Speaker 1: Or of the Auxix John Jrulmerguessos, Jay Dyer of Jays Analysis. Today,
we're going to talk about a book I recently read
and lectured through that is crucial, I think, to understanding
where we are in the post COVID world, the post
syops world, the syops that were used to roll out
and convince everybody of COVID. We're going to be talking
about the book by doctor jus Merleau, The Rape of
the Mind. This is the book that was published in
nineteen fifty six, and it was a summary of the
work that he had done as a psychological warfare expert
to the Allies during World War Two. So he had
done a lot of research and information for the Netherlands
Army during World War Two and kind of summarized all
of his studies about totalitarian regimes.
Speaker 2: It's not just about the Axis powers.
Speaker 1: There's also a lot of information, a lot of chapters
that dealt with the Soviets and the Communists and the
Marxists and their approach to control. And the book is
I think really relevant for it today, especially if we've been.
Speaker 2: Aware of this book.
Speaker 1: I didn't hear about it until somebody mentioned it in
association with doctor Malone's research somewhere around the middle of
the COVID madness that we had to deal with, and
they were pointing out how prescient m'lou's book was and
how much apparently doctor Malone was kind of preceded or
had ideas that preceded.
Speaker 2: Him in this book by Merlou.
Speaker 1: And so in The Rape of the Mind, he wants
to cover the idea of what total term regimes require,
what must they do to survive, What are all of
their techniques and their strategies, what are the things that
they roll out to control the masses? And again this
is nineteen fifty six, we're counting a lot of what
he had gone through and studied in regard to the
followers of Hitler, but also the Soviets.
Speaker 2: Now he notes at the beginning something you wouldn't expect.
Speaker 1: You would think, Okay, this is going to be about psyops,
it's going to be about human.
Speaker 2: Trickery and all that.
Speaker 1: But it begins by talking about the necessary basis in
mind control in terms of ancient cults and the occult,
and he says that what must be understood by the
competent social engineer or the totalitarian regime is the techniques
that were used by ancient religious cults, shamans, sorcerers, wizards,
and the ways that they had perfected a lot of
these techniques even in the ancient world, so sorcery, black magic,
a lot of that had to do with casting a
spell on your target audience to convince them to control
are basically to convince them to worship the state leader.
So most ancient world religions and cults were essentially tied
to the deity or the divinization of some state leader
and the worship of that state leader, be it a pharaoh,
be it an emperor, or whoever a king. And so
the king was always very interested in whatever techniques and
tricks he could use, and if he could really control
the priest class or utilize the tricks of the craft,
then he would have a tremendous amount of control with
the bill a lot of tools at at his hand
that he could use, and one of those is of
course drugging, and so a lot of today's drug warfare
or drugging of the population actually has its origins in
ancient religious and drugging ceremonies. For example, we covered a
few months ago here on the fourth Hour, the Cambridge
Companion to Western Esotericism and Occultism, there was a chapter
in the Ancient Mysteries, and we talked about how in
the ancient mysteries rituals you had the process of initiation
for the misty e of the Aluscinian mysteries, who prepared
for many, many years to undergo this ritual. They didn't
know what to expect. It was a great secret. And
then they're brought into this temple. They're given high doses
of a hallucinogenic drink. The woman pops out who's the goddess,
and she dances naked or whatever. They bring in some
popcorn or something like a corn, a stalk of corn,
which is supposed to represent the goddess. I don't know so,
but it sounds like something pretty intense. Smoking mirrors, and
so if you're tripping balls, this would really blow your mind.
You would be initiated, and it would be a powerful
means of controlling this state associated cult in this case,
the ancient mysteries of Eldessenian Mysteries. Modern regimes were very
interested in studying those techniques, as well as things like
medieval witchcraft or the techniques and principles of how a
witch or a sorceress might put something in her enemies
drink or something like this, and so poisonings and so forth,
assassinations in the history of Europe, these were always very
interesting on them in terms of the advantage point of
the tagnocratic regimes that were rising at the time of
World War Two. And this book is going to be
very important because this anticipates the rise of technocracy. I
think that's the most prescient aspect of this book. I mean, yes,
he talks about what basically would be called mass formations
like Hoastis, but he also goes into great depth about
particularly the chap as we're going to see her a
little bit, predicting the rise of the machines, the rise
of machine man, and the dangers that that would have
or society as a whole if they if we allowed
this technocratic system to come into full fruition.
Speaker 2: He talks about menticide.
Speaker 1: Menticide is essentially the death of the mind, and all
centralized tutalitarian regimes, of whatever flavor they have, this impetus,
the desire to ultimately utilize the technique of mentusicide to
destroy the minds of their population. Now you think, well,
why would they want to do that? Then they want
to mind control the population. Well you'll see why, because
he's going to list all of these great insightful techniques
that remember, this is supposed to be the followers of
Tiny Mustache.
