1
00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:27,760
Speaker 1: And here we are welcome to the Big Podcast on

2
00:00:28,039 --> 00:00:32,600
this Monday. Today is the seventeenth day of November, year

3
00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:36,799
of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. My name is Tom Sullivan.

4
00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:40,159
So man alive? Was that a one eighty or what?

5
00:00:40,280 --> 00:00:43,359
Did you get? A whipped saw? I mean you might

6
00:00:43,399 --> 00:00:48,200
need to go see a chiropractor for your neck. So

7
00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:53,439
President Trump was jumping up and down about the Epstein

8
00:00:53,920 --> 00:01:00,399
vote and the files, and it was clear that it

9
00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:05,560
made him look like he was hiding something, and somebody,

10
00:01:05,599 --> 00:01:08,400
I would love to know what the inside story. Someday

11
00:01:08,439 --> 00:01:11,719
we'll hear it after he's long done with his presidency.

12
00:01:11,799 --> 00:01:14,920
Somebody to write a book and go, what was it

13
00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:16,840
that all of a sudden you went from no way

14
00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:19,719
know how you're not going to release those Epstein files

15
00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:23,040
and went after any Republican that even hinted that they

16
00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:25,120
might vote for something like that. By the way, the

17
00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:30,439
vote on the Epstein files is tomorrow at eleven am,

18
00:01:30,480 --> 00:01:36,159
Tuesday the eighteenth, at eleven am. But somewhere over the

19
00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:40,640
weekend somebody got to him and he came out this

20
00:01:40,799 --> 00:01:44,719
morning and said, Epstein File's fine, let's release them all.

21
00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:48,400
Vote for the as vote for the whole thing. Everybody. Yes,

22
00:01:48,439 --> 00:01:54,640
it's just fine. So I don't even know where to

23
00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:58,280
begin with something like this. Adam Horowitz is one of

24
00:01:58,319 --> 00:02:01,400
the attorneys. There's a whole bunch of attorneys talking that

25
00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:07,879
are label to ask lawyers for the victims, and he's

26
00:02:07,959 --> 00:02:09,840
one of them. Let's see what he has to say.

27
00:02:10,439 --> 00:02:14,039
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is quite a dramatic turn by the presidents.

28
00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:17,080
Big a change as you'll see him make. And but

29
00:02:17,199 --> 00:02:20,960
let's be clear, the alternative would have been worse for him.

30
00:02:21,039 --> 00:02:24,800
He would have been facing a sharp rebuke from Republican

31
00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:29,159
congress members, so it was probably a necessary move for

32
00:02:29,240 --> 00:02:33,280
him to make. But we're glad to see that he

33
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:36,360
is in support of this bill, and hopefully some more

34
00:02:36,400 --> 00:02:38,560
records will soon see the light of the day, because

35
00:02:38,599 --> 00:02:41,240
one of the things that the clients that I'm speaking

36
00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:45,000
with want to see is politics taken out of the equation.

37
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:49,479
A crime is a crime, no matter your party, and

38
00:02:49,599 --> 00:02:53,000
victims do not want this turned into a political weapon.

39
00:02:53,479 --> 00:02:57,199
They simply want justice. And yet almost every statement from

40
00:02:57,199 --> 00:03:01,319
this president and his administration has injected politics into the issue,

41
00:03:02,159 --> 00:03:05,879
falsely at times calling it a Democrat hoax, a scam,

42
00:03:06,360 --> 00:03:10,759
and even attacking his own supporters for demanding accountability. So

43
00:03:10,960 --> 00:03:14,879
that's what victims don't want. Our clients come from every background.

44
00:03:14,919 --> 00:03:19,400
I represent abuse survivors, where Democrats or Republicans, they don't

45
00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:22,280
want this turned into a political football in which only

46
00:03:22,319 --> 00:03:26,280
the president's opponents become the target of a criminal investigation.

47
00:03:26,520 --> 00:03:29,240
President now calling for the release of records, and at

48
00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:32,759
the same breath he's asking the Attorney in general to

49
00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:36,199
investigate certain people, and it could be turned into a

50
00:03:36,199 --> 00:03:41,120
situation where the Attorney General says, well, well, we can investigate,

51
00:03:41,159 --> 00:03:44,199
but we can't release the records. And so that is

52
00:03:44,199 --> 00:03:46,520
a bit of a concern. It's difficult to know if

53
00:03:46,520 --> 00:03:50,400
we'll get the full accounting. And what clients want above

54
00:03:50,439 --> 00:03:54,680
all else is transparency. They want the public to finally

55
00:03:54,719 --> 00:03:58,800
see how law enforcement failed them and how Epstein and

56
00:03:58,879 --> 00:04:02,080
his accomplices received preferential treatments.

57
00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:05,080
Speaker 1: Well, so he bills himself as one of the one

58
00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:08,039
of the lawyers representing the victims. There's a lot of

59
00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:11,280
victims in the Epstein story. But I don't think this

60
00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:14,680
guy knows what he's talking about. He says, yeah, my

61
00:04:15,280 --> 00:04:20,480
clients want to make sure that this isn't a political football. Well,

62
00:04:20,519 --> 00:04:23,040
and to get politics out of it. That's not going

63
00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:26,600
to happen. It's full of politics. And as far as

64
00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:29,680
whether you think you're going to get all the information,

65
00:04:30,279 --> 00:04:34,800
how do you know. Well, here's another attorney who bills

66
00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:40,680
himself as a victim attorney. His name is Naima Ramini.

67
00:04:41,519 --> 00:04:44,720
Speaker 3: Here's what he has to say, Pamela Will under the

68
00:04:44,879 --> 00:04:49,199
Epstein files transparency. The House is trying to get everything

69
00:04:49,240 --> 00:04:52,000
that the Department of Justice has, and let's be honest here,

70
00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:56,240
the DOJ can choose to release these files at any time.

71
00:04:56,319 --> 00:04:59,319
There are some restrictions, of course, for grand jury material

72
00:04:59,639 --> 00:05:03,360
and for material that identifies victims of sex abuse, but

73
00:05:03,720 --> 00:05:06,519
these are privileges that the Department of Justice has, the

74
00:05:06,600 --> 00:05:10,759
law enforcement privileges, the deliberative process privilege, executive privilege. They

75
00:05:10,759 --> 00:05:13,319
can waive that at any moment and release the files.

76
00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:17,879
But if they produce everything to Congress, I expect that

77
00:05:17,959 --> 00:05:22,160
to include everything, the judicial files, the terabytes of data

78
00:05:22,160 --> 00:05:25,000
that were discussed in the Gelane Maxwell case, the Virginia

79
00:05:25,079 --> 00:05:28,160
ju Free civil case. And I think if Congress does

80
00:05:28,199 --> 00:05:30,519
have everything, we're going to see a lot more.

81
00:05:30,319 --> 00:05:32,399
Speaker 4: Than the emails that were released last week.

