WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I'm glad actually that all of these

2
00:00:04.160 --> 00:00:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholics are in a tizzy over the obvious massive

3
00:00:07.599 --> 00:00:12.759
<v Speaker 1>failure of Tim Fordan in the debate. First of all,

4
00:00:12.800 --> 00:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>all three of us were loud and interrupted, and these

5
00:00:17.359 --> 00:00:19.519
<v Speaker 1>hippocrites ack like I was the only one that was

6
00:00:19.600 --> 00:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>loud and interrupted, which is just a ridiculous double standard.

7
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Everybody did it, including Temple. It was an informal debate. Obviously,

8
00:00:30.079 --> 00:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>people lie and act like I've never done formal debates,

9
00:00:32.560 --> 00:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that there aren't civil formal debates. There are dozens of them.

10
00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But we also do the uncivil informal blood sports style

11
00:00:42.320 --> 00:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. And so what amazes me is just the

12
00:00:47.039 --> 00:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>consistent just gas lighting and lying that Roman Catholics do

13
00:00:52.799 --> 00:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. They're actually incapable of reading comprehension, of

14
00:00:59.840 --> 00:01:03.399
<v Speaker 1>just basic honesty about any of the topics that come up.

15
00:01:04.400 --> 00:01:09.359
<v Speaker 1>And just like a bunch of feminists or women on

16
00:01:09.400 --> 00:01:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the internet, the only thing that they care about is

17
00:01:12.879 --> 00:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the optics, how it makes them feel and who hurts

18
00:01:16.959 --> 00:01:19.599
<v Speaker 1>their feelies or whatever. It's nothing to do with the content.

19
00:01:19.719 --> 00:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>None of these people will actually stick to the content.

20
00:01:23.959 --> 00:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And then anytime you invite them to come discuss, they

21
00:01:26.439 --> 00:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>whine and complain as if you're mean, which, by the way,

22
00:01:30.319 --> 00:01:35.079
<v Speaker 1>is a self like gay as hell to complain. But

23
00:01:35.200 --> 00:01:38.719
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, it's not true that you don't get a

24
00:01:38.799 --> 00:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>chance or an opportunity to come make your case. You

25
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>only get interrupted when you don't make arguments, and when

26
00:01:45.879 --> 00:01:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you shift into various fallacies or various straw men. That's it.

27
00:01:52.719 --> 00:01:58.439
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty easy. We have atheists, Muslims, Protestants, Catholics they

28
00:01:58.480 --> 00:02:00.879
<v Speaker 1>call in all the time. I've done so for years.

29
00:02:01.719 --> 00:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>If you could just simply coherently make an argument, it's

30
00:02:04.760 --> 00:02:09.159
<v Speaker 1>very easy to make your case here, and I welcome it.

31
00:02:09.240 --> 00:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I offer it all the time. And what's funny is,

32
00:02:12.400 --> 00:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>out of ten reven cathoy shit talkers, none of them

33
00:02:16.719 --> 00:02:19.719
<v Speaker 1>will actually come debate their arguments. All they want to

34
00:02:19.759 --> 00:02:24.319
<v Speaker 1>do is debate your debating, debate your meanness, your style,

35
00:02:24.520 --> 00:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or what you did bad. Now you'll notice too, that

36
00:02:27.560 --> 00:02:32.039
<v Speaker 1>any moral qualm they have about me, when they pile on,

37
00:02:33.039 --> 00:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they let loose ten times more venom than I letless

38
00:02:37.159 --> 00:02:40.199
<v Speaker 1>in any of these conversations. But it's okay for them

39
00:02:40.240 --> 00:02:43.439
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but not for me. So it's all

40
00:02:43.599 --> 00:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just insane levels of democracy, idiocy, childishness, stupidity, and that

41
00:02:49.280 --> 00:02:56.039
<v Speaker 1>it just never ends. So let's get to the actual issues. Kevin. Kevin,

42
00:02:56.080 --> 00:03:00.599
<v Speaker 1>when you commented, you commented to me about what Vatican

43
00:03:00.639 --> 00:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>two says about Hindus, and I replied to that, and

44
00:03:04.039 --> 00:03:07.159
<v Speaker 1>then you said all this other stuff about Muslims, which

45
00:03:07.199 --> 00:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I never even replied to. I didn't even listen or

46
00:03:09.039 --> 00:03:12.159
<v Speaker 1>look at any of your comments about Islam. So why

47
00:03:12.199 --> 00:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>did you then lie as if I deflected and I

48
00:03:16.560 --> 00:03:19.479
<v Speaker 1>was misleading people. That's why I blocked you, is because

49
00:03:19.479 --> 00:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a total dishonesty. I made one reply to one

50
00:03:22.639 --> 00:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of your comments, gotta I'm me and Kevin.

51
00:03:29.719 --> 00:03:32.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I didn't lie. I'm not really sure what you're

52
00:03:32.479 --> 00:03:36.719
<v Speaker 2>talking about. I said, Vaticant two does not say Hindus

53
00:03:36.759 --> 00:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>worship the same God or.

54
00:03:38.280 --> 00:03:38.800
<v Speaker 3>The one Truth.

55
00:03:39.319 --> 00:03:41.919
<v Speaker 1>And I did I reply to that. You did reply

56
00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to that, okay, And so that was it, right?

57
00:03:44.599 --> 00:03:44.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

58
00:03:44.840 --> 00:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>That was one post and then I reposted or whatever

59
00:03:47.800 --> 00:03:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you yeah, quote what Twitter calls it. I quoted a

60
00:03:50.599 --> 00:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>second post. This one was not about hindu it was

61
00:03:53.599 --> 00:03:57.280
<v Speaker 2>about Muslims. And then I made an argument from Romans one.

62
00:03:58.879 --> 00:04:01.560
<v Speaker 2>You commented about Hindu use again, so that was a

63
00:04:01.599 --> 00:04:02.479
<v Speaker 2>totally different context.

64
00:04:02.879 --> 00:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But I was obviously still replying to the original comment

65
00:04:07.280 --> 00:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'm talking about Hinduism.

66
00:04:08.879 --> 00:04:11.439
<v Speaker 3>Pretty it wasn't pretty obvious. It was not obvious from

67
00:04:11.439 --> 00:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>you at all.

68
00:04:12.039 --> 00:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>If I'm talking about if I'm talking about Hinduism, is

69
00:04:14.360 --> 00:04:16.879
<v Speaker 1>it not obvious that I'm still talking about that post?

70
00:04:17.560 --> 00:04:19.759
<v Speaker 3>It's not. I mean the post the second post was about.

71
00:04:20.160 --> 00:04:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if I'm going to respond to somebody, I'm

72
00:04:21.680 --> 00:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>not gonna respond to them about something.

73
00:04:23.240 --> 00:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Does Vatican does Vatican who actually say that? Say what?

74
00:04:28.279 --> 00:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Your first comment was that Vatican.

75
00:04:30.279 --> 00:04:32.879
<v Speaker 3>Two doesn't say that, right, it does not say what.

76
00:04:35.519 --> 00:04:38.079
<v Speaker 1>It does not say what my original comment said about

77
00:04:38.160 --> 00:04:41.519
<v Speaker 1>throwing Hindus into the mix. That's right. They do not.

78
00:04:41.720 --> 00:04:43.199
<v Speaker 3>They do not worship the same God.

79
00:04:44.199 --> 00:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And yet what term does Vatican two use in no

80
00:04:47.360 --> 00:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>sat It says they. You do read it.

81
00:04:50.959 --> 00:04:53.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm carrying my my daughter me read it.

82
00:04:53.680 --> 00:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't. You don't know what it says.

83
00:04:56.240 --> 00:04:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to butcher it says.

84
00:04:58.120 --> 00:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It says they. Finally they in Hinduism they value the

85
00:05:02.600 --> 00:05:05.519
<v Speaker 1>moral life and worship God. Excuse me, let excuse me,

86
00:05:05.560 --> 00:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>that's the uh, let me go back up. That's the

87
00:05:08.279 --> 00:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Muslim comment, it says, let me pull it up. I

88
00:05:21.959 --> 00:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>got a different spot. That was the wrong comment. Okay,

89
00:05:35.560 --> 00:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>here it is. I'll read the whole section, so you

90
00:05:39.319 --> 00:05:47.879
<v Speaker 1>know with the context. I thinks it says thus in Hinduism,

91
00:05:47.920 --> 00:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>so we're talking about in the religion, men contemplate the

92
00:05:50.959 --> 00:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>divine mystery and express it through an exhaustible abundance of

93
00:05:54.920 --> 00:05:59.879
<v Speaker 1>myths and through searching philosophical inquiry. They seek freedom for

94
00:06:00.079 --> 00:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the anguish of our human condition, either through asthetic practices

95
00:06:04.399 --> 00:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or profound meditation, or a flight to God with love

96
00:06:09.519 --> 00:06:10.079
<v Speaker 1>and trust.

97
00:06:13.319 --> 00:06:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Is that the same thing it says about Muslims that

98
00:06:15.720 --> 00:06:16.920
<v Speaker 2>they worship the One True God?

99
00:06:17.279 --> 00:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Does it? What's what? What? When it's uh? What does

100
00:06:20.399 --> 00:06:23.199
<v Speaker 1>this say about God? What? What does it?

101
00:06:23.480 --> 00:06:27.199
<v Speaker 3>Does it use the proper it does? Does that mean

102
00:06:27.240 --> 00:06:29.240
<v Speaker 3>it's the one True God? What?

103
00:06:29.240 --> 00:06:29.439
<v Speaker 5>What?

104
00:06:29.480 --> 00:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Which one is? It?

105
00:06:30.800 --> 00:06:31.759
<v Speaker 3>Does that mean it's the one True?

106
00:06:32.720 --> 00:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>How many gods? How many gods do you believe in?

107
00:06:34.759 --> 00:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>How many do you capitalize?

108
00:06:35.959 --> 00:06:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, the Hindus believe in many gods.

109
00:06:37.920 --> 00:06:39.519
<v Speaker 1>How many do you capitalize?

110
00:06:40.639 --> 00:06:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean I only talk about one usually, but.

111
00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>How many do you capitalize?

112
00:06:45.240 --> 00:06:48.279
<v Speaker 3>You're falsely inferring that because do you capitalize?

113
00:06:48.439 --> 00:06:50.959
<v Speaker 2>I think you're falsely in capital you're.

114
00:06:51.839 --> 00:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So, how many gods are there that you capitalize? Anybody?

115
00:06:56.040 --> 00:06:58.199
<v Speaker 1>The ones that you believe in? Right? Right?

116
00:06:58.279 --> 00:07:00.120
<v Speaker 2>But I think you're falsely assuming they're That means is

117
00:07:00.120 --> 00:07:01.720
<v Speaker 2>that they're worship the One True God.

118
00:07:02.959 --> 00:07:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Why is it capitalized? You liar?

119
00:07:05.519 --> 00:07:08.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm not lying, Jay, Why is it capitalized?

120
00:07:08.839 --> 00:07:14.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. You don't know exactly, I don't know. Well, yeah,

121
00:07:14.439 --> 00:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't know.

122
00:07:15.079 --> 00:07:16.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean I can make a property, I can

123
00:07:16.439 --> 00:07:19.360
<v Speaker 2>make a proper guest without jump into conclusions that that

124
00:07:19.759 --> 00:07:22.079
<v Speaker 2>they worship the same God as you know Muslims, or

125
00:07:22.120 --> 00:07:24.000
<v Speaker 2>as Christians or as.

126
00:07:25.199 --> 00:07:27.079
<v Speaker 1>So you think Muslims, you think Muslims and Christians do

127
00:07:27.120 --> 00:07:27.879
<v Speaker 1>worship the same God?

128
00:07:28.040 --> 00:07:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Of course that's what the document says, Jay.

129
00:07:32.079 --> 00:07:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, thank you. So it's not what Tim Gordon said.

130
00:07:34.439 --> 00:07:37.879
<v Speaker 3>Right, I'm not aware of anything. I don't follow Tim Gordon.

131
00:07:37.959 --> 00:07:38.800
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea what.

132
00:07:39.240 --> 00:07:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, right, Muslims and Christians worship the same God when

133
00:07:43.480 --> 00:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Muslims don't acknowledge the Trinity?

134
00:07:45.879 --> 00:07:47.720
<v Speaker 2>But why are you changing topics? Let's stick to the

135
00:07:47.800 --> 00:07:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Hindu So.

136
00:07:48.720 --> 00:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to go there were brought up Muslims.

137
00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go. We're gonna go.

138
00:07:52.720 --> 00:07:54.399
<v Speaker 3>We haven't finished hind.

139
00:07:54.560 --> 00:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>You brought them up because you just said you don't

140
00:07:56.279 --> 00:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>know why it's capital g. Now we're going to go

141
00:07:58.040 --> 00:08:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to your other argument because you don't know. So tell

142
00:08:00.680 --> 00:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>me how do Muslims worship the once your God when

143
00:08:02.680 --> 00:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't believe in Christ or the Trinity?

144
00:08:05.399 --> 00:08:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Talking about Hindu?

145
00:08:06.360 --> 00:08:08.079
<v Speaker 1>All right, so this is why this is what you

146
00:08:08.079 --> 00:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>guys do. You just said, you just said about the

147
00:08:10.959 --> 00:08:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Hindu you don't know. You said, I don't know, you, bro?

148
00:08:16.439 --> 00:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you say I don't know?

149
00:08:17.639 --> 00:08:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can't. I can't read into the end why

150
00:08:20.839 --> 00:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>they capitalize the words in God?

151
00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>And you don't know. So we're gonna move on. And

152
00:08:24.600 --> 00:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you lost that point, We're gonna move on.

153
00:08:29.439 --> 00:08:30.319
<v Speaker 3>I haven't lost any point.

154
00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:30.959
<v Speaker 4>You still have.

155
00:08:31.240 --> 00:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know you still your argument? Argument is you're done, dude.

156
00:08:38.519 --> 00:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>This is why you're a liar. You're a liar. Get

157
00:08:40.960 --> 00:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>out of here. That's why these people are discussing liars.

158
00:08:45.240 --> 00:08:48.919
<v Speaker 1>It's Brosey and you noticed he would not go to

159
00:08:48.960 --> 00:08:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the Muslim argument. It's exactly how this is gonna I

160
00:08:51.919 --> 00:08:53.879
<v Speaker 1>told you. So this is what these people do. They

161
00:08:53.879 --> 00:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>make a big stink. They don't even actually have any

162
00:08:57.559 --> 00:09:01.639
<v Speaker 1>capability of dealing with the argument. It's all that I'm bad.

163
00:09:02.200 --> 00:09:05.159
<v Speaker 1>And then when we get to the argument, they lose

164
00:09:05.320 --> 00:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and they flounder and they don't know and they don't

165
00:09:07.480 --> 00:09:12.399
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about it because they're dishonest. That's my point.

166
00:09:12.840 --> 00:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, h browser, it was going on, Jae, Can

167
00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:19.799
<v Speaker 1>you hear me? Yep?

168
00:09:20.159 --> 00:09:23.279
<v Speaker 6>All right, cool, Yeah, it's gonna be quick, man. I

169
00:09:23.360 --> 00:09:27.120
<v Speaker 6>just wanted to say, you know, just with this, this

170
00:09:27.159 --> 00:09:29.399
<v Speaker 6>small bit of engagement I've been doing with these guys

171
00:09:29.399 --> 00:09:32.559
<v Speaker 6>for the past I don't know, like a couple of months.

172
00:09:32.639 --> 00:09:35.840
<v Speaker 6>I genuinely I don't understand how you're still doing this

173
00:09:35.879 --> 00:09:36.360
<v Speaker 6>ship man.

174
00:09:36.399 --> 00:09:37.480
<v Speaker 7>It's that.

175
00:09:37.759 --> 00:09:40.279
<v Speaker 6>Do you remember earlier that that guy under one of

176
00:09:40.320 --> 00:09:42.600
<v Speaker 6>your posts that I called out for that for that too, Kokoy?

177
00:09:44.360 --> 00:09:48.960
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely yes, yeah, so so he did. He took a

178
00:09:48.960 --> 00:09:51.720
<v Speaker 6>while to reply. Once I saw that he did reply,

179
00:09:52.080 --> 00:09:54.559
<v Speaker 6>he completely ignored what it was that I was saying

180
00:09:55.000 --> 00:09:57.000
<v Speaker 6>in the reply, So I just let it go. There

181
00:09:57.039 --> 00:09:58.519
<v Speaker 6>was there was no point in your reply. And then

182
00:09:58.559 --> 00:10:01.000
<v Speaker 6>he went to then he went to my page and

183
00:10:01.039 --> 00:10:04.799
<v Speaker 6>then he uh he he left the reply under under

184
00:10:04.840 --> 00:10:08.440
<v Speaker 6>the picture that I shared of yours, saying that you

185
00:10:08.480 --> 00:10:11.639
<v Speaker 6>would smoke you were smoking Aiden and Tim in the debate,

186
00:10:12.480 --> 00:10:13.919
<v Speaker 6>and I was just from a couple of days ago

187
00:10:13.919 --> 00:10:17.240
<v Speaker 6>when he said something and he completely ignored what I

188
00:10:17.279 --> 00:10:21.480
<v Speaker 6>said regarding the different ecclesiologies again, and he asked me,

189
00:10:21.679 --> 00:10:24.759
<v Speaker 6>he said, uh, he he brought up something that, you know,

190
00:10:24.840 --> 00:10:27.159
<v Speaker 6>like something that Carill has said in the past. He

191
00:10:27.200 --> 00:10:31.639
<v Speaker 6>brought up Bartholomew again and uh fuck, who's the last

192
00:10:31.679 --> 00:10:37.519
<v Speaker 6>patriarch of what of John? John of Antioch? He he

193
00:10:37.519 --> 00:10:40.320
<v Speaker 6>brought it, He brought up three and he's he's asking me, Okay,

194
00:10:40.360 --> 00:10:43.840
<v Speaker 6>so are they accumulated? Like how do you how do

195
00:10:43.879 --> 00:10:46.840
<v Speaker 6>you completely ignore what I said under the post reply

196
00:10:47.000 --> 00:10:50.759
<v Speaker 6>to that, completely ignored again under something that under something

197
00:10:50.759 --> 00:10:53.320
<v Speaker 6>from days ago, and then leave another damn reply Like

198
00:10:54.120 --> 00:10:55.759
<v Speaker 6>these people are so fucking dishonest. Man.

199
00:10:55.879 --> 00:10:58.519
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy, man, It's crazy. So the thing with the

200
00:10:58.679 --> 00:11:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox patriarchs, the page is just a bishop with canonical privileges.

201
00:11:02.679 --> 00:11:05.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not some it's not a little pope like they

202
00:11:05.720 --> 00:11:08.559
<v Speaker 1>think that patriarchs are like many popes, and if they

203
00:11:08.600 --> 00:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have a patriarch saying something wrong or ritical, then it's

204
00:11:11.519 --> 00:11:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a gotcha. They're every patriarch. From the Orthodox perspective, every

205
00:11:16.440 --> 00:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>patriarch it has had has had heterodox patriarchs at some point.

206
00:11:20.919 --> 00:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>They've all fallen into heresy, including Rome, including the ep

207
00:11:24.399 --> 00:11:27.639
<v Speaker 1>in any of them. So for us, it's not a

208
00:11:27.639 --> 00:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>defeater if there's a heretic patriarch who falls away, or

209
00:11:31.720 --> 00:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>if there's one even that says something heretical. Now, another

210
00:11:34.159 --> 00:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>point that should be made is that our ecclesiology candon

211
00:11:38.200 --> 00:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>law is different. So the methods about how the Orthodox

212
00:11:41.759 --> 00:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Church goes about dealing with heresy at that level, it's

213
00:11:45.159 --> 00:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>not the same as the methods that Roman Catholics have

214
00:11:47.639 --> 00:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and how they view the relationship of Candilaw to the Church. So,

215
00:11:51.080 --> 00:11:55.399
<v Speaker 1>for example, if a patriarch commits error or heresy, schism, whatever,

216
00:11:55.440 --> 00:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and he continues in that, there's phases too can procedure

217
00:12:00.840 --> 00:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Orthodox view, So eventually, after removal from communion

218
00:12:04.879 --> 00:12:08.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a sonodal excommunication, the rest of the Orthodox laity

219
00:12:08.919 --> 00:12:13.879
<v Speaker 1>are not bound morally and to be expected to remove

220
00:12:13.960 --> 00:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>themselves from communing with that person until there is a

221
00:12:17.639 --> 00:12:22.279
<v Speaker 1>sonodal pronouncement like that. That's Orthodox ecclesiology. So when these

222
00:12:22.360 --> 00:12:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholics are replying to us that Carol said something heterodox,

223
00:12:27.200 --> 00:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Carol said something wrong. I can easily say absolutely he did,

224
00:12:32.080 --> 00:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's just as wrong as Francis. But I don't

225
00:12:34.840 --> 00:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>have the same ecclesiology as you, and so I am

226
00:12:37.159 --> 00:12:39.639
<v Speaker 1>not bound to become a set of a contest as

227
00:12:39.679 --> 00:12:42.519
<v Speaker 1>an Orthodox person like you would be bound as a

228
00:12:42.600 --> 00:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholic to become set of a contest if the

229
00:12:44.960 --> 00:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>pope becomes a heretic er says something heretical. So all

230
00:12:47.600 --> 00:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>they keep doing is just reading Papism into Orthodoxy and

231
00:12:52.399 --> 00:12:55.159
<v Speaker 1>acting like it's a gotcha when it's a different system.

232
00:12:55.480 --> 00:12:58.519
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and but see the day obviously, you know, I've

233
00:12:58.519 --> 00:13:02.399
<v Speaker 6>heard a damn billions on the Twitter spaces where you

234
00:13:02.440 --> 00:13:06.720
<v Speaker 6>will explain that that verbat into somebody and say if

235
00:13:06.759 --> 00:13:09.360
<v Speaker 6>they come back on or maybe even later in the debate,

236
00:13:09.399 --> 00:13:11.759
<v Speaker 6>if it's brought up again, they'll just say that you're

237
00:13:11.879 --> 00:13:15.440
<v Speaker 6>you're using a double standard and it's a so like

238
00:13:15.480 --> 00:13:18.720
<v Speaker 6>based on what happened earlier. It's like they just don't

239
00:13:19.080 --> 00:13:24.039
<v Speaker 6>understand what it means to have different ecclesiology under under

240
00:13:24.080 --> 00:13:28.559
<v Speaker 6>that post. I'm not the first one I said it.

241
00:13:31.960 --> 00:13:33.000
<v Speaker 6>I say that one more time.

242
00:13:33.080 --> 00:13:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Jay thieve of it.

243
00:13:40.919 --> 00:13:42.919
<v Speaker 6>Hold on, Jay, say that one more time. My connection

244
00:13:42.960 --> 00:13:43.320
<v Speaker 6>went out.

245
00:13:43.840 --> 00:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>No, it's my connection. I said. They just can't literally

246
00:13:46.080 --> 00:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>can't conceive of it because they don't think in terms

247
00:13:48.240 --> 00:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of different systems. Yeah, exactly.

