Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And I also I think that we just need to
remain vigilant because while this administration is doing many things
to fight the globalist agendas, including the World Economic Forum's
Great Reset, that this is a long term vision for society,
a long term ideology. So I think complacency could be
a danger and we should just remain vigilant. And also
understand that the US, while it's an important player in
the global landscape, it's not the only country and government
out there, So there are other governments that are more susceptible.
Speaker 3: You are listening to Carrie Lutz's Financial Survival Network, where
you get valuable information you just can't find anywhere else
to thrive in today's trying times. You need the Financial
Survival Network now more than ever. Go to Financial Survivalnetwork
dot com and get your free newsletter and gift. Financial
Survival Network now more than ever.
Speaker 1: And welcome you are listening to and watching the Financial
Survival Network. I'm your host, Terry Lutz. Well, we're just
about blown through February. Who would have thought February would bring?
What has brought the age of Doge and what a
difference it's making. Has Doge stopped the Great Reset dead
in its tracks or is Doge just all a part
of it? Well, Mark Grober is with us now, and Mark,
it's great to have you on the show. So what
of Doge? Has it stopped the Democrats and the Great
Reset Plan, the sous planned flaus Schwab? Has it stopped
them dead in their tracks and really sent them running
for cover?
Speaker 2: I don't know if it's fully stopped it, but it
certainly exposed many things that have been suspected, let's say,
about government corruption and where money has been going. So
this level of transparency is a very new thing, and
let's see how it all plays out. And what I
do wonder, though, Kerrie, is how much of this true
information that's being uncovered we'll make it to the more
mainstream press, because it seems to be a desire to
suppress the information or to downplay or to make the
people pulling for transparency out to be fascists.
Speaker 4: And so will people see the truth or not?
Speaker 1: I got two questions for you. I'm looking to get
tickets for that trans sexual opera in Slovakia, but I
can't find it on a ticket master. So if you
can tell me where I can find it, I'm really interested.
But seriously, Number two is the mainstream media is obsolete.
Has proved in the election. They tried everything they could
to stop the current occupant of the White House from
a seating. I mean, the deep state. Everybody was out there,
the legal system, everybody was out there trying to stop them,
and they failed.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I agree with you.
Speaker 2: I guess the reason for my hesitancy comes from my background.
I have a super mainstream background, and before I was
even interested in politics, I went to Princeton, worked in
investment banking in New York, worked in Silicon Valley for
about a decade.
Speaker 4: So, as you can imagine, many.
Speaker 2: Of the people in my network from that era believe
in the mainstream narrative. So I'm exposed to some of
that of people who I would call highly intelligent from
an intellectual perspective, who've only seen one part of the
narrative and they haven't been exposed to a lot of
what you cover on your show or what more alternative
media sources point to. So I am optimistic in many ways,
but I'm also somewhat pessimistic that certain people are not
looking at the other side, because I also think it
would be very disturbing to their worldview to realize that
they've been misled for so long.
Speaker 1: Yeah, let's see, we're going to ask groc whether this
happened or not, whether Trump has defeated the deep state.
Given the information available, Trump's attempts to fundamentally alter the
structure of government to eliminate this perceived deep state have
not been fully realized or sustained beyond his administration. So,
like you said, the verdict is still out right.
Speaker 2: But yeah, and I also I think that we just
need to remain vigilant because while this administration is doing
many things to fight the globalist agendas, including the World
Economic Forum's great reset that this is a long term
vision for society, a long term ideology. So I think
complacency could be a danger, and we should just remain vigilant.
And also understand that the US, while it's an important
player in the global landscape, it's not the only country
and government out there.
Speaker 4: So there are other governments that are more susceptible.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, so where does this leave us here?
I mean, I think he's definitely put the scare into it.
Like you see all these people Dems mostly demonstrating and singing.
I mean, it's really cringey type stuff they're singing. Leave
it to a senator or a congress person to kill
like really great songs. You know. They just have no
talent other than to rape and pillage. But do you
think the latter they cry, the more on the take
they are or is this just a philosophical thing.
Speaker 4: It's a good question.
Speaker 2: Well, I think at the very least, what's being exposed
is that there is a completely illogical counter narrative that
we've seen for a long time. But it's exposing itself
more and more, and we're hearing things like just this week,
I believe it was on CBS, one of the news
anchors was comparing what's happening in the US with free
speech to Nazi Germany, seeming to claim that in Nazi
Germany there was too much free speech.
Speaker 4: So that was somewhat interesting.
Speaker 2: And also what we're seeing happening in Germany is pretty scary,
where posting certain things on social media can lead people
to be arrested or.
Speaker 1: Cof skidd, Yeah, the attack of the name. They can't
deal with memes. They have no sense of humor. And
that's just the way liberals have always been. So what's
the next step do you see in this fight here? Mark?
