Speaker 1: Cacoday Radio program phone number eight eight eight nine three
Speaker 1: four seven eight seven four glad to have you a
Speaker 1: long Oh boy, boy, old boy. I kind of felt
Speaker 1: bad center ross all the audio I sent him, although
Speaker 1: it wasn't like you had to cut up twenty cackling
Speaker 1: comboly cuts, so you know, you had that going for
Speaker 1: you versus you know, some big event. That being said.
Speaker 1: That being said, man, there's some crazy stuff, crazy stuff
Speaker 1: over the weekend. Look, and let me say this because
Speaker 1: somebody did mentioned it. They're like, you know, I don't
Speaker 1: know if you guys, he said, I don't know if
Speaker 1: you're going to talk about the McDonald's thing. But isn't
Speaker 1: this one of those stunts you talked about? And I
Speaker 1: was trying to fire out, and so I wrote back
Speaker 1: with a question mark and he's like, you know, the
Speaker 1: guy brought the snowball in. And I'm like, you know what,
Speaker 1: that is a very good discussion. That's a very good
Speaker 1: point because if you haven't listened to the show very often.
Speaker 1: One of the things that I absolutely hate, and I
Speaker 1: don't know if it's just the curmudgeon in me, is
Speaker 1: I hate the stupid gotcha stunts The politicians love to do, like,
Speaker 1: you know, there's a reply camera which Republican it was there.
Speaker 1: It was snowing in DC, which it does sometimes, Okay,
Speaker 1: snow's in North Carolina sometimes, so it snows in DC sometimes, okay.
Speaker 1: And he brings a snowball into like the House chamber.
Speaker 1: He's like, see no global and I'm just like, this
Speaker 1: is just also dumb. Do you know what it is?
Speaker 1: It's like disingenuous mini trolling on Twitter or after the
Speaker 1: Chick fil A thing, you had the one Democrat senator
Speaker 1: I think he was, who brought in the bucket a
Speaker 1: KFC and put it right on the podium in front
Speaker 1: of him and then just ate it to show I'm
Speaker 1: not going to Chick fil A. The genius, of course
Speaker 1: being is the product that he has. You can't buy
Speaker 1: a Chick fil A comparably, right, They don't have a
Speaker 1: family bucket. So whatever, Now Trump going to McDonald's is it?
Speaker 1: Is it stunty? Yes? Is it stunty in the same
Speaker 1: way as a sitting member of Congress bringing a prop
Speaker 1: in like their carrot top to an actual hearing. No,
Speaker 1: he's on the campaign trail. I have to be honest.
Speaker 1: I thought the whole thing was kind of pointless. But
Speaker 1: I rethought that for two reasons. One, the video of
Speaker 1: and photos that emerge of Donald Trump leaning through a
Speaker 1: McDonald's window in the guard well, kind of right in
Speaker 1: the apron over the suit. I thought he wouldn't wear
Speaker 1: his tie because he was running a deep friar and
Speaker 1: he likes to let the high's diplow. But no, he
Speaker 1: contained it in an apron. There he did the fry thing.
Speaker 1: He did the the the at the window. And at
Speaker 1: the window you got Donald Trump, a billionaire, leaning his
Speaker 1: head out the window like he's Ray Kroc. It's as
Speaker 1: you see the photo I retweeted that I said, would
Speaker 1: be good for deportation center. Uh wallposters.
Speaker 2: I've seen like all the photos and all the things
Speaker 2: with this thing.
Speaker 1: Yes, okay, I'm curious your take, because you get annoyed
Speaker 1: with this stuff too sometimes. But here's my last point
Speaker 1: that I'm curious your thoughts, and and so I look
Speaker 1: at it through the lens of a campaign thing, and
Speaker 1: then I have to judge it in the same way
Speaker 1: that I see Kamala in a kitchen or uh, you know,
Speaker 1: Cal Cunningham running his grill, right, remember that, And there
Speaker 1: there are things that candidates do, and most of the
Speaker 1: time they don't move the needle because they're trying to
Speaker 1: make a point that is already a political point that
Speaker 1: the candidate's making. In this case, there was some of that,
Speaker 1: and it immediately became clear to me when I saw
Speaker 1: the headline from like in this case, ABC eleven was
Speaker 1: one of them. They just had the most concise headline
Speaker 1: on this, and basically it was Donald Trump goes to
Speaker 1: hold on, let me read the let me read this
Speaker 1: for batim. I realized I had my other story open here.
Speaker 1: All right, So here we go Trump Trump was Trump
Speaker 1: divis McDonald's as he offers no evidence for saying Harris
Speaker 1: didn't work there in college. Okay, I have a question.
Speaker 1: Both of these candidates have told you a lie at
Speaker 1: some point, right Trump? People don't tell me Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is a is is an embellisher at times, and also
Speaker 1: he uh, he says things that he knows people are
Speaker 1: going to react to.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: You know how I feel about that little slice of it.
Speaker 1: Sometimes it's incredibly amusing. Sometimes it's wildly unhelpful. As he
Speaker 1: goes deeper, though, I feel like him doing that is
Speaker 1: more helpful, right because because like you get a little
Speaker 1: analysis with it, and the analysis is this, I don't
Speaker 1: know if she worked at McDonald's for five minutes in college, Like,
Speaker 1: there's probably a lot of people out there who spent
Speaker 1: a few weeks at a job and I'm out, and
Speaker 1: we don't know the details of what she's claiming other
Speaker 1: than the the geographic region, right, think about that. That's
Speaker 1: really that's that's crazy for something that has become a
Speaker 1: contentious point. And there's two explanations. One, she's lying, right,
Speaker 1: and she the reason you will never get these specific
Speaker 1: details is because then they could check it. Or two
Speaker 1: and this is a possibility in something that uh they
Speaker 1: that can't politicians do to each other. It's it's they
Speaker 1: feel it's more beneficial for her that he looked crazy
Speaker 1: screaming she never worked there, So they'll never they'll always
Speaker 1: leave it as one of those, you know, those mysteries
Speaker 1: that are out there. I don't think that works here though,
Speaker 1: because immediately I looked at I looked at the way
Speaker 1: that people were reacting to this, and not just on
Speaker 1: on on the Twitter, right, but how they were interacting
Speaker 1: specifically with ABC within their own with our local affiliate
Speaker 1: here and I'm not picking on them, I kind of am,
Speaker 1: but because it's an ap story that they re ran,
Speaker 1: it would be incredibly easy if reporters still operated under
Speaker 1: their Well, let's figure this out, because how can Trump
Speaker 1: prove a negative? Right? Go to every McDonald's that has
Speaker 1: ever existed in this region or you know, maybe the
Speaker 1: state of California for that matter. Plus you got to
Speaker 1: look for McDonald's that existed elsewhere or clothed or they
Speaker 1: moved the store, and so it doesn't track within that
Speaker 1: specific area. You're certain, like, how how is Trump supposed
Speaker 1: to prove that? So you by you putting that in
Speaker 1: the headline and not pointing out that she's offered no
Speaker 1: evidence other than her word. And we know she's lied
Speaker 1: every and for and for journalists because I saw getting
Speaker 1: called on this.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 1: Some moonbats are like, she just doesn't lie. And I'm like,
Speaker 1: her main campaign points are not true, right, and you
Speaker 1: know they're not true and you have to as the media.
Speaker 1: You just got caught with your pants down over the Biden. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, debate where clearly you and if you if
Speaker 1: you want to say it's not you, but clearly Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris and others in that circle lied to you. So
Speaker 1: why wouldn't you take five minutes to check Sie if
Speaker 1: you worked at Mickey D's. Man, And I think that
Speaker 1: this right here at least allows people to scream that
Speaker 1: enough that some folks may hear go, you know what,
Speaker 1: that's a good question. Why wouldn't they just be like, hey,
Speaker 1: what McDonald's real quick? Hell, you would think they'd want
Speaker 1: to find a photo of her as a young woman
Speaker 1: working a fry thing considering the photo of her as
Speaker 1: a young girl with the bus thing. None of it
Speaker 1: makes sense? So was it a waste of time? Was
Speaker 1: it good meme material? Or do you think it moved
Speaker 1: the needle? Ross? All right, I set it up. Where
Speaker 1: are you at on this thing? Or do you just
Speaker 1: don't care?
Speaker 2: So the reason that they're not supplying a video or
Speaker 2: not a video but a photo or a paste ub
Speaker 2: or a person coming forward saying I've worked with her
Speaker 2: before at McDonald's is because they can't do it because
Speaker 2: she is lying. Oh and the reason this is a
Speaker 2: big point is because, like you've already said, it goes
Speaker 2: against everything that she says her campaign is about. Right,
Speaker 2: I was born in a middle class family. No, you
Speaker 2: were not, No, you were not.
Speaker 1: But here's the other thing. But also, I like, even
Speaker 1: if you're not, even if you're born in a wealthy family,
Speaker 1: some people, even if they're a wealthy family, want their
Speaker 1: kids to have a job for the sure.
Speaker 2: Sure, but my point is that wasn't her in this
Speaker 2: case her what is it on her father's side, he
Speaker 2: owned the biggest slave plantation in all of Jamaica.
Speaker 1: Well, her family the lineage y, Yeah, that's her parents, right,
Speaker 1: her her parents.
Speaker 2: I mean, if we if we're i mean going back
Speaker 2: to the to the to the plantation slavery thing, if
Speaker 2: we're talking about generational wealth, well there you go. Her
Speaker 2: parents were both professors. She was raised in Berkeley and
Speaker 2: then moved to Montreal. Upon moving to Montreal, she was
Speaker 2: given a gift by her family of sixty thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: This is not middle class. She did not work in McDonald's.
Speaker 2: If she did, and we know this because we know
Speaker 2: she has a thin skin, because of how she reacted
Speaker 2: when actually being confronted by an actual interview with Brett Baer,
Speaker 2: she would this would piss her off. So if she
Speaker 2: could prove it wrong, and if they could prove Donald
Speaker 2: Trump to be a liar on this issue. They would
Speaker 2: have provided everything that have already stated.
Speaker 1: Or or you put it in a headline. Yeah yeah,
Speaker 1: and you think that's gonna work. And I don't think
Speaker 1: it works as well as anymore.
Speaker 2: And then you have people saying, oh, well, it was
Speaker 2: just a campaign stunt him being there, and he's just
Speaker 2: using this, it's just a prop. Well, the point goes back,
Speaker 2: he's trolling her because her use of this, of this,
Speaker 2: her working at McDonald's, which is false. Is a is
Speaker 2: a prop it is.
Speaker 1: It is one of the things property of her campaign
Speaker 1: as a middle class person, which is false. And here's
Speaker 1: what I saw people rebut that point, here's what they'd say.
Speaker 1: They'd be like, yes, but even if you don't think
Speaker 1: she was middle class, Trump is a billionaire. The difference
Speaker 1: is I saw somebody put this into better words. I
Speaker 1: don't want to read from their tweak the This is
Speaker 1: where I'm at on it, too, So let me let
Speaker 1: me try to be as concise as possible. Rumps in
Speaker 1: on it. Okay, he's in on the joke.
Speaker 2: He understands it.
Speaker 1: He knows he's a billionaire. He's not pretending that he
Speaker 1: is a fry cook. You know what I'm saying. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's right, he's having fun with it, and he's talking
Speaker 1: to everybody and you know, Ron McDonald and they're laughing.
Speaker 1: And it might be just be polite. Maybe they do
Speaker 1: or don't want to work with him. It doesn't matter,
Speaker 1: and people are showing up and he's joyful about it.
Speaker 2: He understands the joke when he's putting the april on,
Speaker 2: he understand the apron on, he understands the meme that
Speaker 2: it is. Yeah, he's part of it. He can laugh along.
Speaker 2: This goes back to the Al Smith dinner this past
Speaker 2: weekend where she did not show up because she can't
Speaker 2: handle it. She's not she can't pretend to be human
Speaker 2: because everything about her is completely is a falsehood.
Speaker 1: And Trump would never be like, oh, I'm just I'm
Speaker 1: just a fry cook, right, I'm just a humble guy.
Speaker 1: He's serving the damn.
Speaker 2: He's serving the fries, and he's saying, these are the
Speaker 2: best greatest fries they've ever made here, and well he's
Speaker 2: passing him out. Here's the best Mealia ever had here.
Speaker 2: And he's part of the joke and he's playing along
Speaker 2: with people, and it is very I don't see how
Speaker 2: it's anything but a net positive.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, so uh no, the long way about it's
Speaker 1: not It's not a guy walking into a committee hearing
Speaker 1: with the snowball. It's a candidate doing how you do
Speaker 1: this thing where you you Microw, I call it Mike Rowing, right, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean you're Mike Rowe. If you ever watch Dirty Jobs,
Speaker 1: here's here's the Here's why Micro is such a good
Speaker 1: host with that. Micro is such a good host with
Speaker 1: that because if a lot of ps TV presenters or
Speaker 1: news hosts or others who might find themselves doing a
Speaker 1: documentary style show like that would also they would have
Speaker 1: zero ability to connect with the people. Right And if
Speaker 1: you you know, if Mike Row every time he goes there,
Speaker 1: in the back of the mind of a lot of
Speaker 1: the people who do those jobs, because I've done some
Speaker 1: of those jobs, some of you are going to do
Speaker 1: those jobs, right, you will never no one will shovel
Speaker 1: as much cowpoop as I have listening to the show
Speaker 1: right now, I'm almost sure of it, right, And that
Speaker 1: was one of the features that they did on there,
Speaker 1: essentially a ranch hand out there. But I but I
Speaker 1: feel like he genuinely is interested, and he connects with people.
