Speaker 1: I feel lucky. Are you back?
Speaker 2: And I think everybody did a great job.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm like the internet, you know, all right, I
Speaker 1: know it's right.
Speaker 3: Oh my god, all of these fire experts, why didn't
Speaker 3: you just fly a helicopter.
Speaker 1: Into the ocean?
Speaker 3: And I don't know, becau those of one hundred not wins.
Speaker 1: You want to do that? You want to do that
Speaker 1: at night? You've pluna tip. Now, for the record, Bill
Speaker 1: Burr is one of my favorite comics of all time.
Speaker 1: Absolutely love his sets, particularly his older stuff. Thought in
Speaker 1: the late two thousand's, early teens, I guess, I guess
Speaker 1: it's early teens. I don't know how to describe the
Speaker 1: early part of a century. Anyways, I thought he had
Speaker 1: some banger sets, like phenomenal. Unfortunately, since then Bill has
Speaker 1: got married to a harpy and he has also spent
Speaker 1: a lot of time in Hollywood making movies, and as
Speaker 1: a consequence of that, he has become a tard. Sorry
Speaker 1: just calling it how I see it. It's unfortunate. But
Speaker 1: you couldn't really yeah, like you couldn't fit a piece
Speaker 1: of paper between he and Gavin Newsom's arguments when it
Speaker 1: comes to covering up what was an absolutely catastrophic response
Speaker 1: to the fires in southern California. I'm born and raised there,
Speaker 1: I know the area well. I know what these fires
Speaker 1: are capable of. I am not naive. I'm also not
Speaker 1: a fire expert. But guess what, you don't need to
Speaker 1: be a fire expert scare quotes in order to know
Speaker 1: that twelve thousand homes burning down is not doing a
Speaker 1: great job. Okay, I know, bold claims here coming from
Speaker 1: a rube like me, just a guy sitting on his
Speaker 1: couch thinking to himself. Man, this seems like they could
Speaker 1: be doing more to stop the complete obliteration of the
Speaker 1: Pacific Palaces. But that's the reality. They could have done more,
Speaker 1: And I'm not just guessing at this. It's because I've
Speaker 1: actually followed this closely, because I actually did the research
Speaker 1: on my own. I know. God forbid.
Speaker 4: Why is Gavin so adamant about pushing this narrative that
Speaker 4: they did not run out of water in the Pacific Palisades, Well,
Speaker 4: it's because they did. A firefighter told me that he
Speaker 4: was on a street in the Pacific Palisades and not
Speaker 4: only did he run out of water, but they had
Speaker 4: insufficient hydrants. So he explained to me that the standard
Speaker 4: distance between residential homes is usually less than a thousand feet,
Speaker 4: and in this case, these homes were very large. We're
Speaker 4: talking like fifteen thousand square foot mansions and hydrants that
Speaker 4: were over one thousand feet apart. In addition to that
Speaker 4: running out of water in these hydrants being too far apart.
Speaker 4: These hydrants only had a two and a half inch
Speaker 4: wharf hydrant instead of four inches, which means the diameter
Speaker 4: of the hosts. This means that these firefighters did not
Speaker 4: have sufficient fireflow to extinguish these fires. He told me
Speaker 4: that they were doing the best that they could, and
Speaker 4: they were making good effort, but they could have saved
Speaker 4: more homes by putting up a water curtain, which would
Speaker 4: have allowed them to save the exposure of houses, but
Speaker 4: they couldn't because they ran out of water in the
Speaker 4: Pacific Palisades.
Speaker 1: Another thing that I did my research on my own
Speaker 1: and came to a different conclusion than Bill Burr was
Speaker 1: during the lockdown era. And guess what, I got almost
Speaker 1: everything right and Bill Burr got almost everything wrong. I
Speaker 1: want people to walk down the street with a mask on.
Speaker 2: Let's not stock this jo, you know, let's not start
Speaker 2: this Okay, let's start. I don't want to stop this bullshit.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to sit here with no medical degree,
Speaker 2: listening to you with no medical degree, with an American
Speaker 2: flag behind you, smoking a cigar, acting like we know
Speaker 2: what's up better than the CDC. All I do is
Speaker 2: I listen.
Speaker 1: I watched once every two weeks.
Speaker 2: I'm like, mask or no Mass, Still mask, all right, Mass,
Speaker 2: That's all I give a fuck.
Speaker 1: So maybe Bill ought to be doing a little bit
Speaker 1: of his own research as opposed to just parroting with
Speaker 1: appeals to authority to criminal politicians who pathologically lie to
Speaker 1: us and lead us astray time and time again. I
Speaker 1: know you would think that after his track record of
Speaker 1: the past four years and realizing that he got duped,
Speaker 1: he would be doing that, But apparently he hasn't even
Speaker 1: realized that he's been duped or Because I do think
Speaker 1: that Bilberr is a smart guy, he just knows where
Speaker 1: his bread is buttered, and he has decided to basically
Speaker 1: break his own brain. He has decided to not tell
Speaker 1: the truth anymore. And that's even more sad. I would
Speaker 1: actually prefer to believe that he's an idiot than to
Speaker 1: believe that he's a liar, But at this junction, I'm
Speaker 1: kind of convinced that he's either a liar or he's
Speaker 1: lying to himself, which enables him to continue to not
Speaker 1: see the obvious truth that the state of California, that
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom, the mayor of la all of these politicians
Speaker 1: that have been put into these positions of power by
Speaker 1: people like him that vote Democrat no matter what, are
Speaker 1: ultimately responsible for the destruction of the state of California.
Speaker 1: Now it's not just the fires, it's also the taxation,
Speaker 1: it's also the regulation. It's the fact that the entire
Speaker 1: government of California, from top to bottom, including in my
Speaker 1: hometown of San Diego, has been taken over by woke lunatics,
Speaker 1: people who don't think critically, who don't value freedom whatsoever,
Speaker 1: and just want to virtue signal during times of crisis.
Speaker 1: That's what That's the whole reason I left the state
Speaker 1: of California is because it was brutal. Because when you
Speaker 1: have people that aren't capable of doing a fucking job, well,
Speaker 1: things don't work anymore. I get accused a lot, particularly
Speaker 1: because of my shaved head and my visage, that perhaps
Speaker 1: my opposition to DEI is at its core racist wrong.
Speaker 1: I think that there are many examples of people who
Speaker 1: don't look like me that do jobs far better than
Speaker 1: I can. For instance, the entire NBA, there's like seventy
Speaker 1: percent black guys and they're awesome, and I wouldn't want
Speaker 1: to change it. But you know what's weird for instance,
Speaker 1: and this is a little bit off the beaten path
Speaker 1: for a show like this. I don't usually talk about sports,
Speaker 1: but I am a huge sports fan. The NFL has
Speaker 1: something called the Rooney Rule. Guess what the percentage of
Speaker 1: black players in the NFL is, Well, it's over fifty percent. Again,
Speaker 1: probably far higher. I'm not even gonna look it up
Speaker 1: because we all know it's true. And guess what, none
Speaker 1: of us care because we want the best on the
Speaker 1: field because we want the best games, so we don't
Speaker 1: really care about what people look like. We just want
Speaker 1: the best. Well, the NFL has a Rooney rule where
Speaker 1: they have to interview a minority candidate for every head
Speaker 1: coaching position before they anybody. They have to, and if
Speaker 1: they don't, they get fined. I think they get draft
Speaker 1: picks taken away. The punishment is significant, so they all
Speaker 1: do it. It's usually performative. They bring in some black or
Speaker 1: brown guy and they interview him, and then they go
Speaker 1: with whoever they wanted to in the first place. But
Speaker 1: they did this because they felt as if there wasn't
Speaker 1: enough black head coaches. Imagine if you were to do
Speaker 1: the same thing for players on the field that before
Speaker 1: you decided what your starting lineup was going to be
Speaker 1: in the NBA, or you're starting eleven in the NFL,
Speaker 1: or I guess twenty two, if you're going offense defense,
Speaker 1: that you had to you had to give a sit
Speaker 1: down interview with a white guy. Because by percentage basis,
Speaker 1: white people are more than half the country. Why are
Speaker 1: we not more than half of the NFL? Why are
Speaker 1: we not more than half of the NBA. Well, it's
Speaker 1: because we're not as athletically gifted. I know, a very
Speaker 1: controversial take, but it's true and we all kind of
Speaker 1: accept it, and I'm not even upset about it. Most
Speaker 1: people aren't because they realize that biology matters. But when
Speaker 1: it comes to the coaching position, despite the fact that
Speaker 1: these are the same principles at play, these are multi
Speaker 1: billion dollar companies. Basically each team is that should they
Speaker 1: not have their own prerogative to dictate, to dictate and
Speaker 1: decide who they want to hire as a head coach.
