Speaker 1: Or of the Auxix John Jrulmerguessos, Jay Dyer of Jays Analysis. Today,
Speaker 1: we're going to talk about a book I recently read
Speaker 1: and lectured through that is crucial, I think, to understanding
Speaker 1: where we are in the post COVID world, the post
Speaker 1: syops world, the syops that were used to roll out
Speaker 1: and convince everybody of COVID. We're going to be talking
Speaker 1: about the book by doctor jus Merleau, The Rape of
Speaker 1: the Mind. This is the book that was published in
Speaker 1: nineteen fifty six, and it was a summary of the
Speaker 1: work that he had done as a psychological warfare expert
Speaker 1: to the Allies during World War Two. So he had
Speaker 1: done a lot of research and information for the Netherlands
Speaker 1: Army during World War Two and kind of summarized all
Speaker 1: of his studies about totalitarian regimes.
Speaker 2: It's not just about the Axis powers.
Speaker 1: There's also a lot of information, a lot of chapters
Speaker 1: that dealt with the Soviets and the Communists and the
Speaker 1: Marxists and their approach to control. And the book is
Speaker 1: I think really relevant for it today, especially if we've been.
Speaker 2: Aware of this book.
Speaker 1: I didn't hear about it until somebody mentioned it in
Speaker 1: association with doctor Malone's research somewhere around the middle of
Speaker 1: the COVID madness that we had to deal with, and
Speaker 1: they were pointing out how prescient m'lou's book was and
Speaker 1: how much apparently doctor Malone was kind of preceded or
Speaker 1: had ideas that preceded.
Speaker 2: Him in this book by Merlou.
Speaker 1: And so in The Rape of the Mind, he wants
Speaker 1: to cover the idea of what total term regimes require,
Speaker 1: what must they do to survive, What are all of
Speaker 1: their techniques and their strategies, what are the things that
Speaker 1: they roll out to control the masses? And again this
Speaker 1: is nineteen fifty six, we're counting a lot of what
Speaker 1: he had gone through and studied in regard to the
Speaker 1: followers of Hitler, but also the Soviets.
Speaker 2: Now he notes at the beginning something you wouldn't expect.
Speaker 1: You would think, Okay, this is going to be about psyops,
Speaker 1: it's going to be about human.
Speaker 2: Trickery and all that.
Speaker 1: But it begins by talking about the necessary basis in
Speaker 1: mind control in terms of ancient cults and the occult,
Speaker 1: and he says that what must be understood by the
Speaker 1: competent social engineer or the totalitarian regime is the techniques
Speaker 1: that were used by ancient religious cults, shamans, sorcerers, wizards,
Speaker 1: and the ways that they had perfected a lot of
Speaker 1: these techniques even in the ancient world, so sorcery, black magic,
Speaker 1: a lot of that had to do with casting a
Speaker 1: spell on your target audience to convince them to control
Speaker 1: are basically to convince them to worship the state leader.
Speaker 1: So most ancient world religions and cults were essentially tied
Speaker 1: to the deity or the divinization of some state leader
Speaker 1: and the worship of that state leader, be it a pharaoh,
Speaker 1: be it an emperor, or whoever a king. And so
Speaker 1: the king was always very interested in whatever techniques and
Speaker 1: tricks he could use, and if he could really control
Speaker 1: the priest class or utilize the tricks of the craft,
Speaker 1: then he would have a tremendous amount of control with
Speaker 1: the bill a lot of tools at at his hand
Speaker 1: that he could use, and one of those is of
Speaker 1: course drugging, and so a lot of today's drug warfare
Speaker 1: or drugging of the population actually has its origins in
Speaker 1: ancient religious and drugging ceremonies. For example, we covered a
Speaker 1: few months ago here on the fourth Hour, the Cambridge
Speaker 1: Companion to Western Esotericism and Occultism, there was a chapter
Speaker 1: in the Ancient Mysteries, and we talked about how in
Speaker 1: the ancient mysteries rituals you had the process of initiation
Speaker 1: for the misty e of the Aluscinian mysteries, who prepared
Speaker 1: for many, many years to undergo this ritual. They didn't
Speaker 1: know what to expect. It was a great secret. And
Speaker 1: then they're brought into this temple. They're given high doses
Speaker 1: of a hallucinogenic drink. The woman pops out who's the goddess,
Speaker 1: and she dances naked or whatever. They bring in some
Speaker 1: popcorn or something like a corn, a stalk of corn,
Speaker 1: which is supposed to represent the goddess. I don't know so,
Speaker 1: but it sounds like something pretty intense. Smoking mirrors, and
Speaker 1: so if you're tripping balls, this would really blow your mind.
Speaker 1: You would be initiated, and it would be a powerful
Speaker 1: means of controlling this state associated cult in this case,
Speaker 1: the ancient mysteries of Eldessenian Mysteries. Modern regimes were very
Speaker 1: interested in studying those techniques, as well as things like
Speaker 1: medieval witchcraft or the techniques and principles of how a
Speaker 1: witch or a sorceress might put something in her enemies
Speaker 1: drink or something like this, and so poisonings and so forth,
Speaker 1: assassinations in the history of Europe, these were always very
Speaker 1: interesting on them in terms of the advantage point of
Speaker 1: the tagnocratic regimes that were rising at the time of
Speaker 1: World War Two. And this book is going to be
Speaker 1: very important because this anticipates the rise of technocracy. I
Speaker 1: think that's the most prescient aspect of this book. I mean, yes,
Speaker 1: he talks about what basically would be called mass formations
Speaker 1: like Hoastis, but he also goes into great depth about
Speaker 1: particularly the chap as we're going to see her a
Speaker 1: little bit, predicting the rise of the machines, the rise
Speaker 1: of machine man, and the dangers that that would have
Speaker 1: or society as a whole if they if we allowed
Speaker 1: this technocratic system to come into full fruition.
Speaker 2: He talks about menticide.
Speaker 1: Menticide is essentially the death of the mind, and all
Speaker 1: centralized tutalitarian regimes, of whatever flavor they have, this impetus,
Speaker 1: the desire to ultimately utilize the technique of mentusicide to
Speaker 1: destroy the minds of their population. Now you think, well,
Speaker 1: why would they want to do that? Then they want
Speaker 1: to mind control the population. Well you'll see why, because
Speaker 1: he's going to list all of these great insightful techniques
Speaker 1: that remember, this is supposed to be the followers of
Speaker 1: Tiny Mustache.
