Speaker 1: M let in here. So it's talking real soon. I step,
Speaker 1: I'm not to the feeling in the drill. That's so
Speaker 1: the roads just telling your ro still that's fine.
Speaker 2: The corner that Steven gonna standing up killing in the
Speaker 2: neighborhood never got tiny.
Speaker 1: Out a lot of.
Speaker 2: Five thoughts about and I'm gone waiting for the buses.
Speaker 2: But the first one car or the time stops playing
Speaker 2: and the.
Speaker 1: Ship coming and I step, I've never walks was the
Speaker 1: riding that So the room is a lot of compt
Speaker 1: stop sound okay, And I mean it's gone with Dang Wild.
Speaker 2: That's a vote in the sales and to the Brady
Speaker 2: out e a singles claim for that moment in time
Speaker 2: then that final come back.
Speaker 1: And stroking me and die your man isn't here. What
Speaker 1: is calling in real soon.
Speaker 3: Really isn't here. It's just telling you.
Speaker 1: Stuck got outside, okay, And I mean it's going with
Speaker 1: Danny O Wive.
Speaker 2: That's a vote of the sails, Braddy out the the
Speaker 2: things claim for that moment inside and that final come back.
Speaker 1: And throw me a die, I suck.
Speaker 4: Good morning. We have a lot to cover today. So
Speaker 4: it is nine o two a m. My time at
Speaker 4: least eight for most people on the Pacific coast, well
Speaker 4: for everybody on the Pacific coast, and it is the sixteenth,
Speaker 4: nine days, nine days, everybody, nine days till Christmas. Holy shit,
Speaker 4: I had a positive reflect on that for a second.
Speaker 4: Holy co All right, we're here, we know what we're doing.
Speaker 4: How's everybody? So we do have a lot to cover,
Speaker 4: but I want to kind of present something. I got
Speaker 4: two videos here before we get started into the reading,
Speaker 4: and this is going to be something that all right,
Speaker 4: So it's a reflection of the cult itself being presented
Speaker 4: to you in you know, different ways, but also a
Speaker 4: theme of the erasers of history or of timelines. Yeah,
Speaker 4: all right, And there's a parasitic element to this, which
Speaker 4: is very fitting. There is a total destruction element of this.
Speaker 4: There's a aesoteric or sorcerers dial flare to all of this,
Speaker 4: and an elitist group that you'll see in the first
Speaker 4: video who aren't just a bunch of people in suits,
Speaker 4: but there's something a little bit different, like magicians, like
Speaker 4: very you know, high ranking sorcerers, and they have no
Speaker 4: problem you know, cannibalizing their own children or whatever, whether
Speaker 4: that just means sacrifice or whatever.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 4: So here we go. Now this is the I don't
Speaker 4: care to remember what year this was that this came out,
Speaker 4: but I'll find out in a second. Here Langaliers came
Speaker 4: out in nineteen ninety five, Stephen King, So two years
Speaker 4: before I graduated high school? Do they even say who
Speaker 4: the Balkie is? Yeah, bronze and pin choke Balkie or
Speaker 4: Balkie him and his sheep get eaten. That's his butt.
Speaker 4: We're not We're not really concerned about that right now.
Speaker 4: That's not what we're here for. That's a bonus. You
Speaker 4: get that for free.
Speaker 1: I know what.
Speaker 4: My head stuck up his ass, So I'm gonna not
Speaker 4: put my my face on the screen as yet. But
Speaker 4: here we go.
Speaker 3: The lango don't even exist.
Speaker 4: You just made them up?
Speaker 3: Where am I?
Speaker 4: Dude? If this is ten ADP, my eyes are going
Speaker 4: that it says it's it must just be what their
Speaker 4: source was. The the best you can do. Yeh, Well
Speaker 4: it's a little grany. My bad can't do anything about it.
Speaker 4: Go away, though, fucking ship there you go.
Speaker 5: Okayah, those are really bad CGI graphics, that's what these are.
Speaker 4: Notice they destroy something that says American pride out there.
Speaker 4: But then a star that looks like it's a little
Speaker 4: bit I don't know, cock down, its point right, a
Speaker 4: little interesting, wouldn't you say? Maybe symbolic?
Speaker 6: Oh my god, wow, Why doesn't he run into the plane?
Speaker 4: Why does he run past the plane?
Speaker 3: Come on, movement?
Speaker 2: No no.
Speaker 1: No no no no no no, no.
Speaker 3: Praise. You may think you're running, but you're not. You're scampering.
Speaker 3: No no no, make them go away. Please make them
Speaker 3: go away.
Speaker 1: That'll be good, be good bye.
Speaker 4: Please, I promise.
Speaker 3: I'll be good.
Speaker 4: There's a point to all this you're gonna see in
Speaker 4: a minute. I know it's a logratuitous at a little
Speaker 4: excessive and a little lengthy, but listen, indulge you notice
Speaker 4: that it's the L one zero one one. You know
Speaker 4: what the vibe looks like. It looks like the way
Speaker 4: you draw number one with that little thing on the
Speaker 4: top of it, looks like the claw marks and the
Speaker 4: monster can. Right, So that actually is representative of sixty
Speaker 4: sixty six because the vibe is the six and that's
Speaker 4: the plain number.
Speaker 3: What meltan milk can?
Speaker 4: They had to make something that was very dramatic, look
Speaker 4: very dramatically, a flating device hitting you into the head.
Speaker 4: Oh my god, it hurts so bad.
Speaker 1: Ok.
Speaker 3: Okay, then good lords, look at that?
Speaker 1: What is it?
Speaker 3: They're being drawn in? Mister Toomey?
Speaker 4: Where are mister Toomey? Us? If Toomey hadn't left the terminal,
Speaker 4: they would have eaten us and the plane too. She
Speaker 4: knew somehow, she knew. Okay, h.
Speaker 2: Now we know.
Speaker 1: What we know what.
Speaker 2: We know?
Speaker 3: What happens today when it becomes just a bit. He
Speaker 3: waits for them.
Speaker 5: He waits for them, the timekeepers of eternity, always following behind,
Speaker 5: cleaning up the mess in the most efficient way possible.
Speaker 3: By eating it.
Speaker 5: Mister telling you about them, he said they were the
Speaker 5: land leaders.
Speaker 3: Oh no, oh, come on, Oh.
Speaker 7: You're over here.
Speaker 4: God, this guy's annoying. He's going to be annoying. He's
Speaker 4: going to irritate you.
Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
Speaker 3: Come on, do we make this hurry off the ground.
Speaker 3: What happens? Mister mister Warren, sit down, strap yourself then
Speaker 3: and everything.
Speaker 1: I'll be all right, kay m h.
Speaker 3: Need to hear open those.
Speaker 4: Walk now's a good time to say. So where to
Speaker 4: so it kinda has a little bit of a dotty
Speaker 4: darko feel the tangent timeline having to be taken care of.
Speaker 4: Right now, here's another one compliments that one, and it's
Speaker 4: going to be only four minutes that we're good. This
Speaker 4: will make sense when we get to the part in
Speaker 4: the book here today. But think of this as people
Speaker 4: who have fucked up our history in the nature of
Speaker 4: their sorcery and their parasitic nature as well. Now they
Speaker 4: watermark the hell out of this, I think because they
Speaker 4: were afraid of copyrights and they didn't have the licensing
Speaker 4: or whatever. So bear with it because it's the best
Speaker 4: quality resolution I could find. The other one was like
Speaker 4: flour eighty and it was making my eyes hurt just
Speaker 4: to watch it.
Speaker 3: So we're good to go.
Speaker 7: Hold it.
Speaker 4: And as you can see on the screen, it's the
Speaker 4: Day the Years Stood Still two thousand and eight version,
Speaker 4: not the fifties version with Clatota. You too. Clato is
Speaker 4: the guy, but when they did did the Army of Darkness,
Speaker 4: they used his name on purpose, Plato for the what
Speaker 4: they're supposed to say, the words are supposed to say
Speaker 4: before you pick up the Book of the Dead.
Speaker 3: Your sleeve let me out.
Speaker 6: Then we have to flash our protocol.
Speaker 3: I decide what protocol is open the door, let me up,
Speaker 3: Let me up.
Speaker 4: You shut the drum. So he was expendable. So Jio
Speaker 4: number seven that you know that's what they do. Yeah yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: too bad, buddy, Thanks for doing your job. You died
Speaker 4: for your country today. I should reset the drill, put
Speaker 4: me up.
Speaker 3: Certain restraints.
Speaker 4: Little nano bugs, little tiny nano bugs, self replicating. They
Speaker 4: just split and make two little bugs. And don't worry
Speaker 4: that guy just that just called the order to let
Speaker 4: that guy die inside. He's gonna have instant karma here. Soon.
Speaker 3: Open the door, Open the door. This facility has been sealed.
Speaker 4: No one leaves.
Speaker 3: We lost contact with the Flashchamers, Sir.
Speaker 1: M H.
Speaker 3: Whiskey Task Force.
Speaker 4: Hey Jack, is it weird to anybody else that they're
Speaker 4: firing all those rockets at their you know, right at
Speaker 4: their own base. I mean, I get it. There's a
Speaker 4: big cloud of blackness coming toward their way. They don't
Speaker 4: like truck drivers. All right, that should set the mood hopefully.
Speaker 4: H Good morning, Polka. How are you all right? I'm
Speaker 4: getting get into this reading here just a moment. Okay,
Speaker 4: we are, We're on. I see Bushmaster over here in
Speaker 4: the chat over on FTJ. It's finally working now we
Speaker 4: figured out the issue and now we've got people on here.
Speaker 4: Finally it was going to private for those of you
Speaker 4: over on FTJ. I've been on for the last six
Speaker 4: days and you haven't seen it because it was putting
Speaker 4: it on premium only private and that setting. We couldn't
Speaker 4: figure out why we kept doing that, so it was
Speaker 4: supposed to we fixed a couple of times, but now
Speaker 4: it is good. So I would have to make it
Speaker 4: on you know, public after the fact. So what do
Speaker 4: I be after the live stream that you'd be able
Speaker 4: to see it. Most people tune in for the live
Speaker 4: so that kind of made it annoying to me mostly. Okay,
Speaker 4: so the title today, right, let me read a little
Speaker 4: bit of this.
Speaker 7: Uh wata.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 7: I forgot that whapping no one else from here. There's
Speaker 7: people over there on ftday. Give about thee cass you're
Speaker 7: happy path. Thank you so much, appreciate it. I got,
Speaker 7: I got applause.
Speaker 4: I know you guys can't hear, unfortunately, but that's uh,
Speaker 4: thank you appreciate that a lot. So okay. So it
Speaker 4: says for or add as an atom, the first historical
Speaker 4: king in the ancient world. Now this is from the
Speaker 4: British eda, right, who, as I have demonstrated by concrete
Speaker 4: historical proofs in my previous works, that would be makers
Speaker 4: of civilization in recent history. This book, of course, and
Speaker 4: all of the other ones that led up to it,
Speaker 4: like the Venetian or I'm sorry, the Aryan Origins of
Speaker 4: the alphabet, it also makes a strong case for this
Speaker 4: because that's how he shows you the the lingual similarities
Speaker 4: and how this is like the same root language, and
Speaker 4: what they're writing over in the Indus Valley is a
Speaker 4: history of what happened over in summer in Mesopotamia and
Speaker 4: how this was all united kingdom under one king. Okay,
Speaker 4: so thor or add the first historia. And also there's
Speaker 4: a thing about Thrace in Egypt that there's a where
Speaker 4: they're messing up the timelines of the kings because they
Speaker 4: don't realize that they're happening in Ah, you know, simultaneously,
Speaker 4: so they like put them one after the other rather
Speaker 4: than showing them that they're going they're happening at the
Speaker 4: same time, you know, just different rulers, if you will.
Speaker 4: All right, So thor Ad, the first historical king of
Speaker 4: the ancient world, who I have demonstrated by concrete historical proofs,
Speaker 4: by my previous works, and as now fully established in
Speaker 4: the present pages, was the historical original of Adam, the
Speaker 4: son of God Thor, real human being, not the first
Speaker 4: man of the New Testament. Thor is Adam is what
Speaker 4: he's saying here where. However, as well as in Genesis,
Speaker 4: this true history, as the reformer of Eden is spitefully
Speaker 4: spitefully by this Edenite cult, by this saturn cult, mutilated spitefully,
Speaker 4: he says, Mutilated regenerates and transforms the riotous old world
Speaker 4: into a civilized, settled, law abiding, industrial and habitable land
Speaker 4: agriculture by his great uplifting crusade under his banner of
Speaker 4: the red Cross. We're talking five thousand years ago. Everybody
Speaker 4: of his son worship and publishes civilization, and thus affects
Speaker 4: the rise of man. The historical Atom is now disclosed
Speaker 4: to have been not the first created man, but the
Speaker 4: first man who made men of men. He is the
Speaker 4: protagonist of the Eda Epic. His noble, forceful and resourceful
Speaker 4: and inspiring personality with his traditional personal appearance of the tall,
Speaker 4: fair Nordic racial type majestic with a happy combination of
Speaker 4: bron and brain are vividly described, in keeping with the
Speaker 4: more or less contemporary Sumerian and Hittite sculptures, engraved seals,
Speaker 4: and historical records. His building of the first town, establishment
Speaker 4: of the agriculture, metal forges, and other industrial industries and
Speaker 4: town life, His creation of free institutions and of the
Speaker 4: first Parliament, His message of brotherly love and the brotherhood
Speaker 4: of man. His abhorrence of the serpent and its mother.
Speaker 4: Weird cult. Remember Weird is like a sorcerer. Weird cult
Speaker 4: and blood sacrifices are graphically and dramatically narrated. He was
Speaker 4: against the cult, who found it repulsive, as people with
Speaker 4: morals would people's sensibilities. The place of his first appearance
Speaker 4: is located at Troy in the Troad district of Mount Ida,
Speaker 4: bordering the Dardanelles in northern western and northwestern Asia Minor,
Speaker 4: and the tradition in a later scene refers to his
Speaker 4: having come from the Danube Valley in Middle europe An
Speaker 4: immemorial home of the Goths. Remember they were calling themselves
Speaker 4: the Goths five thousand years ago. It's not something that
Speaker 4: happened later on in appearance, and they weren't a bunch
Speaker 4: of barbarian savages didn't know. That's that's all bullshit. The savages,
Speaker 4: the people who never progressed or had anything to show for,
Speaker 4: was this cult because they were anti progress this point
Speaker 4: of his advent and establishment. Oh and by the way,
Speaker 4: what we just saw with those languo ears and what
Speaker 4: we just saw with the with the the nanobugs in
Speaker 4: the two thousand and eight the day the year stood still.
Speaker 4: This is how the Abrahamic cults, of course Judaism being
Speaker 4: in the middle of that, in the in the center
Speaker 4: as the orchestrator, they utilize as a tool Islam to
Speaker 4: be their destroyers of history. They go in there and
Speaker 4: they eradicate and they destroy sculptures, anything that predates Islam
Speaker 4: because they find it to be they don't want it.
Speaker 4: They don't want any evidence or any examples of superiority
Speaker 4: because they're such Yeah, you get it right, they can't
Speaker 4: have that. They have to reduce everything because they can't
Speaker 4: bring themselves up. So they have to reduce everything, their
Speaker 4: anti progress, So they erased histories, they destroy everything in
Speaker 4: their path. They did it, Alexandria, they did it in
Speaker 4: what we'll see here today. And the time and time
Speaker 4: again the Visigoths, the Muslims destroy, they don't create. We
Speaker 4: went through the anti what it was, the myth of
Speaker 4: the of the Golden Age after the Visigoths were eradicated,
Speaker 4: because the Jews helped the Muslims through the gates, and
Speaker 4: oddly enough, for people who are supposed to be adds
Speaker 4: with each other, they left the what we would call
Speaker 4: Jews now in charge of guarding those as they ventured
Speaker 4: further into the Kingdom to kill and kill and kill
Speaker 4: and kill and destroy structures in their path. This is
Speaker 4: what they do, and this is what we see on
Speaker 4: large scale in World War One and World War two,
Speaker 4: as they destroy that which the people who are the
Speaker 4: ancestors of the God or the young. I'm sorry, the
Speaker 4: contemporaries are not the contemporaries. That's in the same time,
Speaker 4: you know what I mean with descendants of those Goths.