Speaker 1: Of course they should. Are they not going to be
Speaker 1: interested in winning given that winning equals more money? Of
Speaker 1: course they will. So should you not rely on them
Speaker 1: to make the best decision, just as you rely on
Speaker 1: the head coach to decide who's going to be on
Speaker 1: the court or on the field as their starting lineup. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you probably ought to. They have a lot of skin
Speaker 1: in the game, and ultimately it's their company, so you
Speaker 1: shouldn't have any fucking say as to who they hire
Speaker 1: and how they hire them. Sitting aside, you know, coercion
Speaker 1: and sexual assault or something which would be a really
Speaker 1: weird thing to do to an NFL head coach, But
Speaker 1: they don't do that. They don't they have a particular
Speaker 1: rule to make sure that you have a performative interview
Speaker 1: with a black guy or a brown guy. It's absurd,
Speaker 1: way off the beaten path here. The point that I'm
Speaker 1: trying to get to is that because you have a
Speaker 1: focus of something other than excellence, of something other than
Speaker 1: being the best in hiring practices, when it comes to
Speaker 1: every single layer of the government of California. You are
Speaker 1: now surrounded by people who are not capable. That is
Speaker 1: not to say that everybody who is a lesbian, everybody
Speaker 1: who is black or brown or whatever that's in a
Speaker 1: position of power in the California government is not capable
Speaker 1: of doing their job. That is not what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: What I am saying is that as soon as you're
Speaker 1: hiring practices prioritize something other than capability, well then you're
Speaker 1: going to have problems. And guess what, you now have
Speaker 1: problems to the tune of over twenty thousand structures that
Speaker 1: have been incinerated. That's what happened. Now. Again, this is
Speaker 1: not racial because a lot of the people that are
Speaker 1: responsible were white, because their brains are broken, because they're liberals.
Speaker 1: It's the truth. Prioritizing anything other than excellence, anything other
Speaker 1: than capability, and that is what California has done for decades,
Speaker 1: and you are now bearing the fruit of that fateful,
Speaker 1: wrongheaded decision, and as a consequence, people are dead. Now.
Speaker 1: That seems like a bold claim, but it's really not.
Speaker 1: When you talk about vital services like firefighting, like firefighting
Speaker 1: is really important. My brother happens to be a firefighter
Speaker 1: in northern California. Fortunately he was not called into the
Speaker 1: inferno in southern California. They did send a strike team
Speaker 1: from his department down there, he was not on it.
Speaker 1: I was very nervous because that fire was completely out
Speaker 1: of control, but he didn't have to go. But firefighting
Speaker 1: is super important obviously when you have and just to
Speaker 1: you know, make Bill Burr's defense a little bit more valid,
Speaker 1: It's very hard to put out a fire during the
Speaker 1: Santa Anas. The winds during a Santa Ana are extraordinary.
Speaker 1: We're talking sometimes over one hundred miles per hour. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you want to put out a fire at one
Speaker 1: hundred mile per hour wins, good fucking luck. It ain't happening.
Speaker 1: So I'm not saying that. What I'm saying is because
Speaker 1: they weren't prioritizing excellence, they didn't have the precautions put
Speaker 1: in place to prevent a fire of this nature, given
Speaker 1: that Santa Anna's are a well, not a constant, but
Speaker 1: a consistent factor that no one's surprised by when they
Speaker 1: happen again, I'll reiterate it spent over thirty years there
Speaker 1: No one's prize that the winds picked up in southern California.
Speaker 1: It happens every year, it seemed like when I was
Speaker 1: growing up, So not a surprise. So what do you
Speaker 1: do given the knowledge that you're going to have extraordinary
Speaker 1: winds and you're surrounded and you're basically in a desert
Speaker 1: that has a lot of trees. Somehow you know that
Speaker 1: the winds come, The winds are coming, You know it's coming.
Speaker 1: What are you gonna do? Well, a rational response would be, well,
Speaker 1: we're gonna prepare. We're gonna make sure that our water
Speaker 1: reservoirs are filled. Oh, by the way, they had record
Speaker 1: rainfall for the past two years, and they didn't save
Speaker 1: most of it because they weren't focused on hiring the best.
Speaker 1: Because the best would have been focused on keeping that
Speaker 1: fucking water in a reservoir, wouldn't they of course they would,
Speaker 1: But that's not what you were focused on, So you
Speaker 1: didn't get that. What else? What else might you do?
Speaker 1: I know none of us are fire experts here, so
Speaker 1: this is really fucking hard to figure out. But I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what you would have done. You would have
Speaker 1: done controlled burns. You would have used there's other employees
Speaker 1: to go out and clean the force of deadfall of
Speaker 1: the leaves and fallen trees, anything that was highly flammable. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know, crazy. You would have done fire breaks where
Speaker 1: you actually burn out sections so that you don't have
Speaker 1: a fire that's able to hop over to a larger,
Speaker 1: you know, populated area. I'm not a fire expert. These
Speaker 1: are just rational, logical things that you might do. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of other ideas I could come up with.
Speaker 1: Some of them probably wouldn't be as good as those,
Speaker 1: but I'm just saying we're spitballing here. Lots of obvious
Speaker 1: things you would have done. They didn't do them. They
Speaker 1: didn't do them, not necessarily because they hate the people there.
Speaker 1: I don't think they do. I think that their ideology
Speaker 1: is sick, that they've lost focus of what really matters,
Speaker 1: which in government is functioning government that you're going to
Speaker 1: actually prevent catastrophes. But if your focus is on, well,
Speaker 1: how many the lesbians are working in the fire department,
Speaker 1: well that's not exactly going to prevent fires, now, is it.
Speaker 1: Now that's not Again, just to reiterate, not to say
Speaker 1: that lesbians can't be great firefighters. I'm sure if you are,
Speaker 1: But on the whole, ninety five percent of the fire force,
Speaker 1: if that's what it's called. Fire department were men, even
Speaker 1: with all of their focus on wokeness.
Speaker 5: You want to see somebody that responds to your house,
Speaker 5: your emergency, whether it's a medical call or a fire call,
Speaker 5: that looks like you. It gives that person a little
Speaker 5: bit more ease knowing that somebody might understand their situation better.
Speaker 5: Is she strong enough to do this? Or you couldn't
Speaker 5: carry my husband out of a fire, which my response
Speaker 5: is he got himself from the wrong place if I
Speaker 5: have to carry them out of a fire.
Speaker 1: But everybody in a position of power seemed to be
Speaker 1: a lesbian. It's kind of weird right now. Maybe they
Speaker 1: were the best for the job, but maybe they weren't.
Speaker 1: And for the record, a lot of the people on
Speaker 1: the fire department, including the chief, the lesbian lady, was
Speaker 1: calling out the woke insanity of the mayor Karen Bass
Speaker 1: of la saying, look, we're getting budget cuts. I'm going
Speaker 1: to her and I'm telling her we can't have budget cuts.
Speaker 1: We actually need more We need more resources, We need
Speaker 1: more firefighters because inevitably a fire is going to hit
Speaker 1: and we haven't done the preparation necessary and we don't
Speaker 1: have the forces necessary to stop this thing. We need more,
Speaker 1: they got less. Okay, if we.
Speaker 6: Cut one position, if we close one station, if we
Speaker 6: close one resource, the residents of Los Angeles are going
Speaker 6: to pay the ultimate sacrifice and someone will die.
Speaker 7: Just last month, fire personnel packed in LA Fire Commission meeting,
Speaker 7: sagging the city to rethink the budget.
Speaker 8: These cuts came in exactly the wrong time, with calls
Speaker 8: for services at an all time high, our firefighters at
Speaker 8: their breaking point.
Speaker 9: We are straining our departments resources beyond the brink and
Speaker 9: we cannot continue on this path.
Speaker 1: Look, in government agencies, they're always going to ask for more.
Speaker 1: So it's very hard to know when you're being lied
Speaker 1: to because they all want more resources because they get
Speaker 1: more pay and more power. So you don't really know.
Speaker 1: But let me tell you, when it comes to Southern
Speaker 1: California and firefighting, you kind of want to air on
Speaker 1: the side of cast, you know, safety, Like, okay, you
Speaker 1: need a little bit more. Okay, we're going to give
Speaker 1: you little bit more. You probably don't want to cut
Speaker 1: that and then focus on other, you know, equity programs.
Speaker 1: You probably want to make sure that you have that handled,
Speaker 1: particularly given that the real estate market in southern California
Speaker 1: is one of the most expensive in the world. Yeah,
Speaker 1: super super expensive. The houses that were lost mint most
Speaker 1: of them were million plus dollar homes, so probably worth protecting.
Speaker 1: Oh might I add these are also the most productive
Speaker 1: contributive people in society, the people that pay the most taxes.
Speaker 1: You probably want to look after them because if you don't,
Speaker 1: they might leave the state, in which case your revenue drops.