Speaker 2: Man, the Hilarian.
Speaker 1: These are the ultimate tyrants, according to Merleu at the
Speaker 1: time of nineteen fifty six, closely followed according to his analysis,
Speaker 1: I'm saying he's right about everything, but closely followed by
Speaker 1: Stalin and the KGB and all that. But what he
Speaker 1: lists pales in comparison to where we are. Now that's
Speaker 1: the crazy part of this book. We're ten times further
Speaker 1: down the rabbit hole than what he describes about the
Speaker 1: regimes in the nineteen forties and fifties. He says that
Speaker 1: menticide is a key component of the tyrannical regime because
Speaker 1: the mind must be controlled so that it doesn't have
Speaker 1: any other things to look to or access to critique
Speaker 1: the regime. For example, objective truth cannot exist with a
Speaker 1: tyrannical regime for many reasons, but for one, because the
Speaker 1: regime has to dictate truth. It has to dictate what's
Speaker 1: true and false, regardless of what's actually trum false. It
Speaker 1: must be the source and the creator of the true
Speaker 1: and the false. Thus, any competing systems or standards are
Speaker 1: necessarily enemies of the totalitarian regime. So there can't be
Speaker 1: fact checkers that are objective fact checkers. There has to
Speaker 1: be fact checkers by the system. There has to be
Speaker 1: snops based fact checker has to be infraguard or whatever
Speaker 1: the various Bill Gates fact checkers are.
Speaker 2: Which are all just going to back up what Bill
Speaker 2: Gates wants, right.
Speaker 1: There has to be system control of all of those
Speaker 1: types of checks and balances, because the regime's number one
Speaker 1: goal is control. He says that in order to further
Speaker 1: ment acide, not only must we have a drug in
Speaker 1: the population, a dumbing down of the population through the drugging,
Speaker 1: but also this was something that I think people still
Speaker 1: haven't figured out, especially in the normy conservative sere.
Speaker 2: People still haven't figured out that. Think about this.
Speaker 1: In the nineteen fifties, Merlou understood that even the Axis
Speaker 1: regimes and the communist regimes knew the power of contradictions.
Speaker 1: Think about that, they knew the power of the system.
Speaker 1: Intentionally rolling out a bunch of contradictions in a row,
Speaker 1: and you may think, well, wait a minut it No,
Speaker 1: that just means they're incompetent, right, the boobs in Washington
Speaker 1: throw the bums out.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 1: No, the system, which is run by people above that
Speaker 1: is very cognizant of the power of intentionally rolling out
Speaker 1: contradictions to throw the audience, throw the population off balance.
Speaker 1: In other words, intentional contradictions throwing them out in a
Speaker 1: very fast paced way is a known technique of tyrannical regimes.
Speaker 1: Think about back in the time of the COVID nonsense.
Speaker 1: We heard one week a mask, you're supposed to put
Speaker 1: it on and it protects you. The next week, no,
Speaker 1: take your mask off. No, the next week, No, you
Speaker 1: get to work two or three masks. Right, And Fauci
Speaker 1: would intentionally contradict himself, and everybody say, oh, look at
Speaker 1: this idiot. Fauci's so stupid. They're not stupid, they're cunning.
Speaker 1: So don't mistake cunning for stupidity. Now, sometimes people in
Speaker 1: the system are stupid, that's true. The layer of the
Speaker 1: government apparatus are a lot of idiots. They think islands
Speaker 1: tip over, islands are floating, right, But that layer of idiocy.
Speaker 1: There is therefore a reason, and we have to be
Speaker 1: cognizant of that to understand that people way above that,
Speaker 1: the people that we're talking about today, the social engineers,
Speaker 1: the technocrats that doctor Juice Muluir was warning about in
Speaker 1: his ninety fifty six book, same methodology, same game plan,
Speaker 1: same worldview today, same people, same power structure. Today, they
Speaker 1: know that by pushing contradictions, by pushing again the mass
Speaker 1: drug in the population, they can create a form of
Speaker 1: menticide in the population by which the population is under
Speaker 1: a spell and surrenders their critical thinking faculties to some
Speaker 1: other entity, namely the corporate state. Now, when we talk
Speaker 1: abou mass drugging it, remember there was no saying at
Speaker 1: this time in terms of World War two of a
Speaker 1: big pharma. Big pharma was really kind of in the
Speaker 1: works to begin to grow around this time, and a
Speaker 1: lot of the drug research at World War two.
Speaker 2: This is where we ca things like mk ultra and
Speaker 2: the production of LSD and all that actually comes out
Speaker 2: of this time.
Speaker 1: Now, what would he say about what we've seen in
Speaker 1: the last few years with the power of big pharma
Speaker 1: and its tentacles all over the globe to be involved
Speaker 1: in this corporate slash US Department of Defense roll out
Speaker 1: of all of this nonsense of.
Speaker 2: The last four or five years.
Speaker 1: By the way, they're still pushing that you need to
Speaker 1: get your stabbies right, your vaccines. All of that is
Speaker 1: ten times crazier than the things that he's describing in
Speaker 1: the nineteen fifties. And according to various calculations, the estimates
Speaker 1: are what fourteen to twenty million as that have died
Speaker 1: as a result of these so called vaccinations which are
Speaker 1: experimental gene therapies.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's again a vast number of people worldwide.
Speaker 1: Now he goes back to discussing example of brainwashing it
Speaker 1: in his time that.
Speaker 2: Are kind of key case examples.
Speaker 1: He mentions the famous case of Cardinal Bozinski, the romcal
Speaker 1: the cardinal who was taken in by the Communist and
Speaker 1: was given a lot of brainwashing techniques. He was put
Speaker 1: through a lot of brainwashing techniques, he was put through
Speaker 1: a lot of torture, and he talks about how this
Speaker 1: was really experimental to see what worked best to wear
Speaker 1: this man down, and that if you could break the person,
Speaker 1: if you could debase them morally, break them through whatever
Speaker 1: techniques worked. The best, then you could extrapolate that and
Speaker 1: use that on a mass scale. And what have we
Speaker 1: been saying for so long about these individual studies, these
Speaker 1: individual psychological profiles of well, we put this test subject
Speaker 1: through all of this torture and chaos and mind control,
Speaker 1: and you know, even studies done in prison, prison camps,
Speaker 1: concentration camps, labor camps, mindless.
