Speaker 1: H I mean, I don't know what you mean. You
can't see the space. I just tweeted it at you
at your profile, so, I mean we've had people leave
and come back before so and by the way, your
profile is basically nothing on it. So I don't know
why you think I'm supposed to think you're credible.
Speaker 2: You should reach out the app, maybe quit the app
and then open it again and find it.
Speaker 1: That'll shut down the whole the whole space. That doesn't work.
Speaker 3: No, that you the guy that's looking oh.
Speaker 4: Katire.
Speaker 1: By the way, if we're low IQ, why are you
even waste your time with us? That means you're low
IQ because you're trying to convince low IQ people's stuff.
Speaker 4: You know, I've thought about that too, if.
Speaker 5: I'm actually generally retarded, for argument with retarded people, like
who's more retarded me or the I'm marging with exactly?
Speaker 6: Yeah, well, just for the record, everybody knows here, I
listened to Canvas all the time, but I agree with
Jane Tristan, So I don't know how that works.
Speaker 1: There's the link, dude, I don't know what your problem is.
Jay's page is messed up. You got to type in
his entire handle. How is my page messed up?
Speaker 6: Me?
Speaker 2: I wonder if there's something weird because you changed your
handle today that is now Dad Jay Dyer and says
something else.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, I mean it's been changed for a while,
so okay, we don't yellow me about it again. Everybody's
so sensitive here there's the link right there. I don't
know what you're talking about. It could be that. It
also could be that if you boot somebody from a space,
maybe they can't immediately come back even if you unblock them.
Maybe they're maybe they're still like blocks.
Speaker 4: You are sensitive.
Speaker 5: I'd lay off the alatony again.
Speaker 6: I do want you know, you know, there was a
point you guys were making earlier, and I do want
to re emphasize that point is the I think, and
I just think this is a general thing. I think
when he when there's good when when women are good
looking and they say something conservative, then people gravitate towards that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because that's what that's what girl was saying.
Speaker 6: Yeah, And and I think that is definitely true. And
and I think you when when when you have a
spectrum of colors, especially like you know, with with canvas,
I think.
Speaker 4: The way it works is.
Speaker 6: Like, not only does she have the you know, race factor,
because they're like the conservatives have been beat down so
long for you know, during especially during the twentieth century.
Is how racist they are is when a black person,
no matter if it's a male or female or whatever,
but if they are semi good looking and they are
you know, put together, and they have a family, you know,
obviously Canada has four kids.
Speaker 3: They see this because the way.
Speaker 6: Everything is presented is that black people, you know, don't
have it together. So when something like that comes up,
there is there's like a you know, emotional thing that
gets attached to it where where because white people have
been told they've been you know, racist forever, they're like, oh,
this is something that I can gravitate towards and it
proves that I'm not a racist. It's a weird psychological thing.
Do you understand what I'm saying?
Speaker 1: Yeah, and.
Speaker 6: That might be I mean, I'm not saying that that's thought.
Speaker 3: Out ahead of time. I don't know.
Speaker 4: She could be a sigh off. Obviously, I'm not saying
that she's not.
Speaker 6: But those are things that people don't think about when
they gravitate towards something and then you get led up
the garden path, like obviously you're you were talking about
it earlier. Is it starts out credible, stuff starts out normal, right,
even the stuff with the macron stuff, it's like, okay,
it's a little weird, but it's like, okay, that kind
of makes sense. But then once you get led up
the garden path to where it's like, okay, Charlie Kirk's
a time traveler.
Speaker 1: You know, yeah, let's listen to this sentence caught my
attention in the article.
Speaker 7: You spoke about the street lamps that would go off
when he would run, about this special school but he
had to go to. We spoke about a lot of
the things that were strange in our childhood, the testing
that both of us had to endure. We spoke about
the fact that we could both astral project you know
all of this. Of course, you have his phone, and
how surprised you were when we learned that not everybody
does that naturally.
Speaker 1: This is not a credible person. She's claiming to get
information through ashyl projection. Okay, she talks about opening the
third eye. This is ridiculous. Anybody who is defending this
kind of nonsense is just out to lunch. Charlie and
I spoke a lot about his third eye and the
street lamps going off. This is retarded and like, what
is what are you getting out of this? I don't
understand what you're even getting out of this. Now here
is her guy, and this is remember somebody they they've
already forgotten to move past all this stuff because it
was a huge embarrassed with this con artist guy Mitch
Snow And here she is right here in the clip.
I never accused anybody, There was no never accusation. He
says ninety five percent sure, ninety nine percent sure that
it was Erica Kirk. And again, what's his story. He
went to the Fort Watchuka because he's owed money from
the government and he happened to overhear in a skiff,
which is not at all plausible. That's where you go
into soundproof room, the generals and colonels planning the assassination.
And did she apologize or issue any retractions because this
guy was an obvious convent. No, of course, not.
Speaker 8: Getting an opponent Tao with those eyes, that was that person.
They were there, and yeah, they had his security there.
He was one of the people walking out with the congressman. No,
how would I know that. I just have a gift
for recognizing people. And yeah, maybe it's not a maybe
as doppelganger, but some of the same mannerisms, the same
crick in his neck, face wax who look on his face,
hand gestures, shoulder shrug, gait, approximate height here.
Speaker 1: So again, jail bots, I appreciate you sending me all
this money, but what you're saying doesn't make sense. You
say she is crazy. It's obvious. Candice isn't saying. I'm
not defending her, but you were defending her, Well, what
are you talking about? You literally said she's worth listening
to because she asks good questions and she gets the
information out and all that. I had the same view
six months ago, because I gave her the benefit of
the doubt, because she did a good expos on the
background of bb Nut and Yahoo and his intelligence background,
and I thought, hey, this is actually a good show.
She did pretty good. This is good information. But again,
you say yourself that disinformation has good stuff, and then
you go down the garden path, like John said, into
the crazy shit, and it just makes you look dumb.
That's exactly what happened with the Q crap, right, Q
said there's shady stuff going on at comment Ping Pong,
and then there's Epstein Island. Right, that's this first stuff
that Q was talking about. Okay, well that's there's truth
to that stuff, right, And then we heard about Podesta emails.
Then we hear about Wiki leaks and Hillary's emails. All
that's true, and then Q turns into Trump's gonna there's
three days of Darkness, and Trump's gonna announce the national
emergency and they're gonna send in the Green Berets to
arrest Tom Hanks and Hillary and Hillary's in Guantanamo and
blah blah blah blah blah. And then it turns into
quantum Q consciousness with the Q Shaman and all this bullshit.
This is obviously just dumb. It's obvious disinformation and Boomer
Tartle crap. And they do this in the nineties, yes, Nasara, they.
Speaker 6: Did this with Timothy McVay and the Seaboman, Like there
was all sorts of stuff, like multiple things being run
at a time where eventually what it did and I'm
not saying that there wasn't real stuff involved.
Speaker 4: With that, but what they would do is they would.
Speaker 6: Like connect it to white supremacist groups, so it would
all be discredited with Nazi stuff.
Speaker 2: So John the idea of winning paintings both Gaboray and a.
Speaker 4: Part of Man. Yeah, I read a long time.
Speaker 1: So let's give you another example. And I just think Candae,
whether she knows it or not, whether she's malicious, I
don't know. I can't prove that it doesn't matter because
she's just putting out disinformation obviously. So if you go
back to the period of pat con this is what
the nineties. I think there was a movement called in
the nineties called NASARA, the National Economic Security Recovery Act,
and the argument was that there are patriots in the
government and they're about to pass a law to save
us from Bill Clinton and all of his bad stuff.
And this is where we first get the quote white
hats narrative. The believers thought that there was a clandestine,
positive group of people in the government working behind the
scene to destroy the deep state, and us were in
a new era. And lo and behold, what was the
AI even here? Link it to very similar to QAnon
exactly core beliefs they were going to take down the irs.
There would be an elimination of all credit card and
bank debt. Everybody's debts would be wiped out. Turns out
Nasara GSARA was a scam and defrauded millions of people
through promising returns through impending financial relief. There was no Nasara,
but a lot of dummies in the Patriots Sovereign Citizen
Ron Paul's camp of things believed in it. In fact,
when QAnon was popular, they even tried to say that
it's the same people as Nasara. You can't make this up.
It's the same idiocy, right, Operation Trust that the Bolsheviks did.
And this was a secret movement supposedly in Russia that
was going to beat the Bolsheviks because within the Bolshevik
establishment there was secret white hats. Right, This was actually
a Soviet counterintelligence deception operation that created a fake anti
Bolshevik underground. They were called the Monarchist Union. It was
a lure to trap and execute the monarchists and the
white army officers and foreign intelligence agents within Russia. Operation Trust. Oh,
you mean exactly what the q tar crop was. So
the world is not run by what people think, it's
run by this kind of stuff. And it takes time
and wisdom and a good sense about this stuff and
discernment to not fall for these types of things. For example,
it's not plausible that there is a secret underground group
white hats. If you've done this enough and you study
this stuff enough, you know that that's just not very plausible.
It's not real. It's way more likely that it's an
intelligence operation itself. And that's exactly what continues to happen
with these things. Now, who's behind CANDAE or what? I
don't know that. I don't need to know that because
it's all the same markers and patterns of Nasara or
Operation Trust. So and then how do I know that? Well,
once I start seeing the real and true information go
off into Sumerian twenty twelve project Camelot time travel crap.
That's a disqualifier right there for me. So I no
longer need to listen to this person. This person is disqualified.
And if you have not been in this sphere long enough,
I understand maybe you now think maybe there is q
Sumerian time travel technology. There's not, And a few years
later down the road you'll realize that's all bull crap.
As a lot of the conspiracy quote unquote world is
now here's the rest of mission Miss Snow definitely walk past.
Speaker 7: Me and you had to put it out a percentage
that you were looking at Brian Harpole. Maybe he's got
a brother in the military who knows, right, Maybe he
does have a doppelganger, he's got a twin brother who knows.
And I want to be clear, I can confirm on
this podcast every step of your story in terms of
where you went, what time you were there, that there
was this big beating that happened. I confirmed the location
with other people that are that are on Fort Wachuka currently.
I can confirm everything with metadata. I obviously can't confirm
that you saw who you say you saw. If you
had to put it at a percentage that you saw
Brian Harpole, what percentage would you put it out?
Speaker 9: Five?
Speaker 1: Now, remember this is the person who was outed as
a total grifter liar. Con Man right after this said
his dad is the Zodiac Killer. Just total nonsense, right?
Did she do any vetting at all? Journalism? I think
people think that journalism is just yapping behind a microphone
and reading a teleprompter. Actually actually not even reading because
you can't pronounce basic words. So it's not journalism, it's
just influencer, which is basically to say meaningless.
Speaker 8: When I saw him, you know, on the interview with
the with his face and gestures, I yeah, with that photo,
it struck me in my gut.
Speaker 4: I blew it off.
Speaker 8: Until there was, you know, some other pictures that came
up with other people.
