Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the thirty first
Speaker 1: of July, Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well,
Speaker 1: today we're going to take a look at the rapidly
Speaker 1: advancing pandemic of bird flu, but also the technocracy and
Speaker 1: the connections to both parties that are there. And as
Speaker 1: Lala Harris is enjoying her honeymoon with the press, it
Speaker 1: made me very short and strange honeymoon, We're going to
Speaker 1: take a look at some of the things that are
Speaker 1: evolving around her, and of course the results of her
Speaker 1: not just being the borders are but she was also
Speaker 1: the bus Czar, the electric bus Zar. We've got updates
Speaker 1: on that as well. Stay whether us will be right back, Well,
Speaker 1: we have an established pattern of censorship. One of the
Speaker 1: first places that they were doing censorship was on copyright strikes,
Speaker 1: and long before there was any social media shadow banning
Speaker 1: or deep platforming or any that kind of stuff. Back
Speaker 1: in twenty thirteen, as I point out many times the
Speaker 1: anniversary one hundredth anniversary of the Federal Reserve report that
Speaker 1: I did, it's a wonderful lie using a few clips,
Speaker 1: but not only that from It's a Wonderful Life talking
Speaker 1: about the creation of the Federal Reserve. That got a
Speaker 1: copyright strike and they took it down. And yet we
Speaker 1: have seen that used over and over again. We've seen
Speaker 1: it most recently with the Nashville Shooters manifesto, the efforts
Speaker 1: to conceal that by the FBI and by people in
Speaker 1: the Nashville government. And what they did was they claimed
Speaker 1: a copyright strike on the writings the diary of the
Speaker 1: Trane Killer there in Nashville. Now, I know they wanted
Speaker 1: to hide that because she's a training but the idea
Speaker 1: that it was a copyright it was absolutely absurd. I
Speaker 1: imagine that's going to be appealed by the newspaper trying
Speaker 1: to get that out. But now we've seen another one,
Speaker 1: and this one is about Bohemian Grow again a copyright strike.
Speaker 1: This is a little bit different. The Federal Reserve report
Speaker 1: was clearly fair use it was clearly an unequal enforcement
Speaker 1: based on political criticism. Because the entire movie that I
Speaker 1: took a few clips from and commented on those clips,
Speaker 1: the entire movie had been up for years, had a
Speaker 1: million views on YouTube. It's back in twenty thirteen, so
Speaker 1: clearly there wasn't a copyright issue. That's why I got
Speaker 1: the stuff was from YouTube and with the Nashville there's
Speaker 1: no copyright that anyone can claim on what this deceased
Speaker 1: writer put down. How did they own that? Anybody, you know,
Speaker 1: either the families of the victims or anyone else to
Speaker 1: finally copyright claim on it. Bohemian Bohemian Grove Club. This
Speaker 1: is a video that recently a citizen journalist got in
Speaker 1: by the name of Dancer. I don't know who that was,
Speaker 1: put it up on YouTube. It's also up and still
Speaker 1: up on Rumble if you want to see it. Rumble
Speaker 1: is not playing these games of censorship, and it's all
Speaker 1: coming from the government. It's coming from the establishment. They
Speaker 1: got in and filmed with just did it recently? The
Speaker 1: parts of the cremation of care ceremony a bizarre ritual
Speaker 1: in the woods with a bunch of men, and you
Speaker 1: know the story about the Bohemian Grove Cremation of Care.
Speaker 1: They essentially have a care is supposedly represented by a
Speaker 1: small baby that they burn in a facsimile of the
Speaker 1: child sacrifices to Mollik Anybody who knows history, who knows
Speaker 1: a biblical history, understands what that's about. Mollik and Ashtroth
Speaker 1: were throughout the Canaanite area and down into the Carthaginian
Speaker 1: area North Africa, and you can find the places where
Speaker 1: they were worshiped mass graveyards of bones of infants. It
Speaker 1: was very very common. Ashtroth was a sexual goddess and
Speaker 1: had rituals, you know, kind of like the Olympics type
Speaker 1: of stuff, you know. But the but then a few
Speaker 1: months later, what they would do is they would sacrifice
Speaker 1: these unwanted children that were a result of their partying
Speaker 1: or whatever. They would sacrifice them for prosperity. And it
Speaker 1: was called passing your child through the fire. They would
Speaker 1: heat up this metal idol that they had made some
Speaker 1: kind of representation to the god Malik, and they would
Speaker 1: place the babies on this heated furnace and burn them
Speaker 1: to death. And you know, it's an abortion essentially, so
Speaker 1: but it was supposed to bring them prosperity. And so
Speaker 1: our elitists have kind of readapted that and said, well,
Speaker 1: you know, it's a cremation of care, because what do
Speaker 1: they care about money? Right? That's all they care about.
Speaker 1: They love money. That's it private event held within the
Speaker 1: confines of a twenty seven hundred acre retreat in Monto Rio, California.
Speaker 1: It's a private club, high profile membership including politicians, business leaders, artists.
Speaker 1: You know, we've seen pictures of Reagan, of Nixon, you
Speaker 1: name it, these different presidents, Walter Cronkite narrating these rituals
Speaker 1: in the past. It asserts strict privacy policies and prohibits
Speaker 1: any recording devices at the gathering. And so what they
Speaker 1: did was they filed a copyright violation with YouTube, and
Speaker 1: YouTube said we're going to enforce that. While these legal
Speaker 1: mechanisms are designed to protect intellectual property rights, they're increasingly
Speaker 1: leveraged by corporations, private entities, and government bodies to sensor
Speaker 1: material deemed sensitive or damaging. This practice not only restricts
Speaker 1: public access to potentially important information, but also Steifel's discourse
Speaker 1: and debate. That's what it's intended to do. You know,
Speaker 1: like I said before the you look at its wonderful life.
Speaker 1: The entire movie was up where I got the stuff from,
Speaker 1: and its stayed up. It remained up, and it was
Speaker 1: up for many years until YouTube started putting up more
Speaker 1: of their content and charging for it than they got
Speaker 1: more strict about copyright issues. But it was up and
Speaker 1: remained up for years. But it is there to stifle
Speaker 1: debate all censorship as particularly won the content in question
Speaker 1: of all's powerful figures and institutions. So they call it
Speaker 1: a private performance. By the way, when we look at
Speaker 1: this guy, as I think he actually got an explanation,
Speaker 1: they actually gave him an explanation, and they gave him
Speaker 1: a strike, as in three strikes in you're out, not
Speaker 1: the same kind of stuff that I got, or a
Speaker 1: complaint has been filed, you're gone. That was the first
Speaker 1: time I got banned just a single complaint, not even
Speaker 1: one strike, but a complaint has been filed. They kept
Speaker 1: sending that about every and it was odd because it
Speaker 1: wasn't a regular interval. It's about every ten to fifteen minutes.
Speaker 1: They did it for months. I had over eight thousand
Speaker 1: of these messages and they would never reply to my
Speaker 1: message and never gave me a reason. And then eventually
Speaker 1: what they did was they shut down my Christmas channel
Speaker 1: that I did in twenty twenty one. Christmas of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one, they shut that down without any comment either.
Speaker 1: Controversy over the Olympics opening ceremony says, break the Matrix
Speaker 1: is a textbook example of manufactured outrage. Well, yeah, look,
Speaker 1: the Olympics are manufactured circuses to keep you distracted. It's
Speaker 1: bread and circuses, and it's all about tribalism with a
Speaker 1: thin veneer of individualism. Every once in a while you
Speaker 1: have an individual who has an outstanding story, like the
Speaker 1: one I talked about yesterday, one hundred years ago, last
Speaker 1: time they had the Olympics in Paris, Eric Little, the
Speaker 1: story of Chariots of Fire. But of course his life
Speaker 1: was not limited just to that one Olympics. It was
Speaker 1: far more important and far more interesting after that. But yeah,
Speaker 1: occasionally you have an individual story that pops out like that.
Speaker 1: But for the most part, it's about promoting tribalism and
Speaker 1: you know, getting people hyped up for tribal wars and
Speaker 1: that type of thing. Of course, all of it is manufactured,
Speaker 1: and that is what is so annoying, and that's all
Speaker 1: we should be outraged about, this manufactured thing that we
Speaker 1: all pay so much money as a society to get
Speaker 1: involved with. Well, this is up on Free Thought Project again.
Speaker 1: It's from Break the Matrix, and he spent a great
Speaker 1: deal of time debunking the idea that this was the
Speaker 1: Last Supper, even though they basically admitted it. I believe,
Speaker 1: But does it really matter, No, it doesn't. As I
Speaker 1: said before, it's not so much that there's nothing sacred
Speaker 1: about that painting. It's the debauchery that people object too,
Speaker 1: and the intended blasphemy, and says, well, you know, last
Speaker 1: Supper only has thirteen people, but this had thirty two people.
Speaker 1: And since when was Jesus ever wrapped in vines? And
Speaker 1: when was he blue? Well this is obviously said referring
Speaker 1: to the Greek god of wine and revelry. Dionysius. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was clearly revelry and debauchery. But you know, all
Speaker 1: this characterizes the Olympics from the very beginning. You know, again,
Speaker 1: when you look at the torch being passed, it was
Speaker 1: at the very beginning handed to a tranny who replaced women.
Speaker 1: So usually there's a woman and a man holding that,
Speaker 1: but this time it's a trainy man and another man
Speaker 1: holding it. It was to purge women out, and so
Speaker 1: that's really characterized this thing from the very beginning. It's
Speaker 1: about revelry. It's about debauchery. It goes on to explain
Speaker 1: all the history, more than you want to know about Dionysius,
Speaker 1: how we created the Roman tradition of bacchanalia. Yeah, exactly,
Speaker 1: credit with introducing theater to the Western world. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: that doesn't redeem bacchanalia. It just helps to define how
Speaker 1: theater got so weird and debauched itself. So he says,
Speaker 1: So the question we have to ask ourselves is why,
Speaker 1: why rather than simply admit that the ceremony was inspired
Speaker 1: by ancient Greek pagan themes, does the media continue to
Speaker 1: propagate the notion that it was an act of deliberate blasphemy. Well,
Speaker 1: because it doesn't stand alone, likes you should. You know,
Speaker 1: the case of the woman with a torch. We got
Speaker 1: the pale rider on the horse. I had a bunch
Speaker 1: of things there, and it was all done in a
Speaker 1: very even the reference heavy metal reference, and you know,
Speaker 1: the woman standing there with their head chopped off and
Speaker 1: all the rest of this stuff. He says, But there's
Speaker 1: a reason people want to believe that it was ask me,
Speaker 1: because they want to create chaos and division. Well, that's
Speaker 1: the whole essence of the Olympics, isn't it everybody, Well,
Speaker 1: how many gold medals does this country have versus that country?
Speaker 1: And so forth? Is it not so much about the
Speaker 1: stories of individual competition and excellence as it is about tribalism.
Speaker 1: That's what chaos and division results in. But it was
Speaker 1: also you know, chaos and division is also Satan's gold
Speaker 1: as well. And anybody who understands that can really see
Speaker 1: this particular essay really only hits the tip of the iceberg,
Speaker 1: because that's what this last Supper thing is. As a
Speaker 1: matter of fact, this article says being offended by offensive
Speaker 1: things is good, actually, and it is. I think we
Speaker 1: should be offended. We should be able to see what
Speaker 1: is right in front of us, and we should not
Speaker 1: be intimidated into silent by anybody. This isn't something we
Speaker 1: just need to oh well, let's just all get along. No,
Speaker 1: this is offensive regardless of any religious references to it,
Speaker 1: because this is a religion. It is a religion of
Speaker 1: revelry and debauchery and revolution and all the rest is
Speaker 1: that was what was on display the French Revolution. Here's
Speaker 1: this woman singing, we cut her head off. Christians should
Speaker 1: be willing to see what's in front of them. You know,
Speaker 1: there's nothing sacred about a da Vinci painting his idea
Speaker 1: of what something might have looked like. This guy says.
Speaker 1: Somebody commented to me when he was talking about on
Speaker 1: social media, says, what's wrong with you? I would never
Speaker 1: have connected this to the Last Supper. I guess you
Speaker 1: see what you want to see. That's essentially what that
Speaker 1: entire article, other article was talking about, he says. But
Speaker 1: the Paris Olympics have confirmed that the scene did draw
Speaker 1: from cheese iconic painting. But again, whether it did or not,
Speaker 1: so what the issue is not the painting. This issue
Speaker 1: is not a sacred painting. The issue is the debauchery,
Speaker 1: the revelry, the new pagan religion that's being sold to
Speaker 1: you and to push you to see if you're going
Speaker 1: to say anything, and then try to silence and punish
Speaker 1: you if you do say something about it. Secondly, he says,
Speaker 1: offence and outrage are not the same thing. He said
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen are Christian. Social media creator posted a rent
Speaker 1: about Starbucks removing holiday imagery from their cups. If you
Speaker 1: um that Starbucks hated Christians and Christmas because Starbucks had
Speaker 1: removed snowflakes, snowmen, and trees from their red holiday cups.
Speaker 1: We rightly reject such silly outrage. I'm not recommending unrighteous
Speaker 1: outrage for Christians about Paris Olympics or anything else. No,
Speaker 1: it's about we have to be outraged at our tax
Speaker 1: mon's being wasted and squandered like this. We've got to
Speaker 1: be outraged at the agenda that they shoved down our throats.
Speaker 1: So we're going to be outraged the fact that they
Speaker 1: deliberately do this to see if they can get a
Speaker 1: reaction from people, and to defy us to react to that.
Speaker 1: He says, finally, we should speak up about offensive uses
Speaker 1: of symbols of our faith. And it's not just about
Speaker 1: symbols of our faith. He finally got it to the
Speaker 1: point why this is offensive. He said, we reject the
Speaker 1: mockery of God's design for human sexuality. That was what
Speaker 1: was on display. That was what was being mocked, Not
Speaker 1: Da Vinci's painting, but they were mocking God's design for
Speaker 1: human sexuality as well as the mockery of Christ's sacrifice
Speaker 1: in a more indirect way. And why does this matter?
Speaker 1: We know why this stuff is being pushed. Here's another example,
Speaker 1: you Edwards, another BBC star, like Jimmy's accused of child
Speaker 1: born and things like that. Now in this particular case,
Speaker 1: unlike Jimmy Saville, I don't see that there are any
Speaker 1: accusations that he was involved with any children. But it
Speaker 1: was child pornography. And Hugh Edwards is a very high
Speaker 1: ranking individual at the BBC, one of the most highly
Speaker 1: paid presenters. Because that's what these guys do. They present
Speaker 1: the news. They don't read it, they don't study it,
Speaker 1: they don't analyze it, they don't comment on it. They
Speaker 1: just read it off the tele property. They're presenters. But
Speaker 1: you know, he looks very, very decent, even though he
Speaker 1: is not decent. Six charges of that. It's just been
Speaker 1: the indictment has just gone out and then as we
Speaker 1: look at the future and we look at these choices.
Speaker 1: This is one of the reasons why I talked about
Speaker 1: the election yesterday, is because I don't want to see
Speaker 1: people getting so caught up in this competition, this phony Olympics.
Speaker 1: I mean, actually the Olympics is a real competition, but
Speaker 1: not the election. And so again it is a tribalism
Speaker 1: though that is revolving around it, and I don't want
Speaker 1: to see people getting so invested in either of these
Speaker 1: candidates that they would push for civil war. And I've
Speaker 1: heard that rhetoric from both sides many, many ways, many times.
Speaker 1: You need to understand that, just like the displays that
Speaker 1: they do in the opening of the Olympics, this whole
Speaker 1: election is just a reality TV show, and don't get
Speaker 1: caught up in that. And here's an example. The AI
Speaker 1: executive Order has apparently been drafted for the Trump presidency
Speaker 1: to launch a Manhattan style project for the Defense Department
Speaker 1: using artificial intelligence. So an executive order, right, dictator. Oh,
Speaker 1: we shouldn't care about that, should we see? Some dictates
Speaker 1: they have a problem with, in others they don't have
Speaker 1: a problem with. All these people said, well, you know Trumpet,
Speaker 1: he might become a dictator. On day one he was saying,
Speaker 1: I'm going to fix this right away. I can just
Speaker 1: do it right Well, it was the same type of
Speaker 1: stuff that he was boasting about when he did gun
Speaker 1: control by executive order. Don't you guys worry about passing that. Fortunately,
Speaker 1: I can do that. I have that power. No you don't,
Speaker 1: but he pretended that he did, and he actually acted,
Speaker 1: and it took a while for people to undo that
Speaker 1: very long process. Fortunately we had some people who pushed
Speaker 1: back against that and won in the Supreme Court. But
Speaker 1: he did act like a dictator. He acted like a
Speaker 1: dictator with gun control, and then he acted like a
Speaker 1: dictator in other areas as well. And now they're always
Speaker 1: grabbing what he has to say. Like he was telling Christians,
Speaker 1: you know, go ahead and vote, you vote this time,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna fix everything for you. What a simplistic, idiotic thing.
Speaker 1: I don't know how that motivates anybody, anybody that believes that, yes,
Speaker 1: I'm going to fix all the problems with government, and
Speaker 1: I'll do it right away. They want so you won't
Speaker 1: even have to vote again. But my wonderful Christians, you
Speaker 1: need to go out and vote for me. You don't
Speaker 1: turn out and big enough numbers. And when Laura Ingram
Speaker 1: talked to him about that, he said, yeah, the problem
Speaker 1: is that Christians don't vote. I'm trying to get them
Speaker 1: to go out to vote. He wasn't saying that he's
Speaker 1: going to radically alter government, which is what they were
Speaker 1: trying to imply from that. But then he also said,
Speaker 1: and the gun owners, you know, Second Amendment people, they
Speaker 1: don't vote much either in terms of the percentage of
Speaker 1: them that turn out. Well, maybe they saw your gun
Speaker 1: control by executive order. Maybe the Christians saw your your
Speaker 1: worshiping of LGBT that you do it more long ago.
Speaker 1: Maybe they saw how you have thrown babies into the fire. Essentially,
Speaker 1: maybe they don't believe that you're going to do anything
Speaker 1: that you say, so you know that, but nevertheless they
Speaker 1: pick this stuff up. They want to portray him as
Speaker 1: a dictator. And yet Lalla is talking about all the
Speaker 1: things she's going to dictate. She's going to dictate gun
Speaker 1: control just like Trump. And she said that when she
Speaker 1: was running in twenty twenty after he did the gun
Speaker 1: control by executive What does she love that she's going
Speaker 1: to do all kinds of executive orders for green stuff
Speaker 1: and it just like Biden. And isn't it amazing that
Speaker 1: the press pretends, you know, makes a big deal out
Speaker 1: of comments that are that they extrapolate and they give
Speaker 1: meaning to them that they don't have there about being
Speaker 1: a dictator when when he actually dictates stuff, when you
Speaker 1: go back and look at the pandemic and the vacca
Speaker 1: and all the rest of this stuff, they don't call
Speaker 1: him out on any things that he actually did that
Speaker 1: are dictatorial gun control, because they like that. And that's
Speaker 1: where we are. People who like the executive orders, like
Speaker 1: the dictates, they're going to push this. And so of
Speaker 1: course the military industrial complex and technocracy loves the idea
Speaker 1: that Trump is going to remove all the restrictions on
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence that were put in by Biden. Now, don't
Speaker 1: think that Biden was trying to protect US. Biden's restrictions
Speaker 1: and executive orders. Again, Biden put in executive orders. Everybody
Speaker 1: wants the president to be a dictator left and right,
Speaker 1: and so Biden's executive orders on artificial intelligence were there
Speaker 1: not to protect you from autonomous killer robots his executive orders,
Speaker 1: or to protect your privacy, or to keep you from
Speaker 1: being surveilled and creating this massive network of artificial intelligence
Speaker 1: constantly spy and report on you. No, it wasn't about
Speaker 1: any of that. He was trying to protect Sam Altman
Speaker 1: and open AI from competition. That's why Biden did his
Speaker 1: executive orders. And so the executive orders for Trump are
Speaker 1: going to open it up for other competitors. And that's
Speaker 1: what this is about. You see these people who are
Speaker 1: dropping hundreds of millions of dollars into the presidential election.
