17:22.000 --> 00:17:26.519
<v Speaker 2>called vernacular reorganization when we start to adjust our system

323
00:17:26.640 --> 00:17:30.359
<v Speaker 2>towards those around us from that of the home language

324
00:17:30.400 --> 00:17:33.640
<v Speaker 2>or dialect or you know, form our style that we

325
00:17:33.799 --> 00:17:36.839
<v Speaker 2>grew up with up to about age five. The other

326
00:17:36.880 --> 00:17:39.039
<v Speaker 2>thing I will say is, I don't know whether your

327
00:17:39.039 --> 00:17:42.519
<v Speaker 2>sister is older or younger than you. Older she's older,

328
00:17:43.039 --> 00:17:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I would so that's interesting and we don't have to

329
00:17:45.960 --> 00:17:49.119
<v Speaker 2>reveal anybody's ages here. But there has been a really

330
00:17:49.160 --> 00:17:52.759
<v Speaker 2>big trend in the South, and I'm of the generation

331
00:17:52.880 --> 00:17:57.319
<v Speaker 2>where it started and where we find that every generation

332
00:17:57.599 --> 00:18:01.000
<v Speaker 2>since has had less and less of the Southern accent

333
00:18:01.079 --> 00:18:03.480
<v Speaker 2>in urban areas in the South. This is not true

334
00:18:03.519 --> 00:18:05.960
<v Speaker 2>of the rural areas of the South, but in places

335
00:18:06.079 --> 00:18:09.400
<v Speaker 2>like Dallas and Memphis where I grew up. In Atlanta

336
00:18:09.519 --> 00:18:13.839
<v Speaker 2>and Raleigh, massive amounts of Northern immigration is one of

337
00:18:13.880 --> 00:18:16.599
<v Speaker 2>the big reasons why this is the case. But also

338
00:18:16.960 --> 00:18:19.920
<v Speaker 2>just a relocation of many Southerners to those urban areas

339
00:18:20.319 --> 00:18:23.519
<v Speaker 2>that kind of orients people there to a different kind

340
00:18:23.519 --> 00:18:27.359
<v Speaker 2>of accent that's more external to the South has reduced

341
00:18:27.440 --> 00:18:31.680
<v Speaker 2>the southernness of Southern speakers there. And that's Generation X

342
00:18:31.720 --> 00:18:33.960
<v Speaker 2>where we see the first step on that road to

343
00:18:34.119 --> 00:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>less accent.

344
00:18:35.519 --> 00:18:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Interesting and I would be considered an elder millennial while

345
00:18:38.559 --> 00:18:40.799
<v Speaker 1>my sister would be a Gen X there. But also

346
00:18:40.839 --> 00:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some weirdness about where she went to

347
00:18:43.279 --> 00:18:45.599
<v Speaker 1>college and then got married and moved to Arkansas and

348
00:18:45.680 --> 00:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>then moved to New Orleans and you know, kind of

349
00:18:48.000 --> 00:18:53.599
<v Speaker 1>probably re developed some of these quirky Southern styles of

350
00:18:53.640 --> 00:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>speech that I never did that, And it's just, oh,

351
00:18:57.920 --> 00:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just so fascinating thinking about out the uniqueness. I

352
00:19:03.400 --> 00:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's quite the right word, but the

353
00:19:05.480 --> 00:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the variables that are obvious to us versus the ones

354
00:19:11.599 --> 00:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that fly under the radar, Like there are things I

355
00:19:14.440 --> 00:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>think that we don't even notice about how most people speak,

356
00:19:19.559 --> 00:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>those small variations that just sound generally American or maybe

357
00:19:25.079 --> 00:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a little more regional. And then out of the blue,

358
00:19:28.240 --> 00:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you have people like my partner now, who is from Michigan,

359
00:19:31.359 --> 00:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>who has the most Midwestern and he says things like milk.

360
00:19:34.720 --> 00:19:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh, yeah, he has something called the northern city shift.

361
00:19:39.920 --> 00:19:42.039
<v Speaker 1>Obvious to be fair.

362
00:19:42.119 --> 00:19:45.079
<v Speaker 2>Milk is actually also you can find it in Toronto,

363
00:19:45.359 --> 00:19:49.119
<v Speaker 2>so you know it's not just Michigan or Chicago also

364
00:19:49.319 --> 00:19:52.440
<v Speaker 2>has that feature. But he does he also say things

365
00:19:52.519 --> 00:19:55.839
<v Speaker 2>like the word job more like jab I got a jab.

366
00:19:56.200 --> 00:19:58.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it does more like sacks sacks, And he

367
00:19:58.839 --> 00:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>says pajamas instead of pajamas. That's a big one.

368
00:20:02.799 --> 00:20:05.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that actually you find more widespread the pajama

369
00:20:05.680 --> 00:20:09.920
<v Speaker 2>pajama distribution. But for Southerners it's pajama. And so when

370
00:20:09.920 --> 00:20:13.079
<v Speaker 2>I moved to the west, that was something I noticed

371
00:20:13.079 --> 00:20:15.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people hear say, I can't it feels

372
00:20:15.720 --> 00:20:18.720
<v Speaker 2>wrong to say it, but jamas, it's.

373
00:20:18.519 --> 00:20:21.000
<v Speaker 3>So wrong, that's right.

374
00:20:21.039 --> 00:20:23.720
<v Speaker 2>So if that's your see, this is where your southernness

375
00:20:23.799 --> 00:20:27.079
<v Speaker 2>is there, because that is something that Southerners tend to say.

376
00:20:27.200 --> 00:20:29.839
<v Speaker 2>That's you know, people we've moved. So it's not only

377
00:20:29.880 --> 00:20:32.920
<v Speaker 2>something Southerners say now because you know we're contagious.

378
00:20:32.960 --> 00:20:37.799
<v Speaker 1>But it also made me laugh when you said Nevada,

379
00:20:37.839 --> 00:20:41.079
<v Speaker 1>because anybody from Nevada or lives in Nevada calls at Nevada,

380
00:20:41.119 --> 00:20:43.279
<v Speaker 1>but so many people call it Nevada.

381
00:20:43.920 --> 00:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're east of the Mississippi, you tend to call

382
00:20:46.039 --> 00:20:49.599
<v Speaker 2>it Nevada. And in fact, being from the South, I

383
00:20:49.680 --> 00:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>also called it Nevada until I moved to Nevada. And

384
00:20:54.279 --> 00:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I think within the first day of being here, I

385
00:20:57.079 --> 00:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>was told, under no uncertain terms, if I wanted to

386
00:21:01.039 --> 00:21:03.240
<v Speaker 2>stay here, I would learn how to correctly pronounce the

387
00:21:03.240 --> 00:21:05.519
<v Speaker 2>state name. And it's been so drilled into me now

388
00:21:05.559 --> 00:21:07.799
<v Speaker 2>that it hurts to say it the other way.

389
00:21:08.519 --> 00:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>That's amazing, do you know I have to I just

390
00:21:10.720 --> 00:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>love the examples. I have to come up with one

391
00:21:12.480 --> 00:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that people can tell where I live in two seconds

392
00:21:15.920 --> 00:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if we start to talk about traffic, and it's not

393
00:21:18.519 --> 00:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>even accent thing, but it is linguistic in that in

394
00:21:21.240 --> 00:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>southern California, and apparently only in southern California, we put

395
00:21:25.519 --> 00:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the word the before the freeway names.

396
00:21:28.680 --> 00:21:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, say take one, one.

397
00:21:30.279 --> 00:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh one, the two, the five, And it's just I

398
00:21:34.359 --> 00:21:37.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't even notice that I was doing it, and whenever

399
00:21:37.599 --> 00:21:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm outside of home, it blows people's minds.

400
00:21:41.519 --> 00:21:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that is a very typical California trait, Southern California exclusively.

401
00:21:47.480 --> 00:21:50.799
<v Speaker 2>So it's sort of like saying Hella, you're that's a northern.

402
00:21:50.839 --> 00:21:53.079
<v Speaker 2>That's an if you're from the California area, you know

403
00:21:53.119 --> 00:21:55.480
<v Speaker 2>that Hella is a northern and the one oh one

404
00:21:55.720 --> 00:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>is southern. So it's a it's sort of a you

405
00:21:58.039 --> 00:22:00.480
<v Speaker 2>know what, we call it, a shibboleth thing that really

406
00:22:00.519 --> 00:22:03.839
<v Speaker 2>automatically identifies where you're from from the way you pronounce something.

407
00:22:04.359 --> 00:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, the interesting history behind the one oh one

408
00:22:07.839 --> 00:22:11.400
<v Speaker 2>pronunciation or the sticking the the in there. I believe

409
00:22:11.519 --> 00:22:14.400
<v Speaker 2>it has to do with when it was first constructed.

410
00:22:14.880 --> 00:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>There weren't other options, and people would call it the

411
00:22:18.920 --> 00:22:23.279
<v Speaker 2>one oh one, and that just sort of stuck around.

412
00:22:23.759 --> 00:22:27.079
<v Speaker 2>It has something to do with its earliest construction history.

413
00:22:27.160 --> 00:22:29.759
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember the exact story, but it's quite interesting

414
00:22:29.759 --> 00:22:31.640
<v Speaker 2>if you want to dive into that. But yes, it's

415
00:22:31.720 --> 00:22:34.400
<v Speaker 2>absolutely a Southern California feature.

416
00:22:35.279 --> 00:22:37.799
<v Speaker 1>It's it's so I mean, it reminds me of and

417
00:22:37.839 --> 00:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you know all about it. I wonder if

418
00:22:39.680 --> 00:22:44.559
<v Speaker 1>you worked with it before that massive project that was

419
00:22:44.599 --> 00:22:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I think published for like users through the New York Times.

420
00:22:50.319 --> 00:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It was like you use guys and y'all or something

421
00:22:53.039 --> 00:22:56.799
<v Speaker 1>that crazy quiz that would tell you exactly where you

422
00:22:56.839 --> 00:22:57.599
<v Speaker 1>grew up.

423
00:22:57.720 --> 00:23:00.359
<v Speaker 2>I think that was a graph biographics editor. I think

424
00:23:00.359 --> 00:23:03.400
<v Speaker 2>his name was Josh Katz, and it was based on

425
00:23:04.319 --> 00:23:07.839
<v Speaker 2>the Yale Diversity Project. So it was a professor at

426
00:23:08.000 --> 00:23:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Yale's sort of linguistic atlas work which he had done

427
00:23:12.000 --> 00:23:14.519
<v Speaker 2>with his students for many, many years and compiled a

428
00:23:14.599 --> 00:23:19.319
<v Speaker 2>huge amount of data that that this graphics editor used

429
00:23:19.480 --> 00:23:21.559
<v Speaker 2>to generate those different you know.

430
00:23:21.559 --> 00:23:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Word models. Tricky now, because.

431
00:23:24.759 --> 00:23:27.559
<v Speaker 2>That was actually I don't know ten fifteen years ago.

432
00:23:28.079 --> 00:23:35.359
<v Speaker 2>While our massive connectedness now through social media boundary crossing,

433
00:23:35.519 --> 00:23:39.880
<v Speaker 2>and also our mobility which has really moved people around

434
00:23:39.960 --> 00:23:42.599
<v Speaker 2>and into new areas and into urban areas from rural

435
00:23:42.599 --> 00:23:46.519
<v Speaker 2>areas at massive rates this century has made it so

436
00:23:46.559 --> 00:23:50.960
<v Speaker 2>it's much harder to use those kinds of clues to

437
00:23:51.039 --> 00:23:54.640
<v Speaker 2>where people are from. But there are certainly big ones.

438
00:23:54.759 --> 00:23:56.839
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's hard to pinpoint someone to a little

439
00:23:56.839 --> 00:23:59.920
<v Speaker 2>city or something, but there are certainly big ones like

440
00:24:00.039 --> 00:24:03.119
<v Speaker 2>pajama and pajama is on That is a good example.

441
00:24:03.880 --> 00:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there were that could really pinpoint you. I think like, like,

442
00:24:07.519 --> 00:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you call a drive through liquor store? And

443
00:24:09.720 --> 00:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, it's a beer barn. Oh my

444
00:24:11.279 --> 00:24:14.519
<v Speaker 1>friends are like, what is even have one of those?

445
00:24:14.599 --> 00:24:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Right? Yes? I mean Tennessee, Yes, no drive through liquor stores.

446
00:24:19.519 --> 00:24:21.920
<v Speaker 2>So I remember when I saw that. I was one

447
00:24:21.960 --> 00:24:24.359
<v Speaker 2>of the have no idea what the heck you're talking

448
00:24:24.400 --> 00:24:27.319
<v Speaker 2>about on that thing. And then I married someone from

449
00:24:27.359 --> 00:24:28.119
<v Speaker 2>Ohio and he.

450
00:24:28.119 --> 00:24:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Was like, yeah, obviously.