Speaker 7: What other people other pictures?
Speaker 8: If you want me to say, there's a picture of
Erica Kirk with a ponytail and from her past.
Speaker 1: So this is the guy claiming that he stumbled upon
at Fort Wachuga a secret meeting to take out Charlie
with Erica and a bunch of TPUSA people and a
bunch of generals and colonels. If you believe this, you're dumb.
You're just an idiot. You're a stupid person. So I
can't help you with that if you actually believe that.
And again from a known comment.
Speaker 8: That person matches who I saw at Fort Wachuka in
the lobby the night before.
Speaker 1: And what's the other pattern. Whenever this crazy theory gets
laughed at, she moves on to the next crazy theory.
It's the next episode of X Files the next week
with a new Monster of the Week.
Speaker 8: And she was with that with that man in the lobby,
and that man he was president at that meeting.
Speaker 4: The next morning.
Speaker 7: So you had to put it at a percentage that
you saw that the girl in the ponytail matches the
description of Erica Kirk. What percentage would you put that at?
Speaker 8: Those are really rare eyes.
Speaker 10: That's ninety.
Speaker 1: So there we go. There's your groundbreaking investigative journalism over here,
which is just absolute nonsense. I just I can't believe
that you guys are so gullible after after all that
we've seen, and you guys are so gullible. All right,
who's next? Let's see Mart? What's up? Mart? I'm well, wait, guys,
you can ask questions about anything. You want to talk
about the war, you want to talk about Candice, you
want to defend CA and US, you want to give
your arguments, you can. You want to talk about geopolitics,
you want to talk about Orthodoxy? Feel free? What's up?
Speaker 6: Man?
Speaker 11: Uh?
Speaker 3: Hey? Can you hear me? Okay?
Speaker 12: So are we talking about Zionism today?
Speaker 1: Any topic?
Speaker 3: Okay? Okay?
Speaker 4: My question?
Speaker 6: So I believe I saw something recently.
Speaker 13: I'm not an expert, but it was about Catholic political
theology and it dealt with the you know design this
question and I'm mean eptimistic.
Speaker 10: Just a second.
Speaker 1: So you saw something from Catholic political theology on the
Zionis question, what else? Go ahead?
Speaker 4: Okay, I'm sorry I had to interrupted.
Speaker 1: Go ahead, I.
Speaker 3: Saw it and uh puts this question.
Speaker 4: I'm an euphimistic.
Speaker 6: I don't know what you uh historically have.
Speaker 3: Uh, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Okay. So the classic Catholic tradition position would be opposed
to Zionism because it's not just political, it's also quasi
religious right, because many of the early founders believe that
this was also kind of a fulfillment of the Jewish
people's spiritual destiny to be kind of the capital of
the world. So if you read Moses hess in Roman Jerusalem,
he speaks of it. Even though he's not exactly a theist,
he's more of a pantheist. He thinks he thinks of
Zionism and tel Aviv's you knowing Jerusalem being the capital
of the world as a sort of dialectical fulfillment of
the destiny of the Jewish people and that that will
quote save the world. So, uh, it's not totally a
political or excuse me, a religious, it is also quasi religious,
and even as late as I think pious the tenth
uh he was speaking against political Zionism, so that political
support changed with Vatican two, No Tat the gay Jewish
guy that wrote no Tat. That changed the Romancalolic papal
position on Judaism. However, the papacy will still criticize the
political actions of Zionism, but the papacy has affirmed the
spiritual validity ever been in Judaism.
Speaker 3: Yes, but more.
Speaker 13: Specifically, my question was about policies dealing with.
Speaker 4: Well, I'm trying.
Speaker 3: I don't really want to be very.
Speaker 12: Explicit because it's a controversial subject of dealing with Jews.
I don't know what the Orthodox did historically. My question
would be, do you think any of those policies would
be pliable or a political project of today to deal with.
Speaker 3: The problems that we have to day.
Speaker 1: I don't actually know what the Probably the Catholic position
is similar to the traditional Orthodox position, where there would
be an allowance or a tolerance for the existence of
Jews in Orthodox Christian countries, but they would be limited.
At least some of the canon law in the Middle
Ages would limit what they're allowed to do. So for example,
they couldn't open brothels. They couldn't you know. Now, actually
in some Catholic countries they could, but presumably I would
think that there would be limitations on what's allowed. There
may have been times where they were expelled. I'm not
sure when it comes to Orthodox nations, but I don't
know that any of those. I mean, Christianity doesn't have
the political power that it used to have prior to
the Enlightenment, so discussions about political Christianity and how it
relates to Judaism is just kind of not even it's
not even a reality for the present time. If Christianity
gained more prominence, it might be a discussion that you
could have. But I don't know. I don't know what
the answer is to that.
Speaker 3: Okay, thank you for the answer.
Speaker 1: Yep, yeah, I mean there, I don't know what. There's
no immediate political solutions, so I don't know what the
answer is. Carlos, what's up? I mean, I think the
solutions are just simply not political, they're they're religious. What's up, man, Eric?
Speaker 4: But just on the disinformation.
Speaker 14: Thing, uh of alex had Juliet Bryant One of Epstein's victims.
On the other day, he and one of the she mentions, well,
duol ranch, she saw a UFO and it's it was
the classic UFO. And if you're trying to do bad
things to someone and you want to make them unbelievable,
you show them something. I'm trying to think, like an
evil person. You show them something that will discredit anything else.
They say, yeah, right, I think that's and I think Candace,
with the crazy stuff she says, she's a I think she's.
Speaker 1: A chaos agent.
Speaker 14: I don't know if she's just flaky or she seems
too well financed to just be your average flaky person
who can't pronounce things. I wonder if she can say
Corman that that would be a nice test for her.
Speaker 1: Roger Corman, what are you talking about?
Speaker 14: Like Obama corpseman when he's giving Medal of honor to people?
Speaker 1: Oh court, oh oh Cordsman. Okay, I got you, I
got you. Yeah. No, I doubt she could pronounce that,
but thank you for your comments. American. What's up so again?
People are like, how come you're not trying to suss
out who killed Charlie Kirk. I mean, that's like saying,
when are we going to get the trial for nine
to eleven? You're not going to get that. You know.
I've been around for a while, so like you know,
this is like Q target level crab American animal. What's up? I'mute?
Do you want to talk or not? Man? All right,
we'll move on. Carter, what's up?
Speaker 3: Okay?
Speaker 10: Can you hear me?
Speaker 1: Yep?
Speaker 3: Oh, I'm a bipod transgender. I'm here to debate you on.
Speaker 5: Ancient Sumerian time trauma tech.
Speaker 3: There's actually some new uh data come into the mix.
Speaker 1: Okay, well, maybe we're twin flames. Why do we have
to debate? Why can't we just be lovers?
Speaker 3: Fuck?
Speaker 14: I don't know.
Speaker 5: I mean I had to tell you about the new
Doctor Kill Quickly book.
Speaker 4: It's called Hope and Tragedy.
Speaker 1: That's where they talk about it. Okay, well I don't
have any problem with that. In fact, I want us
to be loved.
Speaker 15: How can we be lovers if we can be friends?
How can we something if the fighting never rans a city?
How can we be love us if we can't be friends?
Speaker 10: Is that?
Speaker 1: My boy? Bolton? Michael Bolton, there's a there's a good
Jewish man right there, Michael Bolton said, I loved you,
but I lied.
Speaker 15: This is more than love I feel inside.
Speaker 2: That was actually when I was trans that was my
trans name was Michael Bolton.
Speaker 1: Okay, put the bolts on, if you had to bolt
that thing on. Okay, I like where you're going. Gaddess,
what's up, gaddess, Lily, Gaddess, what's up? I'm you?
Speaker 16: Oh?
Speaker 17: Hello, Yes, I wanted to ask you about Zeus.
Speaker 3: I was in basically.
Speaker 17: Has been studying myth and metaphysics and a lot of
things like that, and I found three interesting things. First
would be how basically Zeus overthrow Saturn, and that's like
some natural law stuff that could correlate to how elites
do some bad stuff to their children from because basically
they think that young people will be stronger or counter
counter the powers of the old.
Speaker 3: That's one.
Speaker 17: Second thing was how Zoos had like so many kids,
and that is also a thing I've seen about the elites,
how they want to basically populate the world with their DNA.
And the last interesting thing was zoos basically control lightning
bolts or I assume it's electricity to represent electricity in nature,
and from what I've looked, into It's basically the top
level or highest level of science can do is through
electric measures, and all our interfaces with atomic levels or
cosmology is actually on electric scale or medium. And how
basically in modern world the offsprings of zoos or offsprings
of electricity is.
Speaker 4: So so prominent, And.
Speaker 17: I just think that myth and that idea is very.
Speaker 1: Very I think you're right because Jamie just read Frankenstein
and there's a lot of predictive transhumanist motifs in in Frankenstein.
So that was a novel way ahead of its time,
especially for transhumanism. And again you know obviously the whole
idea there that electricity is channeled to create life zeus,
same idea. I think you're right. And also, you know,
the deep State has a very intense interest in directed
energy weapons that's been studied for decades going back to Tesla.
All that stuff's real for sure. So yeah, that's some fascinating.
Speaker 2: All the you know, the UFO PSIO stuff.
Speaker 3: How they also, you.
Speaker 4: Know, there seems to be an electrical and there's.
Speaker 2: An electromagnetic aspect to a lot of the experimental aircraft
stuff that they've.
Speaker 1: Played around good point.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Yeah, And all that stuff.
Speaker 2: There's all this mysticism that's baked into the whole model purse.
Speaker 1: Rounding UFOs and stuff.
Speaker 2: They want to create this mystique around it because it
does seem like there's a there's a cold level too.
Speaker 4: You look like, you know the work of.
Speaker 2: Jack Parsons and all early rocketry, where they're that they're
not dealing with magnitive magnetism and electricity. But then really
that's that's where they went with Lockheed and you know,
the big airspace things again.
Speaker 15: How can we be lovers? If we can be friends,
how can we something if the fighting ever?
Speaker 1: And I'm singing this now for the world, not for
you guys, because I want I want there to be
peace in the world. So I'm singing Michael Bolton for
world peace. In case you guys are confused. Right, let's
see who's next, the dissident? What's up dog rockets? How
do they work? Dissident? What's up Man's jay?
Speaker 4: Anyways? I kind of had It's a mixture of.
Speaker 18: A question a point, but I find it very interesting
considering the transpiring events going on in the Middle East,
how quickly the Maga people are willing to run cover
for well, the military operation, but there are no casualties. Oh,
there are only a few casualties. Oh, there's only a
few counter strikes. And anyone who doesn't agree with the
actions of the Trump administration the past year, automatically or
maybe they don't want to vote for a fans Palentier
combo is automatically a left wing supporter and wants the
country to.
Speaker 4: Go into the ground. How do you respond to.
Speaker 18: People who continue to run cover for just the awful
people that represent us on the right now? I don't
even believe voting is really that effective, and I know
you don't either.