Speaker 2: Man, the Hilarian.
Speaker 1: These are the ultimate tyrants, according to Merleu at the
time of nineteen fifty six, closely followed according to his analysis,
I'm saying he's right about everything, but closely followed by
Stalin and the KGB and all that. But what he
lists pales in comparison to where we are. Now that's
the crazy part of this book. We're ten times further
down the rabbit hole than what he describes about the
regimes in the nineteen forties and fifties. He says that
menticide is a key component of the tyrannical regime because
the mind must be controlled so that it doesn't have
any other things to look to or access to critique
the regime. For example, objective truth cannot exist with a
tyrannical regime for many reasons, but for one, because the
regime has to dictate truth. It has to dictate what's
true and false, regardless of what's actually trum false. It
must be the source and the creator of the true
and the false. Thus, any competing systems or standards are
necessarily enemies of the totalitarian regime. So there can't be
fact checkers that are objective fact checkers. There has to
be fact checkers by the system. There has to be
snops based fact checker has to be infraguard or whatever
the various Bill Gates fact checkers are.
Speaker 2: Which are all just going to back up what Bill
Gates wants, right.
Speaker 1: There has to be system control of all of those
types of checks and balances, because the regime's number one
goal is control. He says that in order to further
ment acide, not only must we have a drug in
the population, a dumbing down of the population through the drugging,
but also this was something that I think people still
haven't figured out, especially in the normy conservative sere.
Speaker 2: People still haven't figured out that. Think about this.
Speaker 1: In the nineteen fifties, Merlou understood that even the Axis
regimes and the communist regimes knew the power of contradictions.
Think about that, they knew the power of the system.
Intentionally rolling out a bunch of contradictions in a row,
and you may think, well, wait a minut it No,
that just means they're incompetent, right, the boobs in Washington
throw the bums out.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 1: No, the system, which is run by people above that
is very cognizant of the power of intentionally rolling out
contradictions to throw the audience, throw the population off balance.
In other words, intentional contradictions throwing them out in a
very fast paced way is a known technique of tyrannical regimes.
Think about back in the time of the COVID nonsense.
We heard one week a mask, you're supposed to put
it on and it protects you. The next week, no,
take your mask off. No, the next week, No, you
get to work two or three masks. Right, And Fauci
would intentionally contradict himself, and everybody say, oh, look at
this idiot. Fauci's so stupid. They're not stupid, they're cunning.
So don't mistake cunning for stupidity. Now, sometimes people in
the system are stupid, that's true. The layer of the
government apparatus are a lot of idiots. They think islands
tip over, islands are floating, right, But that layer of idiocy.
There is therefore a reason, and we have to be
cognizant of that to understand that people way above that,
the people that we're talking about today, the social engineers,
the technocrats that doctor Juice Muluir was warning about in
his ninety fifty six book, same methodology, same game plan,
same worldview today, same people, same power structure. Today, they
know that by pushing contradictions, by pushing again the mass
drug in the population, they can create a form of
menticide in the population by which the population is under
a spell and surrenders their critical thinking faculties to some
other entity, namely the corporate state. Now, when we talk
abou mass drugging it, remember there was no saying at
this time in terms of World War two of a
big pharma. Big pharma was really kind of in the
works to begin to grow around this time, and a
lot of the drug research at World War two.
Speaker 2: This is where we ca things like mk ultra and
the production of LSD and all that actually comes out
of this time.
Speaker 1: Now, what would he say about what we've seen in
the last few years with the power of big pharma
and its tentacles all over the globe to be involved
in this corporate slash US Department of Defense roll out
of all of this nonsense of.
Speaker 2: The last four or five years.
Speaker 1: By the way, they're still pushing that you need to
get your stabbies right, your vaccines. All of that is
ten times crazier than the things that he's describing in
the nineteen fifties. And according to various calculations, the estimates
are what fourteen to twenty million as that have died
as a result of these so called vaccinations which are
experimental gene therapies.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's again a vast number of people worldwide.
Speaker 1: Now he goes back to discussing example of brainwashing it
in his time that.
Speaker 2: Are kind of key case examples.
Speaker 1: He mentions the famous case of Cardinal Bozinski, the romcal
the cardinal who was taken in by the Communist and
was given a lot of brainwashing techniques. He was put
through a lot of brainwashing techniques, he was put through
a lot of torture, and he talks about how this
was really experimental to see what worked best to wear
this man down, and that if you could break the person,
if you could debase them morally, break them through whatever
techniques worked. The best, then you could extrapolate that and
use that on a mass scale. And what have we
been saying for so long about these individual studies, these
individual psychological profiles of well, we put this test subject
through all of this torture and chaos and mind control,
and you know, even studies done in prison, prison camps,
concentration camps, labor camps, mindless.
