Speaker 1: You see something's going to happen. What's gonna happen? What?
Speaker 2: Welcome to the Occult Rejects this episode. I'm already screwing
Speaker 2: up already and uh yeah, well we got a couple
Speaker 2: of rejects here. We got a returning guests and this
Speaker 2: person we got to meet him in person and awesome, dude.
Speaker 2: We had a blast with this guy and I definitely
Speaker 2: wanted to get him back.
Speaker 3: On after personally metal guys.
Speaker 1: Awesome.
Speaker 2: But before we introduce the guest, let me introduce the
Speaker 2: other rejects joining us. And today we got headless giant.
Speaker 1: What is going on? Sir?
Speaker 2: Thank you very much for being here.
Speaker 3: How you doing Nick? I love to be here. We
Speaker 3: just got done doing a massive trialogue on Sundays. Check
Speaker 3: that out. Me and Ethan and Ricardo just did it.
Speaker 3: So it was fantastic, guys, go check it out. And
Speaker 3: I've got Alchemy Mondays with Arrows up. Uh so, she's
Speaker 3: going to be coming on there and Tuesday we're gonna
Speaker 3: be doing more Kabbala seven seven seven with Nick. So
Speaker 3: check it out and send your stories for my mail
Speaker 3: bag to at the Chat Podcast at gmail dot com
Speaker 3: and we will read those on Thursday. Thank you, blessure.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much, sir, and we got Ethan in
Speaker 2: to go with us.
Speaker 1: What is going on?
Speaker 2: Ethan, thank you very much for coming on.
Speaker 4: I'm always excited to be here. Nick, thanks for putting
Speaker 4: everything together. Ed, thank you for doing Yeah, we we were.
Speaker 4: I was enthralled with your presentation. Very very interesting. I'm
Speaker 4: looking forward. When was that, by the way, six.
Speaker 1: Yeah, probably I don't know, thank you several months ago anyway,
Speaker 1: probably been there probably been some more discovery since then.
Speaker 1: I'm sure, oh, I would think so. Yeah, absolutely, Yeah,
Speaker 1: fascinating topic.
Speaker 4: I am a writer and an observer of our times.
Speaker 4: I have, you know, easy to find on the social media, Ethan, Indigo.
Speaker 1: I got a few books out.
Speaker 4: There and some articles, write little articles frequently and and
Speaker 4: books and.
Speaker 1: Glad to be here, Indigo pros.
Speaker 4: I was just I was just being self gratuitous talking
Speaker 4: about my writing. Unimportant anyway, Internet canceled you.
Speaker 1: What is your topic of writing?
Speaker 4: If I may ask, Oh, oh, I've I've written on
Speaker 4: a couple of things of fiction.
Speaker 1: And that really are not difficult.
Speaker 4: I wrote, Uh, that's one of my main books now
Speaker 4: those I'm intrigued. Yeah, I explore the seven and eight
Speaker 4: principles in relation to the Bagua and the Eastern excuse me,
Speaker 4: the Western formation.
Speaker 1: Of the ogdauad Uh and care or patients.
Speaker 4: And that's kind of like with the seed of life.
Speaker 4: It has the seven concentric circles with the eighth surrounding it.
Speaker 4: And when you add patients to your practice or to
Speaker 4: your whatever aspect of these principles you you know, or
Speaker 4: or care patient care, Uh, you really get results in effect,
Speaker 4: I guess. And it's like the seven chakras and our
Speaker 4: body or or or you know, container. And I've written
Speaker 4: a lot about four. I've written a few books kind
Speaker 4: of exploring the mage, one being the Matrix of Four
Speaker 4: and the other being the Fourth and Siation exploring these
Speaker 4: ideas through uh, philosophical and initiatory kind of concepts.
Speaker 2: He's actually wrote, he's written a lot actually, so, yeah.
Speaker 1: I've written a lot.
Speaker 4: I don't sell much, you know too, but whatever.
Speaker 2: Don't you don't advertise watching either, but yeah, so.
Speaker 1: It's hard to sell. But it is a nature as
Speaker 1: a beast, you have to do things that yeah, you
Speaker 1: said it, you know. I'm not a painter, but I
Speaker 1: suggest painting for the love of painting not painting for
Speaker 1: the love of commerce. You know, I agree exactly, It's
Speaker 1: just their different concepts. Hopefully, one day we'll have some
Speaker 1: sort of universal income and everyone can be an artist
Speaker 1: full time.
Speaker 2: So please, even though you've been on here before and
Speaker 2: head listen, you can you up let all the other
Speaker 2: new listeners and people who don't know you what you.
Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, I'll just I'll. I've heard some complaints that
Speaker 1: I got to go on about my origin story too long,
Speaker 1: but I like to suggest that i've you know, I've
Speaker 1: been interested in in archaeology since I was an eight
Speaker 1: year old kid in Bridgeport, Pennsylvania, and I found a
Speaker 1: little Egyptian Shapti sarcophagus in the front yard of all places,
Speaker 1: probably someone souvenir or jewelry, who knows, But I think
Speaker 1: the point was it told that little kid that there
Speaker 1: is mysteries in the world still to be solved, that
Speaker 1: not everything is so cut and dry. And then later
Speaker 1: on I saw this show In Search of with Leonard Nimoy,
Speaker 1: which is why I always do my show. He'll be
Speaker 1: my plug. Let's Talk tried ACTLS at seven pm Sunday's
Speaker 1: Eastern Standard time, just because I want to mimic that
Speaker 1: wonderful time slot that I used to watch seven PM,
Speaker 1: which reminds me. A nice segue is Let's moment of
Speaker 1: silence for the original Let's Rest in Peace. Eric von
Speaker 1: donnikin the original Ancient Alien Theorists has transgress to other
Speaker 1: realms or dimensions or what have you.
Speaker 2: What did that happen? When did he die?
Speaker 1: I think yesterday? Oh wow? Or maybe it was today
Speaker 1: but it was a different time zone.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 1: What's the date today?
Speaker 2: Today is the eleventh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, he may have died today in Europe. Possibly, Wow,
Speaker 1: I had no idea. Interesting. So yeah, so let's remember
Speaker 1: von Donakin were without him, we wouldn't have likely the
Speaker 1: first two in Search of Us we're actually movies with
Speaker 1: Rod Sterling from twilight Zone, and I think he actually
Speaker 1: narrates one of them. Maybe maybe he direates two. So
Speaker 1: you want the narrator of Twilight Zone doing your in
Speaker 1: search of ancient alien stuff, definitely watch those things. But yeah,
Speaker 1: so also in Search of is where I saw the
Speaker 1: Patterson video. You know, people say, hey, did you became
Speaker 1: an archaeologist to be like Indiana Jones? And actually it
Speaker 1: was the Bigfoot video because I told my mother about
Speaker 1: the Bigfoot video. She said it was fake, and then
Speaker 1: her aunts gave me the time Life collection of books
Speaker 1: and there was Evolution, Early Man. And I saw the
Speaker 1: Early Man book and I was like, oh, so things
Speaker 1: like this really existed on the planet, so maybe that's
Speaker 1: not fake. And so that was that's what propelled me.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm also a sometimes actor, so I could
Speaker 1: have went in the theater. Thankfully, I guess I was
Speaker 1: already a working actor. I'm like, now, let me do
Speaker 1: something I like, right, and I had. I even had
Speaker 1: a revelation once I was bartending and I was reading
Speaker 1: Carl Sagan's book The what is it The Demon Haunted World?
Speaker 1: I think it was called. I think I left the
Speaker 1: book there by the way. I don't think I fished.
Speaker 1: I remember closing it and saying, I'm going to major
Speaker 1: in anthropology, and that's what I did. I majored in anthropology.
Speaker 1: It's a dual degree with social sciences and an ethnic
Speaker 1: studies background. While I was at school, I ran the
Speaker 1: LAMBD Alpha Anthropology club, and I started volunteering at the
Speaker 1: local museum, which turned into greater opportunities, and I later
Speaker 1: became from a free free to a free volunteer and
Speaker 1: just a tour guide. It became the activities coordinator and
Speaker 1: ran their education department, which also provided archaeologists opportunities. So
Speaker 1: the museum did contracted work. We worked with another company
Speaker 1: named Janice that was working with Army Corps of Engineers.
Speaker 1: The Army Corps of Engineers, you know, years ago they
Speaker 1: had stopped the flow of okeechobee. So they had gone
Speaker 1: back and they started reflowing the water back, fixing the
Speaker 1: problems they started. And so we would do surveys in
Speaker 1: old sugarcane fields and whatnot, old cowfields too. You know
Speaker 1: it's you know it's in old you know it's in cowfields,
Speaker 1: right guys. So those were fun times, you know. And
Speaker 1: even one time I got to choose the dig site
Speaker 1: and digging through the site, lo and behold, pulled a
Speaker 1: white shirt. Projectile point. So when people asked me if
Speaker 1: you were an archaeologist, I was a paid working archaeologist.
Speaker 1: And you know, whether you're a newbie or you have
Speaker 1: a bachelor's degree or you're a doctor, everybody's digging. Everybody
Speaker 1: took turns with the shovel and the sifter. I'm glad
Speaker 1: I was sifting when I found the chirt arrowhead. So yeah,
Speaker 1: that's my background there. I've also been the paleotech for
Speaker 1: Bobby to Palma. Bobby to Palma is sort of a
Speaker 1: paleontological prodigy when he was younger. I guess he's been
Speaker 1: around now, but he's on BBC's Attenborough. So these are
Speaker 1: the type of people that, you know. My friends were
Speaker 1: all I called the silly hat gang. And that's what
Speaker 1: I liked about going to the quest or ancient civilizations.
Speaker 1: Everybody's running around with their silly hats and it reminded
Speaker 1: me of the old days with my buddies.
Speaker 2: Do a museum work, right, nice story, man, So what
Speaker 2: got you into trite dactyls?
Speaker 1: You know? I ignored the Google feed like probably millions of
Speaker 1: other people right literally, And my girlfriend came and she's like,
Speaker 1: did you take a look at those alien mummies? And
Speaker 1: I'm like, she's like, I think you want to take
Speaker 1: another look at that. So I cite her as a
Speaker 1: sort of interesting point of She was a point of
Speaker 1: my She was my point of authority, meaning that I
Speaker 1: trusted her further analysis for me to continue and analyze more.
Speaker 1: And I think that's where some of this starts. So yeah,
Speaker 1: some of this might start with a trust me bro,
Speaker 1: you know that's cool. So so, but but that's where
Speaker 1: I first looked into it, and I saw the testimonies
Speaker 1: and slide shows of doctor jose Zalce Benitez, who happens
Speaker 1: to be the lead forensic officer for the Mexican Navy.
Speaker 1: So he's a forensic anthropologist. You know, my bioanthropology teacher
Speaker 1: was a forensic anthropologist. He would do uh, they would
Speaker 1: like call him out of professional witness to like identify
Speaker 1: bodies and like mass graves and whatnot. And so that's
Speaker 1: just mentioning the sort of mentors and men that you know,
Speaker 1: I've experienced. For example, I went and visited the Miami Circle.
Speaker 1: We had had a private ground survey walking survey with
Speaker 1: a Russian geologist and the Miami Dade archaeologist, the Lake
Speaker 1: Gary Bider, who is my mentor. I gotta be careful, gentleman,
Speaker 1: when you get older. I think about, you know, what
Speaker 1: your testostero level changes. I can get emotional about any
Speaker 1: of this stuff, you know, because I'm reminiscing, I'm talking
Speaker 1: about people in the past. I've probably already been broken
Speaker 1: down on your show. Yeah, I've done it a couple
Speaker 1: of times. I've gotten better. Yeah, I've gotten I thought.
Speaker 2: I was like, yo, this is the first time he's
Speaker 2: on here, this guy's crying. I was like, funk, what
Speaker 2: do we do?
Speaker 1: It's you know, it's the funny thing. I'm an actor.
Speaker 1: She could say I was acting, but really it's the
Speaker 1: actors that are in touch with their emotions and that's
Speaker 1: why we you know, we could do the scenes because
Speaker 1: what am I gonna do. I'm probably gonna do a
Speaker 1: scene one day. I'm gonna remember my time on your show,
Speaker 1: as you know, motivation, that's how it works, not vice versa.
Speaker 1: You know. Uh yeah, so it's happened. I've gotten you know,
Speaker 1: emotional thinking how the Maori call these little green heart
Speaker 1: shape beings with three fingers and three toes ancestors. That's
Speaker 1: choked me up before, like why is that the case?
Speaker 1: So anyway, it wasn't just Zouce Benitez though and his testimony,
Speaker 1: But you would think that a forensic anthropologist who happens
Speaker 1: to work for the Mexican Navy would be enough for
Speaker 1: people to accept this story, but instead it turns into
Speaker 1: ad hominin attacks and strange petty focuses, which isn't on
Speaker 1: the science. If you catch people talking about people during
Speaker 1: this whole Nasca mummies thing, that's a problem. It's not
Speaker 1: about the people. It's about the science of the bodies.
Speaker 1: Let's look at numbers, let's look at things. Everything else
Speaker 1: is just minutia. So I also read Cliff Miles report,
Speaker 1: who's a Canadian paleontologist. I was almost forget what he was.
Speaker 1: He's a published, peer reviewed paleontologist, so he's written papers
Speaker 1: on dinosaurs. Unfortunately, he may have made a critical error
Speaker 1: of combining his report on the tridactyls with a history
Speaker 1: of ufology, which may have tainted the report because now
Speaker 1: you have a bunch of speculative stuff. What's he laughing about?
Speaker 1: I can't even here.
Speaker 2: I see you laughing the comment that somebody posted on
Speaker 2: the bottom cast one.
Speaker 3: Hundred times better than Jorge de Ros and we're like, yop, there.
Speaker 2: Was a guest that fucked.
