WEBVTT

1
00:01:01.600 --> 00:01:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Hello everybody, and welcome. This is the Apostate Profit. How

2
00:01:05.560 --> 00:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>is everyone doing? I am here today with Jay Dyer,

3
00:01:10.439 --> 00:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a very very special guest. H Jay, do you like

4
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:15.159
<v Speaker 1>my intro music?

5
00:01:16.599 --> 00:01:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I do.

6
00:01:16.959 --> 00:01:18.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm having to turn you off because I had you

7
00:01:18.799 --> 00:01:21.760
<v Speaker 3>already going in the background, so yeah, I'm getting a

8
00:01:21.840 --> 00:01:24.200
<v Speaker 3>double dose of you and the music, and so it's

9
00:01:24.200 --> 00:01:24.920
<v Speaker 3>like a remix.

10
00:01:25.040 --> 00:01:29.519
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, nice, amazing, that's amazing. That must sound even better. Uh.

11
00:01:30.239 --> 00:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>This is basically like the Islamic humming that they always

12
00:01:33.400 --> 00:01:39.159
<v Speaker 1>play pathetic. I thought remixed it made much better. It

13
00:01:39.159 --> 00:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>would be much better if it always sounded like this,

14
00:01:41.000 --> 00:01:41.879
<v Speaker 1>but they just don't get it.

15
00:01:44.359 --> 00:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm good. Yeah.

16
00:01:48.959 --> 00:01:51.799
<v Speaker 3>You know, we had a good chat the other day

17
00:01:51.959 --> 00:01:54.640
<v Speaker 3>on my channel, and you brought up a lot of

18
00:01:54.640 --> 00:01:57.599
<v Speaker 3>good issues and kind of probably stuff that was old

19
00:01:57.599 --> 00:02:00.120
<v Speaker 3>hat to you. But it's good to go to that

20
00:02:00.159 --> 00:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>stuff because you know, maybe a lot of my audience

21
00:02:02.200 --> 00:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>might not know a lot of that kind of old

22
00:02:04.200 --> 00:02:07.159
<v Speaker 3>hat classic stuff that you know. So yeah, you brought

23
00:02:07.159 --> 00:02:09.319
<v Speaker 3>a lot of interesting insights. One thing I'd like to

24
00:02:09.360 --> 00:02:12.159
<v Speaker 3>say from the outset was a lot of people got

25
00:02:12.199 --> 00:02:15.759
<v Speaker 3>mad or fussed. A lot of Muslims and even a

26
00:02:15.800 --> 00:02:18.879
<v Speaker 3>few Christians that you and I would have these conversations.

27
00:02:19.759 --> 00:02:22.960
<v Speaker 3>And it's odd to me because, first thing, you know,

28
00:02:23.319 --> 00:02:26.639
<v Speaker 3>whether you're Muslim or Atheist or Christian or whatever, we

29
00:02:26.639 --> 00:02:28.879
<v Speaker 3>should all be aware of fallacies and what they are,

30
00:02:29.479 --> 00:02:33.680
<v Speaker 3>and the genetic fallacy is one of the more well

31
00:02:33.680 --> 00:02:38.240
<v Speaker 3>known fallacies. Because it doesn't matter what source an argument

32
00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:42.039
<v Speaker 3>comes from, the argument either stands or falls on its own.

33
00:02:42.520 --> 00:02:45.520
<v Speaker 3>So it doesn't matter who says the argument. If Judas

34
00:02:45.599 --> 00:02:48.520
<v Speaker 3>says an argument has nothing to do with his betrayal,

35
00:02:48.599 --> 00:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>whether that argument is true or false, right likewise, and

36
00:02:52.560 --> 00:02:53.759
<v Speaker 3>you would think people would know this.

37
00:02:55.199 --> 00:02:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Likewise.

38
00:02:55.919 --> 00:02:57.560
<v Speaker 3>The only case that I can think of in which

39
00:02:58.240 --> 00:03:02.719
<v Speaker 3>we would consider bodies character in an argument is if

40
00:03:02.759 --> 00:03:05.639
<v Speaker 3>the argument was about that person's character, or if they

41
00:03:05.759 --> 00:03:07.800
<v Speaker 3>committed a crime or something like that. In that case,

42
00:03:07.840 --> 00:03:10.680
<v Speaker 3>it would be appropriate to investigate their character. But the

43
00:03:10.759 --> 00:03:16.319
<v Speaker 3>basis of their arguments, the validity the arguments themselves, none

44
00:03:16.319 --> 00:03:17.879
<v Speaker 3>of them have any None of that has anything to

45
00:03:17.879 --> 00:03:23.439
<v Speaker 3>do with the person's character and their beliefs. And it's

46
00:03:23.439 --> 00:03:25.800
<v Speaker 3>odd to me that people don't understand that. But as

47
00:03:25.840 --> 00:03:28.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm beginning to realize with I think this is like

48
00:03:28.280 --> 00:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>my fifth or sixth Islamic debate fallacies seem to be

49
00:03:33.599 --> 00:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>something that a lot of Muslims are not aware of.

50
00:03:36.479 --> 00:03:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, precisely, I agree with everything that's out there pretty much.

51
00:03:42.159 --> 00:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And you will see this every single time when you

52
00:03:44.319 --> 00:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have a debate with Muslims. Most Muslims, the most apologists

53
00:03:48.400 --> 00:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you will encounterar the same complaints all the time. If

54
00:03:53.400 --> 00:03:56.319
<v Speaker 1>you are if you genuinely want you to discuss this topic,

55
00:03:56.319 --> 00:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>then you shouldn't talk to this person, shouldn't talk to

56
00:03:58.560 --> 00:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that person, shouldn't talk to this other guy. UH, only

57
00:04:02.039 --> 00:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>talk to us, only discuss with us. People who criticize

58
00:04:05.879 --> 00:04:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Islam are unreliable and if you talk to them, that

59
00:04:09.879 --> 00:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>means that you are automatically marked as somebody who has

60
00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:17.759
<v Speaker 1>no genuine interest in debating, and you must be shunned

61
00:04:17.839 --> 00:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at all costs. And that's understandable considering that UH, criticizing

62
00:04:22.759 --> 00:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Islam is not allowed, and especially me as an as

63
00:04:25.920 --> 00:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>an ex Muslim, I'm not even supposed to exist in

64
00:04:28.199 --> 00:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Dynal Kikichu's worldview. Like he told me when we when

65
00:04:31.480 --> 00:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we were talking, he basically told me that he thinks

66
00:04:35.560 --> 00:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I should be executed for my leaving Islam. So it

67
00:04:40.680 --> 00:04:43.879
<v Speaker 1>is really it is. Islam is unique, and Muslims are

68
00:04:43.959 --> 00:04:48.959
<v Speaker 1>unique in that way where they very often just have

69
00:04:49.079 --> 00:04:55.879
<v Speaker 1>to invoke that fallacy without understanding the problem that it

70
00:04:56.399 --> 00:05:00.759
<v Speaker 1>that it that it presents. As as said, when we

71
00:05:00.800 --> 00:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about the whole issue with the name of God

72
00:05:03.279 --> 00:05:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Yahweh and Islam versus versus Abrahamic biblical religion, he chooses

73
00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to now completely ignore the points even when you bring

74
00:05:14.199 --> 00:05:18.879
<v Speaker 1>it up simply because because you reference me, or because

75
00:05:18.920 --> 00:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you make a reference to what he said to me.

76
00:05:21.680 --> 00:05:24.079
<v Speaker 1>And when he talked to me about it, he clearly

77
00:05:24.319 --> 00:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>had no clue and later he denied what he actually said.

78
00:05:27.639 --> 00:05:30.759
<v Speaker 1>He basically blasphemed and then later denied what he actually said.

79
00:05:32.360 --> 00:05:35.040
<v Speaker 3>It was surprising because it's I mean, everybody can see

80
00:05:35.040 --> 00:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the clip, and you know, he clearly says it's a

81
00:05:38.600 --> 00:05:42.519
<v Speaker 3>pagan name, and then when asked about that, he says,

82
00:05:42.560 --> 00:05:45.480
<v Speaker 3>I never said that. So you know, it's like this

83
00:05:45.519 --> 00:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>is multiple times now where I'm really questioning, you know,

84
00:05:48.439 --> 00:05:49.399
<v Speaker 3>does he is he really?

85
00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Is he disingenuous?

86
00:05:52.240 --> 00:05:55.439
<v Speaker 3>Right, because I mean, if you have a person on

87
00:05:55.519 --> 00:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>record saying it, it's really difficult to then rewrite the

88
00:05:58.360 --> 00:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>history and say no, I never said that. But you

89
00:06:00.720 --> 00:06:03.120
<v Speaker 3>did say that, so at least you would. You could

90
00:06:03.160 --> 00:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>either own up to it and say, well, I said that,

91
00:06:06.319 --> 00:06:09.160
<v Speaker 3>but here's what I meant, or here's a clarification, but

92
00:06:09.199 --> 00:06:13.399
<v Speaker 3>the outright just so I never said that. I'm noticing

93
00:06:13.439 --> 00:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>a pattern of And this is not to say that

94
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Christians are always honest.

95
00:06:18.839 --> 00:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>People in any position can be dishonest. You can be

96
00:06:21.279 --> 00:06:23.800
<v Speaker 2>an atheist be dishonest. You be a Christian be dishonest.

97
00:06:23.839 --> 00:06:26.360
<v Speaker 3>You could be a Muslim and be dishonest. But there

98
00:06:26.360 --> 00:06:28.120
<v Speaker 3>seems to be, as you noted, a kind of a

99
00:06:28.160 --> 00:06:33.879
<v Speaker 3>tendency to shun the rational discourse, shun the logical argumentation.

100
00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:36.480
<v Speaker 3>And again I'm not an expert on Islam. I'm still

101
00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:39.720
<v Speaker 3>in the process of learning. To me, it looks like

102
00:06:40.319 --> 00:06:43.639
<v Speaker 3>there's a tendency to when you have this going back

103
00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:47.959
<v Speaker 3>to the original pure Islam, which is what my understanding

104
00:06:48.040 --> 00:06:52.079
<v Speaker 3>of Daniel's school, that what it represents, there's a tendency

105
00:06:52.120 --> 00:06:57.399
<v Speaker 3>again to have to shun logic, to have to shun argumentation,

106
00:06:57.560 --> 00:07:01.279
<v Speaker 3>because that's seen as later development. Lam is a later development,

107
00:07:02.720 --> 00:07:06.120
<v Speaker 3>and that might lead to problems, right, because there might

108
00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:08.720
<v Speaker 3>be questions that are not permitted to ask. I remember

109
00:07:08.759 --> 00:07:12.120
<v Speaker 3>in the when I was prepared for the Asraa Rashid debate,

110
00:07:12.720 --> 00:07:16.199
<v Speaker 3>we found some of those old Sunni texts which, even

111
00:07:16.199 --> 00:07:18.360
<v Speaker 3>though they were engaged in kalam one are the texts

112
00:07:18.439 --> 00:07:21.519
<v Speaker 3>dealt with the names of a law of the attributes.

113
00:07:22.319 --> 00:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>And there was a point where the question is raised, well,

114
00:07:27.759 --> 00:07:31.079
<v Speaker 3>how do we reconcile the fact of God of Allah's

115
00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:35.759
<v Speaker 3>pure unity with the fact that we're naming many names

116
00:07:35.839 --> 00:07:38.759
<v Speaker 3>and what about the distinction between the names? And at

117
00:07:38.759 --> 00:07:41.199
<v Speaker 3>a certain point it says it is not permitted to

118
00:07:41.240 --> 00:07:44.439
<v Speaker 3>ask this question. So it's just sort of like you

119
00:07:44.519 --> 00:07:47.360
<v Speaker 3>can debate and discuss to a certain point, then it's

120
00:07:47.439 --> 00:07:50.720
<v Speaker 3>not permitted. And as you were saying, the idea that

121
00:07:50.759 --> 00:07:55.720
<v Speaker 3>there's this unity about Islamic theology is not true. At

122
00:07:55.720 --> 00:07:57.319
<v Speaker 3>one point in the debate, you know, Daniel's trying to

123
00:07:57.360 --> 00:08:02.720
<v Speaker 3>say Christians disagree, there's debates, there's there's that Wait a minute, I.

124
00:08:02.680 --> 00:08:04.079
<v Speaker 2>Mean, you guys don't agree.

125
00:08:04.560 --> 00:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>You guys have all kinds of So in other words,

126
00:08:07.000 --> 00:08:11.199
<v Speaker 3>if disagreements made a position true or false, no position

127
00:08:11.240 --> 00:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>would be true false. I mean yeah, they would need

128
00:08:15.040 --> 00:08:18.079
<v Speaker 3>because none of them would be true. Because now if

129
00:08:18.079 --> 00:08:20.759
<v Speaker 3>some sort of majority opinion or if the fact that

130
00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:24.040
<v Speaker 3>we have, you know, thirty percent of the Islamic schools

131
00:08:24.079 --> 00:08:27.319
<v Speaker 3>agree about this position, sixty percent agree with this position.

132
00:08:27.720 --> 00:08:29.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, none of that has anything to do with

133
00:08:29.160 --> 00:08:32.879
<v Speaker 3>whether it's true false. It's another fallacy to appeal to majority,

134
00:08:33.080 --> 00:08:37.679
<v Speaker 3>appeal to consensus. You can certainly bring in experts, but

135
00:08:37.799 --> 00:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>expert testimony itself doesn't necessarily prove a thing.

136
00:08:41.519 --> 00:08:43.000
<v Speaker 2>And so I just over and.

137
00:08:42.879 --> 00:08:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Over and overhere to hear these appeals that were very

138
00:08:45.120 --> 00:08:48.399
<v Speaker 3>similar to you know, fallacies that I've seen in other

139
00:08:48.480 --> 00:08:51.159
<v Speaker 3>debates that when I would bring them up, you could

140
00:08:51.159 --> 00:08:54.759
<v Speaker 3>tell that he didn't even know what what I was referencing.

141
00:08:54.799 --> 00:08:55.279
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean?

142
00:08:56.480 --> 00:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, there was this very awkward moment that that

143
00:09:00.519 --> 00:09:03.519
<v Speaker 1>I saw, actually multiple awkward moments about the very same

144
00:09:03.559 --> 00:09:05.639
<v Speaker 1>thing during the debate that you had with Daniel Kikitche,

145
00:09:05.679 --> 00:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>which was where you brought up the idea that the

146
00:09:10.679 --> 00:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Quran tells Jews and Christians that they should read their

147
00:09:15.519 --> 00:09:18.279
<v Speaker 1>their own book, and it says that their book is

148
00:09:19.600 --> 00:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is confirmed. But if you go to that book, then

149
00:09:24.399 --> 00:09:27.519
<v Speaker 1>you have the problem of somebody like Daniel Kikitchu saying, okay,

150
00:09:27.519 --> 00:09:30.039
<v Speaker 1>but those books are invalid because they have contradictions and

151
00:09:30.120 --> 00:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they were corrupted, and so you are caught in this

152
00:09:33.679 --> 00:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>whole in this whole dilemma. Okay, are those books now

153
00:09:36.240 --> 00:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>confirmed and authentic or are they not? And he then

154
00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:41.919
<v Speaker 1>comes in and and and and presents this position, which

155
00:09:41.960 --> 00:09:44.519
<v Speaker 1>is the best he can do, because it is just

156
00:09:45.279 --> 00:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a whole problem that Muslims can't get out of.

157
00:09:47.960 --> 00:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>He then tells you that when the Jews and Christians

158
00:09:51.039 --> 00:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>go to those books, uh, they will see contradictions in

159
00:09:55.279 --> 00:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>those books with monotheism as presented in Islam, which is

160
00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>why they will understand that those books are wrong. Okay,

161
00:10:02.440 --> 00:10:04.799
<v Speaker 1>but that means that they have to evaluate that whole

162
00:10:04.799 --> 00:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>situation from its club's perspective, which doesn't make sense. Yeah. Right.

163
00:10:09.399 --> 00:10:13.120
<v Speaker 3>If what's in question is the continuity of the Quran

164
00:10:13.240 --> 00:10:17.360
<v Speaker 3>with previous revelation, then I asked a very simple question

165
00:10:17.480 --> 00:10:21.200
<v Speaker 3>to Daniel, which was, what is the epistemic principle that

166
00:10:21.279 --> 00:10:25.799
<v Speaker 3>you have that tells you when the Old Testament is

167
00:10:25.840 --> 00:10:28.679
<v Speaker 3>true and when it's false? And he says the Quran.

168
00:10:29.320 --> 00:10:32.080
<v Speaker 3>But the thing is that that's what's in question, So

169
00:10:32.120 --> 00:10:34.279
<v Speaker 3>you can't just appeal to the thing any question. When

170
00:10:34.360 --> 00:10:38.120
<v Speaker 3>we're asking about prior revelation. Now you could say, but Jay,

171
00:10:38.159 --> 00:10:39.480
<v Speaker 3>what you did in the day, He said, But Jay,

172
00:10:39.519 --> 00:10:42.039
<v Speaker 3>you you appealed to the Old Testament too, in terms

173
00:10:42.080 --> 00:10:43.919
<v Speaker 3>of your position, Yeah, but I don't argue that the.

174
00:10:43.840 --> 00:10:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Old Testament has a lot of contradictions.

175
00:10:46.279 --> 00:10:48.960
<v Speaker 3>So if I thought the Old Testament had contradictions and

176
00:10:49.039 --> 00:10:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Christianity was the new revelation that replaced it, I would

177
00:10:52.320 --> 00:10:55.600
<v Speaker 3>be in the same boat as Daniel's position. You see, yeah,

178
00:10:55.679 --> 00:10:57.519
<v Speaker 3>because you could say, well, you know, the New Testament

179
00:10:57.559 --> 00:11:00.559
<v Speaker 3>appeals to the Old Testament, right, but it ever makes

180
00:11:00.600 --> 00:11:05.639
<v Speaker 3>the appeal that the Old Testament is true and valid,

181
00:11:05.679 --> 00:11:07.679
<v Speaker 3>but it also has contradictions.

182
00:11:08.000 --> 00:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>That's Daniel's position.

183
00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Daniel's position that the Old Testament is true and valid

184
00:11:11.120 --> 00:11:14.200
<v Speaker 3>because the Koran says so, however, there's all these passages

185
00:11:14.240 --> 00:11:16.919
<v Speaker 3>that don't teach the pure mono theism of Islam. And

186
00:11:17.440 --> 00:11:20.480
<v Speaker 3>I still have that drawing here that I had drawn

187
00:11:20.559 --> 00:11:23.960
<v Speaker 3>up the things whiteboard here. So these are just examples

188
00:11:24.039 --> 00:11:27.120
<v Speaker 3>of theophanies where we find real distinctions in God in

189
00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:28.679
<v Speaker 3>the Old Testament. And there's more.

190
00:11:28.799 --> 00:11:31.519
<v Speaker 2>This is just one list that I could fit on

191
00:11:31.519 --> 00:11:32.399
<v Speaker 2>one board.

192
00:11:32.759 --> 00:11:35.279
<v Speaker 3>And Daniel says, yeah, those are problem texts that are

193
00:11:35.320 --> 00:11:39.720
<v Speaker 3>all contradictions. Now, wait a minute. That's why I asked

194
00:11:39.720 --> 00:11:42.639
<v Speaker 3>the question, Well, then, what's the epistemic principle that tells

195
00:11:42.679 --> 00:11:44.879
<v Speaker 3>you when you go through the Old Testament? Oh, this

196
00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:47.480
<v Speaker 3>is the true verse false, verse true, verse false, verse,

197
00:11:47.799 --> 00:11:50.759
<v Speaker 3>this chapter true, this chapter false, this chunk true, this

198
00:11:50.879 --> 00:11:55.960
<v Speaker 3>chunk false. And the principle was whatever's consistent with the Quran.

199
00:11:56.080 --> 00:11:59.200
<v Speaker 3>But the question was, how do we know that the

200
00:11:59.279 --> 00:12:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Qoran is can assistant with prior revelation given the fact

201
00:12:02.120 --> 00:12:06.519
<v Speaker 3>that the Quran says you can validate this with the

202
00:12:06.559 --> 00:12:09.080
<v Speaker 3>books given to the Jews and the Christians. You see,

203
00:12:09.840 --> 00:12:12.360
<v Speaker 3>this is, like you said, it's an irresolvable dilemma. And

204
00:12:12.399 --> 00:12:14.159
<v Speaker 3>that's why I had to sort of draw this out

205
00:12:14.200 --> 00:12:17.879
<v Speaker 3>for him on the small board, what is your episode

206
00:12:17.879 --> 00:12:23.639
<v Speaker 3>of principle similarity to the Old Testament? And then eventually

207
00:12:23.720 --> 00:12:25.639
<v Speaker 3>ended up saying, well, you just you just look and

208
00:12:25.679 --> 00:12:28.960
<v Speaker 3>see with your eyes what's consistent with with what's not consistent?

209
00:12:29.720 --> 00:12:31.480
<v Speaker 3>You see, So you just look at your eyes. So

210
00:12:31.679 --> 00:12:33.360
<v Speaker 3>can I do not appeal to the same thing of

211
00:12:33.440 --> 00:12:34.720
<v Speaker 3>just looking with my eyes.

212
00:12:36.080 --> 00:12:39.279
<v Speaker 1>It's also extremely funny because the Quran clearly and explicitly

213
00:12:39.320 --> 00:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>says about the Jews and Christians. It says, why do

214
00:12:44.080 --> 00:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they come to you when when they have, you know,

215
00:12:47.080 --> 00:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what was revealed to them, basically saying that they should

216
00:12:50.200 --> 00:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>just go back and read their books. But that doesn't

217
00:12:54.840 --> 00:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. If you once again present this whole problem,

218
00:12:59.720 --> 00:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it again goes into this circular nonsense that he cannot

219
00:13:02.879 --> 00:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>get out of. What are they supposed to do? They

220
00:13:05.200 --> 00:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to Jews and Christians are supposed to go

221
00:13:07.159 --> 00:13:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and read their own scriptures. They don't supposed to come

222
00:13:08.919 --> 00:13:11.039
<v Speaker 1>to Muhammad. Okay, if they are supposed to read their

223
00:13:11.039 --> 00:13:13.039
<v Speaker 1>own scriptures, then they will be educated by their own

224
00:13:13.039 --> 00:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>scriptures on their own beliefs and on how their beliefs are,

225
00:13:18.559 --> 00:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on what they are supposed to believe according to their

226
00:13:20.639 --> 00:13:24.799
<v Speaker 1>own scriptures, which if they do that will eventually contradict

227
00:13:24.799 --> 00:13:27.759
<v Speaker 1>with what Islam Telstone. But then Daniel Kikichu and other

228
00:13:27.799 --> 00:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Muslims come out and say, well, no, no, no, no,

229
00:13:30.080 --> 00:13:33.519
<v Speaker 1>you can't take those things in there that contradict with

230
00:13:34.320 --> 00:13:36.639
<v Speaker 1>real belief because you know those are in values. You

231
00:13:36.679 --> 00:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>take the rest. Okay, what is the rest? Well, whatever

232
00:13:39.360 --> 00:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>agrees with my beliefs.

233
00:13:40.559 --> 00:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I mentioned that he couldn't see that that

234
00:13:43.240 --> 00:13:47.559
<v Speaker 3>was a circle. Now, if he affirm circular logic, then

235
00:13:47.559 --> 00:13:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I would have I mean he would That would have

236
00:13:49.399 --> 00:13:51.720
<v Speaker 3>been more honest and he could have like maybe gone

237
00:13:51.720 --> 00:13:52.440
<v Speaker 3>in another direction.

238
00:13:52.480 --> 00:13:53.440
<v Speaker 2>But of course he didn't want.

239
00:13:53.279 --> 00:13:57.720
<v Speaker 3>To do that because typically when Muslims do accept varying

240
00:13:57.759 --> 00:14:03.039
<v Speaker 3>degrees of philosophy, whichever school they're in, it's usually kind

241
00:14:03.080 --> 00:14:06.639
<v Speaker 3>of a very broad stroke. For example, I have Azar

242
00:14:06.720 --> 00:14:10.519
<v Speaker 3>Rashid's book. When we did our debate, I got his book,

243
00:14:10.559 --> 00:14:16.120
<v Speaker 3>and his approach to epistemology was just a very basic empiricism.

244
00:14:17.200 --> 00:14:19.039
<v Speaker 3>So you know, if you want to have that school

245
00:14:19.039 --> 00:14:23.440
<v Speaker 3>and that approach, that's what that's fine. But anybody that

246
00:14:23.519 --> 00:14:28.960
<v Speaker 3>does that's going to have to deal with the outworkings

247
00:14:29.000 --> 00:14:31.279
<v Speaker 3>of adopting that position. So if you have a very

248
00:14:31.320 --> 00:14:34.120
<v Speaker 3>basic empiricist view, you're going to have a hard time

249
00:14:34.399 --> 00:14:39.279
<v Speaker 3>justifying or given account for questions like what about a

250
00:14:39.279 --> 00:14:42.320
<v Speaker 3>circular argument that you're presenting about the relationship with the

251
00:14:42.399 --> 00:14:47.320
<v Speaker 3>krant prior revelation you can't affirm just from a strictly

252
00:14:47.360 --> 00:14:49.919
<v Speaker 3>philosophical perspective, You're not going to be able to affirm

253
00:14:50.039 --> 00:14:54.159
<v Speaker 3>circular argumentation if you're an empiricist, unless you just want

254
00:14:54.159 --> 00:14:56.159
<v Speaker 3>to say that my position is just self evident. But

255
00:14:56.159 --> 00:14:58.000
<v Speaker 3>if he wants to go that route, then I can

256
00:14:58.039 --> 00:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>just say, okay, well my position is self evident if

257
00:15:00.360 --> 00:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>everybody can just appeal to their own internal self evidence,

258
00:15:05.000 --> 00:15:06.360
<v Speaker 3>which I don't believe.

259
00:15:06.039 --> 00:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>We should do in a debate.

260
00:15:07.639 --> 00:15:09.799
<v Speaker 3>But if you do that, it kind of makes debate

261
00:15:09.879 --> 00:15:12.279
<v Speaker 3>no longer possible because the opponent, you see, can appeal

262
00:15:12.279 --> 00:15:14.120
<v Speaker 3>to the same thing I walk can just appeal to

263
00:15:14.440 --> 00:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>my all my principles are just quote self evident, right,

264
00:15:17.039 --> 00:15:19.600
<v Speaker 3>So so that's not usually the best. That's not usually

265
00:15:19.600 --> 00:15:23.120
<v Speaker 3>how debates go, unless you're debating something like, you know,

266
00:15:23.200 --> 00:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>some obscure topic like transcendental arguments or circular argumentation itself.

267
00:15:27.279 --> 00:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible?

268
00:15:27.919 --> 00:15:28.759
<v Speaker 2>Is it not possible?

