WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.520 --> 00:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Section seventeen of the Science History of the Universe, Volume four.

2
00:00:07.000 --> 00:00:10.599
<v Speaker 1>This is a LibriVox recording. All LibriVox recordings are in

3
00:00:10.640 --> 00:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the public domain. For more information or to volunteer, please

4
00:00:14.240 --> 00:00:20.879
<v Speaker 1>visit LibriVox dot org. Recording by Avay in June twenty seventeen,

5
00:00:22.199 --> 00:00:26.879
<v Speaker 1>The Science History of the Universe, Volume four, edited by

6
00:00:26.920 --> 00:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Francis Rold Wheeler. Chemistry, Chapter thirteen, valence the constitution of

7
00:00:35.079 --> 00:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>organic compounds and the development of stereochemistry. In the preceding chapter.

8
00:00:43.759 --> 00:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Mention has been made of the influence exerted by Frankland

9
00:00:47.320 --> 00:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>on the views developed by Colbert respecting the constitution of

10
00:00:51.719 --> 00:00:56.719
<v Speaker 1>organic compounds. It was Frankland who, in his now classical

11
00:00:56.759 --> 00:01:02.679
<v Speaker 1>paper A New Series of Organic Compounds containing metals, demonstrated

12
00:01:02.920 --> 00:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>that the peering of the radicals with the elements was

13
00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to be explained on the ground of some characteristic property

14
00:01:09.480 --> 00:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>of the atoms, and thus he expelled the useless part

15
00:01:13.079 --> 00:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of the radical theory. Eighteen fifty two. Frankland observed that

16
00:01:21.200 --> 00:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>when the formulae of inorganic chemical compounds are considered, even

17
00:01:26.319 --> 00:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a superficial observer is struck with the general symmetry of

18
00:01:29.719 --> 00:01:35.519
<v Speaker 1>their constitution. The compounds of nitrogen, phosphorus, antimony, and arsenic

19
00:01:35.680 --> 00:01:40.359
<v Speaker 1>especially exhibit the tendency of these elements to form compounds

20
00:01:40.359 --> 00:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>containing three or five equivalents of other elements, and it

21
00:01:44.840 --> 00:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is in these proportions that their affinities are best satisfied. Thus,

22
00:01:49.560 --> 00:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>an eternal group, we have no three n H three,

23
00:01:54.239 --> 00:01:58.719
<v Speaker 1>n I three N S three, p O three, p

24
00:01:58.959 --> 00:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>H three, pc L three, s BO three, s b

25
00:02:04.480 --> 00:02:08.599
<v Speaker 1>h three, s p c L three A s O

26
00:02:08.800 --> 00:02:13.199
<v Speaker 1>three a s H three A s c L three,

27
00:02:13.520 --> 00:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And in the five atom group n O five,

28
00:02:18.520 --> 00:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>n H four O, n H four I, p O five,

29
00:02:23.400 --> 00:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>p H four i, et cetera. Without offering any hypothesis

30
00:02:29.159 --> 00:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>regarding the cause of this symmetrical grouping of atoms, it

31
00:02:33.039 --> 00:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is sufficiently evident from the examples just given that such

32
00:02:37.039 --> 00:02:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a tendency or law prevails, and that, no matter what

33
00:02:40.879 --> 00:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the character of the uniting atoms may be, the combining

34
00:02:44.919 --> 00:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>power of the attracting element, if I may be allowed

35
00:02:48.319 --> 00:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>to term, is always satisfied by the same number of

36
00:02:51.960 --> 00:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>these atoms. End quote. He then proceeded to represent the

37
00:02:58.840 --> 00:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>organometallic compounds obtained by formulae, which brought out the analogy

38
00:03:03.680 --> 00:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>with the inorganic types from which they were thought to

39
00:03:06.919 --> 00:03:12.599
<v Speaker 1>have been derived. From his work on the organometallic compounds,

40
00:03:12.759 --> 00:03:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Franklin developed the doctrine of the valance of the elements,

41
00:03:16.759 --> 00:03:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the germ of which may be recognized in much that

42
00:03:19.400 --> 00:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>has gone before, particularly in the law of multiple proportions,

43
00:03:23.840 --> 00:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>which stated that the elements show different yet definite stages

44
00:03:28.039 --> 00:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in their combinations. The so called doctrine of the polybasic

45
00:03:33.240 --> 00:03:37.719
<v Speaker 1>acids contributed materially to the development of ideas upon the

46
00:03:37.759 --> 00:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>subject of the saturation capacity of the atoms. Galusac, Gmelin,

47
00:03:43.599 --> 00:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and others inclined to the assumption that the atoms of

48
00:03:47.319 --> 00:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the various metallic oxides contained one atom of oxygen united

49
00:03:52.000 --> 00:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to one atom of metal, and that these oxides combined

50
00:03:56.000 --> 00:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>with one atom of acid to form neutral salts. Versalius,

51
00:04:01.520 --> 00:04:06.439
<v Speaker 1>also after sixteen twenty eight, considered that this combining proportion

52
00:04:06.680 --> 00:04:11.639
<v Speaker 1>was the rule. However, by Thomas Graham's famous investigation of

53
00:04:11.719 --> 00:04:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the phosphoric acids eighteen thirty three, it was shown that

