Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. At the clock
Speaker 1: strikes thirteen, It's Thursday, the eighth of January. Here are Lord,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty six. Well, today we're going to talk about
Speaker 1: a killing in Minneapolis, a seizure of a Russian flagged tanker,
Speaker 1: more rhetoric about greenland and forest, and a coming Arctic war.
Speaker 1: And we're gonna show what these things really have in common,
Speaker 1: because all wars are banker wars, and so the debt
Speaker 1: trap the reason behind it. As Trump brings both of
Speaker 1: these things together, saying we need to increase the defense
Speaker 1: budget from the all time high of a trillion dollars,
Speaker 1: let's add another fifty percent. Let's take it there, one
Speaker 1: and a half trillion. Well why stop there? Who cares
Speaker 1: about the debt? Right? Well, you better care about the debt.
Speaker 1: That's what's really going to blow things up. We'll be
Speaker 1: right back. And of course, as we look at the
Speaker 1: warmongering and saber rattling that is happening around the world
Speaker 1: in every country, there's a reason for that, and you
Speaker 1: better understand what's behind that so you don't get caught
Speaker 1: up in this tribalism. A good example of that is
Speaker 1: what happened in Minneapolis yesterday, and I think it is
Speaker 1: a clear case of people not being able to see
Speaker 1: this because of tribalism, as a woman was fatally shot
Speaker 1: as part of a standoff or protest or whatever. I've
Speaker 1: got the video here of the actual killing, and you
Speaker 1: can see here that there were cars there. She's waving
Speaker 1: that car to go through, but that's a n ie
Speaker 1: car that's there. The people get out, They walk up
Speaker 1: to her and say get out of the car. She
Speaker 1: backs up. There's a guy who runs in front of her.
Speaker 1: She turns a wheel and the guy shoots at her.
Speaker 1: Several shots hit her in the head. She goes the
Speaker 1: short ways and the car crashes. She's already dad. The
Speaker 1: car crashes into another car, and that has set off
Speaker 1: a wave of protests and comments about this on both
Speaker 1: sides of the issue. And I'm going to show you
Speaker 1: this from several different angles and see if you can
Speaker 1: see what's really going on with this. It is and
Speaker 1: I laugh because of the blindness that partisanship brings to people,
Speaker 1: even when we look at something like this. And so
Speaker 1: here's a slow motion of the video. Okay, so here's
Speaker 1: the guys. Then you get out of the car, and
Speaker 1: I want you to hear the gunshots and so much.
Speaker 1: Now the guy pulls out his gun. Notice that her
Speaker 1: wheel is turned to the right to avoid him. But
Speaker 1: he pushes himself onto the car, the bump of the car.
Speaker 1: He's not injured. He wasn't run over, as Trump says,
Speaker 1: as Christy Nooam says, I'm gona play that for you again,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to stop talking so that you can
Speaker 1: hear when the gun shots are fired, and you can
Speaker 1: pay attention to the position of the car. First of all,
Speaker 1: notice the wheel has turned to the right. Now listen,
Speaker 1: look at that. Is he in front of the car
Speaker 1: at that point? Is he in danger? The second shot?
Speaker 1: Is he in danger? Or is this person beside him
Speaker 1: and going past him as he's shooting at them? Is
Speaker 1: that a justified use? Of course, this is not defensive, folks.
Speaker 1: He just take a look at that video and you
Speaker 1: can see that the wheel was turned and he was
Speaker 1: shooting those firing those shots when he was on the
Speaker 1: side of the car, not in front of the car.
Speaker 1: And again she probably panicked. This is you know, this
Speaker 1: woman who was in there. We've seen that type of
Speaker 1: thing happen once before. Those women who panicked in Washington,
Speaker 1: DC went into some barriers and they shot her killed
Speaker 1: her there. But anyway, this is again the still pictures.
Speaker 1: There's where he's shooting at her. See that is he
Speaker 1: in danger or is this just hyped up murder? That's
Speaker 1: what I would say if I were on the jury,
Speaker 1: I would convict that guy of murder. And of course
Speaker 1: Christine Oum and Donald Trump don't have any convictions, and
Speaker 1: we're talking about the principal kinds and of course he's
Speaker 1: not going to get any of them. But again, these
Speaker 1: are the places where he's shooting, and he is beside
Speaker 1: the car, and this is just before it all happened. Okay, Now,
Speaker 1: notice that there's shot three times. The first shot is
Speaker 1: from a position that he would be shooting in from
Speaker 1: he would not hit her. If you see where that
Speaker 1: bullet hole is, it's very close to the a pillar
Speaker 1: just to the left of it. The angle for him
Speaker 1: to be able to hit her in the head would
Speaker 1: be different. If he was in front of the car.
Speaker 1: He couldn't hit her in the head from that angle
Speaker 1: unless he was shooting from the side and where are
Speaker 1: the other shots, Well, you don't see them because he
Speaker 1: shot those through the side window. This is what the
Speaker 1: people who are cheering murder on social media don't want
Speaker 1: you to think about. And you better think about it.
Speaker 1: You know, these magabots and these disinformation agents that cheer
Speaker 1: whatever Trump does or whatever he cheers, they cheer it.
Speaker 1: They can't and won't think for themselves. And you better
Speaker 1: think about how our government. This is an indication, folks,
Speaker 1: of the character of the Trump administration, and it's and
Speaker 1: it's an indication of law enforcement and its attitude, and
Speaker 1: how it thinks that it can't do anything wrong, and
Speaker 1: how they will lie whenever they do something wrong. So
Speaker 1: they've turned this into for the most part, they've turned
Speaker 1: this into a partisan fight. I look at the headlines
Speaker 1: of then for wards. For example, radical leftist mayor loses
Speaker 1: it because this woman was put down. That's the way
Speaker 1: they put it. She was put down, Yeah, reducing her
Speaker 1: to an animal. Isn't that the way we always do?
Speaker 1: We always say, well, you know, it's okay to kill
Speaker 1: somebody because they're subhuman. It's okay to kill a baby
Speaker 1: and call it an abortion because they're not a person.
Speaker 1: It's okay to enslave somebody, it's okay to shoot a protester.
Speaker 1: And this is the kind of stuff that this just
Speaker 1: happened to the Conservatives January sixth. You want to have
Speaker 1: a memorial to Ashley Babbitt, who I think did not
Speaker 1: deserve to be shot. Absolutely that was murder. Go ahead
Speaker 1: and remember that, and then at the same time cheer
Speaker 1: this action because now it's Trump who's in charge of
Speaker 1: the police. That's the only thing that's changed. It's still
Speaker 1: excessive use of force, stupid reckless use of force. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, there's a lot of police departments
Speaker 1: that train officers do not shoot into a moving car.
Speaker 1: First of all, you're not usually going to be able
Speaker 1: to hit the person. Of course, in this case the
Speaker 1: car was not traveling very fast. But usually you're not
Speaker 1: going to hit what you're shooting at, but you'll probably
Speaker 1: hit somebody else. The bolt will go through the car
Speaker 1: hurt somebody else. So this is a stupid, reckless, excessive
Speaker 1: use of force. And then you have Trump's statement. A
Speaker 1: look at what he had to say. I've just viewed
Speaker 1: the clip of the event, which took place in Minneapolis.
Speaker 1: It's a horrible thing to watch. The woman screaming was
Speaker 1: obviously a professional agitator. The woman driving the car was
Speaker 1: very disorderly obstructing and resisting, who then violently, wilfully, viciously
Speaker 1: ran over the obstruction, over the ice officer who seems
Speaker 1: to have shot her in self defense. Every bit of
Speaker 1: that is a lie. I am so disgusted with this guy.
Speaker 1: It's just unbelievable. You just saw that. None of that
Speaker 1: is true, none of it. Let me pull this back
Speaker 1: up here again. Then he goes on to say, based
Speaker 1: on the attached clip, it's hard to believe that he's
Speaker 1: still alive. But he's now recovering in the hospital. They
Speaker 1: highlighted that in yellow because that's the most obvious lie.
Speaker 1: They've got a picture there above it. It's now recovering
Speaker 1: in the hospital. The guy walked away without a lamp
Speaker 1: or anything. He wasn't knocked back. He was leaning over
Speaker 1: the corner of the car as it was turning away
Speaker 1: from him, shooting her from the side. Shooting her from
Speaker 1: the side. This is the As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: he goes on to say, the situation is being studied
Speaker 1: in its entirety, but the reason these incidents are happening
Speaker 1: is because the radical left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting
Speaker 1: our law enforcement office and ICE agents. I got to
Speaker 1: say on this issue, I've read the statements of Trump.
Speaker 1: I'll just write that to you. I'll let you hear
Speaker 1: of what Christinaum said, and I've read the statements of
Speaker 1: Tim Waltz and of the radical left mayor there in Minneapolis.
Speaker 1: Let me say, just because we don't agree with him
Speaker 1: on anything politically, doesn't mean that we have to support
Speaker 1: the provocations, the excessive use of force, and the murder
Speaker 1: of people by the police. I do not, and so
Speaker 1: on this issue, and this issue alone, I agree with
Speaker 1: the statements of Tim Waltz and of the leftist mayor
Speaker 1: in Minneapolis, not with Trump, not with Nome. They are
Speaker 1: accessories to murder. They are pushing this type of confrontation.
Speaker 1: As I said before, you've got a lot of people
Speaker 1: who have come into this country illegally. If you want
Speaker 1: to deport them, there are ways to do it that
Speaker 1: are non confrontational for the most part, and you could
Speaker 1: go to places where the government is going to be
Speaker 1: friendly to you. Instead, they have chosen chosen confrontation. They
Speaker 1: go to the places where they know, people don't want
Speaker 1: them there and they get in their faces. And so
Speaker 1: Christinom and.
Speaker 2: Also being told that the woman who was shot has
Speaker 2: a six year old child, should end her husband has
Speaker 2: already passed away.
Speaker 1: Yeah, her husband died in twenty twenty three. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: so there's a six year old child and that's it. Now,
Speaker 1: there was a woman there who was saying I'm her
Speaker 1: wife and identified herself that way to the press. So,
Speaker 1: I don't know what situation is. Does it justify it
Speaker 1: if she's a lesbian. No, because she's not your tribe.
Speaker 1: Because she does things that you don't approve of in
Speaker 1: her personal life, she should be killed by the police.
Speaker 1: Do you realize that you're putting a marker on yourself
Speaker 1: when the Democrats get control?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, this guy was a straight white male. He deserves
Speaker 1: to die, right, and so do not jump into that
Speaker 1: kind of foolishness. It is self destructive behavior. But yes,
Speaker 1: a six year old child now as an orphan. And
Speaker 1: so here's what Christy Noom had to say, some of
Speaker 1: her lines.
Speaker 4: It was an active domestic terrorism. What happened was our
Speaker 4: ice officers were out in an enforcement action. They got
Speaker 4: stuck in the snow because of the adverse weather that
Speaker 4: is in Minneapolis. They were attempting to push out their
Speaker 4: vehicle and a woman attacked them and they were surrounding
Speaker 4: them and attempted to run them over and ram them
Speaker 4: with her vehicle.
Speaker 1: That has to do with what you see happening there.
Speaker 4: And defensively shot to protect himself and the people around him.
Speaker 4: And my understanding is they're not stuck in the snow
Speaker 4: and is deceased or continue to gather more information. But
Speaker 4: this goes to show the assaults that are ice officers
Speaker 4: in our law enforcement are under every single day.
Speaker 1: Everybody of that is a lie. They were stuck in
Speaker 1: this note. No, they weren't stuck in this note. It
Speaker 1: was in self defense. No, it wasn't stuck in They weren't.
Speaker 1: It wasn't in self defense. Every bit of that was
Speaker 1: a lie. They just lie to your face. It's amazing.
Speaker 1: They're worse than Hillary Clinton, and I mean Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: and Bill Clinton. Everything they said pretty much was a lie.
Speaker 1: But these people, it's fantastasized throughout the entire Trump administration
Speaker 1: to people like Christino, people like cash Betel, Dan Bongino,
Speaker 1: Tultsi Gabbard, do you name it, all of them liars, murderers, thieves, pirates,
Speaker 1: everything they do, it's amazing. Well, here is the murderer
Speaker 1: walking away. This is the guy that was run over.
Speaker 1: According to Trump, he's in the hospital.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: Hopefully he'll recover, says Trump. Yeah, hopefully you'll pay the
Speaker 1: price for these kinds of murders and these kinds of lies.
Speaker 1: That's the guy right there, as a matter of fact.
Speaker 1: And here's a close up of him. Look at that face,
Speaker 1: no remorse whatsoever. It looks like he's enjoying it. He's
Speaker 1: a tough guy, isn't he. Yeah, you got a gun
Speaker 1: and you can shoot a woman point blank from the
Speaker 1: side of the car. Big boy, big boy, big man.
Speaker 1: Aren't you pathetic? Pathetic coward? And then this also happened.
Speaker 3: I go check up, whoa back? Now, I'm a position.
Speaker 1: I understand.
Speaker 5: We gotting the best coming, I get it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So I don't care. So they just let her there,
Speaker 1: let her shoes already dead, but they don't know that,
Speaker 1: and they don't care. Just let her, let her bleed
Speaker 1: out there. Yeah, I don't care.
Speaker 2: I'm surprised Christinome didn't start something with Well, normally I
Speaker 2: would prefer if it was a dog that they shot.
Speaker 2: You know, I'm okay with most forms of violence and death.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, treat her like a dog. That was
Speaker 1: the headline basically from Info Wars. Put it down just
Speaker 1: like a dog, right, put the woman down like a
Speaker 1: dog Info Wars. And I tell you take that off
Speaker 1: of my resume, please, that I was ever at that place.
Speaker 1: Disgust me. And then you see the people will get
Speaker 1: justifiably angry at ice and then look at which side
Speaker 1: the violence is on. Yeah. This guy goes over, pushes him,
Speaker 1: shoots him in the face with a pepper spray or
Speaker 1: while whatever it is. It looks to me like it's
Speaker 1: let me play that for you again. It looks to
Speaker 1: me like that violence is initiated as usual by the police.