451
00:24:31.960 --> 00:24:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Here all the time. So yes, there are certain things

452
00:24:35.160 --> 00:24:38.799
<v Speaker 2>that stick around because you don't have them elsewhere. And

453
00:24:38.799 --> 00:24:41.359
<v Speaker 2>there are certain ones like water that are very tied

454
00:24:41.400 --> 00:24:45.400
<v Speaker 2>to very specific places. So you know, that's a very typical,

455
00:24:45.599 --> 00:24:48.480
<v Speaker 2>well known Philly trait. So you know, there are certainly

456
00:24:48.519 --> 00:24:51.160
<v Speaker 2>still those that stick around, but a lot of young

457
00:24:51.160 --> 00:24:53.680
<v Speaker 2>people in Philadelphia don't say that anymore, although they would

458
00:24:53.720 --> 00:24:57.279
<v Speaker 2>still recognize that over someone from California and someone from

459
00:24:57.440 --> 00:24:59.799
<v Speaker 2>la probably has no idea about that. So it's a

460
00:24:59.799 --> 00:25:04.400
<v Speaker 2>really fun survey. The problem with like with words being

461
00:25:04.440 --> 00:25:07.039
<v Speaker 2>the focus is words are fairly easy to pick up,

462
00:25:07.960 --> 00:25:11.640
<v Speaker 2>so there are sort of superficial measures of differences between us. Now.

463
00:25:11.680 --> 00:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>A lot of those are historically based, and so those

464
00:25:14.000 --> 00:25:18.119
<v Speaker 2>have become entrenched in regions in ways that are pretty

465
00:25:18.119 --> 00:25:20.039
<v Speaker 2>good determinists. So I don't know if you'd heard of

466
00:25:20.079 --> 00:25:21.960
<v Speaker 2>it before, but one I love on that one which

467
00:25:22.039 --> 00:25:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I had heard growing up in the South, is when

468
00:25:24.200 --> 00:25:26.559
<v Speaker 2>you have rain on a sunny day, so.

469
00:25:26.440 --> 00:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>That I remember that one, and I didn't. I had

470
00:25:29.279 --> 00:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>never heard of a sunshower or whatever. I mean, there

471
00:25:32.400 --> 00:25:34.839
<v Speaker 1>were other options. I was like, I don't, I don't

472
00:25:34.880 --> 00:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>know what that is. But apparently a lot of people

473
00:25:37.160 --> 00:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>do use those words.

474
00:25:38.839 --> 00:25:41.599
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And in the South, especially rural areas of the South,

475
00:25:41.680 --> 00:25:44.400
<v Speaker 2>it's very typical to say the devil's beating his wife.

476
00:25:44.680 --> 00:25:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, that's what it's not right.

477
00:25:47.160 --> 00:25:50.799
<v Speaker 2>So when when when the sun is out and it's raining,

478
00:25:50.839 --> 00:25:54.599
<v Speaker 2>it's because the devil is beating his wife. Oh I

479
00:25:54.920 --> 00:25:58.279
<v Speaker 2>here in Nevada, I always do a regional dialect survey

480
00:25:58.480 --> 00:26:02.519
<v Speaker 2>on the first day we start dialect talk in class,

481
00:26:02.880 --> 00:26:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and that one kills them every time because they're just

482
00:26:05.839 --> 00:26:09.519
<v Speaker 2>they are disbelief that that could exist. Then really it's

483
00:26:09.799 --> 00:26:13.160
<v Speaker 2>an archaic form. You don't hear very often anymore, and

484
00:26:13.240 --> 00:26:16.720
<v Speaker 2>certainly no one under the age of fifty probably says it.

485
00:26:16.799 --> 00:26:21.440
<v Speaker 2>But it is, you know, an authentic difference. But one

486
00:26:21.440 --> 00:26:24.240
<v Speaker 2>of the ways that we kind of do new dialect

487
00:26:24.359 --> 00:26:28.680
<v Speaker 2>at list work. And another survey that's very famous was

488
00:26:28.799 --> 00:26:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the Phonological atlass done by Bill Lebov and his colleagues

489
00:26:32.200 --> 00:26:35.240
<v Speaker 2>that you pen is by looking at the way vowels

490
00:26:35.240 --> 00:26:39.000
<v Speaker 2>are pronounced across the various regions and how they're similar

491
00:26:39.160 --> 00:26:42.599
<v Speaker 2>or different, because those are harder to pick up. So

492
00:26:42.680 --> 00:26:44.400
<v Speaker 2>if I move to a new place, I can often

493
00:26:44.440 --> 00:26:46.119
<v Speaker 2>pick up a new word or two, and I can

494
00:26:46.240 --> 00:26:48.839
<v Speaker 2>actually pick up a new pronunciation in a single word

495
00:26:48.920 --> 00:26:51.839
<v Speaker 2>or two. But to do that in a very systemic

496
00:26:52.119 --> 00:26:54.960
<v Speaker 2>fashion for all the vowels that that word effects like

497
00:26:55.200 --> 00:26:57.839
<v Speaker 2>picking up the whole pin pen merger pattern. If I

498
00:26:57.880 --> 00:27:01.480
<v Speaker 2>move to the South, that's almost impossible. So studying the

499
00:27:01.559 --> 00:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>way that people say their vowels is actually a really

500
00:27:04.039 --> 00:27:07.759
<v Speaker 2>good diagnostic of regional sort of upbringing.

501
00:27:08.319 --> 00:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's probably why Malk stands out so much.

502
00:27:10.880 --> 00:27:13.519
<v Speaker 2>Exactly exactly, and that's why, you know, one of the

503
00:27:13.559 --> 00:27:17.640
<v Speaker 2>traits that is still somewhat present in young Southern speakers.

504
00:27:17.680 --> 00:27:20.359
<v Speaker 2>I can hear it, especially young African American speakers that

505
00:27:20.519 --> 00:27:24.240
<v Speaker 2>are maybe really you know, live in the South is

506
00:27:24.400 --> 00:27:27.119
<v Speaker 2>pin pen, the pin pen merger. That is actually one

507
00:27:27.119 --> 00:27:28.799
<v Speaker 2>that you can still hear a lot of times when

508
00:27:28.839 --> 00:27:30.079
<v Speaker 2>people leave the South.

509
00:27:30.319 --> 00:27:33.839
<v Speaker 1>You still intensely like it just sounds like that she

510
00:27:33.839 --> 00:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>says like pin and it sounds we.

511
00:27:36.680 --> 00:27:39.079
<v Speaker 2>And we went. Yes, it's very strong, and so if

512
00:27:39.119 --> 00:27:41.000
<v Speaker 2>you're in the South, it's still very strong. But a

513
00:27:41.079 --> 00:27:43.559
<v Speaker 2>lot of times southers that leave the South, they'll still

514
00:27:43.599 --> 00:27:47.799
<v Speaker 2>have it years later. It's sort of hard to change out.

515
00:27:47.880 --> 00:27:50.559
<v Speaker 2>But if I'm moving to the South, I could probably

516
00:27:50.640 --> 00:27:54.400
<v Speaker 2>start learning. I could learn to say when in that

517
00:27:54.519 --> 00:27:56.640
<v Speaker 2>one word, but I'm not going to know that it

518
00:27:56.680 --> 00:28:01.400
<v Speaker 2>also affects words like sense and sense and it's still.

519
00:28:01.480 --> 00:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>On those right. You know, my mother does that. My

520
00:28:04.160 --> 00:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>mother's Puerto Rican and grew up in New York and

521
00:28:06.480 --> 00:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>when she moved to Texas and had us and she's

522
00:28:09.240 --> 00:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>been there since, she you know, she had a I

523
00:28:12.240 --> 00:28:14.799
<v Speaker 1>think a New yor Rican accent. But now she says

524
00:28:14.839 --> 00:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>words like owol, like I need to get my oval

525
00:28:17.039 --> 00:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>chain right.

526
00:28:19.000 --> 00:28:21.759
<v Speaker 2>What she's done is she's picked up that Texas that's

527
00:28:21.799 --> 00:28:26.000
<v Speaker 2>a very sort of typical Texas pronunciation. She's picked up

528
00:28:26.079 --> 00:28:29.920
<v Speaker 2>certain words with that vowel in them. But if you

529
00:28:30.000 --> 00:28:33.440
<v Speaker 2>actually measured her vowels more systemically, so you know that.

530
00:28:33.599 --> 00:28:35.039
<v Speaker 2>What we do is we talk to people and we

531
00:28:35.079 --> 00:28:36.680
<v Speaker 2>have them speak for an hour, and then we have

532
00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:38.920
<v Speaker 2>them read certain things and then you kind of pull

533
00:28:39.000 --> 00:28:41.960
<v Speaker 2>out all occurrences of the same vowel. That's where you

534
00:28:42.000 --> 00:28:46.319
<v Speaker 2>can really see what they really sound like, because it's

535
00:28:46.359 --> 00:28:49.319
<v Speaker 2>really hard to know as a non linguist what those

536
00:28:49.440 --> 00:28:52.680
<v Speaker 2>rules are if you haven't been born somewhere. And what

537
00:28:52.720 --> 00:28:55.240
<v Speaker 2>we also find is if your parents are from that place,

538
00:28:55.720 --> 00:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that's when you really tend to have a heavier accent.

539
00:28:58.079 --> 00:29:00.920
<v Speaker 2>So if you move at three, you can pick up

540
00:29:00.920 --> 00:29:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the accent of the new place you moved to because

541
00:29:02.680 --> 00:29:05.359
<v Speaker 2>you're still in that formative accent phase. But if you

542
00:29:05.640 --> 00:29:08.599
<v Speaker 2>if you have parents from that place that moved back

543
00:29:08.720 --> 00:29:11.440
<v Speaker 2>there with you at three, you're going to acquire that

544
00:29:11.480 --> 00:29:13.680
<v Speaker 2>accent even more. Yeah.

545
00:29:13.799 --> 00:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I've you know, I've noticed that with a lot of

546
00:29:16.000 --> 00:29:19.599
<v Speaker 1>folks where you'll think something is regional, but maybe it's

547
00:29:19.599 --> 00:29:22.319
<v Speaker 1>not regional, and then you find out that their parents lived,

548
00:29:22.440 --> 00:29:24.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, grew up and lived their whole lives in

549
00:29:24.519 --> 00:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a certain area and it sort of made its way

550
00:29:27.000 --> 00:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>into their speech. I think an example that I hear

551
00:29:29.319 --> 00:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and maybe you can help me with this one,

552
00:29:31.200 --> 00:29:34.599
<v Speaker 1>because I still don't know if this is regional, generational,

553
00:29:34.680 --> 00:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>or what. But I have I have friends from Connecticut

554
00:29:37.240 --> 00:29:40.759
<v Speaker 1>and friends from Oregon who both say the word both

555
00:29:40.960 --> 00:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>like both like instead of both, they put an L

556
00:29:44.519 --> 00:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in it. They say both both like an intrusive L.

557
00:29:48.400 --> 00:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah both.

558
00:29:49.519 --> 00:29:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know, I had that feature, and that's they're

559
00:29:52.880 --> 00:29:54.119
<v Speaker 2>from Connecticut.

560
00:29:54.160 --> 00:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>That's Connecticut, but also Oregon.

561
00:29:57.640 --> 00:29:58.200
<v Speaker 3>So Oregon.

562
00:29:58.359 --> 00:30:00.759
<v Speaker 2>When you get to the Western States, it doesn't seem

563
00:30:00.799 --> 00:30:04.000
<v Speaker 2>it's never that surprising when you hear features from somewhere else.

564
00:30:04.200 --> 00:30:06.559
<v Speaker 2>In parts of the West because of the migrat tory

565
00:30:06.640 --> 00:30:10.480
<v Speaker 2>patterns of settlement later. So you know, the West was

566
00:30:10.519 --> 00:30:13.960
<v Speaker 2>settled about two hundred years after the East coast colonies

567
00:30:13.960 --> 00:30:17.480
<v Speaker 2>were settled, and it was already America, and the accent

568
00:30:17.640 --> 00:30:21.480
<v Speaker 2>in the American States was that they were bringing over

569
00:30:21.519 --> 00:30:24.559
<v Speaker 2>with them was also already much different from the British

570
00:30:24.559 --> 00:30:27.400
<v Speaker 2>forms that many of the earliest settlers had brought over.

