1
00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:08,240
Speaker 1: Hey, folks, welcome into the Thinking Crypto Podcasts. You're home

2
00:00:08,279 --> 00:00:12,039
for cryptocurrency news and interviews. I'm your host, Tony Edward.

3
00:00:12,199 --> 00:00:14,599
On your way in. Please hit that subscribe button as

4
00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:16,920
well as the thumbs up button and leave a comment below.

5
00:00:17,199 --> 00:00:19,839
If you're listening on a podcast platform such as Spotify

6
00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:22,039
or Apple, please be sure to follow and leave a

7
00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:24,239
five star rating. All right, folks, we got to talk

8
00:00:24,239 --> 00:00:27,480
to claritiac because there are so many updates. Try to

9
00:00:27,559 --> 00:00:30,160
keep up here because it's a lot. So the Senate

10
00:00:30,199 --> 00:00:34,079
Republicans today they released the latest version of the Claritiac

11
00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:37,719
and the bill contained an initial crypto ethics Agreement. It

12
00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:40,960
covered government officials such as the President of the United States,

13
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:43,759
the Vice President of the United States, members of Congress,

14
00:00:43,799 --> 00:00:48,000
and others, plus their spouses. The ethics Agreement sunsets on

15
00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:52,000
January twentieth, twenty twenty nine. That's a bit problematic, but

16
00:00:52,079 --> 00:00:53,880
let me not get ahead of myself. So we have

17
00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:55,799
a full breakdown of this. Many of you may have

18
00:00:55,840 --> 00:00:58,799
seen my social media posts. I even posted in on YouTube.

19
00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:02,759
The screenshow of the language, and this is really good.

20
00:01:02,799 --> 00:01:05,400
This is what we want to see because I've often

21
00:01:05,439 --> 00:01:09,159
stated no elected officials should have a meme coin or

22
00:01:09,239 --> 00:01:12,000
have a cryptocurrency tied to them. So this is great.

23
00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:14,719
I love it. This is what we absolutely want to

24
00:01:14,760 --> 00:01:17,879
see put into plays. Doesn't matter if you're a Democrat, Republican,

25
00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:20,799
or independent, you should not have anything like this. And

26
00:01:20,879 --> 00:01:23,719
obviously there's a larger ethics issue that needs to be

27
00:01:23,760 --> 00:01:26,200
sorted out, which we'll talk a bit more about later.

28
00:01:26,480 --> 00:01:29,359
So Senator Cynthia Lummus and many others shared all the

29
00:01:29,760 --> 00:01:33,040
key ethics provisions and the breakdown and much more. Now

30
00:01:33,079 --> 00:01:35,200
you may have seen my posts where I gave my

31
00:01:35,400 --> 00:01:37,799
thoughts on it, the good and versus the bad. So

32
00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:41,519
obviously this language, this ethics provision is awesome, right, So

33
00:01:41,519 --> 00:01:43,719
it's really great that this is being put into there.

34
00:01:43,879 --> 00:01:46,480
Now Here are my issues with both the Republicans and

35
00:01:46,519 --> 00:01:48,560
the Democrats. Many of you know I'm an independent, so

36
00:01:48,599 --> 00:01:50,799
I'm not trying to pick sides here. I'm just calling

37
00:01:50,840 --> 00:01:55,079
balls and strikes. So the band with sunset on January twentieth,

38
00:01:55,239 --> 00:01:58,879
twenty twenty nine very weird. It's the same year the

39
00:01:58,959 --> 00:02:03,000
CBDC bands sunsets, so I think this should be permanent.

40
00:02:03,439 --> 00:02:06,319
Why is there a sunset it's only three years away.

41
00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:09,280
I mean, what's going on here? Right? So that's really weird.