82
00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:35,519
Speaker 3: Potentially YUS and we know the US Attorney's Office in

83
00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:39,199
the Southern District of New York, Attorney US Attorney Clayton

84
00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:40,399
is going to lead that investigation.

85
00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:41,240
Speaker 4: But let's not forget.

86
00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:43,800
Speaker 3: But just in July, the dj issued its memos saying

87
00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:48,040
there's no basis to charge anyone else related to the

88
00:05:48,120 --> 00:05:51,399
Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse So that would be a one

89
00:05:51,439 --> 00:05:53,560
to eighty not just for President Trump, but for the

90
00:05:53,639 --> 00:05:57,560
DOJ itself. And when you're talking about a legal case,

91
00:05:57,639 --> 00:06:01,160
you need more than what's in the Epstein file, those emails,

92
00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:05,000
or even Virginia Jiuffre's memoir. For a criminal prosecution, or

93
00:06:05,040 --> 00:06:07,279
even a civil case for that matter, you're going to

94
00:06:07,360 --> 00:06:12,279
need a ready, willing and able victim. And unless someone

95
00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:17,199
comes forward and accuses anyone of sex abuse and that

96
00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:20,639
person is willing to testify a trial, everything that we've

97
00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:25,040
seen it's hearsay. And under the confrontation Clause of the Constitution,

98
00:06:25,439 --> 00:06:28,000
anyone who's accused of criminal defender, they have a right

99
00:06:28,040 --> 00:06:30,959
to cross examine their accusers. So we're going to need

100
00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:33,319
more than the evidence that we've been talking about, whether

101
00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:37,720
it's emails, whether it's videos, to actually pursue a prosecution

102
00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:40,319
against anyone. Everything we've seen so far is more for

103
00:06:40,399 --> 00:06:42,959
the court of public opinion than evidence that can actually

104
00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:44,199
be introduced in the court room.

105
00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:46,759
Speaker 1: Now, I think this guy hit the nail on the head,

106
00:06:47,519 --> 00:06:50,040
even though he's representing victims. In other words, why I

107
00:06:50,040 --> 00:06:53,000
have never understood, and I'm sure there's probably some liability

108
00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:55,879
reasons for it. Why don't the victims come out and

109
00:06:56,000 --> 00:07:01,800
name names and say, Joe Doe, here's his name, he

110
00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:07,720
raped me when I was under age, Name names. What

111
00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:10,839
have they been waiting for? And so this guy says,

112
00:07:11,399 --> 00:07:16,279
all this releasing files and emails isn't going to get

113
00:07:16,319 --> 00:07:22,600
anybody anywhere unless one of these victims comes forward and

114
00:07:22,759 --> 00:07:27,759
is willing to testify under oath exactly what it was

115
00:07:27,839 --> 00:07:33,199
that happened to her and name names. So there's a

116
00:07:33,279 --> 00:07:37,279
lot of hubbub about the big vote tomorrow about the

117
00:07:38,680 --> 00:07:42,040
you know, there's obviously people are covering up the DOJ

118
00:07:42,199 --> 00:07:45,040
said no, nobody did, no, nothing to see here, and

119
00:07:45,079 --> 00:07:48,240
now they're going, oh, yes, we're all over this investigation.

120
00:07:48,519 --> 00:07:53,279
So it's they're playing games, and none of that is

121
00:07:53,319 --> 00:07:56,720
going to lead to a prosecution of any pedophile out

122
00:07:56,720 --> 00:08:01,759
there unless a victim is willing to testify under oath.

123
00:08:02,279 --> 00:08:06,160
And speaking of court battles, there is the President is

124
00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:12,279
now going to sue the BBC, and I actually don't

125
00:08:12,279 --> 00:08:13,920
blame him. I mean, there were some of that when

126
00:08:14,079 --> 00:08:17,480
he went after CBS and ABC, and I kind of

127
00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:20,399
the one thing that we do have in this country

128
00:08:21,040 --> 00:08:25,399
is the Person Amendment and the media due to case law.

129
00:08:25,480 --> 00:08:29,639
There's a famous case Sullivan versus New York Times that

130
00:08:29,800 --> 00:08:35,399
basically said the media may get it wrong, but they

131
00:08:35,559 --> 00:08:37,919
have as long as there's not malice, as long as

132
00:08:37,919 --> 00:08:41,120
they're not trying to harm you on purpose and they

133
00:08:41,159 --> 00:08:43,679
say something bad about you, you can't sue the media.

134
00:08:44,559 --> 00:08:47,600
So I did not think that Trump was going to

135
00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:51,559
be successful in going against CBS or ABC, but both

136
00:08:51,600 --> 00:08:56,960
of those companies capitulated and wrote a big check. This

137
00:08:57,120 --> 00:09:03,279
is different. This is the BBC clearly distorting what the

138
00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:08,879
President said on the mall on January sixth and tried

139
00:09:08,919 --> 00:09:12,559
to make it look like he was trying to say

140
00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:15,679
something different to the people that were there than what

141
00:09:15,759 --> 00:09:22,879
he actually said. Let's start with what the BBC put

142
00:09:23,639 --> 00:09:25,559
out for the public to consume.

143
00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:30,279
Speaker 5: We're gonna walk down to the Capitol, then I'll be

144
00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:31,000
there with you.

145
00:09:31,960 --> 00:09:32,600
Speaker 1: And we fight.

146
00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:36,200
Speaker 4: We fight like hell, and if you don't fight like hell,

147
00:09:36,480 --> 00:09:38,240
you're not going to have a country anymore.

148
00:09:38,120 --> 00:09:41,039
Speaker 1: We're the that's the parts of the BBC. They took

149
00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:45,000
part of what Donald Trump said and then almost an

150
00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:48,360
hour later, what he also said and put them together

151
00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:50,919
to what you just heard to make it sound like

152
00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:54,080
he was trying to get the crowd to go and fight, fight,

153
00:09:54,159 --> 00:09:57,440
fight at the Capitol. This is what he actually said.

154
00:09:57,480 --> 00:10:00,480
Speaker 4: We're gonna walk down to the Capitol.

155
00:10:03,120 --> 00:10:07,120
Speaker 1: And we're going to cheer on our brave senators and

156
00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:11,039
congressmen and women, and we're probably not going to be

157
00:10:11,159 --> 00:10:11,919
cheering so.

158
00:10:11,960 --> 00:10:14,080
Speaker 4: Much for some of them.

159
00:10:14,279 --> 00:10:18,360
Speaker 1: So they literally edited his speech to it was an

160
00:10:18,399 --> 00:10:21,759
hour long. They took apart from the beginning, and they

161
00:10:21,759 --> 00:10:24,039
took some of it from near the end. They put

162
00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:29,039
him together, and it cannoted a totally different message than

163
00:10:29,120 --> 00:10:33,120
what he actually said. Why they did that on purpose,

164
00:10:33,759 --> 00:10:37,039
I don't know. All of us in the media, we

165
00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:40,240
are limited by time and so many times we will

166
00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:44,320
clip out things that are extraneous. But that was putting

167
00:10:44,440 --> 00:10:48,480
two messages together that were totally different and gave a

168
00:10:48,519 --> 00:10:51,919
totally different view of what the President said. Back on

169
00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:58,080
January sixth. It was an edit done on purpose. Jonathan Turley,

170
00:10:58,879 --> 00:11:02,519
the constitutional law professor, reacted this way.