Speaker 1: Yeah, definitely, Oh lord. Yeah. So Cliff Miles wrote a
Speaker 1: you know, a paper report that you could read with
Speaker 1: the stands. And so for me, coming from a background
Speaker 1: a museum background of anthropology and paleontology, to hear these
Speaker 1: two guys speak, I can at least understand where they
Speaker 1: were coming from, and I could see what they were
Speaker 1: pointing out as anomalous, strange features. Now, for me, the
Speaker 1: personal enlightenment was, and I mean almost almost in a
Speaker 1: wooful spiritual fashion, is that on the day of a
Speaker 1: solar eclipse. Even to add to the mythology, it was
Speaker 1: October twenty twenty three and I wrote up. I woke
Speaker 1: up and said, I got to write this down, and
Speaker 1: I started writing my constant companion theory we were never
Speaker 1: alone based on the fact I recognized the tridactyls from
Speaker 1: petroglyphs in both Canada and the Caribbean. So you can
Speaker 1: imagine my poor girlfriend when I'm looking at her saying
Speaker 1: I know what these are. I've seen these before. She's
Speaker 1: thinking I'm nuts and them. But when we go and
Speaker 1: if you want, we can look at those today. When
Speaker 1: you look at these petroglyphs, you see heart shaped, benign
Speaker 1: looking faces with three fingered hands. And there's other peripheral
Speaker 1: petroglyphs that are associated with these. There's spirals that could
Speaker 1: represent water or fertility or both, serpents and mother goddess imagery,
Speaker 1: all this with this tritactal imagery, and so that was
Speaker 1: the beginning of my personal journey. Is that understanding what
Speaker 1: they were saying about the bodies, registering that these were real,
Speaker 1: living things, and that's like a it's like a turn
Speaker 1: key sort of event that happens in your brain. It's
Speaker 1: believing that what you're seeing is real. I think, and
Speaker 1: I think we may literally be seeing amongst a public
Speaker 1: is a literal cognitive dissonance might be happening, and it sounds.
Speaker 1: I hate to guess motives. I hate to play armchair
Speaker 1: psychologist I do or sociologists because we're talking about mass
Speaker 1: events here. But I think some of that's happening, and
Speaker 1: it's It's been very important for me to be very
Speaker 1: upfront and it's truthful, and I'm not going to tiptoe
Speaker 1: around this, and let's just get to what I suggest
Speaker 1: these things are and then everyone can move on with
Speaker 1: whatever their belief system is. But I would like to
Speaker 1: give everyone a base to go from. Too many talking
Speaker 1: heads are coming onto shows going well, they have three
Speaker 1: fingers and three toes and big heads, and that's all
Speaker 1: we know right now. I know a lot more especially
Speaker 1: when you look at the little ones. But I think
Speaker 1: the focus was made for the bigger ones because I
Speaker 1: think the two teams of researchers there's essentially the Mexican
Speaker 1: team and a Peruvian team. I guess they're collaborating, plus
Speaker 1: myself independently, I think those researchers wanted to focus on
Speaker 1: the bigger ones. They may have thought that that was
Speaker 1: an easier hurdle to demonstrate validity because so many other
Speaker 1: people were associating the sixty centimeter ones with a couple
Speaker 1: of dolls that were confiscated at the airport. To be honest,
Speaker 1: I don't I would like to look at one of
Speaker 1: those dolls, and maybe one is a doll, but was
Speaker 1: the other one even examined or is a light now
Speaker 1: cast on the Ministry of Culture elements of it because
Speaker 1: they have come around, they've recognized Maria and Juawita now
Speaker 1: as culture heritage artifacts. It's an important legal move that
Speaker 1: I think had to be done if we wanted to
Speaker 1: stop seeing these bodies spirited out of the country. Is
Speaker 1: ultimately think yes, let's let's go into.
Speaker 3: Your constant contact paper, because I think that gives everybody
Speaker 3: a proper frame constant companion that gives everybody the groundwork
Speaker 3: that you're working on. It's we're not talking about something
Speaker 3: that's alien. We're talking about hey, deeply ingrained in our
Speaker 3: subconscious minds.
Speaker 1: Right. So, you know, the tried axles has been because
Speaker 1: they are this sort of big uh, they're this big
Speaker 1: event and they're this this paradigm shifting event. I know
Speaker 1: it sounds, it always sounds. It sounds like I'm being hyperbolic.
Speaker 1: I'm actually trying to just be as clear as possible
Speaker 1: that this seems to be a paradigm shifting event. And
Speaker 1: it has allowed me the freedom of reimagining past interpretations
Speaker 1: of artifacts and and perhaps seem interpretations how history went down.
Speaker 1: It's allowed me to find other valid hypotheses that we
Speaker 1: can now form into a new one. So, yeah, the
Speaker 1: big part of the constant companion theory that was part
Speaker 1: of the Enlightenment was the heart shaped faces of the
Speaker 1: beings that are found in all the petroglyphs. Now, it's beautiful,
Speaker 1: it's great. You have to paint it, I suggest green,
Speaker 1: but yeah, there's heart shaped. These heart shape images are
Speaker 1: all all over the planet, and even if you just
Speaker 1: go to Peru, you don't have to. You don't have
Speaker 1: to follow any of mine. Just go to the Parrakous cultures,
Speaker 1: nasca cultures, warry cultures. Look at their ceramics, look at
Speaker 1: their fabrics. There are little, benign looking, cherub faced tridactal beings.
Speaker 1: I mean, this are a lot of It looks like
Speaker 1: this is either a first person witness or you know,
Speaker 1: my dad saw this and this is what he told
Speaker 1: me to to create. Those weren't the only ones I
Speaker 1: mentioned Bella Cool of Canada, the Caribbean. I mean, I
Speaker 1: should probably take a trip to the Caribbean. That's really
Speaker 1: where the or or I should be searching limestone around
Speaker 1: Florida to see if I can find my own, right
Speaker 1: forget the ones that are already found. That would be great.
Speaker 1: But from there I found the Tiki of the Maori,
Speaker 1: which they call the ancestor. As I mentioned, the Syrian
Speaker 1: ie idols of tel Brack, which are these little gingerbread
Speaker 1: looking ets, perhaps the watchers from our biblical stories, because
Speaker 1: what is one of the biggest features of these beings
Speaker 1: is the eyes. The Permian bronze animal style castings, which
Speaker 1: is a European culture now, which depicts little bronze depictions
Speaker 1: of three figure families with three fingers, almost as though
Speaker 1: they've captured this image in time. It's almost a candid
Speaker 1: look of a family of tridactyls. Of course, the Dogu ceramics.
Speaker 1: Did I say that, right? The Dogon ceramics, No, see,
Speaker 1: I am getting it. There's the Dogu. There's probably a connection, right,
Speaker 1: there's the Dogon of Africa, and then there's the Joan
Speaker 1: of Japan. But I'm just probably there probably is a connection.
Speaker 1: But anyway, they're ceramics some of the best almost hyper
Speaker 1: realistic depictions of what I think trit actles. And that
Speaker 1: culture also runs with another material artifact called the magatama,
Speaker 1: which looks like little larvas or little other archaeologists say
Speaker 1: embryos or fetuses, you know. And the other big cultural
Speaker 1: complex that really really sparked my interest was the the
Speaker 1: Hongshan pig dragon artifacts. So these here. When I first
Speaker 1: saw these, many of the this is this might be
Speaker 1: a replica, but perfect replica if it is, these may
Speaker 1: out of jade. I realized, oh, this looks like a
Speaker 1: trit axle. I think they were aware of the beings.
Speaker 1: It's another strange one, very strange, and so I got
Speaker 1: three of those. Today I got three hon Sham pig
Speaker 1: dragons and those that complex also has dragon men and
Speaker 1: other different extends to other shapes and whatnot. So it
Speaker 1: seemed to me, after going back and looking at all
Speaker 1: these cultures, it would seem as though in the Caribbean
Speaker 1: there are mother goddesses to the Maori, their ancestors to
Speaker 1: the Syrians, they were fertility beings. And there's even I
Speaker 1: think hyperrealistic stone carving of Maki make in the cave
Speaker 1: on Easter Island as a creator being. So all of
Speaker 1: these myths, of all these hard shaped beings, many with
Speaker 1: three fingers, all seem to be saying the same thing,
Speaker 1: these are some sort of creator beings. This is not
Speaker 1: my This is not my belief. This is what I
Speaker 1: found through interpretation. Now again the skeptics, rather than the
Speaker 1: skeptics will probably attack this as how will they attack
Speaker 1: this coincidence? Usually that's the other thing, coincidence, paradolia. I
Speaker 1: get paradolia for that and the biology. So many times
Speaker 1: it's just like, you know, there's another cham I think
Speaker 1: it's called agnosia, which is which means you look at
Speaker 1: something and you don't know what the hell you're looking at.
Speaker 1: So when people say paradolia, I say, okay, maybe it's agnosia.
Speaker 1: I believe it's the pronunciation uh too good stuff.
Speaker 3: Exactly. So let's let's talk about when when these artifacts
Speaker 3: were first on earth, and there has been a lot
Speaker 3: of controversy. We've even seen the government of Peru actually
Speaker 3: try to get active in taking these artifacts and being
Speaker 3: stopped in the process. They actually attacked one of the
Speaker 3: press conferences looking for these artifacts and trying to take them,
Speaker 3: and a lot of people miss that. It's this is
Speaker 3: at the heart of the politics in Peru.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but it looks like there's gonna be cooperation now
Speaker 1: because now that Peru has designated Maria and Wawita as
Speaker 1: cultural heritage pieces. But not only that, they're cultural heritage
Speaker 1: pieces under the care of aika Eca University, as they
Speaker 1: have been these people. I know they're gonna need funding.
Speaker 1: I see how the mummies are being stored. I would
Speaker 1: love to somehow, you know, be a part of the
Speaker 1: fundraising and helping this museum get started, because we're gonna
Speaker 1: need climate control and security and sprinklers. It's a lot,
Speaker 1: and it's all these things deserve all of that and
Speaker 1: more well ed.
Speaker 3: What we've seen throughout all of history is that sometimes
Speaker 3: the most otherworldly of artifacts get treated with the most
Speaker 3: otherworldly of irresponsibility too. We find it over and over
Speaker 3: again when it comes to giant skeletons and all these
Speaker 3: other artifacts that go into the museum and never make
Speaker 3: it out. That's what I'm concerned about.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, and and and so obviously a government
Speaker 1: has a dangerous role in that, but I think it's
Speaker 1: looking like the Ministry of Culture has gone the other way.
Speaker 1: What you do bring up, though, is the danger of skeptics.
Speaker 1: So while one group might be suggesting, hey, let's at
Speaker 1: least look into this some more, if another group is saying, okay,
Speaker 1: it's time to stop looking into this, that's like a
Speaker 1: red flag to me, Like, okay, you know, anyone's saying
Speaker 1: case closed or things like that, it's a little suspicious.
Speaker 1: So what what is so? Really, it's almost like the
Speaker 1: skeptics are almost more dangerous in that regard. Oh the
Speaker 1: iron some.
Speaker 3: Ways, yeah, because there what I've seen six handed or
Speaker 3: six fingered handprint in areas that are supposed to have giants.
Speaker 3: They've gone to great legs to try and cover those
Speaker 3: things up and sort of buff that out of history.
Speaker 3: You know, any rough patches we've got a sort of
Speaker 3: smooth down into something more manageable. And I just don't
Speaker 3: believe that we should be focused on that sort of
Speaker 3: smoothing down process anymore. Now it's time to pay attention
Speaker 3: to the anomalies.
Speaker 1: Pay attention to them anomalies. It's no longer about coincidences
Speaker 1: and paradolia. That is the low branch skeptic move of dismissal,
Speaker 1: and it ends conversation much of that stuff. That's why
Speaker 1: I think I said earlier before we started the show,
Speaker 1: we all have to be careful that we're encouraging imagination,
Speaker 1: we're encouraging hope, we're encouraging speculation is good. Speculation is good.
Speaker 1: So anyone that's trying to put a damper on someone
Speaker 1: else's again, that's another just red flag.
Speaker 3: You go, do you right right, especially with what you do,
Speaker 3: you're just showing people the art and you're letting their
Speaker 3: imaginations take them where they want to go. I think
Speaker 3: that's one of the things people are missing, is if
Speaker 3: we had contact with something that is more advanced than
Speaker 3: us in the past, it would necessarily show itself in
Speaker 3: our artwork as as like a higher being of some kind.
Speaker 3: It would it would necessarily have that sort of feel
Speaker 3: to it.
Speaker 1: And what happens in the art I mentioned earlier, and
Speaker 1: this is this is a common thing an anthropologists will do,
Speaker 1: is try to guess the generation of the art, because
Speaker 1: you can see art changes. And so what I think
Speaker 1: happens with a lot of our tritactal imagery. At some
Speaker 1: point it went from being hyper realistic to what I
Speaker 1: say a use of steganography and perspective at amorphosis. That
Speaker 1: is that the knowledge and images of the beings were
Speaker 1: actually concealed in various art forms. Or conversely, they became
Speaker 1: completely anthropomorphized and you have your snow White and the
Speaker 1: Seven Dwarfs, or they became completely ionic and iconic and
Speaker 1: just became symbols. So they can go in two completely
Speaker 1: different directions. Either one tend to draw you away, I
Speaker 1: don't know I purposely, or if this is just a
Speaker 1: conscious what should have says social memory loss, You eventually
Speaker 1: just forget the past and it becomes these myths, legends
Speaker 1: and folk tales. You know, one of the biggest fables
Speaker 1: is that I think they're calling it a fab or
Speaker 1: fairy tale, I'm not sure of the particular title. Is
Speaker 1: the frog Prince. That is one of the most prominent myths,
Speaker 1: and that is an animal husband myth, and it involves
Speaker 1: metamorphosis this myth. So here's something that the frog prints
Speaker 1: in many ways could be as important of a tale
Speaker 1: as something from someone's holy book.
Speaker 3: Well, there are so many different stories and fables about
Speaker 3: lizards that change, right, there's some sort of a changeability
Speaker 3: that comes to as frogs, but we don't where do
Speaker 3: we see that in nature? We do see them going
Speaker 3: from one phase to the other, but when they're in
Speaker 3: their final form, it's not like they revert back, like
Speaker 3: there's a certain progression to it, but it's not necessarily
Speaker 3: like you would have with the frog prints, you know,
Speaker 3: like that's a little bit more drastic than.