Speaker 1: Are buying a place at the table. They're buying politicians,
Speaker 1: they're buying Trump. And so you got the people who
Speaker 1: were giving money to the Biden administration giving money to
Speaker 1: La LA. They want a place at the table. They
Speaker 1: want their businesses to be favored. These people like Mark
Speaker 1: and Dreesen, Peter Teel, and others are buying a place
Speaker 1: at the table so that they won't be shut out
Speaker 1: by the government. The government is going to pick who's
Speaker 1: able to compete and who is not going to be
Speaker 1: allowed to compete in these industries. And you have to
Speaker 1: pay Washington politicians in order to be allowed to compete.
Speaker 1: That's why there's so much money in this election, and
Speaker 1: it's why the solution is not going to be found
Speaker 1: in Washington. Technocracy News comments and says if Trump wins,
Speaker 1: he'll surround himself with technocrats, including those that he will
Speaker 1: appoint to his cabinet. Then executive orders like this will
Speaker 1: take Congress out of the loop altogether, and Congress is
Speaker 1: fine with that. Now you'll have Jim Jordan running his
Speaker 1: little show trials all the rest of the stuff and
Speaker 1: doing nothing, doing nothing, just grading for the cameras. Washington
Speaker 1: Post had the report the plan to roll back quote
Speaker 1: burdensome regulation would favor Silicon Valley investors, who are now
Speaker 1: flocking to support the former president because the burdenso regulations
Speaker 1: that are there are there to keep them from competing,
Speaker 1: and they were put there by Biden to protect his investors.
Speaker 1: These people are not putting money into politics because there
Speaker 1: are dear principles of the want to defend, like freedom
Speaker 1: of speech or the right to keep him bear arms,
Speaker 1: or the right to worship as you please, or to
Speaker 1: be able to travel as you wish, or to have
Speaker 1: any of these other protections that are there. No, they're investing,
Speaker 1: they're investing. It's simply a business decision. Trump knows that
Speaker 1: he's talked about. Oh yeah, I gave money to La
Speaker 1: La Harris when she was in California. He was in
Speaker 1: New York. He's buying politicians so he can make money.
Speaker 1: Elon Musk understands that really well. Trump's allies are drafting
Speaker 1: a sweeping AI executive order that would launch a series
Speaker 1: of Manhattan projects to develop military technology and immediately review
Speaker 1: unnecessary and burdensome regulations. Again when you talk about autonomous
Speaker 1: killer robots, they could be as devastating as nuclear weapon
Speaker 1: in terms of the people that they can kill. Making
Speaker 1: an analogy to a Manhattan Project is appropriate. The framework
Speaker 1: would also create industry led agencies to evaluate AI models.
Speaker 1: The framework, which includes a section titled make America First
Speaker 1: an AI, is a markedly different strategy than the Biden administration,
Speaker 1: which last year issued a sweeping executive order. I see
Speaker 1: that Washington Post doesn't care about that dictates a dictate.
Speaker 1: Let's stop calling them executive orders. They call them dictates.
Speaker 1: That leverages emergency powers to subject the next generation of
Speaker 1: AI systems to safety testing. That's what they said. But
Speaker 1: they're not doing any of that. All this stuff is
Speaker 1: coming from the government employees from the America First Policy Institute,
Speaker 1: a nonprofit led by Trump's former chief economic advisor Larry Cudlow,
Speaker 1: has been involved in the effort. It's different presidents, different cartels,
Speaker 1: that's what we're talking about here, but same agenda. Rushing
Speaker 1: headlong into AI. Have put up restrictions for some companies,
Speaker 1: but he's going to let Sam Altman run straight on.
Speaker 1: Greater military investment in AI probably stands to benefit tech companies.
Speaker 1: That already contract with Pentagons, such as Pallanteer Andrewill and
Speaker 1: the rest of these. The Heritage Foundation has also drafted
Speaker 1: AI policies as part of Project twenty five. The Trump
Speaker 1: campaign is running from that for some reason. I even
Speaker 1: see anything in Project twenty five. I haven't read the thing,
Speaker 1: but I haven't seen any of the complaints from the
Speaker 1: left that amount to anything. But he's running scared and
Speaker 1: the chaotic aftermath of the attempted assassination of Trump, says
Speaker 1: Washington Post, key tech executives and investors have endorsed Trump
Speaker 1: for president. That's not what's going on if you look
Speaker 1: at it. Like I said before, it's a few days
Speaker 1: after the shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania. It took a few
Speaker 1: days for these people start piling in, and they did,
Speaker 1: and they really piled in. After Trump selected jd Vance,
Speaker 1: you kind of think of him instead of being a
Speaker 1: Davos young leader, think of jd Vance as being a
Speaker 1: technocrat young leader, a PayPal mafia young leader, Peter Thiel's organization,
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it. It say it's not formal.
Speaker 1: They don't have public meetings and that type of thing.
Speaker 1: I mean, they do go to Builderberg all the time.
Speaker 1: All these guys in PayPal Mafia are regular fixtures at Buildeberg,
Speaker 1: and Peter Thiel has defended Bildeberg, Well, we have privacy,
Speaker 1: coming from a guy who has developed one gigantic surveillance
Speaker 1: company after the other to make sure that you have
Speaker 1: no privacy, He says, well, this is something the libertarians
Speaker 1: want to support. You know, we should have been able
Speaker 1: to have our private meetings, and yet he doesn't think
Speaker 1: anything should be private. He created pellanteer biggest data mining
Speaker 1: surveillance company. We got out there. What hypocrisy? And so
Speaker 1: now these technocrats are playing I guess we could call
Speaker 1: it JD chess forty chess. It's JD Chess. During his
Speaker 1: time in the White House, Trump maintained close ties to
Speaker 1: venture capitalist Peter Thiel and some key executives within his orbit,
Speaker 1: but they clashed with other tech titans of immigration policies
Speaker 1: and social media rules. But on Tuesday yesterday, venture capitalists
Speaker 1: Mark Andresen and Ben Horowitz endorsed Trump on their podcast.
Speaker 1: They said he was the best candidate for little tech,
Speaker 1: and by little tech, what they mean are the multi
Speaker 1: million dollar venture capital things that they've got. Yeah, they're
Speaker 1: millions of dollars instead of billions of dollars, so they're little.
Speaker 1: On their podcast, the two venture capitalists said that Trump
Speaker 1: related his views on AI at a recent dinner that
Speaker 1: they had with him. They said Trump had a very
Speaker 1: simple view of the technology. Of course he does simple
Speaker 1: view of every Just pay me, right, pay me. He said.
Speaker 1: What he said to us is AI is very scary,
Speaker 1: but we absolutely have to win, because we don't win,
Speaker 1: then Shina wins, and that's a very bad world. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's pretty simplistic. Biden AI executive Andreason said would enshrine
Speaker 1: Open Ai and a handful of other AI companies as monopolies.
Speaker 1: And we saw all the hearings. Yeah, you have san
Speaker 1: Altman in there saying, wow, this is so dangerous. You're
Speaker 1: going to have to only let establish companies like us
Speaker 1: handle this because it's just too dangerous to allow startups
Speaker 1: to come in and get involved in this. Okay, so
Speaker 1: we'll give you the monopoly. They said, this would destroy
Speaker 1: a startup ecosystem. Underneath all of that, does anybody care
Speaker 1: about the public. No, No, again, you've got two different
Speaker 1: cartels there figuring out how they're going to make money
Speaker 1: and which politician they're going to invest in. In an
Speaker 1: on air discussion after the interview the tech investors, Trump
Speaker 1: needed to surround himself with people who are smart about
Speaker 1: technologies like AI and nuclear power, because those two are
Speaker 1: going to have to go together. They're shutting our grid down.
Speaker 1: They're telling us everything's got to be run from electricity,
Speaker 1: there'll be no fuel. Meanwhile, they shut down the grid
Speaker 1: that provides electricity to us, and they create their own
Speaker 1: private grid for artificial intelligence, for surveillance, for weapons, and
Speaker 1: they'll be allowed to do whatever they wish, including whatever
Speaker 1: they wish with the nuclear power. They won't pay any
Speaker 1: attention to any safety regulations in any of this stuff.
Speaker 1: They don't care. I mean, I've seen it in Texas
Speaker 1: where Elon Musk went in just you know, about a
Speaker 1: half a mile or so from where we used to live.
Speaker 1: He doesn't care about any of their regulations. They said,
Speaker 1: you can't cut a road in there. You know, our
Speaker 1: Department Transportation hasn't authorized that. Well, I don't care cuts
Speaker 1: it anyway. So they give them a big fine. Is
Speaker 1: I okay, it pays a fine. You can't dump all
Speaker 1: that stuff in the Colorado River, Well, I don't care.
Speaker 1: Find me, I don't care, and he keeps paying the fines.
Speaker 1: So as long as these people pay tribute to Trump,
Speaker 1: they can do whatever they want. Meanwhile, we got the
Speaker 1: army spent eleven million dollars. You know, they can't get
Speaker 1: people to join the army. What is the problem with
Speaker 1: the army? Is is it image or something? Well? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean they had a big pr blowout when they
Speaker 1: started mandating that everybody take an experimental shot. Remember that, Well,
Speaker 1: they didn't really care, and so they think they can
Speaker 1: fix everything by giving the rock Dwayne Johnson eleven million
Speaker 1: dollars and having him use his United Football League that
Speaker 1: he is an investor in. I don't know if he
Speaker 1: owns it, what his status is there, but eleven million
Speaker 1: dollars to get him to help recruit people into the military.
Speaker 1: But they got a really short memory, don't they remember
Speaker 1: when he was out there recruiting people to get the shot.
Speaker 1: If you go back to May of twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: May of twenty twenty one, he was one of the
Speaker 1: first celebrities out there to get a shot, and he
Speaker 1: made a big deal out of it. He shared a
Speaker 1: selfie of himself getting a jab and you know, he
Speaker 1: was so excited to get that experimental shot and telling
Speaker 1: everybody else to get it. I don't know if he
Speaker 1: got the shot. As a matter of fact, you know
Speaker 1: the same thing that Lala was doing. I remember how
Speaker 1: they set up this kind of set and she comes
Speaker 1: in here, she is taking her jacket off and handing
Speaker 1: it to her assistant. Everybody wearing masks, and she says,
Speaker 1: there in the guy prepares this shot. He has to
Speaker 1: put on rubber gloves. Have you ever had anybody put
Speaker 1: on rubber gloves when they gave you a shot. I've
Speaker 1: had shots in the past. I never had a rubber
Speaker 1: glove shot. But you know, he does this and Ian Jecxa,
Speaker 1: she's so excited about all this and then gives people
Speaker 1: a lecture at the end of it. Do we know
Speaker 1: that she got the shot or did she get sugar water? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I mean Alex Jones told us that Trump was making
Speaker 1: sugar water and you got to get the Trump shot.
Speaker 1: Why don't know how you get the Trump shot if
Speaker 1: you're not the president, or you're not Dwayne Johnson the rock.
Speaker 1: So here she is, she's so excited to get that,
Speaker 1: and that's what they were kind of the games that
Speaker 1: they were playing with us. Well before we take a break.
Speaker 1: This just came out and the last couple of days
Speaker 1: there's been a lot of information about brutality at a
Speaker 1: prison Palestinian prisoners, and that the Israelis are running And
Speaker 1: you know, I don't typically talk about this because there's
Speaker 1: so much fog of war and disinformation on both sides
Speaker 1: their atrocities. Yes, that's why you want to stop the war,
Speaker 1: and that's why is this thing drags on, it becomes
Speaker 1: more and more of an issue. But now Israeli police,
Speaker 1: this is being widely reported by the Israeli press, It's
Speaker 1: being discussed by politicians as a matter of fact, debate
Speaker 1: by politicians as well, that it's okay to rape with
Speaker 1: a metal pull the prisoners that they have, Yeah, anything
Speaker 1: is allowed, right. Israeli military police detained Israeli soldiers who
Speaker 1: were suspected of raping a Palestinian prisoner. The injury to
Speaker 1: his anus was so severe he couldn't walk. When the
Speaker 1: Israeli military police went to the prison to detain the
Speaker 1: soldiers suspected of forcibly sodomizing the Palestinian man, they were
Speaker 1: met with resistance. Israeli soldiers at the facility refused to leave,
Speaker 1: and they barricaded themselves in. They also reportedly used pepper
Speaker 1: spray on the Israeli military police. The police ended up
Speaker 1: detaining nine out of ten of the Israeli Defense Force
Speaker 1: soldiers suspected of abusing the Palestinian detainee. The arrest of
Speaker 1: the suspected rapists sparked protests from far right Israeli activists,
Speaker 1: and inside the Kanesset there was at least one member
Speaker 1: of protesters that joined that stormed the Kanesse. At least
Speaker 1: one member of Netanyahu's coalition was spotted among the protesters
Speaker 1: and so as a part of this public debates where
Speaker 1: some people were outraged by this, but others said that's fine,
Speaker 1: we do whatever we wanted to them. Ben Gavere, leader
Speaker 1: of the Jewish Power Party, praise that detained Israeli soldiers.
Speaker 1: He said they're heroes and their arrest is shameful. He
Speaker 1: said the Israeli security establishments should support the soldiers and
Speaker 1: should learn from the prison service. Light treatment of terrorists
Speaker 1: is over. Soldiers need to have our full support do
Speaker 1: anything they want. Meanwhile, in is Israeli whistleblower's not just one.
Speaker 1: Several have detailed widespread abuse and torture at the prison,
Speaker 1: which holds Palestinian detainees from Gaza. The New York Times
Speaker 1: reported last month the Palestinians who made it out of
Speaker 1: the facility said they were subjected to sexual torture. The
Speaker 1: Times report said a leaked report from the un cited
Speaker 1: a forty one year old detainee who said that interrogators
Speaker 1: quote made me sit on something like a hot metal stick,
Speaker 1: and it felt like fire, he said. Another detainee died
Speaker 1: after they put an electric stick up his anus. This
Speaker 1: is when we look at this, this particular war. It
Speaker 1: is absolutely amazing to me that has been allowed to
Speaker 1: go on this long, and the brutality that has involved
Speaker 1: there is just beyond shameful. And yet there is no shame.
Speaker 1: That's the most amazing thing about this. As a politicians
Speaker 1: who openly defend this, who say so what, who openly
Speaker 1: say we have to do more of this, And there's
Speaker 1: reports of doctors who have saw these last week, again,
Speaker 1: I don't cover every one of these reports of atrocities,
Speaker 1: but doctors talking about how they're continually treating children who
Speaker 1: have been shot twice by snipers Israeli snipers, once in
Speaker 1: the chest, once in the head, to make sure they
Speaker 1: kill them. We need to think about what we support,
Speaker 1: you know, quite frankly, I don't support war. And as
Speaker 1: I said last week, and I got somebody to send
Speaker 1: me things, I literally screamed at the radio when you
Speaker 1: equated this kind of brutality with what happens with abortions, Well,
Speaker 1: if you don't see how they are equated, you've got
Speaker 1: a blind spot. If you're going to call yourself pro life,
Speaker 1: might want to try to make peace. Blessed to the peacemakers.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Well on rock fan, Carrius Rex, thank you very much
Speaker 1: or is that an iron nol? Carlos Rex, Yes, thank
Speaker 1: you for the tip. I appreciate that. And rumble, Missus Moody.
Speaker 1: That is very generous. Thank you very much. I said,
Speaker 1: thank you for your commitment to speak the offensive truth. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm sure I've ended some people right there, but I
Speaker 1: am not going to cheer war on either side, not
Speaker 1: sharing what happened on October seventh. Whatever happened with that,
Speaker 1: whether it was all one side or whether it was
Speaker 1: incompetence or a loud Again, we can get caught up
Speaker 1: in the details of things like that, things like the shooting,
Speaker 1: and there was some interesting back and forth, a secret
Speaker 1: service guy who's now replaced the woman who resigned. But
Speaker 1: the reality is is that whatever happened there, whether it
Speaker 1: was planned in a conspiracy, or whether it was a
Speaker 1: loan shooter or whoever was behind any of that, we're
Speaker 1: not going to solve it. We didn't solve nine eleven,
Speaker 1: but we do know how nine eleven was used. Do
Speaker 1: you understand how they're using this to polarize people. I mean,
Speaker 1: we should be concerned about shootings like that, we should
Speaker 1: be concerned about failures. We should be concerned about what
Speaker 1: is happening with our government, how corrupt it is. But
Speaker 1: when you have literally trillions of dollars being handed out,
Speaker 1: you don't think they're going to kill people for that.
Speaker 1: We had pharmaceutical companies and a president to presidents who
Speaker 1: killed people by the tens of millions at the very least,
Speaker 1: gave billions of dollars to corporations. Corporations will kill you
Speaker 1: for billions, what'll they do for trillions. That's what we
Speaker 1: need to look at. In terms of politics and not
Speaker 1: get caught up in this tribalism that's going to lead
Speaker 1: us into a civil war. We think that everything is
Speaker 1: going to be lost if the other guy wins, and
Speaker 1: all we need is to fix all this. We've got
Speaker 1: to get our guy in. If we really buy into
Speaker 1: that fundamental lie, that's a lie that's going to track
Speaker 1: us straight into a civil war. I understand there's not
Speaker 1: a great deal of difference between these people at all.
Speaker 1: They're owned, they have different owners, owned by different groups.
Speaker 1: Microsoft has been hit with another global outage bug riddled
Speaker 1: update for a bug riddled operating system. The disruption is
Speaker 1: impacting emails, Xbox Live three sixty five functions, all of
Speaker 1: which were knocked offline on July nineteenth. Reports about Tuesday's
Speaker 1: problems surfaced about nine am Eastern Time yesterday. The previous
Speaker 1: outage was caused by CrowdStrike. Current issue has not yet
Speaker 1: been linked to crowd strike. It affects their cloud servers
Speaker 1: Azure Services. It is a cloud firewall security service that
Speaker 1: provides threat protections for files, data, and other apps going
Speaker 1: offline and people cannot use their computers. Who at Microsoft
Speaker 1: had the bright idea to have so much be reliable
Speaker 1: on one system, wrote one user. That is really bad practice.
Speaker 1: I literally can't do my job because it's down again.
Speaker 1: That's absolutely right. And so who had the bright idea
Speaker 1: that we should have everything fixed in Washington? We've taken
Speaker 1: into the political sphere. Who had the bright idea that
Speaker 1: everything should be fixed by the president. So we should
Speaker 1: make a federal case out of everything, that there would
Speaker 1: be a law about everything. That central planning ought to
Speaker 1: work as long as it's our guy who's doing the
Speaker 1: central planning. That's a really bad idea. You know. I
Speaker 1: developed my my hatred of centralized systems when I was
Speaker 1: a college student and Karen and I would have to
Speaker 1: go in the wee hours of the morning, whichhould go
Speaker 1: with me, and we would hang out at the computer
Speaker 1: center so it could actually when the lines were lower
Speaker 1: in the middle of the night. And we had sixteen
Speaker 1: card punch machines and at least a quarter of them
Speaker 1: were always broken. They had a guy from IBM who
Speaker 1: had a always wore white shirt and a black tie.
Speaker 1: All the IBM guys did. Wasn't the same guy all
Speaker 1: the time. They had a guy there twenty four to seven,
Speaker 1: three sixty five, and he was constantly fixing this gigantic
Speaker 1: machine that did all of the computer resources for not
Speaker 1: just the University of South Florida, but also another smaller university,
Speaker 1: all the administrative and accounting stuff, all of the work
Speaker 1: for people who are in science and engineering and comput science,
Speaker 1: and all the rest of the stuff. Everybody, all the students,
Speaker 1: all the faculty used it for their computing stuff, and
Speaker 1: all of the business and accounting for the university itself
Speaker 1: used it, and it was it was a mess. Everybody
Speaker 1: was lined up all the time and trying to get
Speaker 1: to these few card punch machines, and the computer was
Speaker 1: going down all the rest of the stuff. This is
Speaker 1: just insane. And of course then we had personal computers
Speaker 1: that decentralized that. It was a real object Lisson. But
Speaker 1: the same thing applies politically, and when you look at
Speaker 1: a government that tries to micromanage and centrally control the economy,
Speaker 1: you wind up that type of system or what we
Speaker 1: saw in the Soviet Union or what we're seeing in Venezuela. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: crowd strike at stock is sliding quite a bit because,
Speaker 1: as I said before, there's going to be a lot
Speaker 1: of people who were suing them, and the first one
Speaker 1: in line that has already hired a lawyer is Delta Airlines.
