1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:04,400
Speaker 1: Okay, imagine this. What if the biggest race we ever ran,

2
00:00:04,599 --> 00:00:07,360
the space race, didn't actually end of the Moon. What

3
00:00:07,440 --> 00:00:10,640
if that giant leap wasn't you know, the finish line,

4
00:00:10,919 --> 00:00:14,599
but more like a smokescreen, a detour on the way

5
00:00:14,599 --> 00:00:15,839
somewhere much much bigger.

6
00:00:15,960 --> 00:00:18,039
Speaker 2: It's a compelling thought, isn't it. Because there's always been

7
00:00:18,039 --> 00:00:21,839
this sort of background noise, this buzz of speculation that

8
00:00:21,920 --> 00:00:25,000
the official story of space exploration well might be missing

9
00:00:25,039 --> 00:00:26,120
a few chapters exactly.

10
00:00:26,120 --> 00:00:30,679
Speaker 1: We're talking about Project Redson, this persistent idea that maybe,

11
00:00:30,879 --> 00:00:34,119
just maybe humans actually walked on Mars way back in

12
00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:35,640
the nineteen seventies, long.

13
00:00:35,439 --> 00:00:38,600
Speaker 2: Before we were officially told it was even remotely feasible.

14
00:00:38,679 --> 00:00:41,240
Speaker 1: Yeah, sounds like pure sci fi, I get it. But

15
00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:44,920
the amount of claims, the alleged evidence, the supposed cover ups,

16
00:00:45,079 --> 00:00:47,280
it's that's a lot, it really is. So today that's

17
00:00:47,280 --> 00:00:49,520
where we're going, right down the rabbit hole. We'll look

18
00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:52,600
at the stories, the proof that's popped up over the years,

19
00:00:52,759 --> 00:00:55,759
and also, really importantly, why so many people are convinced

20
00:00:55,920 --> 00:00:56,840
it just didn't happen.

21
00:00:57,000 --> 00:00:59,719
Speaker 2: Our mission isn't really to say yay or nay.

22
00:01:00,119 --> 00:01:03,640
Speaker 1: Decinatively, no, not at all. It's more about dissecting this

23
00:01:03,759 --> 00:01:06,680
whole thing, this mystery that just won't go away. Why

24
00:01:06,680 --> 00:01:07,560
does it stick around?

25
00:01:07,799 --> 00:01:10,359
Speaker 2: And that brings up the big question right away, why

26
00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:15,000
the secrecy? I mean landing on Mars, that's monumental. The

27
00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:18,719
whole space race was built on public triumphs, national pride.

28
00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:25,439
Showing off basically hiding a Mars landing feels well, completely backwards.

29
00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:27,640
Speaker 1: Doesn't it. It absolutely does. The story we all know is,

30
00:01:27,680 --> 00:01:30,120
you know, Apollo seventeen lands on the Moon in seventy two,

31
00:01:30,519 --> 00:01:34,480
then bam, budget cuts, Apollo eighteen nineteen twenty all.

32
00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:36,840
Speaker 2: Canceled, poof gone, just like that.

33
00:01:37,319 --> 00:01:40,760
Speaker 1: But this redsin theory says, hold on a second, maybe

34
00:01:40,760 --> 00:01:43,760
those missions didn't just disappear into some accountant spreadsheet. Maybe

35
00:01:43,799 --> 00:01:47,640
they went somewhere else secretly to Mars.

36
00:01:47,760 --> 00:01:49,359
Speaker 2: It does change the picture quite a bit.

37
00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:51,560
Speaker 1: It's like finding out your town's mayor had a secret

38
00:01:51,599 --> 00:01:53,239
life as a I don't know a deep sea explorer.

39
00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:54,959
Speaker 2: Well, and you have to remember the context, right, the

40
00:01:54,959 --> 00:01:57,599
Cold War secrecy around tech military stuff that was just

41
00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,760
standard operating procedure. So the idea of a joint US

42
00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:03,079
Soviet mission, which is part of some reds and theories.

