Speaker 1: This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 1: That's all you can say is wow? Right, Look at
Speaker 1: this day we've had. It's just going to get more
Speaker 1: and more insane every second, every minute of every day
Speaker 1: until we finally get the results, and then it may
Speaker 1: even get crazier. Eight five five or zero five eight
Speaker 1: two five five the number the left is not going
Speaker 1: to take this coming defeat line down. You can text
Speaker 1: me d An five seven seven three nine. So where
Speaker 1: to start today?
Speaker 2: How about this? What do you think of this bill that's.
Speaker 1: Being proposed to in Congress to give Trump and Harris
Speaker 1: the same protection as Biden. You would think that would
Speaker 1: sell through unanimously, right, But wanted to let you know
Speaker 1: that's percolating. Get your take on that. President may visit Aurora?
Speaker 1: Do you Aurora, Colorado? Obviously? Do you want to see
Speaker 1: that happen? Eight five five four zero five eight two
Speaker 1: five to five the number text day in Dan five
Speaker 1: seven seven three nine. The Biden administration going out of
Speaker 1: its way like like a little kid sticking out its tongue,
Speaker 1: except here it has potentially fatal ramifications, going out of
Speaker 1: its way to double, triple, quadruple down on threat to democracy.
Speaker 1: They are going out of their way to label Trump
Speaker 1: a threat to democracy, including today from the podium in
Speaker 1: the White House. So I think we already have very
Speaker 1: credible information and we're about to get a lot more that.
Speaker 1: In fact, this latest assassin clearly motivated by that very
Speaker 1: mantra from the left. So now what do you make
Speaker 1: now of the left from the podium at the White
Speaker 1: House doubling and tripling down on that. So we'll start
Speaker 1: with that, but lord knows, we have much much more,
Speaker 1: including thank you, Lord, another interview from Kamalai Harris and
Speaker 1: man just say may and we have plenty of sound
Speaker 1: from it, which you'll thoroughly enjoy if, like me, you
Speaker 1: want to see Trump win. But let me just say
Speaker 1: this goes back to the point I made last week,
Speaker 1: and Ryan, I don't know that I got anybody to
Speaker 1: back me up here, but my point was that Trump
Speaker 1: made a brilliant move by saying he would not debate
Speaker 1: again because Harris didn't get it done at the debate.
Speaker 1: She didn't do what she needed to do to win
Speaker 1: the election. So now she has no other way to
Speaker 1: reach the American people and answer the big questions they
Speaker 1: have without doing interviews, and she is obviously scared to
Speaker 1: death of doing interviews. I mean, it's really unnatural, right,
Speaker 1: It's bizarre and weird and kind of surreal that she's
Speaker 1: installed as the nominee, as a sitting vice president right,
Speaker 1: installed as a nominee and hasn't done a single press
Speaker 1: conference and what is it six weeks now since maybe
Speaker 1: more than that, hasn't done a real interview, and that
Speaker 1: she so she came out of hiding today for one,
Speaker 1: and you can see why she doesn't do these. And
Speaker 1: it does raise the interesting question of, Okay, why is
Speaker 1: she so bad at him? We know now why she's
Speaker 1: so afraid of him, because she's so bad at him,
Speaker 1: but why is she so bad at them? So we'll
Speaker 1: we'll have some tape on that. But now Trump has
Speaker 1: put her in this position where the only hope she
Speaker 1: has of now cutting through to the American people, since
Speaker 1: she blew the opportunity at the debate to answer their
Speaker 1: two big questions, which is how you're going to be
Speaker 1: different than Biden and why did you change your positions?
Speaker 1: Now she has to go try to accomplish that through
Speaker 1: these individual interviews with small audiences. Yeah, good luck with that.
Speaker 1: Eight F five for zero five A two five five
Speaker 1: text da N five seven seven three nine. Speaking of which,
Speaker 1: and it's not luck. It's stunningly impressive ingenuity that we
Speaker 1: have seen time and time again.
Speaker 2: It's biblical right.
Speaker 1: The survival of the Great State of Israel, with all
Speaker 1: these enemies aligned against it, including unfortunately now some right
Speaker 1: here in the United States States of America and a
Speaker 1: significant portion of the powers that be in the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: the Great State of Israel has been able to overcome
Speaker 1: and conquer all of these enemies, sometimes at mind boggling cost,
Speaker 1: unfathomable costs. But Israel, the Jewish people, will start with that.
Speaker 1: And now Israel always survive, always survive, and they prevail
Speaker 1: and they conquer. And today you see the latest example
Speaker 1: of that with the exploding pagers right throughout Haspala. What
Speaker 1: are the latest numbers, Ryan, how many dead? How many wounded?
Speaker 1: At this point, through the incredible intelligence work of Israel
Speaker 1: and planting explosives in the pagers of Hesbela operatives.