Speaker 2: Labor, and so forth.
Speaker 1: What it works the best to cause menticide because the
purpose of menticide is not to create a bunch of
totally you know, vegetable basically mindless vegetables in the mental institute,
but rather to break the population, break the individuals so
that they don't utilize critical thing, and then become re
imprinted repeaters of the state.
Speaker 2: That's the key thing here.
Speaker 1: They become this sort of thing that you could a
blank slate, a tabula rossa that the state can then
re imprint the new man upon. And part of the
reason they believe this at this time was that it
was very popular, especially amongst the Soviets, not so much
amongst the national socials, but amongst the Communists and Soviets
to believe that man was a blank slate. Now it
was in fact a completely determined stimulus response creature like
Pavlov's dogs. I'm going to get to Pavlov's dogs in
a minute, but Pavlov's dogs are relevant because he's a
key figure, not just in the so we had experience
of the creation of the New Man, but actually becomes
a model for many people in the West who we
might think are the opponents of Sovietism, but in fact
we're doing exactly the same studies, exactly the same types
of research, and have exactly the same materialist, atheist presuppositions
as someone like Pavlov. And I'm speaking of people like
Carl Rodgers, B. F. Skinner and others who were supported
by the Rockfeller Foundation. So you might think, oh, well,
they're going to fight, you know, the Rockfeller Foundation is
gonna put money into fighting the bad guys over in
Moscow and the Soviets. No, they're all studying the same stuff,
which is control of the human mind. Before we get
to Pavlov, though, there's a couple other things that Marlou mentions.
He says that we have this drug in the society,
we have this propaganda in society, we have this brainwashing
of the society. The intentional pushing of contradictions. But we
also have the idea of fake guilt. And I thought
this was very prescient because at this time, of course,
the Soviets and other regimes, the communists, we're utilizing this
notion of how bad everyone in the West is because
of colonialism, and you try to foist your culture upon
someone else, and you rape these cultures just for profit,
as if all cultures, as if cultural relativism is true. Well, now,
in fact, some cultures are better than other cultures. Some
cultures are wicked and degenerate. Some cultures cook kiddies for
lunch and others don't, So cultural relativism is not true.
But the presupposition of all of the leftists and the
social justice warriors and activists is that cultural relativism is
true and all cultures are relative. There's no absolute that
can judge between the cultures as good or bad. But
the problem then becomes, well, wait a minute, but the
same people who say that turn around and say you're
all collectively guilty in the West. White men are guilty
in the West because of colonialism and critical race theory
and all the stuff.
Speaker 2: But wait a minute, I thought that you're a cultural relativist.
Speaker 1: If everything is relative, then there's nothing wrong with this
culture doing colonialism or that culture doing or whatever. All
things are relative, right, so then you have no basis
to turn around and say evil white man British empire colonialism. Now,
the British Empire did engage in slavery and different types
of techniques of deception or whatever. But my point is
that if you're an atheist, relativest social justice warrior, there's nothing.
Speaker 2: Wrong with anything. You might not like it, but it's
not actually quote wrong.
Speaker 1: But you see the fissure in the mind of the
individuals who believe in this, the dissociation that begins to happen.
And that's very important because Marlugo's on to talk about
Tyrannical regimes are not only themselves dissociative, they foist dissociation
on the population. Now there was the population themselves dissociable.
Speaker 2: Why is that?
Speaker 1: Why would they want that? In terms of the process
of menta side. Well, one reason for that is because
the regimes themselves are at war with objective truth. As
we said, right, there can be no competing standards which
the regime, the tyrannical system must submit to because it
must dictate truth. If capital t truth exists, or objective
truth exists, then the regime is bound by certain limitations
and certain principles.
Speaker 2: It can't do whatever it wants.
Speaker 1: Thus, if a regime desires to do whatever it wants
raw pure power, brutal Nietzsche and uber minch power, be overman,
or whatever the overwill will to power, then that regime
must thus wear at war against truth. But since there
is truth, this creates a fissure within the system itself.
The system itself is thus warring on what is actually
objective objectively the case, for example, that there are no
biological men and women. If the regime adopts this position
and then foists this and pushes this on everyone, as
it has nowadays unfortunately, and this goes back to the
Tavistok Institute and what they pioneered in the last ten
years to push as a form of psychological warfare and
mind control, then they've created an immediate fissure between reality
and what the regime dictates as reality.
Speaker 2: But then there's a mirrored aspect of this where when.
Speaker 1: They push this because the society looks to the nanny state,
the daddy state, which is odd, like why is there
a nanty state and daddy state if there's no genders.
