Speaker 1: You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
Speaker 1: six forty.
Speaker 2: KFI AM six forty Bill Handle here on a taco Tuesday,
Speaker 2: October twenty nine, next Tuesday, the election, and we're not
Speaker 2: gonna call it.
Speaker 1: No one's gonna call it the nine of the election
Speaker 1: unless it is a complete landslide, which it won't be.
Speaker 1: So it's gonna go on for days, maybe a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks before we actually know now talking about the election.
Speaker 1: And a couple of things have happened in the world
Speaker 1: of newspapers. Two major newspapers, one the La Times, the
Speaker 1: other one the Washington Post. La Times owned owned by
Speaker 1: a gentleman, a doctor who became insanely wealthy, Patrick Soon Shong,
Speaker 1: and the Washington Post owned by Jeff Bezos. And both
Speaker 1: of those papers were gonna come out and endorse Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris like papers do, and wording to the editorial board.
Speaker 1: It was Bezos and Patrick Schuen Shong that said, nope,
Speaker 1: there will not be an editorial, there will be no endorsement.
Speaker 1: And it took everybody on the editorial board for just
Speaker 1: a loop on both papers because they're both saying that
Speaker 1: The Times and the Post were just about to publish that,
Speaker 1: and it went to the owners for a final approval
Speaker 1: and the owner said, nope, you're not going to publish.
Speaker 1: And all of a sudden, I mean, this is a
Speaker 1: week before the election and people are reeling. So there
Speaker 1: is an op ed piece by a former member of
Speaker 1: the La Times editorial board and it was printed in
Speaker 1: the Atlantic because it wasn't going to be printed in
Speaker 1: The Times. And immediately started questioning and a lot of
Speaker 1: people started questioning, why do you say no to an
Speaker 1: endorsement that the board already has voted on. I mean,
Speaker 1: the owners, of course have the right to say no,
Speaker 1: but usually there's a firewall where the editorial department is
Speaker 1: separate from the news department and the owners leave it alone. Well,
Speaker 1: it didn't happen in this case, and the editorial board
Speaker 1: was ignored. The owners overrode the editorial board. And I'll
Speaker 1: tell you it happens. For example, in the case of
Speaker 1: the Post, two hundred thousand people cancel their subscription. Have
Speaker 1: no idea how many subscriptions were canceled with the La Times.
Speaker 1: That hasn't been released yet. Now does a newspaper always
Speaker 1: endorse not always? Matter of fact, the Times stopped endorsing
Speaker 1: for twenty years, actually more than that, right up until
Speaker 1: from nineteen seventy two to two thousand and eight. So
Speaker 1: add that one up all of those decades. Why because
Speaker 1: people were a little upset in Los Angeles that the
Speaker 1: LA Times endorsed Richard Nixon in nineteen seventy two, sort
Speaker 1: of in the middle of Watergate, and so the Times
Speaker 1: pulled back, and then in two thousand and eight they
Speaker 1: came back and said, well, we're back to endorsing it.
Speaker 1: We're gonna endorse this relatively little known guy by the
Speaker 1: name of Barack Obama. So in this op ed piece
Speaker 1: that this writer wrote arguing why endorsements are so important now,
Speaker 1: Bezos and Soon Shong said, endorsements from papers do nothing.
Speaker 1: They don't move the needle. When it comes to presidential elections.
Speaker 1: No one votes for president because the paper has endorsed
Speaker 1: that particular candidate. And that's not the argument. Oh. The
Speaker 1: other thing is that Shun Shong said that he had
Speaker 1: asked the editorial board to write an analysis of all
Speaker 1: the positive and negative policies by each candidate, and the
Speaker 1: board didn't do that. And the writer said, oh, yes,
Speaker 1: we didn't do that that's just an utter lie that
Speaker 1: was said by shun. So here's the argument for editorials,
Speaker 1: and this one made a lot of sense because I
Speaker 1: believe it too. Who cares what a paper? Do you
Speaker 1: pay attention to what a paper says an endorsement? I don't.