Speaker 1: And most of the time when you see a politician
Speaker 1: go in there and they got their their you know,
Speaker 1: their apron, but you know with the folds in it,
Speaker 1: or they're they're purporting that this is normal. Chuck Schumer
Speaker 1: is he wants you to believe that He normally girls
Speaker 1: hamburgers where he puts the cheese on at the same
Speaker 1: time he puts the meat on the grill as you
Speaker 1: do ross. That's that's how you grow, right, You take
Speaker 1: raw hamburger, put the cheese right on it, put it
Speaker 1: on the grill first, right.
Speaker 2: I just eat the meat raw. It's better for you.
Speaker 1: Oh all right, liverking here, yeah, right. But Micro connects
Speaker 1: with him and Donald Trump. And the reason is is
Speaker 1: Mike Rowe is a millionaire, multi millionaire. He's a producer.
Speaker 1: He's got some credits on stuff people don't even realize.
Speaker 1: But at no points you go in and he's like, no,
Speaker 1: I'm just a ditch digger too. He is a guy
Speaker 1: who is genuinely interested, not necessarily just in the job
Speaker 1: that they're doing, but the motivation that people have to
Speaker 1: do that job. And it comes across as more genuine
Speaker 1: and I'm not saying that's necessarily Trump because there's the
Speaker 1: tinge of the politics there. But like, people don't think
Speaker 1: he's being fake except for the media.
Speaker 2: Right, But they would these people on the left would say, oh,
Speaker 2: Micro doesn't really work for the sewage system. You know,
Speaker 2: he was just down there in the hole, but he
Speaker 2: wasn't actually working for it. It was like a bit
Speaker 2: for the show. Well he was down in the sewage man,
Speaker 2: standing there doing what they do. So what do you
Speaker 2: want to meet?
Speaker 1: But the point of his show is not to show
Speaker 1: that Mike Row, I don't know, do whatever the sewage
Speaker 1: you gotta do. The point is to spotlight the intensity
Speaker 1: of some of these jobs that we don't even think about.
Speaker 1: And people who choose to do him. It's this is
Speaker 1: a it's a people feature. So now Donald Trump, here's
Speaker 1: where it's a little Donald Trump. Is there to feature
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and specifically his his race with the Kamala
Speaker 1: and this this is how he chose to go about
Speaker 1: doing it, and I I gotta tell you, I think
Speaker 1: it will be in net positive. Remember this is a
Speaker 1: guy who's kicked off his weekend with the Atlantics new
Speaker 1: article about where he is worse than the combination currently
Speaker 1: is Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then you see him hanging out the window
Speaker 2: waving with that red tie with the yellow and he
Speaker 2: looks like he could be like the McDonald's mascot.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a great.
Speaker 2: Photo of him outside the drive through. Fantastic. I'm telling you,
Speaker 2: it's Uh.
Speaker 1: It worked, and it worked at a time when the
Speaker 1: joy is gone, as they say over over on the
Speaker 1: other side and you're putting out he's literally Mussolini, Stalin
Speaker 1: and Hitler, which, by the way, is it downgrade? You
Speaker 1: guys like him more because if you remember previously, he
Speaker 1: was Hitler, Stalin and Mao, and really Mao was adding
Speaker 1: some punch to those numbers. So anyway, Yeah, well we'll
Speaker 1: get some sound from all of this and much more
Speaker 1: coming up.
Speaker 5: Hang on.
Speaker 1: Everybody's up, even people and and and I mean especially
Speaker 1: people who disagree, but I can seemingly disagree with out
Speaker 1: screaming names at each other. I'm I'm always down for that,
Speaker 1: and I hate that that has become more and more rare,
Speaker 1: uh in in doing this job. But I mean that's
Speaker 1: that's where we are. Yeah, here we go, are you?
Speaker 4: So?
Speaker 1: Uh, it's it sounds as though your favorability of Trump
Speaker 1: doing this and being able to blend in the microw
Speaker 1: as you say, might be based on your bias. And
Speaker 1: and he lists off Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. No, look,
Speaker 1: here's the deal. This isn't my mind. Now, there are
Speaker 1: politicians that can go in and I don't just mean
Speaker 1: to a favorable room and uh, and are very likable
Speaker 1: to people. And I gave you an example. One of
Speaker 1: the very first politicians that I ever met up in
Speaker 1: Minnesota and had a chance to interview was Paul Wellstone.
Speaker 1: And Paul Wellstone was a Democrat, but the guy was
Speaker 1: inherently likable and came across who's genuine even when he
Speaker 1: would tell you things, You're like, I don't think you
Speaker 1: should vote that for that that sounds crazy. So yes,
Speaker 1: and Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton could schmooz the room man.
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton is very and I don't just mean speaking
Speaker 1: to a popular audience. I saw Bill Clinton speak when
Speaker 1: I was in college, and it was not just college students.
Speaker 1: It was in a red area coupled with college students,
Speaker 1: and arguably it had a little bit of everybody there.
Speaker 2: Now that was about Bill Clinton's superpower.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'd go in and and inherently you'd want to
Speaker 1: go have a beer with him.
Speaker 2: There was that scene remember that movie Primary Colors with
Speaker 2: John Travolta played Clinton, Right, yeah, there's a scene it
Speaker 2: towards the end of the movie where he's sitting down
Speaker 2: at the counter by himself and like a you know,
Speaker 2: a diner.
Speaker 1: This is after he raped the thirteen year old in
Speaker 1: that movie.
Speaker 2: Believe so, yes, But yeah, he's just having a conversation there.
Speaker 2: And that's the point of the scene, is that he
Speaker 2: had the ability to just connect with people.
Speaker 1: Yeah, very powerful, Barack Obama did. There was some other
Speaker 1: stuff going on there. I think he would sometimes come
Speaker 1: across his smug. Now he very much does.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 2: I mean it's like, you know, if it was an RPG,
Speaker 2: you have these politicians where their charismas up to like
Speaker 2: an eleven, right, yeah, yeah, yeah, And that's what it is.
Speaker 2: Because if you put Kamala Harrison that same situation, right, well,
Speaker 2: I'm now going to go do the fries it, dude,
Speaker 2: it would be so cringey. It would be more produced.
Speaker 2: And they're saying this thing was produced and she doesn't
Speaker 2: have that human to human interactive factor. It's just not there.
Speaker 1: It would look equally as stupid. Yeah, yep, of course
Speaker 1: I need murder people with the fry oil and ingest
Speaker 1: their souls or whatever slender Man does. Yeah, so this
Speaker 1: isn't I'm giving you my analysis based on the people
Speaker 1: that are running here and also the way that the
Speaker 1: media is handling it. I don't for a moment throw
Speaker 1: out the idea that politicians, even ones you don't agree with,
Speaker 1: can either come across as genuine or completely full of crap,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't necessarily have to be from what they
Speaker 1: how they vote.
Speaker 2: And I also think that the Trump campaign knows that
Speaker 2: she's full of crap on this issue. They've had to
Speaker 2: do their own research, right, you have charity records, well now,
Speaker 2: I mean you have Social Security records, you have payte ubs,
Speaker 2: And like I said, if at this point in fact,
Speaker 2: I was kind of thinking, if they had this proof,
Speaker 2: it would have dropped yesterday or today, right, if they
Speaker 2: have like a pay ste Ub or somebody that that's
Speaker 2: worked with her, that verifiable photo anything at that time,
Speaker 2: But she didn't even put it on her resume at
Speaker 2: the time of working photo.
Speaker 1: Paste ub of what looks like a at this point
Speaker 1: because I mean people are going.
Speaker 2: To buy it anything, Well, they would have produced it,
Speaker 2: and the fact that they have not produced it, and
Speaker 2: as much as they hate Donald Trump, proves that she
Speaker 2: never worked there. Yeah, it just does just say this
Speaker 2: is a bigger issue, yeah than him working at McDonald's.
Speaker 2: It proves that her whole middle class I you know,
Speaker 2: I was raised in a middle class family is bull crap. Well,
Speaker 2: I mean she's it's it's almost arguably the least bull
Speaker 2: crappy thing as far as how people evaluate when she
Speaker 2: keeps saying it, do you know what I mean? Like
Speaker 2: I do, Like a lot of people will just be
Speaker 2: all right, whatever, we have different definitions of class, Like
Speaker 2: people would move on from it. But then you threw
Speaker 2: this one other verifiable thing in there, and and you're right,
Speaker 2: the Trump campaign seesed on it. But for the media,
Speaker 2: who's like, well, why would we're going to just look
Speaker 2: at the two and decide that.
Speaker 1: He's lying and she's not. She lies every single time
Speaker 1: she gets up and does a stump because she always
Speaker 1: includes because they all sound the same. I don't know
Speaker 1: if you've noticed this. Something different volumes and then sometimes
Speaker 1: she wanders, but core components of her stump speeches are
Speaker 1: Trump's Project twenty twenty five. That is a lie. And
Speaker 1: the media knows that. They understand. They understand the Heritage Foundation.
Speaker 1: The Heritage Foundation has been around for years. They understand
Speaker 1: the difference of a think tank policy positions and a
Speaker 1: platform of a candidate. Okay, don't let them tell you otherwise.
Speaker 2: She lies about all of his positions all the time.
Speaker 2: What's that She lies about all these positions all the time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and so you knowing that even if you justified
Speaker 1: in your mind as a journalist for whoever the AP
Speaker 1: reporter is here, she lies about that. She lies about
Speaker 1: the Charlottesville thing, the fine people still so is Biden?
Speaker 1: What was the suckers and losers? She sometimes that's more
Speaker 1: of a Biden thing? What was the other big one
Speaker 1: was saying about Trump? Like those are the easily verifiable things.
Speaker 1: There's also there's lots of stuff about Trump. You can
Speaker 1: you cannot, you can quote him accurately and probably still
Speaker 1: rile up your base. So they know that, and then
Speaker 1: they don't bother the check it all right, But here
Speaker 1: here's where the rubber meets the road. Here's Trump on
Speaker 1: the ground. I wish there was slightly better audio, but
Speaker 1: that's okay. So here he is, he's he's greeted outside
Speaker 1: of the McDonald's by a manager's whole sequence there. They
Speaker 1: walk him in. There's obviously a customer service like front
Speaker 1: of house lead. This woman she has what sounds like
Speaker 1: a Hispanic accent, and I saw people go, well, they
Speaker 1: did that intentionally. I don't know if all those people
Speaker 1: work exclusively, though I know two of them work at
Speaker 1: the McDonald's because they said it. But what's your point?
Speaker 1: What's your if I go to McDonald's right over by
Speaker 1: the station in the morning, not the one I can capital,
Speaker 1: but the the other one down on wake Forest there
Speaker 1: half the morning lead is Hispanic at the bow Jangles
Speaker 1: half the morning lead has a a an accent. What's
Speaker 1: your point that somebody at the McDonald's that Trump put
Speaker 1: into how to wait? What?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, they were Oh so the woman what the woman
Speaker 1: at the front who gives him the apron listen, let's
Speaker 1: play this audience.
Speaker 6: Everybody is here.
Speaker 1: She has she has.
Speaker 5: I think I should take off the should I take
Speaker 5: off my jackets?
Speaker 6: Wants to say this for you?
Speaker 1: You are well.
Speaker 6: They guy he knows a lot of McDonald.
Speaker 4: That's great, thank you.
Speaker 7: All right.
Speaker 1: So it's a little it's a low park here, but
Speaker 1: I'm like, I didn't even notice. I honestly, it didn't
Speaker 1: even click with me until I saw somebody. So they
Speaker 1: what they're accusing Trump? U is getting some woman with
Speaker 1: an accent sticking her McDonald's uniform for the show, so
Speaker 1: that he I don't I don't know what they think
Speaker 1: he's getting there. So she she's a plant, she's a
Speaker 1: crisis actor from McDonald's christ unt. I don't know.
Speaker 2: She's not an employee from that franchise.
Speaker 1: Except I think I think she is. I don't know
Speaker 1: if it's that location. Clearly, the guy who owns the
Speaker 1: McDonald's where they did this owns a bunch of but
Speaker 1: which is not unusual. I know a guy who owns
Speaker 1: a few McDonald's.
Speaker 2: Or are they shocked that there's a minority that works
Speaker 2: in McDonald's because.
Speaker 1: What it's like, you're telling on yourself. I don't even
Speaker 1: understand why you're bringing this up.
