Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to another episode of
The Diddy Diaries. Ashley Parham has filed an amended complaint
against Ditty and she is named some pretty interesting code defendants.
And those code defendants are Christina Korum, Shane Pearce, Reuben Valdez,
John Pelte, Odell Beckham Junior, Drew des Bordis aka Drewski,
Jacqueline Wright aka Jaguar Wright, Holina Harris, Scott, Mattias Gonzalez,
Brandy Cunningham, Janis Combs, Keith Lux aka Big Homie CC,
and John and Jane those one through ten. So let's
dive into this document and see what Ashley Parham's talking about.
Case number three DASH twenty four DASH CV DASH zero
seven one nine one DASH rfl amended complaint demand for
a jury trial introduction. This case involves Rico enterprise for
the purpose of sexual assault, battery, rape, sexual abuse, false imprisonment,
and kidnapping for the personal and financial benefit to the
enterprise participants. Defendant Ditty has been sued by countless individuals
for crimes similar to the ones enumerated in this complaint.
Defendan Ditty is currently a federal inmate awaiting criminal trial
for crimes similar to the ones enumerated in this complaint.
Defending KK is an employee of Defendant Ditty, often referred
to by Defendan Ditty as his right hand woman. Defendant
Ditty's predatory behavior was constant and well known by several individuals,
including Defendan Ditty's employees, staff, friends, family, and associates. In fact,
Defendant Didtty's sons are being sued for engaging in the
same type of deviant behavior as their father, As pled
in a Los Angeles Superior Court filing. Defendant Ditty was
able to effectuate his crimes and evade capture and prosecution
for his crimes for almost thirty years due to his
position of power and influence in the entertainment industry. Defending
Ditty exploited his position and his relationship with powerful individuals
to force sexual acts through exploitation, fear, manipulation, physical threats,
emotional abuse, intimidation, and retaliation. Had any of the previous
victims of Defendan Didty had been taking seriously or had
any of the betters reported Defending Ditty's actions a law
enforcement Defendan Ditty's illegal and unfathomable behavior could have been prevented. Instead,
Defending Ditty was able to reign his abuse and terrorism
on countless victims for over thirty years. Additionally, had defendant
Ditties numerous business partners and associates not ignored Defendant Ditty's
divan behavior, Defending Ditty would have been unable to continue
his pattern of abuse over such a long period of time.
As alleged herein Defendan Ditty abused his position of power
in the entertainment industry to garner loyalty and trust from
the public at large and law enforcement, while instilling fear
and intimidation in the hearts of his voluminous victims. Allegations
against Defendant Ditty have been disregarded for decades, therefore creating
a failure to protect victims like the plaintiffs named here
In Unlike most victims of defendant Ditty who were employees,
sex workers, or individuals seeking out defendants help to launch
their careers, Plaintiff Parum does not fall into any of
those categories. Plaintiff Parum met Defendant Ditty due to happenstance
and still ended up being brutally victimized in a similar
manner as described by the others who have preceded her
filing and others who surely will follow, including plaintiff doz
here In. Plaintiff John and Jane Doe met with defendant
Ditty through their connections in the music industry. As Plaintiff
John Doe was a previous plaintiff against Michael Jackson for
a sexual assault as a minor. Due to defendants agreements
to participate in a corrupt enterprise, Plaintiff and countless other
victims have been immeasurably and permanently armed. Plaintiff alleged as
follow upon personal knowledge as to themselves and their acts
and experience, and as to all other matters, upon information
and belief, including investigations conducted by their attorneys parties. Plaintiff
Ashley Parham is an individual who resides in and domiciled
in California. Plaintiff John Doe is an individual who is
domiciled in Nevada and resides in another state purposely to
protect his safety and identity. Plaintiff Jane Doe is an
individual who is domiciled in Nevada and resides in another
state purposely to protect her safety and identity. Defend In
Colmes is an individual who resides in and is domiciled
in California. Defendant also owns a residence in Florida, However,
Defendan Diddy is currently an inmate at MDC in Brooklyn,
New York. Defending Christina Korum Defending KK is an individual who,
upon information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in
either California or North Carolina. Defend in Shaine Peers Defending
Chain is an individual who resides in and is domiciled
in California. Defendant Reuben Lera Valdez. Defendant Valdez is an
individual who resides and is domiciled in California. Defending John
Lawrence Pellete is an individual who resides in and is
domiciled in Nevada or Hawaii. Defendant Odell Beckham Junior Defendant
Odell is an individual who resides and is domiciled in Florida.