Speaker 1: Walks over to him and shoves him, then shoots him
Speaker 1: in the face. The guy walks away. Yeah, this is
Speaker 1: our masters, This is slave Landia. How do you like
Speaker 1: being a slave. The overseers on the plantation are wearing masks.
Speaker 1: Disgust me. Here's another one. Okay, guy just walks around
Speaker 1: the protesters standing there exercising their constitutional right to peacefully
Speaker 1: redress their a grievances. They got a grievance. The police
Speaker 1: just murdered an ice cold murder somebody, and so they're
Speaker 1: there to redress their agreements. So these cops just go
Speaker 1: around shoot it, spring people in the face. Remember when
Speaker 1: that happened at Berkeley a few years ago. It became
Speaker 1: a meme for a while. He had some protesters and
Speaker 1: I don't even know what they're protesting, but they have
Speaker 1: a right to have their free speech and to have
Speaker 1: their protests peacefully. They're sitting on the ground protesting, and
Speaker 1: this fat cop goes up and just sprays all of
Speaker 1: them in the face, walking back and forth, springing in
Speaker 1: the face. That's the kind of arrogance that is on
Speaker 1: display here. Let me get some of your comments. Flump
Speaker 1: seventy six. Thank you for the tip. It says your
Speaker 1: voice of reason. Well, I don't see any reason in
Speaker 1: this world. Yeah yeah, read those.
Speaker 2: He says, you're a voice of reason an increasingly unreasonable world.
Speaker 2: In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
Speaker 2: revolutionary act. Be careful, my friend, honor seeker says, totally unjustified.
Speaker 3: Yet if we shoot.
Speaker 2: Someone that is in our home or on our property
Speaker 2: and we are one inch off, we get convicted.
Speaker 1: That's right, you're not allowed to I've used this case
Speaker 1: many times. It doesn't matter if you are a homeowner
Speaker 1: or somebody with a uniform with there's a police uniform
Speaker 1: or a military uniform. You don't get to shoot people
Speaker 1: on the back. You don't get to kill people when
Speaker 1: they're no longer a threat. That's the issue with circling
Speaker 1: back and killing those people that were shipwrecked. That's the
Speaker 1: issue with shooting the boat in the first place, because
Speaker 1: when it saw the US military coming in, it turned around.
Speaker 1: It was not a threat to them, it wasn't attacking them.
Speaker 1: You don't get to kill people who are running away
Speaker 1: from you. And this goes goes back to Austin and Sagari.
Speaker 1: Jackson got into a lot of big fight with Alex
Speaker 1: over this because he confronted Acevedo, the police chief there.
Speaker 1: Because you had a police officer who killed a man
Speaker 1: who was running what chased them down and killed him
Speaker 1: under a bridge. It's like, how is that justified? It's not,
Speaker 1: and it's not justified Alex to defend that because you've
Speaker 1: got political aspirations, because you want people in power to
Speaker 1: like you. It's pathetic. You're pathetic, your big slob, Guard Goldsmith.
Speaker 1: Go ahead, Travis read right.
Speaker 2: Guard Goldsmith. Of course you find him at Liberty Conspiracy
Speaker 2: Monday through Friday at six pm on Rumble and Twitter,
Speaker 2: says the centralization of immigration policing, contrary to the very
Speaker 2: words of the Constitution, is like the centralization of all
Speaker 2: policing trending to arbitrary cruelty and increasing violence.
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what they want. That's exactly what they want.
Speaker 1: And let me tell you, I've said it before and
Speaker 1: I'll say it again. I think where this is leading.
Speaker 1: This is You've got you got Stephen Millener. These people
Speaker 1: who are pushing for these kinds of confrontational policies, they're
Speaker 1: living on military basis. Now, most of the upper echelon
Speaker 1: of the Trump administration, how living on military basis. I
Speaker 1: think they want civil war. I think that they will
Speaker 1: use a false flag attack or a real attack from
Speaker 1: the drug cartels that they're going to go to war with.
Speaker 1: And I think that that's what's going to be the
Speaker 1: tipping point and everybody and be oh, yeah, it's those
Speaker 1: foreign drug cartels. That's good. Again. They're preparing all of
Speaker 1: that right now putting out ice. So you've got to
Speaker 1: get these foreign invaders out of our country. And look,
Speaker 1: I don't think they should be here, but there's ways
Speaker 1: to get them out, especially just end all of the
Speaker 1: welfare payments to them. And the people that would be
Speaker 1: left that didn't self deport would be the people who
Speaker 1: are working hard. Frankly, I don't really have a problem
Speaker 1: with that. They shouldn't be able to vote, but I
Speaker 1: don't have a problem with people who are working hard.
Speaker 1: But again, it's a misdemeanor. If you want to get
Speaker 1: people out, treat it as a demeanor rather than some
Speaker 1: kind of a felony and sending them to a prison
Speaker 1: that's been built for terrorists in El Salvador. But if
Speaker 1: they directly, militarily start to attack these cartels, as Tom
Speaker 1: Clancy and others CIA writers wanted you to see and
Speaker 1: wanted you to support, if they start doing that, I
Speaker 1: could see the drug cartel's doing the same things in
Speaker 1: America that they've done in Mexico and other countries. And
Speaker 1: if they don't do it, I can see our government
Speaker 1: doing it and saying that they did it as they
Speaker 1: false by go ahead, Travis.
Speaker 2: Yeah, briefly, just want to touch on what the previous
Speaker 2: comment said about how you know if you have a
Speaker 2: self defense situation, they're going to try to nail you
Speaker 2: to the wall for it. When I took a concealed
Speaker 2: carry course. That's one thing they stressed is if you're
Speaker 2: involved in a shooting, no matter how justified it was,
Speaker 2: you have a problem.
Speaker 1: Unless you're a cop.
Speaker 2: When the cops show up, they're going to try to
Speaker 2: make this an issue for you. You don't talk to them.
Speaker 2: The only thing you say is I was in fear
Speaker 2: for my life. You don't say anything else. You get
Speaker 2: a lawyer because you have a serious issue.
Speaker 1: And if you're a cop, you're okay. You can kill
Speaker 1: whoever you wish.
Speaker 2: You can pull your gun on anyone. Radis Bros. This
Speaker 2: is a perfect distraction from all the tax fraud and
Speaker 2: how we're getting stolen from on a level never before seen.
Speaker 1: That's right, because now you've got you had Tim Waltz
Speaker 1: on the ropes right now, he's on the side of justice.
Speaker 1: Good job Trump, good job. No, it's just amazing to me.
Speaker 2: Talking about sorry, but talking about the Somali fraud that's
Speaker 2: going on. I've seen some videos people have gone in
Speaker 2: and looked at the websites for some of these daycares.
Speaker 2: They are almost all entirely stolen or AI generated from
Speaker 2: other websites. They're just literally copy pasted, lifted the exact
Speaker 2: wording talking about how they've got a about raising children
Speaker 2: with the exact same name as a podcast from a
Speaker 2: real daycare with real professionals.
Speaker 1: This massive fraud. Tim Waltz never did anything about it.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, he may be part of it.
Speaker 1: Same thing with lhan Omar, same thing the Minneapolis mayor
Speaker 1: Jacob Fry. And yet these people are saying, listen to
Speaker 1: what they have to say. They scoffed at what Trump
Speaker 1: and Christie Omer saying. Obviously a lie. Right, you can
Speaker 1: see they're not stuck in the snow, as she said,
Speaker 1: the car was not running at them, he was beside
Speaker 1: the car. He was not injured, he was not run over,
Speaker 1: he was not in the hospital. Everything that they did
Speaker 1: was a fabrication and lie. How is this any different
Speaker 1: from Hillary Clinton's Benghazi stuff? Right? And so the mayor
Speaker 1: calls the DHS claims bs and garbage narrative, and he's
Speaker 1: absolutely right. The shooting came during an increased tension over
Speaker 1: the surge of more than two thousand ice DHS another
Speaker 1: federal police into Minneapolis, and Saint Paul again, we should
Speaker 1: have the conservatives, We should have John Burs Society out
Speaker 1: there saying get the militarized, federalized police out of here.
Speaker 1: We don't want that. This is such a big part
Speaker 1: of what I was doing when I went to Info
Speaker 1: Wars to push back against the federalization of the police.
Speaker 1: Oh well, yeah, we don't want that because it's Obama.
Speaker 1: Guess what, you let that happen with Trump and then
Speaker 1: it'll be controlled by an Obama at some point in
Speaker 1: the future. So Tim Waltz blasted DHS for saying they
Speaker 1: knew the motives of the dead woman without doing an investigation. Well,
Speaker 1: of course, this is the same kind. They know the
Speaker 1: motivations and they know that there's fentanel on those boats
Speaker 1: that they blow them up with. You let the government lie,
Speaker 1: you let the government kill people, and you don't push
Speaker 1: back against it. They use that, they use that. The
Speaker 1: governor said he had issued a so called warning order
Speaker 1: to state officials to prepare to deploy Minnesota National Guard troops.
Speaker 1: We have someone dead, and their care for no reason whatsoever,
Speaker 1: he said. And we've been warning for weeks that Trump
Speaker 1: administration's dangerous and sationalized operations are a threat to our
Speaker 1: public safety, that someone was going to get hurt. But
Speaker 1: yesterday I said that exactly so again, these corrupt politicians
Speaker 1: who are part of this unbelievable fraud now have been
Speaker 1: given a lifeline by this ice cold murder.
Speaker 2: And like I said before, there is no way the
Speaker 2: Somalians are intelligent enough to figure out the bureaucracy we
Speaker 2: have in place. They are obviously being helped by those
Speaker 2: in power.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think this massive corruption that's.
Speaker 2: There, They are obviously giving kickbacks like this money is
Speaker 2: going into them.
Speaker 1: You think the people in Minneapolis who are already You
Speaker 1: look at Minnesota and those one of the stupid things
Speaker 1: from Lala Aris Tim Walts didn't bring anything to that ticket.
Speaker 1: Minnesota has been reliably the only state that Democrats win
Speaker 1: no matter who the candidate is. I think that maybe
Speaker 1: that was the only state that Ronald Reagan didn't win
Speaker 1: in his re election bid, But they always vote Democrats,
Speaker 1: So why would you even pull somebody from there? But
Speaker 1: now when you look at this, these people, they're they're
Speaker 1: just focused on, you know, the corruption that is there.
Speaker 1: And now the Democrats, the rank and file people on
Speaker 1: the street. When you look at what these ICE agents
Speaker 1: did both before, during, and after this ice cold murder.
Speaker 1: When you look at that, are they going to want
Speaker 1: to hear anything about the Somalian corruption? Now? They'll give
Speaker 1: Waltz to pass on this. They'll just put it into
Speaker 1: their political charges basket, just like the right is doing well.
Speaker 1: These people are guilty with the small things. So therefore,
Speaker 1: you know, shoot and kill people who protest this stuff.
Speaker 1: So again, Christinomes said, they got stuck in the snow.
Speaker 1: They were tempting to push their vehicle out when a
Speaker 1: woman attacked them, using her vehicle as a weapon. She
Speaker 1: is unbelievably stupid. Christinomes is as dishonest and stupid as
Speaker 1: La La Harris. Seriously seriously dishonest and stupid. Total lie,
Speaker 1: total fabrication. And it is a garbage narrative. You can't
Speaker 1: even come up with a plausible lie. That's how stupid
Speaker 1: and arrogant they are. Talk about the hubris of Trump.
Speaker 1: He's been held unaccountable for so long he doesn't even
Speaker 1: have to come up with anything that even approximates the truth.
Speaker 1: Now said an officer of an officer of ours acted
Speaker 1: quickly and defensively to protect himself. No he didn't, No
Speaker 1: he didn't, and it wasn't defensive.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: If it looks could have killed, it would have men
Speaker 1: him instead of her. Right, there is no footage, says CNBC.
Speaker 1: There is no footage on the video that supports Snowm's claim.
Speaker 1: That's right. In other words, you're a liar. You're a
Speaker 1: liar supporting murder. There's nothing showing that the vehicles are stuck,
Speaker 1: nothing showing that they were trying to push their vehicle
Speaker 1: out of snow, and nothing that shows that he was
Speaker 1: attacked by this woman tried carrying the agents, was driving
Speaker 1: up the street. When it stopped and the agents got out,
Speaker 1: the street was clear of any snow. And you can
Speaker 1: see that, as a matter of fact, if you look
Speaker 1: at the here they are. There's one car that's doing that.
Speaker 1: She's there, she starts to move to get out of
Speaker 1: the way and she waves this vehicle on, doesn't realize
Speaker 1: that it's the ice people. They're not stuck in the snow.
Speaker 1: You see them stuck in the snow, and she's pulling
Speaker 1: back and she turns the wheel to go the other
Speaker 1: way and the guy shoots her when she's going sideways
Speaker 1: to him. Yeah, that's the reality they don't want you
Speaker 1: to see. So what they're doing is causing chaos and destruction,
Speaker 1: said the mayor who's there. He said, they're sowing chaos
Speaker 1: on our streets, quite literally killing people. So they're already
Speaker 1: trying to spend this as an action of self defense,
Speaker 1: said the mayor. Having seen the video myself, I want
Speaker 1: to tell everybody directly that this is BS. This was
Speaker 1: an agent recklessly using power that resulted in somebody dying
Speaker 1: and getting killed. Trump and the social media post said
Speaker 1: I just saw this. It's a horrible thing to watch.
Speaker 1: The woman is screaming, that's a lie. The car was
Speaker 1: very disorderly and she ran over the ice officer, who
Speaker 1: is now recovering in the hospital. Unbelievable. The lies that
Speaker 1: they tell. He was just trying to do his job
Speaker 1: of all upper case, making America safe. And then you
Speaker 1: got ilhan Omar. Ilhan Omar, give her a lifeline as
Speaker 1: she should be going down with all the immigration, the
Speaker 1: fraud in her personal life as well as the fraud
Speaker 1: of the Somalian community that keeps her in power. But
Speaker 1: now she says ICE must stop terrorizing our communities and
Speaker 1: leave our city. She's right, she's right about that. ICE's
Speaker 1: actions today were unconsciable and reprehensible. I agree with ilhan Omar.