43
00:02:03,519 --> 00:02:04,519
Speaker 1: Wow, can you make that.

44
00:02:04,519 --> 00:02:07,319
Speaker 2: Would have been politically explosive if it got out. Then

45
00:02:07,599 --> 00:02:10,520
it suggests a level of cooperation or maybe just mutual

46
00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:14,280
interest that seems almost unthinkable for that era.

47
00:02:14,479 --> 00:02:16,879
Speaker 1: Totally unthinkable. Yeah, and that's kind of where the first

48
00:02:16,919 --> 00:02:20,319
alleged breadcrumbs start appearing. Remember back in what twenty eleven

49
00:02:20,319 --> 00:02:24,120
and this Italian journalist Lucas Kenton Burrow, Oh.

50
00:02:24,039 --> 00:02:25,800
Speaker 2: Yeah, I remember him. He made quite a.

51
00:02:25,719 --> 00:02:29,080
Speaker 1: Splash, didn't he. He held this press conference, claimed redsin

52
00:02:29,199 --> 00:02:33,719
was real, talk about secret sources, leaked emails, classified papers.

53
00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:37,439
But the thing that really grabbed everyone that super grainy

54
00:02:37,479 --> 00:02:42,159
photo he showed supposedly buzz Aldrin on Mars right.

55
00:02:42,199 --> 00:02:44,439
Speaker 2: And that's the thing with this kind of evidence, isn't

56
00:02:44,439 --> 00:02:48,879
it grainy photos, secondhand accounts. They often lack the hard

57
00:02:48,879 --> 00:02:53,159
details you need to actually verify anything, definitely, but that ambiguity, ironically,

58
00:02:53,199 --> 00:02:55,120
it can kind of fuel the belief. It gives you

59
00:02:55,280 --> 00:02:57,879
just enough to spark your imagination, but not enough to

60
00:02:57,919 --> 00:03:01,840
easily shoot it down. Classic hope territory really leaves room

61
00:03:01,879 --> 00:03:02,639
for wishful thinking.

62
00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:05,080
Speaker 1: That's a great point. And then you've got these comments

63
00:03:05,120 --> 00:03:08,120
from actual Apollo astronauts. Sometimes they say things that are

64
00:03:08,120 --> 00:03:12,479
a little cryptic jigu, Yeah, people jump on them, interpreting

65
00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:15,360
them as hints about secret Mars stuff like buzz Aldrin

66
00:03:15,439 --> 00:03:19,800
talking about a strange structure on Fobos, Mars's moon.

67
00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:21,159
Speaker 2: Right the monolith comment.

68
00:03:21,360 --> 00:03:23,719
Speaker 1: Yeah. And Gene Cernan, you know, the last man on

69
00:03:23,759 --> 00:03:26,240
the Moon. He made some remarks about future Mars trips

70
00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:30,360
that some people read is looking back at past unacknowledged trips.

71
00:03:30,599 --> 00:03:33,120
Speaker 2: It's intriguing, for sure, but you have to be careful.

72
00:03:33,159 --> 00:03:36,960
These guys saw things, experience things we can barely imagine true,

73
00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:39,039
so when they talk about space it might sound odd

74
00:03:39,039 --> 00:03:41,800
to us anyway, Jumping from I'm interested in Mars to

75
00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:45,840
I secretly went to Mars. That's a pretty big leap.

76
00:03:45,759 --> 00:03:48,599
Speaker 1: It is, it really is? Okay. Then there's the whistleblower angle.

77
00:03:48,879 --> 00:03:52,080
This guy known only is Bravo Xcierra twenty four Ah, Yes,

78
00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:56,400
the anonymous source supposedly smuggled photos out of NASA picture

79
00:03:56,439 --> 00:03:58,840
showing you know, astronauts on a reddish planet, a little

80
00:03:58,879 --> 00:04:01,199
habitat thing, a rover, and the pyramid.

