Speaker 1: What's going on.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for listening to this podcast. It
is heard live every day from noon to three on
WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you want exclusive content
like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, my daily
show prep with all of the links, become a patron,
go to dpeakclendarshow dot com. Make sure you hit the
subscribe button. Get every episode for free right to your
smartphone or tablet. And again, thank you so much for
your support.
Speaker 3: So before we were kind of talking not so much
about Democrats and Republicans, but about the TDS, the Trump
Derangement syndrome, and the MAGA faithful and where those groups
really came from and what they really stand for nowadays.
And I said, and I mentioned it, and we'll probably
talk about it at some point during the program. I'm
not gonna limit not going to go too far into it.
One of the most serious landmndes that the Trump administration
is stepping into, I think inadvertently. I don't know, I
don't know that it's on purpose. But Pam Bondi, the
Attorney General, has made she cash battel everyone. In fact,
cash Bateel has a little more political coverage than Pam
Bondi does. But Cash just said, hey.
Speaker 1: We're going to release all these files. We're going to
release the Martin.
Speaker 3: Luther King stuff, the RFK files, you know, JFK files,
and the Epstein situation, and Pam Bondi, you know, literally
showed the media here's the file. I got to go
through it, but we're releasing it here.
Speaker 1: It is now. The names that Roger Stone's.
Speaker 3: Been out there on social media saying, hey, this was
released back in twenty sixteen or whatever. All the names
were released, but it doesn't matter. She made a big
deal about this. And then yesterday, I think it was yesterday.
Yesterday's Monday, Yeah, so yesterday that they came out or
over the weekend and said there's nothing to see here.
There's really nothing to see you know. Wait, Epstein killed himself,
Julane Maxwell's in prison. Clearly there's more here than not,
but they're acting like there's nothing to see here. And
Trump was just asked about about sixteen minutes ago, you know,
someone asked them about the Epstein cause, Ham Bondi and
Marco Rubier were sitting next to him and he was
asked about it, and he said, are you still talking
about Jeffrey Epstein. This guy's been talked about for years.
I can't believe you're asking a question about Epstein. Well,
that's not going to go away. That's a that's a
serious issue for a lot of folks. That's a regular
corn ucopia of who's who in American politics and entertainment
were in and around these two individuals, Elainne Maxwell and
Jeffrey Epstein. So the American public, you know, just it's
one of those things like it's hard to compute that
Lee Harvey Oswell could have acted alone and taken out
the world's most powerful leader, you know, with a shot
from a couple of shots from a book depository window.
It's it's hard to think that the world is that
fragile that something could happen of that political magnitude. And
so it's hard to believe that after all these years,
that there's no there there beyond what happened. That Epstein
and Maxwell went to jail for what they did, and
there's not more to it.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 3: Even when did he was being tried, you thought a
lot more fallout.
Speaker 1: Would take place, but it didn't.
Speaker 3: So I don't know, but I think that's one of
the land mines. So most people saying, hey, you need
Trump's endorsement next year to win, no matter where you
are in the country. That's one of the things we'll
talk about here with the Senate race in North Carolina
and where that stands right now. But that is a landmine.
One of the land mines they've got is that one.
There aren't as many. He's really had a great streak,
but I think that Bondy has set herself up, and
so what a lot of people want to suspect, especially
in the anti Trump world or even the wait, even
the pro Trump people are very upset that there's no
there there.
Speaker 1: With the Epstein situation, they.
Speaker 3: Simply can't reconcile after being told there's something there there
where there's smoke, there's fire, and then all of a sudden,
these are not the droids you're looking for. It's like
a Jedi mind trick went viral. These are not the
droids you're looking for.
Speaker 1: Well, wait a minute, there's two people in jail. There
must there must be something there.
Speaker 3: He killed himself. Why would he kill himself? A lot
of people don't even believe he killed himself.
Speaker 1: But we'll see.
Speaker 3: Now several issues to get to So I spent the
first hour discussing kind of the difference in left and right,
and it leads us. I've got four different stories, actually five,
but four that are that are absolutely germane that that
become a way do you trust what you see? Who
do you trust? Why do you trust them?
Speaker 1: What do you believe?
