Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, selling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the one of September,
Speaker 2: Ye of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. Well, today we're
Speaker 2: going to try to be a little bit more structured
Speaker 2: in our show. We're going to give you the headline
Speaker 2: news at the top of the hour, and then we're
Speaker 2: going to go into more depth and the rest of
Speaker 2: the hour in these different times topics. First hour, we're
Speaker 2: going to begin with the tariff setbacks. This time it
Speaker 2: wasn't Trump chickening out, but it was a court telling
Speaker 2: him to tap out. But Trump is chickening out on
Speaker 2: the mRNA vaccines. Apparently he's made some noise about this,
Speaker 2: and of course you've got Peter Navara, the father of
Speaker 2: the ventilator, that is trying to move himself back and
Speaker 2: claim this all went bad because of Fauci and the
Speaker 2: Chinese and gain a function nonsense. In the second hour,
Speaker 2: we're going to talk about technocracy and the Antichrists that
Speaker 2: are there. Alex Carp's book The Technological Republic amazing glimpse
Speaker 2: into the dark heart of this movement. So we're going
Speaker 2: to talk about that, and I put a substack editorial
Speaker 2: up today, but I'm going to go over that, and
Speaker 2: then the third hour we're going to talk about Ukraine,
Speaker 2: about the shooting control. I guess we could call the
Speaker 2: gun control shooting control and Trump's police state and his
Speaker 2: inimicable style. We'll be right back, stay with us. Welcome back, y'all.
Speaker 2: Let's let's start out with the headlines for the pharmaceutical
Speaker 2: and tariff articles that we've got. Go ahead, Trump, go ahead,
Speaker 2: Trump not quite sorry. That means insult you.
Speaker 3: As far as tarifs goes. We've got a federal appeals court.
Speaker 3: Appeals Court ruled against Trump's tariffs. Here's what could happen next.
Speaker 3: Is from CBS News. Mody meets with Putin and g
Speaker 3: after Trump and postes fifty percent tariffs on India. That's
Speaker 3: from Fox. Indian officials call for intervention after US blocks
Speaker 3: foreign trucker visas. That's from Zero Hedge. India is not
Speaker 3: happy car rides and handholding. Putin, Mody and g send
Speaker 3: Trump a message at China summit.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this whole thing is backfiring big time, just like Biden.
Speaker 2: It's almost like it was a plan like one two punch.
Speaker 2: Let's see, how can we discredit the entire Western financial
Speaker 2: system dollar in particular?
Speaker 3: And no one is happy about this. It's not good
Speaker 3: for anyone. US trade allies confused after Trump's tariffs suffer
Speaker 3: legal setback. This is from the South China Morning Post. Yeah,
Speaker 3: they're not the only one that's confused. The Supreme Court
Speaker 3: has expanded Trump's power. Now he is seeking more than
Speaker 3: from the Washington Post.
Speaker 2: Now we have the yeah, pharmaceutical stuff. Yeah, Trump has
Speaker 2: got doubts. He's calling on the pharmaceutical companies to quote
Speaker 2: justify the success of the vaccines that he's been breaking
Speaker 2: out for five years.
Speaker 3: Since that s what success is? More like it?
Speaker 4: Yeah, how do you define success?
Speaker 3: We've got the trillion dollar biotech industry is facing failure
Speaker 3: and it's because of COVID injections.
Speaker 4: Maybe that's why he's pushing back on it.
Speaker 2: Maybe it's it's not like he's afraid that everybody's gonna
Speaker 2: grab the guillotines and come after him.
Speaker 4: But maybe that's the.
Speaker 2: Real issue, is that the biotech people are circling their
Speaker 2: train in terms of money they need to.
Speaker 3: The scam has run its course. Everyone's caught on.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so let's push the lambling.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you don't want to be the last person out
Speaker 3: of the pyramid scheme. COVID vaccine's unleashed profound harm, a
Speaker 3: new peer reviewed paper says is from Children's Health Defense
Speaker 3: CDC must create medical codes to track COVID vaccine adverse events.
Speaker 3: Advocacy group says.
Speaker 2: All about that they never even bothered to set up
Speaker 2: a number so they could track these things.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I had no intention.
Speaker 2: The easiest thing in the world to say, Okay, here's
Speaker 2: the number that we're gonna use if there's going to
Speaker 2: be any any harm from the COVID vaccines.
Speaker 4: Never did it.
Speaker 3: Never did it, never even bother It's the simplest thing.
Speaker 3: It wouldn't take any effort at all. It goes to
Speaker 3: show just how committed they are to not giving you
Speaker 3: any info about how harmful These are. Not the slightest
Speaker 3: bit we've got. Michael Crichton's unheeded warning of biotechnology catastrophe
Speaker 3: from the Brownson Insty. Michael Crichton was incredibly prescient with
Speaker 3: what he wrote about when it comes to cloning and
Speaker 3: biotechnology in general.
Speaker 2: I've talked about Jurassic parks. The lessons from that people
Speaker 2: writeing me stop move on something else. Is like, yeah,
Speaker 2: but we're going to go back, and it's not my
Speaker 2: take on it. Somebody else's taken on it.
Speaker 3: So you've got breaking Federal court reopens case of twenty
Speaker 3: four year old who died of COVID vaccine induced mile
Speaker 3: carditis from Children's Health Defense.
Speaker 2: And this is not really what it appears to be.
Speaker 2: I'm afraid, but you know, hope springs eternal. And so
Speaker 2: we're going to talk about what that was. How he
Speaker 2: brought a case saying that they're prevarications about Corminatti versus
Speaker 2: the finer bio intech labeled vaccines.
Speaker 4: How that was.
Speaker 2: You know how we had talked about that many times,
Speaker 2: how they used that to try to play these games
Speaker 2: with legal immunity. Well, he said, you messed up here,
Speaker 2: and I've got you. But also exposes the the fact
Speaker 2: that the military was so deeply at the core in
Speaker 2: the center of this from the very beginning. Yeah, there's
Speaker 2: always a military operation.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you could see that in the way they came
Speaker 3: in and also said, well, if you can't pay for
Speaker 3: this to those countries in South America, we'll just take
Speaker 3: some of your military bases. How would that work for you? Yeah,
Speaker 3: very strange. What does Pfizer need with a military base?
Speaker 3: Fired CDC director refuses to vacate post after over vaccine policy.
Speaker 3: Then enough is enough. What a CDC resignation letter reveals
Speaker 3: from the Brownson Institute The Dauntless Dane Exposed to the
Speaker 3: dark side of HPV vaccines. Another from the Brownstone Institute,
Speaker 3: RFK Junior says Texas Maha legislation's model for other states
Speaker 3: to follow from just the news. Then this opinion, this
Speaker 3: is the one that I saw last night that got
Speaker 3: my blood boiling. We ran the CDC Secretary Kennedy is
Speaker 3: endangering every American's health. Is an opinion piece and it's
Speaker 3: on the New York Times.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and this is from a guy that is he's
Speaker 2: kind of the Sam Britton of the CDC. This is
Speaker 2: a guy who's heavily into bondage and kinky sykes and stuff.
Speaker 2: He's been one of these guys has been fired. His
Speaker 2: first name is Demetrius, I think or something. He has
Speaker 2: been featured in the news before because of his extracurricular activities.
Speaker 2: And he's one of the people who walk down on this, well,
Speaker 2: let's begin with the doubts that Trump may be having.
Speaker 2: And this is coming from the Epic Times, and they
Speaker 2: don't criticize Trump. Typically, Trump calls on pharmaceutical companies to
Speaker 2: quote justify the success of the COVID nineteen vaccines. Trump
Speaker 2: on September first, yesterday said that pharmaceutical companies, including finders,
Speaker 2: should make public information that they've shared with him about
Speaker 2: the COVID nineteen products. He says, it's very important that
Speaker 2: the drug companies justify the success of their various COVID drugs.
Speaker 2: I think he is starting to get a little bit
Speaker 2: of cold feet about some aspects of this. Whether they're
Speaker 2: worried that they're going to be brought up on the
Speaker 2: national criminal charges. I don't think that's going to happen,
Speaker 2: it should, or whether they just are looking at how
Speaker 2: much damage the vaccines have done to the pharmaceutical business.
Speaker 4: That may be it.
Speaker 2: Peter Navara isating this alibi that they have come up
Speaker 2: with the idea that this was a gain of function
Speaker 2: virus that got out of the lab and it's due
Speaker 2: to the Chinese and de Fauci listen to this.
Speaker 4: This is gout.
Speaker 2: Just remember Peter Navarro is the guy who leaned so
Speaker 2: heavily on Ford and General Motors, told them to shut down,
Speaker 2: don't make any more cars, just make ventilators. They've got
Speaker 2: to get ventilators out of everybody. And the pullmonologists were
Speaker 2: looking at and saying, we've never done that for respiratory diseases.
Speaker 2: Why are they doing this? And he killed so many people,
Speaker 2: About ninety percent of the people who got on these
Speaker 2: ventilators died.
Speaker 5: Fauci when he was sitting Fauci that SOB knew for
Speaker 5: a fact that that virus came from the Wuhan lab.
Speaker 4: He knew that this guy so he had.
Speaker 5: Funded the gain of function research in that lab, and
Speaker 5: he had already begun to design a cover up. And
Speaker 5: we know that from the emails he sent.
Speaker 2: And this is their cover up of researchers.
Speaker 5: Academics trying to get their support to push that come
Speaker 5: from nature theory. And that's the biggest lie of omission
Speaker 5: in American history, because if he had simply owned up
Speaker 5: to the fact that that thing came from the lab,
Speaker 5: we could have pressured the Chinese to give us the
Speaker 5: genome sequence.
Speaker 2: Oh you didn't have it, allowed us to you didn't
Speaker 2: have it.
Speaker 4: How'd you make the vaccine.
Speaker 5: The vaccine rather than the crap we wound up getting. Again,
Speaker 5: Trump got lied to about that, not just by Fauci,
Speaker 5: but by Pfizer, the drug company. In what way they
Speaker 5: didn't disclose the side effects of that and they weren't
Speaker 5: clear with him.
Speaker 4: They made him he.
Speaker 5: Was a victim, was a true vaccine.
Speaker 2: Our savior didn't know what was going on. He was
Speaker 2: totally owned by these people. Yeah, that's that's the difficult
Speaker 2: line that they have to walk. He's not only the
Speaker 2: Savior of the West, but he's also the dupe of
Speaker 2: the establish wishment and all the corporations that deceived him.
Speaker 2: And he couldn't see through any of that. And so
Speaker 2: Peter Novarro, it's just this guy. You know, you're going
Speaker 2: to tell this to God one day, Peter, You're going
Speaker 2: to have to explain all the people that you killed
Speaker 2: and how you knew about this. This is all just
Speaker 2: so ridiculous. And as he's saying, they could have given
Speaker 2: us the genome sequence, guess what. Nobody isolated that. That's
Speaker 2: what Christine Massey found out. She said, nobody isolated this
Speaker 2: supposed virus that everybody was creating spike proteins of that,
Speaker 2: everybody was creating vaccines for. Nobody had isolated the virus,
Speaker 2: and that's what led her down the rabbit trail to
Speaker 2: ask them. They said, we never do that. Oh, you
Speaker 2: never isolate the virus that you're creating a vaccine for.
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 2: No, Well have you done any real science? Do you
Speaker 2: even know that there is a virus that's there. That's
Speaker 2: the fraud of rology. And that's why as we keep
Speaker 2: this thing going, it's.
Speaker 4: Important to keep it going.
Speaker 2: People need to see the fraud of the pharmaceutical companies,
Speaker 2: and they need to see the fraud of the so
Speaker 2: called science quote unquote of virology. That's the key thing.
Speaker 2: That's the next domino to fall. I hope you can stand.
Speaker 2: The Chinese had the password the entire time. They could
Speaker 2: have just given us that and we could have created
Speaker 2: the vaccine in an instant and immediately cured it.
Speaker 4: That's right. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I still think back to the Little Dog and Pony
Speaker 2: show that Trump arranged orre He had everybody setting around
Speaker 2: the table and goes around the table, how long is
Speaker 2: it going to take you?
Speaker 4: That's too long?
Speaker 2: How about you? That's faster? But that's not quick enough. Finally,
Speaker 2: they're all arranged and descending order right in terms of
Speaker 2: how quickly they can get this out. He gets to
Speaker 2: the moderna guy, we can do it right now, because
Speaker 2: we make your body a factory for the vaccine.
Speaker 4: Okay, we'll do it.
Speaker 2: I'll give you billions of dollars I need to, like,
Speaker 2: you know, tens of billions of dollars.
Speaker 3: He gave to them so completely and utterly, without morals
Speaker 3: or scruples in any fashion, Unlike those other guys. They
Speaker 3: might have a little bit left, don't worry, We'll do
Speaker 3: it for you.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: The the lab leak thing was something that the alternative
Speaker 2: media like Alex Shows and other people were selling everyone
Speaker 2: at the beginning of this fake pandemic, and now that
Speaker 2: has been adopted as the perfect alibi.
Speaker 4: Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 2: The perfect they talk about controlled opposition is now the
Speaker 2: perfect alibi for what they did. We tried, you know,
Speaker 2: we did our best, and yeah, okay, we killed a
Speaker 2: lot of people, but it was it was worth it,
Speaker 2: said Paul Offitt, the vaccine promoter. Myocarditis being epidemic now
Speaker 2: amongst young children and athletes and things, that's worth it.
Speaker 2: We had to do that, and we just rushed this
Speaker 2: out because we had to respond what the Chinese were doing.
Speaker 2: And so this, you know, blaming the Chinese, blaming Fauci,
Speaker 2: claiming that it came from the lab. Right, It's like
Speaker 2: the monster, the Frankenstein monster that came out of the
Speaker 2: lab that not only covers up for their cynical plots
Speaker 2: and lies at the beginning, but it also bolsters the
Speaker 2: next pandemic because you've got to do better next time.
Speaker 2: Next time, since they did this to us once, they
Speaker 2: could do it again deliberately. Let's just say this time
Speaker 2: if we don't want to go have a pretext for
Speaker 2: war with the Chinese, we said it was an accidental leak.
Speaker 2: But next time that they do something like this, whether
Speaker 2: it is anything that's real or not, they can claim
Speaker 2: that it was the Chinese. And then that's the reason
Speaker 2: been going to go to war, isn't it. Because releasing
Speaker 2: a bioweapon like that, it's like dropping a nuclear bomb
Speaker 2: on people, So it not only covers their butts for
Speaker 2: the past, but it prepares their plans for the future.
Speaker 2: That's what's so reprehensible about it.
Speaker 6: Very weak attenuated yeah virus with a very low amount
Speaker 6: of agivant in it. Prump's looking at it basically sugar
Speaker 6: water for folks, Can we take a little bit of
Speaker 6: an attenuated, microwaved or radiated of a deal as a
Speaker 6: freaking legally. That's why Trump is taking control of process.
Speaker 2: Absolutely totally lying, and he has exactly the same perspective
Speaker 2: as Paul off It right, it was worth it for
Speaker 2: you to take the vaccine, the sugar water, whatever happened
Speaker 2: to you. And it was worth it for you to
Speaker 2: go to January the sixth, whatever happened to you. Because
Speaker 2: he makes money off of this and gets a bigger audience. Reprehensible.
Speaker 2: And of course Trump never stops with all this stuff.
Speaker 6: And look, I guess in a certain way, I'm the
Speaker 6: father of the vaccine because I was the one that
Speaker 6: pushed it.
Speaker 7: I pushed the FDA like they have never been pushed before.
Speaker 6: I wouldn't exactly stay there. They're in love with me.
Speaker 7: The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind.
Speaker 7: All of the countries of the world who are now
Speaker 7: getting the vaccine or soon will be getting it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and he's still been pushing this is recently with
Speaker 2: scherl Ikinson too.
Speaker 3: Fast and in hindsight, based on what we know now,
Speaker 3: what would you have done differently?
Speaker 7: Well, I think they're doing studies on the vaccines and
Speaker 7: we're going to find out.
Speaker 2: And yeah, maybe now we'll find out.
Speaker 4: Huh, But I really had it.
Speaker 7: Five years later, vaccine's done, and I got them done
Speaker 7: very quickly, in record time.
Speaker 4: Could you skip the testing?
Speaker 7: Democrats love it, you know, the Democrats love it and
Speaker 7: the Republicans don't. It's very interesting, the vaccines, they love it.
Speaker 7: I have a friend of mine who said to me,
Speaker 7: why don't you talk about the vaccine what you did
Speaker 7: with He's a Democrat, but I'm sure he voth me.
Speaker 4: I'm sure he did because you're a Democrat too.
Speaker 7: It was the most incredible thing that.
Speaker 2: Look, he's saying, we're going to have to just the
Speaker 2: guy have to justify the success of their various COVID drugs. Trump,
Speaker 2: you didn't do due diligence with all this stuff, and
Speaker 2: you threatened anybody who did. All the shutdowns and the
Speaker 2: bannings and the firings that happened under your regime. It
Speaker 2: continued under Biden's regime. Trump said he wants companies to
Speaker 2: show the information, says show it now all upper case
Speaker 2: to the CDC in the public. Clear up this mess,
Speaker 2: all upper case one way or the other.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Pfizer did not respond to requests for comment. Modernity did
Speaker 2: not return the inquiry. HHS and CDC did not respond
Speaker 2: to requests for comment, says Epic Times. So once you
Speaker 2: asked the Pentagon, there were the ones who ran this
Speaker 2: military war against Americans and the rest of the world.
Speaker 2: It's just amazing to me how he's going to reinvent himself.
Speaker 2: We've seen this over and over again. The alternative media
Speaker 2: has done it. They tried to reinvent it for it,
Speaker 2: and they said stop talking about it, and you come
Speaker 2: out against it. And so now he's finally listening to them.
Speaker 2: He finally listened to them well into the campaign before
Speaker 2: he stopped talking about it. Then he stopped talking about it.
Speaker 2: Now he's going to oppose the vaccine as if he
Speaker 2: had nothing to do with it. He's the father of this.
Speaker 2: Under Trump, in twenty twenty, the government launched Operation Warp
Speaker 2: Speed spent north of twelve billion dollars on the part.
Speaker 2: They spent more than that. Trump has repeatedly praised Operational
Speaker 2: Warp Speed. Operation Warp Speed. People say one of the
Speaker 2: greatest achievements in the in politics or in the military,
Speaker 2: said Trump as recently as August twenty sixth. That was
Speaker 2: last Wednesday in the cabinet meeting. So he's still blowing
Speaker 2: his whistle, his trumpet, I guess. And yesterday he said,
Speaker 2: I hope Operation Warp Speed was as brilliant as many
Speaker 2: say it was. You're the only ones saying it at
Speaker 2: this point, he says, if not, we all want to
Speaker 2: know about it.
Speaker 4: And why. Yeah, I have no idea. What I did.
Speaker 2: You know, he was the father of the vaccine. He
Speaker 2: took control of it. He told the FDA to prove it.
Speaker 2: I don't want any delay, I don't want any testing.
Speaker 4: You do it now.
Speaker 2: And now it's like, well, now we've got to figure
Speaker 2: out what happened with us. If I had nothing to
Speaker 2: do with it, I know nothing.
Speaker 3: When it's you know, the greatest success owner's ever seen. Oh,
Speaker 3: it was ill him all the time. Now the second
Speaker 3: people are questioning it, we better find out who's responsible
Speaker 3: for this. We better find out what these people were
Speaker 3: up to.
Speaker 2: Well, as they say, success as many fathers, but failure
Speaker 2: is an orphan and this guy is the has tried
Speaker 2: to portray himself as a singular father of what he
Speaker 2: portrayed as a success. But now that it is a
Speaker 2: failure and they can't cover it up, he wants to
Speaker 2: distance himselves here.
Speaker 3: I want names, addresses.
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 2: A former federal official who was now an adjunct professor
Speaker 2: at Pepperdine University told Epic Times in a message that
Speaker 2: Trump quote was showing an openness to allow data to
Speaker 2: drive the answer. Oh okay, Well he didn't care about
Speaker 2: data before. He didn't want it collected, right. Let me
Speaker 2: tell you this, to me smells like a move to
Speaker 2: cover up, not only to cover up his culpability and
Speaker 2: his responsibility for all this stuff, but I think this
Speaker 2: is a move to cover up what's going on with
Speaker 2: the Mr and A. I think especially because when I
Speaker 2: got to this point here where I see that Senator
Speaker 2: Bill Cassidy of Louis, there is nobody that is more
Speaker 2: of a cheerleader for big pharmaceutical companies. I mean, this
Speaker 2: guy is totally owned by them. And so if Senator
Speaker 2: Cassidy is coming out and saying, yeah, we need to
Speaker 2: find out what happened to COVID vaccines, this is all
Speaker 2: about rehabilitation.
Speaker 3: We've got Bill Cassidy and the vaccine kid over here.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Yeah, this is a game that they're playing. Look,
Speaker 2: when you want to cover up something, right like the
Speaker 2: jfcas assassination or the nine to eleven, that you create
Speaker 2: a committee, you commission to study this thing. They did
Speaker 2: the same thing already in the UK to cover up
Speaker 2: the what they did, the government did to people and
Speaker 2: necessarily how they kill people, Matt Hancock and the rest
Speaker 2: of them, they created a COVID commission and it was
Speaker 2: a complete whitewash. And I've seen them do it before
Speaker 2: with Climategate, for example, once the emails were released because
Speaker 2: some Russians hacked them to expose and to embarrass the
Speaker 2: UK government. Once they were released, and they said, hey,
Speaker 2: our models don't work. We've got to figure out how
Speaker 2: we're going to hide the fact that temperature has declined
Speaker 2: instead of going up. Once that hit, it was bombshell
Speaker 2: and the only way for them to pull that back
Speaker 2: was to do a climate Gate commission, which came in
Speaker 2: and completely whitewashed it. Said, oh, we've looked at it
Speaker 2: now and these were taken out of contact some bomb
Speaker 2: bombla and so That's what I think is happening with this.
Speaker 2: I don't think that Trump is moving with. The whole
Speaker 2: thing has been a lie from the beginning. This Lablique
Speaker 2: thing is a lie and an alibi, and I think
Speaker 2: now they've got to go bigger because it's hurting the
Speaker 2: pharmaceutical companies. They don't have to worry about going to
Speaker 2: jail because the Democrats and Republicans have both owned this thing.
Speaker 2: They are both deeply embedded into this like they are
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein. So they're not going to start sending each
Speaker 2: other to jail over this. However, the public has awakened
Speaker 2: to the pharmaceutical fraud and so they got to claw
Speaker 2: this back. So Bill Cassidy, chairman of the Senate Health Committee.
