Speaker 1: Ready, get ready for October seven, twenty twenty five. Allegedly,
Speaker 1: according to that thing we call a calendar, this the
Speaker 1: Ocelly effect. You hearing it because you decided to find it,
Speaker 1: and I'm glad you did. Anyway, Tiesday Tuesday, and it
Speaker 1: is our first regularly scheduled broadcast day of the week.
Speaker 1: I was gonna do an early show this week, and
Speaker 1: quite honestly, I didn't feel as though we had enough
Speaker 1: news to get to to make it worthwhile to break
Speaker 1: something down later on this week. I do have Larry
Speaker 1: Hancock scheduled. I have others I'm hoping to schedule. I
Speaker 1: missed a couple of personal calls this week, and I'm
Speaker 1: working on those as well. So I guess it's time
Speaker 1: for just a little more that snap who news? Why not?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: It is, after all, the anniversary of the attack right
Speaker 1: in Israel that led to this protracted event that is occurring,
Speaker 1: this continuous bombardment that is happening with gods of the
Speaker 1: West Bank, the question of what is right regarding Palestinians,
Speaker 1: and on and on. But that's just one thing going on,
Speaker 1: and it is the anniversary of that.
Speaker 3: No, I can keep that water.
Speaker 1: Okay, anyway, just missus O came behind me and snatched
Speaker 1: my water cup and I wanted to keep it anyhow,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter after three quarters of twenty twenty five
Speaker 1: okay under GOP Trump style, you know, and brought to
Speaker 1: you by Project twenty five. WHOA, I got a question?
Speaker 1: Am I allowed to ask? When or if the cult
Speaker 1: will blame Orange Jesus for its suffering? Seems like no,
Speaker 1: And I'm sure we can get around it without doing
Speaker 1: a little more news speak or you know, or what
Speaker 1: is the other thing in Orwell's novel? I don't know,
Speaker 1: but I think I'm gonna have to mention Orwell a
Speaker 1: few times. Eric Blair whatever his real name was, and
Speaker 1: the propaganda piece, plus you know, nineteen eighty four Brave
Speaker 1: New World and the second book the follow up to
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty four, all relevant literature for as long as
Speaker 1: the digital book Burning doesn't come and get it. So
Speaker 1: today troops are being deployed and already active in several
Speaker 1: cities near you. Okay, you know, we got different things
Speaker 1: on the table Memphis, Los Angeles, Portland, the GOP favorite
Speaker 1: Chicago of course, in the offering DC, and we can
Speaker 1: all assume there'll be many more because domestic training grounds
Speaker 1: and staging areas for wars on the alleged enemy within
Speaker 1: will be necessary. So, you know, just trying to trust
Speaker 1: the plan here, if you don't mind me trolling for
Speaker 1: a second. You know, those that currently hold and able
Speaker 1: and support those that are actually in power are making
Speaker 1: things happen. And what can I offer you? Well, I
Speaker 1: can't offer you just a touch of audio and video support.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe because there are things happening that I think
Speaker 1: you should hear from the newspeople themselves. Uh, and about
Speaker 1: certain things that are happening. I mean, after all, there
Speaker 1: was plenty of let's call it WWE type promo clips
Speaker 1: to be had when it came to the Oversight Committee
Speaker 1: today Shifty shift right, Senator shifty versus a g blondie
Speaker 1: and it got a little ugly. Let's listen to it
Speaker 1: for ourselves, or at least a couple of clips.
Speaker 4: This is supposed to be an oversight hearing over these
Speaker 4: these excuse me, you can attack me after my time
Speaker 4: is over.
Speaker 2: You can.
Speaker 4: And I know you've got plenty of candid tacks. We've
Speaker 4: heard them all day to day. This is a hot
Speaker 4: No one needs the candas regular order. Madam Jerrem trying
Speaker 4: to speak. This is supposed to be an oversight here
Speaker 4: of the Justice Department, and it comes in the wake
Speaker 4: of an indictment called for by the President of one
Speaker 4: of his enemies. This is supposed to be an oversight hearing.
Speaker 4: It it comes in the wake of revelations that a
Speaker 4: top administration official took fifty thousand dollars in a bag,
Speaker 4: and this department made that investigation go away.
Speaker 1: Okay, So for clarity, we got to separate that the
Speaker 1: indictment is probably about Comy, and of course the bag
Speaker 1: money issue a supposed fast food bag fifty grand or
Speaker 1: something that was passed along to the border. Z are
Speaker 1: right in order to get favorable contracts because we'll be
Speaker 1: doing lots of business coming up soon. That investigation evaporated
Speaker 1: goes nothing to see there, but plenty to see on
Speaker 1: Comby because believe me that that has been on Trump's
Speaker 1: mind a while and ag Bondi is doing her best
Speaker 1: right anyway, a little more confrontation between Shifting and Blondie,
Speaker 1: let's do it.
Speaker 4: This is supposed to be an oversight hearing when dozens
Speaker 4: of prosecutors have been fired simply because they worked on
Speaker 4: cases invested in the former president.
Speaker 1: This is.
Speaker 4: And this this is excuse me. This is supposed to
Speaker 4: be an oversight hearing in which members of Congress can
Speaker 4: get serious answers.
Speaker 1: Now that's a weird counter the fires in California. Does
Speaker 1: she mean the ones that they were supposed to rake
Speaker 1: up because there were massive fires that burned down entire
Speaker 1: towns or does she mean the ones that occurred during
Speaker 1: the uh Ice rebellion or ice protests or whatever that
Speaker 1: took up a couple of blocks of Los Angeles. I mean,
Speaker 1: which one are we referring to here? I'm not sure.
Speaker 1: But also the indignation, the indignant sort of stance of
Speaker 1: shift is humorous as well. You know, look, I'm a
Speaker 1: both sides guy. I know that if you're really really
Speaker 1: into the right wing, you think I'm just attacking them,
Speaker 1: But I'm not. They just happened to make the most
Speaker 1: noise lately. And the circular firing squads that are formed
Speaker 1: by the alleged opposition continue to keep themselves automatically at bay.
Speaker 1: I mean, how do you keep yourself out of any
Speaker 1: battlefield if you shoot yourself in the leg before you
Speaker 1: ever get dropped off to face the enemy. I mean,
Speaker 1: it takes care of things, doesn't it. Right? And hey,
Speaker 1: during these hearings, we also got to hear about Bloomenthal
Speaker 1: and Stolen Valor because there were issues that Bondi brings
Speaker 1: up about that where the guy said that he was
Speaker 1: a Vietnam vet, but apparently it turns out he was
Speaker 1: a veteran in the Vietnam era, which there is a difference.
Speaker 1: So was it intentional, was it a mistake? Was it
Speaker 1: just a way of inflating his political capital, etc. And
Speaker 1: this has been going on fifteen years because the VFW
Speaker 1: demanded an apology from Bloomenthal, right, but in twenty ten,
Speaker 1: I think going back to it anyway, you know, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of things going on, a lot of things
Speaker 1: going on. And are the battles in the Senate worthy
Speaker 1: of anything except you know, people that maybe tuned into ceasepan.
Speaker 1: Is it emblematic of what's occurring in political discourse in America?
Speaker 1: Kind of yes and kind of no, cause, man, there
Speaker 1: are a lot of wild things going on that I'm
Speaker 1: surprised less and less people really give a crap about.