171
00:11:04,440 --> 00:11:06,960
Speaker 6: Well, there's no question that President is right that this

172
00:11:07,159 --> 00:11:10,960
was misleading. It's also very difficult to see how anyone

173
00:11:11,200 --> 00:11:15,879
editing those tapes could have believed that this represented what

174
00:11:16,120 --> 00:11:19,559
the President actually said. He made two points that were deleted.

175
00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:23,000
One is we're going to go peacefully to Capitol Hill,

176
00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:26,080
and second, the purpose was to cheer on our allies.

177
00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:30,960
Those would seem rather material points for any legitimate news organization.

178
00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:35,480
I'll remind you, John that the January sixth Committee routinely

179
00:11:35,519 --> 00:11:38,480
did the same thing that in every one of their hearings.

180
00:11:38,639 --> 00:11:41,919
They removed these lines when the public was listening to

181
00:11:41,960 --> 00:11:46,720
the president, and that was also obviously intentional. The problem

182
00:11:46,840 --> 00:11:51,080
is the legal standard. The irony is that the better

183
00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:54,879
place to file would be the United Kingdom. It's easier

184
00:11:54,919 --> 00:11:58,480
to bring a defamation case there, but this case is

185
00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:02,159
probably a bit too late to file over in London,

186
00:12:02,720 --> 00:12:05,840
so they're likely to file here in the United States.

187
00:12:06,399 --> 00:12:09,320
But we have a much more protective standard for the

188
00:12:09,399 --> 00:12:13,320
media and for free speech under what's called the actual

189
00:12:13,399 --> 00:12:19,159
malice standard. In a case called New York Times versus Sullivan. Well,

190
00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:22,240
first of all, those earlier settlements came in cases that

191
00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:25,440
themselves would have been quite challenging. The case against CBS,

192
00:12:25,480 --> 00:12:28,960
I think would have been very challenging in court. This

193
00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:34,039
one will be also challenging because BBC can argue that, look,

194
00:12:34,120 --> 00:12:37,679
we messed up. We admitted it. It was bad editing,

195
00:12:38,240 --> 00:12:41,320
but this was not actual malice that. In fact, what

196
00:12:41,480 --> 00:12:43,720
the editor was trying to do is capture what the

197
00:12:43,919 --> 00:12:47,679
editor believed was the thrust of his comments, and that

198
00:12:47,879 --> 00:12:50,159
was to get stir up the crowd and frankly, get

199
00:12:50,159 --> 00:12:52,759
them angry. The question is where the court and the

200
00:12:52,919 --> 00:12:56,399
jury will accept that. The court may be very concerned

201
00:12:56,440 --> 00:13:00,399
about the constitutional implications here. The Supreme Court in New

202
00:13:00,440 --> 00:13:03,240
York Times versus Sullivan said it wanted to give some

203
00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:07,120
breathing room for media organizations because of the role they

204
00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:10,440
play under the First Amendment. The BBC is going to

205
00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:13,440
be relying greatly on that breathing room.

206
00:13:13,960 --> 00:13:17,919
Speaker 1: Another defense lawyer, Donna Rotundo, also weighed in on this

207
00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:20,279
lawsuit against the BBC.

208
00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:22,519
Speaker 7: There, it's a lot of money, and I think you

209
00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:25,240
have to look at the premise first, right, the president's

210
00:13:25,279 --> 00:13:29,320
premise of suing the BBC is because journalism and the

211
00:13:29,399 --> 00:13:32,639
media should be fair and should be honest, and so

212
00:13:32,799 --> 00:13:35,720
I think the honesty aspect here is really what's driving this.

213
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:39,200
What they did, and splicing that video made it sound

214
00:13:39,320 --> 00:13:41,919
like the intent of his words was completely different than

215
00:13:41,960 --> 00:13:43,799
what it was. So at the end of the day,

216
00:13:43,879 --> 00:13:46,960
the intent in this lawsuit is correct. Again, I don't

217
00:13:47,000 --> 00:13:49,480
think this has anything to do with the amount of money,

218
00:13:49,679 --> 00:13:53,200
but the amount of money shows how serious this is.

219
00:13:53,480 --> 00:13:56,799
So when the President throws these huge numbers out there,

220
00:13:57,080 --> 00:14:00,960
I think that's because he wants the public and the

221
00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:04,440
media companies to say she's serious, and we have to

222
00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:07,200
be serious about what we're doing. And obviously these big

223
00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:10,240
numbers are what make all of us stop and listened. Lee,

224
00:14:10,320 --> 00:14:12,879
I think what this show is a pattern, and I

225
00:14:12,879 --> 00:14:17,080
think hopefully media companies are learning from the others when

226
00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:20,080
these things happen. Look at what happened at CBS the

227
00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:23,320
President's suit CBS. CBS has had a major overhaul in

228
00:14:23,320 --> 00:14:26,320
the last several months, and so maybe people are paying attention.

229
00:14:26,759 --> 00:14:29,279
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think the media companies are paying attention. But

230
00:14:29,759 --> 00:14:32,080
the BBC one was agregious and the two top people

231
00:14:32,120 --> 00:14:35,120
there stepped down the woman in charge of the news

232
00:14:35,159 --> 00:14:37,440
for the BBC. She used to be the head of

233
00:14:37,519 --> 00:14:42,039
news for NBC here in the United States. Just so

234
00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:45,519
the media across the board. First of all, they don't

235
00:14:45,559 --> 00:14:48,440
like Donald Trump and general because most of them are Democrats,

236
00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:53,240
but they're going to have to pay attention to basic

237
00:14:53,360 --> 00:14:58,360
journalism of get it right, regardless of your personal feelings.

238
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:07,279
Any stories gambling. The NBA gambling investigation is underway. Story

239
00:15:08,039 --> 00:15:12,039
came out about the Los Angeles Lakers have been asked

240
00:15:12,080 --> 00:15:16,360
to turn in their phones to the investigators. Apparently it's

241
00:15:16,399 --> 00:15:20,399
more than just the Lakers. There are other NBA teams

242
00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:23,759
as well that have been asked to turn in their

243
00:15:23,759 --> 00:15:26,519
phone so that investigators can go through their phones looking

244
00:15:26,559 --> 00:15:33,799
for gambling. Michelle Tafoya used to be sideline reporter on football.

245
00:15:34,519 --> 00:15:39,320
She weighed in about sports and gambling and the problems

246
00:15:39,759 --> 00:15:41,440
that appeared to be growing.