Speaker 1: I think one of them is a go ahead, I
Speaker 1: cut you.
Speaker 3: Well, what you could imagine is an amphibious illusion, right,
Speaker 3: so you you have amphibious illusions, and that would make
Speaker 3: sense too with an amphibian form of life like the
Speaker 3: tridactyls might be right, And of.
Speaker 1: Course, yeah, that's my I call it my amphibian assertion
Speaker 1: that since that from the very beginning we saw that
Speaker 1: they had tridactylely, they had the three fingers. That is
Speaker 1: something you can find in nature amongst frogs and salamanders.
Speaker 1: So isn't that funny too? How interesting how we have
Speaker 1: these bodies with the three fingers and we want to
Speaker 1: immediately say aliens when reality we could say immediately amphibians, right,
Speaker 1: And then there's allusions to them having zero lungs, which
Speaker 1: would be cutaneous breathing. And if they were cutaneous breathers,
Speaker 1: they could be contaneous waste removers. So something like an
Speaker 1: amphibian's waist would be ammonia, and I wonder what kind
Speaker 1: of a smell that would leave. But it didn't stop there.
Speaker 1: In fact, in a recent video of George Knapp was
Speaker 1: interviewing some people and he alluded to my eurostyle. He
Speaker 1: alluded to the tailbone was a little he was a
Speaker 1: little wordy when he said it, but he asked about
Speaker 1: the tailbone. It was important to me because what he
Speaker 1: was getting at is Maria doesn't have a cossacks like
Speaker 1: the rest of us does, and what she has is
Speaker 1: what I believe a eurostyle, meaning it looks like a
Speaker 1: long fused piece of vertebra, but it's where an amphibian
Speaker 1: tail was resorbed, and you can see further evidence of
Speaker 1: that if you were to look and everyone should be
Speaker 1: able to have Maria by the way, you can have
Speaker 1: your own access. You can be in the di coms
Speaker 1: of Maria and waita yourselves and looked up her button,
Speaker 1: see if you see sort of a trapeze olid licking
Speaker 1: bone where that could represent a eurostyle. And another point
Speaker 1: that was brought up is that she doesn't have a navel.
Speaker 1: So if she doesn't have a navel, and if she
Speaker 1: has this evidence of possibly having a tail, then as
Speaker 1: absurd as it sounds, Maria could be a form of
Speaker 1: a mermaid thanks to amphibian metamorphosis, which is of course
Speaker 1: my other theory is that these beings have the amphibian
Speaker 1: larvae in their bodies as we speak. And I suggest
Speaker 1: that the metal implants and the dietamaceous earth combined with
Speaker 1: the cadium chloride is all part of a larva management system,
Speaker 1: because what I noticed when I go into the bones,
Speaker 1: and again if you want to look at some of
Speaker 1: that today, the larva appear to have bored their way
Speaker 1: into pretty much all all regions of the body into
Speaker 1: the skull, into ferculas, into fingers and toes, and so
Speaker 1: I suggest that dietamacious earth wasn't just to preserve the bodies.
Speaker 1: That dietamacious earth first of all, would probably suffocate a
Speaker 1: cutaneous breather. And now you combine this with something as
Speaker 1: toxic toxic as a ascademy and chloride. What is that way?
Speaker 4: So are you saying that likely at the moment of
Speaker 4: death the thing started to.
Speaker 1: Breed and transform. I think they were well aware of
Speaker 1: this phenomenon. It might be a result a sort of
Speaker 1: toxic result of the hybridization, because those little bodies are
Speaker 1: still three to five percent primate or or human for
Speaker 1: that matter. And the eggs, in my opinion, this again,
Speaker 1: this is one of these finer details that you don't
Speaker 1: hear people talk about. So in my opinion, hypothesis so
Speaker 1: far is it looks like the eggs are outside of
Speaker 1: this central canal that connects to the kloaca. Probably should
Speaker 1: deserve a further look on even myself, but I like
Speaker 1: to put these things out there. The eggs are on
Speaker 1: the outside of the kloaca. That's odd and that's a problem.
Speaker 1: So again in amphibians, there's normal processes like ovo viviparity,
Speaker 1: where the young are born within some fully developed Also,
Speaker 1: amphibians have things like gastric brooding so that they're in
Speaker 1: the belly or mouth brooding, and maybe even the father
Speaker 1: might carry the young in his mouth. So all of
Speaker 1: these other things are definite possibilities. But I do believe
Speaker 1: that they were quite well aware of this. And a
Speaker 1: specimen like Alberto so another detail that no one ever
Speaker 1: talks about, so they've got so many cool traits. Are
Speaker 1: these octic capsules, these otic ear capsules. They have encased
Speaker 1: ear capsules within their skull. For a specimen that would
Speaker 1: go underwater, I suggest it's something between a frog and
Speaker 1: a cetacean, looking like very almost whale like. Well, Albertos
Speaker 1: appears to be. I don't even think he has a
Speaker 1: right one for some reason. That's something I realized recently,
Speaker 1: But its left one appears to have been removed from
Speaker 1: the interior and moved up to the top of his skull,
Speaker 1: where now you can see some of the auditory canals
Speaker 1: on the side of his head. So I suggest they
Speaker 1: were well aware of these things, and that's what all
Speaker 1: these implants are for these implants are either extraction zones,
Speaker 1: perhaps constant extraction zones over and over again. I don't know.
Speaker 1: So the body's almost acting like more like you know,
Speaker 1: hives or broods. Yeah, there's that Sebastian with his I plant.
Speaker 1: One guy said he saw writing. Look, I've been looking
Speaker 1: at a lot of writing. First of all, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: alien writing. You know what's going to look like. It's
Speaker 1: going to look like writing because these are like the
Speaker 1: tutelary beings I think of planet error. So there should
Speaker 1: be some logic to it. There should be some some symbols,
Speaker 1: and I see a lot of symbols out there today
Speaker 1: that they seem nonsensical and non repeating. It's just not
Speaker 1: they don't look like this. This is even worse though.
Speaker 1: The plant on Sebastian, it's doesn't even look like writing.
Speaker 1: But if you look on the interior of the implant,
Speaker 1: it looks like boring holes that you might find like
Speaker 1: a termite might do in the wood. But I suggest
Speaker 1: it's from those larval beings within.
Speaker 3: Yes, question, I've got a question. So have you considered
Speaker 3: that they might have being been farmed for some sort
Speaker 3: of product that they am.
Speaker 1: Considering this at this point, I'm considering at this point,
Speaker 1: are these just hosts? Wasn't an honor thing to do
Speaker 1: to be a host? You know? Are are these the
Speaker 1: gods that were probably carried from all the way from
Speaker 1: China down through Southeast Asia across the Pacific to the
Speaker 1: south to the Americas. Is that what happened? Were these
Speaker 1: these ancestral beings as as you might carry us something
Speaker 1: on a litter It might see even in a Catholic
Speaker 1: procession today as a as a modern analogy, because again
Speaker 1: it seems as though they were well aware of the larva.
Speaker 1: You know, Alberto also has a hip implant. Well, I
Speaker 1: was in his hip just the other day with the scans,
Speaker 1: and there's another image of a larva eating part of it.
Speaker 1: You know, I've found larva's in the ferculus the wishbones,
Speaker 1: and these wishbones when you look at them, are are fractured.
Speaker 1: That's the other thing that you don't hear people talking
Speaker 1: about is if you zoom in there is the bones
Speaker 1: are actually compromised. But I suggest the compromised by boring
Speaker 1: uh Amphibian larvae. And they're able to bore because they
Speaker 1: have these rostrum like beaks and possibly some some proto canines,
Speaker 1: if you will.
Speaker 4: I wanted to ask you mentioned that they may have
Speaker 4: been from China, and maybe for the people that haven't
Speaker 4: listened before, you mentioned previously that they did DNA measure.
Speaker 4: They that they looked at the DNA of these beings
Speaker 4: and found there to be Han Chinese?
Speaker 1: Do you yeah? And mayamar? And that's what I was
Speaker 1: willing to ask.
Speaker 4: What you what you might hypothesize off of that, is
Speaker 4: that you think what that they're from there and were hybrids,
Speaker 4: or that they were somehow made there?
Speaker 1: What what do you? What are you apotheesiz?
Speaker 4: Yeah, I know you can't say for certain, so I'm
Speaker 4: just I'm just saying.
Speaker 1: No, I've got a good answer for you. But what
Speaker 1: was the last question, last part of your statement?
Speaker 4: No, that was that was it? I just want to
Speaker 4: know what you think about where they're from and.
Speaker 1: How they So going back, going back to putting all
Speaker 1: those petroglyphs together and realizing that it's not just about
Speaker 1: a mother goddess. Really the full title, I would say,
Speaker 1: is ultimately at the beginning of human cosmology. It starts
Speaker 1: with a water serpent mother goddess cult. If you will
Speaker 1: and not. You know, cult and anthropology just means a
Speaker 1: religion based on well, actually, she wouldn't be a cult,
Speaker 1: she would be the religion. Any other religion that came
Speaker 1: after her would be considered a cult. So I suggest
Speaker 1: a mother Goddess serpent cult stems from the Himalayan plateau
Speaker 1: and what used to be Megalake Gobi before Gobi Desert.
Speaker 1: And I suggest from this point, and traditional academics don't
Speaker 1: like this term, I suggest a hyperd diffusion occurred spreading
Speaker 1: from this Himalayan Megalake Gobi and corresponding with a modern
Speaker 1: day out of Asia theory. You gotta have Africa, you
Speaker 1: gotta have Asia. The apes are coming from northwest Africa.
Speaker 1: And I don't know if I've talked about the orangutangs
Speaker 1: last time. It's very interesting that orangutangs have a very
Speaker 1: complex genetic background and that they're so far away from
Speaker 1: the other apes in Southeast Asia. I suggest that the
Speaker 1: orangutangs might be some form of a seed bank if
Speaker 1: things go south. These creatures are bred to be individuals,
Speaker 1: so there's not going to be destroyed by rampant disease,
Speaker 1: and they'll be harder to hunt of course, we are
Speaker 1: doing a terrible job at the palm oil over there,
Speaker 1: aren't we. So anyway, I think I got a little
Speaker 1: far off. So, yeah, you said a serpent mother, as
Speaker 1: I'm saying, a serpent mother goddess is at the heart
Speaker 1: of this. I mean, my research suggests that maybe even
Speaker 1: this region is the home of even biblical myths, if
Speaker 1: that was Megalake Gobi. Look at all the exit points
Speaker 1: that leave the desert. Great swaths of sediment left that region. Now,
Speaker 1: if you cross map that with language orhimats, that is homelands.
Speaker 1: I prefer maybe they're not even homelands, but they're actually
Speaker 1: they're ending points, they're destinations. If you look at the
Speaker 1: languages of the world, and you imagine a great flood
Speaker 1: dispersing twelve tribes or twelve cities as they say in
Speaker 1: some folk tales of the Gobi desert and spread them
Speaker 1: out through the world, we could bring them back and
Speaker 1: radiate them to this one area. And I did a
Speaker 1: little bit of AI with the language dispersing, and it
Speaker 1: looked like language was moving a mile a year, which
Speaker 1: was interesting, And with Oceania it was moving two miles
Speaker 1: a year, which sort of explains the boats and then
Speaker 1: Native American languages coincidentally also looked like two miles a year.
Speaker 1: So people are saying they crossed across the land bridge.
Speaker 1: They didn't need no bridge. Their language is removing fast
Speaker 1: on the water. So yeah, I means that mega like
Speaker 1: Gobi could be could be your myth point for the
Speaker 1: Tower of Babbel, for Noah's arc, for the Great flood.
Speaker 1: Why everyone always says like, oh, why are these cultures
Speaker 1: have this these flood myths? And then again academia will
Speaker 1: say coincidence. But I can't. I can't deal with coincidences anymore.
Speaker 1: That's how anthropology works for me. I don't go with coincidences, right.
Speaker 1: There has to be an origin point. That's one of
Speaker 1: the reasons I got into this. There's always a reason
Speaker 1: for everything we do in humanity. Everything well reason happens
Speaker 1: to be the trendactoles.
Speaker 3: There is the other possibility that this toad, this weird
Speaker 3: thing that happens in some toads is they produce five
Speaker 3: me o d m T from their backs, and if
Speaker 3: they are being used as cult objects and they are
Speaker 3: being toured around, it kind of makes sense if they
Speaker 3: produced something similar to maybe this amphibian toxic.
Speaker 1: I have something for you, so as not DMT. As
Speaker 1: I say the tridactyls are the impetus for our cosmology,
Speaker 1: I say, the biology of the tritactyls well the cosmology.
Speaker 1: Or we'll use the word mythology. Mythology predicts the biology
Speaker 1: of the tritactyls, because the tritactyls biology is dependent on
Speaker 1: the mythology. And I use the example of the third eye.
Speaker 1: Or another parallel myth is the Nagamandi, which is a
Speaker 1: nagamani is a serpent stone said to reside in cobras.
Speaker 1: So when I see these myths in the third eye,
Speaker 1: I said to myself, because I believe these beings are
Speaker 1: the tutelary beings and the impetus for most beliefs, I said,
Speaker 1: I'll bet you these guys have a third eye. And
Speaker 1: I even made a prediction. I'll bet you that third
Speaker 1: eye is going to be here. That's a new region.
Speaker 1: I called the Kappa, after a Japanese yokai mythological creature
Speaker 1: that collects water in its head, but looking at a
Speaker 1: scan from underneath, it looks very much like a human fontanelle,
Speaker 1: which is very strange. So it could be a soft spot. Well,
Speaker 1: sure enough, I got the scans of Alberto and I looked.
Speaker 1: Actually it wasn't even I didn't get the scans. These
Speaker 1: were on the Alien Dashproject dot com. Anybody can go
Speaker 1: there right now. There's so many specimens you can interact
Speaker 1: with the three d These guys are the original original researchers.