54
00:04:15.759 --> 00:04:19.199
<v Speaker 1>a view so simple as this, according to which almost

55
00:04:19.240 --> 00:04:24.519
<v Speaker 1>every acid was looked upon as monobasic, was untenable. Graham

56
00:04:24.639 --> 00:04:29.519
<v Speaker 1>proved that in the ortho pyro and metaphosphoric acids. For

57
00:04:29.680 --> 00:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>each atom of phosphorus pentoxide, there were three, two and

58
00:04:34.240 --> 00:04:38.959
<v Speaker 1>one atoms of basic water, these latter being replaced by

59
00:04:39.000 --> 00:04:45.399
<v Speaker 1>equivalent amounts of metallic oxides. The saturation capacities of these

60
00:04:45.439 --> 00:04:48.439
<v Speaker 1>acids were in this way shown to be dependent upon

61
00:04:48.480 --> 00:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the amounts of basic water which entered into their constitution.

62
00:04:53.560 --> 00:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Libic extended this to many other acids and distinguished between

63
00:04:57.600 --> 00:05:02.399
<v Speaker 1>mono die and tribasic acid, and the property was referred

64
00:05:02.439 --> 00:05:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to as the basicity of the atoms, a term which,

65
00:05:06.759 --> 00:05:10.319
<v Speaker 1>with the ideas inherent in it, clung for some time

66
00:05:10.439 --> 00:05:14.959
<v Speaker 1>to the theory of valence. In eighteen fifty seven, for example,

67
00:05:15.199 --> 00:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the terms vasicity, valancy, and atomicity were used as synonymous

68
00:05:21.839 --> 00:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and as the measure of the number of hydrogen atoms

69
00:05:24.560 --> 00:05:29.399
<v Speaker 1>that could be replaced or held in combination. The idea

70
00:05:29.519 --> 00:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of basicity was soon extended to the compound organic radicals.

71
00:05:34.959 --> 00:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>In eighteen fifty five, C A voltz eighteen seventy to

72
00:05:39.000 --> 00:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>eighteen eighty four, a pupil of Libic and Duma showed

73
00:05:43.560 --> 00:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that glycerine C three H eight O three may be

74
00:05:48.040 --> 00:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>regarded as the hydrate of the radical C three H five.

75
00:05:53.199 --> 00:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Four years previous, A. W. Williamson eighteen twenty four to

76
00:05:57.480 --> 00:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen O four had expressed the VW that a large

77
00:06:01.079 --> 00:06:04.399
<v Speaker 1>number of compounds may be referred to the type of water,

78
00:06:04.959 --> 00:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the monobasic acids to one molecule, and the polybasic acids,

79
00:06:09.800 --> 00:06:14.199
<v Speaker 1>which are of greater molecular complexity, to a condensed water type.

80
00:06:15.079 --> 00:06:20.959
<v Speaker 1>He wrote, C two H three O H O equals

81
00:06:21.399 --> 00:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>acetic acid, s O two H two O two equals

82
00:06:27.480 --> 00:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>sulfuric acid. Words now showed that the composition of glycerine

83
00:06:33.000 --> 00:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>could be represented by the formula C three H five

84
00:06:37.560 --> 00:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>three prime H three O three, which was similar to

85
00:06:42.399 --> 00:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the formula by which, in accordance with the ideas of Williamson,

86
00:06:46.720 --> 00:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ordinary phosphoric acid P O three prime H three O

87
00:06:52.000 --> 00:06:58.199
<v Speaker 1>three was represented. Gerhardt, in his Trete de chimi organique

88
00:06:58.560 --> 00:07:04.399
<v Speaker 1>stated that quote, in order to compare the radicals among themselves,

89
00:07:04.519 --> 00:07:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I proposed to refer them all to the radical of hydrogen,

90
00:07:08.480 --> 00:07:14.079
<v Speaker 1>and consequently I name them monotomic, diatomic triatomic according to

91
00:07:14.160 --> 00:07:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the quantity of hydrogen which they are capable of replacing

92
00:07:18.000 --> 00:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in the type H two O, that is, according to

93
00:07:21.959 --> 00:07:26.199
<v Speaker 1>whether they are equivalent to one, two, or three atoms

94
00:07:26.199 --> 00:07:30.199
<v Speaker 1>of hydrogen. So, for instance, in alcohol and in ether

95
00:07:31.360 --> 00:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>o C two H five oh C two H five

96
00:07:37.160 --> 00:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>o C two H five C two H five, the

97
00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:47.519
<v Speaker 1>radical ethyl is monotomic because it replaces H one atom

98
00:07:47.560 --> 00:07:54.199
<v Speaker 1>of hydrogen in the type water end quote. The terms

99
00:07:54.439 --> 00:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>monotomic and polyatomic had been employed much earlier, but in

100
00:07:59.399 --> 00:08:06.639
<v Speaker 1>a difference. Thus, in eighteen twenty seven, Presalius called fluorine chlorine,

101
00:08:06.680 --> 00:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>et cetera polyatomic because several atoms of these halogens unite

102
00:08:12.240 --> 00:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>with a single atom of another element. In eighteen thirty three,

103
00:08:17.160 --> 00:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Gordon des Sante used the same terms to express the

104
00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>number of atoms in a molecule, in which sense they