Speaker 3: The reality isn't moving forward? This is by Steve Bennon
over at MSNBC, and I'm sharing this story with you
for a reason that it is not self evident as
I go through it, but I will get to it,
I promise. And that is and he starts out with this,
and it's about why questions about the reliability of federal
economic data have become unavoidable now.
Speaker 1: Even the lead there.
Speaker 3: So what they're saying is, wait, the federal government's giving
us data, Why all of a sudden shouldn't we trust it. Well,
if you're a if you're in the media, you would
you absolutely. This is the kind of stuff you write
because you're like, well, because Trump's in office, so we
can't trust it now. When Biden was in office but
not present, where were your questions? But Trump's in office
and is cognizant and all of a sudden, you think
it's you could trust what came out of.
Speaker 1: The Biden White House.
Speaker 3: Knowing it was a complete lie, it didn't generate a
lot of attention, he says. But Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome
Powell was asking a press conference about cutbacks in federal
economic statistics collection, and his response struck me as interesting.
Having really good data doesn't just help the Fed. It
helps the government, It helps Congress, it helps the executive branch.
Powell said, more importantly, really it helps businesses. They need
to know what's going on in the economy. The United
States has been a leader for many, many years in
this whole project of measuring and understanding what's happening in
our very large and dynamic economy, and I hate to
see us cutting back on that because it's a real
benefit for the general public. Now, everything he pretty much
that Powell said in that statement is ostensibly true, except
for one part. It has one massive assignumption that is wrongheaded,
and that is, do you believe you can get the
same amount of data with fewer people. The assumption is
that everybody's that is there right now is one hundred
percent necessary, and that but for those one hundred percent
people that are absolutely necessary. The data you get are unreliable,
so it's a false premise. These unscripted comments back to
the column, came to mind late last week when the
new monthly job NEMBS came out. Over the first six
months of twenty twenty five, US job growth has slowed,
and I heard from some readers who ask variations on
the same question. Can we trust economic data from the
Trump administration? Of course his base and who's asking them
says a lot. This is MSNBC, after all, In an
era which traditionally a political which has traditional political apolitical
agencies have become overtly partisan, aren't there reasons to be
skeptical about the accuracy of federal statistics because it could
be manipulated?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: The first relates to concerns about corruption and political mischief.
Notice that they weren't asking this when we had a
vacant commander in chief. They're only asking it now. Perhaps
Donald Trump, the argument goes, might use his influence. Might
they didn't say he did, could use his influence to
tell the Labor Department to manipulate the data to deceive
the public. No one's ever suggested that, no one's ever
said that, but he's putting that out there.
Speaker 1: To say what if today?
Speaker 3: There have been instances in which the release of embarrassing
government statistics was delayed, but there's been no evidence of
statistics being altered.
Speaker 1: Though.
Speaker 3: If you're a government official who's received such pressureized sincerely
hope you'll reach out to us and take advantage of
the many who secure ways to communicate. In other words,
he say, Hey, no one's ever done it, but since
you work at the Trump administration, you might want to
let me know through back channels what's going on. This
is the kind that passes for legit media, and you know.
The New York Times reported mister Trump's freeze on federal hiring,
combined with the buyouts he offered early in his term,
has led to increase staff attrition at the statistical agencies.
Staffing shortages appear to have been a factor in the
Labor Statistics recent cuts, according to information the agency provided.
So blah blah blah blah. What they're trying to say is,
whenever you decrease the size and scope of anything in government,
it must be bad because they were one hundred percent necessary.
But when they report business data, when Amazon does it,
or any other company does it. It's the streamline operations.
It's to make it more efficient, but not in government.
Speaker 2: All right, if you're listening to this show, you know
I try to keep up with all sorts of current events,
and I know you do too, And you've probably heard
me say get your news from multiple sources. Why well,
because it's how you detect media bias, which is why
I've been so impressed with ground News. It's an app,
and it's a website, and it combines news from around
the world in one place so you can compare coverage
and verify information. You can check it out at check
dot ground, dot news slash pete. I put the link
in the podcast description too. I started using ground new
a few months ago and more recently chose to work
with them as an affiliate because it lets me see
clearly how stories get covered and by whom. The blind
spot feature shows you which stories get ignored by the
left and the right. See for yourself. Check dot ground,
dot news, slash pete. Subscribe through that link and you'll
get fifteen percent off any subscription. I use the Vantage
plan to get unlimited access to every feature your subscription
then not only helps my podcast, but it also supports
ground news as they make the media landscape more transparent.