571
00:30:27.839 --> 00:30:32.240
<v Speaker 2>There was also a lot more other language influence, so

572
00:30:32.359 --> 00:30:36.160
<v Speaker 2>you had a lot of Scandinavian, Finnish, German settlement in

573
00:30:36.200 --> 00:30:39.039
<v Speaker 2>the Upper North that would have gone from Connecticut to

574
00:30:39.799 --> 00:30:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Usually you migrated westward alongside sort of the parallel of

575
00:30:43.680 --> 00:30:46.440
<v Speaker 2>where you had started, so there was the earliest settlement

576
00:30:46.519 --> 00:30:49.440
<v Speaker 2>in that area was really New England. Connecticut was an

577
00:30:49.440 --> 00:30:53.519
<v Speaker 2>outpost of the New England colony. So that actually make

578
00:30:53.640 --> 00:30:56.000
<v Speaker 2>sense to me that you could hear a feature. A

579
00:30:56.000 --> 00:30:59.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of those are sometimes remnants of either an immigrant

580
00:30:59.359 --> 00:31:03.039
<v Speaker 2>language that affected the pronunciation, so that sounds like a

581
00:31:03.160 --> 00:31:06.400
<v Speaker 2>monopthungal vowel, so that means a shorter vowel, which is

582
00:31:06.400 --> 00:31:08.960
<v Speaker 2>often sort of Scandinavian, So that's sort of why you

583
00:31:08.960 --> 00:31:13.000
<v Speaker 2>get mussola. It's a shorter vowel and actually in earlier

584
00:31:13.079 --> 00:31:16.119
<v Speaker 2>English is we would have more monupthungo vowels. So around

585
00:31:16.160 --> 00:31:19.759
<v Speaker 2>the revolutionary times we would have said something like go

586
00:31:19.960 --> 00:31:23.720
<v Speaker 2>or no, more like go nah. So sometimes as a

587
00:31:23.839 --> 00:31:27.960
<v Speaker 2>remnants of those early forms that just got retained in

588
00:31:27.960 --> 00:31:28.720
<v Speaker 2>a word or two.

589
00:31:29.319 --> 00:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's so fascinating when you watch like period pieces,

590
00:31:32.519 --> 00:31:35.119
<v Speaker 1>does it make you crazy? How wrong they.

591
00:31:35.039 --> 00:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Are so wrong? So wrong? Yes, one time I did

592
00:31:39.240 --> 00:31:41.680
<v Speaker 2>have a director of a movie that was sort of

593
00:31:41.680 --> 00:31:44.759
<v Speaker 2>in the upset in the early eighteen hundreds, the very

594
00:31:44.759 --> 00:31:47.799
<v Speaker 2>early eighteen hundreds call to ask for some help in

595
00:31:47.839 --> 00:31:50.519
<v Speaker 2>making sure they did authentic dialect. And I'm not an

596
00:31:50.559 --> 00:31:53.319
<v Speaker 2>accent I'm not an accent coach. It's a very different thing,

597
00:31:53.400 --> 00:31:54.839
<v Speaker 2>right to be an accent coach than to be a

598
00:31:54.839 --> 00:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>professor of linguistics. But I was like, okay, let's give

599
00:31:57.960 --> 00:31:59.880
<v Speaker 2>it a try. So I was telling him a lot

600
00:31:59.880 --> 00:32:02.119
<v Speaker 2>of the features that would have been frontier speech at

601
00:32:02.119 --> 00:32:04.759
<v Speaker 2>the time, because this was set in the frontier and

602
00:32:04.839 --> 00:32:07.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, for most people if they heard features of

603
00:32:07.559 --> 00:32:12.039
<v Speaker 2>frontier speech from that era, it would sound very rustic

604
00:32:12.039 --> 00:32:15.599
<v Speaker 2>and hickesh to our ears, because a lot of those

605
00:32:15.839 --> 00:32:20.279
<v Speaker 2>things like rastle and Giett and sari for sarah or

606
00:32:20.400 --> 00:32:25.519
<v Speaker 2>best for best. Those things were actually very widespread features

607
00:32:25.519 --> 00:32:29.559
<v Speaker 2>in the early colonial period that were had become around

608
00:32:29.599 --> 00:32:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the Revolutionary era a bit hurt as a bit more

609
00:32:34.039 --> 00:32:38.000
<v Speaker 2>rustic even than by the more educated elite in the

610
00:32:38.039 --> 00:32:41.119
<v Speaker 2>cities along the East coast, But it was very much

611
00:32:41.200 --> 00:32:46.200
<v Speaker 2>what the frontiersman spoke that was considered very typical of

612
00:32:46.240 --> 00:32:49.400
<v Speaker 2>frontier speech. So it would have sounded, you know, really

613
00:32:49.680 --> 00:32:53.880
<v Speaker 2>hickesh to most modern English speakers. So I did not

614
00:32:53.960 --> 00:32:55.839
<v Speaker 2>think that that's probably how he wanted to have his

615
00:32:55.880 --> 00:33:00.799
<v Speaker 2>main character speak in this piece. But most of the

616
00:33:00.839 --> 00:33:04.880
<v Speaker 2>period pieces always seem to think that the elite British

617
00:33:05.000 --> 00:33:07.559
<v Speaker 2>rp accent is the one that everybody spoke in the

618
00:33:07.720 --> 00:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, from sixteen hundred to to current times.

619
00:33:11.960 --> 00:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>But particularly in then every country too.

620
00:33:14.920 --> 00:33:18.279
<v Speaker 2>In some country, if you want to seem like, you,

621
00:33:18.279 --> 00:33:21.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, have some colonial era language, it's going to

622
00:33:21.839 --> 00:33:25.359
<v Speaker 2>be our P. But the truth is our p received pronunciation.

623
00:33:25.519 --> 00:33:28.200
<v Speaker 2>This sort of posh British accent we associate with Queen's

624
00:33:28.240 --> 00:33:32.720
<v Speaker 2>English today really didn't emerge until the late eighteenth early

625
00:33:32.799 --> 00:33:36.279
<v Speaker 2>nineteenth century. Really yeah, so it doesn't mean that there

626
00:33:36.279 --> 00:33:40.000
<v Speaker 2>weren't components of it, but two of the most recognizable

627
00:33:40.039 --> 00:33:44.200
<v Speaker 2>features of received pronunciation, which is a non roticity, which

628
00:33:44.240 --> 00:33:47.559
<v Speaker 2>is a really fancy word that simply means our dropping,

629
00:33:48.720 --> 00:33:53.799
<v Speaker 2>So saying things like wata instead of water. That didn't

630
00:33:53.839 --> 00:33:58.400
<v Speaker 2>emerge until the late eighteenth century. And also the awe

631
00:33:58.559 --> 00:34:03.519
<v Speaker 2>for a pronunciation was also not prevalent in even elite

632
00:34:03.559 --> 00:34:07.519
<v Speaker 2>British speech until then. In fact, those two variants, which

633
00:34:07.720 --> 00:34:11.760
<v Speaker 2>was saying things like instead of saying aunt, you'd say aunt,

634
00:34:12.519 --> 00:34:16.719
<v Speaker 2>or eve, instead of saying father, you'd say father, those

635
00:34:16.760 --> 00:34:19.880
<v Speaker 2>would have been very typical of all British speakers up

636
00:34:19.960 --> 00:34:25.440
<v Speaker 2>to the end of the seventeen hundreds. So none of

637
00:34:25.480 --> 00:34:28.920
<v Speaker 2>the representations we give people with that RP accent in

638
00:34:28.920 --> 00:34:32.400
<v Speaker 2>those period dramas is very accurate unless it's after the

639
00:34:32.440 --> 00:34:33.400
<v Speaker 2>eighteen hundreds.

640
00:34:33.840 --> 00:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>That's so fascinating and I see that actually with all

641
00:34:36.440 --> 00:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of my British South African Australian friends, I always tell

642
00:34:40.880 --> 00:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>them they're allowed to call me Kara because they struggle

643
00:34:43.840 --> 00:34:47.039
<v Speaker 1>to say Kara. But none of my American friends who

644
00:34:47.079 --> 00:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>are from here are allowed to do that. It's not

645
00:34:49.519 --> 00:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>my name, it's Kara, it's not car.

646
00:34:51.599 --> 00:34:52.800
<v Speaker 3>You've had a tricky name.

647
00:34:52.880 --> 00:34:56.599
<v Speaker 2>So the funny thing is the words spelled with A,

648
00:34:56.960 --> 00:35:02.360
<v Speaker 2>and particularly those before an R, are incredibly variable in

649
00:35:02.400 --> 00:35:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the history of English and American English particularly, so depending

650
00:35:07.400 --> 00:35:11.880
<v Speaker 2>on where you're from, you'll say those vowels differently. So

651
00:35:12.039 --> 00:35:14.440
<v Speaker 2>I think we do have to cut people some slack.

652
00:35:14.519 --> 00:35:16.440
<v Speaker 2>But I do have a lot of friends with a

653
00:35:16.760 --> 00:35:19.760
<v Speaker 2>names like yours that get, you know, a little bit

654
00:35:19.920 --> 00:35:23.320
<v Speaker 2>upset when people seem to use the different vowel, And

655
00:35:23.360 --> 00:35:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I get it, I get it. I don't like being

656
00:35:24.960 --> 00:35:28.239
<v Speaker 2>called vowel. So you know, we all get to choose

657
00:35:28.239 --> 00:35:31.320
<v Speaker 2>what we are called. But I will say in their

658
00:35:31.400 --> 00:35:34.440
<v Speaker 2>defense and their defense. Even for Americans, there are such

659
00:35:34.559 --> 00:35:37.599
<v Speaker 2>variable pronunciation for words that are spelled with a, especially

660
00:35:37.639 --> 00:35:40.119
<v Speaker 2>if they were borrowed words or from a different language,

661
00:35:40.599 --> 00:35:45.159
<v Speaker 2>they get variably pronounced in American English or a Canadian English.

662
00:35:45.159 --> 00:35:47.800
<v Speaker 2>So one of the examples, my mother is actually French

663
00:35:47.840 --> 00:35:53.079
<v Speaker 2>Canadian and the word pasta. It used to drive me

664
00:35:53.440 --> 00:35:57.559
<v Speaker 2>baddie when she pronounced it because it was pasta pasta yasta,

665
00:35:57.639 --> 00:35:59.840
<v Speaker 2>which is a very Canadian pronunciation of the word.

666
00:36:00.480 --> 00:36:01.639
<v Speaker 3>And again it's because.

667
00:36:01.360 --> 00:36:06.159
<v Speaker 2>It's a loanword, and a loanword with with an a

668
00:36:06.440 --> 00:36:10.079
<v Speaker 2>in it, and that throughout our history of borrowing words

669
00:36:10.079 --> 00:36:13.119
<v Speaker 2>has always been really hard for Americans to settle themselves

670
00:36:13.119 --> 00:36:14.880
<v Speaker 2>on one particular pronunciation of it.

671
00:36:15.559 --> 00:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think it also varies by context. I

672
00:36:18.039 --> 00:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>used to always joke that my father, who is Italian,

673
00:36:21.039 --> 00:36:25.119
<v Speaker 1>but many generations, you know, separated, who gave me my

674
00:36:25.639 --> 00:36:28.159
<v Speaker 1>last name. If you say it the way that most

675
00:36:28.159 --> 00:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>people you know want to say it romantically, they'll say,

676
00:36:31.320 --> 00:36:33.559
<v Speaker 1>my name is Gotta Santa Maria. But if you want

677
00:36:33.559 --> 00:36:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to go super southern and include my middle name, I

678
00:36:35.800 --> 00:36:39.519
<v Speaker 1>become Cara Louise. And it's a quick change.

679
00:36:40.440 --> 00:36:42.559
<v Speaker 3>Quick, so adaptable, per.

680
00:36:44.559 --> 00:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's there's so many interesting things, you know. I remember

681
00:36:47.480 --> 00:36:50.159
<v Speaker 1>reading a book when I was young about the Revolutionary No,

682
00:36:50.199 --> 00:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it was not, it was about the Civil War. Actually, yes,

683
00:36:52.400 --> 00:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it was about the Civil War and there was a

684
00:36:54.440 --> 00:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>soldier I think in Kentucky. And the way that they

685
00:36:57.599 --> 00:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>wrote it was like a lot of phonetic writing and

686
00:37:00.159 --> 00:37:02.760
<v Speaker 1>book And I don't know why this sentence sticks out

687
00:37:02.800 --> 00:37:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to me, but the boy was asking his parents, will

688
00:37:05.280 --> 00:37:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Kaneentuck go sickish? And it was the way that they wrote,

689
00:37:08.800 --> 00:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>will Kentucky secede? And I remember being so fascinated by this, like, well,

690
00:37:15.079 --> 00:37:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Kane Tuck go Sickish. I don't know what the accent was,

691
00:37:17.599 --> 00:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>but that was how they wrote it, and learning more

692
00:37:19.880 --> 00:37:23.159
<v Speaker 1>about like Appalachia and about this region of the United

693
00:37:23.159 --> 00:37:28.639
<v Speaker 1>States that was so Scottish and not realizing that.