81
00:04:01,520 --> 00:04:04,120
Speaker 2: Can't forget the alleged pyramid in a crater.

82
00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:06,680
Speaker 1: Right, the pyramid. I mean, that's the kind of visual that,

83
00:04:06,879 --> 00:04:08,319
if it's real, just blows your mind.

84
00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:12,439
Speaker 2: If it's real, that's the key verifying where these came

85
00:04:12,479 --> 00:04:16,399
from their authenticity. Without a clear chain of custody, without

86
00:04:16,399 --> 00:04:19,480
proper analysis, they just stay in the claims bucket.

87
00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:24,079
Speaker 1: Yeah, compelling images, sure, but skepticism is kind of your

88
00:04:24,079 --> 00:04:25,040
best friend here, like.

89
00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:29,000
Speaker 2: Seeing a blurry UFO photo. Exciting maybe, but not proof.

90
00:04:29,959 --> 00:04:33,199
Speaker 1: And what about the testimonies? There was Jackie right, former

91
00:04:33,279 --> 00:04:34,279
NASA worker HM.

92
00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:36,360
Speaker 2: Her story was quite something since she.

93
00:04:36,399 --> 00:04:40,160
Speaker 1: Was working monitoring the Viking lander feed back in seventy

94
00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:43,319
nine and suddenly sees two figures in spacesuits walking around

95
00:04:43,319 --> 00:04:45,519
on Mars live feed and then.

96
00:04:45,439 --> 00:04:47,959
Speaker 2: Poof, cut off as soon as someone realized what was showing.

97
00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:51,240
Speaker 1: Yeah, the classic oops, shouldn't have seen that moment, conspiracy gold.

98
00:04:51,319 --> 00:04:54,560
Speaker 2: It's a captivating story, no doubt, but it's entirely her word,

99
00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:58,120
her memory. Decades later, How do you even begin to

100
00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:00,920
verify that, especially if the whole point was it cover

101
00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:04,319
up impossible pretty much, and memory's tricky, you know, without

102
00:05:04,319 --> 00:05:07,560
any backup, it's just an anecdote, a really interesting one,

103
00:05:07,560 --> 00:05:08,519
but still an anecdote.

104
00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:12,199
Speaker 1: Then you have William Rutledge. Now his story is wild, oh.

105
00:05:12,160 --> 00:05:15,000
Speaker 2: Ruttledge, Yeah, that goes way beyond just landing on Mars.

106
00:05:15,160 --> 00:05:17,720
Speaker 1: He claimed he was a retired astronaut flew on these

107
00:05:17,759 --> 00:05:21,959
secret ships, the ISV Columbus. Yea in Melbourne.

108
00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:24,639
Speaker 2: That's it. So they went to the Moon and Mars,

109
00:05:24,759 --> 00:05:28,480
and that Apolla nineteen and twenty were actually these secret Mars.

110
00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:32,879
Speaker 1: Missions and the goal wasn't just exploration, right, it was alien.

111
00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:40,560
Speaker 2: Tech, retrieval tools, bits of spacecraft, even an extraterrestrial body supposedly. Wow, Okay, look,

112
00:05:40,639 --> 00:05:43,319
Rutledge's claims are probably the most out there, and frankly

113
00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:46,360
they've been pretty thoroughly debunked by space buffs. There's just

114
00:05:46,439 --> 00:05:48,399
no record of him. Lots of holes in his story.

115
00:05:48,560 --> 00:05:50,800
Speaker 1: So more gripping narrative than fact.

116
00:05:50,759 --> 00:05:53,800
Speaker 2: Seems that way. Yeah, fascinating story is zero evidence.

117
00:05:53,920 --> 00:05:56,399
Speaker 1: It really is this tangled mess of stories, isn't it.

118
00:05:56,480 --> 00:05:58,920
And then Gary McKinnon throws another wrench in. Yeah, the

119
00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:02,639
Scottish guy who got the NASA and Pentagon computers, right.