Speaker 3: I think it's a couple of thousand wounded and as
Speaker 3: far as the dead, those are the ones that were
Speaker 3: specifically targeted.
Speaker 2: Like you said, they had confiscated.
Speaker 3: These pages apparently, and then somehow the Hesibela members got
Speaker 3: them back, which why would you take them back at
Speaker 3: that point?
Speaker 2: Man?
Speaker 1: It is just such a credit to Israel. And then
Speaker 1: you look at the forces. It's certainly not everybody in
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. And I'm certainly not saying that Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris is Anisemitic, but Kamala Harris gave into that when
Speaker 1: she decided not to pick Josh Shapiro as her VP,
Speaker 1: which is likely to cost her this election though I
Speaker 1: don't think she was ever going to win anyway, but
Speaker 1: we all know you gotta win Pennsylvania to win, right
Speaker 1: And by the way, can I mention this and I
Speaker 1: try out to be too much of a poll geek,
Speaker 1: but you're going to be seeing all these headlines now
Speaker 1: about the USA Today Suffolk poll in.
Speaker 2: Pennsylvania and it has Kamala Harris up three points.
Speaker 4: Ah, She's won.
Speaker 1: This poll is great news for President Donald J. Trump
Speaker 1: because if you go back historically Suffolk at this same
Speaker 1: point in time, Suffolk has had Biden up a bunch
Speaker 1: more in Pennsylvania and had Clinton up more in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: Then they have Harris up now. So again, most of
Speaker 1: these pollsters, they underrepresent Trump and they oversample the opponent.
Speaker 2: And you can see this clear historical trend.
Speaker 1: So the fact that USA today Suffolk only has her
Speaker 1: up three at this point in Pennsylvania very good news
Speaker 1: for Trump. And there are plenty of other good polls
Speaker 1: for Trump in Pennsylvania. But some of the best information
Speaker 1: out of Pennsylvania. And just stop me if your eyes
Speaker 1: are glazing over and you're about to drive off the road,
Speaker 1: because I know it's tough to process all these numbers
Speaker 1: when you're driving right Or maybe it's just me, but anyway.
Speaker 2: Some of the really good news. Do you see that
Speaker 2: date out today? Ryan?
Speaker 1: Of course you did never start a question that way.
Speaker 1: Did you see this data out today? Ryan, because you
Speaker 1: always know the answer is going to be yes. On
Speaker 1: the number of mail in ballots requested in Pennsylvania by party,
Speaker 1: a big, big drop for the Democrats and a very
Speaker 1: little drop for Republicans. Obviously, you're going to have a
Speaker 1: drop because we don't have COVID anymore, but much bigger
Speaker 1: drop for Democrats than Republicans. I'll pull out those exact numbers,
Speaker 1: but it's I think over two hundred thousand, and Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: margin was very very thin for Biden last time. Plus
Speaker 1: a Pennsylvania Supreme Court stepped in and said, no, no,
Speaker 1: you've got to have these properly signed and dated ballots
Speaker 1: for them to count, which is a step in the
Speaker 1: right direction. You would hope for more security than that,
Speaker 1: but it is a step in the right direction. So
Speaker 1: much to talk about, we've just scratched the surface.
Speaker 2: Love the fact that your boy there, Ronnie DeSantis, oh yeah, is.
Speaker 1: In fact taking over that investigation in Florida right now.
Speaker 1: That taking over may be a little bit of an overstatement,
Speaker 1: but he's keeping his hands in it, and I, for one,
Speaker 1: am very very glad to see that. Let's play a
Speaker 1: little Ronnie d here.
Speaker 5: Today, I'm signing an executive order assigning the case involving
Speaker 5: the attempt at assassination a former President Donald Trump to
Speaker 5: the office of Statewide Prosecutor under the supervision of Attorney
Speaker 5: General Ashley Moody. The suspect Ryan Routh has believed of
Speaker 5: committed state law violations across multiple judicial circuits in the
Speaker 5: state Palm Beach Judicial Circuit, the judicial circuit including Martin County,
Speaker 5: as well as perhaps the judicial circuit represented by Broward County. Also,
Speaker 5: the state of Florida has jurisdiction over the most serious,
Speaker 5: straightforward defense, which is attempted murder. I've directed state agencies
Speaker 5: to move expeditiously and to provide full transparency to the public.
Speaker 2: See, I am loving that. I am loving that because
Speaker 2: I do trust this guy.
Speaker 5: In my judgment, it's not in the best interest of
Speaker 5: our state or our nation of the same federal agencies
Speaker 5: that are seeking to prosecute Donald Trump leading this investigation,
Speaker 5: especially when the most serious, straightforward defense constitutes a violation
Speaker 5: of state law but not federal law.
Speaker 1: Oh can I just pause this, just a little standing
Speaker 1: o for Ronnie there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, thank you, thank you. That's what we need to hear.