269
00:15:29.279 --> 00:15:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Most debates are not going in that way. And that's

270
00:15:31.440 --> 00:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>why you know, cor three says there is no God

271
00:15:35.399 --> 00:15:39.120
<v Speaker 3>but He the living, the self subsisting. He sent down

272
00:15:39.200 --> 00:15:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the book that is truth upon the confirming what it

273
00:15:42.519 --> 00:15:45.799
<v Speaker 3>was before he sent the Torah and the Ngel, the Gospel,

274
00:15:47.440 --> 00:15:51.720
<v Speaker 3>and it is the guidance to mankind. Nothing about but

275
00:15:52.120 --> 00:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>it is half corrupted. You see, Oh, it is seventy

276
00:15:54.519 --> 00:15:57.159
<v Speaker 3>percent corrupted. And that's the thing, is that when you

277
00:15:57.240 --> 00:16:00.639
<v Speaker 3>actually look at as and I haven't. Let's just take

278
00:16:00.679 --> 00:16:03.559
<v Speaker 3>the first ten stories, for example. I went through the

279
00:16:03.559 --> 00:16:06.279
<v Speaker 3>first ten, and I got a giant list of all

280
00:16:06.320 --> 00:16:11.759
<v Speaker 3>of the references in the first ten to sections of

281
00:16:11.799 --> 00:16:15.639
<v Speaker 3>the Torah and the profits, right, And here's the thing,

282
00:16:15.919 --> 00:16:17.320
<v Speaker 3>this is what I was trying to get it. I

283
00:16:17.360 --> 00:16:19.120
<v Speaker 3>don't think Daniel got this point. I was trying to

284
00:16:19.120 --> 00:16:22.919
<v Speaker 3>get it across, which is that you got giant portions

285
00:16:22.960 --> 00:16:29.120
<v Speaker 3>that are referred to referenced giant stories, the Exodusk story,

286
00:16:29.480 --> 00:16:34.200
<v Speaker 3>the conquests of David, different stories in the Book of Genesis,

287
00:16:34.200 --> 00:16:39.600
<v Speaker 3>for example, the creation narrative is largely affirmed. So if

288
00:16:39.600 --> 00:16:42.799
<v Speaker 3>we're going to admit that these giant portions of the

289
00:16:42.840 --> 00:16:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Torah are correct, then now we've got a problem of

290
00:16:46.600 --> 00:16:50.720
<v Speaker 3>giant portions not correct. Right, So it doesn't really matter

291
00:16:50.720 --> 00:16:52.080
<v Speaker 3>what percent did you want to say. Let's say you

292
00:16:52.120 --> 00:16:56.320
<v Speaker 3>think seventy percent of it's true and thirty percent is false.

293
00:16:56.399 --> 00:16:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Or maybe you think thirty percent of the Old Testament

294
00:16:58.240 --> 00:17:03.759
<v Speaker 3>the profits is true and seventy percent is false. Either way,

295
00:17:03.799 --> 00:17:07.480
<v Speaker 3>you're stuck in the same kind of bind. Because number one,

296
00:17:07.640 --> 00:17:13.000
<v Speaker 3>the Quran actually says, as you noted, that it's not consistent. Right,

297
00:17:13.160 --> 00:17:15.400
<v Speaker 3>they'll excuse me that the Old Testament is not full

298
00:17:15.440 --> 00:17:19.480
<v Speaker 3>of errors. That's a later argument that they may And

299
00:17:19.799 --> 00:17:23.119
<v Speaker 3>when it does mentions, I think, like you said, when

300
00:17:23.160 --> 00:17:27.200
<v Speaker 3>it does mention that they perverted the message, it says

301
00:17:27.240 --> 00:17:29.680
<v Speaker 3>they perverted the message with their mouth. It doesn't say

302
00:17:29.720 --> 00:17:34.599
<v Speaker 3>the text is perverted. So there's not an intertextual argument

303
00:17:34.599 --> 00:17:38.440
<v Speaker 3>that I'm aware of that argues that the Torah and

304
00:17:38.480 --> 00:17:41.319
<v Speaker 3>the Gospel are full of errors. This is a later argument.

305
00:17:41.359 --> 00:17:43.559
<v Speaker 3>This is why they go to talk about going to

306
00:17:43.640 --> 00:17:47.119
<v Speaker 3>non believers. Well, they ran to you know, bart Ermin

307
00:17:47.200 --> 00:17:50.920
<v Speaker 3>and people for me for so long until bart Erman

308
00:17:51.039 --> 00:17:55.039
<v Speaker 3>said that now there is historical evidence for Christ and crucifixion,

309
00:17:55.039 --> 00:17:56.519
<v Speaker 3>and then I think they wanted to get rid of

310
00:17:56.759 --> 00:17:59.920
<v Speaker 3>using bart Ermin because again, so it's like this double state,

311
00:18:00.000 --> 00:18:01.759
<v Speaker 3>and is what I'm trying to say, there's a double

312
00:18:01.759 --> 00:18:06.200
<v Speaker 3>standard of you know, I can't talk to you because

313
00:18:06.640 --> 00:18:09.240
<v Speaker 3>you don't have the same religion as me. And it's like,

314
00:18:09.319 --> 00:18:11.000
<v Speaker 3>but it does have something to do with the arguments.

315
00:18:11.000 --> 00:18:14.519
<v Speaker 3>But the arguments are true or false regardless of the person.

316
00:18:14.640 --> 00:18:17.559
<v Speaker 3>But to go back to your point, like you know,

317
00:18:17.599 --> 00:18:20.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm just trying to stress that. Look, if you're gonna

318
00:18:20.359 --> 00:18:23.920
<v Speaker 3>say that a giant portion of the prior revelation is false,

319
00:18:23.960 --> 00:18:27.640
<v Speaker 3>which is what his position amounts to, then you're gonna

320
00:18:27.640 --> 00:18:30.480
<v Speaker 3>have to give an account for why does the Quran

321
00:18:30.599 --> 00:18:35.039
<v Speaker 3>then assume many of these stories, oftentimes in passing, So

322
00:18:35.079 --> 00:18:38.599
<v Speaker 3>it'll just reference an event or a person, right, And

323
00:18:39.000 --> 00:18:41.319
<v Speaker 3>how else would we know the context and the meaning

324
00:18:41.319 --> 00:18:44.240
<v Speaker 3>and the background of that person without going to the

325
00:18:44.240 --> 00:18:49.000
<v Speaker 3>prior revelation which predates them, It predates the Koran, predates

326
00:18:49.039 --> 00:18:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the Quran, and isn't.

327
00:18:50.440 --> 00:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And we have some very very explicit Quran versus like

328
00:18:53.599 --> 00:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>chapter five, verse forty seven, which say, and let the

329
00:18:57.480 --> 00:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>people of the Gospel, Christians judge by what Allah has

330
00:19:01.599 --> 00:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>revealed therein, And whoever does not judge by what Allah

331
00:19:04.680 --> 00:19:09.079
<v Speaker 1>is revealed, then those are the defiantly disobedient. So according

332
00:19:09.119 --> 00:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to that verse itself, who are what are Christians supposed

333
00:19:12.680 --> 00:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to judge by by the Gospel, by what was revealed

334
00:19:16.720 --> 00:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to them by In the Quran's understanding, and it's understanding,

335
00:19:20.079 --> 00:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the Gospel is basically a revelation that was revealed to Jesus,

336
00:19:23.599 --> 00:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>like the Quran was revealed to Ahamed. It has a

337
00:19:25.480 --> 00:19:28.559
<v Speaker 1>very it has a big misunderstanding of what the Gospel

338
00:19:28.599 --> 00:19:33.079
<v Speaker 1>actually is, and it tells the Christians explicitly they are

339
00:19:33.119 --> 00:19:35.759
<v Speaker 1>that they should simply stand by and judge by what

340
00:19:35.759 --> 00:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the Gospel says. And there is no single reference throughout

341
00:19:40.200 --> 00:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the Qur'an which explicitly tells you that those books are

342
00:19:44.680 --> 00:19:47.079
<v Speaker 1>no longer valued, that those books have been corrupted, that

343
00:19:47.119 --> 00:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they have been corrupted into oblivion. Such a mindset only

344
00:19:50.839 --> 00:19:56.039
<v Speaker 1>only emerged over the centuries much later, I think, as

345
00:19:56.200 --> 00:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>late as like the eleventh or eleventh century or twelfth

346
00:19:59.720 --> 00:20:03.839
<v Speaker 1>century it was. It became entrenched into Islamic thinking that

347
00:20:04.359 --> 00:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>those that those books, the Torah and the Ingia as

348
00:20:09.920 --> 00:20:13.799
<v Speaker 1>they refer to them, meaning the Gospel and the Torah,

349
00:20:14.119 --> 00:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>were overall corrupted. But that is just that is just

350
00:20:19.079 --> 00:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as it seems, an explanation that they came up with

351
00:20:21.200 --> 00:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because they could not explain the abundance of contradictions between

352
00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the Bible and the Quran, and contradictions on such a

353
00:20:31.480 --> 00:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>level that you cannot possibly believe that both of those

354
00:20:37.440 --> 00:20:41.799
<v Speaker 1>sources as they are today came from the same God.

355
00:20:42.160 --> 00:20:44.519
<v Speaker 1>You cannot hold on to of them at the same time,

356
00:20:44.559 --> 00:20:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it is simply impossible. And I would say, it's like

357
00:20:49.799 --> 00:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this whole game of those books are corrupt. They're not

358
00:20:52.960 --> 00:20:56.839
<v Speaker 1>in their original form. They are only consistent wherever they

359
00:20:56.839 --> 00:21:00.319
<v Speaker 1>are consistent with my beliefs. That would be like if

360
00:21:00.720 --> 00:21:03.319
<v Speaker 1>you went out there, like if Christians went out there,

361
00:21:03.720 --> 00:21:06.079
<v Speaker 1>or if I if anybody went out there and said,

362
00:21:06.480 --> 00:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mohammed was actually a righteous guy. He was

363
00:21:10.880 --> 00:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>led and he was leading people to the belief in

364
00:21:13.599 --> 00:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>one God. But his followers corrupted his sayings and corrupted

365
00:21:18.880 --> 00:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the actual Qur'an, which was full of truth. And when

366
00:21:23.000 --> 00:21:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Mulim's then asked well how can you improve this, did

367
00:21:26.599 --> 00:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you simply say, well, everything that Muhammad said, everything in

368
00:21:30.680 --> 00:21:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the Quran that agrees with our Abrahamic beliefs is correct,

369
00:21:36.240 --> 00:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and everything else that disagrees is obviously corrupted. And there

370
00:21:39.240 --> 00:21:42.319
<v Speaker 1>is your proof. Now let go of your Islamic beliefs

371
00:21:42.359 --> 00:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and come to the truth. Put them in the same position.

372
00:21:46.359 --> 00:21:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. I mean two points there that come to mind.

373
00:21:50.559 --> 00:21:52.359
<v Speaker 3>I want to read that sort of five. I'm glad

374
00:21:52.400 --> 00:21:54.640
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned it because it's really strong. It says, how

375
00:21:54.720 --> 00:21:57.599
<v Speaker 3>is it that they come to deeper judgment when they

376
00:21:57.680 --> 00:22:02.160
<v Speaker 3>have the Torah, wherein is God judgment. Even after that

377
00:22:02.279 --> 00:22:04.519
<v Speaker 3>they turn their backs and they are not believers. Truly,

378
00:22:04.559 --> 00:22:07.680
<v Speaker 3>we sent down the Torah they're in as guidance, where

379
00:22:07.720 --> 00:22:10.519
<v Speaker 3>in His guidance and light by what the prophets who

380
00:22:10.559 --> 00:22:14.440
<v Speaker 3>submitted unto God judged those who are Jews, as did

381
00:22:14.480 --> 00:22:17.400
<v Speaker 3>the sages and the rabbis, in accordance with such with

382
00:22:17.480 --> 00:22:21.480
<v Speaker 3>God's books, as they were bidden to preserve it, and

383
00:22:22.960 --> 00:22:25.680
<v Speaker 3>to which they were witnesses. So I fear not mankind,

384
00:22:25.720 --> 00:22:29.960
<v Speaker 3>fear me. My signs are for sell, not my signs

385
00:22:29.960 --> 00:22:33.319
<v Speaker 3>for a paltry price, where whosoever judge is not by

386
00:22:33.359 --> 00:22:37.440
<v Speaker 3>what God has sent down. So like as you said,

387
00:22:37.480 --> 00:22:39.119
<v Speaker 3>he goes on to say in the Footsteps, we sent

388
00:22:39.240 --> 00:22:42.279
<v Speaker 3>Jesus confirming the Torah, and we gave him that.

389
00:22:42.319 --> 00:22:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Gospel confirming the Torah.

390
00:22:44.240 --> 00:22:46.839
<v Speaker 3>So the assumption of these texts is that there's continuity

391
00:22:46.960 --> 00:22:48.799
<v Speaker 3>not just with the Old Testament of the Koran, but

392
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:51.480
<v Speaker 3>between the Torah and what Jesus said.

393
00:22:52.359 --> 00:22:52.599
<v Speaker 2>Right.

394
00:22:53.079 --> 00:22:55.160
<v Speaker 3>But when we go to what Jesus said, of course,

395
00:22:55.240 --> 00:22:58.400
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of problem texts, such as the entire

396
00:22:58.440 --> 00:23:01.799
<v Speaker 3>Gospel of John, which is why usually Islamic apologetics just says,

397
00:23:02.160 --> 00:23:04.720
<v Speaker 3>that's one we throw out. So now we're throwing out

398
00:23:04.880 --> 00:23:08.480
<v Speaker 3>entire books because as you pointed out, well wait a minute,

399
00:23:08.480 --> 00:23:11.359
<v Speaker 3>the kron speaks as if they thought the Gospel or

400
00:23:11.359 --> 00:23:14.759
<v Speaker 3>the nGael was this book that Jesus got, like like

401
00:23:14.839 --> 00:23:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Muhammad got the Quran. It's not. It's a recorded it's

402
00:23:19.279 --> 00:23:24.440
<v Speaker 3>the disciples recording this oral message and then passing on

403
00:23:24.720 --> 00:23:28.480
<v Speaker 3>various texts which give, in my view, a coherent narrative.

404
00:23:29.079 --> 00:23:33.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's just amazing that this it's not a very

405
00:23:33.480 --> 00:23:36.759
<v Speaker 3>complex argument. I mean, it might be complex if you're

406
00:23:36.960 --> 00:23:39.079
<v Speaker 3>not used to the Old Testament, or if you don't

407
00:23:39.119 --> 00:23:41.720
<v Speaker 3>know actually what's in the Torah and the prophets in

408
00:23:41.759 --> 00:23:43.759
<v Speaker 3>the Bible, But if you actually go and look and see,

409
00:23:44.319 --> 00:23:47.279
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty clear. Now. The other thing that Daniel referenced

410
00:23:47.400 --> 00:23:50.119
<v Speaker 3>was the text in Jeremiah, and he didn't even get

411
00:23:50.279 --> 00:23:54.000
<v Speaker 3>that the This was actually called out by one of

412
00:23:54.039 --> 00:23:57.319
<v Speaker 3>the super chat questions I think if I recall, but

413
00:23:57.400 --> 00:23:59.440
<v Speaker 3>he said, oh, well, you see, Jeremiah says that the

414
00:23:59.519 --> 00:24:03.279
<v Speaker 3>scribe have perverted the text. It doesn't say the scribes

415
00:24:03.319 --> 00:24:08.039
<v Speaker 3>perverted the Torah. It says that the scribes perverted their text,

416
00:24:08.160 --> 00:24:11.799
<v Speaker 3>meaning they're what I would say. When Jesus rebukes the Pharisees,

417
00:24:11.799 --> 00:24:14.319
<v Speaker 3>he says, you've added things to the commands of God.

418
00:24:15.000 --> 00:24:17.720
<v Speaker 3>And it doesn't mean that the Torah was essentially altered,

419
00:24:17.720 --> 00:24:21.160
<v Speaker 3>because Jesus says in the same Gospel that the scriptures

420
00:24:21.160 --> 00:24:24.480
<v Speaker 3>cannot be broken. He presupposes and cites the Torah at

421
00:24:24.559 --> 00:24:28.960
<v Speaker 3>length throughout the Gospels. So the text in Jeremiah is not,

422
00:24:29.200 --> 00:24:31.880
<v Speaker 3>first of all, referring to the Torah itself being corrupted.

423
00:24:31.920 --> 00:24:36.319
<v Speaker 3>It's talking about the rabbinical traditions. However, even if Daniel

424
00:24:36.359 --> 00:24:38.880
<v Speaker 3>did want to say that the text in Jeremiah is

425
00:24:38.920 --> 00:24:42.200
<v Speaker 3>referring to the Torah being corrupted, Daniel doesn't have a

426
00:24:42.240 --> 00:24:45.599
<v Speaker 3>principle by which to know for sure that that text

427
00:24:45.640 --> 00:24:50.119
<v Speaker 3>of Jeremiah isn't corrupted, because the entire Old Testament and prophets,

428
00:24:50.119 --> 00:24:52.680
<v Speaker 3>in his view, are potentially corrupted. That's why asked, in

429
00:24:52.720 --> 00:24:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the principle of epistemic certitude, what is the principle by

430
00:24:56.279 --> 00:25:00.079
<v Speaker 3>which you judge when the Old Testament's true when it's false. Well,

431
00:25:00.119 --> 00:25:01.920
<v Speaker 3>it's whenever it agrees with the Kuran. Ok. How do

432
00:25:01.960 --> 00:25:04.279
<v Speaker 3>you know that the text in Jeremiah that you're citing

433
00:25:04.319 --> 00:25:08.440
<v Speaker 3>about corruption isn't also corrupted because it agrees with the Kuran.

434
00:25:08.559 --> 00:25:12.440
<v Speaker 3>So again it all comes back to this circle. But

435
00:25:12.519 --> 00:25:14.839
<v Speaker 3>as you pointed out, it's not even a good circle

436
00:25:14.920 --> 00:25:17.799
<v Speaker 3>because the book itself that He's is his ultimate principle

437
00:25:18.599 --> 00:25:22.039
<v Speaker 3>already affirms that there's not error and contradiction in the

438
00:25:22.039 --> 00:25:23.160
<v Speaker 3>prior revelations.

439
00:25:23.559 --> 00:25:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, even if we talk about so when we talk

440
00:25:26.519 --> 00:25:29.799
<v Speaker 1>about Jeremiah as a source, there is another problem which

441
00:25:29.839 --> 00:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about last week when we were in your channel,

442
00:25:33.799 --> 00:25:37.559
<v Speaker 1>which is that Jeremiah is an easy prophet as a

443
00:25:37.599 --> 00:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>prophetic source, is not even recognized in Islam. So you

444
00:25:44.039 --> 00:25:48.799
<v Speaker 1>could it's not mentioned in the Quran. This might be

445
00:25:48.839 --> 00:25:52.319
<v Speaker 1>a big surprise to many people, but Jeremiah is not

446
00:25:52.480 --> 00:25:55.839
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the Koran. Huge huge profit in Abrahamic religion.

447
00:25:56.160 --> 00:26:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Samuel is not mentioned in the Quran. Huge profit. Isaiah

448
00:26:00.480 --> 00:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is amazingly huge prophet not mentioned in the Quran. Aslam

449
00:26:04.480 --> 00:26:07.559
<v Speaker 1>as no cool about Isaiah. Daniel, which is very ironic,

450
00:26:07.720 --> 00:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>is also Daniel Kikschu's name is not mentioned in the Quran.

451
00:26:11.200 --> 00:26:14.799
<v Speaker 1>These prophets are not recognized as prophets anywhere in the Quran.

452
00:26:16.079 --> 00:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Any most knowledge about these prophets comes from Jews and Christians.

453
00:26:21.279 --> 00:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>They have to go to Jews and Christians literally to

454
00:26:24.559 --> 00:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>get information about about these people. So when it comes

455
00:26:28.200 --> 00:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to Daniel Ki gets you referencing something in Jeremiah, that

456
00:26:31.759 --> 00:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>would mean he is making reference to a book that

457
00:26:36.079 --> 00:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is a prophetic book according to the Jews and Christians,

458
00:26:40.759 --> 00:26:45.319
<v Speaker 1>whom he cannot trust because they allegedly corrupted everything. So

459
00:26:45.440 --> 00:26:50.759
<v Speaker 1>he is appealing to a potentially corrupted source, which, according

460
00:26:50.799 --> 00:26:54.839
<v Speaker 1>to him, argues that things were at some point corrupted.

461
00:26:54.960 --> 00:26:57.759
<v Speaker 1>This is just no way to go, hope for to

462
00:26:57.839 --> 00:27:02.039
<v Speaker 1>make up stolid argument against for the corruption of Judaism

463
00:27:02.079 --> 00:27:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and Christianity.

464
00:27:03.160 --> 00:27:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, the other funny thing too is that and by

465
00:27:05.440 --> 00:27:07.440
<v Speaker 3>the way, I know that you know, in our last

466
00:27:07.440 --> 00:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>talk on my channel, we had talked about the fact

467
00:27:10.000 --> 00:27:15.119
<v Speaker 3>that many of these prophets that are major figures in

468
00:27:15.160 --> 00:27:18.759
<v Speaker 3>the Old Testament, major prophets, that they I didn't even

469
00:27:18.799 --> 00:27:20.960
<v Speaker 3>realize that it's that they're not even mentioned by name

470
00:27:21.000 --> 00:27:23.319
<v Speaker 3>in the sense of absolutely no mention. I thought, maybe

471
00:27:23.319 --> 00:27:25.799
<v Speaker 3>there's passing references, you know, to the Holy prophet of

472
00:27:25.880 --> 00:27:28.759
<v Speaker 3>so and so, But but you're saying Jeremiah is not

473
00:27:28.759 --> 00:27:29.559
<v Speaker 3>even mentioned at all.

474
00:27:29.920 --> 00:27:32.519
<v Speaker 1>It's not mentioned at allow. Jeremiah has no mention in

475
00:27:32.519 --> 00:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the Corona.

476
00:27:33.319 --> 00:27:35.960
<v Speaker 3>That's wild, because you know, if we were looking for

477
00:27:35.960 --> 00:27:38.680
<v Speaker 3>a religion that was in continuity of prior prophets, I

478
00:27:38.720 --> 00:27:41.200
<v Speaker 3>mean from the vantage point of Jews and Christians. I

479
00:27:41.240 --> 00:27:45.119
<v Speaker 3>mean Isaiah, as we said, is called the Fifth Gospel.

480
00:27:45.160 --> 00:27:48.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's just huge, even if you don't believe

481
00:27:48.359 --> 00:27:51.359
<v Speaker 3>Jesus is and Messiah like I mean, Isaiah is Gian

482
00:27:51.599 --> 00:27:56.200
<v Speaker 3>sixty six chapters. It's huge, you know, Ezekiel huge, right,

483
00:27:56.319 --> 00:27:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Jeremiah huge, I mean vast books of the of.

484
00:27:59.839 --> 00:28:00.680
<v Speaker 2>The Old Testament.

485
00:28:00.720 --> 00:28:03.920
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, just a little funny side note,

486
00:28:04.119 --> 00:28:07.960
<v Speaker 3>the name Daniel means God is my judge. And the

487
00:28:08.240 --> 00:28:13.960
<v Speaker 3>l there is would be probably what Daniel was looking

488
00:28:13.960 --> 00:28:15.720
<v Speaker 3>for when he was looking for the name that was

489
00:28:15.759 --> 00:28:17.400
<v Speaker 3>pagan l l ohem.

490
00:28:18.039 --> 00:28:19.400
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't mean the name is pagan.

491
00:28:19.480 --> 00:28:22.519
<v Speaker 3>Right. This is a word concept fallacy because it's just

492
00:28:22.519 --> 00:28:26.200
<v Speaker 3>like the word divinity. The word divinity or deity might

493
00:28:26.240 --> 00:28:30.440
<v Speaker 3>refer to God, it might refer to many gods. It

494
00:28:30.559 --> 00:28:33.839
<v Speaker 3>might refer to angels, demons, or a human being viewed

495
00:28:33.880 --> 00:28:37.119
<v Speaker 3>as a divine figure. It's it's a generic term, and

496
00:28:37.200 --> 00:28:40.640
<v Speaker 3>so amongst the Canaanites. The term L could be a

497
00:28:40.640 --> 00:28:43.000
<v Speaker 3>reference to any kind of deity or a.

498
00:28:42.880 --> 00:28:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Class of deities.

499
00:28:44.160 --> 00:28:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Right, So a lot of people make this mistake because

500
00:28:46.279 --> 00:28:48.920
<v Speaker 3>they think, oh, well, anything with the name L in it,

501
00:28:49.400 --> 00:28:54.039
<v Speaker 3>Danielle must be so ironically, his own name would be

502
00:28:54.160 --> 00:28:55.119
<v Speaker 3>a pagan name.

503
00:28:56.920 --> 00:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Bible also uses L or as when

504
00:29:02.119 --> 00:29:05.039
<v Speaker 1>when it refers to other gods, when it refers to

505
00:29:05.240 --> 00:29:08.599
<v Speaker 1>other false gods, when it refers to them them making

506
00:29:08.759 --> 00:29:12.759
<v Speaker 1>a god of of objects of of Yeah. Different.

507
00:29:14.000 --> 00:29:17.119
<v Speaker 3>It's a word that's a generic term, like like the

508
00:29:17.160 --> 00:29:18.480
<v Speaker 3>word deity or divinity.

509
00:29:18.759 --> 00:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so it would be it's it's it's just

510
00:29:21.119 --> 00:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>very ignorant from general's perspective and other people's perspective to

511
00:29:25.279 --> 00:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>argue that that would be the the actual name and

512
00:29:29.759 --> 00:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>then to deny the existence of Yahweh as Uh as

513
00:29:33.039 --> 00:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>name of God, and that this is one of my

514
00:29:34.960 --> 00:29:38.319
<v Speaker 1>favorite things by now to to go to one of

515
00:29:38.400 --> 00:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>my one of my favorite arguments against Islam, the whole

516
00:29:41.279 --> 00:29:44.119
<v Speaker 1>absence and ignorance of the name Yahweh in Islam. And

517
00:29:44.160 --> 00:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this in length on your I don't

518
00:29:47.480 --> 00:29:48.119
<v Speaker 1>know if you're talking about it.

519
00:29:48.160 --> 00:29:51.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's an amazing argument that you found there with that,

520
00:29:51.359 --> 00:29:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and especially going into the prophets whose names are also

521
00:29:55.000 --> 00:30:00.279
<v Speaker 3>derivatives of that, and I think that, I mean, I

522
00:30:00.319 --> 00:30:04.279
<v Speaker 3>can't see how this argument can be overcome. I mean

523
00:30:04.319 --> 00:30:06.880
<v Speaker 3>it's really it's really probably one of the strongest that

524
00:30:06.880 --> 00:30:12.119
<v Speaker 3>I've heard. Uh So again, the fact that you, being atheist,

525
00:30:12.240 --> 00:30:13.920
<v Speaker 3>have that argument has nothing to do. I mean, the

526
00:30:14.039 --> 00:30:16.039
<v Speaker 3>argument stands on our own on its own right. So

527
00:30:16.079 --> 00:30:18.839
<v Speaker 3>it's like, I mean, it's a strong argument no matter

528
00:30:18.839 --> 00:30:21.400
<v Speaker 3>who says it. And I think that any position that

529
00:30:21.680 --> 00:30:23.960
<v Speaker 3>doesn't want to deal with arguments and has to kind

530
00:30:23.960 --> 00:30:27.160
<v Speaker 3>of fall over into these kinds of like, oh well

531
00:30:27.160 --> 00:30:29.359
<v Speaker 3>he needs to just be gotten rid of or you.