248
00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:53.840
<v Speaker 6>So I'm not the first one that said anything about

249
00:13:53.840 --> 00:13:57.159
<v Speaker 6>ecclesiology under that post, but he ignored it.

250
00:13:57.200 --> 00:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>When I said that.

251
00:13:58.559 --> 00:14:00.960
<v Speaker 6>Every I went I went back maybe about like an

252
00:14:01.000 --> 00:14:03.440
<v Speaker 6>hour after his reply, just to check and see how

253
00:14:03.519 --> 00:14:07.080
<v Speaker 6>dishonesty was being every other every other person. And there's

254
00:14:07.080 --> 00:14:08.720
<v Speaker 6>a guy Henry I don't I don't know if you

255
00:14:08.759 --> 00:14:10.919
<v Speaker 6>follow him, but I mean, you know, a lot of

256
00:14:10.960 --> 00:14:13.360
<v Speaker 6>a lot of other ortho guys following them whatever, he's

257
00:14:13.360 --> 00:14:15.840
<v Speaker 6>the first one that said something about it. He did

258
00:14:15.879 --> 00:14:17.879
<v Speaker 6>not want to engage with him. And I guess I see,

259
00:14:18.000 --> 00:14:22.840
<v Speaker 6>I see now why, I see why now I don't

260
00:14:22.919 --> 00:14:27.879
<v Speaker 6>I don't see how you're still doing this, ship man. Yeah, yeah,

261
00:14:27.879 --> 00:14:31.000
<v Speaker 6>I don't get it. These like this level of dishonesty

262
00:14:31.039 --> 00:14:33.279
<v Speaker 6>I've just seen just today, just today under you know,

263
00:14:33.320 --> 00:14:36.879
<v Speaker 6>like under like with Vain. I see Vain is in here,

264
00:14:36.919 --> 00:14:39.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, him replying him replying to some of these

265
00:14:39.000 --> 00:14:42.679
<v Speaker 6>motherfuckers under your post, man, is it's madness. I just

266
00:14:42.720 --> 00:14:47.240
<v Speaker 6>don't understand how you can how they can't understand it.

267
00:14:47.240 --> 00:14:51.000
<v Speaker 6>It's like it's basically just an internal critique and they

268
00:14:51.120 --> 00:14:52.919
<v Speaker 6>just don't know how to do that. They just they

269
00:14:53.000 --> 00:14:55.960
<v Speaker 6>just see it as any any critique, you're giving them

270
00:14:56.039 --> 00:14:56.879
<v Speaker 6>a double standard.

271
00:14:56.919 --> 00:14:59.279
<v Speaker 7>Instantly, they just they just a man.

272
00:14:59.200 --> 00:15:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Like, yeah, well you have problems. You have problems too,

273
00:15:05.519 --> 00:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>at doak P. Notice how like only one of all

274
00:15:09.600 --> 00:15:10.639
<v Speaker 1>of them even came.

275
00:15:15.480 --> 00:15:20.840
<v Speaker 8>Okay, Jay, I just wanted to so obviously, I know

276
00:15:21.480 --> 00:15:26.159
<v Speaker 8>this whole discussion is with Catholics Muslims, and they called

277
00:15:26.200 --> 00:15:31.080
<v Speaker 8>they worship right I always. I know you've previously said

278
00:15:31.120 --> 00:15:34.600
<v Speaker 8>that Catholics and Orthodox on what should have seen God either.

279
00:15:34.720 --> 00:15:39.759
<v Speaker 8>So would that be a contradiction within the Catholic system

280
00:15:39.960 --> 00:15:41.399
<v Speaker 8>to say we should have same God as he?

281
00:15:45.240 --> 00:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Would it be a contradiction within the Catholic system for

282
00:15:48.080 --> 00:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a Catholic to say that he worships the same God

283
00:15:50.759 --> 00:15:55.799
<v Speaker 1>as the Orthodox? Yeah? Oh uh, Well, I just think

284
00:15:55.840 --> 00:16:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the Catholic system is just basically entirely operates on word

285
00:16:01.840 --> 00:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>concept fallacies that anything that calls it's deity God is

286
00:16:07.159 --> 00:16:11.799
<v Speaker 1>therefore the same reference as the Catholic God. So when

287
00:16:11.799 --> 00:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a Hindu says that he believes in Atman or Brahman

288
00:16:15.360 --> 00:16:22.279
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, Oh that's God. Or when if a scientologist

289
00:16:22.279 --> 00:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>says he believes in a first mind, oh that's God.

290
00:16:25.519 --> 00:16:27.279
<v Speaker 1>That's the same thing we believe in. So it's so

291
00:16:27.399 --> 00:16:31.279
<v Speaker 1>flexible and elastic that literally anything can be equated to

292
00:16:31.559 --> 00:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>quote one God or the first cause or I mean, yeah, yeah,

293
00:16:36.840 --> 00:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Catholics going to say that he has the same God

294
00:16:38.799 --> 00:16:41.679
<v Speaker 1>as an Orthodox person, the same God as a Muslim,

295
00:16:42.039 --> 00:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the same God as as capital g of the Hindus

296
00:16:45.320 --> 00:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in Vatican two.

297
00:16:46.600 --> 00:16:49.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I guess what I'm wondering is like Catholic was

298
00:16:49.240 --> 00:16:52.799
<v Speaker 8>the say, you know, Orthodox and Catholics wiship would that be?

299
00:16:53.799 --> 00:16:57.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, like always when you say Catholics and Muslims

300
00:16:57.080 --> 00:17:00.519
<v Speaker 8>wishes God. That sounds like massively cregious in one year

301
00:17:00.600 --> 00:17:02.759
<v Speaker 8>listening to that, but I mean would.

302
00:17:03.279 --> 00:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So the reason they say that is natural theology. They

303
00:17:05.960 --> 00:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a generic theism that is the

304
00:17:09.359 --> 00:17:12.759
<v Speaker 1>theism of all the world religions in some loose sense,

305
00:17:13.240 --> 00:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>but a little more so the monotheistic ones they're a

306
00:17:16.480 --> 00:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit closer. And then supposedly Trinity is like the

307
00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>one that's the closest of the close. So it's like

308
00:17:22.720 --> 00:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>a graded scale of what of worshiping God, and that

309
00:17:27.160 --> 00:17:30.599
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist. Like a heretic is in the same boat

310
00:17:30.799 --> 00:17:33.759
<v Speaker 1>as a pagan. Now, a heretic is not identical to

311
00:17:33.799 --> 00:17:37.279
<v Speaker 1>a pagan. They have different theological views, and certainly a

312
00:17:37.319 --> 00:17:40.599
<v Speaker 1>heretic is closer to an Orthodox Christian than a pagan,

313
00:17:41.319 --> 00:17:44.039
<v Speaker 1>but they're still in the same boat of being outside

314
00:17:44.039 --> 00:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the faith. This is what they say can't seem to

315
00:17:46.039 --> 00:17:49.079
<v Speaker 1>grasp and that's why their whole ecclesiology, their whole system,

316
00:17:49.160 --> 00:17:53.319
<v Speaker 1>is built on being twenty percent right, being fifty percent right,

317
00:17:53.359 --> 00:17:57.279
<v Speaker 1>being thirty percent, seventy percent Catholic, which is ludicrous even

318
00:17:57.279 --> 00:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in their own system, because you've got two dogmatic statements

319
00:18:00.920 --> 00:18:06.519
<v Speaker 1>in Roman Catholic theology that one heresy or schism or

320
00:18:06.720 --> 00:18:11.599
<v Speaker 1>action of apostasy literally automatically puts you outside the mystical body.

321
00:18:11.839 --> 00:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if I'm a Roman Catholic and I

322
00:18:14.440 --> 00:18:18.039
<v Speaker 1>decide I do not believe in the Immaculate Conception in

323
00:18:18.119 --> 00:18:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Catholic theology, I'm no longer Catholic. It's a packaged deal.

324
00:18:22.200 --> 00:18:26.519
<v Speaker 1>You can't have nine out of ten dogmas and still

325
00:18:26.519 --> 00:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>be Catholic. This is something that they don't understand their

326
00:18:29.440 --> 00:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>own system says this.

327
00:18:31.039 --> 00:18:34.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I've overready understood the whole like you know, you know,

328
00:18:34.559 --> 00:18:39.519
<v Speaker 8>Orthodox have the same similar like sacraments or whatever as

329
00:18:39.599 --> 00:18:43.920
<v Speaker 8>the Catholic. Therefore, you know, we can receive their echerysm

330
00:18:44.000 --> 00:18:45.839
<v Speaker 8>just like well, they haven't got the same faith then,

331
00:18:46.319 --> 00:18:50.000
<v Speaker 8>so why can we What can you take you know, communion?

332
00:18:51.319 --> 00:18:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a fair critique. I mean, if they are

333
00:18:54.920 --> 00:18:58.279
<v Speaker 1>outside communion with the Roman, see why is it still

334
00:18:58.480 --> 00:19:01.279
<v Speaker 1>quote valid? And again the all goes back to the

335
00:19:01.319 --> 00:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>ex operatta ex operaparado, a sacromatology of Augustine, which the

336
00:19:06.839 --> 00:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox do not entire in its entirety except Foggy Mountain.

337
00:19:12.200 --> 00:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to go to Ruman Catholics to have any

338
00:19:15.000 --> 00:19:17.519
<v Speaker 1>arguments or points or if I want to try to

339
00:19:17.559 --> 00:19:20.839
<v Speaker 1>give some explanation. You can even have sixty seconds and

340
00:19:20.920 --> 00:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll be quiet if you can actually make sense of

341
00:19:24.160 --> 00:19:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Attican too.

342
00:19:27.279 --> 00:19:28.319
<v Speaker 9>Hey J, can you hear me?

343
00:19:29.119 --> 00:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Yep?

344
00:19:30.680 --> 00:19:34.079
<v Speaker 10>Hey J, thanks for having me on. Just this is

345
00:19:34.119 --> 00:19:36.160
<v Speaker 10>my first time on. I just wanted to say, I

346
00:19:36.160 --> 00:19:39.160
<v Speaker 10>think this all just sounds like relativism. To be honest,

347
00:19:40.559 --> 00:19:41.480
<v Speaker 10>it just sounds like.

348
00:19:41.759 --> 00:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Of course it is. That's what I'm saying, Like, it's

349
00:19:43.720 --> 00:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it works to the to their cause for numbers

350
00:19:48.920 --> 00:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to act like every you know, generic usage of the

351
00:19:56.200 --> 00:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>word God is referring to the same thing, and so

352
00:19:59.720 --> 00:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we're all talking about God. It must be the same God.

353
00:20:02.279 --> 00:20:07.039
<v Speaker 10>It's just religious syncretism, just in a different way. Yeah,

354
00:20:07.079 --> 00:20:11.440
<v Speaker 10>So I think they're just lost, you know, like maybe that's.

355
00:20:11.240 --> 00:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Why they don't that's what that's why. How how could

356
00:20:13.720 --> 00:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Erica Bara imagine spending all these years in Roman Catholicism

357
00:20:18.480 --> 00:20:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and papal lawyering and you don't even know that Muslims

358
00:20:22.359 --> 00:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and Christians and Jews don't worship the same deity. So

359
00:20:26.000 --> 00:20:31.279
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten him absolutely nothing. This is why Roman Catholicism

360
00:20:31.359 --> 00:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is a problem, because it leads you into spiritual delusion, contradiction, chaos,

361
00:20:38.519 --> 00:20:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and idolatry. That's one and all of the madness of

362
00:20:42.599 --> 00:20:49.759
<v Speaker 1>these people demonstrates that point against it. It's a system

363
00:20:50.359 --> 00:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that will drive you insane and drive you away from Christ.

364
00:20:54.240 --> 00:20:58.599
<v Speaker 1>It's a religion of dead works because it's all nonsense.

365
00:20:59.200 --> 00:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, it's all trying to

366
00:21:01.000 --> 00:21:05.759
<v Speaker 1>make this stupid papal thing work and the only thing

367
00:21:05.759 --> 00:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that matters in the religion is the papercy at the

368
00:21:07.720 --> 00:21:18.759
<v Speaker 1>end of the day. Felix, what's up, hija?

369
00:21:18.880 --> 00:21:19.480
<v Speaker 7>Can you hear me?

370
00:21:20.839 --> 00:21:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's actually my first time.

371
00:21:22.839 --> 00:21:27.400
<v Speaker 11>Also, I just wanted to add some thoughts that you

372
00:21:27.440 --> 00:21:30.559
<v Speaker 11>like said earlier. And the guy earlier said that the

373
00:21:30.640 --> 00:21:36.839
<v Speaker 11>thing about this like one monotoism that's like seventy percent correct,

374
00:21:37.200 --> 00:21:39.599
<v Speaker 11>like fifty percent correct sort of person correct, it's actually

375
00:21:39.640 --> 00:21:40.480
<v Speaker 11>a Muslim idea.

376
00:21:40.759 --> 00:21:42.359
<v Speaker 3>It's like Muslim idea absolutely.

377
00:21:42.359 --> 00:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>It's because believe Mostlims believe in natural theology, just like running.

378
00:21:46.559 --> 00:21:49.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, and like the way that second two adapted to

379
00:21:49.400 --> 00:21:51.799
<v Speaker 11>some kind of Jewish doctrines and they actually use some

380
00:21:51.880 --> 00:21:54.480
<v Speaker 11>kind of rabbis to write second two. Maybe they use

381
00:21:54.559 --> 00:21:57.240
<v Speaker 11>some kind of Muslim scholars to adapt this thing also,

382
00:21:57.640 --> 00:22:00.240
<v Speaker 11>And I just want I just wanted to add one

383
00:22:00.240 --> 00:22:04.279
<v Speaker 11>more thing that Muslims, like modern Muslims or do this

384
00:22:04.519 --> 00:22:08.880
<v Speaker 11>in some kind of Southeast Asian countries, for example, in Indonesia,

385
00:22:09.039 --> 00:22:13.680
<v Speaker 11>is actually made some kind of syncretic redision between like

386
00:22:14.119 --> 00:22:19.400
<v Speaker 11>Islam and Buddhism and the Hinduism where they made all

387
00:22:19.480 --> 00:22:23.880
<v Speaker 11>the hindu Jitis into one God. And it's like, well,

388
00:22:24.880 --> 00:22:28.319
<v Speaker 11>technically only one God and all the other like Vish

389
00:22:28.319 --> 00:22:31.359
<v Speaker 11>New Brass mind other like Ditis, are just like his.

390
00:22:31.400 --> 00:22:33.799
<v Speaker 3>Advotars, so they are also correct exactly.

391
00:22:33.920 --> 00:22:37.799
<v Speaker 1>It's like this is a this is a version of perennialism.

392
00:22:37.880 --> 00:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is why Roman Catholics like Neoplatonism, because Neoplatonism

393
00:22:41.279 --> 00:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>knows the exact same things with God as manifestations of

394
00:22:44.680 --> 00:22:47.039
<v Speaker 1>the principle of the One the monad. It's the exact

395
00:22:47.039 --> 00:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>same move that they all make. And by the way,

396
00:22:49.839 --> 00:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the whole reason why they do patro mama.

397
00:22:52.519 --> 00:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>All of the people fussing about patcha Mama, what's in

398
00:22:55.440 --> 00:22:58.319
<v Speaker 1>consisted with patcha Mama and the reasoning of Vatican too.

399
00:22:58.920 --> 00:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>If God can be manifested in Hinduism, why can't he

400
00:23:02.559 --> 00:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be manifested as Pacha Mama. Why not just say Pacha

401
00:23:06.000 --> 00:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Mama is Mary. Yeah, it might have been a pagan

402
00:23:08.480 --> 00:23:12.079
<v Speaker 1>sacrificed human sacrifice goddess. Just say that it's Mary. Though.

403
00:23:12.559 --> 00:23:16.519
<v Speaker 1>This is how stupid this is and excellent comments Felix.

404
00:23:16.559 --> 00:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>That's that perfectly makes the point there, with the same

405
00:23:20.559 --> 00:23:24.039
<v Speaker 1>move that Muslims make. I've been debating Muslims for six years.

406
00:23:24.880 --> 00:23:31.039
<v Speaker 1>Many of those debates revolved around their version of natural theology.

407
00:23:31.279 --> 00:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>They literally think that if you're on a desert island

408
00:23:33.720 --> 00:23:35.559
<v Speaker 1>and you just start reasoning, you would come to the

409
00:23:35.640 --> 00:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Muslim god. That's what shaikh az ars, she'd argued, right,

410
00:23:39.200 --> 00:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And so I mean that's literally and where do they

411
00:23:42.240 --> 00:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>get that? Well, the Muslims lie. They think they get

412
00:23:44.000 --> 00:23:47.759
<v Speaker 1>it from the Quran. They get it from Greek Hellenic philosophy,

413
00:23:47.759 --> 00:23:50.559
<v Speaker 1>they get it from Aristotle, they get it from Christian

414
00:23:51.680 --> 00:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I should say tomistic type theology. Chase, what's up? I'm

415
00:23:58.519 --> 00:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>saying there's a symbiotic relationship between the medieval Roman Catholic

416
00:24:03.119 --> 00:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and Muslim theologists and thinkers. What's up cha?

417
00:24:07.400 --> 00:24:07.559
<v Speaker 12>Yo?

418
00:24:09.160 --> 00:24:11.519
<v Speaker 4>You know it's funny, is uh? I? Remember?

419
00:24:11.960 --> 00:24:14.559
<v Speaker 13>You know I message you that thing about how the

420
00:24:14.599 --> 00:24:16.680
<v Speaker 13>people say, yeah they do. It's like, okay, well yeah

421
00:24:16.720 --> 00:24:17.880
<v Speaker 13>you how do you have martyrs?

422
00:24:17.880 --> 00:24:18.039
<v Speaker 1>Then?

423
00:24:18.519 --> 00:24:21.240
<v Speaker 13>But another funny thing is this is actually already baked

424
00:24:21.279 --> 00:24:23.680
<v Speaker 13>in the theological.

425
00:24:26.720 --> 00:24:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Fluidity is already baked into the system.

426
00:24:29.359 --> 00:24:33.200
<v Speaker 13>The Byzantine Catholics can venerate Saint Palomas and not.

427
00:24:33.119 --> 00:24:34.599
<v Speaker 4>Recite the Philioque.

428
00:24:35.759 --> 00:24:38.839
<v Speaker 13>So it's funny because it's actually already baked into their religion.

429
00:24:38.880 --> 00:24:40.680
<v Speaker 13>That the theology doesn't matter.

430
00:24:41.160 --> 00:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>The theology doesn't matter exactly, So theology is always secondary.

431
00:24:44.640 --> 00:24:45.799
<v Speaker 4>To paper exactly.

432
00:24:45.880 --> 00:24:48.480
<v Speaker 13>And so and people, you know, if they say no,

433
00:24:48.640 --> 00:24:51.079
<v Speaker 13>look like we can have these these different things. No,

434
00:24:51.200 --> 00:24:55.400
<v Speaker 13>you're denying massive stretches of you know, eight hundred years

435
00:24:55.400 --> 00:24:59.279
<v Speaker 13>of history, even more, you know, twelve hundred years of history.

436
00:24:59.680 --> 00:25:03.559
<v Speaker 13>We're you're not saying, oh, it's just it's just a uh,

437
00:25:04.519 --> 00:25:07.680
<v Speaker 13>you know, energetic procession. No, you you're literally having a

438
00:25:07.720 --> 00:25:12.039
<v Speaker 13>different theology. You're venerating people in a sect of Catholicism

439
00:25:12.519 --> 00:25:15.480
<v Speaker 13>that were never Roman Catholic, that have a completely different

440
00:25:15.519 --> 00:25:17.799
<v Speaker 13>theology that you your own people.

441
00:25:17.599 --> 00:25:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Will call your No. No, they were actually extra communicated

442
00:25:22.680 --> 00:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>because if you didn't follow lions in Florence, those councils

443
00:25:26.720 --> 00:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>excommunicate you for not following them. So Palamas and all

444
00:25:30.000 --> 00:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>these people that Rome now venerates were previously literally excommunicated heretics.

445
00:25:35.319 --> 00:25:38.680
<v Speaker 13>Yes, so they all worshiped the exact same God though

446
00:25:38.680 --> 00:25:42.319
<v Speaker 13>they were excommunicated as heretics. So it's actually it's interesting

447
00:25:42.400 --> 00:25:46.680
<v Speaker 13>because you know, now you can there's so many horns

448
00:25:46.720 --> 00:25:50.720
<v Speaker 13>of this dilemma for them through Vatican too, that they're

449
00:25:50.759 --> 00:25:53.200
<v Speaker 13>finally having to be put in the hot seat with

450
00:25:53.279 --> 00:25:55.920
<v Speaker 13>that they've been ignoring for you know, forever.

451
00:25:56.519 --> 00:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And well, I'm glad that I was able to put

452
00:25:58.160 --> 00:26:00.079
<v Speaker 1>them in the hot seat. Uh. And you'll know not

453
00:26:00.279 --> 00:26:02.519
<v Speaker 1>if you pay attention to the routes that he took

454
00:26:03.200 --> 00:26:05.039
<v Speaker 1>in the debate. Even though it got heated and it

455
00:26:05.079 --> 00:26:08.799
<v Speaker 1>was loud, he constantly contradicted. At one point, it's like,

456
00:26:09.160 --> 00:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the documents are ambiguous as written by liberals, but it's

457
00:26:11.920 --> 00:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>still orthodox if you just give it the right interpretation.

458
00:26:15.279 --> 00:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, then why is it using the word god

459
00:26:17.279 --> 00:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>capital G. Well, I don't know. I mean, it's it's

460
00:26:20.680 --> 00:26:22.839
<v Speaker 1>it's wrong, but it's also not wrong. Like he just

461
00:26:23.359 --> 00:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>he literally said it's bad, it's ambiguous, totally flipped like

462
00:26:26.759 --> 00:26:28.759
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes later it's like, no, there's nothing wrong with it.

463
00:26:28.759 --> 00:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. Yep.

464
00:26:29.440 --> 00:26:33.039
<v Speaker 13>And and what's interesting is and and I liked him.

465
00:26:33.079 --> 00:26:34.799
<v Speaker 13>I think Tim's a cool guy. I know you you

466
00:26:34.920 --> 00:26:37.920
<v Speaker 13>liked him obviously to Tim's he just seems like a

467
00:26:37.920 --> 00:26:38.480
<v Speaker 13>likable dude.

468
00:26:38.519 --> 00:26:40.519
<v Speaker 1>And we went out to eat, We went out to

469
00:26:40.559 --> 00:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>eat afterwards.

470
00:26:41.200 --> 00:26:41.559
<v Speaker 4>For sure.

471
00:26:41.680 --> 00:26:44.079
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, And but I thought it was funny that he

472
00:26:44.160 --> 00:26:47.480
<v Speaker 13>kept going, no, you're you're confusing, you know, the signifier

473
00:26:47.519 --> 00:26:52.079
<v Speaker 13>and the reference. Like, no, it's the document, the documents

474
00:26:52.119 --> 00:26:54.720
<v Speaker 13>literally saying they have the wrong signifier but.