Speaker 5: In addition to holding the suspect accountable, the public deserves
Speaker 5: to know the truth about how this assassination came to be,
Speaker 5: and I've directed all state agencies to work expeditiously to
Speaker 5: be able to uncover the truth. In addition, to holding
Speaker 5: this suspect accounty.
Speaker 1: That's the key that he's holding the prisoner right. I mean,
Speaker 1: I love all of this. We just want the truth.
Speaker 1: We just want the full truth. So that's great. That's
Speaker 1: her leadership there eight five five for zero five eight
Speaker 1: two five five the numbers.
Speaker 2: So please jump on any of that. And we have
Speaker 2: not yet talked about.
Speaker 1: Taylor Swift right because we've had all of these other
Speaker 1: major events there this latest attempted assassination and this issue
Speaker 1: of Okay, she made her endorsement and do you think
Speaker 1: this is going to change the race? I want to
Speaker 1: talk about that. But also the president may be coming Aurora.
Speaker 1: Do you think he should? You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 4: And now back to the Dan Taplas Show podcast.
Speaker 6: It's a crime shame.
Speaker 2: I mean, my heart breaks for this community.
Speaker 7: You know there were.
Speaker 2: Children, elementary school children who it was it was a
Speaker 2: school photo day. Do you remember what that's like going
Speaker 2: to school on picture day?
Speaker 8: OMG? And you've got to see the video. She's sitting
Speaker 8: down right, You've got to see the video. I mean, Brian,
Speaker 8: what came to your mind as you watch that?
Speaker 2: Now? Be honest, just.
Speaker 3: That she's not comfortable in that setting, and she just
Speaker 3: starts talking until she.
Speaker 1: Is you are an angel, you are truly, You're so generous.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's just a blinding halo back there. Good
Speaker 1: to have Alexa with us today. So sorry, Terry sick.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but.
Speaker 1: I think it gives more credence to the question what
Speaker 1: is wrong with Kamala Harris. I mean, there's obviously something wrong, right,
Speaker 1: because nobody in that position goes this long after being
Speaker 1: installed as the unelected Democrat nominee, without doing a press
Speaker 1: conference and with just doing three very protected little interviews.
Speaker 1: That's just not natural. We can all start with that, right.
Speaker 1: The other thing is she did not look or sound
Speaker 1: or act like this at the debate. And forgive me,
Speaker 1: I just find me for calling it a debate. I
Speaker 1: predicted weeks in advance it would not be a debate.
Speaker 1: It would be ABC protecting or why she made little
Speaker 1: unchallenged speeches, which it was.
Speaker 2: But she didn't act this way.
Speaker 1: She didn't act the way she so often acts, including
Speaker 1: in so much of this sound that we've played before
Speaker 1: like this, and as.
Speaker 9: A woman, there's a balance to be struck between being tough.
Speaker 2: And being a bitch.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So what do you think's going on there? Eight
Speaker 1: by five? Of course are a five eight two five five?
Speaker 1: The number whatever it is. I want to see more
Speaker 1: of it, and I want the American people to see
Speaker 1: more of it. And you can see why immediately they
Speaker 1: wanted a second debate with Trump because they knew from
Speaker 1: the focus groups they were conducting real time that she
Speaker 1: had not answered the key questions, how you're going to
Speaker 1: be different than Biden?
Speaker 2: Why do you change your positions?
Speaker 1: And now they needed to somehow answer those with the
Speaker 1: American people, And with no second debate, how do you
Speaker 1: do that? You got to go out and you got
Speaker 1: to do a bunch of these interviews and she's obviously
Speaker 1: not good at that.
Speaker 2: So would love your take that as well. Let me
Speaker 2: get to some of these great texts.
Speaker 1: But Colorado talk that President Trump will come to Aurora, Colorado.
Speaker 1: Don't know if he will or not, but do you
Speaker 1: think he should? Whether you, like me, want him to
Speaker 1: win or like some of the folks who listen and call,
Speaker 1: want him to lose, do you think he should come
Speaker 1: to Aurora? What would that do for the campaign. So
Speaker 1: would love to hear from you on that. President Trump
Speaker 1: now very actively on the trail, very clear message that Hey,
Speaker 1: their rhetoric obviously look at this killer. Look at what
Speaker 1: he's written. This would be killer, this assassin, look at
Speaker 1: what he's written. He was motivated by them calling me
Speaker 1: a threat to democracy. And so Trump out there hammering
Speaker 1: him for that, and the left tripling down from the
Speaker 1: podium at the White House today labeling him a threat
Speaker 1: to democracy. We'll have some great sound for you on that. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: what do you think is going on there now? Some say, hey,
Speaker 1: the White House is obviously trying to get him killed,
Speaker 1: because it's clear at this point that that that phrase,
Speaker 1: you know, many believe triggered at least this one assassin.