Speaker 4: What they build, they take down, they destroy. What could
Speaker 4: they did to dressden Now they're doing a little bit
Speaker 4: more high tech. I don't know that's not Muslim, but
Speaker 4: I'm saying this is the pattern, this is what they do.
Speaker 4: They're at odds with us because they chose to be
Speaker 4: Thor try to rehabilitate them, and there was a peace
Speaker 4: and the Edenites, who were at least pretending because they
Speaker 4: like to be cryptos, don't they They got along for
Speaker 4: a while, but then the cult reared its ugly head again,
Speaker 4: and it started putting masks on itself, masking, and then
Speaker 4: later in history it masked itself as in Abrahamic religion,
Speaker 4: utilizing pieces of our past, flipping them, co opting them,
Speaker 4: becoming impostors, and erasing our history in the process. Where
Speaker 4: was I that was a little bit, not a little garbled?
Speaker 4: I apologize and working my brain here. This point of
Speaker 4: his advent and establishment of the first civilized state at
Speaker 4: Troy discloses him as the historical original of the first
Speaker 4: traditional king of the Greek Dardanos Greek the original of
Speaker 4: the first traditional king of the Greek Dardanos, after whom
Speaker 4: the Dardanelles are named for. Thor Or, King Dar of
Speaker 4: the Samerian records bears in the Eda as well as
Speaker 4: in the Sumerian the title of Dan, though Homer's tradition
Speaker 4: has placed him about two millenniums later than his real date.
Speaker 4: He is also identified through the Attic title of burr
Speaker 4: meoff or perit of Sumerian and identical achievements with the
Speaker 4: historical original of the far famed Prometheus of the Greek legend.
Speaker 4: Remember that gave that a bad spin and made him
Speaker 4: suffer right. This is the cult showing its animosity Prometheus
Speaker 4: of the Greek legend, who first brought fire to the
Speaker 4: domestic hearth of primitive man and gave them the blessings
Speaker 4: of knowledge and civilization, and so evoked the anger of
Speaker 4: the jealous old gods, as he too with his wife
Speaker 4: Asia was located by the Greek tradition in Asia Minor.
Speaker 4: The edic account of the coming of King thor Dar
Speaker 4: or ad or Adam and his establishment of civilisation is
Speaker 4: profusely illustrated in these pages by early Samerian and Hittite
Speaker 4: sculptures and engraved seals, and is further confirmed by the
Speaker 4: ancient Sumerian, Egyptian, Greek, and Indian traditional records detailed in
Speaker 4: the appendix. And it is of the special Gothic significance
Speaker 4: that the Sumerian and Hittite portraits of the first King
Speaker 4: and his men and women folk represent them usually in
Speaker 4: Gothic dress and wearing the horned hat of the Goths.
Speaker 4: How many times have you seen depictions of Moses with horns?
Speaker 4: Who do you think they're They're they're stealing the archetype
Speaker 4: of for that even if maybe maybe those sculptures aren't
Speaker 4: even Moses. Maybe they just tell us that it is
Speaker 4: so that they can again once again erase and co
Speaker 4: opt our history. Or maybe they were just that dumb
Speaker 4: that they didn't realize that he goat, which was the
Speaker 4: totem of the Goths, was that was a characteristic of them,
Speaker 4: and they screwed up when they were doing their co
Speaker 4: opting and stealing. Who knows? So the the wearing the
Speaker 4: horned hat of the goss really Britain's Anglo Saxons and
Speaker 4: Norsemen of the Viking period. This uh okay, let's see.
Speaker 4: So the succeeded scenes arranged in chronological sequence, disclosed or
Speaker 4: civilizing the Aboriginal tribes not only of the Troad or Trod,
Speaker 4: I don't know, but many also from Middle and Eastern
Speaker 4: Asia minor as far as Lake Van and Armenia. Yeah
Speaker 4: this l I'm gonna show you another clip here in
Speaker 4: a second, another snapshot that I did, and you'll see
Speaker 4: l or Elu and this is where it gets really interesting.
Speaker 4: And I'm gonna I'm gonna explain this to you and
Speaker 4: then you can see for yourself. You can make, you
Speaker 4: can connect your own dots, you can have Okay, I'm
Speaker 4: just gonna present this information. You can do. We can
Speaker 4: let your gears turn on this. And I think this
Speaker 4: is the fun part of it. Right, and even from
Speaker 4: Eden in itself. Eden edenites, right, the bad people, the
Speaker 4: cult who he rehabilitated, who had flocked to his son
Speaker 4: cross standard, right, and even to the Eden itself. So
Speaker 4: he lended the olive branch, if you will. He lended
Speaker 4: the help of the hand of friendship to these people
Speaker 4: that he just conquered. He wasn't the scumback who just
Speaker 4: decided to murder everyone who surrendered, right. He appoints them
Speaker 4: head men or chiefs of their own ranks, and he
Speaker 4: enfranchises and admits those tribal chiefs into his Gothic parliament
Speaker 4: and Commonwealth. Now, if that's not trust, I don't know
Speaker 4: what the hell is. And if that's not showing that
Speaker 4: he's there to work with everybody, I don't know what is.
Speaker 4: He even sanctions the inter marriage of regenerate chief with
Speaker 4: a Regenera chief with a Gothic maid. He establishes weaving
Speaker 4: shops at Troy. He has an adventure on a fishing
Speaker 4: excursion in the troyad with his adversary Woden. Woden is
Speaker 4: not Odin, and Odin is another title ode of the
Speaker 4: inn for Thor. That really is no daddy, okay, the
Speaker 4: Edenite and the serpent wolf chief who with his hordes
Speaker 4: raids Troy and its factories. Woden was fucking Loki. The
Speaker 4: repeat raids on Troy by Woden and his men forced
Speaker 4: Thor to conquer the and annex Phrygia, or the land
Speaker 4: of Lions on the east of the borders of Cappadocia,
Speaker 4: on the east to the borders of Capadocia. In this expedition,
Speaker 4: and supported by his Aboriginal allies, he encounters Amazonian warriors
Speaker 4: warrior isses from eden hey where the Amazon Amazonian did
Speaker 4: come from? Romedian Cappadocia all right, who wore skin coats
Speaker 4: and Edenite fashion that has again come into vogue since
Speaker 4: the war second, well, not the second, but the first,
Speaker 4: as distinguished from the cloth tailor made garments of the Goths. Yeah,
Speaker 4: they didn't they didn't wear animal skins, and under his
Speaker 4: title of Meti the Assa, bearing his son cross Wooden standard,
Speaker 4: he vanquishes Wooden in a notable scene described in Wooden's
Speaker 4: lament at his defeat by the Nine Woods of Middy
Speaker 4: the Assa Assa, which thus explains for the first time
Speaker 4: the nine Saint George's crosses on the prehistoric rock carvings
Speaker 4: of the Midas Monument in the heart of Phrygia, and
Speaker 4: it also explains a contemporary portrait of King Thor with
Speaker 4: his five horned head dress team taming, civilizing if you will,
Speaker 4: the Phrygian lions or totems. That's what their their totem
Speaker 4: animal was on the archaic i recrivering figure. Okay, the
Speaker 4: next scene discloses. The next scenes disclosed Thor's conquest of
Speaker 4: Cappadocia east of Frigia up to the Euphrates and down
Speaker 4: through the Taurus or to the seaboard of Celesia Old spelling,
Speaker 4: his establishing his new chief capital of Vidara Avidhara. Remember Vidar,
Speaker 4: the guy who supposedly vanquished Fenrier. Fenerer was a wolf
Speaker 4: giant wolf right wolf cult wolf totem or Terria, I
Speaker 4: think is al It's pronounced at bogus Koi in the
Speaker 4: heart of Cappadocia, as George of the Red Cross, the
Speaker 4: historical original of Saint George of Cappadocia and England, his
Speaker 4: building and fortifying his capital there, which he calls him
Speaker 4: and h I M I n or Heaven. Okay, that
Speaker 4: was Heaven, right. So this is how it gets all
Speaker 4: misconstrued when we hear these mythical tales. His judgment hall
Speaker 4: him in was his judgment hall. They called him ode
Speaker 4: of the Inn. It was the Inn right, his rowan
Speaker 4: apple tree of life, the Igdrasil as a symbol of
Speaker 4: the Sun. His establishing of baptism as the initiating right
Speaker 4: into the Sun cult. Well, isn't that interesting? They're having
Speaker 4: concluded a treaty with the Edenites, whose central mother, weird
Speaker 4: serpent shrine and garden on the Euphrates was now only
Speaker 4: a few days journey to the south of his borders.
Speaker 4: He is visited in his mountain capital by a party
Speaker 4: of weird vestals from Eden, including Eve, to spy out
Speaker 4: his capital, and most of the episodes in these scenes,
Speaker 4: also from three onwards, are confirmed by the Samerian and
Speaker 4: Hittite sculptures and seals, and Phrygian and Cappadocian monuments. The
Speaker 4: evidence is there, and it's written in stone. The courtship
Speaker 4: and marriage of Thor and or Air Thor Arthur with
Speaker 4: Eve or Gwinifa Guinevere, the eden vestal of the Serpent
Speaker 4: cult after her her conversion by Thor to his son cult.
Speaker 4: So she's a baptized and she's she's now one of them.
Speaker 4: She was of Gothic the you know LINEA. Apparently she
Speaker 4: was actually Gothic, but she was living in the with
Speaker 4: the Edenites. So there you have. It is dramatically described
Speaker 4: in the next scene, and significantly, the EDA account is
Speaker 4: in full agreement down to the most minute detail with
Speaker 4: the great prehistoric boss relief or how we pronounced that
Speaker 4: rock sculptures of the of that ceremony in Neraria or
Speaker 4: bugis Koi, which the EDA now interprets for the first time,
Speaker 4: and also in agreement with the Sumerian, Greek, and Indian
Speaker 4: records of that ceremony. Then follow us, then follow then
Speaker 4: follow scenes with Eve at home and Thor's mountain capital
Speaker 4: of Himen or Heaven as queen Consolur of the Goths
Speaker 4: and as custodian of the life giving Rowan Apples of
Speaker 4: the Sacred Tree. The birth and boyhood of Thor Adam
Speaker 4: and Eve's son, the crown Prince gun Or Khan or
Speaker 4: Cain or you know, Sir Gawain Kane, the one that
Speaker 4: we are told is a bad guy right, brings agriculture,
Speaker 4: supposedly jealous of the blood, sacrifice and cult. Do you
Speaker 4: see the symbolism here? See how they flipped everything around.
Speaker 4: The young Prince Kan being treacherously wounded by the elderly
Speaker 4: Balder or Epley Abel, the son of Wodin and the
Speaker 4: Edenite matriarch. Kane's succored by his mother Eve, who warns
Speaker 4: him against the treachery of the eden knightes. Eve knows
Speaker 4: the eden Knights because she was hanging with them, so
Speaker 4: he's like, watch out for thosemo folks and imparts him
Speaker 4: on his initiation as a young solo red cross Knight,
Speaker 4: the Ten Commandments of his father, the Ten Commandments of
Speaker 4: his father Adam Thor other scenes followed with an attack
Speaker 4: on thors Burg at Bybalder. This is our history that
Speaker 4: they've co opted. Do you see what's happening? Here and
Speaker 4: inverted it, putting themselves at the center and making it
Speaker 4: all Semitic, even though that's something what they are by
Speaker 4: balder or Abel and his men from the Van district
Speaker 4: of Eden and their repulse, their repulse as and having
Speaker 4: to pay an indemnity, indemnity Thor's defense of his Cappadoc
Speaker 4: frontier on the euphrates up to the Garden of Eden,
Speaker 4: the almost fatal wounding of Adam Thor by the murderous
Speaker 4: stone missile of balder An incident seized on by later
Speaker 4: Mother cult Greek bark guards and magnified into the binding
Speaker 4: and wounding of Prometheus for rejecting the old gods. It's all,
Speaker 4: it's all in there. It's all manipulation. And this this
Speaker 4: touches us on a like a DNA level, because parts
Speaker 4: of this are true, but they're inverted, so it resonates
Speaker 4: as truth, but it's completely mind fucking us at the
Speaker 4: same time. So Thor's defense of the cap Dotion frontier
Speaker 4: on you freeze up to the garden, even the almost
Speaker 4: fatal wounding. So what they say, they said that they're
Speaker 4: these these uh Edenites are pissed off because they have
Speaker 4: to pay an indemnity to the Thor. Yeah, they I
Speaker 4: believe that's what it says. Thorsburg by Balder Abel and
Speaker 4: his men from the Van district of Eden, and the
Speaker 4: repulse and having to pay indemnity. Thor's the defense of
Speaker 4: the Cappadoc frontier on the Euphrates. Okay, we got it.
Speaker 4: Thor's succor and extraction of the missile by his son Kin,
Speaker 4: his being capsized in his ship of the off the
Speaker 4: Cilesian coast of Bibalder or Soot or Seth right set
Speaker 4: Seth maybe a typhon architect there Abel and punishment of
Speaker 4: Ladder as the source of the Babylonian legend of Damu,
Speaker 4: the son of God capsized by Sutu and his revenge
Speaker 4: on a piece being again patched up. Adam Thorsvitt visits
Speaker 4: the old matriarch weird El at Eden. Now l is
Speaker 4: also Elu another name I l U remember that because
Speaker 4: this is going to get important at Eden, who recites
Speaker 4: to him his ancestry from the western Hers or Arians
Speaker 4: of the Edel Or Ethel and Dan clans of Europe,
Speaker 4: also eaves answer at ancestry from the same Gothic clan
Speaker 4: Stock and taunts him with wishing to capture her central
Speaker 4: fetish magic stone cauldron now check this out, or holy Grail.
Speaker 4: So the stone cauldron, her little witch's pot, her little
Speaker 4: pharmachea sorcery pot, or Holy Grail. During this piece, balder
Speaker 4: O Loki Lucifer of the Serpent Dragon Call visits King
Speaker 4: Thorpe's banquet hall at Vidhara or Heaven and riotously quarreling
Speaker 4: there with his Gothic hosts and foully insulting Queen Eve.
Speaker 4: He is cast out of that heaven. Get it. See
Speaker 4: what they do to us. They make this all so
Speaker 4: so so so fucked up, so very very real life
Speaker 4: people doing very real life things. He goes into their inn,
Speaker 4: starts screwing around, starts trying to start a fight, and
Speaker 4: then he insults Eve. He has cast out of himmen
Speaker 4: which is heaven by gun Arcane or Mioch. Now this
Speaker 4: is either mistranslations that screwed people's minds up or was deliberate.
Speaker 4: And I would say because of the malicious and and
Speaker 4: you know, the animous, freaking envious cult that did not
Speaker 4: like to be second to anything. This was on purpose
Speaker 4: by gun Arcane or Meoc. Michael, right, So the Sun
Speaker 4: Kine or Mioch Michael. Right, you don't get the e
Speaker 4: l at the end until they semitize it because l
Speaker 4: right disclosing the real traditional historical source of the casting
Speaker 4: out from heaven. What the fuck stop moving of the
Speaker 4: great Dragon Lucifer or apollion able by Saint Michael, the
Speaker 4: archangel of the later New Testament legend, and also the
Speaker 4: earlier and truer version of the expulsion of the Green
Speaker 4: Man from King Arthur's banquet hall by the young Knight
Speaker 4: Sir Gawain, which is Weak or Kane in the Arthurian legend.
