WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.480 --> 00:00:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the quart Side Quantum Physics Podcast, an exploration

2
00:00:05.679 --> 00:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of the fundamental structure of reality where quantum laws govern matter, energy,

3
00:00:11.199 --> 00:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and information. Here, uncertainty is a feature, not a flaw,

4
00:00:16.719 --> 00:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and understanding begins at the smallest scales.

5
00:00:27.640 --> 00:00:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Imagine trying to read a microscopic text message, like really microscopic,

6
00:00:33.320 --> 00:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>But the only magnifying glass that's actually powerful enough to

7
00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:39.759
<v Speaker 2>read those tiny letters is well, it's roughly the size

8
00:00:39.799 --> 00:00:41.439
<v Speaker 2>of the Milky Way galaxy.

9
00:00:41.039 --> 00:00:43.759
<v Speaker 3>Which is quite the infrastructure problem, right.

10
00:00:43.560 --> 00:00:46.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean that is the exact, frankly absurd position that

11
00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>modern physicists find themselves in today. Okay, let's unpack this

12
00:00:49.759 --> 00:00:52.200
<v Speaker 2>because our mission today for this deep dive is to

13
00:00:52.280 --> 00:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>understand the fundamental building blocks of the universe, and more specifically,

14
00:00:58.280 --> 00:01:01.119
<v Speaker 2>how scientists are attempting to prove the existence of something

15
00:01:01.159 --> 00:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>that they literally physically cannot see.

16
00:01:03.840 --> 00:01:06.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it really is sort of the ultimate cosmic taunt

17
00:01:07.079 --> 00:01:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Nature have seemingly hidden the master blueprint of reality behind

18
00:01:12.120 --> 00:01:15.719
<v Speaker 3>this massive energy barrier that humanity may just never be

19
00:01:15.760 --> 00:01:17.719
<v Speaker 3>able to cross physically at least.

20
00:01:17.760 --> 00:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>But before we get to the invisible strings and the

21
00:01:20.680 --> 00:01:23.000
<v Speaker 2>galaxy size magnifying glasses, I feel like, we have to

22
00:01:23.000 --> 00:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about the crisis, the thing that forced physicists into

23
00:01:26.040 --> 00:01:29.239
<v Speaker 2>this corner in the first place. Right, The standoff exactly,

24
00:01:29.319 --> 00:01:32.959
<v Speaker 2>the ultimate standoff in physics, which is basically this massive

25
00:01:33.000 --> 00:01:36.719
<v Speaker 2>clash between the incredibly massive and the impossibly tiny.

26
00:01:36.840 --> 00:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>That is the core of it. Yeah, yeah, because for gosh,

27
00:01:39.359 --> 00:01:42.480
<v Speaker 3>about a century now, physics has been relying on two

28
00:01:42.560 --> 00:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>completely different rule books to describe how the.

29
00:01:44.560 --> 00:01:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Universe works, and they do not like each other.

30
00:01:47.439 --> 00:01:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Not at all. So on the grand scale, we use

31
00:01:50.959 --> 00:01:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Einstein's general theory of relativity.

32
00:01:53.000 --> 00:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>The heavy lifter Exactly.

33
00:01:54.760 --> 00:01:58.879
<v Speaker 3>It's this beautifully elegant framework that explains gravity. It treats

34
00:01:58.920 --> 00:02:03.680
<v Speaker 3>space and time like a like a smooth, continuous fabric.

35
00:02:03.760 --> 00:02:07.359
<v Speaker 3>It predicts how planets orbit, how galaxies collide, black hole,

36
00:02:07.480 --> 00:02:08.240
<v Speaker 3>all the big stuff.

37
00:02:08.360 --> 00:02:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, So it makes perfect sense. It's super predictable, and

38
00:02:11.039 --> 00:02:14.199
<v Speaker 2>it works flawlessly when you're dealing with anything large, and.

39
00:02:14.199 --> 00:02:16.360
<v Speaker 3>This is a massive But the moment you zoom in

40
00:02:16.400 --> 00:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>to the atomic or you know, sub atomic level, general

41
00:02:19.439 --> 00:02:21.159
<v Speaker 3>relativity just completely falls apart.

42
00:02:21.240 --> 00:02:23.159
<v Speaker 2>It just stops working pretty.

43
00:02:22.919 --> 00:02:26.159
<v Speaker 3>Much because down there the universe is governed by quantum

44
00:02:26.159 --> 00:02:30.439
<v Speaker 3>mechanics and the quantum realm is well, it is not

45
00:02:30.479 --> 00:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>a smooth fabric. It is a jittery, chaotic, highly unpredictable place.

46
00:02:35.639 --> 00:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Particles pop in and out of existence, and things only

47
00:02:38.599 --> 00:02:41.759
<v Speaker 3>happen in these discrete, choppy, little jumps.

48
00:02:41.919 --> 00:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>So we have this smooth, heavy rule book for the

49
00:02:44.120 --> 00:02:48.400
<v Speaker 2>big stuff and a jittery, completely chaotic rule book for

50
00:02:48.439 --> 00:02:51.199
<v Speaker 2>the tiny stuff, which you know, if I'm listening to

51
00:02:51.240 --> 00:02:53.319
<v Speaker 2>this right now, I'm probably thinking, okay, so just use both,

52
00:02:53.680 --> 00:02:56.319
<v Speaker 2>like use the big book for planets and the small

53
00:02:56.319 --> 00:02:57.479
<v Speaker 2>book for atoms.

54
00:02:57.120 --> 00:02:59.800
<v Speaker 3>And honestly, that works perfectly ninety nine percent of the time.