Speaker 2: I think we need some more information, but I can
Speaker 2: see why they believe that.
Speaker 1: And so the White House, now aware that this particular
Speaker 1: phrase does that, is now trying to get it out
Speaker 1: there as often as they can.
Speaker 2: Some arguing that, others saying.
Speaker 1: No, it's a legitimate line of attack and they're entitled
Speaker 1: to pursue it. I would absolutely love your take on that,
Speaker 1: because where I come down on this, and I have before,
Speaker 1: and listen, it's hard to imagine anybody out there who
Speaker 1: wants Trump to win more.
Speaker 2: Than I do.
Speaker 1: And it's not because I think he's perfect in any way,
Speaker 1: shape or form. Though there's a lot there that I
Speaker 1: am admire, there's a lot there that I criticize, including
Speaker 1: on air. It's just that, and I won't go off
Speaker 1: on the whole riff. But a vote for Trump is
Speaker 1: obviously a vote for so much more. It isn't really
Speaker 1: even in the end to vote for Trump, though part
Speaker 1: of it is for me, because here's a guy who's
Speaker 1: willing to put his life on the line for this country,
Speaker 1: do the tough things to protect us, knowing it increases
Speaker 1: the danger to him. You know, the way he responded
Speaker 1: to taking that bullet and getting up and immediately so
Speaker 1: strong and providing that leadership. Yeah, part of my vote
Speaker 1: is going to be a vote for him and the
Speaker 1: very good parts of him. But the vote is just
Speaker 1: so much more about saving the country and all that
Speaker 1: other stuff than than it is a vote for him.
Speaker 2: Eight five four zero five eight two five five.
Speaker 1: The number Catholic vote, and I think the Catholic vote
Speaker 1: is going to loom, as I've said before, very large
Speaker 1: in this election and is going to be very very
Speaker 1: much in Donald Trump's favor. For obvious reasons. But Catholic Vote,
Speaker 1: which I also contribute to that organization, just put out
Speaker 1: this ad.
Speaker 6: Just in Medicaid data shows ninety seven underage girls had
Speaker 6: their breasts completely removed. Fourteen underage girls underwent hysterectomies. Sex
Speaker 6: change operations attempting to make young boys into girls. Penis
Speaker 6: amputations sound weird, disgusted, it is, and you're paying for it.
Speaker 6: Kamala Harris supports these taxpayer funded sex change operations. A
Speaker 6: vote for Harris a vote for medical experiments on kids.
Speaker 2: See. I think this is a real sleeper issue.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying this issue alone decides the election, but
Speaker 1: we're talking about an election where, according to a lot
Speaker 1: of different intelligent analysts, you know, it could turn on
Speaker 1: a handful of votes in a few states. And there
Speaker 1: are not many saying people who support all of this
Speaker 1: child mutilation stuff which is now holy grailed to the left.
Speaker 1: And so this is where you see kind of those
Speaker 1: sleeper votes. They'll never admit it to their friends, their neighbors,
Speaker 1: pta any of that stuff, but when they go into
Speaker 1: that booth, it's the kind of issue that can cause
Speaker 1: just enough people to say no, I'm either going to
Speaker 1: vote the other way, or I'm just not voting in
Speaker 1: that presidential eight five ur zero five eight two five
Speaker 1: five will get to our tax at DN five seven
Speaker 1: seven three nine. But there is so much sound up
Speaker 1: here that I love today, and I don't have time
Speaker 1: to play that Taylor Swift sound, but we will get
Speaker 1: to it. And it's so funny, Ryan, because I've been
Speaker 1: telling people for months and months and months, and I've
Speaker 1: been getting so many hate text over this. I've been saying,
Speaker 1: wait a second, as we look at the landscape, we
Speaker 1: got some things out there.
Speaker 2: They're gonna make this tougher.
Speaker 1: First, I said, Biden will be replaced as the nominee
Speaker 1: and the race will become tougher for Donald Trump that day,
Speaker 1: but he will still ultimately win and less something crazy
Speaker 1: up and so that is all hell true, right, and
Speaker 1: then talked about Harris being made president of the United
Speaker 1: States before election day as a last ditch effort to
Speaker 1: get her over the finish line.
Speaker 2: That's still very, very plausible.
Speaker 1: But one thing I've talked about for many a moon,
Speaker 1: and you will attest to it, my friend, because you've
Speaker 1: hated it as much as everybody else has.
Speaker 2: Is what I view as a.
Speaker 1: Fact, whether we like it or not, that if Taylor
Speaker 1: Swift the endorsement, that's one thing that's not going to
Speaker 1: decide the election. But if she decides to go campaigning
Speaker 1: swing state to swing state with Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that could. That could.