Speaker 1: And I reported this last week how Booty Gay was
Speaker 1: coming after Delta Airlines and making threatening statements to them.
Speaker 1: It's like, do you not understand what is going on
Speaker 1: with this stuff? And probably he doesn't. I don't know
Speaker 1: how he understands anything. He's there because he's a DEI hire,
Speaker 1: if ever there was one, goes straight from a mayor,
Speaker 1: a failed mayor of a small town and to handing
Speaker 1: out hundreds of billions of dollars. And we've seen one
Speaker 1: failure after the other with electric charging machines and all
Speaker 1: the rest of this stuff. Anyway, he was threatening Delta
Speaker 1: Airline and because their computers are down, I said, well,
Speaker 1: you watch, they're going to be the first ones to
Speaker 1: sue here. They are the first ones to sue. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact. Interesting thing about this was in
Speaker 1: pre market trading on Monday, Jim Kramer called the bottom
Speaker 1: for the crowd strike stock guarantee that it's got way
Speaker 1: much further to go, and that immediately happened after Jim
Speaker 1: Kramer called the bottom. He always gets everything wrong. Somebody
Speaker 1: should have asked Nancy Pelosi's husband what he thought, because
Speaker 1: he's always right, He's always got the inside track, but
Speaker 1: Jim Kramer is always wrong. By late evening that day,
Speaker 1: CNBC reported Delta Airlines had hired top attorney David Bowie's
Speaker 1: I guess to sue CrowdStrike and Microsoft for damages from
Speaker 1: the global IT outage. The report from CNBC sent crowd
Speaker 1: Strike shares lower down four and a half percent below
Speaker 1: Kramer's bye bye bye level. They telling people to buy.
Speaker 1: How does he stay on? Say, well, it is. I
Speaker 1: think it's CNN that he's on. I don't know, but
Speaker 1: that would explain it, I guess. So. According to Ensure Parametrics,
Speaker 1: US Fortune five hundred company excluding Microsoft are expected to
Speaker 1: incur zero point four billion dollars in financial losses due
Speaker 1: to crowd strikes faulty update. Microsoft may experience more because
Speaker 1: they could become partners in some of these lawsuits because
Speaker 1: the Blue Screen of Death and paralyzed millions of computers
Speaker 1: in the US and worldwide. But again, booty A threatened Delta,
Speaker 1: not CrowdStrike, because you know, CrowdStrike is very Democrat friendly.
Speaker 1: They got friends in the Democrat Party like Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: the rest of them they were parties with. Soh you know,
Speaker 1: leave CrowdStrike alone. Well they're not going to leave CrowdStrike along.
Speaker 1: They're going to sue them. In the UK as we
Speaker 1: look at immigration children dead in a horrendous UK stabbing attack.
Speaker 1: Now we all knew what this was about. We all
Speaker 1: knew that it's going to be an immigrant. We all
Speaker 1: knew there was going to be some ala huacbar there right,
Speaker 1: And Channel three in the UK named suspect as Ali
Speaker 1: al Shakati an asylum seeker, an asylum seeker, an invader,
Speaker 1: a squatter am who arrived in the UK by boat
Speaker 1: last year. Reportedly he was on the MI six watch list.
Speaker 1: But of course all they do is watch. They don't
Speaker 1: do anything right. It's like, you know, the open borders.
Speaker 1: I've talked about it many times. The guy whose daughter
Speaker 1: was killed in Long Island, they had fled from L
Speaker 1: Salvador because of the crime. They went all the way
Speaker 1: up to Long Island, New York and his daughter was
Speaker 1: killed in high school by other migrants from El Salvador
Speaker 1: that were with MS thirteen. But of course, because of DACA,
Speaker 1: they were to be left alone. And even though they
Speaker 1: had MS thirteen literally written all over their faces. Law
Speaker 1: enforcement watched them but didn't do anything. A seventeen year
Speaker 1: old male from the nearby community of Banks. That's the
Speaker 1: way that the the news is reporting it now, because
Speaker 1: even though Channel three now is the name of the
Speaker 1: news report, even though they outed him as a invader
Speaker 1: coming by boat last year, they later retracted the claim,
Speaker 1: saying that he was on the m I six watch
Speaker 1: lists and all the rest of this stuff. So now
Speaker 1: he's being described as a seventeen year old from the
Speaker 1: nearby community of Banks and is not being treated as
Speaker 1: terror related. No, no, not a problem at all. And
Speaker 1: so he went to an elementary school age kids were
Speaker 1: having a Taylor Swift yoga and dance work shop. He
Speaker 1: took exception of that. He stabbed six or seven young girls.
Speaker 1: The yoga instructor who was there heroically tried to intervene.
Speaker 1: She got really cut up badly. They said, mothers are
Speaker 1: coming here now and screaming. It's like a scene from
Speaker 1: a horror movie. They said, it's like something from America.
Speaker 1: They said, well, I mean, we haven't had that type
Speaker 1: of thing happen, but just wait for it. We've got
Speaker 1: three Palestinian terror suspects detained at the southern border as
Speaker 1: agents lament the lack of resources, says Zero Hedge New
Speaker 1: York Post story, one migrant had photos on his phone
Speaker 1: that included a masked man holding an AK forty seven rifle,
Speaker 1: three Palestinians, and a Turkish migrant, all suspected of terror
Speaker 1: group ties. These individuals are among dozens of migrants who
Speaker 1: surrendered to border agents. Yeah, no problem. The play is
Speaker 1: for suckers, because they know this is what Biden wants.
Speaker 1: Biden is at war with America. When agent said, knowing
Speaker 1: who these guys are, we have like no access to
Speaker 1: anything international, Like we really don't, and it kind of sucks.
Speaker 1: He said, I wanted to get into border patrol and
Speaker 1: protect the country from terrorists, and it's like, well, I
Speaker 1: probably let terrorists into the country, he said. San Diego
Speaker 1: Field Office Intelligence Unit assesses that individuals inspired by or
Speaker 1: reacting to the current Israel Hamas conflict may attempt travel
Speaker 1: to or from areas of hostility in the Middle East
Speaker 1: via cecuitas transit across the Southwest border. Foreign fighters motivated
Speaker 1: by ideology or mercenary soldiers of fortune may attempt to
Speaker 1: obfuscate travel too, or from the US two or from
Speaker 1: countries in the Middle East through Mexico. Well, boy, didn't
Speaker 1: think about that, did you. What a surprise? Where did
Speaker 1: that come from?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: Well, meanwhile that's been established and now it's gotten so
Speaker 1: brazen that you have radical as wellmises decide they're going
Speaker 1: to buy a Scottish island and set up a new homeland.
Speaker 1: They're going to raise three million pounds to buy this island.
Speaker 1: The two hundred and seventy one acre Torsa Island is
Speaker 1: what they're looking at. A radical religious group has raised
Speaker 1: more than three million pounds to buy an entire Scottish
Speaker 1: island with an aim to create a closed community which
Speaker 1: practices Sharia law. I guess they got their eyes set
Speaker 1: on London eventually. Al Habib is a founder of the
Speaker 1: Madi Servants Union, the Madi the Islamic Messiah, the Madi
Speaker 1: that they're looking for, which runs military style training camps
Speaker 1: and has an Islamic TV channel. So the Madi Servants
Speaker 1: Union has attacked multiple foreign embassies on religious grounds, including
Speaker 1: the Azerbaijani embassy in August of twenty twenty two and
Speaker 1: the Saudi Arabian embassy three months earlier. They're not just
Speaker 1: training with firearms for their own self defense. They've actually
Speaker 1: used them offensively against the embassies of countries that they
Speaker 1: don't like their policies. Al Haabib was granted asylum in
Speaker 1: the UK two decades ago after facing imprisonment and his
Speaker 1: native Kuwait for his religious views. There you go, this
Speaker 1: is somebody that maybe the Kuwaitis knew what they were doing,
Speaker 1: maybe the people in the UK don't. But look, it's
Speaker 1: been every flavor of government. They've gone through conservative governments,
Speaker 1: liberal governments, labor governments over and over against So this
Speaker 1: is just like in the US. The border problems that
Speaker 1: we have persist regardless of whether it's Trump or Bide.
Speaker 1: Al Khabib says that he will negotiate with the UK
Speaker 1: government to allow Muslims quote from all over the world
Speaker 1: unquote to get a visa to live in what he
Speaker 1: calls his new home homeland unquote. Al Habib preaches only
Speaker 1: in Arabic, but it was reported to saying in one video,
Speaker 1: if you want to live free under the banner of
Speaker 1: the AmAm and a special homeland where you feel everything
Speaker 1: and it reminds you of the awaited Mahdi Everything is
Speaker 1: the Shia Homeland support this project. The same video also
Speaker 1: featured footage recorded on Torsa, the Island in Scottish Island
Speaker 1: and saw An MSU, the Mahdi Servants Union say here,
Speaker 1: my brothers, God willing, we want to build a large mosque,
Speaker 1: a school and a Shia seminary. We want this place
Speaker 1: to be a homeland to the Shias and two believers.
Speaker 1: The island is a half a mile wide and one
Speaker 1: point two miles long. It has a three bedroom farmhouse
Speaker 1: on it which is run as a holiday rental. But
Speaker 1: they're going to turn it like they will the rest
Speaker 1: of the UK. They're going to turn it into that.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 1: We're going to take a quick break and we will
Speaker 1: be right back.
Speaker 4: New World Order in music one, two, three, four five,
Speaker 4: also Unvaccinated us still live. A little bit of Fiza
Speaker 4: in my a little bit of biotite. It does know
Speaker 4: how a little Johnson Johnson does sitting a little rest
Speaker 4: to sandy kusso you don't get sick.
Speaker 1: It's used on number five. They're doing what in the
Speaker 1: place they named after me? Good thing.
Speaker 5: I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed
Speaker 5: on the plots of these traders.
Speaker 1: Making sense common again. This is the David Knight Show. Well,
Speaker 1: I want to give you an update. I said earlier,
Speaker 1: actually it was last week. I said that we had
Speaker 1: problems with cash App that seems to have gone away,
Speaker 1: and so I just want to let people know that
Speaker 1: it was really strange. Again, we had a strange message
Speaker 1: from them and our initial contact with tech support in
Speaker 1: terms of an online help and I don't know if
Speaker 1: that was some kind of AI or not, but we
Speaker 1: were told that we had too many transactions and it
Speaker 1: had been turned off. Karen spent a lot of time
Speaker 1: trying to get somebody who is human to talk to.
Speaker 1: I resolved the issue and told us that the one
Speaker 1: that was blocked was blocked because of the senders side.
Speaker 1: But it was really strange what was happening. We had,
Speaker 1: as I said, for the first time ever, somebody that
Speaker 1: I'd gotten money from on a regular basis on cash App,
Speaker 1: and they made me accept it and create a pin
Speaker 1: number to accept it, which I'd never had to do,
Speaker 1: and then they had other issues in terms of taking
Speaker 1: it out. But it is now working and I just
Speaker 1: want to thank some of the people who contributed in
Speaker 1: July to our July contributors, Mike Richard A, Mike be Read,
Speaker 1: Nick again, Patrick V. Thank you to those of you
Speaker 1: who support us on Kasha didn't have that many, but
Speaker 1: it's not one of the main places that people support us,
Speaker 1: but we do appreciate the support that is there. On
Speaker 1: Rumble Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip. He says.
Speaker 1: Trump said at the Bitcoin conference that he wanted to
Speaker 1: regulate it. They said it would be regulated by the
Speaker 1: people that love this country. Yeah, and he says, you know,
Speaker 1: you've had the UMCA for NAFTA, we've had freedom cities
Speaker 1: and government regulated bitcoin. Call that a CBDC. Exactly right.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just ridiculous that anybody would believe this.
Speaker 1: And do you really I don't think that these these
Speaker 1: people in the bitcoin industry, they're giving big donations to
Speaker 1: Trump or Peter Teel or any of the rest of them.
Speaker 1: They don't believe me the rhetoric that Trump is saying publicly. O.
Speaker 1: They're cutting some deals with him the back rooms and
Speaker 1: for what they want from their particular business, and that's
Speaker 1: what they'll get. And the same way that when you
Speaker 1: look at how he used r f K Junior in
Speaker 1: the transition period. He brings him in, makes a show
Speaker 1: of having RFK Junior in as somebody who is something
Speaker 1: of a vaccine skeptic. He says, well, I'm not anti vaccine,
Speaker 1: and he isn't. He isn't anti vaccine. I'm anti vaccine,
Speaker 1: but r F K Junior is not. He says, I
Speaker 1: just want to make them safe. Oh what does that mean?
Speaker 1: You know, well, let's not have the you know, the
Speaker 1: mercury and the you know, some of these other things
Speaker 1: that from aaldehyde that is in there. Well, as a
Speaker 1: matter of like, somebody sent me a thing and said, well,
Speaker 1: it's actually it's not mercury's thy mirasol. Well that's another
Speaker 1: name for mercury. I I didn't make that connection. I
Speaker 1: didn't know that Thai mirasol was mercury. I couldn't understand
Speaker 1: why when I put I drop and so I tried
Speaker 1: contacts back in the nineteen eighties, and I would put
Speaker 1: those contacts in and my eyes would turn red immediately.
Speaker 1: It's like I had bird flu or something, you know,
Speaker 1: conjunctivitis or something. I don't know what it was, but
Speaker 1: it would. It turned out I knew it was the drops.
Speaker 1: They burned my eyes. And so I was like, I
Speaker 1: can't wear these things. There were soft contact lenses that
Speaker 1: I can't wear. And then in the late nineties I
Speaker 1: went to an optician and he was talking to me
Speaker 1: about it. I said, no, I can't wear I told
Speaker 1: him what it did, and he goes, oh, that was thimerosol.
Speaker 1: That's mercury. He said, it's like what they put mercury
Speaker 1: in the eye drops. No wonder my eyes turned red.
Speaker 1: Why doesn't everybody's eyes turn red? And see, that's how
Speaker 1: they get away with this stuff. It doesn't have everybody
Speaker 1: doesn't have the same reaction to this stuff. But there
Speaker 1: was something I could visually see when you get injected
Speaker 1: with the mercury in your is you know, reacting to it.
Speaker 1: You don't see that and you may not see the
Speaker 1: effects of that for quite some time. And so he said, no, no,
Speaker 1: they stopped doing that, but they were still doing it
Speaker 1: for the vaccines and so you can get you know,
Speaker 1: the mercury and the aluminum and you know, listen to
Speaker 1: Alex after he complained about that for decades. Rifley. So
Speaker 1: then when Trump wants to put it out, he goes, well,
Speaker 1: you know, you can do that for Trump, right, the
Speaker 1: mRNA vaccine, that's just sugar water. Yeah, it's going to
Speaker 1: have some adjuvants in there so that you have a reaction.
Speaker 1: They got to do that. You know, well, why do
Speaker 1: they have to do it. Why do you have to
Speaker 1: tell people to take that? Well, because that's where your
Speaker 1: bread is buttered. Cheering on Trump. It's amazing to me anyway.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, when you look at the Freedom Cities, they're
Speaker 1: nothing more than smart cities. When you look at UMCA,
Speaker 1: nothing more than the have to just rebranded. And as
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, when it came out at that
Speaker 1: point in time, the New American wasn't a Trump cheerleader
Speaker 1: like they've become now. A critically looked at what was
Speaker 1: there and said, you know, this is not good. It
Speaker 1: hasn't fundamentally changed from NAFTA. There's a couple of deals
Speaker 1: that he cut, but in many ways it's arguably worse
Speaker 1: than NAFTA. Just rebranded on Rumble Apoptosis twenty two. Thank
Speaker 1: you for the tip. I appreciate that so as I've
Speaker 1: heard other streamers say that Rumble isn't paying out fully
Speaker 1: and withholding more than the usual fees have you experienced this.
Speaker 1: Thanks for all your hard work and God bless you
Speaker 1: and your family. As a matter of fact, we have
Speaker 1: them on our list to try to figure out what's
Speaker 1: going on. Their payment schedule has not been regular. They
Speaker 1: held about five months worth of stuff back in the
Speaker 1: fall and they showed that they had paid us, and
Speaker 1: we said it was in October. They said, I haven't
Speaker 1: gotten it. And after wrangling with them for months, they
Speaker 1: finally said, well, you know, we're going to cancel that
Speaker 1: check and we'll catch it up on this. But they
Speaker 1: had shown that they paid us and they didn't send anything.
Speaker 1: And for the last several mon I look on the record,
Speaker 1: they say that they've been sending out payments. We haven't
Speaker 1: received anything. So we're we're going to be on the
Speaker 1: phone with them. I don't know what's going on with Rubel,
Speaker 1: but you know, that's the world we live in because
Speaker 1: all of the main places have been shut down to us.
Speaker 1: So I think we'll get it from them. It's just
Speaker 1: something that's happening that's kind of strange. Let's take a
Speaker 1: look at the Olympics a little bit here, because specifically
Speaker 1: the swimming events, it turns out that you have to
Speaker 1: be insane in order to get into the Sane River.
Speaker 1: There's nothing sane about it. They're dumping raw sewage into it.
Speaker 1: It has a fecal bacteria all over the place, and
Speaker 1: they've had to postpone some of their swimming events. Imagine
Speaker 1: if you had a PCR test what you could find
Speaker 1: in the Sane River. It just boggles the imagination, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: It's like some kind of a Petri dish that is
Speaker 1: curating everything. Dustin Helm, thank you very much on rock Fan.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. Concerns about water quality and the Sane
Speaker 1: River lead Paris Olympics organizers to postpone the men's triathlon yesterday,
Speaker 1: but officials hoping that the swimming portion of the race
Speaker 1: will be able to go forward in the long polluted
Speaker 1: waterway in the coming days following inexpensive cleanup, organizers said
Speaker 1: they will try to hold the men's triathle on Wednesday instead. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I guess that's kind of dependent on whether the visitors
Speaker 1: can be told to hold it. So, you know, they're
Speaker 1: dumping their seerge into the sage. I guess they put
Speaker 1: out a request, can you all just hold it for
Speaker 1: a day or so, So we can have some events.
Speaker 1: Maybe they can hold it later on Friday is also
Speaker 1: planned as a back update. The swimming portion of training events,
Speaker 1: meant to let the triathletes familiarize themselves of the course,
Speaker 1: was canceled on both Sunday and Monday, and then the
Speaker 1: event itself was canceled on Tuesday because it concerns over
Speaker 1: water quality. The delays come after the Olympic organizers and
Speaker 1: city officials that expressed confidence in recent days that bacteria
Speaker 1: levels would improve as skies cleared and temperatures warmed. This week,
Speaker 1: some offer hope that the heat wave will kill off
Speaker 1: some of the bacteria. Wait a minute, this Marxist mayor
Speaker 1: of Paris. You know, they have pushed the Paris Climate
Speaker 1: Accord was held there, you know, and then this Marxist
Speaker 1: mayor pushed the idea of fifteen minute cities. I mean,
Speaker 1: she has been on the forefront of the Watermellon movement,
Speaker 1: the thin Veneer green and the big red movement of
Speaker 1: communism underneath it. But she's been right there. And do
Speaker 1: they realize that global warming could clean up and disinfect
Speaker 1: the Seine? The solution is right there before and she's
Speaker 1: fight this as a matter of fact, she pumped in
Speaker 1: to trying to clean this up. She put in one
Speaker 1: and a half billion dollars to try to clean up
Speaker 1: the filthy Sane river. Maybe instead of dumping one and
Speaker 1: a half billion dollars in the cleanup fund, maybe you
Speaker 1: stop dumping raw sewage into it. That would be something,
Speaker 1: wouldn't it. So the UH bacteria levels have remained in flux.