Speaker 1: Do they still care about the Epstein files? I'm not sure,
Speaker 1: But again, I am certain that they do care about
Speaker 1: what who's being indicted and who's not. Jack Smith, by
Speaker 1: the way, facing arrest calls over Arctic frost. That was
Speaker 1: the name of the investigation, you know, that went into
Speaker 1: certain things regarding Trump and his different possible malfeasons, etc.
Speaker 1: And yeah, now there's new reports that there were certain
Speaker 1: senators and congress people that were definitely he spied on, targeted,
Speaker 1: et cetera. And my overall question remains, why does anybody
Speaker 1: expect something different from the FBI. And it's not just
Speaker 1: a right wing target. I know everybody wants to make it. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's only the right, it's only the left, it's only
Speaker 1: the it's only the here's the problem, folks, We're gonna
Speaker 1: argue over who's in the crosshairs for crossfire or the
Speaker 1: next crossfire hurricane. And we're gonna argue about it all
Speaker 1: the way to the point we realize we're all in
Speaker 1: the crosshairs. But pay no attention to that because we've
Speaker 1: got other wars. I mean, I know, the guy promised
Speaker 1: no new wars and tenth Amendment anybody anyways, no new wars? Well,
Speaker 1: those boats are new attacks on a foreign nation's assets
Speaker 1: seem to be a new war, or at least a
Speaker 1: new theater of war in the drug war, according to
Speaker 1: what Trump says, right, I mean, do we need to
Speaker 1: see a crystal ball where the war goes next? I
Speaker 1: don't think so. But anyway, you know, before we get
Speaker 1: into a little more about the domestic terror issue, Trump
Speaker 1: is fighting the drug war on the high seas. It's
Speaker 1: kind of like, you know, American pirates, except we're supposed
Speaker 1: to be the cops and the pirates at the same time.
Speaker 1: Why is it that use of military force against boats
Speaker 1: is to this point and everybody goes, ah, that's the
Speaker 1: way it's gotta go. We got to stop the drug traffickers.
Speaker 1: So blowing boats out of the water and having our
Speaker 1: commander in chief brag that people from that nation don't
Speaker 1: even want to go fishing, No, mo sounds like you
Speaker 1: might be endangering everybody when you're supposed to be targeting
Speaker 1: something in warfare. I mean, it's usually not a blanket
Speaker 1: attack unless you're after the entirety of the nation. But
Speaker 1: I thought we were supposed to target things with war.
Speaker 1: But you know, fishing boats are afraid to go. You
Speaker 1: know what, enough out of me let's hear from Trump
Speaker 1: on this. No new wars guy, remember the peace president
Speaker 1: who wants a prize.
Speaker 5: In recent weeks, the Navy has supported our mission to
Speaker 5: blow the cartel.
Speaker 1: Terrorists the hell out of the water.
Speaker 5: You see that, and you know there are no boats
Speaker 5: in the water anymore.
Speaker 1: We can't find any.
Speaker 6: We'll have a hard time finding them.
Speaker 5: But you know, it's a pretty tough thing we've been doing.
Speaker 5: But you have to think of it this way. Every
Speaker 5: one of those boats is responsible for the death of
Speaker 5: twenty five thousand American people and the destruction of families.
Speaker 7: So when you think of it that way, what.
Speaker 5: We're doing is actually an act of kindness. But we
Speaker 5: did another one last night. Now we just can't find
Speaker 5: any you know, it's the old story. We're so good
Speaker 5: at it that there are no boats. In fact, even
Speaker 5: fishing boats. Nobody wants to go into the water anymore.
Speaker 5: Sorry to tell you that, but we stop. We're stopping
Speaker 5: drugs coming into America. If that's okay. We're stopping drugs
Speaker 5: at elevel that nobody's ever seen before. Last year we
Speaker 5: lost I believe, three hundred thousand people. And that's not
Speaker 5: talking about the destruction to families. Every one of us
Speaker 5: knows families that have been destroyed because the son's daughter,
Speaker 5: even mothers and fathers are destroyed by the fentadol pouring in.
Speaker 1: And drugs pouring in.
Speaker 5: Well, they're not coming in by sea anymore, So now
Speaker 5: we'll have to start looking about the land because they'll
Speaker 5: be forced to go by land. And let me tell
Speaker 5: you right now, that's not going to work out well
Speaker 5: for them either.
Speaker 1: Okay, So now they're going to take the war on
Speaker 1: Venezuelan drug traffickers who were part of a cartel to
Speaker 1: the land soon hint, hints, where's the land that he's
Speaker 1: taken it to and blowing up these boats on the
Speaker 1: water without seizing them, investigating what they're actually carrying, and
Speaker 1: literally admitting that fishing boats are afraid to come out. Now, well,
Speaker 1: why would they be afraid to come out if they're
Speaker 1: not drug traffickers. And you know, it's like I'm not
Speaker 1: going to drive on the road over here because drug
Speaker 1: dealers drive on this road and I'd be afraid of
Speaker 1: getting arrested. Well, if you're being targeted with any level
Speaker 1: of specifics, you might think that doesn't encourage fear. By
Speaker 1: utilizing military force against people that there is no war
Speaker 1: with declared and deciding that they are criminals. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is all okay with everybody. We're good, no problem there, Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: we'll move on and even use let's see, I mean,
Speaker 1: I got some references here in the show notes. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna give you, and of course I'll leave you to
Speaker 1: contemplate the implications and where this will go in the
Speaker 1: future regarding the drug war. But the White House is
Speaker 1: busy dealing with the egregious court order. Egregious is their
Speaker 1: word used in their statements. Egregious court order blocking troop
Speaker 1: deployments Portland on rest. The ruling is one of the
Speaker 1: most egregious and thunderous violations. Thunderous, Yes, thunderous. That's the
Speaker 1: word is violations of constitutional order we have ever seen.
Speaker 1: This is a quote from Stephen Miller and my sources
Speaker 1: of Fox News Politics. White House slams egregious court order
Speaker 1: blocking troop deployments. Okay, anyway, Trump's National Guard moves are
Speaker 1: part of a dangerous plan, according to the California AG.
Speaker 1: You can get that from let's see KQED. Okay, that's
Speaker 1: a broadcast entity. Seems to me as though the Peace president,
Speaker 1: the guy who wants surprize, has culture wars, right, renewed
Speaker 1: drug wars, if not new drug wars or new wars
Speaker 1: under the guise of drugs, or maybe new wars to
Speaker 1: combat drugs. However you want a word it, we got
Speaker 1: new drug wars or new feeders for drug wars. Anyways,
Speaker 1: we got a war against the left, we got rumors
Speaker 1: of civil wars. We've got wars of words by the
Speaker 1: best words from all stable geniuses mouths and is orwell
Speaker 1: smiling over the Nobel Peace Prize demands of the potus.
Speaker 1: I think, so are you with them? Or are you
Speaker 1: with the Antifa terrorists? As we approach Halloween time, is
Speaker 1: Santa still in charge of Christmas? Okay? How about real wars?
Speaker 1: Because as of October seventh, right now, it's been two
Speaker 1: years since the Hamas attack on Israel. You know Hamas,
Speaker 1: that entity that BB Netting now who literally sent suitcases
Speaker 1: full of cash to indirectly right, you know, to make
Speaker 1: sure that they stayed in power, to stabilize the area.
Speaker 1: That's a provable fact and something that they know in Israel,
Speaker 1: at least the Israeli press prints it. Nobody talks about it.