105
00:08:24.040 --> 00:08:29.639
<v Speaker 1>were used by Kameelin, Clausius and Odling. Williamson attached the

106
00:08:29.680 --> 00:08:33.759
<v Speaker 1>idea of capacity for saturation or atomicity of the radical,

107
00:08:34.120 --> 00:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to the number of hydrogen atoms capable of substitution, and

108
00:08:38.080 --> 00:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the notion of atomicity was soon extended to the known

109
00:08:41.600 --> 00:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>compound radicals and played an important part in the theory

110
00:08:45.759 --> 00:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of types et cetera, which obtained inorganic chemistry. Franklin's speculations

111
00:08:53.080 --> 00:08:57.039
<v Speaker 1>concerning the substitution value of radicals compared with that of

112
00:08:57.120 --> 00:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>elementary atoms were of great importance, yet they did not

113
00:09:01.639 --> 00:09:06.279
<v Speaker 1>meet with immediate approval. By eighteen fifty eight, however, the

114
00:09:06.399 --> 00:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>valence theory had made rapid progress. In this year, August

115
00:09:11.399 --> 00:09:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Kekule first deduced the balance of carbon from its simplest compounds,

116
00:09:16.799 --> 00:09:21.639
<v Speaker 1>declaring it to be tetravalent. This had already been recognized

117
00:09:21.679 --> 00:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>by Colbert and Franklin, if not expressly stated by them,

118
00:09:26.360 --> 00:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But Caculae rendered further and much greater service by inquiring

119
00:09:30.240 --> 00:09:32.759
<v Speaker 1>into the manner in which two or more of these

120
00:09:32.840 --> 00:09:37.759
<v Speaker 1>tetravalent carbons were united with one another. The doctrine of

121
00:09:37.799 --> 00:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>atomic chains open and closed sprang from this, and the

122
00:09:42.360 --> 00:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>domination of the structural idea in chemistry became complete. In

123
00:09:47.559 --> 00:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the same year, and independently of Caculae, M. S. Cupere

124
00:09:52.360 --> 00:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>arrived at conclusions almost identical with those of Caculae. Both

125
00:09:57.799 --> 00:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Caculae and Couperre expressed with absolute definiteness the axiom that

126
00:10:03.320 --> 00:10:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the atomicity of the elements was to be made use

127
00:10:06.960 --> 00:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of for arriving at the constitution of chemical compounds. The

128
00:10:11.639 --> 00:10:15.279
<v Speaker 1>idea of the term atomicity had without any doubt been

129
00:10:15.320 --> 00:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>introduced by Franklin six years previous to this. The further

130
00:10:20.519 --> 00:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>development of the above axiom and its utilization in the

131
00:10:24.120 --> 00:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>theory of the linking of atoms, was carried out mainly

132
00:10:27.799 --> 00:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>by Caculae, and in the succeeding years also by Butlerrow

133
00:10:31.960 --> 00:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and erlen Meyer. While the radical and type theories were

134
00:10:37.240 --> 00:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>attempts at securing an idea of the structure of chemical compounds,

135
00:10:41.799 --> 00:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it was the valance theory which rendered it possible to

136
00:10:45.000 --> 00:10:47.639
<v Speaker 1>furnish a lucid answer to the question as to the

137
00:10:47.679 --> 00:10:53.039
<v Speaker 1>composition of such bodies, and especially after the year eighteen seventy,

138
00:10:53.600 --> 00:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the determination of the constitution of complex molecules became the

139
00:10:57.759 --> 00:11:03.799
<v Speaker 1>higher aim of chemistry. Some rudiments of systematic classification had

140
00:11:03.840 --> 00:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>before this been introduced into organic chemistry, and these classificatory

141
00:11:09.240 --> 00:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>beginnings were of great assistance in the erection of structural chemistry.

142
00:11:14.399 --> 00:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>In eighteen thirty six, Laurent, when he brought forward his

143
00:11:18.159 --> 00:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>nucleus series, arranged organic compounds in series. And it was

144
00:11:23.320 --> 00:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen forty one that Gerhardt entered on a research

145
00:11:26.960 --> 00:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to discover some general law which might suggest an all

146
00:11:30.559 --> 00:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>sufficing system of classification, and the following year he was

147
00:11:34.879 --> 00:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>ready with his letder of combustion, with its highest drung

148
00:11:38.679 --> 00:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>cerebral matter, its lowest carbonic acid, water and ammonia, to

149
00:11:44.240 --> 00:11:49.799
<v Speaker 1>unfold the whole science of organic chemistry. He soon found, however,

150
00:11:50.279 --> 00:11:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that this arrangement, according to mere complexity of composition, was

151
00:11:54.679 --> 00:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>no sufficient classification. So he betook himself to another line

152
00:11:59.279 --> 00:12:03.039
<v Speaker 1>of inquiry. A note of triumph seems to ring through

153
00:12:03.080 --> 00:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the following lines from the preface to his Precis de

154
00:12:06.559 --> 00:12:12.399
<v Speaker 1>schimik Organique, published in eighteen forty four. Quote, I have

155
00:12:12.480 --> 00:12:17.879
<v Speaker 1>succeeded in establishing homologous series. These have indicated to me

156
00:12:18.000 --> 00:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the means of classifying organic substances in natural families, and

157
00:12:22.600 --> 00:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>of disposing them on a kind of combustion letter end.