But let's say that it's not about being consistent, it's
about being inconsistent on purpose. So now we have this
idea that the population is then being told by their
authority structure that there actually isn't male and female, that
it's actually a social contrctor that do you actually become
whatever you want, which is not true. This creates the
dissociative state in the mass population who buys into the
collective delusion. So there's a reflexive symbiotic relationship then between
the system pushing delusion which they know is not true,
but they think they can dictate truth the population the
experiences that dissociation and then further looks to the state
to confirm and affirm and back up its collective delusion.
Speaker 2: And it's not just about gender. That's just an easy example.
Speaker 1: It's also about, as we've seen in the last several years,
the medical establishments lies about itself, and it's sacraments of stabs,
the stabby sacrament and everything that Merleu describes in many
of the chapters about the way the totalitarian regime works
is that it works like a cult, works like a
religious establishment. And boy are the parallels striking when we
think about the last few years, the dogmas of Big
Pharma and the CDC and the Rockefeller Foundation, and then
Bill Gates and the WHO and all these people right,
their dogmas about medicine and experimental therapy, gene therapies and
all this. Well, they're the system, they're the establishment, right,
And how does every boomer think, Well, they wouldn't be
in power if they didn't have something, right, how come
you ain't up there in power if you know so
much about what you're talking about, Amomas six, Debbi and
I'll feel good, and then he dies next year. I'm
not trying to be mean, but I heard that and
had that debate many times in the last five or
six years right now, to be fair, During the period
when Quickly talks about in Tragy and Hope the rise
of the managerial state, he says that the next generation,
and he's talking about the Boomer generation because he was
a generation above him. He says, they will be indoctrinated
into what we call managerial rule by experts. So unfortunately,
the boomers were actually the first to really be a
baby Boomer generation to really be indoctrinated into the ideas
of looking to the medical experts, and we could have
never had koof and all this happened. Did we not
have a baby Boomer generation who was indoctrinated by a
design into worshiping their doctors and their big pharma establishment.
That's their church, that's their sacrament that they look to.
And so nobody who questioned this would ever have any
hope of stopping all this nonsense the last four years,
had not the Boomers, as a collective generation, who have
most of the wealth and were in power at this time,
foisting this on the rest of the country.
Speaker 2: I'm not just blaming boomers.
Speaker 1: This was a intentional propaganda that was geared at their
generation as a test bed for the latest and sophistication
of psychological warfare at that time.
Speaker 2: Now, remember murl lou is writing a generation ahead of that.
Speaker 1: But what Murlau's describing in his book is what you
see manifested in the next generation, because he's great generation
in the Boomers, and what is their generation given as
their collective delusion and mythology.
Speaker 2: Total liberation through the nineteen sixties countercolls, which.
Speaker 1: Was given to them by design, a fake guilt of
the older generation, which the younger boomer generation adopted as
their form of activism to bring social justice. This is
where you begin to see social justice warrior stuff. It
comes from this period of the nineteen sixties boomers. You
can look to people like Tim Leary, and to people
like Terence McKenna, and to people like Barbara Marx Hubbard,
to people like Jane Goodall. This generation was flooded with
this idea. They were broken through the mental side of
the psyops of the generation prior to be a generation
that again would look to the experts, reject the traditional
conservative ideas of religion. They would experiment with new ways
of living by design, which Alvin Toffler says was done
by design. Stanford Research gave all that by design, changing images,
a man, etcetera. They would then raise the generation of
Gen X, who would pioneer the notions of the next
phase of social justice warrior, the grunge movement, the grunge bands, MTV,
Pearl Jam all this stuff and the nausea, the nauseating
social justice mindset of people like Eddie Vedder, etc. We're
talking about psyops and the generational destruction meant a side.
Speaker 2: Here on the fourth hour of the Alex jochemerguest host
Chany Dyer.
Speaker 3: To Merrick has been used as a medicine for thousands
of years to treat digestive disorders, respiratory problems, arthritis, and depression.
It has strong anti cancer, anti diabetic, anti microbial, and
antioxidant properties and is one of the most effective anti
inflammatory medications available. The Powerful Bodies formula at infowarstore dot
com includes ninety five percent kercubinoids, Boswellia serrata extract, organic
sage leaf, organic lemon bomb leaf, organic time leaf, and
pippering from black Pepper Bodies is arguably the best to
Merrick formula available. Get it now. Support free speech and
support the info war at infowarsstore dot com.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the fourth hour of the aust Shell
shown your guest host Jay Diery of Jay's analysis. I
remind you that I'll be live October twenty five and
twenty six at the Rohemian Grove event in Florida. The tickets,
the flyer. It's at the top of my Twitter. If
you go to my ax, you can go find me
on x under j Dyer and you'll see penned at
the top. There is the flyer and the links to
get tickets to that event. It's gonna be a lot
of fun. It's going to be two days of comedy
podcast live. I think Elijah Shaffer will be there, Leonardo
Joni will be there, maybe Shane Cashman and others. So
it's going to be a lot of fun. Get your tickets.
