1 00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:06,599 Speaker 1: CFL Betting Bru Blueprint. This is week eight. 2 00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:09,960 Speaker 2: Andrew and Bobby with you to break things down, talk 3 00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:12,800 about the line move and talk about the current numbers, 4 00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:15,560 and update you on some spots that we think will 5 00:00:15,599 --> 00:00:18,039 be best to get on now or to wait until 6 00:00:18,120 --> 00:00:21,199 later in the week. Of course, guys, before we jump 7 00:00:21,199 --> 00:00:22,679 into the show, we want to remind you if you've 8 00:00:22,679 --> 00:00:26,079 been enjoying the content, win or lose with us, please 9 00:00:26,399 --> 00:00:29,079 hit the like button and comment below. Let us know 10 00:00:29,120 --> 00:00:31,320 who you are betting in the CFL, and I'll tell 11 00:00:31,320 --> 00:00:34,000 you what. Guys, first and foremost, when you start hearing 12 00:00:34,039 --> 00:00:37,079 about NFL training camps and you start hearing about college 13 00:00:37,159 --> 00:00:40,920 football betting lines, this is the time you make the 14 00:00:40,960 --> 00:00:43,240 most money in the CFL. I know a lot of 15 00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:45,399 us would love to make the most money possible in 16 00:00:45,439 --> 00:00:48,039 the CFL when there's nothing else going on. 17 00:00:48,679 --> 00:00:50,880 Speaker 1: But the fact is, right now. 18 00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:53,359 Speaker 2: We're entering probably what I would describe as one of 19 00:00:53,359 --> 00:00:56,840 the best periods to bet CFL out there in the 20 00:00:56,880 --> 00:01:02,479 full entire season. Updated numbers for me minus zero point 21 00:01:02,679 --> 00:01:07,519 seven units year to date on the season, it's either 22 00:01:07,560 --> 00:01:10,480 been a really good season or good week or a 23 00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:13,959 pretty bad week. We haven't really had that many average weeks, 24 00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:16,760 so we're in bounce back mode. I had a big 25 00:01:16,799 --> 00:01:19,760 play on Winnipeg, tried to fade Calgary that didn't go 26 00:01:19,879 --> 00:01:20,400 too well. 27 00:01:20,879 --> 00:01:22,400 Speaker 1: A couple other losses in there. 28 00:01:22,359 --> 00:01:25,400 Speaker 2: Got the pct team total, but other than that, we're 29 00:01:25,439 --> 00:01:26,359 in bounce back mode. 30 00:01:26,439 --> 00:01:27,280 Speaker 1: Let's bring in Bobby. 31 00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:31,959 Speaker 2: How are you, Bobby Good? 32 00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:33,799 Speaker 3: I'm coming in the middle of nowhere here, So if 33 00:01:33,799 --> 00:01:36,000 I bounce out, I'm just gonna kick to my phone 34 00:01:36,040 --> 00:01:39,439 and rejoin. But just spend the afternoon of a deck 35 00:01:40,159 --> 00:01:44,760 saw Alexander Graham Bell's museum there, developed the telephone, developed 36 00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:49,879 the airplane. Everything people take for granted now, and I 37 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:53,400 feel like we're kind of similar as everybody started coming 38 00:01:53,959 --> 00:01:57,200 take for granted that the Red Blacks are boneheads and 39 00:01:57,439 --> 00:01:59,400 Trey Ford shouldn't be starting in the CFL. 40 00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:05,799 Speaker 2: Somehow we're tying it Alexander Graham Bell and the Red Blacks. 41 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:06,599 Speaker 1: He love to see it. 42 00:02:07,799 --> 00:02:10,759 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, look, I don't want to stay because 43 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:13,520 you know how I get when I'm pissed off and 44 00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:15,439 I'm angry and I'm motivated for the next week. 45 00:02:15,520 --> 00:02:18,039 Speaker 1: But you could say this, I mean, it was a 46 00:02:18,080 --> 00:02:18,479 good week. 47 00:02:18,639 --> 00:02:22,080 Speaker 2: People that were betting the obvious, like, hey, Calgary's covered 48 00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:24,719 every time as an underdog, and they do it again. 49 00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:28,560 Hamilton beat Ottawa last week and then they did it 50 00:02:28,599 --> 00:02:30,960 again this week. I mean, those were two spots that 51 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:34,159 you know, you could probably look at it, especially the 52 00:02:34,159 --> 00:02:35,599 one with Hamilton in Ottawa. 53 00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:39,960 Speaker 1: But Drew Brown getting absolutely smacked once again. He got 54 00:02:40,479 --> 00:02:41,840 I think his helmet knocked up. 55 00:02:42,039 --> 00:02:45,759 Speaker 2: Not really a good look once again for the offensive 56 00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:49,400 line of the Auto Red Blacks. So you hate to 57 00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:52,240 see that. But hopefully he can be okay and get 58 00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:54,680 healthy again. But when it comes down to it, we 59 00:02:54,800 --> 00:02:56,800 definitely should have been just faiding the crap out of 60 00:02:56,840 --> 00:03:00,759 this Red Blacks team all throughout this season. Bobby, let's 61 00:03:00,759 --> 00:03:02,599 take a look at these odds here. We got to 62 00:03:02,719 --> 00:03:05,680 use odds Logic. Guys, make sure you check out odds Logic. 