Speaker 1: Rope Center is a clear choice for a rapid life
Speaker 1: saving treatment. Learn more at you See how dot com.
Speaker 1: Southbound seventy five continues slow from Tylersville to two seventy
Speaker 1: five as a wreck east to seventy five s ramp
Speaker 1: to northbound seventy five and eastbound one twenty nine. Crews
Speaker 1: continue to work with the wreck before Cincinnati Dayton Road.
Speaker 1: The latest is on southbound seventy five at Shepherd left
Speaker 1: hand side. Coming up next a guess who has been
Speaker 1: able to incorporate his beliefs into his outdoors display for
Speaker 1: the holidays. In addition to putting twinkle whites on his
Speaker 1: inflatable constitution, he now has a giant all waft next
Speaker 1: to it. But it looks suspiciously like Rand Paul the
Speaker 1: judge's next chucking ramon fifty five krs the talk station.
Speaker 2: Fifty five, Does Congressman Massey get introduced that way?
Speaker 3: No, he does not judge of poti A pardon the
Speaker 3: voice here in the little or Froggy today. Now you
Speaker 3: are the only person who gets specialized treatment from Ingram.
Speaker 3: He's on every segment doing the traffic. He's on other
Speaker 3: stations around the country. You're it my friend, and it's
Speaker 3: well deserved.
Speaker 2: That banquet in Cincinnati about which we've been speaking for years. So,
Speaker 2: but you and I once did about ten years ago. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I have to hug and kiss Ingram in front.
Speaker 4: Of the crowd.
Speaker 3: You will get it to him someday. You're honor, I'm
Speaker 3: certain of it. I was glad you're able to listen
Speaker 3: to Congressman Thomas Massey too, because obviously we all play
Speaker 3: well together.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Anyway, pivoting over.
Speaker 2: Maybe Joe can Joe Strecker can set up that three
Speaker 2: way between you and Thomas Massey and I. And of
Speaker 2: course I agree with everything he said. But the sacred
Speaker 2: cow there and he knows this and he agrees, is
Speaker 2: the Defense Department. Donald Trump actually wants to increase the
Speaker 2: budget to over nine hundred billion. This, of course, is
Speaker 2: more than the next ten countries combined, including Russia, which
Speaker 2: has a bigger army, and China, which has a bigger navy.
Speaker 3: Yes, and in spite of the fact that after eight
Speaker 3: separate attempts to audit defense spending, they've been coming up
Speaker 3: belly up. They can't do it. They have no blanking
Speaker 3: idea where the money's going. And that disgusts me to
Speaker 3: no end.
Speaker 2: Right Thomas A. Congressman Massey knows all of this. He
Speaker 2: is a voice crying in the wilderness often when it
Speaker 2: comes to it. But I am delighted he's still Congressman
Speaker 2: Massy and did not fall for any seduction of joining
Speaker 2: the Trump administration because he's far more valuable to the
Speaker 2: First Principles that we believe in and to the Constitution
Speaker 2: on the floor of the House than in the Department
Speaker 2: of Agriculture or whatever they considering him for.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, when Tomason Assi speaks, people listen, and
Speaker 3: I think it largely springs from the fact that he
Speaker 3: is such a thorn in the side of those who
Speaker 3: want to and regularly play fast and loose with the Constitution.
Speaker 3: He's got a target on his back, so when he
Speaker 3: speaks like he said, he fact checks everything he does
Speaker 3: before he puts it out there. And guess what, people
Speaker 3: apparently pay attention. He prevented the Dea guy from getting
Speaker 3: appointed just by pointing out that the sheriff locked up
Speaker 3: a minister for conducting services during COVID nineteen. That is
Speaker 3: not someone who understands the First Amendment and the right
Speaker 3: to free assembly.
Speaker 2: And back to Ingram's comment about rand Paul, which is
Speaker 2: equally as flattering to me. He does the same thing
Speaker 2: in the Senate. He'll stand up, read a portion of
Speaker 2: the Constitution and then read legislation that's on the floor
Speaker 2: of the Senate which directly contradicts the portion of the Constitution.
Speaker 2: And these characters and big government characters in both parties,
Speaker 2: they can't answer them. They're dumbfounded.
Speaker 3: Well, and that stumbles right into probably intentionally your column today,
Speaker 3: will Donald Trump stop domestic spying? Which I think the
Speaker 3: answer is going to be no, for the reasons you
Speaker 3: articulate so well in your column today.
Speaker 2: You know, it's very unsettling because he was the victim
Speaker 2: of domestic spying back in twenty fifteen and sixteen before
Speaker 2: he was president, and we now know during his first
Speaker 2: term in the presidency, you would think that he would
Speaker 2: put a stop to it. He can put a stop
Speaker 2: to it with the stroke of a pen. He can
Speaker 2: resind Ronald Reagan's executive or to twelve Triple three, which
Speaker 2: I don't mention in the column, which has language in
Speaker 2: it that's so vague it enables the intelligence community to
Speaker 2: spy on everyone. He can dial back the NSA. He
Speaker 2: can prohibit the CIA from doing anything other than administrative
Speaker 2: work in the United States. He can tell Cash Ptel,
Speaker 2: his new director of the FBI, where the business of
Speaker 2: solving crime, not predicting crime, no computer hacking, no surveillance
Speaker 2: other than that which is authorized by an Article three
Speaker 2: judge pursuing to the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. He
Speaker 2: can do all that, but he won't. He won't because
Speaker 2: the intelligence community has its pause on him and on
Speaker 2: members of Congress, not on Commis Massey and Rand Paul,
Speaker 2: but on the vast majority of those in both houses
Speaker 2: and both parties who are terrified of what the intelligence
Speaker 2: community has on them and might reveal. That includes the
Speaker 2: Speaker of the House, who voted against all this surveillance
Speaker 2: when he was Congressman. Johnson then had a two hour
Speaker 2: secret meeting with leaders of the intelligence community. Then came
Speaker 2: out of his office and said, I'm going to break
Speaker 2: the tie and vote in favor of authorizing the NSSA
Speaker 2: to spy on Americans and.