694
00:37:28.840 --> 00:37:31.880
<v Speaker 2>It was very right Scottish not and also it had

695
00:37:31.920 --> 00:37:35.199
<v Speaker 2>some you know, Irish, and not only just the Scots

696
00:37:35.400 --> 00:37:39.559
<v Speaker 2>and the Irish, but author the Scots Irish were very

697
00:37:39.559 --> 00:37:43.599
<v Speaker 2>influential in that area. There was also early British influence

698
00:37:43.679 --> 00:37:45.880
<v Speaker 2>as well. So a lot of the features that we

699
00:37:46.000 --> 00:37:51.840
<v Speaker 2>think of as typical in Appalachian English, so like a prefixing,

700
00:37:52.000 --> 00:37:56.079
<v Speaker 2>so I'm a hunting and a fishing, those are actually

701
00:37:56.199 --> 00:38:00.239
<v Speaker 2>features that were fairly widespread in early British English at

702
00:38:00.280 --> 00:38:03.199
<v Speaker 2>the founding of the initial thirteen colonies. He would have

703
00:38:03.199 --> 00:38:07.440
<v Speaker 2>heard those, not just in Appalachia, which actually wasn't a

704
00:38:07.440 --> 00:38:11.320
<v Speaker 2>thing at that time, but it would have been all

705
00:38:11.360 --> 00:38:14.079
<v Speaker 2>over because it was a feature that was used more

706
00:38:14.159 --> 00:38:18.480
<v Speaker 2>widespread in British English at the time. But scott was

707
00:38:18.519 --> 00:38:24.039
<v Speaker 2>a variety of English that retained a lot of older features,

708
00:38:24.199 --> 00:38:26.599
<v Speaker 2>and they retained it for longer. And so that's why

709
00:38:26.639 --> 00:38:28.840
<v Speaker 2>we see in Scott's Irish. We see a lot of

710
00:38:28.840 --> 00:38:32.880
<v Speaker 2>features that have overlapped with earlier British English, but were

711
00:38:32.880 --> 00:38:36.360
<v Speaker 2>we retained longer in Scott's Irish. But absolutely, the Scott's

712
00:38:36.400 --> 00:38:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Irish were incredibly influential in the Appalachian area.

713
00:38:41.039 --> 00:38:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I find that when, like I've had I used

714
00:38:44.320 --> 00:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a partner who was Scottish like, born and

715
00:38:46.599 --> 00:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>raised in Scotland, and when he would when he was

716
00:38:49.920 --> 00:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, when we would watch movies or

717
00:38:51.800 --> 00:38:54.760
<v Speaker 1>he would hear the Appalachian accent, he could understand it

718
00:38:54.800 --> 00:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>better than I could, And I found it fascinating because

719
00:38:59.039 --> 00:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>he he did really his parents were South African, so

720
00:39:01.760 --> 00:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that's extra confusing. So he sounded kind of just like

721
00:39:04.360 --> 00:39:07.840
<v Speaker 1>vaguely colonial British, like nobody could place him. But he

722
00:39:07.880 --> 00:39:11.320
<v Speaker 1>could hear a broad Scottish accent really well because that's

723
00:39:11.519 --> 00:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that's how he grew up. He was surrounded by it

724
00:39:13.360 --> 00:39:16.199
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And there's a certain point when somebody

725
00:39:16.280 --> 00:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Scottish accent is too strong where I'm like, are they

726
00:39:18.360 --> 00:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>speaking English? Like I cannot understand what they're saying at all.

727
00:39:22.360 --> 00:39:23.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So a lot of you know, I've had a

728
00:39:23.679 --> 00:39:25.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of people tell me that the English accents they

729
00:39:25.880 --> 00:39:28.599
<v Speaker 2>find most difficult to understand is the Scottish one. So

730
00:39:28.639 --> 00:39:30.719
<v Speaker 2>if they go to Scotland, it takes them a few

731
00:39:30.800 --> 00:39:34.400
<v Speaker 2>days to kind of acclimate to be like, okay, what

732
00:39:34.400 --> 00:39:38.079
<v Speaker 2>are you saying. And it's not surprising because in part

733
00:39:38.159 --> 00:39:41.760
<v Speaker 2>it was a more conservative English, meaning that it retained

734
00:39:41.880 --> 00:39:46.519
<v Speaker 2>features longer than you know. Even now English English has

735
00:39:46.559 --> 00:39:49.079
<v Speaker 2>a lot of new features. Scottish English, I mean, every

736
00:39:49.199 --> 00:39:51.239
<v Speaker 2>dialect has changed, so there's none that we are the

737
00:39:51.280 --> 00:39:53.639
<v Speaker 2>same as the sixteen hundreds. And it's a riff that

738
00:39:53.920 --> 00:39:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Appalachian English is, you know, Shakespeare in the Holler. That's

739
00:39:57.920 --> 00:40:01.199
<v Speaker 2>not that's not true. Does it attain certain features that

740
00:40:01.239 --> 00:40:05.559
<v Speaker 2>are older, certainly it does, but every accent does things

741
00:40:05.719 --> 00:40:07.159
<v Speaker 2>like that. You know, we all have things that are

742
00:40:07.199 --> 00:40:11.320
<v Speaker 2>older and younger and new and innovative, and Scottish English

743
00:40:11.360 --> 00:40:14.920
<v Speaker 2>is the same way. It's gotten innovations. But for example,

744
00:40:15.079 --> 00:40:18.280
<v Speaker 2>in Scottish English, you tend to have more differences in

745
00:40:18.360 --> 00:40:22.320
<v Speaker 2>vowels that occur before our sounds that American English, where

746
00:40:22.320 --> 00:40:25.400
<v Speaker 2>we've kind of merged everything together, you know, so if

747
00:40:25.440 --> 00:40:28.480
<v Speaker 2>you have words like mary, mary and mary, which are

748
00:40:28.679 --> 00:40:31.599
<v Speaker 2>m e r r y y, m a r r

749
00:40:31.800 --> 00:40:35.880
<v Speaker 2>y and m a r y, most Americans merge those suckers.

750
00:40:36.199 --> 00:40:38.880
<v Speaker 2>But you know in Scottish and Irish English is those

751
00:40:39.760 --> 00:40:42.960
<v Speaker 2>vowel mergers before r were not as widespread, so you

752
00:40:43.000 --> 00:40:45.559
<v Speaker 2>tend to have more distinct vowels before them. So that's

753
00:40:45.639 --> 00:40:51.280
<v Speaker 2>an Mary. Yes, yes, Southerners actually used to do that

754
00:40:51.440 --> 00:40:54.199
<v Speaker 2>distinction more often, but it's harder to find it in

755
00:40:54.280 --> 00:40:55.239
<v Speaker 2>the South nowadays.

756
00:40:55.719 --> 00:40:57.519
<v Speaker 1>And you hear the opposite. I remember there was a

757
00:40:57.639 --> 00:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>viral video of a man in Baltimore, which to me

758
00:41:01.599 --> 00:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most fascinating accents. There's a viral

759
00:41:04.519 --> 00:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>video of him reading the sentence. It was something like

760
00:41:07.599 --> 00:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>aarin uh oh, gosh, Aaron's something in iron eurn Aaron Oh,

761
00:41:13.679 --> 00:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Aaron earned or Aaron earned an iron earn. And he

762
00:41:17.119 --> 00:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>was like iron earned and iron urn, like all the

763
00:41:19.840 --> 00:41:22.159
<v Speaker 1>vowels were the same, and he's like, whoa.

764
00:41:22.119 --> 00:41:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Do I talk like yes? But you know, some people

765
00:41:25.559 --> 00:41:29.280
<v Speaker 2>feel I have heard Southerners that also say things that

766
00:41:29.480 --> 00:41:33.079
<v Speaker 2>I think non Southerners, if they're very traditional Southern, often

767
00:41:33.599 --> 00:41:36.039
<v Speaker 2>at certain places in the South that have a heavier accent,

768
00:41:36.119 --> 00:41:38.360
<v Speaker 2>where people go there and say the same thing. You know.

769
00:41:39.039 --> 00:41:40.920
<v Speaker 2>So I've had, you know, someone saying I'm ron it,

770
00:41:43.199 --> 00:41:47.679
<v Speaker 2>which is I'm going to iron it. That's Southern for

771
00:41:47.800 --> 00:41:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to iron it, you know, I I oh, right, right,

772
00:41:50.599 --> 00:41:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Or I would say someone who said that it took

773
00:41:52.920 --> 00:41:55.199
<v Speaker 2>me a while. I'm like, oh, okay, you're going to

774
00:41:55.280 --> 00:41:58.599
<v Speaker 2>iron it. One of my mothers when I was young. So,

775
00:41:58.800 --> 00:42:01.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think it's partially whenever we have accents

776
00:42:01.280 --> 00:42:03.920
<v Speaker 2>that are further from what we think of as sort

777
00:42:03.960 --> 00:42:08.360
<v Speaker 2>of this national standard, general American model that we're more

778
00:42:08.400 --> 00:42:11.400
<v Speaker 2>familiar with, even if we don't speak at ourselves, because

779
00:42:11.440 --> 00:42:13.480
<v Speaker 2>we can't help but be familiar with it because our

780
00:42:13.559 --> 00:42:17.320
<v Speaker 2>teachers are broadcasters. You know, every ad on television tends

781
00:42:17.360 --> 00:42:21.280
<v Speaker 2>to have that accent. Then it can be harder for

782
00:42:21.519 --> 00:42:23.559
<v Speaker 2>a short time for us to figure it out. We

783
00:42:23.679 --> 00:42:27.960
<v Speaker 2>do something really amazing called accent normalization or vowel normalization,

784
00:42:28.159 --> 00:42:32.119
<v Speaker 2>where our brain kind of adjusts with enough input and

785
00:42:32.199 --> 00:42:36.840
<v Speaker 2>relatively rapidly to understanding how this new system fits with

786
00:42:37.039 --> 00:42:39.760
<v Speaker 2>our old system. So the more familiar you become with

787
00:42:39.840 --> 00:42:41.159
<v Speaker 2>the speaker, the better.

788
00:42:41.039 --> 00:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>You do with this, and it probably makes it just

789
00:42:44.000 --> 00:42:45.760
<v Speaker 1>easier to understand people with time.

790
00:42:46.960 --> 00:42:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, what we do find is people with really diverse

791
00:42:49.360 --> 00:42:53.280
<v Speaker 2>accent exposure. So people that either grow up around a

792
00:42:53.320 --> 00:42:57.199
<v Speaker 2>lot of diverse accent. So, for example, in la Or

793
00:42:57.599 --> 00:43:01.840
<v Speaker 2>they have more people at work from various places, they

794
00:43:02.000 --> 00:43:05.280
<v Speaker 2>tend to do better with accent normalization because they're just

795
00:43:05.400 --> 00:43:08.440
<v Speaker 2>more adaptable. They've had more range, and so their brain

796
00:43:08.480 --> 00:43:10.000
<v Speaker 2>has learned to process it more quickly.

797
00:43:10.719 --> 00:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have a tendency. I've traveled quite a

798
00:43:13.039 --> 00:43:15.119
<v Speaker 1>lot in my life. Have been very lucky because of

799
00:43:15.159 --> 00:43:16.679
<v Speaker 1>the work that I do to travel quite a lot,

800
00:43:16.760 --> 00:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and my friends would tell me that I have a

801
00:43:18.559 --> 00:43:20.599
<v Speaker 1>tendency when I come home from a lot of travel

802
00:43:21.039 --> 00:43:25.559
<v Speaker 1>to sort of have picked up like affectations and different

803
00:43:25.679 --> 00:43:28.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of quirks of speech while I'm away, and then

804
00:43:28.719 --> 00:43:32.199
<v Speaker 1>obviously they decay after a few days. But usually when

805
00:43:32.199 --> 00:43:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I come home from a place, they're like, oh my god,

806
00:43:33.840 --> 00:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you're talking like.

807
00:43:34.519 --> 00:43:40.519
<v Speaker 2>You're like a superheroer. There are yes, I think all

808
00:43:40.559 --> 00:43:42.960
<v Speaker 2>of us are familiar with it, with those types.

809
00:43:43.000 --> 00:43:45.679
<v Speaker 3>So superhero types, Oh my god, I didn't even know

810
00:43:45.800 --> 00:43:46.360
<v Speaker 3>as I was doing it.

811
00:43:46.400 --> 00:43:48.719
<v Speaker 2>That's all just pick it up, and you know, there

812
00:43:48.840 --> 00:43:52.679
<v Speaker 2>really is some interesting variability in our ability to do that.

813
00:43:53.000 --> 00:43:56.239
<v Speaker 2>So I think a lot of times people are feel

814
00:43:56.400 --> 00:43:58.519
<v Speaker 2>like they are not as good as other people in

815
00:43:58.639 --> 00:44:02.280
<v Speaker 2>picking up languages or hearing accents, and part of it

816
00:44:02.280 --> 00:44:05.719
<v Speaker 2>is part of its exposure and motivation, for sure, But

817
00:44:05.840 --> 00:44:10.039
<v Speaker 2>it does seem like certain people are more perceptually able

818
00:44:10.280 --> 00:44:15.440
<v Speaker 2>to pick up on these finer distinctions, analyze it cognitively,

819
00:44:15.599 --> 00:44:19.519
<v Speaker 2>and produce it. And we see this in people particularly

820
00:44:19.599 --> 00:44:21.639
<v Speaker 2>that have a really good musical ability.

821
00:44:21.679 --> 00:44:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And I was gonna say I was trained as a vocalist.

822
00:44:24.039 --> 00:44:25.079
<v Speaker 1>That's probably good.

823
00:44:25.320 --> 00:44:27.480
<v Speaker 2>There you go, right, And so if you, especially if

824
00:44:27.480 --> 00:44:30.360
<v Speaker 2>you can hear tone differences really well, you tend to

825
00:44:30.400 --> 00:44:32.960
<v Speaker 2>be very good at picking these very nuanced differences in

826
00:44:33.079 --> 00:44:35.960
<v Speaker 2>language up better. So there we tagged you. We know

827
00:44:36.039 --> 00:44:38.639
<v Speaker 2>why you're so good or bad?