Speaker 2: Labor, and so forth.
Speaker 1: What it works the best to cause menticide because the
Speaker 1: purpose of menticide is not to create a bunch of
Speaker 1: totally you know, vegetable basically mindless vegetables in the mental institute,
Speaker 1: but rather to break the population, break the individuals so
Speaker 1: that they don't utilize critical thing, and then become re
Speaker 1: imprinted repeaters of the state.
Speaker 2: That's the key thing here.
Speaker 1: They become this sort of thing that you could a
Speaker 1: blank slate, a tabula rossa that the state can then
Speaker 1: re imprint the new man upon. And part of the
Speaker 1: reason they believe this at this time was that it
Speaker 1: was very popular, especially amongst the Soviets, not so much
Speaker 1: amongst the national socials, but amongst the Communists and Soviets
Speaker 1: to believe that man was a blank slate. Now it
Speaker 1: was in fact a completely determined stimulus response creature like
Speaker 1: Pavlov's dogs. I'm going to get to Pavlov's dogs in
Speaker 1: a minute, but Pavlov's dogs are relevant because he's a
Speaker 1: key figure, not just in the so we had experience
Speaker 1: of the creation of the New Man, but actually becomes
Speaker 1: a model for many people in the West who we
Speaker 1: might think are the opponents of Sovietism, but in fact
Speaker 1: we're doing exactly the same studies, exactly the same types
Speaker 1: of research, and have exactly the same materialist, atheist presuppositions
Speaker 1: as someone like Pavlov. And I'm speaking of people like
Speaker 1: Carl Rodgers, B. F. Skinner and others who were supported
Speaker 1: by the Rockfeller Foundation. So you might think, oh, well,
Speaker 1: they're going to fight, you know, the Rockfeller Foundation is
Speaker 1: gonna put money into fighting the bad guys over in
Speaker 1: Moscow and the Soviets. No, they're all studying the same stuff,
Speaker 1: which is control of the human mind. Before we get
Speaker 1: to Pavlov, though, there's a couple other things that Marlou mentions.
Speaker 1: He says that we have this drug in the society,
Speaker 1: we have this propaganda in society, we have this brainwashing
Speaker 1: of the society. The intentional pushing of contradictions. But we
Speaker 1: also have the idea of fake guilt. And I thought
Speaker 1: this was very prescient because at this time, of course,
Speaker 1: the Soviets and other regimes, the communists, we're utilizing this
Speaker 1: notion of how bad everyone in the West is because
Speaker 1: of colonialism, and you try to foist your culture upon
Speaker 1: someone else, and you rape these cultures just for profit,
Speaker 1: as if all cultures, as if cultural relativism is true. Well, now,
Speaker 1: in fact, some cultures are better than other cultures. Some
Speaker 1: cultures are wicked and degenerate. Some cultures cook kiddies for
Speaker 1: lunch and others don't, So cultural relativism is not true.
Speaker 1: But the presupposition of all of the leftists and the
Speaker 1: social justice warriors and activists is that cultural relativism is
Speaker 1: true and all cultures are relative. There's no absolute that
Speaker 1: can judge between the cultures as good or bad. But
Speaker 1: the problem then becomes, well, wait a minute, but the
Speaker 1: same people who say that turn around and say you're
Speaker 1: all collectively guilty in the West. White men are guilty
Speaker 1: in the West because of colonialism and critical race theory
Speaker 1: and all the stuff.
Speaker 2: But wait a minute, I thought that you're a cultural relativist.
Speaker 1: If everything is relative, then there's nothing wrong with this
Speaker 1: culture doing colonialism or that culture doing or whatever. All
Speaker 1: things are relative, right, so then you have no basis
Speaker 1: to turn around and say evil white man British empire colonialism. Now,
Speaker 1: the British Empire did engage in slavery and different types
Speaker 1: of techniques of deception or whatever. But my point is
Speaker 1: that if you're an atheist, relativest social justice warrior, there's nothing.
Speaker 2: Wrong with anything. You might not like it, but it's
Speaker 2: not actually quote wrong.
Speaker 1: But you see the fissure in the mind of the
Speaker 1: individuals who believe in this, the dissociation that begins to happen.
Speaker 1: And that's very important because Marlugo's on to talk about
Speaker 1: Tyrannical regimes are not only themselves dissociative, they foist dissociation
Speaker 1: on the population. Now there was the population themselves dissociable.
Speaker 2: Why is that?
Speaker 1: Why would they want that? In terms of the process
Speaker 1: of menta side. Well, one reason for that is because
Speaker 1: the regimes themselves are at war with objective truth. As
Speaker 1: we said, right, there can be no competing standards which
Speaker 1: the regime, the tyrannical system must submit to because it
Speaker 1: must dictate truth. If capital t truth exists, or objective
Speaker 1: truth exists, then the regime is bound by certain limitations
Speaker 1: and certain principles.
Speaker 2: It can't do whatever it wants.
Speaker 1: Thus, if a regime desires to do whatever it wants
Speaker 1: raw pure power, brutal Nietzsche and uber minch power, be overman,
Speaker 1: or whatever the overwill will to power, then that regime
Speaker 1: must thus wear at war against truth. But since there
Speaker 1: is truth, this creates a fissure within the system itself.
Speaker 1: The system itself is thus warring on what is actually
Speaker 1: objective objectively the case, for example, that there are no
Speaker 1: biological men and women. If the regime adopts this position
Speaker 1: and then foists this and pushes this on everyone, as
Speaker 1: it has nowadays unfortunately, and this goes back to the
Speaker 1: Tavistok Institute and what they pioneered in the last ten
Speaker 1: years to push as a form of psychological warfare and
Speaker 1: mind control, then they've created an immediate fissure between reality
Speaker 1: and what the regime dictates as reality.
Speaker 2: But then there's a mirrored aspect of this where when.
Speaker 1: They push this because the society looks to the nanny state,
Speaker 1: the daddy state, which is odd, like why is there
Speaker 1: a nanty state and daddy state if there's no genders.