You can also get my books at the shop at
Jasonalysis dot com. I have my two Esoteric Hollywood books
working on the third book right now. It's going to
be out hopefully in a few months. I've got about
three inner pages in Esoterically, with three it's a little
bit different. It's going to be covering a lot more films,
a little more in depth style with more films, so
shorter analysis, more hard hitting information, and more films.
Speaker 2: So look for that in the coming months.
Speaker 1: You can get Esoteric Hollywood one and two signed copies
in the shop at Jasonolysis dot com.
Speaker 2: You can also follow me over on Rockfin.
Speaker 1: I did just put up a exclusive one and a
half hour interview with most famous living gangster Samme to
Bowl at Ravano. Now we're talking about Soviet creation of
machine man. I was talking about the Boomers and how
they were given a certain specific line of indoctrination. So
I want to go now to Pavlov, because Pavlov is
in a very important character in the history of mind
control and technocratic engineering, and he's probably the most famous
of the Soviet social engineers and technocrats, because his whole
position was based around what we call operant conditioning, and
this is the idea that man is basically an animal.
Speaker 2: There is no soul. The soul is a fairy tale,
a medieval fiction.
Speaker 1: Man is an operant response machine that is dictated by
external stimuli. And so if you can perfect the external stimuli,
then you can control the input outputs, and thus you
can create a completely controlled, refurbished machine man who's an animal.
Speaker 2: Thus you could call him manimal.
Speaker 1: So it's pretty much literally Pavlov's views that man is
a manimal and his goal with all this was to
quote get rid of man's inner resistance to what to state,
to the absolute technocratic control. He's a perfect example of
what we see embodied in the figure of someone like
O'Brien in the In nineteen eighty four, when Winston and
O'Brien are having that discourse about truth and how again,
as I've said many times, O'Brien says, that you have
to believe that the state, that the system, the corporate
state in our case, dictates reality itself.
Speaker 2: That's the key.
Speaker 1: So Pablov is tasked then with being able to find
the techniques to do this. What are the techniques to
create the Soviet man, as he called it, the machine man,
the manimal. So you can begin to see that already
this is technocracy, this is the idea that man is
already just a machine. And Merlo says that the real
origin of where Pavlov got this was accepting Descartes a
mechanistic view of the universe, a deistic mechanistic view of
the universe. I mean a Descartes was be perhaps deistic,
but in the case of Palvlov, is just strict materialism
and atheism. And so man is really just another collection
of molecules. There's nothing special about him. He's just like
any other collection of molecules. And so when you have
a collection of a dog that you need to train,
you train him with the bell and the food, and
you know, the Pavlovyan ring the bell system. Right as
Will Smith's saying about you can ring my bell, so
the dog Wolf Smith, you can.
Speaker 2: Ring my bell. This is the whole model of.
Speaker 1: Palvlov because if you could control perfectly and understand the
stimulus response, the external stimuli of the internal response, and
then this feedback loop, you could therefore master man. So
he actually had the belief not just that you could
destroy the inner resistance, you could also master the individual
man and completely reshape and reform him, re imprint him
through this operant conditioning to be the perfect Soviet man,
the perfect collective man. Man can be totally controlled and explained,
he said, And this was the purpose of a lot
of these experiments.
Speaker 2: He also was.
Speaker 1: Involved in other things I'm sure you've heard of, like
whether you see the famous experiments of the mouse, and
the mouse is standing on an electrical grid, and if
he does the right thing by eating the food or whatever,
he doesn't get shocked. If he does something wrong, he
gets shocked. And so electro shock conditioning with mice and
probably with humans as well, this is all part of Havlovianism.
Speaker 2: And so what we get out of this is the
idea of the feedback loop.
Speaker 1: Now that's very important because you might think, well, what
does this have to do with machines and what does
this have to do with transhumanism. Well, the idea of
creating and controlling a machine man is picked up by
other people, not just in the West in terms of psychology,
people like Carl Rogers and be Of Skinner and others
who are working on similar types of projects. But this
filters over into the idea of Norbert Wiener's cybernetics. If
you don't know, Norbert Wieners of course sort of the
father of modern cybernetics, and a lot of his research
was done at MIT. But what a lot of people
don't know is if you read Norbert Wiener's book Cybernetics,
the first twenty pages deals with all of these foundations
and people funding him, promoting and supporting his research. That
just happened to be the Macy Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation,
and other CIA connected outfits that are going under cutout names.