828
00:44:38.719 --> 00:44:41.159
<v Speaker 1>It was so annoying, I guess I could say, you know,

829
00:44:41.360 --> 00:44:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm also really curious. You mentioned something before about oh gosh,

830
00:44:46.360 --> 00:44:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what was it?

831
00:44:46.880 --> 00:44:47.039
<v Speaker 2>It was?

832
00:44:47.199 --> 00:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a Southern thing where they ran, oh the

833
00:44:49.039 --> 00:44:52.280
<v Speaker 1>ironing thing, which was so good, and one of the

834
00:44:52.360 --> 00:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>ones that I saw once on it was either Baltimore

835
00:44:55.119 --> 00:44:59.119
<v Speaker 1>or or Pittsburgh, which I think Baltimore. I find Baltimore

836
00:44:59.159 --> 00:45:01.519
<v Speaker 1>and Pittsburgh to be the most fascinating accents in the US.

837
00:45:02.079 --> 00:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But they would say like g eat jeet instead of

838
00:45:05.079 --> 00:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>did you eat.

839
00:45:05.960 --> 00:45:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, running all together, I mean all of us do it.

840
00:45:08.599 --> 00:45:12.199
<v Speaker 2>So there's you know, economic ways of speaking, and it's

841
00:45:12.760 --> 00:45:16.000
<v Speaker 2>all due to articulatory efficiency, and every one of us

842
00:45:16.639 --> 00:45:20.119
<v Speaker 2>does things like that where we uh sort of smush

843
00:45:20.400 --> 00:45:24.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sounds into smaller and smaller syllables when

844
00:45:24.800 --> 00:45:27.639
<v Speaker 2>we're talking fast, and it's something very familiar and recoverable

845
00:45:27.679 --> 00:45:31.639
<v Speaker 2>from the context. The trick is certain places like Pittsburgh,

846
00:45:31.840 --> 00:45:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I know is one. Also Philly is also known for that,

847
00:45:35.840 --> 00:45:38.800
<v Speaker 2>where's there's a lot of smushing that goes on. Sort

848
00:45:38.800 --> 00:45:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of it's become a local joke, right that you can say,

849
00:45:41.039 --> 00:45:44.400
<v Speaker 2>get yet, and everybody there will know, will know what

850
00:45:44.559 --> 00:45:47.159
<v Speaker 2>it is, but all of us say eat, yeah, did

851
00:45:47.239 --> 00:45:48.039
<v Speaker 2>you eat it yet?

852
00:45:48.159 --> 00:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, I'm going.

853
00:45:50.760 --> 00:45:53.840
<v Speaker 2>To As a Southerner, I actually one tag for me.

854
00:45:54.239 --> 00:45:57.039
<v Speaker 2>My husband always says he notices I say it is

855
00:45:57.159 --> 00:46:00.519
<v Speaker 2>I say, I'm a I'm doing that. I eat. I'm

856
00:46:00.519 --> 00:46:03.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna eat now, And that's the same thing instead of

857
00:46:04.000 --> 00:46:06.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to eat or finna right the.

858
00:46:06.599 --> 00:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I was going to bring that one up, fina, Yeah, I.

859
00:46:09.039 --> 00:46:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Was fixing to right too. Yeah, and then it shortens

860
00:46:12.400 --> 00:46:14.239
<v Speaker 2>so and we all do this. It's all due to

861
00:46:14.320 --> 00:46:16.960
<v Speaker 2>these natural tendencies and speech, which are the things that

862
00:46:17.039 --> 00:46:20.400
<v Speaker 2>gave rise to accents in the first place, which is

863
00:46:20.559 --> 00:46:24.320
<v Speaker 2>whenever we separate we're not talking to the same people,

864
00:46:25.159 --> 00:46:29.360
<v Speaker 2>we will have these different variations arise that sort of

865
00:46:29.639 --> 00:46:32.159
<v Speaker 2>come in different ways, different forms, but all from the

866
00:46:32.239 --> 00:46:36.719
<v Speaker 2>same underlying predispositions we have as human language speakers due

867
00:46:36.719 --> 00:46:41.519
<v Speaker 2>to articulatory and perceptual efficiencies in the way that our

868
00:46:41.599 --> 00:46:44.079
<v Speaker 2>mouths work, in the way that our brains process things.

869
00:46:44.519 --> 00:46:48.480
<v Speaker 2>So a great example is in unstressed syllables, of which

870
00:46:48.559 --> 00:46:52.360
<v Speaker 2>English has a lot. Whenever you get an unstressed syllable,

871
00:46:52.599 --> 00:46:56.639
<v Speaker 2>it for every speaker of every variety of English, it

872
00:46:56.719 --> 00:47:01.400
<v Speaker 2>will cause what's what's known as weakening or nission bilinguist,

873
00:47:01.440 --> 00:47:05.519
<v Speaker 2>which simply means you reduce the articulatory gestures because it's

874
00:47:05.599 --> 00:47:09.320
<v Speaker 2>spoken much more quickly and which with less articulatory force

875
00:47:09.440 --> 00:47:11.800
<v Speaker 2>because it's an unstressed syllable, and so.

876
00:47:11.920 --> 00:47:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And so those tend to be the ones that disappear.

877
00:47:14.000 --> 00:47:17.000
<v Speaker 2>They are the ones that either get completely deleted or

878
00:47:17.320 --> 00:47:21.519
<v Speaker 2>you have continental changes that happen typically, or even vowel changes.

879
00:47:21.599 --> 00:47:25.599
<v Speaker 2>So a great example is the way that we say water,

880
00:47:26.920 --> 00:47:30.440
<v Speaker 2>so water is a stressed and unstressed syllable. The first

881
00:47:30.480 --> 00:47:33.639
<v Speaker 2>syllable stress, the second's unstressed, which means that second still

882
00:47:33.719 --> 00:47:37.679
<v Speaker 2>syllable is ripe for stuff to happen. And yeah, I

883
00:47:37.719 --> 00:47:39.840
<v Speaker 2>mean you can get things where it's who whole deletion,

884
00:47:40.079 --> 00:47:41.639
<v Speaker 2>So I want some wah wah.

885
00:47:41.760 --> 00:47:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Right by the way a baby would say it wah wah.

886
00:47:45.239 --> 00:47:47.719
<v Speaker 2>But more likely what happens is you do something like

887
00:47:47.840 --> 00:47:50.519
<v Speaker 2>change the way the teas pronounce, so you either keep

888
00:47:50.559 --> 00:47:54.159
<v Speaker 2>it a tea so water, which sounds very right British,

889
00:47:54.719 --> 00:47:57.719
<v Speaker 2>or you say wah uh, which also sounds British, but

890
00:47:57.800 --> 00:48:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a very different variety of British English. Or you say

891
00:48:00.679 --> 00:48:04.159
<v Speaker 2>water with a D, which is which is always say

892
00:48:04.199 --> 00:48:06.599
<v Speaker 2>that lap, right, which is a flap. It's not really

893
00:48:06.639 --> 00:48:08.239
<v Speaker 2>the same thing as a D, which is actually a

894
00:48:08.360 --> 00:48:12.519
<v Speaker 2>more forceful articulation, So a D has more articulatory effort

895
00:48:12.599 --> 00:48:15.679
<v Speaker 2>than the flat. But a flap is like an intermediate

896
00:48:15.760 --> 00:48:17.519
<v Speaker 2>sound between a T and a D, where the tongue

897
00:48:17.639 --> 00:48:20.239
<v Speaker 2>just slaps against the alveolar ridge really fast and makes

898
00:48:20.320 --> 00:48:21.559
<v Speaker 2>a D like sound.

899
00:48:22.480 --> 00:48:23.639
<v Speaker 3>And notice how those.

900
00:48:23.480 --> 00:48:29.519
<v Speaker 2>Are all basically weakening occurrences occurring in an unstressed syllable.

901
00:48:30.320 --> 00:48:32.559
<v Speaker 2>So but the outcome is different, and the outcome is

902
00:48:32.639 --> 00:48:36.840
<v Speaker 2>different because we've been separated by time and land and

903
00:48:37.039 --> 00:48:42.039
<v Speaker 2>social space. So it one became British and one became American,

904
00:48:42.159 --> 00:48:45.239
<v Speaker 2>and it's mainly because those things developed after we separated,

905
00:48:45.280 --> 00:48:47.199
<v Speaker 2>and we're apart for long periods of time.

906
00:48:48.239 --> 00:48:51.039
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating and I've always posited, tell me if this

907
00:48:51.239 --> 00:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. I've always posited that the reason that Americans

908
00:48:54.480 --> 00:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>say file at and British people say fill it is

909
00:48:58.519 --> 00:49:02.760
<v Speaker 1>because we are adapting the I mean, it's a French word, right,

910
00:49:03.079 --> 00:49:05.280
<v Speaker 1>so we're we're saying it the way we heard the

911
00:49:05.400 --> 00:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>French say it, or did we change it back from

912
00:49:09.039 --> 00:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>phill it?

913
00:49:10.840 --> 00:49:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know it's I'm more systemically, American English speakers

914
00:49:14.800 --> 00:49:19.159
<v Speaker 2>tend to have stress patterns that are different than British speakers.

915
00:49:19.960 --> 00:49:22.360
<v Speaker 2>So secretary secretary, how do they say it in Britain?

916
00:49:22.400 --> 00:49:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So say secretary secretary or laboratory?

917
00:49:25.599 --> 00:49:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, right, So they often have a different stress pattern

918
00:49:28.360 --> 00:49:30.679
<v Speaker 2>and so that will change the way you pronounce, specially

919
00:49:30.760 --> 00:49:34.559
<v Speaker 2>the end sounds and like buffet is the same thing,

920
00:49:35.559 --> 00:49:36.079
<v Speaker 2>it's different.

921
00:49:36.159 --> 00:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah we say ballet, Yeah, we say in ballet, ballet right.

922
00:49:40.000 --> 00:49:42.679
<v Speaker 2>So it's part of a larger trend, and part of

923
00:49:42.800 --> 00:49:47.639
<v Speaker 2>that is driven by after the Revolution, the founding fathers

924
00:49:47.679 --> 00:49:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and Noah Webster really wanted to americanize American English because

925
00:49:53.400 --> 00:49:58.280
<v Speaker 2>of its role in symbolic unity, but also its role

926
00:49:58.599 --> 00:50:02.760
<v Speaker 2>in separating from our former motherland. And so a lot

927
00:50:02.800 --> 00:50:07.679
<v Speaker 2>of stress differences were part of this reform movement that

928
00:50:08.159 --> 00:50:11.000
<v Speaker 2>was both in spelling, to spell English differently, but also

929
00:50:11.079 --> 00:50:14.800
<v Speaker 2>to pronounce words in an American way. And sure, some

930
00:50:14.960 --> 00:50:17.320
<v Speaker 2>of it more recently, depending on the history of a

931
00:50:17.400 --> 00:50:20.880
<v Speaker 2>specific word, can be while we borrowed it later from French,

932
00:50:21.119 --> 00:50:23.760
<v Speaker 2>and so that's why we have that pronunciation. Certainly you

933
00:50:23.880 --> 00:50:27.199
<v Speaker 2>can find that, but more generally, when we see patterns

934
00:50:27.320 --> 00:50:31.320
<v Speaker 2>like this, it's often attributable to these earlier points of

935
00:50:31.519 --> 00:50:35.800
<v Speaker 2>history where the American language was trying to find its

936
00:50:35.840 --> 00:50:39.599
<v Speaker 2>own footing. We got lots of new words, new stress patterns,

937
00:50:39.719 --> 00:50:43.400
<v Speaker 2>new spellings, and much of this played a symbolic role

938
00:50:43.639 --> 00:50:48.480
<v Speaker 2>in establishing American identity. But it wasn't just arbitrary. In fact,

939
00:50:49.079 --> 00:50:54.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, people like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and Noah Webster,

940
00:50:54.719 --> 00:50:59.199
<v Speaker 2>John Adams, even George Washington did play a role in

941
00:50:59.760 --> 00:51:02.480
<v Speaker 2>make making sure the American language as they called it,

942
00:51:02.599 --> 00:51:06.760
<v Speaker 2>which Noah Webster coined, was a unifying force on a

943
00:51:06.840 --> 00:51:10.119
<v Speaker 2>fragile nation because the states were already at war with

944
00:51:10.239 --> 00:51:13.039
<v Speaker 2>each other within a few years after the revolution, and

945
00:51:13.599 --> 00:51:17.079
<v Speaker 2>having regional dialects was actually something they were worried about.

946
00:51:17.199 --> 00:51:19.519
<v Speaker 2>Having different ways of saying things with something they were

947
00:51:19.559 --> 00:51:22.000
<v Speaker 2>worried about because of the impact it had in sort

948
00:51:22.039 --> 00:51:23.960
<v Speaker 2>of establishing a national identity.