Speaker 1: I can't believe it. I'm beyond outraged at their reckless,
Speaker 1: callous actions and the killing of a legal observer in Minneapolis.
Speaker 1: That's exactly right, that's what happened. So again Trump is
Speaker 1: helping Tim Waltz, ilhan Omar and Jacob Fry.
Speaker 2: Thing that is worth remembering, though, is that if this
Speaker 2: was a white man or a white family that had
Speaker 2: been gunned down, ilan Omar would have nothing to say.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I know. That's why I say, I hate
Speaker 1: to see these people being given a lifeline. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: you know, being able to take a principled stand against
Speaker 1: the unprincipled murder and lies from the Trump administration. This
Speaker 1: is why I say, you know, it makes a difference
Speaker 1: how you do things. The end does not justify the means,
Speaker 1: even if you agree with his policies in terms of
Speaker 1: getting rid of fraud and getting rid of the massive
Speaker 1: ways of illegal immigrants and all that. Worst of stuff,
Speaker 1: and I do agree with it in general, I don't
Speaker 1: agree with the means that they're using, the tactics that
Speaker 1: they're using. That makes all the difference in the world,
Speaker 1: because bad means and bad tactics will be used to
Speaker 1: achieve evil ends in the future when the other side
Speaker 1: takes over. So again, you know, going back to this
Speaker 1: picture here of where the bullet is. One person commented
Speaker 1: on that, so the photo of the vehicle is also
Speaker 1: damming for ICE agents. A single bullet hole on the
Speaker 1: far side on the curved part of the windshield. The
Speaker 1: agent was not in front of the vehicle when this
Speaker 1: is fired. This angle would not have hit her in
Speaker 1: the head. Also, where are the other two bullet holes? Yeah,
Speaker 1: blew out the windows because he shot her from the
Speaker 1: side when he was not in danger. You and I
Speaker 1: would be convicted for murder, but our government has no
Speaker 1: convictions when it comes to the police. This is a
Speaker 1: drive by shooting where the person doing the shooting is
Speaker 1: not in the car. So again you can see it
Speaker 1: from the very beginning that she had her wheel turned.
Speaker 1: So the headlines that you see from different places ICE
Speaker 1: protesters as shot and killed after hitting an officer with
Speaker 1: their vehicle. That's the way they'll put this stuff out
Speaker 1: right and make this all about her. And again, she's
Speaker 1: thirty seven years old, has a six year old child
Speaker 1: who's now an orphan because the father died two years ago.
Speaker 1: So the interesting thing is, as I said, when you
Speaker 1: look at and Reason has a good article about this,
Speaker 1: that the rules for engagement that most police departments have.
Speaker 1: DHS's Public Affairs office has made similar accusations against US
Speaker 1: citizens who are subjected to violent and deadly force by
Speaker 1: ice and Border patrol officers, but in several of those cases,
Speaker 1: the defendant's names were cleared after evidence emerged contradicting DHS's
Speaker 1: initial claims. For example, federal prosecutors in Chicago dropped their
Speaker 1: charges in November against Mehrmar Martinez, a woman who was
Speaker 1: shot five times by a Border Patrol agent. The government
Speaker 1: accused her of ramming an agent's vehicle, but according to
Speaker 1: her lawyer, video showed an agent turning his vehicle into
Speaker 1: her car, after which the agent said do something. It
Speaker 1: cursed out her right. The agent then got out of
Speaker 1: his car and started shooting at Martinez. DHS's original press
Speaker 1: release described Martinez as a domestic terrorist with a history
Speaker 1: of doxing federal agents. They don't mention it in their
Speaker 1: piece here, but remember the guy who was a part
Speaker 1: of an observation group. And look, we need to have
Speaker 1: people who watch the police. And the Supreme Court, as
Speaker 1: they point out in this article, the Supreme Court has
Speaker 1: over and over again said that filming the police is
Speaker 1: not a crime. It's not only not a crime, it's
Speaker 1: a necessity now to film the police. And yet this
Speaker 1: guy was filming the ice officers who are walking around
Speaker 1: wearing masks, and they rammed his car intentionally. So DHS
Speaker 1: considers following, recording and alerting others to the presence of
Speaker 1: law enforcement to be illegal activity, despite the fact that
Speaker 1: every federal court that has considered this issue has firmly
Speaker 1: upheld the First Amendment right to film and to monitor
Speaker 1: the police and public warning people the police are here. What.
Speaker 1: I'm sure you've had this happen to you. Perhaps you've
Speaker 1: done it to help other people. You see a cop
Speaker 1: with a speeding trap set up, right, what do you
Speaker 1: do and coming traffic? I usually flashed my brights at
Speaker 1: them to warn them, and I appreciate when people do
Speaker 1: that for me. So, you know, should I be shot
Speaker 1: for that. Christ Num would say, yes, I should be
Speaker 1: shot like a dog, like one of her dogs. David
Speaker 1: Beer of the Cato Institute has collected dozens of these instances,
Speaker 1: and report released last month, he concluded that the amount
Speaker 1: of video evidence, in conjunction with memos and public statements
Speaker 1: from DHS leadership amounts to an official nationwide policy of
Speaker 1: intimidating and threatening people who attempt to observe and to
Speaker 1: record their operations. What are you ashamed of? I think
Speaker 1: we do know what you're ashamed of, and you should
Speaker 1: be ashamed. You should wear a mask, you should be
Speaker 1: in prison. And I comment to reason last month DHS
Speaker 1: Office of Public Affairs, so that following and recording law
Speaker 1: enforcement officers sure sounds like obstruction of justice to me,
Speaker 1: said the DHS. Yeah, they that's where they are.
Speaker 2: So I also just want to say, if you are
Speaker 2: a trained professional, if your entire.
Speaker 1: Job is the to a higher standard, that's right.
Speaker 2: You are held to a higher standard. I don't care
Speaker 2: if the crowd is rowdy. I don't care if they're
Speaker 2: saying mean things or even potentially shoving you, that's right.
Speaker 2: If they are not actively shooting, engaging you with physical
Speaker 2: lethal violence. You have no excuse for using lethal violence
Speaker 2: on them.
Speaker 1: But that's not what they're doing. These people are not shoving,
Speaker 1: they're being shoved and shot in the face.
Speaker 3: WHOA.
Speaker 1: It's the cops who are initiating the violence. And we've
Speaker 1: seen that over and over again, even before this kind
Speaker 1: of stuff, even before ICE, just with ordinary cops in
Speaker 1: a demonstration situation, they initiate the violence. Many people said
Speaker 1: they initiated violence on January the sixth, and there's a
Speaker 1: lot of evidence showing that they did so. Yet again,
Speaker 1: a law enforcement officer is fired into a moving vehicle,
Speaker 1: even though experts on the use of force and many
Speaker 1: agencies' rules prohibit or discourage the practice as dangerous and ineffective.
Speaker 1: Shooting into moving cars is often a bad idea, even
Speaker 1: when it might be legally justified. And it wasn't here
Speaker 1: because he wasn't in danger. Officers who fear they're in
Speaker 1: danger often missed their target, sometimes harmlessly, sometimes striking bystanders
Speaker 1: or other officers. Jeffrey Albert, a professor at the University
Speaker 1: of South Carolina, an expert on the police use of force, said,
Speaker 1: if you actually hit the driver and are successful, now
Speaker 1: you have an unguided missiles. We saw after he killed
Speaker 1: the woman. You know, her car was still going very slow,
Speaker 1: it was never going fast, and it plowed into another
Speaker 1: car that was there. Could have hit pedestrians if there
Speaker 1: had been any on the road, could have hit officers.
Speaker 1: Her car could have hit officers. It's now an unguided missile. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it turned into a weapon because he killed the driver,
Speaker 1: Christinom the vehicle became a weapon, an unguided weapon. And
Speaker 1: I've seen people, Megan Kelly. There's another angle that from
Speaker 1: a from a distance and you see the guy who's
Speaker 1: leaning over making contact with it, said, see she hit
Speaker 1: she hit him, and all this kind of stuff. It's like,
Speaker 1: who hit who? I mean, you saw him? He wasn't limping,
Speaker 1: wasn't limping at all. If she had hit him, he
Speaker 1: would be limping. If he went over and leaned onto
Speaker 1: the vehicle and shot her from the side of the
Speaker 1: front bumper, which is what he did, then he would
Speaker 1: not be limping.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: It's just Megan Kelly disgusting yet again. This is this
Speaker 1: is as disgusting as her excuses for pedophilia. Well, I
Speaker 1: don't know, you know, girl, that's sixteen seventeen eighteen or whatever.
Speaker 1: She prostituted herself at Fox News. That's what she did
Speaker 1: to get her job. That's where she's coming from. It's
Speaker 1: just as likely if you shoot somebody that a foot's
Speaker 1: going to go on the gas as to go on
Speaker 1: the brak. In this case, photo suggested the suv struck
Speaker 1: another car after the driver was shot. That photos don't
Speaker 1: suggest it, they show it. You can hear it if
Speaker 1: you've got that. We took the audio off because people
Speaker 1: are losing it in terms of explicatives there anyway, and
Speaker 1: understandably so. Because of this, many departments advise against opening
Speaker 1: fire on moving vehicles. Following a nineteen seventy two shooting,
Speaker 1: the New York Police Department adopted a policy that banned
Speaker 1: officers from shooting or shooting from a moving vehicle, or
Speaker 1: shooting at a moving vehicle unless the person in the
Speaker 1: vehicle was using or threatening deadly force, which did not
Speaker 1: include the vehicle itself. Many other agencies have since followed
Speaker 1: a suit, and guidelines recommended by police officers tend to
Speaker 1: concur so. Nonetheless, shooting and a moving vehicle continues to
Speaker 1: happen frequently, violations of department rules may draw internal discipline,
Speaker 1: you might get a paid vacation, but they're not enforceable
Speaker 1: as a matter of law. Experts also point to poor
Speaker 1: training as a common reason for these shootings. Though the
Speaker 1: identity and experience of the officer who operated who open
Speaker 1: fire are not yet known, it should be an area
Speaker 1: of focus. The White House has lowered the standards to
Speaker 1: hire thousands of new ICE agents, two thousand just recently
Speaker 1: sent into Minneapolis. Got to get them all on the street.
Speaker 1: Got to have a coming from Stephen Miller. He was
Speaker 1: the one who came up with the idea. I what
Speaker 1: three thousand arrests every day. Well, if you got quotas
Speaker 1: like that, we know what that looks like. Ex ICE
Speaker 1: director called Christi Nooam's shooting statement incredibly irresponsible. Just called
Speaker 1: a lie. That's what it is. It's a cold lie.
Speaker 1: So former ICE Acting director John Sandwegg criticized non for
Speaker 1: making incredibly irresponsible comments. He said that the woman had
Speaker 1: perpetrated said after Noam said the woman had perpetrated an
Speaker 1: act of domestic terrorism, that looked like domestic terror to you.
Speaker 1: I mean, go on, just look at that. That's not
Speaker 1: domestic terror anyway. He said, Noam was out of line,
Speaker 1: didn't have enough information to make that statement. Well, everything
Speaker 1: in her statement was a lie. She was saying the
Speaker 1: ice officers were stuck in this and as they're trying
Speaker 1: to get their vehicle out, they were viciously attacked by
Speaker 1: a domestic terrorist driving a car. That is not anywhere
Speaker 1: close to what happened. None of that is true. I
Speaker 1: find this to be an incredibly irresponsible statement. He said. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Assistant DHS Secretary, a Tritian mclonchlin called it a ramming incident. No,
Speaker 1: it wasn't. And again Trump attacks the women and directly
Speaker 1: contradicts what the Minneapolis police statement said and directly contradicts
Speaker 1: the reality of what the video shows. There's the poor victim.
Speaker 1: I guess he's walking on his way to the hospital,
Speaker 1: given high fives to the other guys. Maybe that's it.
Speaker 1: Maybe he hurt his arm giving high fives to the
Speaker 1: other ice officers. People are pathetic, So federal and local
Speaker 1: authorities to put out conflicting statements. Yeah, because the Feds
Speaker 1: are lying about everything. Homeland Security issued a statement claiming
Speaker 1: that the ice officer, fearing for his life and the
Speaker 1: lives of his federal law enforcement and the safety of
Speaker 1: the public fired defensive shots, which is not safe for
Speaker 1: the public into a moving vehicle after a rioter weaponized
Speaker 1: her vehicle. You know, when he killed the driver, he
Speaker 1: weaponized her vehicle, didn't he. DHS also branded the dead
Speaker 1: woman a domestic terrorist. That's everybody that they don't like.
Speaker 1: They don't like you politically, you are a domestic terrorist.
Speaker 1: They are just like Biden and the Democrats, you know
Speaker 1: who called all the January the six people, called them
Speaker 1: all terrorists, including the vast, vast, vast majority of them
Speaker 1: who were peacefully redressing their grievances against the government. They
Speaker 1: called them terrorists, treated them like terrorists when you look
Speaker 1: at the conditions that they incarcerated them under. And so
Speaker 1: this is typical of the raw, raw cheerleading of the right.
Speaker 1: This is WND saying domestic terrorism. They repeat it, of course,
Speaker 1: fatal ice related shooting sparks unrest in Minneapolis. Yeah, unrest.
Speaker 1: And you can all these horrible protesters standing there yelling
Speaker 1: at the police. So the police go over and shove
Speaker 1: them and put and spray them in the face. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and then this guy Nick soretor do you know who
Speaker 1: this guy is Travis. I've seen his name multiple times.
Speaker 2: I've heard the name, but I don't know anything about him.