Speaker 1: And you can also go to tritactyles dot org and
Speaker 1: they have Maria and Jawita available and you can apply
Speaker 1: for the other ones. And you can go to my
Speaker 1: site tritactyles dot com if you want to read my
Speaker 1: cultural assertions. And I wrote a fifty page paper on
Speaker 1: their physical traits. I wanted to make sure that we
Speaker 1: went through each part of this anomalist. That was the
Speaker 1: one good thing about skeptics. You know, skeptics would be like,
Speaker 1: what's with the limbs? Those those joints would never work. Well,
Speaker 1: it looks like they're probably hinge joints. Yeah, like I Amphibian.
Speaker 1: So it's just their different setups.
Speaker 3: The entire mythology of the Kapa almost mirrors what you
Speaker 3: would be saying about these beings to begin with. So
Speaker 3: it says a yoka is called the Kappa, famous Japanese
Speaker 3: water spirit known for a dish like depression on its
Speaker 3: head that holds water, which is the source of its power.
Speaker 3: So as you're talking about the third eye again, that
Speaker 3: would be the source of its power. The Kappa is
Speaker 3: weakened when you bow respectfully to him, because.
Speaker 1: Then he bows back right water.
Speaker 3: There is that that aspect. Now, what if this water
Speaker 3: is some sort of you know, powerful thing. What if
Speaker 3: that's the thing that you know as this experience. That's
Speaker 3: why it's like the head depression. That's why it's.
Speaker 1: Well in actuality. Though, in that very depression is where
Speaker 1: I spotted a parietal penial comp legs, so not only
Speaker 1: a penial gland, but a parietal eye that you might
Speaker 1: find something like in a to aitara, which is a
Speaker 1: it's not a lizard, but a type of reptile that
Speaker 1: it's like a lizard. But another parallel is in lamprey.
Speaker 1: Lamprey have this parietal penial complex So technically it's not
Speaker 1: even just a third eye, it's a third and fourth
Speaker 1: eye because they're both likely photoreceptors. What I did was
Speaker 1: I set a scan to the expert in parietal penial
Speaker 1: complexes who discovered one in a fifty million year old
Speaker 1: monitor lizard. And I didn't tell him what he was seeing.
Speaker 1: I just sent him this pictures and he said, oh, well,
Speaker 1: that that creature looks like a primate or a mammal
Speaker 1: with its binocular forward facing view. Why does it have
Speaker 1: a dual gland complex at the top of its skull?
Speaker 1: And I was like, thank you very much. You've been
Speaker 1: very helpful. So that's another little trait that people don't
Speaker 1: talk about. Now that, of course, all that needs to
Speaker 1: be verified by others. This is just my own supposition.
Speaker 1: But again I did have it, you know, vaguely peer
Speaker 1: reviewed if you will. I had it. I had a
Speaker 1: peer I had it. Trust me bro reviewed, trust me.
Speaker 4: Another. I wonder if you've looked into this correspondence of mythos.
Speaker 4: The Hope tradition says that they're you're familiar.
Speaker 1: They they talk.
Speaker 4: About they were living in the Third World and it
Speaker 4: was destroyed and the ant people their their companion actually
Speaker 4: guides them to the underground cavern and saves them from
Speaker 4: the flood and enables their food to grow, and teaches
Speaker 4: them and and then brings them back to the earth
Speaker 4: and there it's like the exact kind of teacher saved,
Speaker 4: or it's all related.
Speaker 1: It's all the same one event, one event happened, or
Speaker 1: one uh you know, continuous group of actions occurred. Right.
Speaker 1: So we've always looked at these stories and sort of
Speaker 1: we've passed them off. I have, I've ignored them as
Speaker 1: you know, fairy tales essentially, right, tall tales, et cetera,
Speaker 1: et cetera. Now they have to we we have to
Speaker 1: reevaluate all of this, and clearly this is something that's
Speaker 1: part of a you know, it's no longer about coincidence.
Speaker 1: It's it's not independent innovation where each culture makes up
Speaker 1: their own myths. It's clearly hyper diffusion of certain beliefs
Speaker 1: over and over again. And we have to stop pretending
Speaker 1: that it isn't.
Speaker 4: I wonder to that point if there are if there
Speaker 4: are any other specifically South American groups that might use
Speaker 4: the term ant people or well.
Speaker 1: There are, yeah, yeah, there is. Uh, there's this one
Speaker 1: video go is around where they show a couple of
Speaker 1: tribes met a picture of an alien and the tribe'smen say,
Speaker 1: that's at people. And also, if you notice, I think
Speaker 1: it's the hope. The ant people name is very similar
Speaker 1: to like Anu naki it is, I forget what it is.
Speaker 1: And when you combine the Iknu with their kami, it's
Speaker 1: anew kami. And also even that Naki has a what
Speaker 1: I call the Naga phoneyme in it the oung sound
Speaker 1: and key many times is a goddess sound. So there's
Speaker 1: a goddess morphine. So there's a lot, there's a lot
Speaker 1: to be said even just in you know, I suggest
Speaker 1: if you're looking for a lot of civilization, try looking
Speaker 1: into these morphines. I speak of the ung sound, which
Speaker 1: I say is related to the Naga and may have
Speaker 1: translated west into various lakes as aang and then that
Speaker 1: may have ended up to the Proto Europeans as angila
Speaker 1: as and eels and possibly even angels. So there's clues
Speaker 1: even in just tiny bits of sound. Did you say
Speaker 1: kabbala earlier?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: Another byproduct of this was literally rediscovering a lost, forgotten
Speaker 1: god named Ka. Yeah. I read the Nila Mata Purana
Speaker 1: every week. It's a sort of it's a sort of
Speaker 1: a Mahabata sort of peripheral book takes place in the
Speaker 1: Kashmiri region. It's some of the origins of the Naga people,
Speaker 1: and I just I just did a.
Speaker 4: Quick AI search, so I've been questioning their their truthfulness
Speaker 4: really recently.
Speaker 1: But the ants people, it says, are the Anu synem okay,
Speaker 1: so the Hanu is right there there you go. So
Speaker 1: yeah again even and it's even the I knew with
Speaker 1: the Joe Man culture, so lines having ant on the
Speaker 1: yeah an answer, Yeah, it could be an answer a
Speaker 1: spider or something that's true. Yeah, I do call it
Speaker 1: an ant, don't they They call it an ant or
Speaker 1: some people call it a spider. I don't know. I
Speaker 1: think maybe right is an ant. Yeah, So I mean,
Speaker 1: if you really want to see the ant people too,
Speaker 1: I think like the smaller even less primate maybe zero percent.
Speaker 1: Like there's the species, the the ones Newcari and Souye,
Speaker 1: which are very be steal looking. There is nothing absolutely,
Speaker 1: I don't think there's any primate in them, so that
Speaker 1: they would they would very much be ant people. I think,
Speaker 1: even though they're really their teeth look like Lamprey's. Let's
Speaker 1: face it.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: The Alien Project also called them reptilians. I say they're
Speaker 1: more amphibians. They use the termine sectoids, but they only
Speaker 1: have four limbs. So I do think there are some
Speaker 1: invertebrate parallels there. This whole center axial duck that these
Speaker 1: little ones have might be more related to a worm,
Speaker 1: which again worm is another term for people even use
Speaker 1: for dragons. You know what you talked about the Asian
Speaker 1: cultures before. Yeah, so the DNA was Han and Meamar
Speaker 1: and you know some of these clants are not literally
Speaker 1: a place called Nagaland, and these tribes will tattoo what
Speaker 1: looks like the temporal bones and the super orbital arches
Speaker 1: of the tritactyls on their face, as well as a
Speaker 1: hashtag pattern of their skin. When you look at a
Speaker 1: close up of their skin, it matches hashtags that we
Speaker 1: use every day, or a rhomboid pattern, a pattern that
Speaker 1: I saw in ceramics that I had a feeling represented reptiles,
Speaker 1: and then when I finally saw close up of the skin,
Speaker 1: it was hashtags and rhomboid patterns. Again, details that people
Speaker 1: are missing. You know, there's a theory that Maria may
Speaker 1: have had tape on her face because they see a
Speaker 1: pattern of cross hatching, and you know, they think I'm backtracking,
Speaker 1: but I already had the theory out. I already have
Speaker 1: pictures of the rhomboid and crosshatching, and I was like, well,
Speaker 1: that might be that's just the skin and they know
Speaker 1: that's not true or whatever. You're making up stuff like well,
Speaker 1: I already posted about that like last year.
Speaker 5: So anyway, was it that you were talking about earlier?
Speaker 5: What's that you think You're trying to think of a
Speaker 5: name of the pre hoping name pre hoping people.
Speaker 1: Was it Ana Sauzi?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: No, I mean I was going to bring up the
Speaker 1: Ka China. There's that Ka, that Ka morphine, the Ka bala.
Speaker 1: So you know, I've kind of come up with my
Speaker 1: own sort of folkloric proto language. I'm trying to decipher
Speaker 1: what some of this means. And Ka appears to be
Speaker 1: a name for a alpha male god, likely the son
Speaker 1: of the goddess. And in one of the early Sanskrit
Speaker 1: scripts Sanskrit scripts is a very serpentine letter for their
Speaker 1: primary alpha letter, and it's Ka. And then when I
Speaker 1: read the Nila Matzapurana, there is a series of sentences
Speaker 1: that said, Brahma is the Presa pazzi, the creator, Kubera
Speaker 1: is the preja patti of the creator, and Ka is
Speaker 1: the creator. And when I saw that. I was like, Okay,
Speaker 1: my suspicions are right. I had a feeling that this
Speaker 1: alphabet alpha, I have a film that even in our
Speaker 1: alphabet and other letters, what we're seeing is depictions of
Speaker 1: these beings. I mean, the earliest Chinese script for God
Speaker 1: sky ten looks like a tiny being with anomalous limbs
Speaker 1: and a big head. Why would a little dwarf like
Speaker 1: being be used to represent God in the sky?
Speaker 3: God's my judge here says, I don't know if you
Speaker 3: touched on it, but the Egyptian temple had a green
Speaker 3: amphibious God and has a water pool. They don't know
Speaker 3: how deep it refills itself to a certain level a mystery.
Speaker 3: This goes back to the ogdd kech the frog gun. Right,
Speaker 3: So we had all gods as the original out part
Speaker 3: of life from the water. Yeah, and uh, Tridactyls were
Speaker 3: all over Egypt.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, I mean if you look at my temple
Speaker 1: hathor where it looks like steganography was used to conceal
Speaker 1: hyper realistic faces of tridactyls in the pillars that tourists
Speaker 1: see every day by the thousands. Let me know if
Speaker 1: you guys want to start looking at some stuff too.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, pull it up please please? Yeah, yeah, you
Speaker 2: know there was something earlier you said. Uh, it just
Speaker 2: another random thing. I just wanted to throw out that
Speaker 2: because it popped into my head. I mentioned earlier about
Speaker 2: amphibians and reptiles and like smelling like ammonia. I have
Speaker 2: heard of abductees mentioning abductees have said that they've smelled.
Speaker 1: Exactly. So anyway, what we have here is Joseph Fina
Speaker 1: just in the background. I don't know if there's anything
Speaker 1: particular you would want to look at Josephina, or if
Speaker 1: you would like me to pull up some cultural stuff.
Speaker 1: Oh whatever, you think anything, Well, we got this here,
Speaker 1: so we can take a look at it.
Speaker 4: One question I wanted maybe you could answer by looking
Speaker 4: at this, I wanted to ask. I think you kind
Speaker 4: of answered this already. But the breastplate, you're you're theorizing
Speaker 4: that it controlled the breeding process, which might have overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: The breastplate could very well have been pre preemptive. Because
Speaker 1: as these are, and we're going to pull up a
Speaker 1: better image for you guys, as these beings are forlimb
Speaker 1: first developers, so they're they're interesting in that they have
Speaker 1: a tail that they retain and lose, making them like frogs.
Speaker 1: But they also have forlimb first development like a ax
Speaker 1: a lottel a, you know, a salamander.
Speaker 4: Oh, you guys don't want to So you're seeing these
Speaker 4: different phases of development in multiple beings in one body.
Speaker 1: Yes weird, Yes, weird. I mean it's not that weird
Speaker 1: to me, only because I did predict it. There's even
Speaker 1: a video of me doing a lecture where I sit.
Speaker 1: I think I'm gonna find these in the mouth and
Speaker 1: the skull as well, based on the mythos myths like
Speaker 1: the mind born motif or life from the mouth or
Speaker 1: born from the mouth, or born from the serpent's mouth.
Speaker 1: These motifs we've seen before. So yeah, the so yeah,
Speaker 1: the implants. I've also considered the implants, like for magnetic breasts,
Speaker 1: you know, did they have to feed these? But this
Speaker 1: implant here may these may have came after Artemis. Artemis
Speaker 1: has implants all down the middle, which is where I
Speaker 1: first started to suggest. Oh ovi viviparody is a problem.
Speaker 1: The larva being born from the eggs and then they
Speaker 1: are getting stuck into these stomach ribs, right because these
Speaker 1: guys have not just this ribs on the side the
Speaker 1: left and the right like we do. They have the
Speaker 1: gastralia stomach ribs of like a crocodile, and that would
Speaker 1: help probably help support the body of cutaneous breathing. By
Speaker 1: the way, those arms are longer than the legs, probably
Speaker 1: resulting in a beginning. And it also means they could
Speaker 1: probably be pretty active on four legs. So can we
Speaker 1: see any every one of them? I'm sorry, no, no.
Speaker 1: So what I'm saying is it's not just I say,
Speaker 1: overall management, right, So it might not all of them
Speaker 1: been entrance ways. For example, Alberto has a hip in plant.