Speaker 1: So like anyone with a longer term horizon of analysis
Speaker 1: on this would have been like, Yeah, let's make sure
Speaker 1: we get this right. Karen mess she was actually in
Speaker 1: Africa when the fire broke out, sitting in for some
Speaker 1: presidential ceremony or some nonsense.
Speaker 8: Do you owe citizens and apology for being absent while
Speaker 8: their homes were burning? Do you regret coming the fire
Speaker 8: department budget by millions of dollars?
Speaker 2: Madam Mayor?
Speaker 8: Have you nothing to say today? Have you absolutely nothing
Speaker 8: to say to the citizens today? Alon Mosk says that
Speaker 8: you're utterly incompetent. Are you considering your position, Madam Mayor?
Speaker 8: Have you absolutely nothing to say to the citizens today?
Speaker 8: Here dealing with.
Speaker 1: This disaster and her city was on fire. Why would
Speaker 1: the of La ever be invited, much less attend some
Speaker 1: ceremony in Africa. It's fucking weird. I'm sorry it is,
Speaker 1: and I would I would feel the same if it
Speaker 1: was the mayor of La that was going to Mexico
Speaker 1: or Canada or anywhere in Europe. What the fuck are
Speaker 1: you doing. You're the mayor of one of the biggest,
Speaker 1: if not the biggest city in the country. Focus, okay,
Speaker 1: but instead you knew the Santatas were coming. You hop
Speaker 1: a flight to go to some ceremony in Africa. If
Speaker 1: that's not worth calling out, if you think it's unfair,
Speaker 1: I think it's unfair that twelve thousand plus homes have
Speaker 1: burnt down. I think that's actually the real injustice here.
Speaker 1: I'm not so much interested in your feelings at this moment.
Speaker 1: Getting back to Bill Burr.
Speaker 3: How are you This was definitely mismanaged. That's a big
Speaker 3: word we're hearing now, mismanaged like some idiot on the
Speaker 3: internet knows how to manage the worst fire in La
Speaker 3: sitting there in his underwear.
Speaker 8: You know what.
Speaker 3: Looking at the footage on the internet, I have determined
Speaker 3: that this here was mismanaged.
Speaker 1: You know about helicopters, because I remember, And it's interesting
Speaker 1: now thinking about it, because you said I know about.
Speaker 2: The one that I fly. Other than that, I don't
Speaker 2: know anything about it, you know, so I throw on
Speaker 2: the internet, you know everything.
Speaker 1: There's this disturbing trend with Bill where he he's constantly
Speaker 1: appealing to authority, but then when Jimmy Kimmel points out that, oh,
Speaker 1: you actually have some authority in this arena. You fly
Speaker 1: a helicopter, so you can actually speak to this, he goes,
Speaker 1: I don't know if I cat anything. I know a
Speaker 1: little bit about the helicopter I fly on the regular,
Speaker 1: but I don't know anything about helicopters. It's like, what
Speaker 1: are you doing? And I think what it is is
Speaker 1: that it's just pure past the buck that you don't
Speaker 1: want to ever be in a position of actually knowing
Speaker 1: the truth. That it's much easier to just plead obliviousness
Speaker 1: and then point at everybody else and say, oh, all
Speaker 1: of these people that see to have opinions that don't
Speaker 1: jive with the narrative of the state of California, Gavin
Speaker 1: Newsom in particular, Well, they're just conspiracy theorist idiots with
Speaker 1: no authority to talk on this subject whatsoever. Oh no,
Speaker 1: by the way, neither am I. But I can still
Speaker 1: critique them because I don't know anything. And because I
Speaker 1: don't know anything, everybody else must not know anything. Well,
Speaker 1: that's not how the world works, Bill, Just because you're
Speaker 1: a fucking idiot doesn't mean that everybody else is. And
Speaker 1: when you talk to us like that, given that you're
Speaker 1: mister blue collar, mister oh, I'm just standing up for
Speaker 1: the little guy against the insanity of the world. And
Speaker 1: then you shoot on the little guy. Good luck, dude.
Speaker 1: I hope that the next Netflix contract is seven figures,
Speaker 1: because I don't think people are going to be lining
Speaker 1: up around the block to go see your shitty movies.
Speaker 1: And this is coming from a fan. I am a fan,
Speaker 1: but you're wrong here.
Speaker 3: I love how all the chatter out there is about
Speaker 3: bands of illegal immigrants and homeless people, fires like fires
Speaker 3: every day they're living outside cold. And this theory that
Speaker 3: some homeless guy without a car went from Al Fadeno
Speaker 3: all the way to the Pacific Palisades and then we
Speaker 3: have a hanglider.
Speaker 1: Now, this, ladies and gentlemen, is a perfect encapsulation or
Speaker 1: a perfect example of the woke mind virus. He goes
Speaker 1: people are saying that it's the homeless that are lighting fires. Look,
Speaker 1: the homeless light fires every day. Yeah, that's not normal. Bill.
Speaker 1: It may be normal for you because you've continued to
Speaker 1: vote for these evil, corrupt politicians, but for the rest
Speaker 1: of the country, that's actually extraordinarily unusual that you have
Speaker 1: so many homeless people that are just randomly lighting fires
Speaker 1: that an inferno could break out at any second and
Speaker 1: there's nothing we can do to stop it. And if
Speaker 1: it happens as a consequence of one of these random
Speaker 1: homeless people lighting a fire and then destroying twelve thousand homes,
Speaker 1: that you just go, oh, what are you gonna do.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of homeless people, they're cold. What do
Speaker 1: you want them to free?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: I want them to not fucking be there, Bill, I
Speaker 1: don't want there to be one hundred thousand homeless people
Speaker 1: in the city of La which there are, excuse me,
Speaker 1: the county. One hundred thousand human beings live on the
Speaker 1: streets of Los Angeles County. Think about what that means.
Speaker 1: That is a city or a county that is so
Speaker 1: poorly ran, in a state that is so poorly ran
Speaker 1: that anybody who's thinking rationally even from a place of
Speaker 1: pure sympathy for the homeless, would say, holy shit, what
Speaker 1: are we gonna do? This is not sustainable. I don't
Speaker 1: want to live like this. I don't want them to
Speaker 1: live like that. We've got to figure this the fuck out.
Speaker 1: But no, that's not what people like Bill Bird do.
Speaker 1: That's not what people like Jimmy Kimmel does. They don't.
Speaker 1: They just take it as a given because, guess what,
Speaker 1: they're better than us. I know, it's weird, right. They
Speaker 1: don't do anything to actually address problems. They vote for
Speaker 1: politicians that created the problems. They continue to vote for
Speaker 1: politicians that will keep those problems alive. And yet they
Speaker 1: have this air of superiority that stinks to high hell
Speaker 1: and you can't get away from it. It's sincere, which
Speaker 1: is the weirdest part of it that it's not an act.
Speaker 1: They genuinely think that they're better than the people that
Speaker 1: are at home going. Hey, I'm seeing these videos of
Speaker 1: homeless people lighting fires in Los Angeles, and then I'm
Speaker 1: seeing this footage of tens of thousands of houses on fire,
Speaker 1: and I'm putting two to two together, and I'm saying,
Speaker 1: I think that something should have been done here and
Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel and Bill Berg go, what do you hate
Speaker 1: the homeless? Talk about missing the fucking point. No, I
Speaker 1: don't hate the homeless, They're human beings. I feel bad
Speaker 1: for them. But guess what My priority is my family
Speaker 1: and my property. And then somewhere down the priority list
Speaker 1: are the homeless people. Well, I don't really know, but
Speaker 1: the top priority is my family. And guess what when
Speaker 1: you ignore these homeless people, which I have sympathy for,
Speaker 1: you create a dynamic by which there might be an
Speaker 1: inferno which burns my family alive. And I take this
Speaker 1: personally because, as you know, I still have a lot
Speaker 1: of family in southern California. So it breaks my heart
Speaker 1: to witness this, and it infuriates me that people like
Speaker 1: Bill Burr continue to ignore reality to the detriment of
Speaker 1: genuine human suffering, and that includes the homeless. It is
Speaker 1: not to their benefit to continue to provide just enough
Speaker 1: aid to keep them basically drugged up and on the streets.
Speaker 1: Is that a sustainable path? Of course not. It's a catastrophe.
Speaker 1: Anybody that looks at any major city in the rest
Speaker 1: of the world, you would say, well, there's something deeply
Speaker 1: wrong with that country. If Shanghai had a quarter million
Speaker 1: or one hundred thousand homeless people, you'd be like, what
Speaker 1: the fuck is wrong with China? But they don't the CCP.
Speaker 1: They seem to manage their shit better than we do.