532
00:30:29.240 --> 00:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Know, shut up, shut him up.

533
00:30:30.680 --> 00:30:32.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's just showing kind of weakness in the

534
00:30:32.400 --> 00:30:33.599
<v Speaker 3>position from my vanished point.

535
00:30:33.880 --> 00:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and even when I brought that whole argument about

536
00:30:37.160 --> 00:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the name of Yahweh on how Islam is completely ignorant

537
00:30:39.920 --> 00:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of the name of Yahweh, I specifically brought that topic

538
00:30:43.200 --> 00:30:45.279
<v Speaker 1>to him and challenged him on that because I knew

539
00:30:45.359 --> 00:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>very well that he that his understanding of scripture, theology

540
00:30:49.480 --> 00:30:54.559
<v Speaker 1>and things like that is very very poor. He was

541
00:30:55.359 --> 00:30:58.480
<v Speaker 1>actively it looks like it clearly looks like he was

542
00:30:58.519 --> 00:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>actively researching while I was talking and then trying to

543
00:31:01.640 --> 00:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>give me these off way answers to my challenge. And

544
00:31:06.720 --> 00:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what he did come up with is, well, Yahweh did

545
00:31:10.279 --> 00:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not Yahweh was not in in Genesis, which was false.

546
00:31:14.559 --> 00:31:17.039
<v Speaker 1>Yahweh is just you know, it's it's a name that

547
00:31:17.400 --> 00:31:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the Hebrews probably adopted this pagan name from the from

548
00:31:23.160 --> 00:31:27.559
<v Speaker 1>from from these polytheistic people, and then gave that name

549
00:31:27.599 --> 00:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to their own God. And later prophets actually fought against

550
00:31:31.960 --> 00:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this and wanted to you know, rid their religion of

551
00:31:36.240 --> 00:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>this corruption, but then you know, it just kept being

552
00:31:40.880 --> 00:31:42.799
<v Speaker 1>used in this corrupt form.

553
00:31:42.839 --> 00:31:45.960
<v Speaker 3>It just doesn't weird because that's that's yeah, that's usually

554
00:31:46.119 --> 00:31:48.720
<v Speaker 3>the when people who and that's a very low tier argument,

555
00:31:49.000 --> 00:31:51.119
<v Speaker 3>like you said, based on ignorance, they usually are referring

556
00:31:51.160 --> 00:31:54.680
<v Speaker 3>to Aloheim. Usually they say the name Elohim is the

557
00:31:54.720 --> 00:31:59.599
<v Speaker 3>one that is borrowed from Canaanite religion and therefore Christianity

558
00:31:59.640 --> 00:32:03.319
<v Speaker 3>and Judy or false because there's this paganization just on

559
00:32:03.359 --> 00:32:06.519
<v Speaker 3>the basis of a word concept ballacy of the name Elohim.

560
00:32:07.160 --> 00:32:10.599
<v Speaker 3>But I think he got mixed up or he just

561
00:32:10.799 --> 00:32:13.240
<v Speaker 3>slipped oh, well, Yahweh is the same thing. It's like

562
00:32:13.279 --> 00:32:15.640
<v Speaker 3>that it's a pagan it's but it's not. There's no

563
00:32:16.359 --> 00:32:19.119
<v Speaker 3>equivalent that I'm aware of it being a pagan name.

564
00:32:19.920 --> 00:32:23.839
<v Speaker 1>So what he did as a result is he completely

565
00:32:23.880 --> 00:32:28.519
<v Speaker 1>wasted the one opportunity of actually dealing with that argument

566
00:32:28.720 --> 00:32:33.599
<v Speaker 1>and still presents it as if he was actually he

567
00:32:33.640 --> 00:32:36.839
<v Speaker 1>actually successfully argued his point when he was challenged with that.

568
00:32:37.559 --> 00:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at the footage, you can clearly

569
00:32:39.960 --> 00:32:43.759
<v Speaker 1>see that he gives completely nonsensical answers and it's just

570
00:32:43.839 --> 00:32:45.799
<v Speaker 1>out there, and he still doesn't engage with it anymore

571
00:32:45.960 --> 00:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>after I called him out that his response doesn't make sense,

572
00:32:50.000 --> 00:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that his response that Yahweh is a pagan name basically

573
00:32:52.720 --> 00:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>invalidates Islam as well, because Islam itself, the crown itself

574
00:32:56.480 --> 00:33:01.599
<v Speaker 1>uses theophoric names which clearly references Awe, including the biggest

575
00:33:01.599 --> 00:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say is Elijah, which truly means Ali yahooh

576
00:33:06.240 --> 00:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>my God, is Yahweh. And he didn't even get that.

577
00:33:09.920 --> 00:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>He was like, Okay, well, why why is that Yahweh?

578
00:33:11.759 --> 00:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't sound like yeahweh? Okay, yeah, it doesn't have

579
00:33:15.920 --> 00:33:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to exactly sound like yeah, yeah, it's Ali. Yahli. Yeah,

580
00:33:21.359 --> 00:33:23.119
<v Speaker 1>that the Yah is already enough that that that is

581
00:33:23.119 --> 00:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>what is commonly used throughout the Bible and throughout throughout

582
00:33:28.240 --> 00:33:32.039
<v Speaker 1>Hebrew to reference reference Yahweh, and that should already be

583
00:33:32.160 --> 00:33:34.759
<v Speaker 1>enough for him. Plus you have two instances of the

584
00:33:34.799 --> 00:33:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Quran explicitly naming, explicitly saying that John and Jesus, two

585
00:33:41.359 --> 00:33:47.359
<v Speaker 1>figures that were Allah announced their names beforehand, before they

586
00:33:47.359 --> 00:33:50.799
<v Speaker 1>were born, and it is Allah himself who gave them

587
00:33:50.839 --> 00:33:56.519
<v Speaker 1>those names, and both of those names referenced Yahweh. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

588
00:33:56.559 --> 00:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So it is just it is just.

589
00:33:59.240 --> 00:34:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't know if you saw the when I

590
00:34:01.039 --> 00:34:05.440
<v Speaker 3>posted you the clip that you argued. His reply was,

591
00:34:07.200 --> 00:34:10.840
<v Speaker 3>I never said that. And it's like the clip has

592
00:34:10.920 --> 00:34:11.679
<v Speaker 3>you think, what do you mean?

593
00:34:11.760 --> 00:34:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Never said it?

594
00:34:13.599 --> 00:34:15.559
<v Speaker 1>And that's it. He wouldn't respond to that, right.

595
00:34:16.719 --> 00:34:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean that was the response. I never said that.

596
00:34:19.159 --> 00:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, free bird said Yahweh. Don't mention the New Testament.

597
00:34:24.280 --> 00:34:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Sure it does.

598
00:34:25.679 --> 00:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, go ahead if you want to respond to that,

599
00:34:29.519 --> 00:34:31.159
<v Speaker 1>so I would, I would say, off the top of

600
00:34:31.239 --> 00:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>my head, it is already. First off, it is it's

601
00:34:34.360 --> 00:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a completely irrelevant point because Christians don't have the problem

602
00:34:38.000 --> 00:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>which Muslims have of not having the previous scriptures the

603
00:34:43.360 --> 00:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament. It is known as the Old Testament as

604
00:34:45.400 --> 00:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>part of the Bible, so Christians read the very book

605
00:34:48.760 --> 00:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>which mentions Yahweh over six thousand times, although due to

606
00:34:56.519 --> 00:35:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Hebrew tradition it was it is shane into auto and

607
00:35:01.199 --> 00:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I in Hebrew and then the English for example, into a

608
00:35:04.159 --> 00:35:08.159
<v Speaker 1>lord in capital letters. But that is basically Yahweh plus

609
00:35:08.199 --> 00:35:12.079
<v Speaker 1>plus the New Testament says Hallelujah for example, which is

610
00:35:12.239 --> 00:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a direct, direct inclusion of direct reference to Yahweh.

611
00:35:17.239 --> 00:35:19.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a lot of different ways that you can

612
00:35:19.119 --> 00:35:21.679
<v Speaker 3>demonstrate this. One of those, as I pointed out, is

613
00:35:21.719 --> 00:35:24.320
<v Speaker 3>if you look at Exodus three, when you have the

614
00:35:24.320 --> 00:35:27.440
<v Speaker 3>burning bush manifestation or what we call it a theophany,

615
00:35:28.480 --> 00:35:30.920
<v Speaker 3>it's known as the ash air, it's God saying I

616
00:35:30.960 --> 00:35:33.639
<v Speaker 3>am that I am, and so God is the I am.

617
00:35:33.800 --> 00:35:36.800
<v Speaker 2>This is also equivalent to or.

618
00:35:37.239 --> 00:35:39.679
<v Speaker 3>A reference to Yahweh as well, because if you go

619
00:35:39.719 --> 00:35:45.519
<v Speaker 3>over to Exodus twenty three, God says that the angel

620
00:35:45.519 --> 00:35:48.079
<v Speaker 3>who will go before the messenger. And I remember, a

621
00:35:48.119 --> 00:35:51.880
<v Speaker 3>messenger doesn't always mean a created angel. It can be

622
00:35:51.920 --> 00:35:54.400
<v Speaker 3>a divine messenger or it can be a created messenger

623
00:35:54.480 --> 00:35:57.159
<v Speaker 3>like Gabriel or whoever. But if you look at Exodus

624
00:35:57.239 --> 00:36:01.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, the same mess or the one that the

625
00:36:01.440 --> 00:36:04.400
<v Speaker 3>voice that speaks in the bush is identified as the

626
00:36:04.519 --> 00:36:08.559
<v Speaker 3>same messenger who will I'll read it. Hold, I will

627
00:36:08.599 --> 00:36:11.880
<v Speaker 3>send my messenger before your face to keep you in

628
00:36:11.920 --> 00:36:14.039
<v Speaker 3>the way and in the land that are prepared. Listen

629
00:36:14.119 --> 00:36:17.079
<v Speaker 3>to him and obey the voice. Do not provoke him,

630
00:36:17.079 --> 00:36:20.000
<v Speaker 3>for he will not pardon your sins. Only God can

631
00:36:20.039 --> 00:36:24.119
<v Speaker 3>prepardon sins. By the way, not angels. My name Yahweh

632
00:36:24.400 --> 00:36:28.840
<v Speaker 3>is in him, is in the as in the the

633
00:36:28.960 --> 00:36:31.840
<v Speaker 3>being speaking from the bush. It's this identified as the

634
00:36:31.880 --> 00:36:35.039
<v Speaker 3>same being of Exodus three. And so when you read

635
00:36:35.039 --> 00:36:39.239
<v Speaker 3>the Gospel of John, Jesus says for many in many instances,

636
00:36:39.360 --> 00:36:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I am, He says, I am, when before Abraham was

637
00:36:43.039 --> 00:36:45.880
<v Speaker 3>I am. And particularly if you want to focus on

638
00:36:46.519 --> 00:36:50.719
<v Speaker 3>John one and then John five through nine. In those chapters,

639
00:36:50.800 --> 00:36:54.559
<v Speaker 3>Jesus identifies himself as the one that spoke to Moses.

640
00:36:54.719 --> 00:36:58.320
<v Speaker 3>So the one speaking in the bush, the one speaking

641
00:36:58.840 --> 00:37:01.079
<v Speaker 3>and being the messenger to go before them to either

642
00:37:01.119 --> 00:37:02.519
<v Speaker 3>pardon them or not pardon them.

643
00:37:02.519 --> 00:37:03.760
<v Speaker 2>In Exodus twenty three.

644
00:37:04.159 --> 00:37:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Jesus identifying himself as that to the Pharisees. And that's

645
00:37:07.239 --> 00:37:10.000
<v Speaker 3>what motivates the Pharisees in John five through nine to

646
00:37:10.199 --> 00:37:14.679
<v Speaker 3>want to stone him because they recognized Jesus saying, Abraham

647
00:37:14.800 --> 00:37:19.559
<v Speaker 3>believed in me. Abraham saw my day. Abraham believed in me,

648
00:37:20.519 --> 00:37:23.679
<v Speaker 3>saw my day and was glad. He says Moses, right,

649
00:37:24.159 --> 00:37:28.199
<v Speaker 3>no one sees the Father at any time, but he

650
00:37:28.320 --> 00:37:31.360
<v Speaker 3>says that somebody was there speaking to Moses. He's implying

651
00:37:31.360 --> 00:37:34.199
<v Speaker 3>that it was himself. He says, Moses wrote about me.

652
00:37:35.079 --> 00:37:38.800
<v Speaker 3>This isn't what enrages the Pharisees because Jesus identifying himself

653
00:37:38.840 --> 00:37:42.519
<v Speaker 3>as the Angel of the Lord and as the face

654
00:37:42.679 --> 00:37:45.480
<v Speaker 3>that spoke to Moses, and this makes them want to

655
00:37:45.559 --> 00:37:48.599
<v Speaker 3>stone him. So those passages I think are very clear

656
00:37:48.639 --> 00:37:51.760
<v Speaker 3>if you're familiar with the typology, and also if you

657
00:37:51.760 --> 00:37:53.800
<v Speaker 3>go through a lot of these passages that I mentioned

658
00:37:55.079 --> 00:37:57.760
<v Speaker 3>that are called the offen. These these are manifestations of

659
00:37:57.840 --> 00:38:03.239
<v Speaker 3>distinctions in the Old Testament that refer both to the Father,

660
00:38:04.079 --> 00:38:06.320
<v Speaker 3>to the Angel of Yahweh or the Angel of the Lord,

661
00:38:07.039 --> 00:38:10.599
<v Speaker 3>and to the Spirit. And this is just a partial list.

662
00:38:10.639 --> 00:38:13.320
<v Speaker 3>There's many many more. It gots smudged over here. But

663
00:38:14.000 --> 00:38:15.519
<v Speaker 3>if you go back to the Daniel debate. You can

664
00:38:15.559 --> 00:38:18.239
<v Speaker 3>see all of those that I've referenced, and so what

665
00:38:18.280 --> 00:38:20.760
<v Speaker 3>you get is a comprehensive in my view of presentation

666
00:38:20.920 --> 00:38:25.079
<v Speaker 3>of differentiation in Yahweh throughout the Old Testament, that the

667
00:38:25.159 --> 00:38:28.480
<v Speaker 3>New Testament is consistent with even if you didn't believe

668
00:38:28.480 --> 00:38:31.639
<v Speaker 3>in Christianity. I think that modern Jews, for example that

669
00:38:31.719 --> 00:38:34.719
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned in the debate, the Summer Text, the Seagull Text,

670
00:38:36.320 --> 00:38:39.599
<v Speaker 3>the Schaeffer, they're all Jewish scholars. They're admitting that there

671
00:38:39.639 --> 00:38:42.760
<v Speaker 3>is quite a bit of differentiation and distinction in the

672
00:38:42.800 --> 00:38:45.079
<v Speaker 3>persona of Yahweh and the Old Testament. So it's not

673
00:38:45.119 --> 00:38:49.000
<v Speaker 3>a strict unitarianism. So I'm just pointing out that whether

674
00:38:49.320 --> 00:38:52.719
<v Speaker 3>you're a Christian who approaches the New Testament and the

675
00:38:52.800 --> 00:38:56.039
<v Speaker 3>name of Yahweh and how it's differentiated in the Old

676
00:38:56.039 --> 00:38:58.800
<v Speaker 3>and New Testament, how it's applied to Christ, or whether

677
00:38:58.840 --> 00:39:02.920
<v Speaker 3>you're a Jew who looking at for example, Daniel seven

678
00:39:03.760 --> 00:39:05.800
<v Speaker 3>in the text where we see this one like a

679
00:39:05.800 --> 00:39:10.320
<v Speaker 3>son of Man, these Jewish scholars are admitting that early

680
00:39:10.440 --> 00:39:17.599
<v Speaker 3>Christianity is consistent with a quote conservative Judaism of that time.

681
00:39:18.719 --> 00:39:21.960
<v Speaker 3>In other words, it's not a completely wholesale made at religion.

682
00:39:22.039 --> 00:39:23.679
<v Speaker 2>In fact, they're admitting that.

683
00:39:24.960 --> 00:39:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Without believing it. They're admitting that the Jews, the early Christians,

684
00:39:28.280 --> 00:39:31.559
<v Speaker 3>who were all Jews, were attempting to interpret and be

685
00:39:31.719 --> 00:39:36.039
<v Speaker 3>consistent with the revelation in the Torah and the prophets

686
00:39:36.079 --> 00:39:39.480
<v Speaker 3>that was not a strict unitarianism. And in fact, I

687
00:39:39.480 --> 00:39:44.159
<v Speaker 3>think some Summers argues that the really strict unitarianism of

688
00:39:45.039 --> 00:39:48.039
<v Speaker 3>Judaism doesn't really come about until my monodies.

689
00:39:48.880 --> 00:39:51.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's also interestingly kind of parallel with.

690
00:39:53.320 --> 00:39:57.960
<v Speaker 3>The rise of Islam and its strict version of unitarianism.

691
00:39:58.000 --> 00:40:00.559
<v Speaker 1>What is very interesting is dealing with all of these

692
00:40:00.679 --> 00:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>uh these issues that are presented when we deal with

693
00:40:03.960 --> 00:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Islam and compared to to Abrahamic religion. You pointed out

694
00:40:07.920 --> 00:40:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that that there is a that there seems to be

695
00:40:10.840 --> 00:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this this attitude, this behavior among traditionalist Muslims, which Dane

696
00:40:16.639 --> 00:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Kikichu seems to be a representative of, of not of

697
00:40:22.400 --> 00:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>not really engaging with the the argument. And there is

698
00:40:26.480 --> 00:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>an older tradition of simply not asking questions, and that

699
00:40:31.360 --> 00:40:34.519
<v Speaker 1>goes back to such a such a fundamental level. Indeed,

700
00:40:35.360 --> 00:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I quickly want to point that out that is not

701
00:40:36.920 --> 00:40:39.519
<v Speaker 1>just something we say. There is a there is a

702
00:40:39.639 --> 00:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>term in Arabic bila cave, which literally means without how,

703
00:40:45.679 --> 00:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>or which means without asking how? How, Yeah, without asking how?

704
00:40:50.719 --> 00:40:53.519
<v Speaker 1>And and that is a that is a concept, a

705
00:40:53.639 --> 00:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>principle which became popularized by very early Muslim scholar and

706
00:41:00.960 --> 00:41:05.599
<v Speaker 1>which traditionalists, Muslims, literalists, legalists stood by for quite a

707
00:41:05.599 --> 00:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>long time when they dealt with, for example, how how

708
00:41:09.880 --> 00:41:13.639
<v Speaker 1>allies described in the Qur'an, and that there are references

709
00:41:13.639 --> 00:41:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to alli having body parts, but then also references to

710
00:41:17.320 --> 00:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to a lot being just uh, you know, everywhere at

711
00:41:19.920 --> 00:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>all time, and this and that and and and Muslims

712
00:41:21.920 --> 00:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>had problems figuring out how exactly they're supposed to make

713
00:41:26.039 --> 00:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of these different interpretations, and the the early scholars

714
00:41:29.960 --> 00:41:32.639
<v Speaker 1>came up with this, with this explanation or with this

715
00:41:32.800 --> 00:41:37.119
<v Speaker 1>coping method, which was do not ask how, just read it,

716
00:41:37.280 --> 00:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>accept it, do not ask questions. And this is an

717
00:41:40.519 --> 00:41:45.280
<v Speaker 1>actual concept. As said, it's called bila cave. And quite

718
00:41:45.320 --> 00:41:50.039
<v Speaker 1>a few Muslim schools have stood by ed. Traditionalist schools

719
00:41:50.039 --> 00:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>today are still very much respecting that rule, some of them.

720
00:41:56.159 --> 00:41:58.079
<v Speaker 2>Does this go back to like the hunt ball.

721
00:41:58.239 --> 00:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's I think what a prominent opinion is

722
00:42:01.480 --> 00:42:03.639
<v Speaker 1>that is that Ahmad hn Mad actually came up with

723
00:42:03.679 --> 00:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that whole explore. It was his his idea that this

724
00:42:07.760 --> 00:42:10.199
<v Speaker 1>is what needs to be done in order to preserve

725
00:42:10.400 --> 00:42:17.320
<v Speaker 1>proper belief and to avoid corrupting theology. So just take

726
00:42:17.400 --> 00:42:21.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever the text says, do not question it, do not

727
00:42:21.440 --> 00:42:23.519
<v Speaker 1>try to make sense of it, do not compare the

728
00:42:23.960 --> 00:42:27.880
<v Speaker 1>apparent contradictions. It's none of your business. Just just accepted it.

729
00:42:28.000 --> 00:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>That's it. That's also consistent with the Quran saying, with

730
00:42:32.960 --> 00:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Quran saying for the true believers, when when they

731
00:42:36.480 --> 00:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>hear a last versus they they say, I hear and

732
00:42:40.559 --> 00:42:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I obey. That's it. And another another instruction by Mohammad

733
00:42:47.599 --> 00:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>where he says that the devil comes to you and

734
00:42:50.480 --> 00:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>asks you questions about Allah and who created this and

735
00:42:53.280 --> 00:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>who created that. Whenever that happens, seek refuge with Allah

736
00:42:58.079 --> 00:43:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and sees thinking about these things. So these are actually

737
00:43:02.639 --> 00:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>slamming instructions.

738
00:43:03.519 --> 00:43:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Does that in that in that view? Does that also

739
00:43:06.880 --> 00:43:09.000
<v Speaker 3>apply to the hot eath or just the Kuran.

740
00:43:10.480 --> 00:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Hadith are more complicated, much more complicated. But I guess

741
00:43:16.000 --> 00:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>with the hadith, but what they do is they respect

742
00:43:20.039 --> 00:43:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the tradition of figuring out what is and is not

743
00:43:24.239 --> 00:43:29.039
<v Speaker 1>authentic in the hadiths, and then accepting whichever hadith is

744
00:43:29.519 --> 00:43:33.760
<v Speaker 1>most supported, most stable if there are if there are

745
00:43:34.000 --> 00:43:39.760
<v Speaker 1>differing reports only specific instants. But yeah, so there is

746
00:43:39.760 --> 00:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, Haidith which says which I love, which says

747
00:43:43.840 --> 00:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that a lot comes down every night at a specific

748
00:43:48.079 --> 00:43:51.639
<v Speaker 1>time to the world, Yeah, to the lowest heaven, the

749
00:43:51.840 --> 00:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>heaven of the earth, and stays there to listen to

750
00:43:54.039 --> 00:43:56.039
<v Speaker 1>all the prayers, and then he goes back again. And

751
00:43:56.119 --> 00:43:58.280
<v Speaker 1>when do you actually think about that very deeply? That

752
00:43:58.280 --> 00:44:03.599
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense because when exactly, how exactly would

753
00:44:03.639 --> 00:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that work, considering that it is always night somewhere and.

754
00:44:08.880 --> 00:44:11.880
<v Speaker 3>They are just and also, I mean, this is kind

755
00:44:11.920 --> 00:44:16.400
<v Speaker 3>of that point about the shins and the above the throne.

756
00:44:16.599 --> 00:44:21.880
<v Speaker 3>These are spatial locations, and you know, if we're supposed

757
00:44:21.880 --> 00:44:24.039
<v Speaker 3>to believe in tall heed, that's not possible. And so

758
00:44:24.119 --> 00:44:25.280
<v Speaker 3>we're sort of forced.

759
00:44:24.960 --> 00:44:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Into a position then of.

760
00:44:28.519 --> 00:44:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Making analogies saying, oh, this just represents various attributes and powers, right,

761
00:44:35.239 --> 00:44:37.639
<v Speaker 3>But then when we do that, we're now moving into

762
00:44:37.679 --> 00:44:41.559
<v Speaker 3>the domain of philosophical explanations and analogical predication.

763
00:44:42.400 --> 00:44:43.960
<v Speaker 2>And if we're gonna do analogical predication.

764
00:44:44.079 --> 00:44:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Then we have to square that with the text that

765
00:44:46.440 --> 00:44:48.840
<v Speaker 3>says that there's absolutely nothing in.

766
00:44:48.840 --> 00:44:50.199
<v Speaker 2>Creation that's like a lot.

767
00:44:51.199 --> 00:44:53.280
<v Speaker 3>So you can't have both of those things, right, you

768
00:44:53.320 --> 00:44:55.679
<v Speaker 3>can't have analogical predication. And for those that don't know,

769
00:44:57.039 --> 00:45:00.239
<v Speaker 3>predication by analogy means predication on the basis of likeness

770
00:45:00.239 --> 00:45:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and similarity.

771
00:45:01.719 --> 00:45:04.599
<v Speaker 2>Right. So God is a judge.

772
00:45:04.199 --> 00:45:07.639
<v Speaker 3>In the way that a virtuous human being is a

773
00:45:07.719 --> 00:45:11.800
<v Speaker 3>righteous judge. Right, so he judges between cases. God judges, right,

774
00:45:12.159 --> 00:45:15.519
<v Speaker 3>a father loves his son, God loves us in an

775
00:45:15.559 --> 00:45:18.119
<v Speaker 3>analogous way. It's an analogy between the love of father

776
00:45:18.159 --> 00:45:20.719
<v Speaker 3>and a son and God's love for us. Just this

777
00:45:20.800 --> 00:45:24.599
<v Speaker 3>is just throughout history of theology. But in the Middle Ages,

778
00:45:25.159 --> 00:45:29.360
<v Speaker 3>analogical predication is just predicating on the basis of similarity

779
00:45:29.360 --> 00:45:32.519
<v Speaker 3>and likeness. But you see the Koran's already said there's

780
00:45:32.679 --> 00:45:37.480
<v Speaker 3>no likeness at all between Allah and anything created. But

781
00:45:37.519 --> 00:45:41.559
<v Speaker 3>then we have all these names which are predicates, right, Allah,

782
00:45:41.639 --> 00:45:45.719
<v Speaker 3>the merciful, the righteous judge. And then we have these

783
00:45:46.920 --> 00:45:52.360
<v Speaker 3>attribute or these qualities that are predicated like shin, like

784
00:45:52.519 --> 00:45:55.840
<v Speaker 3>spatial location. So they have to be explained. Then at

785
00:45:55.880 --> 00:45:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the same time as saying but there is no such

786
00:45:57.880 --> 00:46:01.679
<v Speaker 3>thing as analogical predication. Oh but there is analogical predication,

787
00:46:02.719 --> 00:46:05.320
<v Speaker 3>and then they just sort of talk around what that means.

788
00:46:05.920 --> 00:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, this I've had.