So cybernetics, according to Norbert Winner himself, was funded by
all of these cutouts foundations elite technocratic operators.
Speaker 2: That then becomes what we know of as MIT. So
he goes to do all of this.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of experiments, and I think he traveled
to somewhere to do a bunch of research under the
Rockefeller aegis, and then he goes back to MIT becomes
the hub of a lot of this, and then he
pioneers at MIT this whole discipline of cybernetics. They're working
together with studies that Ewan Cameron was doing at mont
Royal and Canada and McGill University. So we start to
get the idea that wait a minute, mkultra is not
just mind control and drugs and assassins and hypnosis. That's
just one tiny part of it. Turns out mkultre's actually
dozens of projects, dozens of experiments, dozens of universities worldwide.
In fact, there's mkulture projects and research that was being
done in Australia that people we've only learned about this
in the last ten years through the Internet. In fact,
so even in the nineteen fifties, when Murlou is writing
about what Pavlov is up to, Murlou doesn't even seem
to be aware of the fact that a lot of
this type of research is being done in the West
at the so called Free Allies Studies the Free West
at the Tavistock Clinic because all the same people and
entities that Norder Wiener lists, the Macy Foundation, the Rockefellers
and all that, well, guess.
Speaker 2: Why, they're also all tied into the Tavistock Clinic.
Speaker 1: So keep in mind the idea that the West or
the good guys fighting the Eastern atheist bad guys during
this time period is just simply not really the case.
The elites in both of these systems are atheists, and
they're both working all the same types of projects to
perfect mind control.
Speaker 2: What happened?
Speaker 1: Did I give birth? There was a bunch of fireworks
just went off. I don't know, am I am I
coming out as a boy? Is this my gender reveal?
Or am I coming out as a girl?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: So transhumanism is actually an end result of this whole
project of what Pavlov was up to, even though he
might not have known immediately about transhumanism. He specifically wanted
to create the perfectly conditioned stimulus response machine manimal, and
this influences later research into the notion of cyborg man.
Speaker 2: Now you might think, what is this up to do
with any of us. Well, social media.
Speaker 1: And its feedback loop stimulus response has been studied for
many years as well by the pioneers of Silicon Valley
pushing out all the Remember a few years ago when
Jason Lannier and the other people from Facebook were talking
about how Facebook was put out to really mind control
and destroy people through this feedback loop. And the engineers,
remember they were admitting all this and that they had
invented all these different techniques to addict you and to
get you upset, and all this kind of stuff all
by design. So the feedback loop is not just about
theoretical inkaulture research and mind controlling people in a lab
or whatever. It's about projecting this and using this on
a mass scale. That's what all this research is about.
And all the same entities behind Tavistock and involved in
the tabstat are the same entities behind the mk ulture
project and the same entities behind Norbert Wiener and cybernetics.
Speaker 2: And that's where we get transhumanism today.
Speaker 1: This ties into DARPA, This ties into the rank corporation
studies and all that into creating and controlling and mastering
man's inner mind and his inner resistance to break it down. Now,
remember the two famous mk Ultra books that were first
published in the late seventies Walter Boler's book Operation My
Control and John Marx's book CAA and The Search for
the Mentoring Candidate. Both books end with a chapter on
where MK Ultra went after it was supposed a little
shut down.
Speaker 2: Was it completely shut out? Well, of course not.
Speaker 1: It changed names and developed into other projects MK Search,
MK Delta, and other things focusing on implantable microchips, modification,
human augmentation, super soldiers, et cetera, et cetera. So it
became transhumanism. For example, look up doctor Jose Delgado's famous book,
which you can't find. Actually, thankfully we do have a
copy of it, Physical Control of the Mind. Doctor Jose Tolgato,
so Pavlov is one of these key figures that contributes
to the creation of mass man, collective man, Soviet man. Well.
Guess who was studying the same types of stuff in
the West to create mass man not through a centralized
state control, but through advertising and through public opinion polls.
Walter Lippmann, who also worked with Tavistock public Opinion in
the nineteen twenties, they had perfected the technique of mass
mind controlling people through opinion polls, fake poles. What they
would do is they would take public polls and they
would get real information and data, see what the people
really thought, and if they wanted to tweak where people
where they wanted people to go. If too many people
were against a war or something like this, well what
we would way they do is put out a poll
that lies and says that, well, you know, most people
support this thing, this war, this policy. And they realized
that because most people had a tendency to want to
be part of the group, they would change their opinion
and go with the majority because they.
Speaker 2: Didn't want to be in the minority.
Speaker 1: So this inherent weakness in human nature to project glory,
to want to be part of the winning team, to
want to be part of the group and the collective.
They played upon that and they perfected the technique of
fake and lying polls.
Speaker 2: We've seen fake and lying poles.