63 00:03:05,719 --> 00:03:08,479 You can go to oddslogic dot com slash am get 64 00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:11,439 a good seven day free trial. But we proudly support 65 00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:14,879 them here at wager Talk. Looking at the numbers here, 66 00:03:15,199 --> 00:03:18,120 we've got minus five and a half open number. We're 67 00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:21,439 calling an open number in Calgary. Move now to six 68 00:03:21,479 --> 00:03:25,080 and a half. Pretty much across the board. Edmonton, Saskatchewan 69 00:03:25,599 --> 00:03:28,639 opener nine and a half. Well, we saw some tens 70 00:03:28,759 --> 00:03:33,240 now back to nine and a half, Winnipeg open minus 71 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:35,000 two and a half, now at three and a half, 72 00:03:35,039 --> 00:03:39,000 mostly across the board, some threes are there, and Hamilton 73 00:03:39,159 --> 00:03:43,360 BC steadily at minus three. Now here's guys, what I'm 74 00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:47,000 gonna say is again, we would love to be able 75 00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:51,000 to say that the early part of the CFL season 76 00:03:51,080 --> 00:03:53,960 is where we can make the most money. And look, 77 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:56,039 I was on a seven and three run until last 78 00:03:56,039 --> 00:03:58,960 this past weekend where it all it didn't go very well. 79 00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:02,599 But this is a spot where I think that, you know, 80 00:04:02,639 --> 00:04:04,840 you start making money because the numbers aren't going to 81 00:04:04,960 --> 00:04:05,719 change as much. 82 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:07,599 Speaker 1: The numbers aren't going to move as much. 83 00:04:07,639 --> 00:04:11,240 Speaker 2: People are actually concerned right now about NFL preseason lines 84 00:04:11,599 --> 00:04:15,479 more than they are going to be concerned about lines 85 00:04:15,639 --> 00:04:18,560 in you know, week eight of the CFL. 86 00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:19,800 Speaker 1: That's just how it goes. 87 00:04:20,319 --> 00:04:23,120 Speaker 2: So when I look at this here, I want to 88 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:26,759 talk about some of these numbers and some of these 89 00:04:26,879 --> 00:04:30,360 kind of spots that we're going to see in the CFL. Now, 90 00:04:30,399 --> 00:04:36,040 let's take a look at CFL ats records and take 91 00:04:36,079 --> 00:04:37,839 a look at some of these updated numbers. Here, guys, 92 00:04:37,879 --> 00:04:41,480 so right now. Calgary did it to me again. They 93 00:04:41,519 --> 00:04:45,759 did it again. They covered once again as an underdog. 94 00:04:45,920 --> 00:04:50,800 This Calgary team five n o ats as an underdog 95 00:04:51,000 --> 00:04:54,759 five and one ATS overall, and they are five and 96 00:04:54,839 --> 00:04:59,279 one on the season. Saskatchewan five and one record five 97 00:04:59,319 --> 00:05:02,879 and one eight, Winnipeg three and two record three and 98 00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:06,920 two ATS, BC three and four record three and four ATS. 99 00:05:06,959 --> 00:05:08,240 Speaker 1: Same goes for Edmonton. 100 00:05:09,199 --> 00:05:13,319 Speaker 2: Looking at Montreal four and two record three and three ATS, 101 00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:17,199 Hamilton four and two record three and three ATS, Toronto 102 00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:21,000 record one in five straight up two and four ATS, 103 00:05:21,040 --> 00:05:25,399 and Ottawa one and six record two and five ATS. 104 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:29,319 Looking at some of the under over numbers the best 105 00:05:29,480 --> 00:05:31,879 over team in the league, which is a bit shocking 106 00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:34,879 because we know how great the offense or defense can 107 00:05:34,920 --> 00:05:39,279 be for them, Winnipeg four and one over under on 108 00:05:39,439 --> 00:05:42,600 the season, and looking at some of the other teams 109 00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:45,160 that maybe are doing better as far as the unders, well, 110 00:05:45,279 --> 00:05:48,680 Toronto two three and one, and I think if you 111 00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:50,800 look at most books, you could say two and four, 112 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:54,120 so they might be actually one of the more under teams. 113 00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:56,600 But we can tell you they've had one game that 114 00:05:56,759 --> 00:05:59,759 was a big time over against Hamilton, but other than that, 115 00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:02,879 they have seen quite a few unders due to the 116 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:06,240 lack of their offense. We are going to have a 117 00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:09,480 very quick show this week. We got Bobby coming back 118 00:06:09,519 --> 00:06:12,839 here in a second. We're going to give our opinions 119 00:06:13,319 --> 00:06:15,319 and then we'll, you know, make sure we're tweeting some 120 00:06:15,360 --> 00:06:19,720 stuff out later on in the week on our Twitter 121 00:06:19,720 --> 00:06:22,519 handles as you guys can always find those as well. 122 00:06:22,519 --> 00:06:26,279 But let's get Bobby back up here with us. 123 00:06:26,519 --> 00:06:28,480 Speaker 1: And let's talk about some of these lines. 124 00:06:28,519 --> 00:06:31,560 Speaker 2: So Bobby, you're back with us, let's not waste the 125 00:06:31,639 --> 00:06:34,639 time here. Montreal and Calgary, what do you think about 126 00:06:34,639 --> 00:06:35,040 that one? 127 00:06:37,519 --> 00:06:39,920 Speaker 3: So that stam Peters game, like they did, laid a 128 00:06:39,920 --> 00:06:41,560 pretty good beat down on him, and people are going 129 00:06:41,639 --> 00:06:45,399 to say it's because of Zach Klaros getting injured, But 130 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,279 I think if Klaros stayed in that game, Calgary was 131 00:06:48,319 --> 00:06:51,560 still going to run away with it, right, So Calgary 132 00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:53,959 was the right side. We've been on Calgary plenty of 133 00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:57,759 times and it was definitely the other experience for us, 134 00:06:57,839 --> 00:07:00,319 at least for me last week, Like the was no 135 00:07:00,399 --> 00:07:02,120 real chance, so I was sweating that three and a 136 00:07:02,120 --> 00:07:06,439 half Winnipeg right from the start. So I just don't 137 00:07:06,439 --> 00:07:10,319 want to write off MBT just yet. Like you said, 138 00:07:10,360 --> 00:07:14,639 Alexander's out for six weeks. Confidence in Calgary's at an 139 00:07:14,639 --> 00:07:18,920 all time high. But like if David Alexander was playing, Like, 140 00:07:20,040 --> 00:07:22,480 wouldn't this line be like pretty close to a pick, 141 00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:25,959 especially on a neutral. Maybe Calgary is one point better. 