Speaker 1: By the way, just to give you.
Speaker 3: Lest you think, Heyazz just spouting off stuff, the voter
registration trends in North Carolina continue to be headwinds for Democrats.
Democrats are not winning over voters, they're not registering war voters.
Speaker 1: I mean, unaffiliated are doing quite well. But we're not far.
Speaker 3: From Democrats being the second tier party. I mean Republicans
replacing Democrats in sheer volume of registrations. And you know,
when you look at that, a good example this just
in new July voter registration North Carolina. Republicans up sixteen
hundred and forty Democrats minus nine hundred and sixty four.
I mean, that's a twenty five hundred vote shift just
for July voter registration.
Speaker 1: It's drifting.
Speaker 3: North Kina continues to drift, and when if you're looking
for more you know details on this, the final day
of May listed seven point five million registrations split, you know,
thirty point seven percent Democrat thirty point four percent Republican.
So that trend continues to move in Republicans favorable territory.
The other damaging thing is that thirty seven point eight unaffiliated,
the state's largest group, tends to vote to the right
more than the left. And that's a problem for Democrats
because if North Carolina becomes a state, I mean, it's
got two senators, it's got majorities in both houses, it's
voted even Romney one North Carolina trip point at three
times in a row. If North Carolina becomes reliably red enough,
I mean the last senator to have it would have
been kay Hagen and she held it one term.
Speaker 1: John Edwards one term.
Speaker 3: But if it becomes reliably read from a financial standpoint,
that is very problematic for Democrats because that would mean,
you know, you've already got you know, Florida Texas to
Texas Florida, You've got several reliably red states. And if
enough of those become reliably reliably read, the resources that
are there that can be shifted to other states means
Democrats are playing more defense in state after state after state.
That is a trend that is very potentially damaging for Democrats.
I mean, I know they're very optimistic about taking back
the Senate next year, but as you look on the
ground in North Carolina and I'll get into that. I
want to finish up this this one column and several
others as a matter of fact, but one of the
discussions is where do we head for the Senate? And
if you look right now at where we are in
the Senate race, it's kind of interesting because on the
Democrat side you got Roy Cooper, who you know, has
he left the state, He's got a teaching position. It's
either Harvard or Yell. I think it's Harvard, but I
don't know. And plus, Roy Cooper really can't stand Republicans,
and if you move him to d C, he would
have to deal with a lot of them and probably
be in the majority. And I don't think he would
deal with them. I don't think he has the fire
to be the next Senator from North Carolina. I think
he's but again, I'm not prognosticating. My gut tells me.
And it's not hatred toward or Cooper, fundamental disagreements with him,
but it's not personal. Is that I just don't see
the fire in his belly. I think he wants time
with his family. That's me guessing. I think also it
would be a gut wrenching race for him. It would
be very different than a gubernatorial race. It would be
a very difficult race, especially with the president out there
on the campaign trail. That would leave someone like Jeff
Jackson out there, who you know, wouldn't have to sacrifice
his attorney general position. He's very charismatic, he could raise money.
So the Democrats have a few candidates that chiefs roue.
I would say Jeff Jackson would be the front runner
right now.
Speaker 1: That's me.
Speaker 3: Secondly, on the Republican side, and you've got people, you know,
Dan Bishop's name.
Speaker 1: Gets bandied about.
Speaker 3: There's some other names that get pandied about, but Pat
Harrigan is a name that continues to be out in
that front circle.
Speaker 1: Now, I say that with a caveat.
Speaker 3: Pat Harrigan Western North Carolina is in Congress, the very
Trump friendly.
Speaker 1: The President's met with him, likes him.
Speaker 3: And for the Republicans will the real question is will
either party have a primary. I would suspect that if
the President jumps into that race, there will be no
Republican primary. For Democrats, I think they need every dime
they can get it. Democrats are really good about pushing
people aside in primaries, and probably they would have to
rally around one, so the race could be a very
long one, which would make it a lot more expensive.