Speaker 1: But here is the argument why they're so important. The
Speaker 1: analysis here, the analogy is endorsements and editorials are a
Speaker 1: lot like a lawyer's closing argument to a jury after
Speaker 1: a long trial, where you have exhibits, you have witnesses,
Speaker 1: and what the lawyers do is simply remind. They remind
Speaker 1: the jurors of everything they've seen in chronological order and
Speaker 1: to put it all together, and then you vote. You
Speaker 1: the jurors vote same thing with the editorial board when
Speaker 1: they make an endorsement. This is the argument, is that,
Speaker 1: look at all of the issues, look at all of
Speaker 1: the evidence that has been presented in this campaign. We're
Speaker 1: going to put it all together for you, and we
Speaker 1: are then going to make a choice as to an endorsement.
Speaker 1: But that's our choice, not your choice. An endorsement is
Speaker 1: not a call. For example, let's say I endorse a
Speaker 1: candidate and in this election, i am I'm not endorsing,
Speaker 1: I'm non endorsing. I am voting against Trump. I'm not
Speaker 1: voting for Kamala Harrison. It has happened so many times
Speaker 1: because in the last I don't know how many races,
Speaker 1: when's the last time you actually voted for a candidate.
Speaker 1: We've now come in the world of national politics where
Speaker 1: you simply vote against. And that's my case. Now. I
Speaker 1: gave you all the reasons why over the past several months,
Speaker 1: and in the end, the process says, here is who
Speaker 1: I'm not going to vote for. However, it's up to you.
Speaker 1: I'm adamant about telling you, please, don't pay attention to me.
Speaker 1: Just look at me for my reasons. And it's like
Speaker 1: sitting down at a cocktail party. You're sitting down at
Speaker 1: dinner or having a coffee clatch or clutch, whatever they
Speaker 1: call it, and you're saying, here are the reasons, and
Speaker 1: you put it all together. That's why editorials are so important.
Speaker 1: And editorials also The Times, even though it didn't endorse
Speaker 1: a specific presidential candidate the la time, because I read
Speaker 1: it every day, The Times had no problem down ticket,
Speaker 1: not at all. Assembly people judges, they endorse, they enjoy
Speaker 1: Senate races. It's just the presidential this time around didn't endorse,
Speaker 1: so bezos is and shouldn't shung are practicing I always
Speaker 1: mispronounce everybody's name. Are saying, Nope, nope, nope, we just
Speaker 1: don't want to endorse. And it's too bad because paper
Speaker 1: should endorse. They should endorse, and explain why that's my feeling,
Speaker 1: all right, Neil, stop looking at me that way. You
Speaker 1: know that you shake your head, and you know I'm
Speaker 1: not trying to convince you to do or say anything.
Speaker 1: No the thought, Yes I am. It's a different world.
Speaker 3: It's gotten very heated, and I think in some of
Speaker 3: these cases it's gotten too much to the point where
Speaker 3: it's hard to trust any media whatsoever.
Speaker 1: And that's to go back with something a little different.
Speaker 1: But that is and that is the problem, because when
Speaker 1: I see an endorsement by a major news outlet, and
Speaker 1: here the reasons why the endorsement, and it's well thought out.
Speaker 1: No one makes any crazy claims. They lay it out
Speaker 1: and that I look at because I actually pay attention
Speaker 1: to the LA Times a lot more than I pay
Speaker 1: attention to info Wars. I pay attention to the New
Speaker 1: New York Times a lot more than I pay attention
Speaker 1: to Fox and that's why I'd love to see the endorsement,
Speaker 1: and why from a legitimate source in my opinion, where
Speaker 1: they're not going crazy with the politics of politics. All right,
Speaker 1: Next Tuesday, it's election day and we are going to vote.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you one thing. I don't get involved in
Speaker 1: your voting, except I get really angry when you don't vote.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is our fundamental franchise. We are a
Speaker 1: government of the people, by the people, and if you
Speaker 1: don't vote, you have no business saying anything about politics.
Speaker 1: It's that simple, all right. So what's going to happen
Speaker 1: next Tuesday. Well, we're not gonna have a president next
Speaker 1: Tuesday elected. I'll tell you that. Here's what absolutely going
Speaker 1: to happen. No matter who wins, Donald Trump's going to
Speaker 1: claim the election was rigged. If he loses, it was rigged,
Speaker 1: he goes to the courts. And even beyond that, if
Speaker 1: he wins, it was still rigged because remember he won
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen. But the election was rigged. You know why,
Speaker 1: because Hillary Clinton got more She got more votes across
Speaker 1: the country, she got more popular votes, even though she
Speaker 1: lost the electoral college. We've talked about that a lot.