Speaker 1: So what it looks like is as they're they're allowing
Speaker 1: the they're allowing these beings to do certain damage. Maybe
Speaker 1: the damage was done cross ocean or something. Maybe it
Speaker 1: was something in that regards. Maybe they just didn't have
Speaker 1: access suit to a sin lean pool and some of
Speaker 1: this happened while they were alive. Maybe more of it
Speaker 1: happened afterwards, and then as we suggested, it just became
Speaker 1: sort of hives or broods. Let's see if we can
Speaker 1: get in closer to this implant.
Speaker 3: And this now you said this is Artemis.
Speaker 1: Correct, No, this is Josephina Artemis has implants all down
Speaker 1: her front. Sebastian is one of my biggest proponents for
Speaker 1: this larva management because while some people suggest there is
Speaker 1: writing on the implant on his neck, if you look
Speaker 1: on the inside, it looks like the boring you would
Speaker 1: see from like a termite or some sort of insect.
Speaker 1: And I've found plenty of larva just on the other
Speaker 1: side of his implant. So between that and seeing larva
Speaker 1: boring through bone near Alberta's implant, plus they're in the skulls.
Speaker 1: So let's see if we can even see one right now,
Speaker 1: we'll probably have to switch to a differferent setting. Let's
Speaker 1: try soft tissue setting where the bones are gonna anything
Speaker 1: high density will be more reflective, and we can try
Speaker 1: just to even of course, we're gonna have to remove
Speaker 1: a layer two here, so let's go in. Let's go
Speaker 1: in from the top, all right, We're going down to
Speaker 1: the fercula, and already you can see there's this there's
Speaker 1: a contrast. There is the high density white bone, and
Speaker 1: we start to see anomalous soft tissue gray shapes, which
Speaker 1: depending on well, if we get lucky. Depending on it,
Speaker 1: we could come up with something that looks hyper realistic
Speaker 1: to a blurry what is that? It's it's a little
Speaker 1: it's a little bit of a game here because I'm
Speaker 1: cutting through layers and I'm playing with the density to
Speaker 1: try to gleam the best images of what could be
Speaker 1: soft tissue. Like even in that bone up there. What's
Speaker 1: gonna happen too, The size is going to vary depending
Speaker 1: on how close the bone is and the larva is
Speaker 1: to when the scanning camera went by. So right here,
Speaker 1: for all I know, this very well could be a
Speaker 1: close up of a larva. I wouldn't bet my life
Speaker 1: on it at this stage because I try it to
Speaker 1: point out things if I'm not sure. But any of
Speaker 1: these gray soft shapes, here's a good one right there,
Speaker 1: right underneath the dot. Look at that. So the what
Speaker 1: I can see first is is the two black eyes.
Speaker 1: And if what we can do is, if we don't
Speaker 1: trust ourselves, we could even try to find this in
Speaker 1: you know, maybe another scan and try to find where
Speaker 1: that last one was that I just dropped. That was
Speaker 1: near the fercula, right, So the furcula is the wishbone
Speaker 1: that some say is a fused clavical Okay, I just
Speaker 1: I like the term friculate because it gives it one
Speaker 1: Latin term. But we're still plenty of soft tissue. You
Speaker 1: can there's plenty of to be seen. I suggest everyone
Speaker 1: gets a copy of the Maria one so they can
Speaker 1: find it herself. See now I can't find this guy anyway,
Speaker 1: Let's just keep looking then again gray soft tissue. And
Speaker 1: I so, now what I can do is let me
Speaker 1: put full screen so you can see what's behind my
Speaker 1: body here and we can see if we come up
Speaker 1: with anything. Sciencey, Okay, So what we can do is
Speaker 1: we can hover our mouse over various parts like the
Speaker 1: otic ear capsule, and then I can read as to
Speaker 1: what the intensity number is. And this is bone and
Speaker 1: it's coming up twenty three hundred. But now I see
Speaker 1: here there appears to be two black coming out of
Speaker 1: the ear and some other gray mass. I can try
Speaker 1: to play with the intensity to see if we can
Speaker 1: even can we pull this out even more? We might
Speaker 1: be able to do better. You play with the lighting
Speaker 1: and you see other things come out over here. But
Speaker 1: we're focused on this year. Let's keep with that. And
Speaker 1: now if those are really eyes or they should come
Speaker 1: up something equal to air negative two sixty five. That's good.
Speaker 1: And now let's see if I move over here where
Speaker 1: the possible rostam or beak is, I'm getting an intensity
Speaker 1: of three hundred and eighty eight, but not as high
Speaker 1: as the bone. And then if I move over to
Speaker 1: the soft tissue, it's saying one nine. So there you go.
Speaker 1: There's a little bit of simple science for you, just
Speaker 1: real easy science. So I can verify the intensity of
Speaker 1: these all these different things bone, rostrom, beak, soft tissue,
Speaker 1: and eyes. So that's a little bit of science for
Speaker 1: you guys.
Speaker 3: Wow, well I wanted to I brought up or not Diana,
Speaker 3: but Artemis, because I think what you're basing that naming
Speaker 3: off of is Artemis of Ephesis, which had crawling with
Speaker 3: these sort of lumpy protuberance is they call them bull testicles,
Speaker 3: and this is the Artemis of Ephesis or Diana of
Speaker 3: Ephesus in Turkey, right right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I know what you're talking about now, yes, mm hmm, Artemis. Interesting. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Artemis might represent an older, older model. I don't know
Speaker 1: if the flat faced ones are more are are newer
Speaker 1: or younger than the other ones, but just he has
Speaker 1: so many implants. I wonder if they got better at
Speaker 1: dealing with them and maybe even were precautionary. But a
Speaker 1: lot of this probably did happen after they died. I
Speaker 1: think all this massive amounts of damage. But again, the
Speaker 1: I think even our myths of Medusa and whatnot are
Speaker 1: alluding to work. Because we're in the skull right here,
Speaker 1: and I'm looking in the skull and I'm we're looking
Speaker 1: at again, there's soft tissue serpentine shapes within the tiny bone.
Speaker 1: So someone asked, you know, well, ed, how could you
Speaker 1: possibly be seeing these if the other researchers aren't well?
Speaker 1: For one, because I knew to look for them, and
Speaker 1: two I knew they would be small and we would
Speaker 1: have to use this soft tissue setting. So again, all
Speaker 1: these gray blobs with these little black dots, I contend,
Speaker 1: are these are mostly larva than not. Let's go to
Speaker 1: the body. Let's go to a different view of the body.
Speaker 2: Oh, we can't see any of it, just in case,
Speaker 2: I let you know.
Speaker 1: Oh, thanks, I've been talking to There we go. So
Speaker 1: we're in the torso here I see some of the
Speaker 1: We're already past some of the ribs, but I'm also
Speaker 1: already seeing soft tissue shapes. And by the way, these
Speaker 1: are like half a millimeter slices. So that's the other
Speaker 1: reason why I'm able to see these a lot of
Speaker 1: the other researchers. It's funny too, because there are researchers
Speaker 1: posting their pictures and scans and every now and then,
Speaker 1: if you zoom in, you can see shape. So once
Speaker 1: again here this clues me in the shape itself. Remember
Speaker 1: our old cortiform heart shaped faces. It still applies here.
Speaker 1: And the white reflections many times are again those rostrum beaks.
Speaker 1: I left a dot there. I don't want to.
Speaker 4: Excuse my ignorance, but I've been some of the my
Speaker 4: ignorant perspective, I felt like some of it was nonsymmetrical.
Speaker 1: Is that what maybe queued you into this? Or is that?
Speaker 4: Is there something going on with the It seems seems
Speaker 4: like the sides weren't symmetrical.
Speaker 1: Oh on the beings, yeah, on the full sized beings
Speaker 1: are not symmetrical. Yah. Again, it's just what my Oh
Speaker 1: well here's a good one. Yeah, well address that. But
Speaker 1: like this right here, this is like, I mean, this
Speaker 1: is practically hyper realistic, and I don't even know if
Speaker 1: I've seen this one before, so I'm gonna screenshot that.
Speaker 1: You know, this is basically like a little frog person
Speaker 1: is coming out of the skull. I don't know how
Speaker 1: else to describe this to you. So that is the Again,
Speaker 1: there's the void eyes once again, the reflective beak, and
Speaker 1: it looks like we're even getting at least a unitcarpal.
Speaker 1: Most of the time they're caught engaged in predation, so
Speaker 1: there's usually a confusion because they're they're dining on e
Speaker 1: either another decayed member or an actual younger juvenile. Again
Speaker 1: another one. You hear we have an eye and an eyelid,
Speaker 1: and again we're on the soft tissue setting. We're in
Speaker 1: a well, we're in the body now, aren't we?
Speaker 4: Where are we or in the body each other in
Speaker 4: that phase?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, they're different ages. So there's larger ones that
Speaker 1: you might call a water cat or an underwater panther
Speaker 1: based on archaeology depictions, and they'll predate on lancets. Smaller versions.
Speaker 1: I've identified tiny newborn larvae that look like they're pink
Speaker 1: in color, which is kind of creepy because is that
Speaker 1: like a mammal trade. I guess there's some amphibians in.
Speaker 1: Then they grow into larger white lancets. Then they become
Speaker 1: they start to become a darker color and start to
Speaker 1: grow the fore limbs. This is actually this is a
Speaker 1: lot here, guys, we got we did get lucky today.
Speaker 1: This is in the torso. I know it looks like
Speaker 1: a massive crap, but if you zoom in and we
Speaker 1: go through each tiny scan, you sometimes get lucky and
Speaker 1: there's even more of a reveal. But this is what's
Speaker 1: gonna really change the whole topic. Is once a if
Speaker 1: I had a d R in front of my name,
Speaker 1: we probably wouldn't even be talking about this anymore. We'd
Speaker 1: be on. We'd be on. Uh, we wouldn't. We would
Speaker 1: just pass right over Rogan. We'd go right right to
Speaker 1: the evening news if there was a But you know,
Speaker 1: look at this here, Look at this, you guys, almost
Speaker 1: hyper realistic. This is a creature turning its head sideways. Also,
Speaker 1: many times the parietal eye and the penial gland, because
Speaker 1: of their calcification, are also reflective. So this is a
Speaker 1: head turned sideways. I know it's super blurry, but let's
Speaker 1: see how Let's see how big this is. Let's take
Speaker 1: out our ruler, just so you know what we're dealing with. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's under a centimeter and sometimes too. I realized I
Speaker 1: might even be able to put a Python script on
Speaker 1: this and we might be able to get more out
Speaker 1: of it. But that's all of this gray mass, double black. Guys,
Speaker 1: these are our little et beings. For lack of a
Speaker 1: better word, isn't this wild?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Man, I mean this one's great. This is like this
Speaker 1: thing's like coming at you is which that's his little
Speaker 1: foot right there again, let's I I'd love to try
Speaker 1: to find it elsewhere, right, let's put it. Let's put
Speaker 1: a mark in him, and can we find him even
Speaker 1: in the maybe in our three D model, that would
Speaker 1: be wild. They're down there. Let's see what we got, guys,
Speaker 1: We're gonna move some layers. We're getting into Joseph Josephine
Speaker 1: is the hollow type. So technically this is specimen number one,
Speaker 1: at least of the small ones. Here we are again,
Speaker 1: we are inside. We can see again more soft, great tissue.
Speaker 1: But yet there are some reflective points. And those reflective
Speaker 1: points could be either beaks or oh look at that
Speaker 1: in the limbs here. All right, So what are we
Speaker 1: I get so adhd because it's my opinion these the
Speaker 1: body is look at is full of them. So here's
Speaker 1: like two on top of each other again rostrom beak.
Speaker 1: You can even see they'll make out their little slit eyes.
Speaker 1: Let me show you while we're doing this, how is
Speaker 1: everybody out there? Let me? Uh, I'm gonna go ahead
Speaker 1: and pull up just my advert for today's show. I
Speaker 1: do my live stream at seven pm. But I just
Speaker 1: put like a whole bunch of my recent Larva finds
Speaker 1: and there we go. Let's go full screen for that,
Speaker 1: shall we? And so here's just a whole bunch of
Speaker 1: them from a variety of bodies.
Speaker 4: See any lights you can see the faces right?
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, can you ye?
Speaker 1: Little faces of little baby ets. This is what people
Speaker 1: say paradolia. That's why I try to overwhelm you with
Speaker 1: as many images as possible. Oh and you're asking this
Speaker 1: one here looks like a fore limb first one. I
Speaker 1: should probably pull up the fore limb first uh meme too,
Speaker 1: just so you can see that and see that. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, the ancients depicted these, that's the that's what
Speaker 1: that clue to be in sore out my journey, you
Speaker 1: would hear me say things like, that's what's fun about,
Speaker 1: you know the social media. The social media is just
Speaker 1: continuing with with you know, posting showing what I post.
Speaker 1: So some theory that comes out I can later prove it,
Speaker 1: which is pretty cool. Let's see here. I'm gonna go ahead,
Speaker 1: and what are we pulling up? We're gonna pull up
Speaker 1: just the memes showing you infomeme. I call them info memes.
Speaker 1: It's kind of how I started with, just trying to
Speaker 1: translate information from the researchers and just trying to do
Speaker 1: my due diligence like I would a teacher normally disseminating information. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let me tell you what I found. I can see
Speaker 1: I've posted here. We go awesome, Well, maybe we'll examine
Speaker 1: some other stuff. It's amazing how just my the Twitter
Speaker 1: is sometimes just as much of a great tool as
Speaker 1: anything else. So here's captures of forelimb first tritactyle metamorphosis.
Speaker 1: So it's they're past the serpentine stage. It looks like
Speaker 1: at least three out of four of them are engaged
Speaker 1: in sibling predation, so there is a smaller one, many
Speaker 1: times either gripped in their hands or or getting near
Speaker 1: their their mouths and just I believe with no Osca culture.