Speaker 4: Subsequent scenes disclose the binding of Balder Loki by Miak,
Speaker 4: Michael or Kine, owing to his continued destructive raids on
Speaker 4: the Gothic territory. So they are still screwing with them right.
Speaker 4: Balder's escaped from the fetters, his vetters, his kidnapping of
Speaker 4: in revenge of Eve, whom he carries off to Eden,
Speaker 4: so he kidnaps the Queen Thor's wife, rapes Sir. This
Speaker 4: is the raping of Europa. King Thor's fury at this
Speaker 4: dastardly outrage and rape by Balder, his hurried crusade against Eden,
Speaker 4: frequently called in the Eda Hell, Eda is calling Eden
Speaker 4: Hell his entire, his entry there, bearing along with his
Speaker 4: invincible stone mace, the sacred Ai Yeah, epic epaphetic oh sorry,
Speaker 4: Rowan Tree branch of his Sun cult, now disclosed as
Speaker 4: the real origin of the Golden Bow legend of Virgil
Speaker 4: and not the missiletoe, and also as the source of
Speaker 4: the old British and scottage adage Rowan Tree and red
Speaker 4: threed guard. The witches take their speed thors rescue of
Speaker 4: Eve with the aid of Cain Son from the clutches
Speaker 4: of the Edenite Balder, here called in the Eda Epley
Speaker 4: or Abel, Thor's physical punishment of the latter, and his
Speaker 4: seizure in carrying off of the central fetish stone, magic
Speaker 4: bowl or Witch's cauldron of Eden, which he then consecrates
Speaker 4: to his Sun cult as the holy Grail of King Arthur,
Speaker 4: which still exists in the semi inscription of his great grandson,
Speaker 4: and the wounding of Gun or Cain during their victorious
Speaker 4: retreat by the Stone missile of the pursuing Balder form
Speaker 4: other scenes. The Great Battle of Eden, the most momentous
Speaker 4: and epoch making battle of the Old World, forms the
Speaker 4: next scene, furious at the loss of their central fetish bowl,
Speaker 4: Balder and his mother weird L. This is a really
Speaker 4: weird like relationship between the mother and the son, if
Speaker 4: you get my drift.
Speaker 1: L.
Speaker 4: Now, remember we think in terms of Babylonian L as
Speaker 4: being a dude. Right, It's interesting that this is a
Speaker 4: female muster all their Edenite swarms of Hordes by river,
Speaker 4: sea and land for the great battle against Thor. And
Speaker 4: remember L and Elu are the same, and so it was.
Speaker 4: I guess another way of our title of her was
Speaker 4: high or Helene, like that thing that just blew through
Speaker 4: North Carolina. All right, let me start the sentences long.
Speaker 4: Ye there's no periods here, but hell all right, let
Speaker 4: me just start off. Furious at the loss of their
Speaker 4: central feinish bowl, Balder and his mother, weird L muster
Speaker 4: all their Edenite swarms of Hordes by river, sea and
Speaker 4: land for a great battle against Thor, who, on hearing
Speaker 4: of it, musters along with Cane, all their force of
Speaker 4: well disciplined Gothic Yeomen cultivators and their allies for the fray.
Speaker 4: Eden was, according to the Eda, defended by skin clad
Speaker 4: and wolf tailed men armed with flaming switches cherubims with
Speaker 4: flaming swords. The battle, which proved catastrophic for the Edenites.
Speaker 4: I'm so sorry, is described in lurid colors in the Eda,
Speaker 4: as in the Sumerian and Babylonian records. Well there you go,
Speaker 4: I mean anyway, in the battle, Miak or Mickley, Michael
Speaker 4: or Cain slays balder suit or able. These are just
Speaker 4: other titles. The Dragon cult chief in single combat and
Speaker 4: avenges his father for the rape of his mother. Thus
Speaker 4: the Eda recovers at last the true history of the event,
Speaker 4: which has been so falsely misrepresented by the later Kaldi literature.
Speaker 4: He might as well, just says, and reveals the historical source,
Speaker 4: or he can slay Saturn Cult, which will probably be
Speaker 4: even more accurate. Saturn Moon colt these Edenites right, and
Speaker 4: reveals the historical source of the New Testament legend of
Speaker 4: Saint Michael slaying Apollion at the Dragon, the Egyptian Horus
Speaker 4: of the Sun Cult slaying set or Seth, and Sir
Speaker 4: Gawain slaying the Green Man. It discloses the Sumerian origin
Speaker 4: of the title Tubal for Tubul Kane, the slayer of
Speaker 4: Ball Balder and confirms his identity with Cain through the
Speaker 4: Hebrew tradition of his being the instructor of every artificer
Speaker 4: in brass, bronze, and iron, and this and his traditional
Speaker 4: inventorship of the plow. Caine built the plow. It also
Speaker 4: discloses the real historical source of the lamentations of the Caladies,
Speaker 4: which modern writers mistakenly called the killing of the God.
Speaker 4: Notwithstanding the villainy of balder Thor and his son and
Speaker 4: nobles sinking all animosities, gave his body a decent funeral,
Speaker 4: worthily without vengeance, as if their own brother. They have character,
Speaker 4: they have integrity, they have dignity, they have respect, they
Speaker 4: have care. They're not pieces of shit that which you
Speaker 4: know desecrate or I don't know, throw in to a
Speaker 4: mass grave if you will, or whatever other horrible things
Speaker 4: that we know that it does to people, or we
Speaker 4: did as I've discovered, as I've discussed in reading Summer
Speaker 4: nineteen forty five and Helstorm then follows them, then follows
Speaker 4: the lament of the Caldis for the death of Abel,
Speaker 4: whilst other Chldis rejoice saying thanks only only man is
Speaker 4: m aun Is how they spend the back. Then I
Speaker 4: greet dry tears. Only let Hell hold what it has.
Speaker 4: Let Hell hold but it has Eden is Hell. Now
Speaker 4: we didn't have the heaven and Hell thing. It's all
Speaker 4: figured out, and it's all very practical reality. It's not
Speaker 4: some mythical bullshit. The next scene is the pursuit and
Speaker 4: capture of l the old Serpent Dragon matriarch, who had
Speaker 4: meant meanwhile escaped on the River Euphrates by boat, was
Speaker 4: captured and slain by Thor or Gore George, and in
Speaker 4: this scene she is represented allegorically as the serpent Dragon
Speaker 4: herself Tiamot everybody Tiamat, of which she was the Archpriss priestess,
Speaker 4: and she and her conqueror are similarly represented in full
Speaker 4: agreement with all the edded details in the Egyptian version
Speaker 4: of the scene engraved on the alabaster sarcophagus of Seti
Speaker 4: the first, the father of Ramsey the second in the
Speaker 4: swayin or Sown museum in London figured in the text
Speaker 4: is also with other scenes in agreement with the Samerian
Speaker 4: and Babylonian and hit type versions in sculptured seals and records,
Speaker 4: and in the Indian literary versions self a lot of
Speaker 4: cross referencing there. This recovers for us the historical originals
Speaker 4: of the scene and the personalities of the actors. In
Speaker 4: Saint George slaying the dragon figured on the royal insignia
Speaker 4: of England and on British coins and in the Mid Europe,
Speaker 4: Syria and Asia Minor. The next scene of is the
Speaker 4: enthronement of Erthor or Arthur or Adam on the hill
Speaker 4: of Eden Karcemish, Jerablis or Joroveli of the Eda. They're
Speaker 4: talking about the place, different names for it, or Arthur's
Speaker 4: c to signalize his victory over Eden with the speech
Speaker 4: he made on that occasion. This ed, this Ata record
Speaker 4: is in agreement not only with the Samerian versions, but
Speaker 4: also with the ancient Hittite sculpture actually found on this
Speaker 4: hill of Eden at Kars Shemish, which represents King dar
Speaker 4: to Arthor and throne there as represented in the photograph
Speaker 4: in the text and the Anglo Saxon Bard. I think
Speaker 4: that's Caideman still retained a genuine old tradition that Adam
Speaker 4: was enthroned in Eden on the firm set throne formerly
Speaker 4: occupied there by Lucifer or satan Abel right, we're talking
Speaker 4: about mister balder there or woulden? I mean the son
Speaker 4: end of the son and the father, right, But the
Speaker 4: reformation and regeneration that would that would explain the whole
Speaker 4: Prince of Darkness thing too, right? Why would we call
Speaker 4: that and not the king of Darkness? Well, because he's
Speaker 4: the son of Voiden. The reformation and regeneration of Eden
Speaker 4: by adam Thor and the conversion of that serpent cult
Speaker 4: abode into a utopian city of God forms the next scene.
Speaker 4: The regenerate Edenites were freely admitted on equal terms in
Speaker 4: the Aryan Fellowship and the commonwealth of the transformed city state.
Speaker 4: Listen that the regenerate, the ones that could be rehabilitated,
Speaker 4: the ones that weren't still stuck in their murder cult ways,
Speaker 4: were freely admitted on equal terms into the Aryan Fellowship
Speaker 4: and commonwealth of that transformed city state. And it was
Speaker 4: from this advanced post from of King adam Thor's Cappadocian
Speaker 4: empire at the head of Northern at the head or
Speaker 4: northern end of Euphrates Plane, that King Thor's son Kin
Speaker 4: descended in the twelfth year of his reign into Mesopotamia
Speaker 4: of the Caldis, and annexed and civilized it down to
Speaker 4: the seaboard of the Persian Gulf, building as his chief
Speaker 4: Mesopotamian capital the city of Enoch, which he named after
Speaker 4: his son Unik or Erech on the Euphrates, and so
Speaker 4: named after his son and successor, the third Aryan or
Speaker 4: Samerian king and his epoch making an advent into Mesopotamia
Speaker 4: is now disclosed to be what a seriologists have called
Speaker 4: the coming of the Samarians. Through Who the Samerians were,
Speaker 4: what was their race, where they came from, and what
Speaker 4: their date have hitherto been, all alike unknown until now disclosed.
Speaker 4: The Edda ends here with the utopia of or Golden
Speaker 4: Age or of early civilization, established by King Adam thor
Speaker 4: about three three hundred and fifty BC, but one additional
Speaker 4: pregnant Stanza has been added, presumably by a later hand.
Speaker 4: Human nature being what it is, progress is not always forward,
Speaker 4: but sometimes forward forward I and backward downward too, into
Speaker 4: the abysm. There was, some time after King adam Thorpe's death,
Speaker 4: presumably several generations later, a reactionary revival of the Aboriginal
Speaker 4: mother Son cult of matriarchy with its blood sacrifice site
Speaker 4: sorry their blood sacrifices, fetish worship, and superstition of hell,
Speaker 4: thus resulting in a real fall of man. In the
Speaker 4: post Adamite period, the Chaldean Semites in their reactionary religion
Speaker 4: listen to that the Kaldean Semites in their reactionary religion,
Speaker 4: whilst discarding the atomist worship of the one God in
Speaker 4: Heaven represented by the benign Sun or the son of
Speaker 4: the God of the Sun and light of the world,
Speaker 4: as the universal power of nature which us Goths brought
Speaker 4: to them. On reverting to their old Mother Son cult
Speaker 4: and its secretary demons, now deified their Moon of darkness
Speaker 4: and converted their demons personified as the Mother Matriarch and
Speaker 4: her son the serpent wolf totems into gods and goddesses
Speaker 4: by borrowing the idea of God as well as the
Speaker 4: god name from their aryan civilizer and great benefactor, adam Thor.
Speaker 4: Co Opt, co opt, invert, co op, co op, invert right.
Speaker 4: They then vilified and cursed the audacious king adam Thor,
Speaker 4: the Friend of Man, with his Cult of Heaven Cult
Speaker 4: of Heaven, along with his noble heroic son Prince Kan
Speaker 4: and the former for his great offense and sin of
Speaker 4: uplifting man by knowledge and disabboyting the jealous Adamite serpent demon.
Speaker 4: I'm sorry, the jealous Preadamite serpent demon and its oracular priestess,
Speaker 4: and the latter for slaying the serpent called necromatic priest
Speaker 4: and sacrificer, the only son of the weird, and they're
Speaker 4: talking about balder and abolishing their sancutary sacrifices. He abolished
Speaker 4: the sacrifices Thwar did, and this spiteful vilification have been
Speaker 4: actively and mechanically propagated down through the ages to the
Speaker 4: present day in Semitic creeds. On the other hand, the
Speaker 4: ruling race of the Samerians or Arians, who formed only
Speaker 4: a relatively small proportion or superstratum of the mixed population
Speaker 4: in their empires in Mesopotamia and elsewhere, carried on the
Speaker 4: good work of Adam Thorp's reformation and continued to be
Speaker 4: more or less monotheistic. Sun worshippers came worshippers of the
Speaker 4: deified and Dara or zax Zeus or Aya or ea
Speaker 4: As the heavenly King, and some of them laterally deified
Speaker 4: his Titless mystically as separate personages, and also deified his
Speaker 4: clean consort and his son, though the purer Arians treated
Speaker 4: his canonized son merely as an archangel, Saint Michael. Hence
Speaker 4: we have today the paradox that the self same people
Speaker 4: in our British Isles now listen to what they did
Speaker 4: there though Iah Jah or Jove as the heavenly king.
Speaker 4: So this this, this trilog do you know the father
Speaker 4: son Holy Spirit right or the father father son mother
Speaker 4: This is also lifted from there. Hence we have today
Speaker 4: the paradox that the self same people in our British
Speaker 4: Isles who blindly swallow those Semitic calumnies against the first
Speaker 4: and noblest of all epoch making kings, the arian establisher
Speaker 4: of the world'sations, the first bringer of just government, peace
Speaker 4: and goodwill to men. So the Trinity isn't that interesting
Speaker 4: that it kind of resonates right there and how it's
Speaker 4: been altered against the first noblest of all epoch making kings,
Speaker 4: the aryan establisher of the world civilization, the first bringer
Speaker 4: of just government. It's all coming from the goth Arians
Speaker 4: just government because before that they were under the rule
Speaker 4: of a human sacrificing cult of sorcery, peace and goodwill
Speaker 4: to men, the first apostle of brotherly love, the deliverer
Speaker 4: of the week from the oppressor, the knitter together of
Speaker 4: men into nations, and the uplifter of man and against
Speaker 4: his queen and heroics, and under their titles, respectively, of
Speaker 4: Adam even Cain. Yet at one and the same time
Speaker 4: glorify all unknowingly these self same personages under their other
Speaker 4: names are titles. They hate us. They fucking hate us.