Speaker 1: They say, do they have a backup venue anywhere else?
Speaker 1: So they could go swimming anywhere in France? Apparently not.
Speaker 1: Daily water quality tests measure levels of fecal bacteria known
Speaker 1: as E. Coli. Yeah, they can kill you, right. Safe
Speaker 1: limits of nine hundred colony forming units per one hundred
Speaker 1: milliliters have been determined by European rules, but of course,
Speaker 1: the the athletic groups that have more stringent limits, but
Speaker 1: they've relaxed them with the Olympic group that's there now.
Speaker 1: Isn't that interesting that E coli which will kill you?
Speaker 1: They don't have a zero ecoli policy. They have a
Speaker 1: zero carbon policy, they have a zero COVID policy, but
Speaker 1: they don't have a zero E coli policy. They will
Speaker 1: tolerate E coli. They understand that it's never going to
Speaker 1: be perfect, right, and so they have a level but
Speaker 1: they say, well, okay, it's still there, but it's safe.
Speaker 1: But there is no safe level for carbon dioxide. There
Speaker 1: is no safe level for covid. Weah lock everything down.
Speaker 1: Those are the rules that they have. So even a
Speaker 1: mouthful of contaminated water can lead to diarrhea, and the
Speaker 1: germ can cause illnesses such as infections in the urinary
Speaker 1: track or in the intestines. I wonder if you get
Speaker 1: if you go swimming in fecal matter like the Sane River.
Speaker 1: I wonder if you get pink eye, you know, the
Speaker 1: dreaded pink eye of bird flu, the pink eye. Lie
Speaker 1: people can working on the farm, they don't clean their hands,
Speaker 1: they rub their eyes, they get pink eye. You got
Speaker 1: bird flu. I just know it. So one and a
Speaker 1: half billion dollars for a construction of a giant basin
Speaker 1: to capture excess rain water and keep wastewater from flowing
Speaker 1: into the river, and also for upgrading wastewater treatment plants.
Speaker 1: You would have thought that they would do that anyway,
Speaker 1: wouldn't you. But the problem is that when you are
Speaker 1: a Marxist environmentalist like Paris Mayor and Hilldalgo. That sounds
Speaker 1: like a real French name, doesn't it. She come over
Speaker 1: on a boat. But when you are a Marxist mayor
Speaker 1: like that, how you're focused on how you can ban
Speaker 1: cars and lock people up in your city and just
Speaker 1: different areas of your city. You're not going to get
Speaker 1: out of that area. They're focused on other things other
Speaker 1: than cleaning the water. She very publicly took a swim.
Speaker 1: I talked about that two weeks ago. She put on
Speaker 1: a wet suit and she gets in and goes, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm okay, I didn't die, just gets out right. As
Speaker 1: I point out that it's a very different thing than
Speaker 1: when you are swimming an event. Now you're going to
Speaker 1: be getting it in your mouth and your eyes and all
Speaker 1: the rest of this stuff. And even though they have
Speaker 1: an acceptable level of E. Coli in their water, they've
Speaker 1: exceeded that level. It's actually twenty times higher than what
Speaker 1: the World Triathlon considers to be acceptable. But of course
Speaker 1: the Olympic Committee has lowered it. They have low standards
Speaker 1: for everything, don't they. They have low standards for entertainment,
Speaker 1: for everything. The mayor of Paris has still jumped into
Speaker 1: the scene last month, but the small dip is very
Speaker 1: different from submerging yourself for hours during a race. Paris
Speaker 1: hasn't hosted the Olympics for one hundred years. Maybe that's
Speaker 1: why you know that, like I talked about yesterday, that
Speaker 1: was the one that Derek Little was in one hundred
Speaker 1: years ago in Paris. One athlete is taking matters into
Speaker 1: his own unwashed hands. American triathlete Seth Ryder believes that
Speaker 1: he can ward off serious infection. He said by increasing
Speaker 1: my e coali threshold. Oh so he's going to expose
Speaker 1: himself to it to build up his immune system. Remember
Speaker 1: when George Carlin joked about how you're not going to
Speaker 1: get us sick. We all grew up in New York
Speaker 1: City and we were swimming in the dirty river the
Speaker 1: old time, and you know we've got a immune systems
Speaker 1: made out of mind. Well, this guy is trying to
Speaker 1: do that. So he's not washing his hands after using
Speaker 1: the bathroom in order to increase his e coali threshold.
Speaker 1: Other athletes are upping their probiotic intakes and the hope
Speaker 1: of building a stronger gut to a stand and infection.
Speaker 1: But nobody can depend on the mayor to do anything
Speaker 1: and then we have the events themselves. When we look
Speaker 1: at boxing, they have actually put men into box women training.
Speaker 1: Gender ideology is going to get women killed. Well, there
Speaker 1: you go. That keeps going on and it gets pretty
Speaker 1: pretty bad. One guy from Algeria and another guy from
Speaker 1: Taiwan have been cleared by the International Olympic Committee to
Speaker 1: beat up women. That's what we're talking about here. This
Speaker 1: is one of the most extreme examples of their contempt
Speaker 1: for women. The trainees and the International Olympics Committee. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, they had DNA tests to determine
Speaker 1: what their sex is male, but they don't care. In
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three, at the time they were doing the
Speaker 1: DNA tests, the president of the International Boxing Association claimed
Speaker 1: the test had proven the athletes, including these two who
Speaker 1: will both fight later this week, had X and Y chromosomes.
Speaker 1: He said, they've uncovered athletes who are trying to fool
Speaker 1: their colleagues and pretend to be women because they want
Speaker 1: that gold medal. And so the International Boxing Association was
Speaker 1: stripped of its right to run the Olympic boxing competitions. See,
Speaker 1: the Olympics has become a corrupt joke. You've got the
Speaker 1: people who are who have set the levels the World
Speaker 1: Triathlon has levels for E coli. They say we don't care.
Speaker 1: The International Boxing Association says we're not going to let
Speaker 1: men beat up women. The Olympics said, we don't care.
Speaker 1: Someone who's not under any illusion about potentially dangerous threat
Speaker 1: of the female fighters is Mexico's Brionda Tamara, who wrote
Speaker 1: about how overwhelmed she was when facing the guy from Algeria.
Speaker 1: By the way, this is what the guy looks like,
Speaker 1: she says, when I fought with her again playing this game,
Speaker 1: got to use a female pronout. She should say, when
Speaker 1: I fought with him, I felt very out of my depth.
Speaker 1: Her blows, Actually, she means his blows hurt me a lot.
Speaker 1: I don't think I'd ever felt like that in my
Speaker 1: thirteen years as a boxer. Am I sparring with men,
Speaker 1: But she was sparring with a man. So anyway, he's
Speaker 1: this guy from Algeria, another guy from Taiwan scheduled to
Speaker 1: compete in Olympic boxing because the International Boxing Association wants
Speaker 1: to not allow that. They just kick the International Boxing
Speaker 1: Association out despite having been disqualified for having X Y chromosomes.
Speaker 1: And then when you One more thing that we didn't
Speaker 1: talk about with the Olympic opening was the fact that
Speaker 1: they played Imagine and a Polish journalist who is there
Speaker 1: reporting on the opening ceremony has been suspended because he said,
Speaker 1: this is a vision of communism. Yeah it is. John
Speaker 1: Lennon's song. Imagine is a vision of communism, of atheism,
Speaker 1: of collectivism, all the rest of that. But you can't
Speaker 1: say that, you know, just like the International Boxing Association
Speaker 1: can say that's a man. We know that's a man.
Speaker 1: So he said this is a vision of communism, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: and they kicked him out and said they're kicking him
Speaker 1: out because they're all about tolerance and reconciliation and mutual understanding. Well,
Speaker 1: I think he understands exactly what John Lennon's song is about.
Speaker 1: You know, no heaven or hell, no countries, no possessions again.
Speaker 1: You know, but maybe it's the technocracy you'll own nothing,
Speaker 1: but yeah, no possessions, it's communism, no countries again. That
Speaker 1: was communism in the at that time. Their theme was
Speaker 1: the internationale right. That was one of the reasons why
Speaker 1: anybody talks about nationalism. The communists were trying to set
Speaker 1: up a global government their anthem was called the international
Speaker 1: now and so everybody divided along these lines of countries
Speaker 1: versus a global government. And yet the reality is is
Speaker 1: that they're more like than they are different, the fascists
Speaker 1: and the communists. So they got rid of this guy,
Speaker 1: suspended him the reporter, because they're all about mutual understanding,
Speaker 1: tolerance and reconciliation. That's state run media in Poland. That's
Speaker 1: another reasons why you don't want to have the government
Speaker 1: involved in media. You know, there ought to be an
Speaker 1: adenda for the Bill of Rights, the First Amendment or
Speaker 1: something to say that the government will have no will
Speaker 1: not have any state owned media, and it will not
Speaker 1: be allowed to play foot see with media or social
Speaker 1: media behind the scenes, which is what they've been doing.
Speaker 1: But again it's just like he was working essentially for
Speaker 1: PBS type of thing. State media has been an ideological
Speaker 1: battleground in Poland for years, and now the left is
Speaker 1: taken over. Donald Tusk took power in December, acted quickly
Speaker 1: to remove control of the conservative control of the airwaves.
Speaker 1: And so you know, it's all about tolerance, of course,
Speaker 1: I said, all it's about the problem is that a
Speaker 1: lot of people in Poland lived under Soviet imposed communist rules. Drego,
Speaker 1: the navy seal that I interviewed. You know, he hates
Speaker 1: communism because he had to live under it when he
Speaker 1: was in Poland escaped and came to the US. But
Speaker 1: Soviet imposed communist rule up until nineteen eighty nine, and
Speaker 1: some people still remember it. But Donald Tusk is trying
Speaker 1: to defend it. Anyway. We're going to take a quick
Speaker 1: break and we will be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 3: Good morning everyone, Good morning, and to all the young
Speaker 3: leaders who are here and the youngish leaders, good.
Speaker 6: Morning to all of you.
Speaker 7: Good morning, my dear, good morning, good morning. I'm here
Speaker 7: because of you.
Speaker 1: By the way, she loves yellow buses and she's so
Speaker 1: friendly too. We'll talk about that coming up. She loves everybody.
Speaker 1: Good morning. Cackle, cackle.
Speaker 7: Who doesn't love a yellow school bus?
Speaker 3: Can you raise your man if.
Speaker 7: You love a yellow school bus?
Speaker 3: Right? Just there's something about and most of us, many.
Speaker 1: Of us went to.
Speaker 7: School on the yellow school bus.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 1: Yeah. She didn't care how much money she threw at
Speaker 1: this electric school bus, did she. We're going to talk
Speaker 1: about that as well.
Speaker 7: Electric school bus program really does represent an intersection of
Speaker 7: all those points.
Speaker 1: A one A one on a billion dollar program.
Speaker 7: ND, we love the importance of investing in domestic manufacturing.
Speaker 5: New this morning, electric bus and truck maker pro Terra
Speaker 5: says it's seeking Chapter eleven bankruptcy protection for a federal
Speaker 5: court in Delaware. The California company is a supplier of
Speaker 5: buses for transit systems across the nation, including Greenville. President
Speaker 5: Biden took a virtual tour of the Greenville factory in
Speaker 5: twenty twenty one to highlight electric vehicle makers.
Speaker 1: Uh, it's just magic. As a matter of fact, they
Speaker 1: paid for it with magic money, you know, the magic
Speaker 1: money theory, the magic money tree. Mmt uh. Yeah. We
Speaker 1: had that big program of investment, and one of the
Speaker 1: things that they invested in was the billion one dollar
Speaker 1: electric school bus program. It deployed only sixty buses. So
Speaker 1: how much did each of those buses cost children? Yes,
Speaker 1: you're right, sixteen point seven million dollars per bus, seventeen
Speaker 1: million dollars. They should have painted them red for all
Speaker 1: the red ink and the expense instead of yellow. Three
Speaker 1: years ago, LA Law was tasked with overseeing the US
Speaker 1: government's billion dollar investment to order thousands of electric buses
Speaker 1: across hundreds of American school districts. Harris and EPA administrator
Speaker 1: Michael Reagan, through the Clean school Bus Program, used almost
Speaker 1: a billion dollars in federal rebates for three hundred and
Speaker 1: eighty nine school districts across all fifty states to help
Speaker 1: deliver two thousand, four hundred and sixty three electric school buses.
Speaker 1: And when this happened, I talked about, do you realize
Speaker 1: that's four hundred and six thousand dollars per electric school bus.
Speaker 1: That's insane, nearly a half a million dollars per bus.
Speaker 1: But it's even worse because they only deployed sixty buses.
Speaker 1: Only twenty seven of those three hundred and eighty nine
Speaker 1: school districts have had buses delivered to them and took
Speaker 1: out their diesel fueled buses out of service. And of
Speaker 1: course they had issues as well, because they had big
Speaker 1: issues when the weather was cold, They had charging time
Speaker 1: issues as well. Those districts, those twenty seven districts have
Speaker 1: only deployed a total of sixty battery electric or low
Speaker 1: emission propane fueled school buses. They only put out about
Speaker 1: three of these things per district. And only not even
Speaker 1: ten percent of the more like five percent of the
Speaker 1: school districts. As a matter of fact, of the three
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty nine school districts, like I said, twenty
Speaker 1: seven got buses, averaged three buses per district. Fifty five
Speaker 1: districts quit the program, quit the program twice as many
Speaker 1: quit the program has got buses, and are the ones
Speaker 1: who got buses, they typically only got about three of them.
Speaker 1: So this big boondoggle there created as part of Biden's
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. It's going
Speaker 1: to be part of the modern monetary theory, but it's
Speaker 1: really part of the magic money tree. And you have
Speaker 1: these magic yellow school buses that are part of this corruption. Now,
Speaker 1: the politicians are great investment, aren't they? If you want
Speaker 1: to get into crony capitalism. Misas asks, are the technocrats
Speaker 1: also running the Biden presidency, because we know the technocrats
Speaker 1: have lined up with Trump. Are they also there with
Speaker 1: the with the Biden Of course they are. It's just
Speaker 1: a different group of technocrats, right, different companies trying to
Speaker 1: engage in crony capitalism. America has degenerated into the ideal
Speaker 1: technocracy from the technocrats point of view, because all substantive
Speaker 1: decisions are made by unelected technocrats. We have regulation, we
Speaker 1: have taxation without representation. That's been the way that it
Speaker 1: has been for a long time. But to take a
Speaker 1: look at Lalla Harris, you saw her. She's so friendly,
Speaker 1: she's giggling, she's cackling. Ah, good morning to you, Good
Speaker 1: morning to you. That's not the way she treats her employees. However,
Speaker 1: Terry Mcatteer said, there's another side to Lalla Harris. As
Speaker 1: many of you know, my family has long political roots.
Speaker 1: My dad, Jay Eugene Cketeer, was a San Francisco supervisor
Speaker 1: and a state senator until his untimely death at age
Speaker 1: fifty one. I pursued the educational political route and was
Speaker 1: elected Nevada County Superintendent of Schools for six four year terms.
Speaker 1: Our son, Gregory, loves politics and thought that it might
Speaker 1: also be his passion. A few years ago, I assisted
Speaker 1: him in securing a summer non paid internship with Senator
Speaker 1: Dianne Frankenstein in her San Francisco office. Franclnsin's office was
Speaker 1: unable to have Gregory start in June, but told him
Speaker 1: that then Attorney General La La Harris was looking for
Speaker 1: summer interns. While I have nothing against now Senator Harris,
Speaker 1: as she is a good orator and has done some
Speaker 1: fine things while holding elective office. So this is an
Speaker 1: older one, right. He wrote this when she was a senator,
Speaker 1: and he's talking about when she was Attorney general and
Speaker 1: how did she get these jobs? Well, she kind of
Speaker 1: slept her way to the top with Willie Brown. She
Speaker 1: was friendly with him, but not so friendly with her
Speaker 1: staff as a matter of fact.
Speaker 6: Also, she's a good orator. What stop being so polite.
Speaker 6: You can call a spade a spade. She can't speak.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I know that's the worst ortors of our time.
Speaker 1: But you know, he's somebody who is a political animal,
Speaker 1: so he's trying to be as diplomatic as possible. I
Speaker 1: guess he likes her laugh. I don't know. Anyway, she
Speaker 1: is a good orator and she has done some fine things.
Speaker 1: This is another problem here. I don't like what. I
Speaker 1: don't know what she's done. Named something terry. She sued
Speaker 1: the people who were exposing planned parenthood or and didn't
Speaker 1: sue him, but brought criminal charges against him. They exposed
Speaker 1: murder and trafficking of body parts, but murder for hire
Speaker 1: really is what it was. But I don't know what
Speaker 1: else she did anyway. But he says, however, I believe
Speaker 1: how she treats her staff is as important as an
Speaker 1: individual's legislative accomplishments. A person's character is probably one of
Speaker 1: the most important attributes for someone wanting to obtain the
Speaker 1: office of president. See I've said that about Trump. Character
Speaker 1: does matter. And so even though he wants to say
Speaker 1: that she did some good things as Attorney general and
Speaker 1: she's a great orator, he has a real problem with
Speaker 1: the way she treated her staff. She's not like she
Speaker 1: was at that bus company there. Presidential candidate and US
Speaker 1: Senator Amy Klobaschar had drawn scrutiny for her berating treatment
Speaker 1: of her staff. This is probably I don't have the date.
Speaker 1: He date didn't print out, but I'm assuming that this
Speaker 1: was done back in the twenty twenty cycle when they
Speaker 1: were all running for president. This particular flaw by elected
Speaker 1: officials and dealing with common to see in respect towards
Speaker 1: staff is something for which most people in this country
Speaker 1: have little tolerance. Sure, the job is stressful, We've all
Speaker 1: dealt with an angry boss in our lives. But there's
Speaker 1: another side of La La Harris which the general public
Speaker 1: does not know. Now we get into the meat of
Speaker 1: the issue. This is his beef with La La. His son, Gregory,
Speaker 1: had an eye opening experience in La La Harris's office
Speaker 1: that none of us expected. I mean, after all, this
Speaker 1: person is a baby murdering Democrat. You would think she'd
Speaker 1: be really nice to people. For his sake, the month
Speaker 1: could not pass quickly enough. Needless to say, he was
Speaker 1: delighted to work in Frankenstein's office for the rest of
Speaker 1: the summer. His month long internship for Laala Harris, he
Speaker 1: said he found that she vocally throws around a lot
Speaker 1: of f bombs and other profanity constantly as she berates
Speaker 1: her staff and others. The staff is in complete fear
Speaker 1: of her, and she uses her profanity throughout the day.
Speaker 1: Wow as attorney who thought that of somebody who slept
Speaker 1: their way at the top. As Attorney General, Senator Harris
Speaker 1: instructed her entire staff to stand every morning as she
Speaker 1: entered the office and say good morning General. Never once
Speaker 1: during the month long internship did Harris introduce herself to
Speaker 1: our son, as he was only in an office with
Speaker 1: twenty paid employees and staff was too intimidated by her
Speaker 1: to introduce him. The only acknowledgment was a form letter
Speaker 1: of thanks signed by Harris, given to him on his
Speaker 1: last day of service. Gregory was also given instructions to
Speaker 1: never address La Law nor look her in the eye,
Speaker 1: as that privilege was only allowed to senior staff members. Wow, wow, hey,
Speaker 1: you talked about a little dictatorship. I thought it was
Speaker 1: kind of interesting. The picture that was on the drug report.