142 00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:28,199 They have the worst, one of the worst home fields 143 00:07:28,199 --> 00:07:31,639 in the CFL. Like, it's not the McMahon Stadium, it 144 00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:35,160 was five six years ago. I just don't know if 145 00:07:35,160 --> 00:07:38,040 it's that much of a drop off from Alexander to 146 00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:40,879 MBT to warrants, like, or what's the line right now? 147 00:07:40,920 --> 00:07:42,560 We're getting close to a touchdown? I think it was 148 00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:46,480 six last time I checked. I think I'm just going 149 00:07:46,560 --> 00:07:48,879 to wait for the right number and be on the 150 00:07:48,879 --> 00:07:49,639 Alouettes here. 151 00:07:50,720 --> 00:07:55,079 Speaker 2: Yeah, DraftKings is showing seven FanDuel six and a half, 152 00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:57,959 Westgate six and a half, bet Online six and a half, 153 00:07:58,040 --> 00:08:00,680 Penny six and a half, Circa six. 154 00:08:00,480 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 1: And a half. 155 00:08:01,639 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 2: Bobby, I gotta say I did a show, a full 156 00:08:03,759 --> 00:08:06,600 show on my phone. I was at the in laws 157 00:08:06,639 --> 00:08:10,360 cottage last week and didn't bring my laptop. Yeah, I'll 158 00:08:10,399 --> 00:08:12,360 tell you what, you sound way better right now than 159 00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:16,279 you did about five minutes ago. So we'll take that 160 00:08:16,439 --> 00:08:19,519 all the time. Sometimes the phones can be just as good. 161 00:08:19,959 --> 00:08:23,480 So here's the deal is that you know that a 162 00:08:23,480 --> 00:08:26,160 big struggle that I have is like being pissed off 163 00:08:26,199 --> 00:08:28,759 at a team and then like be like, you don't 164 00:08:28,759 --> 00:08:30,720 want to be stubborn, right, Like I've made some money 165 00:08:30,759 --> 00:08:33,200 on Calgary, but obviously I just lost a big one. 166 00:08:33,240 --> 00:08:35,399 And for anybody that follows wager talk and you know 167 00:08:35,440 --> 00:08:38,000 how it is, Bobby, the five percent plays mean a 168 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:40,279 lot to me. You know, you could have a one 169 00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:42,279 in one day, but if I hit that five percent er, 170 00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:45,240 it's huge, and that was a tough one to lose. 171 00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:46,960 Speaker 1: And you know, but here's the funny thing. 172 00:08:47,279 --> 00:08:49,600 Speaker 2: All you're hearing now, Oh Winnipeg, they're going in the 173 00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,840 wrong direction, Winnipeg. Maybe this is the downfall of them. 174 00:08:53,039 --> 00:08:55,600 You know, a little early to say that. But here's 175 00:08:55,639 --> 00:08:59,320 one thing I'm going to say, even though Calgary has 176 00:08:59,480 --> 00:09:02,960 one every game straight up that they were an underdog, 177 00:09:03,120 --> 00:09:06,440 so they're undefeated ats. But also in those situations they've 178 00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:10,519 always they've also won straight up. This is a hell 179 00:09:10,559 --> 00:09:14,559 of a lot different than being plus three and a half, 180 00:09:14,679 --> 00:09:16,759 plus four and a half, plus five and a half 181 00:09:16,799 --> 00:09:19,480 plus seven and a half whatever they might win. Now 182 00:09:19,559 --> 00:09:24,159 they're being asked to lay a number. And I know 183 00:09:24,200 --> 00:09:25,519 we got a quick show here. We don't want to 184 00:09:25,519 --> 00:09:27,639 spend too much time on each game. But this is 185 00:09:27,679 --> 00:09:30,559 the thing, Bobby, is that I said to myself last week, Okay, 186 00:09:31,159 --> 00:09:33,399 you know, if Calgi wins this game and VA puts 187 00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:35,919 on a show, I'm gonna have to give some respect 188 00:09:35,960 --> 00:09:39,480 to Calgary, right And I definitely have to with based 189 00:09:39,480 --> 00:09:43,120 on how they played, especially in Winnipeg. But at the 190 00:09:43,159 --> 00:09:45,519 same time, now they're not just being asked to win 191 00:09:45,559 --> 00:09:48,000 this game. They're being asked to win, as you mentioned, 192 00:09:48,320 --> 00:09:50,360 by a touchdown plus the extra point. 193 00:09:50,759 --> 00:09:52,759 Speaker 1: That's not easy. I know Montreal hasn't. 194 00:09:52,480 --> 00:09:56,159 Speaker 2: Looked great without Davis Alexander out there, but they're still 195 00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:58,000 a pretty good football team. 196 00:09:58,519 --> 00:09:59,159 Speaker 1: In the NFL. 197 00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:01,679 Speaker 2: We look at look ahead numbers all the time. I mean, 198 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:04,120 to your point, what would the look ahead number be 199 00:10:04,240 --> 00:10:07,799 in this one, like Montreal short, you know, road shock, 200 00:10:08,159 --> 00:10:11,840 if it was Alexander or now we got you know, backup, 201 00:10:11,879 --> 00:10:13,879 so maybe it would be a pick like is this 202 00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:16,759 six and a half just extremely based on the number 203 00:10:16,799 --> 00:10:19,399 that we've seen this season or the play we've seen 204 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:21,879 this season? Like, to me, I can only go one way, 205 00:10:21,919 --> 00:10:23,480 and it's got to be the road dog here. 206 00:10:24,320 --> 00:10:26,639 Speaker 3: Yeah, especially if it's creeped up to a touchdown. Like 207 00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:29,039 I we were talking before and I said, if this 208 00:10:29,159 --> 00:10:31,320 is at like five, I'm trying to talk my way 209 00:10:31,320 --> 00:10:33,440 out of not taking the five. And I guess just 210 00:10:33,480 --> 00:10:36,919 waiting for the number was my only excuse. So, like, 211 00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:39,000 I like Calgary either, like I've got them as the 212 00:10:39,039 --> 00:10:43,480 top team, but Montreal is still legitimate and and all 213 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:48,720 MBT has to do is be not terrible and they 214 00:10:48,720 --> 00:10:50,440 should be able to hold it within a touchdown. 