Speaker 1: But let's say that it's not about being consistent, it's
Speaker 1: about being inconsistent on purpose. So now we have this
Speaker 1: idea that the population is then being told by their
Speaker 1: authority structure that there actually isn't male and female, that
Speaker 1: it's actually a social contrctor that do you actually become
Speaker 1: whatever you want, which is not true. This creates the
Speaker 1: dissociative state in the mass population who buys into the
Speaker 1: collective delusion. So there's a reflexive symbiotic relationship then between
Speaker 1: the system pushing delusion which they know is not true,
Speaker 1: but they think they can dictate truth the population the
Speaker 1: experiences that dissociation and then further looks to the state
Speaker 1: to confirm and affirm and back up its collective delusion.
Speaker 2: And it's not just about gender. That's just an easy example.
Speaker 1: It's also about, as we've seen in the last several years,
Speaker 1: the medical establishments lies about itself, and it's sacraments of stabs,
Speaker 1: the stabby sacrament and everything that Merleu describes in many
Speaker 1: of the chapters about the way the totalitarian regime works
Speaker 1: is that it works like a cult, works like a
Speaker 1: religious establishment. And boy are the parallels striking when we
Speaker 1: think about the last few years, the dogmas of Big
Speaker 1: Pharma and the CDC and the Rockefeller Foundation, and then
Speaker 1: Bill Gates and the WHO and all these people right,
Speaker 1: their dogmas about medicine and experimental therapy, gene therapies and
Speaker 1: all this. Well, they're the system, they're the establishment, right,
Speaker 1: And how does every boomer think, Well, they wouldn't be
Speaker 1: in power if they didn't have something, right, how come
Speaker 1: you ain't up there in power if you know so
Speaker 1: much about what you're talking about, Amomas six, Debbi and
Speaker 1: I'll feel good, and then he dies next year. I'm
Speaker 1: not trying to be mean, but I heard that and
Speaker 1: had that debate many times in the last five or
Speaker 1: six years right now, to be fair, During the period
Speaker 1: when Quickly talks about in Tragy and Hope the rise
Speaker 1: of the managerial state, he says that the next generation,
Speaker 1: and he's talking about the Boomer generation because he was
Speaker 1: a generation above him. He says, they will be indoctrinated
Speaker 1: into what we call managerial rule by experts. So unfortunately,
Speaker 1: the boomers were actually the first to really be a
Speaker 1: baby Boomer generation to really be indoctrinated into the ideas
Speaker 1: of looking to the medical experts, and we could have
Speaker 1: never had koof and all this happened. Did we not
Speaker 1: have a baby Boomer generation who was indoctrinated by a
Speaker 1: design into worshiping their doctors and their big pharma establishment.
Speaker 1: That's their church, that's their sacrament that they look to.
Speaker 1: And so nobody who questioned this would ever have any
Speaker 1: hope of stopping all this nonsense the last four years,
Speaker 1: had not the Boomers, as a collective generation, who have
Speaker 1: most of the wealth and were in power at this time,
Speaker 1: foisting this on the rest of the country.
Speaker 2: I'm not just blaming boomers.
Speaker 1: This was a intentional propaganda that was geared at their
Speaker 1: generation as a test bed for the latest and sophistication
Speaker 1: of psychological warfare at that time.
Speaker 2: Now, remember murl lou is writing a generation ahead of that.
Speaker 1: But what Murlau's describing in his book is what you
Speaker 1: see manifested in the next generation, because he's great generation
Speaker 1: in the Boomers, and what is their generation given as
Speaker 1: their collective delusion and mythology.
Speaker 2: Total liberation through the nineteen sixties countercolls, which.
Speaker 1: Was given to them by design, a fake guilt of
Speaker 1: the older generation, which the younger boomer generation adopted as
Speaker 1: their form of activism to bring social justice. This is
Speaker 1: where you begin to see social justice warrior stuff. It
Speaker 1: comes from this period of the nineteen sixties boomers. You
Speaker 1: can look to people like Tim Leary, and to people
Speaker 1: like Terence McKenna, and to people like Barbara Marx Hubbard,
Speaker 1: to people like Jane Goodall. This generation was flooded with
Speaker 1: this idea. They were broken through the mental side of
Speaker 1: the psyops of the generation prior to be a generation
Speaker 1: that again would look to the experts, reject the traditional
Speaker 1: conservative ideas of religion. They would experiment with new ways
Speaker 1: of living by design, which Alvin Toffler says was done
Speaker 1: by design. Stanford Research gave all that by design, changing images,
Speaker 1: a man, etcetera. They would then raise the generation of
Speaker 1: Gen X, who would pioneer the notions of the next
Speaker 1: phase of social justice warrior, the grunge movement, the grunge bands, MTV,
Speaker 1: Pearl Jam all this stuff and the nausea, the nauseating
Speaker 1: social justice mindset of people like Eddie Vedder, etc. We're
Speaker 1: talking about psyops and the generational destruction meant a side.
Speaker 2: Here on the fourth hour of the Alex jochemerguest host
Speaker 2: Chany Dyer.
Speaker 3: To Merrick has been used as a medicine for thousands
Speaker 3: of years to treat digestive disorders, respiratory problems, arthritis, and depression.
Speaker 3: It has strong anti cancer, anti diabetic, anti microbial, and
Speaker 3: antioxidant properties and is one of the most effective anti
Speaker 3: inflammatory medications available. The Powerful Bodies formula at infowarstore dot
Speaker 3: com includes ninety five percent kercubinoids, Boswellia serrata extract, organic
Speaker 3: sage leaf, organic lemon bomb leaf, organic time leaf, and
Speaker 3: pippering from black Pepper Bodies is arguably the best to
Speaker 3: Merrick formula available. Get it now. Support free speech and
Speaker 3: support the info war at infowarsstore dot com.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the fourth hour of the aust Shell
Speaker 1: shown your guest host Jay Diery of Jay's analysis. I
Speaker 1: remind you that I'll be live October twenty five and
Speaker 1: twenty six at the Rohemian Grove event in Florida. The tickets,
Speaker 1: the flyer. It's at the top of my Twitter. If
Speaker 1: you go to my ax, you can go find me
Speaker 1: on x under j Dyer and you'll see penned at
Speaker 1: the top. There is the flyer and the links to
Speaker 1: get tickets to that event. It's gonna be a lot
Speaker 1: of fun. It's going to be two days of comedy
Speaker 1: podcast live. I think Elijah Shaffer will be there, Leonardo
Speaker 1: Joni will be there, maybe Shane Cashman and others. So
Speaker 1: it's going to be a lot of fun. Get your tickets.