949
00:51:24.960 --> 00:51:26.199
<v Speaker 1>So how did they talk?

950
00:51:27.559 --> 00:51:27.599
<v Speaker 2>Like?

951
00:51:27.719 --> 00:51:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I've always been curious because I don't trust the movies.

952
00:51:31.000 --> 00:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that they don't didn't have just

953
00:51:32.519 --> 00:51:36.079
<v Speaker 1>straight up British accents. But even when you look hundreds

954
00:51:36.119 --> 00:51:40.039
<v Speaker 1>of years later at early like American cinema, there was

955
00:51:40.159 --> 00:51:43.079
<v Speaker 1>this way, or if you listen to old recordings of

956
00:51:43.159 --> 00:51:47.440
<v Speaker 1>poets around the turn of this past century, there's this like,

957
00:51:47.760 --> 00:51:51.320
<v Speaker 1>very like affected way that they talk. And I always

958
00:51:51.360 --> 00:51:53.559
<v Speaker 1>have wondered, was that how they actually talked or were

959
00:51:53.599 --> 00:51:55.519
<v Speaker 1>they putting something on for the camera?

960
00:51:55.920 --> 00:51:58.599
<v Speaker 2>No, that's definitely putting something on. In fact, in the

961
00:51:59.599 --> 00:52:02.559
<v Speaker 2>early twentieth century, when cinema was getting started, there was

962
00:52:02.599 --> 00:52:06.920
<v Speaker 2>something called the Transatlantic accent, which was an affected, basically

963
00:52:07.039 --> 00:52:10.199
<v Speaker 2>fake accent that was very prominent in Hollywood, and it

964
00:52:10.280 --> 00:52:14.800
<v Speaker 2>had been taught by essentially articulation and elocution experts and

965
00:52:15.079 --> 00:52:18.480
<v Speaker 2>was particularly talked to actors. It was also taught in

966
00:52:18.599 --> 00:52:21.559
<v Speaker 2>East Coast boarding schools, which is why it has you know,

967
00:52:21.639 --> 00:52:27.360
<v Speaker 2>the Catherine hepburn esque and Jackie o' nassis and Carrie Grant,

968
00:52:27.480 --> 00:52:30.079
<v Speaker 2>So it has this mix of people that were both

969
00:52:30.199 --> 00:52:32.760
<v Speaker 2>actors at the time, but also just you know, fdr

970
00:52:33.400 --> 00:52:36.480
<v Speaker 2>those types of people that were just affluent East Coasters

971
00:52:36.800 --> 00:52:40.000
<v Speaker 2>because that was put on accents that was considered very

972
00:52:41.119 --> 00:52:43.440
<v Speaker 2>elite and posh at the time. When that was a

973
00:52:43.599 --> 00:52:46.800
<v Speaker 2>model of sort of New England model of what we

974
00:52:46.880 --> 00:52:48.400
<v Speaker 2>should sound like, it.

975
00:52:48.480 --> 00:52:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Was just made up.

976
00:52:49.440 --> 00:52:51.719
<v Speaker 2>It was made up. It was actually constructed by a

977
00:52:51.800 --> 00:52:54.360
<v Speaker 2>woman who taught elocution, and it was based on the

978
00:52:54.480 --> 00:52:57.639
<v Speaker 2>model of a sort of a New England American and

979
00:52:58.559 --> 00:53:03.199
<v Speaker 2>received pronunciation British accent kind of hobbled together. But if

980
00:53:03.239 --> 00:53:05.559
<v Speaker 2>you go back to the time of the Revolution, you know,

981
00:53:05.679 --> 00:53:09.079
<v Speaker 2>it's a completely different thing sound than we would think

982
00:53:09.159 --> 00:53:11.440
<v Speaker 2>of today. In fact, I think the closest thing I

983
00:53:11.519 --> 00:53:15.000
<v Speaker 2>could say it sounded kind of like is probably what

984
00:53:15.079 --> 00:53:17.599
<v Speaker 2>we would think of as an Irish accent today, although

985
00:53:17.800 --> 00:53:20.760
<v Speaker 2>again that's changed a lot since the time, But words

986
00:53:20.880 --> 00:53:23.280
<v Speaker 2>like fight and life would have been pronounced more like

987
00:53:23.400 --> 00:53:27.239
<v Speaker 2>foight loife. So it really there were a lot of

988
00:53:27.360 --> 00:53:30.000
<v Speaker 2>things that the flapping we talked about in water would

989
00:53:30.039 --> 00:53:33.719
<v Speaker 2>not have happened yet, so people would have said water, water,

990
00:53:34.159 --> 00:53:36.920
<v Speaker 2>water because there wouldn't have been our dropping yet, so

991
00:53:37.039 --> 00:53:39.400
<v Speaker 2>there would have been no r dropping, So you know

992
00:53:39.440 --> 00:53:41.719
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these things, and vowels would have been shorter,

993
00:53:41.880 --> 00:53:44.800
<v Speaker 2>so when you say day it would have been more

994
00:53:44.840 --> 00:53:47.920
<v Speaker 2>like de wow, and when you say go it would

995
00:53:47.920 --> 00:53:51.679
<v Speaker 2>have been more like gough. So it was very different

996
00:53:51.880 --> 00:53:54.920
<v Speaker 2>than what we think of, and it was probably heard

997
00:53:55.119 --> 00:53:59.199
<v Speaker 2>as still somewhat British, and it probably wasn't that different

998
00:53:59.280 --> 00:54:03.119
<v Speaker 2>than contempt the British of that contemporary time, especially on

999
00:54:03.199 --> 00:54:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the East Coast colonies that had a lot of contact

1000
00:54:05.559 --> 00:54:07.559
<v Speaker 2>with Britain, and they would have had a lot of

1001
00:54:07.599 --> 00:54:12.159
<v Speaker 2>British speakers because the model of the colonies for really

1002
00:54:12.280 --> 00:54:14.960
<v Speaker 2>up to the time of the Revolution was the model

1003
00:54:15.039 --> 00:54:19.039
<v Speaker 2>of London for cultural style and speech. So it did

1004
00:54:19.199 --> 00:54:23.480
<v Speaker 2>have a pressure on the colonies speech, especially among the

1005
00:54:23.800 --> 00:54:28.519
<v Speaker 2>educated colonists in those cities, to sound more like that.

1006
00:54:28.719 --> 00:54:32.440
<v Speaker 2>So it would have sounded still somewhat British. But a

1007
00:54:32.519 --> 00:54:34.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of the commentary we see at the time of

1008
00:54:34.800 --> 00:54:39.800
<v Speaker 2>people writing notes about how Americans versus British speakers sounded

1009
00:54:39.880 --> 00:54:43.760
<v Speaker 2>say that the Americans spoke a more pure form, a

1010
00:54:43.920 --> 00:54:49.079
<v Speaker 2>more homogeneous, elegant form of British English. And that's probably

1011
00:54:49.480 --> 00:54:51.679
<v Speaker 2>indicative of the fact that in Britain at the time,

1012
00:54:52.440 --> 00:54:54.320
<v Speaker 2>you could walk ten miles down the road and not

1013
00:54:54.480 --> 00:54:59.280
<v Speaker 2>understand your neighbor because there were so many incredibly rich,

1014
00:54:59.679 --> 00:55:03.519
<v Speaker 2>dive accents at the time, both from what part of

1015
00:55:03.880 --> 00:55:07.719
<v Speaker 2>Britain you were from, but also and even within England

1016
00:55:07.800 --> 00:55:11.239
<v Speaker 2>if you were northern or Southern English, but even a

1017
00:55:11.280 --> 00:55:14.599
<v Speaker 2>little town that had its unique accent, and then class

1018
00:55:14.880 --> 00:55:18.280
<v Speaker 2>was also very prominent. So in England there were a

1019
00:55:18.400 --> 00:55:22.039
<v Speaker 2>lot of diverse accents that sort of felt like no

1020
00:55:22.119 --> 00:55:24.360
<v Speaker 2>one talked the same way and you couldn't understand your neighbor.

1021
00:55:24.480 --> 00:55:26.800
<v Speaker 2>But because of the fact that it was a London

1022
00:55:26.960 --> 00:55:30.119
<v Speaker 2>cultural and linguistic model used in the colonies, and the

1023
00:55:30.199 --> 00:55:32.719
<v Speaker 2>fact that you had people from all over Britain, plus

1024
00:55:33.119 --> 00:55:37.920
<v Speaker 2>some German and Scott's, Irish and Welsh and Dutch settlement

1025
00:55:38.000 --> 00:55:41.960
<v Speaker 2>early on, you got this sort of leveling of accent,

1026
00:55:42.199 --> 00:55:44.400
<v Speaker 2>so that it kind of moved towards this more central

1027
00:55:44.480 --> 00:55:47.639
<v Speaker 2>tendency of what was more prominent in these feeder accents

1028
00:55:48.159 --> 00:55:50.519
<v Speaker 2>that would have made it still sound British, but almost

1029
00:55:50.559 --> 00:55:52.960
<v Speaker 2>like a purified form of British English, were some of

1030
00:55:53.000 --> 00:55:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the more regional accent features that were less prominent in

1031
00:55:56.519 --> 00:55:58.079
<v Speaker 2>everybody's speech would have died out.

1032
00:55:59.159 --> 00:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It's so fast, you know, there's one concept that I know,

1033
00:56:02.280 --> 00:56:04.079
<v Speaker 1>I said I was going to keep us at the hour.

1034
00:56:04.159 --> 00:56:07.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying. I'm trying, but there's one concept that I

1035
00:56:07.440 --> 00:56:10.199
<v Speaker 1>can't help but bring up that I find really fascinating.

1036
00:56:10.239 --> 00:56:13.519
<v Speaker 1>You've talked a lot about the divisions, right, the divisions

1037
00:56:14.039 --> 00:56:18.320
<v Speaker 1>like geographically, the divisions of class, the divisions of country

1038
00:56:18.400 --> 00:56:22.199
<v Speaker 1>of origin, even through time we've been discussing. One thing

1039
00:56:22.480 --> 00:56:28.079
<v Speaker 1>that I think is a really fascinating slice of America

1040
00:56:28.880 --> 00:56:32.599
<v Speaker 1>is when I talk to my friends, and specifically my

1041
00:56:32.800 --> 00:56:38.440
<v Speaker 1>black friends, who have kind of cultural accents, but who

1042
00:56:38.599 --> 00:56:41.360
<v Speaker 1>also feel a lot of pressure in their daily lives

1043
00:56:41.440 --> 00:56:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to code switch and their ability. And I think some

1044
00:56:45.000 --> 00:56:47.360
<v Speaker 1>people have, you know, more or less ability, probably based

1045
00:56:47.400 --> 00:56:50.639
<v Speaker 1>on all sorts of different things, but their ability to

1046
00:56:51.039 --> 00:56:56.320
<v Speaker 1>change how they speak depending on the audience and whether

1047
00:56:56.480 --> 00:57:02.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously the perceptions there are going to be hateful or understanding,

1048
00:57:02.719 --> 00:57:06.760
<v Speaker 1>or you know, communal or judgmental. And it's such a

1049
00:57:07.039 --> 00:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>fascinating I think example of a lot of things that

1050
00:57:11.000 --> 00:57:12.079
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about.

1051
00:57:12.559 --> 00:57:18.199
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely the African American English that we hear around us

1052
00:57:18.280 --> 00:57:21.079
<v Speaker 2>today what a lot of people don't understand. And this

1053
00:57:21.159 --> 00:57:23.320
<v Speaker 2>is why I had to write a whole chapter on

1054
00:57:23.400 --> 00:57:25.320
<v Speaker 2>it in the book, because I felt like this was

1055
00:57:25.480 --> 00:57:28.440
<v Speaker 2>such an important story that doesn't get told is that's

1056
00:57:28.480 --> 00:57:32.679
<v Speaker 2>a colonial English, just like every other English.

1057
00:57:32.360 --> 00:57:39.320
<v Speaker 3>And we forget that African American heritage started forcibly but

1058
00:57:39.719 --> 00:57:42.320
<v Speaker 3>at the same time essentially that the colonies started. So

1059
00:57:42.599 --> 00:57:45.119
<v Speaker 3>you know, the first slave ship was brought over and

1060
00:57:45.159 --> 00:57:47.719
<v Speaker 3>I think it was sixteen nineteen, which is actually before

1061
00:57:47.800 --> 00:57:52.039
<v Speaker 3>the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. So the history of

1062
00:57:52.159 --> 00:57:55.519
<v Speaker 3>African American English is just as long as the history

1063
00:57:55.639 --> 00:58:00.239
<v Speaker 3>as of white English of the colonies. But what is

1064
00:58:00.440 --> 00:58:02.440
<v Speaker 3>really I think the point of what you were talking

1065
00:58:02.480 --> 00:58:05.360
<v Speaker 3>about is something called the double consciousness of being black

1066
00:58:05.800 --> 00:58:10.400
<v Speaker 3>in America, which you have to be able to recognize

1067
00:58:10.480 --> 00:58:13.679
<v Speaker 3>and adapt to these different situations in terms of how

1068
00:58:13.719 --> 00:58:17.239
<v Speaker 3>you project your identity because first of all for safety,

1069
00:58:17.800 --> 00:58:21.440
<v Speaker 3>for professional success, but also for in group membership and

1070
00:58:21.639 --> 00:58:24.960
<v Speaker 3>feeling part of something. So this idea that you're supposed

1071
00:58:24.960 --> 00:58:30.400
<v Speaker 3>to sound general American is completely denying the fact that

1072
00:58:30.519 --> 00:58:32.599
<v Speaker 3>our identity is tied up in the accents that we

1073
00:58:32.719 --> 00:58:34.599
<v Speaker 3>have in the speech of the people we love and

1074
00:58:34.679 --> 00:58:35.159
<v Speaker 3>grow up with.