Speaker 2: Remember he's the guy that would veto anyone who had
Speaker 2: any concerns really about vaccines for the most part, he said,
Speaker 2: we know what the data says and where it is
Speaker 2: coming from, so the CDC and HHS can make the
Speaker 2: best decisions. It is a whitewash that's going to be
Speaker 2: coming folks, no question about it in my mind. So
Speaker 2: when we look at the trillion dollar biotech industry is
Speaker 2: facing failure because of COVID injections.
Speaker 4: This is from the expos in the UK.
Speaker 2: They said the industry is trying to bypass safety testing
Speaker 2: and regulation. That's what this is about from the very beginning,
Speaker 2: and it's profiting from lightly regulated areas such as animal
Speaker 2: veterinary care and biotech food processing. Here in the US
Speaker 2: lightly regulated. So you've got Brooke Rawlins at the USDA.
Speaker 2: She has just as soon as she got installed by Trump,
Speaker 2: she approved an MR and a vaccine for all of
Speaker 2: our food supply, for chicken, for pork, for beef. And
Speaker 2: lets you tell you something right there about the fact
Speaker 2: that has trumpily had it come to Jesus moment, No,
Speaker 2: not yet. The biotech food processing launching a fight back
Speaker 2: through opinion pieces in corporate media. And so this article
Speaker 2: catalogs how large large media companies like The Washington Post,
Speaker 2: New York Times, and Wall Street Journal have recently engaged
Speaker 2: in a charm offensive for the biotech industry. And this
Speaker 2: is happening because in Japan, another study has come out
Speaker 2: quote significant increase and excess deaths after repeated COVID nineteen
Speaker 2: vaccination in Japan. Japan bought into this lie of the
Speaker 2: pandemic and bought into the Trump Shots more than any
Speaker 2: other country in the world, and they're now paying the price.
Speaker 3: One thing that I noticed is a lot of them
Speaker 3: bought into it, but a lot of them are also
Speaker 3: very questioning of it. So while it seems like they're
Speaker 3: more willing to question was actually done to them than
Speaker 3: a lot of other people. They didn't buy into the hype.
Speaker 3: They believed in the technology, but when it showed that
Speaker 3: there were problems with them, that people were being harmed,
Speaker 3: a lot of them woke up and were able to say,
Speaker 3: there's a problem with this and we need to assess it.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 3: It's very different from what you see in America, where
Speaker 3: it's still you know, the people that bought in no
Speaker 3: matter how many people died, no matter how many people
Speaker 3: get sick or get injured by.
Speaker 4: It, they just keep bullheaded and go down.
Speaker 3: I'm going to go get my next booster.
Speaker 4: Yeah, whereas the.
Speaker 3: Japanese seemed to be capable of actually going there's a
Speaker 3: problem here. We got to figure out what's going on.
Speaker 2: And somebody, well, they're running studies and they're following the evidence,
Speaker 2: and they had they had destroyed a couple of million
Speaker 2: of these vaccines when they discovered two different batches over
Speaker 2: a million each, and they discovered they said, black particulates,
Speaker 2: and the vaccines that they said reacted to magnets.
Speaker 4: What does that tell you.
Speaker 8: It's also just that I don't think they have that
Speaker 8: same level of propaganda that we see here, Not just
Speaker 8: you know, the vaccine immunity thing, it's the constant push
Speaker 8: from the media, just commercial after commercial after commercial, controlling
Speaker 8: the media narrative through essentially roundabout bribery.
Speaker 2: Yes, I think they're far more not that they're perfect,
Speaker 2: but I think they're far more oriented towards actual science
Speaker 2: than we are here in America. And I think they're
Speaker 2: less tribal in terms of partis and politics than we
Speaker 2: are here. Japan received on average three point six doses
Speaker 2: per capita by March twenty twenty four, compared with two
Speaker 2: and a half doses per capita in New Zealand. For example,
Speaker 2: this article is from New Zealand. Around eighty percent of
Speaker 2: the population was vaccinated. The average figure equates to a
Speaker 2: range between zero and up to eight COVID mRNA shots
Speaker 2: per person. Can you imagine getting eight of these things?
Speaker 2: Japan four now has the highest rate of excess death
Speaker 2: in the world. From January twenty twenty to March twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four, there's been a cumulative excess three hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty thousand deaths, or twenty seven hundred and thirty excess
Speaker 2: deaths per million. This rate is three times higher than
Speaker 2: the US, where mr Anda vaccination uptake was significantly lower,
Speaker 2: and two times higher than New Zealand, which is much
Speaker 2: higher than the US. The preposterous fourteen million Lives save
Speaker 2: claim that is being promoted by the World Health Organization
Speaker 2: and Donald Trump has now been downgraded to somewhere around
Speaker 2: two and a half million, which is still a lie.
Speaker 2: So this is a Trump pushing these who figures. Corporate
Speaker 2: biotech is launching a fight back, and it's trying to
Speaker 2: protect its markets by placing opinion pieces and the biggest
Speaker 2: legacy media. For example, on August nineteenth, the Wall Street
Speaker 2: Journal opinion column headline read this RFK Junior's misguided war
Speaker 2: on mRNA and they called it an effort to quote
Speaker 2: carnish a promising technology in a move that could damage
Speaker 2: US innovation. Yeah, we can make a lot of money
Speaker 2: off of this, that's Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 3: Then there you put any restrictions or restraints on what
Speaker 3: we might do to the American people.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 3: How do you raise any safety concerns. We should be
Speaker 3: free to experiment on whoever we want, whenever we want,
Speaker 3: however we want.
Speaker 2: Right about the same time, on August the fifteenth, Washington
Speaker 2: Post had an opinion piece said, here's the headline, I
Speaker 2: witnessed Operation warp speed. Trump's refusal to defend it is baffling.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 2: It's ida now discredited three year old study which claimed
Speaker 2: that COVID nineteen vaccines saved three million lives in the US,
Speaker 2: and describe the development of COVID nineteen vaccines quote as
Speaker 2: a master stroke of American competition. Yeah, that's how we
Speaker 2: compete in America. We had tens of billions of dollars
Speaker 2: to companies to make whatever they want, regardless of how
Speaker 2: dangerous it is. Then you had the New York Times
Speaker 2: on ped Peace on the eighteenth of August. He's all
Speaker 2: clustered within just a couple of days of each other.
Speaker 2: It led with this headline, America is abandoning one of
Speaker 2: the greatest medical breakthroughs. It laments how HHS has decided
Speaker 2: to wind down twenty two mRNA vaccine development projects that
Speaker 2: were started under BARDA, and it has been a defeat
Speaker 2: of them to some degree. That Monarez, who was put
Speaker 2: there in my opinion, by the by Trump or the
Speaker 2: people within Trump's organization, administration, regime, whatever you want to
Speaker 2: call that. Myths of clouds and criminals. They were the
Speaker 2: ones that I think put up Dave Wolden as a
Speaker 2: signal to their base and then took him out and
Speaker 2: put this woman who was deeply embedded into the into BARDA,
Speaker 2: into ARPA. H put her in at the last minute
Speaker 2: and then rubber stamped her through very quickly before there
Speaker 2: was any discussion about it. Everybody talked for a long
Speaker 2: time about Dave Olden. Oh, this is a positive sign.
Speaker 2: This guy is a skeptic about vaccines and folks, we
Speaker 2: should all be skeptics about science. We should all be
Speaker 2: skeptics about politics. Science only advances when people are skeptical,
Speaker 2: and we're only safe when we're skeptical of the politicians.
Speaker 2: Trust no man, said Patrick Henry. But bind them down
Speaker 2: by the chains of the Constitution, And we should bind
Speaker 2: down these scientists by the chains of observation, experimentation, and
Speaker 2: being able to reproduce and to be able to see
Speaker 2: with transparency of what they're doing. So biotech is really
Speaker 2: only profiting when it can skip all with testing. And
Speaker 2: so this is a challenging moment for them, and they've
Speaker 2: got to do a lot to try to regain people's trusts.
Speaker 2: That's what concerns me about our K Junior. He said
Speaker 2: that from the very beginning, he said, I'm here to
Speaker 2: restore people's trust in these institutions. Trust these institutions. These
Speaker 2: institutions were unconstitutional from the very beginning. You should never
Speaker 2: trust something like you shouldn't trust the CDC. You shouldn't
Speaker 2: trust the FDA. They are untrustworthy, they're illegal, unconstitutional organizations.
Speaker 2: You should never trust anything that's government, especially when the
Speaker 2: government has violated its own fundamental law, which is to
Speaker 2: enforce the Constitution. So again, as we said about the
Speaker 2: medical codes, this is an advacy advocacy group that is saying,
Speaker 2: at least create some medical codes so that we can
Speaker 2: track the adverse effects. You haven't done anything to track this.
Speaker 2: And of course, before all this stuff happened, while RFK
Speaker 2: was still at Children's Health Defense, and he had Del
Speaker 2: Bigtree who was there with I can they had done
Speaker 2: a challenge to the CDC. They said, you got legal
Speaker 2: immunity back in nineteen eighty six, and you set up
Speaker 2: the very's system where people could report adverse events, and
Speaker 2: all percent of those are being reported. But what have
Speaker 2: you done with that information? You were supposed to use
Speaker 2: that information to improve vaccine safety. What did you actually do?
Speaker 2: And they stonewalled on that for a long time, and
Speaker 2: finally when they refused to give any information, give any documents,
Speaker 2: and finally they just admitted, we've done nothing for over
Speaker 2: thirty years. We've done nothing about vaccine safety, and here
Speaker 2: we are again. They didn't even bother to set up
Speaker 2: a code to track the adverse effects of COVID. Medical
Speaker 2: codes are used worldwide to standardize medical data reporting and
Speaker 2: for the purpose of tracking disease patterns and populations. The
Speaker 2: codes are also necessary to track the safety of drugs
Speaker 2: and vaccines, including adverse events. A code specifically for adverse
Speaker 2: events due to COVID nineteen vaccine should have been created
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty. It was a new type of vaccine
Speaker 2: that had never been used in humans before. None of
Speaker 2: the pre existing vaccine adverse codes would do, and yet
Speaker 2: they didn't So there is an organization called React nineteen
Speaker 2: represents people been injured by these Trump shots. They submitted
Speaker 2: a petition to the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics
Speaker 2: earlier this month to say, can we please at least
Speaker 2: assign a number so that we can start to count
Speaker 2: these things. The lack of dedicated codes for this is
Speaker 2: significant consequences for patient's clinicians, researchers, and policymakers alike. The
Speaker 2: whole thing was designed to lie and cover up. Do
Speaker 2: you think that this sack of bricks Peter Dunbara is
Speaker 2: going to get to the truth about all this stuff
Speaker 2: or is he just lying to us yet again?
Speaker 4: It's just amazing.
Speaker 2: COVID vaccine inquiry records are recorded under vague categories, if
Speaker 2: they're recorded at all, said the organization that's there, And
Speaker 2: then we get to Michael Crichton should have the Jurassic
Speaker 2: Part theme. I love the music from that. It's actually
Speaker 2: a good movie too.
Speaker 1: Was it.
Speaker 3: It's one of my favorites. Actually, just an incredible film.
Speaker 2: Well, the character Jeff Goldblum's character in Malcolm the Mathem,
Speaker 2: the way he puts it, he said, genetic power is
Speaker 2: far more potent than atomic power and potentially even more destructive.
Speaker 2: That's what these people are playing around with, and they
Speaker 2: don't want you to see any of the adverse effects.
Speaker 2: I think in time what we're going to look at
Speaker 2: is the kind of horror that we saw with the
Speaker 2: nuclear tests, where they put soldiers close to nuclear tests
Speaker 2: so they could have radiation follow them and use them
Speaker 2: as guinea pigs, right, except we all got to be
Speaker 2: the guinea pigs for this links to Trump. For a
Speaker 2: long time, his novels and films depicted catastrophes caused by
Speaker 2: technology going berserk and beyond the control of his human creators.
Speaker 2: For instance, in the seventy three movie Westworld, Crichton's story
Speaker 2: depicted an interactive amusement park replicating an American old West town,
Speaker 2: and we all know how that went. And so that's
Speaker 2: the common theme that people have the illusion of control
Speaker 2: in terms of science and these things that they're doing,
Speaker 2: but they always seem to lose the control. The destructive
Speaker 2: consequences of human attempts at manipulation are all but inevitable.
Speaker 2: He declares his stance about this explicitly in his introduction
Speaker 2: to his two thousand and two novel Prey, which is
Speaker 2: about biology based nanotech. Did you guys ever read that?
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's really good. Yeah it was. Yeah.
Speaker 8: Michael Crichton has a tendency to put really annoying children
Speaker 8: in the books, Like whenever he has a child, it's
Speaker 8: always just the most obnoxious character. Yeah, and Prey was
Speaker 8: no exception. But other than that, if you ignore those parts,
Speaker 8: it's a fantastic novel.
Speaker 2: And of course you can see that in Jurassic Party.
Speaker 2: That's a good observation. Yeah, that's another one of his themes.
Speaker 2: I guess, the lack of control in science, getting out
Speaker 2: of control, thinking that's in control when it's not.
Speaker 8: In control of science or children.
Speaker 3: Maybe it's a subconscious thing, maybe even directed, just putting
Speaker 3: a child there to show you this is who it's
Speaker 3: really going to impact, Like maybe you'll be okay, but
Speaker 3: there's a child here and this is what you know
Speaker 3: down the pipeline. This is who it's really going to
Speaker 3: have an impact on.
Speaker 2: Well, he was very explicit in the introduction to Jurassic
Speaker 2: Part in terms of the fact that things were getting
Speaker 2: out of him very very quickly, and that there wasn't
Speaker 2: really any understanding of the potential downside to it. There
Speaker 2: was no scientific review of this stuff, and that was
Speaker 2: what he was very concerned about. That's why he even
Speaker 2: has his characters say, well, just because you could do
Speaker 2: it doesn't mean that you should do it. And he
Speaker 2: was talking about how things are rapidly advancing. And I
Speaker 2: think he wrote before Crisper came out, and it was
Speaker 2: shortly after Jurassic Part that Crisper either was developed or
Speaker 2: was popularized to the extent that what he had predicted
Speaker 2: started coming true. That it's going to become easy year,
Speaker 2: and everybody's going to start to do this. The total
Speaker 2: system we call the biosphere are so complicated, he says,
Speaker 2: we cannot know in advance the consequences of anything that
Speaker 2: we do. This is a powerful argument for caution, he said.
Speaker 2: He drives us home in a number of weighs. Many
Speaker 2: chapters in Jurassic Park are titled control in one way
Speaker 2: or the other to make his theme more explicit. The
Speaker 2: people sitting in control centers on the Dinosaur Island only
Speaker 2: have the illusion of control, which disappears when the computer
Speaker 2: fails or unexpected things happen, he said.
Speaker 4: Again.
Speaker 2: The mathematician character Malcolm, speaking for Crichton, calls himmond a
Speaker 2: quote great fool for his overconfidence and calls the island
Speaker 2: quote an accident waiting to happen. Malcolm debunks the grand
Speaker 2: vision of science, that is the dream of total control.
Speaker 2: Another problem of human ignorance about nature. And Michael Crichton,
Speaker 2: before he died, took on global warming. Excuse me, how
Speaker 2: to sneeze there? He took on global warming, and that
Speaker 2: tarnished his image with Hollywood and the intelligency of there.
Speaker 4: But he was absolutely right about that as well.
Speaker 3: You don't come after their sacred cows. They get really
Speaker 3: upset about that.
Speaker 2: Again, that's the theme of human ignorance about nature. Even
Speaker 2: the dinosaur experts didn't really know much about the dinosaurs.
Speaker 2: Their knowledge is just limited to skeletal remains in speculation.
Speaker 2: For example, the dinosaurs turned out to be much faster
Speaker 2: than expected and much smarter. So in Jurassic Park, Crichton
Speaker 2: is obviously not just worried about dinosaurs. It mentions the
Speaker 2: presumably fictional company biosins development of a genetically modified Rabi's
Speaker 2: pathogen which can infect people by inhalation. Someone foolishly attempts
Speaker 2: to transport it by a bag on a plane. But
Speaker 2: here in the real world. In twenty twenty three, Yale
Speaker 2: Engineering proudly announced the development of an mr Anda covid
Speaker 2: vaccine with nanoparticles to be inhaled. There we go, that's
Speaker 2: a bioweapon. Nanoparticles, all, all of this, this whole thing
Speaker 2: from the beginning, folks, has been a bio It's not
Speaker 2: a not a virus. It is a bioweapon, vaccine, nanoparticles,
Speaker 2: and the rest of this.
Speaker 8: Yeah, it's the whole We finally created the torment nexus
Speaker 8: from the sci fi classic don't create the Torment Nexus.
Speaker 3: They spend all this time and these novels, as Lance
Speaker 3: pointed out, going through reasons why you shouldn't do this.
Speaker 3: They show dystopia after dystopia, and the scientists sit down
Speaker 3: and go, well, that's an interesting idea.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, and the engineers, the engineers look at it
Speaker 2: and say, yeah, we can make that.
Speaker 3: We can that's an interesting problem. I bet I could
Speaker 3: solve it.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 8: Pray is a good novel. It's of a type with
Speaker 8: that other techno thriller by Daniel Suarez Kill Decision, where
Speaker 8: it's about a AI controlling autonomous drones.
Speaker 4: HM. Well.
Speaker 2: A federal court has reopened the case of twenty four
Speaker 2: year old who died from the Trump shot and specifically
Speaker 2: from myo carditis caused by which we just had Paul
Speaker 2: offit come out and say well, it's worth it. It's
Speaker 2: a small price to pay when some of you die, right,
Speaker 2: Not for him or his family. A federal court has
Speaker 2: reopened the lawsuit against the Department of Defense because this
Speaker 2: is a Department of Defense bio weapon. The shot that
Speaker 2: trumping out was from the beginning a military operation against
Speaker 2: the American people. And we've seen this before. We've seen
Speaker 2: the military I think was it off the coast of
Speaker 2: San Diego where the Navy sprayed some stuff or whatever,
Speaker 2: and it was, oh, don't worry, it's harmless. We just
Speaker 2: want to track if we wanted to do a bio weapon,
Speaker 2: how it would propagate and that.
Speaker 4: Type of stuff.
Speaker 2: So the military is constantly doing stuff like this, and
Speaker 2: it was always from the very beginning a military operation,
Speaker 2: and we had medical martial law that was part of
Speaker 2: this in terms of preparation. This is filed by the
Speaker 2: family of George Wats junior, twenty four year old college
Speaker 2: student who got the Trump shot in twenty twenty one
Speaker 2: because Biden. The other part of the tag team had
Speaker 2: made it a requirement to get the Trump shot in
Speaker 2: order to go to college, and he immediately got sick
Speaker 2: and subsequently died. So the lawsuit is against the Department
Speaker 2: of Defense. A judge at earlier a year ago September
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four, dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that the federal
Speaker 2: government enjoys sovereign immunity. See there's somebody's got the pharmaceutical
Speaker 2: companies have got legal immunity. The government has got sovereign immunity.
Speaker 2: You don't get immunity to anything from these vaccine shots.
Speaker 2: What you get is death and disease. That's what you get,
Speaker 2: which protects it from lawsuits. However, Ray Flora is, the
Speaker 2: attorney who's representing his estate, challenged the dismissal argued that
Speaker 2: the PREP Act. Under the PREP Act, only a three
Speaker 2: judge panel has jurisdiction to grant or deny a motion
Speaker 2: to dismiss. So if you're going to play by the
Speaker 2: PREP Act, says his lawyer, then you're going to have
Speaker 2: to play by the PREP Act, And that says that
Speaker 2: you can't do it with a single judge. It has
Speaker 2: to be a panel of three. The three panel judge
Speaker 2: will now consider this, and what do you think is
Speaker 2: going to happen? You're gonna have any problem getting a
Speaker 2: unanimous three panel judge to throw this out. I don't
Speaker 2: think that's why I said, don't get your hopes up.
Speaker 2: But the good thing about this is that it sheds
Speaker 2: light on the legal prevarications, the lies, the games that
Speaker 2: they were playing, and it sheds light on the fact
Speaker 2: that this is centered on the Department of Defense. That's
Speaker 2: the advantage of all this stuff.
Speaker 3: Another thing to note about this is that the judge
Speaker 3: Nichols is completely unfamiliar with this. He dismisses it. The
Speaker 3: lawyer points out, no, you need a three judge panel.
Speaker 3: He goes, oh, well, you're right. Oh I didn't know that.
Speaker 4: He brings it back in.
Speaker 3: Yeah he's got no clue. Yeah, sure, bring it back.
Speaker 2: Well, all who cares about that? I mean, we're making
Speaker 2: this stuff up as we go along.
Speaker 3: I guess I should have bothered reading it.
Speaker 4: Huh.
Speaker 8: So I just meant you get away with everything.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. So this is all about the interplay
Speaker 2: between the Emergency Use Authorization, the EUA, and the games
Speaker 2: that they played. Saying we're going to approve Cormanati when
Speaker 2: they didn't have any And what they said with the
Speaker 2: approval was they said that they were identical, but that
Speaker 2: they were legally distinct from each other. Right, So they're saying,
Speaker 2: the Pfizer Biointech vaccine, which was the only thing that
Speaker 2: we had here in the United States, the vaccine that
Speaker 2: has that label on it is functionally identical to Cormanati,
Speaker 2: but the labeling is different. So legally they're distinguished. They're
Speaker 2: different from each other, even if in reality they're not
Speaker 2: different from each other. And so they are hammering this
Speaker 2: home and saying, yeah, but you gave him the one
Speaker 2: that had the legally distinct label of Pfizer bio intact.
Speaker 2: It didn't have the label that said Cormonati, so you
Speaker 2: didn't give us the one that was approved. I think
Speaker 2: this is a very important case because it exposes that
Speaker 2: I had from the Children's Health Defense. I had one
Speaker 2: of her name was I forget her first name, Myers
Speaker 2: is her last name. She's of the Oscar Meyer family
Speaker 2: is where her family owned that company. But anyway, she's
Speaker 2: with Children's Health Defense. And she came on and talked
Speaker 2: about the games that they were playing, how they would
Speaker 2: make this legal distinction based on the label when it
Speaker 2: was functionally identical, and how they were trying to get
Speaker 2: it approved, pushing really hard to get approved and part
Speaker 2: of the childhood vaccine schedule because once they did that,
Speaker 2: it got the stronger immunity of the nineteen eighty six
Speaker 2: Act in the sense that they could didn't have to
Speaker 2: rely on emergency use authorization. And so you know, now
Speaker 2: that the emergency use authorization has been removed, they still
Speaker 2: have it on the children's vaccine schedule, so they still
Speaker 2: have that protection that is there. After after their son died,
Speaker 2: his family sued the DoD and Lloyd Austin, in his
Speaker 2: official Capacities Defense Secretary. The DoD oversaw the development and
Speaker 2: the distribution of the COVID vaccines under Operation wark Speed,
Speaker 2: which was a military operation, folks. According to the lawsuit,
Speaker 2: the DoD quote capitalized on quintessential bait and switch fraud
Speaker 2: using the fact that Corminatti was FDA approved. The Bolsters
Speaker 2: claim that the Pfizer Bio Intact Emergency Use Authorization and
Speaker 2: vaccine was safe and effective, but there were two different things,
Speaker 2: and they played that game with everybody. There's one exception
Speaker 2: to this prep act, and that is if the person
Speaker 2: who was injured can prove that the vaccine maker or
Speaker 2: the person who administered vaccine engaged in wilful misconduct. And folks,
Speaker 2: they did. The Pentagon engaged in a wilful misconduct. Trump
Speaker 2: Biden engaged in wilful misconduct.