789
00:46:07.280 --> 00:46:09.400
<v Speaker 3>I brought this up to pretty much every Muslim of

790
00:46:09.480 --> 00:46:12.760
<v Speaker 3>debated except for Daniel. I didn't bring up to Daniel,

791
00:46:12.800 --> 00:46:14.480
<v Speaker 3>but all the other ones that brought it up, and

792
00:46:14.519 --> 00:46:17.559
<v Speaker 3>it's just like, well, it's not saying that all is

793
00:46:17.639 --> 00:46:20.079
<v Speaker 3>like creatures. It's saying that all is like this or

794
00:46:20.079 --> 00:46:23.039
<v Speaker 3>that power. And it's like, okay, well is the power

795
00:46:23.239 --> 00:46:27.320
<v Speaker 3>that you're talking about concept in your head? Okay, but

796
00:46:27.440 --> 00:46:29.960
<v Speaker 3>that's a creature, right, the concept that you're have in

797
00:46:29.960 --> 00:46:32.639
<v Speaker 3>your head of Allah's hand and all as you know,

798
00:46:33.000 --> 00:46:37.000
<v Speaker 3>movement or those are created things in your view, and

799
00:46:37.039 --> 00:46:40.280
<v Speaker 3>you're saying that they are descriptors or the what is

800
00:46:40.320 --> 00:46:41.639
<v Speaker 3>the as she had said.

801
00:46:41.480 --> 00:46:42.760
<v Speaker 2>They signify the divine?

802
00:46:43.239 --> 00:46:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, to signify the divine is to say that this

803
00:46:46.519 --> 00:46:51.639
<v Speaker 3>is a created sign symbol. That's symbology. That's analogical predication.

804
00:46:52.320 --> 00:46:55.280
<v Speaker 3>So how if there's no if all is not like

805
00:46:55.360 --> 00:46:57.360
<v Speaker 3>any creature, is there analogical predication?

806
00:46:59.159 --> 00:47:00.320
<v Speaker 2>You see?

807
00:47:00.559 --> 00:47:06.719
<v Speaker 3>This is sah It's forty forty two to eleven it's

808
00:47:06.760 --> 00:47:07.119
<v Speaker 3>not long.

809
00:47:07.119 --> 00:47:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll read it. It says.

810
00:47:10.760 --> 00:47:14.480
<v Speaker 3>The originator of the heavens and earth, he is appointed

811
00:47:14.480 --> 00:47:17.760
<v Speaker 3>for you, mates among yourselves, and is appointed mates amongst

812
00:47:17.760 --> 00:47:21.840
<v Speaker 3>the cattle. He multiplies you thereby, and not is like

813
00:47:21.960 --> 00:47:26.199
<v Speaker 3>unto him. Unto him ex me. Yet he is the

814
00:47:26.280 --> 00:47:29.320
<v Speaker 3>hero and the seer. So those are analogies. To hear

815
00:47:29.400 --> 00:47:33.320
<v Speaker 3>and to see are analogous to human activities. Right, So

816
00:47:33.320 --> 00:47:35.199
<v Speaker 3>we're saying that all I hear is and all I sees,

817
00:47:36.320 --> 00:47:38.360
<v Speaker 3>but not as a man sees, not as a man hears.

818
00:47:38.480 --> 00:47:40.880
<v Speaker 3>But not only that, here's the problem. Unto him belongs

819
00:47:40.880 --> 00:47:43.679
<v Speaker 3>to the keys of heaven and earth. He comprehends and

820
00:47:43.719 --> 00:47:45.400
<v Speaker 3>strange provision for whomever he will.

821
00:47:46.079 --> 00:47:47.960
<v Speaker 2>He has prescribed that.

822
00:47:50.079 --> 00:47:51.880
<v Speaker 3>There's excuse me out, let me go back a little bit.

823
00:47:51.920 --> 00:47:56.079
<v Speaker 3>It was verse eleven. He multiplies you thereby, but there

824
00:47:56.119 --> 00:47:57.719
<v Speaker 3>is nothing like unto him.

825
00:47:58.079 --> 00:47:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was the text.

826
00:47:58.840 --> 00:48:01.920
<v Speaker 3>I was, excuse me, keep reading. But and then you're

827
00:48:01.920 --> 00:48:04.440
<v Speaker 3>notice in the notes, if you have the study, the

828
00:48:04.519 --> 00:48:07.039
<v Speaker 3>study current, they talk about this discussion of nothing being

829
00:48:07.199 --> 00:48:09.880
<v Speaker 3>like unto him. And I think there's another one too,

830
00:48:10.320 --> 00:48:12.199
<v Speaker 3>which talks in this way. I forget which one it is.

831
00:48:12.239 --> 00:48:14.639
<v Speaker 3>But the point being is that if there's nothing like

832
00:48:14.719 --> 00:48:16.960
<v Speaker 3>unto him. This is I think called tanzi t A

833
00:48:17.039 --> 00:48:21.719
<v Speaker 3>and z i h the doctrine of absolute dissimilarity between

834
00:48:21.719 --> 00:48:25.840
<v Speaker 3>online creatures. If there's absolute dissimilarity, then we can't be

835
00:48:26.000 --> 00:48:29.559
<v Speaker 3>using these predicates like hearing seeing movement.

836
00:48:30.719 --> 00:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the issue is if you just if you already

837
00:48:37.719 --> 00:48:41.800
<v Speaker 1>begin to analyze the things that the Quran says and

838
00:48:41.920 --> 00:48:46.880
<v Speaker 1>point out the obvious problem here, you slowly approach a

839
00:48:46.920 --> 00:48:49.639
<v Speaker 1>topic that has been plaguing the Muslim world in terms

840
00:48:49.639 --> 00:48:54.159
<v Speaker 1>of theology for forever, from the very very beginning, and

841
00:48:54.519 --> 00:49:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that is still around and over which branches of Muslims,

842
00:49:00.280 --> 00:49:04.760
<v Speaker 1>schools of Islam have been denouncing each other and calling

843
00:49:04.800 --> 00:49:08.519
<v Speaker 1>each other disbelievers and even sentencing each other to death

844
00:49:08.599 --> 00:49:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and persecuting each other.

845
00:49:10.239 --> 00:49:12.440
<v Speaker 3>And you're saying, specifically over this question of like the

846
00:49:12.519 --> 00:49:15.079
<v Speaker 3>hand and the placement over the throne.

847
00:49:15.039 --> 00:49:16.480
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the questions. So one of the

848
00:49:16.559 --> 00:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>questions that caused such a huge mess and still does

849
00:49:20.679 --> 00:49:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is that the body parts the attribute to the specific

850
00:49:31.039 --> 00:49:34.679
<v Speaker 1>descriptions of a law, and how you can reconcile them

851
00:49:34.760 --> 00:49:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that there is nothing like Allah, and

852
00:49:38.079 --> 00:49:40.559
<v Speaker 1>how much, how far you can think about them. And

853
00:49:40.599 --> 00:49:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this is actually a very funny thing. I grew up

854
00:49:43.920 --> 00:49:49.599
<v Speaker 1>in a very religious household, and stuff like this was

855
00:49:49.639 --> 00:49:53.079
<v Speaker 1>hammered into my head all the time from all sides,

856
00:49:53.119 --> 00:49:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and I always had trouble understanding that there is nothing

857
00:50:00.079 --> 00:50:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like a lot and I cannot even imagine it. I'm

858
00:50:01.920 --> 00:50:04.360
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to. I cannot think about it. I cannot

859
00:50:04.360 --> 00:50:08.199
<v Speaker 1>imagine it. But then I'm also given these conflicting descriptions

860
00:50:08.239 --> 00:50:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of what a lot does, at what time and how

861
00:50:11.360 --> 00:50:14.639
<v Speaker 1>he will appear, and I'm like, okay, I just it

862
00:50:14.639 --> 00:50:17.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense. I can't reconcile it. And I might

863
00:50:17.679 --> 00:50:21.199
<v Speaker 1>have had this issue as simply somebody who witnesses these

864
00:50:21.719 --> 00:50:24.159
<v Speaker 1>these descriptions of our law and who doesn't study further.

865
00:50:24.280 --> 00:50:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But this has been an issue from the very beginnings

866
00:50:27.320 --> 00:50:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of Islamic history. And there have been a traditionalists who

867
00:50:32.920 --> 00:50:35.159
<v Speaker 1>has said, stuck to the whole idea that you should

868
00:50:35.199 --> 00:50:38.320
<v Speaker 1>not question, because if you question, then you will cause problems.

869
00:50:38.840 --> 00:50:41.679
<v Speaker 1>And there have been the others who are basically the

870
00:50:41.719 --> 00:50:47.199
<v Speaker 1>evidence of specifically that the mainstream Muslims were of the

871
00:50:47.280 --> 00:50:51.639
<v Speaker 1>idea that Allah is up there, and we have certain

872
00:50:51.719 --> 00:50:55.159
<v Speaker 1>things that are described about him, but we are not

873
00:50:55.199 --> 00:50:58.280
<v Speaker 1>supposed to really think about that. Those things may be

874
00:50:58.679 --> 00:51:01.679
<v Speaker 1>metaphorical or literally, we do not know. We don't think

875
00:51:01.719 --> 00:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>about that. Uh. And then there are those the mysticists

876
00:51:05.880 --> 00:51:10.280
<v Speaker 1>who go further and to say Allah is probably up

877
00:51:10.320 --> 00:51:13.679
<v Speaker 1>there wherever that is. But that's it. We're not going

878
00:51:13.719 --> 00:51:17.599
<v Speaker 1>to go into anything else. Everything about him can only

879
00:51:17.599 --> 00:51:22.039
<v Speaker 1>be metaphorical. Uh. And we leave it at that. And

880
00:51:22.079 --> 00:51:24.519
<v Speaker 1>then there are others who go to the extreme. And

881
00:51:25.239 --> 00:51:28.159
<v Speaker 1>actually my parents were kind of part of that, and

882
00:51:28.199 --> 00:51:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they were like in such an extreme form of mysticism

883
00:51:33.599 --> 00:51:36.239
<v Speaker 1>where they deal with all of this mess simply by

884
00:51:36.320 --> 00:51:40.599
<v Speaker 1>saying Allah is not in any direction. It is wrong

885
00:51:40.679 --> 00:51:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to say All is up there, all that. That was

886
00:51:42.679 --> 00:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the Islamic tradition. Always He's everywhere, all at once, very

887
00:51:48.440 --> 00:51:53.639
<v Speaker 1>close to you, within you, even to certain any certain understanding.

888
00:51:54.159 --> 00:51:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And there is no way that you can possibly imagine

889
00:51:57.440 --> 00:52:00.239
<v Speaker 1>or even describe him. The only way he can be

890
00:52:00.280 --> 00:52:02.760
<v Speaker 1>described is in the Quran, and we only understand that

891
00:52:02.880 --> 00:52:06.320
<v Speaker 1>entirely metaphorically. So it's just a huge mess. And all

892
00:52:06.320 --> 00:52:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of these perspectives are not just perspectives that sit at

893
00:52:10.400 --> 00:52:12.599
<v Speaker 1>a table and think, okay, you make sense, Yeah, you

894
00:52:12.599 --> 00:52:14.960
<v Speaker 1>make sense, Okay, I disagree with you. No, they actually

895
00:52:15.039 --> 00:52:18.800
<v Speaker 1>fought each other and killed each other over these over

896
00:52:18.840 --> 00:52:22.639
<v Speaker 1>these problems, over these disagreements, and that is just one

897
00:52:22.639 --> 00:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of those issues. It's the location of our law, the

898
00:52:25.920 --> 00:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>body parts, and what our lie is like. It's whether

899
00:52:30.000 --> 00:52:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the Quran is an eternal part of our law or not,

900
00:52:32.760 --> 00:52:37.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it came into existence through his speech exactly as

901
00:52:37.039 --> 00:52:39.639
<v Speaker 1>it is or not. All of these things were issues

902
00:52:39.639 --> 00:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of major contention that Muslims truly sentence each other to

903
00:52:44.360 --> 00:52:45.440
<v Speaker 1>death and still kind of.

904
00:52:45.559 --> 00:52:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is odd because you know, in Christianity, for example,

905
00:52:50.840 --> 00:52:54.280
<v Speaker 3>in the fourth century, there's a really intense debate that's

906
00:52:54.719 --> 00:52:58.599
<v Speaker 3>kind of analogous to the debate that occurs in the

907
00:52:58.599 --> 00:53:02.199
<v Speaker 3>Middle Ages between Jews and Christians and Muslims over naming God.

908
00:53:02.880 --> 00:53:06.719
<v Speaker 3>And this is the fourth century controversy that the Cappadocians,

909
00:53:06.719 --> 00:53:09.960
<v Speaker 3>this is Basil and the two Gregory's were very important

910
00:53:10.000 --> 00:53:12.320
<v Speaker 3>to Orthodox theology. They had a debate with a guy

911
00:53:12.400 --> 00:53:14.760
<v Speaker 3>named Unomius, and a big part of that debate was

912
00:53:14.800 --> 00:53:17.960
<v Speaker 3>over how and in what ways we can name and

913
00:53:18.000 --> 00:53:20.599
<v Speaker 3>predicate of God. And the only reason I bring that

914
00:53:20.679 --> 00:53:25.280
<v Speaker 3>up is because it's interesting that in other words, if

915
00:53:25.400 --> 00:53:30.519
<v Speaker 3>Islam is the correct next revelation, so to speak, after

916
00:53:31.400 --> 00:53:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Judaism or whatever they think is or are, then it's

917
00:53:38.440 --> 00:53:44.800
<v Speaker 3>almost like there's no cognizance of a prior, intense, nuanced

918
00:53:44.840 --> 00:53:49.000
<v Speaker 3>discussion of this very question of predicating of God. So

919
00:53:49.039 --> 00:53:52.039
<v Speaker 3>it's like, if you were the new revelation, it seems

920
00:53:52.079 --> 00:53:54.960
<v Speaker 3>like you would at least have an understanding of the

921
00:53:55.000 --> 00:53:59.760
<v Speaker 3>previous Jewish Christian discussions and debates over naming God.

922
00:54:00.320 --> 00:54:01.559
<v Speaker 2>Does that makes sense what I'm saying?

923
00:54:01.559 --> 00:54:04.719
<v Speaker 3>Like, in other words, Basil and the Cavedocians have this

924
00:54:04.800 --> 00:54:07.360
<v Speaker 3>debate with Eunomius, who's the earlier unit. He's like a

925
00:54:07.519 --> 00:54:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Unitarians in the sense of Islam or Judaism in the

926
00:54:11.719 --> 00:54:15.639
<v Speaker 3>Middle Ages, and the debate is over whether the names

927
00:54:15.639 --> 00:54:20.719
<v Speaker 3>that we say of God are unifical, equivocal, or analogous.

928
00:54:21.360 --> 00:54:24.360
<v Speaker 3>A unifical term is one in which there's an exact

929
00:54:24.440 --> 00:54:28.079
<v Speaker 3>same meaning between the two the two reference, right. So

930
00:54:29.199 --> 00:54:33.159
<v Speaker 3>for example, if we said God's love is identical to

931
00:54:33.519 --> 00:54:37.679
<v Speaker 3>the sense in which man's love, you know, father son love,

932
00:54:38.719 --> 00:54:43.119
<v Speaker 3>that would be unifical predication. And Eunomius, who was the

933
00:54:43.199 --> 00:54:46.280
<v Speaker 3>radical unitarian of in the days of Basil, and the

934
00:54:46.280 --> 00:54:51.039
<v Speaker 3>Gregory's he believed in unifical predication. Equivocal predication would be

935
00:54:51.320 --> 00:54:54.679
<v Speaker 3>what Islam has, which is that there's no similarity between

936
00:54:55.159 --> 00:54:59.960
<v Speaker 3>when I say God has justice towards us, there's no

937
00:55:00.119 --> 00:55:03.719
<v Speaker 3>similarity between that justice and you know, human law courts

938
00:55:03.760 --> 00:55:09.440
<v Speaker 3>and their creative justice. Analogical predication, which is again what

939
00:55:09.480 --> 00:55:15.079
<v Speaker 3>the Kappadocians and Christian theology wholesale adopts. I would argue

940
00:55:15.079 --> 00:55:17.039
<v Speaker 3>from the earliest days, I think you could find it

941
00:55:17.119 --> 00:55:21.639
<v Speaker 3>in the Old and New Testament itself. It continues clearly

942
00:55:21.639 --> 00:55:25.559
<v Speaker 3>into this controversy and the councils, which Daniel, for whatever reason,

943
00:55:26.079 --> 00:55:28.280
<v Speaker 3>wasn't familiar with what councils are and what they are

944
00:55:28.320 --> 00:55:31.599
<v Speaker 3>about what they mean. He thinks that they're just new revelations,

945
00:55:31.679 --> 00:55:35.159
<v Speaker 3>kind of like new voices of the Holy Spirit or

946
00:55:35.159 --> 00:55:38.320
<v Speaker 3>something like that. That's not what councils are. But the

947
00:55:38.360 --> 00:55:41.519
<v Speaker 3>point is just that this is already a really well known,

948
00:55:41.559 --> 00:55:47.199
<v Speaker 3>intense debate for centuries in Christianity. When Islam arises the

949
00:55:47.239 --> 00:55:52.639
<v Speaker 3>points that you're making about the rise of not questioning

950
00:55:52.800 --> 00:55:56.679
<v Speaker 3>or naming or explaining the hands of God or Allah

951
00:55:56.760 --> 00:56:00.599
<v Speaker 3>or the Allah season. Here's don't ask what that is.

952
00:56:00.639 --> 00:56:04.760
<v Speaker 3>It's just ironic because this debate has already happened. If

953
00:56:04.760 --> 00:56:07.199
<v Speaker 3>you're the continuation of the prior revelation, why is there

954
00:56:07.239 --> 00:56:11.400
<v Speaker 3>no cognizance of that whole discussion? And not only that,

955
00:56:11.480 --> 00:56:16.480
<v Speaker 3>it's like, maybe I'm not worrying this, Well, do you

956
00:56:16.599 --> 00:56:19.639
<v Speaker 3>understand what I'm saying? Yeah? I think it's it's similar

957
00:56:19.679 --> 00:56:21.599
<v Speaker 3>to the point we were making about that the Quran

958
00:56:21.679 --> 00:56:25.039
<v Speaker 3>seems to not even understand what Christianity, whether you think

959
00:56:25.039 --> 00:56:28.440
<v Speaker 3>it's true or not, it doesn't understand what the trinity was. Right,

960
00:56:28.440 --> 00:56:31.239
<v Speaker 3>there's like a trinity in the Quran which includes Mary. Right,

961
00:56:31.280 --> 00:56:34.880
<v Speaker 3>it's like they thought that the trinity included Mary. It doesn't,

962
00:56:35.320 --> 00:56:39.639
<v Speaker 3>never did. But likewise, it's like there was no conception

963
00:56:39.840 --> 00:56:43.880
<v Speaker 3>of what the previous discussions of predication predicating of God

964
00:56:43.920 --> 00:56:47.719
<v Speaker 3>were and so it's almost like bypassing that and saying, well,

965
00:56:47.840 --> 00:56:51.079
<v Speaker 3>Allah's nothing like creation, and that's how it's So it's

966
00:56:51.159 --> 00:56:56.320
<v Speaker 3>it's all, you know, equivocal predication. But it's like, but

967
00:56:56.400 --> 00:57:00.760
<v Speaker 3>throughout your book there's analogical predication, so how could it

968
00:57:00.760 --> 00:57:01.320
<v Speaker 3>be equivocal?

969
00:57:02.280 --> 00:57:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, the reference to the trinity and the Churan

970
00:57:06.199 --> 00:57:09.840
<v Speaker 1>not understanding what It is actually a very fascinating one

971
00:57:09.840 --> 00:57:12.039
<v Speaker 1>that I made a video on very early on when

972
00:57:12.039 --> 00:57:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I started making uh these critical videos. It has the

973
00:57:16.760 --> 00:57:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Quran is different understandings. Uh, there are different interpretations of

974
00:57:20.400 --> 00:57:25.159
<v Speaker 1>what Christians actually believe in. But in one of those instances, Uh,

975
00:57:25.679 --> 00:57:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Jay is not making this up. The Koran actually does

976
00:57:28.039 --> 00:57:32.519
<v Speaker 1>say so. It describes a supposed fantasy conversation in the

977
00:57:32.559 --> 00:57:37.039
<v Speaker 1>future after after everything dies and is resurrected, between Allah

978
00:57:37.079 --> 00:57:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and Jesus, where Allah asks Jesus, did you say to

979
00:57:43.880 --> 00:57:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the people, take me and my mother is deities besides Allah,

980
00:57:48.639 --> 00:57:51.519
<v Speaker 1>and Jesus will say no, I did not, I would

981
00:57:51.639 --> 00:57:55.559
<v Speaker 1>never say that. Where so it looks like the Quran

982
00:57:55.679 --> 00:58:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is they're arguing against this clearly, clearly a great belief

983
00:58:01.760 --> 00:58:06.559
<v Speaker 1>among Christians that that Allah is consists of three, which

984
00:58:06.639 --> 00:58:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is Allah, Jesus and Mother Mary. And it's just it's

985
00:58:14.840 --> 00:58:18.119
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very surprising that when you find that out,

986
00:58:18.119 --> 00:58:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Qur'an seems to not understand what Christians are

987
00:58:21.960 --> 00:58:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to believe and then deals with a completely irrelevant belief

988
00:58:25.840 --> 00:58:28.599
<v Speaker 1>that no Christian actually represents. And if you bring if

989
00:58:28.639 --> 00:58:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you bring this problem up today, Uh, they will try

990
00:58:32.480 --> 00:58:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to explain that a way by saying, well, okay, there

991
00:58:34.800 --> 00:58:37.639
<v Speaker 1>there are there were probably some Christian sects in that

992
00:58:37.760 --> 00:58:39.679
<v Speaker 1>time who did have such a belief, and this is

993
00:58:39.679 --> 00:58:43.920
<v Speaker 1>specifically addressing them, or or they will say this is

994
00:58:43.960 --> 00:58:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a reference to well, to Christians venerating her way too

995
00:58:48.920 --> 00:58:51.000
<v Speaker 1>much and turning her into a god. But that's clearly

996
00:58:51.079 --> 00:58:51.920
<v Speaker 1>not the case there.

997
00:58:52.320 --> 00:58:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, we would need to know what's

998
00:58:55.400 --> 00:58:58.719
<v Speaker 3>the evidence that there was a historic group that did

999
00:58:59.000 --> 00:59:01.880
<v Speaker 3>deify and put Mary as a member of the Trinity.

1000
00:59:01.920 --> 00:59:04.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I suppose that's possible, but I've.

1001
00:59:03.960 --> 00:59:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Never heard of this.

1002
00:59:05.480 --> 00:59:09.920
<v Speaker 3>But secondly, even if that was the case, why would

1003
00:59:09.960 --> 00:59:14.320
<v Speaker 3>you be addressing some tiny fringe group that had no continuity?

1004
00:59:14.440 --> 00:59:18.079
<v Speaker 3>Is basically irrelevant, right, I mean, wouldn't you want to

1005
00:59:18.119 --> 00:59:21.840
<v Speaker 3>address the actual positions? That's what That's what I'm trying

1006
00:59:21.880 --> 00:59:25.280
<v Speaker 3>to say, right, And it's the same point with analogical predication,

1007
00:59:25.400 --> 00:59:28.440
<v Speaker 3>like when you want to at least address or explain, Oh,

1008
00:59:28.480 --> 00:59:30.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Christians when they had.

1009
00:59:30.039 --> 00:59:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Their debates with the Eunomians and and you know what.

1010
00:59:32.760 --> 00:59:37.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and they made their great mistake on analogical predication,

1011
00:59:37.360 --> 00:59:40.039
<v Speaker 3>as Basil and the Gregory's did who who are the

1012
00:59:40.199 --> 00:59:43.079
<v Speaker 3>you know, the great profits of the early like, there's

1013
00:59:43.119 --> 00:59:44.159
<v Speaker 3>no knowledge of any of this.

1014
00:59:44.880 --> 00:59:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that's actually, I mean, that's a very big problem.

1015
00:59:47.960 --> 00:59:50.840
<v Speaker 1>It's I have to be very honest. It is when

1016
00:59:50.840 --> 00:59:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I started getting out of Islam, and during that whole process,

1017
00:59:56.920 --> 01:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to further understand and Christianity and Judaism.

1018
01:00:02.440 --> 01:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So I started reading, reading, reading the Bible, and I

1019
01:00:06.840 --> 01:00:11.199
<v Speaker 1>noticed that it was completely foreign to me. And the

1020
01:00:11.239 --> 01:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>same thing is so this is a problem that Muslims

1021
01:00:13.800 --> 01:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>in general deal with. To them, the Bible, Abrahamic belief

1022
01:00:19.039 --> 01:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is entirely foreign because all they know about it is

1023
01:00:22.679 --> 01:00:26.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff that comes from the Quran and from Muslim tradition.

1024
01:00:27.199 --> 01:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, and that stuff what comes from the

1025
01:00:30.079 --> 01:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Quran is incredibly limited and very ignorant because there is

1026
01:00:34.039 --> 01:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>no continuation, because the Quran is simply its own product,

1027
01:00:37.960 --> 01:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>which emerged in the seventh century. It makes references to

1028
01:00:42.360 --> 01:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>the Bible, to Judaism and Christianity and to their beliefs,

1029
01:00:46.519 --> 01:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but it is completely absent from the vast knowledge that

1030
01:00:51.199 --> 01:00:56.519
<v Speaker 1>comes with the Bible. So the Quran Islam claims to

1031
01:00:57.639 --> 01:01:01.679
<v Speaker 1>be the final message, claims to contry knew what was before,

1032
01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:05.239
<v Speaker 1>but then completely disregards and gets rid of all of

1033
01:01:05.280 --> 01:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge that is in the Bible, which is abundant

1034
01:01:08.320 --> 01:01:11.639
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to the Quran, and then moves on with that.

1035
01:01:11.840 --> 01:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And then, as you said, has no understanding of all

1036
01:01:15.840 --> 01:01:18.599
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that are already addressed in Christianity and Judaism,

1037
01:01:18.760 --> 01:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>has no understanding of so many things mentioned in the Bible,

1038
01:01:21.480 --> 01:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>has no connection to Jewish and Christian history and theology

1039
01:01:25.519 --> 01:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>that was already centuries old in terms of Christianity, that

1040
01:01:31.039 --> 01:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is a huge problement.

1041
01:01:32.360 --> 01:01:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say to better formulate what I was

1042
01:01:35.800 --> 01:01:39.679
<v Speaker 3>trying to say the way you put it more concisely. There,

1043
01:01:41.199 --> 01:01:46.760
<v Speaker 3>if the Quran and Islam were the correct, final or

1044
01:01:46.800 --> 01:01:51.239
<v Speaker 3>new revelation, I would expect there to be an addressing

1045
01:01:51.760 --> 01:01:57.760
<v Speaker 3>of the specifics of where the previous system or systems

1046
01:01:59.079 --> 01:02:03.199
<v Speaker 3>got these things wrong. So what we see is actually

1047
01:02:03.519 --> 01:02:08.679
<v Speaker 3>no familiarity or consistent knowledge of very precise, very well

1048
01:02:08.719 --> 01:02:12.079
<v Speaker 3>known doctrines theologians and people.

1049
01:02:14.480 --> 01:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I can think of one issue, which is Christology and Jesus.

1050
01:02:22.280 --> 01:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Early Christian history has a very prominent history of discussing it.