55
00:03:00.039 --> 00:03:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Can get away with it, right, But the crisis hits

56
00:03:02.719 --> 00:03:04.360
<v Speaker 3>when you are forced to deal with something that is

57
00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:09.520
<v Speaker 3>both incredibly massive and incredibly tiny at the exact same time. Oh,

58
00:03:09.599 --> 00:03:11.800
<v Speaker 3>like what we'll think about the very center of a

59
00:03:11.840 --> 00:03:15.840
<v Speaker 3>black hole, yeah, or the very first moment of big bang.

60
00:03:16.439 --> 00:03:18.919
<v Speaker 3>In those extreme, extreme scenarios, you have to combine the

61
00:03:18.960 --> 00:03:20.800
<v Speaker 3>two rule books. You have to figure out how gravity

62
00:03:20.840 --> 00:03:24.319
<v Speaker 3>operates at the quantum level, quantum gravity exactly. Finding a

63
00:03:24.360 --> 00:03:27.319
<v Speaker 3>theory of quantum gravity is the holy grail. But when

64
00:03:27.319 --> 00:03:30.080
<v Speaker 3>you smash those two math equations together.

65
00:03:30.080 --> 00:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>What actually happens, Like mathematically.

66
00:03:32.759 --> 00:03:35.599
<v Speaker 3>The math literally vomits out infinities.

67
00:03:35.639 --> 00:03:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Wait, infinities.

68
00:03:36.840 --> 00:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, in a probability equation, a result of one

69
00:03:40.800 --> 00:03:43.520
<v Speaker 3>means something is one hundred percent guaranteed to happen, and

70
00:03:43.599 --> 00:03:46.599
<v Speaker 3>infinity means a probability greater than one hundred percent.

71
00:03:46.400 --> 00:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Which makes absolutely zero sense physically none.

72
00:03:49.680 --> 00:03:53.599
<v Speaker 3>It's the universe's fundamental code. Just flashing of fatal error message.

73
00:03:53.879 --> 00:03:56.479
<v Speaker 3>The math is telling us, hey, you are missing a

74
00:03:56.560 --> 00:03:57.479
<v Speaker 3>crucial piece of the.

75
00:03:57.400 --> 00:04:00.159
<v Speaker 2>Puzzle here, which brings us to the proposed savior, the

76
00:04:00.159 --> 00:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>thing that's been floating around the physics world for decades, right,

77
00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:04.639
<v Speaker 2>string theory.

78
00:04:04.960 --> 00:04:07.840
<v Speaker 3>String theory is arguably the most famous attempt to fix

79
00:04:07.879 --> 00:04:11.439
<v Speaker 3>those broken equations, because since the dawn of modern physics,

80
00:04:11.759 --> 00:04:16.399
<v Speaker 3>we've always treated the smallest building blocks of matter, you know, quarks, electrons,

81
00:04:16.959 --> 00:04:18.800
<v Speaker 3>as microscopic dots.

82
00:04:18.720 --> 00:04:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Like zero dimensional points with literally no physical size exactly.

83
00:04:23.839 --> 00:04:28.600
<v Speaker 3>And string theory proposes this radical shift. It suggests that

84
00:04:28.639 --> 00:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>if you were to zoom in, say a billion billion

85
00:04:32.199 --> 00:04:36.839
<v Speaker 3>times smaller than a single proton, a billion billion unimaginable scales.

86
00:04:37.480 --> 00:04:40.319
<v Speaker 3>But if you did, those dots are not actually dots

87
00:04:40.360 --> 00:04:43.839
<v Speaker 3>at all. They're incredibly tiny vibrating one dimensional loops of

88
00:04:43.959 --> 00:04:45.800
<v Speaker 3>energy strings.

89
00:04:45.519 --> 00:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>And just by swapping out the word dots for strings,

90
00:04:48.120 --> 00:04:49.839
<v Speaker 2>the math suddenly starts behaving.

91
00:04:49.959 --> 00:04:53.040
<v Speaker 3>It does because a string has physical length, right, So

92
00:04:53.079 --> 00:04:56.279
<v Speaker 3>it effectively smears out the interaction over space and time.

93
00:04:56.639 --> 00:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>And that smearing smooths out those chaotic quantum jitters just

94
00:05:01.399 --> 00:05:06.399
<v Speaker 3>enough to incorporate gravity without triggering those impossible mathematical infinities.

95
00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:08.519
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I mean that sounds like a massive victory, Like

96
00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:10.680
<v Speaker 2>give whoever thought of that a Nobel prize and let's

97
00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:11.040
<v Speaker 2>go home.

98
00:05:11.360 --> 00:05:14.319
<v Speaker 3>If only were that simple as always catch a huge one,

99
00:05:14.519 --> 00:05:17.680
<v Speaker 3>The mathematics of string theory demand a really steep price.

100
00:05:18.199 --> 00:05:20.279
<v Speaker 3>First of all, the equations only work at the universe

101
00:05:20.319 --> 00:05:22.120
<v Speaker 3>has at least ten dimensions ten.

102
00:05:22.240 --> 00:05:25.519
<v Speaker 2>And we only experience four right, three of space, one

103
00:05:25.519 --> 00:05:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of time.

104
00:05:26.360 --> 00:05:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Right, The theory argues, the other six are curled up

105
00:05:29.519 --> 00:05:32.800
<v Speaker 3>so tightly we just can't perceive them. But as you

106
00:05:32.800 --> 00:05:35.839
<v Speaker 3>can imagine, that alone makes a lot of people highly skeptical.

107
00:05:36.319 --> 00:05:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, ten dimensions is a tough pill to swallow. But

108
00:05:39.920 --> 00:05:42.759
<v Speaker 2>the real problem, the real physical problem, is the proof.