158
00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, it was only the word

159
00:12:30.960 --> 00:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>homology that Gerhard could claim as his own. Two years earlier, J.

160
00:12:36.559 --> 00:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Shield had shown that a very simple relation existed between

161
00:12:40.320 --> 00:12:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the alcohols, then known that their radicals might all be

162
00:12:44.039 --> 00:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>represented by the general expression n R plus h R,

163
00:12:49.320 --> 00:12:54.879
<v Speaker 1>suggesting the group C two H two C equal six. Moreover,

164
00:12:55.039 --> 00:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in the same year, Duma had demonstrated the existence of

165
00:12:58.480 --> 00:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a similar relation between the several members of the fatty

166
00:13:01.759 --> 00:13:06.159
<v Speaker 1>acids known to him. Yet Gerr had generalized from this

167
00:13:06.320 --> 00:13:10.399
<v Speaker 1>fact of homology and proved the possibility of predicting the

168
00:13:10.440 --> 00:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>existence of terms unknown in his series. Many systems of

169
00:13:16.159 --> 00:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>classification were suggested during the sixth decade, the classification by

170
00:13:21.440 --> 00:13:25.039
<v Speaker 1>series as that of Shield and duma, that of series

171
00:13:25.080 --> 00:13:30.399
<v Speaker 1>depending upon formulae, series depending upon chemical behavior, and many

172
00:13:30.440 --> 00:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>other systems. The lack of agreement among chemists, however, as

173
00:13:35.720 --> 00:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to the formulae belonging to the different compounds, as to

174
00:13:39.360 --> 00:13:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the relative weights of the molecules, the atomic weights, and

175
00:13:43.279 --> 00:13:47.399
<v Speaker 1>even the number of atoms, prevented a general acceptance of

176
00:13:47.480 --> 00:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>any of the classifications proposed until Caculae established the fact

177
00:13:52.639 --> 00:13:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of the tetravalance of the carbon atom, showed the difference

178
00:13:56.320 --> 00:14:02.799
<v Speaker 1>between saturated and unsaturated compounds, and reduced his chain formulae.

179
00:14:03.399 --> 00:14:08.799
<v Speaker 1>About eighteen sixty Franklin's views regarding a saturation capacity peculiar

180
00:14:08.840 --> 00:14:13.879
<v Speaker 1>to the elements were accepted either delitescently or expressly by

181
00:14:13.919 --> 00:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>most chemists, but it was considered that this saturation capacity,

182
00:14:18.759 --> 00:14:23.679
<v Speaker 1>under certain circumstances might be a varying one. In eighteen

183
00:14:23.720 --> 00:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty six, Gerhardt had stated that nitrogen was sometimes triatomic

184
00:14:28.799 --> 00:14:35.159
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes pentatomic. This view was also held by Franklin, Vts. Williamson,

185
00:14:35.240 --> 00:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and Coupert, and the latter three considered that the valance

186
00:14:39.320 --> 00:14:42.759
<v Speaker 1>was also variable in the cases of many other elements.

187
00:14:43.559 --> 00:14:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Corbet thought that it must be assumed that a constant

188
00:14:46.919 --> 00:14:50.879
<v Speaker 1>valancy was characteristic of a few elements, and a varying

189
00:14:51.000 --> 00:14:54.639
<v Speaker 1>one characteristic of many more, since he perceived in it

190
00:14:54.759 --> 00:14:58.799
<v Speaker 1>another expression for the law of multiple proportions, and nothing

191
00:14:58.919 --> 00:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>was known concerning the cause of valence. As early as

192
00:15:02.720 --> 00:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty four, Colbert had concluded that each element possessed

193
00:15:07.320 --> 00:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a maximum saturation capacity, but that lower stages of saturation

194
00:15:12.080 --> 00:15:15.679
<v Speaker 1>might exist along with this, and toward the beginning of

195
00:15:15.720 --> 00:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the sixties several chemists who took an active part in

196
00:15:19.519 --> 00:15:23.639
<v Speaker 1>developing the structure theory expressed the same opinion in a

197
00:15:23.679 --> 00:15:29.799
<v Speaker 1>more definite manner. Allenmeyer, in particular, maintained in various papers

198
00:15:30.039 --> 00:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and afterward in his leabug dea organishan Kimi that each

199
00:15:34.559 --> 00:15:38.879
<v Speaker 1>element possesses a maximum valancy, or that each is furnished

200
00:15:38.919 --> 00:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with a definite number of affinivalentin or affinity points affinitetspunkten.