42
00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:11,680
And I'm going to try to bring some experts on

43
00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:13,960
the podcast to talk about this, because why would you

44
00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:17,520
only ban it for three years and again same year

45
00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:20,599
as the CBDC bands. Something doesn't seem right here, but

46
00:02:20,639 --> 00:02:22,360
I didn't want to read too much into it. Now

47
00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:26,719
on the Democrat side, they're asking for each state attorney

48
00:02:26,759 --> 00:02:30,080
generals to be in charge of ethics enforcement. But this

49
00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:34,159
is unrealistic because each state operates many times in different ways.

50
00:02:34,199 --> 00:02:36,000
You have different people, so you have different point of

51
00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:39,080
views and perspectives, and as you can imagine, each state

52
00:02:39,120 --> 00:02:41,199
is going to handle this very different, so you're going

53
00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:43,759
to have a hodgepodge of all kinds of craziness. Right

54
00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:46,400
New York is going to do something different versus Florida versus.

55
00:02:46,800 --> 00:02:49,400
You can't have that. So I absolutely disagree with the

56
00:02:49,439 --> 00:02:53,639
Democrats on here. This is a bit outlandish. So this

57
00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:56,719
is where we're at. I love the ethics provision that's

58
00:02:56,719 --> 00:02:58,960
put in there. I don't like the sunset band date,

59
00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:00,759
and I'm sure many of you, regardless of if you're

60
00:03:00,759 --> 00:03:04,159
a Republican or whatever, you don't agree with that, And now,

61
00:03:04,199 --> 00:03:07,039
of course absolutely don't agree what the Democrats are saying

62
00:03:07,039 --> 00:03:08,960
that they're not going to vote for the bill unless

63
00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:13,759
each state attorney generals can Yeah, again, it's just unrealistic. Right.

64
00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:17,680
But with all that said, the Democrats say they opposed

65
00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:21,360
the new Crypto Clarity Act draft bill, but are working

66
00:03:21,719 --> 00:03:24,479
with Republicans to get it over the finish line. So

67
00:03:24,520 --> 00:03:27,039
that's good. You know, this is this sausage making process.

68
00:03:27,039 --> 00:03:28,479
You're going to see a lot of back and forth,

69
00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:31,719
give and take right, and sometimes these on both sides

70
00:03:31,759 --> 00:03:34,199
they come heavy handed and then they'll give a bit

71
00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:35,080
and take away a bit.

72
00:03:35,199 --> 00:03:35,360
Speaker 2: Right.

73
00:03:35,639 --> 00:03:39,319
Speaker 1: It's a negotiation tactic. So great to hear that they're

74
00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:43,439
still willing to work on getting this right. Also, Senator Lummis,

75
00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:46,919
she says that the ethics and other provisions in the

76
00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:50,599
Clarity Act to be further discussed. So the lead negotiators

77
00:03:50,599 --> 00:03:54,120
on the bills are working with the Democrats. So again,

78
00:03:54,199 --> 00:03:58,039
the negotiations are ongoing. So guys, we're making progress. We

79
00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:00,960
are making progress. You know, this is again this ugly

80
00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:05,479
sausage making process, and we'll see how it all pans out. Obviously,

81
00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:08,520
there's no guarantee that this bill passes, and in fact,

82
00:04:08,599 --> 00:04:12,039
on polymarket, when this draft came out, the odds of

83
00:04:12,039 --> 00:04:15,479
it passing dropped. Now we saw it was pumping when

84
00:04:15,479 --> 00:04:18,519
it was news of Trump backing the ethics language. It

85
00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:22,519
started going above fifty percent. Now it's back below fifty percent.