247
00:15:42,039 --> 00:15:43,679
Speaker 8: Well, the way to correct it is going to be

248
00:15:43,840 --> 00:15:46,919
very probably unlikable to a lot of fans. But I

249
00:15:47,039 --> 00:15:49,519
find now whenever I've got whether it's a college basketball

250
00:15:49,559 --> 00:15:52,039
game or an NBA game on the TV, and someone

251
00:15:52,080 --> 00:15:54,639
misses a shot, it goes through my mind, do they

252
00:15:54,639 --> 00:15:57,159
mean to miss that shot or they turn the ball over.

253
00:15:57,279 --> 00:15:59,240
It goes through my mind, did they mean to turn

254
00:15:59,279 --> 00:16:01,639
the ball over. I think that's the real danger for

255
00:16:01,679 --> 00:16:04,879
these sports. What they're looking for with these NBA documents,

256
00:16:04,879 --> 00:16:07,919
I believe is you've got to have your injury report

257
00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:11,639
publicized five pm Eastern time on a game day, one

258
00:16:11,679 --> 00:16:14,279
pm Eastern time on the second game of a back

259
00:16:14,320 --> 00:16:18,080
to back. Those are firm times, and the reason is

260
00:16:18,120 --> 00:16:21,559
they want to minimize or at least maximize transparency of

261
00:16:21,600 --> 00:16:24,320
who's going to be playing, who's injured, who's ill, whatever

262
00:16:24,360 --> 00:16:27,440
the case may be, and so those deadlines are very stringent.

263
00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:30,240
I would imagine that paperwork. Now, look, if I know

264
00:16:30,840 --> 00:16:32,720
Lebron's not going to play, and I know it two

265
00:16:32,799 --> 00:16:36,000
days before the game, before that report has been published,

266
00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:38,759
now I've got insider information, and I can place a

267
00:16:38,840 --> 00:16:41,799
bet with information that nobody else knows. So I think

268
00:16:41,799 --> 00:16:44,000
they're going to look through all these injury reports, the

269
00:16:44,039 --> 00:16:46,159
things that were filed, the things that are very important

270
00:16:46,159 --> 00:16:48,879
to the NBA to keep this game clean, and compare

271
00:16:48,960 --> 00:16:51,919
that with some of the performances of these players or

272
00:16:52,080 --> 00:16:55,480
the betting patterns of the betters out there. I think

273
00:16:55,480 --> 00:16:57,159
you're right We're never going to get out of this

274
00:16:57,679 --> 00:17:02,440
unless there's some really austere measure like stop prop bets,

275
00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:05,400
maybe altogether, but it's going to it's going to be

276
00:17:05,400 --> 00:17:09,039
painful because the amount of money this gambling generates. This

277
00:17:09,119 --> 00:17:12,079
is why they do it, right, follow the money. It

278
00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:15,000
is so lucrative, all of this betting, and it keeps

279
00:17:15,039 --> 00:17:17,920
people's eyes on the televisions or the streaming or whatever.

280
00:17:18,039 --> 00:17:20,640
They're no longer just cheering for the Lakers. They're cheering

281
00:17:20,680 --> 00:17:23,160
for prop bets. They're cheering for the San Antonio Spurs

282
00:17:23,160 --> 00:17:26,279
prop bets, and the Boston Celtics and every college game

283
00:17:26,319 --> 00:17:29,279
in America. So those keep the eyeballs on the game.

284
00:17:29,319 --> 00:17:32,160
Those keep the ratings sort of where they want them.

285
00:17:32,559 --> 00:17:36,160
All of this generates money, and that's what it's all about.

286
00:17:36,160 --> 00:17:38,839
And I hate to make it that simple, but unfortunately

287
00:17:38,960 --> 00:17:42,640
it's going to You're going to have fans really lose

288
00:17:42,680 --> 00:17:44,599
their faith in the game, and that's going to ruin things.

289
00:17:44,680 --> 00:17:49,279
Speaker 1: Yeah, so let's review the chances of getting gambling out

290
00:17:49,359 --> 00:17:55,400
of sports. I think is they'll temporarily behave, but you're

291
00:17:55,400 --> 00:17:57,839
not going to They've had gambling in sports for as

292
00:17:57,880 --> 00:18:02,480
long as there's been gambling and or sports. And to

293
00:18:02,559 --> 00:18:06,279
go back to the whole business about the Justice Department's

294
00:18:06,319 --> 00:18:10,920
going to release all of the Epstein files because Congress

295
00:18:10,920 --> 00:18:13,200
told him to. I don't that's not going to happen either.

296
00:18:13,319 --> 00:18:17,079
But those are just my opinions on all of this.

297
00:18:17,880 --> 00:18:23,160
Speaking of money. How about that dirty word, which also

298
00:18:23,279 --> 00:18:25,160
is all of a sudden a big one to eighty.

299
00:18:25,480 --> 00:18:27,839
The President said, stop talking about affordability.

300
00:18:27,839 --> 00:18:28,400
Speaker 4: That's a hope.

301
00:18:28,440 --> 00:18:31,119
Speaker 1: It's a Democrat thing. And now all of a sudden,

302
00:18:31,200 --> 00:18:36,799
everybody's out talking about affordability. Here's the Treasury Secretary, Scott Pessant.

303
00:18:36,839 --> 00:18:40,640
Speaker 9: So we inherited this terrible inflation. We are flattening it out.

304
00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:43,519
The real thing that is going to happen that is

305
00:18:43,640 --> 00:18:48,640
going to give Americans real purchasing power increases. It's going

306
00:18:48,680 --> 00:18:49,880
to be through growth.

307
00:18:50,200 --> 00:18:54,359
Speaker 1: Well he's right, but that's not going to make people

308
00:18:54,400 --> 00:18:57,920
feel warm and cuddly about their economy. It doesn't matter

309
00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:00,839
about the CPI or the gen or any of that

310
00:19:00,920 --> 00:19:03,359
comes down to how do you feel, how does your

311
00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:06,880
wallet feel at the end of the month. Kevin has it.

312
00:19:07,039 --> 00:19:10,119
I think there's a much better job than anybody on

313
00:19:10,440 --> 00:19:13,839
explaining what the problem is and he says the problem

314
00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:18,119
was baked in during the Biden years and that we

315
00:19:18,240 --> 00:19:21,480
haven't quite recovered yet. Well, I mean, for sure, people

316
00:19:21,640 --> 00:19:24,440
still are trying to dig out from the big hole

317
00:19:24,519 --> 00:19:27,920
that was dug by the previous administration's policy. So if

318
00:19:27,920 --> 00:19:32,599
you figure the typical mortgage, monthly mortgage payment about doubled.

319
00:19:33,319 --> 00:19:35,519
If you look at a typical bag of groceries, the

320
00:19:35,519 --> 00:19:38,319
monthly bag of groceries cost about four hundred dollars when

321
00:19:38,319 --> 00:19:42,640
President Trump was leaving office last time, and about five

322
00:19:42,720 --> 00:19:47,079
hundred and twelve dollars right about when President Trump took office.

323
00:19:47,079 --> 00:19:49,359
And since then it's gone up almost not at all.