Speaker 2: Have you Have you not been to McDonald's drive through lately?
Speaker 2: Because I have?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: Really, So what's the opposite of that? So he hires
Speaker 2: only white people to work at this fake.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, no, no, this is you're already. This is why
Speaker 1: when you actually think about it, you shouldn't think about it. Ross,
Speaker 1: don't think about it. Don't think about that statement where
Speaker 1: immediately in your mind like nine red flags go off,
Speaker 1: just just you know, yeah, obviously say you sound like
Speaker 1: you know who you You sound like Alex Jones. The
Speaker 1: you know who is you know, among the the greatest
Speaker 1: of Satan's probably in your mind. All right, let's go
Speaker 1: and get over the fries. That's why we're here, French fries.
Speaker 1: And uh, they have this guy who is by the
Speaker 1: owner is is sold as a guy who spent what
Speaker 1: like a decade cooking fries, so obviously it's a long
Speaker 1: time employee there. He does work at that franchise. The
Speaker 1: way that they worded how it was written by one
Speaker 1: of the reporters, so like, I guess you can't say
Speaker 1: he's a plant. Who the hell knows? And then they
Speaker 1: just have a conversation of like two people, granted one
Speaker 1: as a former president, but a guy showing another dude
Speaker 1: how to do something on a job site, which we've
Speaker 1: all been there, right, Ross, how many guys have you
Speaker 1: showed how to use a piece of equipment over the
Speaker 1: years that were new or interns or any of the
Speaker 1: red Like, that's a very normal conversation that was going on.
Speaker 1: Granted it's under the harsh lights of camera, and it's clearly,
Speaker 1: you know, a political thing. But Trump and this is
Speaker 1: this is what it is. It's not high pitch going
Speaker 1: oh oh right the whole time. Like he seems genuinely interested.
Speaker 1: He also seems like somebody who's consumed those fries a bunch, right,
Speaker 1: because he has some opinions. But it doesn't feel fake.
Speaker 1: It just feels produced because it is produced and you
Speaker 1: can't get away from that. But it doesn't feel fake.
Speaker 5: Of course, my hand's a nice kind. These guys are
Speaker 5: good instructor.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it.
Speaker 6: I'm going to give a really big one so that
Speaker 6: whether that is pouring out of.
Speaker 4: The hill, how good is that?
Speaker 5: Morgo him Margo?
Speaker 1: All right, So he's handing out the fries. Man, he's
Speaker 1: just doing his thing, And I I like, there wasn't
Speaker 1: I didn't sense any awkward, anything more awkward than a
Speaker 1: guy in a suit with a tie under it and
Speaker 1: an apron dipping fries.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's as awkward as a billionaire who's running for president. Yeah,
Speaker 2: working at a McDonald's, he understands how how goofy that is.
Speaker 1: But but like, here's the deal, Trump isn't. Trump could
Speaker 1: never undercover Boss. Okay, for those of you who watched
Speaker 1: the show, is that show even still on? I don't know.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine Trump trying to undercover Boss? By the way,
Speaker 1: SNL there's a funny skit for you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, they did it before. I remember with the
Speaker 2: Kyler Wren Kylo.
Speaker 1: Red was fantastic. Try to pretend he's just a regular stormtrooper,
Speaker 1: but he keeps murdering everybody. Oh, it's great, it's great.
Speaker 1: You could do that with Trump. Can you imagine Trump?
Speaker 1: You know what, how do you get a fake wig?
Speaker 1: What do you do?
Speaker 2: You'd have to put a wig on top of the wig.
Speaker 1: You put a fro. He's got a frow, right. But
Speaker 1: his mannerisms, the way like he it's so unique in
Speaker 1: the way that he deals with I know some of
Speaker 1: you just hate this and you feel that I'm fangirl.
Speaker 2: I'm not.
Speaker 7: So.
Speaker 1: There's so many times that Trump does something I'm like,
Speaker 1: I don't why why did you?
Speaker 2: I think a lot of it.
Speaker 1: I'll give you an example, And why is Antonio Brown
Speaker 1: at Trump's Pennsylvania thing this weekend? That guy's a lunatic?
Speaker 1: Am I wrong? Is it? Is he not a lunatic?
Speaker 1: Why is Trump hugging Antonio Brown? This is That's the
Speaker 1: stuff where I'm just like, what is going on? But
Speaker 1: McDonald's thing isn't one of them. I'm sure, what were
Speaker 1: you gonna say?
Speaker 2: I think a lot of it is Barack Obama won
Speaker 2: in two thousand and eight. You saw a lot of
Speaker 2: focus on Wow, look at this guy. He gets that
Speaker 2: this is a new form of media and he's using
Speaker 2: the Internet to find his supporters and bring them together.
Speaker 1: Sure it is.
Speaker 2: We are living in a different world than even in
Speaker 2: twenty sixteen. It doesn't seem that far ago, but we are.
Speaker 2: Social media is even more powerful, and so is the
Speaker 2: power of memes. And I saw somebody mention it on Twitter.
Speaker 2: It was our friend josh Sir Joshua, and he was
Speaker 2: talking about I think Trump's just doing it for the memes.
Speaker 2: And it's a very good point because this is a
Speaker 2: new way to spread information in a campaign message.
Speaker 1: You've seen me and your stuff in there. Yeah, but
Speaker 1: it also is risky because either comes across it's super fake.
Speaker 2: But you also see it in the way that he's
Speaker 2: been doing interviews where he's been doing it with a
Speaker 2: lot of big podcasters as opposed to traditional media.
Speaker 1: And this is why I didn't criticize Kamla for going
Speaker 1: on the call, like I understand that you and I
Speaker 1: understand demographic reach within broadcast.
Speaker 2: When you look at these podcasts he's been doing with
Speaker 2: podcasters that maybe might not be familiar to an older audience,
Speaker 2: but definitely is with a younger demo. Yeah, he's crushing it.
Speaker 2: We're talking about total, like god, close to one hundred
Speaker 2: million views on these podcasts. Just absolutely ridiculous. Think of
Speaker 2: how many when you think about this Trump campaign, how
Speaker 2: many epic, iconic photos we've gotten out of it from
Speaker 2: the Trump campaign. Some of them they didn't wish to have,
Speaker 2: like the picture of him jumping up with a bloody
Speaker 2: face with the fist saying fight, But that's just another
Speaker 2: example of it. Then yesterday him outside the window smiling
Speaker 2: looking like he could be the McDonald's mascot. It's a
Speaker 2: powerful image and these images will go further than words can. Right,
Speaker 2: you know what they say about a photo, right, it's
Speaker 2: worth a thousand words or whatever. Yeah, I mean it
Speaker 2: is smart and it is good and a lot of
Speaker 2: the cod what you're seeing from the left now is
Speaker 2: a lot of cope realizing that their candidate does not
Speaker 2: have the ability to do this.
Speaker 1: No, it just doesn't.
Speaker 2: He's undefeated in this category during this campaign, and I
Speaker 2: think it's done wonders for his campaign, especially when you
Speaker 2: see that she's been out talking to the press and
Speaker 2: her numbers have been tanking, and he just keeps coming
Speaker 2: out win after win after win, and his numbers are
Speaker 2: going up. I think it's about you.
Speaker 1: Can start picking around the edges, like yeah, because then
Speaker 1: you have the family and the you know, the family
Speaker 1: that comes up to get their order at the drive
Speaker 1: through and they're like those people were pre checked by
Speaker 1: the secret Yes, but it's the interaction, right, Sorry, didn't
Speaker 1: want an arsenal rolling up to the window, right, you
Speaker 1: want somebody doing the third assassination attempt through the window? No,
Speaker 1: I'll pass on that one. But it's just his interaction.
Speaker 1: Even if they are supporters who wanted who won the
Speaker 1: ability to be in line at this. McDonald's right for
Speaker 1: this way of trolling Kamala, which is that's what it was.
Speaker 1: It was it was a trolling on her and her
Speaker 1: quote and her fake middle class family lie. Right, That's
Speaker 1: that's what it is. The interaction he has with these people,
Speaker 1: even if they are supporters, they are genuine and they
Speaker 1: are good yeah yeah, and uh, and people like him
Speaker 1: and and want to like him personally, and I don't know,
Speaker 1: maybe he's a monster when you get on the plane
Speaker 1: and and they've all just like, I don't know, but one,
Speaker 1: they're not going to send random people, at least ones
Speaker 1: who haven't been security screen inside of a vehicle where
Speaker 1: they would have essentially a limited site interaction with the
Speaker 1: president or the former president maybe future president like that
Speaker 1: just wouldn't happen. What is this the fact that you've
Speaker 1: had It's just sad that we're in a state where
Speaker 1: we have to I somebody said, it's just say, we
Speaker 1: have to talk about this. I don't feel that I'm
Speaker 1: defending myself. I wanted to make a delineation there because
Speaker 1: I think that a fair question was asked, right, because
Speaker 1: it's a bigger question more than just what I think.
Speaker 1: It's also, should we ignore stunts like this, because for
Speaker 1: the most part I do, But I felt that this
Speaker 1: was different, and I wanted to lay out the case
Speaker 1: for why. So the article on ari Elsa's Kamala just
Speaker 1: says it works. You work for McDonald's source kamala. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's the trust me bro meme. But I digress. Sorry,
Speaker 1: let's get to the the drive through interaction.
Speaker 6: Good working do Hello everybody, this is not a normal
Speaker 6: situation that I want a good exam Right, how do
Speaker 6: you give the dews?
Speaker 4: They look like they look like.
Speaker 1: Ready, I got that right, you appreciate.
Speaker 4: That, kid, and there'll be no charge.
Speaker 6: Trump is tank.
Speaker 1: Oh, I got you.
Speaker 2: Okay, this is on on Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm allowed to do that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, lets you check a bike shirts.
Speaker 1: Everything you said it was better.
Speaker 2: It's gonna be the best year.
Speaker 5: I made it myself.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine when they finally get them. It's for
Speaker 1: giving chicken nuggets the kids. I'm paying for it. So
Speaker 1: he's bribing them. Oh dear god, all right, we got
Speaker 1: one more cut there. Unfortunately I'm up against it. But
Speaker 1: uh that and uh there's some amazing elon audio you
Speaker 1: have to hear. And uh, if you like sea creatures,
Speaker 1: it's got sea creatures in it. So fun for the
Speaker 1: whole family. We'll get to all that and much more
Speaker 1: coming your way in just a few Your news also
Speaker 1: coming up. It's the CaCO Day Radio program. Hang on
Speaker 1: CaCO Day Radio Program, Ross, you said some of the
Speaker 1: first in our previous segment. You said you were comparing
Speaker 1: to contrasting how different things are today, and I would
Speaker 1: agree with you, Like if you'd have told me five
Speaker 1: years ago that I would have to ask Ross where
Speaker 1: he found a picture of Hitler dressed as a McDonald's worker,
Speaker 1: or if he himself rendered, I would never have this conversation.
Speaker 1: And yet I happen to swing by the show Twitter
Speaker 1: account there because I saw a bunch of you know,
Speaker 1: you can just see the notifications coming in, you know
Speaker 1: who else worked in McDonald's. I can't see the pictures.
Speaker 1: I'm like, well, what is that? I thought maybe Ross
Speaker 1: worked You post a picture of him back in the day,
Speaker 1: and it's a it's it's not and I understand the reference,
Speaker 1: But like, did GROC do that for you? Is that
Speaker 1: thing floating around on the internet? It did? Oh, such
Speaker 1: a which is another great reason to invest in an
Speaker 1: ex premium because you get access to Groc and then
Speaker 1: it can make you black and white photos of Hitler
Speaker 1: sitting there working at McDonald's. Well, look, the other ones
Speaker 1: will make you photos of black people working for Hitler.
Speaker 1: So right, six and one half a dozen of the
Speaker 1: other What did I what did I try to render
Speaker 1: the other day? And on one of the other ones,
Speaker 1: and it was like, oh, I wanted I wanted a
Speaker 1: gun safe, a gun safe behind a road clothes sign.
Speaker 1: This was back when they wouldn't do the inspections. They're
Speaker 1: a chimney rock. And I was mocking that and I
Speaker 1: was like, we can't REDI, we can't do a safe
Speaker 1: or a gun safe. It has the word gun. And
Speaker 1: I'm like, all right, can I have a safe? And
Speaker 1: then I described it so it would look very similar
Speaker 1: to gun safe and it would even render me one
Speaker 1: that looked kind of like I mean, they had like
Speaker 1: an old timey safe. They had a huge bank vault.
Speaker 1: This is so point.
Speaker 2: There's probably like a safeguard on that whatever program you
Speaker 2: were using against firearms or something.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but it's a safe. I don't even want to open.
Speaker 1: I don't even want to open. I just want one
Speaker 1: that stands about I said, I want one that stands
Speaker 1: about six feet tall, big metal safe. And I even
Speaker 1: list off a couple brands, and it wouldn't do it.