1051
01:02:29.519 --> 01:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Coming to a proper understanding of the nature of Jesus

1052
01:02:32.480 --> 01:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>uh the crucifixion and the resurrection. I mean that is

1053
01:02:37.800 --> 01:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a that's a core issue. It is the core, It

1054
01:02:41.320 --> 01:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is the fundament, is the fundamental the fundamentals of Christianity

1055
01:02:45.079 --> 01:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is Jesus comes, preaches, does many things, and then very important,

1056
01:02:51.840 --> 01:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>he is crucified, and then he is resurrected. And that

1057
01:02:55.480 --> 01:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>resurrection is supposed to play a great role in terms

1058
01:02:58.239 --> 01:03:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of what Christians believe. It Islam is supposed to come

1059
01:03:01.800 --> 01:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and correct the Christians because they were wrong about Jesus

1060
01:03:06.800 --> 01:03:10.199
<v Speaker 1>about how they explained his crucifixion and resurrection. But it

1061
01:03:10.239 --> 01:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do anything about it at all. It doesn't even

1062
01:03:12.679 --> 01:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>address the resurrection. It just all it says about the

1063
01:03:17.079 --> 01:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>death of Jesus is and they did not crucify him,

1064
01:03:21.119 --> 01:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>nor did they kill him. But it was made to

1065
01:03:25.519 --> 01:03:28.719
<v Speaker 1>it was made to appear that way to them, and

1066
01:03:28.760 --> 01:03:32.719
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Why wouldn't why wouldn't the Quran address this

1067
01:03:32.800 --> 01:03:35.559
<v Speaker 1>whole giant elephant in the room. If the Christians are

1068
01:03:35.599 --> 01:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>indeed wrong, if they corrupted their own beliefs, if Christianity

1069
01:03:39.480 --> 01:03:43.119
<v Speaker 1>is a giant misunderstanding, as the Quran claims, why would

1070
01:03:43.159 --> 01:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it not deal with Christology? Why would it not deal

1071
01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>with what exactly happened after Jesus died. With the resurrection,

1072
01:03:50.320 --> 01:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't do any of these things and therefore leaves

1073
01:03:53.840 --> 01:04:01.639
<v Speaker 1>a huge discussion completely unanswered. Just as DANIELI Kikachu does says, well,

1074
01:04:01.719 --> 01:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just look at it, and whatever agrees with Islam is true,

1075
01:04:03.800 --> 01:04:05.679
<v Speaker 1>and whatever it doesn't just false. That's it.

1076
01:04:05.800 --> 01:04:09.079
<v Speaker 3>Well, and I mean it was like all of what

1077
01:04:09.119 --> 01:04:12.239
<v Speaker 3>you just said is bypassed by you. Just look and

1078
01:04:12.280 --> 01:04:16.079
<v Speaker 3>see with your eyes, Okay.

1079
01:04:15.880 --> 01:04:18.079
<v Speaker 2>Well can I not? I could appeal to the same thing.

1080
01:04:18.159 --> 01:04:20.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, when I look and see with my eyes, it

1081
01:04:20.440 --> 01:04:22.480
<v Speaker 3>can it confirms my view? Right, So I mean that's

1082
01:04:22.519 --> 01:04:25.599
<v Speaker 3>really just a non answer. But yeah, I mean this

1083
01:04:25.679 --> 01:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>is a great point about the resurrection. I mean, you know,

1084
01:04:27.920 --> 01:04:31.719
<v Speaker 3>even if you didn't believe in Christianity, you would at

1085
01:04:31.760 --> 01:04:35.199
<v Speaker 3>least want to understand, Well, what is their view? Why

1086
01:04:35.199 --> 01:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>do they think that, you know, this is so important?

1087
01:04:37.800 --> 01:04:40.079
<v Speaker 3>What is the resurrection have to do with the fall

1088
01:04:40.119 --> 01:04:43.800
<v Speaker 3>of man? What about what about all these prophecies, for example,

1089
01:04:44.920 --> 01:04:48.719
<v Speaker 3>in the Psalms of David, that we see as predictions

1090
01:04:48.760 --> 01:04:51.679
<v Speaker 3>and prophecies of the Messiah, his descent to Hades, and

1091
01:04:51.679 --> 01:04:54.880
<v Speaker 3>his resurrection. Now, maybe you don't believe that, but it

1092
01:04:54.880 --> 01:04:59.039
<v Speaker 3>would be better. It would make sense to understand, you know,

1093
01:04:59.559 --> 01:05:02.599
<v Speaker 3>like here is what they believe, and you know this

1094
01:05:02.719 --> 01:05:04.599
<v Speaker 3>is why it is false, you know, but we don't

1095
01:05:04.639 --> 01:05:07.280
<v Speaker 3>get that. That's what's amazing is that there's not even

1096
01:05:07.320 --> 01:05:09.800
<v Speaker 3>an understanding of what the position is. And I would

1097
01:05:09.880 --> 01:05:12.800
<v Speaker 3>I feel like if this was a divine revelation, they

1098
01:05:12.800 --> 01:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>would at least, you know, God would understand what the

1099
01:05:17.039 --> 01:05:20.760
<v Speaker 3>errors were, you see, and they would be corrected. But

1100
01:05:20.920 --> 01:05:23.960
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't even explain what the erroneous position is. If

1101
01:05:23.960 --> 01:05:26.039
<v Speaker 3>I could misunderstand the erroneous position.

1102
01:05:26.920 --> 01:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's actually a very interesting coron verse that I

1103
01:05:29.320 --> 01:05:33.119
<v Speaker 1>could quickly want to go to, and I might put

1104
01:05:33.159 --> 01:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it on the screen here because I wanted to bring

1105
01:05:36.760 --> 01:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that up. It's actually very relevant to the very point.

1106
01:05:42.239 --> 01:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me share this one here, so Kara three, verse

1107
01:05:50.039 --> 01:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty five. I'm appealing to all the different translations here,

1108
01:05:53.840 --> 01:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>but I'll just take the first one. Soayga international. What

1109
01:05:56.960 --> 01:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it says mentioned when Alas said, Oh Jesus, indeed, I

1110
01:06:02.480 --> 01:06:06.519
<v Speaker 1>will take you and raise you to myself and purify

1111
01:06:06.760 --> 01:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you from those who disbelieve, and make those who follow

1112
01:06:10.920 --> 01:06:15.079
<v Speaker 1>you superior to those who disbelieve until the day of resurrection.

1113
01:06:15.880 --> 01:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Then to me is your return, and I will judge

1114
01:06:17.920 --> 01:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>between you concerning that in which you used to differ.

1115
01:06:21.440 --> 01:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Very very interesting point, very interesting verse here, So a

1116
01:06:26.039 --> 01:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>lot told Jesus that he will raise him and purify

1117
01:06:31.119 --> 01:06:35.559
<v Speaker 1>him from those who denied him, while making those who

1118
01:06:35.599 --> 01:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>followed him and believed him superior until the day of judgment.

1119
01:06:41.920 --> 01:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Interesting but how exactly does that work? So who were

1120
01:06:44.480 --> 01:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>those people who followed Jesus, Who were the people who

1121
01:06:49.880 --> 01:06:54.559
<v Speaker 1>who acknowledged him, who believed him? And which group exactly

1122
01:06:54.639 --> 01:06:58.079
<v Speaker 1>has been has been made superior since then? And which

1123
01:06:58.079 --> 01:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>group will be made superior from then till the day

1124
01:07:01.039 --> 01:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>of judgment.

1125
01:07:03.320 --> 01:07:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm actually baffled by this. What what what is

1126
01:07:05.920 --> 01:07:07.000
<v Speaker 2>their explanation of this?

1127
01:07:07.119 --> 01:07:10.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand the explanation I can tell you will

1128
01:07:10.119 --> 01:07:13.719
<v Speaker 1>be well, this is actually a reference to the Muslims.

1129
01:07:16.199 --> 01:07:17.239
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make much sense.

1130
01:07:17.280 --> 01:07:19.199
<v Speaker 2>But what do they think the raising is?

1131
01:07:20.199 --> 01:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, that he was just you know, he was raised

1132
01:07:23.280 --> 01:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to heaven as a as a prophet, and he will

1133
01:07:26.880 --> 01:07:29.079
<v Speaker 1>stay there and he will come back one day. And

1134
01:07:29.119 --> 01:07:31.239
<v Speaker 1>when he comes back, he will then announce that all

1135
01:07:31.239 --> 01:07:34.519
<v Speaker 1>the Christians and all the people who had these corrupt

1136
01:07:34.519 --> 01:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>beliefs went astray, and that the Muslims are actually the

1137
01:07:38.960 --> 01:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>true believers, and then he will come and fight for

1138
01:07:40.880 --> 01:07:44.119
<v Speaker 1>the Muslims and abolish the cross, and break the cross

1139
01:07:44.280 --> 01:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and and do things like that and basically becoming Muslim Jesus.

1140
01:07:48.960 --> 01:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>That is their explanation. But if you read it on

1141
01:07:51.519 --> 01:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the surface, it just looks like it pretty much improves

1142
01:07:54.519 --> 01:07:55.599
<v Speaker 1>of the questions.

1143
01:07:55.880 --> 01:07:59.199
<v Speaker 3>It also it reminds me of I forget exactly where

1144
01:07:59.199 --> 01:08:03.920
<v Speaker 3>it is, but samr Moon had referenced a there's actually

1145
01:08:03.960 --> 01:08:06.599
<v Speaker 3>just sections of the Gospel of John that are kind

1146
01:08:06.599 --> 01:08:09.960
<v Speaker 3>of cribbed, you know. I'm talking about like there's like

1147
01:08:10.519 --> 01:08:13.000
<v Speaker 3>several verses that are basically just copied and pasted into

1148
01:08:13.079 --> 01:08:17.399
<v Speaker 3>the Koran. Oh yeah, yeah, which is because they typically

1149
01:08:17.439 --> 01:08:19.800
<v Speaker 3>want to say the Gospel of John is fraudulent. It

1150
01:08:19.880 --> 01:08:23.319
<v Speaker 3>was like, wait a minute, aren't some of the passages

1151
01:08:23.359 --> 01:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>actually just copied and pasted into the Koran? Well, those

1152
01:08:25.800 --> 01:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>are the ones that are not corupped. Oh okay.

1153
01:08:28.479 --> 01:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>You can also find Muslims occasionally give some references from

1154
01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>the Gospel of John in order to prove that Muhammad

1155
01:08:35.159 --> 01:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was mentioned in the gospels, or that Jesus prayed like

1156
01:08:39.640 --> 01:08:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a Muslim or things like that, which is a very selective,

1157
01:08:44.680 --> 01:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>dishonest approach. They will say, they will take that, they

1158
01:08:46.960 --> 01:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>will take the part, for example, where Jesus throws himself

1159
01:08:50.920 --> 01:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and pray and prays, and they will say, look,

1160
01:08:53.760 --> 01:08:57.119
<v Speaker 1>he prayed exactly like Muslims pray. But that's not he

1161
01:08:57.159 --> 01:08:59.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't do a ritual prayer there. That's not the only

1162
01:08:59.399 --> 01:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>prayer date according to the Gospel. So that's a very

1163
01:09:02.720 --> 01:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>very interesting.

1164
01:09:03.600 --> 01:09:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's like that text in Deuteronomy that they use

1165
01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:09.880
<v Speaker 3>about I'll raise a prophet amongst your brethren, and you know,

1166
01:09:09.960 --> 01:09:12.319
<v Speaker 3>you know, Christianity obviously has always seen that as a

1167
01:09:12.319 --> 01:09:14.279
<v Speaker 3>prophecy of the Messiah.

1168
01:09:14.439 --> 01:09:15.279
<v Speaker 2>You find many.

1169
01:09:15.159 --> 01:09:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Church fathers prior to the rise of Islam citing that

1170
01:09:17.840 --> 01:09:20.960
<v Speaker 3>as a text about the Messiah. Conceivably, Jews might also

1171
01:09:21.520 --> 01:09:27.760
<v Speaker 3>cite it as a potential Messianic text. But the for Muslims,

1172
01:09:27.800 --> 01:09:30.359
<v Speaker 3>that's a prediction of Mohammad. And and I didn't really

1173
01:09:30.359 --> 01:09:32.399
<v Speaker 3>get to go into this, but when it was mentioned

1174
01:09:32.399 --> 01:09:36.640
<v Speaker 3>in the debate, the argument was, well, this is about Muhammad.

1175
01:09:36.680 --> 01:09:38.439
<v Speaker 3>And I said, well, but it says amongst your brethren,

1176
01:09:38.560 --> 01:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>so I'm pretty sure Mohammad wasn't a Jew. And they said, oh,

1177
01:09:40.880 --> 01:09:44.479
<v Speaker 3>but they can all be brethren, because everybody is a

1178
01:09:44.520 --> 01:09:46.039
<v Speaker 3>brethren all the way back to Abraham.

1179
01:09:46.079 --> 01:09:47.279
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like, well, but wait a minute.

1180
01:09:47.359 --> 01:09:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Genesis is cast out the slave woman, and so they're

1181
01:09:51.000 --> 01:09:54.039
<v Speaker 3>not actually brethren, but in the Jewish sense, they're not

1182
01:09:54.079 --> 01:09:56.560
<v Speaker 3>bresent brethren. That's the sense that we would be getting

1183
01:09:56.600 --> 01:09:59.520
<v Speaker 3>from Deuterom the eighteen, not the Koronic sense. It would

1184
01:09:59.520 --> 01:10:00.840
<v Speaker 3>be the Jewish sense of brethren.

1185
01:10:01.479 --> 01:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>What's funny is one last point.

1186
01:10:03.840 --> 01:10:05.560
<v Speaker 3>The other thing that's funny about that, which is that,

1187
01:10:05.680 --> 01:10:08.119
<v Speaker 3>so wait a minute. If everybody is a brethren, then

1188
01:10:08.319 --> 01:10:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Edomites are brethren, but no Jew would call an Edomite brethren.

1189
01:10:11.960 --> 01:10:14.399
<v Speaker 3>They're the enemies of the Jews. But they have a

1190
01:10:14.399 --> 01:10:16.920
<v Speaker 3>common They have just as much a lineage that's common

1191
01:10:17.039 --> 01:10:19.560
<v Speaker 3>as what would be Hagartes.

1192
01:10:20.279 --> 01:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It might be amazing to you the forms of a

1193
01:10:22.880 --> 01:10:25.479
<v Speaker 1>responses that you can get from you to cope with

1194
01:10:25.479 --> 01:10:28.039
<v Speaker 1>that problem, which is when they bring that up. I

1195
01:10:28.079 --> 01:10:31.359
<v Speaker 1>even got the response, which was a ridiculous one when

1196
01:10:31.359 --> 01:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think about it again and again, which is that

1197
01:10:34.800 --> 01:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it says your brethren, and that clearly means that it's

1198
01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in reference to to the Ishmae alliance to the to

1199
01:10:42.800 --> 01:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the others, because that's why it says brethren instead of

1200
01:10:46.760 --> 01:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>just saying from from you or your own tribe.

1201
01:10:50.119 --> 01:10:52.199
<v Speaker 3>But no Jew is going to listen to an Ishmael.

1202
01:10:52.359 --> 01:10:53.079
<v Speaker 2>That's the weird part.

1203
01:10:53.119 --> 01:10:56.640
<v Speaker 3>It's like the rest of the rest of Deuteronomy assumes

1204
01:10:56.680 --> 01:10:58.880
<v Speaker 3>that only a Jew is only going to listen to

1205
01:10:58.960 --> 01:10:59.319
<v Speaker 3>a Jew.

1206
01:10:59.760 --> 01:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, and that's the that's the whole problem. But

1207
01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:06.239
<v Speaker 1>then there comes forth some guy in seventh century Arabia

1208
01:11:06.239 --> 01:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't like his own culture and his own religious

1209
01:11:11.880 --> 01:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>beliefs and looks up to the Christians and Jews and things.

1210
01:11:14.880 --> 01:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>He's going to just start a message and claim that

1211
01:11:19.039 --> 01:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the same God is speaking to him. And what's very

1212
01:11:21.640 --> 01:11:25.239
<v Speaker 1>interesting is I actually put a thing together. A I

1213
01:11:25.279 --> 01:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>took out all of the references in the Quran to

1214
01:11:28.159 --> 01:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Christians and Jews and put them in chronological order as

1215
01:11:31.600 --> 01:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>far as we know. And you can see very much

1216
01:11:34.520 --> 01:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that in the beginning, it is just this very naive

1217
01:11:37.720 --> 01:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>approach to the Christians and Jews of like, oh, yeah,

1218
01:11:40.119 --> 01:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're nice, they're good, they have true beliefs,

1219
01:11:43.279 --> 01:11:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we are just like them, same source,

1220
01:11:45.640 --> 01:11:51.039
<v Speaker 1>same guys, and then it increasingly becomes gets into disagreements

1221
01:11:51.039 --> 01:11:54.119
<v Speaker 1>with them, and eventually at some point it comes to, Okay,

1222
01:11:54.159 --> 01:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they have their beliefs, you have your belief and finally

1223
01:11:56.720 --> 01:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>it comes to they will accept your beliefs or else.

1224
01:12:00.560 --> 01:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just a if everything, naive, ignorant approach from Muhammad

1225
01:12:05.560 --> 01:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to Jewish and Christian beliefs. And and here we are

1226
01:12:10.760 --> 01:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a religious group that actually claims to be

1227
01:12:15.079 --> 01:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in possession of the true religion, yet one that is

1228
01:12:18.760 --> 01:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>completely disconnected and completely ignorant. And I actually want to

1229
01:12:22.800 --> 01:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>ask you a question about that. So, when you read

1230
01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the Quran, when you began studying the Qur'an as somebody

1231
01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>who extensively studied the Bible, what is your what was

1232
01:12:35.039 --> 01:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>your impression of the Qur'an? Did it appear similar in

1233
01:12:44.479 --> 01:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what was What was your impression in

1234
01:12:46.600 --> 01:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>comparison to your own?

1235
01:12:47.880 --> 01:12:52.840
<v Speaker 3>My initial impression is not really different than where I'm

1236
01:12:52.880 --> 01:12:55.239
<v Speaker 3>at now. It's just kind of like I've read more

1237
01:12:55.319 --> 01:12:59.039
<v Speaker 3>text from scholars that I think really back up the

1238
01:12:59.079 --> 01:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>impression that I have, which is, you know, especially like

1239
01:13:01.800 --> 01:13:05.479
<v Speaker 3>the Gabriel site Reynolds book where he goes through about

1240
01:13:06.039 --> 01:13:09.840
<v Speaker 3>thirteen or fifteen I forget how many case studies where

1241
01:13:09.840 --> 01:13:14.039
<v Speaker 3>he basically just compares the references in the Koran to

1242
01:13:14.640 --> 01:13:19.840
<v Speaker 3>the biblical context from which they come, and then contrasts

1243
01:13:19.920 --> 01:13:26.079
<v Speaker 3>and compares the narratives whether they make sense where they contradict,

1244
01:13:26.199 --> 01:13:29.359
<v Speaker 3>and then the various Islamic explanations. So it's a really

1245
01:13:29.439 --> 01:13:33.560
<v Speaker 3>good book from a person who I don't think he's

1246
01:13:34.159 --> 01:13:37.560
<v Speaker 3>a Christian or a Muslim. He's just an academic. But

1247
01:13:37.640 --> 01:13:41.359
<v Speaker 3>the text shows the ways that there have been attempts

1248
01:13:41.439 --> 01:13:44.199
<v Speaker 3>to explain, and it also shows what was really helpful

1249
01:13:44.239 --> 01:13:47.680
<v Speaker 3>to me all of the different extra canonical sources that

1250
01:13:47.840 --> 01:13:51.319
<v Speaker 3>Islam also draws from. So I think you made a

1251
01:13:51.319 --> 01:13:52.800
<v Speaker 3>great point when you and I were talking about this

1252
01:13:52.840 --> 01:13:54.680
<v Speaker 3>the other day. You know, when you start getting into

1253
01:13:54.680 --> 01:13:57.039
<v Speaker 3>the hadiths is where it becomes a lot clearer that

1254
01:13:57.319 --> 01:14:00.439
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of other influences here. So it's not

1255
01:14:00.600 --> 01:14:03.800
<v Speaker 3>like you're just dealing with the Quran. You're also dealing

1256
01:14:03.840 --> 01:14:07.000
<v Speaker 3>with about a bunch of world tradition which is kind

1257
01:14:07.039 --> 01:14:10.760
<v Speaker 3>of collected and then it has to be scholarly kind

1258
01:14:10.800 --> 01:14:14.720
<v Speaker 3>of feeded out as to how authoritative they are. But

1259
01:14:14.960 --> 01:14:17.960
<v Speaker 3>those also apparently rely on a lot of myths and

1260
01:14:18.760 --> 01:14:21.760
<v Speaker 3>narratives and stories, as the Quran does. And so when

1261
01:14:21.760 --> 01:14:24.359
<v Speaker 3>I first started reading the Koran, my first impression was,

1262
01:14:25.399 --> 01:14:29.560
<v Speaker 3>it's it sounds like the Bible, but it's like I

1263
01:14:29.680 --> 01:14:35.000
<v Speaker 3>was detecting kind of like stories and references that they

1264
01:14:35.039 --> 01:14:39.319
<v Speaker 3>didn't understand that are coupled together. And then your point

1265
01:14:39.359 --> 01:14:41.880
<v Speaker 3>about the Hadiz, I think further backs that up. But

1266
01:14:42.479 --> 01:14:45.399
<v Speaker 3>now I see, Okay, well, it's not just the infancy

1267
01:14:45.520 --> 01:14:49.800
<v Speaker 3>narrative of Christ that you referenced as an extra canonical text.

1268
01:14:50.640 --> 01:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>It's also Cave.

1269
01:14:52.399 --> 01:14:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Of Treasures, Life of Adam and Eve proto Evangelim of James.

1270
01:14:56.960 --> 01:14:59.399
<v Speaker 3>It's all of the Sleepers of Ephesus. It's all these

1271
01:14:59.399 --> 01:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>other storiesries and traditions, some of which are also by

1272
01:15:02.960 --> 01:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the way, telmudick. Which is odd because you know, uh

1273
01:15:07.720 --> 01:15:11.279
<v Speaker 3>that that weird reference that Reynolds points out about how

1274
01:15:12.239 --> 01:15:17.199
<v Speaker 3>the Sabbath that was a punishment, It's like, that's absolutely

1275
01:15:17.399 --> 01:15:20.479
<v Speaker 3>totally foreign to everything that's in prior revelation. It's not

1276
01:15:20.520 --> 01:15:21.000
<v Speaker 3>a punishment.

1277
01:15:21.039 --> 01:15:24.039
<v Speaker 1>It goes back to Genesis, right, expand on it very quickly,

1278
01:15:24.119 --> 01:15:28.079
<v Speaker 1>for yeah, you can quickly expand it if you want

1279
01:15:28.079 --> 01:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to or I can.

1280
01:15:29.560 --> 01:15:31.359
<v Speaker 3>No, I'll let you expand on it, because it was

1281
01:15:31.399 --> 01:15:35.039
<v Speaker 3>just just a cap on my to summarize my point

1282
01:15:35.039 --> 01:15:37.319
<v Speaker 3>there about the more that I would get into this,

1283
01:15:37.359 --> 01:15:39.399
<v Speaker 3>the more I'm realizing, wait a minute, this is like

1284
01:15:39.720 --> 01:15:44.840
<v Speaker 3>cribbed from earlier stuff, cobbled together, and what's cobbled together

1285
01:15:45.159 --> 01:15:48.800
<v Speaker 3>is not actually coherent. But then it's the job of

1286
01:15:48.920 --> 01:15:52.039
<v Speaker 3>the Islamic scholars to try to make this thing work.

1287
01:15:52.359 --> 01:15:53.479
<v Speaker 2>That's what I get from it.

1288
01:15:53.800 --> 01:15:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, So the point about the Sabbath in the

1289
01:15:56.079 --> 01:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Quran is people who have looked into that or deeply

1290
01:16:00.640 --> 01:16:07.319
<v Speaker 1>can pretty much I guess explain that better. But I

1291
01:16:07.640 --> 01:16:10.439
<v Speaker 1>made a note a while ago here on that. But

1292
01:16:10.479 --> 01:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the Quran basically, when it references to Sabbath, doesn't recognize

1293
01:16:14.920 --> 01:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it as something that that is a fundamental or essential

1294
01:16:19.880 --> 01:16:25.359
<v Speaker 1>part of of of biblical or Jewish belief. What it

1295
01:16:25.439 --> 01:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>basically says is that the Sabbath was just prescribed to

1296
01:16:29.800 --> 01:16:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the Jews as as a punishment for their for their actions,

1297
01:16:35.239 --> 01:16:38.239
<v Speaker 1>for their transgressions, and it was it was basically a

1298
01:16:38.239 --> 01:16:43.079
<v Speaker 1>burden placed on them by Allah, which is why I

1299
01:16:43.119 --> 01:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>only they keep it. So that is that is and

1300
01:16:46.760 --> 01:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>then that's that's a very ridiculously ignorant.

1301
01:16:51.479 --> 01:16:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's very central to you know, the entirety

1302
01:16:54.680 --> 01:16:57.159
<v Speaker 3>of the Torah goes back to Genesis as part of

1303
01:16:57.159 --> 01:17:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the creation narrative. So it's it's almost like to think

1304
01:17:00.760 --> 01:17:05.680
<v Speaker 3>that the Sabbath would be a punishment would be to

1305
01:17:05.680 --> 01:17:09.760
<v Speaker 3>again completely misunderstand something very fundamental to Genesis, which is

1306
01:17:09.880 --> 01:17:17.039
<v Speaker 3>the seven Days and the Sabbath. And in the the

1307
01:17:18.680 --> 01:17:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Say Reynolds book, it's pages one, nine, ten, and eleven,

1308
01:17:22.800 --> 01:17:27.640
<v Speaker 3>and you've got multiple Islamic scholars and people have tried

1309
01:17:27.680 --> 01:17:32.039
<v Speaker 3>to explain this, and it's just all the different explanations

1310
01:17:32.039 --> 01:17:34.680
<v Speaker 3>are kind, they're just they're amusing because when you see

1311
01:17:34.760 --> 01:17:39.359
<v Speaker 3>the scholarly explanations, they're even they're not understanding what the

1312
01:17:39.479 --> 01:17:43.359
<v Speaker 3>meaning was for the Jews and the Christians. So I

1313
01:17:43.359 --> 01:17:46.000
<v Speaker 3>could understand if okay, so fine, you think it's wrong,

1314
01:17:46.600 --> 01:17:50.239
<v Speaker 3>but at least understand how central this was to the

1315
01:17:50.319 --> 01:17:53.880
<v Speaker 3>creation narrative and to the entirety the Old Testament. To

1316
01:17:53.960 --> 01:17:55.600
<v Speaker 3>think that, as many of these scholars have.

1317
01:17:55.960 --> 01:17:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Said, that it was a punishment from God, it.

1318
01:17:57.840 --> 01:18:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Just shows an incoherence of not even understanding the narrative,

1319
01:18:01.760 --> 01:18:04.079
<v Speaker 3>just like with other things that we talked about like

1320
01:18:04.159 --> 01:18:07.600
<v Speaker 3>the Arc of the Covenant. They thought that because it

1321
01:18:07.680 --> 01:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>had the Seraphim on top of it as a box,

1322
01:18:11.920 --> 01:18:13.359
<v Speaker 3>that it was a box that flew.