324
00:19:49,400 --> 00:19:51,400
Speaker 10: I think it's like five hundred and fifteen dollars, but

325
00:19:51,440 --> 00:19:53,799
it hasn't gone back to four hundred dollars. And so

326
00:19:53,960 --> 00:19:56,079
what the Democrats are doing is they're saying that this

327
00:19:56,519 --> 00:20:01,599
runaway spending that we gave you guys, it created runaway inflation,

328
00:20:01,880 --> 00:20:05,039
is one hundred percent your fault because you haven't fixed

329
00:20:05,079 --> 00:20:07,839
it already. And of course that's very economically illiterate, and

330
00:20:07,880 --> 00:20:10,119
I don't think really many people in markets are buying it.

331
00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:13,440
A more precise way to say it, though, is that

332
00:20:13,559 --> 00:20:16,680
purchasing power has gone up that so real wages that's

333
00:20:16,880 --> 00:20:19,640
w divided bip for our technical people of the audience

334
00:20:19,920 --> 00:20:22,000
have gone up by about twelve hundred dollars this year.

335
00:20:22,279 --> 00:20:24,160
So the way to think about it is that we've

336
00:20:24,359 --> 00:20:26,920
dug a three thousand dollars hole because of Biden policies,

337
00:20:27,000 --> 00:20:29,799
and we've you know, gained twelve hundred dollars on the

338
00:20:29,799 --> 00:20:32,400
way out already, which should give you a great deal

339
00:20:32,400 --> 00:20:34,599
of hope for the future that the wage increases that

340
00:20:34,599 --> 00:20:38,759
we're seeing will continue and even if inflation stays positive.

341
00:20:38,880 --> 00:20:40,599
Make it so that people feel way better when they

342
00:20:40,599 --> 00:20:42,720
go to the grocery store and to buy a car.

343
00:20:42,799 --> 00:20:45,000
You know, we've reduced the cost to buy a car

344
00:20:45,119 --> 00:20:47,839
with the deductibility of interests. I mean, there's a million

345
00:20:47,880 --> 00:20:50,319
things that we're doing to fix this problem, but it's

346
00:20:50,359 --> 00:20:53,880
just kind of astonishing to be that the cost problem

347
00:20:53,920 --> 00:20:56,599
is somehow being blamed on us. Now think about it,

348
00:20:56,680 --> 00:20:59,400
especially with the Obamacare thing. So Obamacare is one hundred

349
00:20:59,400 --> 00:21:03,960
percent democratic policy. It's always about one hundred percent democratic policy.

350
00:21:04,000 --> 00:21:07,880
What they did is they expanded the subsidies during COVID,

351
00:21:08,279 --> 00:21:10,640
and then all those subsidies basically went right into the

352
00:21:10,680 --> 00:21:16,160
pockets of insurance companies, and Obamacare insurance policies have doubled

353
00:21:16,279 --> 00:21:20,200
in price relative to normal policies, and so the fastest

354
00:21:20,200 --> 00:21:23,400
inflation in the economy is these big government subsidies thrown

355
00:21:23,440 --> 00:21:26,200
at Obamacare insurance. Think about it's kind of like if

356
00:21:26,240 --> 00:21:29,559
you give lots of student loans, then the tuition goes up.

357
00:21:29,839 --> 00:21:32,920
It's that effect. And so now they're blaming President Trump

358
00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:35,160
for Obamacare as well. They should have fixed Obamacare in

359
00:21:35,200 --> 00:21:37,799
the first place. And President Trump had a plan in

360
00:21:37,839 --> 00:21:41,039
the Big Beautiful Bill to give people some subsidies, but

361
00:21:41,039 --> 00:21:43,200
the Democrats didn't like it because the subsidies weren't going

362
00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:46,000
to their campaign contributors, the insurance companies.

363
00:21:46,400 --> 00:21:50,160
Speaker 1: So another hitdch Andnapping moment over the weekend was they

364
00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:52,640
have done away with a lot of the tariffs or

365
00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:55,960
reduced a lot of the tariffs affecting anything at the

366
00:21:55,960 --> 00:22:01,440
grocery store. So food tariffs substantially reduced or done away with,

367
00:22:02,160 --> 00:22:07,200
which is again basically proving the point that tariffs do

368
00:22:07,359 --> 00:22:09,240
lead to higher prices.

369
00:22:09,680 --> 00:22:10,839
Speaker 4: Well, first, this is nothing new.

370
00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:12,559
Speaker 10: If you go through all of the trade deals that

371
00:22:12,559 --> 00:22:14,720
we've been doing all the way through, then there have

372
00:22:14,759 --> 00:22:17,480
been things that we decided it was prudent based on

373
00:22:17,519 --> 00:22:21,359
the economics of supply deband to exempt. And one of

374
00:22:21,400 --> 00:22:24,319
those things that we've been exempting all along is something

375
00:22:24,319 --> 00:22:26,119
that we don't make in the US, will never make

376
00:22:26,160 --> 00:22:28,279
in the US, or almost ever. I know that in

377
00:22:28,319 --> 00:22:32,039
Hawaii they make some coffee and so on. Shoring that

378
00:22:32,079 --> 00:22:35,200
production really doesn't make sense. It's not part of our strategy.

379
00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:37,519
And what the President just did with food is decided

380
00:22:37,559 --> 00:22:40,160
to make like a blanket movement so that we weren't

381
00:22:40,160 --> 00:22:42,920
going through each deal and picking this and that. Well,

382
00:22:43,160 --> 00:22:45,440
it was done very quietly, but they have done away

383
00:22:45,480 --> 00:22:48,559
with a lot of the tariffs that affect prices at

384
00:22:48,599 --> 00:22:53,240
the grocery store. So this affordability issue is catching the

385
00:22:53,240 --> 00:22:55,960
attention of the White House. At first, the President was

386
00:22:56,440 --> 00:23:00,440
saying no. Now, obviously they're doing something about it. As

387
00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:06,640
far as the love affair for Democrats or Republicans or

388
00:23:06,680 --> 00:23:11,119
the not love affair, Harry Anton has the very latest

389
00:23:11,119 --> 00:23:15,240
about how politics are shaking out from the latest news.

390
00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:18,240
Speaker 5: Yeah, Democrats are in a considerably better position than they

391
00:23:18,240 --> 00:23:20,720
were just four weeks ago. What are we talking about here? Okay,

392
00:23:20,799 --> 00:23:23,359
chance of winning the House in twenty twenty six prediction

393
00:23:23,480 --> 00:23:23,960
market outs.

394
00:23:24,079 --> 00:23:24,480
Speaker 4: Look at this.

395
00:23:24,519 --> 00:23:27,200
Speaker 5: In October twentieth the Dems were ahead, but they had

396
00:23:27,240 --> 00:23:28,079
just a fifty.

397
00:23:27,799 --> 00:23:30,200
Speaker 4: Six percent chance of taking the House. Look at where we.