Speaker 1: I didn't put it in the deck here. I would
Speaker 1: show it to you, but maybe you saw it. They
Speaker 1: have a giant coconut and she's setting on it because
Speaker 1: she's got this thing about you know, coconut has become
Speaker 1: like an inside thing with her people. And they had
Speaker 1: all these you know, characters, politicians, George Clooney and everybody
Speaker 1: else celebrating. She's setting up on top of this big
Speaker 1: coconut and at the top it said Cama Lot. And
Speaker 1: I told Karen, I said, you know, you hear how
Speaker 1: they're focusing on this thing. Don't call her Kamala, call
Speaker 1: her camel Law. I said, they're going to push this
Speaker 1: Camelot stuff and loihole. Two days later, Dredge report, Camelot,
Speaker 1: Well you Camelot, Camelot. I know it gives a person pause.
Speaker 1: But in Camelot, what Laala says are the laws. Okay,
Speaker 1: she's going to rule as a dictator. We'll always past
Speaker 1: the distant moon to go here. July and August cannot
Speaker 1: be too hot. Yeah, that's maybe the coconut thing. Maybe
Speaker 1: that's a reference to the Marx Brothers, cause they are coconuts,
Speaker 1: aren't they. And this thing, but she does seem to
Speaker 1: have quite a bit of an ego, so much so
Speaker 1: this guy four years ago was talking about it, he says. Furthermore,
Speaker 1: she didn't show the quality of leadership skills or even
Speaker 1: being a decent boss, much less the class to approach
Speaker 1: Gregory at least once during the month to say Hi,
Speaker 1: I'm La La Harris and giggle, you know, hello, hello,
Speaker 1: and I want to thank you for volunteering in my office.
Speaker 1: And he says, and what's up with this don't look
Speaker 1: her in the eye instruction? He says, I want to
Speaker 1: work in that kind of hostile environment. He said, I
Speaker 1: had Gregory read this piece before submitting it, and he
Speaker 1: is willing to put his own integrity on the line
Speaker 1: because the truth is important to him. In fact, integrity
Speaker 1: and character are still virtues that cannon should be upheld
Speaker 1: in our politicians and politics. We just haven't seen them
Speaker 1: in a while. So this guy is a member of
Speaker 1: the Union editorial board. This is not an anonymous thing
Speaker 1: on social media. This guy talked about his father, his
Speaker 1: identified himself identified his son said, you don't look her
Speaker 1: in the eye, and you've got to call her general.
Speaker 1: So is it any surprise that she has had ninety
Speaker 1: two percent turnover rate? It's almost like everybody she hired
Speaker 1: within the three years has quit. They say the work
Speaker 1: environment is toxic. It's not just this guy who was
Speaker 1: saying that about his son's internship. Those who have worked
Speaker 1: for her over the past decade report she was a
Speaker 1: tyrannical boss. Opened the books, discovered a ninety two percent
Speaker 1: staff turnover through payroll books. But that doesn't stop the
Speaker 1: white dudes for Harris. As somebody pointed out yesterday's and
Speaker 1: I was really disturbed to see Jeff Bridges of The
Speaker 1: Big Lebowski, you know, the dude himself white dudes. I
Speaker 1: saw the thing and he'said when I saw it was dudes,
Speaker 1: I just had to get in on it. But you
Speaker 1: also had Sean Aston from Lord of the Rings, and
Speaker 1: is Patty Duke Patty Duke's son. He was also and
Speaker 1: Rudy Mark Hamill of course the Star Wars saying Mark
Speaker 1: Hamill is not a surprise. I mean he's been out
Speaker 1: there making ridiculous statements and politics for quite some time.
Speaker 1: And they were all joining with Adam Schiff and had
Speaker 1: a virtual event Monday. They called it white dudes of Harris. Well,
Speaker 1: I think somebody had the perfect response to it. They said,
Speaker 1: you mean white dudes for Harris? Is that like this
Speaker 1: Dylan the tranny And you know Richard who goes by
Speaker 1: Rachel Levine, the deputy HHS Secretary. I call him Dick
Speaker 1: Divine because they love this guy. But yeah, white dudes
Speaker 1: for Harris. That's what it's really about. A woman president,
Speaker 1: how exciting, said Jeff Bridges. Not only that she's not
Speaker 1: just a woman, she's a general. Just don't look her
Speaker 1: in the eye. You're gonna have some big problems. And
Speaker 1: then Pete Boutigay also appeared. They're starting to really stretch
Speaker 1: the definition of dude, aren't they. Pete Boutygay and on
Speaker 1: the call well. James Carvel, the Commntion Democrat strategists, was
Speaker 1: on PBS's firing line talking about La LA's chances and
Speaker 1: he said she's gone to get slaughtered. He says, they
Speaker 1: ask him, what is the key for the vice president
Speaker 1: to sustain excitement for her candidacy through the rest of
Speaker 1: the campaign. Well, that's the key, he said. The first
Speaker 1: thing to recognize what happened. What happened was people wanted
Speaker 1: something different, and she just projects the fact that she is,
Speaker 1: you know, excited about the future. There's no policy that
Speaker 1: anyone was pushing. That's right, He'll tell you the truth
Speaker 1: to some degree. There's no policies involved in all this.
Speaker 1: It's just personalities that they're putting out there. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: nothing but a personality beauty contest. Again, I've never seen
Speaker 1: any election cycle that is more like a high school
Speaker 1: student council election. Just disgust me. There's no issues involved
Speaker 1: in this stuff. And even if there is an issue,
Speaker 1: even if they tell you, well, this is where I'm
Speaker 1: taking out my position, you can count on the fact
Speaker 1: that they're lying. Because all these people are such phony grifters.
Speaker 1: He says, there's no particular group is behind this just
Speaker 1: a general feeling people want a different choice and Trump
Speaker 1: and Biden and they got it. But now look she's
Speaker 1: going to get slaughtered. He said, they're coming out. This
Speaker 1: is part of the you know, no different than it
Speaker 1: was any other time. They got to get up, get ready.
Speaker 1: They got to be able to defend an attack. At
Speaker 1: the same time, it's going to be a time of
Speaker 1: struggle and definition as to who Vice President Harris is.
Speaker 1: So they got to define her. You know, it's like
Speaker 1: a pageant. It was wag the Biden and now they're
Speaker 1: going to wag the La Law. But it's not just
Speaker 1: white dudes who are supporting her. She has a much
Speaker 1: broader base that includes broads like this one.
Speaker 8: Over one point five million followers is here to help
Speaker 8: gentle parents us through this election. Thank you, hi everybody.
Speaker 8: I am so hard to speak today.
Speaker 1: I am like shaking who was like a creepy mister Rogers.
Speaker 8: In such incredible company. We are here because as if
Speaker 8: you were here earlier, you've heard BIPOC women have tapped
Speaker 8: us in as white women to step up, listen and
Speaker 8: get involved the selection season. This is a really important
Speaker 8: time and we all need to use our voices and
Speaker 8: influence for the greater good. No matter who you are,
Speaker 8: you are all influencers in some way. So tonight I'm
Speaker 8: going to share some dos and don'ts for getting involved
Speaker 8: in politics online and navigating the toxicity that comes with it.
Speaker 8: And spoiler alert, as much as the toxicity can come
Speaker 8: from the outside, it can come from us too. So first,
Speaker 8: don't isolate yourself. We can do our best work words
Speaker 8: of wisdom. We need together like we are tonight.
Speaker 1: What about the lockdown feels smaller when.
Speaker 8: We support together. Isolate yourself, don't make it about yourself.
Speaker 8: As white women, we need to use our privilege positive changes.
Speaker 8: If you find yourself talking over or speaking for BIPOP individuals,
Speaker 8: or god forbid, correcting them, just take a beat and
Speaker 8: instead we can put our listening ears on. So do
Speaker 8: learn from and amplify the voices of those who have
Speaker 8: been historically marginalized, and use the privilege you have in
Speaker 8: order to push for a systemic change.
Speaker 1: Okay, I can't take any more of this. I don't
Speaker 1: know about you, but you know I got to say
Speaker 1: that she's the best argument for going bipop I've ever
Speaker 1: seen white liberal women just unbelievable isn't.
Speaker 6: It all the hand oceans Her inflection, it's like she's
Speaker 6: speaking to a group of kindergarteners, and it really makes
Speaker 6: you realize that she is. Everyone involved in this has
Speaker 6: the mentality of the kindergartener. Ooh Kamala laughs.
Speaker 1: Oh that's right. Yeah, that's our kindergartener minders. And she
Speaker 1: actually had a TikTok account called missus Frazzled. I'd be
Speaker 1: surprised if she's actually married. Her name is a photoor
Speaker 1: aerial photoor, and she's a former kindergarten teacher, so that
Speaker 1: qualifies her obviously for the highest offices of the la
Speaker 1: law or Biden administration, being in a kindergarten.
Speaker 8: Hello, Congress, you know why I'm here.
Speaker 1: Contraception.
Speaker 8: Take your hands off your ears please.
Speaker 1: I don't think she has to worry about contraception. I
Speaker 1: think she's been spared that concern, Thank you forever. And
Speaker 1: then she lectures us about the bands of gas on ovens.
Speaker 8: Everybody freeze, uncle, don No one wants to take your
Speaker 8: gas stove, no friend. They just want you to know
Speaker 8: about your gas stove. Do you see how it says
Speaker 8: natural gas. They just want to put a little warning
Speaker 8: sticker on your stove so that you know that it
Speaker 8: actually means methane gas.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and then they'll go from there. Well, Colin rugs
Speaker 1: as the weird white woman who went viral during a
Speaker 1: women's kama law Zoom calls a teacher turned influencer whose
Speaker 1: TikTok account is even more cringe than her.
Speaker 2: I knew it.
Speaker 1: I knew it. Oh yeah, kindergarten, kindergarten teacher.
Speaker 6: Yeah, all my instincts are good.
Speaker 1: She still talks to adults like she's talking to five
Speaker 1: year olds. But she was able to get one point
Speaker 1: three million followers on tiktokh what is it? You know?
Speaker 1: I can't get those kind of followers. I gotta get
Speaker 1: my game up here.
Speaker 6: Somehow, it reminds you that George Carlon quote, think about
Speaker 6: how dumb the average person is, and then remember half
Speaker 6: the population is dumber than that.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, you take the square root of her intelligence. Okay,
Speaker 1: we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: Making sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: Well, we are closing out the month of July, and
Speaker 1: I just want to get people an update. We are
Speaker 1: up to seven eighths on the gas tank. I really
Speaker 1: do appreciate the voluntary support of people, and I want
Speaker 1: to thank the people on ZELL. Haven't read this list,
Speaker 1: I think through most of July. I just read a
Speaker 1: few at the beginning of July, so this is pretty
Speaker 1: much almost all the month of July. But I do
Speaker 1: want to acknowledge and think the people who have contributed
Speaker 1: on ZEL. Again, if you want to see how you
Speaker 1: can support the program, if you would like to go
Speaker 1: to the Davidnightshow dot com. It'll show you where you
Speaker 1: can find the show, both the video channels where we
Speaker 1: also put some clips from the show, but the video
Speaker 1: channels as well as some direct links to where you
Speaker 1: can find the podcast, because sometimes it can be difficult
Speaker 1: to find the podcast on the podcast site, so you
Speaker 1: may need to go to the David Night Show to
Speaker 1: find the link to it. Again, if you could like
Speaker 1: the stream wherever you're watching it, that helps for people
Speaker 1: to find it. Perhaps we think the jury is still
Speaker 1: kind of out on that, but it certainly doesn't hurt
Speaker 1: and it helps it On some of the platforms, some
Speaker 1: of them they play games with the search algorithms. Wherever
Speaker 1: you're watching it. It does help it if you can
Speaker 1: like the stream, and it also have links to how
Speaker 1: you can support us, and so these are the ones.
Speaker 1: If your bank does, Zella is a good way to
Speaker 1: support us. It doesn't charge any fees or commissions, and
Speaker 1: there's no delay on it either. Sylvia D, J H.
Speaker 1: Benjamin R. Thank you very much. It's very generous. I
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Raymond G Adam D, William W. Susan L.
Speaker 1: Michael P. Mary Moore because I mentioned full name, because
Speaker 1: she has been on the show and she's actually matched
Speaker 1: these in the past. Michael P. Stacey A, Kimberly M.
Speaker 1: Gretchen C. Susan L. A second time, thank you very much,
Speaker 1: Susan regular supporter, William R. Gregory Jeffries and all these
Speaker 1: names are regular supporters that we see on a monthly basis.
Speaker 1: I have to say Kenneth C, Brian P, Kevin M,
Speaker 1: JEFFREYC again, Jared you, Teresa J, Matthew S, Terry M,
Speaker 1: Susan L again, Manny D, Scott L. Thomas g Ronald H.
Speaker 1: Mary Mary Moore, Amy B and Ralph M. Again, thank
Speaker 1: you very much. That's very generous. I appreciate that. And again,
Speaker 1: we have a new name on there, Teresa Jay, thank
Speaker 1: you very much, and also Thomas G. Both of those
Speaker 1: are new names. Everybody else that is on there somebody
Speaker 1: who contributes on a regular basis, and we really do
Speaker 1: appreciate that it's a few people who contribute that keep
Speaker 1: the program going. Really is the case. Let's talk a
Speaker 1: little bit about the war on raw milk, because we
Speaker 1: know this is part of their pandemic push, and I think,
Speaker 1: you know, we just need to explain to people that
Speaker 1: raw milk is far, far, far far safer than Parisian water.
Speaker 1: Not bare water, but Parisian water. You don't want to
Speaker 1: drink that water from Paris. But I'm not too concerned
Speaker 1: about raw milk. As a matter of fact, raw milk
Speaker 1: seems to be safer than soy milk or silk, or
Speaker 1: produce or the deli meat from boys that we've had
Speaker 1: listeria outbreaks and all those put nearly forty people in
Speaker 1: the hospital, killed a couple of people, you know, have
Speaker 1: if there have been any outbreaks with raw milk, you
Speaker 1: can bet that would have been headline news. They are
Speaker 1: dying literally, or I shouldn't say it literally, dying of
Speaker 1: the people who have listeria are literally dying. But these
Speaker 1: people are metaphorically dying for any dirt that they can
Speaker 1: find for raw milk. But that dog hasn't barked, and
Speaker 1: that should tell you something. They should tell you that
Speaker 1: there's not a problem with it. People drink raw milk
Speaker 1: for millennia, but now we're supposed to believe that they
Speaker 1: were probably drinking raw milk before the French River was
Speaker 1: so polluted. Does anyone else find it strange that COVID
Speaker 1: experts like epidemiologists doctor Eric Feigelding are back in the
Speaker 1: media now. They are sounding the alarm about bird flu
Speaker 1: as an ex pandemic, but this is zero hedge, and
Speaker 1: they don't mention the fact that Trump's Redfield is doing
Speaker 1: the same thing. You know, both Robert Redfield, who was
Speaker 1: Trump's CDC head, and this reprehensible fear manger, lying so
Speaker 1: called scientist Eric Feigelding, both of them are pushing fear
Speaker 1: and both of them are pushing this totally made up
Speaker 1: number that bird flu is going to have a fifty
Speaker 1: percent casualty rate. That's absolute nonsense. There is absolutely no way,
Speaker 1: no way that they have any basis for that number.
Speaker 1: It just shows how these virologists are making up everything everything.
Speaker 1: This bird flu has arrived in the US very fast
Speaker 1: and furious. Just like fast and furious. It is a
Speaker 1: false flag designed to sell an agenda. But that's what
Speaker 1: you call it. He said, it's arrived in the US
Speaker 1: very fast and furious. Definitely don't drink raw milk. It's
Speaker 1: fifty percent mortality among those who we detect it in. Now,
Speaker 1: this is a bullfaced lie. They try to make a
Speaker 1: case that there have been people who have contracted bird flu,
Speaker 1: but they have pinkie and they don't have respiratory illness,
Speaker 1: and they don't have fever, they don't have a flu.
Speaker 1: They've got pink eye, they've got conjunct dividis, and they
Speaker 1: haven't had anybody die, let alone fifty percent mortality. He says,
Speaker 1: if this truly jumps into humans and spreads to human
Speaker 1: to human, we're in deep trouble, said figl Ding. Well.
Speaker 1: Thomas Massey took him on on social media. He said,
Speaker 1: figle Ding you're flat out lying and fear mongering. You
Speaker 1: just made up the fifty percent fatality number and didn't
Speaker 1: explain it. You don't even know if pasturization kills a
Speaker 1: bird flu. People he said, are not being are not
Speaker 1: contracting fatal bird flu from consuming raw milk. Well, I'm
Speaker 1: glad he took him on with that, and we need
Speaker 1: to see that more often and again Massy will speak
Speaker 1: the truth to these people. And late twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: figl ding Twitter for abandoning it's COVID misinformation policy, the
Speaker 1: same nonsense policy that deplatformed users were even suggesting that
Speaker 1: COVID came from a lab. But now that is a
Speaker 1: useful lie to tell people that COVID came from a lab.
Speaker 1: They don't have any evidence for COVID and the weaponized
Speaker 1: kill shot was what came from a lab, folks. But
Speaker 1: now it's a useful lie and they want to push it.
Speaker 1: They want to make this real. And so even though
Speaker 1: they were punishing people, this is on zero hedge, Zero
Speaker 1: hedge was kicked off because they said, well, you got
Speaker 1: a guy working right there where they say that this began,
Speaker 1: and you know he was working on bat and coronavirus research,
Speaker 1: and it's on his LinkedIn profile, it's on a public profile.
Speaker 1: And they said, you doxed him, you're off of Twitter.
Speaker 1: There they had set that whole thing up. They punished people.
Speaker 1: Now they have all pivoted and they have jumped behind that.
Speaker 1: But it was a very useful lie for the right
Speaker 1: wing alternative media to scare their people to say, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is gain of function stuff. So Feigelding's attempts to
Speaker 1: dissuade people from drinking raw milk has been disastrous for
Speaker 1: at least one small time farmer, Sarah Armstrong, who runs
Speaker 1: her companies called Nourish. She was featured in a recent
Speaker 1: video that was uploaded on x It shows how her
Speaker 1: world was turned upside down when the bird flew spread
Speaker 1: gained momentum. In April, she said the Michigan Department of
Speaker 1: Agriculture and Rural Development hit her farm with a cease
Speaker 1: and desist order. She said Nourish co Op was mandated
Speaker 1: by the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development to
Speaker 1: destroy all of their raw dairy products after receiving a
Speaker 1: cease and desist order from the state. So, as they
Speaker 1: pointed out in this article, at the very end of it,
Speaker 1: it's time for people to take back their local supply
Speaker 1: chains and to support local farmers. Enough with these mega
Speaker 1: corporations that are controlling the food supply. So how do
Speaker 1: we do that, how do we take it back? Well,
Speaker 1: first of all, you know, if you want a natural
Speaker 1: food supply and you want to make sure that it's there,
Speaker 1: not only do we have to worry about the politics,
Speaker 1: but we've got to worry about the biology of it.
Speaker 1: And a key part of this are bees. And if
Speaker 1: you don't know anything about bees, there's a great opportunity
Speaker 1: for you to learn something about it, for you to
Speaker 1: learn what you can do to help to create a
Speaker 1: bee friendly environment. Patriot b Best is a place where
Speaker 1: you can do research. They have issues that they put out.
Speaker 1: They have a subscription to their magazine called Buzz. You
Speaker 1: can subscribe at a couple of different levels. But they've
Speaker 1: done it intensive research and study about this issue. They've
Speaker 1: created an educational online digest to help spread the word
Speaker 1: about the challenges facing the American bee and to educate
Speaker 1: American patriots to engage as advocates, to inform others and
Speaker 1: demand together to help solve this problem. Patriot b Best
Speaker 1: is a digital b sanctuary for education, engagement, and real change.
Speaker 1: These people know bees and Patriot b Best is laser
Speaker 1: focused on restoration and preservation of the American bee population.
Speaker 1: You can learn how the honeybee benefits all of us.
Speaker 1: You can discover be friendly initiatives and other helpful resources.