Speaker 3: All an absolute, outright violence violation of the Constitution. I
Speaker 3: talked with a Congressman who I'm going to let remain unnamed,
Speaker 3: a personal friend of mine, but have a profound disagreement
Speaker 3: on this point.
Speaker 4: It was innocence.
Speaker 3: No, we need this, Brian, because if you knew what
Speaker 3: I knew, Like for example, if you had a security
Speaker 3: clearance as high as mine and you sat in the
Speaker 3: back room and heard all this stuff, if you knew
Speaker 3: what I knew, you would support these unconstitutional actions.
Speaker 4: And I'm sorry, I can't abide.
Speaker 2: Now, what is the sense of the constitution, What is
Speaker 2: the meaning of it, what is the value of it?
Speaker 2: If these guys in secret, based on secret knowledge can
Speaker 2: abrogate it? I mean, who knows more the people or
Speaker 2: the government? The government knows more about us than we
Speaker 2: know about the government. Do we work for the government
Speaker 2: or does the government work for us? Whoever a gal,
Speaker 2: whoever the person is totally has priorities inverted.
Speaker 3: Well that was my reaction, because of course, if you
Speaker 3: speak with Congressom Massey or someone like you who appreciates
Speaker 3: and understands the supreme law of the land, then you
Speaker 3: cannot justify its violation.
Speaker 4: You know, if there's a.
Speaker 3: Dangerous activity going on there that sounds to me like
Speaker 3: it rises to the level of criminal activity. If it does,
Speaker 3: then you can justify by getting a war in front
Speaker 3: of a judge and then go spy you know.
Speaker 2: Of course, of course, I mean basically what they're doing
Speaker 2: is computer hacking. You want to jump to Syria. We
Speaker 2: gave aid and comfort to a terrorist organization, the leader
Speaker 2: of which we have put a ten million dollars bounty
Speaker 2: on his head, and we trained his forces. If that's
Speaker 2: not giving aid and terror aid and comfort to our
Speaker 2: terror organization, I don't know what is. And when the
Speaker 2: FBI jumps into this and hold up my mobile device,
Speaker 2: if that isn't computer hacking, I don't know what is.
Speaker 2: So does the government work for us or do we
Speaker 2: work for the government. Do the laws only apply to
Speaker 2: the people, or do they apply to the government as well.
Speaker 3: Well, we all know the answer to those rhetorical questions,
Speaker 3: and sadly they're not positive answers, and we continue to
Speaker 3: move on.
Speaker 2: And may think Trump is awake and maybe he's listening.
Speaker 3: I don't know, maybe he is. Well, just send him
Speaker 3: a copy of this conversation. I'll referm the podcast link
Speaker 3: and he can listen for himself and decide for himself
Speaker 3: whether it's time to finally put an end to all
Speaker 3: of these ridiculous violations of our rights, Judge Enna Polaitano,
Speaker 3: I'm glad we've got you, and I'm glad we've got
Speaker 3: Congressman Massey to continually remind people of the shenanigans that
Speaker 3: are going on in government and also the strange reality.
Speaker 3: And I really find it so disturbing. And we've talked
Speaker 3: about it before. You brought it up in your column,
Speaker 3: and we talked about it today. The idea that our
Speaker 3: elected officials are afraid to take these powers away for
Speaker 3: fear that we will find out what these behind the
Speaker 3: scenes spies know about them. That is a frightening, frightening reality.
Speaker 3: It's blackmail, it's black justice.
Speaker 2: The late Justice Scalia told me the members of the
Speaker 2: court knew that they were being spied upon. Now they
Speaker 2: can supy. If they can spy in the Supreme Court,
Speaker 2: they can spy in anybody. I asked my intelligence community people,
Speaker 2: does the CIA spy on the White House? Answer?
Speaker 4: Yes, frightening Glad we get to talk about it.
Speaker 3: Judging Freedom in the podcast Judging of Paulatna hosts and
Speaker 3: you need to check it out online where we get
Speaker 3: your podcasts, Judge, As we always in the conversation Who
Speaker 3: are you gonna be talking with today?
Speaker 4: I see you're still in New York here.
Speaker 2: Douglas McGregor at eleven fifteen, Professor John Meerscheimer at two o'clock,
Speaker 2: Phil Giraldi, the famous CIA agent who told George Bush
Speaker 2: Sadamosine has no weapons of mass destruction and Bush threw
Speaker 2: them out of the Oval office at three o'clock.
Speaker 3: That's a solid lineup as always, until next Wednesday, my
Speaker 3: dear friend, have a wonderful day week, best of health,
Speaker 3: and we'll have another great conversation next Wednesday.
Speaker 2: Back at you, Brian, Thank you all the best.
Speaker 4: Love you brother.
Speaker 3: Eight forty two fifty five K Seed Talk Stations Stick
Speaker 3: around me right back after something brief
Speaker 4: Words fifty five KRC