201
00:15:45.879 --> 00:15:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Only part of these, however, being in many cases combined

202
00:15:49.720 --> 00:15:54.919
<v Speaker 1>with the affinity points of other elements. Calculates theory of

203
00:15:55.000 --> 00:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the constant balance of the elements could not withstand the

204
00:15:58.480 --> 00:16:02.559
<v Speaker 1>critical examinations to which it was subjected. However, and in

205
00:16:02.639 --> 00:16:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the course of the last forty years, the majority of

206
00:16:05.679 --> 00:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>chemists have adopted the view that the atoms of most

207
00:16:09.039 --> 00:16:13.919
<v Speaker 1>of the elements possess a varying saturation capacity, varying according

208
00:16:14.000 --> 00:16:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to the conditions. Although the structure theory was unable to

209
00:16:19.600 --> 00:16:23.159
<v Speaker 1>accomplish the extreme expectations which aimed at a knowledge of

210
00:16:23.200 --> 00:16:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the special arrangement of the atoms, it possessed nonetheless great

211
00:16:27.399 --> 00:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>practical value. The development of organic chemistry since the middle

212
00:16:32.240 --> 00:16:35.799
<v Speaker 1>of the sixth decade shows in fact that through the

213
00:16:35.840 --> 00:16:39.639
<v Speaker 1>aid of the structural hypothesis, the discovery of new modes

214
00:16:39.679 --> 00:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of formation and decomposition of compounds, the recognition of the

215
00:16:44.039 --> 00:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>relations existing between various classes of bodies, and especially the

216
00:16:49.399 --> 00:16:54.399
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of the constitution of numerous organic substances became possible.

217
00:16:55.360 --> 00:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Calculates theory of the aromatic compounds forms the most striking

218
00:16:59.759 --> 00:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>proof of this in eighteen sixty five to eighteen sixty six.

219
00:17:04.839 --> 00:17:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Taking the quadryvalance of carbon as his principle, Calculate called

220
00:17:09.599 --> 00:17:12.759
<v Speaker 1>attention to the fact that in the fatty compounds, the

221
00:17:12.839 --> 00:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>carbon atoms are linked together by one balance of each.

222
00:17:17.400 --> 00:17:20.839
<v Speaker 1>In the case of benzene, the next simplest assumption was

223
00:17:20.880 --> 00:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>made in accordance with which the carbon atoms are linked

224
00:17:24.400 --> 00:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>together by one and two balances alternately, so as to

225
00:17:28.480 --> 00:17:32.319
<v Speaker 1>form a closed chain or ring. Of the twenty four

226
00:17:32.359 --> 00:17:36.599
<v Speaker 1>affinities of the six carbon atoms, eighteen are employed in

227
00:17:36.720 --> 00:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>linking carbon to carbon. Thus six over two times four

228
00:17:41.559 --> 00:17:48.039
<v Speaker 1>plus six over two times two equals eighteen. Six valencies

229
00:17:48.119 --> 00:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>then remain which are satisfied by the six hydrogen atoms

230
00:17:51.720 --> 00:17:56.559
<v Speaker 1>of the benzene. Hence, according to Calculate, benzene may be

231
00:17:56.640 --> 00:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>represented by means of a regular hexagon whose sides are

232
00:18:00.519 --> 00:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>composed of single and of double lines alternately, the c

233
00:18:04.920 --> 00:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>groups occupying the corners. Thus, Caculae and his pupils, together

234
00:18:12.039 --> 00:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with many other chemists, who had busied themselves with the

235
00:18:15.240 --> 00:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>derivatives of benzene after this view had been published, now

236
00:18:19.480 --> 00:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>directed their efforts to comparing all the known and rapidly

237
00:18:23.279 --> 00:18:27.599
<v Speaker 1>increasing observations bearing upon this class of bodies. With the

238
00:18:27.680 --> 00:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>deductions drawn from the above formula and therewith to proving

239
00:18:32.240 --> 00:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>by actual experiment the admissibility of the assumptions on which

240
00:18:36.279 --> 00:18:41.759
<v Speaker 1>the formula was based. The result was that Caculae's anticipations

241
00:18:41.799 --> 00:18:48.079
<v Speaker 1>were realized and his hypothesis substantiated. In eighteen sixty six,

242
00:18:48.240 --> 00:18:53.039
<v Speaker 1>Caculae had stated that what is wanted is that the

243
00:18:53.160 --> 00:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>largest possible number of substitution products of benzene should be

244
00:18:57.720 --> 00:19:01.279
<v Speaker 1>prepared by the most diverse methods, that they should be

245
00:19:01.440 --> 00:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>most carefully compared with regard to isomerism, that the modifications

246
00:19:06.480 --> 00:19:11.799
<v Speaker 1>so found should be counted end quote. And in the

247
00:19:11.839 --> 00:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty seven edition of his textbook he called attention

248
00:19:15.759 --> 00:19:18.839
<v Speaker 1>to a number of cases of isomerism which at that

249
00:19:19.039 --> 00:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>time had received no explanation. Among these we find that

250
00:19:23.839 --> 00:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of ethylene chloride with ethylidne chloride, of acetyl with diethyl

251
00:19:30.599 --> 00:19:36.519
<v Speaker 1>glycol for malaic and fiumaric for ucake and saccharic acids.