1323
01:18:14.079 --> 01:18:20.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So here's the reference we're talking about. In the Quran,

1324
01:18:20.199 --> 01:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>in chapter sixteen, verse one, and twenty four, it says, basically,

1325
01:18:24.199 --> 01:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the Sabbath was only appointed for those who differed over it,

1326
01:18:28.159 --> 01:18:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and indeed your Lord will judge between them on the

1327
01:18:30.319 --> 01:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>day of Resurrection concerning that of which they used to differ.

1328
01:18:33.039 --> 01:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's further than recognized that the Jews were basically

1329
01:18:38.800 --> 01:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>transgressors over and over again, and the Sabbath was only

1330
01:18:42.560 --> 01:18:46.239
<v Speaker 1>given to them because of their because of their of

1331
01:18:46.279 --> 01:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>their troubles and there their transgressions.

1332
01:18:49.680 --> 01:18:54.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's even you. You have this four forty seven.

1333
01:18:54.560 --> 01:18:55.680
<v Speaker 2>You have been given the book.

1334
01:18:55.840 --> 01:18:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Believe in what they have brought, what we have brought down,

1335
01:18:59.079 --> 01:19:02.680
<v Speaker 3>which confirms which is already with you. Before we transform

1336
01:19:02.720 --> 01:19:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the figures, turning them inside out, we curse you as

1337
01:19:05.840 --> 01:19:07.359
<v Speaker 3>we curse the people of the Sabbath.

1338
01:19:09.479 --> 01:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's I don't know, it's just sometimes I

1339
01:19:16.000 --> 01:19:17.039
<v Speaker 1>feel like it is very.

1340
01:19:16.880 --> 01:19:22.079
<v Speaker 4>Hard to put into words the amounts of of ignorance

1341
01:19:22.119 --> 01:19:26.199
<v Speaker 4>that the Quran brings to the Chable when it talks

1342
01:19:26.199 --> 01:19:31.359
<v Speaker 4>about Abrahamic biblical beliefs, and to then claim that this

1343
01:19:31.439 --> 01:19:33.720
<v Speaker 4>is the same God, the same source, it's just it's

1344
01:19:33.760 --> 01:19:34.359
<v Speaker 4>just absurd.

1345
01:19:36.279 --> 01:19:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And and again, I mean, there's a lot of

1346
01:19:39.640 --> 01:19:42.920
<v Speaker 3>different ways to approach this discussion, this debate. I mean,

1347
01:19:43.800 --> 01:19:49.399
<v Speaker 3>one another example would be if you if you thought,

1348
01:19:49.399 --> 01:19:55.119
<v Speaker 3>for example, that the Revelation to Jews and Christians was false.

1349
01:19:56.800 --> 01:19:59.640
<v Speaker 3>One thing that's prevalent throughout the Old and the New

1350
01:19:59.680 --> 01:20:05.960
<v Speaker 3>test is analogical predication. So if you're going to say

1351
01:20:06.159 --> 01:20:08.800
<v Speaker 3>that was all wrong and we can't do analogical predication,

1352
01:20:08.880 --> 01:20:12.680
<v Speaker 3>which conceivably you could have with many Islamic schools and

1353
01:20:12.720 --> 01:20:16.119
<v Speaker 3>the denial and the teaching of Tanzi, then you would

1354
01:20:16.119 --> 01:20:20.760
<v Speaker 3>need to again explain or at least understand that this

1355
01:20:21.199 --> 01:20:24.479
<v Speaker 3>group four thousands of years, for centuries prior to Islam

1356
01:20:24.560 --> 01:20:27.600
<v Speaker 3>with Christianity, you know, for six injuries, that they got

1357
01:20:27.600 --> 01:20:31.560
<v Speaker 3>this big thing wrong. And again there's not even a

1358
01:20:31.560 --> 01:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>reference to So let me put it this way. There's

1359
01:20:35.720 --> 01:20:40.079
<v Speaker 3>very sophisticated philosophical debates. Okay, here's a great book that's

1360
01:20:40.880 --> 01:20:43.279
<v Speaker 3>just on this very topic I recommend, And this is

1361
01:20:43.279 --> 01:20:47.800
<v Speaker 3>not from This is from just an academic at it's

1362
01:20:47.800 --> 01:20:50.359
<v Speaker 3>published by Oxford. I forget where he teaches, but it's

1363
01:20:50.359 --> 01:20:54.000
<v Speaker 3>a well known book called The Rise of Christian Theology

1364
01:20:54.039 --> 01:20:56.439
<v Speaker 3>and the End of Ancient Metaphysics, and it basically traces

1365
01:20:56.479 --> 01:21:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the development of just the idea of hypostasis, right, which

1366
01:21:00.680 --> 01:21:03.479
<v Speaker 3>is very important to the Trinity, all the way from

1367
01:21:03.560 --> 01:21:08.039
<v Speaker 3>the Cappadocians to John Damascus in the seven hundred seventh centuries,

1368
01:21:08.079 --> 01:21:09.359
<v Speaker 3>which is contemporary.

1369
01:21:09.439 --> 01:21:10.880
<v Speaker 2>He's the first Christian to write about.

1370
01:21:10.760 --> 01:21:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Islam, by the way. So basically we're going to trace

1371
01:21:14.119 --> 01:21:18.000
<v Speaker 3>this really sophisticated development of what hypostasis is in the

1372
01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Trinity and what it is in Christology.

1373
01:21:21.079 --> 01:21:24.000
<v Speaker 2>And it's very nuanced, very precise.

1374
01:21:24.079 --> 01:21:27.359
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of philosophical terminology, a lot of references

1375
01:21:27.359 --> 01:21:30.720
<v Speaker 3>to Aristotle, all this kind of stuff. And then by

1376
01:21:30.760 --> 01:21:35.119
<v Speaker 3>the time that we get the revelations to Muhammad, it's

1377
01:21:35.199 --> 01:21:38.560
<v Speaker 3>like it's like that and never, none of this ever happened,

1378
01:21:39.439 --> 01:21:43.920
<v Speaker 3>you see. And again I'm stressing this argument because if

1379
01:21:43.920 --> 01:21:46.479
<v Speaker 3>we're going to look at continuity again, we would want

1380
01:21:46.520 --> 01:21:51.600
<v Speaker 3>to know precisely where the previous tradition was wrong. And

1381
01:21:51.640 --> 01:21:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to bank everything on philosophy. But it's

1382
01:21:53.840 --> 01:21:57.319
<v Speaker 3>sort of like, you know, Christianity had already adopted and

1383
01:21:57.840 --> 01:22:01.840
<v Speaker 3>baptized and was okay philosophy by this point. Even if

1384
01:22:01.880 --> 01:22:05.279
<v Speaker 3>you think it's wrong, this is this is not really debatable.

1385
01:22:05.279 --> 01:22:08.960
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty easy to It's pretty well known, right. I

1386
01:22:08.960 --> 01:22:12.279
<v Speaker 3>mean John Damascus, for example, he wrote an entire book

1387
01:22:12.319 --> 01:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>on Aristilian philosophy, is another book on dialectical philosophy. I

1388
01:22:16.560 --> 01:22:19.239
<v Speaker 3>mean his his systematic theology in the seventh century is

1389
01:22:19.359 --> 01:22:23.399
<v Speaker 3>utilizing a lot of philosophy, as we said, from Cappadocians

1390
01:22:23.399 --> 01:22:25.960
<v Speaker 3>and people prior to him. Maximus the Confessor full of

1391
01:22:26.039 --> 01:22:28.079
<v Speaker 3>a lot of philosophy and at texts. And it's like,

1392
01:22:28.159 --> 01:22:30.079
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to deal with and reject the position,

1393
01:22:30.239 --> 01:22:33.000
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not even saying that it's true, because it's

1394
01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:35.279
<v Speaker 3>a lot of philosophy. I'm just saying that we would

1395
01:22:35.319 --> 01:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>need to see understanding of what's being talked about. And

1396
01:22:39.760 --> 01:22:42.000
<v Speaker 3>it's not even that it's not understood. It's like there's

1397
01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:42.960
<v Speaker 3>no knowledge of it at all.

1398
01:22:43.720 --> 01:22:47.479
<v Speaker 1>It's like you're having it's like you had this whole long,

1399
01:22:47.600 --> 01:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>lengthy discussion on a major pressing issue that you're trying

1400
01:22:52.680 --> 01:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to understand, everybody has had this discussion forever. He went

1401
01:22:55.920 --> 01:22:58.479
<v Speaker 1>on and on and on. Yeah, you have already established

1402
01:22:58.520 --> 01:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a system of analyzing This is how different theories came

1403
01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:06.039
<v Speaker 1>to proper conclusions dealt with it. And then some guy

1404
01:23:06.079 --> 01:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>comes along and entirely ignores everything that has been said

1405
01:23:11.119 --> 01:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and just starts a discussion from the very beginning.

1406
01:23:14.079 --> 01:23:15.920
<v Speaker 3>It says, I had a dream and everything you said

1407
01:23:15.960 --> 01:23:20.479
<v Speaker 3>is don't basically basically, let me ask you this question

1408
01:23:20.680 --> 01:23:22.439
<v Speaker 3>what you think of this? So the more I hear

1409
01:23:22.760 --> 01:23:26.560
<v Speaker 3>what we're talking about in regard to the rise of Islam, originally,

1410
01:23:26.680 --> 01:23:31.359
<v Speaker 3>it's very parallel in many ways to Mormonism, and so

1411
01:23:31.439 --> 01:23:36.079
<v Speaker 3>Mormonism basically says, all the prior revelation has some truth

1412
01:23:36.159 --> 01:23:39.279
<v Speaker 3>in it, but it was also corrupted. Ours is the

1413
01:23:39.319 --> 01:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>new final revelation, and you just didn't have the full

1414
01:23:43.039 --> 01:23:45.720
<v Speaker 3>consistency of understanding that God is.

1415
01:23:45.720 --> 01:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Actually three things. It's also ironic too.

1416
01:23:48.399 --> 01:23:51.720
<v Speaker 3>That in Mormonism God has a the Father has a

1417
01:23:51.760 --> 01:23:54.640
<v Speaker 3>body much like what we see in the Koran, with the.

1418
01:23:56.159 --> 01:23:59.119
<v Speaker 2>Body of all lots of it. But you know.

1419
01:23:59.119 --> 01:24:03.439
<v Speaker 3>They're they're a pro is not Now there's actually polytheism.

1420
01:24:03.479 --> 01:24:08.000
<v Speaker 3>I would argue Mormonism is ultimate polytheistic. But I mean,

1421
01:24:08.199 --> 01:24:14.319
<v Speaker 3>could we conceivably just counter the whole system with Mormonism,

1422
01:24:14.319 --> 01:24:18.800
<v Speaker 3>because if the argument is, well, the Kuran is preserved, well,

1423
01:24:18.800 --> 01:24:22.279
<v Speaker 3>maybe the books of Mormon are better preserved.

1424
01:24:22.520 --> 01:24:23.000
<v Speaker 2>You see.

1425
01:24:23.600 --> 01:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Plus the aside from the preservation, you don't even need

1426
01:24:27.439 --> 01:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the preservation there. You could simply appeal to the fact

1427
01:24:29.880 --> 01:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>that some guy comes along in the middle of a

1428
01:24:36.279 --> 01:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>land where people are trying to figure out which religious

1429
01:24:40.439 --> 01:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>beliefs to hold onto. This guy comes along and claims

1430
01:24:44.479 --> 01:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to receive revelations, and there are people around him who

1431
01:24:47.359 --> 01:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>are affirmed that he is indeed revelations. The affirm that

1432
01:24:50.920 --> 01:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>he's of great character, the affirm that he is a

1433
01:24:55.239 --> 01:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>fantastically pious guy who was entirely selfless, and a lot

1434
01:25:00.880 --> 01:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to be God, seems to be completely in agreement

1435
01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>and basically in his service, and it gives him these

1436
01:25:08.560 --> 01:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>these revelations, and he establishes the truth and declares that

1437
01:25:13.199 --> 01:25:16.239
<v Speaker 1>people corrupted his message. I mean, he's ultimately doing exactly

1438
01:25:16.279 --> 01:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>what Mohammad did. I've heard a lot of people refer

1439
01:25:19.479 --> 01:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>to him as the American Muhammad or there there there

1440
01:25:24.439 --> 01:25:27.920
<v Speaker 1>are people who say I spoke to a former Mormon

1441
01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>here on this channel, a woman who is a former

1442
01:25:32.039 --> 01:25:35.239
<v Speaker 1>an ex Mormon. I think her her channel is called

1443
01:25:35.319 --> 01:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>ex mole X, But she came on here just to

1444
01:25:39.760 --> 01:25:43.199
<v Speaker 1>to also pleasantly argue that she did hear about Islam

1445
01:25:43.479 --> 01:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and how Mormonism is compared to Islam before when she

1446
01:25:46.640 --> 01:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>when she was a Mormon, and also afterwards. And she

1447
01:25:52.720 --> 01:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>was also pointing out that the way the revelation is

1448
01:25:56.479 --> 01:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>seen and the way the way Joseph Smith, yeahs my

1449
01:26:05.199 --> 01:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>mind going all over the place, the way he is

1450
01:26:07.600 --> 01:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>he is trusted by Mormons in terms of his revelations,

1451
01:26:11.359 --> 01:26:14.079
<v Speaker 1>even if they seem completely absurd and out of places.

1452
01:26:14.159 --> 01:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Quite similar to the way Mohammed is trusted in Islam

1453
01:26:17.159 --> 01:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>when he makes when he brings outrageously weird revelations, or

1454
01:26:21.760 --> 01:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>when he brings revelations that are just about him and

1455
01:26:23.800 --> 01:26:27.319
<v Speaker 1>his desires. It's quite similar to it to Mormonism. To

1456
01:26:27.359 --> 01:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the point that you bring up it could be very

1457
01:26:31.159 --> 01:26:34.079
<v Speaker 1>it could be reasonable to to go with that projection.

1458
01:26:34.119 --> 01:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>And I have seen people actually argue against Muslims and

1459
01:26:37.439 --> 01:26:40.479
<v Speaker 1>and say why not just accept Mormonism. It does the

1460
01:26:40.600 --> 01:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>very same thing. But then you get a very hypocritical

1461
01:26:44.039 --> 01:26:48.039
<v Speaker 1>answer from them, and the answer is just revolves around, well,

1462
01:26:49.439 --> 01:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we know that that's not true, because you know, he

1463
01:26:52.880 --> 01:26:56.239
<v Speaker 1>was just all about his own desires and then he

1464
01:26:56.399 --> 01:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just made up revelations. Well, you could say the same

1465
01:26:58.560 --> 01:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>thing about Mohammad. Well we already know, we already have

1466
01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the truth. With Muhammad already brought the truth, we don't

1467
01:27:05.199 --> 01:27:06.079
<v Speaker 1>need anything else.

1468
01:27:06.319 --> 01:27:10.119
<v Speaker 3>Well you could see, can I could see them just

1469
01:27:10.119 --> 01:27:12.760
<v Speaker 3>in terms of epistemology making that work is that they'd

1470
01:27:12.760 --> 01:27:16.560
<v Speaker 3>have to say in a strict way that the Qur'an

1471
01:27:16.760 --> 01:27:19.720
<v Speaker 3>was the final revelation. But I mean, but aren't the

1472
01:27:19.760 --> 01:27:23.119
<v Speaker 3>hadiths also additional revelations?

1473
01:27:23.239 --> 01:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>So well what what you what they do with that

1474
01:27:25.640 --> 01:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>is they will say the Koran is up is the

1475
01:27:27.359 --> 01:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>absolute final revelation, that is the truth. After that, no

1476
01:27:30.920 --> 01:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>revelation can can come, no prophet can come.

1477
01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:34.119
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

1478
01:27:34.199 --> 01:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>The hadiths are different from that because the hadiths are

1479
01:27:36.720 --> 01:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>basically just saying, so Muhammad that or actions that people

1480
01:27:40.560 --> 01:27:44.199
<v Speaker 1>around him noted that are not considered revelation. Everything that

1481
01:27:44.239 --> 01:27:49.279
<v Speaker 1>comes after him is absolutely unacceptable, absolutely false. And that's

1482
01:27:49.279 --> 01:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the answer that they will give you when you when

1483
01:27:51.159 --> 01:27:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you tell them, okay. Joseph Smith he made a lot

1484
01:27:53.359 --> 01:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of claims. He said, these religions in

1485
01:27:55.600 --> 01:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the past word corrupted, and he's he brings the truth.

1486
01:27:58.920 --> 01:28:03.279
<v Speaker 3>He So wait a minute, though, Let's expand that argument

1487
01:28:03.279 --> 01:28:07.880
<v Speaker 3>and say, well, but Allah apparently allowed divine revelation to

1488
01:28:07.920 --> 01:28:12.199
<v Speaker 3>be corrupted amongst the Jews and the Christians, right, yes,

1489
01:28:12.439 --> 01:28:16.600
<v Speaker 3>so he allowed them to be deceived, apparently, and for

1490
01:28:16.640 --> 01:28:17.720
<v Speaker 3>the revelation to be corupted.

1491
01:28:17.720 --> 01:28:19.079
<v Speaker 2>Hence, why we need the Koran?

1492
01:28:19.960 --> 01:28:22.439
<v Speaker 3>Why are we why should we think that it's not

1493
01:28:22.640 --> 01:28:28.239
<v Speaker 3>all also corrupted if Allah can allow the revelation to

1494
01:28:28.279 --> 01:28:29.359
<v Speaker 3>be corrupted.

1495
01:28:29.279 --> 01:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Because because because the Quran is unique in that Allah

1496
01:28:33.720 --> 01:28:38.119
<v Speaker 1>had a plan of those previous scriptures being corrupted, and

1497
01:28:38.479 --> 01:28:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the Koran is unique in that this is the only

1498
01:28:40.520 --> 01:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>book which Allah promised nobody will ever be able to

1499
01:28:43.560 --> 01:28:45.359
<v Speaker 1>corrupt and he will protect it for well.

1500
01:28:45.359 --> 01:28:49.039
<v Speaker 3>But my point is that the promises are in the

1501
01:28:49.079 --> 01:28:54.560
<v Speaker 3>older books too, right, So.

1502
01:28:53.399 --> 01:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But you can't trust those books because those books were corrupted.

1503
01:28:56.119 --> 01:28:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I know. But that's what I'm saying is that the

1504
01:28:58.640 --> 01:29:02.479
<v Speaker 3>same promise of non corruption was in the Torah, it's

1505
01:29:02.520 --> 01:29:08.560
<v Speaker 3>in the Christian texts and allowed.

1506
01:29:07.720 --> 01:29:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Us to be deceived.

1507
01:29:08.800 --> 01:29:12.439
<v Speaker 3>Then how are we not in the same epistemic dilemma.

1508
01:29:13.199 --> 01:29:15.800
<v Speaker 3>If we believe the Kuran, that Allah might be allowing

1509
01:29:15.880 --> 01:29:17.000
<v Speaker 3>us to be deceived.

1510
01:29:17.039 --> 01:29:18.159
<v Speaker 2>Now you see what I'm saying.

1511
01:29:18.359 --> 01:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but a lot wouldn't do that because and we

1512
01:29:20.039 --> 01:29:23.319
<v Speaker 1>already know that. We already know that those crypt scriptures

1513
01:29:23.319 --> 01:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are corrupt because when you when you read them, you

1514
01:29:25.600 --> 01:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>will see that they are obviously uh not in alignment

1515
01:29:28.880 --> 01:29:31.239
<v Speaker 1>with pure morttheistic as like beliefs.

1516
01:29:31.760 --> 01:29:34.199
<v Speaker 3>But that's derived from the book the same question.

1517
01:29:34.479 --> 01:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, well if you just if you, if you

1518
01:29:37.880 --> 01:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>go and look at those books, if you just look

1519
01:29:39.840 --> 01:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>at the Kuran and open your eyes, you will see that.

1520
01:29:41.760 --> 01:29:52.439
<v Speaker 5>You just look, Okay, yeah, I mean that's the thing.

1521
01:29:52.720 --> 01:29:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Somebody wrote a paper. I have to dig it up.

1522
01:29:55.760 --> 01:29:57.760
<v Speaker 3>I've got it save somewhere. It's a couple of years ago.

1523
01:29:57.800 --> 01:30:03.600
<v Speaker 3>But they were arguing that. But Islam does argue that

1524
01:30:03.840 --> 01:30:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Allah is a good deceiver, right, And so if Allah

1525
01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:10.760
<v Speaker 3>is a good deceiver, then how are we able to

1526
01:30:10.880 --> 01:30:14.520
<v Speaker 3>trust at all any of our reading of the Quran? Right,

1527
01:30:14.960 --> 01:30:19.680
<v Speaker 3>we might potentially be be be being deceived. Right, And

1528
01:30:19.960 --> 01:30:24.800
<v Speaker 3>so now all the propositions are potentially deceptive, and so

1529
01:30:24.840 --> 01:30:28.399
<v Speaker 3>we're not in any better position with the Qoran than

1530
01:30:28.479 --> 01:30:30.720
<v Speaker 3>we are if we are a Muslim and we're looking

1531
01:30:30.760 --> 01:30:34.520
<v Speaker 3>at the Jewish and Christian text, which also promise that

1532
01:30:34.560 --> 01:30:37.880
<v Speaker 3>they're inspired and not that they don't have errors.

1533
01:30:37.920 --> 01:30:38.319
<v Speaker 1>You see.

1534
01:30:38.800 --> 01:30:41.199
<v Speaker 3>So in other words, let's say I'm taking Let's say

1535
01:30:41.239 --> 01:30:44.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm a fourth century Jewish Christian.

1536
01:30:45.399 --> 01:30:47.520
<v Speaker 2>The books that I have tell me that.

1537
01:30:47.399 --> 01:30:51.560
<v Speaker 3>They're not corrupted, and they're inspired and they're authoritative. But

1538
01:30:51.840 --> 01:30:57.920
<v Speaker 3>from the Islamic perspective, those books are corrupted and I'm

1539
01:30:58.319 --> 01:31:02.840
<v Speaker 3>basically deceived, right, and so I need the Quran to

1540
01:31:02.920 --> 01:31:06.600
<v Speaker 3>fix that. But Allah is already a good deceiver, and

1541
01:31:06.680 --> 01:31:09.199
<v Speaker 3>so why would I not think that the New revelation

1542
01:31:09.359 --> 01:31:12.399
<v Speaker 3>also is potentially deceptive. You can't just say, well because

1543
01:31:12.399 --> 01:31:14.840
<v Speaker 3>it says it's not because the old books said they

1544
01:31:14.840 --> 01:31:15.079
<v Speaker 3>were not.

1545
01:31:15.239 --> 01:31:18.159
<v Speaker 2>But God was also deceptive back then, you see.

1546
01:31:18.239 --> 01:31:19.079
<v Speaker 3>Does that make sense?

1547
01:31:19.399 --> 01:31:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1548
01:31:19.680 --> 01:31:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And there is a very funny, a very nice

1549
01:31:23.159 --> 01:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that you can add to that which I love

1550
01:31:24.680 --> 01:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>about Jesus and his crucifixion, some flavor you can add

1551
01:31:30.800 --> 01:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to specifically that which is uh So allied as a deceiver.

1552
01:31:36.399 --> 01:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>He he he says that he is the best of deceivers.

1553
01:31:40.560 --> 01:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Think about the what the Quran says about Jesus. Jesus

1554
01:31:43.920 --> 01:31:48.159
<v Speaker 1>was he was sent down with a message with a scripture.

1555
01:31:49.520 --> 01:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>He was They tried to they denied him, and they

1556
01:31:53.640 --> 01:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>tried to crucify him. They tried to kill him, but

1557
01:31:57.600 --> 01:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they did not manage to kill him, not managed to

1558
01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>crucifying him. It was only made to appear that way. Okay, Well,

1559
01:32:04.760 --> 01:32:07.359
<v Speaker 1>what happened as a result of that, as a result

1560
01:32:07.439 --> 01:32:12.079
<v Speaker 1>was specifically that a major religion came into existence, that is,

1561
01:32:12.359 --> 01:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>according to Islam, a complete corruption of the truth. And

1562
01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:21.439
<v Speaker 1>why did it come into existence? Because the people believed

1563
01:32:21.920 --> 01:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that Jesus on that day was crucified and they saw him,

1564
01:32:27.199 --> 01:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess rise, which is a deception. It was made

1565
01:32:31.640 --> 01:32:35.439
<v Speaker 1>to appear to them. So and that appearance, that deception,

1566
01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:38.359
<v Speaker 1>that illusion, whatever you want to call it, brought forth

1567
01:32:38.399 --> 01:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the largest religion in the world, which happens to be

1568
01:32:41.039 --> 01:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a completely corrupt religion. Is this a last plan? Did

1569
01:32:45.640 --> 01:32:50.039
<v Speaker 1>did a lot establish a plan for Jesus where his

1570
01:32:50.239 --> 01:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>death was basically a deception which brought forth the largest

1571
01:32:56.159 --> 01:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>false religion in the world? So did Allah create this

1572
01:32:58.720 --> 01:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>false religion on purpose? By by creating this deception?

1573
01:33:01.880 --> 01:33:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, they would say, yeah, right, I mean, if you're

1574
01:33:03.680 --> 01:33:05.359
<v Speaker 3>a you're a hard determinist, right.

1575
01:33:06.439 --> 01:33:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And why would you blame the Christians? Then? See

1576
01:33:10.920 --> 01:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly why would you blame the Christians Because it looks

1577
01:33:14.640 --> 01:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>like Allah made it a lot, created the deception, and

1578
01:33:16.840 --> 01:33:19.319
<v Speaker 1>they fell for it. So it's it's not there is

1579
01:33:19.319 --> 01:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it their fault? If All is the best of deceivers?

1580
01:33:25.840 --> 01:33:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's just maybe this plays into the pathology of

1581
01:33:30.720 --> 01:33:34.760
<v Speaker 3>that religion right to where well, if Allah is the

1582
01:33:34.760 --> 01:33:39.239
<v Speaker 3>best of deceivers, is it possible that Muslims then welcome

1583
01:33:39.319 --> 01:33:40.039
<v Speaker 3>being deceptive?

1584
01:33:41.399 --> 01:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe?

1585
01:33:43.239 --> 01:33:45.039
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm what do you think is do you.

1586
01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Think that.

1587
01:33:51.840 --> 01:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to think deeply, like you.

1588
01:33:53.760 --> 01:33:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Know people, do you think the takia objection? Is that

1589
01:33:56.600 --> 01:33:57.960
<v Speaker 3>overused or is that.

1590
01:33:58.039 --> 01:34:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Okay, that's why I'm thinking about

1591
01:34:00.439 --> 01:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this right now. But here's the issue. There is a

1592
01:34:03.720 --> 01:34:07.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of there is a lot of overuse of that

1593
01:34:07.239 --> 01:34:11.399
<v Speaker 1>whole tekia accusation of saying whenever Muslims says something that

1594
01:34:11.439 --> 01:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be true or that doesn't seem to

1595
01:34:13.319 --> 01:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be consistent. Uh, some people might say they're just they're

1596
01:34:16.840 --> 01:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>just doing tekia. I would say that that is largely

1597
01:34:19.359 --> 01:34:24.479
<v Speaker 1>overused Muslims do not learn actively to to lie and

1598
01:34:24.520 --> 01:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to deceive and to you know, hide the truth and

1599
01:34:27.600 --> 01:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>all of that. And they don't learn about this concept, uh,

1600
01:34:30.520 --> 01:34:33.439
<v Speaker 1>this idea called tekia, and that they're supposed to practice this.