Speaker 3: But how do you even respond to these people?
Speaker 18: It's like, well, then you want abortion to be legal
nationwide because you won't vote for the ZIONI is controlled GOP.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's no easy answers to any of these things.
I mean, other than trying to reason people into positions,
which is a long, slow, hard road. I don't know,
there is no easy answer. I mean, you know, you
could rationalize, like Father Deacon points out that voting, you
could rationalize, as some of the elders and saints have said,
that you vote for the candidate that's best for Christianity.
You could reason it that way, and then because you're
never going to you're not going to ever find like
perfect voting candidates are perfect platforms. It just doesn't exist.
So it's a great question. I don't know what the
answer is to that.
Speaker 18: Yeah, because I talk to people, especially older people, and
it's like, yes, I know, you know the GOP does
represent us on X, Y and Z issue, but we
have to do it anyways. It's like where at some point,
you know, do people sit out to prove a point
or try to find a way to push people right.
And like I said, I agree with you that the
solution is religious.
Speaker 4: It's Christianity. It's not political obviously, but we do live
in a world.
Speaker 18: So it's just kind of a tension that I think
a lot of people deal with.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, here's weird that.
Speaker 2: It feels like the issues get tossed back and forth,
and it's it's a weird managed dialectic because you have
a fake right and a fake left, and most of
the positions leading up to the election, they're what both
sides are proposing. In the positions that they take are
purely it's purely the signaling to the base that they're
trying to harness the votes of it doesn't matter once
they get in, it's the same old, same so and
then the fake right is based on these stupid false
pretenses of you know, Enlightenment liberalism, and the fake left
is Enlightenment liberalism but just more gay.
Speaker 1: So it's like, it's not it's really it is.
Speaker 4: It is difficult.
Speaker 18: I just wonder how many of these people are either
taking money or are compromised to degree when you know,
I mean, look, Trump's done some good things, but obviously
the military actions are very contrarian to what he's discussed
running for election. Of course, politicians double speak all the time,
but they're so quick to run interference and also so
quick to condemn people for pointing out the contradiction.
Speaker 4: Because AOC might become president in twenty twenty eight, it's
pretty funny.
Speaker 3: To me.
Speaker 18: Would be more likely than AFC, whatever, whatever demonic goober
they throw up.
Speaker 1: I vote for any big boody Latina, including myself, So
that's my stance. Apocryphal what's up? Thank you? Though the
great great comments are apocryphal. What's up? John accidentally removed
gentlemen too? Hey hear yeah? What's a dog? By the
way they're saying, they're saying that this recent, they're saying,
they're saying that this new shooting today, but of course
right on time. They're saying that he is a Islamic
t E R R O R person, which, by the way,
is plausible. We do have large amounts of Muslims now
in the country. Uh so it is plausible. However, that
doesn't mean that he could not have been uh coerced
or entrapped or motivated to do this if it's even real.
Nadiaga singleleese Muslim. Now again, if you remember the New
go Ahead, No, I was just gonna say, if you
think back to the newburgh Sting, this could be a
situation like that where you've got not the most intelligent
black dudes from other countries or from prison who are
coerced into doing something which aids then the story of
why we ought to continue, uh the the war, the
war with Islam us is we're still at Bush Neocon
you know, supposedly Christianity versus Islam, Samuel P. Huntington Clash
the civilizations type of stuff, But really we all know
that this is nothing really to do with Christianity. It
is ultimately to do with the Greater, Greater Israel project,
which again I've been talking about that for fifteen years.
So what's up man?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 4: Yeah, my question is a little off topic from that, Okay.
Speaker 19: I just wondering, I guess for people who are not
necessarily religious, do you see a way to like electivize
or find common ground with people without specific ideology, because
obviously most leftists, my brother in particular two is like
so far on that side that we basically can't agree
on anything.
Speaker 1: Not really. I mean I think that people have good
will and they want to find common ground, But I
mean when people become like openly supporters of rabid evil
like harming children, you can't find common ground with them.
Father Deacon, would you comment on this from a spiritual perspective?
Are you there?
Speaker 4: Yeah? I'm I mean there is.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean think about in terms of spiritual it's
not just ideologies, but you're participating in commonic energies.
Speaker 4: Through various ideas.
Speaker 19: So yeah, yeah, totally, I totally agree with that. I
feel like a lot of people don't or aren't aware
of that.
Speaker 4: I guess no.
Speaker 19: I think the practices that they're doing, like the belief
in something giving it the power.
Speaker 5: Because that's one thing that we've noticed, whether it's uh
and particularly on the left, like, look, we all have
our criticisms, right and conservatives they're.
Speaker 4: Dumb and they could be no army and stuff like that,
but they typically.
Speaker 5: Don't take at least the voting. Those who vote that direction,
they're not demonic like the left has I did. Like
those who vote on the left and Democrats, they literally
have demonic.
Speaker 4: Ideas that they're actually supporting.
Speaker 3: What you can see is there's.
Speaker 5: A possession that's clear a state, like if you look
at the protest where they're.
Speaker 3: Screaming, and it's it's the whole.
Speaker 5: Mark like possession too.
Speaker 4: There's a lot.
Speaker 5: Of being able to dialogue and rationality and these various things.
So when I look at what's going on, and that's
a total demonic possession through ideas, and that's what demons do.
They're they're angeloss, right, they're messengers.
Speaker 4: They have ideas and send messages.
Speaker 5: And of course the person has no idea that they're
under a possession. And Jay didn't we I think I
posted it, but I think.
Speaker 20: You did too.
Speaker 21: It was during it was I forget who wrote it,
but it was during the Soviet era, sorry, the Bolshevik revolution.
Speaker 3: From one of.
Speaker 5: The fathers of saints that says when nations become possessed.
Speaker 1: It's a bishop. It's a bishop in Russia who wrote
that about the Bolshviks. If he says the nation becomes
demonically energized, possessed, Yeah.
Speaker 4: That's a great thing to look at.
Speaker 5: And and again we can have a criticisms of libertarians conservatisms.
Speaker 4: They're not demonically possessed. There's a demonic ideology in the
left and that's very similar. And that's why the article
so timely too.
Speaker 5: And think about who was pushing the koof narrative, narrative
and scam. And that was a classic example of mass
possession like people, because one of the things about possession
is irrationality, anger, all these kinds of things. Remember, they
were calling for people who even question the narrative to
be executed.
Speaker 1: Do you remember this, Yeah, Chomsky said, Chomskys their lives.
Speaker 5: They were like, these people should be locked up, they
should be executed.
Speaker 1: Chomsky said, you should be locked up or exiled.
Speaker 21: But there were other people too, Yeah, there were other people.
Speaker 1: Actually saying no, no, it's saying that you should be killed,
I should actually be. Yeah, here's the article. By the
By the way, the article is called how Individuals and
Nations become demonically Possessed by Metropolitan Tikon. It's there on
the screen. Nice, great questions. Appreciate that. Yeah, great question.
We're going to move on though, to electric what's up? So,
by the way, to get over here into this, it
looks like Pope France, excuse me, put Francis, but Leo
is warning Trump destruction and death, and of course I
would agree with that point. But the problem is that
the Roman Catholics they all point to this and they
say they'll they'll pull this up Bill. Oh look, see,
Pope Francis is not a Zionist. He's calling out the war.
That has nothing to do with the statements at Vatican two,
right and no stratat that are a direct contradiction with
previous Catholic theology on Jews and Judaism. So that is
a political statement to not have this war. That does
not defend the trad cat nonsense of the contradiction between
Vatican Two's Nostra Taate and the previous papal teaching. So
this is they always conflate this because remember when Pinesap
and I were debating the other day, he was like,
all you got to do is look at the fact
that the Vatican consistently calls out, you know, being against
these Middle Eastern wars. Okay, that's not the same thing
as the Vatican two statements, right, So I don't so
what says it looks like Saudi crown prince supposedly was
secretly lobbying for this attack. Well, of course, the Saudis
are linked at the hip with the masaud and the CIA.
They were set up by British intelligence. They've always been
linked to the West and Western intelligence, especially through oil deals,
et cetera. So of course they're going to lobby for
siding with Israel and Trump to attack Iran. And by
the way, here are your leftists. This is the average
sort of leftist activists on the screen that you see here,
these creatures. By the way, this Trump tweet did not
age well, be prepared. There's a small chance that these
horrendous leaders will take you into World War three. And
this is what Middle Eastern stuff, right, wasn't back then.
This is twenty thirteen, so the Trump is probably talking
about what Assad in Syria back then I'm guessing well
that that tweet did an age very well. By the way,
shout outs to Jill Boughts dot com for that one
hundred dollars super chat appreciate that doing car five dollars.
Israel State media says that after I ran, Turkey will
be next. Well, this is actually in the documents, right,
So you have the od on and you have the
net Yahoo memo. Uh and I think I know one
of them mentions Turkey, but they might have both mentioned it.
Speaker 5: Go ahead, I just saw on your YouTube you put
that picture to somebody just came to you when you
put that picture of all the Antifa goblins.
Speaker 4: Huh, it just.
Speaker 5: Came to me.
Speaker 1: What do you see that with?
Speaker 4: Like the fish? This physiogamy?
Speaker 1: Is that a word? It is?
Speaker 4: Now?
Speaker 1: What I see is I see that they're not a
beautiful bipoc persons like myself.
Speaker 4: Okay, I just realized you we're on the theme of possession.
Speaker 21: I mean, don't you see that right?
Speaker 1: Like the demonic Yeah, that's why I pulled that picture up.
Speaker 5: Described as the most you know, beautiful created being. What's
Augustine said, optima corrupt the passion of.
Speaker 4: The best things corrupt to become the worst.
Speaker 1: So you're saying, these are the most beautiful people and
now they're the most worst people.
Speaker 5: Well, I mean, and then all let's just pull from
movies too, right, what happens when people become you know,
vampiric or they're possessed or something like, they they become mutants, right,
like the demonic actually deforms.
Speaker 3: And I didn't even think about you know what.
Speaker 5: I know you can't anyways, Uh, I my hand.
Speaker 1: Okay, welcome to Welcome to our first one, mom first one,
and the.
Speaker 4: Clergy, so I get to set the rules.
Speaker 3: Uh, but I mean think about this.
Speaker 1: Okay, you can go after you can go after him.
Go ahead.
Speaker 3: Now I've lost my train.
Speaker 1: Of thought on well, gra grab aphronsia and and get
it back.
Speaker 9: Something about the Oh I had previous theories about just
kind of gnostic ideas and kind of being reactionary and
why people on the left kind of.
Speaker 5: Take these kinds of forms of self mulation coloring the
hair and stuff like that. But I didn't until you
put that photo up and just was talking about that
that I'm like, that would be another sign of demonic possession.
Is uh corrupting and just figuring.
Speaker 4: Uh, the way one.
Speaker 22: Looks yea, yeah, I think would often it would often
attend that ideology and that spiritual perspective electric what's up?