Speaker 1: And so if Trump doesn't win the popular vote and
Speaker 1: the electoral vote, it is rigged, even if he becomes president,
Speaker 1: like it will happened last time around. So that is
Speaker 1: going to happen. First of all, we're not going to
Speaker 1: know who wins unless it is a blow out landslide,
Speaker 1: which is not going to happen because you have three
Speaker 1: states Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, all battleground states, very slow at
Speaker 1: counting for various reasons. Some jurisdictions they can't even start
Speaker 1: counting early ballots until the election day when everything is counted,
Speaker 1: and so some have to be hand counted because there
Speaker 1: will be enough. They'll be so close that some laws
Speaker 1: kick in where you have to recount. I mean, there's
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of reasons. Now, he claimed, and this
Speaker 1: is Donald Trump. He claimed that in twenty sixteen he
Speaker 1: was robbed of the popular vote. Okay, he was robbed.
Speaker 1: He has already charged. And this is what the Republicans
Speaker 1: have said, and particularly him, that the only way the
Speaker 1: Democrats are going to win is if they rig the vote.
Speaker 1: It is impossible for Donald Trump to lose in a
Speaker 1: free democratic election. By definition, the only free election that
Speaker 1: it can occur in this country is if he wins.
Speaker 1: And the unfortunate part. Now, as crazy as that sounds
Speaker 1: to me, and it does, I mean, it's just it's
Speaker 1: kind of insane. The majority of Republicans believe that in
Speaker 1: this country. I'm talking about regular smart people. I'm talking
Speaker 1: about people who I talk to, who have great jobs,
Speaker 1: who have a great education, who are rational. And I've asked,
Speaker 1: was the election rigged when he lost? Absolutely? If he
Speaker 1: loses again, is it because there'll be a rigged election. Absolutely,
Speaker 1: there's no way we have a free election without the
Speaker 1: Republicans winning. And so if Trump loses, here come the courts.
Speaker 1: It's certainly not over on election day. This is what
Speaker 1: his campaign manager said earlier this year. It's not over
Speaker 1: on election day. It's over on inauguration day, and the
Speaker 1: fight is going to continue. Four years ago, when Biden won,
Speaker 1: there were all kinds of legal challenges the Republicans or
Speaker 1: he asked the Republican state legislatures to overturn the results,
Speaker 1: demanded that Mike Pence refuse to certify the electoral votes,
Speaker 1: which of course he had no legal ability to do that,
Speaker 1: and then it culminated into the really angry Trump supporters
Speaker 1: there in Washington invading the Capitol. And so what happens.
Speaker 1: What are the possible outcomes. Well, let's say there is
Speaker 1: a tie, which it can't happen two seventy to two
Speaker 1: seventy electoral College. Then it kicks over the House of Representatives,
Speaker 1: and there every state has one vote. California has the
Speaker 1: same as Rhode Island, California with forty million people Rhode
Speaker 1: Island with I think eighteen people living in the state
Speaker 1: at any given time, same vote. And since there is
Speaker 1: a Republican majority by a factor of four and still
Speaker 1: will be on election on election night, Trump gets the election.
Speaker 1: If it were a Democratic majority, it would be a
Speaker 1: Democrat that gets the election. We'll say that's happened once.
Speaker 1: By the way, it was Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr
Speaker 1: who were fighting for it, and Thomas Jefferson clearly won.
Speaker 1: Here's the other thing that's been going on around the
Speaker 1: country the Republican state legislatures, of which there are many
Speaker 1: rampant Republicans who were just as angry at the ripoff
Speaker 1: when Biden won, because those clearly a stolen election, have
Speaker 1: changed the rules and now it is far easier for
Speaker 1: the election officials to question, to examine, to re examine
Speaker 1: the vote. They have become, frankly law enforcement officials, because
Speaker 1: think of this. Election officials their job is to count.
Speaker 1: That's it. Nothing else count, and if there is an
Speaker 1: allegation of fraud, if they discover something wrong, they turn
Speaker 1: it over to law enforcement. Law enforcement deals with fraud
Speaker 1: and rigging of the votes, which is a federal crime.
Speaker 1: And the way the laws have been rewritten, it is
Speaker 1: now up to election officials to not only count and certify,
Speaker 1: but also investigate and overturn votes if they deem that
Speaker 1: there has been fraudulent voting. And that's the problem they are.