1601
01:34:34.960 --> 01:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>The problem is the problem with that is and there

1602
01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of nuance to this, although takia is

1603
01:34:42.479 --> 01:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>usually a wrong, over used accusation. Although Muslims don't actively

1604
01:34:47.319 --> 01:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>learn to to lie explicitly, Muslims do have a habit

1605
01:34:53.319 --> 01:35:01.119
<v Speaker 1>quite often of concealing uncomfortable truths or conceal certain things

1606
01:35:01.119 --> 01:35:06.159
<v Speaker 1>which they also lie to themselves about, and simply go

1607
01:35:06.279 --> 01:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to whatever makes it easier to convince the other side

1608
01:35:09.840 --> 01:35:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that Islam is true. And and you learn this whole concept,

1609
01:35:13.760 --> 01:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>which is that religion is supposed to be made easy.

1610
01:35:18.079 --> 01:35:22.079
<v Speaker 1>So when you try to preach Islam to somebody, make

1611
01:35:22.119 --> 01:35:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it easy. Forget about the complexities. You can cover things

1612
01:35:28.720 --> 01:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that don't need to be mentioned, you can ignore questions

1613
01:35:31.520 --> 01:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that are more pragmatic. Yeah, just focus on one whatever

1614
01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>makes it easier for the other person to accept Islam.

1615
01:35:37.479 --> 01:35:40.760
<v Speaker 1>That's it. So, while the accusations of the key are

1616
01:35:41.199 --> 01:35:44.760
<v Speaker 1>largely wrong and overused, there is an element of doing

1617
01:35:44.800 --> 01:35:46.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever it takes just to make the other person accept

1618
01:35:46.800 --> 01:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that Islam is true, and that might include there is

1619
01:35:51.720 --> 01:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a there is an issue here that might include occasionally

1620
01:35:54.680 --> 01:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>using deliberate deception when you deal with people that you

1621
01:35:58.279 --> 01:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>consider enemies of Islam, like myself, where they say it

1622
01:36:03.239 --> 01:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they are basically at war with me and with any

1623
01:36:05.720 --> 01:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>mues of Islam, and in war, deception is allowed, as

1624
01:36:08.760 --> 01:36:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Mohammad said, exactly is it is it is to be used.

1625
01:36:12.079 --> 01:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>So that is part of that as well.

1626
01:36:14.720 --> 01:36:17.880
<v Speaker 3>So there's not like any hadith that says, you know,

1627
01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:21.720
<v Speaker 3>you may deceive your opponent explicitly.

1628
01:36:22.359 --> 01:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>No, there is nothing that says you may or you

1629
01:36:26.359 --> 01:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>should lie to them. All there is is that there is,

1630
01:36:30.720 --> 01:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>there is implied, there are words for Muhammed that deception

1631
01:36:34.920 --> 01:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>is part of war, and there are just instructions on

1632
01:36:40.520 --> 01:36:44.119
<v Speaker 1>making it making it easier for people to understand Islam.

1633
01:36:44.239 --> 01:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's pretty much.

1634
01:36:45.319 --> 01:36:48.720
<v Speaker 3>It interesting, that's good, that's overused.

1635
01:36:48.800 --> 01:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Like said, yeah, I want to point at this thing

1636
01:36:54.319 --> 01:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>here to simply revisit the whole issue of ignorance of

1637
01:36:58.039 --> 01:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>pre Islamic beliefs. So here's a whole narrative that is

1638
01:37:01.359 --> 01:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>adopt adopted from later Christian ideas where Jesus speaks as

1639
01:37:07.560 --> 01:37:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a as a baby when he is born and tells

1640
01:37:10.760 --> 01:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>people that he is Jesus. But what's very important here

1641
01:37:13.960 --> 01:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that narrative is in Graduate in nineteen verse thirty. It

1642
01:37:17.760 --> 01:37:23.119
<v Speaker 1>says Jesus said, indeed, I am the servant of Allah.

1643
01:37:23.239 --> 01:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>He has given me the scripture and made me a prophet.

1644
01:37:27.239 --> 01:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>So I hear you already chuggling about this about what

1645
01:37:34.319 --> 01:37:37.119
<v Speaker 1>it says here. But yeah, so that the understanding here

1646
01:37:37.159 --> 01:37:40.439
<v Speaker 1>is that Allah gave Jesus a scripture and made him

1647
01:37:40.479 --> 01:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a prophet. And what's very interesting is that Jesus says

1648
01:37:42.840 --> 01:37:47.079
<v Speaker 1>this as a baby already, is what Jesus is saying

1649
01:37:47.079 --> 01:37:49.399
<v Speaker 1>this as a baby here, So he's speaking as a

1650
01:37:49.439 --> 01:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>baby and he's seeing, I am a servant of Allah.

1651
01:37:52.399 --> 01:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Allah gave me a scripture and made me a prophet.

1652
01:37:57.000 --> 01:37:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I have a note two saying that this is from

1653
01:37:59.840 --> 01:38:01.760
<v Speaker 3>that Syriac infancy narrative.

1654
01:38:01.840 --> 01:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, yeah, and.

1655
01:38:04.600 --> 01:38:07.319
<v Speaker 3>What what what when when that's brought up, I've not

1656
01:38:07.359 --> 01:38:11.359
<v Speaker 3>hurt anybody addressed? Like is that ever addressed? Like aren't

1657
01:38:11.359 --> 01:38:15.880
<v Speaker 3>these from prior non canonical or superb a graphical texts?

1658
01:38:15.920 --> 01:38:17.239
<v Speaker 3>Like is that ever addressed.

1659
01:38:17.680 --> 01:38:22.760
<v Speaker 1>The answert you get usually are that that people did

1660
01:38:22.840 --> 01:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>have certain truths and falsehoods that survived throughout the centuries,

1661
01:38:30.359 --> 01:38:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and some of these stories that.

1662
01:38:31.760 --> 01:38:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Came from they don't have a prominent minting that these

1663
01:38:33.880 --> 01:38:34.479
<v Speaker 3>are older.

1664
01:38:35.720 --> 01:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, you know the yeah they So they will

1665
01:38:38.359 --> 01:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>just explain that a way is some truth and falsehoods

1666
01:38:41.239 --> 01:38:44.479
<v Speaker 1>through the centuries. Same thing with with For example, there

1667
01:38:44.560 --> 01:38:52.439
<v Speaker 1>is an issue with chapter verse, chapter five, verse thirty three,

1668
01:38:52.680 --> 01:38:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe, which is the prominent verse of whoever kills

1669
01:38:57.760 --> 01:39:03.439
<v Speaker 1>one person has killed all men, all humanity. Okay, that's

1670
01:39:03.479 --> 01:39:09.840
<v Speaker 1>chapter five, verse thirty two. It says there we decreed

1671
01:39:09.920 --> 01:39:13.079
<v Speaker 1>upon the children of Israel that whoever kills a soul,

1672
01:39:13.239 --> 01:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>unless for his soul or for corruption in the land,

1673
01:39:15.720 --> 01:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it is as if he had slain all mankind, And

1674
01:39:18.840 --> 01:39:21.359
<v Speaker 1>whoever saves one, it is as if he had saved

1675
01:39:21.399 --> 01:39:26.479
<v Speaker 1>all mankind entirely. And Muslims will often cite only part

1676
01:39:26.520 --> 01:39:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of this, and we'll just say, whoever kills somebody has

1677
01:39:29.800 --> 01:39:33.319
<v Speaker 1>killed all mankind. Whoever saves someone has saved all mankind.

1678
01:39:34.119 --> 01:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>The problem with this is, as it points out, we

1679
01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>decreed upon the children of Israel. This is something that

1680
01:39:40.359 --> 01:39:45.399
<v Speaker 1>was apparently taken from Jews. And the problem with this

1681
01:39:45.560 --> 01:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is this stuff here, whoever kills a soul unless for

1682
01:39:49.760 --> 01:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>his soul, it's as if he had killed all mankind.

1683
01:39:52.319 --> 01:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And then the same with saving is something that directly

1684
01:39:55.960 --> 01:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>comes from the town Wood.

1685
01:39:58.039 --> 01:40:01.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've heard rabbinical sources said, yeah, it.

1686
01:40:01.039 --> 01:40:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Is directly in the Talmud. The Talmud deals with this issue.

1687
01:40:06.239 --> 01:40:12.439
<v Speaker 1>It explains something from the Torah and then says what

1688
01:40:12.479 --> 01:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you can understand so that the rabbi says what you

1689
01:40:15.600 --> 01:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>can from understand from that is that if one killing

1690
01:40:19.640 --> 01:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>one Jew is like killing all of mankind and saving

1691
01:40:21.960 --> 01:40:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Jews like saving all of So that that is an

1692
01:40:24.840 --> 01:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>idea that is that is that was presented by the

1693
01:40:26.960 --> 01:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>rabbis in the Talmud. It is not something that was

1694
01:40:29.640 --> 01:40:32.720
<v Speaker 1>revealed or that was found in the Torah or anything

1695
01:40:32.800 --> 01:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. It is directly a Talmudic rabbinic explanation of

1696
01:40:37.800 --> 01:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the Talmud. But here it is in the Qur'an directly

1697
01:40:40.560 --> 01:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>presented as God, as if it were from Allah revealed.

1698
01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:47.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I didn't know about that one either.

1699
01:40:47.279 --> 01:40:50.479
<v Speaker 3>So and Reynolds mentioned a couple of those, but I

1700
01:40:50.520 --> 01:40:52.439
<v Speaker 3>don't remember off the top of my head, which one

1701
01:40:52.520 --> 01:40:56.279
<v Speaker 3>he said was Talmudic in terms of the source, So

1702
01:40:56.359 --> 01:40:57.560
<v Speaker 3>that would be that would be one of them.

1703
01:40:57.760 --> 01:40:58.319
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting.

1704
01:40:59.159 --> 01:41:01.119
<v Speaker 1>It was also important note here is that this is,

1705
01:41:01.199 --> 01:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>according to the Quran, only a law for the Jews.

1706
01:41:04.039 --> 01:41:08.439
<v Speaker 1>So and here's the next verse, just to make it

1707
01:41:08.520 --> 01:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>very nice. Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war

1708
01:41:11.880 --> 01:41:14.359
<v Speaker 1>against a lie is messenger and strive upon earth to

1709
01:41:14.359 --> 01:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>cause corruption is none but that they should be killed

1710
01:41:17.039 --> 01:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>or crucified, or their hands and feet be cut off

1711
01:41:19.880 --> 01:41:24.119
<v Speaker 1>from opposite sides, or that they should be exiled from

1712
01:41:24.119 --> 01:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world,

1713
01:41:26.920 --> 01:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>and for them here in the hereafter is a great punishment.

1714
01:41:29.399 --> 01:41:31.439
<v Speaker 1>This is a horrible So.

1715
01:41:31.520 --> 01:41:34.199
<v Speaker 3>Is this why you see some of the radical a

1716
01:41:34.279 --> 01:41:38.399
<v Speaker 3>islonic groups doing this to people at times, including like crucifixion?

1717
01:41:38.880 --> 01:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and including there were reports in Somalia, for example,

1718
01:41:42.680 --> 01:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in the recent civil wars where they were referencing this

1719
01:41:46.680 --> 01:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>first and actually cutting off the hands and feet from

1720
01:41:49.279 --> 01:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>opposite sides of rebels.

1721
01:41:51.159 --> 01:41:51.760
<v Speaker 2>That's what I thought.

1722
01:41:51.840 --> 01:41:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, pretty messed up. Yeah, there's a lot.

1723
01:41:58.119 --> 01:41:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Now is that that one?

1724
01:41:59.640 --> 01:42:03.039
<v Speaker 3>Is that uh from a prior source or is that

1725
01:42:03.159 --> 01:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>unique to the Quran.

1726
01:42:05.920 --> 01:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>That part about cutting off stuff that is not that

1727
01:42:10.039 --> 01:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is that is from the Quran, but that is just

1728
01:42:12.039 --> 01:42:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the first after the one that is taken from the Jews,

1729
01:42:15.359 --> 01:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>from the Talmud. So what happened, what probably happened there.

1730
01:42:18.600 --> 01:42:21.159
<v Speaker 1>The theory is what probably happened there. Why the Quran

1731
01:42:21.479 --> 01:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>suddenly has a Talmudic teaching there as if it was

1732
01:42:25.279 --> 01:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>really revealed from a law, is that Muhammed was in Medina,

1733
01:42:28.439 --> 01:42:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Medina had a lot of Jews, learned Jews. Jews interact

1734
01:42:33.199 --> 01:42:35.039
<v Speaker 1>with him and tell him things, and one of the

1735
01:42:35.079 --> 01:42:39.439
<v Speaker 1>prominent ideas and teachings they have is specifically that moment

1736
01:42:39.520 --> 01:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>hears it and probably thinks, oh Allah revealed this to them.

1737
01:42:43.600 --> 01:42:46.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's that included as a revelation from a law.

1738
01:42:46.399 --> 01:42:49.079
<v Speaker 1>But and that's just a big oopsie, you know.

1739
01:42:50.680 --> 01:42:53.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it looks like a lot of the narratives are

1740
01:42:53.720 --> 01:42:59.359
<v Speaker 3>maybe things that were heard and misunderstood, like the Trinity

1741
01:43:01.640 --> 01:43:04.119
<v Speaker 3>Mary stuff that sounds like something that was heard. Oh

1742
01:43:04.159 --> 01:43:06.359
<v Speaker 3>they think this you know there was recorded.

1743
01:43:06.439 --> 01:43:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Also I mentioned in Grand nine, verse thirty, there

1744
01:43:10.279 --> 01:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is this Jews say Ezra is the son of a

1745
01:43:13.640 --> 01:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>law and Christians say the Messiah son of a law

1746
01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:22.479
<v Speaker 1>knowed you believe that of God and worships Ezra. But

1747
01:43:23.119 --> 01:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it's probably something that he heard. I mean, maybe somebody joked.

1748
01:43:25.520 --> 01:43:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe somebody was joking about the room,

1749
01:43:27.920 --> 01:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and he took it seriously and included.

1750
01:43:29.520 --> 01:43:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe somebody was trolling him.

1751
01:43:31.840 --> 01:43:34.840
<v Speaker 3>And I told him, yeah, we think Ezra right, and

1752
01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:38.520
<v Speaker 3>he wrote that down like it was an ancient trolling.

1753
01:43:38.960 --> 01:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what, what's have you heard of? The of the

1754
01:43:42.640 --> 01:43:45.319
<v Speaker 1>idea that Alexander the Great is also in the Qur'an.

1755
01:43:47.680 --> 01:43:50.359
<v Speaker 1>That's a very important thing to look into. That. Uh.

1756
01:43:51.319 --> 01:43:55.399
<v Speaker 1>There is a character named the Karnaine in the same

1757
01:43:55.520 --> 01:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>chapter that also mentions the people the Sleepers seven Sleepers,

1758
01:44:00.199 --> 01:44:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and it talks about a figure named Dul Karnain who

1759
01:44:04.119 --> 01:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is a servant of all and who was given all

1760
01:44:08.039 --> 01:44:10.279
<v Speaker 1>kinds of power by Allah and went to the very

1761
01:44:10.359 --> 01:44:14.119
<v Speaker 1>far ends of the world. And the issue with that

1762
01:44:14.239 --> 01:44:17.439
<v Speaker 1>character is nobody knows who that character is. The issue

1763
01:44:17.439 --> 01:44:20.079
<v Speaker 1>with that character is early Islamic scholars, we are very

1764
01:44:20.119 --> 01:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>clear that the Karnain is Alexander the Great, But over time,

1765
01:44:24.600 --> 01:44:27.039
<v Speaker 1>when people learned who Elese and the Grade actually is,

1766
01:44:27.159 --> 01:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they began to deny that and many mostms today will

1767
01:44:32.880 --> 01:44:37.119
<v Speaker 1>still deny that because the Quran basically depicts Alexander the

1768
01:44:37.159 --> 01:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Great there as a servant of Allah. Yeah yeah, yeah wow.

1769
01:44:44.520 --> 01:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And what happens there going to the Hadith is people come,

1770
01:44:46.920 --> 01:44:50.680
<v Speaker 1>apparently Jews are coming and asking him about this, and

1771
01:44:50.760 --> 01:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he then goes away. It comes back many days later

1772
01:44:55.199 --> 01:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>with these revelations. But the revelations get it all wrong Islam.

1773
01:45:02.680 --> 01:45:06.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, maybe maybe he heard, you know, the texts in

1774
01:45:06.479 --> 01:45:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Daniel or Maccabee's which reference that time period of of Alexander. Yeah,

1775
01:45:13.680 --> 01:45:17.399
<v Speaker 3>and maybe he thought that that meant that Alexander was

1776
01:45:17.439 --> 01:45:20.279
<v Speaker 3>a servant of God, which is odd because that's not

1777
01:45:20.399 --> 01:45:24.239
<v Speaker 3>at all what Maccabee says. Like it, Maccabee's doesn't really

1778
01:45:24.279 --> 01:45:28.279
<v Speaker 3>comment a lot on Alexander. It focuses on Antiochus of

1779
01:45:28.359 --> 01:45:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Theefani's right, who's the one that defiles the temple. I'm

1780
01:45:33.119 --> 01:45:35.600
<v Speaker 3>just trying to think, like why he would have Maybe.

1781
01:45:36.000 --> 01:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>There's an explanation off so historically seen. Apparently the early

1782
01:45:41.800 --> 01:45:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Jews had a developed and understanding of of Alexander the Great,

1783
01:45:46.560 --> 01:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>where they for a while referred to him as somebody

1784
01:45:51.680 --> 01:45:56.920
<v Speaker 1>who was given given power by God or was favored

1785
01:45:56.960 --> 01:46:01.800
<v Speaker 1>by God because they had an understanding that people who

1786
01:46:01.800 --> 01:46:03.479
<v Speaker 1>become very powerful and we have.

1787
01:46:04.960 --> 01:46:05.399
<v Speaker 2>Providence.

1788
01:46:05.960 --> 01:46:08.079
<v Speaker 1>They yeah, they're they are given divine providence and they

1789
01:46:09.159 --> 01:46:11.439
<v Speaker 1>so they began referring to him as somebody who was

1790
01:46:11.520 --> 01:46:13.800
<v Speaker 1>gifted by God. Yeah, but that doesn't mean that he

1791
01:46:13.960 --> 01:46:17.760
<v Speaker 1>herved God, like that's that's the issue, and probably misunderstood

1792
01:46:17.800 --> 01:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that so exactly.

1793
01:46:19.880 --> 01:46:23.159
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it says the same thing about uh Nebucannezer

1794
01:46:23.279 --> 01:46:27.039
<v Speaker 3>that like, when Daniel's talking about Nebucanezer, he says that

1795
01:46:27.159 --> 01:46:32.319
<v Speaker 3>divine providence raised up Nezer. Doesn't mean that Negeezer was

1796
01:46:32.359 --> 01:46:34.479
<v Speaker 3>a servant of God. In fact, he was a blasphemer

1797
01:46:34.560 --> 01:46:36.960
<v Speaker 3>and he in the Book of Daniel, he's punished.

1798
01:46:36.640 --> 01:46:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Because he's a blasphemer.

1799
01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1800
01:46:38.560 --> 01:46:41.159
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's fascinating.

1801
01:46:41.399 --> 01:46:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna look and see how because I know

1802
01:46:44.159 --> 01:46:49.359
<v Speaker 3>mccabee's mentions. I can't remember if it mentions him explicitly

1803
01:46:49.640 --> 01:46:51.359
<v Speaker 3>or if it just kind of mentions him in passing

1804
01:46:51.640 --> 01:46:56.079
<v Speaker 3>in the first chapter of Macabee's but he's talking about

1805
01:46:56.159 --> 01:47:00.479
<v Speaker 3>that period. Yeah, I don't I don't think he mentions

1806
01:47:00.560 --> 01:47:01.159
<v Speaker 3>him by name.

1807
01:47:03.399 --> 01:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Thinks serious said, can you look at the errors of

1808
01:47:05.920 --> 01:47:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity in the ground. We did that, thank you

1809
01:47:07.840 --> 01:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>so much.

1810
01:47:08.680 --> 01:47:09.720
<v Speaker 2>No, it does, excuse me.

1811
01:47:09.880 --> 01:47:13.760
<v Speaker 3>So the first, the very beginning of maccabee's doesn't mention

1812
01:47:13.960 --> 01:47:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Alexander as king of Greeks. He went to the ends

1813
01:47:17.399 --> 01:47:22.199
<v Speaker 3>of the earth, he spoiled, he spoiled the earth like

1814
01:47:23.720 --> 01:47:30.399
<v Speaker 3>army spoils. He fell sick and died, doesn't reference anything

1815
01:47:30.439 --> 01:47:33.520
<v Speaker 3>about it, just states it kind of like a history

1816
01:47:33.600 --> 01:47:37.640
<v Speaker 3>of Alexander. And then it moves into talking about Antiochus

1817
01:47:37.960 --> 01:47:41.560
<v Speaker 3>being a horrible blasphemer because he was one of the

1818
01:47:41.800 --> 01:47:46.000
<v Speaker 3>four generals that took over after Alexander passed away. Alexander

1819
01:47:46.039 --> 01:47:48.039
<v Speaker 3>ray for twelve years and then he died. His servants

1820
01:47:48.079 --> 01:47:50.039
<v Speaker 3>took over and ruled in his place. One of those

1821
01:47:50.199 --> 01:47:55.199
<v Speaker 3>was Antiochus. So it doesn't there's never a positive mention

1822
01:47:55.479 --> 01:47:58.760
<v Speaker 3>in maccabe's as just as curiosity.

1823
01:48:01.439 --> 01:48:03.079
<v Speaker 1>I will quickly put this year on the screen just

1824
01:48:03.159 --> 01:48:07.439
<v Speaker 1>because it's so funny. Uh So, here is the Kuronic

1825
01:48:07.520 --> 01:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>narrative on the Karnae, and it says in eighteen eighty

1826
01:48:10.760 --> 01:48:14.279
<v Speaker 1>three and they ask you about the Karnaine and lo

1827
01:48:14.439 --> 01:48:20.479
<v Speaker 1>garnane literally means the two horned one, the two horned one, Yeah,

1828
01:48:20.520 --> 01:48:21.479
<v Speaker 1>two horned one.

1829
01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:24.439
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that that might actually be a reference to Daniel.

1830
01:48:25.520 --> 01:48:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, the thing is so, if if you look at this,

1831
01:48:30.600 --> 01:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the narrative here, it is very much,

1832
01:48:34.359 --> 01:48:41.359
<v Speaker 1>very much copies ancient myths, the legends about Alexander. It

1833
01:48:41.720 --> 01:48:47.359
<v Speaker 1>basically copies the Alexander romance legends. And Alexander the Great

1834
01:48:47.520 --> 01:48:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was known as the one who wears a helmet with

1835
01:48:50.840 --> 01:48:54.359
<v Speaker 1>two horns. And there were coins that were that existed

1836
01:48:54.359 --> 01:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in Arabia as well at the time where Alexand the

1837
01:48:56.760 --> 01:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Greatest depicted somebody with two horns. But it says here

1838
01:49:00.279 --> 01:49:03.119
<v Speaker 1>I will recite to you about him a report. Indeed,

1839
01:49:03.199 --> 01:49:05.319
<v Speaker 1>we established him upon the earth, and we gave him

1840
01:49:05.319 --> 01:49:08.279
<v Speaker 1>from everything away. So he followed away until when he

1841
01:49:08.359 --> 01:49:11.359
<v Speaker 1>reached the setting of the sun, he found it setting

1842
01:49:11.399 --> 01:49:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in a body of dark water. And he found neared

1843
01:49:14.600 --> 01:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>eight people, and we said, oh, theo carnein. Either you

1844
01:49:19.760 --> 01:49:22.920
<v Speaker 1>punish them or else adopted them a way of goodness.

1845
01:49:23.479 --> 01:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Here is a very interesting detail. He found the sun

1846
01:49:26.039 --> 01:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>setting in a pool of dark water. He said, as

1847
01:49:31.760 --> 01:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for one who wrongs, we will punish them. Then he

1848
01:49:33.560 --> 01:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>will be returned to his lord, and he will be

1849
01:49:35.600 --> 01:49:37.880
<v Speaker 1>punished with a terrible punishment, but as for one who

1850
01:49:37.960 --> 01:49:41.319
<v Speaker 1>believes and does righteousness, he will have a reward. Then

1851
01:49:41.359 --> 01:49:43.600
<v Speaker 1>he followed another way. When he came to the rising

1852
01:49:43.680 --> 01:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of the sun, he found it rising on a people

1853
01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:48.840
<v Speaker 1>for whom we had not made against any shield, and

1854
01:49:48.920 --> 01:49:51.359
<v Speaker 1>then he builds for them ay wall to protect them.

1855
01:49:52.199 --> 01:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>But this is basically goes back to all legends about

1856
01:49:55.920 --> 01:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Alexander the Great, who allegedly traveled to the very very east,

1857
01:50:00.199 --> 01:50:04.319
<v Speaker 1>very west, and who built a giant wall to protect

1858
01:50:04.399 --> 01:50:06.239
<v Speaker 1>these people from these invaders.

1859
01:50:07.520 --> 01:50:11.760
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, but you'll find this interesting because if you

1860
01:50:11.840 --> 01:50:16.439
<v Speaker 3>look at Daniel eight, like verses five to fourteen, a

1861
01:50:16.479 --> 01:50:18.159
<v Speaker 3>lot of people think that it's whether you think it's

1862
01:50:18.199 --> 01:50:21.920
<v Speaker 3>a prophecy or whether it was written later. It's talking

1863
01:50:21.960 --> 01:50:25.079
<v Speaker 3>about Alexander, and it's calling him the horn the horned one,

1864
01:50:26.880 --> 01:50:28.840
<v Speaker 3>the goat, it calls him the male goat.

1865
01:50:28.880 --> 01:50:30.319
<v Speaker 2>I think here and yeah, verse five.

1866
01:50:31.439 --> 01:50:34.079
<v Speaker 3>So what I'm saying what's funny about that is that

1867
01:50:34.680 --> 01:50:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the description is that he's an evil pagan ruler in Daniel,

1868
01:50:39.800 --> 01:50:42.560
<v Speaker 3>but he's called the horned goat, the horned one. Yeah,

1869
01:50:42.960 --> 01:50:44.880
<v Speaker 3>and he's li liken to a goat, which in scripture,

1870
01:50:44.920 --> 01:50:48.520
<v Speaker 3>goats are typically referred to as the wicked sheeps and goats.

1871
01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:51.600
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just pointing out that it's the chronic narrative.

1872
01:50:51.840 --> 01:50:54.920
<v Speaker 3>If if he heard this story from Jews, or if

1873
01:50:54.960 --> 01:50:59.000
<v Speaker 3>he'd heard Daniel and thought maybe that was about Alexander.

1874
01:50:59.199 --> 01:51:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe maybe that could be how its So what's.

1875
01:51:03.319 --> 01:51:07.119
<v Speaker 2>Funny is that in Daniel he's a wicked person.