Previously referred to as John Doe and plaintiff Parum's original complaint.
Defending Drew Desbortis Defending Drewski is an individual who, upon
information and belief, resides in and is domiciled in either
Maryland or Georgia. Previously referred to as John Doe and
plaintiff Parum's original complaint. Defendant Jacqueline Wright Jaguarre is an
individual who, upon information and belief, resides in and is
domiciled in California or Nevada. Defendant Helena Harris Scott Defendant
Helena is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides
in and is domiciled in California. Defendant Mattias Golton Gonzales
Defending Gonzales is an individual who, upon information and belief,
resides in and is domiciled in Nevada. Defendant's Brandy Kloninger
Cunningham Defending Brandy is an individual who, upon information and belief,
resides and is domiciled in Arkansas. Previously referred to as
Jane Doe in plaintif Parhum's original complaint. Defending Janis Colmbs
is an individual who resides and is domiciled in Florida.
Defending Keith Lux Defending Big Homy CC is an individual who,
upon information and belief, resides and is domiciled in Nevada.
Defending John and Jane Does one through ten Defending Does
one through ten are individuals who, upon information and belief,
reside in and are domiciled in various states, but mainly California.
Jurisdiction venue timeliness in California's Sexual Abuse and Cover Up
Accountability Act, This Court has Federal question jurisdiction under twenty
eight Code Section thirteen thirty one, and supplemental jurisdiction under
US Code twenty eight Section thirteen sixty seven for the
state law claims alleged. This court has personal jurisdiction overall
defendants because they have purposefully availed themselves, are residents of
the state, and or were conducting business in California in
this lawsuit arised out of the acts that occurred in
California and relates to their contracts and contracts in California. Further,
the pervasive culture of abuse, including sexual assault, rape, inappropriate touching,
and wielding power and control over plaintiffs were a constant
presence when defendant Diddy and the other here in named
defendants engaged in the acts described herein. The location of
all relevant events herein alleged occurred within the jurisdiction of California.
Plaintiffs were harmed and injured in California by defendants. Venue
is proper in this judicial district under US Code twenty eight,
section thirteen ninety one B and C. Further venue is
proper in this judicial district. Pursu into US Code eighteen,
section nineteen sixty five. This action is timely under Federal Racketeering,
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act US Code eighteen, section nineteen
sixty one, as the Ditty Sexual Abuse and Cover Up
Enterprise fraudulently concealed the ongoing sexual and deceitful activity towards
in conspiracy taking place within Ditty Sexual Abuse and Cover
Up Enterprise. This action is also timely under California Sexual
Abuse and Cover Up Accountability Act. California Sexual Abuse and
Cover Up Accountability Act AB twenty seven seventy seven amended
California Civil Procedure Section three forty dot sixteen, extending the
statute of limitations, opening up revival window for adult survivors
of sexual assault and related claims, and acknowledging that a
two years statute of limitations simply does not provide sexual
assault survivors adequate time to heal from the physical and
emotional trauma of sexual assault and prepare for a civil case.