252
00:19:36.960 --> 00:19:40.039
<v Speaker 1>The last effort of his philosophy had only found him

253
00:19:40.079 --> 00:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the two formula C four H two double prime O

254
00:19:44.799 --> 00:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>two H two O two and C six H eight

255
00:19:50.640 --> 00:19:57.079
<v Speaker 1>double prime O six H two O two, respectively. Calculae

256
00:19:57.240 --> 00:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>instanced two those bodies which only differed in their effect

257
00:20:01.519 --> 00:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>on polarized light, the tartaric, the malic and camphoric acids,

258
00:20:06.920 --> 00:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and the amyl alcohols. It was owing to these cases

259
00:20:11.759 --> 00:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of isomerism that structural formulae could not be assigned. In

260
00:20:16.680 --> 00:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>some cases, a greater number of isomeric bodies were known

261
00:20:19.960 --> 00:20:23.079
<v Speaker 1>than could possibly be accounted for by any arrangement of

262
00:20:23.119 --> 00:20:27.519
<v Speaker 1>the atoms in formulae upon a plane's surface, retaining, of course,

263
00:20:27.960 --> 00:20:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the accepted views as to balance, et cetera. And since

264
00:20:31.640 --> 00:20:36.559
<v Speaker 1>these isomers differed principally in certain physical properties, they were

265
00:20:36.599 --> 00:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at first termed physical isomers. The study of these resulted

266
00:20:41.720 --> 00:20:44.839
<v Speaker 1>in the consideration of the arrangement of atoms in space,

267
00:20:45.400 --> 00:20:50.079
<v Speaker 1>the chemistry of space, or stereochemistry, in which branch of

268
00:20:50.160 --> 00:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the science an extended view of atomic grouping was essayed.

269
00:20:54.880 --> 00:21:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Modern stereochemistry was anticipated by Emmanuel Swedenborg in seventy twenty one,

270
00:21:01.359 --> 00:21:04.079
<v Speaker 1>when he made an attempt to explain the phenomena of

271
00:21:04.160 --> 00:21:10.039
<v Speaker 1>chemistry and physics on geometrical principles. In his prodromus principorium

272
00:21:10.160 --> 00:21:17.839
<v Speaker 1>rerum naturalium. Seeven novorum tentaminum, chemium at physicum, experimentalem geometric

273
00:21:18.119 --> 00:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>explicandi and similar beginnings were made by Johann Barcussen ten

274
00:21:23.319 --> 00:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>years earlier. In eighteen sixty four, Carrius, who first used

275
00:21:29.119 --> 00:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the term physical isomerism, explained it as follows quote. I

276
00:21:35.799 --> 00:21:38.759
<v Speaker 1>have tentatively expressed a view as to the cause of

277
00:21:38.799 --> 00:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>what I call physical isomerism. Substances which exhibit this property

278
00:21:45.319 --> 00:21:49.519
<v Speaker 1>yield under the same or nearly the same conditions, products

279
00:21:49.559 --> 00:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>which are either identical or physically isomeric. According to our

280
00:21:54.759 --> 00:21:58.599
<v Speaker 1>present views, I think it improbable that such substances should

281
00:21:58.599 --> 00:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>have their atoms differently arranged, that is, that they should

282
00:22:02.400 --> 00:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>be metameric. But it is quite conceivable that in the

283
00:22:06.559 --> 00:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>formation of physical isomers, differences of condition may cause the

284
00:22:11.079 --> 00:22:15.039
<v Speaker 1>production of substances with the same arrangement of the atoms

285
00:22:15.079 --> 00:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>within the molecule, but with a different aggregation of these molecules,

286
00:22:20.160 --> 00:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and that thereon depends the difference in their properties. Thus

287
00:22:25.640 --> 00:22:30.079
<v Speaker 1>we must consider as certainly only physically isomeric, a large

288
00:22:30.160 --> 00:22:33.519
<v Speaker 1>number of the substances distinguished by the difference of their

289
00:22:33.559 --> 00:22:37.599
<v Speaker 1>action on polarized light, such as the two modifications of

290
00:22:37.839 --> 00:22:42.799
<v Speaker 1>amyl alcohol, the tartaric acids, the malic acids, et cetera.

291
00:22:44.240 --> 00:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>End this explanation was inadequate, and in eighteen seventy three

292
00:22:51.720 --> 00:22:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Johannes Vivalentius eighteen thirty five to nineteen oh two, who

293
00:22:56.440 --> 00:23:00.319
<v Speaker 1>succeeded Colbert as professor of chemistry at Leipzig in eighteen

294
00:23:00.359 --> 00:23:05.839
<v Speaker 1>eighty five, suggested the substitution of the term geometrical isomerism

295
00:23:06.200 --> 00:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>for physical isomerism. He had been engaged in an investigation

296
00:23:11.000 --> 00:23:15.039
<v Speaker 1>of the various modifications of lactic acid, and had found

297
00:23:15.240 --> 00:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that the ethylene lactic acid or hydrocrylic acid prepared by

298
00:23:20.240 --> 00:23:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Bielstein by treating beta iodopropionic acid with silver oxide, possessed

299
00:23:26.119 --> 00:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>properties different from those of the ethylene lactic acid obtained

300
00:23:30.160 --> 00:23:35.039
<v Speaker 1>from ethylene cyane hydrone. This difference was so marked that

301
00:23:35.079 --> 00:23:38.079
<v Speaker 1>he thought it might be explained by assigning the two

302
00:23:38.160 --> 00:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>acids different structural formulae. The first was optically inactive, while

303
00:23:44.160 --> 00:23:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the second, paralactic acid, was textra rotary. This one point

304
00:23:49.400 --> 00:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of difference appeared hardly sufficient to make it necessary to

305
00:23:53.559 --> 00:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>assign to paralactic acid a structural formula other than that

306
00:23:58.240 --> 00:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>of fermentation lactic acid. It seemed much more likely that here,

307
00:24:03.240 --> 00:24:06.599
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, were cases of what Carriers had called

308
00:24:06.839 --> 00:24:12.839
<v Speaker 1>physical but what Wislicenus now proposed to call geometrical isomerism.