Speaker 1: He's some cheap horror for MAGA, some MAGA influencer, some
Speaker 1: Trump bought Nick sword horror. He says. Absolute mayhem is
Speaker 1: breaking out in South Minneapolis after ice involved shooting. Yeah,
Speaker 1: look at this mayhem and who's side it's on here? Yeah,
Speaker 1: look at that, he says. Pathetic. Show these people zero mercy.
Speaker 1: That's right. If they're criticizing you, if they're on the
Speaker 1: other political tribe, run over, shove them and shoot them
Speaker 1: in the face with pepper spray, says Nick Shortor. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So again, your time is coming. Nick. You're cheering for
Speaker 1: government to have no control, no guidelines, no restraints, and
Speaker 1: that government is going to be aligned with you. Do
Speaker 1: you not remember it hasn't been that long. All these people.
Speaker 1: It's like watching the MAGA people. It's like men in black,
Speaker 1: you know, it's like they all got flashed with that
Speaker 1: light and they forgot everything that happened even two years ago. Well,
Speaker 1: we could never have a government that would unjustly call
Speaker 1: people domestic terrorists. Really, so House Majority whip Tom Emmer
Speaker 1: our brave ice agents. But their lives on the line
Speaker 1: every day to protect our communities from dangerous criminals. This
Speaker 1: is the guy. When people were complaining to Tom Emmer
Speaker 1: because this I think is his jurisdiction, he is, no,
Speaker 1: it's not, because it's Ilhan Omar's jurisdiction. But it was
Speaker 1: people who were close by. He's maybe got an adjacent one.
Speaker 1: He's there from Minneapolis anyway. At one of the town meetings,
Speaker 1: he had people who were complaining to him about the
Speaker 1: number of Somalians that were there, and he said, well,
Speaker 1: there's nothing I can do about it, and these are
Speaker 1: upstanding people, and he's worked with the Democrats to help
Speaker 1: the Somalians to stay. He's got the Somalian Congressional Coalition.
Speaker 1: And this guy has been a cheerleader for all this
Speaker 1: illegal immigration, for all this Smalian fraud, even after people
Speaker 1: knew it was fraud. Was known about this for a decade.
Speaker 1: We've been talking about it's just now reached a pinnacle
Speaker 1: of press attention because they went to weaponize it against
Speaker 1: Tim Waltz, and it deserves to be weaponized against him.
Speaker 1: But Tom Emmer just came out and said, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: we need to kick these people out. I don't care
Speaker 1: if they've got citizenship, Now kick him out. So he's
Speaker 1: mister tough guy. Now he's just a turncoat and he
Speaker 1: will wear whatever uniform, whatever, whichever way the wind is blowing.
Speaker 1: That's what Tom Emmer is gonna do. He's number three
Speaker 1: with a GOP in the house, and he's just like
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson. And so the right is heavily criticizing these people.
Speaker 1: Megan Kelly, this cop almost got run over by this woman. Yeah,
Speaker 1: looks kill It would have been him, right, except if
Speaker 1: you look, Meghan, you can see that the wheel is turned.
Speaker 1: If you look at where the bullet holes are, Meghan,
Speaker 1: you can see that he shot her from the side
Speaker 1: after if there was any imagined threat, after that imagined
Speaker 1: threat was clearly over. She's not gonna be able to
Speaker 1: hit him sideways. Clay Travis, who I think, isn't this
Speaker 1: the guy that one of the two guys that took
Speaker 1: Russell balls place? Do you know? I don't know? Anyway,
Speaker 1: he said, so the mayor was spreading an inflammatory lie
Speaker 1: by saying it was BS and he called it a
Speaker 1: justified shooting. The ice agent was clearly contacted by the
Speaker 1: woman in this car, so don't touch these people because
Speaker 1: they'll kill you. And I'm serious. You know when you
Speaker 1: get pulled over by the cops, yes sir, yes, sir,
Speaker 1: because many of them are just looking for an excuse
Speaker 1: to kill you. Pro Trump commentator Benny Johnson shared a
Speaker 1: clip of the incident and said it was irrefutable that
Speaker 1: a Democrat terrorist hit the federal agent with her car,
Speaker 1: and he said it was attempted murder. Benny, you need
Speaker 1: to go back to your grinder account and get off
Speaker 1: of social media. Disgusting. I'm so disgusted with these so
Speaker 1: called influencers. They're nothing but magabots, maggots, which I want
Speaker 1: to put it shortly here, how dare you? Meghan Kelly
Speaker 1: raged at Tim Waltz's shameful statement on Ice shooting. She's
Speaker 1: still in tribal mode here, so you want to further
Speaker 1: inflame and already charge situation. That's your side that's doing it,
Speaker 1: Meghan killing somebody. So yeah, it is truly reprehensible. And then,
Speaker 1: of course this is the other line that they go
Speaker 1: back to. This one is from the Tennessee Star Tim
Speaker 1: Waltz in a sorrows backed prosecutor. Oh okay, let's see
Speaker 1: how many boxes can we come up with to check
Speaker 1: to make this tribal. It's just like the Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matter stuff and everything is like when you look at
Speaker 1: the people that are getting killed, Yes, it is true
Speaker 1: it's a higher percentage of blacks that are suffering from
Speaker 1: the excessive police force and killings and that type of thing.
Speaker 1: But that's a higher percentage of the black community that
Speaker 1: happens to. However, if you look at the higher number
Speaker 1: of people, it's more white people. They're doing that. But
Speaker 1: they want you to break into this black tribe white
Speaker 1: tribe thing. And the same thing as true of the politics.
Speaker 1: They don't want any control of law enforcement. They don't
Speaker 1: want to stop the federal police, the federalization of police,
Speaker 1: and the militarization of the police. They don't want to
Speaker 1: stop any of that stuff. And the way that they
Speaker 1: keep that from happening, the way the government escapes the
Speaker 1: rule of law is to divide and conquer people by tribes.
Speaker 1: That's what's happening here. And I'm seeing these buttons being
Speaker 1: pushed by all the usual grifters. Disgust me go ahead
Speaker 1: to travers read a couple of these comments before we
Speaker 1: take a.
Speaker 2: That's right, We've got your destiny twenty twenty six. As
Speaker 2: law enforcement, whatever branch is trained to empty their mags,
Speaker 2: they are triggered. I will also say, though, that basically
Speaker 2: every shooting course I've seen or taken has said that
Speaker 2: once you start shooting, you do not stop shooting until
Speaker 2: the threat is neutralized. So emptying the mag is a
Speaker 2: something most people would do in any situation when they're shooting.
Speaker 2: Guard Goldsmith. I find it astounding that some maga try
Speaker 2: to use the false equivalency of portraying the whole US
Speaker 2: as your house, plus talking about stopping home invasion, yet
Speaker 2: the invade states and neighborhoods.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and then you know, when you're talking about a
Speaker 1: home invasion, Like I said so many times, if somebody
Speaker 1: steals your television set and or running out with it,
Speaker 1: you can't shoot them in the back. It's only if
Speaker 1: your life is threatened. This guy's life was not threatened.
Speaker 1: She was driving away from him, the wheel was turned.
Speaker 1: He shot her from the side. Murder murder.
Speaker 2: Patty Wax says, I'm just saying it is very convenient
Speaker 2: that when things look like there will be a condemnation
Speaker 2: of what went on in Somalia's city of Minnesota. Suddenly
Speaker 2: we have another crisis for the Antifa blue hairs.
Speaker 1: Yep, yep, he pulled their butt out of the fire
Speaker 1: yet again Trump did.
Speaker 2: Yeah, DG eight, thank you very much, appreciate the support,
Speaker 2: says NOME is pledging refugee status for all the Venezuelans.
Speaker 2: Haven't they learned anything from the Haitians here in Springfield
Speaker 2: and Somalians in Columbus, Minnesota, Band Maine. Disgusting.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I played that the other day, christin Home saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're going to extend this temporary protective status for people
Speaker 1: coming from Venezuela. We're going to bring in a lot
Speaker 1: more refugees, and other people had said that as well,
Speaker 1: even before she jumped the gun on this. I remember,
Speaker 1: as people are anticipating the fact that Trump was going
Speaker 1: to invade Venezuela and do something that they said, do
Speaker 1: you start some kind of a war there. We're going
Speaker 1: to get flooded with Venezuelan immigrants. But of course CHRISTINEO
Speaker 1: Home doesn't wait for that, She proactively invites them in.
Speaker 2: There is almost no idea worse than bombing and destroying
Speaker 2: a country and then telling all of its residents. Hey
Speaker 2: you can come here.
Speaker 1: Yeah, national security. How does that make us more secure
Speaker 1: to do that? Yeah, absolutely does not.
Speaker 2: I'm personally of the opinion that we just say no
Speaker 2: more refugees. Saying you're a refugee does not entitle you
Speaker 2: to a residence here in the United States. Our country
Speaker 2: is bad, it's terrible.
Speaker 1: We need to we need to leave.
Speaker 2: Well, that's that's that's a shame.
Speaker 1: And we do have a bias against Christian refugees especially.
Speaker 1: I mean, take a look at the Biden administration. It
Speaker 1: was a homeschooling Christian family that fled from Germany because
Speaker 1: the German government was going to take their children away
Speaker 1: from them for homeschooling them. And they've been here for
Speaker 1: about a decade. But with all the open borders and
Speaker 1: the millions of people coming in from all over the
Speaker 1: world through the southern border, the bib administration decided that
Speaker 1: the one family that needed to be ejected was that
Speaker 1: German Christian homeschooling family. And this is the way this
Speaker 1: stuff is going to be weaponized. Uh, they will use
Speaker 1: it for their political side. And the idiots, the fools
Speaker 1: who are cheering this stuff on don't realize what they're
Speaker 1: begging for We'll be right back. Counts.
Speaker 6: You know some turn me love them.
Speaker 1: Remember processor you lost?
Speaker 6: Remember process if you sposnt all of the world. Jesus's game.
Speaker 7: APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your
Speaker 7: mobile device.
Speaker 2: Get the APS radio app today and listen wherever you go.
Speaker 1: Port topic.
Speaker 5: The premiere of Greenland and the premiere of Denmark and
Speaker 5: other Danish officials are responding to a Twitter post from
Speaker 5: your wife Katie Miller for self reformer Trump White as
Speaker 5: official showing Greenland with an American flag, saying soon after
Speaker 5: that was posted, President Trump repeated the claim that the
Speaker 5: US needs Greenland for.
Speaker 3: National security reasons.
Speaker 5: The Danish Prime Minister responded to this in an interview
Speaker 5: earlier today, is reported by Bloomberg quote, I believe one
Speaker 5: should take the American president seriously when he says it
Speaker 5: wants Greenland. But I will also make it clear that
Speaker 5: if the US chooses to attack another NATO country militarily,
Speaker 5: then everything stops, including NATO and thus the security that
Speaker 5: has been established since the end of the Second World War.
Speaker 5: Can you rule out that the US is ever going
Speaker 5: to try to take Greenland by force?
Speaker 3: Well, let me go back a step.
Speaker 7: The President has been clear for months now, so I
Speaker 7: know you're treating this as breaking news. The President has
Speaker 7: been clear for a month now that the United States
Speaker 7: should be the nation that has Greenland as part of
Speaker 7: our overall security apparatus.
Speaker 5: Right, but your wife posted that like hours after the
Speaker 5: Venezuela operation. But that's why it's relevant.
Speaker 7: No, and I'll talk with you about it for an hour.
Speaker 7: I think it's really important conversation up. I just wanted
Speaker 7: to reset, Jake by making clear that it has been
Speaker 7: the formal position of the US government since the beginning
Speaker 7: of this administration, frankly going back into the previous Trump administration,
Speaker 7: that Greenland should be part of the United States. The
Speaker 7: President has been very clear about that. That is the
Speaker 7: formal position of the US government.
Speaker 3: Right, but can you.
Speaker 5: Say that military action against Greenland is off the table?
Speaker 7: You're gonna be in a military action against Greenland? The
Speaker 7: Greenland has a population of thirty thousand people, Jake. The
Speaker 7: real question is, a boy, what right does Denmark is
Speaker 7: certain control over Greenland? What is the basis of their
Speaker 7: territorial claim? What is their base? Lynn is a colony
Speaker 7: of Denmark. The United States is the power of NATO
Speaker 7: for the United States to secure the Arctic region, to
Speaker 7: protect and defend NATO and NATO interests.
Speaker 3: Obviously, Greenland should be part of the United States.
Speaker 7: And so that's a conversation that we're going to have
Speaker 7: as a country's we're going to have as a as
Speaker 7: a new community of nations.
Speaker 3: So you can take it.
Speaker 5: Off the table that the US would use military force
Speaker 5: to seize Greenland.
Speaker 3: You can't understand that.
Speaker 7: Jake, I unders said, you're trying very hard to which
Speaker 7: which again is your job.
Speaker 3: I respect it.
Speaker 7: It is great to get exactly the headline right that
Speaker 7: catch you headlines to.
Speaker 3: Get an answer. It says that says Miller refuses to
Speaker 3: rule out.
Speaker 7: The the United States should have Greenland as part of
Speaker 7: the United States. There's no need to even think or
Speaker 7: talk about this in the context that you're asking of
Speaker 7: a military operation.
Speaker 3: Nobody's going to fight the United States militarily over the
Speaker 3: future of Greenland. One last question, one last question.