California Bill Analysis AB two seven seven seven six fourteen,
twenty twenty two. When the perpetrator is someone of victim trusts,
it can take years for the victim even to identify
what happened to them as sexual assault. For these reasons,
it's self evident that the unique nature of the emotional
and psychological consequences of sexual assault, especially on women, can
paradoxically permit wrongdoers to escape civil accountability unless statutes of
limitation are crafted to prevent this injustice from occurring. Moreover,
when these data are combined with widespread news reports of
major companies being accused of covering up sexual assaults by
their employees, it's self evident that statutes of limitation for
sexual assault need to be crafted in a way that
does not cause the covering up company to enjoy the
fruits of their cover up, solely because our statutes of
limitation permit and thus motivate such behavior. Defendants fraudulent concealment
through active attempts to her up caused an ongoing trauma
to plaintiff and caused her to suffer. Plaintiff Parum has
repressed her experience until recently, when defendant Ditty was accused
by his ex girlfriend former employee Cassiventura and others regarding
their experiences with defendant Ditty. Accessing the civil justice system
allows victim survivors an opportunity to seek accountability for the
years of suffering caused by the abuse they experienced and
a chance to take back the power they lost as
a result of the sexual assault. Plaintiffs John and Jane
Doe have been paralyzed in fear, have had to change
their names and frequently move from their residences for fear
of being kidnapped, raped and abused and assaulted by defendant Herein,
Plaintiff Doze hereby invoked the pseudonym to protect their lives
from the long reach of the Ditty sexual abuse and
cover up enterprise. Additionally, any statute of limitations applicable to
the blow claims if any is told and defendants are
e stop from raising such a defense as their actions
described below deprive plaintiff of the opportunity to commence this
lawsuit before now, as well as other equitable and legal bases.
All right, we're gonna wrap up part one right here,
and then the next episode we're gonna pick up with
factual allegations. Common do all counts. If you'd like to
contact me, you can do that at Bobby Kopuci at
protonmeil dot com. That's Bobby cap you Cci at protonmeil
dot com, or if you prefer, you can find me
on x at Bobby Underscore cap u Cci. All of
the links that we discussed can be found in the
description box. What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode
of The Diddy Diaries. In this episode, we're going to
pick up where we're left off with the Ashley Parhum,
a mended complaint filed against Diddy that added a whole
bunch of people including Odell Beckham and Jaguar Wright and
Drew Ski, factual allegations, common doll counts. Plaintiff Parum. Plaintiff
met Defend and Shane in February twenty eighteen after an
altercation with an man at a bar and defending Shane
came to plaintiff's rescue. While outside the bar with friends
and other patrons defending, Shane FaceTime video call defendant Ditty
and was showing people defending Ditty in the video on
his phone, attempting to impress people with his famous friend
defending Shane. Then showed plaintiff defending Ditty on his video call,
which plaintiff ignored, stating she was not impressed by him
knowing defendant Ditty because she believed defendant Ditty had something
to do with the murder of rapper Tupac Shakur, visible
in the FaceTime call, was defending Ditty and some of
his children, including his sons Christian and Quincy. It appeared,
from plaintiff's perspective, Defendan Ditty was having a get together
at his home during the time of the FaceTime call
with defending Shane. Defendant Ditty heard Plaintiff's statement and made
a remark that plaintiff would pay for her statements regarding
Tupac an overall dismissal of defendant Didty. On March twenty three,
twenty eighteen, Defending Shane invited plaintiff over to his home
to assist him with his cancer medications because he stated
he was weak and unable to open his medication. Upon
plaintiff's arrival, Defending Shane in foremn Plaintiff that he wanted
to give her a ride in his new car. Plaintiff
and Defending Shane left his residence for a brief period
and then returned once they returned. Defending Shane left the
door to his apartment partially open and stated that the
door was ajar because there was an issue with the
door where it wouldn't close completely. Defending Shane was renting
an apartment on the lower floor of a home in Orinda, California.
Defended Shane had a separate entrance into his residence that
led to the backyard of the home. The home also
had a main entrance on Loma Vista Drive. Defending Shane
rented the home from a woman who lived in the
upstairs portion of the home and had two dogs who
resided with her. Plaintiff and Defending Shane then began to
watch a movie, and Defending Shane offered her a glass
of water, which he retrieved and brought back to plaintiff.
Approximately ten minutes after Plaintiff and Defending Shane returned from
their drive, Defendant Diddy entered defending Chaine's residence. Defendan Didty
entered the home in a grand, ready to party manner.