Speaker 1: So what do you think Trump should do, if anything,
Speaker 1: about the endorsement of Kamala Harris by Taylor Swift eight
Speaker 1: five to five for zero five A two five five
Speaker 1: The number texts d A N five seven seven three
Speaker 1: nine And guess who's in Colorado courtesy of the left
Speaker 1: that rules this state. Oh yeah, Mexican drug cartells. That
Speaker 1: story just broke here on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 2: Comes out against Trump.
Speaker 9: I don't care if they write that. I'm sad that
Speaker 9: I didn't two years ago, but I can't change that.
Speaker 9: I'm saying right now that this is something that I
Speaker 9: know is right, and you guys, I need to be
Speaker 9: on the right side of history. And if he doesn't win,
Speaker 9: then at least I at least I tried.
Speaker 2: Here's the problem.
Speaker 9: I just want to read you what I wrote, and
Speaker 9: I'm going to try to start I just really want
Speaker 9: you to know that this is important to me.
Speaker 3: Yes, I've read the entire thing and the bottom line
Speaker 3: right now, I'm terrified.
Speaker 2: I'm the guy that went out and bought armored cars.
Speaker 9: I worry for her safety as much as anybody does,
Speaker 9: maybe more.
Speaker 1: You see, that's that's so very interesting to me because
Speaker 1: that the history of violence is on the left. And
Speaker 1: I understand people are going to point to J six
Speaker 1: or whatever. First of all, those people who broke the
Speaker 1: lawn Jay six, they're not conservatives, and that is not
Speaker 1: at all that the history the tradition of Trump's supporters.
Speaker 1: But but you see on the left this steady over
Speaker 1: time history of the use of violence to to accomplish
Speaker 1: their goals, and and I think the reason for that,
Speaker 1: and it's completely unjustifiable, was the left can't win based
Speaker 1: on fact and logic and reason and morality, so they
Speaker 1: have to resort to politics of personal destruction. They have
Speaker 1: to resort to violence, and a different form of non
Speaker 1: physical violence. But you see it very prevalent here in
Speaker 1: Colorado as well from the left, which is censorship. They
Speaker 1: really have to resort to censorship because they know they
Speaker 1: can't win the battle of ideas, so they try to
Speaker 1: condemn people for simply allowing opinions.
Speaker 2: The left doesn't like to be voiced.
Speaker 1: So there's this censorship, and we see this, and I
Speaker 1: play this not because oh it offends me as a
Speaker 1: matter of principle. I play this because we are very
Speaker 1: very close, you know, should Kamala Harris win this race,
Speaker 1: and it's still possible, you know, we're very very close
Speaker 1: to a situation where we're going to see even more
Speaker 1: because there's so much of it going on right now,
Speaker 1: right but even more abuse of the criminal justice system
Speaker 1: and civil penalties, etc. To try to destroy and punish
Speaker 1: in silence those who disagree with the left. Here's Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton on that just I think today.
Speaker 10: But I also think there are Americas who are engaged
Speaker 10: in this kind of propaganda and whether they should be
Speaker 10: civilly or even in some cases criminally charged.
Speaker 2: They're not being subtle about it. They I mean, it's amazing.
Speaker 1: And of course Walls, who's only relevant really for the
Speaker 1: harmonies doing to the dem ticket.
Speaker 2: Fortunately he is very blunt about it. I think we
Speaker 2: need to push back on this.
Speaker 3: There's no guaranteed of free speech on misinformation or hate speech,
Speaker 3: and especially around our democracy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so we can all see where this is going.
Speaker 1: Right, every election's the most important election ever, but this
Speaker 1: one sure seems to be, and obviously that's the reason
Speaker 1: this guy was trying to kill him. On Sunday, Dan,
Speaker 1: could the failed assassination attempt a publicity stunt for the
Speaker 1: Secret Service? I would say not one chance in a trillion. There,
Speaker 1: I was listening to Michael Brown's fine show. He does
Speaker 1: a tremendous show in the morning's on six thirty KHW
Speaker 1: in the Denver market, and there was a caller who
Speaker 1: was suggesting that scenario where the Secret Service had set
Speaker 1: this up in order to be the hero and in
Speaker 1: order to make the agency look better personally. I don't
Speaker 1: think there's one chance in a trillion. I think what
Speaker 1: we've got here is we've got a Biden White House
Speaker 1: that consciously decided not to provide Trump with the protection
Speaker 1: he should get even after Pennsylvania. And credit to that
Speaker 1: hero agent foreseeing the barrel. But how do you end
Speaker 1: up in a situation you got to laugh for your cry, right,
Speaker 1: how do you end up in a situation where a
Speaker 1: somebody could do this, but beyond that where they could
Speaker 1: do it, and then after the hero agent spots him
Speaker 1: and gets off a few rounds to chase them away.