Speaker 1: What's on? What? What's your favorite flavor of Phronsie.
Speaker 3: Painting?
Speaker 23: By the way, it's been all to be in your space.
Speaker 3: Thanks a lot for.
Speaker 6: Giving me the mike.
Speaker 23: I follow you all the time.
Speaker 24: A huge fan.
Speaker 23: Of info wowers thank you for the time.
Speaker 25: Like I'm really kind of excited about.
Speaker 26: The space.
Speaker 10: I get into.
Speaker 23: I'll say, like in terms of the space, the name
of the space I get into it like my major
battle with the people that I interact with on these uh,
I call them t watter spaces. Uh.
Speaker 25: The example of what feminism is.
Speaker 23: And I continue to fight that there's a even newer
wave of kind of which is for a woman to
be truly happy, she should support the man that is happy.
Speaker 6: That's that's the way that we were built.
Speaker 4: To, you know what I mean, Like we're supposed to
be equally happy.
Speaker 23: And in terms of Zionism, I don't like being laborer
labeled as something just because I believe that I probably
agree with all of the ideas behind it.
Speaker 3: It's the way that like people.
Speaker 23: Were slacking U label on me, bothered me, and in
terms of the iology. At the end of the day,
I gonna what's going to happen at the end.
Speaker 1: You're cutting out, So apologize, but you're cutting out a
hard time hearing what you're saying. Let's see we get
one more call from coal. By the way, the FBI
is saying that get ready for t E R R
O R. Now that the IA tolahs have gone off
the hook, right one Itola has been lost, Another IA
Toola is back, allegedly A'madnejad has been taken out. Well,
get ready for sleeper cell t E R R O
R the establishment and media are telling us, which means
get ready for perhaps fake flag events. They're also good.
Speaker 6: I'm sure they have nothing to do with those cells
at all.
Speaker 1: Well, speaking of that, Oh, this is what I was
going to get to next. Let's see who's fighting on
the side of the West. This is quite telling because oh,
it just happens to back up everything that I've said
and argued for the last ten to fifteen years. Listen
to this. Guess who's come out on the side of
the good guys al Qaeda, Brada. Did you know Osama
bin Laden is our best friend again. I thought he
did the Big nine event. Now he is our friend again.
Speaker 10: A muss is.
Speaker 1: This is Commander Cari Khalil Khalid of al Qaeda, and
he pledges his support for Israel. Exactly what I've said,
Exactly what we've said this whole time. Go ahead.
Speaker 5: It's just such a crazy world, Like.
Speaker 4: I can't even tell what's really more.
Speaker 5: That's it's the world so absurd and you got the
AI and so I'm like, is this even real?
Speaker 1: Like I mean, I mean, of course is Reel.
Speaker 6: Pointed out that al Qaeda and ISIS never attacked Israel.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the leaders of Israel even say this.
Speaker 4: Yeah, no news here.
Speaker 1: Let's see who does ISIS attack Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Egypt.
Oh and not the one in the middle. Okay, come on.
This is what everybody in our sphere has been saying,
and we've known this because it's actually pretty profuse in
the literature that this is a proxy, a cutout, it's
a proxy force. Going back to nineteen seventy nine Afghanistan,
Brazinski Robert Gates under Carter to recruit mujahadeen that becomes
al Qaeda. This is where we also get the spin
offs of isis. So again, people have read the books
have no surprise to the things that.
Speaker 3: You pointed out.
Speaker 6: And you know, we talk about back in the days
that like there were British intelligence agents who were.
Speaker 4: Like Arab files.
Speaker 1: Oh absolutely, So.
Speaker 6: This even stems further back where there's this like you know,
kind of archaic revival fascination in the nineteen twenties and
thirties with Islam.
Speaker 1: Yes, British intelligence had about half of their top people
they were Araba files. They loved. And again with people
like you know, Saint John Philby, he may have even
actually converted. Now he could have converted for intelligence reasons
he was a spy, or perhaps he wanted four wives,
or perhaps he really believed Sunni Islam because he became,
you know, a famous convert. And again whether it's everybody
should watch the movie to get an idea of this
with Nicole Kidman where she's playing Gertrude Bell and has
Robert Pattinson in it too. I did a whole talk
on this book, Black Gold Spies, great book written by
a French intelligence analyst guy on the history of British
and French intelligence in the Middle East, and it became
a goal of trying to find where the oil was
throughout the Middle East. So the British Empire sent out
their spies the turn of the century mainly to try
to figure out and capture areas where there would be oil.
The French were not successful at this, the Russians were
not successful, but the Americans and the British were, and
Gertrude Bell is one of the most famous. She's a
fascinating character. She learned Farsi because she had such a
love for the Persians and for Iran. She was also
obviously a spy and working directly under the Fabian Socialists
and the British War Office. Bert Gertrude Belle Iraq's uncrowned queen.
She is the one that went and decided and negotiated
which tribes king Farouk right. She basically said, we'll put
you in charge. You be the king of this place
called Iraq. T Lawrence did it with the Saudis. He
went and found Ibn Salud and said you be the king.
You will be this country called Saudi Arabia. So and
why did they do this is a key point right here.
This was part of the strategy against the Ottomans. So
the British linked up with Sunni Salafi Hobbi Islam as
a way to battle against the Ottoman Empire, which eventually collapsed.
Speaker 4: So go ahead, no I was gonna say.
Speaker 6: Is one of the myths of conspiracy bill which in
my early days I fell into as will, is not
every single person involved in something is like cynical.
Speaker 3: They actually believe in their cause.
Speaker 6: And so those people are the ones who are the
most susceptible.
Speaker 3: So like like you were saying.
Speaker 6: With uh with her, she she actually believed and was
a Arabi file And those are the most like those
are the best people to push something through. It's not
always somebody's like, oh, cynical and LARPing and they're just
like an actor right.
Speaker 1: In fact, the best some of the best spies are
the ones that are true believers. And if you read
a lot of the geopolitical texts, they espionage texts, they
point this out because of a true a true believer
will die for the will die for the cause. A
cynical person is self interested, they may not necessarily die
for it.
Speaker 27: Yeah, but in the modern day, it all gets lumped
in in a weird way where it's like, oh, everybody's acting,
everybody's a LARPer, everybody doesn't believe in anything.
Speaker 3: And that's the kind of.
Speaker 6: Modern approach to it is everything, you know, nobody believes
in any cause.
Speaker 3: Actually, there's a lot of people who believe in a lot.
Speaker 4: Of causes throughout history.
Speaker 1: Sure, a great point. Yeah, I think a lot of
people tend to think, oh, you know, everybody at that
level is cynical and uh, you know, it's just power politics.
Well for some people, but for some people there are
serious believers. But you know, if you really, if you
you know, do watch this movie Queen of the Desert
with Nicole Kibman. It's not the best movie, but it's
a great window into what we're talking about. And after
reading Galsmunier's book, I went and watched the movie and
I thought this was actually a pretty good movie. H
And everybody, if you're interested in this topic, it's called
Black Gold Spies and that is on my channel right here,
and it's just a history of the spies that we're
talking about here during this time period from and it's
not just the British either, it was also the Russians
and the French. And it's a two part talk that
I did right here, So a lot of fun, great book,
absolutely necessarily read for this history of this time period,
setting the stage for how we got to know the
British Empire, essentially setting up the state of Israel through
the raw Chols. And I was also I did a
talk with Kotel on British intelligence in the Middle East.
It's an area that I find very fascinating. I'm not
an expert, but I read a lot of books on it.
I do find it very, very fascinating, so I think
that gives me a little bit of an insight into it. Guys,
if you would like and share. Also, we got some
more Superchazzal'll read this quickly. Banana out of the Buttson's
one hundred dollars, Thank you so much.
Speaker 10: Jay.
Speaker 1: The Iran narrative is surface level, exactly. Well, good propaganda
is always surface level. So absolutely pull up a map
of a Ran and look who they neighbor. Yes, it's
always important to do this. Let's take a look at
the region. Here. By the way, we did a four
hour talk on the history of intelligence modern intelligence in
the Middle East. It is in the members section. I
think it got demonetized because they have talked about you
know what, and it's still there. It's a great four
hour talk, but it is demonetized. So if we see here,
we've got Iran is situated between Afghanistan, Turkmenistan. Over here
isra Bayan, Armenia, Turkey, Iraq. Right, so you've got a
lot of key resource in geostrategic areas that they because Brazenski,
for example, right, you talked about Afghanistan is a gayway
to Eurasia. Well, obviously, then Iran is crucial because it's
a massive border of Afghanistan. So you know, Iran is
situated in a very crucial important area. This is also
why I think Persia was probably able to be an
empire in the ancient world was because of the this locale.
So when we see all of these neighbors, and then
when we look at, for example, the Seven Nations Plan
and the BB Memo and the Oda Dynan Plan, you
can see exactly why Israel has the strategy that it
does as well. So here's the Greater Israel project. Even
coming up right away, the idea was to expand right
into areas of Egypt, into areas of Syria, into areas
of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, et cetera, and bordering then
on i Ran. So even though it's not directly expanding
into Iran, you can see why here's Turkey up here
above Syria. Turkey is obviously then a very crucial player
and why Israel feels like they have to probably make
a move against Turkey next because Turkey is the last
in that list of nations that Oda, Yanan and Bibi
have said need some kind of regime change or some
kind of something else. I don't know, because again Turkey,
that doesn't make Turkey good. By the way, Uh, Turkey
has consistently aided a lot of NATO projects. They you know,
they they are they officially at NATO or they want
to be in NATO. I forget exactly what the status
of Turkey is, but for a long time they wanted
to be part of NATO. But that doesn't mean that
you're good or that you're bad. It's just mean it's
just power power relations. So anyway, uh, there you can
see that's why, for example, you know, Lebanon has to
be dealt with and controlled significant chapters of Ostrovsky's book
deal with Lebanon and how important it is to control
Lebanon for Israel. So anyway, Jeff, what's something? I mean,
I think the British Empire wanted this powder keg. They
put this, you know this, They set the situation up
on purpose, and it's it's a pretty good strategy, even
though they eventually after the King David Hotel Boll, I mean,
they lost control of Israel, But I mean you could
you could understand the strategy at the time versus the
Ottomans and then versus Russia. What's up, Cole, Who's next?
Speaker 3: Hey?
Speaker 5: Yeah, I enjoyed the Epstein covers a lot.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no problem. And but I listened to Andrew Wilson's
stream recently and he was he seemed like he was.
Speaker 6: Mentioning to check out Michael Tracy, like he was credible.
Speaker 3: And I saw a.
Speaker 18: Couple of your tweets on I think Michael Tracy before.
Speaker 3: I'm pretty sure you tweeted about him.
Speaker 5: And and I've read some of this stuff too, and
he seems like like a skeptic to the point where
you can't give him you couldn't even give him any evidence.
Speaker 1: To well, yeah, I think that, yeah, and that might
be an issue where Andrew and I would have disagreement.