Speaker 4: And this is a grudge that's been held onto for
Speaker 4: five thousand years for upsetting and interrupting their party of
Speaker 4: completely horribly brutalizing everyone else around them. Thus they canonized
Speaker 4: the first King under his titles of Saint George of
Speaker 4: Cappadocia and England with his Red Cross, and as the
Speaker 4: dragon Slayer, as Saint Andrew of the Cross, the patron
Speaker 4: Saint of the Scots and the end of Gothland, Scithic Russia,
Speaker 4: Hungary in the Danube Valley valley with its Andreas Island,
Speaker 4: and Burgundy of the Visigoths, whom they also sent the
Speaker 4: freaking Muslims over to to destroy right and admire him
Speaker 4: as King Arthur, and as Jack the Giant Killer, now
Speaker 4: to mention his classic heroic titles of Prometheus, Zeus, Jove,
Speaker 4: and Dardanos. They glorify or admire his queen consort as
Speaker 4: Gwenevere and under her classic titles of Hera or Juno
Speaker 4: Athene and Eurytus, and his Crown Prince the Admirer as
Speaker 4: the Majestic Dionysus or Bacchus, before they altered that and
Speaker 4: made it disgusting right and honor, and Sir in honor
Speaker 4: as Sir Gawain, the foremost of Red Cross Knights, the
Speaker 4: vanquisher of the fearsome truculent green Man, and canonize and
Speaker 4: adore him under his title of Saint Michael or Saint
Speaker 4: Michael the Archangel, the Vanquisher of the Dragon Apollyon, the
Speaker 4: Old Serpent Satan Satan. And these three are now disclosed
Speaker 4: as identical, respectively with the leading hero, his Queen and
Speaker 4: Crown Prince of our great ancestral national epic of the
Speaker 4: ancient Britons, the Eda. Even in the late shadowy King
Speaker 4: Arthur legend in England, an analogous fashion of deprecation of
Speaker 4: the central hero his queen and Crown princess deadly developed
Speaker 4: amongst the later English romancing bards, and the great license
Speaker 4: they have taken with ancient historical tradition, falling somewhat the
Speaker 4: same lines as the spiteful, perversive propaganda of the Mother
Speaker 4: Son cult. Gee, I wonder why that is. This deprecation
Speaker 4: as regards King Arthur was already beginning to show itself
Speaker 4: in the time of Sir Thomas Mallory, and evoked from
Speaker 4: him in his La Morte de Arthur fourteen eighty five,
Speaker 4: the falling indignant protest in the quaint old English speech
Speaker 4: of this day, I'm not reading the old English. Well,
Speaker 4: ayb it's okay, low ye gill ye, all englishmen see
Speaker 4: ye not what a mischief here was that? For he
Speaker 4: that was the most king and knight of the world
Speaker 4: old and most loved the fellowship of noble knights, and
Speaker 4: by him they were all upholding. Now might not his
Speaker 4: this Englishman hold them content with him? Alas this is
Speaker 4: a great default of us Englishmen, For there may no
Speaker 4: thing please us, no term length of time. Yeah, so
Speaker 4: it's a little bit, you know. So we're good, we're good,
Speaker 4: We're gonna get into.
Speaker 1: The rise.
Speaker 4: But let me go, let me jump over here real quick,
Speaker 4: because I this is where it's going to get really
Speaker 4: interesting for some people. Not that let's see get circumcised. No, yeah,
Speaker 4: that's that's an interesting way of looking at Lord of
Speaker 4: the Rings, right because what was talking about in another thing, right,
Speaker 4: that they were selling deep fried calamari circumcised for skins.
Speaker 4: So yeah, sure, Saturn's the Lord of the Rings. But
Speaker 4: it's even more grossy you think about it as being
Speaker 4: circumcised skin as their way of venerating or worshiping or
Speaker 4: pleasing Saturnbody else is that a thing?
Speaker 1: Like?
Speaker 4: Why? Okay? So if they truly believe in God, God
Speaker 4: makes us with extra parts or additional skin that we
Speaker 4: need to remove in order to worship him, how the
Speaker 4: fuck is that? Unless he's not the creator God? But
Speaker 4: remember they got their idea of God from the Goths.
Speaker 4: Now we're going to I got to get to the
Speaker 4: part where it says, all right, so here, Yeah, let's
Speaker 4: read this one right here. So it says in the
Speaker 4: early nineteen hundreds. In the early nineteen hundreds, the Arians
Speaker 4: were some times regarded by archaeologists as warlike and uncivilized,
Speaker 4: both in India and Europe. But E. B. Havevel, a
Speaker 4: contemporary of Waddell meaning living in the same time, argued
Speaker 4: it was on insufficient grounds and objected to the idea
Speaker 4: that Aryans were unskilled and barbarian in character, in his
Speaker 4: opinion that Vedas were the records of poets and philosophers
Speaker 4: who lived mostly from agriculture with one hand on the
Speaker 4: sword and the other on the plow, and imported a
Speaker 4: solar and spiritual cult as well as a patriarchical patriarchal
Speaker 4: ideals into India at the time its culture was matriarchal
Speaker 4: between five thousand and three thousand BC. Communal marriages were
Speaker 4: a custom in the matriarchal system. Communal meaning you could
Speaker 4: fuck anyone some children being the offspring of intercourse between
Speaker 4: members of different tribes at the festivals of the seasons.
Speaker 4: And they keep that alive with their little rituals, right,
Speaker 4: the little orgies that they have. What ELL's views were compatible,
Speaker 4: if not identical, with what this other guy said. Havel
Speaker 4: also considered it probable that the Arians of India were
Speaker 4: an overflow for Mesopotamian cities in and Persia. Now that's
Speaker 4: one aspect. Let's go I already pass itnpe all right,
Speaker 4: hold on, it's up here. Then, yeah, here it is. Okay.
Speaker 4: The decoded Eda discloses ancient Arian architects of civilization. Now
Speaker 4: this is coming from the book're about to get into.
Speaker 4: This is the Rise of Man, a book dedicated to
Speaker 4: biographically telling you a little bit more about who La
Speaker 4: Waddell was and then getting even deeper into the proofs
Speaker 4: of what he said. The decoded Eda discloses ancient aryan
Speaker 4: architects of civilizational lords ass men of Asia Guti or
Speaker 4: ancient Goths, taking possession of thrace five thousand years ago,
Speaker 4: then establishing at headquarters himen Hi m I n or
Speaker 4: Heaven at Bogus Koi, Cappadocia or present Turkey. These newcomers
Speaker 4: then fight a great battle in Eden as mighty armies
Speaker 4: rally from as far as Armenia under the leadership of
Speaker 4: l or Elu. Remember that i l U, the matriarchal
Speaker 4: ruler of the Old Kaldian world, to oust them out.
Speaker 4: L is a powerful matriarch gifted with occult powers, deified
Speaker 4: during her own living, and the ruler of the indigenous
Speaker 4: Old Kaldean Ruld who controls a serpent dragon cult they
Speaker 4: don't mention the wolfear, but they should blood sacrifices and
Speaker 4: moon worship. The hidden meaning of the mysterious formula of
Speaker 4: serpent dragon slang myth performed as rituals and Hittite festivals,
Speaker 4: which has so far remained a mystery in Indo European
Speaker 4: poetic studies, is found in the fact that the imagery
Speaker 4: of the serpent dragon stands for the cult and anarchy
Speaker 4: of the metriarchical ruler as well as herself, as she
Speaker 4: is person the personification of evil and evil with capitally
Speaker 4: personification of evil. Okay, her name is Elu, all right, now,
Speaker 4: let's take a look at that the Elu Limnu our
Speaker 4: Babylonian demons. I l U matches up with L's name
Speaker 4: her other name, right, Elu are Babylonian demons? What do
Speaker 4: you think this is more? What do you think is
Speaker 4: more likely that these people call themselves these illuminati call
Speaker 4: themselves the illumined ones, They refer to themselves as or
Speaker 4: think of themselves as the illumina illumined ones? Or are
Speaker 4: they the Elu Lumni Limnu looks awful similar, doesn't it?
Speaker 4: The illuminati Elu Limnu illumined ones. I don't know kind
Speaker 4: of sounds like what they sell the public or are
Speaker 4: they or are they masking their embodiment? Remember, because they're
Speaker 4: into this conjuring and bringing into the spirits into themselves,
Speaker 4: that are they masking their embodiment as the Elu Limnu?
Speaker 4: And what was that? But then a name for the
Speaker 4: sorceress of the Edenites, making sense why they venerate Lilith? Okay,
Speaker 4: with all that said, but you have to go back
Speaker 4: to mask kame Hole, which I covered in my book
Speaker 4: Preestcraft Beyond Babylon and then we'll get into the rise
Speaker 4: of man, you know, open up or what there you go. Now,
Speaker 4: this is in the introduction by Michael W. Ford in
Speaker 4: his book Masking Hole, which is Babylonian magic right dark magic,
Speaker 4: and he says to the Elu Limnu hah ha. This
Speaker 4: grimoire is dedicated to the seven malevolent phantoms of the Flames,
Speaker 4: the seven mass Cheme, who are Elulimnu gods who embody
Speaker 4: rebellion and chaos. May the words within stir them continually
Speaker 4: from their abode in the heavens huh and dark Earth
Speaker 4: by the sea and the realm of the dead. Arise
Speaker 4: seven serpents of the deep Earth whose voices resound in
Speaker 4: the heights. Thou who disturb order, get it begetting chaos,
Speaker 4: find rule again, Thou malevant gods, phantoms of the vast heavens,
Speaker 4: come thou forth to ignite our souls, our minds with
Speaker 4: the black flame. What the fuck? Right? But that's a yeah,
Speaker 4: that's a the Limnu for you, and it gets in.
Speaker 4: Let me see if I can drop a little bit
Speaker 4: more detail on here real quick. See how many times
Speaker 4: the pop up this living or dead grimoire mascum hole
Speaker 4: is a gate to not only the Ilulimnu or evil gods.
Speaker 4: So they're talking about this even night cold again and
Speaker 4: what they were fucking wrong with yet also the yeah,
Speaker 4: also the all of gods of the Babyloni Assyrian pantheon.
Speaker 4: If you apply the structure within blah blah blah blah,
Speaker 4: the Ilu Limnu evil god, the Ilu Limnu so evil.
Speaker 4: I mean, if we're gonna take it from this way
Speaker 4: to that way, her, Yeah, she is the personification of evil,
Speaker 4: of evil just by being called Elu. The Ilulimnu or
Speaker 4: evil God, is suggested to be originally one of the
Speaker 4: children of Tamot. Well, it sounds like it is tmot,
Speaker 4: because tmot is a is a composite of like a
Speaker 4: structure for for oh, for this Elu woman, this Heidi
Speaker 4: by theo Ceophilis Pinches, who remained like other spirits associated
Speaker 4: with Absolute Tiamat and Kingu, the Elu seems. The Ilulimnu
Speaker 4: seemed to be a seems to be a title associated
Speaker 4: with a seven mask game. The evil god may be
Speaker 4: either singular or plural, and often is shown as a
Speaker 4: single for the ease of writing. No, it's I think
Speaker 4: it's done specifically because the Ilulimnu is her. For instance,
Speaker 4: the gem carving of the moon god sin oh boy
Speaker 4: look drop popping right back up with the whole moon
Speaker 4: cult by the Sabidi shows a single evil god rather
Speaker 4: than seven. We may safely consider that the Ilulimnu is
Speaker 4: another epithet for the mask scheme or of subiti as
Speaker 4: evil gods born of the union of the Anu and key. Hmm, Hey, look, Pazus,
Speaker 4: this guy's got to he's all over at place. This
Speaker 4: guy all right, So now we have our backstory there
Speaker 4: and it all comes together, doesn't it. This is the
Speaker 4: things that call themselves who huddle around the scene called
Speaker 4: Judaism and call themselves Jews. Now this is this Edenite cult.
Speaker 4: But you know what, guess what, they've suckered a lot
Speaker 4: of people into their cult up as well by making
Speaker 4: a distinction between their cult, which is a mask for
Speaker 4: this boon cult, this Saturn cult, and then bringing other
Speaker 4: people in as the sacrifice and calling that one Christianity,
Speaker 4: and then the muscle or the destroyers of history, their
Speaker 4: little blangaliers themselves, the you know, Muslims or Islam, all
Speaker 4: with a central base of control because they can manipulate
Speaker 4: through their writings. The Rise of Man in the Gardens
Speaker 4: of Samaria biography of L. A. Waddell by Christine Preston,
Speaker 4: probably on time, I take a look at that real quick.
Speaker 4: We don't need to look at that. It's gotta get
Speaker 4: to the preface. All right, hold on, let's see what
Speaker 4: time I got. I said, let's see what time we got?
Speaker 4: All right, cool, we're good, okay, good morning to Karen.
Speaker 4: Hello polka.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Oh by the way, yeah, So that's what the other
Speaker 4: thing that they did, and we'll hopefully get to that
Speaker 4: today as far as what they use the Muslims for
Speaker 4: and another example of that would be the destruction of
Speaker 4: the aryan Uh Lamaism that was prevalent for a time,
Speaker 4: for it was eradicated and destroyed and erase from history.
Speaker 4: With remnants they're still floating around in the Himalayas. But
Speaker 4: as things go, they get warped through time and manipulation
Speaker 4: and deliberate acts right to be something that they never
Speaker 4: started out to be. Like they didn't even talk about Brahmaism,
Speaker 4: which is where or they just call it Buddhism, which
Speaker 4: I think is already a mistake. Well, I just need
Speaker 4: to get some water here, all right, let's do this.
Speaker 4: At the turn of the twentieth century. Yeah, At the
Speaker 4: turn of the twentieth century, the media referred to la Waddell,
Speaker 4: who lived from eighteen fifty four to nineteen thirty eight,
Speaker 4: as the first scholar to have penetrated the mysteries of
Speaker 4: Lamaism and an authority on Buddhism after he had worked
Speaker 4: had a work published in eighteen ninety five. His career
Speaker 4: in the East as a British Army officer culminated with
Speaker 4: a commission to acquire Tibetan manuscripts during the famous British
Speaker 4: expedition to Tibet nineteen oh three nineteen oh four, which
Speaker 4: contributed largely to his being put in the limelight in
Speaker 4: addition to the publication of Lasha and its Mysteries in
Speaker 4: nineteen oh five. Waddell was also a philologist and linguist.
Speaker 4: You know what a philologist is, That's like what Ammin
Speaker 4: Hillman is, right, studying the languages. He studied Sanskrit and Sumerian.
Speaker 4: But in contrast with the fame he experienced in earlier
Speaker 4: in the early phase of his career and Tibet Tibetology
Speaker 4: tibetal he gained no recognition as a sumerologist and his
Speaker 4: work and his works in a new field on topics
Speaker 4: of the history of civilization and with an Aryan theme
Speaker 4: were received as controversial. Of course, right because the controllers right.
Speaker 4: And it wasn't a new field because they were related.
Speaker 4: That's why it's in quotations there. The Rise of Man
Speaker 4: in the Gardens of Samria reconstructs Waddell's life and career
Speaker 4: and sheds lay on the ideologies of those works which
Speaker 4: appear to be little known today because they were sidelined
Speaker 4: or bypassed by the media and scholars among this among
Speaker 4: the sources available to reconstruct his life for reviews and
Speaker 4: articles and academic journals, one of which it was published
Speaker 4: with the purpose of opposing his claim of decipherment of
Speaker 4: seals excavated by John Marshall in the Indus Valley. Waddell
Speaker 4: contended he was able to read their inscriptions thanks to
Speaker 4: his knowledge of Sumerian, which these people don't have. But
Speaker 4: they still will say, no, that's not true, can't be.