Speaker 1: At the Worker Bee subscription level. Each issue of the
Speaker 1: Buzz offers educational information, advocacy opportunities, be friendly products, b
Speaker 1: rescue activities, and more. In addition, Queen Bee subscribers will
Speaker 1: get access to bonus content on patriotic topics related to
Speaker 1: restoring and reinforcing American values. Join now to learn about
Speaker 1: restoring the health of the American bee population. Check them
Speaker 1: out at patriotbbest dot com to subscribe to see all
Speaker 1: the cool b related products they have to offer. Patriot
Speaker 1: b Best is the destination for all things American b
Speaker 1: Check out the links in the description to find out
Speaker 1: more about this exciting opportunity. Be part of the Patriot
Speaker 1: b Best hive and catch the Buzz today. They have
Speaker 1: a link why are b American bee population is under attack?
Speaker 1: To have a video there and again the website is
Speaker 1: Patriot b Best. You know you have to again you
Speaker 1: want to get involved with things that are going to
Speaker 1: support and protect local farm workers as well as the
Speaker 1: working bee. Find out how to do that. So, what's
Speaker 1: the best way to stop bird flu? Will you give
Speaker 1: farm workers annual flu shots? Says the CDC. See who's
Speaker 1: where the politics comes in. Here's where you stand in
Speaker 1: defense of your neighbor. This is very much like what
Speaker 1: we've seen in turn the attacks and Holland on farms
Speaker 1: and things like that. It absolutely surprised me to not
Speaker 1: see more people turn out for the protests in Holland,
Speaker 1: although it did create a new political party that rose
Speaker 1: to the top very quickly and they displaced Mark Ruta,
Speaker 1: who's now been given another globalist job. They'll always protect
Speaker 1: their own. Do we stand with our own? You know,
Speaker 1: if they shut down the farms, where are you going
Speaker 1: to eat? Well? What if they kill the farm workers
Speaker 1: with the shots. They're worried that if somebody catches both
Speaker 1: the flu and the bird flu together, the virus could
Speaker 1: mutate to become both severe and highly contagious. This is
Speaker 1: a bunch more science fiction, dystopian fantasy, that's what this is.
Speaker 1: And when you look at the CDC, they are the
Speaker 1: major retailer of flu vaccines. That has been their game
Speaker 1: for a very long time. That's why it was so
Speaker 1: easy to spot this from the very beginning, and people
Speaker 1: that I had worked with, had talked about that on
Speaker 1: a regular basis, But then you know, when it came time,
Speaker 1: oh well, no, they wanted to join the lie sell,
Speaker 1: the fear sell, the storable food and all the rest
Speaker 1: of this stuff. We've watched the CDC play this fear
Speaker 1: mongering game about flu every year, pushing people to get
Speaker 1: the flu, saying that it's going to protect you, when
Speaker 1: they knew that it wasn't going to protect you, saying
Speaker 1: that they had anticipated somehow with their crystal ball they
Speaker 1: knew what strain of flu was going to be around.
Speaker 1: Even if you buy into their virology, it made absolutely
Speaker 1: no logical sense. There's no way if they're going to
Speaker 1: tell you that they got multiple strains of flu, there's
Speaker 1: no way that they know which one to prepare in
Speaker 1: advance and to have people inoculated for. But of course,
Speaker 1: we had seen for years that the people who got
Speaker 1: it had severe adverse effects one of the more dangerous vaccines,
Speaker 1: and of course they're you know, it's not just COVID
Speaker 1: that is harming and killing people. So the autism and
Speaker 1: all the rest of the stuff from the childhood vaccines,
Speaker 1: but especially from the flu shots as well. Health officials
Speaker 1: believe vaccinating hundreds of thousands of livestock workers with regular
Speaker 1: flu shots will save rural health systems from being overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: This winner got to flatten the cave, right, same lies
Speaker 1: that they told us through this phony pandemic, we got
Speaker 1: to save the health system. We're going to have overcrowded hospitals.
Speaker 1: They send everybody home to die, and then if you
Speaker 1: got really sick, bring them on in. We'll give them
Speaker 1: rendz of air. We'll put them on a ventilator. More
Speaker 1: than a dozen people, all of whom work on either
Speaker 1: poultry or cattle farms, have been sickened with bird flu
Speaker 1: so far this year. That is a sickening lie. This
Speaker 1: article from AOL absolutely lying about this. It's pink eye.
Speaker 1: And they do after they make that lying statement, they
Speaker 1: do admit, well, it's been relatively mild, and they had
Speaker 1: eye redness, and they didn't have any respiratory systems symptoms,
Speaker 1: and nobody's had to be hospitalized. And unlike listeria, right,
Speaker 1: these people didn't get sick. They don't you know, they
Speaker 1: got conjunct dividis, end of story. No matter how many
Speaker 1: people used to get conjunct dividis before they started making
Speaker 1: a federal case out of it. This is really just
Speaker 1: planning in preparedness. One oh one. So the deputy director
Speaker 1: of the CDC in a briefing yesterday, about forty seven
Speaker 1: percent of the US population gets an annual flu shot.
Speaker 1: As person said, during the twenty twenty two flu season,
Speaker 1: the flu shot prevented six million illnesses and three thy
Speaker 1: seven hundred deaths. How did they know that? Don't? We
Speaker 1: used to laugh when Obama said, you know, it was
Speaker 1: laughable for presidents to talk about jobs created. Of course,
Speaker 1: because they don't create jobs. They may remove obstacles to
Speaker 1: people who have businesses who do create jobs, because they
Speaker 1: create products and they have profits and things like that.
Speaker 1: But it's a private sector that creates jobs. It's not
Speaker 1: the government except for the bureaucrats that they hire. But
Speaker 1: they would take credit for it and say we created
Speaker 1: the jobs. Well, that was something that you could measure.
Speaker 1: But then you had the absurd position that was taken
Speaker 1: by Obama who claimed, well, we have this many jobs
Speaker 1: that we created and this many we saved. Everybody said,
Speaker 1: you can't say that. You have no basis for saying
Speaker 1: that you saved jobs. How could you possibly know that.
Speaker 1: How could you possibly measure you can't. How could they
Speaker 1: say they saved lives with this stuff? How could they
Speaker 1: say they prevented illnesses? Well, we know what happened in
Speaker 1: twenty two twenty two, same thing happened twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: In twenty twenty, they pretended that everybody that had a
Speaker 1: respiratory illness had COVID. So of course they're going to say, well,
Speaker 1: look at everybody stopped getting the flu. Isn't that great?
Speaker 1: But now they want the flu shot, which they've always
Speaker 1: wanted to make mandatory. That was the big tell, the
Speaker 1: big tell. The other big tell was you have to
Speaker 1: wear the mask to save other people. You know, the
Speaker 1: mask doesn't protect you, it protects other people. They actually
Speaker 1: said that they actually created PSAs about that public service announcements.
Speaker 1: An obvious lie, but that was the lie. That was
Speaker 1: the basis for all of the childhood vaccines, And so
Speaker 1: we knew when they were lying about that with a mask,
Speaker 1: that they were laying the foundational lie for the vaccine.
Speaker 1: That says, same thing. Your vaccine doesn't protect you, it
Speaker 1: protects other people. What nonsense. Your seat belt doesn't protect you,
Speaker 1: it protects the people in the other cars. Your motorcycle
Speaker 1: helmet doesn't protect you, protects the guy in the semi trailer. Right, yeah, right.
Speaker 1: The CDC is investing five million dollars for livestock workers
Speaker 1: to get shots to protect against seasonal flu. Officials are
Speaker 1: distributing four million dollars to the nonprofit National Center for
Speaker 1: farm Worker Health to partner with community based organizations and
Speaker 1: states with animals and people infected with bird flu. Well,
Speaker 1: good luck, because there aren't any people. Our approach is
Speaker 1: really focused on local organizations. You see how they're operating
Speaker 1: though they've always known that all politics is local. They
Speaker 1: plan globally, they act locally. That's where you can stop them.
Speaker 1: You can't stop them in Washington. You have no clout
Speaker 1: in Washington. You have no people that are going to
Speaker 1: stand for you in Washington. It's going to be the
Speaker 1: local level or nothing. They know that. Our approach is
Speaker 1: focused on local organizations who know their community and are
Speaker 1: already trusted by farm workers. They're going to use people
Speaker 1: that are trusted, just like they openly schemed to do
Speaker 1: when they rolled out the vaccine. We're going to go
Speaker 1: to trusted community leaders. We're going to go to people
Speaker 1: who are pastors or whatever, and we're going to get
Speaker 1: them to sell the vaccine to people who trust them.
Speaker 1: We're going to get them to sell the Trump shot.
Speaker 1: The organization wants to provide ecosystems or farm workers, typically
Speaker 1: immigrants and many lacking US documentation, can't access healthcare in
Speaker 1: rural settings already short on medical services. Since the spring
Speaker 1: of this year, thirteen people, again this is aol lying
Speaker 1: one side, up one side and down the other. Thirteen people,
Speaker 1: all livestock workers, have been infected with bird flu. And
Speaker 1: they just told you that it was pink i. They
Speaker 1: just told you no temperatures, no flu symptoms, no hospitalization.
Speaker 1: Now they say thirteen people, the bird flu virus hasn't
Speaker 1: caused severe disease, and any of the workers, they say
Speaker 1: further on, hasn't been transmitted without symptoms and hasn't developed
Speaker 1: the ability to jump from person to person, said the CDC.
Speaker 1: So it hasn't caused severe disease. They've had pink eye
Speaker 1: and it hasn't transmitted from person to person. They've had
Speaker 1: no symptoms. How do you know you got it? Well,
Speaker 1: we got this phony thing called a pc of R
Speaker 1: right now. The seasonal flu shot is the right tool
Speaker 1: for the job. Why they don't explain. Of course they
Speaker 1: don't explain. That's AOL and USA Today that wrote that
Speaker 1: propaganda piece. By the way, when we go back and
Speaker 1: we look at the pandemic, this is kind of interesting.
Speaker 1: This is on a world magazine. The pandemic did not
Speaker 1: slow sexually transmitted infections in the US. Wait a minute,
Speaker 1: that means that people were not social distancing. If they're
Speaker 1: spreading sexually transmitted infections, they're not social distancing. They didn't
Speaker 1: Why didn't they all die? And they also say it's
Speaker 1: older Americans that are contracting sexually transmitted diseases. Here, sexually
Speaker 1: transmitted infection. It's kept rising in the US over the
Speaker 1: last three years, according to a new report, proof that
Speaker 1: the pandemic didn't stop Americans from having unprotected sex with
Speaker 1: multiple partners. But experts differ on which part of the
Speaker 1: population is responsible for the continued increase. But it continued,
Speaker 1: same type of thing that we saw in the UK.
Speaker 1: For example, Matt Hancock, the guy who was writing the
Speaker 1: arbitrary false rum, he's not a scientist, he's not a doctor,
Speaker 1: he doesn't even claim to be one. He's just a dictator,
Speaker 1: just a bureaucratic dictator, Matt Hancock, and he told everybody
Speaker 1: about all these isolation rules and all the rest of
Speaker 1: this stuff. Meanwhile, he got caught having an illicit to
Speaker 1: sexual relationship with a married woman who was sneaking over
Speaker 1: to his house or his apartment or wherever that was,
Speaker 1: and he was forced to resign. But after they got
Speaker 1: his as part of their commission inquiry, which is really
Speaker 1: a whitewash job, they got his texts and he was
Speaker 1: laughing about what he was doing to other people violating
Speaker 1: his rules. And you see, they had a massive increase
Speaker 1: and sexually transmitted disease and infection during the so called lockdown.
Speaker 1: So what does that tell you? If there was a pandemic,
Speaker 1: people would have been dying if anything that they said
Speaker 1: was true. The US government tanked the economy with the
Speaker 1: lockdowns in order to gain control over the population through
Speaker 1: data collection and enforcement. This is the headline from XOSA
Speaker 1: News out of the UK. I thought it was interesting
Speaker 1: that they said the US government did it because their
Speaker 1: government did the same thing. Every government in the world
Speaker 1: did the same thing. She says, US government because she
Speaker 1: refers to an article from Jeffrey Tucker talking about ten
Speaker 1: points of how the US government tanked the economy. But
Speaker 1: let's understand it wasn't the US government. You know, when
Speaker 1: conservatives talk about what Trump did, they say the US government.
Speaker 1: When they talk about what the US government did with Biden,
Speaker 1: they say the Biden administration. Let's not have this double standard.
Speaker 1: It was the Trump administration, folks, that tanked the economy
Speaker 1: with the COVID lockdowns to gain control over the population
Speaker 1: through data collection and enforcement. Call it what it is.
Speaker 1: Come on, I am so sick and tired of people
Speaker 1: who blame Biden, but don't blame Trump for the same stuff.
Speaker 1: The COVID lockdowns amounted to the world largest and most
Speaker 1: elaborate economic head fake in human history. It left the
Speaker 1: entire world less free, less prosperous, with drained hopes the
Speaker 1: restoring normality can happen anytime soon. To add injury to insult,
Speaker 1: most official institutions are manufacturing fake data to cover it up.
Speaker 1: And now they've got the lab Liek theories. Now the
Speaker 1: establishment media's a place that they've retreated to. And yet
Speaker 1: nobody wants to hold the Biden administration or the Trump
Speaker 1: administration responsible for any of it. You know, the people
Speaker 1: who create these policies, who execute these policies, the people
Speaker 1: who wrote the checks. They're celebrated as heroes. People like
Speaker 1: Peter Navarro who pushed out and bragged about all these
Speaker 1: ventilators that killed nearly ninety percent of the people that
Speaker 1: got him. He's a hero. Keep him in jail. Ten
Speaker 1: points about post lockdown economics from Jeffrey Tucker at the
Speaker 1: Brownstone Institute. He said, the world's economy crashed. It wasn't
Speaker 1: just the US and Trump. You see, Trump was part
Speaker 1: of a globalist plot. He is a globalist puppet. Well,
Speaker 1: the very best you could say is he is a
Speaker 1: globalist dupe that went along with all of this stuff.
Speaker 1: And of course so the Conservatives and you know Boris
Speaker 1: Johnson in the UK, but you know they're on the
Speaker 1: same team with Trudeau and with Macron and with all
Speaker 1: of them. It doesn't matter what their political philosophy is.
Speaker 1: They all did the same thing because they're globalist puppets,
Speaker 1: marching and lockstep, stomping on our faces and lockstep. So
Speaker 1: he says, here's ten observations about the results. He said,
Speaker 1: first of all, the labor markets have never recovered. They
Speaker 1: can play these statistical games, So the job market has
Speaker 1: not been hot by any standard. Number two, stimulus was
Speaker 1: wiped out by inflation. And it wasn't about stimulus anyway.
Speaker 1: It was about an experiment with universal basic income. That's
Speaker 1: what the stimulus check was about. It was not there
Speaker 1: to help anybody. It was there to see how we
Speaker 1: were going to react if they cut a check for
Speaker 1: us to do nothing, take away people's jobs, just do
Speaker 1: it like that and then cut them a check. How's
Speaker 1: that going to work out. You want to talk about technocracy, Well,
Speaker 1: I tell you that stimulus thing. I called it from
Speaker 1: the very beginning. I said, this is universal basic income test,
Speaker 1: a compliance test. Number three, retail sales and wholesale factory
Speaker 1: orders are not up. Only the GDP adjusted for inflation
Speaker 1: is up a little bit. For output has not increased,
Speaker 1: he says. Number five, the inflation data is fake, always is.
Speaker 1: It has been fake for a very very long time. Six.
Speaker 1: Trade blocks have formed, but will not save us when
Speaker 1: all supply chains in the world in March of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty then gradually reopened based on national politics. We saw
Speaker 1: the frame of seventy years of global integration, and the
Speaker 1: purpose is to crash everything. Number seven he said, property
Speaker 1: rights are not secure. Never before in US history have
Speaker 1: so many small businesses been shut down coast to coast
Speaker 1: with such brutality. Trump paid them to do it. He
Speaker 1: didn't protect anybody while it was being done by the
Speaker 1: governors that they delegated it to. And that was the
Speaker 1: plan practiced for twenty years. Hey, the debt is out
Speaker 1: of control, whether you're talking about personal debt, corporate debt,
Speaker 1: or government debt. Number nine. Central bank digital currencies are
Speaker 1: essential to this plan. The major ambition, he says, as
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Tucker of the COVID response, was a creation of
Speaker 1: a universal vaccine passport. And it's not even about that.
Speaker 1: The central plan is have a global ID for everybody.
Speaker 1: A central bank digital currency does that, but also gives
Speaker 1: them financial control, so you can't buy or sell without
Speaker 1: their approval. It's sound familiar. It was deployed at first
Speaker 1: in New York. The entire city was closed in all
Speaker 1: of its public facilities for the unvaccinated. No one refusing
Speaker 1: the injection was permitted in restaurants, bars, libraries, theater. As
Speaker 1: we know all this, but CBDC is the central thing.
Speaker 1: Financial markets, he said, will thrive until they don't until
Speaker 1: they collapse. So again, if you want to do wealth protection,
Speaker 1: but more importantly, if you want to protect yourself against
Speaker 1: this kind of tyranny, because nobody is being held responsible.
Speaker 1: Nothing has been changed, None of the model state health
Speaker 1: emergency powers that have been put in there have been removed.
Speaker 1: People are just more cynical. How did that work out
Speaker 1: for the people in communist Russia? They were very cynical
Speaker 1: about the lies that they were being told by the government,
Speaker 1: but they didn't do anything at all about it. They
Speaker 1: had two different news outlets that had Pravda and Asvestia.
Speaker 1: Pravda meaning truth, is Vestia meaning news. They said there
Speaker 1: is no truth in Pravda, there's no news in Asvestia.
Speaker 1: They're very cynical about it. But what they do nothing?
Speaker 1: What are we doing nothing? As this iron curtain descends
Speaker 1: on us, five countries are going to be testing a
Speaker 1: European vaccination card. It's not going away. None of this
Speaker 1: stuff is the vaccine passport stuff. They're putting it in now.
Speaker 1: This is Belgium, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Portugal will test this
Speaker 1: new vaccination card in a variety of formats, including printed cards,
Speaker 1: mailed copies, and digital versions for smartphones, and critics call
Speaker 1: it a direct threat to freedom. Of course it is.
Speaker 1: They're calling it the European Vaccination Card aims to empower individuals, No,
Speaker 1: it aims to enslave individuals. The only reason I need
Speaker 1: to have a number is because you're reducing me into
Speaker 1: a piece of inventory. An Internet of things is also
Speaker 1: an inventory of things. Consolidating all your vaccination data and
Speaker 1: one easy, inaccessible area, isn't that great? It's new and improved,
Speaker 1: just like the video that they were telling people in Ukraine. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, by twenty thirty, the war is going to
Speaker 1: be over. We will have won, and all of your
Speaker 1: government interactions are going to be on this wonderful electronic card.
Speaker 1: You won't have to carry anything around with you. Now
Speaker 1: you'll just carry the burden of slavery and poverty everywhere
Speaker 1: you go with the government that intrudes itself into your life.
Speaker 1: But oh, you don't have to carry this stuff. That's
Speaker 1: for their convenience. It's not for your convenience. The nudge theory,
Speaker 1: that's what it is. An operation here because all of
Speaker 1: this is a psychological warfare. As I said, the only
Speaker 1: science behind this pandemic was psychological manipulation BF Skinner positive
Speaker 1: operant conditioning. See how much of that you can spot
Speaker 1: in here and look at how similar this is to
Speaker 1: what I talked about in July of twenty twenty. Yale
Speaker 1: had already gone through this many different points, and they
Speaker 1: had this one way or the other, how they're going
Speaker 1: to apply this to get people to take the vaccine,
Speaker 1: and they published it on the NIH website. But here
Speaker 1: are some of their nudging techniques. Default options set the
Speaker 1: default choices that align with the desired behavior, making it
Speaker 1: easier for people to opt in. Or you can have
Speaker 1: loss a version, use the fear of loss. You know,
Speaker 1: you don't want to be responsible for somebody dying because
Speaker 1: you didn't take a vaccine. Scarcity create a sense of urgency. Well,
Speaker 1: I don't know if we've got enough of these vaccines
Speaker 1: to go around, but you know, get in line now
Speaker 1: and we'll get you some, right. They create a false
Speaker 1: sense of shortage about these vaccines as well. Feedback provide
Speaker 1: feedback on behavior. Social proof use social influence by showcasing
Speaker 1: the action of others like I was showing you with
Speaker 1: La La Harris or Dwayne the Rock Johnson, all these
Speaker 1: other people depending that out on social media, the feedback,
Speaker 1: the social proof. The visual cues use visual elements such
Speaker 1: as placement, color, imagery for the desired behavior. That also helps.