Speaker 4: They all did.
Speaker 2: All the public health officials they knew and they did
Speaker 2: it anyway, it was wilful misconduct. It was fraud by
Speaker 2: the vaccine companies. And that is the thing that takes
Speaker 2: this out of that that is the perhaps if we
Speaker 2: can get that, that should be the achilles heel for
Speaker 2: all this stuff. We'll see the family alleges that the
Speaker 2: DoD engaged in wilful misconduct by continuing to distribute only
Speaker 2: the stockpiled version of the EUA Pfizer shot. Well, the
Speaker 2: interesting thing is is that as this Monarez person has
Speaker 2: been kicked out, and again I don't know that it's
Speaker 2: really over the vaccine or if it's over the personal
Speaker 2: issues with RFK Junior. When he told her to fire
Speaker 2: some of these people and she refused to do it,
Speaker 2: then he fired her and then they walked out in sympathy,
Speaker 2: Except that they haven't gone she has refused to vacate
Speaker 2: her post. It's kind of interesting how these people are saying, no,
Speaker 2: you can't fire me. First time we saw that was
Speaker 2: with the Consumer Financial Protection Board and the first the
Speaker 2: very first guy who'd been head of it. This thing,
Speaker 2: this monster that was created by Elizabeth Warren and I
Speaker 2: think it was Barney Frank. They created this thing, and
Speaker 2: the very first person when he stepped down, the number
Speaker 2: two said now I'm the director, and Trump said no,
Speaker 2: I get to appoint the director. So they had to
Speaker 2: fight about that. I think he won that one and
Speaker 2: should have. Actually they just should shut it down. Montereza's
Speaker 2: ouster was announced by HHS on August of twenty seven.
Speaker 2: They said she's no longer director of the CDC, and
Speaker 2: yet her attorney responded to that, saying that he represents
Speaker 2: her and the director continues to fill that role. She's
Speaker 2: still this is she's kind of like often from the
Speaker 2: office face right, So if a fire breaks out, check
Speaker 2: to see where she has been that the fire breaks
Speaker 2: out of the CDC building. So this guy this letter
Speaker 2: that really set you off. So this guy, Dmitri dus Coloccus,
Speaker 2: I guess we could call him a Dmitri Caca Locus.
Speaker 2: Like I said before, he's another Sam Britain. He's a
Speaker 2: bondage and kink guy. Consider this its charged that he
Speaker 2: can no longer serve an environment. That quote treats the
Speaker 2: CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that
Speaker 2: do not reflect scientific growding. He said they're designed to
Speaker 2: hurt rather than to improve the public's health. Yeah, right,
Speaker 2: So he wrote this big thing about how wonderful the
Speaker 2: vaccines are and how you should never question people in
Speaker 2: authority like him, especially if they're in the bondage in kink.
Speaker 4: Right, you should just do whatever they say.
Speaker 3: You see someone like me, you should just bow your
Speaker 3: head of virtual eyes and know that my pronouncements are
Speaker 3: from on high and you should treat them as you
Speaker 3: know law. Yeah, anything I say, if it comes out
Speaker 3: of my mouth, it's correct.
Speaker 2: This Brownstone up at Peace quotes some of the things
Speaker 2: he said, and they summarize it by saying, if you
Speaker 2: question the safety of these things, the timing, the number,
Speaker 2: or the necessity of vaccines, then that condemns the country
Speaker 2: to Darwinian misery. At Quinnaham, So they just need a
Speaker 2: rubber stamp whatever the pharmaceutical companies say, and you need
Speaker 2: to be just fine with whatever the CDC rubber stamps.
Speaker 4: So RK.
Speaker 2: Junior is saying that Texas is MAHA legislation is a
Speaker 2: model for other states to follow. He said, food manufacturers
Speaker 2: in this country have now agreed to remove none synthetic
Speaker 2: petroleum based dies from their food.
Speaker 4: Are you kidding me?
Speaker 2: We've had this problem with vaccines and mRNA and you're
Speaker 2: focusing on die We need to focus on the people
Speaker 2: who are dying from the m r and A nano
Speaker 2: weapons that are out there. I think he's got his
Speaker 2: priorities mixed up. But we want to take a quick
Speaker 2: break here because I still want to get into some
Speaker 2: of the tarifsuff and we've got lots of comments. Lance
Speaker 2: is very busy. Over the weekend, he wrote an automated
Speaker 2: script to go through and let him collect these things
Speaker 2: off of multiple streams. So very impressive what he's been
Speaker 2: able to do here. But let's let's go through these, Travis.
Speaker 2: You can read these.
Speaker 3: Yes, we've got Patty wax as the virus came from
Speaker 3: UNC Chapel Hill. It got moved to Wuhan burn your
Speaker 3: baby blue t shirts.
Speaker 2: Well, they were engaged. I'm not convinced that the virus
Speaker 2: is real I or really not. You you isolated and
Speaker 2: then show it. It showed me the isolation if they
Speaker 2: haven't isolated this, let's stop all this stuff about gain
Speaker 2: of I think the gain of function is dangerous at
Speaker 2: the very least, it's a waste of money and they
Speaker 2: should stop it. But it's part of the bigger bioweapon
Speaker 2: thing them to make these bioweapon vaccines. But I don't
Speaker 2: think that there was ever a virus. And I know
Speaker 2: that they were engaged in a lot of this stuff
Speaker 2: and they have focused on that, but I don't believe
Speaker 2: that whole prominence of it.
Speaker 3: Now we've got Yona Andy Wodie says Patty Wax knows
Speaker 3: all about doctor Ralph Barrick, MD, and has gained a
Speaker 3: function bioweapon work at the Research Triangle Park and UNC
Speaker 3: Chapel Hill. There's a lot of shady stuff that.
Speaker 4: Got the places.
Speaker 3: Cesspool for sure, just a bad area.
Speaker 4: We live not too far from there.
Speaker 3: It's such it's a real shame because it's a very
Speaker 3: very pretty area. UNC has got a lot of very
Speaker 3: pretty campuses. However, it's a cesspool Patty Wax says, it's
Speaker 3: also insane. There may or not be viruses, but there
Speaker 3: are always experiments, and there are always biolabs, yes.
Speaker 2: And that needs to be stopped. And again it did stop.
Speaker 2: In twenty fourteen. He had Alison Young, I think it
Speaker 2: was with the USA dated a long Xosa, talking about
Speaker 2: all the accidents that they'd had and all the diseased
Speaker 2: animals that have been released into the wild. One of
Speaker 2: the biggest ones was down at the National Primate Center
Speaker 2: in Louisiana, and they found that the equipment was careless
Speaker 2: and faulty, and people were getting sick and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. And I remember I covered that extensively.
Speaker 2: And so they shut it down in twenty fourteen. And
Speaker 2: I don't know whether it was Congress or the Obama administration,
Speaker 2: but Obama was present at the time they shut it
Speaker 2: down in twenty fourteen. One of the first things that
Speaker 2: Trump did was to bring back gain a function research
Speaker 2: like that. In twenty seventeen.
Speaker 3: We're going to research function bigly, very bigly. Francine Steve
Speaker 3: Evs says, read the contagion myth, and he also says,
Speaker 3: read doctor Mark Bailey's a farewell to virology and read
Speaker 3: the Final Pandemic. Yeah, yes, yes, going to Andy Woodie
Speaker 3: says a virus is real if you believe, have faith.
Speaker 4: It's like the Peter Pan effect.
Speaker 2: Right, I do believe all that it's all a collap
Speaker 2: for the fairy fran scene.
Speaker 3: How many people really died from the shot? Two millions?
Speaker 3: That's again we don't know. They haven't even been keeping track.
Speaker 3: They haven't been created a number to track the adverse effects,
Speaker 3: so there's no way of telling.
Speaker 2: They want you to think that if you got a
Speaker 2: relative that died after these, it's just the same game
Speaker 2: they've been running for decades, they don't. They want you
Speaker 2: to think that you are the outlier. This isn't happening
Speaker 2: to anybody else, So maybe it's not even what you
Speaker 2: think it is. Right, whether it's SAIDs or whether it's SADS,
Speaker 2: Sudden infant death syndrome or sudden adult death syndrome, they
Speaker 2: want you to feel like you are this is something
Speaker 2: that didn't happen to anybody else, So maybe that's not
Speaker 2: really what Maybe your eyes are deceiving you.
Speaker 3: And because the effects are so buried and strange, it
Speaker 3: makes it hard as well, because Oh, well, who knows.
Speaker 3: Maybe this weird, strange thing that's happening with you isn't
Speaker 3: due to that. Maybe it's something else. It presents all
Speaker 3: kinds of different weird stuff. Now we have nad Lander
Speaker 3: Moderna told everyone that it was a modified DNA therapy,
Speaker 3: but people don't even know what DNA is anymore. Well,
Speaker 3: sure sounds good. B. L. Houghton says at Francine Bummer,
Speaker 3: I lost two colleagues at work who both promoted the jabs.
Speaker 3: One just dropped over and the other got turbot answer.
Speaker 3: Sorry to hear that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't wish that on anybody, even the people
Speaker 2: who were real in your face about it.
Speaker 3: I mean, Scott Adams comes to mind. Yes, I feel terrible.
Speaker 2: I feel bad for Scott Adams, but you know he
Speaker 2: I will still talk about what he had to say
Speaker 2: because it's a good example of the kind of ignorance
Speaker 2: of prejudice that was out there.
Speaker 3: Yeah. B. L. Houghton says, I believe my dad passed
Speaker 3: from the J and J shot as he went downhill
Speaker 3: quickly after taking it, and he had a constant burning
Speaker 3: sensation in his neck that prevented him from resting or
Speaker 3: enjoying life.
Speaker 4: I'm very sorry to hear that.
Speaker 3: Biale Houghten. Patty Wack says, However, I thought Japan was
Speaker 3: the one that put them on the side and didn'td
Speaker 3: miminister them. Saw black things squiggling in the tubes. That
Speaker 3: started after a while.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, starting after a while, and again they
Speaker 2: interacted with magnets. So that was that was something that
Speaker 2: sounded a lot like the graphic and just disappeared.
Speaker 4: All of a sudden. They just shut down, didn't talk
Speaker 4: about it anymore.
Speaker 3: We also now have uh Solo Cat nineteen eighty. Don't
Speaker 3: destroy the vaccines, hold them for evidence.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: By the time you hold them very long and you
Speaker 2: don't refrigerate them, you started getting those black pristiculars that
Speaker 2: are out there.
Speaker 3: Yeah, whatever's going on with that? B L Hoten for sure.
Speaker 3: At Francine, I retired and they told us we had
Speaker 3: to take it and show proof of VACS. I said,
Speaker 3: no way, and I never looked back. I should have
Speaker 3: let them fire me, but I was ready to go anyway.
Speaker 4: Yeah, good god, glad you take it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, very glad you didn't take it.
Speaker 2: That's the thing we knew. You knew I knew, we all,
Speaker 2: most of the people in this audience knew this stuff.
Speaker 4: Don't tell me.
Speaker 2: That I know that Peter Navara is not the brightest
Speaker 2: ball out there, but don't tell me that he didn't know.
Speaker 2: Don't tell me that Trump didn't know. Don't tell me
Speaker 2: that all these people didn't know. They knew, they knew.
Speaker 3: It's somehow just the most intelligent people in the world
Speaker 3: who keep falling for these scams. I don't get it. Yeah,
Speaker 3: we've got cletus five five five. The smoking gun here
Speaker 3: is when RFK Junior himself said that Trump was paid
Speaker 3: one hundred million from Big Pharma to do what he did.
Speaker 3: Be my Valentine. Such a shame that Japan was not
Speaker 3: worry of the COVID shots shots. The country suspended vaccines
Speaker 3: decades ago for children hunder two, and sid's rate went
Speaker 3: down to zero after assuming SIDS went back up to
Speaker 3: where it was defy tyrants seventeen seventy six. I don't
Speaker 3: know all the reasons why they wanted seventy percent of
Speaker 3: the population to get jet but I do know it's
Speaker 3: a very sinister reason.
Speaker 4: Depopulation, depopulation control.
Speaker 3: All the reasons for everything.
Speaker 2: Yeah, sinister, and of course you know, it was very
Speaker 2: effective for them to move the Overton window for control
Speaker 2: in terms of being able to lock down nationwide, and
Speaker 2: all the countries did it all at the same time.
Speaker 2: We're going to talk about that later. What is developing
Speaker 2: here is kind of a meta constitution for global governance,
Speaker 2: not global government, like they have a particular capital somewhere,
Speaker 2: but this is going to be kind of under the radar,
Speaker 2: and it's going to be over all. The governments will remain.
Speaker 2: They will be there as plausible deniability for the governance
Speaker 2: that is there. So you have national governments, but there
Speaker 2: will be global governance that will run by these organizations
Speaker 2: like World Health organization, by trade organizations, by the banks,
Speaker 2: by the corporations and that type of thing. That's what
Speaker 2: we're going to talk about later in the show.
Speaker 3: Yeah, defive tire at seventy to seventy six. Oh no,
Speaker 3: read that one, Spencer DeLong, David and Travis. Did you
Speaker 3: see the big jump in gold prices over the weekend?
Speaker 3: It broke its thirty five hundred and ounce high from April.
Speaker 3: It peaked at thirty five sixty three Friday night, And
Speaker 3: is that thirty five forty eight at the start of
Speaker 3: the show. Gold also broke a recent record by breaking
Speaker 3: the forty an ounce wall. It peaked at forty one
Speaker 3: point seventy three and it's currently at forty one point
Speaker 3: twenty five. I did see stuff.
Speaker 2: About it's up like thirty four this year, and I
Speaker 2: just had someone a couple of weeks ago send me.
Speaker 2: They weren't Kenya listener, and I don't want to attack them,
Speaker 2: but it was they They showed the charts, and you know,
Speaker 2: people will do this with a bitcoin and say, look,
Speaker 2: you know, whenever it's got a having or something like that,
Speaker 2: you know, whenever it goes to one of these particular stages,
Speaker 2: it drops and does this, and we see these charting patterns, and.
Speaker 4: There are a lot of people who do that. A
Speaker 4: lot of people do that successfully.
Speaker 2: I just I'm not into the gold situation for trying
Speaker 2: to do a market timing. And this person said, I said,
Speaker 2: gold has hit its peak, and it hasn't.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 2: He said, it's going to be a strong dollar from
Speaker 2: here on out. All the fundamental things that have made
Speaker 2: the dollar a week politically as well as financially are
Speaker 2: all still there and it's only going to get worse.
Speaker 2: And when we see what's happening with the tariff stuff,
Speaker 2: I think that it's going to get worse, and you
Speaker 2: need to look at something that is outside of their system.
Speaker 2: And when we get into this article talking about the
Speaker 2: kind of medical institution for global governance, you realize how
Speaker 2: hidden and how complicated and this whole structure is and
Speaker 2: how complex. You're not going to fight this system, and
Speaker 2: you're not going to be able to take it apart.
Speaker 2: It may collapse on its own at some point. However,
Speaker 2: you've got to work on a system that is parallel
Speaker 2: and outside of it. And so you want to have
Speaker 2: something that is physical, not digital, and you want to
Speaker 2: make sure that you've got something that has held true
Speaker 2: value over centuries and millennia, I should say. And that's
Speaker 2: where gold is. And by the way, people are still
Speaker 2: saying that they think silver is going to do even
Speaker 2: better than gold for a lot of different reasons. But
Speaker 2: I think gold is really the play the bet against
Speaker 2: this global governance system they're trying to impose on people.
Speaker 2: By the way, go to Tony Ardman, go to David
Speaker 2: Knight tyed gold. I'll take to tony Ardiman's wise well
Speaker 2: of gold, and you can pick up gold and silver
Speaker 2: there at Tony's site.
Speaker 3: Yes, good investments, and they're also physical that you can
Speaker 3: keep on you. It's not something that's going to evaporate
Speaker 3: when you know, if power goes down. Spencer DeLong Silver
Speaker 3: also broke a high of forty. I meant, oh, yeah,
Speaker 3: because Anovante seventeen to seventy six has a three judge,
Speaker 3: a three panel judge, Yeah, a divided mind. The shadow Boxer.
Speaker 3: A lot of mixed messages caused fear made it impossible
Speaker 3: to see patterns that would help to figure out the scam.
Speaker 3: They were all over the place, people saying all kinds
Speaker 3: of different things.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a constant chatter that's out there, isn't it,
Speaker 2: and so be able to recheck that. My first project
Speaker 2: that I did in engineering when I was still a student,
Speaker 2: it was a military project and they had spread spectrum
Speaker 2: radar antennas and what they were do is they would
Speaker 2: pick up a jaming signal that might be somewhere, and
Speaker 2: they would when they pick up the jaming signal, they
Speaker 2: would adapt the antennas in this array so they could
Speaker 2: effectively put a knull where that was coming from and
Speaker 2: that's what you have to do in your real life.
Speaker 2: You got to identify where the propaganda's coming from and
Speaker 2: put a knull there in terms of you know, polar response,
Speaker 2: so you don't pay attention to that, and you have
Speaker 2: to be able to distinguish a little bit of what
Speaker 2: is true and what isn't and good place to start
Speaker 2: with that is the truth. And if you look at
Speaker 2: the principles of God's word, that kind of clues you in.
Speaker 2: You can see some of the people who are adamantly
Speaker 2: opposed to that, and that is going to bear really
Speaker 2: bad fruit. So you can kind of look at that
Speaker 2: and mark that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and it's not just the mainstream media in these
Speaker 3: places where you see all these weird nonsense mixed messages.
Speaker 3: Just a few years ago, remember there was that hole,
Speaker 3: you know, they're putting snake venom in the water, things
Speaker 3: like that from well, what's that guy's name, I can't
Speaker 3: remember whatever his name is, Peters, Stu Peters, Yeah, that was,
Speaker 3: it's Stu Peter and st Peter.
Speaker 2: Stupid doographer tries, Yeah, that was again, that was one
Speaker 2: of these things to just discredit all this stuff, and
Speaker 2: they run that through the controlled opposition. They want to
Speaker 2: discredit when somebody starts to get close to it, sometimes
Speaker 2: they deny it. Sometimes they cancel you. Sometimes they put
Speaker 2: somebody out there who makes it look really stupid. And
Speaker 2: there's a person that I used to have on and
Speaker 2: when I was backing in for worse, and he said, yeah.
Speaker 4: To introduce Alex once.
Speaker 2: He said, Alex makes the truth sound unbelievable. It's like
Speaker 2: that's exactly his role. He makes the truth sound unbelievable.
Speaker 3: He does a good job at it. Yeah, you've got
Speaker 3: super not five thousand. There's no immunity for mass murder.
Speaker 3: That's yeah, it shouldn't be. Sadly, it seems like they
Speaker 3: continually get away with it.
Speaker 4: But they're all partners in crime. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Like I said before, this is like murder on the
Speaker 2: Express And if you haven't seen the spoiler alert, I
Speaker 2: get the Christy's novel. They have all these people and
Speaker 2: they all look like they've got motive an opportunity to
Speaker 2: kill this person on the train, and then at the
Speaker 2: very end you find.
Speaker 4: Out they all did it.
Speaker 2: They all took turns with a stab on this person
Speaker 2: so that they were all guilty. That's what happened with
Speaker 2: the COVID thing. They all took turns taking a stab
Speaker 2: at you, at the public with their needles.
Speaker 3: They're all in it together. They're all equally guilty. If
Speaker 3: one of them goes down, they all go down.
Speaker 4: The murder on the warp Speed Express.
Speaker 3: We've got fran scene before the pandemic. I had a
Speaker 3: can of lye cell on the label. There was the
Speaker 3: viruses which it killed, and coronavirus was among them. I
Speaker 3: should have kept it.
Speaker 8: Cure the whole time, exactly. Only you had gotten to
Speaker 8: the CDC with this. They didn't need the genome password
Speaker 8: from the Wuhan lab. They could have just used your
Speaker 8: lisol spray.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that was the thing. People were wearing gloves.
Speaker 2: They're afraid to touch the gas pumps and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. I said at the very beginning
Speaker 2: of it, we've gone OCD. The entire country is.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: One of the things to me that always made it
Speaker 3: I was just if this was going to be a problem,
Speaker 3: it was as contagious as they said it was going
Speaker 3: to be, Surely we would have just seen the homeless
Speaker 3: dropping dead on the side of the road, right. They've got,
Speaker 3: you know, poor immune systems. They're usually wrecked by drugs
Speaker 3: and alcohol. They've got no sanitation, and yet they were fine.
Speaker 3: Your your meth head, your you know, heroin head on
Speaker 3: the side of the road, continued to beg for money,
Speaker 3: the same as always. They were totally fine. Pasanovante seventeen
Speaker 3: seventy six. A truck carrying vials of MODERNA m aren't
Speaker 3: wrecked on a highway outside Morgantown, West Virginia, during CONVID.
Speaker 3: Well that's a good at least they didn't make it
Speaker 3: to its destination. Hopefully that means some people didn't end
Speaker 3: up getting it. Has an Avante seventeen seventy six. The
Speaker 3: highway was shut down. The highway patrol called in the
Speaker 3: DoD careful, don't breathe this, don't get this in your
Speaker 3: respiratory system. N Max. Trump is saying it's from China,
Speaker 3: so that's probably not true. Whatever Trump says, I believe
Speaker 3: the opposite. That's a fair place to start. China, China,
Speaker 3: they gave us the virus. Very bad people, original babe.
Speaker 3: There was no virus, never been isolated in pure form.
Speaker 3: No virus to this day has ever been isolated in
Speaker 3: pure form. Viruses are a line. That's what I believe
Speaker 3: Yona Anni Wodi. Just doubt yourself. Don't doubt their lives.
Speaker 3: That's right, don't doubt the man behind the curtain. Shadow boxer.
Speaker 3: Covid DNA was discovered in silico, meaning in a virology
Speaker 3: software like Photoshop and installed into the fake PCR test.
Speaker 4: And that interesting.
Speaker 2: You know, they have m vitro, they have I think
Speaker 2: m vivo meaning they it' send live organism.
Speaker 4: And then they have in silico, which.
Speaker 2: Means in the computer. Yeah, it's a computer virus. There
Speaker 2: you go, that's a help.
Speaker 8: My computer's got COVID viruses are in fact computer virus.