Speaker 1: So it just goes to show you the NASA we're
Speaker 1: well aware and maybe even well aware that at at
Speaker 1: a microscopic level, that you might be able to pick
Speaker 1: up their strange spinal cord. They have an armored spine,
Speaker 1: the armored zigzag spine. There's another motif for you, the
Speaker 1: zigzag motif. I can see within there. This was the
Speaker 1: hathor temple of Dendra, where I suggest the tritactyl faces
Speaker 1: are concealed a tegonography here perspective anamorphosis. So yeah, most
Speaker 1: of the time I do try to focus on the
Speaker 1: little bodies and the larva because I feel like it's
Speaker 1: that important and it relates to the other finds of
Speaker 1: the dietamacious earth and the implants. But at times, yeah,
Speaker 1: depending if I get lucky with the scans, like we're
Speaker 1: having a good day today. Actually I know a lot
Speaker 1: of it looks kind of blurry, but we're actually we're
Speaker 1: pretty fortunate today. I'm seeing a lot of really cool
Speaker 1: possibilities and we can move in look for our I
Speaker 1: don't know if we'll be able to find our specimen
Speaker 1: here or was it it's one of those numbers. We
Speaker 1: may have to change angles. And this is what I
Speaker 1: do a lot of times. I'm trying to find and look,
Speaker 1: we're doing good. We found some great images. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to find the best skeptic killer images. Because again this
Speaker 1: is not shared by the traditional researchers from Peru and Mexico.
Speaker 1: They do not they've put out specifically the message is
Speaker 1: saying that we don't agree or understand this. Oh boy,
Speaker 1: you know, it's fun. I think I was on Ricardo's
Speaker 1: podcast and the shamans. Look at this guy. Here you
Speaker 1: see him. This one's kind of cute. Let's see. There
Speaker 1: you go. They do this head torquing where that looks
Speaker 1: like they turn their head. Also a part of the predation,
Speaker 1: ironically is I think they're going for that Kappa region
Speaker 1: and they might be going for that sweet penial gland within. Also,
Speaker 1: in cephalopods, the otic not otk the optic the optic
Speaker 1: system plays a role in reproduction. So if these are
Speaker 1: parthenogenic being with a optic endo neuroendocrine reproductive system, that
Speaker 1: means they might be able to literally think creation into being. Well,
Speaker 1: do you guys see that? Do you see that? This
Speaker 1: is a turning its head again. There's our black dots,
Speaker 1: and what we can do. We can check our science.
Speaker 1: We're getting it looks like an eighty three one oh
Speaker 1: three for the beak. We're in the negatives for the
Speaker 1: black whole eye. That's good. Let's see is this flesh
Speaker 1: thirty six twenty eight one o six? So anyway, yeah, man,
Speaker 1: So I'm always looking because there's literally a chance that
Speaker 1: there's like just these hyper realistic, full on depictions of
Speaker 1: these tritacles juveniles. What do you think.
Speaker 2: That's crazy?
Speaker 3: Looks Yeah, we got from the chat God's my only jedge.
Speaker 3: She was talking about this place, the Assyrian and Abodos,
Speaker 3: So it's got a lot of the features that you
Speaker 3: were mentioning. The Assyrian and Abodus is a mysterious megalithic
Speaker 3: underground temple part of seti Ee's funerary complex, designed as
Speaker 3: a symbolic tomb for the god o Cyrus, featuring a
Speaker 3: massive massive granite blocks, water channels, and unique construction unlike
Speaker 3: any other Egyptian temples, baffling archaeologists with its ancient techniques,
Speaker 3: debated age, Some suggest old kingdom and enduring enigma. Right,
Speaker 3: so this is behind seti iss temple, connected by a
Speaker 3: subterranean passage. Design resembles a valley of the king's tomb,
Speaker 3: with central hall surrounded by water, creating an island effect
Speaker 3: simulating o Cyrus's birth. Construction built with immense, tightly fitting
Speaker 3: granite block some sixty tons, lacking mortar, suggesting advanced or
Speaker 3: different techniques than contemporary structures. Water, a unique deep water
Speaker 3: source fills the central canal, define removal and a hinting
Speaker 3: at its design. Intended design inscriptions contain religious texts, including
Speaker 3: the Book of Gates, but much remains unfinished or inaccessible.
Speaker 3: Symbolic tomb Cento cenotaph for seti I, linking him with Osiris,
Speaker 3: the god of the afterlife. Dating debate, of course. While
Speaker 3: connected to setii's thirteen century BC, it's megalithic style leads
Speaker 3: some to question if its core is much older. I
Speaker 3: think so. If it's an Osaria, come on engineering Marvel.
Speaker 3: It's precise stone work and design showcase incredible engineering and
Speaker 3: profound spiritual beliefs, making it a significant archaeological fire. So yeah,
Speaker 3: we can find these weird kind of you know, these are.
Speaker 1: Water's important to these beings are amphibians. Water is going
Speaker 1: to be important, well land if they want to breed
Speaker 1: with the previous generation of primates. Right, so yeah, you
Speaker 1: know a lot of these cultures say things like the
Speaker 1: men and Hune. You know, they build waterways overnight. So
Speaker 1: you know, again, just sitting here, just another just great image,
Speaker 1: almost hyper realistic eyes. Looks like there's another being here.
Speaker 1: Maybe they're both eating the same object. Those are pretty
Speaker 1: those are pretty good eyes, I have to say for
Speaker 1: a scan. I mean, you got again keep in mind
Speaker 1: this are very very small. So I'm having a good day,
Speaker 1: just so you know that these gray shapes are actually
Speaker 1: pretty good finds today. What else though, I feel like
Speaker 1: this and again this could be a mine head to
Speaker 1: here look at that. You know, you have to double check.
Speaker 4: Has there ever been at least in rumor even any
Speaker 4: other similar discovered mummified beings only in this one location.
Speaker 1: I think this is like the first three finger documentation, right,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but I mean there's the closest I
Speaker 1: would suggest are the Parocis skulls. And you know, there's
Speaker 1: not a lot of mythology on this sort of larva thing,
Speaker 1: but definitely in the Paracas culture in the South American cultures.
Speaker 1: You can see the serpentine shapes. You can see watercats
Speaker 1: as well. What I mean is you can see the
Speaker 1: four limb first development. You can see Dug Dan.
Speaker 3: D Doug Dan was commenting at the Quest for Ancient
Speaker 3: Civilizations that there was a head binding culture in Washington State,
Speaker 3: that there's been a ton of archaeological fraud to cover up.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I don't even know about that, So
Speaker 1: it sounds like the fraud was successful.
Speaker 3: Why are they binding their heads? What are they trying
Speaker 3: to be like?
Speaker 1: I think they're trying to be like Maria and Monsarrat,
Speaker 1: and Maria and Monsarrat, We're just honoring the ancestors that
Speaker 1: came before them. I think ultimately, you know, religion isn't
Speaker 1: about a worship of anything. Religion is remembrance of the ancestors.
Speaker 1: In fact, isn't that one of the etymological definitions of
Speaker 1: religion is remembering rebinding. You're rebinding, and so by saying
Speaker 1: it over and over again, you're remembering the ancestors, and
Speaker 1: you know, their homes, the ancestral subterranean homes may have
Speaker 1: become you know, later we would call them tombs. Oh,
Speaker 1: they were tombs. They might not have been tombs originally,
Speaker 1: they may have been homes at first that segued in tombes.
Speaker 1: What do you guys think of this image? You see
Speaker 1: this little cute head, the little band down it and
Speaker 1: the two eyes, a little arm hanging off looks like
Speaker 1: biting some other head. That's a pretty good one. Guys, regardless,
Speaker 1: you know, find me that I've already had, like radiologists
Speaker 1: say like, well, that's just muscle. Oh yeah, I had
Speaker 1: one dentist say no, that's just a nerve. Ending I'm like, well,
Speaker 1: why is it? Why am I finding it everywhere? That's
Speaker 1: same paradolia, So uh uh, yeah, there's there again. I've
Speaker 1: found these these It's consistent across forms. Even when the
Speaker 1: guys that other researchers post videos and images many times
Speaker 1: you can still see if you zoom in there is
Speaker 1: soft tissue, strange anomalous shapes, and at the very least
Speaker 1: they could tell us what they think it is. Right,
Speaker 1: let's see sometimes a little frog like these little images
Speaker 1: almost like frog like people, because that's what the tritactyls are. Essentially,
Speaker 1: they're amphibians. We can see it in their super orbital arches.
Speaker 1: There is Northwest Native American frog as husband myths where
Speaker 1: the princess goes underground and when she comes back she
Speaker 1: ends up vomiting out life, vomiting out worms. Yeah, worms
Speaker 1: and maggots. In the myths I found pretty much all
Speaker 1: the animal mythology in human history. It's never about the animal.
Speaker 1: It's always about how does the animal remind the ancestors
Speaker 1: of their ancestors. Let's see, I thought I had something cool.
Speaker 1: Maybe not, but yeah, each each click of the mouse
Speaker 1: honestly deserves inspections. So it's not like it's also easy
Speaker 1: just to do this. You have to zoom in, you
Speaker 1: have to go back and forth with your mouse, you
Speaker 1: have to change the intensity. You know, if any of
Speaker 1: you guys get the Maria thing, we should just have
Speaker 1: like a we should have Maria class. Oh look at
Speaker 1: this little guy here. It's little like Moby Dick figure here. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we should just have everybody do Maria at the same time.
Speaker 1: You know, everybody, Okay, class, open your Maria's cans and
Speaker 1: we can go through it together and see the various
Speaker 1: morphological traits. Because when you'll hear the talking heads and
Speaker 1: all the shows say they'll talk about the three fingers,
Speaker 1: they'll talk about the toes, they'll talk about the elongated head,
Speaker 1: because we know the parrakaskulls. It's interesting, but they seem
Speaker 1: to be woefully neglecting Josephina and her fercula, her crocodilian
Speaker 1: stomach ribs, her parietal penial gland in her head, even
Speaker 1: the fact that these are actually I consider these dual
Speaker 1: brain guys. Let's check that out. These are. It's something
Speaker 1: I don't always get a chance to talk about. But again,
Speaker 1: it's a growing topic. It's almost like a video game
Speaker 1: that you're not good at. You have to keep returning
Speaker 1: to the scans and keep looking and seeing what you find.
Speaker 1: I don't really like this. Let's go to X rays.
Speaker 1: There's different settings. Okay, so I used to seeing it
Speaker 1: more with Louisa. It looks like Josephinis has maybe some
Speaker 1: more brain left in her than Luisa. But there is
Speaker 1: actually a bony separation between the back part of the skull.
Speaker 1: So where we have like one occipital bump, these guys
Speaker 1: look like they have too. In fact, you can almost
Speaker 1: see that heart shape return because it's almost as though
Speaker 1: it's not just a brain that's separated it looks like
Speaker 1: that there's actually two distinct brain cavities, one here and
Speaker 1: one there, so that could be another interesting part of
Speaker 1: this tale. And again the ear capsules is something that
Speaker 1: again a lot of the researchers don't even mention. I don't.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure why. I guess maybe there are people
Speaker 1: who don't know what these are. You know, I've done
Speaker 1: my due diligence, and I've tried to examine every piece,
Speaker 1: and again these are like a frog like or whale
Speaker 1: like earbone. You can see again, there's usually usually try
Speaker 1: to act to larv around it. Yeah, do you know?
Speaker 4: And red cards to the dual brain this area. Are
Speaker 4: there any other animals on earth that have that trait?
Speaker 4: Frogs or salamanders or anything.
Speaker 1: Boy, you know, there isn't a lot that has that
Speaker 1: one actually, because I can't even it's funny you say that.
Speaker 1: Normally I do have a parallel animal to mention off
Speaker 1: the top of my head. I want to suggest there
Speaker 1: might be an insect. You know, I could do a
Speaker 1: quick cursory look just in my own in my own
Speaker 1: chat here, but I don't think that's very you know,
Speaker 1: you know, have I don't think that's common at all,
Speaker 1: So maybe that is an indicator of how old they are.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's the trait that indicates that this is they're
Speaker 1: a genesis taxon. They are the ancestral beings to all
Speaker 1: proto amphibians, basal tetrapods, perhaps some of the first to
Speaker 1: walk on land. So we'll see. I'm asking, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: I have my AI all loaded up with tritactyl documents.
Speaker 1: But that's funny you asked that, and off the top
Speaker 1: of my head, I don't have an answer, and I
Speaker 1: usually do, so.
Speaker 4: Well, yeah, you related so many other animals. Quality, Yeah,
Speaker 4: with the being potentially and now when I'm just okay,
Speaker 4: really seem like a rarity.
Speaker 1: Second major neural control center could be found in cephalopods
Speaker 1: and insects. Yeah, so they're saying that things like a
Speaker 1: ganglion acts as a primitive brain. So okay, there at
Speaker 1: least there is some so parallels. Let's see, isn't this weird?
Speaker 1: People are suggesting, even in humans, that we have this
Speaker 1: nervous system and gastro intestinal tract that is widely referred
Speaker 1: to as a second brain. That's a weird thing. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: at least there's a little bit of a little bit
Speaker 1: of parallels there, right, Splike, Nick Ganglion, Oh and plenarian flatworms. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's just I say. These are a proto if you
Speaker 1: want to hear the full sentence, they are proto amphibian
Speaker 1: basil tetrapods with invertebrate parallels, is what I suggest. So again,
Speaker 1: if you have invertebrate parallels, we're talking about something that
Speaker 1: is crossing quite possibly that great invertebrate vertebrate divide. How
Speaker 1: wild is that?
Speaker 3: That would be crazy?
Speaker 1: So you can see there's definitely a lot more to it,
Speaker 1: at the very least than what we're getting from the
Speaker 1: talking heads.
Speaker 3: Well, if they've been here, right, I mean, look, who knows,
Speaker 3: they might be from outer space, but I'm thinking that
Speaker 3: they were probably from here.
Speaker 1: Right. When I look at the traits of a fricula,
Speaker 1: a bird like fercula, crocodilian like ribs, a parietal penial
Speaker 1: complex possible invertebrate parallel or at least yeah, invertebrate parallel
Speaker 1: reproductive system. You would have to go back hundreds and
Speaker 1: hundreds and hundreds of millions of years for all of
Speaker 1: these morphological traits to be in one animal. And when
Speaker 1: you look at Victoria's unknown DNA, which is suggested to
Speaker 1: be as high as sixty five percent or more. Again,
Speaker 1: you would have to go back hundreds and hundreds of
Speaker 1: millions of years just to find a known hit of
Speaker 1: a living Earth animal. So regardless though, these are all
Speaker 1: earthly traits. So I like the term as they're a
Speaker 1: possible genesis taxon, which would go with the morphology, it
Speaker 1: would go with the unknown DNA, and it would even
Speaker 1: go with the cultural assertions from our own ancestors, not mine.