Speaker 1: Again, Why am I playing that again? Played it yesterday? Well,
Speaker 1: because it shows the character of the Trump administration. And
Speaker 1: there's a very important character and the Trump administration, and
Speaker 1: that's Stephen Miller, and he's the character that is not
Speaker 1: only respond possible for this greenland stuff, but he's also
Speaker 1: the character that's responsible for the way the government has
Speaker 1: conducted itself in Venezuela, as well as what they've done
Speaker 1: with Ice. The hardline tactics that Ice is taking, it
Speaker 1: comes from this guy, And as The New York Times
Speaker 1: puts it, Stephen Miller offers a strong man's view of
Speaker 1: the world that's absolutely right. The world, he said, must
Speaker 1: be governed by force. You know, it's kind of interesting
Speaker 1: to see how hilarian this guy is. You know, he
Speaker 1: may be Jewish, but even his own family has attacked
Speaker 1: him and said, if you know, followed your types of policies,
Speaker 1: we would have all been killed. In Germany. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: the Israelis as well as the American government have become
Speaker 1: the monsters that they fought, and so has a Trump administration, especially,
Speaker 1: you know, as John Quincy Adams who said, we don't
Speaker 1: go abroad seeking monsters to destroy. And I think there's
Speaker 1: a good reason for that that Fredrich Nitzi understood. He
Speaker 1: was the one who said, be careful that you don't
Speaker 1: become the monsters that you fight. Right when you start
Speaker 1: fighting these monsters, you typically adopt their practices. It was
Speaker 1: the Nazis who invaded other countries for no reason at
Speaker 1: all except for they just wanted it, and so now
Speaker 1: we're doing that. It was the Nazis who began massive
Speaker 1: civilian bombing campaigns, targeting the civilians in order to break
Speaker 1: the will of the country to fight, and it had
Speaker 1: just the opposite effect. And yet even though it backfired,
Speaker 1: we adopted that same practice. We became the monsters that
Speaker 1: we fought. And that's true of Israel as well. Both
Speaker 1: Israel and the United States have become the kinds of
Speaker 1: monsters that we fought in World War Two, the Nazis,
Speaker 1: the fascist Japanese. So again, you become this monster because
Speaker 1: you adopt their methods, their tactics, and we see that
Speaker 1: now and the total war tactics of bombing civilians and
Speaker 1: the tactics of not giving people quarter, but you go
Speaker 1: back and you kill the people who are shipwrecked. Are
Speaker 1: the very idea that you've got preemptive strikes or the
Speaker 1: idea that you invade another country because you want their stuff?
Speaker 1: Are we not the Nazis? Is Israel not become Nazis
Speaker 1: as well. Miller has spent the bulk of his White
Speaker 1: House career furthering right wing domestic policies that have resulted
Speaker 1: in mass deportations. And again, I want to see mass deportations,
Speaker 1: but not in the tactics that he has done it.
Speaker 1: Now Miller is casting his gaze further abroad, towards Venezuela
Speaker 1: and toward Greenland. Specifically, he's doing so in the service
Speaker 1: of advancing Trump's foreign policy ambitions, which so far resemble
Speaker 1: realistic designs to exploit less powerful, resource rich countries and
Speaker 1: territories all over the world and use those resources for
Speaker 1: America's gain. I don't like the term imperialism because men
Speaker 1: use so much by the left. I prefer the term
Speaker 1: pirate because that's really what this is. According to Miller,
Speaker 1: using brute force is not only on the table, but
Speaker 1: also the Trump administration's preferred way to conduct itself on
Speaker 1: the world stage, and how they conduct themselves domestically. When
Speaker 1: you look at ice and border patrol and the armies
Speaker 1: that they have unleashed against their political enemies. He said,
Speaker 1: and this is a quote from Miller, we live in
Speaker 1: a world in which you can talk all you want
Speaker 1: about international niceties and everything else, but we live in
Speaker 1: a world. In the real world, Jake, we are governed
Speaker 1: by strength, and that is governed by force, and that
Speaker 1: is governed by power. This is a dangerous individual. This
Speaker 1: is an individual who doesn't believe that he's accountable to God.
Speaker 1: And neither does Trump, and obviously neither does Christino, or
Speaker 1: she wouldn't lie the way she does.
Speaker 2: I've got to say, Stephen Miller, he looks like a
Speaker 2: discount lex Luthor.
Speaker 1: You know, he's been called many things. Ja the first
Speaker 1: person I've seen the calling that, But yeah, that's You're
Speaker 1: absolutely right. It's a Lex Luther.
Speaker 2: I guess you could call him Lex juth or even
Speaker 2: you know he is Jewish.
Speaker 1: He says, these are the iron laws of the world
Speaker 1: since the beginning of time. We don't want to have
Speaker 1: any system of law or restraint or guidelines domestically or internationally.
Speaker 1: We don't care about borders. Mike makes right. That is
Speaker 1: Stephen Miller and the Trump administration in a nutshell. The
Speaker 1: aggressive posture towards Greenland and in turn the rest of
Speaker 1: the world, writes in New York Times, is a perfect
Speaker 1: encapsulation of the raw power that Trump wants to project,
Speaker 1: even against Denmark. A NATO ally that controls Greenland. The
Speaker 1: moment also illustrates how people like Miller have ascended to
Speaker 1: the inner circle of a leader who has no interest
Speaker 1: in having his impulses checked, and how they exert their
Speaker 1: influence once they arrive there by the way. You know,
Speaker 1: we already have if you look at military spending, we
Speaker 1: already have thirty seven percent of the world's military spending,
Speaker 1: and as American far outweighing anything that anybody else is doing.
Speaker 1: We just had an all time high federal budget for
Speaker 1: the Defense Department of a trillion dollars. She broke that
Speaker 1: for the first time. But that's not enough for Trump.
Speaker 1: Now he wants to increase it by another fifty percent
Speaker 1: one and a half trillion.
Speaker 2: I also want to say, if we were going in
Speaker 2: and taking all these resources and they were being used
Speaker 2: to make America better, and they were being redistributed to
Speaker 2: the people to improve quality of life, it would still
Speaker 2: be wrong. It would still be wrong. We still shouldn't
Speaker 2: do it. But that's not going to happen.
Speaker 1: That's not even a pragmatic reason.
Speaker 2: No, these resources are going to be taken and used
Speaker 2: to enrich the billionaire class. The people that sit at
Speaker 2: the very top, and it will make our lives worse.
Speaker 2: They will import a million or a billion refugees, however
Speaker 2: many they can get their hands on, after they have
Speaker 2: made them hate you and hate us, while they sit
Speaker 2: in their ivory towers far away from any conflict that
Speaker 2: they generate. Now, they will steal every resource Venezuela has,
Speaker 2: and none of it will make its way to the
Speaker 2: American people.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, So Steven Miller, like so many others
Speaker 1: in the Trump administration, Christina Marco Rubio or Pete Hegsath,
Speaker 1: they are all living on military basis. Now, what do
Speaker 1: you think they're doing that for? Well, because they know
Speaker 1: full well that they're trying to create a civil war here.
Speaker 1: I think they're also realize that there may be an
Speaker 1: asymmetric war as they elevate the drug war to a
Speaker 1: hot war. And I mean, if they thought that they
Speaker 1: were going to have a nuclear war with Russia, I
Speaker 1: don't think they would go to a military base that's
Speaker 1: kind of like ground zero, you know. But I think
Speaker 1: that they're looking at this. They do want to have
Speaker 1: some kind of a civil war, some kind of an
Speaker 1: asymmetric war. And it's very interesting. It's also unprecedented. You know,
Speaker 1: we've had an occasional official in the past that has
Speaker 1: done this type of thing, but now you know, for
Speaker 1: pretty much all of the upper echelon of the Trump
Speaker 1: administration to be doing this, that is quite telling, you know,
Speaker 1: it is interesting. It was a very good and uplaid
Speaker 1: clips of it, and you've probably seen it yourself. There
Speaker 1: was an HBO production of John Adams and there was
Speaker 1: a clip at one point in time. But the two
Speaker 1: of them, you know, Adams and Jefferson was his vice
Speaker 1: pres and they were political enemies. That's the way the
Speaker 1: system allowed at that time. The number two would wind
Speaker 1: up being the vice president. So that'd be kind of
Speaker 1: like if you can imagine today, that'd be Trump with
Speaker 1: his vice president Laalayrris. That'd be an interesting situation, wouldn't it.
Speaker 1: But anyway, at one point, they're walking through the streets
Speaker 1: of Washington talking And the thing that struck me the
Speaker 1: most was the fact that you've got both the president
Speaker 1: and the vice president just walking through the street of
Speaker 1: Washington talking to each other. Nobody's paying any attention to them,
Speaker 1: number one, because they don't have that much impact on
Speaker 1: people's lives, and because they didn't have impact on people's
Speaker 1: lives because they were not trying to micromanage and destroy
Speaker 1: everything in our life. I mean, whether you're talking about
Speaker 1: the way toilets flush or the way gas cans operate.
Speaker 1: And I mean the federal government has intruded itself into
Speaker 1: every corner of our life. These people are hated and
Speaker 1: they have to have bodyguards, have to have this massive
Speaker 1: praetorian guard that follows them and precedes them everywhere they go,
Speaker 1: shutting down traffic everywhere. What a difference between the founders
Speaker 1: of this country and the empire that has become. And
Speaker 1: of course it's not just domestically, but it's an enemy
Speaker 1: is abroad because of the assassinations that we have engaged in.
Speaker 1: This is why these people need to live on military bases.
Speaker 1: You know, why do they need this kind of security.
Speaker 1: It really is because of policies from the CIA. They're
Speaker 1: the deep state that runs this administration. Also probably threats
Speaker 1: from the CIA. You know, you do what we tell
Speaker 1: you to do or else. So the civilian leadership living
Speaker 1: on these military bases increasingly seeing themselves and their mission
Speaker 1: as force, both domestic and Venezuela, Greenland, Minnesota. You name it.
Speaker 1: So you've got Marco Rubio, Pete Hegsea, christineom all of
Speaker 1: them living on military bases, including Stephen Miller. Now, in
Speaker 1: the past you had isolated cases of this. Robert Gates,
Speaker 1: Defense secretary under George W. Bush and Obama lived on
Speaker 1: a military base. Jim Mattis, who was at one point
Speaker 1: in the Trump administration, and Mike Pompeo, they'd lived on
Speaker 1: military bases. This is a relatively new thing. I mean,
Speaker 1: prior to Pompeo and Matis in the Trump administration you
Speaker 1: had only one person who'd lived on a military base before,
Speaker 1: and now you've got the entire upper echelon of the
Speaker 1: Trump cabinet living on a military base. There is no
Speaker 1: record of so many political appointees living on military installations.
Speaker 1: The shift adds to the blurr of traditional boundaries between
Speaker 1: civilian and military worlds. Yeah, these people only see the
Speaker 1: world in terms of force and conquest and moving boundaries.
Speaker 1: Steven Miller is also having daily yelling meltdowns. Think of
Speaker 1: him as Hitler rants. He's seen the Hitler Butler bunker
Speaker 1: rants that people repurposed as memes for a long time.
Speaker 1: But this is a thing with Steven Miller. His daily
Speaker 1: conference calls routinely descend into him loudly braiding staff and
Speaker 1: launching into full on meltdown. Insiders have revealed a lengthy
Speaker 1: Atlantic profile of Miller talks about how he begins with
Speaker 1: his ten am calls, including on Saturdays, and he gives
Speaker 1: him a chance to act like a wartime general who's
Speaker 1: living on a military base, and to shout at those
Speaker 1: he believes are not doing enough to push as a
Speaker 1: g he gets on the phone, he yells at everybody.
Speaker 1: Nobody is spared from his wrath. Miller is widely seen
Speaker 1: as the architect behind some of Trump's most hardline immigration policies.
Speaker 1: Miller demanded that ICE detain as many as three thousand
Speaker 1: immigrants a day in order to fulfill Trump's plan to
Speaker 1: carry out the largest mass deportation in US history. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, if he did that for four years, he's
Speaker 1: still only about three and a half million. That doesn't
Speaker 1: that doesn't get rid of the people that came in
Speaker 1: during the first Trump administration and the Biden administration, not
Speaker 1: even by long shot. Steve Bannon says that the deranged
Speaker 1: persona that Miller adopts in front of the cameras is
Speaker 1: just an act. He plays the character well, knowing that
Speaker 1: he always wants to have owned the Libs right and
Speaker 1: have their heads blow up, said Steve Bennon. And yet
Speaker 1: from what people are saying, that's the way the guy
Speaker 1: really is, and he supports these dangerous policies. Other allies
Speaker 1: acknowledge that Miller's personality is something of an acquired taste.
Speaker 1: One of the harsher ones compared his bedside manner to
Speaker 1: that of Heinrich Himmler, the Nazi leader, the second most
Speaker 1: powerful figure in the Third Reich. And of course that's
Speaker 1: the way he's really shaping up. You know, you look
Speaker 1: at Susie Wiles, and she may be there in terms of,
Speaker 1: you know, a moderating force as someone we're saying, I
Speaker 1: don't think that's the case. I don't see any moderation
Speaker 1: at all. But it is Stephen Miller who's really pushing
Speaker 1: and executing these policies, not so much Susie Wiles. He
Speaker 1: oversees every policy the administration touches, said Caroline love It.
Speaker 1: I can't tell you the number of times that a
Speaker 1: policy matter is discussed and the Oval and Trump will say, well,
Speaker 1: where's Stephen tell them to get that done. To critics,
Speaker 1: Miller is the smirking embodiment of everything they view as dangerous,
Speaker 1: an authoritarian about the trumpetdministration, I would say that's the
Speaker 1: way I view it. That's a pretty good summary right there.