Speaker 1: On January sixth, Trump told his followers, if you don't
Speaker 1: fight like hell, you won't have a country anymore. This one,
Speaker 1: it's gonna this is getting even better or worse. Last
Speaker 1: month in Wisconsin, he said at a rally, if I
Speaker 1: don't win, migrants will walk into your kitchen, they will
Speaker 1: cut your throat. We will not have a country anymore.
Speaker 1: And so the thought of just the litigation going on,
Speaker 1: I mean, that's sort of a given. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: getting worse and worse, and as are elections are becoming
Speaker 1: safer and safer. They're being attacked more and more. For example,
Speaker 1: you've got what was a sixty minute piece talking about
Speaker 1: I think election Arizona. They have put up the hard wire,
Speaker 1: hard fences, concertina wire around the election, the nuts, polling
Speaker 1: place of the ballot, counting buildings Detroit, bulletproof glass in
Speaker 1: the buildings, Snipers on roofs. This is for counting facilities.
Speaker 1: This is to count the votes. And they have snipers
Speaker 1: on the roof and so it's very depressing, very depressing.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna follow, We're gonna see you wins. No
Speaker 1: idea who's gonna win, by the way, none whatsoever. But
Speaker 1: I know we're going to have the lawsuits of plenty
Speaker 1: over one hundred, by the way, have already been filed
Speaker 1: before the election. Over one hundred lawsuits have been filed
Speaker 1: to invalidate rules and mail in balloting and when they're
Speaker 1: counted and errors are they serious?
Speaker 4: Errors?
Speaker 1: Are they not? I mean, this goes on and on
Speaker 1: all right. Mike Dubuski, who is the ABC News Technology reporter, Mike,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for taking the time to talk
Speaker 1: to us. Big doings in the world of Apple their
Speaker 1: AI is arriving, and I tried to go on Siri
Speaker 1: today and it was not good. It's going to be
Speaker 1: easier for me, isn't it. Well, that's what they say.
Speaker 5: So Apple Intelligence is Apple's branding for their take on
Speaker 5: the generative artificial intelligence craze. We first got to look
Speaker 5: at how they were thinking about this technology all the
Speaker 5: way back in June at WWDC, their Worldwide Developer Conference.
Speaker 5: They made some big promises there, among them a much
Speaker 5: more intelligent version of Siri that you can talk to
Speaker 5: just like we're talking now, kind of more natural language,
Speaker 5: free flowing conversations. It's gonna be able to do a
Speaker 5: lot more as well. In addition to that, they made
Speaker 5: some big promises around partnerships with open Ai, promising to
Speaker 5: bring chat GPT into Apple software as well. For things
Speaker 5: that their own artificial intelligence can't handle, they're going to
Speaker 5: hand it off to chat GPT. Those were just a
Speaker 5: few of the announcements they made back in June. Now
Speaker 5: we're starting to see the realization of some of those promises.
Speaker 5: In a new software update this week to iPhones, iPads,
Speaker 5: and Mac computers. You're going to be able to play
Speaker 5: around with some Apple intelligence stuff, and what that means
Speaker 5: is basically two things. There's a new photo editing tool
Speaker 5: where you can go into your photos and basically highlight
Speaker 5: anything that you don't want to be there, and using
Speaker 5: artificial intelligence, Apple will be able to delete that thing
Speaker 5: and fill in the background behind it. Is a feature
Speaker 5: that we've seen on other smartphones in the past. Google
Speaker 5: pixel as a feature called the Magic Eraser, which has
Speaker 5: been around for a few years now. Now iPhone users
Speaker 5: will be able to play around with that technology as well.
Speaker 5: And Notifications is the other big AI announcement with regard
Speaker 5: to their software this week. That's going to be able
Speaker 5: to look at your texts, look at your emails, and
Speaker 5: summarize them in notification form, so you can get a quick,
Speaker 5: at a glance look of what someone wants to tell
Speaker 5: you without scrolling through a long, boring email.
Speaker 1: All right, I use a lot of Siri and it
Speaker 1: doesn't really do very good job. I use it on
Speaker 1: the phone, I use it on the air here and eh,
Speaker 1: you know, and I have the traditional series. A matter
Speaker 1: of fact, I'm going to try something right now, Okay, Siri?
Speaker 1: Who is Mike Dubuski.