Speaker 4: To me, the next step is continuing to expose the
corruption and the truth which has been hidden by the
mainstream for so long.
Speaker 2: I mean, just compare what we are carry today in
twenty twenty five versus twenty twenty when the Hunter Biden
laptop story was being censored on Twitter. Now this sort
of thing is mainstream, so there's massive positive momentum, and
I think we just have to keep it up and
shows like yours that are presenting these alternative views are
really important because, as we've been discussing, there are some
people who don't see it, and I think they're smart
enough where if they did see it, they could shift.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, they don't want to see it. You know
that from a few good men, Jack Nicholson, you can't
handle the truth, right. They don't want to know because
it will upset their view of the world and the way.
You know, everyone wants to believe that they're right. So
what happens when you find out that you're wrong and
your view of the world is wrong, and your view
of the world is part of your own view, self view,
your own identity, it's hard for many of you out
there to just just stop believing completely agree.
Speaker 2: And there's also something I discussed in my book and
end to the up side on reset on political psychology
because I tried to psychoanalyze the left what's going on here?
I've been wanting to understand it. And there is this
emphasis on compassion, which is in many ways a good thing,
but it can blind people where they view themselves to
be so compassionate, where they will then not look at
the ways in which they're actually not being compassionate. And
to your point, if they realize that they've been wrong,
then they would have to realize that they have not
been compassionate, and that would destroy their self image.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and what's compassionate about supporting failing schools that trap
minorities in a cycle of poverty and crime and fatherlessness
and all of this the same thing with welfare. Welfare
broke up these minority families, Black families in particular. I
can remember the day when my father rented some apartments
in a place in New Jersey and one of the
black tenants, she was supposedly not living with their husband,
but he would he had moved out quote unquote moved out,
but he was really living there, but the welfare department
was doing checks on him to see if he was there,
because if he was there, she couldn't collect benefits. You know,
it's a very twisted way of expressing compassion, isn't it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, it's typically a superficial compassion. For example, the
term equality, that's something that we hear a lot about
from the left. But as the Nobel Prize winning economist F. A.
Hayek put it, human beings by definition are distinct and unique,
meaning we're all different. We're unequal in that way. So
if you wanted to enforce equality because we're unequal, you'd
have to treat each person unequally. It goes against the
entire principle.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and then there's equality of opportunity and equality of
the outcome. Quality of opportunity is like, you want to
be an airline pilot. The opportunities out there, but we're
not going to make you an airline pilot if you
can't pass it on your own. Right, The whole DEI
thing breaks down when you view it from opportunity to outcome.
And that's the whole thing about equity, right, Yes, what
is equity. I don't understand what that term means, do you?
Speaker 2: And it seems like forcing people to do things that
a certain ideology wants and using a term that sounds
like it's compassionate on the surface, just like diversity. Thomas
soul the Great Economist, said, if you want to talk
about diversity, why don't you ask how many Republicans there
are in the university's sociology department, Because typically we're talking
about diversity in very superficial ways like skin color or gender,
but not in ideology or other things.
Speaker 1: So true, so true, not diversity of thought, just superficial diversity.
And you know, everybody, all of us out there, want
everybody to be their best that they can be, to
achieve your potential. To me, like it's a crime when
someone doesn't achieve their potential, whether it's because they make
bad choices, bad upbringing. But the left would have you
believe that unless the government gives a helping hand, they
have no ability to realize their potential whatsoever. And the
right seems to me believes that we'll give you a
helping hand, but basically you've got to pull yourself up.
We can't push you up there.
Speaker 2: Well, the lefts of view, as you describe it, is
very much condescending and patronizing. It's basically saying, well, you
aren't really capable of anything on your own unless this
body helps you out, whereas the alternative, I think is
more empowering to people, which is where I would love
to see design and go.
Speaker 1: For sure, for sure, So your book, give us the
name again and how we get it?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's called an End to the Upside Down Reset.
It's available on Amazon in paperback, kindle and audible formats.
Speaker 4: It goes through the psychology of the left.
Speaker 2: It deconstructs the great Resets agenda, including how they've culture, politics, economics, environment, technology,
and metaphysics, and hopefully by exposing that we can prevent
this long term vision from being enacted.
Speaker 1: All right, And it's available on Amazon and wherever find
books used to be sold. And if you've got a
question from Mark or myself, shooting me an email as
always Klatcarrie LUTs dot com. And while you're at it,
you can find a link to the book on the
show notes to this interview and Financial Survival Network dot com.
Just to ask when you go there, sign up for
our free newsletter Mark been a pleasure. Great luck on
the book.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Kerry, thanks for listening to Carrie Lutz's Financial
Survival Network, your solution to today's trying times. For the latest,
go to Financial Survivalnetwork dot com. Financial Survival Network now
more than ever,