475
00:26:54.759 --> 00:26:57.640
<v Speaker 4>The same reference. That's exactly insane.

476
00:26:57.720 --> 00:26:59.839
<v Speaker 1>That's the point. The document is saying that if we

477
00:27:00.319 --> 00:27:02.519
<v Speaker 1>if we really get into it, we're all worshiping the

478
00:27:02.559 --> 00:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing. It's just the words get in the way,

479
00:27:05.039 --> 00:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly shape.

480
00:27:05.960 --> 00:27:09.440
<v Speaker 13>So then now another another aspect of the same dilemma,

481
00:27:09.480 --> 00:27:12.119
<v Speaker 13>because there's it's so much fun thinking of how many

482
00:27:12.160 --> 00:27:13.480
<v Speaker 13>places you can bring this to.

483
00:27:14.000 --> 00:27:17.440
<v Speaker 4>The funny thing is okay, why does why does Florence matter?

484
00:27:17.519 --> 00:27:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Now?

485
00:27:18.839 --> 00:27:22.319
<v Speaker 13>Why does lions matter? Why doesn't I see a matter?

486
00:27:23.000 --> 00:27:27.720
<v Speaker 13>Why does chalcdon matter? If it's everything is pointing to

487
00:27:27.839 --> 00:27:29.519
<v Speaker 13>the same reference, why does it matter?

488
00:27:29.680 --> 00:27:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Like like you, like you said, if this Vatican to

489
00:27:32.519 --> 00:27:35.279
<v Speaker 1>theology is correct, there would never have been in any

490
00:27:35.319 --> 00:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>need for martyrs in the first three centuries, because why

491
00:27:38.440 --> 00:27:41.839
<v Speaker 1>are you not, like, why can't you sacrifice to the emperor?

492
00:27:42.279 --> 00:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Just read the Emperor as an image of the once

493
00:27:44.400 --> 00:27:46.839
<v Speaker 1>your God, and there you're sacrificing to God.

494
00:27:46.799 --> 00:27:51.720
<v Speaker 13>See exactly exactly, And it's yeah, it's just it's so

495
00:27:52.079 --> 00:27:55.920
<v Speaker 13>it's such an insane game, and I'm i think. You

496
00:27:55.920 --> 00:27:58.240
<v Speaker 13>know what I'm excited for is I think people are

497
00:27:58.279 --> 00:28:00.599
<v Speaker 13>finally going to see why you have been saying for

498
00:28:00.759 --> 00:28:03.680
<v Speaker 13>years and then myself as well when I, you know,

499
00:28:03.799 --> 00:28:06.839
<v Speaker 13>started getting into doing apologetics and got a blessing to

500
00:28:06.839 --> 00:28:07.680
<v Speaker 13>do apologetics.

501
00:28:07.759 --> 00:28:11.319
<v Speaker 4>This is where natural theology leads. This is where it leads.

502
00:28:11.359 --> 00:28:14.160
<v Speaker 13>And I was reading the uh the ambiguou uh the

503
00:28:14.200 --> 00:28:19.920
<v Speaker 13>Ambiguum the other day and it's funny because Saint Maximus,

504
00:28:19.960 --> 00:28:21.640
<v Speaker 13>I gotta I'll find the quote later and I'll send

505
00:28:21.640 --> 00:28:25.599
<v Speaker 13>it to you. Saint Maximus was talking about these things

506
00:28:26.000 --> 00:28:30.359
<v Speaker 13>and and explicitly saying that like the human mind, uh

507
00:28:30.559 --> 00:28:33.880
<v Speaker 13>looking around, can't can't reason up to any of these

508
00:28:33.920 --> 00:28:36.759
<v Speaker 13>great things because it sees all the finitude of life

509
00:28:36.960 --> 00:28:40.319
<v Speaker 13>constantly all around it. And they'll venerate him to It's

510
00:28:40.359 --> 00:28:43.000
<v Speaker 13>just funny. There's so many layers, but uh, I'm gonna

511
00:28:43.000 --> 00:28:44.759
<v Speaker 13>pop out and listen. Thanks for pulling me up.

512
00:28:46.039 --> 00:28:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Well.

513
00:28:46.279 --> 00:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the kill shot too is the more I

514
00:28:48.680 --> 00:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>thought about it, every Roman Catholic will agree that Arians

515
00:28:52.039 --> 00:28:54.759
<v Speaker 1>are heretics, and are you know God does not accept

516
00:28:54.920 --> 00:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>aryan adoration and worship, and yet Muslims are literally from Arians,

517
00:29:00.240 --> 00:29:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, and we're supposed to believe that Vatican too

518
00:29:04.400 --> 00:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is saying right that God still accepts it and and

519
00:29:07.279 --> 00:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they adore the one True God. So I mean, yeah,

520
00:29:09.920 --> 00:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why I always ask these people too, like do

521
00:29:11.960 --> 00:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you think Basil thought that the Eunomians had the same

522
00:29:15.680 --> 00:29:18.119
<v Speaker 1>God as him? And most Roman Catholics who know anything,

523
00:29:18.119 --> 00:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they'll actually ad meant no. And it's like, then you

524
00:29:20.799 --> 00:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just shot your whole Vaticans who document in the foot.

525
00:29:23.240 --> 00:29:28.839
<v Speaker 13>Yep, and yeah, it's so, it's so funny, it's so funny.

526
00:29:28.839 --> 00:29:31.400
<v Speaker 13>And and the funny thing is about the about the

527
00:29:31.559 --> 00:29:34.519
<v Speaker 13>Aryan thing is is that this also ties into it's

528
00:29:34.599 --> 00:29:36.960
<v Speaker 13>the you know, the whole meme of people saying.

529
00:29:36.720 --> 00:29:39.279
<v Speaker 4>Like, oh, saying Christ is king is is anti Semitic.

530
00:29:39.599 --> 00:29:42.160
<v Speaker 13>Say okay, but now when people say Christ is king

531
00:29:42.160 --> 00:29:45.240
<v Speaker 13>in Christ is Lord and stuff, it's like, you see

532
00:29:45.240 --> 00:29:49.559
<v Speaker 13>how they can just be a Muslim saying that it's

533
00:29:49.599 --> 00:29:53.640
<v Speaker 13>exactly Catholics will go, yeah, dude, you got the slogan,

534
00:29:53.759 --> 00:29:54.519
<v Speaker 13>let's go.

535
00:29:55.839 --> 00:29:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Well. Actually a lot of the track cass do cheer

536
00:29:58.400 --> 00:30:00.799
<v Speaker 1>on the Muslims from the Muslims wool agreed and stuff

537
00:30:00.880 --> 00:30:04.079
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah, but it doesn't make any sense because

538
00:30:04.119 --> 00:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the Lord is a title of divinity.

539
00:30:05.920 --> 00:30:08.200
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, yeah, I'm gonna pop out and listen, have

540
00:30:08.240 --> 00:30:08.720
<v Speaker 4>a good one.

541
00:30:09.440 --> 00:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they get Jordan, what's up?

542
00:30:11.319 --> 00:30:11.519
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

543
00:30:11.559 --> 00:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

544
00:30:12.000 --> 00:30:12.200
<v Speaker 7>Man?

545
00:30:13.279 --> 00:30:13.519
<v Speaker 14>Yeah?

546
00:30:13.559 --> 00:30:17.440
<v Speaker 15>I was discussing with the Roman Catholic about the energies

547
00:30:17.440 --> 00:30:20.440
<v Speaker 15>the energy distinction, right, and he was saying, like, oh,

548
00:30:20.799 --> 00:30:24.039
<v Speaker 15>if the so like, if the energies themselves are not

549
00:30:24.119 --> 00:30:28.000
<v Speaker 15>identical to the essence and they subsist within God, how

550
00:30:28.000 --> 00:30:31.279
<v Speaker 15>can you say that this isn't lead leading to polytheism

551
00:30:31.440 --> 00:30:34.119
<v Speaker 15>or like, how why couldn't you just hold to Scotus's

552
00:30:34.559 --> 00:30:35.960
<v Speaker 15>definition of formal distinction.

553
00:30:39.000 --> 00:30:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean we've addressed this many times because there's

554
00:30:41.400 --> 00:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple things going on here. There's modal collapse problem. First

555
00:30:44.440 --> 00:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, there's a question of what we participate in.

556
00:30:47.680 --> 00:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>If you want to say that it's a formal distinction,

557
00:30:51.039 --> 00:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you see the church fathers Basil Cappudians

558
00:30:54.359 --> 00:30:56.359
<v Speaker 1>letter two thirty four. Do they talk about participating in

559
00:30:56.400 --> 00:30:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a formal distinction or do they talk about participating in

560
00:30:59.359 --> 00:31:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the uncreated reality that is divine glory and immortality in life?

561
00:31:03.680 --> 00:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So God's energies have to be really distinct because everyone

562
00:31:07.240 --> 00:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>agrees through apithetic theology the via negativa that we don't

563
00:31:11.880 --> 00:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>know the divine essence, but what we do know is

564
00:31:14.240 --> 00:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the energies that come down to us, as Letter two

565
00:31:16.039 --> 00:31:18.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty four says. So really the key way to refute

566
00:31:18.359 --> 00:31:23.519
<v Speaker 1>the Scotis type angle or whatever, or even the identification

567
00:31:23.759 --> 00:31:26.519
<v Speaker 1>of the attributes and the operations with the essence in

568
00:31:26.519 --> 00:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a strict identification sense is to look at participation. Because

569
00:31:31.680 --> 00:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no creature that can save us. So the grace

570
00:31:33.759 --> 00:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that we participate in cannot inherently be created, because that's

571
00:31:37.319 --> 00:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>an aryan form of grace is just another creature. We

572
00:31:40.240 --> 00:31:43.319
<v Speaker 1>actually need to be saved by the uncreated glory. And

573
00:31:43.319 --> 00:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in John seventeen, Jesus says that his disciples will participate

574
00:31:46.279 --> 00:31:48.279
<v Speaker 1>in the glory that he shared with his father before

575
00:31:48.279 --> 00:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the foundation of the world. Everyone agrees God's glory is

576
00:31:51.200 --> 00:31:54.319
<v Speaker 1>not created. That's why the Theophanes also proved this, because

577
00:31:54.319 --> 00:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they're not the divine essence, and yet they are the

578
00:31:56.359 --> 00:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>energetic manifestation of the logos in time and space that

579
00:32:00.519 --> 00:32:04.759
<v Speaker 1>immediately destroys the absolute divine simplicity. Argumentation and scout doesn't

580
00:32:04.759 --> 00:32:08.079
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't get you anything other than a harder distinction

581
00:32:08.200 --> 00:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>between the attributes and the essence. That's all it does.

582
00:32:11.039 --> 00:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't answer the question of what we participate, what

583
00:32:13.279 --> 00:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we participate in. It doesn't answer any of the questions

584
00:32:15.680 --> 00:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>about Theophanes, It doesn't answer the modal collapse. All the

585
00:32:18.680 --> 00:32:19.759
<v Speaker 1>same problems are still there.

586
00:32:20.119 --> 00:32:23.960
<v Speaker 15>So okay, oh yeah, that's actually great. I actually even

587
00:32:24.000 --> 00:32:25.759
<v Speaker 15>in the Bible, Saint Paul talks about it and so

588
00:32:25.839 --> 00:32:27.319
<v Speaker 15>forth to early Church fathers.

589
00:32:28.079 --> 00:32:29.240
<v Speaker 7>But also I would.

590
00:32:29.079 --> 00:32:33.000
<v Speaker 15>Talk what about the the incarnation itself? Because the Roman

591
00:32:33.000 --> 00:32:36.599
<v Speaker 15>Catholic was like, well, the incarnation itself, the flush is created,

592
00:32:36.640 --> 00:32:37.599
<v Speaker 15>that's a created effects.

593
00:32:37.599 --> 00:32:40.039
<v Speaker 3>So how can you say, if that's a creative effect.

594
00:32:39.680 --> 00:32:43.559
<v Speaker 15>Why can't we why can't we perceive the created effects

595
00:32:43.599 --> 00:32:45.960
<v Speaker 15>as opposed to uncreated energy? So what's wrong with that?

596
00:32:47.400 --> 00:32:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Again, We're not saved by being participated by participating in

597
00:32:51.400 --> 00:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>something created. It's uncreated glory. In John seventeen John Damascus,

598
00:32:57.000 --> 00:33:00.119
<v Speaker 1>when he talks about the human nature of Christ, he

599
00:33:00.160 --> 00:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>says that Christ transferred his immortality that he possessed by

600
00:33:05.160 --> 00:33:07.799
<v Speaker 1>his divinity to the human nature. So the human nature

601
00:33:07.880 --> 00:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that he possesses really participates in Jesus's uncreated grace, glory

602
00:33:13.160 --> 00:33:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and immortality. If you read the two Letters of Serials Sensus,

603
00:33:16.839 --> 00:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he talks about how we all agree that it's not

604
00:33:19.759 --> 00:33:23.079
<v Speaker 1>the essence of God that is what saves us or

605
00:33:23.119 --> 00:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that we participate in. It's his uncreated grace and immortality

606
00:33:26.680 --> 00:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>by which he deified the human flesh that he assumed.

607
00:33:31.240 --> 00:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So that has that requires a necessary Okay, yeah, the

608
00:33:35.160 --> 00:33:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Eucharist requires an essencerityistinction because everyone agrees we're not eating

609
00:33:38.839 --> 00:33:40.519
<v Speaker 1>the essence of God exactly.

610
00:33:40.599 --> 00:33:42.720
<v Speaker 5>And that was the point I brought up to him too.

611
00:33:43.079 --> 00:33:46.160
<v Speaker 15>It is the uncreated grace that deifies the flesh, which

612
00:33:46.200 --> 00:33:48.559
<v Speaker 15>makes it like possible for us to partake in grace.

613
00:33:49.160 --> 00:33:53.200
<v Speaker 15>So concerning that, though, does the energies does it have?

614
00:33:53.359 --> 00:33:56.039
<v Speaker 15>Does it make humans who partake in it do this?

615
00:33:56.119 --> 00:33:57.960
<v Speaker 15>Does it make them have a different view than people

616
00:33:57.960 --> 00:33:59.079
<v Speaker 15>who don't partake in grace?

617
00:33:59.240 --> 00:33:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Like?

618
00:33:59.680 --> 00:34:02.920
<v Speaker 15>You know, so if babies unlive for some weird reason,

619
00:34:03.000 --> 00:34:06.119
<v Speaker 15>right or die, let's say, since they don't get to

620
00:34:06.160 --> 00:34:09.519
<v Speaker 15>partake in the divine grace, would would they have a

621
00:34:09.519 --> 00:34:14.000
<v Speaker 15>different view of God? They wouldn't be able to perceive him?

622
00:34:14.280 --> 00:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You talk about like an unbaptized infant or.

623
00:34:16.000 --> 00:34:19.599
<v Speaker 15>Something even that, or like even like people of other face.

624
00:34:19.679 --> 00:34:22.320
<v Speaker 15>They perceive God differently because they don't partake in God's

625
00:34:22.360 --> 00:34:23.079
<v Speaker 15>grace the same.

626
00:34:22.920 --> 00:34:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Way that Actually, yes, actually I think both things are happening.

627
00:34:25.639 --> 00:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So the unbeliever, as Paul says, the natural man, cannot

628
00:34:28.880 --> 00:34:30.639
<v Speaker 1>receive the things of the spirit. So that's what the

629
00:34:30.920 --> 00:34:33.599
<v Speaker 1>reason Roman Calviyus can't see this stuff or understand this stuff.

630
00:34:33.960 --> 00:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not an intellectual problem, it's a spiritual problem. It's

631
00:34:36.400 --> 00:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the same with atheists. So you're correct, they can't actually

632
00:34:39.440 --> 00:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>see or perceive any of this. They think it's foolishness

633
00:34:42.320 --> 00:34:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and as polytheism and all the other ad hominem and

634
00:34:44.840 --> 00:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>stupid blasphemous things they say about the divine energies, which

635
00:34:47.480 --> 00:34:50.320
<v Speaker 1>are literally in Paul's epistles. They say it because they're

636
00:34:50.360 --> 00:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>stupid and they're blinded. And I don't say that out

637
00:34:52.440 --> 00:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of pride. I say that because I want them to

638
00:34:53.960 --> 00:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>be saved. But in the case, so that's the case

639
00:34:57.320 --> 00:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of anyone's perception that you can't even perceive the things

640
00:35:00.559 --> 00:35:04.039
<v Speaker 1>without having the Holy Spirit, which you get three repentance

641
00:35:04.079 --> 00:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>and the orthodox sacraments in church life. But separate from that,

642
00:35:08.280 --> 00:35:11.559
<v Speaker 1>I would say, yeah, there is a tradition that in

643
00:35:11.840 --> 00:35:16.559
<v Speaker 1>some of the Church Fathers that the the Cappadocians Uh

644
00:35:16.840 --> 00:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>even talk about at times. It's not exactly limbo like

645
00:35:19.440 --> 00:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the Roman Catholic sab but it's a version of hold

646
00:35:22.480 --> 00:35:24.119
<v Speaker 1>on one second, I'm trying to buy something in me,

647
00:35:24.199 --> 00:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just one second, excuse me. Some of the Orthodox Church

648
00:36:00.039 --> 00:36:04.039
<v Speaker 1>prayers talk about that we just simply commend infants to

649
00:36:04.119 --> 00:36:09.320
<v Speaker 1>God who have died baptized. We don't know their exact state,

650
00:36:09.519 --> 00:36:11.559
<v Speaker 1>and we don't think they're necessarily damned because they don't

651
00:36:11.599 --> 00:36:15.079
<v Speaker 1>have any actual sin. Because we don't believe in original guilt,

652
00:36:15.119 --> 00:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't say that they're automatically damned. That was even

653
00:36:17.960 --> 00:36:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the Roman Kelly Church doesn't believe that anymore. But so

654
00:36:20.880 --> 00:36:23.679
<v Speaker 1>there's some speculation, and then some of the liturgical prayers

655
00:36:23.880 --> 00:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>talk about how you know, God will take care of

656
00:36:26.719 --> 00:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>them and that kind of stuff, so they're not necessarily damned.

657
00:36:29.039 --> 00:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But there's no evidence either that they're necessarily partake of theosis.

658
00:36:33.159 --> 00:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So exactly what happens with unbaptized infants is unclear. There's

659
00:36:37.519 --> 00:36:40.679
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit of liturgical prayers that discuss it.

660
00:36:41.679 --> 00:36:43.039
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, so what would it.

661
00:36:43.000 --> 00:36:44.840
<v Speaker 15>Be like though it would it would they still have

662
00:36:44.880 --> 00:36:47.519
<v Speaker 15>eternal happiness, they just don't have the vision of God

663
00:36:47.760 --> 00:36:53.199
<v Speaker 15>with the beatific vision, like they can still have eternal Yeah.

664
00:36:53.239 --> 00:36:55.599
<v Speaker 1>I think the one statement that I've seen from Nissa

665
00:36:55.880 --> 00:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is that he speculates that they would be put into

666
00:36:57.960 --> 00:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a place of natural felicity, which is kind of close

667
00:37:01.519 --> 00:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>to infant limbos of the Roman Catholics have.

668
00:37:05.199 --> 00:37:08.960
<v Speaker 15>Okay, and like, because why come from like a reform background,

669
00:37:09.000 --> 00:37:11.400
<v Speaker 15>so I don't want to think of I know, Orthodox

670
00:37:11.400 --> 00:37:15.719
<v Speaker 15>doesn't think of God as as legalistic, but well, i'd say, like,

671
00:37:15.960 --> 00:37:18.719
<v Speaker 15>would you say that damning itself just talking about like

672
00:37:18.719 --> 00:37:22.000
<v Speaker 15>regular humans here is it to satisfy God's wrath since

673
00:37:22.079 --> 00:37:23.559
<v Speaker 15>you are in opposition to his will?

674
00:37:24.159 --> 00:37:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Is that the whole basis of hell. No, I think

675
00:37:29.239 --> 00:37:31.639
<v Speaker 1>that the Orthodox conception of hell is a lot more

676
00:37:31.719 --> 00:37:37.360
<v Speaker 1>sensible the whole river of fire thesis versus some satisfaction notion.

677
00:37:37.519 --> 00:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>First of all, no creature can satisfy God. And this

678
00:37:40.000 --> 00:37:41.559
<v Speaker 1>is one of the reasons why we don't believe in,

679
00:37:42.800 --> 00:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the penal substitution reformation idea, because that's all

680
00:37:46.800 --> 00:37:50.599
<v Speaker 1>premised on the father damning the son to satisfy his

681
00:37:50.920 --> 00:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>justice and his infinite holiness. But the problem is that

682
00:37:55.000 --> 00:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>what's offered in the in the triad cannot be one

683
00:37:57.480 --> 00:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>person to another because anything that happens in nity is

684
00:38:00.480 --> 00:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>all three persons. So you got to have a triadic

685
00:38:03.960 --> 00:38:08.639
<v Speaker 1>action in the traditional offering notion is either anti trinitarian

686
00:38:08.920 --> 00:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>or can you stop doing that? The background is really loud.

687
00:38:13.679 --> 00:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, right, so they so so you you know,

688
00:38:18.880 --> 00:38:20.800
<v Speaker 1>if you have the traditional reformed idea of like the

689
00:38:20.880 --> 00:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>damning of the sun, then that's anti trinitarian. So you can't,

690
00:38:25.039 --> 00:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we can't do that. So the business E Sonos the

691
00:38:28.280 --> 00:38:32.159
<v Speaker 1>eleventh century points out that what's offered is the humanity

692
00:38:32.199 --> 00:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of Christ to the Father in the spirit. So it's

693
00:38:34.360 --> 00:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a triadic action or this whereby the son is offering

694
00:38:37.760 --> 00:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>his humanity to the Father in love in the Holy Spirit.

695
00:38:41.360 --> 00:38:46.679
<v Speaker 1>So uh, that's not any like a penal sanctioned imputational model.

696
00:38:47.199 --> 00:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a offering of love that restores heels and deifies

697
00:38:52.360 --> 00:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>our nature. So is that Oh.

698
00:38:55.360 --> 00:38:58.400
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, that that answers it. Well, just just one more thing,

699
00:38:58.880 --> 00:39:01.440
<v Speaker 15>just just like about the litargy about how God can

700
00:39:01.960 --> 00:39:05.000
<v Speaker 15>do you think that not just in scripture but also

701
00:39:05.119 --> 00:39:08.360
<v Speaker 15>like through the liturgy. God could speaks obviously through the church,

702
00:39:08.440 --> 00:39:11.559
<v Speaker 15>and he speaks through liturgies. Is that like, you know,

703
00:39:11.800 --> 00:39:14.559
<v Speaker 15>when we proclaim the invocation of the saints, you know

704
00:39:14.719 --> 00:39:15.960
<v Speaker 15>Mother Mary of course.

705
00:39:15.800 --> 00:39:18.599
<v Speaker 3>Or Buss and Mother. Is that God's speaking through the liturgy?

706
00:39:22.480 --> 00:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, actually everything is God speaking, So in a sense, yeah,

707
00:39:27.079 --> 00:39:29.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean everything that's happening in some senses, you know,

708
00:39:29.719 --> 00:39:33.760
<v Speaker 1>God's providence. Everything that happens in our lives is God's providence.