Speaker 1: They can get away, they can get a How far
Speaker 1: was this guy, Ryan when they finally got him or
Speaker 1: so forty miles away?
Speaker 2: How could that even happen?
Speaker 1: And if it hadn't been for the hero citizen taking
Speaker 1: the picture of the car, do they ever get him now?
Speaker 1: I can't answer that question without access to the forensic
Speaker 1: evidence they have that he left behind. He may have
Speaker 1: wanted to eventually be caught, but again, he was driving
Speaker 1: away and he did get forty miles away, or so
Speaker 1: you're telling me.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 4: Dan, To be.
Speaker 1: Honest, I think Trump should shut up about Taylor Swift.
Speaker 1: He should have never said anything to begin with that
Speaker 1: from Cindy. Cindy, I would agree with you on that.
Speaker 1: I thought the tweet Sunday morning was a bad idea.
Speaker 2: What was that tweet again? Ryan? I think it was
Speaker 2: pretty direct.
Speaker 3: It was a truth social post and it was said
Speaker 3: in all caps.
Speaker 1: I hate Taylor Swift exaction a lot of ambiguity. What
Speaker 1: do you think was the strategic thought by that? Because
Speaker 1: there was one? Those people think it's just Trump's spouting
Speaker 1: off because he got up on the wrong side of
Speaker 1: the bed. They don't know Trump. There was a strategic
Speaker 1: idea behind this. I don't think it should have been sent.
Speaker 1: What do you think that was?
Speaker 3: Well, the fact that he made it personal, I think
Speaker 3: is terrible, and maybe it appeals to a fringe of
Speaker 3: his red meat bait. But if he would have just
Speaker 3: said something like I hate Taylor Swift's music. That's funny.
Speaker 3: Now you're ripping out our music, and that's debatable. Some
Speaker 3: people like it, some people don't. But he says I
Speaker 3: hate Taylor Swift, like you said, there's no ambiguity there.
Speaker 3: I don't like that. I don't think that's a positive message.
Speaker 3: I don't think that wins anybody over.
Speaker 11: No.
Speaker 1: I think it was a bad idea on multiple levels.
Speaker 1: He's not perfect, none of us are perfect. That was
Speaker 1: a bad idea on multiple levels, but it was there
Speaker 1: was a tactical plan behind it, which I disagree with.
Speaker 1: Whatever it was, but I think the tactical plan behind
Speaker 1: it was that morning, if I remember correctly, there had
Speaker 1: been a couple of major polls, there had been a
Speaker 1: couple of major polls released that indicated that her endorsement
Speaker 1: of Harris was helping Trump more than it was hurting Trump.
Speaker 2: So maybe it was a calculation based on that.
Speaker 1: I whatever calculation you made, and again I disagree with it,
Speaker 1: but I think the calculation also goes back to both
Speaker 1: sides are treating this right as totally a base election.
Speaker 1: They're treating it as a base election, and I keep saying, hey,
Speaker 1: it's twenty sixteen all over again, and I believe it is.
Speaker 1: And the key to Trump's success in twenty sixteen was
Speaker 1: a massive turnout among the base. But here's the key
Speaker 1: among a whole lot of people who normally don't vote,
Speaker 1: and they only turn out for Trump. And so I
Speaker 1: think that may have very well been a play to
Speaker 1: the base and a play to those folks who don't
Speaker 1: normally vote.
Speaker 2: The other thing.
Speaker 1: Tactically that I think may have been going on there
Speaker 1: was I think listen, I think that tweet acknowledges what
Speaker 1: I've been saying, that she poses a real threat. And
Speaker 1: I think this may have been, you know, an effort
Speaker 1: by the Trump campaign to try to back her off
Speaker 1: of campaigning in those individual states. Maybe others say that
Speaker 1: makes it more likely she will. Bottom line is, I
Speaker 1: don't think you should have sent that tweet. Eric and
Speaker 1: castle Rock here on the Dan Kaplis Show Welcome.
Speaker 7: Oh hey, look, I just wanted to say real quick
Speaker 7: that I don't know my baking. I think that the
Speaker 7: Walls family and our case supporting Trump holds a little
Speaker 7: bit more weight than Vladimir Putin and Taylor Swift supporting Harris.
Speaker 7: And I saw something interesting today and I thought you
Speaker 7: would enjoy it. But there's some really cute T shirts
Speaker 7: going around that are Swifties for Trump, and there's quite
Speaker 7: a bit out of that going out there, I think
Speaker 7: from the backlash coming from this, and I've felt really
Speaker 7: really good seeing that.
Speaker 11: That sent a good.
Speaker 7: Message to me. So we'll see where this goes. But
Speaker 7: I don't know. It's a craftshoot, no matter what you
Speaker 7: call it. I just hope one thing and one thing only.
Speaker 7: I hope that we can have faith in our elections.