86
00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:24,800
So I'm not too concerned about the ebbs and flows

87
00:04:24,839 --> 00:04:27,720
of that. So just something to keep in mind. I

88
00:04:27,720 --> 00:04:29,839
think what we want to see is progress, and it

89
00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:33,639
may get ugly again. You know, this muzzlinging the game

90
00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:36,240
of politics. You guys know how it's all played. And

91
00:04:36,879 --> 00:04:39,519
let's hope, you know, we can get this done. They

92
00:04:39,519 --> 00:04:42,800
can get it passed by the end of July. I

93
00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:46,079
know that's not very far away or even you know,

94
00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:48,439
in the early days of August. It then goes to

95
00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:52,279
the House and the House can pass it. And I'll

96
00:04:52,319 --> 00:04:55,920
be interviewing Congressman Brian Style, who heads up the Subcommittee

97
00:04:56,120 --> 00:04:59,639
on Digital Assets in the House Financial Services Committee, tomorrow

98
00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:04,199
to bring you guys some details and get his perspective

99
00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:06,879
about what may happen in the House once this passes

100
00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:10,639
the Senate. So, guys, TLDR, we're making progress. There needs

101
00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:13,600
to be some fine tuning on this ethics language. We'll

102
00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:16,920
see what the Democrats and Republicans agree upon and how

103
00:05:16,920 --> 00:05:19,959
they can find the common ground here and get this

104
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:22,959
thing done, because it's not about Democrat or Republican. It

105
00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:27,399
needs to be about America winning in this technological race

106
00:05:27,399 --> 00:05:30,279
and creating jobs and innovation and much more. And here's

107
00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:33,839
a great article that highlights that crypto is still very

108
00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:38,040
much a political issue overall, because if you're anti crypto,

109
00:05:38,079 --> 00:05:39,879
you're going to get your ass handed to you, like

110
00:05:39,920 --> 00:05:43,160
we saw in twenty twenty four. So crypto pack pours

111
00:05:43,199 --> 00:05:47,040
one million dollars into Michigan Democratic primary race. So this

112
00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:51,319
is between two Democrats. One is pro crypto, Shri Tenidar.

113
00:05:52,319 --> 00:05:54,279
I'm butchering his name and I met him in person

114
00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:58,240
and one of the Blockchain Association or Digital Chamber events,

115
00:05:58,759 --> 00:06:03,480
and Donovan McKay he's running against him, and the crypto

116
00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:08,120
lobby is putting some money to back Sree Tenantars. So

117
00:06:08,839 --> 00:06:11,240
if you're anti crypto, doesn't matter if you're a Democrat

118
00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:14,920
or Republican, you're going to get demolished. Right, So these

119
00:06:14,959 --> 00:06:18,480
guys need to learn their lesson, man, like, this is

120
00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:21,240
just a technology and if you're going to you know

121
00:06:21,279 --> 00:06:24,680
buddy up with Elizabeth Warren and go against Crypto. It's

122
00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:27,000
not going to work out well for you. So the

123
00:06:27,040 --> 00:06:30,160
money's going to be poured in heavily here as it's

124
00:06:30,199 --> 00:06:32,439
a midterm election year. So let's see how it all

125
00:06:32,519 --> 00:06:35,519
pans out. Now, guys, this news is a shocker because

126
00:06:35,600 --> 00:06:39,519
it's related to ethics overall. Apparently the House today pass

127
00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:44,319
the Congressional Stock Trading Ban. Two hundred and seventeen Republicans

128
00:06:44,399 --> 00:06:47,360
voted in support, one hundred and ninety eight Democrats voted against.

129
00:06:47,560 --> 00:06:49,839
Now the context there, I want to make sure they're

130
00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:52,839
not voting overall to say we want to trade stocks,

131
00:06:53,120 --> 00:06:56,360
because the Save the America Act was also put into

132
00:06:56,399 --> 00:06:59,600
this bill, and that's where a lot of Democrats were

133
00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:03,439
voting against. But can you believe it? They actually got

134
00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:06,240
this done in the House. Now, the big hurdle is

135
00:07:06,279 --> 00:07:09,920
the Senate. It's much much more difficult to move bills

136
00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:12,199
in the Senate, as we're seeing with the Claritiac. Right, guys,

137
00:07:12,519 --> 00:07:15,480
remember the FIT twenty one bill, which was a version

138
00:07:15,480 --> 00:07:17,959
of the Claritiac passed in the House last year. But

139
00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:21,759
the bigger challenge has been the Senate. So I don't

140
00:07:21,759 --> 00:07:23,160
know if this is going to make it through the Senate.