Speaker 4: That yeah, they're all in soul.
Speaker 3: WeGo, n Max take the shot. Shut up and don't
Speaker 3: ask any questions. Be a good little citizen. That's right.
Speaker 3: Don't ask any questions. Defy Tyrant seventeen seventy six DK.
Speaker 3: You don't believe in virus three, But you say gain
Speaker 3: a function is dangerous. You can't use gain of function
Speaker 3: on something that's imaginary.
Speaker 2: Well, they have isolated bacteria and things like that. And
Speaker 2: as a matter of fact, that the thing that got
Speaker 2: out in that lab there in two lane was burke
Speaker 2: Holderia pseudomalii. Is the name of the thing, and it
Speaker 2: was only found in the soil in one or two places.
Speaker 4: They brought it.
Speaker 2: In to make it more virulent, and I believe that
Speaker 2: they can do that. I think that that is something
Speaker 2: that they can do to bacteria.
Speaker 8: And fire weapons are in fact real.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, you can weaponize biological things. And some
Speaker 2: of this other stuff is weaponizing nanotech. Okay, you call
Speaker 2: that gain of function, right, it may be synthetic and artificial,
Speaker 2: but you can weaponize it and you can make it
Speaker 2: stronger like mRNA.
Speaker 3: We've got original babe, says at Nmax. Those white fibers castings,
Speaker 3: I think someone needs to check to see if they
Speaker 3: contain spider silk DNA. They started that in coats, and
Speaker 3: they do all kinds of weird things with genetic modification
Speaker 3: of animals.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 3: We're going to get some very strange.
Speaker 2: And that's the other part of what the gain of
Speaker 2: function stuff is, right, it's genetically modifying DNA and other things,
Speaker 2: which is what the mRNA stuff.
Speaker 3: I'm going to be very concerned if I see a
Speaker 3: goat climbing the walls.
Speaker 4: Well, they can actually a lot of cases.
Speaker 2: These mountain goats are pretty good there's a lot of
Speaker 2: videos of goats climbing walls.
Speaker 8: Maybe they've been genetically modified with spider DNA.
Speaker 3: That's how they managed it. Audi m Are, I've been
Speaker 3: having gold Slash Silver ship to me every month for
Speaker 3: over a year now.
Speaker 2: That's good, good, that's why. Well, I'm glad you're doing that.
Speaker 2: We're gonna take a quick break and we come back.
Speaker 2: We're going to talk quickly about terrorists and then only
Speaker 2: get too far behind schedule. And oh yeah, Producer Pee
Speaker 2: for the love of the Road gifted a sub on
Speaker 2: kick yesterday.
Speaker 4: Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: I appreciate that, and I want while we're talking about that,
Speaker 2: I just want to thank everybody for last month. We
Speaker 2: made goal and we didn't have to do a matching
Speaker 2: funds thing at the end of the month, So I
Speaker 2: just wanted to thank everyone. Thank you so much for
Speaker 2: your generous contributions. Yes, thank you and donations. We're going
Speaker 2: to take a quick break and when we come back,
Speaker 2: we are going to talk about terraffs.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: And while we let's finish up too on the contributions.
Speaker 2: I want to thank four names here checks that we
Speaker 2: got at the very end, Wayne and Danielle b thank
Speaker 2: you very much. That was incredibly generous. I appreciate that.
Speaker 2: Helen t Rodney d and t K from Ohio. Let's
Speaker 2: talk a little bit about the tariffs. And on Friday,
Speaker 2: we had a federal appeals court ruled against Trump's tariffs,
Speaker 2: and this is the second time he's lost. Uh, this
Speaker 2: is an appeals court, but he also lost by a
Speaker 2: trade organization. The court ruled that Trump overstepped his authority
Speaker 2: by declaring national emergencies in order to justify the terraffts.
Speaker 2: The ruling does not apply to all of his terifts,
Speaker 2: but it does limit his ability to impose them in
Speaker 2: the future. And the response of Trump was to say,
Speaker 2: this is going to destroy the future of America, best
Speaker 2: sent than others were saying. It's going to be very
Speaker 2: embarrassing for America with our enemy or with our trading partners.
Speaker 2: Because again, this was not set up as a means
Speaker 2: of funding the government. They can't they're spending too much money,
Speaker 2: and it was not set up to protect a particular industry. Now,
Speaker 2: there have been some of the tariffs that were set
Speaker 2: up that way, and those are going to be allowed
Speaker 2: to stand, they come under a different authority. But the
Speaker 2: reciprocal terifts, that again the brainchild, if he could call it,
Speaker 2: the brain of Peter Navara, these reciprocal terars that had
Speaker 2: absolutely nothing to do with any tariffs that they charged.
Speaker 2: Is this idiotic formula they came up with. Those reciprocal
Speaker 2: tariffs were targeting particular countries. They weren't trying to save
Speaker 2: a particular industry or bolster it, and they weren't trying
Speaker 2: to fund the government. They were just at war with
Speaker 2: other countries, basically at war with the entire world to
Speaker 2: one degree or the other. And if you look at it,
Speaker 2: what Trump's reciprocal tariffs, so called reciprocal tariffs, they were
Speaker 2: not reciprocal, and they put tariffs on countries that had
Speaker 2: no teriffs at all, on American goods, countries that we
Speaker 2: had a trade surplus with that we were selling more
Speaker 2: to them than they were buying from us. He put
Speaker 2: tariffs on all those. So there wasn't any reciprocity. There
Speaker 2: wasn't any rationale for any of this stuff. And it
Speaker 2: is going to be embarrassing because they may have to
Speaker 2: issue refunds to these various people and it's going to
Speaker 2: be very expensive for them to go through that process
Speaker 2: as well. He's claimed the authority to bypass Congress and
Speaker 2: imposed sweeping tariffs on these formed products. Now Federal Appeals
Speaker 2: Court has thrown a roadblock in his path. This has
Speaker 2: been going on for several months. It was brought by
Speaker 2: several different states and five small businesses that were harmed,
Speaker 2: especially by his indecision and his vacillation. That's there, but
Speaker 2: it is a hallmark of what Trump has sought to do,
Speaker 2: not just in a massive way at the beginning of
Speaker 2: this second term, but that's what he was doing with
Speaker 2: the medical martial law, creating a fake emergency in order
Speaker 2: to issue dictates. So the US Court of Appeals to
Speaker 2: the Federal Circuit rule Friday the Trump went too far
Speaker 2: when he declared national emergencies to justify terrafts on nearly
Speaker 2: every country on Earth, and even on the McDonald Island
Speaker 2: that is filled with penguins and no humans. On Friday,
Speaker 2: he lashed out, called the Appeals Court highly partisan and
Speaker 2: noted that the tariffs are still in effect because they
Speaker 2: are until they gave I think until October fifteenth for
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court to make a ruling before they would
Speaker 2: shut those down as part of the month's long legal
Speaker 2: battle of these tariffs from various states and small businesses.
Speaker 2: The appeals court decision was focused on these tariffs that
Speaker 2: were imposed in April on most trading partners, but they
Speaker 2: didn't roll out until the beginning of August. That's why
Speaker 2: when you look at the pro Trump press, they try
Speaker 2: and say, say, we got these tariffs, and we haven't
Speaker 2: seen a lot of inflation. Well, we've seen some and
Speaker 2: we've seen some price increases because of the teriffs, but
Speaker 2: for the most part, the terriffs didn't go into effect
Speaker 2: until August the first, and a lot of them that
Speaker 2: even went into effect August the first, there's already contracts
Speaker 2: that run out there three months to four months at
Speaker 2: a time. It's kind of like you have with commodities,
Speaker 2: you know. It's one of the things that farmers do
Speaker 2: with the Commodities Market Exchange in Chicago. They will sell
Speaker 2: the products in the future so that it helps to
Speaker 2: even out fluctuations and even out the market. And so
Speaker 2: a lot of that stuff is baked in and you're
Speaker 2: not going to really see the effects of this stuff
Speaker 2: until you're out three or four months out. So on
Speaker 2: April the second, what he called Liberation Day, what I
Speaker 2: call April Fool's part, due impose the so called reciprocal
Speaker 2: terrafts up to fifty percent on some countries, with a
Speaker 2: ten percent baseline tariff on almost everyone else.
Speaker 3: He's liberating us from our money.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what it was, you know. The President later
Speaker 2: suspended these terrafts for ninety days to give countries time
Speaker 2: to negotiate trade agreements with the US. He justified the
Speaker 2: taxes under the nineteen seventy seven International Economic Emergency Economic
Speaker 2: Powers Act IEEPA called i EPA. Soundl likes be the
Speaker 2: Gonzales by the clearing longstanding US trade deficits to be
Speaker 2: a national emergency. They are not an emergency. Are they bad? Yes,
Speaker 2: but they are not an emergency. And the question is,
Speaker 2: even if something is bad, as the arbitrary, capricious, and
Speaker 2: vacillating policy that's not strategic, is that a remedy to
Speaker 2: a bad situation?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 4: The real reality.
Speaker 2: Trump is absolutely manic about trade deficits, but he doesn't
Speaker 2: care about the spending deficits of the federal governments. Matter
Speaker 2: of fact, he's pushing his big, beautiful bill to create
Speaker 2: trillions more in debt. This is the insanity and the
Speaker 2: double think of Trump and his followers.
Speaker 4: That are out there.
Speaker 2: In February, he'd invoke the law to impost tariffs on Canada, Mexico,
Speaker 2: and China, saying that illegal immigration drug trafficking amounted to
Speaker 2: a national emergency. And we all know that there is
Speaker 2: not a massive amount of fentanyl coming in from Canada. Mexico, yes,
Speaker 2: but not Canada, so it doesn't apply to all tariffs.
Speaker 2: His levees on foreign steel, aluminum, and autos were imposed
Speaker 2: under a different regulation after the Commerce Department investigations concluded
Speaker 2: that imports in these industries were threats to US national security.
Speaker 2: And again you can argue what form of taxation we
Speaker 2: should have. I just don't want to have all the.
Speaker 4: Above, which is what Trump is giving us.
Speaker 2: He's giving us think of the ex plus teraris, all
Speaker 2: the rest of this stuff. I think, and I've said
Speaker 2: in the past, I thought that tariffs is a better
Speaker 2: way to do it than an income tax. I still
Speaker 2: think that, but not the way that Trump is doing this.
Speaker 2: These were focused on particular industries by the Commerce Department.
Speaker 2: I'm not for government protectionism. I don't think the government
Speaker 2: should be picking winners and losers.
Speaker 4: It is.
Speaker 2: It invites corruption, which we have seen whenever's been done,
Speaker 2: and it subverts the marketplaces out there. But these have
Speaker 2: the added problems of being done illegally, done with a
Speaker 2: phony emergency, and.
Speaker 4: Arbitrary.
Speaker 2: You know, when Trump could get upset with China, that's it,
Speaker 2: I'm adding another forty percent to your tariffs, you know,
Speaker 2: just like that. And it's that kind of capriciousness and
Speaker 2: arbitrary noss being able to rule like a dictator that
Speaker 2: is so abhorrent with these policies. This is beyond arguing
Speaker 2: whether or not tariffs are a good form of taxation
Speaker 2: or not. It's about the somebody acting as a dictator,
Speaker 2: and that's what's really dangerous about this. Nor does it
Speaker 2: include tariffs that Trump imposed on China in his first
Speaker 2: term that Biden also kept after a government investigation conclude
Speaker 2: that China used unfair practices to give their own technology
Speaker 2: firms an edge of arrivals from the US and other
Speaker 2: Western countries. Well, of course they did. One of the
Speaker 2: biggest things though, that has given them an edge is
Speaker 2: not necessarily the tariffs. I mean, tariffs are part of
Speaker 2: the China price But again understand that when we look
Speaker 2: at the Paris Climate a Cord from twenty fifteen that
Speaker 2: the Obama administration signed US onto. That Paris Climate Accord
Speaker 2: basically takes the US wants to push the US in
Speaker 2: Europe into a net zero situation where we have no energy,
Speaker 2: but it allows China and India, the biggest polluters, to
Speaker 2: continue to accelerate creating cheap and dirty power plants using coal.
Speaker 2: Coal can be done cleanly, but it's expensive to do
Speaker 2: it cleanly, but they don't impose that requirement on them.
Speaker 2: They can build as many cheap and dirty power plants
Speaker 2: as they want. And so what they've done is this
Speaker 2: climate agenda has given a much bigger advantage to China
Speaker 2: than they ever had with the China Price, which is
Speaker 2: about violating intellectual property, currency manipulation, trade, terrace manipulations, and
Speaker 2: slave labor. That was already a big advantage, but what
Speaker 2: they've done with the climate stuff is much much bigger
Speaker 2: than that.
Speaker 3: So if you really want to impact the Chinese, which
Speaker 3: you should do is say all right, we're not accepting
Speaker 3: any more Chinese students into our elite schools. We're not
Speaker 3: going to let you come in get trained here, come
Speaker 3: to work for our companies, steal their you know, ideas,
Speaker 3: and then send them back to the mainland. This happens
Speaker 3: over and over and over again every single year. There's
Speaker 3: stories about it. You want to impact the Chinese say no,
Speaker 3: you don't get to come here, you don't get to
Speaker 3: come to school here, you are untrustworthy.
Speaker 2: Well yeah, that might be a way to subvert them,
Speaker 2: actually inculcate them with the liberal values and dei and
Speaker 2: send them back home to take kind of deft.
Speaker 3: To see which one is stronger, the communist Chinese brainwashing
Speaker 3: or the liberal well.
Speaker 2: Story for Texas instruments, you had to be an America
Speaker 2: in order to work in the areas where they were
Speaker 2: doing defense contracts, and so they're trying to push me
Speaker 2: into that, and I didn't want to get into it.
Speaker 2: But when you got into consumer electronics, which is really
Speaker 2: where the state of the arts stuff was, it wasn't
Speaker 2: really in defense.
Speaker 4: You know, in.
Speaker 2: Defense they had the code for cruise missiles. It was
Speaker 2: like fifteenth thousand lines of fortrain code. This is a nightmare.
Speaker 4: I don't know. Thanks, don't throw me in that briar patch.
Speaker 2: But the uh so, it's not necessarily state of the art.
Speaker 2: But state of the art was in the manufacturing of
Speaker 2: the consumer goods and things like that. And in that
Speaker 2: you had lots of people from foreign countries, China, especially
Speaker 2: China and Taiwan. As a matter of fact, the guy
Speaker 2: who worked for like thirty years or something for Texas Instruments,
Speaker 2: and then Texas Instruments started getting away from manufacturing and
Speaker 2: semic conductors, so he quit and he went back home
Speaker 2: to Taiwan and he started Taiwan Semiconductor TSMC. I think
Speaker 2: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company the biggest one that's out there,
Speaker 2: the one that's getting billions of dollars now from Biden
Speaker 2: and from Trump to build factories in the US. So
Speaker 2: again that is you know, you talk about technology transfer.
Speaker 2: That's one of the ways that it's done. The administration
Speaker 2: to argue the courts had approved Nixon's emergency use of
Speaker 2: tariffs and the economic chaos that followed his decision to
Speaker 2: end a policy that linked the US dollar to gold
Speaker 2: another fallout from Nixon's Brettonwoods to where they delinked the
Speaker 2: dollar from gold. And so because of that, as I've
Speaker 2: always said, government will create two problems rather than fix
Speaker 2: or admit even to the first problem.
Speaker 4: So he breaks the.
Speaker 2: Link to gold, and then he creates the emergency use
Speaker 2: of terriffts because he created the emergency. In May, the
Speaker 2: US Court of International Trade in New York rejected Trump's
Speaker 2: Liberation Day terrorists.
Speaker 4: They said they exceed the.
Speaker 2: Authority granted to the president under the Emergency Powers law.
Speaker 2: In reaching this decision, the Trade Court combined two challenges,
Speaker 2: one of them by five businesses and one by twelve
Speaker 2: US States into a single case. Now they appeal that,
Speaker 2: and the appeals Court has ruled, yes, you did not
Speaker 2: have an emergency, and so it's going to have to
Speaker 2: go to the Supreme Court, and it may wind up
Speaker 2: where they get remaids to the entire world. The Appeals
Speaker 2: Court wrote in at seven to four ruling that it
Speaker 2: seems unlikely that Congress intended to grant the president unlimited
Speaker 2: authority to impose terrors.
Speaker 4: But if he has to.
Speaker 2: Get it from Congress, I am sure that he can
Speaker 2: get squeaker mouse Johnson to rubber stamp anything that Trump
Speaker 2: wants where they can get through the Senate. Again, that's
Speaker 2: another question, but certainly the House will give him whatever
Speaker 2: he wants. The government has argued that if Trump's tariffs
Speaker 2: are struck down, it might have to refund the import
Speaker 2: accidents collected, delivering a financial blow to the US treasury. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they would kind of get ready to send all this
Speaker 2: stuff out rather than paying off some of the real deficit,
Speaker 2: you know, not the trade deficit, but their spinning deficit.
Speaker 2: Rather than paying that off. Trump and Bessett were already
Speaker 2: planning on giving everybody a stimmy check again, So I
Speaker 2: should love him.
Speaker 4: Do you love me?
Speaker 1: Yet?
Speaker 3: Here we had plans for this already. Getting the government
Speaker 3: to disgorge anything is of worderline impossibility.
Speaker 4: That's right. They'd like to keep stolen property.
Speaker 2: That's why they do with civil asset forfeit all the time,
Speaker 2: so they get a link at this as like a
Speaker 2: global civil asset forfeiture program where they take your stuff
Speaker 2: without any legal justification or do process. Right, mister Trump
Speaker 2: does have alternative laws for imposing import taxes, but they
Speaker 2: would limit the speed and the severity with which he
Speaker 2: could act. In other words, he couldn't just go on
Speaker 2: social media and say, Okay, that's it, I'm adding another
Speaker 2: forty percent to China, and if you say anything else,
Speaker 2: I'm going to up it again, you know.
Speaker 4: It's a you'd have to go through the legal process.
Speaker 4: Imagine that.
Speaker 2: So the Trade Actor in nineteen seventy four restricts tariffs
Speaker 2: to fifteen percent and only one hundred and fifty days
Speaker 2: on countries with which to the US runs big trade deficits.
Speaker 2: So he could do it, and he could do it temporarily.
Speaker 2: It's kind of like the see, tariffs and sanctions are
Speaker 2: like war, and so what they've done is they've given
Speaker 2: the president and the war powers actors and other things
Speaker 2: that the ability to take military action, but only for
Speaker 2: a limited amount of time, and then Congress needs to
Speaker 2: get involved. And so it's the same thing with war
Speaker 2: as it is with tariffs. The administration could also invoke
Speaker 2: levies under the Trade Expansion Act of nineteen sixty two,
Speaker 2: as it did with foreign steel aluminum automobiles, but that
Speaker 2: requires a Commerce Department investigation and cannot be imposed at
Speaker 2: the president's sole discretion or his whims. He can't do
Speaker 2: a late night attack on a particular country because he
Speaker 2: doesn't like the leader. US trade allies are confused about
Speaker 2: all this stuff. After these legal setbacks, It's like, how
Speaker 2: can this be our trading partners must be dazed and confused,
Speaker 2: said a senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute,
Speaker 2: a veteran US trade negotiator. Many of them entered into
Speaker 2: framework deals with US, and some of them are still negotiating. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but you know, this is an embarrassment, and it's not
Speaker 2: embarrassment to the US, It's an embarrassment to Trump in
Speaker 2: his administration. The Supreme Court has now expanded Trump's power
Speaker 2: on many occasions, and he's still seeking more. When you
Speaker 2: look at the fight going on between him and Federal
Speaker 2: Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. One of the things I think
Speaker 2: is the most important thing about that story is the
Speaker 2: fact that when I talked about it, and I didn't
Speaker 2: realize at first of what was happening. But the guy
Speaker 2: who he's put in in the Housing Authority, I guess
Speaker 2: FHA or some Federal Housing authority, Pulty of Pulty Homes.
Speaker 2: He's a netbo baby, and he has talked about how
Speaker 2: he's going to use artificial intelligence to mind people who
Speaker 2: are violating FHA laws. And guess what he's been doing.
Speaker 2: That's why you see, as I said, there's a certain
Speaker 2: symmetry here to the people that Trump is investigating. You know,
Speaker 2: he's coming after a lot of people from mishandling documents
Speaker 2: or not doing things properly on business forums, which are
Speaker 2: the primary avenues that they came after. People came after
Speaker 2: Trump the first time through of the lawfair that they did.
Speaker 2: In terms of Poltie and these investigations, it was kind
Speaker 2: of stright.
Speaker 4: I looked at it.
Speaker 2: I didn't say anything on the air, but when I
Speaker 2: first looked at it, this guy must have an army
Speaker 2: of people to investigate Letitia James and her mortgage mortgages
Speaker 2: that she took out in her forms, and then to
Speaker 2: look at Lisa Cook and find out that she took
Speaker 2: out multiple loans, which is fraudulent, multiple loans claiming that
Speaker 2: they were going to be her primary residence, and they
Speaker 2: were in different states and they were not her primary residence.
Speaker 2: She even rented one out right away, and so she
Speaker 2: did commit fraud. But the very concerning thing about this
Speaker 2: is the fact that Poulty is using artificial intelligence to
Speaker 2: go through the records and define this kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: This is what has always been dangerous about this. I've
Speaker 2: said this for the longest time. When the NSA put
Speaker 2: up the data center, in. I think it's Bluffdale, Utah.
Speaker 2: It's out in the middle of the desert where they
Speaker 2: don't have a lot of power, and they certainly don't
Speaker 2: have a lot of water, which they need to cool
Speaker 2: these places off. And they started storing everything out there
Speaker 2: for the day that they would have sufficient computer power
Speaker 2: to be able to go through and mine all the
Speaker 2: information about you and me that they've scraped off.
Speaker 4: Of the Internet.
Speaker 2: And so now that day is here with artificial intelligence.
Speaker 2: We saw that with Doge. Remember, I said, the very
Speaker 2: concerning thing about Elon Musk's vision here is that he
Speaker 2: wants to get rid of the people and these various
Speaker 2: regulatory agencies and people on the irs and stuff like that,
Speaker 2: and use AI to audit all of us all the
Speaker 2: time and look at the smallest details of our lives.
Speaker 2: And of course AI will get some of that wrong,
Speaker 2: but people be cowed down and say, oh a, I
Speaker 2: said it, so don't argue. It's science, right. And that's
Speaker 2: what he's doing to Trump's enemies right now, auditing them
Speaker 2: with artificial intelligence. I find that very concerning this. Hearkens
Speaker 2: back to Stalin's slogan, bring me the man and I'll
Speaker 2: find the crime. Right, bring me my political enemies, and
Speaker 2: we'll send them over to artificial intelligence and it will
Speaker 2: go through their past and every document you can find
Speaker 2: on them, and it'll find a crime. Because we're all
Speaker 2: committing full needs, whether we realize it or not, because
Speaker 2: there's so many of them out there. So there's already
Speaker 2: been a lot of places where the Supreme Court has
Speaker 2: back down on Trump as he's accruing power, and everybody
Speaker 2: should be concerned about that except squeaker of the house mouse.