Speaker 1: But you know that's going on, and a significant amount
Speaker 1: of a population, which was sitting on a piece of land,
Speaker 1: no matter what you want to call it, is dying
Speaker 1: through military action. Hamasa is in charge, they say, maybe
Speaker 1: not so much. There are speculations about power vacuums that
Speaker 1: are forming, and you know, in Orwell's nineteen eighty four,
Speaker 1: Oceania is in a state of perpetual war with the
Speaker 1: other two superstates, Eurasia and East Asia, though the specific
Speaker 1: enemily frequently changes to maintain a state of perpetual conflict
Speaker 1: that uses up surplus resources and keeps the population impoverished
Speaker 1: and ignorant. Oceania is at war with both Eurasia and
Speaker 1: East Asia, but it's unclear who could be the primary enemy.
Speaker 1: At any given moment, the state's allegiance shifts, you know,
Speaker 1: like Ukraine is no good and they don't have any
Speaker 1: cards too well, Putin didn't pay any attention to me,
Speaker 1: So now Ukraine could win, and it's presented differently in propaganda,
Speaker 1: so that you have your own algorithm. Defeed it to
Speaker 1: you one way or another. But why should we pay
Speaker 1: attention to all that? How about we get into the
Speaker 1: media mayhem of the news cycle. By the way, there's
Speaker 1: a supermoon coming in October. Be on the lookout. There
Speaker 1: will be something to look at in the sky. The
Speaker 1: US government's big, beautiful showcase shut down showdown is already
Speaker 1: in progress. And yes, Bob Barker, actual opposition is already neutered,
Speaker 1: without imaginary transgender illegal immigrant surgery to hinder it. And
Speaker 1: indeed they're already pre neutered, no problem. Pay no attention
Speaker 1: to the chemicals in the water, the plastic bottles leaching
Speaker 1: to the estrogen mimickers, because I'm just a conspiracy theorist,
Speaker 1: right hey, And what is the opposite of bondsi anyhow?
Speaker 1: You know, I have to also at least mention the
Speaker 1: off cycle twenty twenty five selection offering in Jersey, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, we got to get to that piece of news.
Speaker 1: We should. There is a governor's race in New Jersey,
Speaker 1: Mikey Cheryl Okay versus a guy Okay who is named Chattarelli. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna talk a little bit about it because Jack
Speaker 1: Chattarelli versus Mikey Cherrow is an interesting presentation there from
Speaker 1: the Purple state of Jersey. I know, a lot of
Speaker 1: people think it's blue, and other people would argue that
Speaker 1: it's really red. But every once in a while they
Speaker 1: kick out the red guys and they make it blue.
Speaker 1: Now it swings back and forth. It's like watching one
Speaker 1: of those you know with the metal balls that click,
Speaker 1: and if you let two metal balls click up against
Speaker 1: the mass, two metal balls fly away from the mask.
Speaker 1: You know, those things that people used to leave on
Speaker 1: their desks. I don't even know the name of it,
Speaker 1: but it was one of those common desk decorations at
Speaker 1: one point. Maybe it isn't anymore, Maybe it is. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I don't go to office buildings with people
Speaker 1: dressed nicely anymore. But anyway, a narrow standard behavior has
Speaker 1: possibly influenced the governor's race. The selection twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: again off cycle and even outside of the mid term
Speaker 1: mayhem and melee that will occur shortly in twenty twenty six.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what we're gonna do. We'll go to CBS, Yeah,
Speaker 1: why not CBS New York and take a listen to
Speaker 1: their news report about this and see why Mikey Sheryl,
Speaker 1: who is the Democrat versus you know, the Italian guy
Speaker 1: who is the Republican and what's actually happening there. Let's
Speaker 1: get their report first before we get into my commentary
Speaker 1: about it.
Speaker 8: With a poll showing the new j these governors race
Speaker 8: neck and neck, newly released documents reveal Democrat Mikey Cheryl
Speaker 8: was part of a cheating scandal during her military career.
Speaker 8: Christine Sloan has been following this race very closely, and
Speaker 8: she explains how the scandal could impact the election.
Speaker 1: Okay, now let's just stop there. Mikey Cheryl is a woman,
Speaker 1: is a Democrat, and you know she's got kind of
Speaker 1: an interesting little background here where she's a pilot who
Speaker 1: did serve in a war. Apparently not saying that I
Speaker 1: know these things for certain, but this is the way
Speaker 1: the pr looks. Helicopter pilot Mikey Cheryl. Okay, a woman again,
Speaker 1: Jersey a little different. She's made some noise in recent years. Okay,
Speaker 1: and she's got a it's like a bit of an
Speaker 1: old school shakeup, almost right. Former Navy helicopter pilot, congress
Speaker 1: member and war veteran was barred from walking in her
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety four Naval Academy graduation. And you heard the
Speaker 1: words cheating scandal, but the real scandal was she failed
Speaker 1: to report her classmates who had cheated on an exam
Speaker 1: and their allegations that her opponent in the current race
Speaker 1: may have involved may have been involved with leaking personal
Speaker 1: records that were made available by NARA in violation of
Speaker 1: the nineteen ninety nineteen seventy four Privacy Act. You know,
Speaker 1: we heard about this during the JFK record stuff, about
Speaker 1: how there was all this horror over the violation of
Speaker 1: people's privacy, even though most of those people were dead
Speaker 1: when it came to the JFK stuff. But some people
Speaker 1: that were alive, they're so security numbers were shared. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's kind of like they were virtually, in essence docksed
Speaker 1: by the National Archives. Whether it's due to ineptness or
Speaker 1: it's intentional, I leave that for you to decide. But
Speaker 1: social security numbers, her parents' addresses, her former addresses, their
Speaker 1: military record, medical stuff, up, insurance details. I mean, a
Speaker 1: lot of stuff was dropped on Mikey Cheryl here right
Speaker 1: out in public, and her opponent is basically taken it
Speaker 1: as well. It's opposition research. I'm not really responsible for
Speaker 1: putting this stuff out I mean it almost adds weight
Speaker 1: to my my supposition that they will not be an
Speaker 1: Italian president in my lifetime. But uh, you know, it
Speaker 1: is what it is. Back to the report from ABC seven,
Speaker 1: which is the broadcasting entity in New York and would
Speaker 1: probably be one of the best local broadcasters to cover, uh,
Speaker 1: the New Jersey race for governor, because Jersey's only got
Speaker 1: really two channels, and one of them still calls itself
Speaker 1: New York as far as broadcast goes. Uh, I mean,
Speaker 1: they got a couple of these like uhfs out of
Speaker 1: Atlantic City, I think are now what do you call it?
Speaker 1: They're they're they're they're finished, they're going on right, they're
Speaker 1: no longer in business. They have been eliminated in the
Speaker 1: evolution of broadcast and digital media. And then you got
Speaker 1: Philadelphia that might give a crap for a minute about
Speaker 1: what's going on in Jersey, but really WR calls itself
Speaker 1: a New York station even though they're transmitters in Secaucus.
Speaker 1: And then we have this other Channel twelve, which they
Speaker 1: call News Channel twelve there. So really, when it comes
Speaker 1: to major stories or assets or anybody who's going to
Speaker 1: put some money into following things around or having personnel.
Speaker 1: You got to deal with the New York stations, and
Speaker 1: ABC seven is one of them that focused is focuses
Speaker 1: on news and has ever since I was a child.
Speaker 1: So I go back to them as a point of reference,
Speaker 1: but always listen with a cautious year and watch carefully.