Speaker 1: You can also get my books at the shop at
Speaker 1: Jasonalysis dot com. I have my two Esoteric Hollywood books
Speaker 1: working on the third book right now. It's going to
Speaker 1: be out hopefully in a few months. I've got about
Speaker 1: three inner pages in Esoterically, with three it's a little
Speaker 1: bit different. It's going to be covering a lot more films,
Speaker 1: a little more in depth style with more films, so
Speaker 1: shorter analysis, more hard hitting information, and more films.
Speaker 2: So look for that in the coming months.
Speaker 1: You can get Esoteric Hollywood one and two signed copies
Speaker 1: in the shop at Jasonolysis dot com.
Speaker 2: You can also follow me over on Rockfin.
Speaker 1: I did just put up a exclusive one and a
Speaker 1: half hour interview with most famous living gangster Samme to
Speaker 1: Bowl at Ravano. Now we're talking about Soviet creation of
Speaker 1: machine man. I was talking about the Boomers and how
Speaker 1: they were given a certain specific line of indoctrination. So
Speaker 1: I want to go now to Pavlov, because Pavlov is
Speaker 1: in a very important character in the history of mind
Speaker 1: control and technocratic engineering, and he's probably the most famous
Speaker 1: of the Soviet social engineers and technocrats, because his whole
Speaker 1: position was based around what we call operant conditioning, and
Speaker 1: this is the idea that man is basically an animal.
Speaker 2: There is no soul. The soul is a fairy tale,
Speaker 2: a medieval fiction.
Speaker 1: Man is an operant response machine that is dictated by
Speaker 1: external stimuli. And so if you can perfect the external stimuli,
Speaker 1: then you can control the input outputs, and thus you
Speaker 1: can create a completely controlled, refurbished machine man who's an animal.
Speaker 2: Thus you could call him manimal.
Speaker 1: So it's pretty much literally Pavlov's views that man is
Speaker 1: a manimal and his goal with all this was to
Speaker 1: quote get rid of man's inner resistance to what to state,
Speaker 1: to the absolute technocratic control. He's a perfect example of
Speaker 1: what we see embodied in the figure of someone like
Speaker 1: O'Brien in the In nineteen eighty four, when Winston and
Speaker 1: O'Brien are having that discourse about truth and how again,
Speaker 1: as I've said many times, O'Brien says, that you have
Speaker 1: to believe that the state, that the system, the corporate
Speaker 1: state in our case, dictates reality itself.
Speaker 2: That's the key.
Speaker 1: So Pablov is tasked then with being able to find
Speaker 1: the techniques to do this. What are the techniques to
Speaker 1: create the Soviet man, as he called it, the machine man,
Speaker 1: the manimal. So you can begin to see that already
Speaker 1: this is technocracy, this is the idea that man is
Speaker 1: already just a machine. And Merlo says that the real
Speaker 1: origin of where Pavlov got this was accepting Descartes a
Speaker 1: mechanistic view of the universe, a deistic mechanistic view of
Speaker 1: the universe. I mean a Descartes was be perhaps deistic,
Speaker 1: but in the case of Palvlov, is just strict materialism
Speaker 1: and atheism. And so man is really just another collection
Speaker 1: of molecules. There's nothing special about him. He's just like
Speaker 1: any other collection of molecules. And so when you have
Speaker 1: a collection of a dog that you need to train,
Speaker 1: you train him with the bell and the food, and
Speaker 1: you know, the Pavlovyan ring the bell system. Right as
Speaker 1: Will Smith's saying about you can ring my bell, so
Speaker 1: the dog Wolf Smith, you can.
Speaker 2: Ring my bell. This is the whole model of.
Speaker 1: Palvlov because if you could control perfectly and understand the
Speaker 1: stimulus response, the external stimuli of the internal response, and
Speaker 1: then this feedback loop, you could therefore master man. So
Speaker 1: he actually had the belief not just that you could
Speaker 1: destroy the inner resistance, you could also master the individual
Speaker 1: man and completely reshape and reform him, re imprint him
Speaker 1: through this operant conditioning to be the perfect Soviet man,
Speaker 1: the perfect collective man. Man can be totally controlled and explained,
Speaker 1: he said, And this was the purpose of a lot
Speaker 1: of these experiments.
Speaker 2: He also was.
Speaker 1: Involved in other things I'm sure you've heard of, like
Speaker 1: whether you see the famous experiments of the mouse, and
Speaker 1: the mouse is standing on an electrical grid, and if
Speaker 1: he does the right thing by eating the food or whatever,
Speaker 1: he doesn't get shocked. If he does something wrong, he
Speaker 1: gets shocked. And so electro shock conditioning with mice and
Speaker 1: probably with humans as well, this is all part of Havlovianism.
Speaker 2: And so what we get out of this is the
Speaker 2: idea of the feedback loop.
Speaker 1: Now that's very important because you might think, well, what
Speaker 1: does this have to do with machines and what does
Speaker 1: this have to do with transhumanism. Well, the idea of
Speaker 1: creating and controlling a machine man is picked up by
Speaker 1: other people, not just in the West in terms of psychology,
Speaker 1: people like Carl Rogers and be Of Skinner and others
Speaker 1: who are working on similar types of projects. But this
Speaker 1: filters over into the idea of Norbert Wiener's cybernetics. If
Speaker 1: you don't know, Norbert Wieners of course sort of the
Speaker 1: father of modern cybernetics, and a lot of his research
Speaker 1: was done at MIT. But what a lot of people
Speaker 1: don't know is if you read Norbert Wiener's book Cybernetics,
Speaker 1: the first twenty pages deals with all of these foundations
Speaker 1: and people funding him, promoting and supporting his research. That
Speaker 1: just happened to be the Macy Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation,
Speaker 1: and other CIA connected outfits that are going under cutout names.