Speaker 1: He's been called a Nazi, a neo Nazi, a white supremacist,
Speaker 1: a capo, a lord Voldemart. Posters of Miller, pursed lips,
Speaker 1: furrowed brow have been plastered all around the nation's capital,
Speaker 1: stamped with creep and fascism. Ain't pretty. His own uncle
Speaker 1: denounced him, writing at one point that his immigration policies,
Speaker 1: if they had been implemented a century ago, he said,
Speaker 1: our family would have been wiped out. So again Bannon
Speaker 1: calls him Prime Minister. I guess because Trump is evidently
Speaker 1: the king. Miller is now acting as an accellerant for
Speaker 1: the President's most incendiary impulses, shaping the lives of individual
Speaker 1: Americans and nearly every area of our life. The result
Speaker 1: of Miller's power is a vestige of George W. Bush's
Speaker 1: war on terror. Weeks after the attacks of September eleven,
Speaker 1: Bush established a Homeland Security Council to coordinate the government's
Speaker 1: domestic response. Miller has attached that rubric of national emergency
Speaker 1: to a new target, turning the Council into a daily
Speaker 1: war room to track and to fine tune Trump's campaign
Speaker 1: to deport one million people a year. So beyond that,
Speaker 1: as Trump has griped about the homeless encampments, one day,
Speaker 1: Caroline love Ittt recalled that he turned to Miller and
Speaker 1: he said, get it done within six hours. She said,
Speaker 1: I looked at Twitter and there were camera cranes rather
Speaker 1: cleaning up these sites. Steven is the most effective political
Speaker 1: aid of this generation, and probably since James Baker, no
Speaker 1: one is more deft at moving the lovers of government
Speaker 1: to turn the president's policies into action, said a former
Speaker 1: Trump advisor, Cliff Simms. Tell Miller approaches a problem, for example,
Speaker 1: Columbia University, they said, you know, they wanted to shut
Speaker 1: down protests about what Israel was doing. So he was
Speaker 1: the one who implemented it. And he said, as he
Speaker 1: watched for people's reactions, and since people didn't react much
Speaker 1: against it, he said, well, we can use this in
Speaker 1: other areas as well. That's the way they operate, and
Speaker 1: that's why it's very important for us to react, to
Speaker 1: speak out against this, because the Internet is flooded, and
Speaker 1: of course they are given when you look at social
Speaker 1: media on X and so forth, this echo chamber of
Speaker 1: maggots that are out there. They reinforce whatever Trump wants
Speaker 1: to do. And there are a lot of bots as
Speaker 1: well as a lot of grifting influencers like Meghan Kelly,
Speaker 1: Benny Johnson and others Nick shortor who are out there.
Speaker 1: They have massive engagement on social media, and it's important
Speaker 1: for us to speak out against that. So just on
Speaker 1: an individual level, something to think about, because they do
Speaker 1: look at what they can get away with. And look
Speaker 1: when you look at these universities, as I said before,
Speaker 1: they're not entitled to any money in the first place.
Speaker 1: But that was not what it was about. It wasn't
Speaker 1: about saying, you know, we've got thirty eight trillion dollars
Speaker 1: in debt and we shouldn't be giving billions of dollars
Speaker 1: a year to Harvard. Was that nine billion? I think
Speaker 1: it was anyway. No, the condition was that if you
Speaker 1: stop protests against Israel on campus, we'll turn the money
Speaker 1: faucet back on. But if you allow a foreign government
Speaker 1: to be protested, their actions to be protested. We will
Speaker 1: cut off your money supply. It was an attack on
Speaker 1: free speech, on behalf of a foreign government that seeks
Speaker 1: to end the First Amendment. As I played for you.
Speaker 1: That guy's name is Slimo Kramer, I think is his name.
Speaker 1: Close observers or say his total command is in marked
Speaker 1: contrast to his role during the first Trump administration. There
Speaker 1: he didn't have the authority to make things happen, and
Speaker 1: they give examples of where he asked for something to happen.
Speaker 1: Everybody walked down and said, we're not doing that. But
Speaker 1: they're doing it now. He now has that kind of power.
Speaker 1: You've got another here's another guy, Tom Tillis. This is
Speaker 1: a guy that I really do not like North Carolina.
Speaker 1: I know this guy. I had him pegged as a
Speaker 1: globalist from the very beginning, even though he's Republican. As
Speaker 1: soon as the Republican Party got the majority, you know,
Speaker 1: two thousand and eight election, they voted for Obama. They
Speaker 1: were fed up with what Obama had done. By twenty ten,
Speaker 1: everything went Republican except for the congressional races because those
Speaker 1: are determined by the jerrymandering. But then you had the
Speaker 1: Republican Party that had always been in the minority in
Speaker 1: the State House and Senate, I think got the major
Speaker 1: and the guy that had been there for a very
Speaker 1: long time, I knew him. He was an honest guy,
Speaker 1: he was a Christian guy, and he really did have
Speaker 1: conservative principles. Tom Tillis just came out of nowhere and
Speaker 1: they made him Speaker of the House. The guy who
Speaker 1: had been the minority leader got passed over. And one
Speaker 1: of the first things that Tom Tillis did as Speaker
Speaker 1: of the House was to open the floodgates to foreign
Speaker 1: companies who wanted to put in toll roads that had
Speaker 1: never been in North Carolina again. So he did that,
Speaker 1: and he was rewarded for those types of things. That
Speaker 1: was just one of the things that he did along
Speaker 1: those lines. But you could clearly see that he was
Speaker 1: a tool of the global establishment. They quickly put him
Speaker 1: in as Senator, and he's been there for quite some time,
Speaker 1: and he is now leaving and he is free to
Speaker 1: criticize Trump and the Trump administration, and so he said
Speaker 1: the day after that clip I just showed you of
Speaker 1: Jake Tapper talking to Steven Miller. He got on with
Speaker 1: Jake Tapper, and he said, look, either Steven Miller needs
Speaker 1: to get into the lane where he knows what he's
Speaker 1: talking about, or he needs to get out of this job,
Speaker 1: said tell us to Jake Tapper, and he's retiring so
Speaker 1: he can criticize Trump. He is somebody who has been
Speaker 1: in the Senate, He's been part of the NATO Observer Group,
Speaker 1: so he is very pro NATO's I said, he's a globalist,
Speaker 1: and he called the NATO alliance critically important. He told
Speaker 1: Jake Tapper that shaking that alliance sends a signal to
Speaker 1: Putin that he's winning. So again, this is, you know,
Speaker 1: feeding that divide there, that mcgillan divide. So I see
Speaker 1: NATO as a threat to piece. It's a different kind
Speaker 1: of threat to peace than Steven Miller and the Trump administration,
Speaker 1: but they're both a threat to peace. And so he said,
Speaker 1: we need to make it very clear that our strength
Speaker 1: and our ability to project power, to stand off against Putin,
Speaker 1: to stand off against Russia, to stand off against China, Iran,
Speaker 1: it all rests on this exquisite capability that we have
Speaker 1: under NATO. NATO doesn't bring anything to the defense of
Speaker 1: America quite the contrary. NATO is a liability, NATO is
Speaker 1: a trap. It is a trip wire to draw us
Speaker 1: into wars that Europeans have always had, always bickering about things,
Speaker 1: and now NATO is trying to drag us into a
Speaker 1: direct war with Russia. So it is not part of
Speaker 1: our security. They don't bring anything to protect us. It's
Speaker 1: all unilateral and we all know that. But he goes
Speaker 1: on to say, I'm really sick of stupid. You know,
Speaker 1: I am too, And I think war, regardless of which
Speaker 1: direction it comes to us for foreign entanglements, is stupid.
Speaker 1: I don't care if it's Europe's geopolitical ambitions or if
Speaker 1: it's Trump's command ambitions, or whatever it is. I think
Speaker 1: it's still stupid. He says, I want good advice for
Speaker 1: this president because I want to see this president have
Speaker 1: a good legacy. This nonsense about what is going on
Speaker 1: with Greenland is a distraction from the good work that
Speaker 1: he's doing. And the amateurs who said it was a
Speaker 1: good idea should lose their job. So he's calling him
Speaker 1: stupid an amateur. Miller asserted during the interview with Tapper
Speaker 1: that Greenland should be part of the United States. Tillis
Speaker 1: told Tapper that Miller's CNN interview is a horrible execution
Speaker 1: on a subject matter that he knows nothing about. But
Speaker 1: the reality is is that what Miller did was to
Speaker 1: lay out for everybody to see that the policy of
Speaker 1: the Trump administration is brute force. They don't care about law,
Speaker 1: they don't care about convention, borders, guidelines, constitution, None of
Speaker 1: this stuff matters. It's just what they can get away with.
Speaker 1: And that's the key takeaway here. So he said, you know,
Speaker 1: what makes me cranky, stupid, What makes me cranky is
Speaker 1: when we tarnish the extraordinary execution of a mission that
Speaker 1: I fully support in Venezuela by turning around and making
Speaker 1: insane comments about how it is our right to have
Speaker 1: territory owned by the Kingdom of Denmark. Again, Miller is
Speaker 1: consistent and Tom Tillis is consistent in the sense that, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, let's have a war with Venezuela and let's
Speaker 1: have a war with Putin. NATO is not an organization
Speaker 1: for peace. When Denmark and Greenland make it clear that
Speaker 1: Greenland is not for sale as a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: there's a joke about that. What's the difference between Trump
Speaker 1: and Greenland. Greenland's not for sale. The United States must
Speaker 1: honor as treaty obligations and respect the sovereignty and territorial
Speaker 1: integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark. Well, Europe has drawn
Speaker 1: the line on this, as the Washington Post story they
Speaker 1: take They said, you know, there's been a lot of
Speaker 1: conflict over the last year with Trump and NATO allies,
Speaker 1: conflict over how Ukraine should be handled. And then Trump
Speaker 1: began his tariff wars, and so they decided that they
Speaker 1: would just kind of go easy and try to manage
Speaker 1: him around the edges and that type of thing. But
Speaker 1: they're saying now that he is directly going after Greenland,
Speaker 1: things look a bit different, they said, and so they
Speaker 1: are taking this on as a direct assault. So let's
Speaker 1: talk a little bit about Greenland.
Speaker 2: Oh to look around at the patch of round as
Speaker 2: Mother Najercy.
Speaker 1: So it's all all to bus.
Speaker 3: It's a miserable place to day.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I guess we've had enough time. Now I can
Speaker 1: play that clip that had a year ago. It's Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirk singing with Donald Trump. They went on their sniffing
Speaker 1: tour of Greenland. And so the US is discussing ways
Speaker 1: to acquire Greenland. Military use is on the table, they say,
Speaker 1: And I think that that is true, but not in
Speaker 1: the way that people are thinking. I think what is
Speaker 1: going to happen is that they've had a massive presence
Speaker 1: in Greenland in the past, and they still have that
Speaker 1: treaty that was signed with Denmark saying that they can
Speaker 1: bring troops in. So the US had a couple of
Speaker 1: dozen different military bases in Greenland. They had ten thousand
Speaker 1: troops in Greenland. I don't know if that was just
Speaker 1: at the one base that they have, if that was
Speaker 1: distributed with those other bases they're during World War Two.
Speaker 1: That still stands, and they could put troops in if
Speaker 1: they want and not violate that treaty and not have
Speaker 1: a shooting war. And who's going to shoot in that war?
Speaker 1: On the other side, as Steven Miller says, there's only
Speaker 1: about thirty thousand people, Well actually it's about fifty thousand,
Speaker 1: but they're not armed and they're not going to shoot.
Speaker 1: And the US could just move massive amounts of men
Speaker 1: in material, create new military bases, or revive the old ones,
Speaker 1: and there'd be nothing that they could do about it.
Speaker 1: And that may very well be what they're talking about
Speaker 1: in terms of a military solution with all this stuff,
Speaker 1: and that is if that really is their concern, if
Speaker 1: they want to they're concerned, as they say that Russia's
Speaker 1: got a very large fleet of icebreakers and things like that,
Speaker 1: that Russia is moving to take over the Arctic. There's
Speaker 1: also this narrative, Oh, and because of global warming, the
Speaker 1: polar ice caps are melting, and soon we'll have access
Speaker 1: to all those resources in Greenland and we'll be able
Speaker 1: to navigate around that. Well, I don't think that's true.
Speaker 1: If that were true, Russia clearly doesn't believe it either,
Speaker 1: because they're building ice breakers. They wouldn't be building icebreakers
Speaker 1: that they thought the polar ice caps are going to melt,
Speaker 1: So that's nonsense. But it does go back to the hegemony,
Speaker 1: which is basically geopolitical monopoly. It's the game of monopoly,
Speaker 1: and who's going to put their hotels on Greenland? So
Speaker 1: we may see some things like that, but it'd be
Speaker 1: very easy for them to put the military bases there.
Speaker 1: Trump has made it well known that acquiring Greenland is
Speaker 1: a national security priority in the United States, vital to
Speaker 1: tour our adversaries in the Arctic region, said Caroline love it.
Speaker 1: And so again, as I said, it doesn't mean that
Speaker 1: you have to make Greenland part of the United States
Speaker 1: in order to do that. They did it before. We
Speaker 1: don't have any resources there. If it's so vital to
Speaker 1: our national security, why don't we have any resources there?
Speaker 1: And again, they could add them at any point that
Speaker 1: they want. There's no need for this kind of confrontational
Speaker 1: rhetoric that they put out there, but he doesn't because
Speaker 1: Stephen Miller and Trump want conflict, they want confrontation. They
Speaker 1: thrive off of this professional wrestling rhetoric that is out there.
Speaker 1: Since at least twenty nineteen, Trump has publicly emphasized Greenland's
Speaker 1: importance to American national security, and he's just recently appointed
Speaker 1: Louisiana governor, who this is his last year in office,
Speaker 1: as a special envoy to there. Said we need Greenland,
Speaker 1: he said, not for minerals. If you take a look
Speaker 1: at Greenland, you look up and down the coast, you
Speaker 1: have Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We
Speaker 1: need it for national security. We have to have it. Well, again,
Speaker 1: there is absolutely no reason that he can't that he
Speaker 1: has to have Greenland in order to put a military
Speaker 1: base there.
Speaker 2: Greenland does.
Speaker 1: The precious so much so that I was skeptical when
Speaker 1: he's talking about this a year guy said, I think
Speaker 1: I think that's a lie, just like the fentanyl coming
Speaker 1: from Canada is a lie. I think he really wants
Speaker 1: the mineral resources there, and that still may be the case,
Speaker 1: but because if he wants to put troops there, they
Speaker 1: can do that and it doesn't have to be an invasion.
Speaker 1: So there's talk that widely reported from insiders by the
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal that Secretary Rubio told lawmakers and a
Speaker 1: closed door briefing that Trump seeks to buy Greenland rather
Speaker 1: than invade it, and that would indicate again that they
Speaker 1: want the minerals and the oil that are there rather
Speaker 1: than for defense purposes. When asked about it, House Speaker
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson gave his standard reply, well, I don't remember
Speaker 1: that anything about that. I don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 1: I have to go back and take a look at this.