I'd have to ask Andrew specifically. But I did notice
that people asked Andrew, wait a minute, are you saying
that there wasn't bad things going on with Epstein? And
he said no, But I don't think Trump was directly
involved in being a PDF. So that was Andrew's qualification
on that. But no, I don't think Michael Tracy is
credible at all. But good question, mikeat What's up?
Speaker 20: Thanks Jerry, thanks for tech Nicole, and thanks to bother
expert analysis as well.
Speaker 4: Hear the clergy speak.
Speaker 20: I just wanted to ask a couple of questions regarding
and I don't mean to switch the topics too quickly.
Speaker 1: That's about whatever you want.
Speaker 4: The idea that we have younger.
Speaker 20: People like I think Candas Owens and perhaps these Chase
and I'm not looking. I don't want to stick up
with these people because I've always had a bit of
a concern about Chase and Candace.
Speaker 1: Myself, Chase Haggard, Who's Chase? Yeah, guys are oh Chase guys?
I thinked about Chase Haggard. I've already forgot about Chase guys,
and I'm sorry. I was like, what, what's wrong with
Chase Haggard?
Speaker 3: Dude, Yeah, we'll go ahead.
Speaker 28: Father.
Speaker 4: I was on the same page as Jay. I thought
you were talking about our buddy Chase Haggard.
Speaker 1: And yeah, the other Chase guys. You go ahead, Chase guys.
I already forgot we were talking about Chase guys earlier.
Go ahead, I.
Speaker 3: Suppose I'll just quickly bring it in. It's really that I.
Speaker 20: Sometimes think that we have laughs about boomers and all
the rest of it, But sometimes I think that we
are somewhat boomeresque in the way that.
Speaker 1: We treat some of these younger crowds.
Speaker 20: And I think Candas and I also believe that Chase
is perhaps a young go on as well, and we
we just missed them because they don't know as much
as us, because they haven't been on the planet long enough,
and then perhaps they're not as well versus well studied.
Speaker 1: As j and As he Yeah, you're correct, you're correct.
One thing I'll say about that is the problem then
is not so much those people, but the problem is
that their cult followers are all rabid attack dogs, and
they do not operate in a rational way. And so
what happens is like when you criticize Candace, you get
hundreds of these bots and people coming after you. Oh
you work for BIB, you go seven thousand BB books
to say those are and then so then it just
sort of feeds into the battle. Not so much with Chase, guys.
I think you know, Chase may may actually believe that
masonry is not that bad and it's just a fraternal er. Yeah,
he could be, you know, sincere in believing that that's true. However, uh,
I've been pretty hands off and patient with kind of
with Chase and saying, hey, let's talk about this, let's
have it to public debate.
Speaker 3: Is that?
Speaker 1: But I also have to keep him like to me,
a public debate people see that as a threat or aggression.
I don't even think of it as aggressive. I think
of it like this is what men would do in
a normal you know, sphere where you exchange ideas and
come to better, you know, better understanding. But a lot
of people see debate as aggressive if you ask it,
Oh you're being aggressive by asking debate, So well, go ahead,
my owner, Jack Jake.
Speaker 20: I think a lot of people see debating also as
not to say I'm too esthetiity, but it's the ego
and someone that's true.
Speaker 3: We know.
Speaker 20: If it's a debate, sure, and I don't. And sometimes
these aren't for debate. It's just we're trying to discuss.
Like I think, when if we were to use the candace,
it's not even the canvas situation. It's the Charlie Kirk assassination.
So if we had to use that as an example,
we're looking at something here that just doesn't flow. None
of us believe what's happened here. It doesn't matter what
you believe, but it just doesn't flow. Nothing seems correct.
You know, we've got cash just says yep, no worries
are yeah.
Speaker 1: No, I don't believe. I don't believe the establishment, sorry
at all. Yeah, exactly. And so what I'm suggesting here
and I think is important.
Speaker 20: I'm not on board with the attack dogs, but I
don't know if those people can control always those attack dogs.
Some of those people could be their own enemy, splitting
what are essentially the good versus you know, these could
be evils supporting disenfranchising all these sorts of people because
it suits them.
Speaker 4: You know, at the end, of the day.
Speaker 29: I believe that I think Candice is not the most
well read, and I think she has good intensions, and
I think Father is probably discussing what we were looking
at the souls here, and I would, oh, it's just cause.
Speaker 20: Just don't don't accept everything said. Of course, none of
us do, and none of us should know, none of
us wise souls do.
Speaker 1: But certainly don't throw.
Speaker 3: The baby out with the bath water.
Speaker 4: This is this is just too important.
Speaker 1: Okay, Well, look, I appreciate that, I appreciate the comments. However,
I think what also comes with being in the space
for a long time is understanding that we're not naives.
So you might think it's a rash judgment, and you know,
I gave Canda's benefit of the doubt. You know, six
months ago when she was talking about Babie's background, it
was a good analysis and then it turned into two
crazy stuff. And we've been here long enough that we
can kind of recognize when things smell of not good motives. So,
you know, if a person is a so called journalist
and they consistently have bad sources, bad information, wild implications
and theories, and then it just moves on on. That
suggests something more than just innocent youth making mistakes. Thick,
what's up? Oh, I'm sorry, I got to read the
rest of the rest of Banana up the butts, super
he said, the Iran narrative is very surface level. If
you pull up at map of Iran and look at
who they neighbor. Turkey fought against Iran in Syria, but
they want a stable neighbor. Pakistan and Afghanistan or at
war right now, but they would also want a stable neighbor.
This is a second level effect. Interesting. Thank you for
that comment. Here. There's a lot, obviously, of components to
this region and all of what's going on here, a
lot of different operations and a lot of different alliances
and changing alliances. So thank you for that, Banana of
the butt, that's a good point. But yeah, if Israel
successfully achieves regime change in Iran and then moves towards Turkey, uh,
you know what would that look like? That's going to
be interesting to see. I don't I don't actually know
what to say there, Thick, what's up? Thick? You know
what I mean?
Speaker 24: Oh, I'm sorry, I just uh, well, first I wanted
to say, well, you've been a big inspiration for me
and convert into to Orthodoxy. I wouldn't really say I've
converted quite yet.
Speaker 23: Uh.
Speaker 24: I've visited my first Orthodox church today, and I just
I loved a lot of what I saw when I
was reading what I could hardly understand. And I guess
my my question for you would be, did do you
have any like recommendations for for things I can read?
Speaker 3: Any like church fathers?
Speaker 24: I reckon you'd refer to them as that I can
sort of just look up to sort of try.
Speaker 3: To understand what I'm actually listening to.
Speaker 1: Yeah, sure, I would say, if you're starting out, I
would read something like Athenacious on the Incarnation. It's a
great place to start. You'd read Athenacious against the Gentiles
or ad Gentees, another good place to start. I would
read the Five Theological Orations of Saint Gregor of Nazi
and Zeus, because that's a good introduction to the Trinity
and the deity of Christ and kind of the sacraments.
And then I would say, gets something like Pomazanski's Dogma
Orthodox Dogmatic Theology book. It's a great catechism. And Father
Digging Doctor Anonius on his channel has for many months
now been going through that that entire book doing Katechisas.
So I would check out his channel Patristic Faith on
YouTube and you can go through his kateachisis if you,
you know, are not at the point of being in
katechisas at the church yet. So let's see Russia warns
that Trump has united Untied our Hands. I assume that
means that they would be linking up with Iran. I'm
not sure what China's position on this. Will be missiles
fire supposedly at a US warship. I thought I saw this,
but I couldn't make out. It's got and crazy because
when you go to X now you can't tell if
the clips that you're watching are clips from like two
years ago or if they're AI. So it's like, I
have no idea what any clips are that I'm seeing.
What were you gonna say?
Speaker 17: I was just gonna say that too, and.
Speaker 5: It's just gonna get worse too, And then there's all
the disinformation.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, what was that.
Speaker 4: Kind of struck a warship or like this is gonna
they were gonna And it's.
Speaker 5: Like you have to wait at least three days before
you can kind of figure out some of the stuff.
It's like, Okay, that was fake, that was disinformation, and
it's gonna get worse.
Speaker 1: I think.
Speaker 4: I think it's part of the plan too.
Speaker 1: I arrest three illegals from Muslim countries before Austin shooting,
so it looks like they're trying to pin this as
a Islamic attack. Of course, people should keep in mind
Sunni Muslims, as we just saw with al Qaeda, do
not like Iran. They will side with the US and
Israel against Iran. So but again, that also doesn't mean
that low Iq prison Muslims or people from you know,
Nigeria or whatever. They don't know the distinctions between Sunni
and Shia, so they might just be doing whatever they're
told by their handlers. Who knows, right that, we'd have
all kinds of possibilities. I do think it's a ripe
time for the for fake flag events to occur. That
would certainly shore up US support, which is very low.
Not I don't think the public is supporting Trump and
Israel in these operations. It's very very low levels of support.
That does not mean that I support Ayatola's I think
they are corrupt, insane cult so I don't have to
choose a good guy or a bad guy in this situation.
But this is coming out of the Ron Paul's sphere,
which has tended to be correct when it comes to
the foreign policy mistakes. And it's noting that Iran is
not really running up our debt. Iran is not spying
on Americans. Iran is not the IRS taxing us to death.
Iran did not push the coof. Ran did not print
seven trillion dollars during the coof and destroy the dollars
perching power. Iran is not pushing the drag queen story time. However,
Iran does promote it's the world hub of transitioning, So
I would take issue with that one. Iran is not
destroying the country. They're not the area. So it's like
if you step back for am in it and think
about this, like, the main problems in America are America's
own corrupt corporate elite and the banking elite. That's the problem,
not the enemy five thousand miles away that we're always
pointed to, right, So I would keep that in mind,
even though of course I'm not pro Iatola bald Man,
what's up? You want to I mute? Hello, Yeah, can
you hear me.
Speaker 18: Do you think that there's any chance that this could
be like a Venezuela situation where wrapped up quickly or
do you think this is going to.
Speaker 1: Be like a rat two point zero? I don't know.
I mean Iran is not equivalent of Venezuela. I mean
they have, you know, way more hypersonic missiles, they have
way more ability to do things, They have a much
more capable, vast, you know, intelligence network. They're smart people.
This is not the same thing as Venezuela. So h
and by the way, you know, this could also perhaps
trigger other countries to you know, support Iran. So it
could lead to, ironically, as Trump said, world war three.
I mean, what did he tweet forever? If you go
with these people, you gotta get world War three. They
gotta drag get the world War three. Crazy Hillary with hell,
you'll get world War three. Ruiz says, for five dollars,
go ahead, go ahead. Did you want to say something?
That's all I thought? Thank you appreciate that. Remember Trump
saying that I just shared his tweets like that was
his whole thing. But look, for those of us that
have been you know, watching politics since we were teenagers.