We'll see, But I think on the right you heard
me talk about Pat Harrigan, and I omitted one name
on perse because it is it is a field clearing name,
and that is Laura Trump. She turned down the run
in Florida. I don't think that was a good run
for North Carolina. Five days ago there was a story
that Pat Harrigan has said that if Laura Trump wins,
she will have one have his endorsement. I think that's
a way for Pat to keep his name in the mix.
Laura Trump hasn't signaled that she wants to run, so
it's going to be a matter of who has the
passion for it. She is from North Caroline, She's from
Rightsvill Beach. She has a lot of connections.
Speaker 1: In North Carolina.
Speaker 3: Plus her name, plus her name ID, plus obviously the
endorsement of her father in law. That could be a
tremendous asset on the ground in North Carolina for a
Senate seat that the Republicans cannot afford to give up. Also,
we're Harrigan or Laura Trump to prevail, that would be
a reliably conservative vote in that particular seat to join
Ted Budd, who would then become the states who will
be by the way, Ted Budd will be the state's
senior senator moving forward. And if either of those were
to win or to be and again we're light years
away from who it might be registrate. I mean, sign
up doesn't start until December. We're one of those two
to win be a reliably red seat, a reliably conservative
seat for the Republicans in DC. Democrats desperately want it.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know.
Speaker 3: With the president hear what Roy Cooper, I don't think
he wants to tangle with that one. So the Democrats
will put someone, but it know you a lot about
what they think their chances are by who becomes the nominee,
because that could be either one of the most expensive
races in the country or it's going to be a
Republican's walking to victory. I don't see the Democrats why
they could Trump could be very damaged by next year.
Who knows, it's a political light year. As they say,
here's a great idea. How about making an escape to
a really special and secluded getaway in western North Carolina?
Just a quick drive up the mountain, and Cabins of
Asheville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating an anniversary, a honeymoon,
maybe you want to plan a memorable pos or get
family and friends together for a big old reunion. Cabins
of Asheville has the ideal spot for you where you
can reconnect with your loved ones and the things that
truly matter. Nestled within the breath taking fourteen thousand acres
of the Pisga National Forest, their cabins offer a serene
escape in the heart of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Centrally
located between Asheville and the entrance of the Great Smoky
Mountain National Park. It's the perfect balance of seclusion and
proximity to all the local attractions with hot tubs, fireplaces,
air conditioning, smart TVs, Wi Fi, grills, outdoor tables and
your own private covered porch. Choose from thirteen.
Speaker 2: Cabins, six cottages, two villas and a great lodge with
eleven king sized bedrooms. Cabins of Ashville has the ideal
spot for you for any occasion, and they have pet
friendly accommodations. Call or text eight two, eight, three, six, seven,
seventy sixty eight or check out all there is to
offer at cabins Offashville dot com and make memories that'll
last a lifetime.
Speaker 3: I mentioned earlier people there are other people they do
know how to social media, and they did.
Speaker 1: I won't repeat what was that. It's funny.
Speaker 3: It's just questionable if I should repeat it, but it was.
I appreciate the shout out about Jeff sat Jackson will
be the nominee unless you know, the Democrats find the
candidate can check certain you know, trans race boxes before.
Speaker 1: You know they got a candidate. That was funny.
Speaker 3: Now, when we went to the break, it was talking
about it was a writer from MSNBC and it was
about the veracity of data from the White House on
job numbers from the Labor Department. And here's the funny thing,
I said, And I went through the whole article, and
it's the short row. I didn't go through the whole article,
the short version of the article, and it it takes
snippets from the New York Times and other leftist sources
and it says, you know, can we trust the numbers
that the Trump administration gives us because wouldn't they put
pressure on the labor Department to skew the numbers. Now
he has no evidence to support that other than they
don't like Trump. But nowhere do they question the data
that the Biden administration was given. Well, mainly because it
was very bad and it was proven it was neat,
because all the prognostications, Oh, it's gonna get better than
inflation reduction acts gonna work, it's gonna be great, it's
gonna be wonderful, and it just just the opposite.