Speaker 1: Is that just because they're superior? Well, no, I don't
Speaker 1: think it is. But if you're going to just allow
Speaker 1: this type of situation to languish and exacerbate and become worse,
Speaker 1: you're gonna have a lot of people that start to
Speaker 1: look at other countries and other government models and say, well,
Speaker 1: that must be better. I'm sure they say it's communism,
Speaker 1: but it must be better than this, not realizing that
Speaker 1: they live under socialism right now. And that's the reason
Speaker 1: everything's falling apart and everyone's brain is broken, so that
Speaker 1: no one's actually really thinking about how do we remedy this?
Speaker 1: Because everyone's lying, and Bill's lying, and Jimmy's lying, and
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom's lying, and Karen bass is lying, and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's lying, and the White House Press Secretary's lying, and
Speaker 1: most of the people that pay attention to politics or line,
Speaker 1: even the conservatives, they don't tell you the truth either.
Speaker 1: They don't tell you that they're they get the same
Speaker 1: donor capital that allows them to hide and ignore these problems.
Speaker 1: We need actual honesty if we're going to address these issues.
Speaker 1: And apparently Bill Burr, a man who made his name
Speaker 1: as an elite comic by telling uncomfortable truths, has abandoned
Speaker 1: that role for society. And that's sad. And I don't
Speaker 1: say this with any glee because I genuinely loved his shit.
Speaker 1: I loved his comedy. But I promise you, with his worldview,
Speaker 1: he will not be able to maintain the same great
Speaker 1: comedic endeavors that he once did, because, at its core,
Speaker 1: comedy requires honesty with yourself and with your audience, and
Speaker 1: he doesn't have it anymore. You wanted your Hollywood deals,
Speaker 1: you wanted your movie deals, you wanted your Netflix deals.
Speaker 1: You got them. I hope it was worth it.
Speaker 3: And they're talking about looting, but CNN and Fox News
Speaker 3: are not going to bring up the insurance companies that
Speaker 3: are just going to keep everybody's premiums and still get
Speaker 3: themselves a bonus free Luigi, I love how they acted.
Speaker 1: Surprise, Why did that happen? I have no idea, wrote
Speaker 1: on the bullets. Why it happened. Oh we're back to Luigi. Okay, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I never left Luigi. And this is when I truly
Speaker 1: knew that he had lost his mind, because if you're
Speaker 1: actually paying attention to what's happened in the state of California,
Speaker 1: then you would know that the state of California made
Speaker 1: it illegal for the insurance companies to actually charge what
Speaker 1: was necessary to offset the risk of covering these homes
Speaker 1: in these incredibly fire prone areas with incredibly expensive real
Speaker 1: estate and replacement costs. So many of these insurance companies,
Speaker 1: given that they now had caps on what they were
Speaker 1: allowed to charge, decided to leave the state, including State Farm,
Speaker 1: and they notify their customers, we can't make a profit here.
Speaker 1: We're leaving. You're on your own. And then California stepped
Speaker 1: in with basically a program that allowed for them to
Speaker 1: pay for insurance through the state, which means the taxpayers
Speaker 1: on the hook. So people, let me say, imbeciles like
Speaker 1: Bill Burr, want to blame the insurance companies. And I'm
Speaker 1: not fond of insurance companies. They suck by and large,
Speaker 1: but they're also a business, and I understand business. And
Speaker 1: if you can't make a profit, and you're facing an
Speaker 1: inferno of twelve thousand homes because you know that the
Speaker 1: state government has ran poorly and they've now capped the
Speaker 1: premiums that you're allowed to charge your customers. Well, what
Speaker 1: fucking choice do you have but to cancel those contracts
Speaker 1: and get the fuck out of there, just like I
Speaker 1: did a businessman who saw a situation that was untenable
Speaker 1: and left. Do I blame them for leaving? No, I
Speaker 1: don't do. I blame the state of California for putting
Speaker 1: a cap on what they were allowed to charge that
Speaker 1: could actually enable them to stay in business while providing
Speaker 1: insurance protection to the people that lived in southern California. Yes,
Speaker 1: I do. That's on them. But Bill, on the other hand,
Speaker 1: points the finger at the insurance companies, probably oblivious to
Speaker 1: the fact that Gavin Newsom even had that rule in place,
Speaker 1: and probably in favor of it if he was aware
Speaker 1: that that rule existed, and he says, long live Luigi Mangioni,
Speaker 1: a guy who brutally assassinated a healthcare CEO and a father.
Speaker 1: I'm my dad. You see how sick that worldview is.
Speaker 1: I hope you do again. Not fond of insurance companies.
Speaker 1: But if you think that executing CEOs of insurance companies
Speaker 1: is how you make a more functional society, you have thoroughly,
Speaker 1: thoroughly imbibed communist propaganda. Health insurance is confusing, expensive and frustrating,
Speaker 1: and claim denials are becoming more and more common. The
Speaker 1: headache of health insurance is exactly why crowdhealth was cre
Speaker 1: It's not health insurance. It's a better way to pay
Speaker 1: for healthcare through crowdfunding. So stop sending money to the
Speaker 1: big insurance companies who profit off of not paying your
Speaker 1: bills and check out crowdhealth. Health insurance is the ban
Speaker 1: of my existence. I don't enjoy dealing with it, but
Speaker 1: we all get sick from time to time. You break
Speaker 1: a break an arm, whatever things happen. This is a
Speaker 1: better way to get the care you need. For one
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy five dollars for an individual or five
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy five dollars for a family of four
Speaker 1: or more, you'll get access to a community of people
Speaker 1: who are willing to help out in the event of
Speaker 1: an emergency. You'll get access to tell medicine visits, discount
Speaker 1: and prescriptions, and so much more. Without doctor's networks getting
Speaker 1: in the way, and of course you'll join the crowd
Speaker 1: group of members just like you who want to help
Speaker 1: pay for each other's unexpected medical events. Let crowdhealth help
Speaker 1: with your healthcare needs. Get start us today for just
Speaker 1: nine to nine dollars per month for your first three
Speaker 1: months by using code lockdown at join crowdhealth dot com.
Speaker 1: Crowdhealth is not insurance. Learn more at joincrowdhealth dot com.
Speaker 1: That's join crowdhealth dot com code lockdown. And Bill Burr,
Speaker 1: despite being a multi millionaire based off of the capitalist
Speaker 1: model that we live under, to some extent, hates it
Speaker 1: and he wants to point the blame at anybody other
Speaker 1: than himself and the politicians that he's supported. But that's
Speaker 1: who deserves the blame. And that's the truth. And that's
Speaker 1: the reason that my audience continues to grow, because that's
Speaker 1: my only duty to you, to just tell the truth.
Speaker 1: There it is.
Speaker 7: Twenty eighteen, even before I was governor of California, tried
Speaker 7: to withhold money down in Orange County until apparently a
Speaker 7: staff member, and this has been well reported. Staff members
Speaker 7: said there were a lot of Trump supporters that he
Speaker 7: decided to change his mind and so the rhetoric is very,
Speaker 7: very familiar, and it's increasingly acute, and obviously we all
Speaker 7: have a reason to be concerned about it.
Speaker 1: What's the disinformation you were referring to in the letter
Speaker 1: and what is the correct information?
Speaker 7: Well, I mean, look what the President elect was saying
Speaker 7: about State Water Project and the Delta smelt somehow being
Speaker 7: culpable of, you know, somehow leading to some of the
Speaker 7: challenges that we face down here. Was it's words, It's
Speaker 7: a salad. It's a form and substance of fog. It's
Speaker 7: made up, it's delusional, and it's a consistent mantra from
Speaker 7: Trump going back years and years and years, and it's
Speaker 7: reinforced over and over and over within the right wing,
Speaker 7: and so it's become gospel, and it's so profoundly ignorant,
Speaker 7: and yet he absolutely believes it. It's not an ignorance
Speaker 7: on his part. It's such it's sort of an indelible
Speaker 7: misinformation that he sort of manifested a falsehood, and he
Speaker 7: decided to bring it into this crisis in a profoundly
Speaker 7: demeaning and demand in damaging ways.
Speaker 1: Given Gvin Newsom's obvious and catastrophic failures what does he do?
Speaker 1: Does he reflect, does he taken of the blame on
Speaker 1: his shoulders, say, we're going to get this right. We're
Speaker 1: going to fix whatever whatever allowed for this fire to happen,
Speaker 1: We're going to get it right moving forward. And I
Speaker 1: apologize or you know, does he have enough honor to resign?
Speaker 1: Certainly not. What does he do?
Speaker 7: Well?
Speaker 1: He goes after Donald Trump from missing disinformation and he
Speaker 1: goes to the White House and he asks for them
Speaker 1: to increase censorship to prevent this type of miss in disinformation.
Speaker 10: I ask you, We've got to deal with this misinformation.
Speaker 10: There were hurricane force wins of miss and disinformation lives.