Speaker 1: So cybernetics, according to Norbert Winner himself, was funded by
Speaker 1: all of these cutouts foundations elite technocratic operators.
Speaker 2: That then becomes what we know of as MIT. So
Speaker 2: he goes to do all of this.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of experiments, and I think he traveled
Speaker 1: to somewhere to do a bunch of research under the
Speaker 1: Rockefeller aegis, and then he goes back to MIT becomes
Speaker 1: the hub of a lot of this, and then he
Speaker 1: pioneers at MIT this whole discipline of cybernetics. They're working
Speaker 1: together with studies that Ewan Cameron was doing at mont
Speaker 1: Royal and Canada and McGill University. So we start to
Speaker 1: get the idea that wait a minute, mkultra is not
Speaker 1: just mind control and drugs and assassins and hypnosis. That's
Speaker 1: just one tiny part of it. Turns out mkultre's actually
Speaker 1: dozens of projects, dozens of experiments, dozens of universities worldwide.
Speaker 1: In fact, there's mkulture projects and research that was being
Speaker 1: done in Australia that people we've only learned about this
Speaker 1: in the last ten years through the Internet. In fact,
Speaker 1: so even in the nineteen fifties, when Murlou is writing
Speaker 1: about what Pavlov is up to, Murlou doesn't even seem
Speaker 1: to be aware of the fact that a lot of
Speaker 1: this type of research is being done in the West
Speaker 1: at the so called Free Allies Studies the Free West
Speaker 1: at the Tavistock Clinic because all the same people and
Speaker 1: entities that Norder Wiener lists, the Macy Foundation, the Rockefellers
Speaker 1: and all that, well, guess.
Speaker 2: Why, they're also all tied into the Tavistock Clinic.
Speaker 1: So keep in mind the idea that the West or
Speaker 1: the good guys fighting the Eastern atheist bad guys during
Speaker 1: this time period is just simply not really the case.
Speaker 1: The elites in both of these systems are atheists, and
Speaker 1: they're both working all the same types of projects to
Speaker 1: perfect mind control.
Speaker 2: What happened?
Speaker 1: Did I give birth? There was a bunch of fireworks
Speaker 1: just went off. I don't know, am I am I
Speaker 1: coming out as a boy? Is this my gender reveal?
Speaker 1: Or am I coming out as a girl?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: So transhumanism is actually an end result of this whole
Speaker 1: project of what Pavlov was up to, even though he
Speaker 1: might not have known immediately about transhumanism. He specifically wanted
Speaker 1: to create the perfectly conditioned stimulus response machine manimal, and
Speaker 1: this influences later research into the notion of cyborg man.
Speaker 2: Now you might think, what is this up to do
Speaker 2: with any of us. Well, social media.
Speaker 1: And its feedback loop stimulus response has been studied for
Speaker 1: many years as well by the pioneers of Silicon Valley
Speaker 1: pushing out all the Remember a few years ago when
Speaker 1: Jason Lannier and the other people from Facebook were talking
Speaker 1: about how Facebook was put out to really mind control
Speaker 1: and destroy people through this feedback loop. And the engineers,
Speaker 1: remember they were admitting all this and that they had
Speaker 1: invented all these different techniques to addict you and to
Speaker 1: get you upset, and all this kind of stuff all
Speaker 1: by design. So the feedback loop is not just about
Speaker 1: theoretical inkaulture research and mind controlling people in a lab
Speaker 1: or whatever. It's about projecting this and using this on
Speaker 1: a mass scale. That's what all this research is about.
Speaker 1: And all the same entities behind Tavistock and involved in
Speaker 1: the tabstat are the same entities behind the mk ulture
Speaker 1: project and the same entities behind Norbert Wiener and cybernetics.
Speaker 2: And that's where we get transhumanism today.
Speaker 1: This ties into DARPA, This ties into the rank corporation
Speaker 1: studies and all that into creating and controlling and mastering
Speaker 1: man's inner mind and his inner resistance to break it down. Now,
Speaker 1: remember the two famous mk Ultra books that were first
Speaker 1: published in the late seventies Walter Boler's book Operation My
Speaker 1: Control and John Marx's book CAA and The Search for
Speaker 1: the Mentoring Candidate. Both books end with a chapter on
Speaker 1: where MK Ultra went after it was supposed a little
Speaker 1: shut down.
Speaker 2: Was it completely shut out? Well, of course not.
Speaker 1: It changed names and developed into other projects MK Search,
Speaker 1: MK Delta, and other things focusing on implantable microchips, modification,
Speaker 1: human augmentation, super soldiers, et cetera, et cetera. So it
Speaker 1: became transhumanism. For example, look up doctor Jose Delgado's famous book,
Speaker 1: which you can't find. Actually, thankfully we do have a
Speaker 1: copy of it, Physical Control of the Mind. Doctor Jose Tolgato,
Speaker 1: so Pavlov is one of these key figures that contributes
Speaker 1: to the creation of mass man, collective man, Soviet man. Well.
Speaker 1: Guess who was studying the same types of stuff in
Speaker 1: the West to create mass man not through a centralized
Speaker 1: state control, but through advertising and through public opinion polls.
Speaker 1: Walter Lippmann, who also worked with Tavistock public Opinion in
Speaker 1: the nineteen twenties, they had perfected the technique of mass
Speaker 1: mind controlling people through opinion polls, fake poles. What they
Speaker 1: would do is they would take public polls and they
Speaker 1: would get real information and data, see what the people
Speaker 1: really thought, and if they wanted to tweak where people
Speaker 1: where they wanted people to go. If too many people
Speaker 1: were against a war or something like this, well what
Speaker 1: we would way they do is put out a poll
Speaker 1: that lies and says that, well, you know, most people
Speaker 1: support this thing, this war, this policy. And they realized
Speaker 1: that because most people had a tendency to want to
Speaker 1: be part of the group, they would change their opinion
Speaker 1: and go with the majority because they.
Speaker 2: Didn't want to be in the minority.
Speaker 1: So this inherent weakness in human nature to project glory,
Speaker 1: to want to be part of the winning team, to
Speaker 1: want to be part of the group and the collective.
Speaker 1: They played upon that and they perfected the technique of
Speaker 1: fake and lying polls.
Speaker 2: We've seen fake and lying poles.