709
00:39:34.320 --> 00:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>The liturgy is yes, God's speaking to us. I mean,

710
00:39:38.119 --> 00:39:40.599
<v Speaker 1>lives of the saints speak to us, the Bible speaks

711
00:39:40.599 --> 00:39:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to us. All these things are potentially you could say,

712
00:39:45.639 --> 00:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>God speaking.

713
00:39:47.320 --> 00:39:50.320
<v Speaker 15>Okay, yeah, oh yeah, that's some great answers there. I

714
00:39:50.360 --> 00:39:53.800
<v Speaker 15>actually learn quite a bit. Well, yeah, thank you for

715
00:39:53.800 --> 00:39:55.360
<v Speaker 15>answering my questions. I appreciate it.

716
00:39:57.519 --> 00:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, great questions. We got a lot of you know,

717
00:40:00.320 --> 00:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>talk some videos on all those topics. So Joshua, Hello, Yeah,

718
00:40:14.880 --> 00:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>what's up?

719
00:40:15.880 --> 00:40:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Hi?

720
00:40:16.119 --> 00:40:16.599
<v Speaker 4>Can you hear me?

721
00:40:19.440 --> 00:40:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I go ahead.

722
00:40:20.880 --> 00:40:24.320
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I just had a quick question on Oriental Orthodoxy

723
00:40:24.320 --> 00:40:28.679
<v Speaker 16>because just within the Orthodox Church right now, I find

724
00:40:28.760 --> 00:40:32.360
<v Speaker 16>that there's a bit of like an acceptance of the

725
00:40:32.440 --> 00:40:36.639
<v Speaker 16>Oriental position without I guess I guess I want to

726
00:40:36.719 --> 00:40:39.960
<v Speaker 16>know more about it. I'm just scurious if you know,

727
00:40:40.079 --> 00:40:43.239
<v Speaker 16>if you like have any recommendations on books that that

728
00:40:43.360 --> 00:40:47.360
<v Speaker 16>might just give some insight into the controversy as well as.

729
00:40:47.599 --> 00:40:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one of the best books is joh John mcguckin's

730
00:40:52.639 --> 00:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>book Saying Cyril of Alexander in the Christological Controversy, Okay,

731
00:40:57.239 --> 00:40:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and then I would read say Maximus's Little Book Just

732
00:40:59.840 --> 00:41:06.159
<v Speaker 1>be Tation with Purists, and then I would read John

733
00:41:06.239 --> 00:41:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Damascus's book three of on the Orthodox Faith. That's really

734
00:41:09.639 --> 00:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>good too. So all those three things will will I

735
00:41:12.960 --> 00:41:15.760
<v Speaker 1>think helps solidify. But especially at the end of the

736
00:41:15.840 --> 00:41:18.559
<v Speaker 1>macguckan book is the Two Letters of Serial to six Census,

737
00:41:18.599 --> 00:41:19.519
<v Speaker 1>which is really important.

738
00:41:19.679 --> 00:41:22.079
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's awesome, all right, thank you so much. Ja.

739
00:41:23.079 --> 00:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're going through. We're still doing our Oriental series.

740
00:41:26.440 --> 00:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>We've all we've only done three, but we're going to continue.

741
00:41:28.960 --> 00:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Joshua other Joshua you there, oh hey, sorry, yeah, sorry,

742
00:41:41.360 --> 00:41:42.559
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. Yeah.

743
00:41:42.599 --> 00:41:46.960
<v Speaker 17>So, I was just wondering where is where does Luminingentia

744
00:41:47.440 --> 00:41:48.519
<v Speaker 17>mentioned Hindus.

745
00:41:48.559 --> 00:41:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking it up right now, let me see,

746
00:41:53.880 --> 00:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I know know Tratte does in three right, So Okay, okay,

747
00:41:58.519 --> 00:42:02.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm it's we read it earlier, loyell On, let me see.

748
00:42:03.360 --> 00:42:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, it's it's paragraph too. It says in Hinduism,

749
00:42:08.360 --> 00:42:12.159
<v Speaker 1>men contemplate the divine mystery and express it through an

750
00:42:12.159 --> 00:42:16.519
<v Speaker 1>inexhaustible abundance of myths and through searching philosophical inquiry. They

751
00:42:16.559 --> 00:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>seek freedom from the anguish of our human condition, and

752
00:42:19.760 --> 00:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>through esthetic practices or profound meditation, or a flight to

753
00:42:24.559 --> 00:42:31.199
<v Speaker 1>God with love and trust. Okay, which is not true.

754
00:42:32.119 --> 00:42:34.559
<v Speaker 1>You don't. You don't have a flight to God in

755
00:42:34.639 --> 00:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>love and trust and into it.

756
00:42:36.000 --> 00:42:39.920
<v Speaker 17>It's pretty much like Romans one, but exact opposite, exactly.

757
00:42:42.400 --> 00:42:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

758
00:42:42.679 --> 00:42:45.320
<v Speaker 18>No, I'm just reading, like I'm just trying to find

759
00:42:45.519 --> 00:42:48.559
<v Speaker 18>on Luminegentia and paragraph sixteen.

760
00:42:48.280 --> 00:42:52.679
<v Speaker 19>Like what Catholics have to say about that, And.

761
00:42:54.199 --> 00:42:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can't figure out like.

762
00:42:56.360 --> 00:43:02.280
<v Speaker 18>How they like why it's singing Muslims specifically.

763
00:43:03.559 --> 00:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, remember there's two I think because the argument in

764
00:43:08.039 --> 00:43:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Lumgentium is and in No Ratt is that since Jews

765
00:43:13.119 --> 00:43:17.039
<v Speaker 1>are not gonna at all have anything good to say

766
00:43:17.079 --> 00:43:21.519
<v Speaker 1>about Jesus or Mary, if Muslims at least like Jesus

767
00:43:21.559 --> 00:43:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and Mary, then they're closer to Us than Jews, although

768
00:43:26.400 --> 00:43:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Jews are actually listed first Intate and limit Gentium, which

769
00:43:30.320 --> 00:43:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is funny, right yeah, no.

770
00:43:32.480 --> 00:43:35.280
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, which is also like a shocking page where it

771
00:43:35.320 --> 00:43:38.239
<v Speaker 18>says God still has like this.

772
00:43:38.320 --> 00:43:40.239
<v Speaker 3>People remains most dear to God.

773
00:43:40.400 --> 00:43:44.559
<v Speaker 17>I'm like, that's kind of a misinterpretation of there is.

774
00:43:44.519 --> 00:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>No ambiguity there.

775
00:43:45.519 --> 00:43:45.719
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

776
00:43:45.719 --> 00:43:49.159
<v Speaker 1>In fact, yeah, in fact, the two thousand and three

777
00:43:49.239 --> 00:43:52.760
<v Speaker 1>document that they put out, the US Conference of Catholic

778
00:43:52.800 --> 00:43:55.599
<v Speaker 1>Bishops put out, is even worse. It actually says that

779
00:43:55.679 --> 00:43:58.360
<v Speaker 1>because God still loves them, you shouldn't try to convert Jews.

780
00:43:58.440 --> 00:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, all that, Yeah, that's worse.

781
00:44:02.760 --> 00:44:09.079
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, like it's uh that that one's surprising.

782
00:44:09.119 --> 00:44:11.400
<v Speaker 17>And then just the one look like I don't know,

783
00:44:11.480 --> 00:44:15.960
<v Speaker 17>like the idea that it even matters that you consider

784
00:44:16.039 --> 00:44:21.239
<v Speaker 17>Jesus a prophet when Saint John says that where Jesus

785
00:44:21.320 --> 00:44:22.960
<v Speaker 17>is incarnate, son of God.

786
00:44:23.079 --> 00:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Anti Christ exactly. Yeah, that's exactly my point with the

787
00:44:26.920 --> 00:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>whole argument, Like, Okay, so most Catholics are going to

788
00:44:30.559 --> 00:44:37.679
<v Speaker 1>say that Arians are heretics and God doesn't accept arianism.

789
00:44:37.920 --> 00:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh but wait a minute, Muslims are basically arians. They

790
00:44:41.280 --> 00:44:45.360
<v Speaker 1>come out of arianism, and God accepts Muslim it's just stupid.

791
00:44:45.599 --> 00:44:52.639
<v Speaker 1>It's like, hey, Yates, what's up? Man? Hey, diy can

792
00:44:52.639 --> 00:44:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you hear me? Yes, sir, Hey, I'll make this quick.

793
00:44:56.840 --> 00:45:00.679
<v Speaker 20>With Lemon Gentium sixteen, I sent you a d with

794
00:45:00.760 --> 00:45:03.000
<v Speaker 20>this information, but I'll try to make it quick as possible.

795
00:45:04.000 --> 00:45:07.880
<v Speaker 20>The very last sentence says, and together with us, they

796
00:45:07.920 --> 00:45:10.760
<v Speaker 20>adore the One merciful God. Mankind's judge on the last day.

797
00:45:11.519 --> 00:45:13.880
<v Speaker 20>Mankind's judge on the last day, according to John five

798
00:45:13.920 --> 00:45:14.440
<v Speaker 20>twenty two.

799
00:45:14.519 --> 00:45:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Is Jesus.

800
00:45:15.199 --> 00:45:18.639
<v Speaker 20>It's explicitly stated. So how on earth could they get

801
00:45:18.639 --> 00:45:19.199
<v Speaker 20>around that?

802
00:45:21.079 --> 00:45:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Exactly. And also don't Muslims think that Jesus participates

803
00:45:26.199 --> 00:45:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in the judgment at the last day too? So, I mean,

804
00:45:29.440 --> 00:45:32.079
<v Speaker 1>is that not even clearer against the argument that Tim

805
00:45:32.119 --> 00:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Gordon was making.

806
00:45:33.199 --> 00:45:36.199
<v Speaker 20>Right, it's explicitly saying, yeah, we adore the One God

807
00:45:36.199 --> 00:45:42.039
<v Speaker 20>with Muslims, but also Jesus is God. It's just a

808
00:45:42.039 --> 00:45:44.679
<v Speaker 20>contradiction in the same sentence.

809
00:45:45.639 --> 00:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Yeah, See, you can't there's no such thing as

810
00:45:48.280 --> 00:45:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like half God. Right, Well, we're on the same page

811
00:45:51.320 --> 00:45:54.039
<v Speaker 1>because we worship half of God. I mean imagine saying

812
00:45:54.360 --> 00:45:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe in the same God as you, but only

813
00:45:56.000 --> 00:45:58.599
<v Speaker 1>half of it. It's like, well, there's this thing as

814
00:45:58.599 --> 00:46:01.159
<v Speaker 1>half God. Oh really there's not. Well then how are

815
00:46:01.159 --> 00:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>your works being the same God if it's not the Trinity?

816
00:46:03.599 --> 00:46:04.639
<v Speaker 19>Right my adults?

817
00:46:04.679 --> 00:46:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Exactly?

818
00:46:05.239 --> 00:46:07.079
<v Speaker 20>All right, I'm gonna let somebody else get up here.

819
00:46:07.679 --> 00:46:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah a good qu a good point. Josh again, got

820
00:46:12.719 --> 00:46:19.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot Josh's hey, I think I got a delay here.

821
00:46:19.119 --> 00:46:21.880
<v Speaker 3>So every time I request, like, it's delayed, so my bad.

822
00:46:23.599 --> 00:46:25.400
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, so I just want to throw Like Also, the

823
00:46:25.519 --> 00:46:28.559
<v Speaker 18>natural theology move that they make when they go to

824
00:46:28.679 --> 00:46:31.239
<v Speaker 18>Romans one is totally bogus, Like.

825
00:46:31.559 --> 00:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not natural theology, like.

826
00:46:33.440 --> 00:46:36.719
<v Speaker 18>The idea that Mohammad and Saudi Arabia is sitting there

827
00:46:36.800 --> 00:46:40.079
<v Speaker 18>reasoning himself to God as opposed to like he was

828
00:46:40.199 --> 00:46:42.400
<v Speaker 18>taught under the threat of force that this is what

829
00:46:42.519 --> 00:46:49.519
<v Speaker 18>I believe, Like this is not like, yeah, it's not right.

830
00:46:49.559 --> 00:46:52.719
<v Speaker 1>So, as we point out, if you read Romans One

831
00:46:53.079 --> 00:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>from the Orthodox perspective, Paul is talking about a darkened heart. Uh,

832
00:46:57.920 --> 00:47:02.199
<v Speaker 1>it's not primarily about intellect and Roman Roman Caltholk read

833
00:47:02.519 --> 00:47:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the Romans. Catholics read Romans One like if you just

834
00:47:06.719 --> 00:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>if a pagan just kind of sat there and reasoned correctly,

835
00:47:09.760 --> 00:47:11.639
<v Speaker 1>like Aristotle like he was. If he was just doing

836
00:47:11.679 --> 00:47:15.079
<v Speaker 1>like syllogisms, he would basically he would be aristotl right,

837
00:47:15.119 --> 00:47:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he would come to the right conclusion about a first cause.

838
00:47:17.639 --> 00:47:20.119
<v Speaker 1>That's literally what they think Romans one is about is

839
00:47:20.199 --> 00:47:25.559
<v Speaker 1>like syllogisms. No, No, it's saying that the reason that

840
00:47:25.679 --> 00:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>men don't worship the true God is that their hearts

841
00:47:28.760 --> 00:47:33.360
<v Speaker 1>are darkened and they worship idols. It's the literal opposite

842
00:47:33.440 --> 00:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the of the problem which that Roman Calolus say,

843
00:47:38.079 --> 00:47:41.440
<v Speaker 1>which they locate in the intellect. They act like the

844
00:47:41.480 --> 00:47:44.159
<v Speaker 1>intellect is making a mistake in the way that reasons

845
00:47:44.199 --> 00:47:47.320
<v Speaker 1>about creatures, and that that's what Paul's talking about if

846
00:47:47.320 --> 00:47:50.119
<v Speaker 1>they just reason correctly. But the whole point is that

847
00:47:50.159 --> 00:47:52.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not even the reasoning faculty that is the problem.

848
00:47:52.800 --> 00:47:56.719
<v Speaker 1>They reason falsely because their hearts are darkened, because Roman

849
00:47:56.880 --> 00:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Romanic caalics don't have a doction of the heart of

850
00:47:58.480 --> 00:48:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the news. So by wait, I think if I recall

851
00:48:02.119 --> 00:48:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the actual terminology that's used there by Paul, and the

852
00:48:04.960 --> 00:48:11.039
<v Speaker 1>Greek corresponds to the terminology uh in the Hebrew text

853
00:48:11.159 --> 00:48:14.119
<v Speaker 1>that like David uses about the heart the news, and

854
00:48:14.159 --> 00:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the news is not a Greek gnostic doctrine. It's a

855
00:48:16.880 --> 00:48:21.039
<v Speaker 1>Hebrew doctor the news. The heart is not the same

856
00:48:21.079 --> 00:48:24.639
<v Speaker 1>thing as the intellect, but in reman Caltholic theology, the

857
00:48:24.719 --> 00:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>soul is basically just the intellect, the reasoning faculty spirit

858
00:48:28.480 --> 00:48:29.000
<v Speaker 1>led what's up?

859
00:48:35.719 --> 00:48:38.159
<v Speaker 21>Yes, all right, I gotta I got a quick question

860
00:48:38.239 --> 00:48:40.280
<v Speaker 21>for you, and is it? Is it okay if I

861
00:48:40.320 --> 00:48:43.199
<v Speaker 21>ask you something kind of outside of the debate title.

862
00:48:43.239 --> 00:48:44.840
<v Speaker 19>If not, that's cool. We could we could.

863
00:48:44.679 --> 00:48:49.280
<v Speaker 21>Say no, I don't care, all right, So I just

864
00:48:49.480 --> 00:48:53.000
<v Speaker 21>I want to get your opinion on like speech, so

865
00:48:54.719 --> 00:48:56.880
<v Speaker 21>not that you know, not that we have to be

866
00:48:57.880 --> 00:49:00.719
<v Speaker 21>I guess, like perfect all the time their speech. And

867
00:49:01.199 --> 00:49:04.280
<v Speaker 21>I'm definitely not advocating for tone policing, but I'm just

868
00:49:04.280 --> 00:49:06.760
<v Speaker 21>trying to figure out, like what is because when I

869
00:49:06.840 --> 00:49:09.719
<v Speaker 21>read the Patristic Fathers, it's like they don't they tell

870
00:49:09.800 --> 00:49:14.360
<v Speaker 21>us to not really like like curse, you use crude

871
00:49:14.440 --> 00:49:16.760
<v Speaker 21>language stuff like that, And again this is not.

872
00:49:17.000 --> 00:49:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I disagree because they they curse and say horrible things

873
00:49:22.920 --> 00:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and make mean jokes all the time. Gotcha.

874
00:49:25.920 --> 00:49:28.119
<v Speaker 21>Yeah, Like I said, I want to get your take

875
00:49:28.199 --> 00:49:31.440
<v Speaker 21>on like like what I guess it's it kind of

876
00:49:31.440 --> 00:49:33.000
<v Speaker 21>falls into economy too.

877
00:49:33.159 --> 00:49:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Like I just let's let's walk all all right, So

878
00:49:35.719 --> 00:49:37.599
<v Speaker 1>let's walk through a couple of points there, right, So, like,

879
00:49:39.239 --> 00:49:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Saint Cyril Jerusalem says hate all here

880
00:49:43.280 --> 00:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>at sics and hate the assemblies of the hero at Sis.

881
00:49:45.519 --> 00:49:48.239
<v Speaker 1>That's actually in the rudder too. Yeah, So does that

882
00:49:48.280 --> 00:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>mean that I have to like go out and you know,

883
00:49:51.239 --> 00:49:55.599
<v Speaker 1>like literally have hatred in my heart? I think he's saying, like,

884
00:49:55.719 --> 00:49:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you hate the theology, you hate their system. Right, if

885
00:49:58.800 --> 00:50:01.639
<v Speaker 1>you read the way that Paul talks about, you know,

886
00:50:01.719 --> 00:50:04.119
<v Speaker 1>people of Creed, he says Cretans are all liars, they're

887
00:50:04.119 --> 00:50:09.079
<v Speaker 1>basically to comebacks. Okay, So if you read Jerome the

888
00:50:09.079 --> 00:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>way that he talks about Helvidius or Vigilantius, I mean

889
00:50:12.400 --> 00:50:14.639
<v Speaker 1>he just calls him a dog, he calls him a monster,

890
00:50:14.719 --> 00:50:19.159
<v Speaker 1>he calls him basically a loser. So it's pretty common

891
00:50:19.159 --> 00:50:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Patristic writings that they call people these names

892
00:50:22.880 --> 00:50:25.760
<v Speaker 1>all the time, especially they're the enemies of the faith.

893
00:50:26.400 --> 00:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>They don't typically do that for people inside the church,

894
00:50:28.480 --> 00:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>although sometimes they even do that. But aside from that,

895
00:50:32.239 --> 00:50:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the scriptures themselves tell us to avoid the fool.

896
00:50:36.440 --> 00:50:38.639
<v Speaker 1>How can I avoid the fool? If I can't identify

897
00:50:38.639 --> 00:50:42.400
<v Speaker 1>who a fool is, Yeah, so it just call. If

898
00:50:42.400 --> 00:50:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I was to say you're a fool, I'm not going

899
00:50:43.960 --> 00:50:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to waste my time with you. There's nothing wrong with

900
00:50:46.239 --> 00:50:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that unless the person isn't a fool. And if you remember,

901
00:50:49.880 --> 00:50:52.079
<v Speaker 1>and when Jesus talks about he says, if anybody calls

902
00:50:52.079 --> 00:50:54.519
<v Speaker 1>his brother a fool without reason, he is liable to

903
00:50:54.559 --> 00:50:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the judgment. Well that's yeah, without reason. So if there

904
00:50:58.719 --> 00:51:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is a reason, then you're not likeable to the judgment.

905
00:51:01.000 --> 00:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And Jesus himself called people names all the time. He

906
00:51:03.039 --> 00:51:06.440
<v Speaker 1>called Herod of Fox, he called you know, a woman

907
00:51:07.039 --> 00:51:09.280
<v Speaker 1>who came to him, he called her he said, the

908
00:51:09.320 --> 00:51:12.559
<v Speaker 1>dogs eat from the eat from the table. So I

909
00:51:12.559 --> 00:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>mean Jesus used this kind of demeaning language at times too,

910
00:51:15.559 --> 00:51:18.679
<v Speaker 1>So I don't see why even that language is a

911
00:51:18.880 --> 00:51:23.400
<v Speaker 1>universally a problem. Now. Second from that, cursing is a

912
00:51:23.400 --> 00:51:26.320
<v Speaker 1>different issue where I think I disagree with a lot

913
00:51:26.320 --> 00:51:30.039
<v Speaker 1>of people on this because people think that what Protestants

914
00:51:30.039 --> 00:51:34.519
<v Speaker 1>decided that. So you have these Puritans in a few

915
00:51:34.519 --> 00:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>centuries ago in America, and they had this moralistic idea

916
00:51:37.960 --> 00:51:42.639
<v Speaker 1>that cursing wasn't just like literally pronouncing a curse or

917
00:51:42.760 --> 00:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>using God's name in vain, which is actually what it

918
00:51:45.880 --> 00:51:48.159
<v Speaker 1>is to curse, curse somebody with God's name or something,

919
00:51:49.599 --> 00:51:52.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, to say GD for example, Like that kind

920
00:51:52.199 --> 00:51:54.559
<v Speaker 1>of stuff is what blaspheming and using the Lord's name

921
00:51:54.719 --> 00:51:58.039
<v Speaker 1>in vain is. That's cursing. Saying the F word or

922
00:51:58.079 --> 00:52:02.280
<v Speaker 1>saying the word shit. That's just older English language that

923
00:52:02.440 --> 00:52:05.440
<v Speaker 1>commoners used. So there's nothing inherently wrong with the word.

924
00:52:05.639 --> 00:52:08.639
<v Speaker 1>It's like there's nothing that makes the word poop more

925
00:52:09.000 --> 00:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>holy than the word shit. They literally are identical. And

926
00:52:12.960 --> 00:52:16.559
<v Speaker 1>even the King James Bible uses the word piss, right,

927
00:52:16.639 --> 00:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So do I have to say peepie or piss? So

928
00:52:19.079 --> 00:52:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe. I don't. I don't believe there is

929
00:52:20.760 --> 00:52:23.639
<v Speaker 1>such a thing as quote cuss words. I think that

930
00:52:23.679 --> 00:52:28.159
<v Speaker 1>there are things like propriety and taboos, and so, for example,

931
00:52:28.199 --> 00:52:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be appropriate to walk into a church and say,

932
00:52:30.960 --> 00:52:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, shit and fuck or something like that, because

933
00:52:34.400 --> 00:52:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's improper and that would be a vulgar speech. But

934
00:52:39.280 --> 00:52:41.960
<v Speaker 1>if somebody says, you know, did you have sex with

935
00:52:42.039 --> 00:52:45.840
<v Speaker 1>her or did you hump her or did you fuck her?