Do you think I'm surprised that a politician has gone
back on his campaign promises? Dude, every politician goes back
on his campaign promises. What are you talking about? RUI says, everyone,
have a good night, great stream, Thank you. Your key
says two dollars? What do you think of flat? I'm
now not into that stuff? Bloomerslayer, what's up? Uncouth? Became
a member? What's up? I'm here for debates and geopolitics
while you're at the right place walking to the new
members since you're hypocrite, the world is horrified with f
scene and wars. When you're gonna do another resident evil stream, Well,
I did it last night, and I'm gonna be honest
with you. I want to play the game, and I
don't know if I have enough energy to keep live streaming.
So I mean maybe i'll live stream after this, but
I don't know. I'm getting kind of tired. I might
want to just chill ambersus for ten dollars. In the nineties, people,
nineties people, does this remind you of rap beefs? They
were perpetuated by record labels. If you get what I'm saying,
are you talking about Erica and Candas. Are you talking
about me and Candace because my rap label is deaf
jam and they definitely put me up to beefing with
Candas to try to get some attention because I'm jealous.
That's the only reason I would do it. So I'm jealous, Ivan,
what's up? And the only reason you would ever criticize
anybody is if you're jealous? Ivan?
Speaker 10: What's up?
Speaker 1: I'm you, Yvonne Ivan.
Speaker 30: Yeah, okay, So I'm a form Baptist, well recently for Baptists,
like been about two years, so kind of getting into stuff.
Speaker 31: But I had questions about the appeal to the church
for the canyon, and so obviously I've heard you say
that for Protestants.
Speaker 10: Like how do we know the canyon without the church
or the testimony to the church? Yeah, how would it be?
Speaker 28: How was it different like appealing to the authority of
the canyon by saying that the church basically recognize it.
But it's like begging the question right by using like
the bab churches like that the church will not fall away.
Speaker 1: Or like the case of the case of what does
it say I'm not following you, what is the church
falling away or not? What does that have to do
with the recognizing the canon.
Speaker 28: Because I've heard you say it like it was a
couple of streams ago, and I heard I was hearing
that you said that the gates of hell were not
the gates of death will not prevail against the Church.
Speaker 4: Like, oh, that's like why we.
Speaker 10: Can appeal to the church as of recognizing.
Speaker 5: Then I'm gonna I'm gonna say to you, it's ambiguous
what you mean by appeal to the church.
Speaker 11: Well, if you say, like the Church recognized the correct
books of the Bible, if I were to just say
like or like perform Baptists or Protestants whatever, like your
critique of them would be like, well, you know the
canyon without the church.
Speaker 10: Basically be recognizing it. Right, I'm getting into answer it
because I just got into your stuff.
Speaker 5: So like I'm it's not recognizing in a vacuum, like
there are like things that the church is appealing to
in recognizing it too.
Speaker 16: But yeah, you would expect that, like that's not circular
because that's not the reason, but you would expect that
the Church is the body of Christ would recognize that.
Speaker 10: Yeah, I guess it was maybe maybe I didn't know.
Speaker 32: I'm sure I didn't articulate it, right, So like if
I were to if I want to say, how I
know the Bible is the Bible, it's How's word, because
and I would killed to a Versus in the Bible,
right that Jesus says, my chief here my voice.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but how do you know that those those books
are supposed to be in the cannon? So that's why
it's begging the question.
Speaker 10: Yeah, but then that's what I'm saying. So how how
is it not begging the question to say that you
know the Church recognizes the.
Speaker 1: Right because the question because the question is because the
question is precisely how do we know? And who decides
what books make up the Bible? So you can't just say, well,
the Bible tells me, because it doesn't tell you that.
Speaker 10: So what what what would you say? Why do you
know it's the Church that recognizes the.
Speaker 1: Web because historically that's where those books come from, and
historically there were councils that decided what books make up
that book. And that's not even just disputed historically, it's
not even imagine if.
Speaker 5: We had, like your researching something in antiquity in Roman law,
what would you look you would look at Roman history
and Roman law that recognize and make presence about Roman law.
Speaker 4: Like, that's not circular, that's what they saying. That's exactly
what the question and the topic.
Speaker 10: What is it is like historical records valuable.
Speaker 1: Well, the again, what you think is fallible and not
fallible will depend on your paradigm. So the paradigm of
Orthodoxy is not inconsistent in saying that the Church in
history determines the canon because the Church is prior to
the canon and prior to the written texts. For you,
you have a different paradigm. You think that the written
text is prior to and determines the Church. Well, the
problem then is how do you know, apart from history
what the correct texts are. So you're taking a problem
for your paradigm and putting it upon my issu. My paradigm,
my paradigm doesn't have the same positions and presuppositions as yours.
That's why that argument doesn't work on me.
Speaker 11: What your position is, like, how do you how can
you say it about it being a problem for your paradigm.
Speaker 1: That because I don't believe that the text is prior
to the church, the Church created the text and determines
the text. Paul says, the Church is the pillar and
ground of truth, not the text. You say, the text
is the pillar and ground of truth, and the text
determines the church. So that's a problem. It's a problem
for your position, not mine.
Speaker 23: Yeah, but you know me.
Speaker 10: But you know how, you just used the Bible verse
to explain it.
Speaker 1: It's not a problem in my position. The Bible verse
is admitting the Bible isn't prior, so it's that's not
contradictory in my position. That's a category. Or if I
cite the Bible saying that the Bible isn't primary, that's
not inconsistent with my paradigm. It is with yours.
Speaker 10: So your ultimate authority is the history of the Church.
Speaker 1: No, that's a false dialectic. My ultimate authority is divine.
Stop interrupting me, and when you ask me a question,
let me answer. My ultimate authority is divine revelation in
scripture and tradition that is also preserved by the Church.
That's my position, So it's not it's not it's not
inconsistent with that paradigm to cite either tradition or the Bible,
because they're both authorities.
Speaker 28: For me.
Speaker 1: For you you have a different problem because you think
the Bible is prior to the Church.
Speaker 10: The Bible is in the Word of God, or like
the in itself.
Speaker 1: You tell me what you what you mean by word
of God, because you guys equivocate all the time between
divine revelation, the person of Christ, and written texts. You
guys are the ones that equivocate that. How well, for example,
the Bible is not God. It's a book that records
a message about the second person of the Godhead. Jesus
is the Word of God, not a book. So that's
how you guys equivate it all the time.
Speaker 10: Where do you think Bonton got it involved? Where would
you like?
Speaker 1: But I have a lot of critiques, so you could
go watch all the critiques of Bonson. I mean, he
gets it wrong with his Trinitarian theology. He believes in
absolutely my simplicity that Philly Okuay created grace, p s A.
All of those Calvinists teachings are wrong. So you could
go watch some of the podcasts where we critique Calvinism.
Appreciate your call, but we're going to move on. You
can find a lot of debate. What the debate you
should watch is the debate with Dale the Protestant. So
me and doctor Branson debate Dale the Protestant. He's pretty
much making a lot of the same arguments that you're making.
Such check that out, h Brosy, what's up? Welcome back dog? Hey,
what's on your mind? Yeah?
Speaker 12: Gotcha?
Speaker 1: G one second, I'll read a couple of super Dutch
L means five dollars. Aiden Ross admitted a lot of
streamers inflate their chats and viewers, including themselves. Yeah, I
wouldn't be surprised. I've never bought subs, bots or anything.
Never done it. Always wanted it to be organic and real.
Slow boy, twenty dollars. Speaking of spooks, Clovicular was on
Jack Neil yesterday at twenty three minutes and fifty seconds.
Body language is very telling. When he's asked about influencers
and perhaps influencers being spies, he said he can't create
content without any stimulant drugs. He's totally an AstroTurf fed
in your opinion, Well, I wouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 10: I haven't.
Speaker 1: Actually, I've only seen like one clip of Clovicular ever,
so I don't even know what he talks about. Other
than his like two minutes convert. I watched two minutes
of him talking to Michael Knowles, and I was like,
this guy's an idiot. But I wouldn't be surprised if
I mean, I think, yeah, a lot of a lot
of influencers are probably most influencers are AstroTurf to some degree.
I wouldn't be surprised. Ah, Brosley, what's up tuxedo mask? Five?
Two dollars? Jay, you can't even try time travel yet? Yikes? Exactly, Well,
if I do time travel, I will find my twin flame.
Maybe it will be Tristan, maybe it will be Charlie Kirk,
maybe it'll be Candace. Will have to see what the
time continuum quantum spectrum tells me. Hey, yo says for
five dollars, I'm gonna make a mega planet? Should I
do it? Yes? You should do that instead of creating
a Tussaumi roll stakes. Did Ian Carroll ever reply that
he except, of course not. I mean, I haven't checked,
but like, of course that guy's not gottabate. No one
will debate or defend the Cannis positions, which is crazy
because it's like I'm eager to debate something other than
Orthodoxy and the papacy, or Orthodoxy and Protestant. But nobody
will do any of these debates. I have to go
pharm a debate accidentally with Temple, so Anda's floating rock
for dollars. Trump's Iran war underscores the democracy is a
fake veneer. If MAGA is just classical liberalism, then what
about Orthodox monarchy. What's the best case or solution for that? Well, again,
I mean, we're not ever going to get that anytime soon.
So that's why I really did. Politics doesn't even really
matter if you're Orthodox too much. I mean, it matters,
but it doesn't. So there wouldn't be an Orthodox monarchy
in one hundred years when the country is the majority
of Orthodox that's when. So that's why, really we can
just kind of observe the political sphere from kind of
a detached, you know, bird bird's eye perspective, because it's
all it's all liberalism everything. That's what I was trying
to convey to Tim Poole, which he didn't kind of
he didn't really understand what I was arguing. It's all
liberal All of the political discourse for the last several
hundred years is all liberalism. Just different flavors of it, Sapphire,
what's on your mind?
Speaker 10: Guys?
Speaker 1: If you want to get a hold of Eseter Colvid one,
two and three, you can get it right there, signed copies.
Now I have to admit and mention as well. The
book orders have been back ordered. I apologize. I know
that there's some people complaining. We almost got through all
the orders and now there's another sixty to do.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 1: And Jamie's book was back ordered from Bezos for a
little while, and the Red books were back ordered. But
I think they're here. I think they arrived when I
was at Timcast. So I will try to get out
as many in the next couple of days as I can.
But I apologize if your books are taking a little
bit longer, it's not me. Sometimes the books are slow
to get Like if you Jamie orders are books from Bezos,
it literally takes like three weeks for the books to come.
So you can order like a thousand dollars worth of
books and it's like three weeks before it gets here.
It's crazy, Sapphire. What's up?
Speaker 3: Oh, what's going on?
Speaker 4: Jay?
Speaker 6: Hey?
Speaker 3: So I had a book question for you real quick.
I made mean to ask you I've been on here
a couple of times. Have you ever read Lost to
the West by Large brown Worth?
Speaker 25: No, I think, Uh, that one is something that my
parents got me when I was a teenager. It covers
the history of Byzantium, the whole empire, and how pretty
much saved Christianity from falling.