109
00:05:43.040 --> 00:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Right.

110
00:05:43.279 --> 00:05:45.920
<v Speaker 2>That's where our milky way sized magnifying glass comes in.

111
00:05:46.040 --> 00:05:50.439
<v Speaker 3>That is the insurmountable hurdle. To physically see something as

112
00:05:50.480 --> 00:05:54.240
<v Speaker 3>infinitesimally small as a string, you have to probe it

113
00:05:54.279 --> 00:05:57.000
<v Speaker 3>with an unimaginably high frequency of energy.

114
00:05:57.000 --> 00:05:59.279
<v Speaker 2>You've got to smash stuff together really really hard.

115
00:05:59.399 --> 00:06:02.879
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, you accelerate particles and smash them together. Right now,

116
00:06:02.920 --> 00:06:05.439
<v Speaker 3>we use the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland, which is

117
00:06:05.560 --> 00:06:09.399
<v Speaker 3>a ring about seventeen miles in circumference, which is huge,

118
00:06:09.680 --> 00:06:12.959
<v Speaker 3>it is, But to generate enough power to actually detect

119
00:06:13.000 --> 00:06:15.639
<v Speaker 3>a string, you would need to build a particle collider

120
00:06:15.720 --> 00:06:17.120
<v Speaker 3>roughly the size of a galaxy.

121
00:06:17.759 --> 00:06:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, checking humanity's current infrastructure budget, I'm pretty sure we

122
00:06:21.680 --> 00:06:24.319
<v Speaker 2>cannot afford a galaxy size machine anytime soon.

123
00:06:24.560 --> 00:06:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Not quite.

124
00:06:25.279 --> 00:06:28.959
<v Speaker 2>So we are completely stuck. Like, if you think about it,

125
00:06:29.040 --> 00:06:33.000
<v Speaker 2>we have this beautiful theory that flawlessly unites the two

126
00:06:33.680 --> 00:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>warring rule books of physics, but it's locked in a

127
00:06:36.800 --> 00:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>vault that we can never ever physically open. So how

128
00:06:40.120 --> 00:06:43.079
<v Speaker 2>do we even proceed? How can we possibly know if

129
00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:46.759
<v Speaker 2>string theory isn't just an elegant mathematical fantasy you pivot.

130
00:06:47.600 --> 00:06:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you can't break through the front door

131
00:06:49.240 --> 00:06:52.120
<v Speaker 3>with physical experiments, you have to find a logical backdoor.

132
00:06:52.759 --> 00:06:55.439
<v Speaker 3>And this is where modern theoretical physicists have recently done

133
00:06:55.439 --> 00:06:59.720
<v Speaker 3>something just brilliant. They decided to revive a classic, almost

134
00:06:59.800 --> 00:07:03.079
<v Speaker 3>for gotten mathematical strategy from the nineteen sixties. It's known

135
00:07:03.120 --> 00:07:04.360
<v Speaker 3>as the bootstrap approach.

136
00:07:04.480 --> 00:07:07.839
<v Speaker 2>The bootstrap approach like the old phrase pulling yourself up

137
00:07:07.839 --> 00:07:09.120
<v Speaker 2>by your bootstrap.

138
00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:11.439
<v Speaker 3>Exactly building something massive out of essentially nothing.

139
00:07:11.639 --> 00:07:13.000
<v Speaker 2>So how does that work in physics?

140
00:07:13.040 --> 00:07:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, historically this is fascinating. Back in the nineteen sixties,

141
00:07:16.560 --> 00:07:20.319
<v Speaker 3>prominent physicists, guys like Jeffrey Chew at UC Berkeley and

142
00:07:20.360 --> 00:07:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Stephen Frauschi at Caltech. They were frustrated.

143
00:07:22.360 --> 00:07:23.639
<v Speaker 2>Why what was happening.

144
00:07:23.879 --> 00:07:28.079
<v Speaker 3>Quantum mechanics was just getting incredibly messy. Particle colliders were

145
00:07:28.120 --> 00:07:31.959
<v Speaker 3>spitting out dozens of new, bizarre particles and nobody can

146
00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:35.199
<v Speaker 3>make any sense of the underlying rules. So Chew suggested

147
00:07:35.240 --> 00:07:37.879
<v Speaker 3>they just throw out all their complex models. He wanted

148
00:07:37.879 --> 00:07:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to us start from absolute scratch.

149
00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, like, wipe the chalkboard completely clean.

150
00:07:42.720 --> 00:07:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they adopted the absolute bare minimum universally agreed upon

151
00:07:46.639 --> 00:07:50.360
<v Speaker 3>rules of basic logic and causality, things you just cannot

152
00:07:50.439 --> 00:07:52.439
<v Speaker 3>argue with, and they tried to build up the laws

153
00:07:52.439 --> 00:07:54.600
<v Speaker 3>of physics just from those tiny constraints.

154
00:07:54.720 --> 00:07:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Did it work well?

155
00:07:55.879 --> 00:07:58.439
<v Speaker 3>The problem was, in the nineteen sixties, the sheer computing

156
00:07:58.519 --> 00:08:01.759
<v Speaker 3>power and the mathematical technique needed to actually run those

157
00:08:01.800 --> 00:08:05.519
<v Speaker 3>massive equations that it didn't exist yet. The bootstrap method

158
00:08:05.560 --> 00:08:08.240
<v Speaker 3>became way too complex to manage, and it eventually fell

159
00:08:08.319 --> 00:08:09.399
<v Speaker 3>completely out of fashion.