Speaker 1: Every day in the last you know, five, six, ten years, right,
I mean, polls lie all the time, the job reports,
the Kamala's suddenly the most popular person in the world.
Speaker 2: You know, all of this fake polls ands over.
Speaker 1: That's all perfected social engineering techniques out of Tavistock and
out of Walter Lippmann and people who were actually working
in advertising. So this begins in domains of advertising in
the West. In the East, it's the super state, Soviet
state wanting to control the individuals, and all of this,
as we said, was to ultimately depersonalize and to dissociate
the minds of the target population. Goes on to talk
about the key components of the super state, the technocratic state,
doctor Marlieu of using medical submission, medicine, the medical psychiatric
pharmaceutical arm Again big Pharma's not here yet, but the
state's use of these things was being pioneered, especially at
the time of World War two and by the Soviets.
This was to ultimately create addicts, he said, well, not
necessarily to make everybody at drug addict. Well, actually, to
a degree, yes, to make everyone a drug addict. Think
about how many moomers rely on these pharmaceuticals and these
like I remember one of my good friend's dad before
he passed away, he had a shelf that he took
like fifteen cent pharmaceutical pills every day, and it was
obvious that the pills were killing him, but in his
mind because the doctor told him that he had to
take these fifteen different pharmaceutical pills every day.
Speaker 2: That's the doctor.
Speaker 1: What the doctors are God, and what they say is law,
even though doctors are basically glorified pharmaceutical salesmen for the
most part, not all doctors about I'm just saying, now,
how did they get to this? Well, again, they utilize
studies about mass movements, mass populations, how populations want to
not be in the minority, and so you do what
you're told the majority says. Of course, mass media plays
a key role in that. So remember, even though Soviets
are studying the mass man for state purposes, in the West,
advertising agencies and corporations are studying the same stuff to
homogenize the mindset of the population and supposedly the free West.
But it's the same techniques and strategies to homogenize and collectivize.
This is where Mrlew's book gets very prophetic because he
has an entire chapter about what TV and mass media
was doing in the nineteen forties and fifties. So think
about this. This is wild way before any of the
madness that we have today. He was warning about in
his day in the forties and fifties, he already saw
TV addiction as a key means by which the state
was able to propagandize and control the populations someone in
the West. Television has the ability, he says, to addict
people because it creates fantasy worlds where people who are
under tyrannical regimes will retreat to escape the dullness, the boredom,
the tyranny that's actually going on in the real life
under the tyrannical regime. And so the tyrannical state must
have all forms of leisure, all forms of bred and
circuses and entertainment that allow the population to direct their
misery into through dissociation and through fantasy worlds. He says
that what will happen is that TV and television and
ultimately mass media will kill creativity. Why would TV kill creativity, Well,
he says, the ease and the convenience of this information
in the time of television, remember this is way before internet.
He says that this will create a population who doesn't
want to go through the hard work of reading a
book when they can just watch it on TV. And
so the mind will dull and will become less creative
because not only does TV make people lazy, because they
won't read the book, They'll just go and watch some
movie or some television version of it.
Speaker 2: People will be.
Speaker 1: Less able to read, they will be less able to
critically analyze and think, and they will be less creative because.
Speaker 2: Of the reliant it's on the ease and the convenience
of immediate media.
Speaker 1: And it's about a thousand times worse now, isn't it
than just the nineteen forties and fifties television. Another thing
that mass culture will do, and mass television brainwashing will do,
is create monoculture.
Speaker 2: Instead of going to a city or to some place to.
Speaker 1: Taste their exotic foods or to learn about other cultures,
you'll watch it on TV. Why go there when I
can watch it on TV. But what that does is
that that will also create a monoculture where the screens
will emit to everyone what is the acceptable thing to believe,
what is the acceptable culture to accept and to care about?
What are the things to not care about? In other words,
will control and mandate what even questions can be asked. Now,
this is a very important issue because, for example, think
back to the koof Right. In that time period of
the COVID, there was all these debates going back and
forth right, And I'm not saying that Lablink and all
this stuff wasn't a valid discussion to have or debate
or whatever, But there were only certain things that you
were allowed to even discuss during that time period. Were
we allowed to even discuss in the public sphere. The
fact that these exercises like Event to A one and
the Spars document and clay X and Crimson Catagen and
on on on that that might have been examples of
pre planning for this. No, that's not even a valid
question to even ask. You can't even bring that up.
This is called the magic circle. And famous philosophers like
Eric Boglan talked about this because he says, in tyrannical
technocratic regimes, the magic circle is necessary to absolutely control discourse.
Speaker 2: And the way that works is that just simply.
Speaker 1: You can't ask any questions that are outside of the
circle of acceptable discourse.
Speaker 2: And so all the system has to do is make
sure that no one is.