1075
00:58:35.239 --> 00:58:38.119
<v Speaker 2>And who are important to us. But it also ignores

1076
00:58:38.199 --> 00:58:41.960
<v Speaker 2>that you can be an African American English speaker and

1077
00:58:42.079 --> 00:58:46.599
<v Speaker 2>be a middle class standard African American English speaker. This

1078
00:58:46.840 --> 00:58:50.639
<v Speaker 2>idea that African American English is only this vernacular form

1079
00:58:51.519 --> 00:58:55.920
<v Speaker 2>is erroneous. And I think what we have found, particularly

1080
00:58:56.119 --> 00:58:58.760
<v Speaker 2>in the modern era after the Great Migration of the

1081
00:58:58.840 --> 00:59:03.480
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century, that African American English, which effectively was Southern

1082
00:59:03.559 --> 00:59:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to begin because at the turn of the twentieth century,

1083
00:59:06.920 --> 00:59:09.480
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent of African Americans lived in the South, but

1084
00:59:09.639 --> 00:59:12.280
<v Speaker 2>by the end of the twentieth century, fifty percent of

1085
00:59:12.360 --> 00:59:16.480
<v Speaker 2>those African Americans lived in urban areas, primarily in the North,

1086
00:59:17.440 --> 00:59:20.639
<v Speaker 2>and many have also re emigrated into the South since then.

1087
00:59:20.760 --> 00:59:28.440
<v Speaker 2>But you know, it is a story of such incredible cultural, linguistic, musical, literary,

1088
00:59:29.159 --> 00:59:33.239
<v Speaker 2>social heritage that forged all these different varied accents of

1089
00:59:33.280 --> 00:59:37.440
<v Speaker 2>African American English, and I think what we often think

1090
00:59:37.519 --> 00:59:42.719
<v Speaker 2>of as code switching is often this idea that to

1091
00:59:42.880 --> 00:59:47.119
<v Speaker 2>be black in America and sound black can serve a

1092
00:59:47.199 --> 00:59:51.119
<v Speaker 2>really good purpose for you as a social being, right

1093
00:59:51.239 --> 00:59:53.360
<v Speaker 2>fitting with the people that matter to you. But it

1094
00:59:53.440 --> 00:59:58.239
<v Speaker 2>can also be a very difficult sound to have if

1095
00:59:58.280 --> 01:00:01.079
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to be successful in this structure that white

1096
01:00:01.079 --> 01:00:05.159
<v Speaker 2>America has put up. And you know, one of the

1097
01:00:05.239 --> 01:00:06.840
<v Speaker 2>things that I talk about in the book is that

1098
01:00:07.000 --> 01:00:10.199
<v Speaker 2>we don't expect most middle class white speakers to go

1099
01:00:10.320 --> 01:00:12.440
<v Speaker 2>to school or go to work and adopt a different

1100
01:00:12.599 --> 01:00:15.320
<v Speaker 2>accent and then get judge for the fact that they

1101
01:00:15.360 --> 01:00:19.440
<v Speaker 2>can't do it. But that's precisely what we expect African

1102
01:00:19.480 --> 01:00:21.280
<v Speaker 2>American English speakers.

1103
01:00:20.880 --> 01:00:23.519
<v Speaker 1>To do, and so we are less patient about it.

1104
01:00:23.599 --> 01:00:26.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean as a as a like a white nationalistic

1105
01:00:26.559 --> 01:00:31.679
<v Speaker 1>supremacist society. I think we are less patient with an

1106
01:00:31.719 --> 01:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>African American person who maybe has more of a difficulty

1107
01:00:36.119 --> 01:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>with that adaptations than somebody who is like a foreign national, right,

1108
01:00:41.400 --> 01:00:45.079
<v Speaker 1>somebody from India or somebody from China who speaks English

1109
01:00:45.159 --> 01:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>but has a very thick accent.

1110
01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I think that we're impatient with a lot.

1111
01:00:49.719 --> 01:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you're probably right. Yeah, it's a pretty

1112
01:00:52.440 --> 01:00:55.079
<v Speaker 1>racist country across just race.

1113
01:00:54.960 --> 01:00:57.519
<v Speaker 2>Its class, So you know, I mean, I think also

1114
01:00:57.559 --> 01:00:59.679
<v Speaker 2>we forget with African American English. And this is one

1115
01:00:59.719 --> 01:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>point that I really do think is important, is there

1116
01:01:02.360 --> 01:01:05.320
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of African American standard English speakers. And

1117
01:01:05.440 --> 01:01:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about necessarily standard mainstream general American only,

1118
01:01:08.960 --> 01:01:11.840
<v Speaker 2>but there are standard varieties of African American English that

1119
01:01:11.960 --> 01:01:15.239
<v Speaker 2>have more of the prosity, sort of the melody, but

1120
01:01:15.440 --> 01:01:20.599
<v Speaker 2>less of the you know, stigmatized features. And that's a

1121
01:01:20.760 --> 01:01:24.559
<v Speaker 2>different thing than a working class white speaker or a

1122
01:01:24.639 --> 01:01:27.920
<v Speaker 2>black speaker that tries to be successful in professional America.

1123
01:01:28.199 --> 01:01:30.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I don't know that you know, race

1124
01:01:31.039 --> 01:01:33.719
<v Speaker 2>is a big issue, for sure, but also class is

1125
01:01:33.760 --> 01:01:36.199
<v Speaker 2>a big issue. And you know, if you are black

1126
01:01:36.320 --> 01:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and working class, you have a double whammy. But if

1127
01:01:38.920 --> 01:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>you're white and working class, you're judged also quite a

1128
01:01:42.519 --> 01:01:45.599
<v Speaker 2>bit for the accent you have. And there's a resounding

1129
01:01:45.960 --> 01:01:50.800
<v Speaker 2>number of studies that suggest when you talk with accent

1130
01:01:50.960 --> 01:01:54.960
<v Speaker 2>that betrays your class status, that sound makes you sound

1131
01:01:55.000 --> 01:01:57.599
<v Speaker 2>like you're from a certain class group, that doors shut

1132
01:01:57.679 --> 01:02:01.119
<v Speaker 2>to you in professional settings so that people find you

1133
01:02:01.320 --> 01:02:07.159
<v Speaker 2>less intelligent, less educated, sloppy, lazy, all these negative personality traits.

1134
01:02:07.880 --> 01:02:12.000
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's actually a lot with class, and

1135
01:02:12.159 --> 01:02:14.719
<v Speaker 2>race does also play an issue, but I think also

1136
01:02:15.480 --> 01:02:19.599
<v Speaker 2>non native speakers. I've heard from so many non native

1137
01:02:19.639 --> 01:02:22.039
<v Speaker 2>speakers that have told me that they've encountered that same

1138
01:02:22.119 --> 01:02:23.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of impatience.

1139
01:02:23.480 --> 01:02:24.119
<v Speaker 1>You're so right.

1140
01:02:24.400 --> 01:02:26.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think what we don't understand is that we

1141
01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>don't just speak with an accent. We listen with an accent,

1142
01:02:30.239 --> 01:02:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and we filter everything we hear through the accent of

1143
01:02:34.239 --> 01:02:38.880
<v Speaker 2>our own people, right, our own groups, our own identities,

1144
01:02:39.400 --> 01:02:41.519
<v Speaker 2>and then we judge other people for not measuring up

1145
01:02:41.519 --> 01:02:45.400
<v Speaker 2>to the identity accents that we have. And it's really

1146
01:02:45.440 --> 01:02:49.480
<v Speaker 2>about communication, and we are in a partnership when we're communicating,

1147
01:02:49.599 --> 01:02:51.199
<v Speaker 2>and we tend to forget that when we're talking to

1148
01:02:51.280 --> 01:02:52.559
<v Speaker 2>someone that doesn't sound like us.

1149
01:02:53.039 --> 01:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and I think we see it with gender differences

1150
01:02:57.159 --> 01:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean, one thing we were talking about

1151
01:02:59.719 --> 01:03:02.199
<v Speaker 1>right as we started this recording, and maybe it's an

1152
01:03:02.280 --> 01:03:06.519
<v Speaker 1>interesting note to go out on, is the judgment that

1153
01:03:06.679 --> 01:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>often women speakers have with the sounds of their voices

1154
01:03:11.559 --> 01:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and different standards that are held. I mean, I know,

1155
01:03:14.119 --> 01:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>working on another podcast where I'm the only woman, we

1156
01:03:18.079 --> 01:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>get so many emails all the time about my vocal

1157
01:03:21.599 --> 01:03:24.599
<v Speaker 1>fry and about how often I interrupt, and the male

1158
01:03:24.880 --> 01:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>host is always like, I interrupt more, but.

1159
01:03:29.920 --> 01:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure of it. I'm higher percent sure of it.

1160
01:03:32.480 --> 01:03:35.360
<v Speaker 2>We hear interruptions from women much more than we hear

1161
01:03:35.440 --> 01:03:37.920
<v Speaker 2>them from men, and this is a very consistent finding

1162
01:03:38.519 --> 01:03:41.639
<v Speaker 2>the vocal fry issue. So this was actually what the

1163
01:03:41.719 --> 01:03:44.400
<v Speaker 2>topic of my first book. One of the main motivations

1164
01:03:44.440 --> 01:03:46.639
<v Speaker 2>for like Literally Dude is because it's not just that

1165
01:03:46.719 --> 01:03:48.679
<v Speaker 2>these are new features we love to hate, but that

1166
01:03:48.920 --> 01:03:51.360
<v Speaker 2>so many of the new features that we love to

1167
01:03:51.400 --> 01:03:54.559
<v Speaker 2>hate are also new features that women are associated with.

1168
01:03:55.239 --> 01:03:57.920
<v Speaker 2>And it really is. There is a lot of history

1169
01:03:57.960 --> 01:04:01.119
<v Speaker 2>behind why that's so, dating back to you know, antiquity.

1170
01:04:01.639 --> 01:04:05.039
<v Speaker 2>But vocal fry is a particular pariah for a lot

1171
01:04:05.119 --> 01:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>of people in the broadcast network. So I hear that

1172
01:04:08.920 --> 01:04:11.840
<v Speaker 2>from so many female hosts. I can't tell you, almost

1173
01:04:11.880 --> 01:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>every female host of every interview I have been on

1174
01:04:14.760 --> 01:04:18.199
<v Speaker 2>tell me that they have gotten notes from listeners about

1175
01:04:18.320 --> 01:04:22.239
<v Speaker 2>their vocal fry, even though men fry too, and historically speaking,

1176
01:04:22.280 --> 01:04:24.840
<v Speaker 2>when we look at the early studies of fry, we

1177
01:04:24.960 --> 01:04:27.280
<v Speaker 2>hear the studies were first done in Britain. It was

1178
01:04:27.360 --> 01:04:29.119
<v Speaker 2>a predominantly masculine feature.

1179
01:04:29.480 --> 01:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>It was a masculine voices, yes, and it.

1180
01:04:32.119 --> 01:04:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Was as being actually aristocratic. So you know somehow now

1181
01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:40.280
<v Speaker 2>that women use it and we notice it more and

1182
01:04:40.320 --> 01:04:43.679
<v Speaker 2>women's voices only because creek, which is what we call it,

1183
01:04:43.960 --> 01:04:47.679
<v Speaker 2>but vocal fry happens at lower pitches. So women have

1184
01:04:47.840 --> 01:04:50.039
<v Speaker 2>higher pitch voices, so when they go to creek, in

1185
01:04:50.199 --> 01:04:52.480
<v Speaker 2>order to get creek, you have to drop to a

1186
01:04:52.519 --> 01:04:55.239
<v Speaker 2>lower pitch, and so it's more noticeable that pitch cliff

1187
01:04:55.519 --> 01:04:58.079
<v Speaker 2>that you go off. That makes sense, and I have a.

1188
01:04:58.079 --> 01:05:00.039
<v Speaker 1>Deeper voice for a woman like I don't have a

1189
01:05:00.119 --> 01:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>high pitch voice as far as women's voices go, and

1190
01:05:02.719 --> 01:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I do.