Speaker 4: Oh, Michael John March nineteen eighty two, America, former professional
Speaker 4: baseball outfielder, first baseman, and shortstop.
Speaker 1: So when did you stop playing baseball? Well?
Speaker 5: See, here's the thing. Theory got that pretty wrong. I
Speaker 5: couldn't even tell you how to play baseball nrtually. So yeah,
Speaker 5: that's the thing with Siri is that it's often looked
Speaker 5: at as the perennial also ran of the voice assistant world.
Speaker 5: It's been usurped by Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa in terms
Speaker 5: of what it can do. In addition things like that,
Speaker 5: like we just demonstrated, it doesn't really understand you very well.
Speaker 5: It kind of makes mistakes like that pretty frequently, and
Speaker 5: when it can answer a question, it just kicks you
Speaker 5: over to the web saying like hey, I'll look that
Speaker 5: up on the web.
Speaker 1: For yeah, and it didn't work. So what you're saying,
Speaker 1: hopefully is that once this Apple AI kicks in, and
Speaker 1: by the way, I'm going to get another phone. I'm
Speaker 1: just it's what is it, the new Blasto five thousand,
Speaker 1: whatever the hell the new phone is that I'm getting it.
Speaker 1: I'm assuming it will have Apple AI. And if I
Speaker 1: were to ask that same question again next time we talk,
Speaker 1: I'll have an idea of who you are, and maybe
Speaker 1: you'll be paying football instead of baseball.
Speaker 5: Well a couple of asterisks is there. So Apple Intelligence
Speaker 5: is only available on certain phones. So depending on what
Speaker 5: phone you upgrade to, you may or may not have
Speaker 5: access to Apple Intelligence. And this has been a criticism
Speaker 5: of Apple over the last few weeks. Here, the iPhone sixteen,
Speaker 5: the latest iPhone, all of them across the range are
Speaker 5: going to be able to support Apple Intelligence. Only the
Speaker 5: iPhone fifteen Pro models are going to be able to
Speaker 5: support Apple Intelligence. That's the nicer phones from last year.
Speaker 5: Anything else, you're kind of out of luck. That's because
Speaker 5: the chips, the processors that run in these phones, they
Speaker 5: are built to sustain artificial intelligence and AI like this
Speaker 5: generative AI requires a lot of computing power, so they're
Speaker 5: really limiting the rollout of this technology. What's more, the
Speaker 5: smarter SERI isn't available right now. In fact, when the
Speaker 5: iPhone sixteen launched last month, there was no AI in
Speaker 5: it really at all in terms of Apple Intelligence, and
Speaker 5: that was a criticism of Apple. They're all over the
Speaker 5: marketing is Apple Intelligence. You can get the new iPhone
Speaker 5: sixteen with Apple Intelligence, but up until this week, you
Speaker 5: really couldn't access any Apple intelligence, and the Apple Intelligence
Speaker 5: stuff you can access this week is kind of small fry.
Speaker 5: It's a photo editing feature that we've seen in other phones,
Speaker 5: and it's like a notification summary the bigger stuff, the
Speaker 5: smarter serie, the chatch Ept integration that's coming in the
Speaker 5: next few months, and that delay is certainly getting the
Speaker 5: attention of some smartphone providers.
Speaker 1: Of course. All right, Mike, thank you much. We'll talk again,
Speaker 1: and thanks for taking the time, so, of course, take
Speaker 1: it all right, Mike Dubuski, ABC News Tech reporter out
Speaker 1: of New York. All Right, Dodgers Yankees. There's not just
Speaker 1: a battle for the World Series. There's also the battle
Speaker 1: of the brands. How much is the brand of the
Speaker 1: Yankees and the Dodgers worth? Right now, the Yankees are
Speaker 1: the highest value team in Major League Baseball valuation of
Speaker 1: seven point six billion dollars. The brand itself is valued
Speaker 1: at one point two billion. Dodgers are the runner up,
Speaker 1: their second in the league five point five billion valuation,
Speaker 1: and the brand is worth one point one billion. And
Speaker 1: why are the Yankees such a top brand in Major
Speaker 1: League Baseball? Well, they've won the World Series. More than
Speaker 1: any other team. I think they have a twenty seven
Speaker 1: World Series and the next up is eleven. They had
Speaker 1: Babe Ruth, Joe DiMaggio, Ty Cobb. Does Ty Copp play
Speaker 1: for the Yankees? I think he did, I don't remember anyway,
Speaker 1: So there is a history. And then you know, look
Speaker 1: at Jay Z's baseball cap. The Yankees have partnered with Gucci,
Speaker 1: and Hollywood loves the Yankees, even though the Dodgers are
Speaker 1: the LA town are the local team here in Los Angeles.