Speaker 2: That you sound dangerous and should be investigated.
Speaker 1: You made a hitler McDonald's mean this morning, that's what
Speaker 1: you did with your mourning. Well he dubbed the audio and.
Speaker 2: That took me like two seconds, I know.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine. I'm just glad he wasn't around to
Speaker 1: see bagel breakfast sandwiches. Can you imagine after the reaction
Speaker 1: we saw from the Columbia students over bagels, if you
Speaker 1: don't remember that, when they're in the first they're still
Speaker 1: going on. But during the first bout, it's weird. I
Speaker 1: don't know if you guys know this. The college things
Speaker 1: are still going on. Why aren't they the focus of
Speaker 1: the media?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 2: That was at Columbia, right where they put in.
Speaker 1: Columbia, they put out a list of things they need
Speaker 1: because you know, they're all so poor at their eighty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year college, and but the list included
Speaker 1: also something they specifically didn't want, which was bagels. It's
Speaker 1: just so weird.
Speaker 2: And at the time, people like couldn't figure it out.
Speaker 2: They're like, well, why do you why we figured it
Speaker 2: out immediately?
Speaker 1: Because yeah, you associate bagels with with the Jewish. Jewish
Speaker 1: people can't have no, you can't have no Jewish foods,
Speaker 1: right you big it's cheeze. Yeah, that was I thinking.
Speaker 1: All right, man, real quick. Oh yeah, I'm sorry. We
Speaker 1: got one other Trump cut. Let me go ahead and
Speaker 1: play this, and well because we got a bunch of
Speaker 1: audio and you do not want to miss this Elon
Speaker 1: Musk stuff. This dude, this story that'll be here in
Speaker 1: just a moment. So then it came down to the
Speaker 1: reason for Trump being at the McDonald's, make no make
Speaker 1: no bones about it, because he didn't This was about, uh,
Speaker 1: this is trolling Kamala, right, which most stunts are. They're
Speaker 1: about trolling your political opponent. But one, it's in a
Speaker 1: campaign setting. In two, I think he did a good
Speaker 1: job of it. That's the that's the far more hurtful
Speaker 1: part for for Harris and the uh he did a
Speaker 1: good job of it. And then you had people like
Speaker 1: where's the Palmer report thing, some big dem accounts that
Speaker 1: were tweeting things like he has dementia. This is it's
Speaker 1: so embarrassing the humiliation they subjected him to for a
Speaker 1: photo op. Okay, one, that's projection, right, But two, you
Speaker 1: say that and then you delete he deleted it. The
Speaker 1: report is just it's moonback. It's not commona HQ, but
Speaker 1: it wishes it was so, and they delete it. You
Speaker 1: know why, because every person who works at a fast
Speaker 1: food joint thinks you're saying what they do is embarrassing
Speaker 1: and like that never occurred to you, So like you're
Speaker 1: doing the work for him if you hate him so much.
Speaker 1: And let me tell you a lot of people who
Speaker 1: work a lot of uh, you know, jobs that are
Speaker 1: poverty line jobs, they don't they're not they're not listening
Speaker 1: to you about abortion and stuff. Okay, they don't care.
Speaker 1: Some of them do. I I'm sure care, but it's
Speaker 1: not the thing that's driving their lives. But's driving their
Speaker 1: lives is people's inability to pay for things. And it
Speaker 1: gets and it's that much harder when you're on the
Speaker 1: lower end of the so shoe economic ladder. You're still
Speaker 1: building or whatever whatever reason you're doing that. And so
Speaker 1: for you to sit there and imply that it's just
Speaker 1: it's just embarrassing that he would allow himself to be
Speaker 1: thought that they would do that, they'd put him into
Speaker 1: McDonald's saying, Oh, it's just so embarrassing. Why is that embarrassing? What? What?
Speaker 1: What kind of jobs have you had in the past.
Speaker 1: I haven't always worked in radio, but I make no
Speaker 1: bones about where I've worked in the past. I've done roofing, hypelon, welding,
Speaker 1: I've shoveled all the cow poop, all the horse poop. Right,
Speaker 1: I kind of got indentured servitude into that one. But yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's how it goes. Your kid, uh work, I
Speaker 1: delivered pizzas. There's no shame in the game there if
Speaker 1: you're out there working. I mean, that's the that's the
Speaker 1: thing that that people find frustrating is those who would
Speaker 1: sit there and and not even not even attempt to
Speaker 1: engage in it, and just sit back and take the check,
Speaker 1: which is I think what you guys are counting.
Speaker 2: I was about to say, there's nothing shameful in working
Speaker 2: to try to support yourself or your family. That is
Speaker 2: to be commended, because it's a lot easier to sit
Speaker 2: in your ass and collected check, like you said, you've bet.
Speaker 2: We recently found out my fifteen year old nephew Liam,
Speaker 2: he can now work. He's down in Georgia. He wants
Speaker 2: to work so bad for Donald's or Chick fil A.
Speaker 2: And get this, he says he wants to work for
Speaker 2: Chick fil A because quote, they have good benefits, they do.
Speaker 1: And for that, for that, for that level of where
Speaker 1: that entry level work, it's it's pretty it's like BUCkies.
Speaker 1: Did you see the thing for BUCkies who they're hiring? Yeah,
Speaker 1: thing right.
Speaker 2: Yes, I have.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And you know, we had explained to him, his parents
Speaker 2: had explained, you have to worry about the benefits you have.
Speaker 2: You know, we we have benefits through our jobs.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 2: But just the fact that he's at age and he's
Speaker 2: thinking that far ahead, right, and he wants to contribute
Speaker 2: to the household, and the fact that he wants to
Speaker 2: work to make money as opposed to just getting money
Speaker 2: from his parents, that is exceptional. I told Marky said,
Speaker 2: this is fantastic.
Speaker 1: And let me say and let me say this too
Speaker 1: as somebody who's had to be involved in hiring as well,
Speaker 1: especially when you go to a job where there's going
Speaker 1: to be a higher propensity for there to be people
Speaker 1: who don't excel because it's entry level, like you don't
Speaker 1: know how well you're going to do in there. But Also,
Speaker 1: you have some people that those are those jobs can
Speaker 1: be easier to get so they'll get themselves in there,
Speaker 1: and they're almost more of a liability. If you how
Speaker 1: many how many of you have been to a fast
Speaker 1: food restaurant since that's where we are and things were
Speaker 1: you know, it was crazy, it was busy. People are
Speaker 1: you know, running around behind there. Maybe there was a
Speaker 1: problem that somebody's trying to do and but there is
Speaker 1: an employee that deals with it exceptionally well. Good customers,
Speaker 1: like they stand out so much, right, somebody in there
Speaker 1: who immediately is able to, like I don't know, level
Speaker 1: up to a skill set that isn't necessarily required for
Speaker 1: where they are, but they are able to demonstrate it,
Speaker 1: especially when things are crazy. I'm telling you that doesn't
Speaker 1: go it doesn't go unnoticed. It may go unnoticed in
Speaker 1: that one setting because your boss is a jerk and
Speaker 1: it's nepotism. Like I'm trying to think of the worst
Speaker 1: case scenario, but that attitude doesn't go unnoticed in the
Speaker 1: same way that ross when he I don't know who
Speaker 1: told you that, maybe your mom or whatever. Hey, your
Speaker 1: first thing was like respect bro right, uh, with your
Speaker 1: with your fifteen year old nephew. Like, that's that's awesome, right,
Speaker 1: that's great because you recognize that there's work ethic there.
Speaker 1: So to just lay waste to everyone who was working
Speaker 1: there by saying, oh, Trump, even having to appear there,
Speaker 1: they put him into this thing of embarrassment. What are
Speaker 1: you talking about? One, I one hundred percent believe that
Speaker 1: was his idea. Broz, Do you think somebody pitched at
Speaker 1: McDonald's or do you think that was Trump's idea?
Speaker 7: No?
Speaker 2: I think that's his.
Speaker 1: That's his idea. Nobody put him in there like Biden,
Speaker 1: where you got to fill his schedule with three things
Speaker 1: and note cards telling them where to poop. Right, you gotta,
Speaker 1: like Trump say I'm gonna go work with They probably
Speaker 1: tried to talk about of it.
Speaker 2: But that's the thing too, Like did he look embarrassed
Speaker 2: in the photos in the video saw at all?
Speaker 1: Not at all, not for a moment. And but more importantly,
Speaker 1: he also didn't make anyone that we saw feel embarrassed.
Speaker 1: He didn't go in there and be like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: I used I always pull my lambou through to get
Speaker 1: these fried. He's amazing.
Speaker 2: He took it very seriously.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he took it seriously but also cutting up in
Speaker 1: the same way that like employees.
Speaker 2: Do, right, how people talk to each other.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm sorry, I know I'm hammering this, but like
Speaker 1: it's I've given it a lot of thought. And it's
Speaker 1: also why you're seeing people freak out over the weekend.
Speaker 1: It's why you're getting the Stalin Mussolini Hitler stuff. It's
Speaker 1: why you're getting what I would argue if you honestly
Speaker 1: believe that, you know, journalists have a spot's ability to
Speaker 1: not put things in a way that could be you
Speaker 1: to fuel insanit, you know, some insane person to do something.
Speaker 1: I think I found this story. It's not titled go
Speaker 1: shoot Trump, but it could have been a subtitle. And
Speaker 1: they did it to Elon too. Uh what is it?
Speaker 1: Their Spiegel? Their Spiegel is running a cover of Elon
Speaker 1: must it says, and world enemy number two. I'll let
Speaker 1: you guess who number one is. All right, So here
Speaker 1: is Trump real quick, and look, this is the reason.
Speaker 5: Hey, you know, if you look at really what's happened.
Speaker 5: You look at the crowd over it, look out happy,
Speaker 5: happy because they want.
Speaker 8: To hope, they need to hope.
Speaker 1: Well, that's what we do that's what they do when
Speaker 1: give there's hope. Because it was like, you actually have
Speaker 1: worked at McDonald's.
Speaker 6: Now is now I have worked I've now worked for
Speaker 6: fifteen minutes.
Speaker 1: For the cava all right. Like the whole thing was
Speaker 1: for that line, because you got it. You gotta bottle
Speaker 1: stuff up. The whole thing was for that line and
Speaker 1: it went too well in I think people's opinion. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: you got headlines. Dude, this is this is abs absolutely brutal.
Speaker 1: Uh and I well, let me do this. I'm just
Speaker 1: looking up at the clock here. Oh plus uh, ladies,
Speaker 1: I gotta I'm gonna have a question for you, but
Speaker 1: I want you and then let me do this. I
Speaker 1: want you to make sure you're in a room alone
Speaker 1: and you're safe. No prioneers, prian eyes, okay away from
Speaker 1: that medieval husband of yours. Don't worry. It's not nothing like.
Speaker 1: I just I have a question and I want I
Speaker 1: want honesty, and I feel like that's only we're gonna
Speaker 1: get it because apparently there's an issue I was not
Speaker 1: aware of, and I'm concerned. I don't know if I
Speaker 1: should be concerned, but I'm gonna be concerned until we
Speaker 1: get an answer. So we will get into that, and yes,
Speaker 1: Jonathan Lemire is the journalist from MSNBC. I'm going to
Speaker 1: share with you the story that he ran over the
Speaker 1: weekend and then go ahead and tell me about charged
Speaker 1: language and stuff. Okay, can't wait to be lectured by
Speaker 1: my intellectual betters over at MSNBC on why this isn't
Speaker 1: a giant problem. But we'll get into that much more
Speaker 1: coming up here on the KCO Day Radio program KCO
Speaker 1: Day Radio program. So yeah, let's let's check out MSNBC,
Speaker 1: because remember it was we've graduated over the weekend, and
Speaker 1: we did this last time around, and we talked about
Speaker 1: it on this show, probably about you know, a couple
Speaker 1: two three weeks before the twenty twenty election, and even
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen for that matter. But the whole thing
Speaker 1: was once you've gone worse than Hitler, where do you go?
Speaker 1: And then I was like, oh, they got me because
Speaker 1: they last time around when he's Hitler MAO installing. And
Speaker 1: I'm like, touche right, because when you add up the
Speaker 1: numbers there, like that's that's Hall of Fame bag guide numbers.
Speaker 1: You're dealing with times, you know, times three, but also
Speaker 1: probably top five of all time. And so we're back
Speaker 1: there again, and this time they ejected Mao and throw
Speaker 1: Mussolini in there. But it's the same thing. And over
Speaker 1: at MSNBC, Jonathan Lemire ran this article and I if
Speaker 1: you don't think this is crazy, crazy person fuel, then
Speaker 1: I don't know what to tell you. All Right, you ready,
Speaker 1: this is Politico an MSNBC guys writer and then contributor.