936
00:52:46.159 --> 00:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Between those three words, they all mean essentially the same thing,

937
00:52:49.039 --> 00:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's nothing inherently like, there's not It's not like

938
00:52:52.039 --> 00:52:54.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the words is magically more evil than the

939
00:52:54.360 --> 00:52:57.360
<v Speaker 1>other word. That's that's just moral. That's just like Protestant

940
00:52:57.719 --> 00:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Puritan superstitioning.

941
00:52:59.199 --> 00:53:02.079
<v Speaker 21>Yeah, I got you're saying, you're you're not like advocating

942
00:53:02.199 --> 00:53:03.519
<v Speaker 21>for like vulgar speech.

943
00:53:03.559 --> 00:53:04.960
<v Speaker 19>But it's just like, who are we kidding?

944
00:53:05.039 --> 00:53:07.639
<v Speaker 21>Right, Like if you say hump, it means the same thing, right,

945
00:53:07.719 --> 00:53:09.280
<v Speaker 21>So I get.

946
00:53:09.199 --> 00:53:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, but no, wait a minute, So you understand that

947
00:53:11.320 --> 00:53:14.519
<v Speaker 1>people talk about like you have to talk about these

948
00:53:14.559 --> 00:53:17.280
<v Speaker 1>things at times, So I'm not sure what you mean

949
00:53:17.320 --> 00:53:20.159
<v Speaker 1>by that, Like, so if so, first of all, when

950
00:53:20.159 --> 00:53:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you talk about vulgar, the term vulgar again meant the

951
00:53:24.000 --> 00:53:28.039
<v Speaker 1>common language. And so in the West, what we think

952
00:53:28.280 --> 00:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is vulgar terminology or cuss words is just identified with

953
00:53:33.079 --> 00:53:37.039
<v Speaker 1>what the poor people and the bar people and the

954
00:53:37.039 --> 00:53:40.320
<v Speaker 1>wench made maids would say, you know, down at the

955
00:53:40.400 --> 00:53:43.320
<v Speaker 1>pub when they would talk about going to the bathroom

956
00:53:43.440 --> 00:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or having intimate affairs. Right, that's the speech of the

957
00:53:47.519 --> 00:53:52.000
<v Speaker 1>vulgar people, the commoners. That's why it's called vulgarity. That's

958
00:53:52.079 --> 00:53:55.599
<v Speaker 1>literally literally the origin of it and so the point

959
00:53:55.639 --> 00:53:58.559
<v Speaker 1>is that if I is it really any different if

960
00:53:58.599 --> 00:54:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I say poop is out of shit? Now? Okay? So,

961
00:54:03.880 --> 00:54:07.039
<v Speaker 1>and is it necessarily wrong to talk about poop if

962
00:54:07.119 --> 00:54:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to have you know, I have to explain

963
00:54:09.840 --> 00:54:11.880
<v Speaker 1>where are you going? I'm going to poop like like,

964
00:54:11.920 --> 00:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing wrong.

965
00:54:12.679 --> 00:54:14.280
<v Speaker 19>With that, yeah, yeah, yeah.

966
00:54:14.360 --> 00:54:16.199
<v Speaker 1>And there's nothing wrong with saying I'm going to take

967
00:54:16.199 --> 00:54:19.119
<v Speaker 1>a ship like this, There's no it's just silly to

968
00:54:19.280 --> 00:54:22.639
<v Speaker 1>quibble over this stuff. But again, I do agree that

969
00:54:22.679 --> 00:54:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there are there is such a thing as propriety, and uh,

970
00:54:26.840 --> 00:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, for example, if I'm in a comedy club,

971
00:54:29.559 --> 00:54:31.559
<v Speaker 1>that's a different setting than if I'm in the church,

972
00:54:31.840 --> 00:54:34.199
<v Speaker 1>And so it's proper in a comedy club that you're

973
00:54:34.199 --> 00:54:36.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear. And by the way, I'm not for nasty,

974
00:54:36.440 --> 00:54:38.559
<v Speaker 1>disgusting jokes. There's a lot of raunchy stuff that I

975
00:54:38.559 --> 00:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>think is over the line. Yeah, so there there is speech.

976
00:54:41.480 --> 00:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>As Paul talks about that is I mean that the

977
00:54:44.920 --> 00:54:47.440
<v Speaker 1>English translation used the word vulgar. But you know, let

978
00:54:47.480 --> 00:54:49.800
<v Speaker 1>no unclean speech come out of your mouth. Paul says,

979
00:54:50.119 --> 00:54:52.960
<v Speaker 1>But even that, you could argue, it's more it's it's

980
00:54:53.079 --> 00:54:55.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're talking bad about your brother. That's

981
00:54:55.159 --> 00:54:58.079
<v Speaker 1>worse than saying the word shit. So Paul might even

982
00:54:58.119 --> 00:55:00.760
<v Speaker 1>mean unclean speech in that way. But anyway, go ahead

983
00:55:00.800 --> 00:55:01.400
<v Speaker 1>with your points.

984
00:55:01.559 --> 00:55:04.079
<v Speaker 21>Yeah, No, I I just, you know, wanted to get

985
00:55:04.079 --> 00:55:07.679
<v Speaker 21>your your take on that, because I've even noticed you

986
00:55:07.800 --> 00:55:10.159
<v Speaker 21>kind of like tone it down a little bit too.

987
00:55:10.199 --> 00:55:11.920
<v Speaker 21>Like I hear you a lot of the times, kind

988
00:55:11.960 --> 00:55:14.639
<v Speaker 21>of like qualifying and telling people like, I'm not trying

989
00:55:14.679 --> 00:55:15.440
<v Speaker 21>to be mean to you.

990
00:55:15.559 --> 00:55:19.000
<v Speaker 19>But so I think like you, at least from.

991
00:55:18.760 --> 00:55:21.440
<v Speaker 21>What I've what I've seen since I've been watching you,

992
00:55:22.679 --> 00:55:25.719
<v Speaker 21>is that you actually take care to let people know like, hey,

993
00:55:25.719 --> 00:55:27.400
<v Speaker 21>I'm not trying to be mean to you or whatever,

994
00:55:27.480 --> 00:55:29.360
<v Speaker 21>but you know, I gotta, I gotta kind of.

995
00:55:29.320 --> 00:55:30.760
<v Speaker 19>Correct you on this point or whatever.

996
00:55:31.119 --> 00:55:35.119
<v Speaker 21>And it's really only when people I guess get ridiculous

997
00:55:35.119 --> 00:55:36.960
<v Speaker 21>where you kind of have to shut them down. Might

998
00:55:37.000 --> 00:55:39.360
<v Speaker 21>call him an idiot, might use some of the language

999
00:55:39.400 --> 00:55:41.000
<v Speaker 21>that the Patristic fathers utilize.

1000
00:55:41.000 --> 00:55:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But I don't.

1001
00:55:41.480 --> 00:55:43.000
<v Speaker 21>I don't really see you going out of your way

1002
00:55:43.039 --> 00:55:45.360
<v Speaker 21>to like just randomly insult.

1003
00:55:44.960 --> 00:55:46.159
<v Speaker 19>People because you want to be mean.

1004
00:55:47.960 --> 00:55:48.440
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't.

1005
00:55:48.559 --> 00:55:52.119
<v Speaker 19>I mean, which is what you get, which is what

1006
00:55:52.159 --> 00:55:55.400
<v Speaker 19>you get accused of right, right, Yeah, So I just

1007
00:55:55.679 --> 00:55:56.039
<v Speaker 19>wanted to.

1008
00:55:57.199 --> 00:55:58.840
<v Speaker 21>I just wanted to, like I said, just kind of

1009
00:55:58.840 --> 00:56:00.559
<v Speaker 21>wanted to get your take on that and just kind

1010
00:56:00.559 --> 00:56:05.039
<v Speaker 21>of see where you are coming from on how you

1011
00:56:05.159 --> 00:56:07.000
<v Speaker 21>view some of this language stuff.

1012
00:56:08.920 --> 00:56:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, go read your own. I mean, he's pretty vicious

1013
00:56:11.679 --> 00:56:14.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to everybody. He had disagrees with King

1014
00:56:14.400 --> 00:56:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what's up?

1015
00:56:15.840 --> 00:56:16.480
<v Speaker 22>Hey, what's up?

1016
00:56:16.559 --> 00:56:17.119
<v Speaker 23>Jay?

1017
00:56:17.559 --> 00:56:19.960
<v Speaker 22>I just wanted to agree with you on your earlier

1018
00:56:20.000 --> 00:56:22.960
<v Speaker 22>ex post when you said that this Vatican two is

1019
00:56:23.079 --> 00:56:27.320
<v Speaker 22>very Masonic. It absolutely is. It's something I wish God

1020
00:56:27.440 --> 00:56:31.360
<v Speaker 22>spoken about more. It's actually it's so new age, which

1021
00:56:31.400 --> 00:56:35.519
<v Speaker 22>you obviously know. It's I'm not trying to be a crass,

1022
00:56:35.679 --> 00:56:38.039
<v Speaker 22>but it sounds like something you know, when I was

1023
00:56:38.079 --> 00:56:41.840
<v Speaker 22>sixteen doing ascid with my buddies, that we would come

1024
00:56:41.920 --> 00:56:44.519
<v Speaker 22>up with this Vatican two. We're all one and so

1025
00:56:44.719 --> 00:56:47.639
<v Speaker 22>to the Catholics, I say, I mean, dude, is your

1026
00:56:47.679 --> 00:56:51.960
<v Speaker 22>theology seriously just we're all one? No, We're not all one.

1027
00:56:52.760 --> 00:56:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like DMT brow theology exactly. Yeah.

1028
00:56:55.519 --> 00:56:58.960
<v Speaker 22>So this Pope of the Future that your videos are

1029
00:56:59.000 --> 00:57:03.039
<v Speaker 22>so hilarious about it is totally this new age hope

1030
00:57:03.039 --> 00:57:08.239
<v Speaker 22>of the future. So yes, thank you. Jay, I appreciate you, bro, Yeah.

1031
00:57:08.079 --> 00:57:10.079
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. That's exactly the whole point.

1032
00:57:10.199 --> 00:57:10.519
<v Speaker 7>I mean.

1033
00:57:10.679 --> 00:57:13.719
<v Speaker 1>The problem is not quibbling over words. The problem is

1034
00:57:13.719 --> 00:57:17.599
<v Speaker 1>that believing this theology is delusion and it will lead

1035
00:57:17.599 --> 00:57:20.559
<v Speaker 1>you to spiritual ruin if I believe all the religions

1036
00:57:20.559 --> 00:57:23.119
<v Speaker 1>are passed to God, which is essentially what Francis said,

1037
00:57:23.199 --> 00:57:27.360
<v Speaker 1>echoing Vatican too. That's the dangerous in result of this,

1038
00:57:28.159 --> 00:57:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and it also demonstrates the whole point that we've been

1039
00:57:30.480 --> 00:57:34.119
<v Speaker 1>making for many years that natural theology literally can just

1040
00:57:34.199 --> 00:57:37.039
<v Speaker 1>lead to perennialism. If you read the Garby paper, that's

1041
00:57:37.079 --> 00:57:38.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the points he makes at the beginning, because

1042
00:57:38.679 --> 00:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>he studied under the famous perennialist John Hick, and he

1043
00:57:41.840 --> 00:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>said he argues, like, if I'm going to be doing

1044
00:57:45.440 --> 00:57:48.199
<v Speaker 1>natural theology, there's no reason why that has to lead

1045
00:57:48.239 --> 00:57:51.360
<v Speaker 1>me to Tomism or Catholicism. Why can't it lead me

1046
00:57:51.400 --> 00:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to perennialism. And the argument I think that's kind of

1047
00:57:55.920 --> 00:58:00.239
<v Speaker 1>being made here indirectly by everybody via this Vatican into

1048
00:58:00.360 --> 00:58:03.360
<v Speaker 1>debate and what's happening with you know, Tim Gordon and stuff,

1049
00:58:04.239 --> 00:58:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is that Vatican too kind of is perennialism, Like why

1050
00:58:07.559 --> 00:58:10.719
<v Speaker 1>is it not? Why why does that have to lead

1051
00:58:10.760 --> 00:58:15.320
<v Speaker 1>me to tonis zone and sure as hell doesn't necessarily

1052
00:58:15.400 --> 00:58:18.360
<v Speaker 1>lead to Jesus. And why are we going to use

1053
00:58:18.400 --> 00:58:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the arguments and the philosophy and the metaphysics of Muslims

1054
00:58:22.840 --> 00:58:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Neoplatonists and all these people and then try

1055
00:58:27.000 --> 00:58:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to get them into Christianity. It's it just doesn't make

1056
00:58:29.280 --> 00:58:31.320
<v Speaker 1>any sense. It's like, yeah, let me show you that

1057
00:58:31.320 --> 00:58:34.119
<v Speaker 1>we all believe in a monad. Oh, but it's not

1058
00:58:34.199 --> 00:58:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the Muslim monad. It's the Jesus monad. Like we all

1059
00:58:37.280 --> 00:58:39.320
<v Speaker 1>believe in the monad, let's just stick Jesus on top

1060
00:58:39.400 --> 00:58:42.599
<v Speaker 1>of it. That's the whole Roman Catholic approach. Here's inquirer.

1061
00:58:42.639 --> 00:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Yeah, what's up? Currit Yeah?

1062
00:58:51.480 --> 00:58:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, yeah.

1063
00:58:52.519 --> 00:58:53.880
<v Speaker 4>I just want to say I've been seeing you on

1064
00:58:53.920 --> 00:58:54.800
<v Speaker 4>some bigger podcasts.

1065
00:58:54.840 --> 00:58:58.840
<v Speaker 15>That's awesome, man, it's good to see you getting some recognition.

1066
00:58:59.719 --> 00:59:01.119
<v Speaker 3>Cool enjoy your work.

1067
00:59:01.199 --> 00:59:03.760
<v Speaker 4>So I just have a couple of questions, like.

1068
00:59:05.199 --> 00:59:10.320
<v Speaker 24>I am in the process of like starting Catechism, and

1069
00:59:10.639 --> 00:59:12.960
<v Speaker 24>the one thing that kind of stands out to me

1070
00:59:13.079 --> 00:59:13.639
<v Speaker 24>is when they.

1071
00:59:13.559 --> 00:59:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Say you Roman Catholic catechis hold on Orthodox Katechistas or

1072
00:59:21.559 --> 00:59:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholic Catechism. Okay, gotcha. Yeah.

1073
00:59:28.920 --> 00:59:32.400
<v Speaker 24>So I'm just wondering, like when they say theotokos like

1074
00:59:32.599 --> 00:59:35.079
<v Speaker 24>most holy, what do they mean by that?

1075
00:59:35.199 --> 00:59:37.280
<v Speaker 4>Like that is the only thing that really sticks out

1076
00:59:37.320 --> 00:59:37.519
<v Speaker 4>to me.

1077
00:59:37.760 --> 00:59:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I clearly they don't mean the most out of all. Right, No,

1078
00:59:42.880 --> 00:59:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we would say she's the queen of Heaven, She's the

1079
00:59:44.960 --> 00:59:48.320
<v Speaker 1>queen of saints, she is the holiest love creatures. We

1080
00:59:48.320 --> 00:59:51.719
<v Speaker 1>would agree with that. No, just I think it's just

1081
00:59:52.320 --> 01:00:00.719
<v Speaker 1>a delay. Can you hear me? Now there? Can you

1082
01:00:00.719 --> 01:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>guys hear me out there in this? I think there

1083
01:00:02.960 --> 01:00:04.719
<v Speaker 1>was a delay with that guy. Can you guys hear me?

1084
01:00:06.440 --> 01:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>If you can hear me, do like a thumps up

1085
01:00:08.519 --> 01:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>or something. Can anybody hear me? He requests to speak? Okay,

1086
01:00:20.280 --> 01:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys can Yeah? I mean yeah. So Mary is

1087
01:00:23.719 --> 01:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>called most holy because she's the queen of saints. She

1088
01:00:26.760 --> 01:00:30.559
<v Speaker 1>is the the tokos, she is the godbearer, Mother of God.

1089
01:00:31.679 --> 01:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, in Psalm forty five, she's pictured as right

1090
01:00:34.400 --> 01:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>next to the king. It's a Messianic psalm and Mary

1091
01:00:37.079 --> 01:00:40.079
<v Speaker 1>is the queen in that song. So all of the

1092
01:00:40.199 --> 01:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>accolades that we give to her signify that she is

1093
01:00:43.519 --> 01:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the pre eminent of all the creatures. She's the new Israel,

1094
01:00:48.119 --> 01:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>She's the again Tetoko's Mother of God, Queen of Heaven

1095
01:00:51.440 --> 01:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Revelation twelve. So it's just proper to her honor that

1096
01:00:56.400 --> 01:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>she be called and given that title. Kelly. I'm you, Kelly.

1097
01:01:10.920 --> 01:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

1098
01:01:12.679 --> 01:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Hi?

1099
01:01:13.320 --> 01:01:15.280
<v Speaker 25>I just joined the space and so I was reading

1100
01:01:15.280 --> 01:01:18.880
<v Speaker 25>the comments below. So it sounds like people are saying

1101
01:01:18.880 --> 01:01:22.559
<v Speaker 25>that Roman Catholics won't come up. So I'm a Roman Catholic.

1102
01:01:22.559 --> 01:01:25.639
<v Speaker 25>I'm not sure if we're against us or for us.

1103
01:01:25.679 --> 01:01:28.400
<v Speaker 25>So do you want to clarify or does any people?

1104
01:01:28.440 --> 01:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, the point was that because I just did a

1105
01:01:31.800 --> 01:01:36.599
<v Speaker 1>big Roman Catholic debate. The debate centered around the fact

1106
01:01:36.679 --> 01:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that the text of Vatican two say very clearly that Muslims, Christians,

1107
01:01:41.880 --> 01:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and Jews all worship the same God, and that's essentially

1108
01:01:44.840 --> 01:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're taking issue with. It also says that Hindus

1109
01:01:47.559 --> 01:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>worship God too.

1110
01:01:50.519 --> 01:01:52.000
<v Speaker 9>Oh, I say, I was just gonna.

1111
01:01:52.320 --> 01:01:55.320
<v Speaker 25>I wasn't quite sure if people were saying that, you know,

1112
01:01:56.159 --> 01:01:58.159
<v Speaker 25>our religion, I'm not sure if you're Catholic, but I

1113
01:01:58.199 --> 01:02:00.760
<v Speaker 25>am so, are my really isn't true?

1114
01:02:00.880 --> 01:02:03.519
<v Speaker 9>Or if anyone had any questions about.

1115
01:02:03.480 --> 01:02:06.039
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm saying that it makes it not true because

1116
01:02:06.079 --> 01:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a contradiction from the basics of the Bible and

1117
01:02:09.079 --> 01:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>traditional Christian teaching. Muslims and Christians and Jews don't worship

1118
01:02:12.400 --> 01:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the same God. And if Vatican two says that, then

1119
01:02:15.480 --> 01:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>from Catholicism is not true.

1120
01:02:18.519 --> 01:02:18.960
<v Speaker 9>Correct.

1121
01:02:19.440 --> 01:02:23.000
<v Speaker 25>Yes, I mean they don't see Jesus the same as Catholics.

1122
01:02:23.039 --> 01:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>To well, then it's not the same reference, it's not

1123
01:02:27.679 --> 01:02:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the same deity. So then Vatican two is false. That's

1124
01:02:31.159 --> 01:02:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the point.

1125
01:02:32.519 --> 01:02:35.800
<v Speaker 25>Oh, I see, Okay, I see what you're saying. Well,

1126
01:02:36.159 --> 01:02:39.480
<v Speaker 25>I mean, that's that's fine. I mean, you know, I

1127
01:02:39.760 --> 01:02:43.039
<v Speaker 25>wasn't quite sure if just anybody was calling Catholics out

1128
01:02:43.119 --> 01:02:46.199
<v Speaker 25>as far as what it is that we believe. So,

1129
01:02:46.920 --> 01:02:50.159
<v Speaker 25>I mean, you know that obviously we're more towards the

1130
01:02:50.760 --> 01:02:53.480
<v Speaker 25>you know, I mean, the Jews kind of stop at

1131
01:02:53.920 --> 01:02:56.119
<v Speaker 25>the first you know, half of the Bible were more

1132
01:02:56.480 --> 01:02:57.159
<v Speaker 25>New Testament.

1133
01:02:57.320 --> 01:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, But this is more specifically an argument about

1134
01:03:02.159 --> 01:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the Vatican teaching at the Second Vatican Council, which is

1135
01:03:06.280 --> 01:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to basically admit that it's adopting a kind of a

1136
01:03:11.440 --> 01:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>syncretism or a perennialism, where all the religions in some

1137
01:03:15.920 --> 01:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>way kind of point to and participate in Christ in

1138
01:03:19.840 --> 01:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>God and salvation even though they don't know it. It's

1139
01:03:22.880 --> 01:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>a very problematic thing to say that Muslims, Christians at

1140
01:03:26.679 --> 01:03:30.559
<v Speaker 1>Jews worship the same God when they clearly don't. For example,

1141
01:03:31.320 --> 01:03:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Jesus says in John eight that Abraham believed and worshiped

1142
01:03:35.159 --> 01:03:39.119
<v Speaker 1>him and that Jesus is the creator and God of

1143
01:03:39.199 --> 01:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the Old Testament. Well that's the case, then the Jews

1144
01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Muslims don't worship the same God as Jesus did.

1145
01:03:47.960 --> 01:03:48.599
<v Speaker 9>Right, correct.

1146
01:03:48.639 --> 01:03:52.360
<v Speaker 25>I mean I'm not well read on honestly what the

1147
01:03:52.400 --> 01:03:53.639
<v Speaker 25>Muslims and he Dos.

1148
01:03:55.159 --> 01:03:59.079
<v Speaker 9>Believe in any way, because I.

1149
01:03:58.119 --> 01:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, Muslims are good on this point, because they're a

1150
01:04:01.880 --> 01:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>good example in this to make this case, because Muslims

1151
01:04:05.400 --> 01:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>say that Allah has no sons. But if Allah has

1152
01:04:09.360 --> 01:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>no sons and Jesus calls God his father, then Allah

1153
01:04:12.920 --> 01:04:15.639
<v Speaker 1>can't be Jesus's God and can't be God the Father.

1154
01:04:18.440 --> 01:04:20.880
<v Speaker 25>Correct, And I mean do they I'm assuming that they

1155
01:04:20.960 --> 01:04:25.039
<v Speaker 25>don't believe that the Blessed Mother is the actual mother

1156
01:04:25.119 --> 01:04:27.960
<v Speaker 25>of Jesus, or they do, and then they just don't

1157
01:04:27.960 --> 01:04:28.320
<v Speaker 25>seem to.

1158
01:04:28.320 --> 01:04:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Care about her.