141
00:07:23,199 --> 00:07:26,040
If it does, that would be really great because it

142
00:07:26,079 --> 00:07:29,399
will put the overall ethics law in place, not just

143
00:07:29,480 --> 00:07:31,360
for crypto but for all assets.

144
00:07:31,439 --> 00:07:31,560
Speaker 2: Right.

145
00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:34,360
Speaker 1: Well, well, here the highlighting stock ranning trade. But I

146
00:07:34,399 --> 00:07:36,839
would say, hey, what about gold? What about oil? What

147
00:07:36,879 --> 00:07:40,519
about other commodities? Because if I know, hey, something's going

148
00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:43,720
to happen that's going to affect the price of oil, Well,

149
00:07:43,759 --> 00:07:46,439
there's futures markets out there. I can go trade against

150
00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:48,839
it or go long, go short, whatever it may be.

151
00:07:49,319 --> 00:07:51,639
I can get access via et apps and all these things.

152
00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:54,560
So I'm going to ask Congressman Brian Style about this

153
00:07:54,639 --> 00:07:58,240
tomorrow in our interview because it needs to cover all assets, right,

154
00:07:58,279 --> 00:08:00,399
we need to cover all bases here. But can you

155
00:08:00,439 --> 00:08:03,759
believe it they actually got this done. I was actually

156
00:08:03,759 --> 00:08:07,319
blown away that it actually made it through. So let's

157
00:08:07,319 --> 00:08:09,959
see if it can make it through the Senate. Now, folks,

158
00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:11,199
quick word from our sponsor.

159
00:08:11,439 --> 00:08:15,120
Speaker 2: This episode is brought to you by Fortax. Guys, Let's

160
00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:18,319
be honest. The crypto market has been moving sideways for

161
00:08:18,360 --> 00:08:20,959
a while now. A lot of people are just sitting

162
00:08:20,959 --> 00:08:23,720
on their coins waiting for the next big move. But

163
00:08:23,920 --> 00:08:27,079
while you're waiting, your crypto is just sitting in your

164
00:08:27,120 --> 00:08:30,759
wallet doing absolutely nothing. That's why I want to mention

165
00:08:30,879 --> 00:08:35,039
one of my longtime partners, Fortax. Instead of just letting

166
00:08:35,039 --> 00:08:38,559
your assets sit idle, you can put supported cryptocurrencies into

167
00:08:38,600 --> 00:08:43,000
fortestx liquidity pools and earn daily rewards while still keeping

168
00:08:43,039 --> 00:08:46,639
the flexibility to withdraw whenever you want. One of the

169
00:08:46,639 --> 00:08:50,000
reasons I've continued working with them is because they keep delivering.

170
00:08:50,360 --> 00:08:54,720
The team is public, they've successfully completed Cyberscope team verification,

171
00:08:54,919 --> 00:08:59,600
KYC past independent security audits, and the platform has been

172
00:08:59,600 --> 00:09:04,480
building consistently for years. They focus on long term growth, transparency,

173
00:09:04,519 --> 00:09:07,360
and security rather than hype. In a market like this,

174
00:09:07,639 --> 00:09:10,360
it makes far more sense to have your crypto working

175
00:09:10,440 --> 00:09:13,559
for you instead of letting it sit idle in your wallet.