Speaker 2: Johnson is not. He's just going to let him do
Speaker 2: anything he wants. And as one person said, this is
Speaker 2: a challenge to what I think heretofore would have been
Speaker 2: regarded as a core power of Congress. But again, Johnson
Speaker 2: wants him to do whatever he wishes. As a result
Speaker 2: of all of this, you have India and China coming
Speaker 2: together with bricks because I remember they're right at the
Speaker 2: center of bricks, right, Russia, India, China, that's the ricky's
Speaker 2: inside the brickies, and so they're all working together. They
Speaker 2: had a meeting where they all came together. You had
Speaker 2: India's Modai coosing up with Putin and she in a
Speaker 2: statement that they put out jointly talking about how Trump
Speaker 2: is bullying them, and quite frankly he is. Now a
Speaker 2: lot of people will cheer that, but it is bullying.
Speaker 2: And if you're going to weaponize your financial system, don't
Speaker 2: be surprised when people create another financial system parallel to it,
Speaker 2: the same thing that we as Americans need to start
Speaker 2: working on. They've been working on this for quite some time.
Speaker 2: And so they got together and Putin made a point
Speaker 2: of taking she around in his limousine as a had
Speaker 2: broken protocol by putting Putin in the beast they anymore right?
Speaker 4: They they call the car the beast, so it's a.
Speaker 1: Getting the beast.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So these tariffs, these taxes are a geopolitical power
Speaker 2: play in order to bully and he's doing the same
Speaker 2: thing that Biden did, and that is one of the
Speaker 2: biggest threats to the United States. And it is also
Speaker 2: like a bipartisan tag team match. Biden puts the sanctions
Speaker 2: out there, and that was the first attack against the
Speaker 2: Western financial system, and then Trump comes along and does
Speaker 2: the terriffs. How bull headed can you be to bully
Speaker 2: people that way? Of course, you're going to create and
Speaker 2: energize another alternative system and They're more than happy to
Speaker 2: do it. Indian Prime Minster Modei held warm meetings with
Speaker 2: Russian President Putin and Chinese president She They don't call
Speaker 2: it bricks for nothing. Modi was pictured having friendly exchanges
Speaker 2: and holding hands with both leaders as he emphasized that
Speaker 2: India sees itself as a partner of China rather than
Speaker 2: as a rival. Modi never criticized Trump of the US
Speaker 2: outright his warnings he's warming up to US adversaries as
Speaker 2: a clear rebuke, though, amid India's tariff strikes with Trump.
Speaker 3: Like how they see, Yeah, we're allies. Yeah, they're both
Speaker 3: trying to destroy the American economy in their own ways.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 2: They're allied against us, against Trump and against Biden. Trump
Speaker 2: imposed fifty percent tariff on Indian goods beginning last week.
Speaker 2: She also stopped short of naming Washington, but condemned bullying
Speaker 2: behavior by countries during his summit address. But of course,
Speaker 2: the key thing is that it's a bigger threat. These
Speaker 2: tariffs are not as big a threat as the moves
Speaker 2: against the H one B Visus. You know, when you
Speaker 2: look at the commercial driver's licenses and things like that,
Speaker 2: they have freaked out about that because of the accident
Speaker 2: that happened in Florida and a couple of others they
Speaker 2: reported last week. You have the Apartment of Transportations say
Speaker 2: we're going to look very closely at the people who
Speaker 2: are getting commercial driver's licenses who are coming from other countries.
Speaker 2: And you know, even had was it Florida Lance that
Speaker 2: that video was we were talking about that it was
Speaker 2: highway patrol arrested several people. They showed the videotapes to
Speaker 2: the news. These guys are sitting there and they've got
Speaker 2: earplugs in and they have unbuttoned their shirt so they
Speaker 2: got a phone in there and can see what they're
Speaker 2: looking at on the test, and they've got somebody who
Speaker 2: is watching, like doing your FaceTime with them and giving
Speaker 2: them the answers for what they need to put down.
Speaker 2: And so these guys doing it and the rest of them.
Speaker 8: But these are immigrants that don't speak any English at all.
Speaker 8: They just use the phone to FaceTime someone in the
Speaker 8: parking lot outside or wherever who is going to give
Speaker 8: them the answers in their language. And this was a coordinated,
Speaker 8: organized mass fraud thing that was going on. The video,
Speaker 8: said Jacksonville. Will have it on the board tomorrow. Yeah,
Speaker 8: I assume Jacksonville, Florida.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and so this is something's happening. So there's a
Speaker 2: lot of chatter about how they got to stop this,
Speaker 2: so much so that people that were high officials in
Speaker 2: the Indian government freaked out and contacted the American govermanents
Speaker 2: that don't shut that down. You had to understand how
Speaker 2: big this is.
Speaker 4: This is huge. It's like forty percent.
Speaker 2: Of their economy is money that is being sent back in.
Speaker 2: We had the same situation in Mexico when they said
Speaker 2: we're going to clamp down on the money that's being
Speaker 2: transferred back into Mexico from people who are here illegally.
Speaker 2: It's even bigger in India. And that is a bigger issue,
Speaker 2: quite frankly, than the manufacturing stuff. It's the labor that's
Speaker 2: coming in here, taking our jobs and sending the money
Speaker 2: out of the country. That is a much much bigger
Speaker 2: issue than any of these trade deficits. And Trump is
Speaker 2: not really focused on that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's specifically something that India brags about. They say,
Speaker 3: this is a huge part of our economic plan is
Speaker 3: sending people out to get jobs in foreign countries and
Speaker 3: then just send the money back.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, And the in officials call for intervention if
Speaker 2: the US blocks foreign trucker VISUS. And this is again
Speaker 2: in response to what we saw in Florida, this guy
Speaker 2: who's twenty eight years old, that was caused the death
Speaker 2: of those three people when he did the illegal U
Speaker 2: turn across the interstate system there. Since his arrest, two
Speaker 2: point two million people have signed a change dot org
Speaker 2: petition calling for desantists to commute his sentence if he
Speaker 2: gets convicted. They are hanging together, they said. The majority
Speaker 2: of the signatures appear to come from Indian nationals. There
Speaker 2: are approximately three point two million Indian migrants in the
Speaker 2: USA today, and they are allowed and encouraged to support
Speaker 2: their own people.
Speaker 4: We are not.
Speaker 2: You know, even when their own people are doing something wrong,
Speaker 2: they close ranks behind them.
Speaker 3: Good place to start, just start tracking the ip of
Speaker 3: everyone that signs that petition. Ah, have another one, out
Speaker 3: the door, out the door, out the door.
Speaker 1: Goodbye.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Well, in response to the because again you know, this
Speaker 2: is putting their ethnic identity, we say that because it's
Speaker 2: putting their ethnic identity ahead of the real threat to
Speaker 2: everybody's lives. I mean it could have been Indians who
Speaker 2: could have been killed in that car. They need to
Speaker 2: think about that. In response to the federal halt on
Speaker 2: the trucker VISUS, political officials in India have taken a
Speaker 2: great interest in the situation, and so you have one
Speaker 2: of the ministers in the Indian government spoke out on this.
Speaker 2: They took particular offense to the requirement that migrant truck
Speaker 2: drivers be required to speak English. Can you imagine, you know, yeah,
Speaker 2: you shouldn't have to learn Hindu or whatever they speak
Speaker 2: in India if you go there to drive a truck,
Speaker 2: I guess. And so you have. An Indian politician has
Speaker 2: Simrot Badal asked the country's foreign minister to intervene in
Speaker 2: US politics in order to protect Sikh truck drivers in
Speaker 2: America after her gender Singh's arrest. She is particularly incensed
Speaker 2: by the requirement the truckers speak English.
Speaker 8: There was I don't know if it'll be in English.
Speaker 8: I kind of doubt it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, no, probably not. She said this though she
Speaker 2: said Punjabi and Sikh drivers make up twenty percent of
Speaker 2: the US trucking industry. Any mass level action against them
Speaker 2: would have detrimental effects on trucking families and would be
Speaker 2: discriminatory in nature. Considering the fact that Punjabis have built
Speaker 2: and sustained trucking logistics and trucking networks over the decades.
Speaker 2: I don't know how we would have managed just Americans.
Speaker 3: I've infiltrated and taken jobs from and scammed the system,
Speaker 3: is what I'm hearing. And how dare you try to
Speaker 3: clean up the damage that's been done. All these people
Speaker 3: act like they are entitled to come to the United States, Yeah,
Speaker 3: and scam us for our resources.
Speaker 2: It'll work for less money. This is they said. The
Speaker 2: reason truncking companies are looking for migrant workers is because
Speaker 2: they take twenty to thirty percent less pay. And they
Speaker 2: can do it because for six hundred dollars a month,
Speaker 2: an Indian can live a very high lifestyle anywhere outside
Speaker 2: the two main cities of Mumbai or Delhi. They said,
Speaker 2: a luxury lifestyle would be if you had one thousand
Speaker 2: dollars a month or more. Right, So that's why they're
Speaker 2: doing it, and that's why they're sending the money back there. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but she overstated the influence of the Indians on this.
Speaker 2: They said, if you look at all foreign born drivers together,
Speaker 2: it makes about eighteen percent of the US truck and fleet,
Speaker 2: but again that's about twenty percent, and so that is
Speaker 2: those are jobs that taken from Americans, and those are
Speaker 2: jobs that are given to people in many cases don't
Speaker 2: speak English. As we saw in Jacksonville, only four percent
Speaker 2: of drivers are from India. The situation changes in California, however,
Speaker 2: where mass immigration is subsidized and migrant truckers make up
Speaker 2: nearly half of all those employed in the state, and
Speaker 2: they get their license in California and they go to
Speaker 2: the rest of the country. That's what the guy that
Speaker 2: was in Florida that kill those people, and he had
Speaker 2: a California commercial driver's license. So we've seen this story
Speaker 2: before with Mexico and the money that is sent out
Speaker 2: of the country in terms of what is going to India.
Speaker 2: Without feeding on these remittances from America, India would lose
Speaker 2: out about one hundred and forty billion dollars, which is
Speaker 2: about thirty percent of their entire annual tax revenue. That's
Speaker 2: equivalent to that, So they would lose about a third
Speaker 2: of their tax revet is q much about a third
Speaker 2: of their tax revenue.
Speaker 8: There's money that's flowing out of America.
Speaker 3: That's right, that's right, the United States. Whell it empowers India.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they need their own apac all right. They just
Speaker 2: take out the eye for Israel and change it to India.
Speaker 2: They can buy politicians and get them to support that
Speaker 2: foreign country at the expense and against the interests of America.
Speaker 4: They can follow that same lead.
Speaker 2: Well, before we take a break, let's see what we
Speaker 2: got here in terms of comments.
Speaker 3: Yes, well start want to say thank you to B. L. Houghton.
Speaker 3: I see that he's gifted ten subs in chat on Rumble,
Speaker 3: So thank you very much, Stealth Patriot, thank you very
Speaker 3: much for the tip. That is incredibly generous. The politics
Speaker 3: of today's the politics of today is Trump throws feces
Speaker 3: against the wall and seas if it sticks, the wall
Speaker 3: is Scotus and the feces are his executive orders.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he definitely believes. And don't ask for mission before
Speaker 2: you do it. Go ahead and do it and see
Speaker 2: if they stop you.
Speaker 3: Yeah, better to ask forgiveness in permission, I guess.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: A Rachio has subscribed on kick Well, thank you very much, Rachia,
Speaker 3: thank you, thank you very much. Nights of the Storm
Speaker 3: starlink will be the backbone for our technocracy. That's why
Speaker 3: they are rushing to get all these data centers put in.
Speaker 3: Musk is a huge technocrat. He's definitely involved in it.
Speaker 3: Jerry al Atalo, there's no statute of limitations in America
Speaker 3: for the crime of mRNA injections mass murder. Well, it's
Speaker 3: an entirely new crime. Basically it's never been tried.
Speaker 2: Well for murder, there's not a standard limitations. So and
Speaker 2: the fact that this was mass murder. The question is, though,
Speaker 2: who is going to again, they have got everybody involved
Speaker 2: in this. This is mass murder on the warp Speed Express.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Who isn't tainted by this? Who would actually be willing
Speaker 3: to prosecute? Yeah, we have b sue. The homeless were
Speaker 3: fine and when they were forced to wear mask it
Speaker 3: lifted one out of the trash can. That's right. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's right, Chris Constitutional conservative. The tariffs are not reciprocal.
Speaker 3: These tariffs are levies on us, that's right.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the other big fiction, you know, And that's
Speaker 2: why I say this is why the people who are
Speaker 2: selling that narrative in order to support Trump are ignoring
Speaker 2: the fact that businesses cannot lose that kind of money forever.
Speaker 2: It's a massive amount of money that's being lost by
Speaker 2: Japanese automakers on a daily basis, are losing millions of dollars. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they cannot stay in business that way. They're going to
Speaker 2: have to raise prices. They can handle that over the
Speaker 2: short term and over the short term when a lot
Speaker 2: of these things have not kicked in, and when they
Speaker 2: have been slow to pass those costs along, you've got
Speaker 2: everybody saying, look, it's free money. You know, Beware when
Speaker 2: anybody tells you that there's a free lunch, especially when
Speaker 2: they're doing it to suck up to Trump.
Speaker 3: What's the old thing. If you can't find the sucker
Speaker 3: at the table, the sucker is you Nibaro twenty twenty nine.
Speaker 3: When gold reaches a high enough value, the federal government
Speaker 3: will not allow private ownership of gold FDR. History has
Speaker 3: been rhyming since petulant Trump's first pestilence.
Speaker 2: Yes, but it's going to be harder for them to
Speaker 2: take the gold from you. Then it's going to be
Speaker 2: for them to take the stable coin or the bitcoin
Speaker 2: and the rest of this stuff. It's going to be
Speaker 2: much harder to take the physical stuff from you than
Speaker 2: it is going to be. I just take a look
Speaker 2: at the drug war, you know, that's the other part
Speaker 2: of it. I think that you know, we had not
Speaker 2: had we'd had alcohol prohibition and people had shut that down,
Speaker 2: but we hadn't had the kind of long run prohibition
Speaker 2: like we have had with drugs, and physical drugs have
Speaker 2: been illegal for a long time and they haven't been
Speaker 2: able to put a dent in it.
Speaker 3: Yes, Audi, Mr R. I love the meme that says,
Speaker 3: if the Constitution is ignored by government because of an emergency,
Speaker 3: the government will continue creating emergencies. Yeah, if you let
Speaker 3: them do it for a specific reason, they'll just keep
Speaker 3: generating that reason. Stealth's patriot, Thank.
Speaker 4: You very much, stealth patriot, Yes, thank you.
Speaker 3: Oh that's the other one, original bait. We already read that, babe.
Speaker 3: They're also stopping coal use here but selling our coal
Speaker 3: to China for power production.
Speaker 2: That's rights they are. We are exporting coal to China
Speaker 2: because if you burn it dirtily, dirtily, if you burn
Speaker 2: it without doing any cleanup in China, that's not a problem.
Speaker 2: And you get a lot of these people who are
Speaker 2: true believers in this climate change nonsense, and I said,
Speaker 2: this is crazy. This is just a transfer of wealth
Speaker 2: and manufacturing to China. Because if you want to talk
Speaker 2: about global warming, if you want to say that doing
Speaker 2: this activity is going to cause global warming, then you
Speaker 2: can't rubber stamp it for India and China because it's
Speaker 2: still going to cause global warming if it's there. It's crazy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Epstein Island says and Max tariffs are so good
Speaker 3: that I dread grocery shopping tomorrow.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 3: Prices have gone up bigly, bigly, Christian constitutional considerati. The
Speaker 3: ro An Empire only put tariffs on exotic goods they
Speaker 3: themselves could not produce. Ybu twenty twenty nine. Give me
Speaker 3: your four year olds, Nina generation. I will build a
Speaker 3: socialist state of Vladimir Lenin.
Speaker 4: That's the key. It's education, absolutely, it's the key. Yeah,
Speaker 4: the real I've all understood it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's just it's the method of attack that is
Speaker 3: most successful for these people. The real octo spook AI
Speaker 3: will in the near future replace the irs.
Speaker 4: Yeah, the artificial income system.
Speaker 3: All our income is going to be artificial.
Speaker 4: All your income belong to us.
Speaker 3: Lant says, I think AI will be used by the irs.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 3: There's going to be one or two bureaucrats right at
Speaker 3: the top.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what the whole doge thing is about, minimizing
Speaker 2: government employees and maximizing governance. Knowing everything that you're doing.
Speaker 8: They'll be able to use just the single most officious
Speaker 8: bureau and get rid of all the rest of the
Speaker 8: reasonable ones.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we've got Christian constitutional conservative tariffs are a sales
Speaker 3: tax on us we cannot write off. Yeah, n Max,
Speaker 3: I'm sure AI can be used for good, but has
Speaker 3: far more than various potentials.
Speaker 2: And the issue is that becomes a tool, a weapon
Speaker 2: of evil people. You know, when we look at what's
Speaker 2: going on the technocracy, it really is the arntelect war
Speaker 2: that Hugo de Garris talked about. You know, his book
Speaker 2: was the premise, because he's not a Christian, he thinks
Speaker 2: that he's creating a godlike intelligence. And he would always
Speaker 2: ask people, you know, would you do that if you
Speaker 2: thought you're going to create this godlike intelligence? Would you
Speaker 2: still do it even if it's going to kill all humanity?
Speaker 2: And he said all the scientists who would ask would
Speaker 2: say yes. He asked that The only time he got
Speaker 2: a no answer was at a Christian conference that I
Speaker 2: was speaking at. And but you know that that is
Speaker 2: the hubris that it appeals to people with that. But
Speaker 2: his premise with the Art like War was that people
Speaker 2: are going to realize what the technocratic elite are doing
Speaker 2: and say we don't want that, We've had enough, and
Speaker 2: start to come for them, and so they would weaponize
Speaker 2: their technology against us. And that's exactly what these guys
Speaker 2: are plotting. That's what Alex Karp is really plotting in
Speaker 2: his Technological Republic.
Speaker 4: He wants a strong, vicious government.
Speaker 2: He talks about hard power is a subtitle of it,
Speaker 2: and that's what he wants.
Speaker 3: Nice of the Storm says, I don't think AI is
Speaker 3: capable of being good or evil. It's a powerful tool
Speaker 3: being wielded by evil people. I guess you could program
Speaker 3: it to do evil things on its own. It is
Speaker 3: a tool just like any other the same way you
Speaker 3: know a gun is a tool. It can be used
Speaker 3: for great evil, it can be used for good.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Now AI is different in the sense that you know,
Speaker 3: garbage in, garbage out they loaded up with bad data
Speaker 3: and things that are evil. It makes it a bit
Speaker 3: more unwieldy and difficult to parse, but at its core,
Speaker 3: it is still a tool. Yes, the real Octo spook.
Speaker 3: The only punishment of foreign government slash business is driving
Speaker 3: their prices up to an American consumers start becoming unable
Speaker 3: to even afford the cost of these products, effectively kill
Speaker 3: Americans purchasing power to stop form businesses slash manufacturing from
Speaker 3: selling products.
Speaker 4: Yeah, what is that.
Speaker 3: Saying, bite your face to spite your nose or something
Speaker 3: like that. Yeah, Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Guard.
Speaker 3: I hope you are doing well. The tariff story always
Speaker 3: seems to get people using terms like the best form
Speaker 3: of tax, et cetera, comparing different forms of theft.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you got me, You got me. There's not a
Speaker 2: good form of theft. I would just say, you know,
Speaker 2: lesser of evils, And of course, the lesser of an
Speaker 2: evil is still evil. And that's the key thing. You know,
Speaker 2: we look at it when you want to when you
Speaker 2: have a tax, and this is one of the things
Speaker 2: I've noticed, you know, when they do it, the value
Speaker 2: added tax that they would put on the European countries,
Speaker 2: they would actually tax their people more heavily than in
Speaker 2: America and I always thought it was interesting because they
Speaker 2: could get away with that in the sense that it
Speaker 2: was it didn't have the kind of transparency that the
Speaker 2: income tax did. I thought, why is it that in
Speaker 2: America they have this complicated thing and you've got to
Speaker 2: fill out all these forms and do this. And it
Speaker 2: came to the realization that it was more important for
Speaker 2: the American government to get that intelligence about you. That
Speaker 2: was before they had computers and social media and the Internet,
Speaker 2: that they could scrape information, They could glean intelligence about you,
Speaker 2: They could get you to incriminate yourself, and many other
Speaker 2: things like that. And they were willing to even put
Speaker 2: up with less tax money, especially because they could engage
Speaker 2: in deficit spending without any consequences for the longest time
Speaker 2: with this stuff, whereas in Europe they would add a
Speaker 2: tax every time it changed hands, and the cumulative effect
Speaker 2: of these taxes were huge. But that's you know, when
Speaker 2: you start to look at this stuff, it starts to
Speaker 2: show you what the priorities of government are. And of
Speaker 2: course in America they haven't had to have any fiscal
Speaker 2: accountability for many, many decades, and so it's all about
Speaker 2: how they can weaponize it against you. When we look
Speaker 2: at the tariffs, the tariffs like the vat things or
Speaker 2: sales taxes or something like that. We're done with anonymity.
Speaker 2: But now all that is coming to close.
Speaker 3: With just regular computers, we have Nights of the Storm.
Speaker 3: AI has no soul, so it's not capable of being evil.
Speaker 3: The people who program it and use it are evil. Yeah, right,
Speaker 3: as he said, it's a tool, and evil people can
Speaker 3: use the tool for evil, and good people can use
Speaker 3: the tool for good. Birdhouse Blues. Well, not that there
Speaker 3: are any good people, but that's a that's a topic
Speaker 3: for a different time. President Trump is scheduled to make
Speaker 3: a TV announcement from the Oval Office today at two
Speaker 3: pm Eastern Time related to the Department of Defense.
Speaker 4: Question mark, I wonder it's going to change the name.
Speaker 4: It's a war.
Speaker 3: It's a war department. We're going to war.
Speaker 4: We'll always won. We all at war.
Speaker 3: What we were honest about, what we were doing, we won.
Speaker 3: It's not about defense, it's about war. Guard Goldsmith, the
Speaker 3: National Emergency Idea for the nineteen seventy seven statute Trump
Speaker 3: used for imposing tariffs definitely deceives using the aura of
Speaker 3: military when there is no declaration of war, so no
Speaker 3: real enemy. And the judge who ruled against Trump didn't
Speaker 3: bother reading the Constitution and blasting the entire need you
Speaker 3: to scroll down the entire nineteen seventy seven statute for
Speaker 3: Emergency blocks of trade just insane. A pres can't declare
Speaker 3: an emergency quote unquote.