Speaker 4: They can't read the ship, But now they'll argue. We
Speaker 4: found the signs more cursive than cannuniform, but similar to
Speaker 4: those inscriptions excavated by Flinders Petrie at Abbidos, and dated
Speaker 4: them to the period of the rule of the Samerian
Speaker 4: Sargon the First. He also claimed to have been able
Speaker 4: to decipher them with his knowledge of Samerian, whereas Egyptologists
Speaker 4: could not. Waddell built for himself a unique perspective of
Speaker 4: ancient history and civilizations on the basis of his overall
Speaker 4: research and decipherments, including the view that Egyptian civilizations started
Speaker 4: out as a Sumerian dependency. An example of the scripts
Speaker 4: he studied and that helped him to read the seals
Speaker 4: is provided in the illustrations. The title Rise of Man
Speaker 4: alludes to the effects of the creation of civilization. As
Speaker 4: per Wdell's interpretation of mythological lore, it's not mythological, that's
Speaker 4: the whole thing. That's a mistake. They shouldn't even wrote
Speaker 4: with logical In the Elder Eda, the stories of which
Speaker 4: were compiled by saman the learned on parchment leaves Codex
Speaker 4: Regis Wddell contended the language of the manuscript was mistaken
Speaker 4: as Scandinavian due to the similarity of Old Norse and
Speaker 4: Old English, and that it had been traced to a
Speaker 4: family that had settled in Iceland in eighty seven ninety five,
Speaker 4: but had come from the west of Scotland, hence his
Speaker 4: title the British Eda. In the nineteen seventies, the codex
Speaker 4: was returned to Iceland, as it was where it had
Speaker 4: been discovered, and scholars agreed it was not Scandinavian. According
Speaker 4: to Wodell, manuscripts with epic poems that were recited at
Speaker 4: festivals were quite common in the British Isles up to
Speaker 4: the sixth century, but were destroyed. Hey, look at this,
Speaker 4: it's not just the Muslims that destroy history by Christian
Speaker 4: missionaries by the eleventh century. Furthermore, he identified a multitude
Speaker 4: of Cappadocian and Sumerian placed names in the text of
Speaker 4: Codex Regis that revealed the most the lost origin of
Speaker 4: the tradition that the learned preserved, as well as a
Speaker 4: scenario of sometime parallel to the accounts of Genesis. The
Speaker 4: decoded Eeda discloses ancient aryan makers of civilizations, lords, Assyrian
Speaker 4: man of Asia as Guti. You're going to see this.
Speaker 4: This is part of snapshoted men of Asia Guti or
Speaker 4: ancient gods taking possession of thrace five thousand years ago
Speaker 4: and established then establishing headquarters called Himen or Heaven at
Speaker 4: Vidhara Peteria bogus Koi in present day Turkey, the home
Speaker 4: of later Hittites. These newcomers then fight a great battle
Speaker 4: in Eden as mighty armies rally from as far as
Speaker 4: Armenia under the leadership of l or Elu to oust
Speaker 4: them out. L is a powerful matriarch. She's a sorceress
Speaker 4: gifted with the cult powers deified during her own life
Speaker 4: and ruler of the indigenous Old Chaldean world who controls
Speaker 4: the dragon servent cult and demands blood sacrifices. Wolf totem
Speaker 4: is important to because that's how you follow it into
Speaker 4: the rome and establish what exactly the crest of Ignatius
Speaker 4: really is, symbolizing the hidden meeting of the formula of
Speaker 4: Indo European and Hittite Serpent dragon slaying myths. Scholars is
Speaker 4: still a mystery is revealed the slaying of the dragon
Speaker 4: in Indo European poetics with symbolic of the eradication of
Speaker 4: the Serpent Dragon cult as a result of a great
Speaker 4: battle fought by Aryan Goths against the matriarchal ruler in
Speaker 4: Eden in about three thousand BC and their victory. The
Speaker 4: reason for the formation of the myth is that the
Speaker 4: eradication of the matriarch's rule and of the Serpent dragon
Speaker 4: cult represented liberation from evil as an extremely important event
Speaker 4: for the ancient world. This battle and liber from evil
Speaker 4: gave rise to the notion of a struggle of light
Speaker 4: and darkness and a primordial time in mythologies and religions.
Speaker 4: Weddell's interpretation also sheds lay on the killing of Tma
Speaker 4: by Marduk Artik would have been Kane would have been Yeah,
Speaker 4: you know what, I'm talking about in the Mesopotamian tradition.
Speaker 4: It has implications for genesis, as TMA is associated with
Speaker 4: watery chaos before cosmic creation, and it's a serpent, and
Speaker 4: it's this chick l But Waddell shows us that it
Speaker 4: is chaos preceding the creation of civilization. So listen. But
Speaker 4: Whatdell shows us that it is chaos. She is chaos,
Speaker 4: chaos preceding the creation of civilization, before it, before he
Speaker 4: came and settled everybody down, got them, you know, civilized civilization, civilized, right,
Speaker 4: can't go around killing everybody anymore. You got you know
Speaker 4: what you gotta, you gotta, you gotta plain ice, you
Speaker 4: gotta follow rules in otherwise we're not gonna ever get
Speaker 4: anywhere here, And that the latter puts order into the
Speaker 4: ancient Near East. The legend of Saint Michael slaying the
Speaker 4: dragon Apollion, as well as that of Saint Michael slaying
Speaker 4: the Red Dragon in the Book of Revelation, would be
Speaker 4: more recent adaptations, also stemming from the myth mythologization of
Speaker 4: the same historical events that happened when they got rid
Speaker 4: of the sorceress byach right, they split her in two
Speaker 4: with an arrow when in the story of Martich and
Speaker 4: then the Tigris and euphrase came out of her after annexing,
Speaker 4: and that's actually written. I talk about that in my
Speaker 4: book pre Scrap Beyond Babylon pret Christmas Gift. After annexing
Speaker 4: the new territories of Eden to their Cappadocian kingdom, the
Speaker 4: Arian lord civilized indiation, just people including dwarves and eden Nites,
Speaker 4: and bring them the benefit Listen, listen. After annexing the
Speaker 4: new tradition the new territory sorry of Eden to their
Speaker 4: Cappadocian kingdom, the Aryan lords civilize indigenous people including dwarves
Speaker 4: and eden what are dwarves just people that are sort
Speaker 4: of them and eden Kites and bring them the benefits
Speaker 4: of irrigation and agriculture. And by the way, these shorty
Speaker 4: people were very very grateful to be out from underneath
Speaker 4: the murderous thumb of these fuckers. Very grateful. They were
Speaker 4: most loyal as you will. I don't know if you'll
Speaker 4: catch it on this one, but they talk about it
Speaker 4: in the bringing them benefits of irrigation and agriculture, so
Speaker 4: you know, progress, not living in their own dirt and
Speaker 4: filth and shit like the eden Knites had kept everybody.
Speaker 4: This innovation was so important that it gave rise to
Speaker 4: legends such as the one about the Garden of Eden
Speaker 4: and Genesis. What do they always do? They bomb people
Speaker 4: back into the Stone Age? Right? They even say that
Speaker 4: this innovation was so important that it gave rise to
Speaker 4: legends such as the one about the Garden of Eden
Speaker 4: and Genesis. It was a confused collection of a historical event.
Speaker 4: It was a confused recollection of a historical event. So
Speaker 4: what I was trying to say? Eden has been identified
Speaker 4: as the plane where Sumerian civilization was created. The idea
Speaker 4: of civilization and agriculture are encapsulated in the term garden
Speaker 4: in the title Rise of Man and the Gardens of Samaria.
Speaker 4: The Aryans imposed laws and spread their sun cult. Their
Speaker 4: knowledge caused a spiritual rise, the spiritual rise of man.
Speaker 4: But in the context of this interpretation of the Eda,
Speaker 4: the effects of civilization were spiritual as well as material.
Speaker 4: As far as scholars are concerned, the Sumerians remained nameless
Speaker 4: and their origin a mystery. Waddell's history of the creation
Speaker 4: of civilizations offers many clues for the elucidation of questions
Speaker 4: which have remained unsolved in archaeology. It has been suggested
Speaker 4: in academic circles that the origin of Genesis was an
Speaker 4: oral tradition that circulated in the ancient Near East for
Speaker 4: thousands of years before the stories were penned down with Waddell.
Speaker 4: It becomes clear that in a period of decline, the
Speaker 4: original sense of the rise of man was lost, and
Speaker 4: the golden age of civilization was remembered as a lost
Speaker 4: paradise and then inverted by the way by these people
Speaker 4: who said that their dark times were the golden age
Speaker 4: and that Thor came around and screwed everything up by
Speaker 4: liberating people and then giving them hope in life. Right,
Speaker 4: They didn't want that, and they're trying to revert back
Speaker 4: to what shitty conditions we had before. Look around you.
Speaker 4: Are they doing a good job?
Speaker 1: They have?
Speaker 4: They imprisoned the minds of most people to follow their
Speaker 4: stupid cult, even though they don't realize that they're following
Speaker 4: their stupid cult right off a fucking cliff, looking for
Speaker 4: the end times, not realizing that that means it's their
Speaker 4: end and if they do, then they're just idiots. Suicide
Speaker 4: death cult. Waddell was a pioneer in some sumerology. Has
Speaker 4: He asserted before Thorklid Thorkild Jacobsen that the antediluvian dynasties
Speaker 4: of the iceen Lists were the result of duplication of
Speaker 4: material by the Eisen prince priests or Essen could be
Speaker 4: Eastern priests. His comparative studies permitted him to recover the
Speaker 4: fact that the dynasty of Ernina founded was the very
Speaker 4: first dynasty of the Samerians. Weddell's history of civilization is
Speaker 4: truly unique and still unknown, unknown to most, not unknown
Speaker 4: to us. Ernina is known under other names such as
Speaker 4: Er Sagaga and King Dhar or tur thor Right and
Speaker 4: the title of Ukusi of Uku City in the Kish
Speaker 4: chronicle Ernina, who is referred to as er Nanshi in
Speaker 4: the Louver Museum, was deified as zach Sak or Lord
Speaker 4: sak Ugu, which ends up becoming Zeus later Sak. Waddell
Speaker 4: contends that this king's achievements were and then they bastardided.
Speaker 4: But remember now they make Zeus the guy who goes
Speaker 4: and steals Europa and rapes her. See how they fuck
Speaker 4: everything up. Wadel contends that this king's achievements were told
Speaker 4: in the Elder Eda as Thores, he was of the opinion,
Speaker 4: then this is this is something that they always did.
Speaker 4: They project their own sins on others. Right, So it
Speaker 4: goes from balder steel Eve and raping her to Zeus,
Speaker 4: who would be the the Thor stealing his own wife
Speaker 4: and raping her.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 4: But see they put they project their own wicked evilness
Speaker 4: onto the peak. There's so there's never any good, there's
Speaker 4: never any hero. It's always something that would you you'd
Speaker 4: be repulsed by if you actually wanted to, like, oh,
Speaker 4: I want to worship that. No, that's why I have
Speaker 4: such a hard time with the Old Testament, and that's
Speaker 4: why I rejected as a grimoire in a freaking cultish book. Anyway,
Speaker 4: ber er Nina is known under the other names as yeah,
Speaker 4: we always said all that. Okay, here we go. What
Speaker 4: Ell contends that this king's achievements were told on the
Speaker 4: in the Elder Eda as Thor's he was of the
Speaker 4: opinion that Zeus and Jehovah gods are God's of thunder,
Speaker 4: like Thor derived from Zach, the deified form of this king.
Speaker 4: As the Greeks and Israelates inherited legacies from older nations,
Speaker 4: i et The Egyptians and Babylonians. A seal discovered at
Speaker 4: Tello that Wdell deciphered revealed the fact that er Nina
Speaker 4: ruled over the second Eden situated in the Indus Valley
Speaker 4: when they had to migrate forcefully, his first guarden of
Speaker 4: agriculture being in Mesopotamia. He contended er Nina did not
Speaker 4: rule solely over a city state, as scholars seemed to believe,
Speaker 4: the existence of a second Eden was interpreted by Waddell
Speaker 4: as colonization of the Indus Valley. This Eden would also
Speaker 4: have been a garden of Sumeria, hence the title Rise
Speaker 4: of Man in the Gardens of Samria, in which gardens
Speaker 4: is the plural, as the rise of Man is not
Speaker 4: just in relation to the garden situated in Mesopotamia, but
Speaker 4: also when in the Indus Valley. Further evidence of this
Speaker 4: empire is on the basis of Waddell's discovery that Manas Tussi,
Speaker 4: son of the Samerian Sargon the First was Many's, Manus
Speaker 4: Tucci was Many's, and the inscriptions excavated by Flinders Petrie
Speaker 4: at Abodos that Egyptologists could not decipher were Sumerian and
Speaker 4: of Sargon's time. It was Waddell's opinion that Many's first
Speaker 4: Egyptian dynasty started out as a Sumerian dependency. He was
Speaker 4: known to the Minoans as King Minos. Following the excavation
Speaker 4: of seals in the Indus Valley by the archaeologist John Marshall,
Speaker 4: Waddell wrote an Indo Sumerian seal decipher in nineteen twenty
Speaker 4: five to announced that he had been able to read
Speaker 4: their inscriptions with his knowledge of Sumerian. But his claim
Speaker 4: was opposed on the evidence of articles in that academic
Speaker 4: journal so well other retards said in other journals, see
Speaker 4: what I mean, it's like. No, we already said that.
Speaker 4: That's not right, So don't even look any further, even
Speaker 4: though we can't possibly read as well as you do.
Speaker 4: This is what I'm talking about. This is that rise,
Speaker 4: This is that expert bullshit. Right, No, we've already controlled
Speaker 4: that information. Why are you talking against it? And or
Speaker 4: were that stupid? Why are you questioning our ignorance knowledge
Speaker 4: of Samerian? But his claim was opposed on the evidence
Speaker 4: of articles and academic journals. No, it's not true because
Speaker 4: we already said so, though the starting point of his
Speaker 4: theories was supported by prevalent views in archaeology in the
Speaker 4: nineteen twenties. Furthermore, Furthermore, in the nineteen forties, when Sir
Speaker 4: Mortimer Reeler was in charge of the Archaeological Survey of India,
Speaker 4: his conclusions about the indigenous origin of the Indus Valley
Speaker 4: civilization made Waddell's decipherment appear impossible. Oh so, sad attention
Speaker 4: has been drawn to the fact that the theory is
Speaker 4: prevalent in the nineteen twenties were a good start starting
Speaker 4: point for Whatdell's claim that the Sumerian hypothesis in respect
Speaker 4: of the identification of the underlying language of the induscript
Speaker 4: remains a possibility. Yes, it does. One of the reasons
Speaker 4: for the literary oblivion of those of Waddell's works on
Speaker 4: the history of civilization with an Aryan theme is suggested
Speaker 4: in the introduction to be in relation to the fact
Speaker 4: that he did not give up the quest for the
Speaker 4: Aryans in terms of racial origins when it was abandoned
Speaker 4: in the eighteen seventies. And this, jeez, what else happen on?
Speaker 2: There?
Speaker 4: There was a rise of some other thing wasn't there,
Speaker 4: and this quest was very influential to his choice of career. Furthermore,
Speaker 4: the term Aryan, which stands for Indo European, we know
Speaker 4: it doesn't that's actually a miss They try to make
Speaker 4: it like that, but that's it's a misdirection and was
Speaker 4: discarded became associated with the rise of Nazism, especially in
Speaker 4: the post second Second World War period. The works that
Speaker 4: are now little known may have also we also have
Speaker 4: been sidelined due to having been erroneously associated with anti
Speaker 4: Semitic theories, due to well Dale's used to the Termrian
Speaker 4: and despite the fact that they predated the embarrassing episode
Speaker 4: of which scholars experience in the nineteen thirties and forties,
Speaker 4: as they were published in the nineteen twenties. Yeah, well,
Speaker 4: there was nothing embarrassing about what happened in Germany. Sorry,
Speaker 4: nothing embarrassing at all. That again is you know, reading
Speaker 4: what other people wrote about them, polemics negatively spending years.
Speaker 4: So we're talking about how the Semitic touch screws up things.
Speaker 4: But then you don't look at Germany and see how
Speaker 4: the Semitic touch fucked that up to and lied about everything.
Speaker 4: Come on, man, come on Christine Preston, get with it
Speaker 4: or were you doing that to save your own career.