Speaker 9: And now Mikey Cheryl has made her military service as
Speaker 9: an Avy helicopter pilot part of her campaign. But now
Speaker 9: the Democrat is reacting after it was uncovered that she
Speaker 9: was caught up in a cheating scandal at the US
Speaker 9: Naval acut aatomy, saying, quote, when I was an undergraduate
Speaker 9: at the Naval Academy, I didn't turn in some of
Speaker 9: my classmates, so I didn't walk, but graduated and was
Speaker 9: commissioned as an officer in the US Navy, serving for
Speaker 9: nearly ten years with the highest level of distinction and honor.
Speaker 9: Political analyst micah Res Newsen says that speaks volumes.
Speaker 10: She was not ever in trouble for having cheated on
Speaker 10: the test. It was a question of whether or not
Speaker 10: she turned in people she knew who.
Speaker 9: Did see the test, but campaign and a statement saying the.
Speaker 1: Okay, So there's her explanation. I think I already kind
Speaker 1: of said that too, but you know, I'm doing it
Speaker 1: for my readings of these things. Here's Jiterelli's response, right,
Speaker 1: and it's pretty typical. And I gotta tell you he
Speaker 1: definitely looks Italian. And I gotta say, well, go look
Speaker 1: the guy up online for yourself. And I'm not going
Speaker 1: to make any other commentary because it's just low hanging
Speaker 1: fruit here. But again, and I say, there are some
Speaker 1: good and bad reasons why we will not see an
Speaker 1: Italian president in my lifetime, okay, And I even decide
Speaker 1: to do a little research on the guy, check him
Speaker 1: out and see what he was about this and that,
Speaker 1: And you know what, I'm not saying nothing about it.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter because especially if you try to explain
Speaker 1: that a Republican has, you know, a bit of a
Speaker 1: shadowy or sketchy background, man, they come at you. And
Speaker 1: I'll tell you, I love to support people from the
Speaker 1: same Mediterranean zone as me. And this guy's even apparently
Speaker 1: Southern Italian from what I can tell. And even in
Speaker 1: his name origin, it's funny because his name Origin doesn't
Speaker 1: actually have a meaning, or even a loose meaning. It's
Speaker 1: sort of like a name for the sake of having
Speaker 1: a name but appears to be from the same type
Speaker 1: of region where my people would be from. I'd be
Speaker 1: glad to say this is great and Italian is going
Speaker 1: to come up and his name's not Florio, for God's sake,
Speaker 1: in the governor's race. I like it. No, I don't.
Speaker 1: But anyway, I think without knowing that his name has
Speaker 1: a meaning, you can figure out what his meaning is.
Speaker 1: And you know what ror shock test. Okay, sometimes prejudices
Speaker 1: against Italiano is with purpose. And you know, I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that there is there is not one here. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that there's any sort of OC connection or
Speaker 1: LC connection here. What I'm saying is this guy is
Speaker 1: definitely an Italian politician. I know. That's a lot less
Speaker 1: respectable than a gangster in my Tosaurus, in my encyclopedia,
Speaker 1: I know in the book according to o'celli. You know
Speaker 1: what else could I say about him? If I say
Speaker 1: he's a lawyer and a politician. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: it gets worse and worse as we go. But anyway,
Speaker 1: no judgments. Let's get the statement from him and see
Speaker 1: what he had to say or his camp ain't had
Speaker 1: to say.
Speaker 9: Anyway, mission she was quote implicated in and punished for
Speaker 9: her involvement in the largest cheating and honor coach scandal
Speaker 9: in the history of the United States Navy is both
Speaker 9: stunning and deeply disturbing. In a separate incident, documents which
Speaker 9: were also obtained by CBS News appear to show Ryl's
Speaker 9: military records almost completely unredacted. Chidarelli's campaign tells us it
Speaker 9: never use those documents for any wrongful purpose. But Democrats
Speaker 9: are calling for an investigation.
Speaker 10: It's outrageous that Donald Trump and his administration and political
Speaker 10: hacks connected to them continue to violate the law.
Speaker 1: Okay, that's how Keem Jefferies making a statement here. Of course,
Speaker 1: he's representative from New York, so ABC seven is going
Speaker 1: to grab his piece right on this anyway, the technician
Speaker 1: should not have released the entire record. YadA, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 1: You know, Narah. Oops, they keep doing this, by the way,
Speaker 1: this is becoming a pattern this year. I don't know why,
Speaker 1: you know, I would err on the side of saying
Speaker 1: ineptitude is probably your most likely you know, incompetence is
Speaker 1: the best suspect here possible. But you know, then again,
Speaker 1: maybe that's my prejudice coming through after dealing with the
Speaker 1: National Archives and Records people for way too long over
Speaker 1: way too petty a thing. But maybe that's just me.
Speaker 1: And I gotta tell you, when they let things out,
Speaker 1: I feel like ten people had to intentionally let each
Speaker 1: and every sentence go. So I don't buy this constant incompetence,
Speaker 1: because there was a bunch of this. If you remember
Speaker 1: during the hearings, when Luna was sitting there and they
Speaker 1: had the other guy. You know, it's like, oh, we
Speaker 1: want the records release, we don't need him released. We're
Speaker 1: for it, we're against it, and Bobert's screwing up and going,
Speaker 1: you're the guy who said that Johnson killed Kennedy And meanwhile,
Speaker 1: couldn't get one stone apart from the other. Doesn't know
Speaker 1: her stones, although she does know her sticks. Anyway, Besides
Speaker 1: all that, you know, they had another guy going and
Speaker 1: this was a violation of people's personal privacy and this
Speaker 1: should never have happened in the nineteen seventy four Privacy Act,
Speaker 1: And you know what, he's right, But then again gives
Speaker 1: me a headache. So what's what here? I leave it
Speaker 1: for you to judge for yourselves. But let's see what
Speaker 1: the rest of it was. Technicians should Okay, let's.
Speaker 9: See a National Archives and Records Administration spokesperson tells CBS
Speaker 9: News quote the technician should not have released.
Speaker 7: The entire record.
Speaker 9: But with a race and a near dead heat, Rasmussen says,
Speaker 9: anything about the candidates will make a difference.
Speaker 10: It means that everything they do between now and the
Speaker 10: election is going to matter. It means that we don't
Speaker 10: have a clear favorite the way that maybe some people
Speaker 10: thought we did.
Speaker 9: Why both sides agree every vote will count in November
Speaker 9: in Lawrenceville, New Jersey, Christine Sloan, CBS News, New York.
Speaker 1: Okay, so that's Channel two News, CBS in. But again,
Speaker 1: here's the brass tax on it, right, what the violation
Speaker 1: is here? And I realize there is an expectation of
Speaker 1: a higher what we call it ethical level here when
Speaker 1: it comes to people that are supposed to be graduating
Speaker 1: from military academy and all that. But what it comes
Speaker 1: down to is, you know, if you're ever in a
Speaker 1: store and you see a shoplifter, do you go right
Speaker 1: to the store manager every single time and say, hey,
Speaker 1: you're being robbed, man? Check out that kid with the
Speaker 1: candy bar. Maybe you do, maybe you do, maybe you don't.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm not even judging this. Is it
Speaker 1: a violation of some sort of you know code? Apparently
Speaker 1: you know you're supposed to make sure you snitch on
Speaker 1: anything you see. If you see something, you're supposed to
Speaker 1: say something. But I got to tell you that when
Speaker 1: you encourage people in the military to make sure that
Speaker 1: they work as a team and work with one another,
Speaker 1: I've heard many a story where somebody broke a rule,
Speaker 1: and you know what, it wasn't about the rule, it
Speaker 1: was about sticking together. Right anyway, I'm just saying it
Speaker 1: may not be as black and white as anybody wants
Speaker 1: to make it out. And who knows whether they just
Speaker 1: went well, thank you thing falling from the sky into
Speaker 1: my lap. On the other side, the opposition research was
Speaker 1: done for him and delivered by the National Archives, again
Speaker 1: in competence or nefarious purpose, or you know, when you
Speaker 1: pick the guy up with your cab, did you realize
Speaker 1: they just came from a murder? I don't know, and
Speaker 1: I realize it's a hell of a stretch to get
Speaker 1: from one to the other. But open for your consideration, nonetheless,
Speaker 1: But anyway, this is yet again another one of the
Speaker 1: battles elections, selections and what counts and all so on
Speaker 1: and so forth. How about some other stuff going on
Speaker 1: if you don't mind. You know, despite many ideas floated
Speaker 1: for different coins and things like that, there have been
Speaker 1: forty presidents that have been turned into dollar coins, right,
Speaker 1: and only dead Potus was eligible when the program for
Speaker 1: the gold metallic color series was being minted and and ended.