Speaker 1: You know, it's funny. It's we live in this weird
Speaker 1: time where it's like we have to respect everyone's beliefs,
Speaker 1: but but not that that one. Yeah, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 3: And they keep finding hominids. They keep finding ancient hominids
Speaker 3: that were around at the same time as us. So
Speaker 3: it's like the idea that there wouldn't be other species.
Speaker 3: It just it doesn't make sense. A lot of the
Speaker 3: stuff plays by the same rules. It's just different morphology,
Speaker 3: different different creatures.
Speaker 1: You know. Yeah, it's good stuff. It's really kept me busy.
Speaker 1: I've never been happier to have my degree. You know.
Speaker 1: The museum was a dream job, and it's sad that
Speaker 1: it closed. But if I didn't take that anthropology class,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't have ever seen those petroglyphs. So you know,
Speaker 1: what is the value of education? Is it really the
Speaker 1: lesson I had that day? Or was it the time
Speaker 1: and place opportunity? Was that the lesson? You know, you
Speaker 1: still see the brain matter here, you know, interestingly on Luisa,
Speaker 1: which we could probably even if we wanted. You guys
Speaker 1: want to say, I think we've been on one specimen
Speaker 1: the whole time. You guys want to see another specimen.
Speaker 2: Or throw one up and we'll look at it for
Speaker 2: a little bit before we wrap it up.
Speaker 1: Sh I, I've been looking at the time, So I
Speaker 1: just figured you guys kept listening, So I'm just going
Speaker 1: to keep talking so we can go ahead and uh,
Speaker 1: let's pull up Luisa. Oh no, that's not do Luisa,
Speaker 1: because we need to do one of the different ones.
Speaker 1: Let's do Monserrat. Everyone likes Monserrat. They say, you know,
Speaker 1: she's pregnant. It's very difficult to locate her fetus, and
Speaker 1: it's also not centrally located. Some people cite her clutched
Speaker 1: hands as an indicator of a pregnant being, but many
Speaker 1: of them have a clutch, their clutched hands over their abdomen.
Speaker 1: It could be from the pain of having their insides devoured.
Speaker 1: But you know, there's also they're putting out these virtual
Speaker 1: uh forensic reports autopsies, and they're suggesting that there's like
Speaker 1: a million, you know, uh, murder weapons that were used uh.
Speaker 1: And I suggest if those murder weapons are a centimeter wide,
Speaker 1: those might not be murder weapons and may simply just
Speaker 1: be the tritactyl boring holes. Once again, so we are
Speaker 1: looking into monserrat. I hope there she is coming in
Speaker 1: hot one of the larger beings, meaning she has less
Speaker 1: trite actyle and more primate in her. So we can
Speaker 1: see how there's definitely similarities between Obviously, what.
Speaker 4: Are the percentage differences of prim.
Speaker 1: Well technically hasn't had her DNA done, but if we
Speaker 1: were to base her on Maria, it varies Maria because
Speaker 1: it's bigger or other things. Bigger, yeah, bigger, And we
Speaker 1: can see that the head has definitely evolved in shape.
Speaker 1: So again, when you look at Maria's DNA, it depends
Speaker 1: on you know, there's different DNA reports. So if I
Speaker 1: were to cherry pick my choice, some say she's one
Speaker 1: hundred percent human. There's another one that says she's thirty
Speaker 1: to thirty three percent, and that makes a little more
Speaker 1: sense to me.
Speaker 4: This area is recording a amazing story of what these beings,
Speaker 4: what was going on. They were changing, and they were
Speaker 4: breeding with humans.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's just yeah, or at the very least,
Speaker 1: apes right, primates to create better better. Well said, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's just that's just says when you speak of apes too,
Speaker 1: more so with Maria. But I'm sorry, I kind of
Speaker 1: talked over you. I'm a little adhd on myself. They
Speaker 1: have like barrel, very much like an ape too. I
Speaker 1: think Manserat a little bit less. So again, we're looking
Speaker 1: at Monserrat and if we wanted to again try to
Speaker 1: find that fetus, which again it seems to be very
Speaker 1: difficult in my experience.
Speaker 4: You think they were trying to survive and they were
Speaker 4: a dying race, or at least their numbers in that
Speaker 4: area were not enough.
Speaker 1: To it might be a natural process of the earth.
Speaker 1: You know, a lot of times with our myths we
Speaker 1: speak of the gods. I don't think we focus enough
Speaker 1: on the mother Goddess or Mother Earth, and maybe the
Speaker 1: Earth itself is just this is a natural order of
Speaker 1: things to produce such a creature that become the constant gardeners.
Speaker 1: That evolution is partially true with time, but it requires
Speaker 1: a helping hand, and that might be ultimately the scary
Speaker 1: thing about being human is that it might still need
Speaker 1: some sort of helping hand or we're just go going
Speaker 1: to you know, if we put a bunch of humans
Speaker 1: in the woods, would like pigs, they just grow hair
Speaker 1: and revert back.
Speaker 3: Yeah, well, we have we have full blow encrypted ideas
Speaker 3: of wild men, which would be people you know, away
Speaker 3: from society long enough out in the backwoods of these
Speaker 3: places that they start to revert back to something in
Speaker 3: earlier form. Who knows, maybe there is a lot of uh,
Speaker 3: you know, alien DNA that kind of uh, I don't know.
Speaker 3: The programming comes out, war goes in.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, maybe that's where some of our original
Speaker 1: myths or customs of not marrying within the family come from.
Speaker 1: So we're in the back of Montserrat. I'm trying to
Speaker 1: remove layers to see what sort of interesting soft tissue
Speaker 1: we can find within that could just be paradolia. I
Speaker 1: don't know, I've never seen that before or let's take
Speaker 1: it from the front. So I do spend a lot
Speaker 1: of my time. Again, most of it's looking for looking
Speaker 1: for the young, because I know, depending on the scan
Speaker 1: and if I do the images and the light right
Speaker 1: you come here, look at this, you'll come up with
Speaker 1: a good image like this one here looks very serpentine.
Speaker 1: Might be something there. What made you start to look
Speaker 1: for these? It was the Hongshang pig dragons, these these
Speaker 1: these things, then the Magatama and the parrakas and South
Speaker 1: American ceramics and fabrics that show serpentine shapes. And also
Speaker 1: there's a letter I noted it's still around in Chinese
Speaker 1: and it's called the Gi or the Child, and it's
Speaker 1: like a stick figure of a mermaid child. And I
Speaker 1: saw that in Semitic languages. I saw that in North
Speaker 1: American Native American petroglyphs. So it was one of these
Speaker 1: global images where I said, oh, okay, so this looks
Speaker 1: like if this is the child, then it looks like
Speaker 1: these guys are four limb first amphibians. And that's exactly
Speaker 1: what I found. So that again the archaeology is predicting
Speaker 1: the biology, or at least mister ed is I am
Speaker 1: so yeah, I'm just in Monserrat. We're just we're playing
Speaker 1: around with intensities. There's obviously a lot going on. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I don't recognize a lot of the organs myself.
Speaker 1: Some people claim they do. Almost still a little suspicious.
Speaker 1: It's very still, very foreign, and I don't know how
Speaker 1: much of this is damage or are they even what
Speaker 1: if we're looking at some sort of you know, a
Speaker 1: nest if you will, is that another term we could use?
Speaker 1: Are these net for the beings, brood points and whatnot?
Speaker 1: They were in Montserrat. There's still strange shapes, very hard.
Speaker 1: I would like to show you Raphael the fetus, but
Speaker 1: I've never really was too successful. I think it's on
Speaker 1: the left side, and there's a close up looks like
Speaker 1: of a tridactyl head larva head. Plenty of soft tissue
Speaker 1: masses where it looks like many of the larva were
Speaker 1: just trying to burrow their way out head here ahead here. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we'll have to see if this gets either. I almost
Speaker 1: expect it to be denied for some reason. This isn't true.
Speaker 1: This is all paradolia, that's kind of I almost expect
Speaker 1: that direction to go for no good reason. Okay, we're
Speaker 1: getting near where Raphael is suggested to be. What is this?
Speaker 1: Is that an oota capsule of another creature or is
Speaker 1: that some sort of bone of a child within? You know,
Speaker 1: I do this during the week. Two guys, I'll just
Speaker 1: play like new age music and for an hour, I
Speaker 1: just go through this looking for things.
Speaker 5: Is listening to Enigma looking at this Hay.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I don't know if we saw anything too
Speaker 1: cool Montserrat. And again it's really hard to find that
Speaker 1: that child that they say is in here. It's you know,
Speaker 1: I have seen masses of things, and I've seen a
Speaker 1: lot of other things more clearly than that Raphael. That's
Speaker 1: a little interesting too. I really expected I would see
Speaker 1: Raphael just it right out. See there's all this massive
Speaker 1: reflective stuff that I suggest could be either larval heads
Speaker 1: or even eggs possibly. You know, doctor fun has alluded
Speaker 1: to he thinks he saw evidence of cancer. Again, I
Speaker 1: don't think that's cancer. I think it's larva like this
Speaker 1: one here, gnawing through bone. So I hope you guys
Speaker 1: eventually go check out Maria yourself.
Speaker 4: I suppose there would be intrusive manners to see what
Speaker 4: was going on in there. Yeah, okay, right, I was
Speaker 4: asking Edward if they if they did have a subject
Speaker 4: they could intrusively detect, if they went in there, they
Speaker 4: could see maybe these being Yeah, because they.
Speaker 1: Have used scopes before to look inside the bodies. I
Speaker 1: also believe that you can actually see the larval forms
Speaker 1: on the surface on somebodies, and they've had the dry
Speaker 1: hand that they dissected, and I believe you can see
Speaker 1: the larval forms within there. But I don't know how
Speaker 1: to proceed except perhaps eventually, I douche. I should probably
Speaker 1: do a hands on inspection and maybe with some sort
Speaker 1: of high intensity you know, microscope or camera photo lens,
Speaker 1: and then maybe I can start to demonstrate this. Otherwise
Speaker 1: it's going to take any of these other radiologists who
Speaker 1: go into this to come out and say, hey, wait
Speaker 1: a minute, I'm seeing something more in there. Otherwise, for
Speaker 1: now it's sort of left to paradolia, isn't it.
Speaker 3: True? Yeah, we do need more study or else, you know.
Speaker 3: I mean, look, all we could do is speculate. So
Speaker 3: it's time to get back in there, guys. Doesn't matter
Speaker 3: if it smells like uria. Get in there.
Speaker 1: Exactly and six hopefully we'll be getting the six DNA
Speaker 1: reports and so hopefully that will change things. Okay, we
Speaker 1: might be able to see a font and nell over
Speaker 1: here if I'm lucky, and that could be that could
Speaker 1: be this could be Rafael's head here. This could possibly
Speaker 1: that looks actually looks like well, it could be a
Speaker 1: larvae in the fonts. Now, yeah, and look at this
Speaker 1: strange shape here? What is this? What is that? Oh,
Speaker 1: you guys are lucky, so I guess go full stream
Speaker 1: with this. So this could be Uh, this is the
Speaker 1: general region where they say Rafael.
Speaker 3: Is sorry, I hit the wrong button.
Speaker 1: Not in the not in the that does not appear
Speaker 1: to be in the center where she's clutching's Raphael is
Speaker 1: said to be over here on the side. I don't know.
Speaker 1: This is very highly reflective here, So that's a great
Speaker 1: candidate for a skull. And that space where it looks
Speaker 1: like there's also a larva could be a fontanelle. And
Speaker 1: maybe that is the skull there. Again, the best thing
Speaker 1: to do would probably be to put a marker in it.
Speaker 1: But you know, when I go in here, I'm looking
Speaker 1: at images like this, what's that? Forget Raphael? What is that?
Speaker 1: Those things kind of wig me out a little. So
Speaker 1: there is definitely a lot going on in here. I
Speaker 1: even wonder if these beings could be possibly dual uterine,
Speaker 1: having two uteruses. Okay, another just strange anomalous features in here.
Speaker 1: I don't know how big even some of the larva
Speaker 1: could have gotten. I think Montserrat is far more complicated
Speaker 1: than Oh, there's a Rafael fetus in there. I think,
Speaker 1: way more complicated than that. When you start to zoom
Speaker 1: in and remember this is again this is like soft
Speaker 1: tissue settings. I see it looks like again a tritactyl head,
Speaker 1: the reflective rostrum in the middle, perhaps a bunch of
Speaker 1: dining even smaller larva in here. So yeah, they may
Speaker 1: have to just for this mystery to be proven. You're right,
Speaker 1: they made us have to go in, right. I know
Speaker 1: nobody wants to he wants to do an invasive There's
Speaker 1: so many I suggest, there's so many other interesting things
Speaker 1: than possibly Raphael in my opinion, isn't that interesting?
Speaker 4: I heard I heard a rumor. It might just be
Speaker 4: a rumored that there were dozens.
Speaker 1: Oh there may be hundreds or thousands, is what's being said.
Speaker 1: Excuse me? Interesting? Yeah, hundreds or thousands, there's.
Speaker 4: Only a few that's been presented to the public.