Speaker 2: And that's the key thing, right, if a president can
Speaker 2: declare an emergency, and then with an emergency he's got
Speaker 2: special powers.
Speaker 4: What's wrong with that approach?
Speaker 3: Hmm?
Speaker 2: And that's basically what Trump has caught on too. You right,
Speaker 2: wait a minute, I can declare emergencies and then I've
Speaker 2: got special emergency of powers.
Speaker 4: I just declared myself a dictator.
Speaker 3: We have n max. Then you found trashed masks everywhere
Speaker 3: on the ground, et cetera. What happened to the dangerous
Speaker 3: toxicity and disease spreading on the masks? No one cared.
Speaker 3: That's right, they're just discarding these highly toxic things all
Speaker 3: over the place, just where there you go.
Speaker 2: They blocked me from going into the bank when all
Speaker 2: this stuff is happening because wouldn't wear a mask. They
Speaker 2: called the security guard out and he came out and
Speaker 2: talked to me, and he had that strung underneath his notice.
Speaker 2: I said, you don't even believe it, you got it
Speaker 2: under your nose. And he didn't say anything. He just
Speaker 2: kind of goes from side to side, like, does anybody
Speaker 2: see me? And he pulls up over his nose.
Speaker 3: Darn, he caught me.
Speaker 4: He caught me. It was such fraud. It's so stupid.
Speaker 3: Real quick. I've been seeing in chat that apparently Owen
Speaker 3: Schreyer has been fired from Info Wars from being too
Speaker 3: anti Trump.
Speaker 2: That's right, yeah, people, you know Alex will go ranting
Speaker 2: against Trump and then he'll callow it back, you know,
Speaker 2: because he knows what his audience is. He's done that
Speaker 2: so many times. He's been all over the place with Trump.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but one he's just consistently inconsistent. Trump does something
Speaker 3: that he thinks his audience might not like and he
Speaker 3: has to go out and rant and rave.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, you know, after telling you that the vaccine
Speaker 2: with sugar water, then he told you that the vaccine awful,
Speaker 2: and then he comes back later and he says, see,
Speaker 2: I told you all this stuff. I'm always right, you know,
Speaker 2: because he's on both sides of the issue, just like
Speaker 2: he's on both sides of Trump, and so after telling
Speaker 2: everybody to take it because it was Trump and you
Speaker 2: could trust the vaccine that was coming from Trump, then
Speaker 2: he comes back and tells you how dangerous it is,
Speaker 2: but he still doesn't connect it to Trump in any way,
Speaker 2: shape or form. And that's an old, old story. Yeah, Yeah,
Speaker 2: you gotta gotta suck up to Trump because that's what.
Speaker 3: That's what we gets you. That's where the bread is buttered.
Speaker 3: That's where the that's where they make the money. If
Speaker 3: you get rid of the Trump audience, now there's not
Speaker 3: much left. That's the problem is, in my opinion.
Speaker 2: Audience he got so incredibly wealthy off of Trump and
Speaker 2: off of pushing Trump and hyping Trump. He knows where
Speaker 2: his bread is buttered, and he's going to continue to
Speaker 2: push that no matter what Trump does. I mean, look
Speaker 2: at what happened in twenty twenty. We had the entire
Speaker 2: country lockdown. Supply chains were broken, there were destroying food
Speaker 2: on farms. They couldn't put him in the place. Nothing
Speaker 2: nothing that Trump did to the constitution, to the economy,
Speaker 2: to individuals, to our health, nothing that he did. And
Speaker 2: then they topped it off after the election with all
Speaker 2: this January the sixth stop the steal stuff that was
Speaker 2: against their own base. Trump and Alex. I mean, there's
Speaker 2: absolutely nothing that these two guys won't do.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's to their own people. The grift that keeps
Speaker 3: on grifting.
Speaker 4: It's just amazing.
Speaker 3: But good luck to Owen, I guess, yeah, good for him.
Speaker 3: We always he was always a really nice guy with me.
Speaker 3: You know, I have no ill will towards him. Hopefully
Speaker 3: everything goes well for him.
Speaker 2: Yeah, good for him, Good for him. There is life
Speaker 2: after Alex and info Wars. You know, there isn't any
Speaker 2: job that is you know, as people have said, there's
Speaker 2: no indispensable people to any organization. You can always be
Speaker 2: replaced in your job, and there is no indispensable employer.
Speaker 2: And we need to understand that the next time they
Speaker 2: tried to black mail us into taking a kool aid injection,
Speaker 2: there's no indispensable employer. I've talked to many, many people
Speaker 2: who stood up for principal and refuse to take that,
Speaker 2: and they have all done as good or much much
Speaker 2: better than they did. And I think that God honors
Speaker 2: people who do that for that right reason. I think,
Speaker 2: you know, God honors those who honor Him, and so
Speaker 2: if that's your reason for doing it, that's especially important,
Speaker 2: and you should be able to stand on that promise
Speaker 2: and not worry about it.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I also saw people saying in chat, no way, you
Speaker 3: guys didn't know. It's like, no, we don't. We don't
Speaker 3: follow info wars that closely at all.
Speaker 4: When did that happen?
Speaker 3: I think they said it happened yesterday.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 3: Well, as he said, look to.
Speaker 2: Him, yeah yeah, it's yeah, Info Wars is Alice is
Speaker 2: going to be there, and he's It's amazing when you
Speaker 2: look at this one and a half billion dollar lawsuit,
Speaker 2: what a bunch of non instence that was.
Speaker 4: I mean, you know, as.
Speaker 2: Part of the trial, it came out that Alex had
Speaker 2: somebody sent him this donation of millions of dollars, and
Speaker 2: they said, you got an eight million dollar bitcoin donation,
Speaker 2: didn't you? Well it was nine million. That's in the trial.
Speaker 2: Nobody talked about it. I couldn't imagine. It's amazing to
Speaker 2: me how the mainstream media didn't even pick up on that.
Speaker 2: The people who hated Alex and wanted to attack him.
Speaker 3: Well, probably because you know, they make so much money
Speaker 3: over there from far from the farm industry. They said, oh,
Speaker 3: well nine million, who cares, that's chump change.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it was Trump change.
Speaker 3: They're so divorced from reality that, yeah, there's that nine million.
Speaker 2: But you know, one and a half million dollars nowhere
Speaker 2: close to that. When you see this this first thing,
Speaker 2: what was the Onion trying to buy the property in
Speaker 2: Alix's dad who was independently wealthy, multimillionaire, and his dad
Speaker 2: put up like three million and the Onion put up
Speaker 2: one and a half million, and they awarded it to
Speaker 2: the Onion because they said the people in Connecticut said
Speaker 2: we won't take our share because we want to shut
Speaker 2: down info Wars, and so then they appealed that and said, no,
Speaker 2: you've got to go for the most money, and we
Speaker 2: offered you the most money.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 2: So again it's not a one and a half billion.
Speaker 2: It might be like a three million dollar hit that
Speaker 2: they take, but we'll wait and see what happens either way.
Speaker 2: He's already had his next place where he was going
Speaker 2: to broadcast, was already set up. He was ready to
Speaker 2: just transfer everything over there. And he has made so
Speaker 2: much more money than at ever cost him, including the
Speaker 2: big legal fees that he had to pay to keep
Speaker 2: his sources of money where he stashed that secret. In
Speaker 2: spite of all that, he still made out like a
Speaker 2: bandit off of all this stuff. And he knows that
Speaker 2: he can do that because he is because of the
Speaker 2: people who are following Trump. Well, we're going to take
Speaker 2: a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 9: Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have
Speaker 9: access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues,
Speaker 9: classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
Speaker 9: for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 1: Analyzing the Globalist Next, now the Deep Nuts Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks. We've got a lot of comments which
Speaker 3: I'm gonna try to get through quickly. Here it says
Speaker 3: China Christian constitutional conservatives. So China and India seem to
Speaker 3: be immune from global warming. Yeah, funny how that works.
Speaker 3: And Max, Yes, one small bag at the grocery store
Speaker 3: is fifty dollars. Used to be a cartful? Was that much?
Speaker 3: Thanks Trump? Yeah, groceries have gotten enormously expensive.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: Overture terrorifts just reveal how much of our food is imported.
Speaker 3: We do import a ton of food.
Speaker 4: That's like bananas.
Speaker 2: Are we gonna put tariffs on bananas so we can
Speaker 2: have a banana industry, have the right climate for most
Speaker 2: of those and even if we did, you still got
Speaker 2: to start the farm, right. It's like the whole thing
Speaker 2: about the.
Speaker 3: We can't even be a banana republic.
Speaker 4: Banana Republicans.
Speaker 3: Yeah, we've got epigeons is at Whistler Lance. That's why
Speaker 3: they fired all the irs employees.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 3: They're going to replace them all with robots and max
Speaker 3: problem is the opportunistic American companies will raise their rates
Speaker 3: appropriately with the tariffs. Yeah, they're not going to see there.
Speaker 3: They're gonna just raise everything. They'll take that opportunity as
Speaker 3: soon as they can. Brandon Bennett. Now I can watch
Speaker 3: Owen again, whatever he shows up. Pezivantes Pezzonovante seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 3: Owen got fired by aj Owen. It is a badge
Speaker 3: of honor, Knights of the Storm. Alex re Ward's Owen
Speaker 3: with the rest of his life off for Labor Day.
Speaker 3: That's what we got for Christmas.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I have a permanent holiday.
Speaker 3: Epstein Island. Last week Owen abruptly ended a show and
Speaker 3: it was ads for over an hour. Huh hmm, very strange.
Speaker 4: Yeah, b L.
Speaker 3: Hoten, what happened last Wednesday?
Speaker 2: Alex has been known the third temper dangels like Crump
Speaker 2: you know, Epstein Island. It was one day I came
Speaker 2: out of the office and this water fountain was completely
Speaker 2: destroyed and wrapped off.
Speaker 3: Remember that, I don't that might have been before my time.
Speaker 2: And I asked, no, no, it wasn't. But I asked somebody,
Speaker 2: I said, what happened to the water fountain? Was just
Speaker 2: torn up, I mean, smashed up anything on the floor,
Speaker 2: wrapped off the wall. Somebody said, Alex got mad.
Speaker 4: Figure.
Speaker 3: So Belle Hopton says, what happened last Wednesday? Owen? And
Speaker 3: Epstein responds Owen had breaking news and was stopped. Epstein
Speaker 3: Island says Owen literally seemed to walk off the set.
Speaker 3: Harrison maybe next well, yeah.
Speaker 4: I hope you keep this job.
Speaker 3: Got a family, yeah, Harrison really like Harrison, will respect Harrison.
Speaker 3: He's a very We found the doctor we take our
Speaker 3: son to through them. He was very kind to recommend
Speaker 3: the doctor, so we really appreciate that. He's been a
Speaker 3: very good friend. Just a very very kind and nice individual. Yeah,
Speaker 3: his family is very kind too. The pigeon at Guard Goldsmith,
Speaker 3: he starts too early for Alex. I think aj would
Speaker 3: constantly interrupt on in the afternoon, never interrupts Harrison.
Speaker 2: Well, that was the other thing I told Alex when
Speaker 2: he started pushing this stop to steal stuff. After he
Speaker 2: did the first time, I said, I don't want you
Speaker 2: coming in here and doing that anymore in front of
Speaker 2: my crew.
Speaker 4: And that really got him angry. If they've been a
Speaker 4: water fountain, it would have been endangered. At that point
Speaker 4: in time.
Speaker 2: You could see the steam coming out of his ears
Speaker 2: and he goes, you know, you can't tell me that.
Speaker 2: It's like He's like, well, you know, you can either
Speaker 2: talk about stop the steel or you can have me here.
Speaker 2: So he decided he would talk about stop the steal.
Speaker 2: I want to thank the people who have support us.
Speaker 2: These are self contributions that came in at the end
Speaker 2: of the month. Janice W. Ryan F Thank you, Ryan, Gregory, I,
Speaker 2: Lisa Kay, Gretchen c. These are all people that we
Speaker 2: see all the time supporting this constantly.
Speaker 4: Marco V. William R. Ronald H.
Speaker 2: Susan L. Thank you, and Kevin M. William W. Maurice W.
Speaker 2: Joseph R. Amy B and Kelly K. Thank you all
Speaker 2: so much. I appreciate that that helped us to reach
Speaker 2: our goal by the end of the month. I put
Speaker 2: up a op ed over the weekend. We got it
Speaker 2: up late last night actually, and it's about the new
Speaker 2: book from Alex Carp called Technological Republic, and it is
Speaker 2: his vision of governance, and it is really an eye opener. Again,
Speaker 2: remember that Alex Karp is like Peter Teel, is now
Speaker 2: part of the Bilderberg Steering Committee, and he is a
Speaker 2: a globalist of the first order. And it's always interesting
Speaker 2: to see what these people say, you know, when you've
Speaker 2: got Klaus Schwab out there, uvol Harari or whatever. But
Speaker 2: certainly Alex Karp ap Pallenteer, like Peter Teel, you should
Speaker 2: pay attention to these guys because they're the ones who
Speaker 2: have a great deal of political and financial power. And
Speaker 2: so it is the Technological Republic. I subtitled the review
Speaker 2: here called it the twenty first century Jeremiah, about the
Speaker 2: purpose in life by man who is richer than Solomon
Speaker 2: and wealth and information, but lacking Solomon's wisdom, and that's
Speaker 2: really what it is. It's Jeremiah that, like Jeremiah the prophet,
Speaker 2: he's weeping about the state of society and what he
Speaker 2: thinks is wrong with it. And his subtitle about it
Speaker 2: was hard power, soft belief in the future of the West.
Speaker 2: And that's exactly how we fight these people. They do
Speaker 2: have hard power, and if our belief system is soft,
Speaker 2: they will win. We need to harden our belief system.
Speaker 2: And if you look at this guy, it's actually like
Speaker 2: I said, when I've many times, I said, when you
Speaker 2: look at evil Harari and his disgust for God and humanity,
Speaker 2: I find it to be very encouraging.
Speaker 4: Because this is this is.
Speaker 2: Somebody who's literally shaking his fist at God and uh.
Speaker 2: And I've seen what happens throughout history when people shake
Speaker 2: their fist at God like this. So I'd rather have
Speaker 2: God on my side than uvil Harari. Be where the
Speaker 2: guy is, he's going to go up in flames like
Speaker 2: the Orgy Domet the.
Speaker 4: Burning Man thing.
Speaker 2: So I said, if you don't know who Alex Karpet
Speaker 2: is in the societies in which he travels, you'll be
Speaker 2: clued in from the start. By the praise that's given
Speaker 2: to him in this book. He's got quotes from Jamie Demon,
Speaker 2: General Mathis, and many others in the military industrial complex.
Speaker 2: Bankers love this guy. The military industrial love complex loves him.
Speaker 2: He's a big hit and he's a regular their club.
Speaker 2: The Builderbergers. The cart begins this by decrying the sh
Speaker 2: shallowness and the fleeting nature of what Silicon Valley pursues.
Speaker 2: That's why I said it first reminded me of you know,
Speaker 2: Solomon and Ecclesiastes. He's saying, you know, all of life
Speaker 2: is vanity. Uh, all of Silicon Valley is vanity, vanity
Speaker 2: and uh. And yet when you look at his solution,
Speaker 2: what he wants is a much stronger, much more activist,
Speaker 2: much more violent government. And this is the guy who's
Speaker 2: running Pallateer, that is a data mining company for them.
Speaker 2: He's the eyes and ears our searching for meaning and life,
Speaker 2: and but he's looking in the wrong places. Karp is
Speaker 2: in a way emblematic of our times. His surveillance and
Speaker 2: data mining company, Pallateer, gives him a tremendous amount of information.
Speaker 2: But that is itself the disease of our time that
Speaker 2: we are so overcome with details and factoids that we
Speaker 2: can't see the forest for the trees. That is what
Speaker 2: Pollanteer was designed to do. But if God is not
Speaker 2: the reference point, the blind are leading the blind. The
Speaker 2: dedication of his book is about heart. He says to
Speaker 2: those who seek to move the hearts of others and
Speaker 2: know their own. And then he follows that up with
Speaker 2: a quote from Gutta. You never touch the heart of
Speaker 2: others if it does not emerge from your own. And
Speaker 2: yet God says through Jeremiah, so the heart is deceitful
Speaker 2: above all things, and desperately wicked. Who can know it well?
Speaker 2: The fear of the Lord is beginning of wisdom, said Solomon.
Speaker 2: You won't find the fear of the Lord in his
Speaker 2: book Technological Republic, neither in the book or in his ima,
Speaker 2: imaginary society that he wants to build. Can you imagine
Speaker 2: how his elitist friends would react to a book if
Speaker 2: he called it the Theological Republic and they call it
Speaker 2: Christian nationalism, and you know they would freak out like
Speaker 2: vampires when you hold a cross up. It is required
Speaker 2: reading to get a read on the hearts of the
Speaker 2: man who the men who seek to exercise hard power
Speaker 2: that he references in the subtitle of this book. He
Speaker 2: is a true believer in big government. He believes that
Speaker 2: government is what made the West and Western civilization great,
Speaker 2: and he laments the fact that government is not quote
Speaker 2: innovative enough anymore. This is a quote from the book.
Speaker 2: He says, a moment of reckoning has arrived for the West.
Speaker 2: The loss of national ambition and interest in the potential
Speaker 2: of science and technology and the resulting decline of government
Speaker 2: innovation across sectors from medicine to space travel to military software,
Speaker 2: has created an innovation gap.
Speaker 4: He sees gaps everywhere.
Speaker 2: That's his favorite term, because when he goes to Pentagon,
Speaker 2: he can say, you've got a gap in this area
Speaker 2: with China. I can fill it. If you give me
Speaker 2: a lot of money. I can fill that gap.
Speaker 3: For a few billion dollars. The gap to be filled for.
Speaker 4: A few dollars more fistful of dollars.
Speaker 2: The state has retreated from the pursuit of the king
Speaker 2: of large scale breakthroughs. This is a Karp talking that
Speaker 2: gave rise to the atomic bomb and the Internet, seeding
Speaker 2: the challenge of developing the next wave of path breaking
Speaker 2: technologies to the private sector, a remarkable and near total
Speaker 2: placement of faith in the market. Karp hates the marketplace,
Speaker 2: He hates the private sector. He loves all things government.
Speaker 2: I've never seen a more statist person in my wife
Speaker 2: says when I talk about this, you know, he talks
Speaker 2: about the loss of national ambition. You know, the founders
Speaker 2: of this country saw ambition as a character flaw, and
Speaker 2: it was they were very worried about a government that
Speaker 2: will be led by ambitious politicians. And when Abraham Lincoln
Speaker 2: became president, that was the key criticism in the early
Speaker 2: stages of Lincoln was that he was very ambitious. That
Speaker 2: was considered to be a disqualification. Now Karp wants to
Speaker 2: see all of government being ambitious. He said, you know,
Speaker 2: that's the quote that I just read to you. Notice
Speaker 2: that the first contribution of government innovation that he mentions
Speaker 2: is medicine. Yet Operation warp Speed is one of the
Speaker 2: greatest failures of Western civilization that came from in order
Speaker 2: to borrow his characterization, a remarkable and near total placement
Speaker 2: of faith not in the marketplace, but in the government.
Speaker 2: And so it's anesthetical. The government has not been the
Speaker 2: basis of Western civilization. It's been anathetical to that. If
Speaker 2: you read rosewalder Lane's book That Discover Your Freedom, you
Speaker 2: should read that to your kids. By the way, it
Speaker 2: describes the rise of Western civilization as being one of
Speaker 2: freedom and of restraint of government. I would agree with
Speaker 2: Karp that the atomic bomb is an innovation of government
Speaker 2: and yet another reason why hard power has to be restrained.
Speaker 2: Government preachers like Karp never justify what the evil government does.
Speaker 2: They merely point to another, presumably more evil government and
Speaker 2: the gap that we have with them in some area,
Speaker 2: whether it's nuclear bombs, artificial intelligence. So let's be as
Speaker 2: evil as the monsters that we fight, so he can
Speaker 2: even surpass them. Perhaps Karp speaks of an innovation gap,
Speaker 2: with innovation being large scale projects. Does he not see
Speaker 2: the large scale innovation of Operation Warp speed, decades of
Speaker 2: preparation to impose it, innovations that made our legal foundation,
Speaker 2: as well as medical innovation to create the bioweapon that
Speaker 2: killed far more people worldwide than the atomic bomb killed
Speaker 2: in Hiroshima or Nagasaki combined. Karp's worship of government is
Speaker 2: undoubtedly how he sells his detalitarian schemes to government officials
Speaker 2: scheming for power. He's been very successful in selling the
Speaker 2: idea of government as God to the government. It will
Speaker 2: be harder to sell the idea to the public, whom
Speaker 2: he seeks to stomp in the face with a jackboot
Speaker 2: of government forever. My view of government and innovation is
Speaker 2: exactly the opposite of his view.
Speaker 8: I was just going to say, it's a much easier
Speaker 8: sell for the person wearing the boot than the person
Speaker 8: that's the face getting stepped on.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 2: The government is not essential to innovation. It is essential
Speaker 2: to making people like Carp rich. America did not become
Speaker 2: wealthy and the quality of life improved because of government innovation,
Speaker 2: but because of private innovation and the free market that
Speaker 2: Krp despises. He actually competes in a market where, whether
Speaker 2: he acknowledges or not, it is an elite market of
Speaker 2: just a few people who control the vast wealth of America.
Speaker 2: Karp's market is the Pentagon and the intelligence agencies to
Speaker 2: which he sells. The development of the first flying plane
Speaker 2: is an interesting refutation of Karp's idea of government being
Speaker 2: essential to innovation. Why did Langley, a celebrated government scientist,
Speaker 2: receive government resources for his attempts to create a flying machine.
Speaker 2: As secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, Sam Langley secured funding
Speaker 2: from the US War Department when it was the War Department,
Speaker 2: including a fifty thousand dollars grant in eighteen ninety eight.
Speaker 2: Equipment to about one point eight million dollars a day
Speaker 2: due to the innovation of the Federal Reserve that devalues
Speaker 2: a dollar to develop the the aerodome project that he
Speaker 2: called his flying machine. The support included access to government
Speaker 2: facilities and personnel to assist in the experiments. But despite
Speaker 2: all of this, Langley's manned flight attempts failed. In nineteen
Speaker 2: oh three, he was beaten by two homeschool bicycle mechanics
Speaker 2: without a penny of government subsidy. They were not even
Speaker 2: educated by the state. Perhaps that's the reason for their success.