Speaker 3: So that might be a good recommendation for you.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure how hold is slow down a little
bit Lost to the West by Lars Bronworth. Yeah, got it? Okay, Yeah, I.
Speaker 25: Read that when I was a teenager and it's it
was a pretty.
Speaker 3: Good read for me.
Speaker 1: Okay, appreciate that now. I always like when you guys
give me good book recommendations, and most books that you
guys recommend I end up buying. So I'll add this
to my book list here.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 3: No solid at things like bus too, so it's super.
Speaker 1: Easy to go perfect, just added it.
Speaker 14: Uh.
Speaker 26: You mentioned the.
Speaker 3: Monarchy thing, and that's something you know.
Speaker 25: It was the Orthodox guy I talk about as well.
Speaker 6: With like friends and family and stuff, and then you
know they kind of bulk at that.
Speaker 25: But I wanted to ask you, like and more in
line with some of the other stuff you talk about,
how likely.
Speaker 3: Do you think it is that like these.
Speaker 25: Dark Enlightenment monopoly capitalist types will actually get towards achieving
their goal of their monarchy, like their their ceo capitalists.
Speaker 1: Hypercatal Yeah, I don't know. It's a good question. I mean,
we're going to be talking about that because Jamie just
read Dark Enlightenment and uh, you know, I know Curtis
Yarvin visited an Orthodox church the other day, so it's
all it's all very interesting. I don't know how far
they get there, elusive, what's up? It's good question. What
the I'm gonna have to get a little deeper into
it because I've not read Dark Enlightenment, But go ahead,
Jay Dizzel's going, man, hey, hey, that's you got me
into Orthodoxy.
Speaker 18: And I do have to say that ever since then,
I care very little about politics like I used to.
Speaker 4: And it's it's pretty awesome.
Speaker 1: It's funny because American street politics it is a religion
in America. It really is, yeah, for sure, And now
like sports and politics are the religion of.
Speaker 2: America, it's more of like, just like you said, sit
back and observe, and I don't know's it's a good
feeling though it feels great.
Speaker 1: Not it's kind of a burden, you know, lifted to
not have to, you know, deal with this drama every day.
It's just it's all retarded anyway, But go ahead.
Speaker 3: It is for sure.
Speaker 4: I was going to see have you read The International
jew by Henry Ford?
Speaker 1: I read significant sections of that many many years ago,
back around two thousand seven, so I'm familiar with most
of it. Yeah, I was just curious. Is pretty good.
Speaker 18: And then in that he talks about the protocols and
he learned elders of Zion.
Speaker 4: Have you seen those protocols?
Speaker 1: I have read that also about back around two thousand
and seven. So yes, I've read all this stuff. But yeah,
I appreciate that we're on YouTube. So Jeff, what's up?
America's religion is sportshole in politics and I guess butt stuff. Now,
what's up, man, Jeff? I'm you.
Speaker 3: Okay?
Speaker 26: Yeah, Jay, my window keeps dropping on my laptop, but
I'm sorry. I wanted to talk about the you know,
I know the whole world is run by one bank,
so there are no nations. It's all theater or distraction. Now,
I researched crypto and I've led me to sabat and Francists,
you know, starting with Sabati is a and he said
that he would lead to people to Palestine back in
sixteen sixty six, and later on I read that Frank
was friends or associated with Rothschild.
Speaker 3: And do you feel that, you know, you're.
Speaker 1: More read, you're you're What does that have to do
with cryptops I'm familiar with all that was that to
do with crypto?
Speaker 3: Is this Is this a cult?
Speaker 26: Is this a cult inverted Judaism to where it's not
really the Jews, it's the cult of Sabatine Francists.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think that that was a historical cult
with you know, a satan and kind of perspective, But
I don't know that that cult necessarily runs the whole world,
because you know, Rabbinic Judaism itself is pretty Satanic, so
it doesn't have to be specifically some cult Rabbinic Judaism.
And just look at the Hasidic ways to trick God
warm and warm end something. I mean, the talent would
satanic before Jacob Frank existed. Go ahead, Piggy, uh huh,
I can't go back to that not too fun terrible voice. Dude,
You need to work on your singing. Wway, what's up, dude?
If you're gonna sing my song, you better be beautiful.
Fuzz funks are five dollars if you can critique a
new age of positions that all religions tell you to
be kind, but you don't need to be a part
of any religion to recognize virtues. Well, all the religions
don't tell you to be kind. First of all, many
religions tell you to sacrifice humans to go to war.
So when you say to quote, recognize virtue, well, the
paradigm is going to tell you what virtue is and
what vice is. So uh, a subjectivist relative relativist position
is arbitrary. What's up, way, what's going on?
Speaker 3: Jay?
Speaker 33: I was going to ask if you could I know
I can't see it right now, but just by name
dropping it, would you be able to like point me
in the direction of any of your videos that would
help me to be able to discern between between Catholicism
and Orthodoxy.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's probably the most covered topic on my channel.
So let's see if we come over here and we
go to live I mean, I would say start with
something like top I think I think I did want
like top ten reasons Catholicism is false, or to five
simple proofs against the papacy. But I mean pretty much
like any there's there's probably two hundred videos that would
all pretty much achieve the same purpose. Let's see, there
was one called I think one of the strongest arguments
of late was how the papacy departed from Orthodoxy. This
is a good one right here, the one where we
points out the contradiction in terms of papal temporal power.
That's a huge contradiction that errors the Latins. This interview
on this book, by the way, FTI forgot. I got
to mail you that book airs the Latins. This is
a good video Muslims and Christians and Jews worshiping the
same God. This is a good contradictory proof video right here.
Let's see, where's the temporal power video? This one right here?
All one dogmatic contradiction as Roman Catholicism. This one's a
good one. All pass lead to God. Francis saying that
that's another good one. So I mean, pretty much any
of these I think kill shutss Nelly ten dollars. I
got to turn it in turn in good night, Thank you, Nelly.
Appreciate that. Na John Brown two dollars. I've always tuned
for suber Chat much love. Thank you, RSL Demicide Jay
control your panel. Temple is a dork. He came close
to throwing you out of the podcast, Bobby C. Is
it worth reading about masonry if it's fading, I mean
it's worth understanding and knowing their basic ideas. Yes, Ruiz says.
For ten dollars, Jay, I put a link in your
channel's community a long time ago about templars and Masons
in my country. Okay, I'll check that out. Orthozowski gifted
five memberships. Thank you so much, Wolf j w jwl
J Wolf ten dollars. What about Jones acting like Trump
is on our side on Twitter fighting the deep state?
That seems like nonsense. Alex has been pretty consistently calling
out Trump lately and imposing his positions, So if he
said that Trump was on our side recently, he's probably conflicted.
Orthozowski Temple thinks God can create a rock that he
can't lift. Yeah, I forgot he said that. Don't car
five dollars.
Speaker 10: No, he did that.
Speaker 1: The issues with Israel and Turkey and Iran follow Orthodox prophecies.
I don't know about I'm not you can a hotel
and Conrad from World War News know all about that stuff.
It's not an area that I know much about. FD
eight know much about Elder's prophecies and Turkey and Iran
and all that.
Speaker 4: No, I'm not a prophecy bro.
Speaker 33: That's what I'm like.
Speaker 5: All the prophecy bros like emerged the last day like, oh.
Speaker 1: Dude, look, yes, I don't know much. I mean I've read,
you know, some of what Elder Ephraim says, and he
critiques Zionism, But beyond that, I don't know about the prophecies. Perez,
You're my favorite Bible.
Speaker 10: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Since there hypocrite, there's a false dialectic between choosing Israel
or Islam. It's a stupid It's stupid considering how many
times this unholy alliance is formed. Why can people see
this because people fall for basic dialectics. Yeah, why do
I have to choose between Iotola or BBI? Well what
if I don't want either one of those? Dew Brough
five dollars? How come there's so many Candace Owens fans
I could be botted. Also, she's gained a lot of
y Mom audience out there so worldwide, says Candace is
the new operation Trust q Andon, I'll be in sack
five dollars Jay to all the normies, you got to
check out Jay's episode called Defense of Traditional Philosophy episode three.
Oh interesting, that's an old one. Let's see what that
one was about. He says, that is his go to
for this. Let's see Defensive Traditional Philosophy Episode three is
where we begin John Damascus. Yeah, so we covered John
Damascus's on the Orthodox faith and episode three is part
one of that. If you're interested, you guys can check
ou out here. That is now what seven or eight
years old? Seven almost eight years old? That's crazy. Thank
you for that reminder there again, shout out to the
guy that was defending Candace and the banana up the butt.
You guys have won the super check competition tonight. Banana
Chan sends twenty dollars and say thank you for all
that you do. I've not seen have you seen? Not
so Aradiit? It talks about orthodox sy in the debate
with Andrew. No, I haven't seen that yet because I
was traveling to timcast and I didn't get to see that,
and I didn't get to see Rachel's debate, but then
I think Rachel's debate person canceled, so but I've not
seen her Rogan episode yet either. I think we'll do
a commentary on some of that soon when I have
another lish. But we're about to go do a bunch
more podcasts. I'll be on the road again worldwide. Two dollars.
Speaker 4: How we did that?
Speaker 1: Go ahead, John, you want to say them.
Speaker 6: I was just going to say to all the blossop
he bros. And if you are a philosophy bro, you
need to read.
Speaker 4: Saint John Damascus on the orthodox S.
Speaker 3: Fate agreed, and I'm sure I'm sure uh Albert Dea
can attest to this as well, because if you are
a philosophy bro in the realm of you.
Speaker 4: Know, like agnostic or atheist.
Speaker 6: Uh, that text will change your mind about Christianity right there.
Speaker 1: JV Free one dollar. I'm blocking our candis will pear
in your dreams every night, Rockly ten dollars. We need
to get past the Republican Democrat dialectics. The only viable
position going forward is a president Wine Mom and a
vice president Space wife. First order of business is to
institute Franzy a welfare program. This is how we unite. Well,
this is if Candace won. This is what you would get.
Dunkar five dollars. My last super chat was zogged. Take
a look, okay if I get when we get to it,
we'll see funky monkey five dollars. What are your thoughts
on anatotally Flamenko's idea of I don't buy. I think
it's crazy. Is this Russian?
Speaker 31: We was?
Speaker 1: I don't think hardly anybody believes that except for Internet
conspiratory people. But I mean, is he is that? Also
like the origins of Tartario stuff too?
Speaker 3: Oh well, never listed, Greece never existed.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just stupid. The church fathers were there during
those times. We have the list of absolute successions. So
how would how would what would that? That's all fake,
It's just stupid, sincere hypocrite five dollars, false dielectic between
isn't know we did that? Blacksmith ten dollars. First question,
have you seen pattern of evidence? I have not two?
Who is mystery Babylon? I think in seventy a d
it's Israel united with the i'm an Empire. What is
the tribulation period? It was the period of the destruction
of the temple. So Daniel nine maps on to what
happens in the Book of Revelation right before seventy a d.