1159
01:04:29.400 --> 01:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>No, they think that there is a virgin birth, but

1160
01:04:31.440 --> 01:04:33.679
<v Speaker 1>there's not really any reason why that happened. It's just

1161
01:04:34.599 --> 01:04:38.079
<v Speaker 1>it's because Islam is a copy paste cut from Christianity

1162
01:04:38.159 --> 01:04:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and Judaism, so it's kind of a mix. So they

1163
01:04:40.679 --> 01:04:42.679
<v Speaker 1>do believe in a virgin birth. They believe that Jesus

1164
01:04:42.800 --> 01:04:45.199
<v Speaker 1>was born from Mary, but there's no real reason why

1165
01:04:45.480 --> 01:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. In Islamic theology, there's not really an

1166
01:04:48.840 --> 01:04:51.519
<v Speaker 1>explanation for what the word Messiah even means, even though

1167
01:04:51.519 --> 01:04:54.639
<v Speaker 1>they think Jesus Messiah.

1168
01:04:55.320 --> 01:04:58.840
<v Speaker 9>Interesting. Well maybe some of them will.

1169
01:04:59.159 --> 01:05:02.320
<v Speaker 25>Well, actually, the Muslims and Hindus seem to be pretty

1170
01:05:02.320 --> 01:05:05.920
<v Speaker 25>hard pressed on their religion, so and they can stay there.

1171
01:05:05.960 --> 01:05:06.440
<v Speaker 9>That's fine.

1172
01:05:06.440 --> 01:05:08.760
<v Speaker 25>I'm not here to to kind of grab anybody over

1173
01:05:08.760 --> 01:05:13.719
<v Speaker 25>to the Catholic Church or anything, but I just you know, yes,

1174
01:05:13.800 --> 01:05:17.000
<v Speaker 25>I'm here for the Catholic faith if anybody cares about that,

1175
01:05:17.800 --> 01:05:19.760
<v Speaker 25>but I will drop if if you'd like me to.

1176
01:05:20.280 --> 01:05:20.559
<v Speaker 9>Thanks.

1177
01:05:20.880 --> 01:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. Good questions. Yeah, I'm an Orthodox Catholic,

1178
01:05:24.159 --> 01:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>so we're the real Catholics. Not trying to be rude,

1179
01:05:27.440 --> 01:05:31.679
<v Speaker 1>but that's that's what Orthodox Christianity is it the Orthodox

1180
01:05:31.760 --> 01:05:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Catholic Church, anybody else, any Roman Catholics. I'm a little

1181
01:05:36.719 --> 01:05:39.239
<v Speaker 1>disappointed that only one Roman Catholic came out of all

1182
01:05:39.280 --> 01:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of these yappers, but I'm not surprised. That's usually what

1183
01:05:44.360 --> 01:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>we get. That we don't usually get anybody who actually

1184
01:05:47.480 --> 01:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to come to discuss the issues. The one kid

1185
01:05:49.519 --> 01:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that came that was it. And then all they have

1186
01:06:00.639 --> 01:06:06.199
<v Speaker 1>is like two quote ways. They're like, well, Carol said

1187
01:06:06.239 --> 01:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that he likes Muslims. That's literally what a guy's sending

1188
01:06:08.800 --> 01:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>me right now.

1189
01:06:09.239 --> 01:06:09.920
<v Speaker 4>It's like, so what.

1190
01:06:14.760 --> 01:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Orth of gaul?

1191
01:06:16.840 --> 01:06:20.679
<v Speaker 26>Hey, so I have a question in regards to what

1192
01:06:20.719 --> 01:06:25.760
<v Speaker 26>do you think about I know, the whole system in

1193
01:06:25.920 --> 01:06:31.079
<v Speaker 26>Orthodoxy and Catholicism is different. When they bring up Patriarch

1194
01:06:31.119 --> 01:06:38.639
<v Speaker 26>Crill and the humanist comparing that to you know, Orthodoxy

1195
01:06:38.679 --> 01:06:39.639
<v Speaker 26>and the Pope.

1196
01:06:41.360 --> 01:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. I mean there's two things to say here.

1197
01:06:43.480 --> 01:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, none of the patriarchs are indefectible and infallible.

1198
01:06:48.079 --> 01:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>That's the teaching of the Roman Church about its Roman bishop.

1199
01:06:51.639 --> 01:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And so it's not equivalent. They want it to be equivalent,

1200
01:06:55.519 --> 01:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a two quote way, but they think

1201
01:06:58.320 --> 01:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a defeater when first of all, let's say for

1202
01:07:02.880 --> 01:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the argument that it is a defeater, well, then it's

1203
01:07:05.079 --> 01:07:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a defeater for both positions, and Rome is still false,

1204
01:07:07.719 --> 01:07:10.639
<v Speaker 1>you idiot. So it's like, if you think this is

1205
01:07:10.679 --> 01:07:13.119
<v Speaker 1>a defeater by just turning it and saying that, well,

1206
01:07:13.199 --> 01:07:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Curle says bad things too, well, then that is implying

1207
01:07:17.280 --> 01:07:21.079
<v Speaker 1>that Francis and all these people are also saying bad things,

1208
01:07:21.280 --> 01:07:24.199
<v Speaker 1>so they're all false. So it's first of all, it's

1209
01:07:24.239 --> 01:07:26.599
<v Speaker 1>a stupid ass move to think that a too quoque

1210
01:07:26.960 --> 01:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>proves anything. But it's also assuming that the Orthodox system

1211
01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:33.599
<v Speaker 1>is the same as the papal system, So they're missing

1212
01:07:33.639 --> 01:07:37.039
<v Speaker 1>the whole point that it's a defeater for your system.

1213
01:07:37.159 --> 01:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're indefectible bishop defects, I don't I can believe.

1214
01:07:42.159 --> 01:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And we already know that every patriarch it has defected

1215
01:07:45.480 --> 01:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the history of the church. All

1216
01:07:47.960 --> 01:07:51.599
<v Speaker 1>the patriarchis have had heritics at some point, So what's

1217
01:07:52.239 --> 01:07:54.079
<v Speaker 1>it's not even the gotcha that they think it is.

1218
01:07:54.440 --> 01:07:57.559
<v Speaker 26>But that doesn't speak for the whole like Russian Church,

1219
01:07:57.679 --> 01:07:59.280
<v Speaker 26>or for the whole orthodomy.

1220
01:07:59.400 --> 01:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>No, they think that like the it's like that the

1221
01:08:03.480 --> 01:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>patriarchis are popes. They think it's like little popes. So

1222
01:08:06.039 --> 01:08:09.719
<v Speaker 1>they think that everybody's underneath a patriarchate and the patriarchs

1223
01:08:09.760 --> 01:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>are little popes, and if the patriarch does something, they

1224
01:08:12.320 --> 01:08:15.519
<v Speaker 1>don't understand that it's all decentralized. A patriarch is just

1225
01:08:15.559 --> 01:08:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a canonical, privileged title. That's it.

1226
01:08:20.239 --> 01:08:22.279
<v Speaker 26>And they would say, well, then why do they have leaders.

1227
01:08:22.279 --> 01:08:25.000
<v Speaker 26>What's the point of having leaders if you're not gonna

1228
01:08:25.119 --> 01:08:27.239
<v Speaker 26>if they're going to be a humanists and not follow.

1229
01:08:31.279 --> 01:08:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Church has had bad leaders in the first

1230
01:08:35.319 --> 01:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand years in many cases. So if a Roman Catholic

1231
01:08:38.039 --> 01:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to make that line of argument and believes that

1232
01:08:41.640 --> 01:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the Church of the first thousand years is Roman Catholic,

1233
01:08:43.760 --> 01:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>then that's a defeater for their own position. So that

1234
01:08:45.760 --> 01:08:48.039
<v Speaker 1>again it's stupid. Yeah, if you think the Roman Catholic

1235
01:08:48.159 --> 01:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Church was the Church of the first thousand years, and

1236
01:08:51.520 --> 01:08:53.119
<v Speaker 1>you think the problems that you're laying out with the

1237
01:08:53.159 --> 01:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>patriarchis are defeaters, guess where the patriarchal the pentarchy system

1238
01:08:57.359 --> 01:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>comes from. The ecumenical councils of the first years. You

1239
01:09:00.640 --> 01:09:05.159
<v Speaker 1>guphus I was like, they don't understand that every time

1240
01:09:05.199 --> 01:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they make this argument, if they think their church is

1241
01:09:07.880 --> 01:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the church of over sousand years, is the.

1242
01:09:09.479 --> 01:09:12.479
<v Speaker 26>Defeat for the coy Yeah, I think they're not getting that.

1243
01:09:12.880 --> 01:09:13.840
<v Speaker 26>I think I don't know.

1244
01:09:13.920 --> 01:09:15.479
<v Speaker 1>No, they're not. It doesn't matter how they time you

1245
01:09:15.479 --> 01:09:16.399
<v Speaker 1>explain it, they don't get it.

1246
01:09:16.960 --> 01:09:19.520
<v Speaker 26>I don't know, they don't care to look further, or

1247
01:09:19.880 --> 01:09:22.079
<v Speaker 26>I don't know. But do you think the sacraments and

1248
01:09:22.159 --> 01:09:26.279
<v Speaker 26>the other church, like the Catholic Church are I don't

1249
01:09:26.279 --> 01:09:28.399
<v Speaker 26>want to use the term ballid or invalid, but.

1250
01:09:30.319 --> 01:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I think valid invalid is Romancolic terminology that muddies the waters. Uh.

1251
01:09:34.760 --> 01:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>So they can do the rituals correctly, but we don't

1252
01:09:38.760 --> 01:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>automatically think that they're efficacious so that they have the

1253
01:09:41.960 --> 01:09:46.119
<v Speaker 1>grace that they signified. The church can determine like whether

1254
01:09:46.199 --> 01:09:48.479
<v Speaker 1>or not the rituals need to be repeated. But what's

1255
01:09:48.479 --> 01:09:52.279
<v Speaker 1>funny is that even in the traditional Roman Catholic Augustinian mindset,

1256
01:09:52.359 --> 01:09:55.359
<v Speaker 1>which is what they think they're all basing their sacramentology on,

1257
01:09:55.439 --> 01:09:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Augustin believes that the sin of heresy and schiz them

1258
01:09:59.600 --> 01:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>prevents the grace. So even in the Augustinian ext opera

1259
01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:07.399
<v Speaker 1>operatal model, even if the baptisms are quote valid and efficacious,

1260
01:10:07.479 --> 01:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're baptized in heresy, being in heresy prevents you

1261
01:10:10.800 --> 01:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>from actually getting the grace even though the grace is

1262
01:10:12.960 --> 01:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>quote there. So even their own system doesn't work.

1263
01:10:16.920 --> 01:10:20.000
<v Speaker 26>So the pope is probably in I mean you would

1264
01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:21.199
<v Speaker 26>say the pope is in heresy.

1265
01:10:21.520 --> 01:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So the whole church, oh, I know, we do not

1266
01:10:23.760 --> 01:10:26.359
<v Speaker 1>believe the Roman Calley Church has the faith. They are heterodox,

1267
01:10:26.479 --> 01:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>meaning they're outside.

1268
01:10:27.239 --> 01:10:30.279
<v Speaker 26>The completely like no, yes, oh.

1269
01:10:29.760 --> 01:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It only takes one heresy to be outside the faith.

1270
01:10:31.880 --> 01:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>That's the faith is the packaged deal. And ironically, get this,

1271
01:10:36.039 --> 01:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>before Vatican two, Roman Catholic theologies said the exact same thing.

1272
01:10:39.880 --> 01:10:43.399
<v Speaker 1>You can reset these Cognitium and Mestici Corporus, two famous

1273
01:10:43.479 --> 01:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholic and cyclicals, one by Leelald thirteenth the other

1274
01:10:46.560 --> 01:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>by Pious A. Twelfth. They actually already say that if

1275
01:10:50.560 --> 01:10:55.119
<v Speaker 1>you deny one of the dogmas, you're outside the faith. So,

1276
01:10:55.159 --> 01:10:58.039
<v Speaker 1>in other words, I can't be a Roman Catholic in

1277
01:10:58.119 --> 01:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>terms of traditional Catholic theology and be like, I'm Roman

1278
01:11:01.239 --> 01:11:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Caloch but I don't believe the Imaculate conception, but I

1279
01:11:03.319 --> 01:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>believe everything else. If you deny. If you deny, I know,

1280
01:11:07.239 --> 01:11:10.159
<v Speaker 1>but that's not consistent with their own theology. If you

1281
01:11:10.239 --> 01:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>deny one dogma, you're outside the faith. That's their theology.

1282
01:11:13.600 --> 01:11:15.399
<v Speaker 26>They don't even know that, So then there can't be

1283
01:11:15.479 --> 01:11:17.960
<v Speaker 26>healing right in their church.

1284
01:11:19.760 --> 01:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>That's the whole point of why this is such a

1285
01:11:21.520 --> 01:11:24.279
<v Speaker 1>dangerous thing. Like it's not just quibbling over the words

1286
01:11:24.279 --> 01:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of Vatican two. They have lost the healing of the

1287
01:11:28.079 --> 01:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>sacraments and of the faith by all of these crazy

1288
01:11:31.800 --> 01:11:35.119
<v Speaker 1>heresies and all this nonsense and madness. I mean, it

1289
01:11:35.119 --> 01:11:38.479
<v Speaker 1>should be obvious everybody that the whole like the rampant

1290
01:11:38.479 --> 01:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>homosexuality must the clergy and the pedophilia, is a clear

1291
01:11:42.079 --> 01:11:46.159
<v Speaker 1>sign of curse, like their curse. Dude, Like, can you

1292
01:11:46.199 --> 01:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>not see that with spiritual discernment that if this institution

1293
01:11:49.399 --> 01:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is a giant money laundering Vatican bank scam.

1294
01:11:52.439 --> 01:11:56.039
<v Speaker 26>Full of do you think that their church produced saints

1295
01:11:56.159 --> 01:11:58.680
<v Speaker 26>like their saints? Are theyy different from our saints?

1296
01:11:59.159 --> 01:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>No, you can't do saints without the uncreated energies which

1297
01:12:02.560 --> 01:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are found in the Orthodox sacraments, in the life of

1298
01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the Orthodox.

1299
01:12:05.600 --> 01:12:07.600
<v Speaker 26>Church, even the saints in the past, like all the

1300
01:12:07.760 --> 01:12:10.680
<v Speaker 26>like Padre Perrot and all of them are they like

1301
01:12:11.359 --> 01:12:11.800
<v Speaker 26>were they?

1302
01:12:12.600 --> 01:12:12.680
<v Speaker 6>No?

1303
01:12:12.720 --> 01:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>If you know? Again, so the idea of an Orthodox

1304
01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>saint is vastly different from what Roman Catholics think saints are.

1305
01:12:19.840 --> 01:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Contrast the life of you know, Basil Gregory, uh, you know,

1306
01:12:25.159 --> 01:12:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Paul Simon, the New Theologian. It's vastly different from the

1307
01:12:29.399 --> 01:12:34.239
<v Speaker 1>histrionics of you know, Francis of a CC and you know, no,

1308
01:12:34.279 --> 01:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it's totally different. We don't have all this not blood

1309
01:12:36.960 --> 01:12:38.479
<v Speaker 1>letting and all this crazy stuff.

1310
01:12:39.119 --> 01:12:41.560
<v Speaker 26>Okay, do you recommend any books you can just throw

1311
01:12:41.600 --> 01:12:42.359
<v Speaker 26>out there.

1312
01:12:42.960 --> 01:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>On what specifically?

1313
01:12:43.920 --> 01:12:50.239
<v Speaker 26>What I like, you know, the Catholic an Orthodox system.

1314
01:12:49.960 --> 01:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And well, I mean there's a good critique of the

1315
01:12:53.720 --> 01:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>papacy by Michael Welton called Two Paths. That's a really

1316
01:12:57.079 --> 01:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>good readable book. Okay, so I was I would start

1317
01:12:59.560 --> 01:13:02.399
<v Speaker 1>with something like that and then just read my just

1318
01:13:02.439 --> 01:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>read Pomezansky's Orthodox Dogmatics to get a good basic idea

1319
01:13:05.720 --> 01:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of Orthodox sacramentology. I wish what some of these Roman

1320
01:13:12.439 --> 01:13:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Catholics would actually discuss. Why just saying that Kirol said

1321
01:13:17.479 --> 01:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>something bad, It is not it doesn't work, but they

1322
01:13:21.680 --> 01:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>won't do it. They just want to have like a gotcha,

1323
01:13:25.399 --> 01:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, and I'm mute.

1324
01:13:27.560 --> 01:13:29.479
<v Speaker 25>Oh okay, sorry, yeah, I think there is a little

1325
01:13:29.479 --> 01:13:33.000
<v Speaker 25>bit of delay. Can we back up to where the

1326
01:13:33.159 --> 01:13:38.560
<v Speaker 25>orthochiic just came up? Are you saying that our Catholic

1327
01:13:38.600 --> 01:13:44.319
<v Speaker 25>saint padre Pio is not a saint or how do

1328
01:13:44.359 --> 01:13:45.000
<v Speaker 25>you look at that?

1329
01:13:45.239 --> 01:13:48.119
<v Speaker 1>No, we do not accept Roman Catholic saints. Correct.

1330
01:13:48.520 --> 01:13:52.479
<v Speaker 25>Interesting, So padre Pios stigmata means what to you?

1331
01:13:52.640 --> 01:13:52.960
<v Speaker 9>Nothing?

1332
01:13:53.119 --> 01:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Or I mean, I don't know that he had stigmata

1333
01:13:57.399 --> 01:13:59.479
<v Speaker 1>other than that Roman Catholic claim that he did. Do

1334
01:13:59.520 --> 01:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>you believe in all the religions and mystical gurus claims

1335
01:14:04.479 --> 01:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>that they can do magic, mumbo and jembo?

1336
01:14:07.199 --> 01:14:07.359
<v Speaker 19>No?

1337
01:14:07.479 --> 01:14:09.600
<v Speaker 25>But I mean in terms of just taking Padre po

1338
01:14:10.279 --> 01:14:13.680
<v Speaker 25>just as an example, I mean, have you ever done

1339
01:14:13.720 --> 01:14:14.520
<v Speaker 25>research into him?

1340
01:14:14.600 --> 01:14:14.800
<v Speaker 19>Or no?

1341
01:14:16.720 --> 01:14:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I have a fact. I used to be a traditional Romancolic.

1342
01:14:19.239 --> 01:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So yes, I know quite a bit about Him've read

1343
01:14:20.880 --> 01:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole book on him.

1344
01:14:22.319 --> 01:14:24.840
<v Speaker 25>Oh okay, so you used to be a Catholic. Okay,

1345
01:14:25.119 --> 01:14:27.680
<v Speaker 25>I'm not familiar with you, so just I'm sorry about that.

1346
01:14:27.640 --> 01:14:30.319
<v Speaker 1>But that's fine. I'm just telling you. Yeah, I was

1347
01:14:30.319 --> 01:14:33.039
<v Speaker 1>a traditional Galic for about ten, maybe eight or nine.

1348
01:14:32.920 --> 01:14:35.119
<v Speaker 9>Years, okay, and then what made you leave?

1349
01:14:35.199 --> 01:14:38.439
<v Speaker 1>If you don't mind me asking some of the contradictions

1350
01:14:38.479 --> 01:14:41.079
<v Speaker 1>between the pre Vatican two and post Vatican two teaching

1351
01:14:41.159 --> 01:14:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is one of the probably the biggest issue.

1352
01:14:44.119 --> 01:14:46.840
<v Speaker 25>Okay, So can we just talk about is it okay

1353
01:14:46.840 --> 01:14:48.079
<v Speaker 25>if we talk about Padre Pio?

1354
01:14:48.159 --> 01:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that okay? I don't mind about Padre Pio. But

1355
01:14:53.720 --> 01:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>what I'm gonna say is what the claims of these

1356
01:14:58.920 --> 01:15:04.479
<v Speaker 1>phenomena can't prove the religion when literally every religion or

1357
01:15:04.520 --> 01:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>cult out there has similar types of claims. So how

1358
01:15:07.880 --> 01:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>could that be the thing that proves the religion?

1359
01:15:10.279 --> 01:15:13.600
<v Speaker 25>Well, I mean considering that, I mean if obviously because

1360
01:15:13.600 --> 01:15:15.439
<v Speaker 25>you were Catholic and you've done research on it prior

1361
01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:19.079
<v Speaker 25>hare Po, I mean he literally had this. I mean

1362
01:15:19.119 --> 01:15:22.800
<v Speaker 25>it's been scientifically proven as well as you know, just

1363
01:15:22.920 --> 01:15:25.239
<v Speaker 25>proven anyway, just that he had.

1364
01:15:25.399 --> 01:15:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, do you know, do you know what a Muslim

1365
01:15:27.279 --> 01:15:28.199
<v Speaker 1>says about the Qoran?

1366
01:15:28.880 --> 01:15:29.039
<v Speaker 7>No?

1367
01:15:29.079 --> 01:15:30.119
<v Speaker 9>I don't care, but go ahead and.

1368
01:15:30.439 --> 01:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Scientifically proven that there's miracles to show that the Qoran

1369
01:15:34.159 --> 01:15:37.159
<v Speaker 1>has to come from a law. Like the Muslims use

1370
01:15:37.239 --> 01:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this argument for like ten years online, like between two

1371
01:15:41.560 --> 01:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five to twenty fifteen. So the point is

1372
01:15:45.800 --> 01:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that that's not a good argument for why the religion

1373
01:15:48.840 --> 01:15:53.239
<v Speaker 1>is true, because it's just there's no way to It's

1374
01:15:53.279 --> 01:15:56.319
<v Speaker 1>a non sequitor from the claims about the person and

1375
01:15:56.359 --> 01:16:00.439
<v Speaker 1>even claims that there's quote scientific proof to therefore the

1376
01:16:00.479 --> 01:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>religion is true because every group has the same competing claim, right.

1377
01:16:06.840 --> 01:16:08.760
<v Speaker 25>No, I mean I understand that. I think it's just

1378
01:16:09.319 --> 01:16:12.159
<v Speaker 25>when I look at somebody like Padre Pio as a

1379
01:16:12.359 --> 01:16:15.920
<v Speaker 25>as a Catholic, I mean, how do you not even.

1380
01:16:16.439 --> 01:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess, lets that would just be purely subjective. It

1381
01:16:18.640 --> 01:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>would be begging the question because the thing in question

1382
01:16:20.920 --> 01:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is is it legitimate? And is he a true saint?

1383
01:16:24.640 --> 01:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And it just I mean, you're already it's already assuming

1384
01:16:27.840 --> 01:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the Catholic idea of what a saint is that a

1385
01:16:29.920 --> 01:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>saint is somebody who dumps buckets of blood out of

1386
01:16:32.760 --> 01:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>their body or something, and they don't just literally just

1387
01:16:35.720 --> 01:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>follow what the teacher of the church fathers are for

1388
01:16:37.720 --> 01:16:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the first thousand years, like that's what a saint is. Right.

1389
01:16:41.399 --> 01:16:43.079
<v Speaker 25>But I mean, as far as if we're going to

1390
01:16:43.159 --> 01:16:45.960
<v Speaker 25>take Padre Pio, I mean he literally was. I mean

1391
01:16:45.960 --> 01:16:48.720
<v Speaker 25>that the Vatican hid him for ten years because of

1392
01:16:48.720 --> 01:16:52.159
<v Speaker 25>his stigmana. So they weren't even quite sure themselves what

1393
01:16:52.199 --> 01:16:53.359
<v Speaker 25>to do with him, and so they were like.