215 00:10:51,200 --> 00:10:52,799 Speaker 1: Yeah, so it should be a good one, guys. 216 00:10:52,799 --> 00:10:55,720 Speaker 2: So we're going to look towards this number on Montreal 217 00:10:55,840 --> 00:10:57,639 that has gone from five and a half to six 218 00:10:57,679 --> 00:11:00,000 and a half. As mentioned DraftKings hanging a seven. 219 00:11:01,679 --> 00:11:02,000 Speaker 1: Look. 220 00:11:02,559 --> 00:11:04,440 Speaker 2: Last week was the week that we were like, okay, 221 00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:06,399 let's see a Winnipeg can do off the bye. But 222 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:10,159 based on this number, this isn't a plus price anymore. 223 00:11:10,200 --> 00:11:13,759 This is like, hey, this is the sports books, any 224 00:11:13,799 --> 00:11:16,200 of the ones that really do care about CFL betting 225 00:11:16,279 --> 00:11:18,639 saying okay, let's see how much all of you guys 226 00:11:18,759 --> 00:11:22,240 really like Calgary, because you know a lot of people. 227 00:11:22,240 --> 00:11:24,840 If you like Calgary, if you've made money on Calgary 228 00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:26,600 this year, you're gonna probably. 229 00:11:26,279 --> 00:11:28,600 Speaker 1: Be on them this week. So we'll see what happens 230 00:11:28,600 --> 00:11:29,159 in that one. 231 00:11:29,960 --> 00:11:33,600 Speaker 2: Again, this is another one that I like the dog here, Bobby, 232 00:11:33,639 --> 00:11:35,480 and if I can get a ten, I like it 233 00:11:35,519 --> 00:11:37,639 even that much more. But we have seen the numbers 234 00:11:37,639 --> 00:11:41,960 circulate back to nine and a half the Elks. One 235 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:45,919 thing I saw which is kind of interesting is the 236 00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:47,799 only game they've covered is the game they won. 237 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:50,759 Speaker 1: Is that? Were you here with the nine and a half? 238 00:11:50,799 --> 00:11:52,399 Speaker 2: I mean, this is kind of the point spread range 239 00:11:52,399 --> 00:11:56,000 that I'm only comfortable taking this Elks team in. Obviously, 240 00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:58,120 I know what you're going to update us. Your thoughts 241 00:11:58,120 --> 00:12:01,440 on the quarterback situation does worry me a bit. The 242 00:12:01,480 --> 00:12:03,399 only time they've covered a point spread is that the 243 00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:06,320 game that they won. But this time it's not only 244 00:12:06,360 --> 00:12:07,799 like four and a half, five and a half, this 245 00:12:07,919 --> 00:12:10,720 is nine and a half points. I'm interested once again 246 00:12:10,759 --> 00:12:11,759 in backing the dog here. 247 00:12:12,759 --> 00:12:16,799 Speaker 3: Yeah, we're getting we're getting into the Taylor Cornelius type numbers, 248 00:12:16,840 --> 00:12:21,080 like the tens, the twelves, the thirteen's, And the interesting 249 00:12:21,159 --> 00:12:24,759 thing that's developed this week is that they're they're splitting 250 00:12:24,799 --> 00:12:28,879 reps at at quarterback in Edmonton. So, like I thought 251 00:12:28,879 --> 00:12:32,080 Mark Killham, the new head coach in Edmonton, might have 252 00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:35,159 been a condition of his employment that he has to 253 00:12:35,200 --> 00:12:38,559 start trey Ford. But eventually, like you just got to 254 00:12:38,639 --> 00:12:40,039 kind of think, like do it. Am I gonna have 255 00:12:40,039 --> 00:12:43,279 a job if I keep starting in tray Ford? How 256 00:12:43,320 --> 00:12:45,039 long are we going to let the better QB sit 257 00:12:45,120 --> 00:12:48,120 on the bench? Right? So, this is the first time 258 00:12:48,200 --> 00:12:50,600 that we've entered a week where trey Ford isn't taking 259 00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:53,879 all of the first team snaps. There's plenty of coach speak. 260 00:12:54,039 --> 00:12:58,399 If you listened to the Edmonton radio, they like, I 261 00:12:58,519 --> 00:13:00,440 like to act all smart, saying, oh, don't know, I've 262 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:02,120 got a real plan here, and then on game day 263 00:13:02,159 --> 00:13:04,080 they can't even figure out whether to tell their player 264 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:06,360 to run it out of the end zone or not. So, uh, 265 00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:09,720 this is their chance to act smart right in when 266 00:13:09,720 --> 00:13:12,679 they're sputting the wraps. Oh, well, we don't know who's starting. 267 00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:14,759 We kind of have a good idea and we have 268 00:13:14,799 --> 00:13:20,480 to go on that. And he said, wait for that. 269 00:13:20,960 --> 00:13:23,240 The thing he said that was interesting. He said, everybody 270 00:13:23,279 --> 00:13:25,279 who's the best at what they do will be starting, 271 00:13:26,080 --> 00:13:28,519 and that's Cody Fajardo in terms of being a quarterback. 272 00:13:28,639 --> 00:13:32,879 So I like Edmonton. I even like Edmonton at that 273 00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:35,960 ten with Trey Ford, So this is almost a free role. 274 00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:40,159 If it's Cody Fajardo. Edmonton always looks different against BC. 275 00:13:40,759 --> 00:13:43,039 You need you need to kind of erase those from 276 00:13:43,039 --> 00:13:46,559 your memory if you're going to handicap the Elks going forward. 