Speaker 1: And so since this all began a year ago, Greenland
Speaker 1: and Denmark have been trying to meet with Marco Rubio
Speaker 1: and he's refused to meet with them, which I think
Speaker 1: is going to interesting. And so the cooperation between Greenland
Speaker 1: and Copenhagen has been long run. The cooperation between Copenhagen
Speaker 1: and Washington has been long standing, especially over Greenland and
Speaker 1: the Denmark is buying American F thirty five fighters, and
Speaker 1: Denmark's parliament voted in favor of a bill to allow
Speaker 1: the US military to set up a base on Danish soil.
Speaker 1: So again they're buying our planes. They said, we can
Speaker 1: put a base on Denmark's soil. We've had many bases
Speaker 1: in Greenland, most of which have been closed, so much
Speaker 1: so that some of the news organizations saying, last time
Speaker 1: the US was there, they left a real mess. You
Speaker 1: can still see after fifty sixty years. You can still
Speaker 1: see the rusty, the rust from the equipment we left behind,
Speaker 1: as well as the groundwater contamination from the military basis,
Speaker 1: which we usually leave in our wake everywhere we go.
Speaker 1: So there was more confrontation with Caroline Lovett, this time
Speaker 1: from a Fox News reporter, Jackie Heinrich. She said, following
Speaker 1: up on Greenland, why not rule out taking it by
Speaker 1: military force? Caroline Lovett said, well, all options are on
Speaker 1: the table for Trump as he examines what is in
Speaker 1: the best interest of the United States. But I'll just
Speaker 1: say the president's first option has always been diplomacy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we've noticed how polite and diplomatically he addresses everybody, Haven't
Speaker 1: you noticed that. I thought that's been one of the
Speaker 1: one of the defining hallmarks of his character is how
Speaker 1: diplomatic Trump is. Does the President recognize Denmark's ownership as
Speaker 1: part of the Kingdom, Heinrich asked in a follow up,
Speaker 1: because there's been some Republican senators questioning the claim that
Speaker 1: Denmark has to Greenland. As a president in that camp
Speaker 1: with them questioning the legality of their ownership of Greenland,
Speaker 1: and she said, well, I haven't heard him question it personally,
Speaker 1: but you're welcome to ask him the next time you
Speaker 1: have the chance. Well, as The London Times points out,
Speaker 1: America's last occupation of Greenland was a disaster. Greenlanders still
Speaker 1: remember the last time the US took their country. Heavy presence.
Speaker 1: During World War II, as many as twenty five American
Speaker 1: military bases, including major posts, weather stations, minor airstrips, and
Speaker 1: auxiliary facilities, provided fuel, information and supply services to allies
Speaker 1: in Europe in nineteen forty seven. It didn't end well
Speaker 1: when we departed the country. We left behind a huge
Speaker 1: toxic mess of oil barrels, military equipment, hangars, and trucks.
Speaker 1: In twenty seventeen, this writer said, when I visited one area,
Speaker 1: one of the major old military sites on the east
Speaker 1: coast of the country, it was in desperate shape. Nearby
Speaker 1: streams ran red with rivers of rust and fuel deposits,
Speaker 1: and the carcasses of air hangars and trucks were rusting
Speaker 1: and sinking into the soft ground. And that's just what
Speaker 1: you could see with the naked eye. The soil is
Speaker 1: said to be contaminated with asbestos and lead, while the
Speaker 1: valley is rumored to contain seven hundred pounds of undetonated dynamite.
Speaker 1: The American argument for leaving the military sites in disarray
Speaker 1: after the war was kin to well, we paid for
Speaker 1: these air bases to save Denmark and Europe from the Nazis,
Speaker 1: so Denmark can clean them up. But it wasn't until
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen that Denmark agreed to pay for a cleanup
Speaker 1: of about thirty bases, including one where more than one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand old or oil barrels were lying around rusting.
Speaker 1: The elimination of asbestos ritted buildings barrels filled with leaded
Speaker 1: aviation fuel and corroding metal trucks. Unexploded dynamite didn't even
Speaker 1: start until twenty and nineteen. If anything, Greenlanders want everybody out.
Speaker 1: Surveys show that sixty six percent I'm sorry, fifty six percent,
Speaker 1: so they would vote for complete independence of a referendumre
Speaker 1: hell today, twenty eight percent would vote no, while seventeen
Speaker 1: percent were undecided. We are our own people with our
Speaker 1: own culture, and we don't want anyone, not the Danish,
Speaker 1: not Americans here. And so again this is the result
Speaker 1: of the election that they had last year. All the
Speaker 1: major parties agreed that they wanted independence from Denmark and
Speaker 1: they didn't want to join America. So a lot of
Speaker 1: what is driving this is the idea. And there's been
Speaker 1: a book that's been written recently that everybody is writing
Speaker 1: about called Polar War, asking whether or not the polar
Speaker 1: North is going to be the site next site of
Speaker 1: global conflict. And again this is all about empire and
Speaker 1: controlling everything, and it's just more of that type of
Speaker 1: tribal thinking. But on that we see with the Republicans
Speaker 1: versus Democrats, These people who operate this way domestically operate
Speaker 1: that way internationally as well. It's all about tribalism, it's
Speaker 1: all about monopolizing power. It's all driven by that same
Speaker 1: thing that drives the drug war. It's an addiction to power,
Speaker 1: So I said, Russia at the point, at this point,
Speaker 1: is leading the charge with more military basis in the Arctic,
Speaker 1: greater competency and cold weather operations, and a fleet of
Speaker 1: icebreakers that towards the maritime Arctic fleets of every other nation.
Speaker 1: It has become far and away the region's biggest player.
Speaker 1: And so we've got to stop that. We've got to
Speaker 1: oppose the Russians having that.
Speaker 2: Area, no matter an Arctic circle gap.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 2: So Russians are going to get up there and they're
Speaker 2: going to take all the polar.
Speaker 1: Bears, that's right. So the New York Times says, we're
Speaker 1: going to buy Greenland or we're going to take it militarily. Well,
Speaker 1: an old pact already gives Trump a free hand to
Speaker 1: put an American military presence there at will. And this
Speaker 1: is the treaty that was done after World War II
Speaker 1: under a little known Cold War agreement. The US already
Speaker 1: enjoys sweeping military access to Greenland. Right now, the US
Speaker 1: has one base in a very remote corner of the island,
Speaker 1: but the agreement allows it to quote, construct, install, maintain,
Speaker 1: and operate unquote military bases across Greenland. They can also
Speaker 1: house personnel control, landings, takeoffs, anchorages, moorings, movements, and operation
Speaker 1: of ships, aircraft, and waterborne craft. It was signed in
Speaker 1: nineteen fifty one by the US and Denmark, which Denmark
Speaker 1: colonized Greenland three hundred years ago. So the question that
Speaker 1: Stephen Miller had, what right do they have to that, Well,
Speaker 1: they've had this area for three hundred years. I think
Speaker 1: that's pretty important. But he doesn't. The US has such
Speaker 1: a free hand in Greenland that it can pretty much
Speaker 1: do whatever it wishes, said one person in Copenhagen. But
Speaker 1: again it could be complicated by some of the independence
Speaker 1: powers that were partially granted to Greenland in two thousand
Speaker 1: and nine. But I still say that, you know, with
Speaker 1: an American military base still there and with this treaty
Speaker 1: in place, the Trump administration could do whatever they want
Speaker 1: to a national security There's absolutely no reason for them
Speaker 1: to manufacture a fight for this, and yet look at
Speaker 1: what they did with Canada. Why would they go to
Speaker 1: why would they create hostilities between the US and Canada
Speaker 1: over a lie about fentanyl and other things? They use
Speaker 1: that lie to create tariffs. Well, when we come back,
Speaker 1: we want to talk about what is that the base
Speaker 1: of all these different countries, not just the US, but
Speaker 1: it's also the UK, Germany, France. What is happening with Russia,
Speaker 1: all of these countries including the US. Why is it
Speaker 1: that they are pushing so hard for war here at
Speaker 1: the end of this fourth Turney and again, all these
Speaker 1: wars are bankers wars, comments Travis.
Speaker 2: That's right, We've got Wally Walrus and thank you very
Speaker 2: much for the support.
Speaker 1: Waller, thank you, he says.
Speaker 2: Let's pray for these agents that they can see the
Speaker 2: wrong they are doing working for the government. Pray for
Speaker 2: our enemies to see the light. Yes, yes, Jason Barker says,
Speaker 2: we create the monsters so we can justify going to
Speaker 2: steal their resources. We need the Venezuelan oil to heat
Speaker 2: the tents in Greenland. That's nice, Yeah, Hi, boost Trump
Speaker 2: is right. I couldn't even sleep last night because of
Speaker 2: the military threat that Greenland poses.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's Greenland, Greenland.
Speaker 2: That's right, They're very serious, very dangerous.
Speaker 1: We gotta take them seriously, Russians and Chinese everywhere.
Speaker 2: Fonsie Bear says, Come on, people, Greenland was never mentioned
Speaker 2: once ever as important by anyone until Trump just spewed
Speaker 2: it out there for the media to gobble up.
Speaker 1: Absolutely right. Well, we're gonna take a quick break, folks,
Speaker 1: and we'll be right back.
Speaker 3: July.
Speaker 1: Listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 8: Hello, it's me Voladimir Zelenski. I'm so tired of wearing
Speaker 8: these same T shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with
Speaker 8: all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
Speaker 8: And I could if only David Knight would send me
Speaker 8: one of his beautiful gray mcguffin hoodies or a new
Speaker 8: black T shirt with the mcguffin logo in blue.
Speaker 3: But he told me to get lost.
Speaker 8: Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some
Speaker 8: at the Davidknightshow dot com. You should be able to
Speaker 8: buy me several hundred. Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies
Speaker 8: are so beautiful. I'd wear something other than green military
Speaker 8: cosplay to my various gallas and social events. If you
Speaker 8: want to save on shipping, just put it in the
Speaker 8: next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
Speaker 1: Well, that's right, and we've got to go, as the
Speaker 1: strange love General played by George Wisconsins, we had to
Speaker 1: go to do and them Ruskies out there, and I
Speaker 1: guess we did yesterday. This is a Russian flagged oil
Speaker 1: tanker that was seized in the Atlantic. They said they
Speaker 1: had special forces board them. First, the coast Guard had
Speaker 1: tried to board them and they had somehow kept that
Speaker 1: from happening. So then you had British joined with the
Speaker 1: US in terms of tracking this thing, and evidently special
Speaker 1: forces coming after them. And you can see something else there.
Speaker 1: Look at that. That's a submarine there with this alleged tanker,
Speaker 1: which is kind of interesting and it's caused some speculation
Speaker 1: by people as to whether or not this is really
Speaker 1: simply about the oil and about the embargo. This had
Speaker 1: because of its route, the speculation that perhaps it was
Speaker 1: carrying weapons and being escorted by a Russian submarine and
Speaker 1: maybe it's going to drop off those weapons and then
Speaker 1: pick up some oil to go back. And the plot
Speaker 1: thickens as well because this tanker was not originally registered
Speaker 1: to Russia. They changed their registration. In the midst of
Speaker 1: this particular journey, the oil tanker making its way to Russia,
Speaker 1: linked to both Venezuela and to Hesbelah, has been seized
Speaker 1: by US forces and a daring mission in the Atlantic
Speaker 1: supported by British armed forces. The claim the ship was
Speaker 1: also linked to Hesbela White House Press Secretary of Caroline
Speaker 1: Lovett set told reporters the captured crew would be brought
Speaker 1: to the United States for prosecution if necessary. Terry is
Speaker 1: prepared to continue this, said hag Seth. The President when
Speaker 1: he speaks, he means it. He's not messing around. We
Speaker 1: are an administration of action, that's right, and a pirate action. Yeah,
Speaker 1: pirate peat, there you go. He's going to do whatever
Speaker 1: is pirate King tells him to do. Again, this is
Speaker 1: always focusing on these different ships. While this ship did
Speaker 1: this and this ship did that. It is a hallmark
Speaker 1: of the anthropomorphism of the civilized at forfeiture lie that
Speaker 1: we see all the time charging inanimate objects and property
Speaker 1: with crimes, confiscating them on that basis, and then maybe
Speaker 1: not even putting any charges at all against the actual
Speaker 1: human owners of these things, but just charging the inanimate
Speaker 1: object with a crime. This ship, now known as the Marinera,
Speaker 1: is under US sanctions and has spent at least two
Speaker 1: weeks attempting to evade a US blockade near Venezuela. Ship
Speaker 1: tracking showed that the tanker nearing Iceland Exclusive Economic Zone.
Speaker 1: Today it holds such importance to the Kremlin that they
Speaker 1: deployed a submarine and other vehicles vessels, I should say,
Speaker 1: to escort it across the Atlantic. It began its journey
Speaker 1: in Iran and was bound for Venezuela to pick up oil,
Speaker 1: part of the so called shadow fleet that moves oil
Speaker 1: for Russia, Iran and Venezuela despite US sanctions. After it
Speaker 1: left the Caribbean, its name was changed from the below
Speaker 1: one to the marian Era, and it switched from a
Speaker 1: Guyana flag to a Russian flag. Every vessel has to
Speaker 1: fly a flag. Incorrect flagging can lead to illegal to
Speaker 1: legal issues. Again, I guess it'd be a false flag, right,
Speaker 1: we are the experts and false flags. But this is
Speaker 1: a literal false flag, and so it may not be
Speaker 1: quite as as it was shown initially. You know, I
Speaker 1: first looked at it, I thought, well, this is even
Speaker 1: more aggression. That is really reckless if we're not going
Speaker 1: to go after Russian vessels. But it may be that
Speaker 1: this was picking up weapons in Iran. And then as
Speaker 1: part of the journey they changed their registration, they changed
Speaker 1: their flag. As a matter of fact, they even ship
Speaker 1: not only changed its flag and its identity, but the
Speaker 1: crew painted a Russian tricolor on the hull as they
Speaker 1: were going, so they they identified. I guess we call
Speaker 1: this a transshipment.