Speaker 1: HW Bush, by the way, got a special one made
Speaker 1: afterwards because it takes Congress to sign off on it
Speaker 1: to mint another one. See he was still alive when
Speaker 1: they finished the program. But the excluded presidents so far,
Speaker 1: don't take it personal Trump pumpers, but Trump is on
Speaker 1: that list. He's excluded so far. Obama, Trump, Biden, Clinton, Carter,
Speaker 1: and w the excluded. And they're forty that made it.
Speaker 1: Like I said, HW had to be added later because
Speaker 1: he died well in an inconvenient slot there. And you
Speaker 1: were supposed to be dead a couple of years before
Speaker 1: they put your face on the coin. I don't know
Speaker 1: if that's superstition or tradition, but either way it is
Speaker 1: what it is. I know they didn't adhere to it
Speaker 1: when they put Kennedy on the half dollar and sixty four.
Speaker 1: I mean it was months later and shar Jar got
Speaker 1: ahead of us on that. I have one of those coins.
Speaker 1: By the way, I'm gonna bring it with me to answer,
Speaker 1: see if anybody wants to buy it. Anyways, should we
Speaker 1: talk about this? Why am I talking about this? Because
Speaker 1: they're talking about maybe issuing a Trump dollar coin, and
Speaker 1: I say, why not put all the rest of the
Speaker 1: presidents on their dollar coins and be done with it.
Speaker 1: Every year if we get a new president. If we
Speaker 1: ever get another president, you make another coin. Although I
Speaker 1: got a sneaking suspicion that if you complete the set
Speaker 1: here that'll be the end of the set, because we'll
Speaker 1: have something else at that. But anyway, brighter news, how
Speaker 1: about this Rush announces a reunion tour of five years
Speaker 1: after the death of drummer Neil Perk. Just another piece
Speaker 1: of random news. I figured i'd give you. Trump says
Speaker 1: he'd consider Glen Maxwell parton and mentions Diddy in the
Speaker 1: same breath. Uh yeah, you have to take a look right. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I got links for this stuff and the reunion tour
Speaker 1: for Neil Pert. You know, I have five years after
Speaker 1: Peert's dead, excuse me and all that stuff. And you
Speaker 1: know another O'Kelly prediction that will fall down the memory
Speaker 1: hole when the cryptomedia scheme is revealed and it will
Speaker 1: be a mad dash to figure out wholied whose pockets
Speaker 1: when it comes to you know, the Trump Ellison alliance.
Speaker 1: CBS is adding a new editor in chief, Barry Weiss.
Speaker 1: What a shocker. So you remember when she went all
Speaker 1: independent for a minute and I said, oh, she's gonna
Speaker 1: miss that paycheck, Well not for long. She's took a vacation.
Speaker 1: And isn't that gonna reshape CBS and its news division?
Speaker 1: I think so. So a new family dynasty has happening.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know Murdoch and family. Dude. I know
Speaker 1: you assembled all those busted and broken down TV stations,
Speaker 1: but this is gonna be nothing compared to this monster,
Speaker 1: I assure you. Anyway, Seymour Hirsch is asking if Trump
Speaker 1: is in cognitive decline. I give you a link to that,
Speaker 1: and I didn't even read the whole thing because you
Speaker 1: know what, it's irrelevant. But Seymour Hirsch is saying that.
Speaker 1: So now I'm suspicious. I always am you know, dark
Speaker 1: sided Camelot guy says anything, it really starts to make
Speaker 1: my skin crawl, even if nothing's under it. I mean,
Speaker 1: cacistocracy is a thing. And if the politician think, you know,
Speaker 1: population thinks it's winning, okay, Neo fascism may have multiple
Speaker 1: alert horses in the derby as well. You know what
Speaker 1: I'm saying, Probably not. It doesn't matter whether I speak
Speaker 1: in code or I code when I speak, you know,
Speaker 1: because if I'm not speaking exactly to the music you
Speaker 1: want to dance to, I'm irrelevant. Right stick around, you know,
Speaker 1: Chelly effect a.
Speaker 3: Little more.
Speaker 11: The use expressed my caller schools there anyone else who
Speaker 11: happens to get on the air of Jelly dot com
Speaker 11: do not necessarily reflect he uses dot com or chub
Speaker 11: and we are not responsible for any stupidity which might ensue.
Speaker 6: Thank you.
Speaker 3: What the Effect?
Speaker 12: Revelation through Conversation dot Com Radio The War State by
Speaker 12: Michael Swanson explains the great national transformation that took place
Speaker 12: and put the Kennedy presidency in the context of the
Speaker 12: Times and reveals never before published information about the Cuban
Speaker 12: missile crisis.
Speaker 13: President Kennedy would not have been assassinated if he had
Speaker 13: been president two hundred years ago. His assassination took place
Speaker 13: in the context of the Cold War and the rise
Speaker 13: of the national security state. Before World War II, the
Speaker 13: United States was a continental republic. In the decade that followed,
Speaker 13: it became an imperial superpower. Generals such as Curtis LeMay
Speaker 13: not only wanted to invade Cuba, but knew that there
Speaker 13: were short range missiles on the island armed with nuclear
Speaker 13: warheads that they could not destroy because they were on
Speaker 13: mobile launchers. Their invasion could have led to a Third
Speaker 13: World War, and they wanted to go to war anyway.
Speaker 13: The War State by Michael Swanson reveals why and will
Speaker 13: show you what President Kennedy was up against. For more information,
Speaker 13: the Warstate dot com.
Speaker 14: In Denial Secret Wars with air strikes and Tanks by
Speaker 14: Larry Hancock. Secret wars became a staple of US covert
Speaker 14: operations and are still happening today. Larry Hancock's book In
Speaker 14: Denial rips the cover off many of them, using new files.
Speaker 15: It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs that no
Speaker 15: one has ever written about before. It shows why it
Speaker 15: really failed and why the United States did not earn
Speaker 15: from it. It also shows why other countries today are
Speaker 15: doing secret operations with more success. This is the book
Speaker 15: that puts what's want to deny into the light. In
Speaker 15: Denial secret wars with air strikes and tanks Larry Hancock.
Speaker 15: For more information, go to Larry hyphen Handcock dot com.
Speaker 15: Pick up your copy of In Denial at Amazon dot
Speaker 15: com in digital or physical form.
Speaker 16: Pledge Legions so a false flag of the new United
Speaker 16: Manic state of Magarrida, red Orange Margarita one. They symbolic
Speaker 16: the anti gods in anything they would team worthy of.