Speaker 10: People want to divide this country and we're gonna have
Speaker 10: to address that as well. And it breaks my heart
Speaker 10: as people are suffering and struggling, that we're up against
Speaker 10: those hurricane force forces as well. And that's just a
Speaker 10: point of personal privilege that I share that with you,
Speaker 10: because it infects real people that are out there. People
Speaker 10: I meet every single day, people the mayor has been
Speaker 10: meeting with, and they're having conversations that are not the
Speaker 10: typical conversations you'd have at this time, and you wonder
Speaker 10: where this stuff comes from and it's very damaging as well,
Speaker 10: but we're here to get the job done.
Speaker 1: When in reality, much of what he's really concerned with
Speaker 1: is the truth. That the truth will be politically damning
Speaker 1: for him, or at least it ought to be, but
Speaker 1: it probably won't because for those that aren't familiar, Gavin
Speaker 1: Newsom was actually recalled back in twenty twenty Arena maybe
Speaker 1: it was twenty one, and then during the recall election
Speaker 1: he won by seventy percent or not by seventy he
Speaker 1: got seventy percent of the vote or close to that. So, Yeah,
Speaker 1: the people of California are fucking idiots and there's nothing
Speaker 1: I can do to help them at this point. Not
Speaker 1: all of them, obviously, thirty thirty percent or so are awesome,
Speaker 1: but seventy percent who would continue to vote for Gavin
Speaker 1: Newsom after he locked down the state for no fucking reason. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you can't really help those people, now, can you. Now
Speaker 1: there's this big controversy over whether or not Donald Trump
Speaker 1: will withhold federal funds and aid from the state of California. Well,
Speaker 1: before you go, oh, how dare he? You might want
Speaker 1: to ask yourself, what do you do with an addict?
Speaker 1: Do you give an addict more money so that they
Speaker 1: can go get their next fix, or do you cut
Speaker 1: them off? I know this sounds harsh. I don't care.
Speaker 1: Sometimes you need tough love. And I love the state
Speaker 1: of California. I know a libertarian saying he loves the state.
Speaker 1: How dare I? But I do. I love the state
Speaker 1: of California. I spent thirty five years there. It's fucking beautiful.
Speaker 1: I love the people. I love it all. I just
Speaker 1: don't love the government. When Gavin Newsom should have been
Speaker 1: preparing for this next inevitable fire, what was he doing, well,
Speaker 1: he was actually trump proofing the state of California, deploying
Speaker 1: tens of millions of dollars to dry and be prepared
Speaker 1: with attorneys and whatever lawfare set up to defend against
Speaker 1: incursions from federal power from Donald Trump.
Speaker 11: As it relates to the special session, that's a special
Speaker 11: session to focus on litigation operation. As it relates to
Speaker 11: the reality, it's an It's not a theoretical exercise. We
Speaker 11: know what happened the last time Donald Trumpe as president.
Speaker 11: He vanalized our progress, He vandalized our programs, He broke
Speaker 11: the law. Courts adjudicated that it's not an assertion. He
Speaker 11: did certain things that were unwound at the agency level
Speaker 11: that attacked this state, and so we are preparing for that,
Speaker 11: and that was the whole point, is the whole point
Speaker 11: of the special session. We're not going to be caught
Speaker 11: flat footed, and we want to be prepared as early
Speaker 11: as January twentieth, and that's why the special session is important.
Speaker 11: We also have a brand new legislature coming in a
Speaker 11: lot of new people, and this will be an opportunity
Speaker 11: to engage and convene talk about the previous one hundred
Speaker 11: and twenty two lawsuits. Again, we reacted to the assault.
Speaker 11: Wasn't a proactive litigation strategy, it was a reactive strategy.
Speaker 11: I hope there's not one lawsuit with Trump administration. As
Speaker 11: I said, open hand, not a closed fist. No governor
Speaker 11: in California work more closely no governor in the country.
Speaker 11: I would argue Democrat work more closely democratic governor with
Speaker 11: Donald Trump than I did during COVID.
Speaker 1: And now, as soon as the crisis strikes, he turns around,
Speaker 1: he puts his hand out and he says, give me
Speaker 1: all of the money to rebuild the entire destroyed state.
Speaker 1: Which my own malfeasance enabled. Why should you do that?
Speaker 1: Why should everybody in the United States of America be
Speaker 1: on the hook for the mismanagement of the state of
Speaker 1: California and the people of California that voted for the mismanagement.
Speaker 1: Why should I in Florida be held liable financially for
Speaker 1: their own fuck ups. Well the answer is obviously we shouldn't.
Speaker 1: None of us should. And maybe you could say, oh,
Speaker 1: this isn't sympathetic to the thirty percent of the people
Speaker 1: that didn't vote for Gavenus from the state of California. Well, look,
Speaker 1: I was in that thirty percent, and I got the
Speaker 1: fuck out because that was the responsible thing to do.
Speaker 1: So now you've got to deal with it. You're in
Speaker 1: a state that's so mismanaged that you couldn't even get
Speaker 1: fucking fire insurance on your home and then everything burns down.
Speaker 1: You still didn't leave after that, and now I have
Speaker 1: to pay for it. Seem fair? I'd say, no, say
Speaker 1: it seems totally unfair. So you need to fucking show
Speaker 1: some tough love to the state of California. They need
Speaker 1: to figure their own shit out. You do not want
Speaker 1: to enable this government to persist, and if the federal
Speaker 1: government intervenes and offers them one hundred billion dollars or
Speaker 1: whatever it costs to fix everything there, that's not good.
Speaker 1: They should suffer. Sometimes you have to suffer the consequences
Speaker 1: of your bad ideas, because if you don't, you don't
Speaker 1: ever learn the lessons that you ought to, because your
Speaker 1: ideas suck because a quarter of your state burnt down
Speaker 1: and you're still saying everything's fine. In fact, it's just
Speaker 1: missing disinformation. We need more censorship, and we need more
Speaker 1: federal funds to remedy everything that is apparently fine. Somehow,
Speaker 1: they need to fucking figure it out. I want to
Speaker 1: be able to go back to my state at some
Speaker 1: point and not fear for my life when I visit family.
Speaker 1: I also want my family, who lives there every single day,
Speaker 1: to not be in danger. And as long as people
Speaker 1: like Gavin Ussom and Karen Bass and the entire DEI
Speaker 1: Army are in positions of power, the people of California
Speaker 1: are not and will not be safe. So you need
Speaker 1: to show tough love, and if that means that you
Speaker 1: have to put stringent requirements on how those funds are used,
Speaker 1: you have to do that because guess what, a scumbag
Speaker 1: like Gavenussom will take federal fucking funds and he will
Speaker 1: use that to further trump proof the state to keep
Speaker 1: any sort of reform from happening, reforms that are desperately
Speaker 1: needed lest this state completely implode upon itself. So yeah,
Speaker 1: I am fine what they're being strings attached when it
Speaker 1: comes to federal aid going to the state of California.
Speaker 1: Given that they created this entire dynamic, they ought to
Speaker 1: own it. I don't even support them getting federal funds,
Speaker 1: but if they're going to get them, they better come
Speaker 1: with harsh, harsh strings attached. Like everybody that's found liable
Speaker 1: or responsible for this fire and these twelve thousand homes
Speaker 1: and twenty plus thousand structures that burnt down, Ohn, might
Speaker 1: I add a dozen plus lives lost incinerated that you're
Speaker 1: actually held responsible, you ought to be charged criminally, you
Speaker 1: won't be, but at minimum, you ought to be forced
Speaker 1: to resign at minimum, And until that happens, don't expect
Speaker 1: me to demonstrate much sympathy, and don't expect me to
Speaker 1: make light of it the way Bill Burr attempted to. Terribly.
Speaker 1: It's a catastrophe. It's sad. I don't say any of
Speaker 1: this with callous even though I'm a bit callous because
Speaker 1: of my experiences living there. I love that state and
Speaker 1: I love the people there. So this is not about hate.
Speaker 1: This is about love, and you need some tough love, California.
Speaker 9: I'm talking that white hot. I need to sink my
Speaker 9: teeth into something in scream kind of breaks, because what
Speaker 9: do you mean that it never had to be this
Speaker 9: hard for us? Like, what do you mean in other
Speaker 9: countries they don't have this and twenty percent of their
Speaker 9: paycheck on groceries. What do you mean in other countries
Speaker 9: everyone can own home because they're not paying two thousand
Speaker 9: dollars a month in rent, or that their mortgages aren't
Speaker 9: like their entire paycheck. What do you mean that people
Speaker 9: in China work one job and they don't even work
Speaker 9: forty hours and they can easily afford their life. And
Speaker 9: then I'm over here working six hours a week just
Speaker 9: meet as a single payer to like barely make ends meet,
Speaker 9: and I'm penny pinching every single second, and like there's
Speaker 9: so much life that my kidness is out on and
Speaker 9: that I miss out on because of money, and like
Speaker 9: work and no social support net. And you mean to
Speaker 9: tell me that it didn't have to be like this.