160
00:08:09.720 --> 00:08:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Ah. Right, but I'm guessing that today, with supercomputers and

161
00:08:14.000 --> 00:08:18.240
<v Speaker 2>better math, modern physicists are dusting off this retro technique.

162
00:08:18.319 --> 00:08:21.079
<v Speaker 3>What's fascinating here is how powerful this method has become.

163
00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:24.279
<v Speaker 3>In the modern era, physicists like Clifford Chung and Grant

164
00:08:24.319 --> 00:08:27.519
<v Speaker 3>Remen decided to apply that old bootstrap philosophy to the

165
00:08:27.600 --> 00:08:29.720
<v Speaker 3>ultimate problem, quantum gravity.

166
00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>So instead of assuming string theory is real and trying

167
00:08:33.279 --> 00:08:36.240
<v Speaker 2>to prove it, they just started with that blank slate exactly.

168
00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:39.879
<v Speaker 3>They adopted just two basic rules about how energy and

169
00:08:39.919 --> 00:08:43.679
<v Speaker 3>particles should behave, and they let the mathematics dictate what

170
00:08:43.799 --> 00:08:45.080
<v Speaker 3>the universe must look like.

171
00:08:45.240 --> 00:08:47.559
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I have an analogy for this. Tell me if

172
00:08:47.559 --> 00:08:49.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm on the right track here, go for it. This

173
00:08:49.480 --> 00:08:52.960
<v Speaker 2>sounds exactly like a Pseudoku puzzle. Oh. I like that, right,

174
00:08:53.440 --> 00:08:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Because when you sit down with a blank Sudoku grid,

175
00:08:56.200 --> 00:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>you don't guess the final picture. You don't just start

176
00:08:58.759 --> 00:09:01.639
<v Speaker 2>throwing numbers in ran because you think they look nice.

177
00:09:02.039 --> 00:09:05.279
<v Speaker 2>You only have a few fundamental rules, right numbers one

178
00:09:05.320 --> 00:09:07.799
<v Speaker 2>through nine. No repeats in a row, no repeats in

179
00:09:07.840 --> 00:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>a column, no repeats in a box.

180
00:09:09.480 --> 00:09:11.320
<v Speaker 3>That is a perfect way to visualize it.

181
00:09:11.519 --> 00:09:13.879
<v Speaker 2>And the magic of a Sudoku puzzle is that if

182
00:09:13.919 --> 00:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>you follow those basic rules strictly mathematically, there is only

183
00:09:18.360 --> 00:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>one unique solution that can possibly emerge at the end.

184
00:09:21.320 --> 00:09:24.279
<v Speaker 2>You don't force the outcome at all. The constraints force

185
00:09:24.360 --> 00:09:24.879
<v Speaker 2>the outcome.

186
00:09:25.080 --> 00:09:28.639
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly the same logic they used. These physicists wanted

187
00:09:28.639 --> 00:09:31.360
<v Speaker 3>to set up the cosmic Sudoku grid. They need to

188
00:09:31.399 --> 00:09:34.799
<v Speaker 3>find the absolute minimum constraints required for the universe to

189
00:09:34.840 --> 00:09:38.519
<v Speaker 3>function without tearing itself apart with mathematical infinities.

190
00:09:38.600 --> 00:09:40.799
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we need to look at the specific rules

191
00:09:40.840 --> 00:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>they plugged into this grid. What is rule number one?

192
00:09:43.399 --> 00:09:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Rule number one is something they call ultrasoftness. And to

193
00:09:46.919 --> 00:09:49.519
<v Speaker 3>understand why this rule is necessary, we have to talk

194
00:09:49.559 --> 00:09:51.799
<v Speaker 3>about a concept called the plank scale.

195
00:09:52.039 --> 00:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's translate that. What does the plank scale look like

196
00:09:54.480 --> 00:09:55.879
<v Speaker 2>in plain English.

197
00:09:56.320 --> 00:09:59.679
<v Speaker 3>It is the ultimate extreme of physics. It's an energy

198
00:09:59.759 --> 00:10:03.159
<v Speaker 3>level roughly nineteen orders of magnitude greater than the mass

199
00:10:03.159 --> 00:10:03.919
<v Speaker 3>of a single.

200
00:10:03.679 --> 00:10:06.039
<v Speaker 2>Proton, which is hard to picture.

201
00:10:06.080 --> 00:10:08.279
<v Speaker 3>Right, So to give you an intumitive sense of that scale,

202
00:10:08.720 --> 00:10:11.480
<v Speaker 3>imagine taking the explosive energy of a full tank of

203
00:10:11.559 --> 00:10:14.919
<v Speaker 3>jet fuel, okay, and compressing all of that immense power

204
00:10:15.360 --> 00:10:18.480
<v Speaker 3>down into a space the size of a single subatomic particle.

205
00:10:18.679 --> 00:10:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, that is an incomprehensible level of density and heat.

206
00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:27.240
<v Speaker 3>It is. And at that extreme scale, general relativity breaks.

207
00:10:27.759 --> 00:10:31.159
<v Speaker 3>The gravitational pull between particles becomes so intense that if

208
00:10:31.200 --> 00:10:35.399
<v Speaker 3>they were to actually collide, the resulting mathematical probability equations

209
00:10:35.679 --> 00:10:37.639
<v Speaker 3>rock it straight to infinity.

210
00:10:37.240 --> 00:10:38.720
<v Speaker 2>The fatal error recidence.

211
00:10:38.840 --> 00:10:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Right, the math says, the universe breaks. So to fix

212
00:10:43.159 --> 00:10:47.720
<v Speaker 3>this on their blank slate, the physicists introduced ultrasoftness. They

213
00:10:47.759 --> 00:10:51.120
<v Speaker 3>assumed that for reality to exist, nature must have a

214
00:10:51.159 --> 00:10:54.399
<v Speaker 3>mechanism that softens these interactions at ultimate extremes.