176
00:09:13,840 --> 00:09:16,320
I've worked with fortestx for a long time, and if

177
00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,559
you're planning to hold your crypto anyway, I genuinely think

178
00:09:19,759 --> 00:09:22,360
it's one of the smartest ways to put those assets

179
00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:24,960
to work. And folks, I know security is very important

180
00:09:24,960 --> 00:09:26,919
to all of us as we hold our crypto assets

181
00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:30,120
and they are fully audited by certic and they are

182
00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:32,960
sec registered and much more so you've got to check

183
00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:37,080
out FORTX. Go to fortx dot fi slash x slash

184
00:09:37,080 --> 00:09:39,600
thinking crypto link will be in the description.

185
00:09:39,919 --> 00:09:42,799
Speaker 1: All right, moving ahead, huge news here from a tradi

186
00:09:42,840 --> 00:09:49,639
Fi incumbent, SMP launches Blockchain Fundamentals Index for digital assets. So, folks,

187
00:09:49,639 --> 00:09:52,759
we continue to see the infrastructure being established for the

188
00:09:52,799 --> 00:09:55,480
crypto market with all the bells and whistles and the

189
00:09:55,519 --> 00:09:58,960
moving parts and components that exist for traditional assets. So

190
00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:03,159
the SMP, now Jones Indices, and Pantera Capital launch a

191
00:10:03,279 --> 00:10:07,759
digital asset index that tracks blockchain networks and protocols based

192
00:10:07,759 --> 00:10:12,120
on protocol revenue, marking a departure from crypto benchmarks built

193
00:10:12,159 --> 00:10:17,360
around market capitalization or token prices. Very interesting protocol revenue.

194
00:10:17,759 --> 00:10:21,320
This may be I might be wrong, but this may

195
00:10:21,399 --> 00:10:25,320
be a huge narrative in the next bull market which

196
00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:28,639
blockchains are generating a certain amount of revenue. So the

197
00:10:28,679 --> 00:10:32,960
index draws from the SMP Cryptocurrency Broad Digital Asset Index,

198
00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:38,120
but only includes assets that meet minimum thresholds for protocol revenue,

199
00:10:38,279 --> 00:10:42,600
market capitalization, and liquidity. Eligible networks are then ranked by

200
00:10:42,759 --> 00:10:47,200
aggregate protocol revenue over the previous two quarters and weighted

201
00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:51,519
by adjusted market capitalization with the largest holding capped at

202
00:10:51,559 --> 00:10:55,200
thirty five percent and the remaining constituents generally capped at

203
00:10:55,279 --> 00:10:59,159
twenty percent. The index is rebalanced quarterly, so the index

204
00:10:59,240 --> 00:11:03,960
launched with a eighteen constituents, with ether BnB, Solana, Tron,

205
00:11:04,159 --> 00:11:08,080
hyper Liquid as its five largest holdings. According to an

206
00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:13,279
SMP Dow Jones Indices indexology blog posts. The blog identified

207
00:11:13,279 --> 00:11:17,320
Bitcoin and XRP as the largest non constituents compared to

208
00:11:17,399 --> 00:11:22,399
the SMP Cryptocurrency Broad Digital Acid Index, reflecting the benchmarks

209
00:11:22,480 --> 00:11:28,279
protocol revenue based on selection methodology. Wow. So again the

210
00:11:28,279 --> 00:11:32,480
infrastructure being built here a by Tradifi to bring crypto

211
00:11:32,679 --> 00:11:36,720
into the mainstream markets. Now. SEC Commissioner has S. Purse

212
00:11:37,320 --> 00:11:42,600
put out some details here about tokenization, saying that crypto

213
00:11:42,679 --> 00:11:46,480
vaults and on chain lending strategies could fall under US

214
00:11:46,559 --> 00:11:50,080
securities laws depending on how they're structured and managed to

215
00:11:50,399 --> 00:11:53,879
urge builders to work with the SEC on compliant paths

216
00:11:53,960 --> 00:11:58,240
forward rather than do headstands, backflips and other gymnastics to

217
00:11:58,320 --> 00:12:00,840
avoid the law. I think this is really great. Has