Speaker 1: Inflation went through the roof the job. Numbers were bad.
Speaker 3: The Biden administration was a dismal failure on many fronts,
but the most significant is that you didn't know who
was in charge, and the same people from MSNBC they're
questioning the truthiness for lack of a better phrase of
the Labor Department didn't question the Biden administration didn't question.
If ever, there was pressure to probably cook the books,
so to speak, when you don't have a commander in
chief in charge who has to look at cheat sheets
just to say, hello, how.
Speaker 1: Are you doing?
Speaker 3: Who's running the show. When they're giving you data, who
do you trust? Why do you trust it? But now
they question it? So I didn't want to belabor that.
But that was one example, and that was from MSNBC.
Now the next one, then, I think is a good one,
is well, I'll go to the healthcare first.
Speaker 1: So the.
Speaker 3: So the healthcare and the media bias, Let's go to healthcare.
Speaker 1: It's Victor Davis.
Speaker 3: Hanson has said some things, but this is really about
Derek Hunter. Derek Hunter over at town dot com Road
to piece. You know now that there's one big beautiful
bill and is the law of the land. The panic
that democrats. Remember I told you whenever Democrats get upset,
people are going to die.
Speaker 1: Meaning uh, Trump cut off.
Speaker 3: Aid, millions of people are going to die in Africa, UH, meteorology, Texas,
They're going to die in anything. It's always oh. And
then in North Carolina because the big beautiful bill, people
are going to die.
Speaker 1: Amputees are going to get amputated with no health They're
going to die. That's their answer.
Speaker 3: Rather than have a salient substance of debate, it's just
people are going to die. Now, the one big beautiful
bill is the law of the land. The panic Democrats
tried to inspire, We'll have nowhere to go. What do
you do with the people. So gullible that they believe anything.
A Democrats says, some people are simply unreachable and it's
probably best not to waste your time. But it's worth
noting that the fear they manufacture.
Speaker 1: In people is not an accident.
Speaker 3: How many times have you heard someone say big drug
companies would rather people die than see their profits drop,
or some such variation. I bet you've heard it a lot.
It's a very effective line of attack as it pits
someone in need against a horrific evil corporation and doesn't
hate faceless corporate Who doesn't hate faceless corporations? The only
problem is, if you think about it rationally, what kind
of business plan is it where you have your customers
base die?
Speaker 1: Not a growth industry there.
Speaker 3: While you can find cases, now, I would add the
caveat theory is that the allegation is that drug companies
would rather have you dependent on their drugs and live
for a long time than to have a cure that
you take one time. That's the conspiracy theory. While you
can find cases of people genuinely unable to afford their
prescriptions or an insurance companies screwing over someone, those cases
are more rare than not. Surveys show during the Obamacare
debate that health insurance companies were wildly unpopular with the public,
but because the public had a highly favorable view.
Speaker 1: Of their own insurance.
Speaker 3: Why people hate Congress but they typically like their congress person.
Medicaid is no different. Medicaid is the joint state and
federal program for health insurance for the poor, and Democrats
have been using the quote cuts to the program and
the one to being beautiful guild to scare the hell
out of people and the hope that it'll stop it.
Speaker 1: But it didn't stop. You know one woman.
Speaker 3: I'm not going to get to that, get to the
rest of the column, but the key to a woman
who complained about all this issue is laid bare when
talking about getting a job and how it won't make
her happy. That's not the point of work, at least
not when you're starting out. It's about gaining experience, building
skills and talents, and someone Sometimes it's about discovering what
you don't want to do with the rest of your life.
I've had more jobs than most families have had, and
each one taught me something. I've had I can't even
tell you how many jobs right off that I myself.
The Democratic Party has instilled in a lot of people
the poisonous idea that you somehow are entitled because you exist,
and that any expectation of you is oppressive. Not only
is that destructive to society, but it's also destructive to
the individuals who start believing that stuff. Democrats don't give
a damn if someone were to harm themselves for someone else.