Speaker 16: Ranting completely divided, explaining algorithms adamized without the.
Speaker 1: Liberty of state freely and justice.
Speaker 16: Probably be elite that can afford to rank, but not
Speaker 16: justice with the sale that transuit.
Speaker 13: Is tact pro.
Speaker 17: Oh Chili dot com revel.
Speaker 1: Through coassage, Go ahead.
Speaker 7: Call it the truth about the JFA assassination.
Speaker 1: Right, Well, what do you want to know?
Speaker 12: Dy Baker's wild claim Oswald girlfriend if he knew Ruby
Speaker 12: and Barry answer weapons?
Speaker 1: Really, I imagine I could claim I have four wheels. It
Speaker 1: doesn't make me a wagon, but okay, building and I'm.
Speaker 12: Trying to prevent the murder of John Kennedy come on
Speaker 12: now has a real.
Speaker 7: Effort on the Dayfay assassination book into her claim.
Speaker 1: Go to Amazon dot com enter Judith Baker in her
Speaker 1: own words. You'll get the results for a digital copy
Speaker 1: of a book where Walt Brown utilizes her own words
Speaker 1: and the known evidence in the case to get at
Speaker 1: well a different perspective. Let's say you can get judas
Speaker 1: Ary Baker in her own words from the author himself,
Speaker 1: signed if he request it by contacting doctor Brown at
Speaker 1: ki as JFK at aol dot com. It's a fun
Speaker 1: book and it actually dissects the many, many fantas astic
Speaker 1: claimings judas very Baker in her own words.
Speaker 13: In the location.
Speaker 1: Hey, and you know there is still time to sign
Speaker 1: up for November in Dallas. That is the JFK Lancer
Speaker 1: Conference where I am scheduled to be and hopefully I
Speaker 1: will make it there in one piece to be the
Speaker 1: MC for the Lancer Conference. A lot of presenters, both
Speaker 1: virtual and in person are also scheduled to appear, and
Speaker 1: I bet they got more reliable ideas about their travel time,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. Anyway, it'll be between November twenty
Speaker 1: first and the twenty third of twenty twenty five at
Speaker 1: the Fairmont Dallas Hotel, seventeen seventeen North Ackrid Street, Dallas, Texas.
Speaker 1: The website, though, whether you want to join virtually or
Speaker 1: in person, is Assassination Conference. That's all one word, Assassinationconference
Speaker 1: dot com. And if you choose, you could get a
Speaker 1: ten percent discount by using the code ocelly ten at
Speaker 1: checkout sign up, get yourself a ticket and ten percent
Speaker 1: off with the code o'celly ten occh e l l
Speaker 1: I one zero and you get ten percent off conference.
Speaker 1: Whether it's virtual or in person anyway, that's what it is.
Speaker 1: That's what it was, and hopefully I'll see you or
Speaker 1: hear from you about what's happening November twenty first to
Speaker 1: the twenty third of this year, twenty twenty five, because
Speaker 1: I'm supposed to be the MC and present a live
Speaker 1: Myths episode along with a whole cavalcade of individuals that
Speaker 1: are meant to show up there. Good stuff coming and
Speaker 1: I don't even want to mention a single name this time,
Speaker 1: just telling you o'celli ten is your discount code. Go
Speaker 1: to Assassination Conference dot com.
Speaker 17: See you there, oh Chilly dot com.
Speaker 1: Ah the name of that song Force Multiplier, and we
Speaker 1: had that pumpin just for a minute in order, well
Speaker 1: not even a minute, just to give us a bridge
Speaker 1: here to get back to it. We are still with
Speaker 1: the snaffoo news and it is what it is. You know,
Speaker 1: I mentioned the deployment of National Guard troops and all
Speaker 1: that stuff throughout the country, and what's going on with Portland. Well,
Speaker 1: last time I checked, there might even be a block
Speaker 1: coming for deploying the California National Guard to Portland, Oregon,
Speaker 1: because Portland, Oregon was blocked by a Trump appointed judge.
Speaker 1: But maybe we should let's see. Let's go to KGW
Speaker 1: News and take a listen to their report on the
Speaker 1: blocking by a Trump aported judge of Trump's desires to
Speaker 1: deploy troops to Portland, Oregon, where he says the whole
Speaker 1: place is like a helpit of a war ravaged Portland.
Speaker 1: In dispite with the judge, the governor, and a lot
Speaker 1: of people on social media that are posting, you know
Speaker 1: stuff or saying The.
Speaker 18: United States has a long history with the Tenth Amendment
Speaker 18: of protecting state sovereignty, of leaving it to each individual
Speaker 18: state to handle local law enforcement, and the US Supreme
Speaker 18: Court in a case in the nineteen nineties, with the
Speaker 18: majority opinion written by a very conservative justice Antonin Scalia
Speaker 18: expressly pointed to the Tenth Amendment as protecting states from
Speaker 18: having their domestic law enforcement taken over by the federal government.
Speaker 18: And so I think Judge Immergut, in her decision was
Speaker 18: pointing to this long history of the federal courts restraining
Speaker 18: the federal government from trying to usurp local law enforcement
Speaker 18: within the states.
Speaker 19: Now, once again, Portland came up during the White House
Speaker 19: Press briefing this morning. CNN's Caitlin Collins had this question
Speaker 19: for White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt.
Speaker 2: Listen, a federal judge over the weekend that the President
Speaker 2: and appointed to the bench in his first term in office,
Speaker 2: basically argued that he could not deploy other States National
Speaker 2: Guards to Portland. Basically said that it was untethered his
Speaker 2: argument to what was actually happening on the ground, which
Speaker 2: local officials in Portland have said that the.
Speaker 7: National Guard is needed there.
Speaker 20: With all due respect to that, judge, I think her
Speaker 20: opinion is untethered.
Speaker 7: In reality and in the law.
Speaker 20: The President is using his authority as commander in chief
Speaker 20: US Code twelve four six, which clearly states that the
Speaker 20: president has the right to call up the National Guard
Speaker 20: in cases where he deems it's appropriate.
Speaker 19: Okay, let's pause there before we move on with the
Speaker 19: rest of what she had to say, and let's take
Speaker 19: a look at that federal law that she cited.
Speaker 7: While this may get a little wordyed.
Speaker 19: Trying to stick with me because we think it's important context.
Speaker 1: Now. Meanwhile, for the record, this is a Channel eight,
Speaker 1: you know, local affiliate over there, KGW, and I'll give
Speaker 1: you a link in the show notes so you can
Speaker 1: take a look at the whole clip yourself. But I
Speaker 1: think this is a relevant thing where they're actually going
Speaker 1: to read, you know, the thing that was cited by
Speaker 1: the Press secretary. And let's see what's.
Speaker 19: What Okay, Title ten of US Code, so section twelve
Speaker 19: four oh six.
Speaker 7: Here's exactly what that says.
Speaker 19: Whenever one the United States or any of the commonwealths
Speaker 19: or possessions is invaded or is in danger of invasion
Speaker 19: by a foreign nation, two there is a rebellion or
Speaker 19: danger of a rebellion against the authority of the governments
Speaker 19: of the United States, or three the president is unable
Speaker 19: with the regular forces to execute the laws of the
Speaker 19: United States. Then the President may call into federal service
Speaker 19: members and units of the National Guard of any state
Speaker 19: in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion,
Speaker 19: suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these
Speaker 19: purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States, or,
Speaker 19: in the case of the District of Columbia, through the
Speaker 19: Commanding General of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.