120
00:06:02,519 --> 00:06:05,639
Speaker 2: The hacker who apparently just found unlocked doors, no passwords,

121
00:06:05,639 --> 00:06:06,079
that kind.

122
00:06:05,920 --> 00:06:08,120
Speaker 1: Of thing kind of amazing really, Yeah, and he finds

123
00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:12,120
his spreadsheet labeled non terrestrial officers.

124
00:06:11,959 --> 00:06:15,319
Speaker 2: And lists of Navy ships that weren't on any public record,

125
00:06:15,439 --> 00:06:18,399
which to him screamed secret space program.

126
00:06:18,519 --> 00:06:21,360
Speaker 1: It's almost funny the idea of hiding spaceships on an

127
00:06:21,439 --> 00:06:22,639
unsecured spreadsheet.

128
00:06:22,680 --> 00:06:25,199
Speaker 2: Well, what's not funny is how hard the US government

129
00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:27,759
went after him try and extradite him. That part was

130
00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:30,639
very real. Definitely, it shows they were serious about the

131
00:06:30,639 --> 00:06:35,199
breach whatever he actually saw. But does non terrestrial officers

132
00:06:35,399 --> 00:06:39,680
automatically mean astronauts on Mars could mean lots of classified

133
00:06:39,759 --> 00:06:41,639
but maybe less exciting things.

134
00:06:41,839 --> 00:06:45,519
Speaker 1: Good point. And we can't forget doctor John Brandenburg, the

135
00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:49,040
physicist with the ancient Martian civilization theory.

136
00:06:49,160 --> 00:06:51,319
Speaker 2: Ah, yes, the nuclear war on Mars idea.

137
00:06:51,279 --> 00:06:54,720
Speaker 1: Exactly wiped out by nukes, and he thinks NASA is

138
00:06:54,759 --> 00:06:55,600
hiding the evidence.

139
00:06:56,079 --> 00:06:58,959
Speaker 2: Brandenburg's work is based on his analysis of isotopes and

140
00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:02,720
surface features on Mars, but it's definitely, let's say, outside

141
00:07:02,759 --> 00:07:06,000
the mainstream scientific consensus hugely. His link to Red Sun

142
00:07:06,160 --> 00:07:08,519
is more thematic. This idea that if NASA is hiding

143
00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:11,839
secret missions, maybe they're also hiding evidence of ancient Martians.

144
00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:14,879
It just adds to the whole grand cover up narrative.

145
00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:20,360
Speaker 1: So we've got photos, testimonies, hacked files, scientific theories, all

146
00:07:20,399 --> 00:07:21,519
these little pieces.

147
00:07:21,199 --> 00:07:22,920
Speaker 2: Floating around, intriguing pieces.

148
00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:25,279
Speaker 1: Yeah, but and this is the big butt, right. Yeah.

149
00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:28,600
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary.

150
00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:30,959
Speaker 2: Evidence, precisely. And that's where Red Sun, for all its

151
00:07:31,120 --> 00:07:33,600
you know, undeniable fascination, really struggle.

152
00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:35,279
Speaker 1: Yeah. That solid proof just isn't there.

153
00:07:35,399 --> 00:07:40,720
Speaker 2: The lack of anything verifiable, anything independently confirmed. That's the

154
00:07:40,759 --> 00:07:44,000
wall you hit. The idea of a hidden history is exciting,

155
00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:47,079
no doubt, but you can't build history on anecdotes and

156
00:07:47,079 --> 00:07:50,800
blurry pictures, critical thinking, solid evidence, that's what you need.

157
00:07:51,439 --> 00:07:54,639
Speaker 1: Still, it makes you wonder why this idea persists so strongly,

158
00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:57,279
Why Mars in the seventies. What's the appeal?

159
00:07:57,519 --> 00:08:00,199
Speaker 2: Maybe it taps into something deep, you know, that feeling

160
00:08:00,279 --> 00:08:02,319
that the official story isn't always the.