Speaker 2: Government's innovation was to use their invention to drop atomic
Speaker 2: bombs to destroy cities and civilians. That's what the government
Speaker 2: brought to it. They weaponized it, and after they were
Speaker 2: able to do that, the government was more than willing
Speaker 2: to buy it from them when their guy could not
Speaker 2: produce the goods. So he's got it divided into four parts.
Speaker 2: The first part. I'm just gonna go through this quickly
Speaker 2: instead of reading the entire op ed piece again, you
Speaker 2: can find it on substack.
Speaker 4: What's our substack address.
Speaker 3: At David Knight Show on substack. I have dropped the
Speaker 3: link to the article on substack in the rumble chat.
Speaker 8: David Knight Show again Davidnightshow dot substack dot com.
Speaker 2: Okay, all right, Well, the first part he talks about
Speaker 2: the software Century. He titles it Lost Valley. That's how
Speaker 2: he refers to Silicon Valley as the Lost Valley. I
Speaker 2: would agree with that, but I also see it as
Speaker 2: the uncanny Valley. Increasingly so for him, history begins post
Speaker 2: World War II with the creation of the military industrial
Speaker 2: complex and the national security state. Along with that the
Speaker 2: massive subsidies to be had by those like him who
Speaker 2: serve this beast. And so that's where he sees a
Speaker 2: you know, he thinks that that was the pinnacle, not
Speaker 2: the nadir, of our society, the creation and national security State.
Speaker 2: In part two of his book, it is titled the
Speaker 2: Hollowing Out of the American Mind, he argues that there's
Speaker 2: a systematic attack and an attempt to dismantle any conception
Speaker 2: of American or Western identity during the nineteen sixties and seventies.
Speaker 2: I would agree with that, but Karp ignores the role
Speaker 2: of the CIA. These are the people that he serves,
Speaker 2: the people that he has empowered with his tool Palleteer.
Speaker 2: They're the people who invested in Palateer as well with
Speaker 2: their venture capital firm in Cautel. It was a CIA
Speaker 2: that was instrumental in orchestrating the dismantling of society and
Speaker 2: of the family. So again he has another valid criticism
Speaker 2: where he talks about our digital society inventions that changed
Speaker 2: our line but did not improve our lives. In his
Speaker 2: third part of the book, he gets to the palunteer
Speaker 2: corporate philosophy based on quote, lessons we can learn from
Speaker 2: the social organization of honeybee swarms and flocks of starlings
Speaker 2: quote unquote. This is a hive mentality. As Lansa has said,
Speaker 2: everybody says nothing good ever comes in swarms. Get these
Speaker 2: these swarms of drones or whatever.
Speaker 4: It's not anything good ever.
Speaker 2: And I don't like I heard mentality, But he actually
Speaker 2: he holds up as examples of good things the conformity
Speaker 2: experiments done by Milgram and Ash and others. In the
Speaker 2: late nineteen fifties and early sixties. I've talked about them
Speaker 2: many times. The Milgrim experiment where you were told to
Speaker 2: harm somebody by a person who's in authority, and typically
Speaker 2: about two thirds of time they can get person to
Speaker 2: do that. The Ash experiment where they have a group
Speaker 2: of people who are influencing you, the person who is
Speaker 2: an authority. But he thinks both of those things are great.
Speaker 2: And it's not surprising because I've long argued that it
Speaker 2: was the purpose of the Internet envisioned by a darpest
Speaker 2: psychologist jcr Leicklier, and social media created with venture capital
Speaker 2: from the deep spooks. And he actually references jcr Licklider.
Speaker 2: He thinks the guy who is great, I don't. Karp
Speaker 2: has a more cynical view that the experiments quote exposed
Speaker 2: the feebleness of the vast majority of human minds when
Speaker 2: confronted with the threat of authority. There you go, BF Skinners,
Speaker 2: Beyond freedom and dignity taken to the next level. Part
Speaker 2: four is a call to action, a call to build
Speaker 2: the technological republic that he wants to see happen what
Speaker 2: the rest of us would call a dystopian technocracy. Volunteer
Speaker 2: is the embodiment of everything that Christians must resist and evade.
Speaker 2: Don't forget that this is truly a war. It is
Speaker 2: a war against your mind. There is no neutral territory
Speaker 2: where you can set this one out. Don't get feeble
Speaker 2: knees when you're confronted with the threat of authority. Get
Speaker 2: on your knees to the ultimate authority and pray for
Speaker 2: the destruction of this tower of Babel technocracy. You know
Speaker 2: the we already have a lot of people. Well, you
Speaker 2: know when the Antichrist comes, thanks is going to get
Speaker 2: really bad. It may escalate in intensity, but everything may escalate.
Speaker 2: But we already have Antichrist. The spirit of Antichrist has
Speaker 2: been here for two thousand years and it's been a
Speaker 2: spiritual war. It's been a cold war for a very
Speaker 2: long time. And the question you don't have to wait
Speaker 2: for some event to happen, some eschatological event to happen.
Speaker 2: It's here now. You know, what are you doing about it?
Speaker 2: This cold war may turn into a physical It's a
Speaker 2: cold war, a spiritual war, and it may turn into
Speaker 2: a hot war and may turn into a physical war.
Speaker 2: There's something to be fighting about right now. I end
Speaker 2: the review by saying, I'll never forget the scene from
Speaker 2: the movie Patent where a patent played by George Scott
Speaker 2: is defeating Rommel in a tank battle. He looks at
Speaker 2: his field glasses and he said, Rommel, you magnificent. You
Speaker 2: make this a bastard. I read your book, Carp, you
Speaker 2: magnificent bastard. I read your book, and I also read
Speaker 2: God's book, and it speaks about people like you. There
Speaker 2: is nothing that is new under the sun. Folks who've
Speaker 2: got our marching orders. The question is what are we
Speaker 2: going to.
Speaker 1: Do about it?
Speaker 2: And we need to understand who our enemy is. You
Speaker 2: can't fight a war if you don't know who the
Speaker 2: enemy is. If you don't know what their tactics are,
Speaker 2: if you don't know what their goals and their strategies are.
Speaker 2: You have to know this. And so it's important for
Speaker 2: us to understand where these people are coming from and
Speaker 2: what they want out of all this stuff. And if
Speaker 2: we don't pay attention, they will be able to make
Speaker 2: our lives very miserable. Of course, they're not going to
Speaker 2: win in the end. They're allied against God and his
Speaker 2: anointed Christ. But you know, we don't have to let
Speaker 2: them have such an easy victory in the meantime over us. So,
Speaker 2: as I said before, you know, the meta constitution system
Speaker 2: that is coming up is really a system of world government,
Speaker 2: of world governance. It isn't going to have as I
Speaker 2: said before, it's not going to necessarily be a capital,
Speaker 2: you know, where they're going to set up a building
Speaker 2: and fly a flag and all.
Speaker 4: The rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: It's going to be this shadowy network of organizations and
Speaker 2: rules that are created by banks, trade organizations. It'll have
Speaker 2: the veneer of science and necessity on it, and.
Speaker 4: This is what we have to fight.
Speaker 2: There was a great article that I would recommend our
Speaker 2: expos A News about the meta Constitution system. It is
Speaker 2: a system of world governance through standards, best practices and
Speaker 2: technical guidance. The kind of stuff that the World Economic
Speaker 2: Form and the World Health Organization have been putting out there,
Speaker 2: the kind of stuff that we saw during the twenty
Speaker 2: twenty pandemic. That's a good example of it. That's how
Speaker 2: they got everybody everywhere to do the same thing all
Speaker 2: the same time. And they would use these non governmental
Speaker 2: agencies to put this stuff through, to set up these
Speaker 2: practices and tell us what the science was, and then
Speaker 2: they'd run it through these bureaucracies without running it through
Speaker 2: your elected officials. That's the purpose of empowering the so
Speaker 2: called public health officials. The system sits above the law
Speaker 2: in the most literal sense. It shapes economic behavior more
Speaker 2: powerfully than the legislation. It achieves binding authority not through
Speaker 2: the popular mandate, but through systematic embedding of compliance requirements
Speaker 2: in the essential infrastructure that modern economy, that life depends on.
Speaker 2: And so in this piece here, what they do is
Speaker 2: they lay this out and talk about many of these
Speaker 2: international organizations that set up these best practices and set
Speaker 2: up the so called science, and understand that it is
Speaker 2: global governance, not government. And that's what I really want
Speaker 2: to stress the idea. This is a shadowy government of
Speaker 2: webs of relationships and networks that operate not necessarily in
Speaker 2: the background, but over and above the legal system that
Speaker 2: you see. They will maintain that to give you the
Speaker 2: illusion of control. They will maintain these show elections and
Speaker 2: all the rest of the stuff, even if the elections
Speaker 2: were honest. These structures are going to be the things
Speaker 2: that actually govern us. There is no world parliament for
Speaker 2: this system. There is no global constitution, no international elections.
Speaker 2: Yet it governs more comprehensively than most democratic states, shaping
Speaker 2: economic behavior across every sector in jurisdiction through mechanisms that
Speaker 2: operate entirely above legal authority. It achieves total compliance through
Speaker 2: technical infrastructure embedded in the essential systems of modern economic life.
Speaker 2: Through accreditation networks, through the financial plumbing, through digital identity systems,
Speaker 2: through audit processes, through data governance frameworks and government procurement platforms.
Speaker 2: Every sustainability report, every procurement tender, every financial transaction, every
Speaker 2: digital credential becomes visible as an enforcement action for a
Speaker 2: comprehensive system that shapes global economic behavior without requiring a
Speaker 2: single vote, without your knowledge, without your permission. Power flows
Speaker 2: above this legal authority through the sequences that they outline here.
Speaker 2: They have a couple of examples. They talk about the OECD,
Speaker 2: the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. They determine what
Speaker 2: gets measured. ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, creates technical
Speaker 2: standards that ensure that measurements are interoperable globally. You know,
Speaker 2: we were talking earlier, Travis about the code for COVID
Speaker 2: adverse effects. You know, if you want to control something
Speaker 2: you create a code for it. We saw that in
Speaker 2: New York State they got the ISO to create a
Speaker 2: code for the credit card companies for people who were
Speaker 2: in the gun business, retail or hotel. So once they
Speaker 2: create that code, now they can track those people. They've
Speaker 2: identified them. If they don't want you to track something,
Speaker 2: they don't create a code for it, but they want
Speaker 2: something that's tracked so they can try to shut it
Speaker 2: down and control it. They create a number for it,
Speaker 2: and then you have a lot of different organizations they
Speaker 2: go through in this HASSE is another one model process
Speaker 2: or the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis transforms the
Speaker 2: measurement data into algorithmic governance through integrated assessment models at
Speaker 2: link environment, economy, population, security, and health. Then you've got
Speaker 2: a lot of different alphabet agencies under that which are
Speaker 2: not government agencies, they're international standards agencies surveillance and data
Speaker 2: collection feed this through global monitoring systems, climate monitoring, public
Speaker 2: health surveillance, economic tracking, and social measurement or all things
Speaker 2: like that. Democratic bypass through technical authority, politicians received THEASA
Speaker 2: model outputs as a scientifically neutral advice. This is what
Speaker 2: we saw during warp speed right that appears to emerge
Speaker 2: from objective analysis rather than from political choice. The technical
Speaker 2: complexity and the institutional authority make challenging its recommendations appear
Speaker 2: to be anti scientific and irresponsible. So this is something
Speaker 2: that came out of pseudoscience and pseudo data analysis. We've
Speaker 2: got science on our side. The politicians just bowed down
Speaker 2: and let them do it. And the way that they
Speaker 2: enforce this is through things like accreditation through the banking
Speaker 2: system and capital allocation like Black Rock and others. And
Speaker 2: it is a very subtle system. And that's why I
Speaker 2: say I think the importance of gold is not to
Speaker 2: try to time getting in or out of the market.
Speaker 2: It's about getting into a separate system. This is a
Speaker 2: termination that's been made by Russia, India, China to get
Speaker 2: out of this system because of its unlocking controls. And
Speaker 2: the same thing is true of us. Just as they
Speaker 2: lock down all of Russia's investments in their system, they
Speaker 2: can do the same thing to any person that they
Speaker 2: don't like in the future as well. It's a government
Speaker 2: knowing controlling what can be known. A good example of
Speaker 2: this is something that's put out by Mark Karney and
Speaker 2: the elect and he put out his value statement, he says,
Speaker 2: to rebuild the social contract means that we need to
Speaker 2: focus on common values and beliefs. So we need to
Speaker 2: change those in order to rebuild the social contract that
Speaker 2: he talks about. And he says beliefs and values are
Speaker 2: not fixed, but they are nurtured. That says belief and
Speaker 2: so this is what these behavioral scientists all believe. They
Speaker 2: believe that you don't have freedom and dignity. They don't
Speaker 2: believe that you're creating the image of God. And they
Speaker 2: know that if they are persistent in their manipulation and
Speaker 2: their propaganda, especially to young children, that the value systems,
Speaker 2: beliefs and values that they want to destroy, that they
Speaker 2: seek to replace what they call the social contract. They
Speaker 2: know that that is nurtured, that it is something that
Speaker 2: is taught and caught, and that they can nurture that
Speaker 2: with propaganda that is repetitive that continues all the time. Finally, again,
Speaker 2: as I emphasized before, it'll be global coordination. That's what
Speaker 2: I mean by global governance. And it'll be done without
Speaker 2: a government seat. It'll be done without a government flag.
Speaker 2: There won't be someplace in Brussels or Washington where they
Speaker 2: fly a flag. It's going to just be this network.
Speaker 2: And we see elements of it in Builderberg and these
Speaker 2: other structures that these guys create where they ouprate under
Speaker 2: Chatham House rules. We see this all the time. Technical neutrality,
Speaker 2: mass their political control, and private authority is going to
Speaker 2: exercise public power. This is how these constructs are coming together.
Speaker 2: So when you look at Peter Teel and his series
Speaker 2: it's coming up on the Antichrist, I think it is
Speaker 2: very interesting that he wants to talk about a Christian
Speaker 2: eschatology that's been out there for a while in concept
Speaker 2: and say that, yeah, the Antichrist will come selling peace
Speaker 2: and safety, and so be careful to people who offer
Speaker 2: you peace and safety. You want to have the people
Speaker 2: who few war and endangerment, you know, like him and
Speaker 2: Alex carp And furthermore, he says, and they will do
Speaker 2: it to say they have to control artificial intelligence. So
Speaker 2: while a lot of people are looking at artificial intelligence
Speaker 2: and saying this will kind of concentrate massive amounts of
Speaker 2: power in the hands of evil people, he says, no,
Speaker 2: what we need to do is have no regulation whatsoever
Speaker 2: on artificial intelligence. And you can see his fingerprints all
Speaker 2: over the big beautiful bill that Trump got put through
Speaker 2: because one of the things that was part of that
Speaker 2: that eventually got pulled out because a lot of states
Speaker 2: are pushing back against it. They want to have a
Speaker 2: moratorium against any kind of regulation at the state level
Speaker 2: for over a decade, So no regulation for AI because
Speaker 2: it wasn't going to come out of Washington. The whole
Speaker 2: purpose of stopping states was because they knew that they
Speaker 2: had control of Washington. So when to use Washington to
Speaker 2: stop any state regulation of artificial intelligence. So here's a
Speaker 2: guy saying the real hallmark of an antichrist beast system
Speaker 2: is to try to stop artificial intelligence. He's exactly the opposite.
Speaker 2: It was kind of a Hans are we the baddies moment.
Speaker 2: He had an interview with somebody and the guy actually
Speaker 2: called him out on that. He says, well, there's some
Speaker 2: people that think that you are who you're the person
Speaker 2: that you're talking about here, And he was kind of
Speaker 2: caught in the headlights for a while there with that.
Speaker 2: But again, as we see the pushback against this, we
Speaker 2: see that Putin and she and MODAI are all coming
Speaker 2: together to try to create a different financial system. This
Speaker 2: is what has to be done by individuals in America.
Speaker 2: We need to start gaining our independence and our self
Speaker 2: sufficiency by learning skills, by creating community at the local level.
Speaker 2: That's the only way that we're going to fight this.
Speaker 2: I think it's going to be effective.
Speaker 3: This also goes to show just how I see some
Speaker 3: people perennially saying, Oh, Putin's a good guy, he's trying
Speaker 3: to save the world. I don't believe that. I think
Speaker 3: he's more than willing to engage in his own world
Speaker 3: orders so long as he's one of the people that
Speaker 3: gets to be on top of it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, he's a KGB guy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they're all in it for themselves. They might have
Speaker 3: differing end goals, but their methods of operation are fairly
Speaker 3: the same across the board.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: Just because he's not friendly with specific people we don't
Speaker 3: like here does not mean he's a friend to us.
Speaker 2: It's kind of interesting, and speaking of who the friends are,
Speaker 2: it's kind of interesting. This British politician who went to
Speaker 2: work for Silicon Valley for about a decade.
Speaker 4: His name is Nick Klegg, and he just.
Speaker 2: Had an interview with I think it was a Guardian
Speaker 2: where you're talking to them about what he saw in
Speaker 2: Silicon Valley and the way it's reported by futurism, says
Speaker 2: Meta defector. He worked for Facebook for Meta issues, a
Speaker 2: devastating psychological takedown of the technocrats and the CEOs that
Speaker 2: are running everything in Silicon Valley. He said. He's a
Speaker 2: former Meta executive who left the company at the started
Speaker 2: this year. He's had a lot of experience in different
Speaker 2: things before jumping ship to the tech world. He was
Speaker 2: a deputy Prime Minister of the UK. He was a
Speaker 2: leader of the UK's Liberal Democrat Party. Now, to give
Speaker 2: you an idea of what this is, this is kind
Speaker 2: of as close as are going to get to say
Speaker 2: a libertarian party. They're about free market and they focused
Speaker 2: on civil liberties. They were also though, caught up with
Speaker 2: climate nonsense and really supported EU membership over Brexit and
Speaker 2: independence and things like that. However, he rose into became
Speaker 2: a Deputy Prime minister because of being able to get
Speaker 2: into the debates and Nick Clegg was there with the
Speaker 2: Labor and the Tory party person and he offered another
Speaker 2: opinion that was there and got very very popular, got
Speaker 2: a sizable chunk of the vote, and so they had
Speaker 2: to include him in the government that was there. But anyway, again,
Speaker 2: like I said, they did focus on the marketplace and
Speaker 2: private property and civil liberties. Not saying that I agree
Speaker 2: with him, but that's really kind of their position, wasn't
Speaker 2: when you hear liberal democrat, wasn't like Nancy Pelosi. Liberal
Speaker 2: Democrats a very different label. His new book is How
Speaker 2: to Save the Internet, and he took aim at the
Speaker 2: noxious culture in San Francisco, the tech bro Denisens, with
Speaker 2: whom he begrudgingly rubbed shoulders during a stint at Meta
Speaker 2: from twenty eighteen until this year. He said, you'd think,
Speaker 2: wouldn't you that if you were immensely powerful and rich
Speaker 2: like Elon Musk and all these other tech bros and
Speaker 2: members of that podcast community, that reflect on your good
Speaker 2: fortune compared to most other people. Kind of like Rockefeller
Speaker 2: right when he was asked by the reporter, you're the
Speaker 2: richest man in the world, how much is enough? And
Speaker 2: Rockefeller said just a little bit more. It's never enough.
Speaker 2: They're never satisfied. Instead, Clegg sees he said, they cry
Speaker 2: about being persecuted in Silicon Valley. Far from thinking that
Speaker 2: they're lucky, they think that they think they're hard done by.
Speaker 2: In other words, that they're victims. He says, I couldn't
Speaker 2: and still can't understand this deeply unattractive combination of mchismo
Speaker 2: and self pity. It's a cultural thing, he said. And
Speaker 2: he was a person, by the way, I said before
Speaker 2: they were committed to civil liberties, except that he led
Speaker 2: the charge to kick Trump off of Facebook in tween
Speaker 2: twenty one after the January sixth situation. So much for
Speaker 2: a commitment to free speech right. So again, all these
Speaker 2: labels and parties and positions that they have are just
Speaker 2: marketing positions that they take. If you're accustomed to privilege,
Speaker 2: he said, equality feels like oppression. He also charged it
Speaker 2: the self styled freethinkers of Silicon Valley are actually clingingly conformist.
Speaker 2: Everyone wears the same clothes, they drive the same cars,
Speaker 2: they listen to the same podcasts, they follow the same fads.
Speaker 2: It's a place born of an immense sort of herd
Speaker 2: like behavior. Sounds like high school.
Speaker 8: There's no group of people that are more conformists than
Speaker 8: people that really want to be seen as anti conformists.
Speaker 2: That's right, it's the whole disney.
Speaker 8: I'm the resistance because I, you know, have the flags
Speaker 8: and present the popular stuff. Therefore, I'm against the establishment
Speaker 8: because I do everything I'm told.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're virtual signaling to be a part of this
Speaker 2: new club that they just had formed. And you see
Speaker 2: that all the time. I've seen it all my life
Speaker 2: with teenagers who, you know, in a desire to distance
Speaker 2: themselves from their parents and create their own culture, they
Speaker 2: become so incredibly heard like and conformist to each other.
Speaker 4: As a joke, I thought that as a teenager. Anyway.
Speaker 2: The funniest thing he said is that Silicon Valley is
Speaker 2: a place that prides itself on challenging orthodoxy, conformity, and
Speaker 2: conventional wisdom. Yet in many ways it's the most conformist
Speaker 2: place I've ever lived in my life, which is exactly
Speaker 2: what we were talking about. With Alex Karp's point of view.
Speaker 2: The guy is an unbelievable statist and conformist. He is
Speaker 2: absolutely in love with raw power and with the ability
Speaker 2: to kill people. And he's talked about that as well.
Speaker 2: You know, we'll decide who the bad guys are that
Speaker 2: will kill a very dangerous person. He has far more
Speaker 2: power than someone like Evil Harari, who is just sitting
Speaker 2: on the sidelines carping and throwing his opinions out there.
Speaker 2: Alex carp can actually get missiles thrown at you and
Speaker 2: many other people as well.
Speaker 8: This carp is carping, and it's a lot more dangerous.
Speaker 4: That's right. That's right.
Speaker 8: He's good at it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. So yeah, let's take a break. You
Speaker 2: want to cover some of the time.
Speaker 3: Let's take a look at the comments that we've got
Speaker 3: got Epstein Island. Nobody talks about Trump and Bill Gates
Speaker 3: having an off camera meeting at the White House last week,
Speaker 3: shortly after Trump praised Operation Warp Speed Neighbor twenty twenty nine.
Speaker 3: Bill Gates has the solution to seeing the forest through
Speaker 3: the trees by cutting down all the trees.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the ultimate carbon sink is a tree, right, and
Speaker 2: they want to cut them down, and then he wants
Speaker 2: to bury it because he doesn't want anybody to use
Speaker 2: the lumber for anything.
Speaker 3: You know, you get no use out of it. We've
Speaker 3: got bulldog. One thing left have over everyone is they're
Speaker 3: very organized. Yeah, and they have a lot of different
Speaker 3: organizations and they're very good at getting people in places.