218
00:12:00,840 --> 00:12:04,000
there has always been ahead of the curve, very thoughtful

219
00:12:04,000 --> 00:12:07,799
about these things, and you know, look some of the offerings,

220
00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:11,799
you know, based on what folks are building could be securities, right,

221
00:12:12,279 --> 00:12:15,399
So I think it's good that the SEC is saying, hey, look,

222
00:12:15,440 --> 00:12:17,759
come and talk to us, let's figure it out and

223
00:12:18,039 --> 00:12:21,480
see what you're doing, versus you trying to find loopholes

224
00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:23,360
and all these things. So this is really great. Now

225
00:12:23,519 --> 00:12:26,519
B and Y is laying the groundwork for twenty four

226
00:12:26,559 --> 00:12:30,919
to seven treasury settlement planning tokenized treasuries and pilot trades

227
00:12:31,000 --> 00:12:33,600
on its private blockchain by the end of twenty twenty six.

228
00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:36,600
So what we're going to see as a hybrid approach from

229
00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:40,120
any of these institutions. They're going to have private blockchains

230
00:12:40,159 --> 00:12:42,559
which they're going to use internally and maybe amongst a

231
00:12:42,639 --> 00:12:45,039
group of friends so to speak, right, maybe other banks

232
00:12:45,039 --> 00:12:47,759
and people they have partnerships with. But they're also going

233
00:12:47,799 --> 00:12:50,039
to bridge the public chains, and they're going to use

234
00:12:50,039 --> 00:12:54,320
public chains in different ways. So don't be surprised by this. Again,

235
00:12:54,519 --> 00:12:58,679
the wall gardens don't work for broad market adoption. They

236
00:12:58,720 --> 00:13:01,200
work for you know, a handful of folks who may

237
00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:04,039
be already doing business and they have you know, they

238
00:13:04,039 --> 00:13:08,000
can tap into each other as blockchains. But remember the

239
00:13:08,039 --> 00:13:10,440
idea of public chains why they work so well is

240
00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:14,360
that they're decentralized, and if I don't have an existing

241
00:13:14,440 --> 00:13:16,440
partnership with you, it's going to take a lot for

242
00:13:16,559 --> 00:13:19,200
me to trust your chain, which you control, right, and

243
00:13:19,679 --> 00:13:23,080
it's centralized where you can delete transactions and do all

244
00:13:23,120 --> 00:13:26,799
these things, versus a public chain where it's all visible. Right.

245
00:13:26,879 --> 00:13:29,919
So these are things that keep in mind as we progress.

246
00:13:29,960 --> 00:13:32,519
You're going to see again a hybrid approach. All right, folks,

247
00:13:32,519 --> 00:13:34,159
that's the news. Let me know what you think. Leave

248
00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:36,639
your thoughts and comments below. Hit the THUMBSU button subscribe

249
00:13:36,679 --> 00:13:38,679
if you happen it's yet, be sure to support the

250
00:13:38,720 --> 00:13:41,759
podcast by subscribing to my free email newsletter. It's one

251
00:13:41,840 --> 00:13:44,480
hundred percent free. Link will be in a description. Check

252
00:13:44,480 --> 00:13:47,360
out my book on Amazon. It's available in paperback, in digital.

253
00:13:47,759 --> 00:13:49,679
And if you want to expand your knowledge around crypto

254
00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:51,679
and blockchain tech, then you got to check out my

255
00:13:51,759 --> 00:13:55,120
course at Mycrypto course dot com. This is a comprehensive

256
00:13:55,159 --> 00:13:57,200
course that teaches you everything you need to know. So

257
00:13:57,240 --> 00:13:59,679
again to go to Mycrypto course dot com. All the

258
00:13:59,720 --> 00:14:01,759
links will be in a description. Folks, thank you so

259
00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:04,240
much for tuning in. I appreciate you all, and I'll

260
00:14:04,279 --> 00:14:05,519
talk to you all later