Speaker 2: The Transatlantic.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they transit themselves and transit and they became Russian.
Speaker 1: So by January first, it had become officially renamed to
Speaker 1: the marin Era and it was listed on the Russian
Speaker 1: Maritime Register of Shipping RIF planes were understood to have
Speaker 1: been involved in the US operation, British air bases were
Speaker 1: used as a launch pad for the mission to try
Speaker 1: to board the vessel. We provided enabling support to the US,
Speaker 1: said the Royal forces there. They said the RAF also
Speaker 1: provided air surveillance as part of a Russia Iran sanctions
Speaker 1: evasion access. We know that Iran has been seeking to
Speaker 1: sell oil against the sanctions that are in place, and
Speaker 1: they use the proceeds from selling that oil that is
Speaker 1: transported on these shadow vessels to fund into fuel terrorism
Speaker 1: and to fuel conflict and misery from the Middle East
Speaker 1: to Ukraine. Well, I'll just say that. You know, we've
Speaker 1: always said that, and it is true. Sanctions are an
Speaker 1: act of war and it could very easily lead to
Speaker 1: a shooting war, especially when you confiscate ships, as we're
Speaker 1: doing on a regular basis. Because was it wasn't just
Speaker 1: that ship that was confiscated. There was a second one
Speaker 1: that was confiscated, but everybody focused on that one because
Speaker 1: it had changed this registration and flag to Russian before
Speaker 1: that happened. And so as I mentioned yesterday, and as
Speaker 1: Gerald Slenty is mentioned frequently when you look at the
Speaker 1: context of Pearl Harbor, the US Adari cut off successfully
Speaker 1: basically cut off the oil shipments to Japan that didn't
Speaker 1: have any oil of its own, and so basically backed
Speaker 1: them into a corner. Great powers, however, have erased international law,
Speaker 1: says the Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico, accusing Washington of
Speaker 1: acting with impunity and of erasing international law in pursuit
Speaker 1: of resources. He said, great powers today literally do whatever
Speaker 1: they want. They have completely erased the existence of international
Speaker 1: law and the necessity of complying with it. And they've
Speaker 1: done the same thing at home with the Constitution as well.
Speaker 1: And Trump knows this, and so that's why the recent
Speaker 1: all time high military budget of a trillion dollars is
Speaker 1: not enough. The world is not enough for a chains
Speaker 1: Moderli like Villain got to have a fifty percent increase
Speaker 1: for this, and again, we're already forty percent of the
Speaker 1: world's military budget, he says. If it weren't for the
Speaker 1: tremendous numbers being produced by the teriffs from other countries,
Speaker 1: many of which in the past have ripped off the
Speaker 1: United States at levels never seen before, I should I
Speaker 1: would stay at the trillion dollar number, but because of tariffs,
Speaker 1: we can now go higher. Do you notice something, you know?
Speaker 1: For the last year, Trump and Bescent have been claiming
Speaker 1: that there was going to be a windfall for the
Speaker 1: tariffs and that was going to be passed on to
Speaker 1: the American people. Remember that, Yeah, it's going to be
Speaker 1: a large amount of money. We're going to get you
Speaker 1: a stimulus check or something. Because it is a tax,
Speaker 1: it is a hidden tax. And now Trump is saying, no,
Speaker 1: I don't think we're going to give it back to
Speaker 1: the people. We're going to spend it on military equipment.
Speaker 2: Just briefly, as an aside, there's a retro game shop
Speaker 2: here nearby where we live, which I like to go.
Speaker 2: I chat with the owner and you know, we talk.
Speaker 2: The tariffs have really put a hit on his business.
Speaker 1: Really.
Speaker 2: He imports a lot of things from Japan and it's
Speaker 2: caused prices for him to go up, you know, twenty
Speaker 2: thirty percent almost.
Speaker 1: Well, it is a tax, and you know, Republicans always
Speaker 1: would say, you can't tax the corporation. Why a business
Speaker 1: is going to pass those costs along to people or
Speaker 1: they're going to go out of business. And that's one
Speaker 1: of the reasons why we see so many small businesses
Speaker 1: going out of business, because they don't feel like they
Speaker 1: can pass that along and they don't have very deep pockets.
Speaker 1: You know, the large corporations can pretty much draw money
Speaker 1: from Wall Street as if they were a central bank.
Speaker 1: They could almost manufacture money that way, and so small
Speaker 1: businesses can. I mean, for years, we operate against Blockbuster,
Speaker 1: which is owned by Paramount, and they could operate at
Speaker 1: a loss for decades. Small businesses can't. So but the
Speaker 1: real thing that's damaging is this on again off again,
Speaker 1: oscillation vacillation of Trump as to what these amounts are
Speaker 1: going to be. Nobody can plan it right. Some one
Speaker 1: of the reasons that it makes it so difficult to
Speaker 1: raise prices, and so this has been very destructive economically.
Speaker 1: But it is a tax, and he chose to do
Speaker 1: a tax that was going to be somewhat hidden. But
Speaker 1: we also need to pay attention to the fact that
Speaker 1: why is it that all of these countries are held
Speaker 1: bent on war? They want a global war, every one
Speaker 1: of these Western nations. Here's an example, the West wants
Speaker 1: to send troops to Ukraine over fear of a war
Speaker 1: in Ukraine. And again this is Alexey Ristovich, the guy
Speaker 1: who has been very frank about a lot of this stuff.
Speaker 1: He was the guy a top aid to Zelensky after
Speaker 1: they got elected in twenty nineteen on a platform of peace.
Speaker 1: Because there was already a civil war in Ukraine. The
Speaker 1: eastern areas did not want to be a part of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: They wanted to remain with Russia. They were culturally, linguistically,
Speaker 1: religiously connected to Russia, and they didn't want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the government that we had installed as
Speaker 1: a coup and so the response from that American back
Speaker 1: government was to bomb the people on the eastern side
Speaker 1: of the country. And so he was the guy that
Speaker 1: went to the peace twks and as you remember, I've
Speaker 1: talked about this and shown this many times. He comes
Speaker 1: back and talks to a reporter there in Ukraine. She said,
Speaker 1: why the chances for peace? He goes not Because she goes, oh,
Speaker 1: that's awful. He goes, no, it's going to get worse.
Speaker 1: He said. In twenty nineteen, right after the had been elected,
Speaker 1: he said we're going to have in three years a
Speaker 1: war with Russia. And they did, and she goes, that's horrible.
Speaker 1: He goes, yeah, but we'll gain. The country will be destroyed,
Speaker 1: but we'll be able to get into NATO, he said.
Speaker 1: But he's also the guy who got fired because he
Speaker 1: told people that the one of these Scrus missiles that
Speaker 1: hit a apartment building hit the apartment building because it
Speaker 1: had been hit by a defensive fire that took it off. Course,
Speaker 1: he was summarily fired, but he has been very candid
Speaker 1: about all this stuff, and he is now saying that
Speaker 1: there is a deployment that is coming in order to
Speaker 1: prevent civil war within Ukraine. The military presence there will
Speaker 1: be used as a stabilization force. But it's not even
Speaker 1: just that. Britain is very eager to get boots on
Speaker 1: the ground. So is France, and so Keir Starma just
Speaker 1: did a joint declaration with France and Ukraine Tuesday to
Speaker 1: confirm details with so called multinational force boots on the
Speaker 1: ground in Ukraine. And they're trying to draw the US
Speaker 1: into that as well. That's why you have Zelensky proposing
Speaker 1: a fifteen year occupation of Ukraine by American forces to
Speaker 1: get US into a tripwire situation with war with Russia.
Speaker 1: And so so far the US government has pulled back
Speaker 1: against actual boots on the ground, but France and the
Speaker 1: UK are eager to get in there put their soldiers
Speaker 1: on the ground. Russia has said that any European troops
Speaker 1: that are there will be treated as hostile forces and
Speaker 1: are liable to be attacked. Meanwhile, Witkoff from the US
Speaker 1: has said the security proposals are meant to deter any
Speaker 1: further attacks in Ukraine. If there are any attacks, they
Speaker 1: are meant to defend. So this is how we get
Speaker 1: drawn into a World War three, and they all want
Speaker 1: to do that and there's reason that they want to
Speaker 1: do that because they all know it's not just America
Speaker 1: that has got a massive debt trap. This is something
Speaker 1: that also applies to the EU, also applies to the UK.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, Alistair McLeod has an article
Speaker 1: on zero Hedge saying debt trap. Who's going to bail
Speaker 1: out first? Who's going to be taken down by this
Speaker 1: debt trap first? Will be the US, the UK or
Speaker 1: the EU? He said. Stagnating economies together with high government
Speaker 1: debt loads inevitably create funding crises and debt traps. Nowhere
Speaker 1: is this problem more destructive than for the Fiat dollar.
Speaker 1: But it's not just the dollar. Economies in the Eurozone
Speaker 1: and the UK have insufficient growth to support their colossal
Speaker 1: mountains of government debt. And this article I explained the
Speaker 1: mechanics of the debt trap, how a combination of rising
Speaker 1: interest rates reflect growing risk and stagnating economies. And of
Speaker 1: course one of the key reasons that these economies are
Speaker 1: stagnating is by design. When we look at Germany and
Speaker 1: the EU and the UK, it is this green agenda
Speaker 1: that has caused them to basically scrap their energy sources
Speaker 1: and their manufacturing base and abandon it to China, who
Speaker 1: are allowed to create, however many power plants they wish,
Speaker 1: they can make them as cheap and dirty as they
Speaker 1: wish using coal. They don't even have to use natural gas.
Speaker 1: So the economies are going down everywhere as the government
Speaker 1: regulation increases, as the government debt increases, and so all
Speaker 1: these Western governments that are pushing so hard for war
Speaker 1: are all facing this debt trap. And that's really the key.
Speaker 1: So I said before, all wars are bankers' wars. And
Speaker 1: when you look at the fourth turnings, they usually begin
Speaker 1: with economic issues and then they cullinate with a war
Speaker 1: because we all know that as things get really bad
Speaker 1: and people get really upset and they start to go
Speaker 1: after the institutions and the governments to stave off a
Speaker 1: revolution or an overthrow of the government, they will take
Speaker 1: you to war. And you can see that happening with
Speaker 1: net Yahoo's government in Israel. And so this is something
Speaker 1: that is going to be coming to everybody. This is
Speaker 1: why the worldwide debt crisis is really the driving force
Speaker 1: behind a world war that is there. And so as
Speaker 1: he points out, you look at he had massive debt
Speaker 1: after World War II, we had a debt to GDP
Speaker 1: ratio of about one hundred and twenty percent. That disappeared
Speaker 1: because we were able to grow our way out of that.
Speaker 1: It wasn't that the government stopped spending money, or that
Speaker 1: the government spending decreased, and it wasn't lower interest rates,
Speaker 1: It wasn't any of that. It was the fact that
Speaker 1: the economy was still able to grow. But they have
Speaker 1: continued to regulate and to ban economic activity, so that's
Speaker 1: becoming very difficult to do. And when they do that,
Speaker 1: one of the things that they turn to are taxes.
Speaker 1: But there's only so much taxing that you can do.
Speaker 1: That's why Trump did these tariffs. It's a way of
Speaker 1: taxing people by stealth. And you've got this massive army
Speaker 1: of magabots and magatards out there. The magabots who are
Speaker 1: telling people and the magatards who believe it that tariffs
Speaker 1: are not going to raise prices, not going to be
Speaker 1: a hidden tax on people.
Speaker 2: Also, I want to jump in and remind people that
Speaker 2: there is never a better time than now to start
Speaker 2: growing your own food or raising your own foods. Right,
Speaker 2: you have the ability, right chickens are you know their work,
Speaker 2: But they're less work than a lot of other animals
Speaker 2: and you get eggs and then you can eat the
Speaker 2: chicken when the time comes. So it's a good idea
Speaker 2: if you can raise chickens, raise chickens, find ways to
Speaker 2: collect water. And if you want a stash of survival food,
Speaker 2: you can go to homestead Products dot shop and use
Speaker 2: promo code nine for ten percent off. But you really
Speaker 2: want to be able to produce your own food.
Speaker 1: And also Jack loss in books, yeah, and Civil Defense
Speaker 1: Manual very very important. And when you look at money
Speaker 1: and this debt crisis that is on its way, very
Speaker 1: important to get some money into gold and silver and
Speaker 1: to make sure that it's physical. You know, tether which
Speaker 1: is connected, which is tethered to Lucky Lutnik, the Commerce Secretary.
Speaker 1: They're getting into gold in a big way and they're
Speaker 1: going to use gold back stable coins in order for
Speaker 1: people to be able to do transactions. Don't tokenize things though,
Speaker 1: stay physical. That's why you need to go to David
Speaker 1: Knight dot Gold. I'll take you to Tony rdban. Make
Speaker 1: sure you've got gold and silver to get out of
Speaker 1: this dollar debt trap that is global. You can't get
Speaker 1: out of the war. But you can have some preparations
Speaker 1: that you can do with some of these products.
Speaker 2: And more important than any of that is.
Speaker 1: Give your life the place that's right.
Speaker 2: Christ is the only true salvation.
Speaker 1: That's the real hope, the real kingdom that we should
Speaker 1: be focused on.
Speaker 2: Whatever happens on earth. You want to be right with Christ.
Speaker 1: That's right. Absolutely. Thank you folks for listening. Have a
Speaker 1: good day, and prepare the common man. They created common
Speaker 1: Core and dumbed down our children. They created common past,
Speaker 1: track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure
Speaker 1: the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see
Speaker 1: the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of
Speaker 1: us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
Speaker 1: That is what we have in common. That is what
Speaker 1: they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
Speaker 1: They desire to know everything about us, while they hide
Speaker 1: everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
Speaker 1: expose what they want to hide. Please share the information
Speaker 1: and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank
Speaker 1: you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't
Speaker 1: support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. D
Speaker 1: Davidnightshow dot com