215
00:10:54.600 --> 00:10:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Wait, I gotta stop you there. How does an interaction

216
00:10:57.000 --> 00:10:59.519
<v Speaker 2>soften when you have that much energy involved? Like if

217
00:10:59.559 --> 00:11:01.799
<v Speaker 2>two things are hurtling toward each other with the energy

218
00:11:01.840 --> 00:11:04.320
<v Speaker 2>of a jet engine. How do they not create a

219
00:11:04.360 --> 00:11:05.600
<v Speaker 2>catastrophic crash.

220
00:11:05.679 --> 00:11:07.759
<v Speaker 3>It's weird, I know. Think of it less like physical

221
00:11:07.759 --> 00:11:10.759
<v Speaker 3>objects colliding and more like sound waves or water waves.

222
00:11:11.279 --> 00:11:14.000
<v Speaker 3>If two massive ocean waves crash directly into each other,

223
00:11:14.159 --> 00:11:17.559
<v Speaker 3>you get a violent, localized splash. Right, that's our mathematical infinity.

224
00:11:18.200 --> 00:11:22.480
<v Speaker 3>But ultrasoftness suggests that at the absolute highest energy extremes,

225
00:11:22.720 --> 00:11:25.799
<v Speaker 3>particles act more like ripples in a pond. As their

226
00:11:25.919 --> 00:11:28.080
<v Speaker 3>energy increases, they start to spread.

227
00:11:27.759 --> 00:11:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Out, spread out.

228
00:11:28.879 --> 00:11:32.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, when they meet, they just glide through one another's frequencies.

229
00:11:32.360 --> 00:11:36.559
<v Speaker 3>They disperse the energy smoothly instead of creating a localized explosion.

230
00:11:36.759 --> 00:11:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, here's where it gets really interesting. So it's

231
00:11:39.879 --> 00:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>like two cars speeding toward each other on a highway.

232
00:11:43.559 --> 00:11:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Normally you'd expect a catastrophic crash, which is our infinite math,

233
00:11:48.080 --> 00:11:51.879
<v Speaker 2>but at extremely high speeds, instead of crashing, they decide

234
00:11:52.039 --> 00:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>they just don't want to interact. They turn into ghosts

235
00:11:54.720 --> 00:11:56.879
<v Speaker 2>and pass reely right through one another.

236
00:11:57.120 --> 00:11:59.440
<v Speaker 3>That's a great way to picture it. By requiring the

237
00:11:59.480 --> 00:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>math to follow this rule of ultrasoftness, the interaction probabilities

238
00:12:03.399 --> 00:12:07.480
<v Speaker 3>drop swiftly as energy rises. The feedback loop of infinite

239
00:12:07.600 --> 00:12:10.279
<v Speaker 3>energies is prevented and reality holds together.

240
00:12:10.559 --> 00:12:12.879
<v Speaker 2>And the beauty of this is they didn't assume strings

241
00:12:12.919 --> 00:12:16.080
<v Speaker 2>were causing this ghost like smearing. They just said, look,

242
00:12:16.159 --> 00:12:18.720
<v Speaker 2>if the math is going to work, this softening effect

243
00:12:18.799 --> 00:12:20.879
<v Speaker 2>has to happen regardless of what's causing it.

244
00:12:21.399 --> 00:12:21.919
<v Speaker 3>Precisely.

245
00:12:22.000 --> 00:12:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's rule one. What about rule two?

246
00:12:23.919 --> 00:12:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Rule two deals with what physicists call minimal zeros. Now,

247
00:12:28.120 --> 00:12:30.039
<v Speaker 3>this one gets a little deep into the mechanics of

248
00:12:30.039 --> 00:12:32.759
<v Speaker 3>something called scattering amplitudes.

249
00:12:32.080 --> 00:12:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Which means what exactly.

250
00:12:33.879 --> 00:12:37.120
<v Speaker 3>It's just the technical term for calculating the angles, momentum,

251
00:12:37.120 --> 00:12:39.399
<v Speaker 3>and spin of particles when they bounce off one another.

252
00:12:39.480 --> 00:12:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Got it, the mechanics of a sub atomic.

253
00:12:41.519 --> 00:12:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Car crash exactly. Within these calculations there are very specific

254
00:12:45.879 --> 00:12:49.600
<v Speaker 3>collision setups, what we call kinematic points. These are exact

255
00:12:49.639 --> 00:12:53.399
<v Speaker 3>angles and speeds where the math dictates the particles must

256
00:12:53.440 --> 00:12:57.000
<v Speaker 3>not interact. They must simply bounce away or pass by

257
00:12:57.480 --> 00:12:59.120
<v Speaker 3>without exchanging any energy.

258
00:12:59.320 --> 00:13:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Like mathmat called dead zones.

259
00:13:00.960 --> 00:13:02.759
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they're called zeros.

260
00:13:02.759 --> 00:13:05.440
<v Speaker 2>But why does the universe need dead zones where nothing happens?

261
00:13:05.639 --> 00:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Because if particles interacted and exchange energy at absolutely every

262
00:13:09.399 --> 00:13:12.960
<v Speaker 3>possible angle in every possible speed. The sheer volume of

263
00:13:13.000 --> 00:13:16.519
<v Speaker 3>those interactions would again trigger a runaway feedback loop.

264
00:13:16.600 --> 00:13:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Ah, the infinities come back right.

265
00:13:18.679 --> 00:13:22.000
<v Speaker 3>The math requires these zeros to act as safety valves, so.