Speaker 1: And here's something I didn't know, by the way, that
Speaker 1: the Yankees' logo was that N and Y that are
Speaker 1: interlocking came from Tiffany's in eighteen seventy seven. Tiffany's actually
Speaker 1: created the Yankees' logo. Interesting little side story. And according
Speaker 1: to Jim Andrews, who's a sports marketing professor at Northwest Journey,
Speaker 1: the Yankees have this status where they transcended baseball, and
Speaker 1: a lot of that is true. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: Babe Ruth, these players transcend baseball. Show Hey Otani certainly
Speaker 1: in Japan, and he's beyond baseball, and a few of
Speaker 1: the stars are, and there's more so on the Yankees team.
Speaker 1: So there's a reason for that. The Yankees are just
Speaker 1: the Yankees, although the Dodgers second place, and they're moving
Speaker 1: up pretty quickly. Right now in terms of internationalization, the
Speaker 1: Dodgers are beating the Yankees. Now. The total number of
Speaker 1: social media followers, well again, you've got the Dodgers at
Speaker 1: thirteen million, you have the Yankees at seventeen and a
Speaker 1: half million. However, however, LA fans engage with the team
Speaker 1: more on social media, the most likes, shares, repost comments,
Speaker 1: video views more than any other team in Major League Baseball,
Speaker 1: So that helps. And a history of the Dodgers, it's
Speaker 1: one of the great rivalries of baseball. The bigger the brand,
Speaker 1: the more merchandise you're selling, according to the professor, the
Speaker 1: more money you're making. That makes sense. So in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three, the Yankees generated six hundred and seventy nine
Speaker 1: million dollars, second place Dodgers five hundred and forty nine
Speaker 1: million dollars.
Speaker 4: And I think a lot of it also has to
Speaker 4: do with where the Yankees play for New York, of course,
Speaker 4: the Dodger play for Los Angeles, and what are the
Speaker 4: two biggest media markets in the United.
Speaker 1: States by a long shot New York, LA. So I've
Speaker 1: always found it fascinating in terms of the brands and
Speaker 1: who is worth more. And a lot of it has
Speaker 1: to do with the recognition, not even so much how
Speaker 1: good a team is, because the Yankees have had miserable years,
Speaker 1: but they're still the Yankees, and they're just revered as
Speaker 1: baseball the most valuable team out there, by the way,
Speaker 1: And I think this is correct, and I'll ask Siri this,
Speaker 1: and that's Manchester United, the soccer team out of Great Britain,
Speaker 1: or at least it was the most valuable sports property
Speaker 1: on the planet. Hey, sirih what is the most most
Speaker 1: valuable sports team in the world the Dallas Cowboys. Del
Speaker 1: that's wrong. It even contradicts the story. We did this
Speaker 1: story with Mike Dubuski about Siri and Ai and how
Speaker 1: crappy it is Manchester United most valuable team in the world,
Speaker 1: but the brand wars between the Dodgers and the Yankees.
Speaker 1: I digressed for a moment. I think at some point
Speaker 1: the Dodgers are going to win this one. All they
Speaker 1: need to do is do a dynasty or two and
Speaker 1: win a few World Series and no one would be
Speaker 1: more thrilled than Amy, and no one would be more
Speaker 1: upset than Anne the Padres. You know where the Padres
Speaker 1: going to go? Anne? No place? Ty Cobb was with
Speaker 1: the Detroit Tigers. Okay, well, thank you. I had asked
Speaker 1: the question. I asked the question. Stick to the topics. Whoa,
Speaker 1: And we'll not be joining us tomorrow on the show.
Speaker 1: I just want to point that out. We are now
Speaker 1: looking for another producer effective today. Coming up. Please actually
Speaker 1: KFI AM six four to eight live everywhere on the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app. You've been listening to the Bill Handle Show.
Speaker 1: Catch my Show Monday through Friday, six am to nine am,
Speaker 1: and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app