Speaker 4: Weddell's notion that the Samerians were Arian was supported by V. G. Child,
Speaker 4: I guess chilled Child, the historian who was regarded as
Speaker 4: having put order in the history of the Indo Europeans,
Speaker 4: and G. Cassina. Unfortunately, it was the latter's conclusions about
Speaker 4: the German people's homeland and racial superiority on the basis
Speaker 4: of archaeological finds that the nazis na, lady, you're screwing
Speaker 4: up again. It's national socialist. This is a derogatory term
Speaker 4: chose for their propaganda a background in archaeology with regard
Speaker 4: to the notion of the Aryans as diffusires of civilization
Speaker 4: and the Sumerians being non Semitic in contradiction non Semitic
Speaker 4: in contradiction of the Biblical view. No, it's not the
Speaker 4: Biblical view. It's the juwview who wrote the Bible. Okay,
Speaker 4: it's the cult's view, the Semitic Chaldean cult who takes
Speaker 4: all comers because it's a cult. A cult is open
Speaker 4: to anybody who goes through the initiation. Has also been
Speaker 4: provided as it permits to under sand that Waddell's apparent
Speaker 4: obsession with the Arians was not a unique in the
Speaker 4: context of contemporary discoveries and research. It wasn't just this
Speaker 4: guy talking about it. There was very high minds looking
Speaker 4: at us all the same time. Waddell stumbled across a
Speaker 4: lost secret. His view of history permitted him to appreciate
Speaker 4: the value of the Samerian Bowl of Utuk, the fragments
Speaker 4: of which he purchased from the excavators. The archaeologist Sir
Speaker 4: Charles Leonard Woolley, who was associated with the expedition that
Speaker 4: discovered the bowl, established the historicity of the Samerian Ernina.
Speaker 4: Waddell believed the Samerian king ruled over Samiria as well
Speaker 4: as a second Eden or agricultural garden of the Indus
Speaker 4: Valley as a colony. He professed that Ernina had been
Speaker 4: deified as Sagaga or Sak, and that the bull had
Speaker 4: been dedicated to him as a legendary ruler by the
Speaker 4: fourth generation descended Utu. Its genealogy confirmed the identification of
Speaker 4: the first Sumerian dynasty that he identified on the basis
Speaker 4: of his comparative studies of Sumerian and Indian kings lists.
Speaker 4: This vessel had been consecrated into the Sun cult of
Speaker 4: the Sumerians before being buried under the foundation of a
Speaker 4: temple at Nippur. It had previously been lost to the
Speaker 4: followers of the Serpent Dragon cult as a result of
Speaker 4: being captured by the Erian lords architects of the civilization
Speaker 4: of sumer. So what they're talking about here is that cauldron,
Speaker 4: and he had pieces of it. He had fragments, So
Speaker 4: he basically had pieces of the Holy Grail because it
Speaker 4: was reconsecrated to their Sun cult. Right, it was a
Speaker 4: magical cauldron or fetish that conferred power to l Elu
Speaker 4: the Devil, the occult matriarch leader of the Edenites. It
Speaker 4: may have been the original of the Grail quest, as
Speaker 4: its loss was spoken of in the Samerian Literatureries about
Speaker 4: the genesis of civilization were explored along the routes of
Speaker 4: the migration from the ancient euries to Western Europe, either
Speaker 4: with a first wave of megalithic oh yeah, okay, serial
Speaker 4: Phoenician builders, or a second one of the Trojan Greeks
Speaker 4: who settled in the British Isles, and then yeah, do
Speaker 4: we care what they think. We don't think. They think
Speaker 4: this person and that person. That's good to know. Come on,
Speaker 4: there we go. The controversial scholar at the turn of
Speaker 4: the twentieth century, Lieutenant Colonel Lawrence Austin Waddell. I don't
Speaker 4: know what any of these means. Maybe I do some
Speaker 4: of them mbmch ll, DCB, CIE, FRAS, FLS, lots of titles.
Speaker 4: Was known as an explorer of the Himalayas and the
Speaker 4: first European to have penetrated the esoteric Buddhism of Tibet,
Speaker 4: after the publication of the Buddhism of Tibet or Lamaism
Speaker 4: in eighteen ninety five. This work was the result of
Speaker 4: research by direct contact with Lamas while he was posted
Speaker 4: on the borders of Tibet, and of activities that were
Speaker 4: made possible because he had joined the Medical Service of
Speaker 4: the Indian Army in eighteen eighty. Waddell had studied Hindustani
Speaker 4: and Sanskrit in addition to it. In addition to editing
Speaker 4: the Indian Medical Gazette for a period of four years
Speaker 4: in India, he had extended his activity to archaeology, philology
Speaker 4: and ethnology in his spare time and in between military expeditions.
Speaker 4: This guy wasn't just wanting to make up history. He
Speaker 4: was able to see what the people had left behind
Speaker 4: and interpret it. He had been able to study Tibetan
Speaker 4: and the rituals of the Lamas during the period of
Speaker 4: his assignment as Deputy Sanitary Commissioner of the Darjealing District
Speaker 4: eighteen eighty five to eighty six and then eighteen eighty
Speaker 4: eight to ninety five. He had also compiled data of
Speaker 4: a secular, political and topographical character in the process of
Speaker 4: dangerous spying activities for the government referred to as the
Speaker 4: Great Game. This gathering of intelligence quote unquote was carried
Speaker 4: out from the borders of Tibet before sanction permitted Europeans
Speaker 4: to cross its frontier. A British newspaper reported that he
Speaker 4: had he was acquainted with secret service agents and had
Speaker 4: made many attempts to reach Lasha in disguise from Darjealing.
Speaker 4: A report of the archaeology survey Waddell carried out at Patna,
Speaker 4: India in eight I think that's supposed to be eighteen
Speaker 4: ninety two, and that was published by the Government of
Speaker 4: Bengal had also caused great excitement among the European orientalists
Speaker 4: because he had discovered the lost site of Patel Putra,
Speaker 4: the capital of the kings of the Mario dynasty, and
Speaker 4: Ahsoka's palace at Petlaputra. Hey the patels, they own every
Speaker 4: every mini, it's not spelled the same Pteli Putra. Waddell
Speaker 4: had supervised excavations in between military expeditions and his duties
Speaker 4: in Darjiling after funding was provided. By that time, he
Speaker 4: was not a beginner in archaeology, as he had already
Speaker 4: carried out excavations at several Indian hermitage hermitages and had
Speaker 4: been credited with the discovery of evidence for Gotoma Buddha's historicity.
Speaker 4: I guess that used to be in question. In nineteen
Speaker 4: oh five, Waddell was again in the limelight due to
Speaker 4: an autobiography recounting the details of the famous nineties three
Speaker 4: four military expedition to Lasha, Tibet. He was assigned to
Speaker 4: accompany this expedition as Superintendent, Head of the Sanitary Services
Speaker 4: or chief medical Officer, as well as commission to acquire
Speaker 4: a collection of ancient Tibetan manuscripts and curios. Because his
Speaker 4: reputation as an authority on Tibetan art was already well
Speaker 4: established after eighteen ninety five. His opportunity permitted him to
Speaker 4: enter the forbidden city with the British expedition and search
Speaker 4: the Lama series for ancient records, for what we shall
Speaker 4: call his Arian quest. At the same time as he
Speaker 4: carried out the military day to day debt duties and
Speaker 4: made official inquiries tore to acquire manuscripts for the government,
Speaker 4: Wedell had indeed aspired to gain entry to Lasha at
Speaker 4: this time, at the time he was posted in Darjeeling
Speaker 4: because of the hope that Lamaism was a repositive toy
Speaker 4: of Indian or promised historic historical records relating to the Arians,
Speaker 4: and that the diffusion of civil and the diffusion of civilization.
Speaker 4: So what was Britain's interest And it almost seems like
Speaker 4: they're in the same quest for this information in these
Speaker 4: in these manuscripts as the Germans were later on. What
Speaker 4: was everybody looking for? Why was everybody so interested in
Speaker 4: this area? Well, let that slip by. He had expected
Speaker 4: that in Tibet scriptures had not been destroyed as they
Speaker 4: were in India at the hand of Mohammedan invaders. So
Speaker 4: there you go. The lingeliers were there. He said he
Speaker 4: expected that in Tibet scriptures had not been destroyed as
Speaker 4: they had been as they were in India at the
Speaker 4: hand of Mohammedan invaders. Presumably there also that was about
Speaker 4: eleven the eleventh century. I believe presume there also was
Speaker 4: a chance some records had been left undisturbed in Lasha
Speaker 4: due to the isolation of the letter from the Western civilization.
Speaker 4: Bedell had also received sorry the Bdell had also aspired
Speaker 4: to go to Lasha. At the time it was forbidden
Speaker 4: to Europeans to gather intelligence due to his involvement in
Speaker 4: the Great Game. The story that he received a large
Speaker 4: sum of government money to purchase Tibetan manuscripts was reported
Speaker 4: in the British press at the time of the departure
Speaker 4: and again in nineteen oh four to announce that many
Speaker 4: works had been donated to the British Museum and British universities.
Speaker 4: This was in addition to reviews for his Lasha and
Speaker 4: Its Mysteries in nineteen oh five, after conducting God damn it,
Speaker 4: hold on, yeah, I could do that in front of you.
Speaker 4: It was literally crazy. After conducting investment, After conducting investigations
Speaker 4: with his assistant David McDonald, the authority sorry the author
Speaker 4: of Twenty Years in Tibet and a different person from
Speaker 4: the General MacDonald that he referred to. Woddell resigned himself
Speaker 4: to the fact that Tibetan manuscripts did not contain records
Speaker 4: of ancient civilization. He came to such a conclusion after
Speaker 4: discussing the question with the Regent Tricompsey, who told him
Speaker 4: he was not aware of the existence of historical secrets
Speaker 4: preserved in Lama series. This was how his personal quest ended.
Speaker 4: He mentioned the fact that it would be a disappointment
Speaker 4: for people who hoped for some proof that Atlanta I
Speaker 4: guess Atlanta Atlantis was more than a myth would be
Speaker 4: discovered in Tibet. After his return to Britain, Waddell was
Speaker 4: at last able to devote full time to his research.
Speaker 4: The year nineteen seventeen has been noted as a time
Speaker 4: of trans when Wadell began to display interest in a
Speaker 4: new field quote unquote began to display interest in a
Speaker 4: new field quote unquote dealing with Aaryan or Sumerian origin,
Speaker 4: and his works in the new field were considered as
Speaker 4: having an Aryan theme in common. However, this was a
Speaker 4: date of publication, not a year of starting the study
Speaker 4: of Simerian. The works published after nineteen seventeen incorporated the
Speaker 4: view that the Samerians were Aryan or that the Arians
Speaker 4: reached Mesopotamia as Sumerians. In contrast with his achievements as
Speaker 4: a British officer, his established reputation in the Oriental field,
Speaker 4: and in spite of the fact that he was a
Speaker 4: professor of Tibetan at the University of College of London
Speaker 4: from nineteen oh six to nineteen oh eight, Waddell gained
Speaker 4: no recognition as a sumerologist, nor for the works published
Speaker 4: after nineteen seventeen on topics of the history of civilization.
Speaker 4: W Thomas, an orientalist and philologists devoted to the history
Speaker 4: of British education in India who pioneered a new school
Speaker 4: of Asian philosophy and wrote about Tibetan mythology, observed that
Speaker 4: Waddell exploited the subject for the first time in an
Speaker 4: article published in the Asiatic Review in nineteen seventeen. It
Speaker 4: was followed with the publication of the Phoenician Origin of
Speaker 4: the Britons in nineteen twenty four. Waddell explained that the
Speaker 4: explained that the fact that India was an ideal location
Speaker 4: to study the air in question was relevant to his
Speaker 4: decision to join the Indian Medical Service. His interest in
Speaker 4: the arians can therefore be traced back to eighteen eighty
Speaker 4: that dilemma. Researchers have sometimes been unable to obtain scholarly
Speaker 4: assessments about Wodell's model of the history of civilizations, his theories,
Speaker 4: or his comparative studies. You don't want know why because
Speaker 4: they can't read the shit that he could read. They
Speaker 4: didn't put the time in to figure this stuff out.
Speaker 4: In one instance, a linguist who was approached replied he
Speaker 4: had never heard of him and dismissed his position on
Speaker 4: the basis of little information. Right he has. The person
Speaker 4: who can't decipher what the hell of what hell is
Speaker 4: talking about has the lesser of the information or the
Speaker 4: knowledge to find it, with the skill using an argument
Speaker 4: that appeared as an evasion to the question, yeah yeah,
Speaker 4: using an argument that appeared as an invasion to the question.
Speaker 4: He is certainly little known in academic circles, a status
Speaker 4: due to the fact that the scholarly assessments of his
Speaker 4: theories have so far been limited to short biographical references,
Speaker 4: i e. Who Was Who and the Oxford Dictionary of
Speaker 4: National Biography. The main sources used in the latter were
Speaker 4: an obituary published in Glasgow, Herold on the twentieth of
Speaker 4: September nineteen thirty eight and an article by F. W.
Speaker 4: Thomas entitled Colonel la Waddell in the Journal of the
Speaker 4: Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Hold one second,
Speaker 4: because this is a dry effing not Hold on all right,
Speaker 4: couldn't handle that? Genius my nose all right the University
Speaker 4: of In the University of Glasgow Library can be found
Speaker 4: a number of letters that famous well, well, what the
Speaker 4: hold I'm looking at? All right? In the University of
Speaker 4: Glasgow Library can be found a number of letters that
Speaker 4: famous scholars wrote to Bedell in reply to his own correspondence,
Speaker 4: as well as letters of article or articles which were
Speaker 4: published in academic journals. But acquaintance with archaeologists, their discoveries
Speaker 4: and theories is necessary to appreciate their significance. Hence the
Speaker 4: need stop stormpring time I'm trying to read something about
Speaker 4: moves their theories is necessarily appreciate their significance, hence the
Speaker 4: need for a companion volume such as the present biography.
Speaker 4: This material, in addition to press cuttings and copies of reviews,
Speaker 4: is part of the special Collections and of seven and
Speaker 4: eleven works from Withdell's personal library. That's a lot of works.
Speaker 4: This collection was a okay. One of the reasons that
Speaker 4: Wedell's work on the history of civilization are a little
Speaker 4: known today seems to be that they were sidelined because
Speaker 4: of their controversiality. A contemporary review or judged that Whdell's
Speaker 4: views were so unorthodox that unorthodox? What the hell is
Speaker 4: unorthodox mean? Not like what everybody else has been babbling about?
Speaker 4: Who doesn't understand or read or look for this stuff?
Speaker 4: So it's unorthodox because every It's like, is truth truth?
Speaker 4: Or what does right and wrong become different because more
Speaker 4: people do wrong?
Speaker 2: Does?
Speaker 4: Does does truth become less truthful because everybody else doesn't
Speaker 4: believe in it? Like? What the fuck? What is that unorthodox?
Speaker 4: But well, it's like that's mob rule mentality. That's the
Speaker 4: biggest group of people are always gonna be the biggest
Speaker 4: fucking idiots. So if they don't agree, then they must
Speaker 4: be wrong, Shut the fuck up, everybody come on. A
Speaker 4: contemporary viewed yeah, okay, unorthodox that he would have to
Speaker 4: expect strong criticism and even ridicule because he had an
Speaker 4: erroneous amount of prejudice to overcome. Yeah, people who want
Speaker 4: to turn facts or turn beliefs into facts and ignore
Speaker 4: facts for their beliefs because they believe something, and they're
Speaker 4: gonna hold firm on that regardless if new evidence is
Speaker 4: in front of their faces or not. Or they'd have
Speaker 4: to look back at their own mistakes and see where
Speaker 4: they may have misinterpreted things. Wadell admitted being at variance
Speaker 4: with that with what seemed to be the established doctrine,
Speaker 4: but argued he was an unbiased, independent student of the
Speaker 4: history of civilization, working by recognized scientific methods which nobody
Speaker 4: else actually follows, by the way, in the vast new
Speaker 4: found field of sumerology. The year in which he stayed
Speaker 4: he started studying Sumerian on a full time basis was
Speaker 4: nineteen oh eight. From about this date he also became
Speaker 4: a follower of the pioneering group led by Henry Rawlinson,
Speaker 4: the scholar who first established the existence of the Sumerians,
Speaker 4: thereby creating a controversy over the fact that the Samerian
Speaker 4: language was not was not Semitic. Rawlinson professed that the
Speaker 4: first speakers of Sumerian were of Scythic origin synonymous of Syrian.