398
00:23:30,160 --> 00:23:33,440
Speaker 5: Are now up to a seventy two percent chance. So

399
00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:37,440
Democrats and Republicans were quite competitive four weeks ago, and

400
00:23:37,559 --> 00:23:40,680
now Democrats have taken the bull by the horns. They

401
00:23:40,799 --> 00:23:43,839
are more than a seven to ten chance of taking

402
00:23:43,920 --> 00:23:45,920
the House in twenty twenty.

403
00:23:45,640 --> 00:23:47,279
Speaker 4: Six, according to the prediction market.

404
00:23:47,279 --> 00:23:47,400
Speaker 2: Od.

405
00:23:47,519 --> 00:23:49,319
Speaker 4: Yeah, it makes a thing exactly right.

406
00:23:49,359 --> 00:23:51,400
Speaker 5: Why are those who are putting their money on the line,

407
00:23:51,440 --> 00:23:54,200
what are they seeing that's making them change the mind? Hmmm,

408
00:23:54,559 --> 00:23:56,920
maybe Democrats have a better chance than we thought. Well,

409
00:23:56,920 --> 00:23:59,240
one of them just comes down to redistricting, right, We

410
00:23:59,279 --> 00:24:03,440
have been talking about this mid decade redistricting gains, and

411
00:24:03,480 --> 00:24:06,680
this is the mid mid decade redistricting gains. You know,

412
00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:09,119
if each sideed maxtowt we were talking about a Republican

413
00:24:09,119 --> 00:24:12,440
gain of seven seats. But right now the projection based

414
00:24:12,519 --> 00:24:15,359
upon current gates is actually a Republican gain of just

415
00:24:15,599 --> 00:24:16,160
one seat.

416
00:24:16,160 --> 00:24:17,599
Speaker 4: We're just talking about one seat.

417
00:24:17,920 --> 00:24:20,400
Speaker 5: These numbers of seats, I wouldn't actually be surprised if

418
00:24:20,440 --> 00:24:23,880
this flips over the Democratic side based upon what may

419
00:24:23,920 --> 00:24:27,119
be happening in Virginia, and maybe Democrats are actually the

420
00:24:27,119 --> 00:24:30,759
ones who benefit from the mid decade redistricting gains. They

421
00:24:30,759 --> 00:24:33,519
could be the ones gaining seats instead of Republicans by

422
00:24:33,640 --> 00:24:36,480
just one seat at this particular point, way south of

423
00:24:36,519 --> 00:24:37,279
where we thought it.

424
00:24:37,279 --> 00:24:37,799
Speaker 4: Was going to be.

425
00:24:37,880 --> 00:24:40,759
Speaker 5: We thought Republicans we'd been picking up five, six, seven seats.

426
00:24:41,000 --> 00:24:42,359
Speaker 4: Uh huh, no longer the case.

427
00:24:42,400 --> 00:24:44,640
Speaker 5: You get Texas, but it's canceled out by California, Then

428
00:24:44,680 --> 00:24:46,960
you get North Carolina, but that's canceled out by Utah.

429
00:24:47,119 --> 00:24:49,680
So the bottom line is Democrats are doing considerably better

430
00:24:49,880 --> 00:24:53,200
than we thought in terms of these mid decade redistrictists. Yeah, okay,

431
00:24:53,240 --> 00:24:55,079
So the other thing that's going on is it's not

432
00:24:55,160 --> 00:24:57,920
just the redistricting. It turns out that Democrats are doing

433
00:24:58,039 --> 00:25:00,799
better in the polls. So let's take a look, right, okay,

434
00:25:00,839 --> 00:25:04,039
Dems versus the GOP on the generic congressional ball The

435
00:25:04,119 --> 00:25:07,480
dem lead has widened. It is widened. So a month ago,

436
00:25:07,519 --> 00:25:10,680
Democrats were a head by three. Now they're ahead by

437
00:25:10,839 --> 00:25:13,839
five in my aggregate of polls, and more than the

438
00:25:13,920 --> 00:25:17,079
nearly doubling of the lead that Democrats have. We of

439
00:25:17,119 --> 00:25:21,039
course had an election right and Dems outperformed their polls

440
00:25:21,240 --> 00:25:22,640
in New Jersey and Virginia.

441
00:25:22,680 --> 00:25:24,640
Speaker 4: So I think that is also playing a role here.

442
00:25:24,720 --> 00:25:26,680
Speaker 5: Democrats doing better in the polls, and a lot of

443
00:25:26,680 --> 00:25:28,680
folks saying, you know, I don't think the Republicans are

444
00:25:28,720 --> 00:25:30,400
going to outperform their polls like they did in twenty

445
00:25:30,440 --> 00:25:30,920
twenty five.

446
00:25:31,079 --> 00:25:33,960
Speaker 1: So that's a little bit of rear view mirror stuff.

447
00:25:33,960 --> 00:25:37,799
Because over the last week or two since the elections

448
00:25:37,839 --> 00:25:40,400
in New Jersey and Virginia, and those were blue states

449
00:25:40,440 --> 00:25:45,319
and blue politicians won, so not a big surprise. California

450
00:25:45,400 --> 00:25:49,079
got their redistricting, which is not a surprise because it's

451
00:25:49,079 --> 00:25:51,480
a blue state. And what Harry was saying was all

452
00:25:51,519 --> 00:25:54,759
this redistricting stuff is going to lead to basically a

453
00:25:54,799 --> 00:25:58,160
break even. It's not going to change the head count

454
00:25:58,319 --> 00:26:01,559
in Congress. But the other thing is all of this

455
00:26:01,680 --> 00:26:05,880
happened in the last couple of weeks. If the Trump administration,

456
00:26:06,200 --> 00:26:10,759
now that they've reduced the tariffs on food items, will

457
00:26:10,960 --> 00:26:13,960
that be enough? What else do they have up their

458
00:26:14,000 --> 00:26:18,519
sleeve to try to get the affordability issued to swing

459
00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:23,279
more in their favor and they have eleven and a

460
00:26:23,359 --> 00:26:27,200
half months to figure out how to do that. And

461
00:26:27,240 --> 00:26:31,400
that also brings up the question of once, ma'am Donnie

462
00:26:31,440 --> 00:26:35,200
and the new lady who's the mayor of Seattle both

463
00:26:35,279 --> 00:26:40,240
the socialist. Once they get in office, wait and see

464
00:26:40,279 --> 00:26:45,119
how people across the fruited plains take a look at

465
00:26:45,119 --> 00:26:47,720
those two cities and goes, this is what we want.

466
00:26:48,279 --> 00:26:53,960
Even Bill Maher was mocking the Democrat socialist.

467
00:26:53,640 --> 00:26:57,599
Speaker 11: Democrats must recognize that Zurn Mom Donnie is the future

468
00:26:57,680 --> 00:26:58,400
of the party.

469
00:26:59,119 --> 00:27:02,240
Speaker 4: Unfortunately, answer the Republican Party. And if you missed his.