Speaker 1: Okay, So according to what I'm reading along with because
Speaker 1: they put this like up on the screen, nice video form.
Speaker 1: Sounds to me like if you have an invasion or
Speaker 1: you have an uprising where it is not being controlled
Speaker 1: by the local authorities and through normal means, and the
Speaker 1: President then can order right through the governors to have
Speaker 1: them activate the National Guard, right, I mean, I don't know,
Speaker 1: maybe I'm losing my mind here, but they can get
Speaker 1: support troops and all that. Let's see, shall be issued
Speaker 1: through the governors of the states, or in the case
Speaker 1: of the District of Columbia, through the right Okay, but
Speaker 1: anyway shall be issued through the governors of the states.
Speaker 1: The governor of Oregon said, no, I think the governor
Speaker 1: of Illinois, I think said no when it came to Chicago.
Speaker 1: But is this a violation of the very thing that
Speaker 1: they're saying or not. I don't know. Let's see what
Speaker 1: this analyst has to say on the team. I didn't
Speaker 1: actually go past them reading this part because I thought
Speaker 1: it was relevant and people should look at what it
Speaker 1: is they cite when they cite it, you know, because
Speaker 1: a lot of people just surrender when they go, well
Speaker 1: section three of artifact D and blah blah, and people
Speaker 1: go oh okay because they glaze over. They don't know
Speaker 1: what it is, they don't read it, and they don't
Speaker 1: bother to read it. They just submit usually. So I'm
Speaker 1: just curious how this goes.
Speaker 7: So it doesn't appear to be quite as clear.
Speaker 19: Cut as Secretary Levitt made it sound, saying that the
Speaker 19: president can call up the guard quote in cases where
Speaker 19: he deems it's appropriate, but of course that's for federal.
Speaker 7: Judges to rule on.
Speaker 19: Levitt then went on to say they will quote be
Speaker 19: inviting independent journalists to the White House soon to share
Speaker 19: their stories from the ground in Portland. And we're not
Speaker 19: sure who exactly she's referring to, but we imagine it's
Speaker 19: the conservative voices who have a large following on social media,
Speaker 19: who are getting special access inside and on type of
Speaker 19: the Ice Building now, access that ICE and DHS officials
Speaker 19: have not given to members of local media, and frankly
Speaker 19: haven't even responded to our requests. And that special access
Speaker 19: for a select few is one part of this letter
Speaker 19: that Portland City attorney sent to the Civil Rights Division
Speaker 19: of the US.
Speaker 7: Department of Justice today.
Speaker 19: Robert Taylor was not shy, and his opening paragraph writing
Speaker 19: does the Civil Rights Division of the US Department of
Speaker 19: Justice care about the Constitution anymore? Many in Portland and
Speaker 19: across America have reason to be concerned about the answer
Speaker 19: to that question.
Speaker 7: He argues, the federal.
Speaker 19: Government is quote failing its solemn duty to uphold the
Speaker 19: rights of all people. He went on to write, the
Speaker 19: city appears to be witnessing unconstitutional uses of force by
Speaker 19: federal agents against peaceful protesters at the Ice Building, and
Speaker 19: that the Feds are engaging in what he calls prohibited
Speaker 19: viewpoint discrimination, writing, for example, it appears the federal government
Speaker 19: is providing special access to the ICE facility for special.
Speaker 7: Media or rather social.
Speaker 19: Media influencers who favor the federal administration while targeting with
Speaker 19: force those who use social media to document the conduct
Speaker 19: of the federal government. Taylor's letter to the DOJ was
Speaker 19: the city's response to this correspondence that the DOJ sent
Speaker 19: last week probing about the arrest of conservative influencer Nick Sorter.
Speaker 1: Okay, so there you have it from a local journalist
Speaker 1: who's kind of confused about the access and the presentation
Speaker 1: of what's happening in Portland. And other people have kind
Speaker 1: of said, you know, including the see it. Look, I'm
Speaker 1: not somebody likes the side with Caitlyn Collins for God's sake.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, you know, non journalist is non journalist.
Speaker 1: But what do we have left for journalists at this point?
Speaker 1: I mean, dude, what are we dealing with you anyway?
Speaker 1: If you don't see the preferential treatment is being given
Speaker 1: to political allies and deferential and defecating treatment is being
Speaker 1: given to the enemies, the alleged enemies. Yeah, it's a problem, folks,
Speaker 1: It really is if you're looking at it objectively, But
Speaker 1: most people aren't, so they're either screaming bloody murder or not.
Speaker 1: And it's all about weaponization. Well, what is weaponization if
Speaker 1: you don't decide who to aim it at. I gotta
Speaker 1: say it looks like it is anyway. Once again, October
Speaker 1: seventh is an anniversary date. But let's not forget that. Also,
Speaker 1: there's over one thousand days of warfare in Ukraine, which
Speaker 1: has flipped and swapped as far as the orientation goes,
Speaker 1: and soybean farmers like I told you what happened, are
Speaker 1: starting to look around and go, hey, there's a problem
Speaker 1: here because the Chinese have cut us off. The AI
Speaker 1: text with Jesus App is exploring, is exploiting, exploding. Excuse me,
Speaker 1: let me reread this, sucker. The AI text with Jesus
Speaker 1: app is exploding. Despite concerns of possible blasphemy, Trump and
Speaker 1: Hamas agreeing to important things in the guy the peace
Speaker 1: was within reach, that is according to uh the Israeli
Speaker 1: National News. Okay, new generation of militias steps out of
Speaker 1: Hamasa's shadow to fill Gaza power vacuum. That is uh.
Speaker 1: Let's see in the Nationalnews dot com. Anyway, let's keep
Speaker 1: going hijacked. Alternative media of the past has been co
Speaker 1: opted perfectly. Okay, Funny o'celly gets no credit for telling
Speaker 1: you the future, just the anger of those who thought
Speaker 1: he was out to get their heroes in the equation, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, because that's all there could be. Ever, I'm
Speaker 1: just going after one side or the other obviously, right. No, No,
Speaker 1: I try and tackle hypocrisy and that which sticks out
Speaker 1: like a sore thumb with the constant spiritual cry from within,
Speaker 1: I'm blind as hell? How come you can't see this anyway?
Speaker 1: Manosphere influencers who boosted Trump are now cooling on him.
Speaker 1: This according to Rolling Stone? Do you buy it? I
Speaker 1: don't buy rolling Stone havenit? In many years. I'd love
Speaker 1: to get the Ozsie copy of a hard cup copy
Speaker 1: of a magazine recently, because I'm sure they had a
Speaker 1: great tribute. But then again, I'd have mixed feelings about
Speaker 1: that because they used to piss all over him too. Anyways,
Speaker 1: how about what's going on with Candice Owen and Tucker
Speaker 1: Carlson's conspiracy theories totally wreck the credibility that alternative media
Speaker 1: is trying to gain. How about that media heites? There's
Speaker 1: an opinion piece on it, and let's see, does Barrywise
Speaker 1: prove woke media is collapsing? That's a good question from
Speaker 1: Reason dot com. Currently, Okay, never had morality to it.
Speaker 1: But is comedy still funny when theF comes from those
Speaker 1: who have no interest in hearing anything they have not
Speaker 1: already thought because someone else programmed them to do so.
Speaker 1: Louis c. K and Saudi Arabia. His defense is terrible.