Speaker 9: They keep us in these chains on purpose, and it
Speaker 9: never had to be like this.
Speaker 1: So the TikTok ban is back. In three days, allegedly,
Speaker 1: TikTok the app will be removed from all devices in
Speaker 1: the United States of America. I know crisis. I've never
Speaker 1: been well. I think I was on TikTok for like
Speaker 1: a few weeks when it first came out. Then I
Speaker 1: got off of it because I thought it was too
Speaker 1: addictive and kind of waste my time just being honest,
Speaker 1: very entertaining videos, but like, way too addictive. The ago
Speaker 1: is phenomenal. I got off there. So the reason I
Speaker 1: say is I don't have a invested interest in this
Speaker 1: decision other than the fact that I have a vested
Speaker 1: interest in the trajectory of our country and how we
Speaker 1: deal with property rights. And that's really what I want
Speaker 1: to talk about, is that, Well, first off, let's just
Speaker 1: point out the unbelievable streisand effect of what's happening right now. So,
Speaker 1: for those that aren't familiar, there's this app. It's in Mandarin.
Speaker 1: I don't know how to pronounce the actual name of
Speaker 1: it in Mandarin, but it's called Red Note in America
Speaker 1: or in English, and it is now the number one
Speaker 1: app in the world in about forty eight hours. Since
Speaker 1: this band basically seemed as if it was officially going
Speaker 1: to happen, millions and millions of people have who are
Speaker 1: hardcore TikTok fans are now scrambling to get on an actual,
Speaker 1: an actual app that does basically the same thing as TikTok,
Speaker 1: but it's a Chinese company. Oops Streisan like a motherfucker.
Speaker 1: And on top of that, now all of these Americans
Speaker 1: are seeing firsthand how Chinese people live, and what they're
Speaker 1: finding is that their lives are a lot easier than
Speaker 1: our own. Double oops, like oops, he really fucked up
Speaker 1: this time. If you own gold, you've probably been happy
Speaker 1: to see prices hitting new all time high this year.
Speaker 1: But your gold can do more than just sit there
Speaker 1: waiting for the price to go up. It can generate
Speaker 1: passive income for you. I know, I didn't know about
Speaker 1: this either. With monetary medals, you can earn up to
Speaker 1: five percent interest on your gold and silver paid in
Speaker 1: more ounces of metal, and accredited investors can even achieve
Speaker 1: double digit returns in their bond offerings. All interest payments
Speaker 1: are made in ounces of gold and silver stored in
Speaker 1: your account free of charge. Whether your medal is gathering
Speaker 1: dust at home or costing you annual storage fees. It's
Speaker 1: time to stop paying to own gold and start getting
Speaker 1: paid to own it and put it to work with
Speaker 1: monetary medals. Check out Monetary dash Metals dot com slash
Speaker 1: lockdown to learn more about how you can start growing
Speaker 1: your wealth. Announces today again, that's Monetary dash Metals dot
Speaker 1: com slash lockdown. I told you that prohibition ultimately doesn't work,
Speaker 1: that people are going to find a way that so
Speaker 1: many people have gotten rich using TikTok, either as creators
Speaker 1: or advertisers or whatever, that they're going to find some
Speaker 1: sort of backup for this thing. If you bann it,
Speaker 1: I assumed that it would have been an American company
Speaker 1: that made the windfall. Turns out not. Turns out that
Speaker 1: the American company which was TikTok. I might add, as
Speaker 1: you know, they had byte Dance so with affiliation to
Speaker 1: the CCP. But now you don't even have the American
Speaker 1: entity intermediary. It's just straight China. So if you were
Speaker 1: concerned about TikTok's propaganda against the American people, Well, strap
Speaker 1: the fuck in because it's about to get worse. Anyways.
Speaker 1: The reason I say I told you so is that
Speaker 1: this is the libertarian argument against prohibition, that when you
Speaker 1: fight market demands, guess what, the consumer finds another way
Speaker 1: around it. And they're doing so in rapid breakneck pace.
Speaker 1: Didn't really expect that, didn't know that it could happen
Speaker 1: that quickly, but it is, and now you've got a
Speaker 1: real problem on your hands. My deep concern is that
Speaker 1: watching people like that, and I have real sympathy for people,
Speaker 1: especially young people who are struggling financially. I think it's
Speaker 1: heartbreaking and I understand it. It's not easy. I mean,
Speaker 1: the cost of living is extraordinary, and I just remember
Speaker 1: it was extraordinary when I came out of high school,
Speaker 1: you know, and college, like right into the teeth of
Speaker 1: a huge bubble, the five six oh seven bubble, and
Speaker 1: then the implosion right after. It was like, this sucked.
Speaker 1: So I know many of you listening live through that.
Speaker 1: You know exactly what I'm talking about. Now. This generation,
Speaker 1: the young people have lived through lockdowns and the entire
Speaker 1: psychological operations that came with that mandates firings. Oh and
Speaker 1: then trillions of dollars that got printed, which created tremendous
Speaker 1: inflationary pressures. And now it's like one thousand dollars for
Speaker 1: groceries for one person per month when it used to
Speaker 1: be three thousand a year. It sucks. I get it.
Speaker 1: So I am not downplaying this, But here's my concern.
Speaker 1: This generation also went through public schooling, and most of
Speaker 1: them are still indoctrinated into what I believe are deeply
Speaker 1: flawed world views like Keynesian economics or just straight up Marxism, socialism, communism, whatever.
Speaker 1: And my fear is that as they look at this
Speaker 1: and they're told that the CCP is Communists in America
Speaker 1: is capitalist, which neither is really true. They're both a hybrid.
Speaker 1: That they're going to look at the lifestyles of the
Speaker 1: Chinese on this red note app and conclude that, well,
Speaker 1: maybe communism is actually better than this capitalist model, not
Speaker 1: realizing that they're basically just picking a poison between the two.
Speaker 1: And that's really dangerous because they don't understand why the
Speaker 1: price of things has escalated because they still believe that
Speaker 1: it's just about corporate greed. God forbid. People actually want
Speaker 1: to get paid for a service that they provide. I know, evil,
Speaker 1: but that's what most of these people believe, especially the
Speaker 1: younger generation. Most of them think as stupid as this
Speaker 1: is that the cost of everything has gone up dramatically
Speaker 1: right after we printed trillions and trillions of dollars because
Speaker 1: people got greedy. I mean, just think about this, logically,
Speaker 1: Why weren't they greedy the year prior to the inflation
Speaker 1: kicking up? Oh, they were greedy. Why didn't they charge
Speaker 1: these same prices in twenty eighteen that they charge in
Speaker 1: twenty two, twenty three, twenty four. Oh, because they couldn't
Speaker 1: because competitors would have came into undercut those prices. But
Speaker 1: competitors can't come in to undercut these prices because these
Speaker 1: are the prices because of inflation. You understand the logic there.
Speaker 1: I hope it makes sense. I'm not going to give
Speaker 1: you a one on one on it. That's I'm gonna
Speaker 1: make it simple. That's why, Okay, you can't undercut because
Speaker 1: the input costs have also gone up, because the cost
Speaker 1: of labor and materials across the board have gone up
Speaker 1: fifty or one hundred percent over the past four or
Speaker 1: five years. So yeah, everything now costs more, and it
Speaker 1: ain't gonna stop until we have a deflationary bust, which
Speaker 1: we might, We definitely might. But in the interim, these
Speaker 1: people who don't understand economics whatsoever and just think that
Speaker 1: its corporate greed are going to say, well, we need
Speaker 1: a CCP styled government, one that has a iron fist
Speaker 1: that controls every corporation in China. Right, they're living better
Speaker 1: than us. That's the direction we got to go. Now,
Speaker 1: if you were concerned about TikTok being a spying and
Speaker 1: propaganda tool to direct the minds of the youth in
Speaker 1: this country, well now you've got a real fucking problem,
Speaker 1: because the youth of this country is now going to
Speaker 1: be convinced that the CCP model is better than the
Speaker 1: American one. And I can't blame them because the American
Speaker 1: model taught them nothing. And now they're gonna look at
Speaker 1: this and they're gonna come to the wrong conclusion that,
Speaker 1: in fact, the CCP model is superior because our education
Speaker 1: system didn't do anything to fucking teach them that that's wrong.
Speaker 1: That the reason that America is declining is because we're
Speaker 1: acting too much like China. But it's really hard to
Speaker 1: make that pitch, especially when they're looking at the app
Speaker 1: and saying, well, if that's true, Clint, why does China
Speaker 1: look better than us. Yeah, it's a tough argument, it's
Speaker 1: a tough sale, but someone's gotta make it. So I'm
Speaker 1: trying on deaf ears with people that don't understand economics.