Speaker 2: Well, you know, Satan has this entire structure hierarchy, and
Speaker 2: and he has.
Speaker 4: The power to reward those who serve him.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
Speaker 4: That's I think that's their superpower as Satan.
Speaker 8: Also, they are a lot more coordinated with things like
Speaker 8: you know, rules for radicals, march through the institution, a
Speaker 8: continual push to get their people in these institutions.
Speaker 2: They have been able to take over all the institutions
Speaker 2: from the top down. I've had people when we're speaking
Speaker 2: at roulags and stuff come up.
Speaker 4: To me and say, how in the world did they
Speaker 4: do that in the world.
Speaker 3: Indeed, Well, there's also the fact that people on the
Speaker 3: right tend to be more individualist and people on the
Speaker 3: left tend to be more collectivist, and as such, they
Speaker 3: are generally better at organizing for a collective goal, whereas
Speaker 3: the right tends to want to be just left alone.
Speaker 3: They don't want to have to deal with it, like
Speaker 3: I just want to run my life. I don't want
Speaker 3: to tell you how to run your life.
Speaker 2: And it's also that for them this life is all
Speaker 2: that they've got, and so you know, they they be focused, desperate,
Speaker 2: so this is not all that we have, you know,
Speaker 2: It's like it's important to be able to provide for
Speaker 2: yourself and your family.
Speaker 4: But we don't worship and serve that they do. They do.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I think the next comment is talking about that.
Speaker 8: But it's not necessarily a bad thing to be, you know,
Speaker 8: individualistic and all that. It is ultimately what you want.
Speaker 8: It's just sometimes that I can get in the way
Speaker 8: of you know, coordinate effort.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Audi Mr R, responding to n Max, says Americans don't
Speaker 3: necessarily need to organize, especially since we know that government
Speaker 3: infiltrates every movement. The key is to all of us
Speaker 3: collectively as individuals, no slash exercise our rights.
Speaker 4: Yes, absolutely right.
Speaker 3: We are all dead. Thank our FK for the pandemic
Speaker 3: of anti Semitic speech MAV twenty two. Fyi, the anti
Speaker 3: semitism algo AI is supposedly going live this week. That
Speaker 3: means it probably went live last month. N Max. Threeyears ago,
Speaker 3: gold was only eighteen hundred dollars. Wish I had bought
Speaker 3: a bunch then it would have doubled in value.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Well again, the way you look at it is
Speaker 2: the American dollar has dropped dropped in half, and when
Speaker 2: you look at you know what a dollar would buy
Speaker 2: versus gold would buy one hundred years ago. It truly
Speaker 2: is amazing to see the effect of the Federal Reserve.
Speaker 2: And Trump doesn't want to fix that. He just wants
Speaker 2: to control the problem. Make it something that answers to him.
Speaker 2: We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks. Want to give you a brief overview
Speaker 3: of what we're going to be covering in these last
Speaker 3: twenty ish minutes. We're going to be talking about that,
Speaker 3: the Las Vegas shooting. To start. We've got headlines here.
Speaker 3: Jason al Dean revisits Las Vegas tragedy in his Essenal performance.
Speaker 3: That's from US Fox News. Trey Goddy calls for disarming
Speaker 3: young white males in wake of Catholic school shooting. Malania
Speaker 3: Trump wants to monitor you and your family's mental health
Speaker 3: and your home to stop school shootings.
Speaker 4: Yeah that's the one that's new.
Speaker 3: Yeah, these people are all cut from the same cloth.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: We've got Tim Walls Way's emergency legislative session on gun control.
Speaker 3: Good old Tim Walls. Pope calls for end pandemic of
Speaker 3: arms after Catholic school shooting. Thomas Massey introduces repeat of
Speaker 3: Gun Free School Zones Act and briefly, if we have time,
Speaker 3: we're also going to look at Ukraine. There'll be no
Speaker 3: peace in Ukraine until washingtonmits to itself it has lost
Speaker 3: the war. That's from the Free Thought Project. Zelenski threatens
Speaker 3: new deep strikes into Russia. That's from RT. Russia backs
Speaker 3: China on global governance reform, and that's from Marti as well.
Speaker 3: Trump unveils another eight hundred and twenty five million arms
Speaker 3: sale to Ukraine while talking peace. That is from Zero Hedge.
Speaker 2: Well, you know they're trapesing out Travis, all the usual
Speaker 2: suspects that have pushed this stuff been useful to their agenda.
Speaker 2: And that's why there's this US magazine profile of Jason Alden.
Speaker 2: He was at the Vegas shooting. I think he was
Speaker 2: actually performing at the time that the shooting commenced. And
Speaker 2: he goes back to recount his Saturday Night Live tribute
Speaker 2: to the victims. And why would a country and Western
Speaker 2: conservative get on Saturday Night Live. Well, because he weid
Speaker 2: his pants and went full gun control after that shooting.
Speaker 2: And that shooting was one of the most obvious false flags. Ever,
Speaker 2: in terms of the lies and things that were put
Speaker 2: out there that were improbable and impossible that happened.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a thing about it that makes any sense
Speaker 3: at all.
Speaker 2: And then Trump jumped in on that with his bump
Speaker 2: stock prohibition by executive order to set a new precedent
Speaker 2: for gun control to be done by pronouncements from the president.
Speaker 8: And so in this thing, that was how he was
Speaker 8: able to remove the window and get all that equipment
Speaker 8: up to that hotel room was because of a bump stock.
Speaker 4: That's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, again, as I said, it's one of the craziest
Speaker 2: narratives about a shooting, but it had a purpose and
Speaker 2: you can see the purpose and how Trump used it
Speaker 2: to assert the ability to do gun control by executive order.
Speaker 2: And it is amazing to me to see how Jason
Speaker 2: Alden recovered from that and basically has this big hit.
Speaker 2: Not in a small town of the lords. We got
Speaker 2: guns and we're going to protect ourselves in a small town.
Speaker 2: He's got a place that he built, a very expensive
Speaker 2: place right in the center of Gatlinburg as well. Every
Speaker 2: time I go past that, just shake my head. It's
Speaker 2: like it's amazing to me to be able to see
Speaker 2: people that are just completely reinvent themselves and spend around
Speaker 2: want to, you know, one hundred and eight degrees away
Speaker 2: from what they did without ever apologizing for what they did.
Speaker 3: It's important to let people grow and change and learn,
Speaker 3: but they have to actually show that they have grown
Speaker 3: and are not just changing the direction of their grift.
Speaker 3: People are people something.
Speaker 2: Everybody can make a mistake and you have to own it.
Speaker 3: And it's not enough to just go one day, you know,
Speaker 3: I'm for Trump the next day without saying anything, without
Speaker 3: condemning anything or admitting you or wrong, just go and
Speaker 3: exact opposite direction.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I see it with some of these high profile
Speaker 2: pastors who get caught some kind of big moral failure
Speaker 2: like a you know, sexual thing or something, and they'll
Speaker 2: take a leave of absence and then they'll just kind
Speaker 2: of come back and I'm back.
Speaker 4: Aren't you glad to have me back? You know? It's like,
Speaker 4: let's talk about what just happened here.
Speaker 2: I mean, there is forgiveness if you own up to it,
Speaker 2: but you need to own up to it. Trey Goddy,
Speaker 2: we talked about this last week. I have a clip
Speaker 2: of it. I'm going to play since work short on
Speaker 2: time here saying it's always young white males, and even
Speaker 2: as his co host corrects him on that, said, no,
Speaker 2: there's been other training shootings as well and not males,
Speaker 2: he still doubles down on that.
Speaker 4: Another one of.
Speaker 2: These people who completely reinvents himself and has actually controlled opposition.
Speaker 4: Then we come to the Millennia.
Speaker 8: A comment about that I thought was really good. It's
Speaker 8: the media can't decide whether to respectfully refer to the
Speaker 8: shooter as a trans woman or to disrespectfully say it's
Speaker 8: a white male.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Jake Tapper was.
Speaker 2: I played that clip last week where it's like, oh,
Speaker 2: we got to make sure we use the right pronouns anything,
Speaker 2: we want to honor the pronoun preferences of this crazy,
Speaker 2: hateful murderer.
Speaker 8: I have both of those on the board to show
Speaker 8: the difference.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, Well we're going to move on though, because
Speaker 2: I want to go quickly in this millennia. Trump wants
Speaker 2: to monitor you and your family's mental health in your
Speaker 2: home in order to stop school shootings. This is from
Speaker 2: bian Shaw Hobby at Health Impact News. Isn't it interesting
Speaker 2: how the Trump people are fully on board with some
Speaker 2: kind of a mental system of red flag gun laws
Speaker 2: and things like that, as we saw with Trump, now
Speaker 2: we see it now with Milania Trump. And of course
Speaker 2: who's going to administer that. Well, it's going to be
Speaker 2: their technocrat bros. Right, they're going to do this, Brian says.
Speaker 2: After the horrific mass shooting, Melania Trump announced her support
Speaker 2: for quote behavioral threat and now assessments across all levels
Speaker 2: of society. Who are you to set in judgment of
Speaker 2: our mental health? This is some kind of a pre
Speaker 2: crime nightmare that the Trump family wants to put on
Speaker 2: the hoypoi, right, hoypooi beginning in our homes, she said,
Speaker 2: and extending through school districts, and of course, she said
Speaker 2: social media.
Speaker 4: This.
Speaker 2: Of course, the question is what the standards will be
Speaker 2: for judging what is good, bad and mental behavior. More
Speaker 2: than likely they will use predictive analysis software, which has
Speaker 2: been around for almost a decade. It has been used
Speaker 2: by the US foster care system with CPS to justify
Speaker 2: taking children away from their parents. Just had a story
Speaker 2: about that last week in Greenland. They would come after
Speaker 2: the native into its there and say that they were
Speaker 2: not fit to be parents and take their kids away
Speaker 2: from them. And we had the situation where as a
Speaker 2: young woman who was pregnant and she had the assessment
Speaker 2: was done on her, and it's become so bad there
Speaker 2: that they passed a law there in Greenland to stop it.
Speaker 2: And yet the Danish authorities continued in her case to
Speaker 2: do it after the law had passed. And what they
Speaker 2: did was they did an evaluation. They looked at her history.
Speaker 2: She was abused by her father, so on the basis
Speaker 2: of her being abused, they said she's.
Speaker 4: Not going to be.
Speaker 2: We're not going to allow her to be a parent,
Speaker 2: and told her they were going to take the baby
Speaker 2: away when it was born, and they did about an
Speaker 2: hour's after the baby was born. This is what Trump
Speaker 2: and Millennia would like to have happened here. CPS using
Speaker 2: predictive analytics software, the label parents is unfit even before
Speaker 2: the baby was born. And he covered this seven years
Speaker 2: ago in Health Impact. He said, there's a recent report
Speaker 2: from jan Eastgate, president of the Citizens Commission on Human
Speaker 2: Rights International, involuntary psychiatric commitment of the homeless a dangerous,
Speaker 2: costly failure. You know frequently talk about how during the
Speaker 2: Reagan administration it took a lot of people who had
Speaker 2: been committed because they had been evaluated and they were
Speaker 2: committed because they had mental illness, so because they were
Speaker 2: addicted to drugs or whatever, and they just released them
Speaker 2: on the streets, and that was why you had this
Speaker 2: big surge of homeless people. Now there's a lot of
Speaker 2: people that are homeless that are not drug addicts, that
Speaker 2: are not mentally crazy, but because of financial as system
Speaker 2: especially it's happening in California right now. But a lot
Speaker 2: of this is government policy that we're not going to
Speaker 2: institutionalize people. And here's the key, folks, It's like everything else,
Speaker 2: it comes back to whether or not the government can
Speaker 2: honestly assess these things. As I said about the red
Speaker 2: flag laws, the issue is, if somebody is crazy, you
Speaker 2: don't just take their gun. I mean, they still got
Speaker 2: access to other guns. They could take a knife, they
Speaker 2: could take a club, they could use their automobile to
Speaker 2: run people down. If somebody is crazy, that'd be confined,
Speaker 2: but you better give them due process. I've said for
Speaker 2: the longest time that in principle I support capital punishment,
Speaker 2: but in practice, when you look at the way our
Speaker 2: government is run, I have some real problems with the
Speaker 2: way our court systems are set up, so that's you know,
Speaker 2: that's always there as a caveat. I mean, you're going
Speaker 2: to talk about these principles, but then you have to
Speaker 2: have an honest system that's going to implement this stuff.
Speaker 2: And this is something when we talk about red flag
Speaker 2: laws and things like that. Now Milania is taking it
Speaker 2: to the logical conclusion that well, we need to be
Speaker 2: the ones to evaluate each and every one of you
Speaker 2: to see if you're likely to commit a crime, and
Speaker 2: if you are, then we're going to do something to you.
Speaker 2: Do see how dangerous that is. It's absolutely horrific what
Speaker 2: the Trump people are ushering in. As you've got people
Speaker 2: who are standing on the sidelines applauding them because it's
Speaker 2: in their financial interest to applaud them.
Speaker 8: So yes, it seems like no matter how bad the
Speaker 8: president is, the first lady is worse. You got you know,
Speaker 8: Hillary Clinton pushing healthcare control from the government, and now
Speaker 8: we've got this from Maloonia.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. And one American town, says Brian Senior
Speaker 2: Systems told that they could not sing gospel songs or
Speaker 2: pray over their meals in their community center because it
Speaker 2: was a public building. Only after an extensive lawsuit. Were
Speaker 2: their rights vindicated? And of course this is not even
Speaker 2: during Trump's pandemic. Trump did that to everybody again with
Speaker 2: the pandemic.
Speaker 4: But it's a.
Speaker 2: Difference between the free exercise religion and establishing a religion.
Speaker 2: The fact that the public building doesn't make any sense
Speaker 2: at all. One child was told they couldn't give pencils
Speaker 2: to her school friends that had the word Jesus printed
Speaker 2: on them. Crying, she asked her mom, why does the
Speaker 2: school hate Jesus. Well, the answer from the mom should be, well,
Speaker 2: it does hate Jesus, but I send you there anyway.
Speaker 4: Why do you send your child to?
Speaker 8: Yeah, I mean it's like that good thing to talk
Speaker 8: to your child about why the school does in fact
Speaker 8: hate Jesus.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, out of the mouth of babes, right, These
Speaker 2: young kids get the message their religion is treated the
Speaker 2: same as a curse word. Understand that Hollywood has turned
Speaker 2: Jesus's name into a curse word. They have done it deliberately.
Speaker 2: They don't do it to Buddha, they don't do it
Speaker 2: to Muhammad. As a matter of fact, we had a
Speaker 2: Japanese friend who said is a Christian and said even
Speaker 2: in Japan. You know, people are swearing at Jesus. You know,
Speaker 2: they're not swearing by Buddha or whatever it is that
Speaker 2: they follow. You know, they use Jesus's name as a
Speaker 2: curse word. She said that was one of the key
Speaker 2: things that made her pay attention. Why are they swearing
Speaker 2: at someone that they don't believe in? Right and anyway,
Speaker 2: these children are being taught at a very early age
Speaker 2: keep your religion to yourself. It's dirty, it's bad. And
Speaker 2: so this is he goes through and he traces this
Speaker 2: to the deliberate strategy of some psychologists as well as
Speaker 2: the educational society. You just need to understand how important
Speaker 2: that is and get your kids out of that. Tim
Speaker 2: Waltz then has an emergency legislation session on gun control
Speaker 2: because it's never enough. Right, the question is when is
Speaker 2: he going to have an emergency session to stop the
Speaker 2: gender gas lighting of children which drives them insane. He's
Speaker 2: not going to do that at all. And in Minnesota,
Speaker 2: they have some of the most strict gun control laws anywhere.
Speaker 2: They are ranked as the fourteenth strictest in the nation.
Speaker 2: They have red flag laws, they have universal background checks
Speaker 2: for handgun sales. They have a concealed carry permit requirement,
Speaker 2: they have gun storage laws requirement, they have a bump
Speaker 2: stock van, and they have a ban on so called
Speaker 2: glock switches and many other things. They've enacted basically everything
Speaker 2: that they can think of, and yet they gaslight children
Speaker 2: on this gender thing and drive them nuts.
Speaker 8: So the post while everywhere it turns it into a
Speaker 8: fully automatic gun.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. The Pope has called for an end
Speaker 2: to the pandemic of arms. Isn't that interesting because when
Speaker 2: we had the other fake pandemic, they were trying to
Speaker 2: get into your arms. Now they're trying to take away
Speaker 2: your arms, trying to get into your actual arms, not
Speaker 2: the weapons. Interesting to see this, you know, just to
Speaker 2: understand that maybe a diocese will in some conservative areas
Speaker 2: might try to protect the kids at school, but certainly
Speaker 2: the Catholic Church is not going to do that. They're
Speaker 2: not going to have any school security or defense that's
Speaker 2: going to be there. That's the key thing. And so
Speaker 2: again another fake pandemic, just like the other pandemics. How
Speaker 2: many dozens of Christians, by the way, were slaughtered by
Speaker 2: Muslims this last week for being Christians. Does the Pope
Speaker 2: care about that. No, he ignores that. He ignores that,
Speaker 2: and he's not going to defend the children in the
Speaker 2: Catholic schools either. He announced the quote logic of weapons, Well,
Speaker 2: the logic of weapons is that you can use them
Speaker 2: to protect kids. That's the logic that he doesn't want
Speaker 2: to acknowledge.
Speaker 8: Meanwhile, Phill hates all forms of logic.
Speaker 2: Thomas Massey has introduced a repeal of the Guns Free
Speaker 2: School Zones Act. I remember when this is done back
Speaker 2: in the nineties, actually it was nineteen ninety. It was
Speaker 2: done under George hw Bush. I mean we talked about
Speaker 2: it if you had a firearm within a thousand feet
Speaker 2: of a school, and you could have that. If you're
Speaker 2: driving by and you've got a pistol under your seat
Speaker 2: or something, you're violating this federal gun law. It was
Speaker 2: set up to entrap people, but it's also intimidated a
Speaker 2: lot of schools from not being able to not protect
Speaker 2: their own children. So Thomas Massey has introduced a bill
Speaker 2: to repeal the Gun Free School Zones Act of George hw.
Speaker 4: Bush.
Speaker 2: They always find these Republicans to push this stuff through,
Speaker 2: don't they able to get it through the Republican When
Speaker 2: they can't get it through with a Democrat. Gun owners
Speaker 2: America praise Thomas Massey's push, saying Congress needs to ab
Speaker 2: abandon the failed federal gunfree school policy and armed teachers
Speaker 2: who are willing to do it and are willing to
Speaker 2: get trained. I couldn't support that anymore strongly. That is
Speaker 2: absolutely the way that needs to go real quickly. We
Speaker 2: just got a couple of minutes. I want to talk
Speaker 2: about Ukraine because you've got a couple of different editorials.
Speaker 2: One of them came from Daniel mcaddams with Ron Paul Institute.
Speaker 2: Other people are saying the same thing. There can be
Speaker 2: no peace in Ukraine until Washington admits to itself that
Speaker 2: it has lost the war, that it is at war
Speaker 2: with Russia. And as Daniel McCadam says, if you are
Speaker 2: going to arm one side of a war, you can't
Speaker 2: present yourself as a neutral arbiter in order to have peace.
Speaker 2: And that's exactly what Washington is doing. Funding one side
Speaker 2: of a war between other nations nullifies the funding nations neutral.
Speaker 2: In other words, you can't pretend that you're neutral if
Speaker 2: you were giving weapons to one side in the war,
Speaker 2: which is what Trump is doing. Trump has positioned himself
Speaker 2: as arbitrator and peacemaker between two warring governments, and that's
Speaker 2: the problem Daniel McAdams of The Ron Paulins pointed out
Speaker 2: several months ago in an interview. He said, Washington, it's
Speaker 2: like having a boxing match and the referee starts punching
Speaker 2: one side, And of course Trump did punch back. After
Speaker 2: the meeting that he had with Putin, he sent more
Speaker 2: arms to Ukraine. It's been clear from the beginning to
Speaker 2: anyone that's being honest with himself, this war was never
Speaker 2: between Ukraine and Russia. There's always a war between Washington
Speaker 2: and Russia, fought by Ukrainians on their land but funded
Speaker 2: and directed by Washington. Began in twenty fourteen with the overthrow.
Speaker 2: But when Washington says this just happened, well it didn't
Speaker 2: just happen. It was something that was deliberate. And also
Speaker 2: in Syria, they tried to get the military basis that
Speaker 2: Russia had in Syria and then the one that they
Speaker 2: had in Crimea home to Russia's Black Sea Fleet for
Speaker 2: over two hundred and forty years. They are not going
Speaker 2: to give up that base. That is clearly the situation
Speaker 2: and so when you.
Speaker 4: Look at.
Speaker 2: This situation, as you said, they need to come to
Speaker 2: terms of this because Russia is gaining more territory every
Speaker 2: day if they want to do something about it. But
Speaker 2: you know, one of the things that Trump has thrown
Speaker 2: out there, as soon as he has the talks, he
Speaker 2: comes back and he throws another eight hundred and twenty
Speaker 2: five million dollars worth of arm sales to Ukraine while
Speaker 2: he's out there talking piece.
Speaker 4: He's not serious about this stuff.
Speaker 2: And it's what we've seen from Trump in one issue
Speaker 2: after the other, this difference between what he says and
Speaker 2: what he actually does, and how the two are at
Speaker 2: diometrically opposite to each other. The criminal is going to
Speaker 2: interpret this as another act of US escalation given the
Speaker 2: long range capability. These things are three three hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty extended range attack munition missiles that are part of
Speaker 2: this massive eight hundred and twenty five million dollars and
Speaker 2: it is all being done for the profits of the
Speaker 2: military industrial complex. It's going to be paid for by
Speaker 2: Denmark and Netherlands. They're going to pay for the weapons
Speaker 2: that they buy from the American arms manufacturers to keep
Speaker 2: this thing going. And finally, you have Ukraine pretending that
Speaker 2: it's got long range missiles that it developed on its own.
Speaker 2: They can go sixteen hundred miles into Russia. And yet
Speaker 2: the British presses pointed out that looks exactly like some
Speaker 2: British missiles that were done. And they just had a
Speaker 2: massive scandal involving the company that controls those missiles in
Speaker 2: Ukraine in terms of corruption. So back to the usual stuff.
Speaker 2: But that's it for today. It's all the time we've got.
Speaker 2: Sorry I didn't get a chance to get to the
Speaker 2: last group of comments here, but thank you, have a
Speaker 2: good day, see you all tomorrow. The common man, they
Speaker 2: created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created
Speaker 2: common past track and control us. They're Commons project to
Speaker 2: make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 2: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 2: It's time to turn that around and expose what they
Speaker 2: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 2: find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 2: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 2: please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com