Speaker 1: All right, quote the very real scenario Trump loses and
Speaker 1: takes power. Anyway, what do you do? What are you
Speaker 1: talking about? So let me dig in four years ago
Speaker 1: as sitting president, rejected by voters, attempted to seize the
Speaker 1: second term. Blah blah blah. I just recap. Now. Trump's
Speaker 1: political comeback has revived a sense of dread among officials
Speaker 1: and institutions who stood in his way last time. Are
Speaker 1: you referring to the fortification, which, by the way, was
Speaker 1: also something that you guys did prior to the election
Speaker 1: and then bragged about where you literally talked about doing
Speaker 1: things that fall outside of what people expect journalists and
Speaker 1: many of these you know, interior government officials to be doing.
Speaker 1: Time is running out, so now you got to rapid fire,
Speaker 1: right and you'll get a few more of these random
Speaker 1: stories with anonymous sourcing, like the uh who try. There
Speaker 1: were two authors on that piece, but the Atlantic piece
Speaker 1: where not the one I just told you about, but
Speaker 1: rather the one previously. We're like, oh, yeah, more proof
Speaker 1: that Trump is, you know, Putin's puppet. And then the
Speaker 1: proof is because there's no other explanation, right, and and
Speaker 1: so you'll get more of that garbage. But when you
Speaker 1: react poorly to it, I mean you're just heightening it.
Speaker 1: So yeah, one account, the Palmer Report, and they're they're like, ah,
Speaker 1: they embarrassed him from making him do this embarrassing job. Ugh,
Speaker 1: people do this job. Ugh, that's not good. That's not
Speaker 1: going to be helpful for you. And the Kamala Wins account,
Speaker 1: this one's a doozy. Here's what they tweeted, breaking they
Speaker 1: did the breaking in caps breaking that McDonald's location, the
Speaker 1: the McDonald's excuse me, the McDonald's location Trump quote worked
Speaker 1: at was cited earlier this year for health code violations.
Speaker 1: Disc So what happened is they had an inspection and
Speaker 1: this you know, we do those in North Carolina a
Speaker 1: lot of states too, and as part of the inspection,
Speaker 1: they cited a couple issues there, but they still have
Speaker 1: a very high grade because that's not unusual. And they
Speaker 1: come in for a restaurant inspection. Like almost everybody in
Speaker 1: the sound of my voice understands this. But they don't
Speaker 1: walk into restaurants and go everything's perfect, everything's perfect. Remember
Speaker 1: I don't know. I guess it depends on your parents.
Speaker 1: My mom would come in and inspect on when we
Speaker 1: had to clean our rooms, inspect it like like ar
Speaker 1: Lee Ermey's character partly Ermie's character in Full Metal Jacket Van,
Speaker 1: you just know you're gonna get by any of you
Speaker 1: military guys. I suspect you know what I'm talking about there.
Speaker 1: I I hell, I got treat to do it as
Speaker 1: a kid, not in a negative way. But she had
Speaker 1: very high standards, which is good. Like guess that good thing,
Speaker 1: young mes, like this is bs right, But she gonna
Speaker 1: go in there and find something I don't remember. I
Speaker 1: don't remember a one room inspection. Well, but that's how
Speaker 1: it works with restaurants too, Like they go in and
Speaker 1: they'll be like a the grease trap isn't properly cleaned
Speaker 1: on this one cooking station, or we found some mop
Speaker 1: water in a bucket, just sitting in a room. They
Speaker 1: don't like that. Does that make it inherently, you know,
Speaker 1: a poison palace? No, but they just tweeted out, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: so your reaction to Trump going there is to try
Speaker 1: to get everyone fired from there if you got to
Speaker 1: close the location. I mean, like feasibly you want you
Speaker 1: want a bunch of people that make far less money
Speaker 1: than you, because remember you're you're disgusted by this job
Speaker 1: ough you just can't even. But also you want them
Speaker 1: not to have a job anymore because Trump went there
Speaker 1: and dipped some fries. You guys are pathological. Man. And
Speaker 1: just to prove my point that no government official would
Speaker 1: come in that quickly, I would like to present to
Speaker 1: you one of the most insane overregulation stories that I've heard.
Speaker 1: And Elon Musk has put out some doozies.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: Remember remember when they were criticizing him for not hiring
Speaker 1: migrants at his rocket factory, and it was pointed out
Speaker 1: even though the media knows this, I pointed this out.
Speaker 1: Elon pointed this out. If you make rockets, all right,
Speaker 1: Let's say that Ross instead of twitch twitch streaming, had
Speaker 1: a side hustle where he built rockets at his house. Okay,
Speaker 1: rockets that are capable of delivering.
Speaker 5: A nuke or.
Speaker 1: Obviously this a twenty story building as we saw with
Speaker 1: that booster, Right, you are weapons Manufet, you're a weapons manufacturer.
Speaker 1: I know you don't make weapons, you make spaceship. But
Speaker 1: you're wet because the technology that is involved there is
Speaker 1: not just proprietary to the business model. Because remember Elon
Speaker 1: Musk rockets use a third of the resources, not just
Speaker 1: the fuel but also the financial resources with development building
Speaker 1: all a third of what NASA was building them for.
Speaker 5: And that's fine.
Speaker 1: I'm not even up on NASA. I mean, somebody had
Speaker 1: to go there first. It's very expensive, but they've refined
Speaker 1: the technology. But the more you refine it, the more
Speaker 1: common it becomes. And and so you have to keep
Speaker 1: an eye on it because the last thing you want
Speaker 1: some crazy goat love and terrorist dude all upset because
Speaker 1: Yolo got greased to have access to is a higher
Speaker 1: technologically advanced rocket, maybe one that the Iron Dome has
Speaker 1: trouble with. So if you you are in a manufacturing
Speaker 1: business like Elon's in with that, you are you have
Speaker 1: a greater threshold for how you can hire people, and
Speaker 1: one of them is you can't hire people that are
Speaker 1: currently in this country under that migrant program. It's not allowed.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the percentage of employees at SpaceX
Speaker 1: with actual security clearances, but it's not low. It's not low.
Speaker 1: So you see stuff like that and you're just you know,
Speaker 1: there's the political nature California Coastal Commission saying that they're
Speaker 1: not going to allow must to launch an additional I
Speaker 1: think whether they want fourteen additional launches out of what
Speaker 1: sixty because him because of politics. They're literally they would
Speaker 1: rather not further space exploration people who purport to be
Speaker 1: progressive than to allow somebody they disagree with to just
Speaker 1: do their thing and compensate. By the way, SpaceX compensates
Speaker 1: the state of California in the form of the permitting,
Speaker 1: but also in the form of maintaining business offices there.
Speaker 1: I know that they moved and obviously he set up
Speaker 1: the whole thing down in Texas, but they still he
Speaker 1: has a ton of employees still in California. One because
Speaker 1: you kind of have to. But two, why do you
Speaker 1: have to if you can't launch rockets there anymore? What's
Speaker 1: the point? But all that pales in comparison. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's I don't say pales in comparison, it's just that's
Speaker 1: not funny. This is kind of funny while also being insane.
Speaker 1: So here is must telling a he says he's got
Speaker 1: a bunch of these stories. But here is an absolute
Speaker 1: doozy that he told an audience over the weekend.
Speaker 7: SpaceX had to do the study to see if starship
Speaker 7: would hit a shark.
Speaker 1: And I'm like, oh, okay, by the way, that whole
Speaker 1: sentence sounds crazy, even when you know what he's talking
Speaker 1: about and you're trying to prouse. What do you mean
Speaker 1: the spaceship's going to hit a shark? They mean on
Speaker 1: re entry, right or possibility? They have protocols for bailing,
Speaker 1: you know, do they have? That's why they have a
Speaker 1: destruct button on a rocket, which is always I would
Speaker 1: always it sounds so disconcerting, pretty kid who wants to
Speaker 1: be an astronaut. I mean, even though you see that
Speaker 1: in movies, you don't think about it. But yeah, there's
Speaker 1: a blowout. The smotherings button that is a thing. That
Speaker 1: is a thing. Remember, a lot of these rockets are
Speaker 1: not manned, so that's one. Two. You're sitting there like,
Speaker 1: well is the charge, so you have re entry, but
Speaker 1: you also have the the things go wrong, what happens.
Speaker 1: So they are literally the federal government is concerned that
Speaker 1: at the precise moment that a an uncatchable booster or
Speaker 1: other parts like the re entry of of some of
Speaker 1: the capsule on the smaller model, because that does land
Speaker 1: in the ocean, that it's going to land on a shark,
Speaker 1: which means there is a crap ton more sharks than
Speaker 1: I ever thought. But this thing, I'm going to play
Speaker 1: it now. It's entirety. I just want you to understand
Speaker 1: the setup. That's what they're implying, so you understand the ridiculousness.
Speaker 7: SpaceX have to do the study to see if starship
Speaker 7: would would hit a shark, and I'm like, it's a
Speaker 7: big ocean, you know, there's a lot of sharks. It's
Speaker 7: not impossible, but it's very unlikely. And we said, okay,
Speaker 7: we'll find we'll do the analysis, and then well, can
Speaker 7: you give us the shark data. They're like, no, we
Speaker 7: can't give you the shark data. Well, okay, well then
Speaker 7: we're a bit.
Speaker 1: Of a quandary.
Speaker 7: How do we solve this difficult this this shock probability issue,
Speaker 7: and they said, well, well, we could give it to
Speaker 7: our Western division, but we don't trust them.
Speaker 1: And I'm like, am I in a comedy sketch.
Speaker 7: Here, Like they're worried about the shock density data, like
Speaker 7: the people who hunt sharks for shark fins somehow getting
Speaker 7: their hands on this shock dance the shock data. And
Speaker 7: so eventually I think we got the data and we
Speaker 7: could you know, run the analysis to say like, yeah,
Speaker 7: the shocks are going to be fine. But what they
Speaker 7: wouldn't let us proceed with launch until we did this
Speaker 7: crazy shark data. And then we said, okay, now we're done,
Speaker 7: and they said, but what about whales.
Speaker 1: I'm like, that's a good point.
Speaker 7: When you look at a picture of the Pacific, what
Speaker 7: percentage of the surface area the Pacific do you see
Speaker 7: is whale? And honestly, if the ship did hit a whale,
Speaker 7: it's like, honestly, that well had it coming because it's
Speaker 7: like the odds are so low, you know, it's like
Speaker 7: like Final Destination, the Whale edition. It's like fate had
Speaker 7: it in for that whale, you know, and so we
Speaker 7: have to do the whale analysis. It's like okay, yeah,
Speaker 7: the whales will be fine too. You know, it goes
Speaker 7: on and on and then there's like, well what if
Speaker 7: the rocket goes underwater it then explodes and then the
Speaker 7: whales have hearing damage.
Speaker 1: You never thought of that. Ross used to live on
Speaker 1: the coast in North I've never lived on the coast
Speaker 1: in North Carolina. How many on average, say, in a
Speaker 1: week marine animals? Did you see murdered by space debris?
Speaker 2: We did a bunch during our turkey drop.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, yeah, it was a space debris though, or
Speaker 1: you guys were ind a helicopter right now, we dropped
Speaker 1: him from space? Oh wow? Correct. Oh would you go
Speaker 1: on the moon and do that thing that the Washington
Speaker 1: Post chicks said where you could throw rocks off the
Speaker 1: moon and kill people on Earth? No, but we did.
Speaker 1: We did do it in the middle of summer. Or
Speaker 1: was that No, that was gamer gate lady. Yeah, oh
Speaker 1: you did in the middle of summer.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean the turkeys are cheaper than yeah.
Speaker 1: No, I mean yeah, no, you're like, uh yeah, that's
Speaker 1: very economically minded, all right, raced agic from the Weather Channel.
Speaker 1: Oh Man, government regulations, So I don't know, have you
Speaker 1: heard that Elon was saying when they were doing the
Speaker 1: thing to to launch the rockets and set up down
Speaker 1: in Texas. The government made him do studies to ensure
Speaker 1: that the capsules upon re entry wouldn't land on whales
Speaker 1: or sharks. Can you imagine?
Speaker 5: Interesting? Yeah? I can't. I mean, how do you do
Speaker 5: such a study?
Speaker 1: I don't know, but expects nuts. So how was your weekend, sir?
Speaker 1: It was great.
Speaker 5: Didn't have to worry about anything yesterday?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Are you five? And any guys? I told you,
Speaker 1: don't pull that crap. I know what happens with us.
Speaker 5: That was a tough one. That was a tough one. Hey,
Speaker 5: but listen, at least the Lions are a good team.
Speaker 1: So yeah, no, no, no, the whole division anyway. Can
Speaker 1: you imagine, though, if you say the power rankings Jacksonville
Speaker 1: Jags like waste? Can you imagine being so bad that
Speaker 1: you lose to the team that's the worst team by far? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I can't. Ross. Can you Can you imagine sitting in
Speaker 1: Boston trying to you know, nurse your eighth Guinness that morning?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: And then you gotta.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean the Patriots, I mean, I mean personally,
Speaker 2: I have no interest. I have no say in the
Speaker 2: matter of this year when it comes to football. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Okay, I don't want to.