Speaker 4: What the fuck is it moving for? In the nineteen twenties,
Speaker 4: the controversy was still alive, but the non Semitic nature
Speaker 4: of Sumerian is now an accepted fact in scholarship. Evidence
Speaker 4: right there put a pin in that one. Thomas praised
Speaker 4: Waddell for his wide accomplishment, but criticized him for being
Speaker 4: too unrestrainedly bent upon discovery. Don't try to find things.
Speaker 4: It's likely that Thomas was irritated by the fact that
Speaker 4: Waddell had taken up the search for the Arians at
Speaker 4: its Eastern or Indo Persian end. No, it's probably because
Speaker 4: he didn't want to be exceeded in achievement by Waddell.
Speaker 4: It's probably jealousy when other scholars had abandoned it in
Speaker 4: the eighteen seventies. Yeah, okay, well because a bunch of yeah,
Speaker 4: they shut the books on it, so therefore you can't
Speaker 4: look anymore. Thomas also stated that Waddell's demonstrations, which could
Speaker 4: which could be studied in sumer Arian dictionary were madely
Speaker 4: based upon linguistic conjectures, ignoring all principles of sober research. So,
Speaker 4: since Woodell usually carried out his studies at great depth,
Speaker 4: and that his sentence had double meeting i e. Linguistic
Speaker 4: conjectures could be referenced to Max Miller's linguistic theories, it's
Speaker 4: possible that Thomas took for granted that Whdell was a
Speaker 4: follower of this scholar. Mueller was a philologist in Sanskrit,
Speaker 4: Sanskritist and the first to use the term Aran in
Speaker 4: the late eighteen hundreds. In the late eighteen hundreds, archaeology
Speaker 4: was subordinate to philology, mean philology reigned, and the latter
Speaker 4: was regarded as an important tool to study the past.
Speaker 4: The reconstruction of a hypothetical ancestral tongue was undertaken in
Speaker 4: linguistical and linguistic paleontology as soon as it was really
Speaker 4: realized that similarities in Indo European languages ie Sanskrit, Latin, Greek, Gothic,
Speaker 4: Celtic and Old Persian could be attributed to their derivation
Speaker 4: from the lost parent language, which they called proto Indo
Speaker 4: European right, because they can't say just fucking Aran. Right.
Speaker 4: In early days, scholars professed that Europeans descended from Jaffat,
Speaker 4: or one of Noah's three sons. Ah said to have
Speaker 4: escaped the biblical flood in an arc because of the
Speaker 4: statement in Genesis nine to one. Right, because they're using
Speaker 4: fucking Genesis but written by a bunch of liars as
Speaker 4: some kind of history. Yeah, way to go, way to go,
Speaker 4: retards that after the waters had receded, God established a
Speaker 4: new covenant and commanded Noah to go forth and multiply
Speaker 4: and fill the earth. Muller, however, suggested a central Asian
Speaker 4: origin for the Indo Europeans, calling them Arians because it
Speaker 4: was the name by which Sanskrit and Old Persian speakers
Speaker 4: called themselves. Sanskrit and Old Persian speakers called themselves Aryans.
Speaker 4: His school was opposed by ethnologists, anthropologists, and archaeologists in
Speaker 4: the race versus Science debates, right because they have to
Speaker 4: reduce everything to stupidity and argue the politics of the
Speaker 4: modern day rather than discover what the fucking truth is.
Speaker 4: The controls were in for a long time, a long
Speaker 4: long time. That rise of that ilulimnu In, which we
Speaker 4: call the Illuminati or the Perfectible list In. They were
Speaker 4: already in all of these orders. They were co opting
Speaker 4: the Free Masonic orders. And a lot of these members
Speaker 4: are these people here that are doing the research, or
Speaker 4: they're connected to them, or they're politically connected to them,
Speaker 4: or they're funded by them. So there's going to be
Speaker 4: controls put in there, because that's the freaking cults, that's
Speaker 4: the Semitic cult, that's the freaking Moon cult hiding itself
Speaker 4: in different masks, including Perfectible list Ins, Freemasonry, and if
Speaker 4: you understand by looking at the history of who were
Speaker 4: members of the Freemasons, it goes all the way through monarchies,
Speaker 4: all through all that stuff. Nobleman, you're going to see
Speaker 4: why this hand was so powerful because this cult, this
Speaker 4: cult was potentially the founders of Rome. I mean, they
Speaker 4: came back in a big fricking way. And where's the
Speaker 4: origin of all these other religions that we now are
Speaker 4: enslaved by? But people willfully are enslaved by. Uh huh okay,
Speaker 4: any moving on. His school was opposed, but yeah, I
Speaker 4: already said that race versus science debates and the Central
Speaker 4: Asian theory was still in vogue at the time. Waddell
Speaker 4: worked on makers of civilization in recent history, and the
Speaker 4: main disagreement in respect of using linguistic tools to demonstrate
Speaker 4: racial interests ancestry was that Aryan speaking races were Aryan
Speaker 4: by language and not by blood. Karl Penka was the
Speaker 4: founder of the Germanist school. His anthropological arguments demolished Moeller's
Speaker 4: central Asian theory in two works in eighteen eighty three
Speaker 4: and eighty six, although he was a strong believer in
Speaker 4: racial divisions by skull measurement and color of the skin
Speaker 4: that the anatomist, anthropologist and ethnologist Thomas Suxley established in
Speaker 4: the nineteenth century. This is the same fag right here
Speaker 4: who is called the bulldog of what do you call it?
Speaker 4: Darwin's bulldog because he could speak better than Darwin to
Speaker 4: explain his own theories and bullshit theories established in the
Speaker 4: nineteenth century and Panka. Waddell disagreed that the European race
Speaker 4: was the Cinderella of or youngest of all. Isaac Tailor
Speaker 4: also rejected the Asian model of migration offered by Muller
Speaker 4: for the Arians because excavations proved that the European race
Speaker 4: was more ancient than previously ascertained. He made the comment
Speaker 4: that the Aryan speech and civilization prevailed, but the Aryan
Speaker 4: race either disappeared or its purity was lost. In the
Speaker 4: world of archaeology, the study of ancient cultures in the
Speaker 4: Aegean region had been similar stimulated by groundbreaking excavations such
Speaker 4: as those of Shimlah. Let's get a little bit further
Speaker 4: up here, because we're just kind of getting into the
Speaker 4: big level right now arguments. But here, here's where it
Speaker 4: gets a little bit. We got to talk about this.
Speaker 4: Here is it we already talked about Vanilla's. Prehistoric archeology
Speaker 4: had emerged a discipline following greater discoveries in ancient Neuris Mediterranean,
Speaker 4: but fifty years before Butdell's time of writing, the first
Speaker 4: scholar had to have combined prehistoric archaeology with linguistics to
Speaker 4: find answers on the question of Riyan origins was Gustav Cassina,
Speaker 4: an anthropologist and philologists who proposed a cradle of German
Speaker 4: people in northern North Germany and a homeland for Indo
Speaker 4: European languages on the basis of his study of courted
Speaker 4: where pottery in the Indo European question to answered questions
Speaker 4: answered archaeologically. Nineteen oh two, B. W. Child, first holder
Speaker 4: of the Abercrombi Chair of Prehistoric European Archaeology and Director
Speaker 4: of the Institute of Archaeology at the University of London,
Speaker 4: a prehistorian and linguist, adopted Casino's approach to explore the
Speaker 4: relationship between prehistoric European cultures. Because archaeology was cultural, Child
Speaker 4: explored the origin of the Arians in terms of culture
Speaker 4: on the evidence of archaeological remains in linguistics. After studying
Speaker 4: material dated to the fourth millennium BC excavated at ur
Speaker 4: kash and Erek in nineteen twenty two, Child concluded that
Speaker 4: it revealed no sign of local development from a primitive state.
Speaker 4: This indicated that the Samerian civilization was not indigenous. It
Speaker 4: was brought there, came there. It had been created by
Speaker 4: conquerors or newcomers from another nation who ruled over the
Speaker 4: local peasantry. The ship bag fucking scumbag Edenites, who were
Speaker 4: you know, brutalizing this peasantry, of course being shut down
Speaker 4: and glorified their victory by the restoration and enlargement of
Speaker 4: old shrines painted figurines with serpent faces. Oh look at that,
Speaker 4: and the moon god Nana, a deity with a distinctive
Speaker 4: metriarchical character, were associated with these shrines. Right they were
Speaker 4: the moon cult painted figurines with serpent faces. All right?
Speaker 4: Said that what the hell? The Samerians remained nameless and
Speaker 4: their origin was a mystery. One of the reasons Child
Speaker 4: believed the Sabarians were Rian was that the correspondence preserved
Speaker 4: at tell Amara, Egypt, the names of the gods that
Speaker 4: were acknowledged were Indo Aryan. He also noted that the
Speaker 4: Amorites Phoenicians were often depicted by the eighteenth and subsequent
Speaker 4: Egyptian dynasties as tall, with blue eyes, brown hair, and
Speaker 4: relatively fair skin. Child stated that the notion expounded by
Speaker 4: Casina i e that the Arians had reached Mesopotamia as
Speaker 4: the Sumerians would have happily explained and supposed the supposed
Speaker 4: affinity between Samerian and Indo European speech. Waddell believed in
Speaker 4: this affinity. Come on, I'm trying to fucking read here.
Speaker 4: Believe in this infinity. But after the non Semitic nature
Speaker 4: of Samerian was firmly established a consensus between and the
Speaker 4: consensus appears as to its non it's not being Indo
Speaker 4: European either and to be unrelated to any other language.
Speaker 4: The archaeologist E. Macki had, however, professed in the nineteen
Speaker 4: twenties that Samerian had evolved from Proto Elamite, an Indio
Speaker 4: European language of Syria Asia Minor, and that Samerian and
Speaker 4: Indus Valley remains also indicated a common Proto Elamite ancestry.
Speaker 4: Now let's get back to where child View viewed the
Speaker 4: Samerians and Hittites as blood brothers and Cappadocia and the
Speaker 4: Sumerians homeland. Waddell's model of Aryan diffusion from Cappadocia to
Speaker 4: sumer and the British Eda seems to have been in
Speaker 4: agreement with Penka's idea that Nordic Arians had migrated toward
Speaker 4: the dan Ubian region and Asia Minor and Casinas, that
Speaker 4: the Aryans had reached Mesopotamia as the Samerians, so they
Speaker 4: conquered Samir Sumer first right. The idea implied that the
Speaker 4: Aryan architects of civilization intruded upon an indigenous population, but
Speaker 4: were genetically absorbed at one point in time because they
Speaker 4: were few by comparison with the people they civilized and
Speaker 4: intermarried with, and this could explain their disappearance. They were
Speaker 4: also hunted down by the Assyrians, but you know whenever.
Speaker 4: In the eighteen eighties, when Modell was in India, Ignatius
Speaker 4: Donnelley wrote his illustrious work Atlantis, The Antedliving World. Donnelly
Speaker 4: traced the seat of the Arians or Indo European family
Speaker 4: of nations to Atlantis and expounded that the gods of
Speaker 4: the Egyptians, Greeks, Phoenicians, Hindus, and Scandinavians were Atlantian kings
Speaker 4: and heroes, and that mythology was a confused recollection of
Speaker 4: historical events. Woddell also asserted that kings, heroes, and makers
Speaker 4: of civilization had been deified real people deified later and
Speaker 4: then skewed convoluted such as such a concept could lead
Speaker 4: to the rational hypothesis hypothesis that the gods of a
Speaker 4: first time, who were sometimes repeat you did to have
Speaker 4: become mortal in the age that followed the mythical divine rule,
Speaker 4: were in large historical personalities real people. Child's Study of
Speaker 4: Nordic Expansion in the Aryans nineteen twenty six was an
Speaker 4: attempt to put order to European prehistory. He tried to
Speaker 4: identify the cradle of the Aryans by reversing Casino's theory
Speaker 4: to derive the battle axe folk from South Russia instead
Speaker 4: of Scandinavia. Es. Central to the theory was a battle
Speaker 4: act which had which was an exceptional device and recognized
Speaker 4: by Scandinavian archaeologists as an imitation of the one used
Speaker 4: by Sumerians by thirty thousand VC. However, at the end
Speaker 4: of this book, Child stated that his confidence in the
Speaker 4: Kurgan South Russian hypothesis was shaken since he espoused it,
Speaker 4: since he espoused it, and concluded that in default, only
Speaker 4: the Germanist theory for the cradle of Aryans suggest of
Speaker 4: Arans suggested by Cassina was left, and that in this
Speaker 4: case Kurgans would not be the earliest Aryans. Child admitted
Speaker 4: that Casina's system was profound mastery of the archaeological material
Speaker 4: and consistent in the settle in the settling down of
Speaker 4: Paleolithic hunters Tall Krogue Magnan in ten thousand BC or
Speaker 4: the shores come on, get on my way on the
Speaker 4: shores of lakes in the Baltic there remain are sorry,
Speaker 4: their main centers being Scandinavia, but also an area from
Speaker 4: Britain to Latvia. Then the round handed or long handed
Speaker 4: ancestral ancestors of Indo Germans, Aryans and Finns who spoke
Speaker 4: and a glutenative a glutenative native an aglut ah, My god,
Speaker 4: I've been talking too long, a glutenative tongue from which
Speaker 4: Indo European and finite Urian languages derived. By four thousand BC,
Speaker 4: some had separated from the homeland. Those who migrated south
Speaker 4: pronounced k C softly and were the linguistic Satum group.
Speaker 4: They created the Danubian civilization. The Satum group were derived
Speaker 4: were driven, sorry, from the Ukraine towards Greece and as Thracians.
Speaker 4: My god, let's fucking read one sentence without a fucking mistake.
Speaker 4: The Satum group were deriven from the Ukraine towards Greece
Speaker 4: as Thracians and founded the Minoan civilization. Some went east,
Speaker 4: and those left on the Baltic coast and northern sea
Speaker 4: built Dolmens. Then North Indo Germans warriors at the same
Speaker 4: time as the pastoralists, cultivators and navigators sent out waves
Speaker 4: of conquering colonists. The Germanist school expounded that the folks
Speaker 4: who lived on the Baltic North Sea Denmark, Sweden and
Speaker 4: Norway were visited by navigators from the southwest seeking the
Speaker 4: source of amber. These could have been Phoenicians navigating from
Speaker 4: Phoenicia across the Mediterraneandan Sea, passing by Gibraltar and continuing
Speaker 4: north along the coast of Spain and France until they
Speaker 4: reached the British Isles and then continued to Scandinavia on
Speaker 4: Casinos chronology. Before three thousand BC, pioneers spread westward along
Speaker 4: the North Sea and down to the Danubian region region.