Speaker 1: I guess, you know, either the grave robbers are revealing
Speaker 1: them of course, the speculation. You know, you can hear
Speaker 1: people create their own narratives. They're saying that they're building
Speaker 1: them as they go and they're learning as they go
Speaker 1: to make them better, or some weird story. And there's
Speaker 1: even small ones with sort of animal features that I
Speaker 1: haven't even got into yet. You know, it took me
Speaker 1: forever to look at Maria and Monsarrat because I was
Speaker 1: so interested in the little ones. And then when I
Speaker 1: finally got to Maria Monster Rat and found out that
Speaker 1: there was larva in them too. I didn't expect that
Speaker 1: because I didn't see eggs in them, and now to
Speaker 1: see larva in them too is just very strange. But
Speaker 1: it could be a very important part of demonstrating that
Speaker 1: these were authentic by showing that, hey, they both have
Speaker 1: the same amphibian forms in them. Even Wawita, which is
Speaker 1: said to be the uh FO if you will fake triactal,
Speaker 1: the manipulated one who does suggest to prove evidence of
Speaker 1: having its digits removed. I've even found larva in that
Speaker 1: one and I'm reminded of the Bob Lazarre comment, which
Speaker 1: is the aliens see us as containers.
Speaker 3: Rights on it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, how pleasant.
Speaker 3: Well, you know we got those movies like Alien it's
Speaker 3: based off of some sort of a yeah.
Speaker 1: I always say, yeah it too. So are we what
Speaker 1: are we experiencing there? Is that a subconscious memory coming
Speaker 1: to the surface. Is it a slow release of information
Speaker 1: or is it even something like the profits of the past?
Speaker 1: And you know the gods drop these creative tidbits into
Speaker 1: people's brains to make franchises out of Well, it.
Speaker 3: Had something to do with this black goo substance that
Speaker 3: was dropped by these creator beings, and that black gou
Speaker 3: sort of metamorphosed into all of these different forms, and
Speaker 3: one of those forms that it took on was this
Speaker 3: alien thing. And so anytime they dropped that black goo,
Speaker 3: there's a chance that it might turn into that and
Speaker 3: then start to evolve from there. So it's like a
Speaker 3: hyper evolution goo, you know, right.
Speaker 1: And it's also it's it's sort of presenting those creatures too,
Speaker 1: as some stain genesis text on, right, there a species
Speaker 1: that's propagating the whole species, which that's what these might.
Speaker 3: Be right, they got the face huggers and larval and
Speaker 3: a poor man.
Speaker 1: Oh I know. And when you think of Artemis or
Speaker 1: any of these if they had larva in them and
Speaker 1: they're literally trying to bore out of the body, I
Speaker 1: have said that is that alien story is strainly poignant.
Speaker 1: And again I try to figure out myself. Is that
Speaker 1: just a subconscious memory? No different than than religion in
Speaker 1: a way, we have to remember the past, you know.
Speaker 1: I suggest there's you know, have you heard of Goruda
Speaker 1: hunting the Nagas. It's an eagle like creature that hunts
Speaker 1: the serpentin in Nagas. I suggest that story might be
Speaker 1: just relating to something that happened even biologically within that
Speaker 1: predation we talked about. Can you imagine an intelligent species
Speaker 1: growing up in an environment like this and having a
Speaker 1: memory of it? Yes? What if they're.
Speaker 3: Farming these things to put into humans?
Speaker 1: Right, So it's for farming to make farming to keep
Speaker 1: the species going, or farming to create other animals. It's
Speaker 1: very strange. Star appears to be lots of skulls like
Speaker 1: at these little tiny larva lined up feeding. Those are
Speaker 1: like two heads side by side, and.
Speaker 3: They introduced this concept of this uh symbiote that would
Speaker 3: stay inside and absorb the memories and then be transferred
Speaker 3: over to somebody else upon your death. So this thing
Speaker 3: is like an eternal memory source.
Speaker 1: You know. I wonder if they riffed on their own
Speaker 1: ideas for that from the next generation when they had
Speaker 1: that like season finale of this like creature comes out
Speaker 1: of like the Admiral's mouth. Ever see that one? And
Speaker 1: and that was supposed to be like a launch of
Speaker 1: a huge like story and I don't think they ever
Speaker 1: touched it again. Just another example that could.
Speaker 3: Be like, right, well, the the idea of having this
Speaker 3: sort of eternal warrior, this this returning character over and
Speaker 3: over through history like that could have something to do
Speaker 3: with the alchemy of these tritactyls. They've got some kind
Speaker 3: of a chemical or biological source that people are after.
Speaker 3: It's like this this this co holy Grail type thing.
Speaker 1: Right and we could have very well have hunted them.
Speaker 1: You know. There's the myth of the heart, and the
Speaker 1: heart is a mythical stag that's hunted for its for its.
Speaker 3: Artists always hunting the stag.
Speaker 1: Hmmm, it's interesting too. I don't know why we say
Speaker 1: this is a heart shaped face. I think I showed
Speaker 1: you guys this before, but when you turn the tritactyl
Speaker 1: head sideway now, it actually does kind of resemble an
Speaker 1: anatomical human heart as opposed to our Valentine's Day symbolism
Speaker 1: of the face.
Speaker 3: That's what Artemis and Ephicis is covered in. Is just
Speaker 3: that very shape so all over kind of like ticks.
Speaker 1: Yeah, almost like it's implying life of these beings came
Speaker 1: from me, right right. So questions, comments, concerns, insults, get
Speaker 1: one insult.
Speaker 2: You some wild shit looking at these things underneath.
Speaker 1: This, yeah, and I think everyone again should have They're
Speaker 1: fun and go in there and you know, maybe they'll
Speaker 1: you know, I used to name them like the first
Speaker 1: one I found in Artemis. I'm like, screw it if
Speaker 1: you guys, if the researchers didn't know about it, and
Speaker 1: Terry seemed just as amazing as I was from the
Speaker 1: Dash Alien des project, well, then I called the one
Speaker 1: I found an Artemis. I called it Cassus. But then
Speaker 1: I realized that there's like dozens of them everywhere, and
Speaker 1: so like I named like six of them or something,
Speaker 1: and I was just like, oh, this is exhausting. You
Speaker 1: can't keep doing. But it would be fun, I think
Speaker 1: for other people to maybe find one, we mark it
Speaker 1: and we give it a name, and maybe for posterity's sake,
Speaker 1: and it just it stays that way. Wouldn't that be fun?
Speaker 1: You can prove it you've found a larva.
Speaker 4: Behind them and sell the rights to naming them, like
Speaker 4: people sell the rights naming.
Speaker 1: The only think I saw I got some T shirts
Speaker 1: at rdactles dot com if people are looking for some movie,
Speaker 1: some shwag. But I always joke I'm not a I'm
Speaker 1: not a T shirt vendor. I didn't get into this
Speaker 1: to be a T shirt salesman. What is this weirdness?
Speaker 1: Look at that weird shape there? What is that? Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of stuff to look at. You can
Speaker 1: look at it from and it's not like a UFO picture,
Speaker 1: you know. We can look at this from what four
Speaker 1: different angles right right? Indeed keeps me busy, It keeps
Speaker 1: me busy. That's awesome stuff, man.
Speaker 2: And you know real quick too, you're going are you
Speaker 2: going to be speaking at any of the upcoming events
Speaker 2: and stuff?
Speaker 1: Gosh, I'm trying to get in touch with Dakota but
Speaker 1: he's so hard to get in touch with. If you know,
Speaker 1: he said that maybe I could speak at Sedona, but
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's going to happen. That'd be cool.
Speaker 1: Otherwise I don't have another engagement. I may just what
Speaker 1: I'll do is I might just even do my own
Speaker 1: so I might ever hear of the MICI here in
Speaker 1: Fort Lauderdale. My kai is like one of the original
Speaker 1: remaining tiki bars. But when I say tiki bar, it
Speaker 1: is a sprawling complex of fountain and gardens and they
Speaker 1: do a full fire show. You can look it up
Speaker 1: online to see the show. The mikai. They'll do a
Speaker 1: fire show and Hulu girls and all that stuff, full
Speaker 1: of polynesi and artifacts. I mean, like you look at
Speaker 1: the menu and you get like trit actles on your menu.
Speaker 1: That's how That's how this this phenomenon is. So I
Speaker 1: might see about maybe doing a lecture there, just because
Speaker 1: the setting is so unusual. I mean, it's been around
Speaker 1: since like nineteen fifties, since Federal Highway was dirt. I
Speaker 1: understand Johnny Carson would fly into town and that would
Speaker 1: be like the first stop, and like him and Jackie
Speaker 1: Gleeson and a Bud, Frank Sinatra, A bunch of those
Speaker 1: type of characters would hang out at the Micai. So
Speaker 1: it's a really interesting place. If you ever get a
Speaker 1: vacation to South Florida and go to Fort Lauderdale, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's touristy. You're gonna pay thirty dollars for Chinese food,
Speaker 1: but they've gotten better. They've you know, even like one drink.
Speaker 1: I think sometimes thirty bucks, but it's like really like
Speaker 1: six drinks in one. They're like these. So anyway, definitely
Speaker 1: if you come to for laudol, you have to go
Speaker 1: to there. Call me on each other, right, Yeah, So
Speaker 1: no specific speaking engagements. We're waiting for the DNA to
Speaker 1: come in. I'm waiting for more scans. I'd like to
Speaker 1: see Souyer. I like to see Paloma. You know, I
Speaker 1: still dip my foot into the cultural but again, I
Speaker 1: like to do a lot of hunting on these larva.
Speaker 1: I just feel like with the right day of the
Speaker 1: right intensity and the scans, I might be able to
Speaker 1: pull just skeptic killers and hopefully you get more people
Speaker 1: on board and maybe more people will be engaged in
Speaker 1: the art of the die coms themselves right and everybody
Speaker 1: else can start looking. That's what's gonna make this fun again,
Speaker 1: especially if there really are larva, like I'm saying, everybody
Speaker 1: can go on these larva hunts themselves and find them.
Speaker 1: It'd be cool.
Speaker 2: Absolutely all right, Well, thank you very much Ed for
Speaker 2: coming on, No problem, thanks for having me, because you
Speaker 2: know I love to just talk about this stuff. Hell yeah, no, no,
Speaker 2: you can definitely see you were enjoying yourself when you
Speaker 2: were talking to people explaining this stuff to them.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's super fun. And so just so you guys know,
Speaker 1: I do do a that seven PM show like Sundays
Speaker 1: Eat Standard Time, and then Wednesdays, I decided to start
Speaker 1: doing a show on Wednesdays at one pm on X
Speaker 1: that's just a Spaces So that's just chit chatting on Spaces.
Speaker 1: But I did it like on Wednesdays to have a
Speaker 1: completely different day than Sunday, you know, like something right
Speaker 1: in the middle of the week sort of thing. And
Speaker 1: then I do the impromptu Larva hunts throughout the week
Speaker 1: where I just show you these guys here with the
Speaker 1: like you said, the enigma, but even this section here
Speaker 1: I just just full of horrible forms and skulls, even
Speaker 1: as we say goodbye, So thanks for having me, guys. Again,
Speaker 1: I think we could probably. I thought I was going
Speaker 1: to focus more on the cultural, but we really got
Speaker 1: into the biological. I really think I should. I still
Speaker 1: need to. I think I said last time, let me
Speaker 1: come back and do the culture. I think we could
Speaker 1: do it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, because that was interesting. I've seen you cover
Speaker 2: some of this stuff kind of that I'm assuming you
Speaker 2: over on here, and it's very interesting. Yeah, you see
Speaker 2: the crossovers. We see crossovers in different cultures, like kind
Speaker 2: of with the same imagery.
Speaker 1: Right right. Yeah, well we'll have to do a part
Speaker 1: of three. I think say sounds good. All right, guys.
Speaker 2: Before we wrap it up, Headless, let everybody know what's
Speaker 2: up with your stuff. Well, your shenanigans got going on.
Speaker 3: You can find me at the Headless Giant Podcast at
Speaker 3: gmail dot com. If you have any sort of esoteric
Speaker 3: or strange anomalous paranormal stories, send them there and we
Speaker 3: will read those on Thursday Mondays. We got the Alchemy
Speaker 3: Mondays with arrows up. We gotta get that ready and
Speaker 3: Tuesdays we're talking up and seven seven, so check those out.
Speaker 3: And Alistair Crowley so he goes through his whole thing
Speaker 3: in there.
Speaker 6: So it's I know a little bit about Crowley acting
Speaker 6: right now, soy was a little sinister, right Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 6: I know, I know a little bit about Crowley, Ethan.
Speaker 2: Let everybody know what's up with you.
Speaker 4: Well, thanks so much, you guys, And that was awesome,
Speaker 4: very very interesting.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. Thanks. Yeah, yeah, thank you for all.
Speaker 4: The depictions, displays and everything. Ethan Indigo Smith easy to find.
Speaker 4: I think I'm easy to find on the internets variously.
Speaker 4: I appreciate people reaching out and writing and books are
Speaker 4: out there easy to find too.
Speaker 1: And yeah, appreciate you guys. Thank you, sir, I appreciate
Speaker 1: you coming on.
Speaker 2: And Ed, is there any any thing else you want
Speaker 2: to leave people with to, like, you know, promote plug
Speaker 2: or so they can find you sites.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean again, I'm I'm at tried Actles t
Speaker 1: R I D A C T y l s on
Speaker 1: most major social media. If you go to tritactles dot
Speaker 1: com you can find my cultural assertions and my biological
Speaker 1: paper where I try to attack all of these very
Speaker 1: strange morphological traits.
Speaker 2: All right, thank you very much, and uh yeah, thank
Speaker 2: you everybody for coming on. The show again, Ed, I
Speaker 2: really appreciate it. We'll definitely have you come on to
Speaker 2: cover that, uh, the other stuff, the cultural stuff, because
Speaker 2: I would really find.
Speaker 1: That a lot of very feel like you have to
Speaker 1: do a part three because it's like that stuff is
Speaker 1: very Yeah, I would like to cover that. I guess
Speaker 1: the things on my mind lately, so you know, I
Speaker 1: get it.
Speaker 2: That's what you're passionate about right now. But and thank
Speaker 2: everybody jumped in on the chat. That's what's up. We
Speaker 2: had a lot of people in there, a lot of
Speaker 2: good comments.
Speaker 1: Appreciate it. Thanks.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and uh, that's the end of another record rejects
Speaker 2: and until the next one, everybody be well.
Speaker 1: Eve