161
00:08:02,319 --> 00:08:05,439
Speaker 1: Whole story, a bit of healthy skepticism towards authority.

162
00:08:05,079 --> 00:08:09,360
Speaker 2: Maybe, and also just wonder the possibility that amazing things

163
00:08:09,399 --> 00:08:12,000
happened just outside our view. It makes a world feel

164
00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:14,639
a bit more mysterious, maybe more exciting than the everyday

165
00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:15,360
And think.

166
00:08:15,199 --> 00:08:18,199
Speaker 1: About the era too, massive tech leaps the Cold War

167
00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:19,720
paranoia exactly.

168
00:08:19,839 --> 00:08:22,879
Speaker 2: The space race itself wasn't exactly an open book, was it.

169
00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:27,399
Lots of classified military angles for sure. So the idea

170
00:08:27,480 --> 00:08:30,680
that even more secret stuff was happening alongside the public

171
00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:35,440
missions it doesn't feel completely impossible. In that context, secrecy

172
00:08:35,519 --> 00:08:37,120
was kind of the default setting back then.

173
00:08:37,399 --> 00:08:40,600
Speaker 1: That's a really good point. The lines between science prestige

174
00:08:40,639 --> 00:08:44,600
and military applications were probably way blurrier than we think.

175
00:08:44,759 --> 00:08:49,679
Speaker 2: The rockets, the life support, navigation, all that tech needed

176
00:08:49,679 --> 00:08:52,840
for the Moon had obvious dual uses. It wasn't just

177
00:08:52,879 --> 00:08:54,039
about planting a flag.

178
00:08:54,279 --> 00:08:57,360
Speaker 1: Okay, But here's something interesting. Some details mentioned in these

179
00:08:57,440 --> 00:09:00,519
red Sun claims, like that mar used.

180
00:09:00,360 --> 00:09:02,960
Speaker 2: To have water, which we now know is true thanks

181
00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:03,799
to later probes.

182
00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:08,200
Speaker 1: Right, yeah, so does that give any retroactive credibility to

183
00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:10,879
the secret vision claims because they mentioned stuff that turned

184
00:09:10,879 --> 00:09:11,559
out to be real.

185
00:09:11,759 --> 00:09:14,080
Speaker 2: It's tempting to connect those dots. I get it, but

186
00:09:14,159 --> 00:09:16,600
we have to be careful about confirmation bias. Just because

187
00:09:16,600 --> 00:09:20,240
one detail aligns with later science doesn't validate the core

188
00:09:20,440 --> 00:09:22,240
claim the secret landings.

189
00:09:21,799 --> 00:09:24,480
Speaker 1: Right, Correlation isn't causation exactly.

190
00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:27,600
Speaker 2: Science proved the water thing through its own methods. Evidence

191
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,399
peer review, none of which exists. For Red Sun, those

192
00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:34,840
coincidences could be informed guesses, could be chance.

193
00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:38,480
Speaker 1: Okay, fair enough, But what are the landing coordinates? Some

194
00:09:38,639 --> 00:09:41,600
Red Sun stories mentioned specific spots on Mars.

195
00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:44,360
Speaker 2: That later turned out to be near where actual NASA

196
00:09:44,440 --> 00:09:47,279
rovers landed. Yeah, that one always raises eyebrows.

197
00:09:47,360 --> 00:09:50,000
Speaker 1: It seems too specific for pure chance, doesn't it.

198
00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:53,080
Speaker 2: It does seem specific. But even without secret landings, NASA

199
00:09:53,080 --> 00:09:56,720
would have been doing long term planning, serving potential future

200
00:09:56,759 --> 00:10:00,240
sites for decades. Ah, So maybe those coordinates came from

201
00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:06,720
early legitimate surveys and planning documents, information management, strategic foresight

202
00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:10,720
that could explain it without needing hidden astronauts, like scouting

203
00:10:10,759 --> 00:10:12,320
movie locations years ahead.