266
00:13:22.080 --> 00:13:27.039
<v Speaker 2>Minimal zeros is basically like designing a massive, complex highway system.

267
00:13:27.279 --> 00:13:30.080
<v Speaker 2>If you have cars interacting at every single intersection, you

268
00:13:30.120 --> 00:13:32.759
<v Speaker 2>get infinite gridlock. You need red lights. You need points

269
00:13:32.759 --> 00:13:35.519
<v Speaker 2>where cars are forced not to interact. I love that, yes,

270
00:13:35.879 --> 00:13:38.440
<v Speaker 2>and the rule of minimal zero says you want the

271
00:13:38.480 --> 00:13:41.639
<v Speaker 2>absolute fewest number of red lights possible to keep the

272
00:13:41.679 --> 00:13:44.039
<v Speaker 2>traffic flowing smoothly without a pile up.

273
00:13:44.440 --> 00:13:48.759
<v Speaker 3>That is a phenomenal analogy. You demand the strict mathematical

274
00:13:48.799 --> 00:13:51.679
<v Speaker 3>minimum of these non interaction points required for the whole

275
00:13:51.799 --> 00:13:54.679
<v Speaker 3>system to hold together. You don't want an infinite number

276
00:13:54.679 --> 00:13:57.159
<v Speaker 3>of red lights because then nothing moves. You want the

277
00:13:57.200 --> 00:13:57.879
<v Speaker 3>bare minimum.

278
00:13:57.919 --> 00:14:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, the Sidoku grid is set. We have Rule one ultrasoftness.

279
00:14:02.720 --> 00:14:05.919
<v Speaker 2>Particles must smear out or turn into ghosts and soften

280
00:14:05.960 --> 00:14:08.679
<v Speaker 2>their interactions at crazy high energies to avoid an infinite

281
00:14:08.679 --> 00:14:13.519
<v Speaker 2>crash check and rule two minimal zeros. The universe must

282
00:14:13.519 --> 00:14:16.519
<v Speaker 2>operate with the absolute fewest number of mathematical red lights

283
00:14:16.600 --> 00:14:19.559
<v Speaker 2>or dead zones allowed. That's it, two basic rules of

284
00:14:19.600 --> 00:14:21.000
<v Speaker 2>logic and traffic management.

285
00:14:21.399 --> 00:14:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Just those two. The researchers deliberately used. No assumptions about

286
00:14:24.960 --> 00:14:28.919
<v Speaker 3>extra dimensions, no assumptions about microscopic vibrating.

287
00:14:28.480 --> 00:14:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Loops, just a completely blank slate.

288
00:14:30.480 --> 00:14:34.159
<v Speaker 3>Right. They took those two unbendable rules and they let

289
00:14:34.200 --> 00:14:36.639
<v Speaker 3>the mathematical engines run to see what kind of universe

290
00:14:36.639 --> 00:14:41.000
<v Speaker 3>would naturally emerge. They mapped out every possible mathematical function

291
00:14:41.080 --> 00:14:44.360
<v Speaker 3>that could satisfy both ultrasoftness and minimal zeros.

292
00:14:44.639 --> 00:14:47.679
<v Speaker 2>And out of all the infinite possibilities of how the

293
00:14:47.759 --> 00:14:52.159
<v Speaker 2>universe could be structured, how many valid mathematical solutions did

294
00:14:52.200 --> 00:14:53.159
<v Speaker 2>they actually find?

295
00:14:53.399 --> 00:14:55.279
<v Speaker 3>They found exactly one, just one.

296
00:14:55.440 --> 00:14:57.399
<v Speaker 2>The Sudoku puzzle solved itself.

297
00:14:57.679 --> 00:15:02.399
<v Speaker 3>Only one unique mathematical function satisfied both of those logical constraints.

298
00:15:02.879 --> 00:15:05.159
<v Speaker 3>And this is really the climax of the whole endeavor,

299
00:15:05.360 --> 00:15:09.279
<v Speaker 3>because that singular mathematical function was not some random string

300
00:15:09.360 --> 00:15:12.639
<v Speaker 3>of new numbers. It was the exact defining formula of

301
00:15:12.679 --> 00:15:13.399
<v Speaker 3>string theory.

302
00:15:13.600 --> 00:15:14.039
<v Speaker 2>No way.

303
00:15:14.240 --> 00:15:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, as Clifford Chung put it, they started with basic

304
00:15:17.000 --> 00:15:18.799
<v Speaker 3>logic and the strings just fell out.

305
00:15:18.759 --> 00:15:20.879
<v Speaker 2>That gives me literal chills. The strings just fell out.

306
00:15:20.879 --> 00:15:23.720
<v Speaker 2>You don't even go looking for string theory. Pure logic

307
00:15:23.799 --> 00:15:26.279
<v Speaker 2>traps the truth in a corner, and string theory is

308
00:15:26.320 --> 00:15:27.960
<v Speaker 2>the only thing left standing in the room.

309
00:15:28.080 --> 00:15:31.559
<v Speaker 3>It's incredible and it wasn't just a vague approximation either.

310
00:15:32.000 --> 00:15:35.679
<v Speaker 3>The solution that emerged from the bootstrap math perfectly matched

311
00:15:35.720 --> 00:15:37.360
<v Speaker 3>something known as the string spectrum.

312
00:15:37.440 --> 00:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>The string spectrum.

313
00:15:38.600 --> 00:15:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. To appreciate this, we have to look back again

314
00:15:41.679 --> 00:15:45.360
<v Speaker 3>to the late nineteen sixties to an Italian physicist named

315
00:15:45.399 --> 00:15:46.639
<v Speaker 3>gabrielle Vinzziano.