470
00:27:02,279 --> 00:27:05,119
Speaker 11: Victory speech in last week's mayoral election in New York,

471
00:27:05,160 --> 00:27:07,640
don't worry. You'll see it in every attack ad for

472
00:27:07,640 --> 00:27:11,000
the next two years. The thing is socialism will do

473
00:27:11,640 --> 00:27:15,359
because socialism, to put it simply, just doesn't work and

474
00:27:15,400 --> 00:27:19,680
has never worked. Democratic socialism is like a dating profile.

475
00:27:19,759 --> 00:27:22,359
Things look great until you meet up in the real world.

476
00:27:22,599 --> 00:27:26,079
Speaker 1: So even a spokeswoman for the Democrat Party, her name's

477
00:27:26,079 --> 00:27:31,519
Melissa de Rosa, and she well listen to the way

478
00:27:31,559 --> 00:27:34,680
she tries to defend the fact that, well, those Democrats

479
00:27:34,680 --> 00:27:38,119
socialists are not Democrats. They're not real Democrats. So what

480
00:27:38,319 --> 00:27:41,480
you have is you have a split in a Democrat party,

481
00:27:41,799 --> 00:27:45,480
and there's the old Democrats and then there's the new

482
00:27:45,559 --> 00:27:49,440
Socialist and it doesn't look like they're on the same page.

483
00:27:49,599 --> 00:27:52,640
Speaker 12: Big tent yes, hijacked tent no. And I think that

484
00:27:52,680 --> 00:27:56,079
the DSA spends more time attacking mainstream Democrats thays to

485
00:27:56,279 --> 00:27:58,759
attacking Republicans. And I think that what you're going to

486
00:27:58,839 --> 00:28:02,839
see going into the midterm is this crop of primaries

487
00:28:02,839 --> 00:28:05,200
that are going to come from everyone from Hakeem Jeffries

488
00:28:05,240 --> 00:28:08,200
to La Mayor Bass and it's going to distract from

489
00:28:08,240 --> 00:28:10,839
what the actual political enemy is, which is the Republicans

490
00:28:10,839 --> 00:28:13,200
and trying to take over the House. So I think

491
00:28:13,240 --> 00:28:16,119
the DSA is fringe. I think they're extremists. I think

492
00:28:16,160 --> 00:28:19,119
we're having a Democratic Party tea party moment where we're

493
00:28:19,119 --> 00:28:21,279
going to try to see who we are and every

494
00:28:21,279 --> 00:28:23,039
time you lurch to the left, how much do you

495
00:28:23,079 --> 00:28:26,359
lose in the middle. How many moderate Democrats leave the party,

496
00:28:26,400 --> 00:28:28,880
feel left out by the party and say, whoa, whoa,

497
00:28:28,960 --> 00:28:30,200
this is not the party that I'm.

498
00:28:30,079 --> 00:28:34,119
Speaker 1: Here at In Josh Gottheimer, who is a moderate Democrat

499
00:28:34,119 --> 00:28:38,640
from New Jersey, this is his The DSA, by the way,

500
00:28:38,680 --> 00:28:42,039
is shorthand for Democrat Socialist of America.

501
00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:45,359
Speaker 13: Those are not our views and the views of where

502
00:28:46,000 --> 00:28:49,079
reasonable common sense democrats across the country are, you know,

503
00:28:49,200 --> 00:28:52,759
the we want common sense. We want people to stand

504
00:28:52,759 --> 00:28:56,359
by cops and firefighters and amts to fight to get

505
00:28:56,359 --> 00:28:58,880
taxes down, in childcare costs and energy bills down, right,

506
00:28:58,920 --> 00:29:02,240
that should be what are focused on. We certainly don't

507
00:29:02,240 --> 00:29:07,119
want a job killing, tax hiking socialist in the Democratic Party.

508
00:29:07,880 --> 00:29:09,759
Speaker 1: So there's more and more of those coming out where

509
00:29:09,759 --> 00:29:11,720
the Democrats have a split. It kind of reminds me

510
00:29:11,799 --> 00:29:15,720
of the MAGA took over the Republican Party. You got

511
00:29:15,759 --> 00:29:20,720
the old school, the old school establishment Republicans. They got

512
00:29:20,720 --> 00:29:23,400
pushed out of power, and it looks like the Democrats

513
00:29:23,440 --> 00:29:29,920
may be facing something similar in their party. In other politics,

514
00:29:30,440 --> 00:29:33,880
I mentioned it on Friday about the fact that the

515
00:29:33,880 --> 00:29:36,240
President came out with the idea of just sending money

516
00:29:36,559 --> 00:29:38,920
directly to people for them to use to pay their

517
00:29:38,960 --> 00:29:44,160
medical bills, rather than giving money through subsidies which go

518
00:29:44,319 --> 00:29:47,599
directly to insurance. Instead of giving money to insurance companies,

519
00:29:47,960 --> 00:29:50,519
give it to the people to pay their medical bills.

520
00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:53,279
And a lot of people are scratching their heads going

521
00:29:53,640 --> 00:29:56,160
how would this possibly work. I know what's going to happen.

522
00:29:56,160 --> 00:29:58,160
They're going to take that money and they're going to

523
00:29:58,200 --> 00:30:04,519
buy buy boo and cigarettes, And no, there is I'll

524
00:30:04,519 --> 00:30:09,519
explain it again. There is a system that's been in

525
00:30:09,559 --> 00:30:12,519
place now for quite a few years, the Health Savings Accounts.

526
00:30:12,880 --> 00:30:17,200
You get essentially a credit card, but it won't work

527
00:30:17,759 --> 00:30:22,759
on anything other than approved medical expenses. If you go

528
00:30:22,839 --> 00:30:26,599
to the store and you buy you go to a

529
00:30:27,480 --> 00:30:32,200
CBS and you buy some medicine, and you buy some

530
00:30:32,440 --> 00:30:35,279
over the counter medicine, and you pick up your prescriptions,

531
00:30:35,759 --> 00:30:38,079
and you pick up a candy bar while you're there,

532
00:30:38,359 --> 00:30:41,400
and you go to the cashier and run the run through,

533
00:30:41,480 --> 00:30:44,640
and you try to use your HSA card health Savings

534
00:30:44,640 --> 00:30:47,480
account card, it won't pay for the candy bar. You're

535
00:30:47,480 --> 00:30:49,839
going to have to pay for that separately. So there

536
00:30:49,920 --> 00:30:54,480
is a system. Bill Cassidy, the senator from Louisiana, he

537
00:30:54,680 --> 00:30:58,319
is a medical doctor, and I'm right there with him.

538
00:30:58,359 --> 00:31:00,880
He's all enthused about it, and soul Am.