Speaker 5: I don't think yeah, well, I mean, I'm not gonna
Speaker 5: say the Patriots are a good team. Is that what
Speaker 5: you're saying, Jackson? No, okay, so.
Speaker 1: Making fun of two page I think three Patriots listeners.
Speaker 5: So I just say, because I don't have you a
Speaker 5: pretty bad time another you know, pick on, I would
Speaker 5: say one pretty bad team be another pretty bad team.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you see the chis run on the field during
Speaker 1: the Steelers game yes day. I did not hold the
Speaker 1: hold holding the pro Trump sign, but obviously who's uh,
Speaker 1: he's in tough economic times could bear afford a shirt,
Speaker 1: and let me tell you, she needed a lot more.
Speaker 1: I don't know she needed it.
Speaker 5: But if she needed to, I'm sure we could have
Speaker 5: found her or.
Speaker 1: A sports bra. But in fact, we tweeted the video
Speaker 1: so people can see this crazy moment. O.
Speaker 5: Thanks, we appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Check it out while Ray twit your dooms your weather.
Speaker 5: Yeah no, there's no doom here. Listen. We got plenty
Speaker 5: of time to talk about anything. But because I could
Speaker 5: just do this, sunny mid seventies to upper seventies all
Speaker 5: week overnight Low's start the week in the low to
Speaker 5: mid forties, go up to the mid to upper forties,
Speaker 5: maybe fifty degrees by the weekend. Might be a day
Speaker 5: where we're closer to seventy degrees, that would be Friday.
Speaker 5: But it is going to be dry, it's going to
Speaker 5: be mild, and I don't see it changing for the
Speaker 5: rest of the month, which takes us through next Thursday.
Speaker 5: Not seeing any big changes around. So it's good on
Speaker 5: one breath, said it before another couple of weeks, maybe
Speaker 5: we may start talking about, hey, you know what, we
Speaker 5: can actually use a little bit of rainfall, because you
Speaker 5: don't really want it all to come at once as
Speaker 5: it did with Lean. You kind of wanted to come in,
Speaker 5: you know, little spits and triples every few days. Get rained,
Speaker 5: then it's nice everything, you know, just like we don't
Speaker 5: want these extended periods of dry weather. That's what we got. Dry,
Speaker 5: mild for the rest of the week, maybe the rest
Speaker 5: of the month.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, thank you, sir. Go check that video
Speaker 1: out that I told you about it.
Speaker 5: Okay, I don't even know what that means.
Speaker 1: The woman you run on the field on the Twitter.
Speaker 1: You said, yeah, yeah, on the Twitter. Yeah, get on.
Speaker 1: All right, we'll talk to you in an hour. There
Speaker 1: you go, race Agic from the Weather Channel. Yeah. Man,
Speaker 1: this running on the field there. It's the the red
Speaker 1: Trump Secure Border, Kamala open Border. And what's funny too,
Speaker 1: is like they immediately seize her and put her into custody,
Speaker 1: which kind of spoke to what her sign says, but
Speaker 1: also clearly clearly this woman is facing the same economic
Speaker 1: pressures as us, judging the amount of fabric there. All right,
Speaker 1: seven point fifty hang on, a few weeks out from
Speaker 1: the election, everybody's lost their damn minds. The journalists have
Speaker 1: had to flip on the Mussolini Stalin Hitler scripts and also, uh,
Speaker 1: make a huge deal out of a campaign stop for
Speaker 1: French fries, which is in a way telling on yourself
Speaker 1: because if you just ignore it. But they didn't, and
Speaker 1: they didn't because they get it. They understand that that
Speaker 1: that's not helpful for their preferred candidate. So I'm sitting
Speaker 1: there and I'm reading about all this stuff and then
Speaker 1: oh wait, hold on, hold on, oh no, no, Ross, Ross,
Speaker 1: we got a problem combo that and that and that
Speaker 1: is for Trump's campaign. Ah, oh jeez.
Speaker 2: Oh no.
Speaker 1: Newsweek rumors circular iating that former President Trump's visit to
Speaker 1: the popular fast food chain McDonald's was staged. What does
Speaker 1: that even mean? What? What do you mean by what
Speaker 1: do you mean stage?
Speaker 2: This is what I was referencing before earlier.
Speaker 1: I know, I know, but I had to put the
Speaker 1: because this one's got a twist. But go ahead, I'm
Speaker 1: saying it's crazy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're like, oh, well, you know, they actually shut
Speaker 2: down to McDonald's and they weren't actual like customers, and
Speaker 2: he didn't actually work for the entire day, and they
Speaker 2: knew he was coming and all this kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: It's nuts, right, He's not sitting around waiting for his
Speaker 2: first check. So you can have that video moment like
Speaker 2: the kid who first figures out how taxes work, right
Speaker 2: because he knows. Yeah, they wanted they wanted ran those
Speaker 2: just showing up at the windows so they could pull
Speaker 2: off the third assassination attempt.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, but like what do you mean stage? And
Speaker 1: and and by the way, uh ross, what do you
Speaker 1: think they're sources? This is the best part. Uh what
Speaker 1: do you think? Because knew we had to have a
Speaker 1: source for this. Kamala hq uh close? Uh there are
Speaker 1: you ready? According to an anonymous post on Reddit, why'd
Speaker 1: you do it? You know it's really you know who
Speaker 1: does read it? Lot Kyle. Kyle always sends me read
Speaker 1: at lengths. I think you think Kyle did it.
Speaker 2: I mean it is possible.
Speaker 1: According to an anonymous post on Reddit, you use that
Speaker 1: is your the source line of your article? I I
Speaker 1: I took mass com in high school, like sophomore year.
Speaker 1: It's actually how I ended up visiting our radio stage
Speaker 1: to put in an application and here we are. Thank
Speaker 1: you Janette Baxwell for hiring me. But like in that
Speaker 1: mass Colm class, we also learned to write stuff and
Speaker 1: that's when I got a genuine interest in it. And
Speaker 1: sophomore Missus Barrett. I still remember the teacher because her
Speaker 1: husband was my football coach. Missus Barrett would have absolutely
Speaker 1: thrown me out of class if I source something. Maybe
Speaker 1: not on Reddit at the time, and I don't even
Speaker 1: know if Reddit was even in its inflace. Like the
Speaker 1: Weekly World News says yeah, but no, the Weekly World
Speaker 1: News at least is trackable, do you know what I'm saying? Like,
Speaker 1: because even if you don't know who the reporter is,
Speaker 1: you can hold the editor or owner responsible for this
Speaker 1: sourcing there.
Speaker 2: I'm trying to figure out what would be the equivalent
Speaker 2: equivalent to Reddit in like nineteen ninety six or ninety
Speaker 2: a Ouiji.
Speaker 1: Board, right, I went to we went to that magic
Speaker 1: shop you worked at. I'm sure obviously when you guys
Speaker 1: sold Wigi boards.
Speaker 2: Probably we actually didn't because the owner thought they were demonic.
Speaker 1: Oh my mom did too, so yeah that's also. I
Speaker 1: wasn't allowed to watch the Smurfs. I don't know why,
Speaker 1: because no gargamel will get you. Yeah I watched them anyway,
Speaker 1: Sorry mom, So anyway, yeah, yeah, Ouiji board. I don't
Speaker 1: know a speaking say no because you know who built
Speaker 1: this speak. I don't know, man, I know that Reddit,
Speaker 1: even the good stuff when you know the good stuff
Speaker 1: of Reddit, if there is such a thing anymore. The
Speaker 1: mods there have destroyed that place, right like you Like
Speaker 1: every day there's a new example of just some inc
Speaker 1: Oh I remember I remember read it was banning Japanese
Speaker 1: people who were critical of the Assassin's Creed game for
Speaker 1: being racist. They were banning Japanese people, but even not
Speaker 1: just Japanese people complain about that, but Japanese people claiming
Speaker 1: the game designers didn't even bother to figure out how
Speaker 1: rice was used as currency then and the trees like
Speaker 1: they're nitpicking them, but Reddit was banning people. So that's
Speaker 1: the lunatics you're dealing with. So for Newsweek to run
Speaker 1: this article saying it was stage, which it was, because
Speaker 1: it was, because it has to be, But the level
Speaker 1: of staging is different. The staging that people are looking
Speaker 1: for is did Trump go in there and was he
Speaker 1: able to human around people? And the answer is it
Speaker 1: kind of looks like it and could Kamala do it?
Speaker 2: Yeah know, we're saying like it's like the micro thing, right, like, oh,
Speaker 2: Mike Road, doesn't you know he staged the hole. He
Speaker 2: doesn't really work for the sue, you know, he's not
Speaker 2: actually yeah yeah, for the sewage or whatever.
Speaker 1: No, he's down in the hole, man, he's keeping it.
Speaker 1: Like and there's Trump. I mean, he's getting the fries,
Speaker 1: he's serving, he's talking to the people. What do you
Speaker 1: wanted to do? I don't know. Well they had a
Speaker 1: health food vile. They'll probably blame the health violation on him.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's still more than Kamala did or she's
Speaker 1: ever done, because that's a big lie. She's never done it.
Speaker 1: Which comes to her middle class lie. Well, unfortunately, Newsweek's
Speaker 1: got the goods from an anonymous post on Reddit.
Speaker 2: Sighting.
Speaker 1: Okay, so here's are the post sites. It cites a
Speaker 1: letter that was posted on the storefront. So what you
Speaker 1: have is you have a picture of a white piece
Speaker 1: of paper with a handwritten note on it. I don't
Speaker 1: know if you know this those It probably is real,
Speaker 1: by the way, because there is some printing and logoing,
Speaker 1: but also it could be fake. But it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: I just assumed they controlled access to the restaurant when
Speaker 1: the guy who's been trying they've tried to murder twice
Speaker 1: this year shows up, and they're going to control access
Speaker 1: to the interior, the exterior. The couple in the truck
Speaker 1: is purportedly customers, but vehicles were checked and people were vetted.
Speaker 1: It's he's under Secret Service protection. And it doesn't make
Speaker 1: it if if if Kamala poses for a photo with
Speaker 1: somebody at her rally, right, here's a teacher from you know, uh, Saginaw, Michigan, whatever, right,
Speaker 1: arm and arm That woman who got into that rally
Speaker 1: underwent security vetting obviously the search on the way in there,
Speaker 1: and depending on I guess if she's part of the
Speaker 1: program or a labor person or somebody who has meetings
Speaker 1: with her, she may have undergun because that's how it works.
Speaker 1: Even before I heard about this a lunatic moonbat theory
Speaker 1: right there, Yeah, I was, I just assumed. But the
Speaker 1: theory's correct.
Speaker 2: It was stage you know, no, no, But what I'm saying,
Speaker 2: like before before you know I heard it, they're making
Speaker 2: a thing, or they're trying to make it a thing.
Speaker 2: I when I watched the video of him at the
Speaker 2: window talking to people, I assumed, or at least I
Speaker 2: hoped that before they got to that window, there was
Speaker 2: a bunch of Secret Service guys right looking through the
Speaker 2: truck going, hey, are you a lunatic who's going to
Speaker 2: try to shoot the fan president?
Speaker 1: Yeah, a family of four, you all have guns, you know? Okay? Great? Yeah,
Speaker 1: and you know what, I want that to be the thing.
Speaker 2: And the other thing is, see they're trying to say, oh,
Speaker 2: those actual people that worked there, they lost out on
Speaker 2: pay for a day.
Speaker 1: They did they lose that on pay for a day?
Speaker 2: I'm assuming they did not, right, you would assume they'd
Speaker 2: still pay them because I mean that that rest they're
Speaker 2: there the franchise owners of the McDonald's are getting a
Speaker 2: hell of a lot of promotion out of it.
Speaker 1: But yeah, the same people, so, the same people that
Speaker 1: think they may have missed out on a day of
Speaker 1: pay are trying to get them shut down for health
Speaker 1: co violations. It make it make sense kind of? I
Speaker 1: can't all right back to this, ladies, Is this the
Speaker 1: monster we're just saying? Is this who your husband, under
Speaker 1: a threat of who the heck knows, has ordered you
Speaker 1: to vote for? Is this how it works? Again, I'm
Speaker 1: not married. I didn't know. Ross. Do you just hand
Speaker 1: Markie a note or how does that work? I'm I'm
Speaker 1: unclear on how husbands are ordering their wives to vote
Speaker 1: for because.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure that happens well.
Speaker 1: And here's the thing again, I'm not married. But any
Speaker 1: woman that I've dated for a reasonable amount of time,
Speaker 1: if I handed her a piece of paper and said
Speaker 1: here's who you're going to vote for, she would laugh
Speaker 1: at me and I would get it right like because
Speaker 1: And don't get me wrong, are there some people out
Speaker 1: there that are very subservient on both sides? By the
Speaker 1: way you do you think is more subservient some maga dude,
Speaker 1: and his wife, you know, out on the boat with
Speaker 1: their nine Trump flags. Do you think that she's being
Speaker 1: coerced into voting or do you think that it's every
Speaker 1: Kamala dude who literally has to hear people in his
Speaker 1: periphery constantly suggesting that if men don't fall in line,
Speaker 1: they should withhold sex and affection from them. The Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris people ran a parody of a web series. You've
Speaker 1: probably seen clips from it, where like a bachelor walk in,
Speaker 1: they'll be like six women standing there holding a balloon
Speaker 1: and then is they kind of Q and A and
Speaker 1: if they don't have any interest anymore, they pop the balloon.