1394
01:16:53.359 --> 01:16:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's again, I don't the Vatican has a history of lying,

1395
01:16:56.319 --> 01:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>so I don't even know if any of that's true.

1396
01:16:57.600 --> 01:16:59.119
<v Speaker 1>How are we supposed to know that all that's true?

1397
01:16:59.279 --> 01:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>The Vatican's an extremely corrupt organization and entity. I don't

1398
01:17:02.520 --> 01:17:04.079
<v Speaker 1>trust anything about against.

1399
01:17:03.720 --> 01:17:06.800
<v Speaker 9>Those, Okay, I mean that's that. Yeah, I understand that.

1400
01:17:06.840 --> 01:17:09.600
<v Speaker 25>But I mean, if you're you can read ten books

1401
01:17:09.600 --> 01:17:12.720
<v Speaker 25>about Pajepo and his life and they're all the same.

1402
01:17:12.760 --> 01:17:15.039
<v Speaker 25>And yes, I know that that doesn't prove anything to

1403
01:17:15.199 --> 01:17:17.800
<v Speaker 25>you or to anybody else, but I mean as far

1404
01:17:17.840 --> 01:17:18.640
<v Speaker 25>as he I mean.

1405
01:17:18.800 --> 01:17:21.319
<v Speaker 1>And so look, don't you understand that there has to

1406
01:17:21.359 --> 01:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>be a better way to delineate between competing claims like this,

1407
01:17:25.720 --> 01:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Because every religion, every cult that Cybaba has followers in

1408
01:17:29.439 --> 01:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>India that will swear by his powers in terms of

1409
01:17:32.720 --> 01:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>his miracles, right, and so there, I'm sure there's Hindu

1410
01:17:37.920 --> 01:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>theologians that have quote scientific papers and proofs. So if

1411
01:17:43.439 --> 01:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a million different claims and so called scientific proofs,

1412
01:17:48.479 --> 01:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there has to be some other way to delineate between,

1413
01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the true and which is the false. It

1414
01:17:55.039 --> 01:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>could never be done through infinite regressions of miracle claims

1415
01:17:59.600 --> 01:18:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and science tipic papers. It just it doesn't get anywhere.

1416
01:18:02.720 --> 01:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>So there has to be a better way to do it. Well,

1417
01:18:04.159 --> 01:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the best, the easiest way to do is to see

1418
01:18:05.960 --> 01:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>which religion contradiction which one doesn't. I'll talk about contradiction

1419
01:18:09.640 --> 01:18:11.319
<v Speaker 1>an internal critique sense.

1420
01:18:12.079 --> 01:18:15.119
<v Speaker 25>Okay, So in the Orthodox religion, did they recognize the

1421
01:18:15.119 --> 01:18:17.159
<v Speaker 25>blessed Mother as as the same as we do in

1422
01:18:17.199 --> 01:18:17.920
<v Speaker 25>the Catholic faith.

1423
01:18:20.840 --> 01:18:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, Mary is the Theotoko, she's the god bearer,

1424
01:18:24.119 --> 01:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>she's the Mother of God. But we don't believe that

1425
01:18:26.640 --> 01:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>she was immaculately conceived. She's not some sort of like, uh,

1426
01:18:30.880 --> 01:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>goddess or something. And I think sometimes Retolism tends in

1427
01:18:33.960 --> 01:18:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that direction.

1428
01:18:35.279 --> 01:18:37.319
<v Speaker 25>Oh no, I mean we don't. We don't think she

1429
01:18:37.399 --> 01:18:40.399
<v Speaker 25>was markedly conceived. I mean she was conceived within with

1430
01:18:40.600 --> 01:18:41.800
<v Speaker 25>she was shared full grace.

1431
01:18:42.119 --> 01:18:45.239
<v Speaker 1>No, no, you believe in the maculate exception she was

1432
01:18:45.319 --> 01:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>immaculately conceived. That's a dogma in your church.

1433
01:18:47.960 --> 01:18:50.199
<v Speaker 25>Oh yes, I'm sorry, I thought you meant like her,

1434
01:18:50.279 --> 01:18:54.319
<v Speaker 25>but you mean Jesus being no.

1435
01:18:53.520 --> 01:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>No, her, she is immaculately conceived. Jesus is born of

1436
01:18:57.840 --> 01:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a virgin. The immaculate conception is her exemption from original

1437
01:19:04.039 --> 01:19:05.479
<v Speaker 1>sin and Roman Calloy theology.

1438
01:19:06.199 --> 01:19:08.199
<v Speaker 9>Oh I see, so Orthodox doesn't believe that.

1439
01:19:08.279 --> 01:19:10.439
<v Speaker 25>So then you don't hold her in the same as

1440
01:19:10.880 --> 01:19:12.439
<v Speaker 25>the highest esteem is as we do.

1441
01:19:12.880 --> 01:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>She is the queen of saints, she is the queen

1442
01:19:15.000 --> 01:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of Heaven. She's just not immaculately conceived because she died,

1443
01:19:19.319 --> 01:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and everyone who dies is a son or a daughter

1444
01:19:21.560 --> 01:19:24.199
<v Speaker 1>of Adam. If she went to sleep, and if the

1445
01:19:24.279 --> 01:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Roman Callolic church has the feast of door mission, then

1446
01:19:26.960 --> 01:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>she died. Why did she die because she's the son

1447
01:19:29.399 --> 01:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of Adam. Well, then she's not immaculately conceived and she's

1448
01:19:32.560 --> 01:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not accepted from original sin.

1449
01:19:36.079 --> 01:19:40.000
<v Speaker 25>Interesting, okay, so but then oh yeah, okay, I see

1450
01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:40.479
<v Speaker 25>what you're saying.

1451
01:19:41.119 --> 01:19:44.399
<v Speaker 9>Okay, that's that's fine. Thanks, I'll drop from speaker.

1452
01:19:45.520 --> 01:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, those are great questions. It's open for him

1453
01:19:58.920 --> 01:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>if anybody wants to come up. None of these Roman

1454
01:20:00.640 --> 01:20:04.279
<v Speaker 1>galaxies if I'm not much just uh, it's all all

1455
01:20:04.319 --> 01:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the ones that I argue about today, and I'll talk

1456
01:20:06.039 --> 01:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>about anyone, any any anyone, any of the ones that

1457
01:20:12.159 --> 01:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I got intok with today. Uh, if you would like

1458
01:20:18.520 --> 01:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the subject matter. Uh, here's Ash, what's

1459
01:20:22.840 --> 01:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>up in Here's a couple of people. We'll go to

1460
01:20:26.199 --> 01:20:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Ash the whole stuff the other guys.

1461
01:20:30.399 --> 01:20:32.760
<v Speaker 27>Hey, So I was speaking with my wife today. We

1462
01:20:32.800 --> 01:20:36.560
<v Speaker 27>were just you know, rolling around and uh, going around

1463
01:20:36.560 --> 01:20:38.279
<v Speaker 27>on the buggy around the neighborhood, and we were talking

1464
01:20:38.279 --> 01:20:43.039
<v Speaker 27>about how, uh, when it comes to Protestantism and and

1465
01:20:43.079 --> 01:20:45.600
<v Speaker 27>their their justification for their canon.

1466
01:20:46.039 --> 01:20:47.159
<v Speaker 7>I had an interesting thought.

1467
01:20:47.239 --> 01:20:51.279
<v Speaker 27>I was like, if they're not basing their cannon off

1468
01:20:51.319 --> 01:20:53.640
<v Speaker 27>of tradition, you know a lot of them have to go, oh, well,

1469
01:20:53.680 --> 01:20:55.079
<v Speaker 27>it's just the most accurate cannon.

1470
01:20:55.159 --> 01:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>You know.

1471
01:20:55.359 --> 01:20:57.960
<v Speaker 27>They like to make kind of like scholarly art arguments

1472
01:20:57.960 --> 01:21:03.119
<v Speaker 27>and kind of post enlightenment have presuppositions. I was like,

1473
01:21:03.520 --> 01:21:08.319
<v Speaker 27>there would be no like moral difference between a Protestant

1474
01:21:08.399 --> 01:21:12.159
<v Speaker 27>who accepts all sixty six books and then this other

1475
01:21:12.159 --> 01:21:15.399
<v Speaker 27>Protestant who's like, yeah, I accept like sixty four. I

1476
01:21:15.520 --> 01:21:18.359
<v Speaker 27>just you know, for example, don't accept Revelation or Hebrews

1477
01:21:18.520 --> 01:21:20.640
<v Speaker 27>because you know, the evidence isn't there.

1478
01:21:21.359 --> 01:21:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Right. Yeah. We made this point up many times, all right.

1479
01:21:24.359 --> 01:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I was just wondering what you thought about that? And

1480
01:21:25.760 --> 01:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>if it would be a good you know, yeah, that's

1481
01:21:27.800 --> 01:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a great argument. In fact, I mean that's essentially what

1482
01:21:30.039 --> 01:21:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Luther did when Lucter started to say that other you know,

1483
01:21:33.199 --> 01:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>some of these books shouldn't be here. Totally agree. Guess

1484
01:21:35.680 --> 01:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a good fellow, what's up?

1485
01:21:46.239 --> 01:21:46.520
<v Speaker 7>Hello?

1486
01:21:48.079 --> 01:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what's up?

1487
01:21:49.479 --> 01:21:49.640
<v Speaker 7>Hey?

1488
01:21:49.720 --> 01:21:53.319
<v Speaker 14>J glad I can jump on here and chat with you.

1489
01:21:53.800 --> 01:21:58.920
<v Speaker 14>So I've been listening to Refuting Oriental Orthodoxy, the series

1490
01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:02.760
<v Speaker 14>you guys did, and just background. I come from like

1491
01:22:02.760 --> 01:22:08.760
<v Speaker 14>a Pentecostal oneness modalist background, been exploring Orthodoxy for the

1492
01:22:08.840 --> 01:22:13.399
<v Speaker 14>last three years. Uh had a question about, you know,

1493
01:22:13.560 --> 01:22:21.199
<v Speaker 14>the person versus nature distinction, and uh, okay, I know

1494
01:22:21.239 --> 01:22:23.760
<v Speaker 14>you in that Refuting arthor you see, you guys were

1495
01:22:23.800 --> 01:22:26.439
<v Speaker 14>kind of laying out the metaphysics of the Orthodox Church

1496
01:22:26.760 --> 01:22:32.159
<v Speaker 14>and the uh, the fact that so the human nature

1497
01:22:32.239 --> 01:22:36.520
<v Speaker 14>is something that's shared across all human beings. That's it's

1498
01:22:36.520 --> 01:22:40.279
<v Speaker 14>something that's shared. And then individual.

1499
01:22:40.439 --> 01:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a it's a universal yeah.

1500
01:22:42.439 --> 01:22:49.159
<v Speaker 14>Then and then individual hypostaces is the identities right or persons?

1501
01:22:49.439 --> 01:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's correct, it's the individual subject, the it's the

1502
01:22:52.760 --> 01:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>it's the mode in which the nature exists, which is

1503
01:22:55.159 --> 01:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>in the mode of the individual subject or the person.

1504
01:22:57.520 --> 01:23:01.680
<v Speaker 14>Correct, right, So I mean I have I have issues

1505
01:23:01.760 --> 01:23:05.560
<v Speaker 14>with with modalism. But what I'm trying to kind of

1506
01:23:05.640 --> 01:23:10.039
<v Speaker 14>understand is, how do you get around saying that the

1507
01:23:10.039 --> 01:23:14.279
<v Speaker 14>Father's Time and Holy Spirit are three distinct persons with

1508
01:23:16.439 --> 01:23:19.840
<v Speaker 14>let's share a divine nature. How does that now make

1509
01:23:19.920 --> 01:23:25.239
<v Speaker 14>them three gods the same way that three person human

1510
01:23:25.319 --> 01:23:31.399
<v Speaker 14>persons who share a human nature are not three distinct persons.

1511
01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Right. So if you read the Cappadocians, like Besil's letter,

1512
01:23:35.319 --> 01:23:38.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it's thirty eight where he goes into this distinction,

1513
01:23:38.720 --> 01:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>he just he just makes it as an analogy. So

1514
01:23:42.439 --> 01:23:45.439
<v Speaker 1>humans are just are created, they begin to be, They're

1515
01:23:45.439 --> 01:23:50.079
<v Speaker 1>in time and space, they're discrete, they're separate. So it's

1516
01:23:50.159 --> 01:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just an analogy that humans have a singular nature, but

1517
01:23:54.920 --> 01:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>they're distinct in person. It's an analogy to the trinity,

1518
01:23:58.680 --> 01:24:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and analogy means that not every aspect of it matches

1519
01:24:01.399 --> 01:24:03.279
<v Speaker 1>up one to one, some of it matches up as

1520
01:24:03.319 --> 01:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>some of a dozen. So if it was unifical predication,

1521
01:24:09.720 --> 01:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it would be what you're saying, right. So arians make

1522
01:24:12.960 --> 01:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this argument because arians say, well, if God is you

1523
01:24:17.680 --> 01:24:24.079
<v Speaker 1>know cause and the Father causes the son. Then causation

1524
01:24:24.319 --> 01:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>requires time, because every father who causes a son is

1525
01:24:27.800 --> 01:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in time. That's based on what we call unifical reasoning.

1526
01:24:32.960 --> 01:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>That would mean that it's used in the same sense,

1527
01:24:36.159 --> 01:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And we don't believe in unifical reasoning because that would

1528
01:24:38.840 --> 01:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>be arian, but we would say it's analogical. In other words,

1529
01:24:41.479 --> 01:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>there's an analogy between the way that a father causes

1530
01:24:44.840 --> 01:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a son and that the father is the source of

1531
01:24:47.760 --> 01:24:51.039
<v Speaker 1>the son. But there's other aspects of it which don't

1532
01:24:51.079 --> 01:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>match up to God, namely the temporal relations. So the

1533
01:24:54.840 --> 01:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>father didn't start to become a father at some point

1534
01:24:57.439 --> 01:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in time. The father was always eternal, generating the sun

1535
01:25:01.039 --> 01:25:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and hence eternal generation. So the usage of person in

1536
01:25:05.359 --> 01:25:09.239
<v Speaker 1>nature amongst human beings is an analogy to the person

1537
01:25:09.359 --> 01:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>nature distinction in the trinity. And it's not unifical.

1538
01:25:12.720 --> 01:25:16.680
<v Speaker 14>Okay, what would be a good you know, coming from

1539
01:25:16.760 --> 01:25:20.800
<v Speaker 14>a Protestant background, there's always kind of proof texts and

1540
01:25:20.800 --> 01:25:24.399
<v Speaker 14>everything else and involved. I'm just wondering, is there a

1541
01:25:24.439 --> 01:25:28.399
<v Speaker 14>good source I could read that would lay out, like

1542
01:25:28.439 --> 01:25:33.399
<v Speaker 14>you said, first of all, like the claim, which I

1543
01:25:33.399 --> 01:25:36.079
<v Speaker 14>don't have a problem with it, but just to substantiate

1544
01:25:36.119 --> 01:25:41.079
<v Speaker 14>the claim that God was always the Father, Like, how

1545
01:25:41.079 --> 01:25:44.520
<v Speaker 14>do I substantiate that in scripture?

1546
01:25:46.439 --> 01:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean you could get a good, a good

1547
01:25:48.479 --> 01:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>easy book to read, like Palmazansky's Orthodox Dogmatic Theology. Most

1548
01:25:53.600 --> 01:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of that is really just going through the scriptural text

1549
01:25:57.039 --> 01:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Orthodox positions, and you're going to get you know,

1550
01:25:59.720 --> 01:26:02.319
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot of positions about the eternality of the

1551
01:26:02.319 --> 01:26:05.079
<v Speaker 1>fatherhood of Father, of eternality, fatherhood of God the Father,

1552
01:26:06.199 --> 01:26:09.039
<v Speaker 1>and uh separate though from that. If you're looking for

1553
01:26:09.079 --> 01:26:14.319
<v Speaker 1>somebody that addresses that specific issue, uh, Athanacius is I

1554
01:26:14.359 --> 01:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's the discourses against the Arians is actually addressing

1555
01:26:17.720 --> 01:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that very issue because one of the arguments that his teacher,

1556
01:26:20.760 --> 01:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Saint Alexander made against the Arians was that if God

1557
01:26:25.520 --> 01:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>was eternally the Father, then that requires by necessity he

1558
01:26:28.800 --> 01:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>eternally has a son, or else the word father makes

1559
01:26:31.039 --> 01:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>no sense. So this is a pretty strong rhetorical and

1560
01:26:35.800 --> 01:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>metaphysical argument against the Arians, because you know it, it

1561
01:26:39.640 --> 01:26:44.039
<v Speaker 1>necessitates by by definition almost if God's eternally the father,

1562
01:26:44.159 --> 01:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the father of who, right, So there's got to eternally

1563
01:26:46.800 --> 01:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>be a son. So excuse me. I would also say

1564
01:26:53.960 --> 01:26:57.079
<v Speaker 1>you could read something like Vladimir Lowski's books to Mystical

1565
01:26:57.079 --> 01:27:01.079
<v Speaker 1>Theology or Vision of God excuse me, vision of God. Uh,

1566
01:27:01.199 --> 01:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>those also cover these topics pretty extensively. Okay, Yeah, good questions,

1567
01:27:08.039 --> 01:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So appreciate that.

1568
01:27:09.840 --> 01:27:14.399
<v Speaker 26>Uh, what's up, dude?

1569
01:27:15.520 --> 01:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Hello, what's on your mind?

1570
01:27:18.359 --> 01:27:18.720
<v Speaker 7>Did you?

1571
01:27:19.159 --> 01:27:23.359
<v Speaker 5>Did you already bring up the relativity of just making

1572
01:27:23.680 --> 01:27:27.319
<v Speaker 5>the statements in Vatican two? So that anybody who the

1573
01:27:27.319 --> 01:27:36.159
<v Speaker 5>Holy Spirit was just making words themselves be by themselves objective.

1574
01:27:38.720 --> 01:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh? I think Chase, when Chase was on here earlier,

1575
01:27:41.800 --> 01:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or maybe the guy before Chase said that, his conclusion

1576
01:27:45.840 --> 01:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>would be that the documents are thus relativized and the

1577
01:27:49.520 --> 01:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>theology of God is relativized if no stretate is correct.

1578
01:27:53.760 --> 01:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's true. Now you're probably being a

1579
01:27:55.880 --> 01:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>little more specific with linguistic philosophy, but yeah.

1580
01:28:00.119 --> 01:28:03.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, because if you just say, you know, God is

1581
01:28:03.960 --> 01:28:09.800
<v Speaker 5>the Muslim God is the same as you know Christian God,

1582
01:28:10.560 --> 01:28:13.960
<v Speaker 5>but it takes either a good or a bad pope,

1583
01:28:14.079 --> 01:28:17.880
<v Speaker 5>or a good or a bad magisterium to interpret the words,

1584
01:28:18.199 --> 01:28:21.319
<v Speaker 5>then the intention of what the way it was written

1585
01:28:21.760 --> 01:28:23.039
<v Speaker 5>is irrelevant.

1586
01:28:24.720 --> 01:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Yeah, I think so. Temp. The last text ten

1587
01:28:30.720 --> 01:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>sent me was kind of going in that direction where

1588
01:28:32.680 --> 01:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to make a distinction between authorial intent

1589
01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and the exact words that are used. And he was

1590
01:28:39.960 --> 01:28:43.079
<v Speaker 1>trying to argue that I don't even have to like

1591
01:28:43.199 --> 01:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>he thinks the intent of the authors was nefarious and

1592
01:28:46.680 --> 01:28:50.439
<v Speaker 1>malicious and ambiguous, but that the words can be just

1593
01:28:50.479 --> 01:28:54.319
<v Speaker 1>simply re read and revised in an interpretive scheme to

1594
01:28:54.439 --> 01:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>make the orthodox, which I think is just silly.

1595
01:28:57.199 --> 01:29:00.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that is that would never work in any other

1596
01:29:01.159 --> 01:29:03.640
<v Speaker 5>I mean that would would would that even work in law.

1597
01:29:04.560 --> 01:29:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Only in a only in a in a sophistical legal system.

1598
01:29:07.960 --> 01:29:13.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, like that would be. And then this idea

1599
01:29:13.520 --> 01:29:18.159
<v Speaker 5>of debating over whether there was a the before a

1600
01:29:18.199 --> 01:29:23.760
<v Speaker 5>god or an ad in the sentence, like we've talked

1601
01:29:23.760 --> 01:29:28.199
<v Speaker 5>about before. That's like, you know, a teenager child debating

1602
01:29:28.239 --> 01:29:31.319
<v Speaker 5>will Actually, I didn't say I was coming directly home

1603
01:29:31.399 --> 01:29:31.960
<v Speaker 5>after I was.

1604
01:29:32.319 --> 01:29:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I said I was coming home, but I didn't

1605
01:29:34.319 --> 01:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>say when I was coming home.

1606
01:29:37.680 --> 01:29:40.079
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I just wanted to see.

1607
01:29:40.199 --> 01:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>No, that's a great that's a great point, John. In fact, yeah,

1608
01:29:42.760 --> 01:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and no other disciplines would this count except for vaticate

1609
01:29:46.960 --> 01:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to theology and RBIC. But also it also speaks to uh,

1610
01:29:53.199 --> 01:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like the again the relativizing of this, because if that's

1611
01:29:58.600 --> 01:30:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the case here, then well then what's wrong with what

1612
01:30:01.439 --> 01:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>all the modernists did in the Roman Catholic Church in

1613
01:30:03.800 --> 01:30:07.079
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century by rewording all the other stuff? Like

1614
01:30:07.119 --> 01:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>why does it have to only be reworded or reread

1615
01:30:13.039 --> 01:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in a conservative sense? Like what stops it from being

1616
01:30:15.880 --> 01:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>read in some other liberal sense? And that's and that's

1617
01:30:18.760 --> 01:30:22.079
<v Speaker 1>exactly the point that I think you made this point too, John,

1618
01:30:22.720 --> 01:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>which is that that's why it does matter how the

1619
01:30:26.079 --> 01:30:29.239
<v Speaker 1>popes act after Vatican Two, because if they act on

1620
01:30:29.319 --> 01:30:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the basis of these documents in the way that I'm saying,

1621
01:30:33.279 --> 01:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>which is that they go pray in mosques towards Mecca,

1622
01:30:36.479 --> 01:30:40.039
<v Speaker 1>then that is relevant to how the documents are worded.

1623
01:30:40.319 --> 01:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not it's not irrelevant to the documents, which is

1624
01:30:42.640 --> 01:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>what they have to try to say.