Speaker 1: So what am I gonna do? I don't know, but
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what you shouldn't do. You shouldn't be
Speaker 1: banning their apps because a lot of young people that
Speaker 1: have very limited opportunities, which is why they're on TikTok,
Speaker 1: which is why they're on OnlyFans. I might add all
Speaker 1: the fucking moral posturing about all these reprehensible pornographers, these
Speaker 1: women with no values that are out doing this. You
Speaker 1: want to take a little blame when you made it
Speaker 1: impossible for them to actually get ahead because inflation became
Speaker 1: so brutal. You want to take a little blame when
Speaker 1: their entire lives. You told them, Hey, if you go
Speaker 1: to college and you get some liberal arts degree, you're
Speaker 1: gonna come out and you're gonna make six figures and
Speaker 1: you're gonna be able to buy a home and have
Speaker 1: a family. And then they got out and they realized, Oh,
Speaker 1: I can't get a job at all with this doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go be a barista for fifteen bucks an hour?
Speaker 1: Or am I gonna show my tits and make ten
Speaker 1: grand a month. Look, I'm not saying it's the right decision,
Speaker 1: but I get it. If I was a young hot chick,
Speaker 1: and that's a weird, wird sentence. If I was a
Speaker 1: young hot chick and I was like, Oh, I can
Speaker 1: work forty hours a week and barely afford to rent
Speaker 1: a room in someone else's house, or I could just
Speaker 1: show my tits on webcam and I could buy a house.
Speaker 1: That's a fucking hard call. Man, that's a hard call.
Speaker 1: So I have a lot of sympathy for these gals.
Speaker 1: I know. I'm Captain Sabajo over here. Sorry, I just
Speaker 1: I just understand human nature. I get it. But the
Speaker 1: system made it hard. They led them down a bad path.
Speaker 1: So then people make decisions. It's kind of like the
Speaker 1: drug dealer in the hood. It's like when he commits
Speaker 1: a drive by, do you still have sympathy for him? No,
Speaker 1: not at all. But before that, can you understand that
Speaker 1: someone who has no opportunity, there's no businesses that are
Speaker 1: hiring in his area, that his father was locked up
Speaker 1: on some bullshit nonviolent drug charge, and now he's just
Speaker 1: there with his single mom, surrounded by gangs getting beat
Speaker 1: up if he doesn't join one, and he decides to
Speaker 1: sell drugs to try and get out. You don't have
Speaker 1: any sympathy for that. You can't understand that dynamic. Someone
Speaker 1: who's like, I can't even get a job, or if
Speaker 1: I can get one, it's gonna be seven bucks an hour,
Speaker 1: or I can risk my life and make five grand
Speaker 1: a month selling you know, potter crack or whatever. What
Speaker 1: do you think they're going to do? A lot of
Speaker 1: people are gonna take that path. I can't really blame them.
Speaker 1: I look at the only fans shit the same way
Speaker 1: I do. I know it's gonna be unpopular with some people,
Speaker 1: but I think it's right. I think it's true. It's
Speaker 1: human nature. People are gonna take the best opportunity as
Speaker 1: long as it's not so morally reprehensible that they decide
Speaker 1: that it's a bridge too far. Well, when the risk
Speaker 1: reward is so slanted towards the reward side, particularly with
Speaker 1: a you know some of these girls and only fans
Speaker 1: just racking crazy amounts of money. Who can blame them?
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna but I think at the core what
Speaker 1: we need to recognize is that it's a product of
Speaker 1: a system that's crumbling. It's a product of a system
Speaker 1: that's run on ESG DEI framework, It's a product of
Speaker 1: a system that's run pushing kind of this Marx societeology
Speaker 1: that you can't get ahead, that there is no meritocratic,
Speaker 1: you know, pathway forward, that it's just pure greed and nepotism,
Speaker 1: and if you don't know somebody, you can't get anywhere.
Speaker 1: And to some extent that's true, that's not how it
Speaker 1: used to be. But that's a product of a declining civilization.
Speaker 1: So how do we repair that? Instead of looking at
Speaker 1: the symptoms of the declining situation civilization? Which is the
Speaker 1: drug dealer, which is the only fans girl, which is
Speaker 1: the in cell that's jerking off to these broads a
Speaker 1: thousand hours a week, what is the real focus? Should
Speaker 1: you blame all of those people or should you say, okay,
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not like, I'm not applauding any of
Speaker 1: their decisions, but I'd like to actually address the root cause.
Speaker 1: Why is the system structured in a way that it's
Speaker 1: failing so many people, particularly are young, And if you're
Speaker 1: not asking yourself that question, I've seen a lot of
Speaker 1: the you know, normal conservative pundits that are coming out
Speaker 1: and it's it's very popular. It gets a lot of
Speaker 1: clicks to chastise the either the TikTok girls or the
Speaker 1: only fans checked in cells like. I get it. I
Speaker 1: get why it's popular to do that, but is it productive?
Speaker 1: I guess in some ways shaming people is productive a
Speaker 1: little bit. But at the end of the day, what
Speaker 1: I would like to see is to live in a
Speaker 1: functioning civilization that does not lead so many young people
Speaker 1: down this immoral path. And until we actually do that, well,
Speaker 1: I think we probably ought to shut the fuck up
Speaker 1: about shaming them so much. Unless you have I think
Speaker 1: unless you have the answers on how to fix the
Speaker 1: underlying problems, you should probably not be shaming them because
Speaker 1: you don't have an answer, you just have a finger. Well,
Speaker 1: I think we all ought to point the finger at
Speaker 1: ourselves a little bit and figure out why. Well, I'll
Speaker 1: tell you a few things we shouldn't have a public
Speaker 1: education system at all. But if we're going to have one,
Speaker 1: it ought to be actually oriented towards something that creates
Speaker 1: people who are able to create a product that has
Speaker 1: value in the marketplace. I know, what a fucking crazy concept.
Speaker 1: It's true, you shouldn't have people going to school with
Speaker 1: gender studies and all this other nonsense would say did
Speaker 1: for decades, which has now produced an entire just fucking
Speaker 1: army of worthless people that can't provide anything to civilization
Speaker 1: and therefore become extraordinarily angry with capitalism, which they already
Speaker 1: learned was evil in college. So it just further proves
Speaker 1: to them that they're right that the system is fucked
Speaker 1: up because capitalism is evil. But in reality they're not
Speaker 1: providing anything to the system because their education was worthless.
Speaker 1: So you see, it's all just broken, and it just
Speaker 1: feeds upon itself. We have to stop the system from
Speaker 1: feeding upon itself. So you need to have a If
Speaker 1: you're going to have a public education system at all,
Speaker 1: it has to be oriented towards what actually creates value,
Speaker 1: like I don't know, maybe accounting, maybe engineering, maybe plumbing,
Speaker 1: maybe electricians, construction, sure, doctors, nurses, that's all important. To
Speaker 1: actually things that we need that are not imminently replaceable
Speaker 1: by AI, which, by the way, is a coming. It's
Speaker 1: coming real fast. So if we don't figure this out
Speaker 1: like yesterday, we're gonna have I mean, the problems we
Speaker 1: already have are extraordinary. Five years from now, when thirty
Speaker 1: percent more of these jobs are gone because of AI,
Speaker 1: it could be higher. I might add, I may be
Speaker 1: way under selling the percentage of jobs that are going
Speaker 1: to be absorbed by AI. If you don't have an
Speaker 1: answer by then the problem is going to go exponential.
Speaker 1: You're gonna go from having ten or twenty million young
Speaker 1: people who are just adrift to fifty million, and then
Speaker 1: we're totally fucked. That's how you get revolutions, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 1: So you could get serious about this or you can't.