309
00:24:13.880 --> 00:24:18.039
<v Speaker 1>He said, quote my conclusion for the present is to

310
00:24:18.119 --> 00:24:22.759
<v Speaker 1>declare paralactic acid and the fermentation lactic acid as most

311
00:24:22.880 --> 00:24:28.759
<v Speaker 1>probably only geometrically isomeric. Their great similarity, even identity in

312
00:24:28.880 --> 00:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>all chemical properties, the ease of transformation on heating of

313
00:24:33.319 --> 00:24:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the first into the second, and their differences, particularly in

314
00:24:37.319 --> 00:24:41.519
<v Speaker 1>optical behavior, may all alike be explained on this basis.

315
00:24:42.599 --> 00:24:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Concerning the special how of this explanation, I am engaged

316
00:24:46.839 --> 00:24:55.039
<v Speaker 1>in experimental investigations. The next year ja fand Hoff furnished

317
00:24:55.079 --> 00:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>an answer to this. However, before giving his exposition, mention

318
00:25:00.200 --> 00:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>must be made of Luis Pasteurs eighteen twenty two to

319
00:25:03.319 --> 00:25:08.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ninety five, pioneer work in this field. Pasta studied

320
00:25:08.680 --> 00:25:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the various tartrates crystallographically and showed that there are four

321
00:25:13.400 --> 00:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>isomeric tartaric acids, that is, rhsemic acid, inactive tartaric acid,

322
00:25:20.680 --> 00:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and right and left rotating tartaric acids. He showed moreover

323
00:25:26.079 --> 00:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that the two latter acids crystallized in similar but in

324
00:25:29.599 --> 00:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>oppositely built up and antiomorph forms, that they both rotate

325
00:25:35.240 --> 00:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a ray of polarized light through equal angles but in

326
00:25:38.720 --> 00:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>opposite senses, and that when mixed in equal quantities, they

327
00:25:43.200 --> 00:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>yield optically inactive rhsemic acid. Further, he succeeded in decomposing

328
00:25:49.279 --> 00:25:53.839
<v Speaker 1>rhsemic acid again into the two optically active tartaric acids

329
00:25:54.119 --> 00:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>by three different methods. Pasta established the correlation of molecul

330
00:26:00.119 --> 00:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ll dysymmetry and rotary power in these investigations, and it

331
00:26:04.519 --> 00:26:08.799
<v Speaker 1>remained to discover under which conditions the dysymmetry could obtain

332
00:26:08.880 --> 00:26:14.519
<v Speaker 1>in two molecules structurally identical. This was undertaken in eighteen

333
00:26:14.559 --> 00:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy four by J. A. Fantauff in Holland and J. A.

334
00:26:18.920 --> 00:26:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Lebel in France, who, in papers published that year, offered

335
00:26:23.279 --> 00:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>an explanation practically the same for cases of isomerism which

336
00:26:27.759 --> 00:26:30.559
<v Speaker 1>could not be included under the theories of the time.

337
00:26:31.559 --> 00:26:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Fantauff states that in general Lebel's original paper and his

338
00:26:36.079 --> 00:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>were in accord, but that while Paste's researches formed Lebel's

339
00:26:40.279 --> 00:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>starting point he took for his own caculaise laws of

340
00:26:44.039 --> 00:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the tetravealence of carbon, to which he added the hypothesis

341
00:26:48.519 --> 00:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that the four balancies are directed toward the corners of

342
00:26:51.720 --> 00:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the tetrahedron, in the center of which is the carbon atom.

343
00:26:56.200 --> 00:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>To quote from Foynd's study of chemical composition quote font

344
00:27:01.359 --> 00:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Hoff introduced no fundamental change in or addition to the

345
00:27:06.039 --> 00:27:11.799
<v Speaker 1>original Valiancy hypothesis. A two dimensional representation of molecular structure

346
00:27:11.839 --> 00:27:14.839
<v Speaker 1>could not at any time have been considered as really

347
00:27:15.000 --> 00:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>true to the actual occurrence, but it was legitimate to

348
00:27:18.839 --> 00:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>use it because of its greater simplicity, as long as

349
00:27:22.160 --> 00:27:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it proved adequate to the purpose. And with this recognition

350
00:27:26.400 --> 00:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and restriction, we continue to use plain structural formulae in

351
00:27:30.559 --> 00:27:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the majority of cases. End font Hoff. Following up the

352
00:27:36.400 --> 00:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>suggestion that may be found implied in Pastor's paper and

353
00:27:40.359 --> 00:27:45.319
<v Speaker 1>that was explicitly stated by Weslycenius, introduces into the science

354
00:27:45.400 --> 00:27:50.039
<v Speaker 1>the consideration of the arrangement of atoms in space. Quote.