Speaker 1: Every day in the last you know, five, six, ten years, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, polls lie all the time, the job reports,
Speaker 1: the Kamala's suddenly the most popular person in the world.
Speaker 2: You know, all of this fake polls ands over.
Speaker 1: That's all perfected social engineering techniques out of Tavistock and
Speaker 1: out of Walter Lippmann and people who were actually working
Speaker 1: in advertising. So this begins in domains of advertising in
Speaker 1: the West. In the East, it's the super state, Soviet
Speaker 1: state wanting to control the individuals, and all of this,
Speaker 1: as we said, was to ultimately depersonalize and to dissociate
Speaker 1: the minds of the target population. Goes on to talk
Speaker 1: about the key components of the super state, the technocratic state,
Speaker 1: doctor Marlieu of using medical submission, medicine, the medical psychiatric
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical arm Again big Pharma's not here yet, but the
Speaker 1: state's use of these things was being pioneered, especially at
Speaker 1: the time of World War two and by the Soviets.
Speaker 1: This was to ultimately create addicts, he said, well, not
Speaker 1: necessarily to make everybody at drug addict. Well, actually, to
Speaker 1: a degree, yes, to make everyone a drug addict. Think
Speaker 1: about how many moomers rely on these pharmaceuticals and these
Speaker 1: like I remember one of my good friend's dad before
Speaker 1: he passed away, he had a shelf that he took
Speaker 1: like fifteen cent pharmaceutical pills every day, and it was
Speaker 1: obvious that the pills were killing him, but in his
Speaker 1: mind because the doctor told him that he had to
Speaker 1: take these fifteen different pharmaceutical pills every day.
Speaker 2: That's the doctor.
Speaker 1: What the doctors are God, and what they say is law,
Speaker 1: even though doctors are basically glorified pharmaceutical salesmen for the
Speaker 1: most part, not all doctors about I'm just saying, now,
Speaker 1: how did they get to this? Well, again, they utilize
Speaker 1: studies about mass movements, mass populations, how populations want to
Speaker 1: not be in the minority, and so you do what
Speaker 1: you're told the majority says. Of course, mass media plays
Speaker 1: a key role in that. So remember, even though Soviets
Speaker 1: are studying the mass man for state purposes, in the West,
Speaker 1: advertising agencies and corporations are studying the same stuff to
Speaker 1: homogenize the mindset of the population and supposedly the free West.
Speaker 1: But it's the same techniques and strategies to homogenize and collectivize.
Speaker 1: This is where Mrlew's book gets very prophetic because he
Speaker 1: has an entire chapter about what TV and mass media
Speaker 1: was doing in the nineteen forties and fifties. So think
Speaker 1: about this. This is wild way before any of the
Speaker 1: madness that we have today. He was warning about in
Speaker 1: his day in the forties and fifties, he already saw
Speaker 1: TV addiction as a key means by which the state
Speaker 1: was able to propagandize and control the populations someone in
Speaker 1: the West. Television has the ability, he says, to addict
Speaker 1: people because it creates fantasy worlds where people who are
Speaker 1: under tyrannical regimes will retreat to escape the dullness, the boredom,
Speaker 1: the tyranny that's actually going on in the real life
Speaker 1: under the tyrannical regime. And so the tyrannical state must
Speaker 1: have all forms of leisure, all forms of bred and
Speaker 1: circuses and entertainment that allow the population to direct their
Speaker 1: misery into through dissociation and through fantasy worlds. He says
Speaker 1: that what will happen is that TV and television and
Speaker 1: ultimately mass media will kill creativity. Why would TV kill creativity, Well,
Speaker 1: he says, the ease and the convenience of this information
Speaker 1: in the time of television, remember this is way before internet.
Speaker 1: He says that this will create a population who doesn't
Speaker 1: want to go through the hard work of reading a
Speaker 1: book when they can just watch it on TV. And
Speaker 1: so the mind will dull and will become less creative
Speaker 1: because not only does TV make people lazy, because they
Speaker 1: won't read the book, They'll just go and watch some
Speaker 1: movie or some television version of it.
Speaker 2: People will be.
Speaker 1: Less able to read, they will be less able to
Speaker 1: critically analyze and think, and they will be less creative because.
Speaker 2: Of the reliant it's on the ease and the convenience
Speaker 2: of immediate media.
Speaker 1: And it's about a thousand times worse now, isn't it
Speaker 1: than just the nineteen forties and fifties television. Another thing
Speaker 1: that mass culture will do, and mass television brainwashing will do,
Speaker 1: is create monoculture.
Speaker 2: Instead of going to a city or to some place to.
Speaker 1: Taste their exotic foods or to learn about other cultures,
Speaker 1: you'll watch it on TV. Why go there when I
Speaker 1: can watch it on TV. But what that does is
Speaker 1: that that will also create a monoculture where the screens
Speaker 1: will emit to everyone what is the acceptable thing to believe,
Speaker 1: what is the acceptable culture to accept and to care about?
Speaker 1: What are the things to not care about? In other words,
Speaker 1: will control and mandate what even questions can be asked. Now,
Speaker 1: this is a very important issue because, for example, think
Speaker 1: back to the koof Right. In that time period of
Speaker 1: the COVID, there was all these debates going back and
Speaker 1: forth right, And I'm not saying that Lablink and all
Speaker 1: this stuff wasn't a valid discussion to have or debate
Speaker 1: or whatever, But there were only certain things that you
Speaker 1: were allowed to even discuss during that time period. Were
Speaker 1: we allowed to even discuss in the public sphere. The
Speaker 1: fact that these exercises like Event to A one and
Speaker 1: the Spars document and clay X and Crimson Catagen and
Speaker 1: on on on that that might have been examples of
Speaker 1: pre planning for this. No, that's not even a valid
Speaker 1: question to even ask. You can't even bring that up.
Speaker 1: This is called the magic circle. And famous philosophers like
Speaker 1: Eric Boglan talked about this because he says, in tyrannical
Speaker 1: technocratic regimes, the magic circle is necessary to absolutely control discourse.
Speaker 2: And the way that works is that just simply.
Speaker 1: You can't ask any questions that are outside of the
Speaker 1: circle of acceptable discourse.
Speaker 2: And so all the system has to do is make
Speaker 2: sure that no one is.