Speaker 1: I'm sure you've seen this, right, So they did one
Speaker 1: and I'll spoiler on it. They did it where he
Speaker 1: said he didn't have a plan to vote and then
Speaker 1: all the women popped it. But you don't understand, if
Speaker 1: you've even seen one clip of that series, the women
Speaker 1: that they bring in are all delusional, insane women, right,
Speaker 1: and it's it's for the thing. It's like it's like
Speaker 1: you're the booking agent for Mory okay, right, they bring
Speaker 1: these women in who all have no uh you know,
Speaker 1: no big time not I shouldn't say any of them,
Speaker 1: but really, the ones who stand out have no long term,
Speaker 1: you know, career thing. They probably in many cases they
Speaker 1: already have kids, which that's not a knock. But my
Speaker 1: point is they're standing there and they're demanding the sixty
Speaker 1: six to six guy. Do you know what that is?
Speaker 1: I'm not going to explain it all to you, but
Speaker 1: basically they want every guy there to be more than
Speaker 1: six foot, have a six finger income or more. Some
Speaker 1: of these women are delusional, and so a guy will
Speaker 1: step in there, seems like a nice enough guy, right,
Speaker 1: not a bad looking dude. He works, he's got a
Speaker 1: good job. But if he's five like ten, all the
Speaker 1: women pop their balloons. And the reason people watch that
Speaker 1: series is because of the delusion, right of the women there.
Speaker 1: Who you know, some woman who's clearly a four or
Speaker 1: five in the looks department but doesn't have any personality
Speaker 1: to bolster that thinks she deserves Prince Charming.
Speaker 2: No, it's the same reason they watch like the Real
Speaker 2: Housewives series, because the women are nuts.
Speaker 1: Yes, so for you to parody that and not realize
Speaker 1: that those are the bad guys, so to speak, in
Speaker 1: this little arc of a stoke. But what are you doing, lunacy?
Speaker 1: Oh somebody said magic eight ball. Yeah, that'd probably be better,
Speaker 1: the magic eight ball versus the reddit source. I think
Speaker 1: that would be pretty comparable. Oh man, all right, so
Speaker 1: any of you, So, how many women voters out there
Speaker 1: are under the thumb of your husband and you're only
Speaker 1: voting how he wants because he's telling you. Because I'm
Speaker 1: being told that's the reason that they're so concerned and
Speaker 1: not just a future excuse as to why they may lose, or.
Speaker 2: It just couldn't be the possibility that when couples get
Speaker 2: together a lot of times it's because they vibe on
Speaker 2: a lot of issues, including those point involving politics, right,
Speaker 2: Like I don't.
Speaker 1: I've dated people who I've never did anyone who was
Speaker 1: actively super political in either sense, which is good for
Speaker 1: me because then they just want to talk about work.
Speaker 1: But very You know, most couples that I run into,
Speaker 1: and you do too, they think a lot alike Like
Speaker 1: I know this. I know that when the Kamala Ads
Speaker 1: come on TV, yeah, we both mark and we audibly grown,
Speaker 1: and she's so upset that she's not being allowed to
Speaker 1: cast her own vote. I know you're making her. Is
Speaker 1: that what you know?
Speaker 2: No, I know when the commercials come on the radio
Speaker 2: and Kamal is like Donald Trump's can increase the prices
Speaker 2: of groceries, Mark, He's like, really blank, Really, I don't
Speaker 2: understand these couples that can be together and be so
Speaker 2: far apart in politics.
Speaker 1: Like, dude, I know, I know a couple. They are
Speaker 1: far apart. They are great, But I've never met anyone
Speaker 1: like him, and I don't understand they probably are serial
Speaker 1: killers together like.
Speaker 2: The killing and Conway and are husband or who's the
Speaker 2: rage and Cajun? Uh yeah, yeah, Carville, Carful and his
Speaker 2: his wife that I don't get that, Like, I couldn't
Speaker 2: function with this job. I couldn't function. Yeah, so that's uh.
Speaker 1: So, I'm sorry that's happening to you, ladies. Donna, what's up?
Speaker 2: Good morning, Casey morning.
Speaker 9: Jeez, you get so many ideas run it through my head.
Speaker 9: One the Newsweek thing. I get a kick out of
Speaker 9: how it starts with the word rumors. Yeah, it sounds
Speaker 9: like something fallacious is coming right.
Speaker 1: Our fleet song, yeah right?
Speaker 9: And then yeah the stage thing. I mean, yeah, everybody
Speaker 9: knows you can't just walk into any McDonald's off the
Speaker 9: street and go work the window.
Speaker 1: You can, you can if you're an a hole TikTok streamer,
Speaker 1: and then that's your thing. And you run in there
Speaker 1: and defri stuff, which some lunatic has been doing. I
Speaker 1: think they arrested him, but yeah, it didn't go all so,
Speaker 1: so obviously the organization is necessary.
Speaker 3: Yes, And as far as these women go talking about
Speaker 3: the husbands telling him how to vote, isn't that the
Speaker 3: reason why you can't go into the voting booth with
Speaker 3: someone you know?
Speaker 9: Because back in the day maybe an archie bunker would
Speaker 9: go in with Edith and make her vote.
Speaker 1: You want the reason, the reason that which I tend
Speaker 1: to disagree with, but the reason in North Carolina you
Speaker 1: can't even film, you can't even photo your ballot, and
Speaker 1: they literally they they tried to drill down on some
Speaker 1: female candidate. It was a GOP candidate for doing so,
Speaker 1: I think it's a dumb lob. But the reason was
Speaker 1: is because back in the day things were so corrupt
Speaker 1: that people were selling and this is an actual story,
Speaker 1: you can look it up. In Lumberton they were selling
Speaker 1: votes for five dollars huddle house gift certificates. And but
Speaker 1: the way you get paid is to take a photo
Speaker 1: of your ballot and and then it gives you the dollars.
Speaker 1: That is the that is the reasoning behind it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, makes sense.
Speaker 9: So yeah, nobody's ever told me how to vote, although
Speaker 9: my ex didn't vote at all, and I would tell
Speaker 9: him every year to register and vote. How I tell
Speaker 9: you that we all have two votes.
Speaker 1: Would say, let's say you're you get married again and
Speaker 1: get your husband and he walks on hand, puts a
Speaker 1: list in your hand and says, hey, you're going down
Speaker 1: to I'm assuming that wouldn't sit well with you.
Speaker 9: Just have no I have a very powerful personality and
Speaker 9: go right in the garbage.
Speaker 1: Like the neighbors would be like, what is going on
Speaker 1: over there? I don't know. He screwed up? So yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, all right, thanks, don I appreciate it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: like maybe with that button every day every day it's
Speaker 1: a little something, all right. So yeah, that's so, that's
Speaker 1: apparently the rumor out there and from a Reddit user
Speaker 1: on the staging and then of course from this this
Speaker 1: a secondhand narrative, by the way, you'll note, actually it's
Speaker 1: a third hand narrative. It's a woman talking about her
Speaker 1: mother's interaction with her cousin, and then what the cousin said,
Speaker 1: So but it was on Reddit, so it must be true.
Speaker 1: All right, look at that creeping up on twenty three.
Speaker 1: Lots more sound to get to. Who got some more
Speaker 1: Elon Musk stuff? And I mentioned Lizzo. I'll explain why
Speaker 1: next hang on. Over the weekend, the New York Times
Speaker 1: ran a big piece on Elon Musk, but more specifically
Speaker 1: about his company's Tesla SpaceX neuralink and then Twitter x right,
Speaker 1: and then they put this chart together. And here's the thing.
Speaker 1: The New York Times is excited. They're excited because they
Speaker 1: think this chart shows how corrupt and evil Elon Musk
Speaker 1: is based on not a Reddit post at least, but
Speaker 1: rather an entire list of federal agencies and cabinet departments who,
Speaker 1: in way, shape or form are challenging, investigating, suing in
Speaker 1: some cases, or and or denying permitting to his companies,
Speaker 1: all of which has really ramped up at a fever
Speaker 1: pitch over the last two years. And the chart shows this, right,
Speaker 1: it shows So these are all of the different agencies
Speaker 1: that are currently after Musk, and only after Musk within
Speaker 1: the last about eighteen months. Two years, but not before
Speaker 1: the dot Justice Department, Labor Department, Interior, Department of Interior,
Speaker 1: maybe that's the Whales, and I don't know, in the
Speaker 1: Department of Agriculture. Actually that's probably the Whales, National Labor
Speaker 1: Relations Board EEOC, Environmental EPA, Securities in Exchange FCC, and
Speaker 1: the Federal Trade Commission, all of which has charted in
Speaker 1: this thing which I am Where you retweet that thing
Speaker 1: I just sent to you. I'm sorry, I was going
Speaker 1: to do it and then I just sent it to you.
Speaker 1: It's far more convincing if you're and they know this.
Speaker 1: That chart is far more convincing to me to make
Speaker 1: the argument that you guys are going full lawfair on this, dude, right,
Speaker 1: because I can I can look at how Elon Musk
Speaker 1: was perceived and we all noticed the change. We also
Speaker 1: know what caused people's opinions to change. It wasn't just
Speaker 1: the Trump thing. It started earlier than that, right, It's
Speaker 1: because he had ideas and he had thoughts, and then
Speaker 1: he had forty four billion dollars and from that moment
Speaker 1: on you can almost track this thing. And they even
Speaker 1: word it that way, mister Musk. Companies are increasingly facing
Speaker 1: regulatory battles and overlapping federal investigations, right, and they just
Speaker 1: talk about how could a man of this stature think
Speaker 1: he could get away with this. That's not what I see.
Speaker 1: And I don't know, maybe look with that many businesses,
Speaker 1: are there things that are probably a technical violation? Sure,
Speaker 1: there's that many laws. Remember this guy was doing studies
Speaker 1: about whales getting hit by rockets or losing their hearing. Yes,
Speaker 1: the same people who detonated two dozen nukes on in
Speaker 1: a toll in the middle of the ocean. And I
Speaker 1: would also point out under the ocean is where a
Speaker 1: lot of those detonations took place, is where it is
Speaker 1: given is stopping space exploration on the off chance a
Speaker 1: booster lands on a humpback. So yeah, yeah, your chart
Speaker 1: is helpful, but not for the reasons that you think.
Speaker 2: Dude, they're so pissed off at him. Yeah, they're so
Speaker 2: pissed because he took away their propaganda sensoring toy. Not
Speaker 2: only did he take it away ready bought it, but
Speaker 2: then he exposed it with the Twitter files and we
Speaker 2: learned how much they were doing. I mean, it was
Speaker 2: election interference, it really was. And they're pissed off because
Speaker 2: that advantage had been taken away from them.
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, they're doing this. They had a law professor up
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania saying that he's breaking the law. You've seen
Speaker 1: a million dollar thing he's doing with the petition. They're like, oh,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, no's he's doing this thing with a petition
Speaker 1: and he needs to go to jail for five years.
Speaker 1: Who was it one of them deported? I mean people,
Speaker 1: And the thing is is a petition. This is a
Speaker 1: law professor and he the law clearly states that it
Speaker 1: is somebody who's involved in the election process who is
Speaker 1: then paying people. Elon doesn't meet those requirements because it's
Speaker 1: a petition. He's doing random lotteries on a petition which
Speaker 1: have outlined rules. I look them up, so like he's
Speaker 1: not even in violation of the Federal Trade Commission, like
Speaker 1: you have to do rules for contesting, we do it
Speaker 1: in radio. Elon did it. And so when you have
Speaker 1: that and you have all of these bureaucrats, this is
Speaker 1: the only way they know how to fight back because
Speaker 1: this is where their power lies. So yeah, they'll come
Speaker 1: be a giant painting your butt absolutely because they think
Speaker 1: they're right. The Coastal Commission will say no more, you know,
Speaker 1: no more new rockets. And by the way, let's review
Speaker 1: the current ones. They would have us, they would have
Speaker 1: us literally explore space slower because they don't like who's
Speaker 1: doing it. Absolute lunatics. Meanwhile, you want to get folks
Speaker 1: riled up, you send in Lizzo man. And look, it's
Speaker 1: a thing. I understand celebrity is going to go there.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's probably a good look. If Lizo's
Speaker 1: standing in front of a private jet before she flies
Speaker 1: to Detroit saying that this is how you save democracy
Speaker 1: and quote you hose can't spell democracy. I I maybe
Speaker 1: that connects with somebody. But let's but let's hear what
Speaker 1: she said in person. All right, let's let's hear what
Speaker 1: she told the crowd at the rally in Detroit for
Speaker 1: Kamala over the weekend. Take it away losing, you know.