What is the tribulation peard of the future. We don't know.
How does the church interpret the end Time's prophecies with
Israel being attacked? The Israel is the Church, it's not Israel.
Lean five dollars. I'm pretty convinced that at least push
conspiracy theories to make it seem like utter lunacy. Oh,
you don't have to be convinced of that from theory.
We have Cass Sunstein's paper on it. Cass Sunstein, who
was the head of the Tzar under Obama, came up
with a paper on cognitive infiltration in interjecting fake conspiracy
theories into real conspiracy theories. Sounds pretty familiar, doesn't it.
This makes everybody who questions the official position sound nuts.
Of course, that's what That's what its main goal is.
This is a classic discrediting by association tactic. Yah, that's
why the CIA came up with the term conspiracy theory.
Speaker 6: Well, even prior to that is like, like I was saying,
is so prominent in this you know, time right now
is the Late Great Planet Earth kind of meloding of
all that into.
Speaker 4: You know, the world view of that.
Speaker 6: Everybody, like everybody, whether they're Protestant or not or just
agnostic in some way, they kind of think like the
world is moving in that direction of what the Late
Great Planet.
Speaker 4: Earth kind of prophesized in that time period.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it achieved. It's a fact. To promote that whole
you know, evangelical christian zionis nonsense. So it achieved. It's
a fact exactly.
Speaker 3: There was a movie about it. There's TV shows.
Speaker 1: Well, and the whole all of the boom the boomer
Protestant world just defaults to that belief, even even amongst Catholicism,
Like there's there's plenty of Catholics who are ignorant but
just default to this Protestant evangelical stuff for end times.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and the and he even incorporates the you.
Speaker 4: Know like worlden collision crowd too.
Speaker 3: Oh really, you know, the you know, planets are aligning.
Speaker 4: Oh this happened. Yeah, all of that's incorporated into the
New Age all that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a lot of delusion exactly. And it's also
geopolitical motivation to get people to support you know the
foreign policy stuff that we've been talking about. Guys who
want to support your vitality, header over to chalk dot
com c h o q dot com US from J
sixty Life. That's J Y six zero l I f
E and gets sixty percent off all those great chalk
products at chalk dot com, including that stack right there.
You don't have to spend one hundred and twenty two dollars.
You get sixty percent off of that with the promo
code J sixty your Life. You can cancel at any time. Also,
there is female vitality as well. It's not just four
peepee stuff. This is actually Jima Jason So to get
you ready, to get fit, get you in the gym,
get that chalk daily, get that female vitality right there.
The Shila Jit asked for Ganda great for regulating the
mood for the ladies and boosting test sauce ron for
the dudes, especially the ton kettalie guys. So follow me.
If you do not follow, hit like and share, I'd
like to have you over here on the regular. We
had a good I think we got up to about
two thousand and five hundred at one point tonight dude,
bro says, Dang, I didn't know there was so many.
Know we did that, Candice Queen's Cody says for ten dollars, Jay,
thank you got me interested in Orthodoxy. Going to a
parish here at the beginning of Lent, prayers for me,
everybody pray for Cody. My wife is opposed Orthodoxy and
this is making it difficult. Well, give it time, she'll
warm up to it. Jmail five dollars, Jay, do you
think Tim Cash will ever have you back? Well, you know,
after the show, he's said he enjoyed the exchange, and
he said I will have you back anytime. In fact,
we might have more debates for you, So that's at
least what he said. So whether that'll happen, I don't know.
Tim doesn't seem like a grudge type of guy. I
think he said Andrew back, and they've had some pretty
feisty exchanges, so I don't think so. Jmail fifteen dollars
is a clip of General General Wesley Clark. It's called
the Five Nations. Yeah. When I say the seven Nations plan,
I'm also referring to the famous Wesley Clark talk where
he mentioned seeing the memo at the Pentagon of taking
out five countries in five years. Yes, it's a famous
thing that's been sided for many years. Go ahead, like
I mean, we've been around.
Speaker 4: How long we've been looking into this stuff. Of course
we've seen the Wesley Clark seven.
Speaker 1: Exactly. Yep. Yeah, I remember Alex was playing that back
in the two thousands, even I think back in the day,
and but it's always good to get a reminder, and
he refresher. So it's another attestation to what we've been
talking about. Mister fund Zirker, five dollars if you can, No,
we did that. Anda's floating rock five dollars, No, we
did that. Excuse me, Matt Scroggin's five dollars. I'm working
out and I listened to your stream when Candace said
little neck note, I almost dropped a fifty found kettle
ball on my foot from laughing. Uh. Yeah, that parody
site's pretty funny because they just collect all of the
things that she mispronounces and doesn't doesn't know how to read.
So I'll see if I had any more of those saved. Yeah,
it's it's called Candace Owens trying to.
Speaker 6: Read Cannas and my girl. But I mean when she
says maccabur, I mean, you can't defend that.
Speaker 1: All right, Let's say here's a new one. I haven't
seen this one. How does she say? How does she
say rhetoric?
Speaker 7: Let's see, it's okay, I really don't remember it. And
then suddenly its the end of Obama. We started hearing
all this Retric drummed up Retric.
Speaker 1: All right, let's see how she says hyperbolic? This hyperbolic
idea hyperbolic in architecture. This one is a classic. Here
was making fun of that.
Speaker 7: Alex Clark told us that wasn't true. He just liked
the architecture, right, he just loved it. He would go
in there and just wow, look at this. Really it
was about the architecture.
Speaker 1: I want you understand, it's all about that architecture. You
know what I'm saying. Little, it's a little bit of
a neckni key.
Speaker 7: I am so very disappointed in Cash, Pateel, Dan Bongino,
and Pam Bondi, who all made these grandoise promises.
Speaker 1: What did she say with the antidote, a little, a
little and a little unect. I forget what she said.
Anecdote is a little, a little Neckdoe, Java Crow says
for ten dollars, I heard the theory that Iran is
still a British asset. Yeah, I'm familiar with that theory.
I mean the British Empire, you know, has been in
the background of that for a long time. Is this
Strategically Trump has strategically various European intelligence groups. I don't
know what that means. Apparently the Iranian Guard has ties
to British and French. What do you think, I mean
to some degree, but I don't think that. I don't
know what you mean that Trump has been strategically various
religious or various European intel groups. I don't know what
that means.
Speaker 4: You can't defend green Barrett either.
Speaker 1: Yeah, she said that she grew up. She grew up
as a fan of She said she grew up as
a fan. She didn't know Prince, but she had heard
the song Rasberry Barrett.
Speaker 4: I was rooting for her, and then she said green Brett.
Speaker 1: That's funny auditing Ireland one dollar. Female intuition breeds conspiratual
thinking and and it links events into hidden emotional narratives. Absolutely,
that's exactly the problem with big scale analysis. That's run
by female intuitive feels. That's exactly the problem. It runs
counter to rationality and objectivity. It runs counter to fact
based scrutiny. There should be some hierarchy in place to
keep feminine feelings in check. That's funny, thoughtful ten dollars.
I'm down to debate you. Okay, he came on. That
was earlier, York Delta Queen. What know we did that?
Dim ful five dollars. Should a beginner start learning metaphysics
or epistemology? I think if you're a beginner, I would
start with Plato the Apology, some of Plato's dialogues, and
some basic Aristotle. I wouldn't try to just dive into
pistemology or metaphysics. You need the background because it's a
long conversation. Philosophy is a civilization, long conversation station. Patrick Hayes, No,
we did that one last time. Excuse me. I want
to remind you guys too. Though I do have a
philosophy course which you can purchase. It still exists. FDA
is featured in one of those episodes, as is a
father of Vladimir on aesthetics. If you go to the
show description, you will see a link to the auto
autonomy Agora marketplace, which is Richard Gross Marketplace right there
to get my philosophy course. It is twelve eleven or
twelve lectures twenty something hours, twenty six hours of material
and you can sign up to get that right here.
It is a full course twenty plus lectures Q and
a reading syllabus here. So everybody who has done it
really enjoys it. It's worth the money because it's a
full course, so you can you can see for yourself
right there if you're interested. Guys, thank you so much
a lot of fun tonight. Appreciate the guys for hopping
on Tristan FDA, John Adams, h BROSI. We didn't. We
lost you there, but I'll get you next time. Thank
you guys for all the fat super Chest supports tonight.
All the winners tonight, been out of the butt. Ryan
Ryan Ellis says for Ryan els Is Finley five dollars day.
I love your content. Sorry this is a mean question,
but do you find yourself thanking the Lord that you
have foolish enemies? I never thought about it that way,
but fun, that's a funny way to put it. If
you want to test out the philosophy course. By the way,
there is the first lecture, the first half of it,
at least forty minutes of the first lecture is available
here on my channel, so you can test out the
full course by listening to the first forty minutes of
the philosophy the lecturers right There's.
Speaker 5: You should put first forty minutes is called going clear.
Speaker 1: This is my introduct some two scientology course. Not joke, guys.
You can also support FDA by subscribing to Patristic Faith
and FDA anything you want to promote you got coming up.
Speaker 5: I may be launching a new class on Patristic Faith
by popular demand, and that will be Philosophy.
Speaker 4: Of Political Philosophy, and this one will be a which mccaud.
Speaker 5: Live lectures other than pre recorded lectures, so I'll let
everybody know about that, and possibly some other classes like
metaphysics or something like that. Also, don't forget Montanica June
fourth to June seventh. Tickets are on sale. We've got
a great lineup and it's gonna be better than ever,
so they are going to sell out pretty soon.
Speaker 4: We also have VIP tickets in which will take you
to the local but scientology.
Speaker 1: Don't relay, says Uh, I'm scared to debate? Who who
am I scared to debate? Are you on here? I'll
bring you up? We can we can have a final
debate here at the end? Man, who's your handles for
all the shout outs? Don't relay?
Speaker 4: Who is?
Speaker 10: Who?
Speaker 1: Are you on Twitter? I'll bring you up? Give me
a emoji or something if you're wanting to come up
to debate. Don't relay, don't relyow Loisius says Jay scared
of debate. Where are you at? Dude? I don't see
you on here? Maybe he's joking. It's calling next time?
Speaker 10: Dude?
Speaker 1: Are you uncle? Uncle Tom? What's up? Uncle Tom?
Speaker 3: Is that you.
Speaker 27: What?
Speaker 1: I'm scared to debate?
Speaker 28: Dog?
Speaker 1: I'm you dude? Good godfather says For five dollars, what
are your thoughts on Epstein running pew pews for Israel
to Iran for Maxwell? Well that lines up with the
victor of Strowsky. So I had not seen that information yet,
but it does seem to make sense. Scruffle the cat.
Ten dollars, No message? Are you talking about where he
describes Maxwell's death or is that something different?
Speaker 3: Thank you?
Speaker 1: Scruffles. Uncle Tom, I don't see you coming up. You
just keep you can't connect. So it's reel say I'm
running from him, So anyway,