Speaker 1: Asking any questions or bringing anything into focus outside of
the controlled circle. So you're free to debate whatever you
want within this, just never anything outside of it. For example,
the two party system which we've had, which is super
corrupt for so long. Nope, you're you're You're allowed to
forever debate the normy Republicans and the normy Democrats and
never anything outside of that.
Speaker 2: It's a classic example.
Speaker 1: So controlling the narrative, controlling the system, controlling the perception
of the population is more important. But to get back
to the technocratic state, the tyrannical technocratic state, what must
it do. It must, as he says again, this is
a very crucial point. It must engage in the technique.
This is not idiocy. It's a technique of lie upon
lie that are introduced at a rapid pace on purpose,
which is an intentional technique of contradicting the system. Is
contradicting on purpose. Why because it forces the population to
become passive and catatonic in the face of the power
structure that they look to abusing them.
Speaker 2: It's a form of Stockholm scenerme, you could say.
Speaker 1: So it demoralizes the population because get this, it's an
intentional technique to not allow the target population or the
opposition any time to actually reply with a reasoned response
based on logic and reason. In other words, the technique
must rely on fast contradictions and lies think about perfect
example of Fauci in the whole Coop crisis, intentionally just
saying ridiculous things and changing what the science says and
then saying he is science just totally just nonsense stuff.
But that was not an accident. That was a technique
that's used by tyrannical regime use lies and make them big,
and then do another one really quick, and the opposition
is thrown into a tizzy. They're off balance that they
can before they reply to the first lie, there's a
new lie, and then when they try to reply to
the second, there's a new one. And how long has
Alex been saying Alex has been saying this for twenty
plus years, that the system will do these lives on purpose.
And yet we have Matt Walsh and all the normany
conservatives that say we're ruled by idiots and the boobs
in Washington, we're ruled by dummies.
Speaker 2: Well, Biden doesn't know where he is.
Speaker 1: Like they knew in the nineteen fifties and forties that
a regime can do this as a technique. Another key
thing is that the public must be kept not just
docile and stupid and all the fat and all that,
but they must be kept in a childlike state. This
is a very precient chapter, a very important Chipie calls
the womb state. So it's not just that there's the
big brother, daddy nanny state, or the mommy state the
womb state. The population must be kept in a super
duper arrested development status. The more dominant childlike the better.
And this is called naotany, or at least in young
men or young women or young people when they're not
sufficiently mature appropriate to their age, this is called naotny.
Speaker 2: This is I'm, you know, living in mommy's basement.
Speaker 1: She feeds me chicken tends and chalky milk, and I
do my activism on the internet, and I live on
rend it or something like this, right, naoty. How does
neotanny occur? Well, the super state. The super regime utilizes
the manipulation of archetypes, particularly to reflect the individual or
the society's image of the father or the mother upon
the state. The state becomes the archetypal father and mother
to the individuals, and the role of the actual father
and mother must be destroyed, thus the destruction of family.
So in order to have a population that looks to
its ruled by the mommy daddy state. The family must
be destroyed. And of course Huxley says that very clearly
at the very beginning of Brand New World, the state
must be seen as the mommy and the daddy, and
not just that but also as the womb. I mean,
this is what Kamala is actually running on. I mean,
wasn't she say she was saying to Drew barrymore like
I'm they call me kamami or something stupid like this,
Like she wants to be the mommy likes it's kamal
unism and kammammi unism, right, she wants to be the
mommy to the population. And then all the really dumb
down like super low IQ masses of people that think
that she is their mommy will look up to her
as a perfect example of Mrlu's womb state, the danger
of the wombs state. And so this childishness must be
foisted upon the population in general. And get this, he said,
in this syop of the womb state, the super state
will foist upon the population. I thought this was wild
cleanliness rituals, rituals that you must engage in which are irrational,
but that make you a good little boy, a good
little citizen. You're keeping to the cleanliness rituals. So, for example,
the tyrannical dictator of the forties and fifties, I don't know,
he might make everybody go to these mass rituals and
there's some form of purgation or a shouting ceremony, two
minutes of hate or something like that.
Speaker 2: But I thought it was fascinating.
Speaker 1: He said that the mind control studies of the super
States also looked at prison camps and mindless cleanliness rituals
that you have to engage in in prison camps wint
for the purpose of mind controls, and he says misplaced
anger purgation, So the anger that individuals will have at
the superstate are misdirected to mindless social distancing, mindless wearing
of mass cleanliness rituals as mind control. This is the
Alex John jop being sure and go over to Alex's
store and buy those products and keep Alex on air.
Covid VACS causes more heart damage than COVID virus and
brain blood immune canser reprodictive study.
Speaker 2: I mean, there's so many of these studies. What do
you make of that