539
00:31:01,440 --> 00:31:03,680
Speaker 14: You've got to have a plan that can work by

540
00:31:03,799 --> 00:31:07,240
January first, twenty twenty six. So that puts a little

541
00:31:07,279 --> 00:31:10,240
bit of a constraint on what you can do. Now,

542
00:31:10,240 --> 00:31:14,079
there's two types of subsidies in Obamacare. There's a subsidy

543
00:31:14,119 --> 00:31:17,640
in the original Obamacare, call that the baseline, and then

544
00:31:17,680 --> 00:31:20,079
there is the extra subsidy that was started under the

545
00:31:20,079 --> 00:31:25,519
Biden administration. That's called the enhanced the enhanced subsidy. So

546
00:31:25,599 --> 00:31:28,200
the plan that I'm thinking would work for January, the

547
00:31:28,240 --> 00:31:33,119
first is to allow the baseline subsidy to continue to

548
00:31:33,240 --> 00:31:39,480
apply to a policy on the exchanges, but the enhanced subsidy,

549
00:31:39,720 --> 00:31:42,559
as the President says, will be put into a health

550
00:31:42,599 --> 00:31:47,279
savings account. Now why does that work? Because someone can

551
00:31:47,319 --> 00:31:49,640
take the subsody they would have gotten for a more

552
00:31:49,680 --> 00:31:55,000
expensive policy under the baseline scenario. They can buy a

553
00:31:55,079 --> 00:31:59,920
bronze level plan, which is a cheaper plan on the exchanges,

554
00:32:00,559 --> 00:32:02,920
and then use their health savings account to pay for

555
00:32:02,960 --> 00:32:07,960
the higher deductible. This decreases your overall cost to be

556
00:32:08,000 --> 00:32:10,880
an insurance instead of having to work through a six

557
00:32:10,960 --> 00:32:13,880
thousand dollars deductible to get the silver plan to.

558
00:32:13,880 --> 00:32:16,680
Speaker 4: Work for you, you.

559
00:32:15,400 --> 00:32:18,119
Speaker 14: Have like say fifteen hundred dollars or two thousand dollars

560
00:32:18,200 --> 00:32:20,720
in your health savings account. The President Trump speaks of

561
00:32:21,200 --> 00:32:23,440
to pay for the first part of your deductible and

562
00:32:23,480 --> 00:32:24,880
you've got the cheaper premium on.

563
00:32:24,839 --> 00:32:25,400
Speaker 2: Top of it.

564
00:32:25,839 --> 00:32:27,240
Speaker 14: I think this is a great idea. I think the

565
00:32:27,279 --> 00:32:28,119
President's right on.

566
00:32:28,319 --> 00:32:31,440
Speaker 1: So do I so do. I know. I'm obviously very

567
00:32:31,519 --> 00:32:34,480
leary about the fact that government can do anything fast.

568
00:32:34,839 --> 00:32:38,400
And the Obamacare subsidies that the Democrats put in place

569
00:32:38,440 --> 00:32:40,480
for five years are going to expire at the end

570
00:32:40,559 --> 00:32:42,839
of this year. So can this be done? Yes, it

571
00:32:42,920 --> 00:32:46,440
could be. I doubt it will be because it's government.

572
00:32:46,839 --> 00:32:51,920
But doctor Bill Cassidy man, he understands it. And again

573
00:32:51,960 --> 00:32:55,079
he brought up the silver plan. You have to spend

574
00:32:55,160 --> 00:32:59,960
six thousand dollars on medical bills before the Obamacare policy

575
00:33:00,079 --> 00:33:04,039
will pay a penny. This would eliminate all that. So

576
00:33:05,359 --> 00:33:09,559
there's no more giant deductible of six thousand dollars. So

577
00:33:10,319 --> 00:33:12,160
we'll keep talking about it because it's going to take

578
00:33:12,200 --> 00:33:15,039
a lot of talking. But I hope somebody in Washington

579
00:33:15,079 --> 00:33:18,240
besides Bill Cassidy is paying attention to all of this

580
00:33:20,720 --> 00:33:26,839
other quote money news. OJ Simpson he's dead. Yes, he's

581
00:33:26,880 --> 00:33:32,119
still dead, but his estate is settling with Ron Goldman's

582
00:33:32,319 --> 00:33:38,799
family and fifty some million dollars they've agreed to pay

583
00:33:39,319 --> 00:33:44,799
the Goldman's Donna Rotundo, a lawyer, got weighs in on

584
00:33:44,839 --> 00:33:45,400
this one.

585
00:33:45,680 --> 00:33:45,880
Speaker 4: Well.

586
00:33:45,920 --> 00:33:48,359
Speaker 7: I think for the Goldman family, this truly was never

587
00:33:48,400 --> 00:33:51,480
about money. This was about justice. This was about watching

588
00:33:51,519 --> 00:33:54,480
someone pay, especially when they did not get what they

589
00:33:54,480 --> 00:33:56,880
wanted out of the criminal court. The civil court was

590
00:33:56,920 --> 00:33:59,960
their only avenue. So going to civil court getting a

591
00:34:00,119 --> 00:34:05,799
judgment vilified mister Simpson and vindicated Ron Goldman. So I

592
00:34:05,799 --> 00:34:08,880
think that's really what this was about. So obviously any

593
00:34:08,920 --> 00:34:11,440
type of money they can recover now I think will

594
00:34:11,599 --> 00:34:14,239
at least add to the feeling of them having some

595
00:34:14,639 --> 00:34:16,920
justice in this matter. So at the end of the day,

596
00:34:16,920 --> 00:34:18,079
I think that's really what this is.

597
00:34:18,320 --> 00:34:21,119
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't think it's about the money, but at

598
00:34:21,119 --> 00:34:25,400
the same time, yeah, the murder was thirty one years ago.

599
00:34:26,199 --> 00:34:29,199
Ron Goldman today he was a young guy waiter at

600
00:34:29,280 --> 00:34:34,280
local restaurant Mezzaluna. He would have been fifty seven years

601
00:34:34,320 --> 00:34:39,000
old today. Nicole Brown Simpson would be sixty six if

602
00:34:39,039 --> 00:34:44,440
they had lived well Wall Street today it is following

603
00:34:44,599 --> 00:34:49,000
whatever Nvidia is doing, and Nvidia had a big sell

604
00:34:49,000 --> 00:34:56,400
off again today. Bitcoin also ninety one thousand dollars. They

605
00:34:56,440 --> 00:35:01,159
have wiped out all of their twenty twenty five gain today,

606
00:35:01,199 --> 00:35:03,960
going down to ninety one thousand dollars on bitcoin, but

607
00:35:04,079 --> 00:35:09,679
the dow down sharply, down five hundred and fifty seven. Again,

608
00:35:09,880 --> 00:35:14,199
the favors that drove the market up are ones driving

609
00:35:14,239 --> 00:35:18,000
it down down five hundred fifty seven to forty six

610
00:35:18,079 --> 00:35:22,360
thousand and five ninety SMP down sixty one, NASDACK down

611
00:35:22,440 --> 00:35:27,119
one hundred ninety two. Gold was down fifty dollars to

612
00:35:27,199 --> 00:35:30,639
four thousand and forty three in oil down about thirty

613
00:35:30,679 --> 00:35:34,440
cents fifty nine dollars now for one barrel of oil.

614
00:35:34,880 --> 00:35:37,599
That's it for today. Thank you for coming by. We'll

615
00:35:37,639 --> 00:35:50,159
be back again tomorrow. Hope to see you them