They don't care that somebody's isolating themselves from friends and
family means they're easier pickings for the brown shirts on
the left, the permanently mobilized, violent mod that enforces the
will of Democrats, that's what they care about. If they
have to instill more panic in people unable to deal
with it, or destroy a few lives along the way,
so be it. What are they going to do? Offer
some specific policy proposal. No, they're not going to do that,
And that's the problem. They just make you fearful rather
than have an honest debate about something. That's what climate
change is. The sky is falling thirty years ago, forty
years ago, twenty years ago.
Speaker 1: What's the end? Hurricanes are going to destroy?
Speaker 3: You got to act now, you gotta you know that
they never The left never saw in climate change originally
the ability to push socialism under the guise of climate change,
because all the answers to climate change are bigger, more
powerful government, higher, more ludicrous taxes, and a way to
destroy businesses and control the means of production visa vie energy.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: Stories are powerful. They help us make sense of things,
to understand experiences. Stories connect us to the people of
our past while transcending generations. They help us process the
meaning of life, and our stories are told through images
and videos. Preserve your stories with Creative Video started in
nineteen ninety seven and Minhill, North Carolina. It was the
first company to provide this valuable service, converting images, photos
and videos into high quality produced slide shows, videos and albums.
The trusted, talented and dedicated team at Creative Video will
go over all of the details with you to create
a perfect project. Satisfaction guaranteed. Drop them off in person
or mail them. They'll be ready in a week or two.
Memorial videos for your loved ones, videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas,
family vacations, birthdays, or just your family stories all told
through images. That's what your photos and videos are They
are your life told through the eyes of everyone around
you and all who came before you, and they will
tell others to come who you are visit creative video
dot com.
Speaker 3: So I'm gonna try to tell you what we'll do here.
So I'm gonna I'm gonna try this, We're gonna try this,
We're gonna see. So she was asked about the Epstein files,
and what I posted was, no matter what answer she
gives at this point, there are many people out there
that will not be satisfied. I'm gonna play her answer
because I want you to hear it from her mouth,
not mine. But here's what Pam Bondi had to say
what asks specifically about the Epstein situation and her comments
previously about it, the client list being on her desk,
and her clarification on that. Here's what she had to say.
Speaker 4: First to back up on that. In February, I did
an interview on Fox and it's been getting a lot
of attention because I said I was asked a question
about the client list and my response was it's sitting
on my desk to be reviewed, meaning the file along
with the jfk MLK files as well, that's what I
meant by that. Also to the tens of thousands of
video they turned out to be child porn downloaded by
disgusting Jeffrey Epstein. Childhorn is what they were never going
to be released, never going to see.
Speaker 3: The light of day.
Speaker 4: To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that.
We can get back to you on that. And the
minute missing from the video. We released the video showing
definitively the video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior
to it was showing he committed suicide. And what was
on that there was a minute that was off the counter.
And what we learned from euro of Prisons was every year,
every night they redo that videos old from like nineteen
ninety nine, so every night the video is reset and
every night should have the same minute missing. So we're
looking for that video to release that as well, showing
that a minute is missing every night.
Speaker 3: So that's from the Attorney General of the United States Pambondi. Clearly,
this is an issue for people. It's not an issue
that's going That is not the answer. And this is
the problem with many big situations in society. When you're looking,
you know a lot of people say you know, I'm
not going to be satisfied until these Democrats a arrested
and they got a picture of Hillary and they put
Obama out there, and they.
Speaker 1: Put all these you know, Millie and all these others.
I'm not going to be happy.
Speaker 3: Well, if there isn't a due process way to do it,
that's not going to make you happy. That's not going
to make anybody happy. It's kind of like the political life.
I'm not gonna be happy till Trump goes to the jail.
Way we got a mug shot of him, Well, Trump
turned it into a magnificent fundraising opportunity, and the others
were lawfair that have since been kind of laughed out.
The point being, we're at a time in society where
we come to conclusions on the right and left very quickly,
and we we because we want to believe certain things.
It's very hard to believe that Jeffrey Epstein, this guy
that had so much power and so much money and
so much influence, just oftened himself in the jail. It's
hard to believe that all of the people that he
associated with, from the Clintons to Trump to everybody, I
mean anybody who was anybody in entertainment and politics. Knew
and had peripheral contact with he Gallne Maxwell, and it's
hard to believe that it could be really that. I mean,
Lalita Island was a real place people went there. We
know about the underage girl with the Britainyalty. We know that,
So you have to infer that there's a lot more
that We've got several girls that have come forward that
have said, hey, there was a lot, there was a
lot there.