316
00:15:46.879 --> 00:15:48.759
<v Speaker 2>Right, I know this one. He was looking at the

317
00:15:48.799 --> 00:15:51.559
<v Speaker 2>messy data coming out of particle colliders at CERN.

318
00:15:51.840 --> 00:15:55.320
<v Speaker 3>He was Article colliders back then were spitting out a

319
00:15:55.320 --> 00:15:59.960
<v Speaker 3>confusing spray of subatomic debris, just particles of all different maps,

320
00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:04.759
<v Speaker 3>masses and spins. It looked like chaotic junk. But Vineziano

321
00:16:04.799 --> 00:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>managed to write down a mathematical formula that described all

322
00:16:08.320 --> 00:16:09.840
<v Speaker 3>these varying masses.

323
00:16:09.519 --> 00:16:10.480
<v Speaker 2>And what did it look like.

324
00:16:10.960 --> 00:16:14.799
<v Speaker 3>His formula revealed a beautiful infinite tower or a ladder

325
00:16:15.200 --> 00:16:18.720
<v Speaker 3>of massive spinning particles where the mass and spin increased

326
00:16:18.759 --> 00:16:20.960
<v Speaker 3>in very discrete, orderly steps.

327
00:16:20.879 --> 00:16:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Like climbing the rungs of a ladder. But what was

328
00:16:23.039 --> 00:16:24.600
<v Speaker 2>actually causing those steps?

329
00:16:24.679 --> 00:16:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, a the time, Benenciano didn't know. But a few

330
00:16:27.320 --> 00:16:30.279
<v Speaker 3>years later other physicists looked at his formula and realized

331
00:16:30.320 --> 00:16:34.080
<v Speaker 3>that this mysterious tower of particles corresponded perfectly to the

332
00:16:34.120 --> 00:16:36.159
<v Speaker 3>harmonic series of a vibrating string.

333
00:16:36.399 --> 00:16:38.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I see, So it's literally like plucking a guitar

334
00:16:38.840 --> 00:16:43.440
<v Speaker 2>string or a violin string. You don't just get static noise,

335
00:16:43.480 --> 00:16:45.840
<v Speaker 2>You get a fundamental bass note, and then you get

336
00:16:45.840 --> 00:16:50.840
<v Speaker 2>a distinct mathematical series of overtones or harmonics. Exactly are

337
00:16:50.879 --> 00:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>you saying? Those different microscopic harmonics are the different subatomic particles.

338
00:16:54.919 --> 00:16:57.799
<v Speaker 3>That is the core beauty of the theory. A single

339
00:16:58.039 --> 00:17:02.960
<v Speaker 3>fundamental entity of vibrating microscopic string can create the entire

340
00:17:03.080 --> 00:17:07.319
<v Speaker 3>zoo of subatomic particles just by changing its tune. An

341
00:17:07.319 --> 00:17:11.119
<v Speaker 3>open ended string vibrating in its fundamental mode produces the

342
00:17:11.160 --> 00:17:13.920
<v Speaker 3>mass and spin of a photon, the particle of light.

343
00:17:14.000 --> 00:17:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so if a different vibration gives you a different particle,

344
00:17:17.319 --> 00:17:19.599
<v Speaker 2>what vibration gives you gravity? Ah?

345
00:17:19.720 --> 00:17:21.759
<v Speaker 3>If the string is a closed loop, like a tiny

346
00:17:21.799 --> 00:17:25.000
<v Speaker 3>rubber band, and it vibrates in a specific mode, the

347
00:17:25.000 --> 00:17:28.559
<v Speaker 3>math perfectly describes the graviton. The graviton, yeah, the theoretical

348
00:17:28.599 --> 00:17:30.519
<v Speaker 3>particle that carries the force of gravity. It is built

349
00:17:30.519 --> 00:17:32.359
<v Speaker 3>in from the start. That was the huge breakthrough in

350
00:17:32.400 --> 00:17:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the nineteen seventies. String theory naturally contained gravity operating smoothly

351
00:17:36.440 --> 00:17:38.680
<v Speaker 3>at the quantum level without throwing infinite errors.

352
00:17:38.960 --> 00:17:42.359
<v Speaker 2>So, bringing it back to this new research, by just

353
00:17:42.400 --> 00:17:44.839
<v Speaker 2>applying rule one and rule two to a blank slate,

354
00:17:45.359 --> 00:17:49.599
<v Speaker 2>this infinite tower of musical particles just naturally emerged from

355
00:17:49.640 --> 00:17:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the equations.

356
00:17:50.440 --> 00:17:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Every single bit of it, the precise interaction strengths, the harmonics,

357
00:17:55.000 --> 00:17:58.319
<v Speaker 3>the behavior of gravity, all of it emerged automatically as

358
00:17:58.359 --> 00:18:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the only logical way to satisfy ultrasoftness and minimal zeros.

359
00:18:02.480 --> 00:18:05.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I have to ask the crucial skeptical question here.

360
00:18:05.319 --> 00:18:07.759
<v Speaker 2>Let me push back for a second. Do if the

361
00:18:07.799 --> 00:18:11.640
<v Speaker 2>math leads to exactly one solution, and that solution perfectly

362
00:18:11.680 --> 00:18:15.400
<v Speaker 2>mirrors string theory, does this mean string theory is officially

363
00:18:15.440 --> 00:18:19.079
<v Speaker 2>a fact? Like have we bypassed the galaxy sized collider

364
00:18:19.119 --> 00:18:21.160
<v Speaker 2>and proven it using just math?