Speaker 1: That is according to the Washington Monthly. And in the
Speaker 1: game we could call tick for no excuse me, tit
Speaker 1: for tac toe? How about that Jack Smith faces arrest
Speaker 1: calls over Arctic frost, and I gotta say one more time,
Speaker 1: I got to give credit where credit's due. Ultimately, I
Speaker 1: can wrap this all around and think very much about
Speaker 1: that terrible Umbrella Man video, and I'll give you a
Speaker 1: link to watch it on YouTube again. Full credit to
Speaker 1: Jimmy James because he pointed out something interesting, although I
Speaker 1: do need to ask him this Friday where he sees
Speaker 1: himself in the master equation. Is that a question I
Speaker 1: should ask? I don't know, but I did recently get
Speaker 1: an email from somebody who had heard one of the
Speaker 1: Friday night shows excuse me, and decided that, you know,
Speaker 1: there might be some validity to this. People literally parroting
Speaker 1: out ideas that are not their own, and I think
Speaker 1: you've struck upon something and he's got a totally different
Speaker 1: point of view from mine, but does recognize the pattern
Speaker 1: and was saying that he'd like to be a guest
Speaker 1: on the show. I'm going to try and get him.
Speaker 1: His name is Dennis, and you know, he titled an
Speaker 1: email to me. I don't know if this is like
Speaker 1: part of his branding or what, but unpacking political witch
Speaker 1: hunts with yeah with with Dennis Brennan, I guess that's
Speaker 1: I don't know, a podcast or a blog or something,
Speaker 1: and I'm not even gonna read it because his message
Speaker 1: made enough sense, he said. The recent Friday Night opened
Speaker 1: Mike with b Pete had me hooked, especially when you
Speaker 1: unpacked how so many people are brainwashed in layers. The
Speaker 1: way you challenged listeners to really examine whether their thoughts
Speaker 1: are their own struck a chord. I've always admired how
Speaker 1: the Ohli effect isn't afraid to confront narratives and spark
Speaker 1: fresh questions, even during conversations that wander from chrome polish
Speaker 1: to weather in California. So I appreciate the little bit
Speaker 1: of cynicism and sarcasm Dennis, and I'm telling you publicly now,
Speaker 1: I responded to you buy email already, and I want
Speaker 1: this guy as soon as possible on the show to
Speaker 1: break this down. I have a feeling from the rest
Speaker 1: of his message he's not a guy who is in
Speaker 1: my political wheelhouse, in my weird and warped little libertarian
Speaker 1: way that makes everybody hate me. Maybe you guys will
Speaker 1: like him. I want to hear what he's got to say,
Speaker 1: and I want to hear how he recognized that, because
Speaker 1: I've gotten lots of crickets over that, and I'm really disappointed.
Speaker 1: There's a handful of you that actually listens to what
Speaker 1: I have to say and it continues to be depressing, demoralizing,
Speaker 1: and discouraging. Anyway, if you help out this month. Look,
Speaker 1: I am trying to get myself ready and hope I
Speaker 1: can at least buy a cheeseburger or two as I
Speaker 1: go to Dallas, because the only thing I'm supposed to
Speaker 1: be assured of is transportation and a bed in a
Speaker 1: hotel room to crash on in between working all day
Speaker 1: and night. But that's it. That's what my trip to
Speaker 1: Dallas is going to be, and I think it'll be
Speaker 1: my last one because I'm not gonna make very many friends.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, what a shock Ochelly doesn't make friends. If
Speaker 1: you're my friend, you are a unique person. You put
Speaker 1: up with somebody who doesn't suffer fools in an intellectual sense.
Speaker 1: Sometimes sometimes I do suffer fools, and I always live
Speaker 1: to regret it, just like I'm living to regret being
Speaker 1: outnumbered and surrounded as much as I am and still
Speaker 1: not really fully engaging with people on a face to
Speaker 1: face basis on a daily except missus Zoe and my
Speaker 1: young son, who I'm both happy and sad, does not
Speaker 1: quite understand the world outside of this house yet. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: I'm going to have to educate them about it, and
Speaker 1: I don't look forward to it. It pains me more
Speaker 1: than having to sort of introduce my other children to
Speaker 1: the outside world. And I didn't have a full chance
Speaker 1: of that and that kind of sucked. But frankly, as
Speaker 1: times have shifted, this is now a deep and dark
Speaker 1: hole I'm going to have to go into. So anyway,
Speaker 1: I do have a couple of bills to pay. If
Speaker 1: you guys can help with that or somehow help me
Speaker 1: stash a little cash so I can go to Dallas
Speaker 1: and to Cheeseburger, like I say, either on the way
Speaker 1: or on the way back, or while I'm there. That'll
Speaker 1: be helpful, because I'm gonna be gone for about a
Speaker 1: week in November between travel that whole weekend, and god knows,
Speaker 1: I'll probably sleep a full day at some point, although
Speaker 1: maybe not because I can't really sleep more than an
Speaker 1: hour or two anymore. I got to tell you, I'm
Speaker 1: not in the best of moods. I'm in a dark place,
Speaker 1: and it's not just because I analyze the news and
Speaker 1: dark things from history. I want humor, I want light.
Speaker 1: I also like a little breathing room and be able
Speaker 1: to know that I can feed everybody tomorrow and keep
Speaker 1: the lights on for more than two days at a time.
Speaker 1: But we're all suffering, and I'm wondering when we're going
Speaker 1: to turn around and decide to blame the people that
Speaker 1: are making it this way, that are making it impossible
Speaker 1: for somebody to do something with efficacy, with ethics intact,
Speaker 1: with their moral compass still functioning, and actually be allowed
Speaker 1: to not just make a living, but live by making
Speaker 1: I don't know. Then again, maybe I'm just delusional, and
Speaker 1: it's a good thing that it's closer to the time
Speaker 1: for me to shuffle off this mortal coil than it
Speaker 1: is well close to my arrival time. Huh. Anyway, keep
Speaker 1: your head up, stay strong, stay safe, and remember I'm
Speaker 1: merely o'celly, and a handful of you are the effect.
Speaker 6: Good night.
Speaker 11: If you expressed my coiler stools, there anyone else who
Speaker 11: happens to get on the air who's only dot com.
Speaker 11: Do not necessarily and we are not responsible for any
Speaker 11: stupidity which might ensue.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Rooklear Holocaust, what Urennium is right?
Speaker 6: Think of rooplar weapons and other things like?
Speaker 13: The war State by Michael Swanson explains the great national
Speaker 13: transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in
Speaker 13: the context of the times and reveals never before published
Speaker 13: information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not
Speaker 13: have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred
Speaker 13: years ago. His assassination took place in the context of
Speaker 13: the Cold War and the rise of the national security state.
Speaker 13: Before World War II, the United States was a continental republic.
Speaker 13: In the decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower.
Speaker 13: Generals such as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba,
Speaker 13: but knew that there were short range missiles on the island,
Speaker 13: arn't with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy because
Speaker 13: they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have led
Speaker 13: to a Third World War, and they wanted to go
Speaker 13: to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson reveals
Speaker 13: why and will show you what President Kennedy was up against.
Speaker 13: For more information, the Warstate dot com.
Speaker 17: Do you like history, Real history that you were never
Speaker 17: taught in schools? Why the Vietnam War Nuclear Bombs in
Speaker 17: nation Building in Southeast Asia by author Mike Swanson, with
Speaker 17: new documentation never seen before that'll open your eyes to
Speaker 17: events that led up to this. Why the Vietnam War
Speaker 17: Nuclear Bombs in Nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty
Speaker 17: five through nineteen sixty one. Get your copy today at
Speaker 17: Amazon dot com. Why the Vietnam War by author Mike
Speaker 17: Swanson