277 00:13:46,919 --> 00:13:49,480 And it's probably gonna be useless information now because it's 278 00:13:49,480 --> 00:13:51,360 not going to be tray Ford playing next time they 279 00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:55,279 play BC. So Edmonton's looking as bad as they as 280 00:13:55,279 --> 00:13:59,559 bad as they possibly could coming into this. The sketch 281 00:13:59,639 --> 00:14:02,279 ones still one of the better teams in the league. 282 00:14:02,279 --> 00:14:06,759 But yeah, ten ten points, nine points, I'd like this 283 00:14:06,840 --> 00:14:10,440 all the way down to like seven, seven, six and 284 00:14:10,440 --> 00:14:14,039 a half if it's Cody Fajardo. So I think it's 285 00:14:14,080 --> 00:14:16,159 free money right now. It's a free bet. If you 286 00:14:16,240 --> 00:14:18,919 got trade Ford, then you've got an actual number. If 287 00:14:18,919 --> 00:14:20,639 you got Cody Fajardo, then you're laughing. 288 00:14:21,600 --> 00:14:24,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, And you know, obviously Winnipeg proved to us last week. 289 00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:26,000 Not every team's gonna look good off a bye, but 290 00:14:26,080 --> 00:14:29,519 they were playing Calgary. However, you know, I think what's 291 00:14:29,519 --> 00:14:31,919 gonna happen. Bobby is, We're probably gonna get both. I 292 00:14:31,919 --> 00:14:33,960 think that even if Fajardo ends up being the guy, 293 00:14:34,000 --> 00:14:37,039 they're going to use FOURD as a running back. We 294 00:14:37,080 --> 00:14:39,279 see our guy Darsha always talking about it. Use this 295 00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:41,799 guy for what he's good at. Use some of these guys. 296 00:14:41,919 --> 00:14:44,200 I mean the fact they're not really drawing up schemes. 297 00:14:44,879 --> 00:14:47,559 I've seen some Edmonton games this season where he ran 298 00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:49,519 the ball like three or four times, and you know, 299 00:14:49,559 --> 00:14:51,639 the first three quarters, it's like, dude, that's like your 300 00:14:51,679 --> 00:14:55,159 one asset is your legs. And then two weeks ago 301 00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:58,759 when when Fajardo came in through an absolute dart in 302 00:14:58,840 --> 00:15:01,799 garbage time to the ends zone, I had the whole 303 00:15:01,840 --> 00:15:03,759 fan base wondering, what the hell is this guy doing 304 00:15:03,759 --> 00:15:06,519 on the bench for the whole season. So we'll see 305 00:15:06,519 --> 00:15:11,399 what happens there. I my moderate and conservative take is 306 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:13,399 going to be there's a world where both those players 307 00:15:13,440 --> 00:15:16,360 get used in a game. I think that could definitely happen. 308 00:15:16,399 --> 00:15:19,639 I think that Ford could be like the Streveler for 309 00:15:19,720 --> 00:15:22,639 the Blue Bombers, except for a Streveler is more so 310 00:15:22,840 --> 00:15:25,799 bulky and strong and not fast as much like like 311 00:15:25,919 --> 00:15:28,399 Trey Ford is. But like you said, getting the nine 312 00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:30,559 and a half is a good number. With Ford, I'd say, 313 00:15:30,600 --> 00:15:33,519 but this number might be the plight the place that 314 00:15:33,600 --> 00:15:36,039 it is because first of all, they felt like they 315 00:15:36,080 --> 00:15:38,600 had to hang a number. But we also know how 316 00:15:38,639 --> 00:15:41,440 it is because if Fajardo goes in there, then this 317 00:15:41,559 --> 00:15:43,639 number should be seven and a half or much lower. 318 00:15:43,720 --> 00:15:46,200 So we're both looking at the dog here. Keep in 319 00:15:46,240 --> 00:15:48,240 mind that Edmonton is getting up a ton of points, 320 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:50,600 so maybe if you do like Edmonton, maybe you just 321 00:15:50,639 --> 00:15:52,879 want to look towards the team total as well. Maybe 322 00:15:52,919 --> 00:15:57,000 a half bet team total, half bet to spread. This 323 00:15:57,039 --> 00:15:58,840 is one of those ones where you got to think 324 00:15:58,879 --> 00:16:01,720 that Edmonton's gonna look a little different in Saskatchewan. Big 325 00:16:01,759 --> 00:16:04,919 win for them last week as well. Guys, Once again, 326 00:16:04,960 --> 00:16:07,759 if you're with us here watching on x on YouTube, 327 00:16:07,840 --> 00:16:10,600 especially on YouTube the wager Talk channel, subscribe to our 328 00:16:10,639 --> 00:16:14,360 ever going channel here two hundred and five thousand subscribers. 329 00:16:14,399 --> 00:16:16,840 I think close to that number two home six. Maybe 330 00:16:17,159 --> 00:16:19,559 hit the like button if you're watching this. We had 331 00:16:19,679 --> 00:16:23,440 one point five thousand viewers fifteen hundred of you guys 332 00:16:23,519 --> 00:16:26,759 last week, and the unfortunate part is that was our 333 00:16:26,799 --> 00:16:28,799 best one yet and it's probably my worst week of 334 00:16:28,840 --> 00:16:31,080 the season, So we're in bounce back mode. 335 00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:31,480 Speaker 1: For you guys. 336 00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:32,799 Speaker 2: We got to have a good week for you. But 337 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:35,600 hit the like button and comment what you are betting. 338 00:16:35,679 --> 00:16:39,320 Comment your thoughts so far on the season. Shout out 339 00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:42,240 to Kevin here with us right now, using both would 340 00:16:42,240 --> 00:16:46,559 be terrible dot dot, so it will probably happen. I 341 00:16:46,559 --> 00:16:49,840 know you like that one, Bobby. I wouldn't be shocked 342 00:16:49,840 --> 00:16:52,519 to see them use both quarterbacks. There any thoughts on 343 00:16:52,559 --> 00:16:55,039 that comment? And then why don't you dive right into 344 00:16:55,039 --> 00:16:56,240 Winnipeg in Toronto for us? 345 00:16:56,480 --> 00:16:58,360 Speaker 3: Well, I think they should use both. They should use 346 00:16:58,399 --> 00:17:00,840 them like a straveler, maybe a little more. But like 347 00:17:00,879 --> 00:17:03,080 there's some sort of thing in the CFL where coaches 348 00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:06,279 think having two quarterbacks is a good idea, And you 349 00:17:06,319 --> 00:17:09,079 saw Callum do that a few weeks ago. Trey Ford 350 00:17:09,119 --> 00:17:11,440 was actually playing decent and he was yanked for an 351 00:17:11,559 --> 00:17:14,359 entire series. You had believe I Mitchell lose his job. 352 00:17:16,359 --> 00:17:21,319 Believe I Mitchell lose his job? Was this the first time? Noe? Yeah, 353 00:17:21,319 --> 00:17:22,839 this was the first time he lost his job In 354 00:17:22,839 --> 00:17:26,000 the last two years. He ended up splitting with Matthew Schiltz. 