His grandiose entrance was so loud that the dogs upstairs
began barking. Defending Ditty did not enter the home through
the backyard entrance, but instead through the main entrance. Along
with defending Ditty were his bodyguard, defendant Big Homey CC,
defending KK, defendant Brandy, defendant Dough two, who upon information
and belief, is a friend of Defending Shane and Didty,
and defending Ditty's driver Dough three, who remained outside in
his vehicle sharing the duration of plaintiff's assault. Plaintiff believes
Defending Shane invited her over to set her up to
be assaulted by Defending Ditty because of the statement she
made about defending Ditty a month prior. Upon Defending Ditty's arrival,
he immediately began to antagonize the plaintiff, stating that she
thought that she would never see him in person pay
for her statements about Tupac during the video call and
defending Ditty caught plaintiff. Plaintiff was in shock, as she
never leave that she would ever see her meat defending
Ditty in real life, let alone in the small apartment
rented by defending Chain. Defending Ditty began advancing towards where
a plaintiff was sitting on defend in Chain's bed with
a knife and held it to the right side a
plaintiff face and threatened to give her a Glasgow smile
in retaliation for her previous statements on the video call.
Defending KK told defendant Ditty that she did not think
giving plaintiff a Glasgow smile would be advantageous to their
potential clients, who they could sell a plaintiff for sex to.
Defending KK then made a threat to plaintiff that they
could ship her off anywhere in the world and that
she would never see her family or anyone she knew ever. Again.
Defend In Shane then partially on dress plaintiff, then Defending
Ditty remove the remainder of Plaintiff's clothing, removing the knife
from her face, and then retrieved a bottle of liquid
from a large fanny pack. Defending Ditty then squirted a
bottle of liquid on plaintiff, which placed her in fear
that she was being squirted with a chemical substance like acid.
Plaintiffs soon realized the substance was an oil or lubricant.
Plaintiff was squirted and this liquid substance over the entirety
of her naked body. Defending KK then told by Defending
Ditty to insert what looked like a syringe from sterile
packaging into plaintiff's vagina. Defending KK did as told, while
assisted by defendant Brandy, and then told defending Ditty that
they were unable to use the IUD because it had
prematurely been released from its packaging. Defending Ditty, upset by this,
took the syringe from defending KK and tried inserting it
in plaintiff's vagina instead. Defending KK and Ditty began to
argue as defending KK continued to advise Defending Ditty that
since the IUD had been prematurely released from its packaging,
it was no way they could insert it into plaintiff's
vagina effectively. After some time, defending Ditty heated the advice
of defending KK and removed the syringe from plaintiff's vagina
and handed it to defending KK. Defending K, Ky and
defendant Brandy then exited defending Shane's residence, leaving plaintiff alone
with defendants Ditty, Shane, and John Does, who had been
named herein Defending Ditty then picked up a television remote
that was near a plaintiff and violently inserted it into
plaintiff's vagina. Defending Ditty while violently raping plaintiff with a
television remote, told plaintiff that her life was in his
hands and that he wanted he could take her and
she would never be seen again. Plaintiff began hysterically crying
from the threats by defendant Ditty, along with the plan
of being violently vaginally raped by defendant Ditty with the
television remote, as well as the lingering pain from the
ordeal with the IUD syringe insertion. Defending Ditty then instructed
defending Shane to turn plaintiff on her stomach, seemingly tired
of hearing the plaintiff's blood curdling screams. Defend in Shane
then grab plaintiff by her abdomen and hips turn plaintiff
on her stomach. Defending Ditty then inserted defending Shane to
put a pillow over her head, be because he didn't
want to see her face or hear her cries, and
instructed defending Shane to annally rape plaintiff. Defending Shane did
as he was told by defending Ditty and began to
annally ray plaintiff. Defending Ditty then violently rate plaintiff anally.
After defending Shane, Defendant dough two then joined defending Ditty
and Shane, taking turns anally raping plaintiff. Immediately after defending
dough two rape plaintiff, he exited defending Shane's residents. Defendant
Diddy then instructed another defendant, Doe, to also rape plaintiff.
Defendant Doe has been determined to be defending Drewski. Wow,
that's some pretty powerful shit right there. Huh, And mister
Drewski running around on the internet like some big shot.
Now he's gonna have to answer for this shit. Instead
of immediately raping plaintiff, defending Drewski doubts plaintiff with more
oil lubricant and then jumped on top of plaintiff's naked
body and oiled body, treating it like a slipping slide
and knocking the wind out of plaintiff due to his
enormous side. Is a sorry, I can't help a laugh
there due to his enormous size. In other words, you
big fat ass, go to the gym, and for all
of you people out there listening, stop making these people famous.