1625
01:30:44.279 --> 01:30:49.199
<v Speaker 5>Well, also, that means that the religion see and this

1626
01:30:49.399 --> 01:30:53.239
<v Speaker 5>is unfortunately I don't I don't say this like like oh,

1627
01:30:53.279 --> 01:30:55.239
<v Speaker 5>and I know you're the same way too. It's not

1628
01:30:55.279 --> 01:30:59.520
<v Speaker 5>like we're it's we're gloating like, oh, we're gonna school

1629
01:30:59.560 --> 01:31:02.960
<v Speaker 5>these RCAs, and it's it's not a mean thing. It's

1630
01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:05.640
<v Speaker 5>like you unfortunately have to say, hey, guess what.

1631
01:31:06.359 --> 01:31:06.600
<v Speaker 7>I know.

1632
01:31:06.680 --> 01:31:11.119
<v Speaker 5>You think that you're going to your TLM and you're

1633
01:31:11.560 --> 01:31:14.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, getting the Mass with the most grace because

1634
01:31:14.840 --> 01:31:20.359
<v Speaker 5>it was, you know, so reverent. But actually the church

1635
01:31:20.520 --> 01:31:25.520
<v Speaker 5>that you believe in is that church is the Novus

1636
01:31:25.600 --> 01:31:29.039
<v Speaker 5>Orto Church. That church is the Skittles Church. That church

1637
01:31:29.880 --> 01:31:34.079
<v Speaker 5>is the Vatican Bank Church. The TLM is like a

1638
01:31:34.319 --> 01:31:35.279
<v Speaker 5>is like a delusion.

1639
01:31:35.920 --> 01:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, well they're shutting down TLM, so exactly.

1640
01:31:44.840 --> 01:31:48.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but some somedays, some trad pope's gonna come along

1641
01:31:48.960 --> 01:31:53.439
<v Speaker 5>and he's gonna interpret Vatican two in the correct way,

1642
01:31:54.119 --> 01:31:57.960
<v Speaker 5>and then once he does that, then we'll be able

1643
01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:00.199
<v Speaker 5>to have the TLM.

1644
01:32:00.479 --> 01:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I heard all of that in two thousand and

1645
01:32:03.479 --> 01:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>six or whatever it was seven, when Rat Singer was coming.

1646
01:32:06.600 --> 01:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh he's going to bring to TLM and he did

1647
01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a moto proprio. I've been there, done that.

1648
01:32:15.279 --> 01:32:17.239
<v Speaker 5>All right, we'll see if anybody else wants to talk

1649
01:32:17.279 --> 01:32:22.800
<v Speaker 5>about those. Yeah, the TLM or trads who are waking

1650
01:32:22.920 --> 01:32:26.239
<v Speaker 5>up to this unfortunate you know, you're gonna have to

1651
01:32:26.279 --> 01:32:28.640
<v Speaker 5>go through a rough period where you're gonna have to

1652
01:32:28.720 --> 01:32:32.600
<v Speaker 5>realize all that stuff. I just know that this is

1653
01:32:32.680 --> 01:32:37.520
<v Speaker 5>done in with you know, with good intentions.

1654
01:32:39.279 --> 01:32:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's what I was saying earlier, is like,

1655
01:32:43.640 --> 01:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>if you buy into this perennialist stuff like, it would

1656
01:32:45.960 --> 01:32:49.119
<v Speaker 1>lead you right into perennialism. So and some of the

1657
01:32:49.199 --> 01:32:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Romancalloic tradcats just go actually do go in that direction.

1658
01:32:52.239 --> 01:32:55.159
<v Speaker 1>I've done several over the years that they went from

1659
01:32:55.359 --> 01:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Vatican to those trataate perennialism into the straight up perennialisms.

1660
01:33:00.399 --> 01:33:02.079
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see why it wouldn't lead you that

1661
01:33:02.119 --> 01:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>way if you go that route, Patriot, Yeah, I got

1662
01:33:22.560 --> 01:33:23.199
<v Speaker 1>on mute.

1663
01:33:23.000 --> 01:33:28.319
<v Speaker 23>Man, uh jay may I may I respond to your

1664
01:33:28.399 --> 01:33:34.600
<v Speaker 23>Vatican two critiques. Sure, okay, Uh Lifeline Catholic here, Uh

1665
01:33:34.760 --> 01:33:42.760
<v Speaker 23>sense baptism and appreciate nice meeting you. So I'm gonna

1666
01:33:42.760 --> 01:33:45.520
<v Speaker 23>give you the very basics of Vatican two, and I'm

1667
01:33:45.520 --> 01:33:48.039
<v Speaker 23>gonna use an anecdote to kind of push this forward.

1668
01:33:48.279 --> 01:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1669
01:33:48.840 --> 01:33:53.600
<v Speaker 23>So I've heard the orthodoxy debate between the the TLM

1670
01:33:53.680 --> 01:33:58.600
<v Speaker 23>and Vatican two sucks, and mattig into is liberalism whatever.

1671
01:33:58.479 --> 01:33:59.359
<v Speaker 4>Blah blah blah whatever.

1672
01:34:00.479 --> 01:34:03.680
<v Speaker 23>Well, you're gonna penalize the novisorder and so on. And

1673
01:34:03.720 --> 01:34:07.800
<v Speaker 23>so forth and modernity and whatever. Then you're gonna have

1674
01:34:07.840 --> 01:34:12.359
<v Speaker 23>to penalize me for a similar situation because the the

1675
01:34:12.359 --> 01:34:14.680
<v Speaker 23>TLM bros Are going to be very mad at me

1676
01:34:14.760 --> 01:34:19.079
<v Speaker 23>because I attended a Mass and Chinese. Okay, Vatican two

1677
01:34:19.199 --> 01:34:23.039
<v Speaker 23>is not some uh liberalization of the faith. It is

1678
01:34:23.079 --> 01:34:26.039
<v Speaker 23>a moving forward to the church. It is putting the

1679
01:34:26.159 --> 01:34:29.279
<v Speaker 23>Church in the English language of Americans.

1680
01:34:29.399 --> 01:34:34.039
<v Speaker 1>Okay, hold on, that's that's only that's only one thing. Well,

1681
01:34:34.079 --> 01:34:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's that's.

1682
01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:38.920
<v Speaker 4>A very important thing. Though very important.

1683
01:34:39.640 --> 01:34:42.079
<v Speaker 1>The Orthodox Church has always done it in the vernacular,

1684
01:34:42.159 --> 01:34:43.079
<v Speaker 1>so we would agree with that.

1685
01:34:43.840 --> 01:34:47.159
<v Speaker 23>Well now, but because there there's a faction and the

1686
01:34:47.319 --> 01:34:50.439
<v Speaker 23>and and the cat and the Catholic body the church,

1687
01:34:51.079 --> 01:34:52.199
<v Speaker 23>that's all t l.

1688
01:34:52.279 --> 01:34:53.640
<v Speaker 5>M taling no disorder.

1689
01:34:56.520 --> 01:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Mm.

1690
01:34:58.560 --> 01:35:02.800
<v Speaker 4>But I'm arguing, wait, what are you arguing?

1691
01:35:03.680 --> 01:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Orthodox. I'm arguing that Vaticans who has theological contradictions,

1692
01:35:07.760 --> 01:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about the.

1693
01:35:08.640 --> 01:35:12.119
<v Speaker 4>Vernocular like what like what the Hindu thing?

1694
01:35:12.960 --> 01:35:13.079
<v Speaker 27>Uh?

1695
01:35:13.479 --> 01:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, among many, one would be that it encourages interfaith

1696
01:35:17.880 --> 01:35:21.199
<v Speaker 1>prayer and gathering, and that's a direct contradiction from Mortalium

1697
01:35:21.199 --> 01:35:23.399
<v Speaker 1>animals in nineteen twenty nine.

1698
01:35:24.039 --> 01:35:27.000
<v Speaker 23>Well, the ecumenical councils are not infallible.

1699
01:35:28.199 --> 01:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Clarification, Are you serious? Okay, yes, correct, No, Ecumenical councils

1700
01:35:33.960 --> 01:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>are magisterium and they are infallible in the Roman Gallic Church.

1701
01:35:36.720 --> 01:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So you have no idea what you're talking about. No, yes, literally,

1702
01:35:42.119 --> 01:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>no idea what you're talking about. Nine nine nine. I

1703
01:35:54.960 --> 01:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>want people to take note of that that the people

1704
01:35:57.560 --> 01:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>that we're dealing with, that we're debating with, don't even

1705
01:36:00.399 --> 01:36:05.159
<v Speaker 1>know if Roman Catholic theology believes that cumenical councils are

1706
01:36:05.239 --> 01:36:13.279
<v Speaker 1>infallible in the Roman system. That's Tilly says, thank you, brother.

1707
01:36:16.840 --> 01:36:20.000
<v Speaker 28>You know, I just wanted to share one thing on

1708
01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:23.000
<v Speaker 28>on the Buddhist side, just because it relates to Hinduism.

1709
01:36:23.079 --> 01:36:29.199
<v Speaker 28>So the practice of Buddhism is is actually one part

1710
01:36:29.239 --> 01:36:33.880
<v Speaker 28>of Christianity, and that is thou shalt not want It's

1711
01:36:33.880 --> 01:36:38.680
<v Speaker 28>a it's a very big it's very big in Christianity.

1712
01:36:38.720 --> 01:36:42.319
<v Speaker 28>It's actually underrated. How important that is. Thou shalt not

1713
01:36:42.359 --> 01:36:44.840
<v Speaker 28>want anything but a relationship with the Father.

1714
01:36:45.399 --> 01:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And and I'm not I'm not trying to rude, but

1715
01:36:48.079 --> 01:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that I don't really have anything to do with what

1716
01:36:49.680 --> 01:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about today, Jacob, what's up. Hello, can you

1717
01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>hear me? Yeah?

1718
01:37:00.680 --> 01:37:03.439
<v Speaker 29>Okay, yeah, So I've been dealing with Mormons, right. I

1719
01:37:03.479 --> 01:37:05.920
<v Speaker 29>don't know if we can get into about like the

1720
01:37:06.119 --> 01:37:08.800
<v Speaker 29>one of the many, but I've been running it on them, right,

1721
01:37:09.439 --> 01:37:12.319
<v Speaker 29>and the most coherent answer I've got in is that

1722
01:37:13.920 --> 01:37:17.279
<v Speaker 29>the three share like a relational unity, and that that

1723
01:37:17.399 --> 01:37:19.119
<v Speaker 29>somehow accounts for the one.

1724
01:37:19.880 --> 01:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't say that's correct, right, that's still by definition polytheism.

1725
01:37:27.359 --> 01:37:29.199
<v Speaker 29>And to solve the one of the many has to

1726
01:37:29.199 --> 01:37:34.840
<v Speaker 29>be ontological unity, because if it's not ontological united, it

1727
01:37:34.840 --> 01:37:36.039
<v Speaker 29>wouldn't be one.

1728
01:37:36.239 --> 01:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Right. Yeah, I would say they're not ultimately one because

1729
01:37:43.720 --> 01:37:47.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, human beings are separate beings, but they're not

1730
01:37:47.279 --> 01:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>ontologically one. I mean, their nature is one, but they're

1731
01:37:50.640 --> 01:37:55.319
<v Speaker 1>still separate beings. So I would say a better argument

1732
01:37:55.479 --> 01:37:58.720
<v Speaker 1>might be about grounding the one and the many in

1733
01:37:58.760 --> 01:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a single mind. And that's why we believe that God

1734
01:38:01.600 --> 01:38:04.199
<v Speaker 1>has a one mind, even though there's three hypostases that

1735
01:38:04.239 --> 01:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>one divine mind exists in the mode of the three

1736
01:38:07.399 --> 01:38:12.079
<v Speaker 1>persons that possess it. So the the mind of God

1737
01:38:12.159 --> 01:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is a better means of grounding than I mean, I

1738
01:38:18.560 --> 01:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't even see how three separate beings could ground something

1739
01:38:22.720 --> 01:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in a units of way when they don't have the

1740
01:38:25.640 --> 01:38:26.199
<v Speaker 1>same mind.

1741
01:38:27.920 --> 01:38:30.079
<v Speaker 29>Yeah, because another thing I've noticed too is that they

1742
01:38:30.119 --> 01:38:33.920
<v Speaker 29>also say that they're divine in some way, but divinity

1743
01:38:33.960 --> 01:38:36.840
<v Speaker 29>doesn't equal uncreated because when I ask.

1744
01:38:36.680 --> 01:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Them, they believe that God evolves. There's an infinite regress

1745
01:38:40.319 --> 01:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>of evolving gods that are creatures, so it makes no sense.

1746
01:38:43.319 --> 01:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So they literally just redefine the word God to mean

1747
01:38:45.680 --> 01:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>an evolving man. So it's like they don't actually believe

1748
01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in anything uncreated except for matter. So basically what so

1749
01:38:54.720 --> 01:38:59.159
<v Speaker 1>God isn't actually uncreated? Matters uncreated, but God is a

1750
01:38:59.279 --> 01:39:01.800
<v Speaker 1>man that evolves to become God. It's just total nonsense.

1751
01:39:02.560 --> 01:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, anybody who tries to get into Mormonism and

1752
01:39:06.159 --> 01:39:09.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't see how stupid it is. Within like a little while,

1753
01:39:11.159 --> 01:39:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to say any other Roman Catholics.

1754
01:39:13.720 --> 01:39:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be at my hotel pretty soon, so

1755
01:39:15.760 --> 01:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to give another chance for any remaining Roman

1756
01:39:18.680 --> 01:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Catholics to pop up. He requests to speak. We only

1757
01:39:23.640 --> 01:39:26.199
<v Speaker 1>had one Roman Catholic who actually came to a dress

1758
01:39:26.720 --> 01:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Vatican two, and which is pretty telling, and I gave

1759
01:39:31.760 --> 01:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>him a chance to speak. He was not honest with

1760
01:39:35.039 --> 01:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>what he put on Twitter. It didn't go well for him.

1761
01:39:39.439 --> 01:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>He said he didn't know what Vatican two meant. He

1762
01:39:42.279 --> 01:39:45.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know why No Strett says what it says, and

1763
01:39:45.560 --> 01:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>he would not go into the issue of the Muslims.

1764
01:39:48.640 --> 01:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And what does that tell you? Max? What's up? I mean?

1765
01:39:56.560 --> 01:39:59.279
<v Speaker 7>See, I just wanted to act to Jay. Why don't

1766
01:39:59.319 --> 01:40:05.560
<v Speaker 7>you debate Eric again? Hello? Eric Yaborrow.

1767
01:40:07.960 --> 01:40:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's basically said he won't have anything to do

1768
01:40:11.159 --> 01:40:11.399
<v Speaker 1>with me.

1769
01:40:11.479 --> 01:40:13.640
<v Speaker 7>So oh yeah, so we gotta we gotta push him

1770
01:40:13.640 --> 01:40:14.680
<v Speaker 7>to debate you. I guess right.

1771
01:40:15.640 --> 01:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's well, he's not gonna debate. He just

1772
01:40:18.279 --> 01:40:20.359
<v Speaker 1>wants to quote mine. He's not going to debate. Like

1773
01:40:22.239 --> 01:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>so when we had our so called debate, I said

1774
01:40:25.359 --> 01:40:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to debate pre Vatican through post Vatican three contradictions,

1775
01:40:28.439 --> 01:40:31.039
<v Speaker 1>and he said we can debate that some other time.

1776
01:40:31.800 --> 01:40:34.479
<v Speaker 1>So if he wants to debate that, yeah, I'm not

1777
01:40:34.600 --> 01:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for it. But he says not too mean to interact with.

1778
01:40:37.079 --> 01:40:39.159
<v Speaker 7>So understand if I want to, like look into a

1779
01:40:39.199 --> 01:40:42.680
<v Speaker 7>book of understanding orthodoxy more I'm a Roman Catholic, one

1780
01:40:42.680 --> 01:40:46.079
<v Speaker 7>book you would recommend in layman terms, not liking a

1781
01:40:46.199 --> 01:40:46.680
<v Speaker 7>very theater.

1782
01:40:46.760 --> 01:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1783
01:40:46.960 --> 01:40:47.039
<v Speaker 8>No.

1784
01:40:47.119 --> 01:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>The easiest readable book is Two Paths by Michael Welton.

1785
01:40:51.680 --> 01:40:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Two Paths.

1786
01:40:52.520 --> 01:40:54.079
<v Speaker 7>All right, thank you, Jaed, I appreciate you.

1787
01:40:54.840 --> 01:41:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah man uh noah, non none yet? Biz? What's up nine?

1788
01:41:12.800 --> 01:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Youa biz?

1789
01:41:13.479 --> 01:41:13.600
<v Speaker 5>No?

1790
01:41:14.079 --> 01:41:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Anybody else? Any Roman Catholics who disagree? Anybody want to

1791
01:41:18.199 --> 01:41:20.359
<v Speaker 1>bring hup an issue of contention. You want to make

1792
01:41:20.359 --> 01:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>an argument, I'll give you sixty seconds. I won't talk.

1793
01:41:22.920 --> 01:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a good idea that Jim Jotras had was to

1794
01:41:25.039 --> 01:41:29.479
<v Speaker 1>introduce the sixty seconds rule that if people want to

1795
01:41:29.479 --> 01:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>come on and make an argument, I will agree to

1796
01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not talk for sixty seconds. And then the Roman Catholics

1797
01:41:35.600 --> 01:41:38.479
<v Speaker 1>can't say that I'm mean, I talk over them. Paul.

1798
01:41:46.840 --> 01:41:50.640
<v Speaker 12>Just make a little argument and run it by you,

1799
01:41:50.720 --> 01:41:54.159
<v Speaker 12>kind of vet it with you. The woman who called

1800
01:41:54.199 --> 01:41:58.520
<v Speaker 12>in earlier and was talking about the miracles performed by

1801
01:41:58.520 --> 01:42:00.920
<v Speaker 12>these Catholic saints. You know, I have a lot of

1802
01:42:00.920 --> 01:42:03.840
<v Speaker 12>family members who are, you know, kind of charismatic, and

1803
01:42:04.760 --> 01:42:07.960
<v Speaker 12>they make similar arguments like, oh yeah, but the miracles.

1804
01:42:08.359 --> 01:42:13.000
<v Speaker 12>And I just wanted to say, if we're if we're

1805
01:42:13.039 --> 01:42:19.800
<v Speaker 12>relying on supernatural proof for things, it's it's not a

1806
01:42:19.880 --> 01:42:23.600
<v Speaker 12>very good argument, and I my very simple, small little

1807
01:42:23.680 --> 01:42:29.880
<v Speaker 12>argument against it is that that would assume it like

1808
01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:34.039
<v Speaker 12>if if we if we're if we're claiming to be

1809
01:42:34.079 --> 01:42:38.439
<v Speaker 12>able to identify that which is supernatural, we would have

1810
01:42:38.479 --> 01:42:42.560
<v Speaker 12>to claim that we completely understand what is natural, you know,

1811
01:42:42.600 --> 01:42:45.800
<v Speaker 12>we would be able to have a knowledge that circumscribes

1812
01:42:45.840 --> 01:42:46.720
<v Speaker 12>the natural world.

1813
01:42:46.760 --> 01:42:50.359
<v Speaker 1>And no one is going to make that claim seriously.

1814
01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:51.479
<v Speaker 1>And so.

1815
01:42:54.399 --> 01:42:58.640
<v Speaker 12>Since we don't know what's what's possible in nature, how

1816
01:42:58.640 --> 01:43:03.600
<v Speaker 12>can we say that something that is that we that

1817
01:43:03.640 --> 01:43:07.119
<v Speaker 12>appears to us as a miracle is indeed some you

1818
01:43:07.119 --> 01:43:09.840
<v Speaker 12>know proof that you know, Oh God is God is

1819
01:43:09.880 --> 01:43:11.600
<v Speaker 12>with me and loves me and supports them.

1820
01:43:11.680 --> 01:43:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is actually some of the atheists and naturalists

1821
01:43:14.479 --> 01:43:18.159
<v Speaker 1>will actually make this line of argument against evidentialists that

1822
01:43:18.279 --> 01:43:22.760
<v Speaker 1>try to use miracle claims as truth. And I think

1823
01:43:22.800 --> 01:43:26.039
<v Speaker 1>this is actually a good point. Like like I'm being

1824
01:43:26.119 --> 01:43:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an atheist when I say this, but it's

1825
01:43:28.439 --> 01:43:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like if if an atheist says, how do we know

1826
01:43:33.279 --> 01:43:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that this so called event wasn't just some natural phenomenon

1827
01:43:37.159 --> 01:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and we just don't know? I mean, is significant enough

1828
01:43:41.760 --> 01:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>doubt because it's very possible, it is not a significant

1829
01:43:46.600 --> 01:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>enough doubt to raise to raise doubt, I should say,

1830
01:43:53.399 --> 01:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and thus it doesn't become a very good proof. I

1831
01:43:55.680 --> 01:43:58.079
<v Speaker 1>just don't understand why people think these things are good truths.

1832
01:43:59.119 --> 01:44:02.079
<v Speaker 1>When I mean you just talked about charismatics. I mean,

1833
01:44:02.319 --> 01:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>if you talk to the charismatics, he's going to tell you, oh,

1834
01:44:04.560 --> 01:44:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I've seen miracles of my holiness Pentecostal Church. I've seen

1835
01:44:08.520 --> 01:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>God grow legs back. And it's like, I don't believe that, dude.

1836
01:44:12.319 --> 01:44:14.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, well, I don't care what you believe.

1837
01:44:14.399 --> 01:44:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it and that's proof. That's all proof I need.

1838
01:44:17.319 --> 01:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, well, Ron mcalleys do the exact same thing.

1839
01:44:19.520 --> 01:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>It's like, how is that proof.

1840
01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:25.760
<v Speaker 12>It's it's a very dangerous form of proof and a

1841
01:44:26.199 --> 01:44:30.119
<v Speaker 12>not a very good thing to rely upon obviously, and

1842
01:44:30.279 --> 01:44:32.680
<v Speaker 12>could really lead us, you know, lead us astray.

1843
01:44:32.920 --> 01:44:35.399
<v Speaker 1>They can't can lead it to a delusion. And that's

1844
01:44:35.399 --> 01:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>why Jesus says, a wicked and adulterous generation seeks signs

1845
01:44:40.279 --> 01:44:44.399
<v Speaker 1>exactly because they say stuff to Jesus like, if you

1846
01:44:44.479 --> 01:44:48.039
<v Speaker 1>are the Messiah, do this miracle, give us some proof,

1847
01:44:48.079 --> 01:44:51.279
<v Speaker 1>do something, do some neat trick, And he says a

1848
01:44:51.279 --> 01:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>wicked adulter's generation seeks these things last one. Moroki, I'm you, hey,

1849
01:45:13.039 --> 01:45:15.760
<v Speaker 1>j Yeah.

1850
01:45:16.119 --> 01:45:20.520
<v Speaker 7>Quick question about icons. Are icons of God the Father allowed?

1851
01:45:23.159 --> 01:45:26.039
<v Speaker 1>Uh no, typically no, it's the only exception as the

1852
01:45:26.039 --> 01:45:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Ancient of days. But that's a that's Christ as the Father. Okay, thanks,

1853
01:45:32.840 --> 01:45:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that was it. All right, thank you, everybody, have a

1854
01:45:35.880 --> 01:45:36.159
<v Speaker 1>good night.