Speaker 1: Asking any questions or bringing anything into focus outside of
Speaker 1: the controlled circle. So you're free to debate whatever you
Speaker 1: want within this, just never anything outside of it. For example,
Speaker 1: the two party system which we've had, which is super
Speaker 1: corrupt for so long. Nope, you're you're You're allowed to
Speaker 1: forever debate the normy Republicans and the normy Democrats and
Speaker 1: never anything outside of that.
Speaker 2: It's a classic example.
Speaker 1: So controlling the narrative, controlling the system, controlling the perception
Speaker 1: of the population is more important. But to get back
Speaker 1: to the technocratic state, the tyrannical technocratic state, what must
Speaker 1: it do. It must, as he says again, this is
Speaker 1: a very crucial point. It must engage in the technique.
Speaker 1: This is not idiocy. It's a technique of lie upon
Speaker 1: lie that are introduced at a rapid pace on purpose,
Speaker 1: which is an intentional technique of contradicting the system. Is
Speaker 1: contradicting on purpose. Why because it forces the population to
Speaker 1: become passive and catatonic in the face of the power
Speaker 1: structure that they look to abusing them.
Speaker 2: It's a form of Stockholm scenerme, you could say.
Speaker 1: So it demoralizes the population because get this, it's an
Speaker 1: intentional technique to not allow the target population or the
Speaker 1: opposition any time to actually reply with a reasoned response
Speaker 1: based on logic and reason. In other words, the technique
Speaker 1: must rely on fast contradictions and lies think about perfect
Speaker 1: example of Fauci in the whole Coop crisis, intentionally just
Speaker 1: saying ridiculous things and changing what the science says and
Speaker 1: then saying he is science just totally just nonsense stuff.
Speaker 1: But that was not an accident. That was a technique
Speaker 1: that's used by tyrannical regime use lies and make them big,
Speaker 1: and then do another one really quick, and the opposition
Speaker 1: is thrown into a tizzy. They're off balance that they
Speaker 1: can before they reply to the first lie, there's a
Speaker 1: new lie, and then when they try to reply to
Speaker 1: the second, there's a new one. And how long has
Speaker 1: Alex been saying Alex has been saying this for twenty
Speaker 1: plus years, that the system will do these lives on purpose.
Speaker 1: And yet we have Matt Walsh and all the normany
Speaker 1: conservatives that say we're ruled by idiots and the boobs
Speaker 1: in Washington, we're ruled by dummies.
Speaker 2: Well, Biden doesn't know where he is.
Speaker 1: Like they knew in the nineteen fifties and forties that
Speaker 1: a regime can do this as a technique. Another key
Speaker 1: thing is that the public must be kept not just
Speaker 1: docile and stupid and all the fat and all that,
Speaker 1: but they must be kept in a childlike state. This
Speaker 1: is a very precient chapter, a very important Chipie calls
Speaker 1: the womb state. So it's not just that there's the
Speaker 1: big brother, daddy nanny state, or the mommy state the
Speaker 1: womb state. The population must be kept in a super
Speaker 1: duper arrested development status. The more dominant childlike the better.
Speaker 1: And this is called naotany, or at least in young
Speaker 1: men or young women or young people when they're not
Speaker 1: sufficiently mature appropriate to their age, this is called naotny.
Speaker 2: This is I'm, you know, living in mommy's basement.
Speaker 1: She feeds me chicken tends and chalky milk, and I
Speaker 1: do my activism on the internet, and I live on
Speaker 1: rend it or something like this, right, naoty. How does
Speaker 1: neotanny occur? Well, the super state. The super regime utilizes
Speaker 1: the manipulation of archetypes, particularly to reflect the individual or
Speaker 1: the society's image of the father or the mother upon
Speaker 1: the state. The state becomes the archetypal father and mother
Speaker 1: to the individuals, and the role of the actual father
Speaker 1: and mother must be destroyed, thus the destruction of family.
Speaker 1: So in order to have a population that looks to
Speaker 1: its ruled by the mommy daddy state. The family must
Speaker 1: be destroyed. And of course Huxley says that very clearly
Speaker 1: at the very beginning of Brand New World, the state
Speaker 1: must be seen as the mommy and the daddy, and
Speaker 1: not just that but also as the womb. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is what Kamala is actually running on. I mean,
Speaker 1: wasn't she say she was saying to Drew barrymore like
Speaker 1: I'm they call me kamami or something stupid like this,
Speaker 1: Like she wants to be the mommy likes it's kamal
Speaker 1: unism and kammammi unism, right, she wants to be the
Speaker 1: mommy to the population. And then all the really dumb
Speaker 1: down like super low IQ masses of people that think
Speaker 1: that she is their mommy will look up to her
Speaker 1: as a perfect example of Mrlu's womb state, the danger
Speaker 1: of the wombs state. And so this childishness must be
Speaker 1: foisted upon the population in general. And get this, he said,
Speaker 1: in this syop of the womb state, the super state
Speaker 1: will foist upon the population. I thought this was wild
Speaker 1: cleanliness rituals, rituals that you must engage in which are irrational,
Speaker 1: but that make you a good little boy, a good
Speaker 1: little citizen. You're keeping to the cleanliness rituals. So, for example,
Speaker 1: the tyrannical dictator of the forties and fifties, I don't know,
Speaker 1: he might make everybody go to these mass rituals and
Speaker 1: there's some form of purgation or a shouting ceremony, two
Speaker 1: minutes of hate or something like that.
Speaker 2: But I thought it was fascinating.
Speaker 1: He said that the mind control studies of the super
Speaker 1: States also looked at prison camps and mindless cleanliness rituals
Speaker 1: that you have to engage in in prison camps wint
Speaker 1: for the purpose of mind controls, and he says misplaced
Speaker 1: anger purgation, So the anger that individuals will have at
Speaker 1: the superstate are misdirected to mindless social distancing, mindless wearing
Speaker 1: of mass cleanliness rituals as mind control. This is the
Speaker 1: Alex John jop being sure and go over to Alex's
Speaker 1: store and buy those products and keep Alex on air.
Speaker 1: Covid VACS causes more heart damage than COVID virus and
Speaker 1: brain blood immune canser reprodictive study.
Speaker 2: I mean, there's so many of these studies. What do
Speaker 2: you make of that