Please stop making these fucking morons famous. While defendan Drewski
was raping plaintiff. Defendan Didty sat in a chair near
the bed and began masturbating while recording plaintiff's rape by
Defendan Drewski. Another party's phone fell on the floor near
a plaintiff. Plaintiff then attempted to grab the phone, but
it slipped out of her hands and onto the floor
due to the oil lubricant that had been doused all
over her person by defendants Ditty and Drewski. Defendant Diddy
began laughing as plaintiff attempts to grab the phone. Throughout
this violent gang rape, defendant Ditty made constant belittling remarks
to plaintiff, including that he owned her now. At some
point during this ordeal, Plaintiff remembers defendant referring to another
defendant Dough as Cornelius, and remembered the name because it
was so odd and unique. Plaintiff has come to discover
that defendant do Cornelius who raped her was defendant Odell.
Plaintiff's body was becoming more and more limp over the
course of the violent rape, until eventually she had no
control over her body nor could she move her body
when defending Drewski finished raping plaintiff. Defending KK entered the
room to examine the condition of plaintiff, who was barely
able to move or control her bodily functions. Defending KK
examined plaintiff to see if she needed assistance and was
about to give plaintiff and IV fluid. Plaintiff cannot be
certain is she did or did not receive such an
intravenous intervention. Defending KK then opened a different bag different
than the one Defending Ditty removed the oil from where
a plaintiff observed several medicine bottles, IV fluid bags, and
other unidentifiable powder like drugs. Defending KK then removed a
pill from one of the medicine bottles and gave it
to defending Ditty. Defending Ditty then inserted the pill in
the plaintiff's mouth and down her throat to where a
plaintiff had no choice but to ingest the unknown pill.
Defending Ditty, Shane KK, O'Dell, and Drewski then exited the
residence to the backyard, where they smoked marijuana and cigarettes.
Plaintiff remained in an almost lifeless state in Defending Chain's
bedroom until she finally regained her bodily functions. Plaintiff then
began looking for her clothes and her purse that contained
her car keys and cell phone, but could not discover
them in the room or anywhere in the apartment. Plaintiff
was only able to find a T shirt on the floor,
which she put on to cover her naked body. Plaintiff
also observed a black condom wrapper on the floor of
the bedroom, which she assumed was used by one of
the defendants, most likely defending Ditty during the raid. Plaintiff
then found the knife with the assistance of Doll plaintiffs
and headed to the backyard where defendants were smoking, as
that was the only way to exit the premises onto
the street. Plaintiff concealed the knife on her left side
as she exited the apartment to the backyard area. Upon
coming to the exit of the home, which led to
the backyard, plaintiff was met by de defendant Big Homie Cci,
who was standing at the door between the residents and
the backyard. By the time the plaintiff was able to
compose herself and come to the backyard, defending KK was
no longer in the backyard, but upstairs on the patiold
balcony with defendant Brandy. Defendant Doe allowed plaintiff to walk
to the backyard where defendants were still smoking. Defendant Doe
did not see the knife that plaintiff concealed on her
left side, as it was obstructed by the oversized T
shirt plaintiff was wearing. Plaintiff observed Defendant Ditty still partially
nude from the assault, while the other defendants had on
their clothing. Defendant Shane then left to the upstairs portion
of the patiold balcony, where defendants KK and Brandy were
already situated. Plaintiff then sat down on a makeshift seat
in the backyard when defendant Ditty noticed her presence and
remarked that he was surprised she was able to walk
because he had given her enough drugs to take out
a horse. Plaintiff then asked defendant Ditty what he gave her,
and he laughed and did not provide a response. Defendant
Diddy made further comments the plaintiffs in a jovial, friendly manner,
asking her why they hadn't partied together before because it
was so much fun and he hadn't had any asks
that tight in a while. All Right, we're gonna wrap
up right here and in the next episode, we're gonna
pick up where we left off, and that's with defendant
Big Homie CC. If you'd like to contact me, you
can do that at Bobby Kopuci at ProtonMail dot com.
That's b O B b Y c A p U
c c I at protonmeil dot com, or if you prefer,
you can find me on x at b O B
B y underscore c A p U c c I.
All the links that we discussed can be found in
the description box