204
00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:15,840
Speaker 1: That makes sense, And now fast forward to today, Space

205
00:10:15,919 --> 00:10:19,559
isn't just NASA anymore. You've got SpaceX, Blue Origin.

206
00:10:19,360 --> 00:10:22,679
Speaker 2: Right, private companies with big Mars ambitions.

207
00:10:22,159 --> 00:10:25,840
Speaker 1: Operating with maybe potentially less public oversight than a government agency.

208
00:10:26,120 --> 00:10:28,840
Speaker 2: It definitely adds a new layer as private companies take

209
00:10:28,879 --> 00:10:33,200
a bigger role, transparency might change accountability, It might.

210
00:10:33,039 --> 00:10:35,879
Speaker 1: Look different, which could just fuel even more speculation about

211
00:10:35,879 --> 00:10:37,679
what's happening off camera, so to speak.

212
00:10:37,759 --> 00:10:41,159
Speaker 2: It's a whole new dynamic, a new frontier, maybe with

213
00:10:41,320 --> 00:10:42,799
fewer public eyes on it.

214
00:10:42,799 --> 00:10:46,600
Speaker 1: It almost feels like like the stage is being set

215
00:10:46,639 --> 00:10:51,399
differently now. Maybe NASA releasing Mars infos slowly, piece by

216
00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:56,399
piece is part of that, like managing expectations, prepping us, Yeah,

217
00:10:56,440 --> 00:10:59,159
prepping us maybe, So it's not a huge shock when

218
00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:02,720
SpaceX land and finds something unexpected, something NASA maybe new

219
00:11:02,759 --> 00:11:03,519
about already.

220
00:11:03,639 --> 00:11:07,480
Speaker 2: That's a really thought provoking idea strategic information release. Are

221
00:11:07,519 --> 00:11:10,120
they guiding the narrative to avoid surprises linked to the

222
00:11:10,159 --> 00:11:13,799
past or just managing our understanding of current discoveries?

223
00:11:13,879 --> 00:11:14,399
Speaker 1: Who knows?

224
00:11:14,519 --> 00:11:16,960
Speaker 2: It? Really highlights the power of information, doesn't it? Who

225
00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:18,679
controls it when it gets released?

226
00:11:18,840 --> 00:11:23,000
Speaker 1: So wrapping this up, we've gone through the claims, the evidence,

227
00:11:23,039 --> 00:11:27,240
the debunking, the context, Project Redsin. It seems lacks that

228
00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:27,960
solid proof.

229
00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:29,960
Speaker 2: Substantiation is definitely missing.

230
00:11:29,919 --> 00:11:34,000
Speaker 1: But the story itself, the questions it raises about secrecy,

231
00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:37,320
about what's possible, it's still pretty compelling, isn't it.

232
00:11:37,480 --> 00:11:40,639
Speaker 2: Absolutely? Even if the nineteen seventies Mars landings are almost

233
00:11:40,639 --> 00:11:45,120
certainly myth, the underlying themes government transparency, the unknowns of space,

234
00:11:45,399 --> 00:11:49,879
the potential for hidden history, they still resonate deeply.

235
00:11:49,639 --> 00:11:51,919
Speaker 1: And as we actually do get closer to sending people

236
00:11:51,919 --> 00:11:53,480
to Mars for real this.

237
00:11:53,480 --> 00:11:55,720
Speaker 2: Time, hopefully for real this time, it.

238
00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:58,519
Speaker 1: Makes you think about these alternative narratives, Why do they

239
00:11:58,559 --> 00:12:02,320
get created, why do they stick, and what do both

240
00:12:02,360 --> 00:12:05,320
the official stories and these unproven theories tell us about

241
00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:08,120
ourselves and our whole push out into the Solar System.

242
00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:11,159
Speaker 2: It's definitely something to chew on, isn't it a fascinating

243
00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:14,200
lens for looking at our past, present, and future in

244
00:12:14,240 --> 00:12:14,600
space