Speaker 5: They say, if Kamala wins, then the so proud to
Speaker 5: be from this city.
Speaker 8: You know, they say, if Kamala wins, then the whole country.
Speaker 9: Will be like Detroit, like Detroit, resilient like Detroit.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Ross, is that a Trump Lizzo AI thing?
Speaker 1: You just dubbed in there is it? So if Kamala wins,
Speaker 1: everything will be like Detroit. I can't even wrapt Ross.
Speaker 1: Can you rap battle?
Speaker 2: Yeah? You can rap battle? Oh okay, I don't even know.
Speaker 2: I don't need a clock. I can go a cappella.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, yeah, it's impressive. Do you go by Ross
Speaker 1: or does it? Oh? No, that's right. You have your
Speaker 1: your your wrap right?
Speaker 2: Like my rap name is stolen ATM machine falling on
Speaker 2: your head?
Speaker 1: Yo?
Speaker 2: It is yo wo yo right, falling in your head?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: I thought it was face? Was it head or face?
Speaker 1: I changed it like Diddy? Oh I see what you
Speaker 1: did there? Is that the only thing you did like Diddy?
Speaker 2: That's about it? Yes?
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay? What are those boxes? Is over there from Costco?
Speaker 1: Let's say a thousand? What are those?
Speaker 2: Those are Christmas inflatables? Oh? I have so many of
Speaker 2: this I have to keep them here.
Speaker 1: It's not baby oil.
Speaker 2: No ghp, I'm allergic.
Speaker 1: Well well I mean yeah technically kind of what uh so?
Speaker 4: So?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah, I think that's like a Trump. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you know, getting out uh gets your passion there,
Speaker 1: But I don't know that's gonna sound clip the way
Speaker 1: that you want. And and here's you're talking about going
Speaker 1: back to Elon real quick, just because I only get
Speaker 1: these last two cuts in. There's some other video that
Speaker 1: like it shows you how effective he is too, Like
Speaker 1: that's what ramps is. Hatred out. I posted some last
Speaker 1: week and I'm it's it's not an original thought, but
Speaker 1: it needed to be said with this clip. If if
Speaker 1: you are a moderate Democrat, right, and and you look
Speaker 1: at part of your party, but and you go just lunatics, right,
Speaker 1: And I think that that's people's natural reaction, even within
Speaker 1: their own part already. But like when you start seeing
Speaker 1: it cut deep and then you look at somebody like
Speaker 1: Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, and yes,
Speaker 1: don't give me, no, we don't need the money. The
Speaker 1: top donors in the election cycle for Biden were all Democrats,
Speaker 1: the top five, right, They were stire, they were Michael Bloomberg,
Speaker 1: they were crypto bro which, by the way, that's all
Speaker 1: stolen money. Right, So, and I don't remember the Democrats
Speaker 1: offering to remunerate the victims of that dude. But I digress, Like,
Speaker 1: don't give me that he's an oligarch.
Speaker 9: Stuff.
Speaker 1: Why because where he is effective is he can even
Speaker 1: with you know, when people go, well, you know, his
Speaker 1: his delivery and they talk about him, you know, being
Speaker 1: on the spectrum and all that stuff. Regardless of the
Speaker 1: way that he processes and says things, which is unique.
Speaker 1: He's very good at delineating things to be easily un understood,
Speaker 1: and he's not Pseudo Intellectuals are not going to get
Speaker 1: the better of this dude. Case in point, here's a
Speaker 1: BBC interview. Listen to the energy change of this thing.
Speaker 8: He change the COVID misinformation.
Speaker 1: Change he's talking about. Remember when back in the day
Speaker 1: you'd post something and then they'd attach the COVID thing
Speaker 1: to it, right, all right, you know, you know, so
Speaker 1: this is what the guy's talking He changed.
Speaker 8: The COVID misinformation.
Speaker 4: BBC changes COVID misinformation.
Speaker 8: The BBC doesn't not sat the rules on twits sets.
Speaker 4: I'm asking you, no, I'm talking about the BBC's misinformation
Speaker 4: about COVID.
Speaker 8: I'm asking you about you change the labels the cod By.
Speaker 1: The way, we talked about pauses being important and ross.
Speaker 1: I know it clicked in your brain, that pause, and
Speaker 1: then it immediately clicked that stays in because that pause
Speaker 1: is him trying to figure out how did we get here?
Speaker 1: The reporter and he looks down at his phone. People
Speaker 1: are always tech. Somebody's texting. I don't think they is.
Speaker 1: I think he has his Q and a bullet points
Speaker 1: on his phone, which is not unusual, but he is.
Speaker 1: His reaction, unable to even engage Elon on this point,
Speaker 1: is to pivot and he looks down at his phone
Speaker 1: and he's looking for the next questions information labels.
Speaker 8: There used to be a policy and then then disappears.
Speaker 8: Why do that.
Speaker 4: COVID is no longer an issue?
Speaker 10: Does the BBC called itself at all responsible for misinformation
Speaker 10: regarding masking and side effects of vaccinations.
Speaker 4: And not reporting on that at all?
Speaker 10: And what about the fact that the BBC was put
Speaker 10: under pressure by the British government to change the editorial policy?
Speaker 4: Are you aware of that?
Speaker 8: And this is this is not an interview about the BBC.
Speaker 4: Oh you thought it wasn't?
Speaker 8: I see not why you've done Twitter spaces. I am
Speaker 8: not a representative of the BBC's editorial policy. I want
Speaker 8: to make that clear. Let's talk about something, all right,
Speaker 8: Let's let's let's talk about Le's talk about something else.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you weren't expecting that. Sorry, I don't want to
Speaker 1: walk over that. And here's the thing, the reporter should
Speaker 1: have said that initially, because the reporter is correct in
Speaker 1: the same way that if you want to ask me
Speaker 1: questions about I heard media, I don't speak for them,
Speaker 1: and it's you know, that's corporate structure one on one.
Speaker 1: I understand that. However, it's comparing policies within media, which
Speaker 1: Twitter x is and the BBC is. If you're going
Speaker 1: to bring it up, you can't tell me, can't respond
Speaker 1: like that. But that moment is very powerful when you
Speaker 1: watch that video, and that's the tool that they ran
Speaker 1: out of their own party. Crazy all right, real quick,
Speaker 1: race stagic, very sorry, clock all right, there's not much
Speaker 1: to give anyway, but buyer was.
Speaker 5: It all looks good, feels good. The afternoons mid upper
Speaker 5: seventies on average through about Thursday and Friday, when we
Speaker 5: go to the low to mid seventies, with Friday being
Speaker 5: the coolest day. The nighttime lows will be up from
Speaker 5: where we are this morning, seeing some upper thirties, low forties.
Speaker 5: The further west you go load to mid forties elsewhere,
Speaker 5: but beautiful afternoons as we said, as the overnight lows
Speaker 5: even come up into the fifties, So expect a couple
Speaker 5: of days through Wednesday Sunday. Let's just recap mid to
Speaker 5: upper seventies overnight lows and the upper forties to low fifties. Thursday, Friday,
Speaker 5: maybe a little cooler load to mid seventies with lows
Speaker 5: in the upper forties, and that's probably going to continue
Speaker 5: into the weekend, so maybe even next week.
Speaker 1: All right, well, look at that raised in ainy water.
Speaker 1: We'll talk tomorrow, sir. Have a good one, okay, and
Speaker 1: we'll be back.
Speaker 6: Hang on, Well, good morning, Casey. Wall Street's major averages
Speaker 6: all posted modest gains on Friday, but the futures are lower.
Speaker 6: Right across the board. This morning, Dow futures are down
Speaker 6: fifty four points. Boweing machinists will vote Wednesday on the
Speaker 6: latest contract offer from the company. There is a tentative
Speaker 6: agreement on a deal to raise workers pay by thirty
Speaker 6: five percent over four years. It also calls for a
Speaker 6: guaranteed annual bonus of at least four percent and an
Speaker 6: additional seven thousand dollars bonus if the pack is approved.
Speaker 6: The machinists have been on strike for five weeks. Now,
Speaker 6: nearly half of all American adults expect to go on
Speaker 6: an overnight leisure trip during the holiday season. This according
Speaker 6: to the latest polling by bank Rate, A lot of
Speaker 6: people who were thinking about flying to their destinations or
Speaker 6: modifying their plans because of airfare inflation. The survey found
Speaker 6: a quarter of holiday travelers who originally thought they'd be
Speaker 6: flying have decided to drive instead or can out. This morning,
Speaker 6: with its twenty twenty four ranking of US cities with
Speaker 6: the biggest rat problems, Raleigh comes in at number twenty eight. Chicago,
Speaker 6: Los Angeles, and New York, in that order, are ranked
Speaker 6: as the rattiest cities in America. The company says it
Speaker 6: uses this data to determine the likelihood of homeowners needing
Speaker 6: help with rodent problems. A lot of TV viewers of
Speaker 6: cancer cable in favor of streaming services. Now, Charter Communications
Speaker 6: is planning a major streaming ad campaign. Charter does business
Speaker 6: as Spectrum. It has deals with most of the big
Speaker 6: streaming services and it's cable TV packages, and starting next year,
Speaker 6: Charter is going to promote more than ten streaming services
Speaker 6: that it will offer. It no additional cost to customers,
Speaker 6: hoping this will discourage cancelations and draw in new subscribers.
Speaker 6: And Casey, a horror film was number one at the
Speaker 6: movie theater box offices as Halloween approaches. comScore estimates Smile
Speaker 6: Too from Paramount Pictures took in twenty three million dollars.
Speaker 1: Casey, I know the Dodgers beat the Mets, and now
Speaker 1: it's a Yankees Dodgers series. Were you rootten for Yankees.
Speaker 6: Or Mets with Yeah, I'm I tend to I'm not
Speaker 6: a Mets hater, but I tend to be a Yankees fan.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, Well we'll Friday picks off against the
Speaker 1: Dodgers World Series. Man, all right, thank you, Okay, take care. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there you go. Ross, you're not talking baseball either.
Speaker 2: Right, Baseball is stupid and football is stupid, and I
Speaker 2: don't have time for stupid things. I'm way you know,
Speaker 2: we're not talking about sports.
Speaker 1: I think the Dodgers, if they play like they played
Speaker 1: against the Mets, it's not that's not good for you guys.
Speaker 1: But sometimes the Yankees just say, hey, you want to
Speaker 1: see us hit eight home runs? So I don't know,
Speaker 1: we'll see even if Ross doesn't want to participate, all right,
Speaker 1: and then finally I have one more, one more clip here.
Speaker 1: I want to get them all in. So is this
Speaker 1: the same This is the same interview with the BBC
Speaker 1: guy right Ross found this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's the same interview just a bit later.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right again, this is this is very effect.
Speaker 1: This is what you pay money.
Speaker 8: I mean, I would only just add that, you know,
Speaker 8: we have spoken to people who have in sacks that
Speaker 8: used to be in content moderation, and we've spoken to
Speaker 8: people very recently he were involved in moderation, and they
Speaker 8: just say they there's not enough people to police this stuff,
Speaker 8: particularly around particularly around hate speech in the common.
Speaker 4: You're talking about. I mean, you use Twitter, right, do
Speaker 4: you see arise in hate speech? I mean just a
Speaker 4: personal anecdote, like what did you?
Speaker 8: I don't personally, my for you, I would see I
Speaker 8: get I get more of that kind of content. Yeah, personally,
Speaker 8: but I'm not going to talk to talk to the
Speaker 8: rest of for the rest of Twitter, more hate speech personally,
Speaker 8: I would I would see more hateful.
Speaker 7: Content in that In that content you don't like or
Speaker 7: or hateful What do you mean to describe a hateful thing?
Speaker 8: Yeah? I mean, you know, this content that will solicit
Speaker 8: a reaction to something that may include something that is
Speaker 8: slightly racist or slightly sexist, those kinds of those kinds
Speaker 8: of things.
Speaker 4: Do you think if something is slightly sexist it should
Speaker 4: be banned? I know what you're saying.
Speaker 8: I'm not saying anything.
Speaker 7: I'm I'm just curious what I'm trying to say, what
Speaker 7: you mean by hateful content?
Speaker 4: And I'm asking for specific examples.
Speaker 10: And if and you just said that if something is
Speaker 10: slightly sexist that's hateful.
Speaker 4: Content, does that mean that a true be bad?
Speaker 8: When you've asked me, you've asked me whether my feed,
Speaker 8: whether it's got less or more, I'd say it's got
Speaker 8: slightly more.
Speaker 4: You think, can you name one example? I honestly don't you. Honestly,
Speaker 4: I don't name a single example.
Speaker 8: I'll tell you why because I don't actually use that
Speaker 8: for you feed anymore, because I just don't particlarly like it.
Speaker 8: A lot of people, a lot of people are quite similar.
Speaker 10: I only you've said you've seen more hateful content, but
Speaker 10: you can't name a single example, not even one