355 00:17:26,079 --> 00:17:29,079 So it always ends in disaster. It's a terrible idea, 356 00:17:29,880 --> 00:17:33,759 but like these coaches just like to try anything and 357 00:17:33,920 --> 00:17:36,079 think they look smart, and they really look ridiculous. So 358 00:17:37,200 --> 00:17:39,160 tray Ford, there's a good use for him. He's a 359 00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:44,240 talented athlete. He shouldn't be the main starting quarterback, especially 360 00:17:44,279 --> 00:17:47,039 with Cody Fajardo on the bench. If he wasn't, then 361 00:17:47,039 --> 00:17:49,519 maybe just there's no there no reason not to go 362 00:17:49,559 --> 00:17:51,720 with trade Ford. But there's a great reason to go 363 00:17:51,799 --> 00:17:53,799 with trey Ford. You can save your season with Cody. 364 00:17:55,279 --> 00:17:55,640 Speaker 1: All right. 365 00:17:55,720 --> 00:17:58,720 Speaker 2: Well, we haven't talked totals yet, but a fifty to 366 00:17:58,720 --> 00:18:01,279 one game, fifty four in the fifty one in the next, 367 00:18:01,559 --> 00:18:05,440 and fifty five fifty one is a consensus total in 368 00:18:05,519 --> 00:18:08,640 the Winnipeg and Toronto game. As I mentioned, Toronto had 369 00:18:08,640 --> 00:18:11,200 that one game that flew over the total against Hamilton. 370 00:18:11,640 --> 00:18:13,759 Other than that, they've kind of struggled to put points 371 00:18:13,759 --> 00:18:16,519 on the board. So any game that's gone under for them, Bobby, 372 00:18:16,559 --> 00:18:18,880 has been because of them, not as much because. 373 00:18:18,680 --> 00:18:19,319 Speaker 1: Of their opponent. 374 00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:22,880 Speaker 2: If you liked Winnipeg laying three and a half against Calgary, 375 00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:24,400 well how do you like them laying three and a 376 00:18:24,440 --> 00:18:26,400 half against the Argos? 377 00:18:26,480 --> 00:18:27,160 Speaker 1: Is the big question. 378 00:18:27,200 --> 00:18:30,960 Speaker 2: Of course, this time they're on the road and it's 379 00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:34,519 almost like we're on Chad Kelly watch, because well, this guy, 380 00:18:34,640 --> 00:18:36,279 I correct me if I'm wrong here, Bobby, I believe 381 00:18:36,279 --> 00:18:39,119 he has two Great Cup rings. He's barely played in 382 00:18:39,119 --> 00:18:41,680 the Great Cup, he has barely played in the CFL, 383 00:18:41,759 --> 00:18:44,079 but yet he's got a pretty good resume as a 384 00:18:44,160 --> 00:18:48,240 Toronto Argonaut member. When will we see Chad Kelly? What's 385 00:18:48,279 --> 00:18:50,039 the Chad Kelly update right now? 386 00:18:51,200 --> 00:18:53,599 Speaker 3: Well, of course as Toronto, So the latest update comes 387 00:18:53,599 --> 00:18:56,079 from the national reporters because they're the only people that 388 00:18:56,279 --> 00:18:59,519 even care about the Argonauts. Dave Naylor said this was 389 00:18:59,519 --> 00:19:03,079 the week they'd be deciding on him, and then today 390 00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:06,160 far And said it's back to Nick Arbuckle taking all 391 00:19:06,160 --> 00:19:10,680 the reps. So I thought we'd be talking about Winnipeg's 392 00:19:10,759 --> 00:19:14,759 quarterback or no, I thought we'd be talking about about 393 00:19:14,759 --> 00:19:16,680 the Argonauts. I didn't think we'd be talking about Winnipeg's 394 00:19:16,759 --> 00:19:19,200 quarterback because I thought for sure it would be Chris Treveler. 395 00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:22,400 Zach Claros took a huge hit, didn't come back in 396 00:19:22,440 --> 00:19:24,599 the game, and I don't know if there's a reason 397 00:19:24,599 --> 00:19:29,839 to rush him back to face Toronto here, but it 398 00:19:29,880 --> 00:19:31,759 seems like he was taking the first team rep. So 399 00:19:31,759 --> 00:19:35,720 I gave out Toronto last night thinking given Nick Arbuckle, 400 00:19:35,960 --> 00:19:39,000 I like that number at three for the Argos, but 401 00:19:39,920 --> 00:19:42,119 I thought they'd be facing Chris Treveler. So now I'm 402 00:19:42,200 --> 00:19:45,200 kind of in a sticky situation. I'm probably gonna maneuver 403 00:19:45,279 --> 00:19:46,799 my way out of it and take a little bit 404 00:19:46,839 --> 00:19:50,279 of a loss because if it's Klaros, this number should 405 00:19:50,319 --> 00:19:53,960 be closer to a touchdown, so especially if it's against 406 00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:58,400 Nick Garbuckle. So I got it just doesn't make sense 407 00:19:58,440 --> 00:20:00,680 to me. They've been so careful with them every time 408 00:20:00,720 --> 00:20:04,319 he's been injured. Chris Streveler somebody that Mike o'she isoks 409 00:20:04,359 --> 00:20:08,160 incredibly loyal to, so it was very surprising to see that. 410 00:20:08,599 --> 00:20:12,039 And then this Chad Kelly thing is is just getting 411 00:20:12,319 --> 00:20:15,200 kind of weird. Now. You thought he'd be out for 412 00:20:15,240 --> 00:20:19,200 six games coming back after a bye. He's not. He's 413 00:20:19,200 --> 00:20:22,799 in Buffalo now he's I don't know, the guy broke 414 00:20:22,880 --> 00:20:26,200 his leg right, so maybe we shouldn't be so surprised. 415 00:20:26,279 --> 00:20:30,119 But they I don't know if it's time to panic 416 00:20:30,200 --> 00:20:33,000 yet for the Argonauts because they have a team called 417 00:20:33,000 --> 00:20:35,319 Ottawa of red blocks in their division and they can 418 00:20:35,519 --> 00:20:37,799 back door their way into any playoff spot they want. 419 00:20:37,920 --> 00:20:43,279 But yeah, definitely interesting. I like Toronto thinking it was Traveler, 420 00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:48,400 but if it's Kolaros, I think this number is gonna 421 00:20:48,480 --> 00:20:50,720 jump up. I think this was a streveler line they 422 00:20:50,799 --> 00:20:53,640 opened with, and it'll jump up closer to a touchdown. 