Speaker 1: If you've got a big advertising budget like Pfizer, simplification,
Speaker 1: Simplify the choices and options. There will only be one
Speaker 1: that you're allowed to have.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: Opportunity will create the environment. We're going to have you
Speaker 1: just drive up to these places and they're just waiting
Speaker 1: to serve you. Capability enhance people's ability to make desired
Speaker 1: choices by providing necessary resources or skills. It's all free.
Speaker 1: Trump has paid billions, tens of billions of dollars to
Speaker 1: the vaccine companies. He's got the military delivering this stuff.
Speaker 1: It's great. You're just gonna love it once we recognize
Speaker 1: it for what it is, and once we know this
Speaker 1: agenda has little or nothing to do with whatever they
Speaker 1: say it's about. It's not about climate change, it's not
Speaker 1: about a pandemic, then we can see how people are
Speaker 1: treating and being trained like we train dogs. Again, it's
Speaker 1: positive operating conditioning goes back to BF Skinner, social credit,
Speaker 1: guinea pigs or given rewards such as free vegetary meals,
Speaker 1: kayak rentals and guided museum tours. That's what they're doing.
Speaker 1: In Copenhagen. They have a program they call it co
Speaker 1: copin Cope and Pay and you know you can if
Speaker 1: you as a tourist or an individual, if you go
Speaker 1: to Cope and Pay's website, it's called Wonderful Copenhagen and
Speaker 1: you can get things like a free vegetarian meal. Wouldn't
Speaker 1: you want to have that? Just give them all your information,
Speaker 1: get your little card. There a great way to spend
Speaker 1: your time while on holiday. You know, when Karen and
Speaker 1: I were to Copenhagen, we spent it photographing Alex krp
Speaker 1: ed Ball, David Beatres paparazzi for these criminals. It could
Speaker 1: be worse things to do, I guess, but that's the
Speaker 1: way we spend our time. When in Copenhagen went to
Speaker 1: cover Builderberg before we go to break on Rumble DG eight.
Speaker 1: Thank you for the tip, he says David. They're going
Speaker 1: to wait till Trump is in to push the bird
Speaker 1: flu and sadly his cult will go along with it.
Speaker 1: Trust him, make excuses, go totally to sleep. They'll say
Speaker 1: this is to drain the swamp. Absolutely. I think that
Speaker 1: will that certainly is one thing that they can do
Speaker 1: with him. When you have Republicans or conservatives and people
Speaker 1: go to sleep just as they the left does when
Speaker 1: their guy is in, just as they say, well, we
Speaker 1: don't need to buy guns now we've got a Republican president. Okay,
Speaker 1: Rock Fann, little John, thank you for the tip, it says,
Speaker 1: thank you, Travis. Can you please play my song? I
Speaker 1: think you call it Smokies. Sure we'll do that when
Speaker 1: we go out on Rumble Mulan Lave nine sixty six.
Speaker 1: Thank you, he says, be well, David b Ee, thank
Speaker 1: you very much. On rumble sa Moore. What kind of
Speaker 1: tablet does David use? This is a I've had it
Speaker 1: now for about a year. I forget what this is.
Speaker 1: Do you know what it is? I have to look
Speaker 1: at this thing. Let's see. I'll tell you when I
Speaker 1: come back. I'll take a look at a supernoe. Yeah, supernote.
Speaker 1: That's it. Thank you, Thank you. You can tell I spend
Speaker 1: a lot of time looking at but it's a supernote.
Speaker 1: That's the tablet that we use. Put everything on a
Speaker 1: PDF so I can write on it here.
Speaker 6: It also prevents us from generating one thousand pounds of
Speaker 6: paper every month.
Speaker 1: It was pretty amazing. You know. We would be printing
Speaker 1: up like three or four hundred pages of stuff each day,
Speaker 1: and then I never get through all the during the show.
Speaker 1: I never get through all the different articles that I've
Speaker 1: read and highlighted and everything. So they would accumulate in
Speaker 1: the start and it was just this paper everywhere.
Speaker 6: So it really through so much printering and dealing with
Speaker 6: the fact that sometimes the printer just doesn't work.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, yeah. It's been a bien, a big
Speaker 1: improvement for us. Absolutely has on Rock Fan Andromeda, thank
Speaker 1: you for the tip and rumble DG eight. David will
Speaker 1: Trump will implement digital ideas. He will say it is
Speaker 1: to find illegals. That's right, and his base will go along.
Speaker 1: That's why VANCE and volunteers so involved in his administration.
Speaker 1: I absolutely agree that is. They have prodded conservatives and
Speaker 1: rightfully so, about the open border, but they plan on
Speaker 1: doing nothing really about it. And you can see this
Speaker 1: already when you look at DeSantis and Republicans in Florida
Speaker 1: pushing through mandatory everifying, meaning that the federal government is
Speaker 1: going to verify your identity before you can get a job,
Speaker 1: and that has been there for a while voluntary. In Florida,
Speaker 1: they made it mandatory. That's the beginning. Why did they
Speaker 1: do it, Well, we have to do it because of illegals,
Speaker 1: got it. We can't protect the border. We won't do
Speaker 1: anything to the border, but we will give you the
Speaker 1: digital idea to prove your identity and you'll have to
Speaker 1: do that. They may, but I think they'll give us
Speaker 1: the digital identity first. Then I think what they'll do
Speaker 1: is they'll put up an electronic wall to keep us
Speaker 1: in at the border. That's the key that's going to
Speaker 1: be happening with it. Well, we're going to take a
Speaker 1: quick break and when we come back, we are going
Speaker 1: to take a look at some listeners' comments as well
Speaker 1: as some updates on the pharma stuff. We'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 1: You know where you showed pictures of the Smokies made
Speaker 1: me think. I saw an article on zero Hedge saying
Speaker 1: talking about the top ten visited national parks is not
Speaker 1: even close Smoky Mountains versus everybody else. It's like thirteen
Speaker 1: million visitors a year. All the rest of the parks
Speaker 1: from number two down to number ten were three to
Speaker 1: four million visitors a year. And of course part of
Speaker 1: that is because so much of the population is so
Speaker 1: much closer to the Smokies. But it is a great
Speaker 1: place to visit if you haven't seen it. I shouldn't
Speaker 1: be encouraging people jams to get bad enough as it is.
Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about money before we get
Speaker 1: into the pharmaceutical stuff. Jennet Yellen again down in Brazil,
Speaker 1: close to the Amazon, like your last truck stop before
Speaker 1: you go into the Amazon. Essentially, it's a small small
Speaker 1: city there. That's where they had their meeting saying that
Speaker 1: we need to pay the World Bank three trillion dollars
Speaker 1: a year in order to protect the planet. And think
Speaker 1: about this, you know, that was kind of what kicked
Speaker 1: off this whole financial disaster. Yeah, locking down and destroying
Speaker 1: people's businesses. That was a big part of the financial disaster,
Speaker 1: destroying the supply chain as we just talked about, but
Speaker 1: also putting us into you know, ramping up the debt
Speaker 1: and the deficits so rapidly three and a half trillion
Speaker 1: dollars stimulus checks and payroll protection plans, and any think
Speaker 1: most of it for gudulent. More than fifty percent of
Speaker 1: the money that was supposed to go to small businesses
Speaker 1: went to the big guys. And so when you look
Speaker 1: at this three trillion dollars a year for twenty years,
Speaker 1: you're from twenty thirty to twenty fifty for twenty years,
Speaker 1: three trillion dollars a year. It's like COVID every year. Well,
Speaker 1: you want to talk about the mcguffins, this climate mcguffin
Speaker 1: is really expensive, isn't it. And so the grand total
Speaker 1: is seventy eight trillion dollars and most of that is
Speaker 1: going to be coming from the United States, assume that
Speaker 1: we have anything left at all, but giving the money
Speaker 1: to the World Bank because they are so trustworthy, aren't they. Now,
Speaker 1: if you want to look at what has happened to
Speaker 1: silver prices, and Tony Rdban has talked about this many times,
Speaker 1: everybody that is in the metals business looks at what
Speaker 1: is happening. Certainly gold and silver have been suppressed and
Speaker 1: manipulated by the central banks and others. But actually in
Speaker 1: this article here from Money Medals Chris Powell, there is
Speaker 1: really about JP Morgan and what they have done for
Speaker 1: the government in order to manipulate the value of metals,
Speaker 1: but the most manipulated seems to be silver. Suppressing silver
Speaker 1: prices has beneficial US policy since nineteen sixty five, he said.
Speaker 1: And of course now and I was surprised because I
Speaker 1: thought that the ETFs silver and gold, SLV and GLD.
Speaker 1: I thought those ETFs were coming out of the Shanghai Exchange.
Speaker 1: But it's actually deeply involved with JP Morgan, who is
Speaker 1: playing footsie with the federal government as well. And they're
Speaker 1: a bit secretive and KG as you would imagine with
Speaker 1: what they're doing with these medals to manipulate them. Why
Speaker 1: would anybody invest in silver the other precious monetary medals
Speaker 1: with JP Morgan Chase can be explained only by ignorance.
Speaker 1: In the last decade we're talking about these ETFs, the
Speaker 1: bank has pleaded guilty to five felonies Jamie demon and
Speaker 1: has paid more than a billion dollars in government fines
Speaker 1: and civil lawsuit settlements, including a fine of nine hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty million dollars, for manipulation of monetary medals markets
Speaker 1: by some of its traders. But silver market manipulation long
Speaker 1: has been bigger than even JP Morgan Chase Indeed, silver
Speaker 1: price suppression has been US government policy since Johnson signed
Speaker 1: the Coinage Act of nineteen sixty five that removes silver
Speaker 1: from the country's money. When he signed it, he said,
Speaker 1: if anybody has any idea of hoarding our silver coins,
Speaker 1: let me say this, Treasury's got a lot of silver
Speaker 1: on hand, and it can be and it will be
Speaker 1: used to keep the price of silver in line with
Speaker 1: its value and our present silver coin. There will be
Speaker 1: no profit in holding them out of circulation for the
Speaker 1: value of their silver content. We'll tell that to the
Speaker 1: people that made profit off of it. So they pointed
Speaker 1: out there moved the silver from circulation. People hoarded it
Speaker 1: as a steady inflation of the US dollar made them
Speaker 1: worth far more than their face value. They held their
Speaker 1: value quite frankly as the fiat currency declined because of inflation,
Speaker 1: and so JP Morgan has long been the primary dealer
Speaker 1: in the US government securities. Is particularly close to the
Speaker 1: US Treasury Department. So when SLV, the ETF for Silver,
Speaker 1: was launched in two thousand and six, JP Morgan became
Speaker 1: custodian of the fund's silver. Suspicion of government involvement with
Speaker 1: the bank and the ETF was aroused because of their
Speaker 1: relationship with a treasure department. The bank now is also
Speaker 1: the custodian of the Medal of the major Gold ETF GLD,
Speaker 1: prompting even more suspicion. Interestingly enough, there was a lot
Speaker 1: of rumors that JP Moore, that Jamie Diamond, the CEO
Speaker 1: of JP Morgan, was being looked at by Trump for
Speaker 1: the Treasury Department. Then he shot those rumors down, but
Speaker 1: then he also talked about Larry Fink, a black rock
Speaker 1: who had been rumored to be the Treasury Department Secretary
Speaker 1: of the Treasury choice for Hillary Clinton. Such a big difference,
Speaker 1: isn't there between Clinton and Trump? But getting back to this,
Speaker 1: complaints that JP Morgan Chase was manipulating the silver market
Speaker 1: grew loud enough that the bank felt obliged to answer
Speaker 1: them publicly after they created SLV the ETF, the bank's CEO,
Speaker 1: Jamie Diamond or Demon depending on how you feel about it,
Speaker 1: said the bank had no interest of its own and
Speaker 1: the monetary medals and traded them only for clients. But
Speaker 1: then in twenty twelve, the head of the bank's commodity
Speaker 1: desk went on CNBC to emphasize this denial, particularly in
Speaker 1: regard to silver, But since CNBC is a mainstream financial
Speaker 1: news organizations, reporter failed to ask the critical follow up question,
Speaker 1: do JP Morgan chases clients trading silver and other monetary
Speaker 1: or precious medals? Does that include governments, particularly the US government?
Speaker 1: Is that directly? Or and directly? The answer to that
Speaker 1: question was provided inadvertently ten years later and barely noticed
Speaker 1: by mainstream financial news organizations during the trial of JP
Speaker 1: Morgan chase traders who were charged and convicted of spoofing
Speaker 1: the monetary medals futures market. Think about that is at all?
Speaker 1: We don't do any of that, and yet they were
Speaker 1: convicted of spoofing it manipulating it. Worryless last paragraph that
Speaker 1: report about the trial, Bloomberg News said another set of
Speaker 1: important clients were central banks, which trade gold for their
Speaker 1: reserves and are among the biggest players in the billion market.
Speaker 1: At least ten central banks held their medal and vaults
Speaker 1: run by JP Morgan in twenty ten, according to documents
Speaker 1: that were disclosed in court. Well, a mechanism for governments
Speaker 1: to use for surreptitious manipulation of monetary medals futures market
Speaker 1: was already in place, and that was that CM Group
Speaker 1: an operator of the major future exchanges in the US,
Speaker 1: it is called the Central Bank Incentive Program where CM
Speaker 1: Group exchanges provide volume trading discounts to government, central banks
Speaker 1: and international organizations. And so they have clubs that do that.
Speaker 1: I guess it's like packed, but it's for the central banks,
Speaker 1: you know, when you have another it's hard not to
Speaker 1: since monetary debasement nearly everywhere one looks, except when you
Speaker 1: look at silver. So why do all the major bullion
Speaker 1: banks seem to trade gold and silver the same way
Speaker 1: at the same time. It sure looks like collusion, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: Just as we pointed out, why are they all doing
Speaker 1: the same thing at the same time during the so
Speaker 1: called pandemic lockdown? Okay, we're doing this, and now two
Speaker 1: months from now we're going to do the next thing
Speaker 1: because you know it's an emergency. Well, same thing they're
Speaker 1: doing here. The central banks are doing the same thing
Speaker 1: at the same time. It sure looks like collusion. If
Speaker 1: it is collusion, it would violate any trust laws in
Speaker 1: the US, the UK, and other western countries, unless, of course,
Speaker 1: the bullion banks are simply executing government trades and giving
Speaker 1: camouflage the government intervention, which is exactly what we've seen
Speaker 1: with social media censorship. They the hidden hand behind the censorship.
Speaker 1: The hidden hand behind this manipulation is really the government.
Speaker 1: So is it any surprise that Jamie demon was being
Speaker 1: talked about as being Treasury secretary. Maybe it would be
Speaker 1: a step down for him. I'd be a Treasury secretary.
Speaker 1: The intervention has been essentially confirmed by the US Commodity's
Speaker 1: Futures Trading Commission, which has repeatedly refused to answer, not
Speaker 1: just for GATA a General Agreement on Trade, but even
Speaker 1: for a US representative whether the Commission has jurisdiction over
Speaker 1: manipulative futures trading undertaken by, or at least at the
Speaker 1: behest of the US government, or whether such manipulation is legal.
Speaker 1: They don't care, just like they don't care that censorship
Speaker 1: is illegal. But they do it, and they use these
Speaker 1: front organizations corporations who will work with them. So what
Speaker 1: exactly goes on every day the trading desks at the
Speaker 1: Federal Reserve in New York. What markets are being traded
Speaker 1: there by the US government, How are they being traded,
Speaker 1: Why are they being traded? Is the desk trading more
Speaker 1: than the government bonds. It reports trading. Why can't the
Speaker 1: public be allowed to observe this trading. This is one
Speaker 1: of the reasons why when Ron Paul said, we need
Speaker 1: to audit the FED, you know, we need to get
Speaker 1: this information. If people were to be able to see
Speaker 1: this stuff, then abolish the FED would happen pretty quickly
Speaker 1: after that. It is the Bank for International Settlements trading
Speaker 1: monetary medals for the US government directly or through intermediaries.
Speaker 1: In two thousand and five, the head of the Bank
Speaker 1: of International Settlement, that's the central bank for central banks,
Speaker 1: the head of their monetary and Economic department, told a
Speaker 1: conference in Switzerland that the primary purpose of the cooperation
Speaker 1: between central banks is the provision of international credits and
Speaker 1: joint efforts to influence asset prices, especially gold. He said,
Speaker 1: So when you look at all of this, what is
Speaker 1: the bottom line, Well, the bottom line is that they're
Speaker 1: going to manipulate the price. And yet even with all
Speaker 1: their manipulations, as tony Ardband has said, they're at war
Speaker 1: with gold. War is a direct competitor to the fiat currency.
Speaker 1: Even in spite of all that, it continues to go up.
Speaker 1: And so it's beyond the economics of it as well.
Speaker 1: Just as we were talking about their desire have a
Speaker 1: central bank digital currency, it is very important for us
Speaker 1: to understand this is the way that we get out
Speaker 1: of their system. Again, if you want to prepare, go
Speaker 1: to David Knight dot Gold. That'll take you to Tony
Speaker 1: Ardiban's Wisewolf Gold, a great place. You don't want to
Speaker 1: trade with JP Morgan. You don't want to get an
Speaker 1: ETF of gold. You don't want to get an ETF
Speaker 1: of SLV because you're going to be dealing with JP Morgan.
Speaker 1: And again, the prices of those ETFs does not track
Speaker 1: the actual prices of gold and silver. You don't want
Speaker 1: to trust these people. They are not trustworthy. But you
Speaker 1: can go to Wisewolf Gold. You can get gold or
Speaker 1: silver a small or large transactions. Tony will work with you.
Speaker 1: He also has wise Wolf which allows you to on
Speaker 1: a regular basis UH save whatever level you want to
Speaker 1: buy in at and also get group discounts. With a
Speaker 1: large group buy all that is at Davidknight dot Gold.
Speaker 4: UH.
Speaker 1: Before we leave the economics aspect of this, you know
Speaker 1: we've talked about what happened in Venezuela very important, uh
Speaker 1: to see what has happened there with the elections, and
Speaker 1: as I pointed out yesterday, the you know all of
Speaker 1: this this uh disagreement over the elections that are there. Uh,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of evidence that the challenger won the election,
Speaker 1: but they're not letting go of the power Maduro and
Speaker 1: his people, the socialists there.
Speaker 8: UH.
Speaker 1: So it's brought them right up to the brink of
Speaker 1: a civil war. I talked about that because I don't
Speaker 1: want that to happen here. That seems to me to
Speaker 1: be the path that they're trying to set up here,
Speaker 1: that everybody is bought into one side or the other.
Speaker 1: Their life is either saved or destroyed based on who wins.
Speaker 1: And we've got people who have bought into that, from
Speaker 1: celebrities in Hollywood to the maga crowds that follow Trump around.
Speaker 1: This is this election is not worth a civil war.
Speaker 1: There are things worth fighting for, but people didn't fight
Speaker 1: for that. They didn't fight when they were shut down,
Speaker 1: when they got mRNA shot into their arms, when their
Speaker 1: family members died, when people were disabled, they didn't fight
Speaker 1: about that. Don't fight over Trump, then don't fight over
Speaker 1: Biden or La La or any of these people. They
Speaker 1: were the ones who betrayed you and all of that.