1876
01:51:07.880 --> 01:51:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And and that's where the issue is. He just hears

1877
01:51:10.800 --> 01:51:13.920
<v Speaker 1>bits of knowledge, probably from from the Jews, from others,

1878
01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:17.199
<v Speaker 1>and then the things, oh, I have a revelation from

1879
01:51:17.239 --> 01:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a law.

1880
01:51:18.520 --> 01:51:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Allah says so and so and so and But you're

1881
01:51:22.039 --> 01:51:25.760
<v Speaker 3>saying that he in this passage about this figure here,

1882
01:51:26.640 --> 01:51:28.800
<v Speaker 3>that it's actually calling him a righteous person.

1883
01:51:28.720 --> 01:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, No, it's it's it's literally according to the verse,

1884
01:51:31.680 --> 01:51:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot communicating with him and making him a

1885
01:51:33.920 --> 01:51:38.279
<v Speaker 1>judge over people, whether they are righteous or or not.

1886
01:51:38.720 --> 01:51:39.520
<v Speaker 2>And you're saying that.

1887
01:51:40.600 --> 01:51:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Initially the Muslim scholars have said it's it's Alexander, but

1888
01:51:46.199 --> 01:51:47.720
<v Speaker 3>now they don't, or there's debate.

1889
01:51:48.359 --> 01:51:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Some still say that it's Alexander, but most of them

1890
01:51:51.199 --> 01:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>nowadays deny it. But it's, yeah, it's in early Islamic history.

1891
01:51:55.079 --> 01:51:58.039
<v Speaker 1>The interation. What's very clear that this is a reference

1892
01:51:58.079 --> 01:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to Alexander the Great.

1893
01:51:59.600 --> 01:52:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, there's another example of just something being misunderstood. Yeah yeah,

1894
01:52:03.159 --> 01:52:05.119
<v Speaker 3>So what would now do they say that it's just

1895
01:52:05.199 --> 01:52:06.640
<v Speaker 3>some unknown ruler or something.

1896
01:52:07.039 --> 01:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, most likely they usually say that it's it's that

1897
01:52:11.039 --> 01:52:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know who it is. But that's also

1898
01:52:14.079 --> 01:52:17.119
<v Speaker 1>very funny because there's just some guy mentioned here, a

1899
01:52:17.119 --> 01:52:19.199
<v Speaker 1>little car name. You have no idea who it is,

1900
01:52:21.239 --> 01:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that's it.

1901
01:52:21.920 --> 01:52:22.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1902
01:52:25.199 --> 01:52:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Plus he also builds a wall here that is

1903
01:52:27.880 --> 01:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to prevent Gog and Magogue, also a narrative taken

1904
01:52:31.920 --> 01:52:36.159
<v Speaker 1>from the Bible and previous beliefs.

1905
01:52:37.399 --> 01:52:41.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's interesting because that's Ezekiel. But there's no ravens

1906
01:52:41.239 --> 01:52:43.039
<v Speaker 3>or explanation to what Ezekiel's talking about.

1907
01:52:43.520 --> 01:52:45.399
<v Speaker 1>But here here it's like he builds a wall, and

1908
01:52:45.560 --> 01:52:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Gog and Magog are these these these beings, these corruptors,

1909
01:52:51.680 --> 01:52:54.039
<v Speaker 1>and they are behind that wall, and they are to

1910
01:52:54.199 --> 01:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this day still trying to get through that wall, and

1911
01:52:57.800 --> 01:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>one day they will make a hole into the wall

1912
01:53:00.000 --> 01:53:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and they will invade the whole world.

1913
01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:04.960
<v Speaker 3>And basically, well, now I'm getting this is in my mind,

1914
01:53:05.920 --> 01:53:07.840
<v Speaker 3>what is this sounds like the plot of.

1915
01:53:09.640 --> 01:53:13.000
<v Speaker 2>What was the Avengers? Were the like making up.

1916
01:53:13.079 --> 01:53:14.960
<v Speaker 3>They're making a hole in the sky and the member

1917
01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:16.920
<v Speaker 3>they come through the portal? Is that what we're talking about?

1918
01:53:17.920 --> 01:53:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Something like that. I've I've never watched you in movies, actually,

1919
01:53:21.760 --> 01:53:22.199
<v Speaker 1>very honest.

1920
01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:24.760
<v Speaker 3>What does this mean? This hole in the wall and

1921
01:53:24.760 --> 01:53:26.199
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to get through to this day.

1922
01:53:28.720 --> 01:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Which which I think there's a I don't want to

1923
01:53:33.680 --> 01:53:36.840
<v Speaker 1>explain it myself. I would like to let Muhammad explain

1924
01:53:36.880 --> 01:53:37.159
<v Speaker 1>it to you.

1925
01:53:38.640 --> 01:53:41.439
<v Speaker 2>Uh, I was just in a hottie about that.

1926
01:53:42.119 --> 01:53:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's it's also here in the Qur'an. It's it is,

1927
01:53:45.560 --> 01:53:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but it is more any more detail described in the

1928
01:53:48.359 --> 01:53:52.079
<v Speaker 1>so here it is mentions They said, although we're kind

1929
01:53:52.079 --> 01:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of indeed, Gog and Magogue are corruptors in the land,

1930
01:53:55.079 --> 01:53:57.159
<v Speaker 1>So may we assigned for you an expenditure that you

1931
01:53:57.239 --> 01:54:01.319
<v Speaker 1>may make a barrier between them and us? And he

1932
01:54:01.640 --> 01:54:05.479
<v Speaker 1>does that. He builds a huge wall, and it says

1933
01:54:05.600 --> 01:54:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so they were unable to pass over it, know, were

1934
01:54:08.039 --> 01:54:12.119
<v Speaker 1>they able to penetrate it? And then it further says,

1935
01:54:12.600 --> 01:54:17.479
<v Speaker 1>but one day much will be blown and will assemble

1936
01:54:17.560 --> 01:54:22.159
<v Speaker 1>them in an assembly. Yeah, one day they will get over.

1937
01:54:22.399 --> 01:54:24.279
<v Speaker 2>I guess, like, is this a literal wall?

1938
01:54:24.399 --> 01:54:27.319
<v Speaker 3>Or is there like some spiritual reality where they can't.

1939
01:54:29.520 --> 01:54:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to now invoke Muhammed. Here ah, here is Mohammed.

1940
01:54:37.800 --> 01:54:42.680
<v Speaker 1>According to the Hadis, it says the prophet got up

1941
01:54:42.680 --> 01:54:44.960
<v Speaker 1>from his sleep with a flushed red face and said,

1942
01:54:45.399 --> 01:54:47.640
<v Speaker 1>none has the right to be worship about Allah. Woe

1943
01:54:47.720 --> 01:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Arabs from the great evil that is nearly

1944
01:54:51.640 --> 01:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>approaching them. Today a gap has been made in the

1945
01:54:54.720 --> 01:54:58.079
<v Speaker 1>wall of gog and magogue like this, and he makes

1946
01:54:58.119 --> 01:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a number. It was asked, shall we be destroyed though

1947
01:55:01.720 --> 01:55:04.439
<v Speaker 1>they are righteous people among us? The prophet said, yes,

1948
01:55:04.520 --> 01:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>if evil is increased. So it is actually a wall,

1949
01:55:07.359 --> 01:55:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're trying to dig through that wall. But it

1950
01:55:09.960 --> 01:55:12.800
<v Speaker 1>gets even better, it gets even better.

1951
01:55:13.279 --> 01:55:16.479
<v Speaker 2>This is bizarre, it is.

1952
01:55:17.720 --> 01:55:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It is very bizarre, very very bizarre.

1953
01:55:23.239 --> 01:55:25.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it says the afflictions of the end of the world.

1954
01:55:25.680 --> 01:55:28.800
<v Speaker 3>So does that mean that this wall in the hole

1955
01:55:29.199 --> 01:55:31.000
<v Speaker 3>has that they're trying to dig has been going on

1956
01:55:31.239 --> 01:55:31.600
<v Speaker 3>from that?

1957
01:55:33.239 --> 01:55:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, it gets very very ridiculous. So this is

1958
01:55:40.800 --> 01:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a description about the end times, and it says he

1959
01:55:46.840 --> 01:55:48.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the job. They said, I will descendhim, kill and

1960
01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:50.520
<v Speaker 1>then people will return to their own nets and will

1961
01:55:50.520 --> 01:55:53.239
<v Speaker 1>be confronted with Gog and Magogue, people who will swoop

1962
01:55:53.319 --> 01:55:56.439
<v Speaker 1>down from every mound. They will not pass by any water,

1963
01:55:56.560 --> 01:55:59.079
<v Speaker 1>but they will drink it by anything, but they will

1964
01:55:59.159 --> 01:56:02.560
<v Speaker 1>spoil it. They will the people will besieged Allah, and

1965
01:56:03.800 --> 01:56:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I will pray to Allah to kill them. The earth

1966
01:56:06.039 --> 01:56:09.680
<v Speaker 1>will be filled with their stench and the people will

1967
01:56:09.680 --> 01:56:11.359
<v Speaker 1>besieged Allah, and I will pray to a lot and

1968
01:56:11.439 --> 01:56:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the sky will send down rain. Uh. Then the mountains

1969
01:56:15.119 --> 01:56:21.479
<v Speaker 1>will turn to dust and the earth and this and that. Uh. Okay,

1970
01:56:21.680 --> 01:56:24.760
<v Speaker 1>there's one description, but there's there's even more. It gets

1971
01:56:24.840 --> 01:56:29.560
<v Speaker 1>very bizarre. It gets very very bizarre. So it describes,

1972
01:56:30.279 --> 01:56:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I go back to the the things here ah Gog

1973
01:56:35.399 --> 01:56:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and Magog. Gog and Magog.

1974
01:56:37.079 --> 01:56:39.199
<v Speaker 2>Are they are these strong head eats.

1975
01:56:39.840 --> 01:56:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Ah yeah yeah. Bugari is always strong, very reliable. Some

1976
01:56:45.600 --> 01:56:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of them are from different sources, but they are also

1977
01:56:47.880 --> 01:56:55.359
<v Speaker 1>marked as sh authentic. M Gog and Magogue dig every

1978
01:56:55.439 --> 01:56:57.399
<v Speaker 1>day until when they can almost see the rays of

1979
01:56:57.439 --> 01:56:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the sun. The one in charge of them says, go

1980
01:56:59.520 --> 01:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>back and we will dig it tomorrow. Then Allah puts

1981
01:57:02.720 --> 01:57:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it back stronger than it was before. This will continue

1982
01:57:05.800 --> 01:57:08.159
<v Speaker 1>until when their time has come. Allah wants to send

1983
01:57:08.199 --> 01:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>them against the people. They will dig until they can

1984
01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:12.680
<v Speaker 1>almost see the rays of the sun. Then they were

1985
01:57:12.720 --> 01:57:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the one who is in charge of them will say,

1986
01:57:14.239 --> 01:57:16.680
<v Speaker 1>go back, and it will dig it tomorrow if Allah wills.

1987
01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:20.439
<v Speaker 1>So they will say, if Allah wills, then they will

1988
01:57:20.479 --> 01:57:22.439
<v Speaker 1>come back to it and it will be as they

1989
01:57:22.560 --> 01:57:24.479
<v Speaker 1>left it. So they will dig and it will come

1990
01:57:24.520 --> 01:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>out to the people, and they will drink all the water.

1991
01:57:27.039 --> 01:57:30.119
<v Speaker 1>People will fortify themselves. They will shoot their arrows towards

1992
01:57:30.159 --> 01:57:33.199
<v Speaker 1>the sky, and they will come back with blood on them,

1993
01:57:33.560 --> 01:57:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and they will say, we have defeated the people of

1994
01:57:35.840 --> 01:57:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the earth and dominated the people of heaven. Then Allah

1995
01:57:40.640 --> 01:57:43.199
<v Speaker 1>will send a worm in the names of their necks

1996
01:57:43.239 --> 01:57:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and will kill them thereby, and so on and then

1997
01:57:45.760 --> 01:57:47.479
<v Speaker 1>and then there will be a beast of the earth

1998
01:57:47.560 --> 01:57:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that will be let's loose. This is all stun so.

1999
01:57:51.880 --> 01:57:55.560
<v Speaker 3>This is another layer of what I would say from

2000
01:57:55.640 --> 01:57:59.319
<v Speaker 3>the Christian biblical perspective of kind of cobbling together things

2001
01:57:59.520 --> 01:58:04.439
<v Speaker 3>in Ezekiel that are kind of mysterious, and but I mean,

2002
01:58:04.479 --> 01:58:07.800
<v Speaker 3>there's nothing, you know what there is. There's a text

2003
01:58:07.960 --> 01:58:13.119
<v Speaker 3>in Ezekiel where Ezekiel is he is talking about the

2004
01:58:13.520 --> 01:58:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Jews who were engaged in pagan worship and that they

2005
01:58:17.079 --> 01:58:21.239
<v Speaker 3>had dug out under the wall of the temple a

2006
01:58:21.399 --> 01:58:26.319
<v Speaker 3>secret place where they were worshiping like pagan gods. H.

2007
01:58:26.880 --> 01:58:30.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's famously the same book where we get Gog

2008
01:58:30.760 --> 01:58:33.439
<v Speaker 3>and Megod from the latter chapters of Ezekiel. I'm just speculating.

2009
01:58:33.640 --> 01:58:37.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking that they might have heard stories from Ezekiel

2010
01:58:37.279 --> 01:58:41.279
<v Speaker 3>about digging through the wall, and then Muhammed is creatively

2011
01:58:41.399 --> 01:58:44.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of cobbling this together and saying, this is an

2012
01:58:44.399 --> 01:58:47.119
<v Speaker 3>end Times narrative of a wall that the Jews and

2013
01:58:47.199 --> 01:58:48.279
<v Speaker 3>other people try to dig through.

2014
01:58:48.359 --> 01:58:53.159
<v Speaker 1>You see what I'm saying, interesting perspective, just speculating. In

2015
01:58:53.199 --> 01:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the ends, we cannot know what exactly happened there, But

2016
01:58:57.159 --> 01:59:00.079
<v Speaker 1>as point of Chule, there is a lot of There

2017
01:59:00.079 --> 01:59:03.479
<v Speaker 1>are lots of references in the Quran where it continues

2018
01:59:03.600 --> 01:59:07.920
<v Speaker 1>saying and they say that these are just stories of

2019
01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the old They say, he hears what he believes whatever

2020
01:59:11.760 --> 01:59:17.399
<v Speaker 1>he says. So these are Koran verses about Muhammad, and

2021
01:59:17.520 --> 01:59:20.600
<v Speaker 1>these Choran verses basically tell us that the people around

2022
01:59:20.720 --> 01:59:24.199
<v Speaker 1>him kept accusing him of taking stories from others, from

2023
01:59:24.239 --> 01:59:29.000
<v Speaker 1>people around him, from believing whatever people say, from making

2024
01:59:29.079 --> 01:59:34.600
<v Speaker 1>things up, of being crazy and so on. So it's

2025
01:59:34.800 --> 01:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we can speculate, but it looks like he just got

2026
01:59:38.840 --> 01:59:45.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot of myths and some true stories, some falsehood

2027
01:59:45.159 --> 01:59:48.399
<v Speaker 1>some complete misunderstandings and mixed them all together and presented

2028
01:59:48.479 --> 01:59:49.399
<v Speaker 1>them as revelations.

2029
01:59:49.520 --> 01:59:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, we have a lot of I mean that that

2030
01:59:51.479 --> 01:59:54.880
<v Speaker 3>end time's kind of stuff there. I mean, I've spent

2031
01:59:54.960 --> 01:59:59.359
<v Speaker 3>many years researching and reading and looking at evangelical approaches

2032
01:59:59.399 --> 02:00:02.079
<v Speaker 3>to end time stuff, and I see a lot of

2033
02:00:02.119 --> 02:00:05.560
<v Speaker 3>parallels there with that, where they'll kind of cobble together

2034
02:00:05.720 --> 02:00:09.640
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of very ambiguous, you know, Old Testament passages,

2035
02:00:09.800 --> 02:00:13.119
<v Speaker 3>especially Ezekiel's latter chapters about Gog and Magog, and it

2036
02:00:13.159 --> 02:00:15.840
<v Speaker 3>gets kind of cobbled together in this jumbled narrative that

2037
02:00:15.880 --> 02:00:18.439
<v Speaker 3>always talking about Russia, and it's talking about the end

2038
02:00:18.439 --> 02:00:20.880
<v Speaker 3>of the world in China, And I mean, I don't

2039
02:00:20.960 --> 02:00:22.920
<v Speaker 3>know what the end of the world is going to

2040
02:00:22.960 --> 02:00:25.640
<v Speaker 3>be like, but I don't think that, you know, the

2041
02:00:25.720 --> 02:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>evangelicals kind of have the they don't know what they're

2042
02:00:28.840 --> 02:00:31.279
<v Speaker 3>talking about, as I'm trying to say. And I sense

2043
02:00:31.399 --> 02:00:38.319
<v Speaker 3>the same kind of extremities and cobbling together with Muhammad

2044
02:00:38.359 --> 02:00:42.279
<v Speaker 3>in those passages that we see, for example, evangelicals doing

2045
02:00:42.399 --> 02:00:46.720
<v Speaker 3>with passages from ezekiel Eschatology.

2046
02:00:46.239 --> 02:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Is a very very interesting, very enticing thing, right two people.

2047
02:00:52.079 --> 02:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It's talking about the end times, talking about the tribulations,

2048
02:00:55.600 --> 02:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff that will happen as something that people

2049
02:00:59.000 --> 02:01:03.199
<v Speaker 1>are always fascinated by. It's also a very easy topic.

2050
02:01:04.520 --> 02:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine that in the seventh century in Arabia.

2051
02:01:08.880 --> 02:01:10.199
<v Speaker 2>It would play well with an audience.

2052
02:01:10.319 --> 02:01:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, where people do not study much, do not know much,

2053
02:01:13.279 --> 02:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything. It is very easy to get everyone's

2054
02:01:16.680 --> 02:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>attention by talking about the end times and all the

2055
02:01:19.359 --> 02:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>fantastic stuff that will happen then. And it's it's quite

2056
02:01:22.800 --> 02:01:26.119
<v Speaker 1>believable that Muhammad got his fair portion of that of

2057
02:01:26.239 --> 02:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>all of that and then turned to that into a

2058
02:01:28.920 --> 02:01:33.159
<v Speaker 1>revelation which he then presents to his own audience. Because

2059
02:01:33.159 --> 02:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it works so well, and there we have it.

2060
02:01:36.359 --> 02:01:39.000
<v Speaker 3>It would be interesting to see a similar type of

2061
02:01:39.079 --> 02:01:43.960
<v Speaker 3>breakdown of the conceptions of anti christ doj all and

2062
02:01:44.000 --> 02:01:45.520
<v Speaker 3>all that kind of stuff that you that you were

2063
02:01:45.560 --> 02:01:48.359
<v Speaker 3>referencing the way that you were talking about, how you know,

2064
02:01:48.720 --> 02:01:53.880
<v Speaker 3>to Christianity, the resurrection has a really significant role. Antichrist

2065
02:01:53.960 --> 02:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>is not as significant, but it does play a key

2066
02:01:56.800 --> 02:01:59.439
<v Speaker 3>role in some of the you know, apocalyptic texts of

2067
02:01:59.439 --> 02:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the Bible.

2068
02:02:00.399 --> 02:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious. I'd be interested to see in what way

2069
02:02:03.800 --> 02:02:07.640
<v Speaker 2>it's misunderstood or sort of cobbled together in Islam because

2070
02:02:07.640 --> 02:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I didn't I didn't know about those passages there with

2071
02:02:09.960 --> 02:02:11.439
<v Speaker 2>your fascinating UH.

2072
02:02:12.000 --> 02:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It's funny. The ja literally means deceiver or something along

2073
02:02:18.560 --> 02:02:24.199
<v Speaker 1>along those lines. So the actual, the actual long form

2074
02:02:24.319 --> 02:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>name is which is the false Messiah or the deceiving Messiah. Uh.

2075
02:02:29.399 --> 02:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It's directly adopted from Christianity but then presented in a

2076
02:02:33.319 --> 02:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>completely different way and then Islam. The narrative is basically

2077
02:02:36.359 --> 02:02:41.119
<v Speaker 1>that the job, the false Messiah will come uh at

2078
02:02:41.159 --> 02:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the end, and he will basically claim to be God.

2079
02:02:45.720 --> 02:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting stuff. He will claim to be God, and

2080
02:02:47.880 --> 02:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>he will raise people from the dead. He will kill

2081
02:02:50.680 --> 02:02:52.399
<v Speaker 1>somebody and raise him from the from the dead, and

2082
02:02:52.720 --> 02:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>he will be sound.

2083
02:02:53.680 --> 02:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>These sound like I mean, that sounds like Paul and

2084
02:02:55.600 --> 02:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Second Thesalonians, and it sounds like chapters of the Revelation.

2085
02:02:59.319 --> 02:03:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he will he will claim to be Allah,

2086
02:03:03.760 --> 02:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and people will follow him because he will be so

2087
02:03:07.920 --> 02:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so so amazing. But the true believers, they will immediately

2088
02:03:11.640 --> 02:03:14.319
<v Speaker 1>recognize him and they will not follow him. And then

2089
02:03:14.560 --> 02:03:17.399
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, Jesus will come down from the

2090
02:03:17.479 --> 02:03:19.279
<v Speaker 1>sky as a Muslim and.

2091
02:03:21.039 --> 02:03:24.159
<v Speaker 2>So this this is crib from the apocalypse, and he.

2092
02:03:24.159 --> 02:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Will he will basically fight, fight them, fight to the

2093
02:03:26.760 --> 02:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>jar and and then pray together with the Muslims. And

2094
02:03:31.560 --> 02:03:33.399
<v Speaker 1>according to the Hadith, he will come and break the

2095
02:03:33.479 --> 02:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>cross and kill the pig.

2096
02:03:37.000 --> 02:03:38.600
<v Speaker 3>And break the Christian cross.

2097
02:03:39.000 --> 02:03:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, break the Christians.

2098
02:03:40.039 --> 02:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Who's the pig?

2099
02:03:41.680 --> 02:03:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Uh, the pig is just killed, he says, kill the swine.

2100
02:03:44.279 --> 02:03:47.359
<v Speaker 1>That's what Muhammed said. Kill the pig again. He just

2101
02:03:47.439 --> 02:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>he just kills the pigs and for no reason.

2102
02:03:50.399 --> 02:03:54.359
<v Speaker 3>And wait, literal pigs are like the people are called pigs.

2103
02:03:54.800 --> 02:03:58.399
<v Speaker 1>No, it's it's it's literal pigs. So he comes, and.

2104
02:04:00.079 --> 02:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Surely you're joking.

2105
02:04:01.680 --> 02:04:03.119
<v Speaker 1>He will come and he'll be like, don't eat this.

2106
02:04:03.439 --> 02:04:04.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why exactly.

2107
02:04:04.359 --> 02:04:06.399
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna becaus gone clean.

2108
02:04:06.760 --> 02:04:09.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess so. But so what Momma says is he

2109
02:04:09.479 --> 02:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>will come and he will break the cross and kill

2110
02:04:12.760 --> 02:04:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the pig. I will prove to you that I'm not

2111
02:04:14.560 --> 02:04:15.239
<v Speaker 1>joking about it.

2112
02:04:17.319 --> 02:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I just I guess.

2113
02:04:18.000 --> 02:04:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I just keep wanting giving the benefit of the doubt

2114
02:04:19.760 --> 02:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>and think, well, surely they mean like the swine symbolic

2115
02:04:22.880 --> 02:04:30.640
<v Speaker 3>of evil people. But you're saying, actually just kill Well,

2116
02:04:30.680 --> 02:04:33.119
<v Speaker 3>I guess at the end of the world, those pigs

2117
02:04:33.199 --> 02:04:34.199
<v Speaker 3>do have to get dealt with.

2118
02:04:34.399 --> 02:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, yeah, somebody has to do something about this.

2119
02:04:44.439 --> 02:04:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, there you go.

2120
02:04:45.960 --> 02:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so a lot of messages at the r will

2121
02:04:48.840 --> 02:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not be established until the Son of Mary the sense

2122
02:04:50.880 --> 02:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>amongst you, as a just ruler. He will break the cross,

2123
02:04:54.199 --> 02:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>kill the pigs, and abolished.

2124
02:04:57.560 --> 02:05:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Do they have like explanations of oh, this symbol lies

2125
02:05:01.119 --> 02:05:02.720
<v Speaker 3>the unbelievers or something.

2126
02:05:02.560 --> 02:05:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Or I haven't looked in length into this, but I

2127
02:05:07.359 --> 02:05:09.319
<v Speaker 1>know that it's that It's like the explanation is just

2128
02:05:09.600 --> 02:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's it's actually pigs, and the cross is

2129
02:05:12.600 --> 02:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>actual cross, and he will he will literally break it

2130
02:05:15.920 --> 02:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>to confirm that the cross belief is false. Yeah. Yeah,

2131
02:05:20.159 --> 02:05:24.199
<v Speaker 1>so these are the priorities of Jesus when he comes back.

2132
02:05:24.520 --> 02:05:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess if look, if Jesus does descend and

2133
02:05:28.840 --> 02:05:30.840
<v Speaker 3>break the cross and destroy the kill all the pigs,

2134
02:05:30.920 --> 02:05:32.399
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'll have to be a Muslim at that

2135
02:05:33.560 --> 02:05:34.520
<v Speaker 3>that happens.

2136
02:05:34.279 --> 02:05:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Right, especially if you see him kill the pig. I

2137
02:05:39.560 --> 02:05:45.119
<v Speaker 1>can't believe that was actually correct. So wow, that's messed up.

2138
02:05:45.319 --> 02:05:50.000
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy, all right, I mean, uh, really instructive, instructive

2139
02:05:50.039 --> 02:05:52.520
<v Speaker 3>and insightful talk. I always enjoyed talking to you. It's

2140
02:05:52.560 --> 02:05:54.880
<v Speaker 3>really funny too, by the way, same thank you for

2141
02:05:54.960 --> 02:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>all that that insight there. You always learn from you.

2142
02:05:57.000 --> 02:05:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that.

2143
02:05:58.199 --> 02:06:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. I I really I of the

2144
02:06:00.279 --> 02:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>debate that you had. It was like your opening was

2145
02:06:04.319 --> 02:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>an education for Daniel, and then he came and just

2146
02:06:06.840 --> 02:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>messed it all up with this very primitive approach to

2147
02:06:10.159 --> 02:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the scripture. So mad respect for that as well. And

2148
02:06:15.279 --> 02:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll always be happy to have you here.

2149
02:06:16.880 --> 02:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Jay, absolutely, yeah, thank you. I'm glad to be glad

2150
02:06:19.760 --> 02:06:22.720
<v Speaker 3>to be back on and anytime you want to chat again,

2151
02:06:23.039 --> 02:06:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm down absolutely.

2152
02:06:25.640 --> 02:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks everyone for joining. Have a fantastic day. I'll see

2153
02:06:29.319 --> 02:06:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you soon and stay away from Islam, all right.

2154
02:06:34.479 --> 02:06:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks man,