423 00:20:55,400 --> 00:20:57,319 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean that's the thing. Like you mentioned, they've 424 00:20:57,319 --> 00:20:59,200 been so safe with him. But I guess maybe they've 425 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:01,720 been safe with him throughout the years because they've been dominant. 426 00:21:01,839 --> 00:21:05,160 Maybe they're like, man, we need this guy, we need 427 00:21:05,240 --> 00:21:07,079 him here to uh to get the wins. 428 00:21:07,079 --> 00:21:07,680 Speaker 1: So we'll see. 429 00:21:07,839 --> 00:21:09,880 Speaker 2: Let's see what Kevin has for us here with this one. 430 00:21:09,920 --> 00:21:11,839 Are we thinking this line is a setup for a 431 00:21:11,880 --> 00:21:15,279 move back below three later this week? Toronto should have 432 00:21:15,319 --> 00:21:18,079 one as ten point road dogs last week. Winnipeg has 433 00:21:18,119 --> 00:21:21,519 looked sort of average lately. Edmonton held them close till 434 00:21:21,519 --> 00:21:25,839 the fourth quarter and they got blasted twice by Calgary. 435 00:21:26,400 --> 00:21:29,480 Are we thinking this line has set up moved back below. 436 00:21:29,240 --> 00:21:30,640 Speaker 1: Three later this week? 437 00:21:31,599 --> 00:21:33,480 Speaker 2: I think it's interesting, Bobbly, because when you look at 438 00:21:33,480 --> 00:21:37,839 this number right now, you know which which Toronto team 439 00:21:37,880 --> 00:21:39,519 are you gonna get. I mean, this is the thing. 440 00:21:39,599 --> 00:21:41,279 I feel like they've played kind of a mixed bag 441 00:21:41,319 --> 00:21:46,039 of teams. Like they played the Alouettes twice, they've played 442 00:21:46,039 --> 00:21:50,440 the Stamps, they played the Riders. So like, if we're 443 00:21:50,480 --> 00:21:53,160 being honest, the only two shit teams the Argos have 444 00:21:53,319 --> 00:21:57,400 played are the Red Blacks and the tie Cats. And 445 00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:00,240 the Tiecats don't even look that shitty right now. Yeah, 446 00:22:00,240 --> 00:22:02,000 it's a nine man league, but I feel like this 447 00:22:02,319 --> 00:22:05,359 Argo's team maybe doesn't look as shitty as they've looked, 448 00:22:05,440 --> 00:22:07,319 you know what I mean, Like if you take away 449 00:22:07,359 --> 00:22:10,000 the fifty one to thirty eight game, Like even look 450 00:22:10,000 --> 00:22:12,480 at the Riders game, it was thirty nine thirty two. 451 00:22:14,440 --> 00:22:15,400 Speaker 1: You know, their their. 452 00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:19,279 Speaker 2: Loss against the against the Stamps is twenty nine to nineteen. 453 00:22:19,599 --> 00:22:22,279 Speaker 1: Obviously, the the. 454 00:22:21,599 --> 00:22:26,079 Speaker 2: Alouettes and Argos game just you know, twenty six twenty five. 455 00:22:26,160 --> 00:22:27,079 Speaker 1: People were shocked. 456 00:22:27,079 --> 00:22:30,119 Speaker 2: I mean, Montreal outscored them twelve nothing in the fourth quarter. 457 00:22:31,160 --> 00:22:32,279 But at the end of the day, that's kind of 458 00:22:32,279 --> 00:22:33,799 one of those ones where it's like, do you look 459 00:22:33,839 --> 00:22:35,559 at it as a good game for Toronto or do 460 00:22:35,599 --> 00:22:37,319 you look at it as something that they like get 461 00:22:37,319 --> 00:22:39,279 away from them? What do you think about that? Comment 462 00:22:39,319 --> 00:22:40,319 there from Kevin. 463 00:22:40,680 --> 00:22:43,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think, well, Toronto was running away with that game. 464 00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:45,720 I thought we had a rocking chair five to one 465 00:22:46,039 --> 00:22:49,720 underdog paying out last weekend. Then I checked the score 466 00:22:49,759 --> 00:22:52,599 and Montreal's come back and won the game down twenty 467 00:22:52,599 --> 00:22:54,640 five to seven in the end of the third. So 468 00:22:55,640 --> 00:22:59,839 like this, the defense is definitely playing better. It just 469 00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:02,759 depends if Nick Garbuckle is going to be the game 470 00:23:02,839 --> 00:23:07,200 manager or its cliche, but he doesn't seem to be 471 00:23:07,240 --> 00:23:11,559 as volatile as he was in previous seasons. So there's 472 00:23:11,599 --> 00:23:16,880 a lot to like about Toronto. Still, Like I don't know, 473 00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:19,559 like you got your kind of hoping if you got Klaraos, 474 00:23:19,599 --> 00:23:22,359 you got a Bombers team that's upset, and the Bombers 475 00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:24,480 team when they're upset, they tend to play pretty well. 476 00:23:24,799 --> 00:23:27,920 So I don't I don't know if it's it's definitely 477 00:23:27,960 --> 00:23:30,279 not going to come back, if Kolaros is going to 478 00:23:30,319 --> 00:23:32,000 continue taking the reps. 479 00:23:32,319 --> 00:23:33,079 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that. 480 00:23:33,480 --> 00:23:36,279 Speaker 2: I think that Winnipeg can get to twenty eight, is 481 00:23:36,279 --> 00:23:38,319 what I'm going to say here. I think Toronto's defense 482 00:23:38,359 --> 00:23:41,519 has look okay, but I also think this game could 483 00:23:41,559 --> 00:23:43,240 have some points for it for both teams. 484 00:23:43,480 --> 00:23:46,599 Speaker 1: I'm going to focus it on Winnipeg. Calgary looked good. 485 00:23:46,680 --> 00:23:48,960 Speaker 2: Calgary brought it every possession, But I think Winnipeg will 486 00:23:49,000 --> 00:23:52,039 have some swag coming into this one, playing a bit 487 00:23:52,079 --> 00:23:54,759 of a bit of a different style opponent. We'll see 488 00:23:54,759 --> 00:23:56,480 what they're running here in this game, but I feel 489 00:23:56,519 --> 00:23:58,279 like they can mark the field put some points up. 490 00:23:58,920 --> 00:24:01,599 Over twenty seven and half minus one oh eight is 491 00:24:01,599 --> 00:24:04,119 the bet at fan duels, So that's what we'll rock 492 00:24:04,160 --> 00:24:04,759 with so far. 493 00:24:05,079 --> 00:24:06,039 Speaker 1: We'll see what happens. 