Speaker 1: But when we look at the way that elections are manipulated,
Speaker 1: as I said last week when I was talking about Venezuela,
Speaker 1: somebody was very upset with me, said, oh, well, you know,
Speaker 1: Venezuela's got problems because of CIA. No, they can do
Speaker 1: it on their own. As a matter of fact, there
Speaker 1: is an excellent article on zero Hedge saying sanctions did
Speaker 1: not destroy Venezuela. Socialism did. And it's said there is
Speaker 1: no comparison to the economic disaster of the Venezuelan and
Speaker 1: twenty first century socialism has caused. They've been there for
Speaker 1: twenty five years, you know, twenty twenty four iss all
Speaker 1: the twenty first century, they've been under socialist rule. Jose Aguera,
Speaker 1: an economist at the Venezuelan Observatory of Finance, explains in
Speaker 1: his brilliant book Twenty five Years of Chavista Governments. He says,
Speaker 1: over the past quarter century of Venezuela's gross domestic product
Speaker 1: has plummeted by more than fifty five percent, while the
Speaker 1: region's GDP has grown by twenty five percent. Per capita
Speaker 1: income has dropped to less than half, poverty has increased
Speaker 1: two point eight times, extreme poverty has multiplied by five
Speaker 1: and the real minimum wage has shrunk by ninety nine percent.
Speaker 1: Now this is all happening even as the region has
Speaker 1: out of growth in per capita income. Venezuela, run by
Speaker 1: socialist has the client like that. In the last fourteen years,
Speaker 1: fourteen zeros of the currency's nominal value have been removed. Wow,
Speaker 1: that is amazing. You may have read the lie that
Speaker 1: Venezuela's problem is a non existent US blockade. That's completely false.
Speaker 1: In Venezuela, there is no blockade and it has bilateral
Speaker 1: agreements with more than fifty nations, including major world powers.
Speaker 1: The US is one of his main trading partners, along
Speaker 1: with China, Russia, Turkey, Spain, India, Netherlands, Brazil and others. Furthermore,
Speaker 1: Venezuela has received soft loans and financial support from China
Speaker 1: and Russia in excess of seventy eight billion dollars since
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen. Moreover, Venezuela has been the largest beneficiary of
Speaker 1: soft loans and debt restructuring in the entire region since
Speaker 1: twenty thirteen. Why is this necessary? You know, when you
Speaker 1: look at Saudi Arabia, as I said yesterday, they've got
Speaker 1: more oil than the Saudis do. Why is it that
Speaker 1: the Saudis are not in this kind of a situation, Well,
Speaker 1: they don't have socialism. Monetary destruction, confiscation of private property
Speaker 1: as well as rampant corruption are trademarks of socialist regimes.
Speaker 1: Chavism is no different. They stole three point four million
Speaker 1: hectares of land, that's eight and a half million acres folks.
Speaker 1: They confiscated more than five hundred and twenty three thousand apartments.
Speaker 1: They expropriated oney, eighty seven businesses, stole it, stole it.
Speaker 1: In addition, sixty two percent of the expropriations were abandoned,
Speaker 1: ninety five percent were directly stolen. Chavism has closed more
Speaker 1: than forty national and regional newspapers, almost forty radio stations,
Speaker 1: has blocked the broadcast of more than thirty TVs, including
Speaker 1: Spanish language CNN. In addition, Chavism holds more than two
Speaker 1: hundred and sixty political prisoners. Venezuela is the most unsafe
Speaker 1: country in the region, with more than three hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty thousand violent deaths in twenty years of the Chavistas.
Speaker 1: The Observatory for Violence says the Maduro's government has killed
Speaker 1: more than ninety four hundred people between twenty thirteen and
Speaker 1: twenty three, institutionalizing murder, according to that NGO, so they
Speaker 1: kill their political prisoners. Violence is rampant. Theft is rampant
Speaker 1: because of Marxism is a kleptocracy. It's based on theft
Speaker 1: and who gets the property, Well, it's the people at
Speaker 1: the top. Sanctions didn't destroy Venezuela as socialism did in
Speaker 1: times of high oil prices, squandering the record oil reviews
Speaker 1: revenues and implementing a regime of terror, misery, and confiscation
Speaker 1: where political leaders become obscenely rich, stealing the nation's wealth,
Speaker 1: just like they do in Cuba, Nicaragua and other socialist regimes.
Speaker 1: So this is the pattern that we see everywhere. By
Speaker 1: the way, before we run out of time, I've got
Speaker 1: to follow up on what happened with the voting machines
Speaker 1: on Smartmatic. I talked about that because you know, some
Speaker 1: of the first voting machines, if not the first, I
Speaker 1: don't know if they If Smartmatic was the very first one,
Speaker 1: one of the earliest ones, and it was put together
Speaker 1: by three friends of Hugo Chavez. And Smartmatic has been
Speaker 1: involved in accusations of fraud all over the world, and
Speaker 1: Philippines is one of the places where that has been
Speaker 1: alleged and just recently in the news. This is a
Speaker 1: press release from Smartmatic that was sent to me. The
Speaker 1: Philippine Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Smartmatic, rectifying
Speaker 1: the fact that they were disqualified by the Elections Commission.
Speaker 1: They call it sounds almost like our candidate here. But
Speaker 1: the Commission on Elections and the Philippines was so disgusted
Speaker 1: by their dealings with Smartmatic that they would not allow
Speaker 1: them to bid any more on projects, and so Smartmatic
Speaker 1: took them to court and won in the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Rather than showing people how they can trust these things,
Speaker 1: what they do is they lawyer up and they get lobbyists.
Speaker 1: Seems to be the way that they operate here. The
Speaker 1: verdict Delta blow against the questionable actions of certain Kamlek commissioners,
Speaker 1: says Smartmatic, which include the sudden and random declaration of
Speaker 1: the vote counting machines as unserviceable despite several more years
Speaker 1: of functionality and ongoing warranty. It is ruling. The Supreme
Speaker 1: Court agrees with the opinion of Kamlek's own law department
Speaker 1: and a dissenting commissioner, who had argued that the commission
Speaker 1: lacked both procedural authority and factual evidence for smart metics disqualification.
Speaker 1: Why would they do that, Well, We've seen this pattern
Speaker 1: of behavior in a lot of different areas, and very
Speaker 1: interestingly here in the United States. On Sunday it was
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. On Monday, it was reported that Georgia Democrats
Speaker 1: and Republicans find common ground and demand a switch to
Speaker 1: paper ballots. Again, the issues that you're seeing here with
Speaker 1: smart Medica are not necessarily or dominion or in these companies,
Speaker 1: not necessarily that particular company, But it's electronic voting in general,
Speaker 1: because what it does is it opens up these It
Speaker 1: opens up voting fraud to people around the world. Any
Speaker 1: bad actors anywhere in the world could be enemy state,
Speaker 1: it could be hackers, it could be anybody now has
Speaker 1: access to the elections, and they can rig them horizontally
Speaker 1: and vertically. They can rig it from the top of
Speaker 1: the ballot down to the very bottom of the from
Speaker 1: president to dog catcher, and they can do it horizontally,
Speaker 1: they can do it across every jurisdiction. You see, what
Speaker 1: the computers do is they provide an enterprise wide solution
Speaker 1: for people to mess with the elections that you don't
Speaker 1: have when you've got something that is physical. Again, ballots
Speaker 1: can be stuffed, voting machines can be stolen, but the
Speaker 1: enterprise wide solution for electronic hacking is something that is
Speaker 1: unique for the electronic voting machines. Democrats and Republicans in
Speaker 1: Georgia have found common ground and are demanding the state
Speaker 1: election board ditch electronic voting machines and switch to paper ballots.
Speaker 1: The chair the Morgan County Democrat Party said in the statement,
Speaker 1: it is madness actually to go into a system and
Speaker 1: to have all of our ballots relying on that well, exactly,
Speaker 1: And that has been the argument from the very beginning
Speaker 1: of this and on the next day in the Philippines
Speaker 1: and Manila Times, even though the Supreme Court is saying no,
Speaker 1: you can allow Smartmatic to bid on these jobs. This
Speaker 1: came out in the Manila Times. Smartmatics global controversies just
Speaker 1: follow the money thirtieth of July, which is yesterday, according
Speaker 1: to the Philippines Cybercrime Investigation and Coordination Center, the system
Speaker 1: of Smartmatic, the contractor of the Commission on Elections, that's
Speaker 1: kam Alike is comprised and not the server of the
Speaker 1: body politic. The tentative result of the inquiries were disclosed
Speaker 1: on Friday and a hearing of the Joint Congressional Oversight Committee,
Speaker 1: as reported by the Manila Times. So the fight continues
Speaker 1: there even though Smartmatic one of the Supreme Court. You
Speaker 1: have the Philippine Congress as well as the Election Commission,
Speaker 1: as well as the cybercrime investigatory people. They are all
Speaker 1: very concerned about the ability of these machines to be secure.
Speaker 1: And why wouldn't you be concerned about that? Just take
Speaker 1: a look at what happened with CrowdStrike, take a look
Speaker 1: at what has now happened yet again with Microsoft. And
Speaker 1: of course the CrowdStrike thing was not a cyber hack.
Speaker 1: It was a it was a self owned thing. And
Speaker 1: we don't know what the Microsoft thing is, but we
Speaker 1: do know that the Pentagon has been hacked, that the
Speaker 1: CIA has been hacked, the NSA has been hacked, every
Speaker 1: organization at and T was just recently hacked. Every organization
Speaker 1: has been hacked, So why would anybody suggest that these
Speaker 1: election machines cannot be hacked. Of course they can be hacked.
Speaker 1: Of course they have been hacked. Reality, you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to say that, but we know that for sure. Just
Speaker 1: common sense would tell you that the Philippines election doubts
Speaker 1: arise over electronic voting machines. This goes back to twenty ten,
Speaker 1: fourteen years ago, when they were just talking about putting
Speaker 1: in electronic voting machines. They said, new computerized electronic voting
Speaker 1: machines are meant to prevent fraud. But and tests the
Speaker 1: voting machines rejected ballots failed to connect to the cell phone
Speaker 1: networks to transmit results. And at about that time twenty ten,
Speaker 1: as I said, there's a lot of illustrations being done,
Speaker 1: even on local news reports, showing how susceptible all electronic
Speaker 1: voting machines were to being hacked. And so they said
Speaker 1: that when they were talking about back in twenty ten,
Speaker 1: as they were talking about putting in for the first
Speaker 1: time electronic voting machines and the Philippines, they set a
Speaker 1: survey conducted of Filipinos. They said they expected that the
Speaker 1: national elections will be clean. Forty eight percent said they
Speaker 1: thought they'd be clean and the results will be credible. However,
Speaker 1: fifty four percent expected trouble if they weren't see This
Speaker 1: is why we talk about this, because we are being
Speaker 1: set up for a civil war. We're being set up
Speaker 1: for trouble. We have vulnerable systems, we have people who
Speaker 1: are vulnerable to fear and you know, just despair over
Speaker 1: the election. That is what is really the key issue
Speaker 1: in this election, because they're not going to do anything about,
Speaker 1: you know, pulling back these movements that they've made on
Speaker 1: our freedom. They're not going to do anything in terms
Speaker 1: of stopping these existential threats to our freedom, to our liberties,
Speaker 1: and our economy. They're not going to do anything about that.
Speaker 1: But there is another threat that is inherent in the election,
Speaker 1: and that is this fight over the results. Smart metic
Speaker 1: Implicated and alleged bribery. This was September of last year
Speaker 1: from CNN. Smart Medic the voting technology companies suing Fox
Speaker 1: and former President Trump's top allies over false claims that
Speaker 1: their machines rigged the twenty twenty election. Was implemented implicated,
Speaker 1: I should say in an alleged bribery scheme. While this
Speaker 1: is all happening, Biden's Justice Department filed money laundering charges
Speaker 1: against former Filipino lawyers and election administrators. Four executives from
Speaker 1: Smart Medics absidiaries were also implicated as uncharged co conspirators.
Speaker 1: The bribery claims are sure to reverberate, and Smart Medics
Speaker 1: ongoing defamation claims and why didn't they they put them in.
Speaker 1: It's the clear implication here is that there was bribery
Speaker 1: and pay to play and lobbying that was going on,
Speaker 1: and even Biden's Justice Department did that. Smartmatic filed massive
Speaker 1: defamation suits against Fox News Newsmax on several individual Fox hosts,
Speaker 1: ex Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, former Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell,
Speaker 1: Mike Lindell, all of this, and as that's happening, there
Speaker 1: is an indictment even from Biden's Department of Justice. So
Speaker 1: we should be very concerned about the election. We should
Speaker 1: not place all of our hope in this. We should
Speaker 1: not be ready to fight a civil war. Anybody goes
Speaker 1: down there and say we're going to remove La La
Speaker 1: Harris or Biden or whatever by whatever means don't follow
Speaker 1: those people. They're trying to set you up in another
Speaker 1: one of these things, or even worse, into a civil war.
Speaker 1: That's the real issue, the overriding issue of this so
Speaker 1: called fake election. We're gonna take a quick break and
Speaker 1: we'll be right back.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 1: Well, I want to take a look at some of
Speaker 1: the listeners comments and questions. This was from Gabby, who
Speaker 1: writes on Sunday says nine to eleven footage vanishes from YouTube.
Speaker 1: He said, are you ware the footage that was filmed
Speaker 1: inside one of the towers immediately after it was hit.
Speaker 1: It was available from Google before the takeover by YouTube,
Speaker 1: but now it's completely finished from the internet. This footage
Speaker 1: showed utter chaos of patrons trying to escape while the
Speaker 1: building violently shook. Why doesn't Google want us to see that? Well,
Speaker 1: you know, again, there is so much evidence. We know
Speaker 1: how this was used, and we know what did not happen,
Speaker 1: which is the official store. We will never know exactly
Speaker 1: what happened with it, but we know enough, especially when
Speaker 1: you look at something like Building seven that was not
Speaker 1: even hit by a plane. There's no way that these
Speaker 1: buildings just collapse in their footprint. And there's so many
Speaker 1: documentaries out there. As a matter of fact, I had
Speaker 1: somebody saying, you know, you should watch Loose Change. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I've seen it pretty much. Most people have seen it.
Speaker 1: It doesn't you know. Again, the bottom line is we
Speaker 1: just have to understand that this was an event that
Speaker 1: was created to push their agenda. The more important thing
Speaker 1: is to stop their agenda. Things like the Model State
Speaker 1: Health Emergency Powers Act and to understand how that was
Speaker 1: tied to nine eleven, how Homeland Security and CDC and
Speaker 1: all the rest of the stuff, the prep back, everything
Speaker 1: was all tied together. This is from Kimmy says, the
Speaker 1: Twitter just activated a setting by default for everyone that
Speaker 1: gives them the right to use your data to train Groc.
Speaker 1: And again Groc is Elon Musk's artificial intelligence. They never
Speaker 1: announced it. You can disable this using the web, but
Speaker 1: it is hidden. You can't disable it using the mobile app.
Speaker 1: And so he's got a direct link to it. So
Speaker 1: this is a forwarded to me by Harry Hound and
Speaker 1: you can find this. The person who put this out
Speaker 1: is Kimmy. Well, actually look for easy Bake oven and
Speaker 1: you'll see the instructions there as to what you can
Speaker 1: do and if you don't want your data to be
Speaker 1: used to train elon Musk's AI, And of course they
Speaker 1: need to have human data in order to train this stuff.
Speaker 1: And he's not a philanthropist. He's got real designs for X.
Speaker 1: He wants to bring back his PayPal like thing, but
Speaker 1: actually he wants to make it more like the Chinese
Speaker 1: social media that was there. And he also sees it
Speaker 1: as a big hive mind. This is from Bill, he
Speaker 1: says David, he says. Peter Teel says he doesn't like
Speaker 1: those people at Davos. I guess that's what all the
Speaker 1: World Economic Forum young global leaders say. I heard Vivek
Speaker 1: Kramaswami say it. I haven't heard Maria Bartiromo say it yet. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, it was interesting and I played this last week.
Speaker 1: He criticized Peter Teel criticized Davos, But I played an
Speaker 1: older video for you where he actually defended Builderberg and
Speaker 1: the secrecy that was there. He called it privacy boy.
Speaker 1: That is certainly hypocritical for somebody who started palenteer to
Speaker 1: look at all of our data. This is from a listener.
Speaker 1: I don't see the name here at the bottom, But
Speaker 1: he did have a couple of things that I thought
Speaker 1: was interesting. He asked for a way for us to
Speaker 1: be able to put the podcast on the website so
Speaker 1: people could listen to it in the background. We have
Speaker 1: looked at that in the past and didn't really come
Speaker 1: up with a good technological solution because the bandwidth that
Speaker 1: charges then are on us and we didn't really know
Speaker 1: how to do that. But he didn't have a good
Speaker 1: solution that maybe we put something on the merchandise section
Speaker 1: of the site where people could just donate or support
Speaker 1: from there instead of getting the merchandise. That reminds me
Speaker 1: we have today. We're still trying to get answers from
Speaker 1: the people who process the payments want to shut us
Speaker 1: off for some reason. Karen's been going around with them.
Speaker 1: They gave us a deadline the end of the month
Speaker 1: to shut this down. We still have not been able
Speaker 1: to resolve that issue, so the ability to even buy
Speaker 1: merchandise might be disappearing for a while if they shut
Speaker 1: us down until we find somebody else to do it.
Speaker 1: Not sure at this moment why they wanted to do that.
Speaker 1: If it was a misunderstanding about something or if this
Speaker 1: is a political don't really know yet, but that's still
Speaker 1: kind of hanging there. And then he says, I'm a
Speaker 1: single father with a ten year old autistic, vaccine damaged
Speaker 1: beautiful daughter. She only got the shots at birth. At birth,
Speaker 1: just the hep B and the vitamin K, so it's
Speaker 1: not just the MMR. It is all of them. And
Speaker 1: you know, we've talked about this and talked about how
Speaker 1: many different vaccines they do and how they do it
Speaker 1: over and over and over again with these but again,
Speaker 1: it can be any of these things because they all
Speaker 1: have things like preservatives and other things like that. So
Speaker 1: just wanted to pass that on to everybody. You know,
Speaker 1: seeing that mother that I played that video so many times,
Speaker 1: who said she didn't realize that her child, who they
Speaker 1: said died from sudden infant death syndrome, We don't know
Speaker 1: what it is until she saw they were saying the
Speaker 1: same thing about adults who were dropping dead from the
Speaker 1: Trump shot, and then she realized what that was about.
Speaker 1: So I just wanted to pass that on to people.
Speaker 1: This is from Robert. He said, thank you for featuring
Speaker 1: the Life site news article. Scientist challenge fundamental precepts of virology.
Speaker 1: After your show, I read the entire article again and
Speaker 1: listen to the audio. I've watched the embedded video. Farewell
Speaker 1: to virology, He says, from the start of this massive
Speaker 1: worldwide coordinated genocide, I prayed for God to expose the
Speaker 1: evil intent and all the principal players involved on the
Speaker 1: very same global scale. I said, this recent article was
Speaker 1: not much of a revelation, as it was a refresher. Still,
Speaker 1: I rejoice in the fact that God is in control
Speaker 1: and we are seeing the scientific community gathering the courage
Speaker 1: and consensus to at least challenge the foundation of virology
Speaker 1: and of vaccines and growing numbers. The Bible tells us
Speaker 1: that mankind will experience far worse than faunci in the future. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we all will, quite frankly, we all have death, disease,
Speaker 1: and suffering in our future. But we as Christians have
Speaker 1: a hope and that is the thing that sustains us
Speaker 1: and gives us the courage to confront these lies. Eventually,
Speaker 1: these lives are going to come out. Whether they come
Speaker 1: out in our lifetime or not, we don't know. It's
Speaker 1: just our job to confront them. So I absolutely agree
Speaker 1: with you. What an amazing crime this has been and
Speaker 1: how these people have all gotten away with it. Thank
Speaker 1: you for listening.
Speaker 7: Let me tell you the David Night Show you can
Speaker 7: listen to with your ears.
Speaker 1: You can even watch it by using your eyes.
Speaker 7: In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're
Speaker 7: listening to the David Night Show right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah, good job.
Speaker 7: And you want to know something else, You can find
Speaker 7: all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to
Speaker 7: the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com.
Speaker 1: That's a website.