355
00:27:50.480 --> 00:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Stereochemistry from stereos solid in the restricted sense of the word,

356
00:27:56.759 --> 00:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>comprises chemical phenomena which demand a considerate of the grouping

357
00:28:01.039 --> 00:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>of atoms in space end quote. Carbon compounds only were

358
00:28:07.160 --> 00:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>considered at first, but the scope of the phenomena dealt

359
00:28:10.640 --> 00:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>with has been extended and now includes compounds of tribalent

360
00:28:14.599 --> 00:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and pentavalent, nitrogen, of tin, and of sulfur. Font Hoff's

361
00:28:20.480 --> 00:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>theory of the asymmetric carbon atom, however, met with difficulties

362
00:28:25.240 --> 00:28:30.279
<v Speaker 1>on its annunciation. To quote from F. P. Armitage's History

363
00:28:30.319 --> 00:28:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of Chemistry quote, When Fantoff enunciated his theory of the

364
00:28:36.359 --> 00:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>asymmetric carbon atom, he was able to say, with much

365
00:28:40.279 --> 00:28:44.559
<v Speaker 1>show of truth, that all optically active substances did contain

366
00:28:44.680 --> 00:28:50.559
<v Speaker 1>certainly one such atom. Soon, however, were heard dissentient voices.

367
00:28:51.279 --> 00:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>What of propyle alcohol, asked one, and of styrolene, demanded another.

368
00:28:57.359 --> 00:29:01.519
<v Speaker 1>The propyle alcohol owes its activity to pis of amyl alcohol,

369
00:29:01.839 --> 00:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>answered Henniger. The styrrolene is impure, said fant Hoff, and

370
00:29:06.480 --> 00:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>their evidence was irrefutable. But font Hoff could not, in

371
00:29:11.039 --> 00:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>eighteen seventy four maintain that the presence of one asymmetric

372
00:29:15.480 --> 00:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>carbon atom necessarily implied optical activity for secondary amyl alcohol

373
00:29:21.480 --> 00:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and its derivatives, also propylene alcohol, were certainly inactive, yet

374
00:29:27.279 --> 00:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>all contained an asymmetric carbon atom. The problem, said the stereochemists,

375
00:29:33.160 --> 00:29:36.599
<v Speaker 1>were somewhat similar to that of the relation between tartaric

376
00:29:36.680 --> 00:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and drassemic acid, so happily solved years before by Pasteur.

377
00:29:42.119 --> 00:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>His methods were recalled, and le Bell soon showed that

378
00:29:45.519 --> 00:29:49.559
<v Speaker 1>these inactive bodies were in reality mixtures of two optically

379
00:29:49.640 --> 00:29:55.039
<v Speaker 1>opposite isomers, and others helping that indeed, every substance with

380
00:29:55.160 --> 00:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but one asymmetric carbon atom was equally capable of mesotomis.

381
00:30:01.519 --> 00:30:05.279
<v Speaker 1>The four varieties of tartaric acid had offered no difficulty

382
00:30:05.880 --> 00:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>with two asymmetric carbon atoms similarly habited, there was necessarily

383
00:30:10.799 --> 00:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>neutralization or a duplication of optical activity. But where two

384
00:30:15.920 --> 00:30:20.799
<v Speaker 1>or more carbon atoms occurred asymmetric by union with different radicals,

385
00:30:21.119 --> 00:30:24.799
<v Speaker 1>as in the sugars and their derivatives, many more cases

386
00:30:24.799 --> 00:30:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of physical isomerism suggested themselves and have since been verified

387
00:30:30.160 --> 00:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>without doubt. The asymmetric carbon atom has made a triumphant progress,

388
00:30:35.079 --> 00:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>winning for Lebel the JACA price of eighteen eighty one,

389
00:30:38.480 --> 00:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>for Fantoefe dominant voice, and the scientific councils of the world.

390
00:30:42.839 --> 00:30:46.039
<v Speaker 1>It will rank with the phlogiston of Starr. The oxygen

391
00:30:46.079 --> 00:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of La Boisier, the atom of Dalton, and the dualism

392
00:30:49.720 --> 00:30:56.799
<v Speaker 1>of Beerzalius. Among the most noted workers in the field

393
00:30:56.839 --> 00:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of stereochemistry have been Aphon Baya, Ballach, Victor Maya, Rique

394
00:31:02.519 --> 00:31:08.799
<v Speaker 1>bischof Werner, Hantsch, Hours and Overton. Even now, the subject

395
00:31:08.880 --> 00:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is in its infancy, and stereochemical theories are as yet

396
00:31:12.960 --> 00:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>insufficiently advanced to present a clear view of the question

397
00:31:16.279 --> 00:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of geometrical isomerism. Yet, as Ladenburg has said quote, it

398
00:31:23.039 --> 00:31:27.079
<v Speaker 1>is beyond doubt that the founding and development of stereochemistry,

399
00:31:27.400 --> 00:31:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a name which originated with Victor Maya, is the most

400
00:31:31.119 --> 00:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>important thing that was accomplished in organic chemistry during the

401
00:31:34.799 --> 00:31:40.039
<v Speaker 1>last two decades of the nineteenth century. Stereochemistry possesses a

402
00:31:40.079 --> 00:31:44.039
<v Speaker 1>significance for this period similar to that which the foundation

403
00:31:44.200 --> 00:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and introduction of the theory of aromatic compounds possessed for

404
00:31:48.079 --> 00:31:55.519
<v Speaker 1>the twenty years preceding end end of section seventeen