365
00:18:21.559 --> 00:18:23.759
<v Speaker 3>It is vital to make a distinction here. No, this

366
00:18:23.880 --> 00:18:25.960
<v Speaker 3>does not mean string theory is officially proven as a

367
00:18:25.960 --> 00:18:29.359
<v Speaker 3>physical experimental fact we still have not directly observed to

368
00:18:29.400 --> 00:18:32.599
<v Speaker 3>string science fundamentally relies on physical.

369
00:18:32.359 --> 00:18:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Observation, So we can't throw a parade just yet.

370
00:18:34.880 --> 00:18:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Not a parade, no, but maybe a quiet, deeply profound

371
00:18:38.440 --> 00:18:42.319
<v Speaker 3>celebration in the theoretical physics department, because what this provides

372
00:18:42.400 --> 00:18:46.519
<v Speaker 3>is incredibly robust theoretical proof. Before this, you could argue

373
00:18:46.519 --> 00:18:49.440
<v Speaker 3>that string theory was just one of many possible arbitrary

374
00:18:49.440 --> 00:18:52.200
<v Speaker 3>ways to fix the math. But this research shows that

375
00:18:52.240 --> 00:18:56.480
<v Speaker 3>if you accept two highly logical, almost unavoidable constricts about

376
00:18:56.519 --> 00:18:59.720
<v Speaker 3>how high energy particles behave, the math doesn't yield an

377
00:18:59.759 --> 00:19:03.720
<v Speaker 3>in definite number of garbage solutions. It yields one deeply

378
00:19:03.799 --> 00:19:04.839
<v Speaker 3>elegant framework.

379
00:19:05.599 --> 00:19:08.440
<v Speaker 2>So what does this all mean when we step back

380
00:19:08.480 --> 00:19:11.839
<v Speaker 2>from the massive equations, plank scales and the quantum jitter.

381
00:19:12.680 --> 00:19:15.240
<v Speaker 2>What does this tell us about the fundamental nature of reality?

382
00:19:15.559 --> 00:19:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, if we connect this to the bigger picture, it

383
00:19:18.000 --> 00:19:21.279
<v Speaker 3>implies a universe that is far less ratrary than we thought.

384
00:19:22.079 --> 00:19:25.480
<v Speaker 3>As prominent physicists have pointed out, this boostrap approach narrows

385
00:19:25.519 --> 00:19:27.319
<v Speaker 3>the playing field of reality.

386
00:19:27.000 --> 00:19:28.559
<v Speaker 2>Narrowing it down just one option.

387
00:19:28.880 --> 00:19:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, It shows us that the universe isn't a random

388
00:19:31.160 --> 00:19:34.680
<v Speaker 3>collection of laws bolted together. It strongly implies that the

389
00:19:34.680 --> 00:19:38.200
<v Speaker 3>fundamental nature of existence is tightly constrained by pure logic.

390
00:19:38.599 --> 00:19:42.319
<v Speaker 2>So, to everyone listening to this right now, the universe

391
00:19:42.400 --> 00:19:45.279
<v Speaker 2>might not be random at all. The puzzle of reality

392
00:19:45.400 --> 00:19:49.759
<v Speaker 2>might only have one valid configuration. The pieces literally cannot

393
00:19:49.759 --> 00:19:53.319
<v Speaker 2>fit together any other way without breaking the universe. You

394
00:19:53.359 --> 00:19:56.200
<v Speaker 2>don't necessarily need to see everything to prove it exists.

395
00:19:56.720 --> 00:19:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes pure logic traps the truth in a corner.

396
00:19:59.480 --> 00:20:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Precisely, which leaves us with a truly fascinating and maybe

397
00:20:03.000 --> 00:20:06.000
<v Speaker 3>slightly unnerving puzzle to ponder on our own.

398
00:20:06.119 --> 00:20:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, what's that?

399
00:20:07.680 --> 00:20:10.759
<v Speaker 3>If this cosmic sudoku puzzle proves that string theory is

400
00:20:10.799 --> 00:20:14.319
<v Speaker 3>the only possible answer based on these two basic assumptions,

401
00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:17.799
<v Speaker 3>what happens if string theory is eventually proven wrong?

402
00:20:18.359 --> 00:20:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Wait, if it's proven wrong, Yeah.

403
00:20:20.680 --> 00:20:23.039
<v Speaker 3>Let's say we find a way to definitively disprove it.

404
00:20:23.440 --> 00:20:25.319
<v Speaker 3>If we want to find another model of the universe,

405
00:20:25.359 --> 00:20:29.000
<v Speaker 3>which of these supposedly unbreakable fundamental assumptions about reality are

406
00:20:29.000 --> 00:20:29.920
<v Speaker 3>we going to have to throw away?

407
00:20:30.319 --> 00:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Are we throwing away the red lights or are the

408
00:20:32.039 --> 00:20:32.680
<v Speaker 2>ghost cars?

409
00:20:32.839 --> 00:20:36.519
<v Speaker 3>Exactly If it's not string theory, then either particles don't

410
00:20:36.559 --> 00:20:39.880
<v Speaker 3>soften a high energies or the universe requires infinite red lights,

411
00:20:40.359 --> 00:20:43.799
<v Speaker 3>and either of those options breaks our understanding of logic completely.

412
00:20:44.079 --> 00:20:47.119
<v Speaker 2>Wow, So we're backed into a corner. Either the invisible

413
00:20:47.119 --> 00:20:50.480
<v Speaker 2>strings are real, or the very foundation of logic itself

414
00:20:50.480 --> 00:20:52.839
<v Speaker 2>has a flaw we haven't found yet. That is a

415
00:20:52.839 --> 00:20:54.200
<v Speaker 2>staggering thought to leave on.