1191
01:05:03.760 --> 01:05:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a pressure on you in broadcast settings. So

1192
01:05:06.480 --> 01:05:09.119
<v Speaker 2>we find that actually in the nineteen nineties, one study

1193
01:05:09.159 --> 01:05:12.440
<v Speaker 2>looked at women in broadcasting and found that women in

1194
01:05:12.519 --> 01:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>broadcasting tended to use vocal fry in part to achieve

1195
01:05:16.519 --> 01:05:20.599
<v Speaker 2>this deeper broadcast voice that was required for women. Because

1196
01:05:20.639 --> 01:05:23.039
<v Speaker 2>in the sixties and seventies, when we first start seeing

1197
01:05:23.119 --> 01:05:26.920
<v Speaker 2>women in broadcasting, they were called shrill of course, and

1198
01:05:27.039 --> 01:05:29.239
<v Speaker 2>so there's been a general lowering of pitch in many

1199
01:05:29.280 --> 01:05:32.239
<v Speaker 2>women's voices, particularly in that setting. And then vocal fry

1200
01:05:32.480 --> 01:05:35.480
<v Speaker 2>also adopts a lower pitch, and those same women in

1201
01:05:35.519 --> 01:05:38.239
<v Speaker 2>a later study that used it in broadcast settings did

1202
01:05:38.400 --> 01:05:40.679
<v Speaker 2>not use it in non broadcast settings. So it seemed

1203
01:05:40.679 --> 01:05:43.840
<v Speaker 2>to be something that what they were using in order

1204
01:05:43.920 --> 01:05:47.079
<v Speaker 2>to come off as more authoritative and more you know,

1205
01:05:47.239 --> 01:05:50.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of assertive in their speech, because they were often

1206
01:05:50.360 --> 01:05:54.079
<v Speaker 2>then getting hit for not sounding assertive enough, and then

1207
01:05:54.119 --> 01:05:56.400
<v Speaker 2>they kept asure, yeah, you can't win, and all of

1208
01:05:56.400 --> 01:05:58.800
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, we're sounding you know, to deep.

1209
01:06:00.199 --> 01:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>God, it's so so I mean, gosh, I feel like

1210
01:06:03.760 --> 01:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I could talk to you, but for like hours and

1211
01:06:05.559 --> 01:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>hours and hours about this stuff. I warned you at

1212
01:06:07.480 --> 01:06:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. I'm fascinated by accents. You are a wealth

1213
01:06:11.800 --> 01:06:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of information. We didn't even get into most of the

1214
01:06:14.320 --> 01:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>things in your book, which is always the case on

1215
01:06:16.440 --> 01:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this show, because why would we do that if you

1216
01:06:17.960 --> 01:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>could go buy the book people? But is there anything

1217
01:06:21.199 --> 01:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's probably several, but is there anything that

1218
01:06:23.360 --> 01:06:27.559
<v Speaker 1>sticks out to you that we didn't dive into that's

1219
01:06:27.559 --> 01:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of like whoa that was? That's like such an

1220
01:06:29.800 --> 01:06:32.079
<v Speaker 1>important topic, and we just completely glossed over.

1221
01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:34.360
<v Speaker 2>It, you know, I think, you know, we talked about

1222
01:06:34.400 --> 01:06:36.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the things that create accents over time,

1223
01:06:37.039 --> 01:06:41.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, class, ethnicity, separation by geography. But one thing

1224
01:06:41.679 --> 01:06:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I think is a really interesting topic that I have

1225
01:06:43.519 --> 01:06:45.559
<v Speaker 2>a couple of chapters that touch upon in the book

1226
01:06:45.639 --> 01:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>that we don't tend to think of, is what drives

1227
01:06:48.599 --> 01:06:51.639
<v Speaker 2>us to be attracted to certain sounds more than others,

1228
01:06:51.719 --> 01:06:54.840
<v Speaker 2>in certain languages more than others. And so, you know,

1229
01:06:54.960 --> 01:06:57.679
<v Speaker 2>for example, why is it that we hate the word moist,

1230
01:06:58.880 --> 01:07:01.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, or you know, I can't stand the word panties.

1231
01:07:02.599 --> 01:07:04.639
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was literally about to say that it's

1232
01:07:04.639 --> 01:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>so gross to say underwear, I know exactly, I.

1233
01:07:07.559 --> 01:07:09.159
<v Speaker 2>Just say underwear. And you know, there's a lot of

1234
01:07:09.239 --> 01:07:14.159
<v Speaker 2>semantic associations because, especially for women, both of those words

1235
01:07:14.239 --> 01:07:18.199
<v Speaker 2>have been put in context where it's not kind of used,

1236
01:07:18.239 --> 01:07:21.719
<v Speaker 2>not as a slur, but as an uncomfortable, sexual, sexualized

1237
01:07:21.800 --> 01:07:24.079
<v Speaker 2>term for women. And so we do find women find

1238
01:07:24.159 --> 01:07:28.679
<v Speaker 2>those words more unappealing. But generally, you know, about twenty

1239
01:07:28.760 --> 01:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>percent of the population doesn't like the word moist, So

1240
01:07:31.039 --> 01:07:33.440
<v Speaker 2>there has to be something driving it, and it can

1241
01:07:33.599 --> 01:07:37.000
<v Speaker 2>be partially the semantics. You know, what we call moist

1242
01:07:37.159 --> 01:07:40.920
<v Speaker 2>is often not attractive, right, moist wounds or nobody's best

1243
01:07:41.039 --> 01:07:44.159
<v Speaker 2>idea of a fun Sunday. But part of it's also

1244
01:07:44.320 --> 01:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe the sounds of the words themselves, and we see

1245
01:07:47.280 --> 01:07:49.440
<v Speaker 2>that also. You were talking about Italian, that your father's

1246
01:07:49.480 --> 01:07:51.559
<v Speaker 2>Italian and you have this beauty. You mentioned it and

1247
01:07:51.599 --> 01:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I actually almost broke it, brought it up. Then you

1248
01:07:54.519 --> 01:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>said your name in this beautiful Italian way, and then

1249
01:07:57.440 --> 01:07:59.280
<v Speaker 2>you said it in kind of this more you know,

1250
01:07:59.519 --> 01:08:03.679
<v Speaker 2>America version in American English. And what I loved about

1251
01:08:03.719 --> 01:08:07.639
<v Speaker 2>that it was really an example of how certain types

1252
01:08:07.760 --> 01:08:12.159
<v Speaker 2>of languages, sounds, and linguistic structures are heard as more

1253
01:08:12.199 --> 01:08:16.279
<v Speaker 2>beautiful to us. And Italian is a beautiful representation of

1254
01:08:16.359 --> 01:08:20.720
<v Speaker 2>a of a language that has that melodiousness that people

1255
01:08:20.880 --> 01:08:24.359
<v Speaker 2>tend to find attractive universally because you know, no offense

1256
01:08:24.399 --> 01:08:26.840
<v Speaker 2>to anybody speaks Italian. But it's not really a globally

1257
01:08:26.960 --> 01:08:30.720
<v Speaker 2>powerful language, right. You know, people aren't learning Italian because

1258
01:08:30.760 --> 01:08:33.840
<v Speaker 2>it's going to help them with world trade, Right, They're

1259
01:08:33.920 --> 01:08:36.479
<v Speaker 2>learning Italian because it's a beautiful language. But what makes

1260
01:08:36.560 --> 01:08:39.359
<v Speaker 2>it beautiful and if we actually look at it structure.

1261
01:08:40.119 --> 01:08:43.560
<v Speaker 2>It's because it has a lot of open syllables, and

1262
01:08:43.760 --> 01:08:45.600
<v Speaker 2>so you know, we have a lot of falla la

1263
01:08:45.920 --> 01:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>type syllables that end in a vowel, and it has

1264
01:08:48.560 --> 01:08:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a quality called sonority that occurs more frequently. And sonority

1265
01:08:53.039 --> 01:08:55.800
<v Speaker 2>is driven by sounds that are made with a relatively

1266
01:08:55.920 --> 01:08:59.159
<v Speaker 2>open articulation in the mouth, and that sounds like R

1267
01:08:59.359 --> 01:09:02.439
<v Speaker 2>and L and M and N, which you can almost

1268
01:09:02.520 --> 01:09:04.520
<v Speaker 2>just get into the rhythm of me saying those versus

1269
01:09:04.800 --> 01:09:10.079
<v Speaker 2>duh cooh, puh right, which are not very melodious.

1270
01:09:09.560 --> 01:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Which sound very German.

1271
01:09:11.039 --> 01:09:13.039
<v Speaker 2>They do sound very German. And so if you look

1272
01:09:13.039 --> 01:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>at German and English, we actually have less sonority and

1273
01:09:16.760 --> 01:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>fewer open syllables than Italian or French or Spanish, which

1274
01:09:20.960 --> 01:09:25.079
<v Speaker 2>are the languages people tend to say are beautiful love languages.

1275
01:09:25.239 --> 01:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes, the lovelanguage, romantic languages.

1276
01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:30.479
<v Speaker 2>I do think that's a fun part of how we

1277
01:09:30.640 --> 01:09:33.000
<v Speaker 2>hear sounds. I mean, it's not the main driver. So

1278
01:09:33.800 --> 01:09:35.760
<v Speaker 2>you can have a lot of languages that are quite

1279
01:09:35.840 --> 01:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>beautiful from that dimension that are not heard as beautiful

1280
01:09:40.880 --> 01:09:44.319
<v Speaker 2>languages because they don't have any global power, or because

1281
01:09:44.319 --> 01:09:47.680
<v Speaker 2>they're associated with a disadvantaged group. So you know, a

1282
01:09:47.720 --> 01:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>good example of a language you don't ever see on

1283
01:09:49.600 --> 01:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>those lists is Hawaiian. But Hawaiian is actually a very

1284
01:09:52.560 --> 01:09:53.439
<v Speaker 2>sonaric language.

1285
01:09:53.479 --> 01:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I was about to say, yeah, there's what. There's only

1286
01:09:55.960 --> 01:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of letters, and it's a lot of

1287
01:09:58.399 --> 01:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot.

1288
01:09:58.960 --> 01:10:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Of vowels, a lot of vowels which are the most

1289
01:10:01.199 --> 01:10:04.359
<v Speaker 2>sonorant of all sounds. And that's probably because of just

1290
01:10:04.479 --> 01:10:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the power dynamics and familiarity. So familiarity is a big

1291
01:10:08.920 --> 01:10:11.840
<v Speaker 2>driver of what we love. So the more familiar a language,

1292
01:10:11.880 --> 01:10:15.039
<v Speaker 2>the more we love it, which explains why English, which

1293
01:10:15.239 --> 01:10:18.880
<v Speaker 2>is a relatively unattractive language by the measure of phonetics,

1294
01:10:19.680 --> 01:10:22.920
<v Speaker 2>is a very attractive language to many people. Not because

1295
01:10:22.960 --> 01:10:25.680
<v Speaker 2>it has open syllables and you can sing it well

1296
01:10:26.319 --> 01:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>like Italian, our Spanish or French, but because you are

1297
01:10:28.920 --> 01:10:29.680
<v Speaker 2>familiar with it.

1298
01:10:29.800 --> 01:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because you saw a lot of movies in English.

1299
01:10:31.680 --> 01:10:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Exactly right. It is hard to avoid English in the world.

1300
01:10:36.239 --> 01:10:39.039
<v Speaker 2>But Hawaiian is one that maybe many people aren't familiar with.

1301
01:10:39.159 --> 01:10:41.600
<v Speaker 2>So there's all these different factors, and I just I

1302
01:10:41.760 --> 01:10:44.560
<v Speaker 2>love everything to do with the way that we talk

1303
01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:48.239
<v Speaker 2>and make sounds. And I think that the message of

1304
01:10:48.359 --> 01:10:51.319
<v Speaker 2>the book is really that we are all coming to

1305
01:10:51.399 --> 01:10:53.560
<v Speaker 2>this from a different perspective of maybe the accents we

1306
01:10:53.760 --> 01:10:56.560
<v Speaker 2>have and the things we say. But what really it

1307
01:10:56.560 --> 01:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>should teach us is the universality of the facts of

1308
01:11:01.119 --> 01:11:05.399
<v Speaker 2>identity and meaning and connection that these accents bring us. Oh.

1309
01:11:06.479 --> 01:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I love this so much. I'm so sad that we

1310
01:11:09.439 --> 01:11:12.399
<v Speaker 1>have to end this episode. I just want to keep

1311
01:11:12.479 --> 01:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>talking to you all day long, everybody. The book is

1312
01:11:16.920 --> 01:11:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Why We Talk Funny The Real Story Behind Our Accents

1313
01:11:21.239 --> 01:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>by doctor Valerie Friedland. Valerie, thank you so much for

1314
01:11:24.920 --> 01:11:26.279
<v Speaker 1>being here. It was such a joy.

1315
01:11:26.560 --> 01:11:29.319
<v Speaker 2>It was you are a great conversational partner.

1316
01:11:29.359 --> 01:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed it a lot. Me too, Me too, and

1317
01:11:31.760 --> 01:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody listening, thank you for coming back week after week.

1318
01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm really looking forward to the next time we all

1319
01:11:37.319 --> 01:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>get together to talk. Nerdy