Speaker 1: So I don't know.
Speaker 3: I don't think that answer is the end of it.
I still think there's more to come because there are
still multiple lawsuits that are underway where there are people
that want the truth to come out about that. Now
is it going to satisfy the masses?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 3: I don't know that that particular answer has been has
been taken care of.
Speaker 1: I don't So you have it. That's what it was.
Speaker 3: Now. A couple of more things that I want to
get to that were a continuation of the first hour
when we were kind of illustrating the distinctions between the
MAGA people and the TDS.
Speaker 1: And I really think the.
Speaker 3: MAGA it wasn't a Trump phenomenon. It was the tea
Party and there was this huge conservative base that was
constantly disappointed by the Republican Party that went after and
challenge the Republicans, and the Republicans would would still you know,
rais raise spending and never deal with things in a
serious manner. And you know, Trump kind of filled that void.
So it was not so much that it was mag
of faithful as a candidate rose from the need and
the hole in the Republican Party that was created by
the Republican Party that Trump filled.
Speaker 1: That's what that is.
Speaker 3: And if there were ten more people like that, and
I think we're going to see that. I think there's
a there's an entire new bench of players in that
that are going to carry forth that that have fundamentally
changed the Republican Party moving forward. For the left, the
Democrats have a problem with Lauraman and AOC and Mamdanie
and they're going to at some point have to figure
out how to reject that world. They're going to have
to figure out, do we really want Mam Donnie to
be the standard bearer.
Speaker 1: He's going to be mayor of New York.
Speaker 3: I mean, Rob a Manuel's kind of signaled the alarm.
I think Gavin Knwsom signaling the alarm. I think the
party faithful starting to be very concerned about their parties
drift into obscurity with the border and with you know,
rapists and murderers and all that of you know, not
not confronting that problem, with the immigration crisis, not confronting
the problem of you know, we had another race where
a trans cyclist just leaps through the field and defeats
you know, all these amazing female athletes, and when they
go to the podium, the second and third placement, it's
just not there. And the Democrats are aligned with that.
Democrats that sit before Congress and can't tell I think
that ten years from now we will look back and go,
how were Democrats unable to tell you what a woman was?
I mean, this girl that lost the race said, hey,
there's an advantage to a Y chromosome. It's just there.
That's just reality. And you have a Supreme Court nominee
in Katanji Brown Jackson. They couldn't answer that question. You
have Democrats Scots of the camp. What's a woman? People
identify as women genders a social construct. I don't know, No,
it's this is you know xxx YX pretty simple I'm sorry.
And then you know, people who can give birth, that's
that's only an expression that the political.
Speaker 1: Left can come up with. They're called women. It's not
real difficult.
Speaker 3: This isn't a this is not a difficult topic.
Speaker 1: It's been made difficult.
Speaker 3: I mean, Charlotte was one of the headquarters of this.
Speaker 1: The men and women's.
Speaker 3: Bathroom issue really started in Charlotte. Now, how's that aging
for them? It's not aging very well, it's just not
so a couple of things we're going to get to
on the other side of the break. I will get
to the flooding that now we've got over one hundred
and one hundred and two victims. But you know, I
want to get to where people have already politicized that event.
They shouldn't have, but they have, and it is it
is really a shame that they've done. So. I also
want to get to the situation on the lies about Medicaid.
Speaker 1: We had caller to the.
Speaker 3: Show yesterday that was very concerned about medicaid. I'm sure
many of you are, and the future of Kamala Harris,
and that many people think the sheet might still be
the nominee. And I think Republicans should have brass.
Speaker 2: That all right. That'll do it for this episode. Thank
you so much for listening. I could not do the
show without your support and the support of the businesses
that advertise on the podcast, so if you'd like, please
support them too and tell them you heard it here.
You can also become a patron at my Patreon page
or go to thepetecleanershow dot com. Again, thank you so
much for listening, and don't break anything while I'm gone.