Speaker 7: That's my bigger worry than who wins. Trump needs to win,
Speaker 7: and I'm not voting for Trump. I'm voting for his policies.
Speaker 7: I don't care to talk about his personalities, his policies
Speaker 7: that matter. But I just hope we can trust our elecgens.
Speaker 7: That's my biggest spear.
Speaker 1: And what would take here. And we've got about thirty seconds.
Speaker 1: Thank you for your take call. What would it take
Speaker 1: for you to trust this election outcome?
Speaker 7: The willingness of an attorney for the state of Colorado
Speaker 7: to want to investigate any questions av Yeah.
Speaker 1: Eric, we're losing the connection, Eric says, a willingness to
Speaker 1: investigate and listen. I said it at the time, I
Speaker 1: said it within a week of election day last time.
Speaker 1: I've been very consistent. I have not seen proof that
Speaker 1: there was enough fraud to change the outcome, but there
Speaker 1: were certainly enormously important, legitimate questions shared by many many
Speaker 1: Americans over what they saw happen on election night in
Speaker 1: certain swing states, and those questions needed to be answered.
Speaker 1: Do I think the answer would have been large scale
Speaker 1: fraud to change the outcome? Personally, I don't think that
Speaker 1: would have been the answer, but they deserve to have
Speaker 1: those fair questions answered, and the failure to get those
Speaker 1: fair questions answered has left major lingering doubt about election
Speaker 1: in tech gritty in many different circles in America, and
Speaker 1: that is very bad for this country because there were
Speaker 1: these fair questions that never got answered. You're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Capla.
Speaker 4: Show, and now back to the Dan Taplass Show podcast.
Speaker 2: It really is thank you.
Speaker 9: She votes against against fair pay for women. She votes
Speaker 9: against the reauthorization of the of the Violence Against Women Act,
Speaker 9: which is just basically protecting us for domestic of use
Speaker 9: in stalking.
Speaker 2: Stalking.
Speaker 6: She votes she thinks that that if you're a.
Speaker 9: Gay couple, or even if you look like a gay couple,
Speaker 9: you should be allowed to be kicked out of a restaurants.
Speaker 2: Nonsense of skiing Taylor Swift.
Speaker 1: By the way, she's talking about Marshall Blackburn because she
Speaker 1: endorsed Marsha's opponent, which means Marshall only won by thirty
Speaker 1: or forty points in that race.
Speaker 2: I don't remember the spread, but it was a big one.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah yeah.
Speaker 1: So what effect do you think that Taylor swift endorsement
Speaker 1: will have? Which is kind of a silly question because,
Speaker 1: as I've been saying for a year on this show,
Speaker 1: don't be worried about her endorsement that was inevitable.
Speaker 2: Worry about her.
Speaker 1: Campaigning in the Swing States with the Democrat nominee, who
Speaker 1: at this point appears that it will remain Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: eight five for zero five eight two five five the number.
Speaker 1: Let's go to beautiful Pueblo, Colorado, listening in the Great
Speaker 1: CACSJ Patrick here on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 11: Welcome, Hello, Dan, good to talk to you. Hey. I
Speaker 11: was just thinking, you know, I heard the other day
Speaker 11: that Taylor Swift's average fan base is fourteen years old.
Speaker 11: I don't think and so those people won't be able
Speaker 11: to vote. And I also heard that young men are
Speaker 11: tending the trend towards Trump. So even if those people
Speaker 11: did vote, maybe the young men would us set that
Speaker 11: but you know, and then look at her concerts in
Speaker 11: Europe where they were threatened with terrorism and a lot
Speaker 11: of those kids got to see firsthand, you know, that
Speaker 11: kind of thing. Now, I don't think they, you know,
Speaker 11: some of the young ones would think that deep, but
Speaker 11: maybe they would. Yeah, you know, I don't think she's
Speaker 11: going to pull that much of the vote for her. Yeah,
Speaker 11: if she was the campaign, maybe so. But if she
Speaker 11: campaigned with her, wouldn't she have to answer a few
Speaker 11: questions from people, you know, being being in that mode,
Speaker 11: you know, you set yourself up to you know, I
Speaker 11: love Pink Floyd, but I don't like how Roger Rogers's
Speaker 11: political stamp.
Speaker 1: Thank you Patrick for your great call to answer you
Speaker 1: a great question. No, Taylor Swift wouldn't have to answer
Speaker 1: any questions. Kamala Harris doesn't have to answer any questions.
Speaker 1: I mean, look at that so called debate. She didn't
Speaker 1: have to answer any questions. You know, as I predicted that,
Speaker 1: the moderators asked her a handful of tough questions knowing
Speaker 1: she wouldn't have to answer and they wouldn't follow up
Speaker 1: and call her on it. So, oh, Taylor Swift wouldn't
Speaker 1: have to listen. The interesting thing about the Taylor Swift
Speaker 1: endorsement is that you had that polling come out Sunday morning,
Speaker 1: and it wasn't polling from the right that showed twice
Speaker 1: as many respondents saying the endorsement would cause them to
Speaker 1: lean against Harris. And so do I think that holds
Speaker 1: if she actively campaigns in the Swing States?