494 00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:09,079 Speaker 2: The fact that the Argos lost that game, I don't 495 00:24:09,079 --> 00:24:11,000 think they can get confidence from it. I feel like 496 00:24:11,079 --> 00:24:12,880 if they won the game, I mean, that's just like 497 00:24:12,960 --> 00:24:15,839 who cares about the cover teams and the CFL aren't 498 00:24:15,839 --> 00:24:17,200 caring about covering point spreads. 499 00:24:17,839 --> 00:24:20,119 Speaker 1: We care about it. But they lost the game. 500 00:24:20,200 --> 00:24:22,200 Speaker 2: You know, they proved that their defense did not help 501 00:24:22,240 --> 00:24:24,920 them out in the fourth quarter. And you know, if anything, 502 00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:26,839 that gives me confidence for a team total. 503 00:24:27,160 --> 00:24:28,480 Speaker 1: Right, if we're gonna bet team. 504 00:24:28,279 --> 00:24:31,400 Speaker 2: Totals, what are the Argos proved to us that, Hey, 505 00:24:32,079 --> 00:24:34,319 maybe they're gonna cover some point spreads, but maybe they're 506 00:24:34,359 --> 00:24:36,440 gonna still give up points late in the game. So 507 00:24:36,640 --> 00:24:38,759 all right, last one here, This is the one I 508 00:24:38,799 --> 00:24:43,000 probably have the least on here. Your thoughts, Bobby on 509 00:24:43,160 --> 00:24:47,680 the last game and concerning your BC Lions minus three 510 00:24:47,839 --> 00:24:51,480 consensus number against the hamblon tired Cats. They're playing at 511 00:24:51,480 --> 00:24:54,880 home here, This BC team. 512 00:24:54,000 --> 00:24:56,400 Speaker 3: Yeah, BC, like they were never in that game against 513 00:24:56,400 --> 00:24:59,680 Saskatchewan and it was clear they they shouldn't have been 514 00:24:59,680 --> 00:25:02,400 favored in that game. I think they went were three 515 00:25:02,440 --> 00:25:04,599 point well I got them. I got the Riders at three, 516 00:25:04,759 --> 00:25:07,640 So they were favored because they look at it good 517 00:25:07,640 --> 00:25:12,680 against Edmonton and then Hamilton had that same opportunity against Ottawa. 518 00:25:12,799 --> 00:25:14,920 Right like you play the Red Blacks, you get the 519 00:25:14,920 --> 00:25:17,200 show vote a bit. All Hamilton did was put up 520 00:25:17,200 --> 00:25:19,720 twenty points and getting the ball spotted at their own 521 00:25:19,799 --> 00:25:22,680 forty a bunch of times from these stupid field goals. Right, 522 00:25:22,759 --> 00:25:26,279 So Hamilton had their chance to play well, like they 523 00:25:26,279 --> 00:25:31,279 almost lost the crumb. So I think this line is 524 00:25:31,279 --> 00:25:33,200 pretty much where it's at. If it goes any higher, 525 00:25:33,200 --> 00:25:36,599 maybe I'll grab the tight Cats. But no action for 526 00:25:36,680 --> 00:25:39,079 me here. I think BC should be a short favorite, 527 00:25:39,359 --> 00:25:41,119 especially at home. It's a long trip for all these 528 00:25:41,160 --> 00:25:43,440 Eastern teams to come out and they usually don't play 529 00:25:43,519 --> 00:25:43,920 very well. 530 00:25:44,599 --> 00:25:46,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, We mentioned last week that it was three straight 531 00:25:46,960 --> 00:25:49,559 road games for BC and then the last one was 532 00:25:49,559 --> 00:25:51,839 their first game back at home, kind of an angle 533 00:25:51,880 --> 00:25:54,279 I usually fade in the NHL. Didn't really think about 534 00:25:54,319 --> 00:25:57,160 it last week. Got lucky as hell. I mean, as 535 00:25:57,200 --> 00:25:58,440 much as it was a bad week for me, you 536 00:25:58,440 --> 00:26:00,279 could have been a disaster, I got lucky at that 537 00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:03,720 backdoor team total, Bobby. So I can't really be bitching 538 00:26:03,759 --> 00:26:05,680 too much because that was like the best win I'm 539 00:26:05,680 --> 00:26:07,079 gonna have all year. Uh. 540 00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:09,319 Speaker 1: And it's kind of funny. It's it reminds you of golf. 541 00:26:09,359 --> 00:26:11,759 Speaker 2: It's like you usually hit your best putt on the 542 00:26:11,839 --> 00:26:14,559 day when you're putting for like double bode, and you 543 00:26:14,599 --> 00:26:16,680 can't hit that way. That's kind of how I felt 544 00:26:16,720 --> 00:26:18,960 with that win. It was like the day after I 545 00:26:19,000 --> 00:26:21,680 lose the five percenter, I end up, you know, getting 546 00:26:21,680 --> 00:26:23,720 this back door three percent team total. 547 00:26:23,799 --> 00:26:24,640 Speaker 1: So I'll take it. 548 00:26:25,759 --> 00:26:27,960 Speaker 2: But yeah, you know, they lose that one last week 549 00:26:28,000 --> 00:26:30,519 and maybe they'll bounce back this week. And you know, 550 00:26:30,599 --> 00:26:34,119 Hamilton's looked great. They've looked great. They're putting points on 551 00:26:34,119 --> 00:26:38,799 the board. Back to back wins against Ottawa. Sometimes we 552 00:26:38,880 --> 00:26:40,839 say that when a team plays against the bad team 553 00:26:40,839 --> 00:26:43,960 and looks fantastic. Let's not really, you know, write too 554 00:26:44,079 --> 00:26:46,640 much into that, although they have beat some good teams 555 00:26:46,640 --> 00:26:50,720 as well. Maybe after two good performances against Ottawa, Hamilton 556 00:26:50,799 --> 00:26:52,559 goes ahead and puts up a stinker on the road 557 00:26:52,559 --> 00:26:53,000 in BC. 558 00:26:53,200 --> 00:26:54,279 Speaker 1: So we'll see what happens. 559 00:26:54,720 --> 00:26:57,799 Speaker 2: Uh, guys, makes you fallo Bobby at Mississuri, Jack myself 560 00:26:57,839 --> 00:27:00,079 at McGuinness picks before you get out of here he 561 00:27:00,200 --> 00:27:02,480 do as a favor, smash that like button like. The 562 00:27:02,519 --> 00:27:06,079 Elks usually get smashed every week. Hopefully not this week though, 563 00:27:06,119 --> 00:27:08,000 because we're probably gonna be on them plus nine and 564 00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:10,400 a half. Have a good week, guys, best of luck, 565 00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:11,680 and we'll both see you next time. 566 00:27:11,720 --> 00:27:13,359 Speaker 1: Right here on the betting blueprint