Speaker 4: Progress was achieved in respect to the decipherment of the
Speaker 4: Hittites system of writing between the time Ahsa, professor of
Speaker 4: seriology at Oxford, identified in a Anatolia in eighteen seventy
Speaker 4: nine and discovery of in nineteen forty seven of the
Speaker 4: bilingual inscription of Caraatepe on slabs at the entrance of
Speaker 4: the fortress of old Phoenician and Hittite hieroglyphs. The discovery
Speaker 4: of ancient Hittite boosted the quest for the Proto Indian
Speaker 4: European language or Proto Aryan. After Henry Rawlinson decoded sorry
Speaker 4: Assyrian Knea form inscriptions. Excivations were undertaken by the British
Speaker 4: Museum at Karsmish or Kargamish, and it was established that
Speaker 4: from one thy one hundred BC, Syria was known to
Speaker 4: the Assyrians as the land of Hati or Itite, right
Speaker 4: its capital was only known by references and texts to
Speaker 4: the Great Ketta or Kati. Sace had suspected it was
Speaker 4: bogus Koi. Excavations began in nineteen oh six. The discovery
Speaker 4: of royal archives comprised comprising about ten thousand community commute
Speaker 4: canuniformed tablets, proved that he was right, but the language
Speaker 4: in which they were to be read was unknown. The
Speaker 4: only bilingual inscription available at the time for a point
Speaker 4: of reference was the Seal of Charkan Demos, with ten
Speaker 4: kenidiform descriptions and six hit tit hierglyphs around a warder figure.
Speaker 4: Place Names were also known from Assyrian inscriptions. The translation
Speaker 4: of the Hittite tablets was entrusted in nineteen thirteen to
Speaker 4: the Douche Deutsche oriented Guselshaft, a group of a seriologist
Speaker 4: and b. Hronsie, a professor in Vienna and later at
Speaker 4: the Universe who cares where they were. Some of the
Speaker 4: tablets were in the well known Acadian language of Babylonia,
Speaker 4: and the meeting of some idiograms was understood without knowledge
Speaker 4: of the underlying language. Let's move on a little bit here. Wait,
Speaker 4: how what is time here? We're gonna have to do
Speaker 4: this next day?
Speaker 5: All right?
Speaker 4: This is part two. We're gonna do part two tomorrow.
Speaker 4: Part two tomorrow. Because this is this I'm not ready
Speaker 4: here for two. Now I have to go check. I
Speaker 4: have to run the stupid test for my computer, the
Speaker 4: new one, because there's crashes and glitch screens. Want to
Speaker 4: see what it looks like. I'll show you. Maybe somebody
Speaker 4: can tell me what this is and if this is
Speaker 4: bad GPU, bad driver for GPU, or what the hell?
Speaker 4: Maybe somebody out there will have an idea, because I'm
Speaker 4: gonna do a fur marked stress test on it. But
Speaker 4: I don't even think that's necessary because it crashes even
Speaker 4: without it, just randomly, and it's been doing it, been
Speaker 4: doing it in a while. Here we go, I'll show
Speaker 4: you that hold on, so I'll just be doing something
Speaker 4: anything on the new computer that has the new install.
Speaker 4: And trust me, I've done this OS install three different
Speaker 4: times to see if there is anything wrong with that,
Speaker 4: and then whenever they installed it, you know, there's an
Speaker 4: auto install for the drivers, and I'm thinking there's something
Speaker 4: going on maybe there, or I have a shit freaking
Speaker 4: GPU that I have to try to return now, I
Speaker 4: don't know. I don't know, but it's a lot of
Speaker 4: hassle just to get a freaking computer started and run
Speaker 4: what the fuck is that they don't see? You can't
Speaker 4: even like scan that even though it happens so quickly,
Speaker 4: So just randomly do that and then restart. That looks
Speaker 4: like glitch ass screen to me, And that to me
Speaker 4: makes me think driver of the GPU or GPU or
Speaker 4: there's something horribly corrupted. But it couldn't be. It's not
Speaker 4: BIOS related. I guarantee you that. I don't think anyway.
Speaker 4: I don't think that was interrupted or anything like that.
Speaker 4: So I don't know anybody have any idea. I'm gonna
Speaker 4: have to go in to get diagnostic today after I
Speaker 4: run that for mark test. So that's why I'm doing
Speaker 4: that right after this lucky Day. Lucky Day. Oh then
Speaker 4: I'm making hot sauce that actually does make me happy.
Speaker 4: I'll enjoy you that because that's when I get to
Speaker 4: catch up on my podcast. And you know, I think
Speaker 4: there's a couple. There might be a couple of New
Speaker 4: Mexicans out there. I think rout the crow house. All right,
Speaker 4: so we'll get we'll continue there and this is going
Speaker 4: to get pick up more So. I didn't get to
Speaker 4: the point where I wanted to today. I could have
Speaker 4: skipped over a few things, but we're on page twenty seven.
Speaker 4: We need to at least read to page fifty five.
Speaker 4: But the effects of racist ideologies on Wddell's works. The
Speaker 4: term arian that Weddell used also became associated with the
Speaker 4: rise of not no national socialism, particularly after the Second
Speaker 4: World War. I've received various queries and comments about Waddell.
Speaker 4: Peter Lavenda, author of On Holy Alliance nineteen ninety five,
Speaker 4: work on the ocult background of the rise of n
Speaker 4: National Socialism not Nazism, had heard rumors that's Weddell was
Speaker 4: a crank, had no background in philology. Right he did
Speaker 4: all this prior to the right shut up and archaeology.
Speaker 4: Had wrote books filled with the racist theories. He said
Speaker 4: he had read a great deal of Withdell and came
Speaker 4: to the feeling that his purported anti semitism quote unquote
Speaker 4: was simply misconstrued, mostly by his use of the Aryan
Speaker 4: term that wasn't a bad thing back then, and it's
Speaker 4: a regular word, and that he was glad to see
Speaker 4: I had reached similar conclusions. It is possible that Withdell's
Speaker 4: polemics against Semitic scholars were misinterpreted in recent time, as
Speaker 4: he used this expression in the sense of British or
Speaker 4: European scholars who maintained that the Sumerians and their language
Speaker 4: were Semitic. No, what he was saying is the Semitic touch,
Speaker 4: like they were semitizing things. They were semitizing the past.
Speaker 4: Now who was doing that, well, probably Jews were influencing something,
Speaker 4: right it probably this ancient cult, this eden Knight Colt
Speaker 4: influencing something so that they could absorb all of the
Speaker 4: accolades and accomplishments of our of us into them, so
Speaker 4: that it could be the center of the world and
Speaker 4: be the chosen people. Right, if there's nothing else, there's
Speaker 4: no place else to look. They've already told you what
Speaker 4: everything you need to know. But and it's all about them.
Speaker 4: It's not about you. You're just the lowly. Nobody's certainly
Speaker 4: not the people who brought order to the world. No,
Speaker 4: you wouldn't be them. Remember we have Jews telling us
Speaker 4: that they are the ones who created morality, brought the
Speaker 4: morality to the world. Those chaotic barbarians. They're so fucking
Speaker 4: backward and full of shit, it's not funny. And we'll
Speaker 4: leave it at that for today. Alright, FD media, let's
Speaker 4: use yours today and mariana screen I even seen, No
Speaker 4: it didn't work, all right here there it goes sure,
Speaker 4: all right, so we're on the FTJ site this time.
Speaker 4: Since we're here and there people's hell of peoples, all right,
Speaker 4: So right there, sipper frillc dot com. Prescraft Beyond Babylon
Speaker 4: is available there. All the links to get to the
Speaker 4: book are there too. You don't have to get it
Speaker 4: directly from me if you don't want to sign. It's
Speaker 4: a little bit cheaper for me to what you want
Speaker 4: to do. Bro uh So Prescraphyon Babylon right there, click it.
Speaker 4: Y I updated a lot of the photos too, so
Speaker 4: all right, So there's all the links Barnes, Amazon, Cobo
Speaker 4: is a digital only, Lulu is digital only Amazon. You
Speaker 4: can also get Kendle and Barnes. You can get Milk,
Speaker 4: but you can also get the hardcover at Amazon or
Speaker 4: the paperback, and then there's a smaller paperback six by
Speaker 4: nine at Barnes. Scroll all the way down, all the
Speaker 4: way down, all the way down on the way down,
Speaker 4: and then you can choose which one you want for
Speaker 4: me to be signed. Don't try to think you're gonna
Speaker 4: get this before Christmas if you order anything but the
Speaker 4: eight and a half by eleven Amazon paperback, okay, because
Speaker 4: the other ones I have to order and they have
Speaker 4: to send me then I have to send them out
Speaker 4: after I signed them, So that's not gonna probably happen
Speaker 4: before Christmas. Knowing how backed up the post office is already,
Speaker 4: and how it usually takes at least two weeks for
Speaker 4: them to send me copies, Okay, sometimes they're right away,
Speaker 4: Sometimes there are three days. I don't It just blows
Speaker 4: my mind. And then sometimes it's three freaking weeks before
Speaker 4: they send one. It's it's all over the place, so
Speaker 4: I don't know. And then the link for doctor Glidden
Speaker 4: you can click there and put the dang there. You
Speaker 4: are right. This is all in the rumble too. And
Speaker 4: by the way, there's a thing called the rumble Rant
Speaker 4: saying this is a thing called the rumble Rant. Click
Speaker 4: that little dollars line there and then you can do
Speaker 4: your h what do you call it your? But they
Speaker 4: kind of like a super chat over on YouTube, except
Speaker 4: rumble rant just sounds cooler. So these are all the
Speaker 4: updated pictures. They got the creatine here, all the hot
Speaker 4: sauce is nice and shiny. Thank you to one of
Speaker 4: the viewers. And I'll tell you. I'll figure out what
Speaker 4: country it is. It's definitely not ours. We're really big
Speaker 4: different time zones here. But uh, the majority of these
Speaker 4: are new. Some of them like I skipped, I missed
Speaker 4: that one. You could see the shadow on it. Still,
Speaker 4: I guess I forgot the sense. These were double And
Speaker 4: then there were in other things I didn't send that
Speaker 4: I have to get single bottle pictures of that. I
Speaker 4: just think I have them. Though. There's my steps on
Speaker 4: when he was little. That one needs to be redone.
Speaker 4: You can see a little shadows in the back right
Speaker 4: that one needs to be done. But the rest of
Speaker 4: them are told that one too. Majority of your all
Speaker 4: brand new, fresh and clean and clean and clean. Right
Speaker 4: there you go. Why'd I say sold out? I have
Speaker 4: a couple of those, don't I? No, No, I don't
Speaker 4: do that one. I do, and I have a couple
Speaker 4: of those, but I like those, so maybe I'm keeping
Speaker 4: up for me. Yeah, okay, anyway, the brand neck is good.
Speaker 4: You should grabble on those if you like spicy, spicy,
Speaker 4: all right. Anyway, So that's there's the sauces, there's the site,
Speaker 4: and then the other The other thing you could do
Speaker 4: he would be to go either to this uh not
Speaker 4: that one, the money tree Publishing dot com. That's to
Speaker 4: go directly to Hellstorm. But you can just hit you know,
Speaker 4: you could take you could just go to the shop
Speaker 4: after that. It's on the top bar and if you
Speaker 4: want to see the other books, but that goes right
Speaker 4: to the hell Storm and then getting the copy that
Speaker 4: has the signed book plate is what I would do.
Speaker 4: It's actually what I did do about three of them
Speaker 4: for family for Christmas. I've already read it, right, and
Speaker 4: uh could be a a l for ten percent off
Speaker 4: what you get over at money Tree Publishing. So there's
Speaker 4: also that method. And then you can do the biomey
Speaker 4: a coffee and no, I've screw screw that. That's not
Speaker 4: what I meant to say. I meant to say Patreon.
Speaker 4: Patreon would be the ideal way because then you get
Speaker 4: stuff all the time ad free. You're getting a benefit
Speaker 4: from it, right, same deal as if you if you
Speaker 4: sign up with Doctor Lydden's thing, right, you get a
Speaker 4: benefit from it, and you get fifty percent off as well.
Speaker 4: The Gibson Go was just a really awesome thing to
Speaker 4: throw at you know, if you want, and you can
Speaker 4: get there from many different avenues. But look how awesome
Speaker 4: people are here to you know.
Speaker 7: Thank you.
Speaker 4: Oh, let me read this. It says, Daniel, thanks again
Speaker 4: for everything that you do. This isn't much, dude, Jeff,
Speaker 4: you're always doing this. Well, that's what the thing you're doing,
Speaker 4: and you're awesome, by the way. But I figured, with
Speaker 4: the amount of knowledge I've gained from your show, this
Speaker 4: is the absolutely least that I could do to help
Speaker 4: out the show. I'm finally in a position to do so,
Speaker 4: and I wouldn't didn't want to wait another minute. I'm
Speaker 4: enjoying the book too, and as soon as I finish it,
Speaker 4: I'll be leaving a review for that too. Thanks again, brother,
Speaker 4: and then beder Billa. Happy holidays to you and your family.
Speaker 4: Kevin Dalton. That was two days ago. It says the
Speaker 4: shows have been awesome. We forgot about that. Thank you
Speaker 4: for all the research that you do this Christmas. Merry Christmas.
Speaker 4: Thank you. Where somebody else do that one alone? Not moving?
Speaker 4: That's weird. Well there's Jeff again. Say I'm telling you, Jeff,
Speaker 4: you just say you do you do this all the time. Man,
Speaker 4: Thank you. All right, So there you go. That's the
Speaker 4: that's the the gifts and go. And if you're on
Speaker 4: FTG media, you can actually just click this in here
Speaker 4: and it goes there. And this one's for the tip
Speaker 4: using the FTJ wallet, which somebody just did today and
Speaker 4: I'll figure out who it was and say thank you
Speaker 4: directly to them. But it just says thank you for
Speaker 4: Daniel Christis on this, so I don't know who. I
Speaker 4: think it was either probably Class or Bushmasher. That also
Speaker 4: I'll find out later. I think I'll be able to
Speaker 4: tell them the this somehow in the back. All right,
Speaker 4: So there you go. So there's the links, there's the descriptions.
Speaker 4: Thank you over there a bit shoot, thanks for watching everybody,
Speaker 4: And yeah, I know it's a little early for people,
Speaker 4: but it's nine o'clock for me to do the eight
Speaker 4: o'clock on to kind of keep in balance with every
Speaker 4: everybody's doing the uh their daylight savings time while we don't.
Speaker 4: So it's a little bit different right for me because
Speaker 4: I have to get start an hour later. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: Oh wait, hold on, there's some there's some things that
Speaker 4: throw up here on the screen. Hold on, hold on,
Speaker 4: I gotta get the people on here if I can
Speaker 4: find them. I hope I find that one. And again
Speaker 4: that was a good one. Where to go. It's nothing
Speaker 4: mouse well, it's I mean, there's other issues. I think
Speaker 4: it's just a glitchy little thing. It might be setting
Speaker 4: to you sensitively, but I wasn't even touching it, and
Speaker 4: it just didn't like that a lot. Uh. This is
Speaker 4: an interesting book.
Speaker 1: As.
Speaker 4: Per usual, with white people travel around and bring civilization
Speaker 4: and then get bred out of existence by darker well
Speaker 4: by anybody, you know. Let's see why is in that
Speaker 4: movie goes yeah, here we go always doing that. It's
Speaker 4: doing from others calling it their own erasing the true history. Yes,
Speaker 4: and then misconstruing and making it ugly. Whatever history is left,
Speaker 4: so that you don't even look towards it, so that
Speaker 4: you only look at them for their guidance, straight off
Speaker 4: the fucking cliff. Love it. Appreciate you, Dan, No, hope
Speaker 4: you have a good one. Brother. I hope you do too,
Speaker 4: mister ic Angel. Okay, I think I did most of them.
Speaker 4: There's a bunch of good mornings and suck guys in here.
Speaker 4: I need to put those up there, and Karen good morning.
Speaker 4: I think I said that already. All Right, I'm out.
Speaker 4: I will see you tomorrow. You'll see me. I just
Speaker 4: see myself on the stupid screen here. I'll see your comments.