Speaker 1: It's your choice, but it's a coming. And on top
Speaker 1: of that, yeah, we fix the education system. We've got
Speaker 1: to fix the culture. We've got to fix the culture
Speaker 1: of like certainly we shouldn't be applauding people that take
Speaker 1: these pathways. That's not good either. We also need to
Speaker 1: fix the money. Fix the money, fix the world. I
Speaker 1: don't agree with that, but if you fix the money,
Speaker 1: you fix a hell of a lot of problems in
Speaker 1: the world, and this is a huge, huge one. The
Speaker 1: reason young people can't afford houses is because you printed
Speaker 1: trillions and trillions and trillions and trillions, and I could
Speaker 1: keep going for a very long time of dollars, which
Speaker 1: ultimately inflated the value. So young people can't afford a house,
Speaker 1: and they can't even dream of owning a home. They
Speaker 1: can't even dream of it unless they show their tits
Speaker 1: on only fans And then you're like, oh, look at
Speaker 1: this stupid broad how dare she if you're a young
Speaker 1: person who couldn't get a house. Ever, otherwise, am I
Speaker 1: gonna hate on you for finding a way? Nope, I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm not. I'm also not gonna applaud you for showing
Speaker 1: your tits on the internet. But like I have to
Speaker 1: appreciate hustle, just as I appreciate the hustle from the
Speaker 1: drug dealer I do. That doesn't mean that I applaud
Speaker 1: the people that they're helping enable their addiction. Is certainly
Speaker 1: if they become violent and kill people, I definitely don't
Speaker 1: applaud that they ought to go to jail. I appreciate hustlers, man,
Speaker 1: I always have. I think that's that is kind of
Speaker 1: the entrepreneurial spirit. Even if it's done in the black
Speaker 1: or the gray market, there's still something there's still something
Speaker 1: kind of noble about it, kinda. So, yeah, we've got
Speaker 1: a lot of fixes that need to be made, not
Speaker 1: a lot of easy answers. But I think until we
Speaker 1: actually get serious about these issues, it's only gonna get worse,
Speaker 1: and it's gonna get worse rapidly. And banning TikTok ain't
Speaker 1: making this go away. And guess what, banning only fans
Speaker 1: wouldn't either. It would just drive it underground. You'd have
Speaker 1: more black market prostitution. That is that is just for
Speaker 1: the record. The increase in prostitution is indicative of a
Speaker 1: economy which is failing. Now you can have the Biden administration,
Speaker 1: which God bless he just left or he's leaving in
Speaker 1: you know, forty eight hours, so sick of him. But
Speaker 1: he's talking about all of his economic achievements and how
Speaker 1: inflation is at this you know, an incredibly low rate
Speaker 1: now compared to when he first came in, and unemployment
Speaker 1: rates in the you know, record lows and blah blah, blah, yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: let me. Let me just show you if you actually
Speaker 1: included only fans participation in the prostitution rates, like actual
Speaker 1: street walking prostitution. Our economy and growing going so hot,
Speaker 1: that is, that is exactly what you saw during Great Depression,
Speaker 1: the Great Recession. It's happening now. A lot of lot
Speaker 1: of women are doing that and some men, I know, weird.
Speaker 1: Our economy is not going too hot, and it's going
Speaker 1: to get really ugly if we don't fix these things,
Speaker 1: the underlying factors, not just the shame game, because guess what.
Speaker 1: If TikTok's data collection is such a national security threat,
Speaker 1: then so is Meta and Google and every other company
Speaker 1: out there, every other American based company. If they're collecting
Speaker 1: data on TikTok, that's so dangerous that it could actually
Speaker 1: endanger our national security. Well that data being collected data,
Speaker 1: I don't know say it either way. If that data
Speaker 1: being collected by domestic based companies, given that there are
Speaker 1: spying operations not just from the CCP but also litany
Speaker 1: of other foreign powers, but also the United States government
Speaker 1: will then make a uniform rule that says that no
Speaker 1: companies doing business in the United States of America can
Speaker 1: collect data which would endanger our national security. Problem solved.
Speaker 1: Oh but you can't do that now, can you? Because
Speaker 1: you want to spy on the American people. And at
Speaker 1: its core, the crux of the issue is that you
Speaker 1: don't want to stop. You don't want our adversaries doing
Speaker 1: the same. I don't want them doing it either. But
Speaker 1: you're an adversary of mine because you're not interested in
Speaker 1: me being free at all. If you were, you wouldn't
Speaker 1: be spy on me and doing everything in your power
Speaker 1: to hold on to that ability. Well, forbidding it to
Speaker 1: the tune of banning TikTok in America so that these
Speaker 1: foreign countries can't do the same. That's the answer. If
Speaker 1: this is really dangerous. If it is, I'm not saying
Speaker 1: it is, But if it is, and that's your claim,
Speaker 1: well then it's dangerous for any of these companies to
Speaker 1: be doing it. And you ought to make a uniform
Speaker 1: rule that forbids that, But you're not going to. And
Speaker 1: I think we all know why. Get you out of
Speaker 1: here on this Biden's farewell address, Good riddance.
Speaker 12: It's a dangerous conversation of power in the hands of
Speaker 12: a very few ultrawealthy people the dangerous consequences if their
Speaker 12: abusive power is left unchecked.
Speaker 13: Today, an oligarch is taking shape in America of extreme wealth,
Speaker 13: power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our
Speaker 13: basic rights and freedoms, and a fair shot for everyone
Speaker 13: to get ahead. We see the consequences all across America,
Speaker 13: and we seen it before more than a century ago,
Speaker 13: with the American people stood up to the Robert barons
Speaker 13: back then and busted the trust. They didn't punish the wealthy,
Speaker 13: just made the wealthy pay played by the rules everybody
Speaker 13: else had to.
Speaker 1: If only someone could have done something to prevent that
Speaker 1: rise of the oligarchy, I don't know, like the President
Speaker 1: of the United States, you fucking asshole. I mean, on
Speaker 1: top of that, just consider this for a second. In
Speaker 1: his waning hours of his presidency, he issues the Metal
Speaker 1: of Freedom to George Soros, a guy who's responsible for
Speaker 1: donating millions and millions, if not billions, of dollars to
Speaker 1: democratic causes all over the world for the past decades
Speaker 1: and decades and decades. Is that not oligarchy? Having a
Speaker 1: billionaire who just dumps money into your political endeavors. If
Speaker 1: it is which it is. Well, then so is Elon okay,
Speaker 1: and so are all these other billionaires that are now
Speaker 1: coming out and being a little bit more friendly towards freedom.
Speaker 1: I look, the reality is that our system is broken.
Speaker 1: Our system is broken because politicians like Joe Biden, who
Speaker 1: were in power for fifty fucking years, created these problems
Speaker 1: and they're certainly not going to get us out of it.
Speaker 1: So for him to get up there in his farewell
Speaker 1: address and lament the oligarchic situation in which we now
Speaker 1: have to deal, well, who's responsible for that, Joe? And
Speaker 1: how dare you for not owning any of your significant
Speaker 1: participation in creating this paradigm? It's infuriating? Might I add
Speaker 1: it was started with Trump, not removing culpability from him whatsoever.
Speaker 1: But the largest wealth transfer in human history happened from
Speaker 1: twenty twenty through twenty twenty one and two, the largest ever.
Speaker 1: If you're going to complain about oligarchy, well then you
Speaker 1: have to acknowledge that locking down the economy but leaving
Speaker 1: the biggest businesses in America open to do business while
Speaker 1: small businesses were shut down and put into bankruptcy to
Speaker 1: tune of tens of thousands. You own this oligarchy and
Speaker 1: you cannot get that blood off your hands, and you
Speaker 1: warning me about it in your final farewell address is gaslighting.
Speaker 1: It's infuriating. And I pray that no American is dumb
Speaker 1: enough to think that that's not the system that they wanted,
Speaker 1: that that's not the system that they created tirelessly over decades,
Speaker 1: central banking and government, capture of corporations and basically fascism,
Speaker 1: which is really what this is more than oligarchy, that's
Speaker 1: the system they wanted. That's the system that gives them
Speaker 1: maximal power. It's not an accident. It's a consequence of
Speaker 1: deliberate action for decades. And if you're tired of it,
Speaker 1: if you're bothered by it, do not allow the people
Speaker 1: responsible for it to push this off as if this
Speaker 1: is some new threat because Elon Musk bought X you
Speaker 1: Sally come Lately, lying motherfucker you. I ain't buying it,
Speaker 1: and I hope you guys aren't either. Thank you guys
Speaker 1: so much for tuning in. Please do hit the like button, subscribe,
Speaker 1: leave a comment. If I got anything wrong. I'm sure
Speaker 1: I got a lot wrong, and you're gonna want to
Speaker 1: debate me all right, I'm prepared for it. Go ahead
Speaker 1: and leave it com in anyways, do share the show around. And, last,
Speaker 1: but not least, if you want to support my work,
Speaker 1: you could subscribe on x at Liberty Logpod. I will
Speaker 1: follow you back libertylockdown dot locals dot com. To support
Speaker 1: my work also and share this sh around. That's the
Speaker 1: best way. Last, but not least, leave a five star
Speaker 1: review on Spotify or Apple Podcasts wherever you're listening right now.
Speaker 1: I appreciate your continued support. I'm going to be starting
Speaker 1: a show called Dangerous rtrds. You can decide what that
Speaker 1: stands for. It's real talk, real dudes with the homietop
Speaker 1: lobs in Raven probably in February, and got some other
Speaker 1: things in the works which are still still formulating or finalizing.
Speaker 1: So I'm not gonna say anything about that, but appreciate
Speaker 1: you guys as always. See so pease.
Speaker 8: Welcome ton Liberty Lockdown, please gott get block hold your
Speaker 8: liberty ain't come.
Speaker 1: But yeah it's acohol. It's where did it come from?
Speaker 7: And where did he