Speaker 11: No?
Speaker 1: I think if she actively campaigns with Harris in the
Speaker 1: Swing States, pushing voter registration, etc. It could do real
Speaker 1: damage to Trump. Maybe I'm missing something here, right, Maybe
Speaker 1: I'm missing something. Maybe there'd be this big backlash among others,
Speaker 1: because truly, would anybody, any sane person out there, Let's
Speaker 1: start with this want Taylor Swift to be president.
Speaker 2: Hey, I love her music.
Speaker 1: I really like her, just personally, I think her politics
Speaker 1: would mean suicide for this nation. So I think her
Speaker 1: politics are insane. But no, what same person would want
Speaker 1: Taylor Swift to be president then take it down or
Speaker 1: notch What same person would want Taylor Swift's ideas to
Speaker 1: rule this nation? I mean, so, yeah, maybe there is
Speaker 1: a big backlash out there that's already shown up in
Speaker 1: the polls that I didn't anticipate.
Speaker 2: But well, I think she's.
Speaker 1: Still hoping she does not campaign in the Swing States
Speaker 1: with Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: I think it's bad for business, Dan, and that would
Speaker 3: be my first concern if I was in her, in
Speaker 3: her circle, like you heard with her parents there, we're
Speaker 3: hearing about swifties for Trump A big portion, I would say,
Speaker 3: a large portion of her audience leans right politically, not left. Now,
Speaker 3: she might be left, and she's being true to herself.
Speaker 3: That's fine, but that comes at a cost. And plus,
Speaker 3: as we just heard, she doesn't really know what she's
Speaker 3: talking about, so that's a problem. And nobody wants to
Speaker 3: hear from a musician who they want to vote for
Speaker 3: any more than the musician wants to hear how to
Speaker 3: play their music.
Speaker 1: Well, a big tell will be whether she starts talking
Speaker 1: politics and her concerts because she goes back on tour. Right,
Speaker 1: she goes back on tour, I think tour at the
Speaker 1: end of the month that continues through election day in
Speaker 1: the US. Then I believe about that time goes to Toronto.
Speaker 1: But she's not going to be on tour in any
Speaker 1: swing states. She'll be in Florida, but that's not a
Speaker 1: swing state. And so will she then leave the tour
Speaker 1: to go campaign in swing states?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: So will she talk about it in the concerts? I
Speaker 1: bet you she does not. And then to her good question,
Speaker 1: can I answer your good question about isn't she concerned
Speaker 1: about the impact on her business? I bet she's not
Speaker 1: concerned at all about that. For this reason, I think
Speaker 1: this is a common human experience that once you have
Speaker 1: everything material, it's like, oh, that's not fulfilling, because that's
Speaker 1: not where real fulfillment comes from.
Speaker 2: So now she's had this.
Speaker 1: Experience being glorified all over the world, packing these stadiums.
Speaker 1: It has more money than anybody could ever spend. But
Speaker 1: my guess is she's still very unfulfilled. So at this point,
Speaker 1: I don't think she's sitting there thinking, oh, I need
Speaker 1: another billion to feel fulfilled. I think she's realized, wait
Speaker 1: a second, all of that adoration, all of that money,
Speaker 1: all of that everything hasn't fulfilled.
Speaker 2: But she's not rage against the machine.
Speaker 3: My point being, her music is not about anger, and
Speaker 3: you know, just this avarice toward everything. Hers about love
Speaker 3: and positivity and bringing people together. She starts getting political
Speaker 3: at her concerts, Dan and half, is that going to
Speaker 3: have her fans start booing her?
Speaker 2: She might not a mistake. Yeah, you are right, and
Speaker 2: she won't. She won't.
Speaker 1: I've never been more sure of anything. But that's not
Speaker 1: what would hurt him. Go jabber for three hours at
Speaker 1: your concerts, that's that's not gonna hurt Trump on election day.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: What would hurt him is if she starts campaigning with
Speaker 1: Harris in the Swing States. So love your thoughts on that.
Speaker 1: We have so much more to cover when we get back.
Speaker 1: If you just joined us, thank you, But a long
Speaker 1: laundry list of hot news stuff, including Harris, you can
Speaker 1: see why she hasn't been doing interviews.
Speaker 2: She's just not very good at him.
Speaker 1: And is there something real, real real weird going on
Speaker 1: with or replace some of that sound from today's interview
Speaker 1: Mexican Cartel's now documented in Colorado. Thank you, Jared Polish
Speaker 1: here on The Dan Kaplis Show.