Speaker 1: Today, your bet builders hang away a thread here, Relax, relax,
they still need one more goal. Well if it loses,
nov BET's got your covered. Nobe Besh is the home
of the bet builder.
Speaker 2: This world come from.
Speaker 3: Goalscorers to cards.
Speaker 1: Get the best value on every match, plus get money
back as a free bash. If your bat builder loses
on the biggest game every single day, join today and
get seventy euros.
Speaker 3: In pre bets nob Bash.
Speaker 1: More power to you, Teacencys apply eighteen plus bet responsibly, gamblingcare, dot.
Speaker 4: I E.
Speaker 3: Attention, getowheads, attention, bow scouts Rose by the pseudonym motion Nerdly.
It's time for the soul of excellence. He is a
radio host here in New York.
Speaker 5: The Rush Hour is on the air, Rush Rush Now
here's James Golden.
Speaker 6: There is a lot of news here at home. Domestically.
The President also just making news a few moments ago
on the Texas Senate primary. He just endorsed the Attorney
general down there, Ken Paxton for the Senate race. This
is in direct opposition to the leadership the GUP leadership
on Capitol Hill, including John Thune, who is backing John
Cornyn for that seat.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we have the reactions, some of them. Anyway. Welcome
my friends to the Tuesday edition A baser Lea's Rush,
our fastest hour in American media. You know, the left today,
not just the left, but the left in particular, they're
losing their poop. They're they're they're they're losing it. The compensation,
this compensation. They're losing their minds. They are it's beyond
the usual losing their minds. They are enraged, livid, And
you know what, when I first heard about it, I
was like, really, but and I'm not you know, I
heard Scott Jennings say he's not so comfortable with it.
I'm not either, But at the same time, I'm enjoying
every minute of it because of the reaction that it
is garnering mainstream press and the left. Tomorrow's primary day
in six states, Jooja is one of them. President made
an endorsement in the Georgia Racist. Well, but this compensation
form they're losing, And to me, that's all. He's hysterical.
Here's the uh huh The New York Times story Trump
Administration of Trump Administration live updates deal on compensation fund blocks,
I r S claims against President and and his family.
Speaker 7: Uh.
Speaker 2: President made an agreement with the Justice Department to settle
his lawsuit against the I R S, which still which
they were already fuming about. President Trump sued the I
R S. Littal's got mad? How dare he sued the
I No other president is sue of the I R S.
He's suing the I R S.
Speaker 3: How is this?
Speaker 2: So he settles, He settles the lawsuit. And in this
settlement there's a provision barring the IRS from pursuing tax
claims against against President Trump, his family, or his businesses. Now,
that would have been enough to send them over the moon,
but that wasn't all. That provision came a day after
we got word that the Justice Department agreed to settle
the Trump lawsuit by creating a one point eight billion
dollars compensation fund for people that he thinks were wronged
by federal investigations or prosecutions. The Treasury's top lawyers step
down after the fund was created, according to three people
familiar with the move. Huh, and a one page document
signed by Acting Attorney General Todd blanche and quietly posted
how do you quietly post post? How do you quietly post? Something.
When you post something on a website, do you post
it loudly or do you post it? Sort of? When
you post something, Carlos, do you post it quietly or
do you post it loudly?
Speaker 8: I think posting something quietly is when you're telling nobody
about it and you just like post it.
Speaker 2: But who do you supposed to tell about it? That's
why you're posting it. Yeah, you're posting it so that
people can see it, but.
Speaker 8: You didn't talked about it that you're going to post it,
so nobody knew you were going to post.
Speaker 2: So it was a quiet post. Okay, I'll buy that.
Speaker 3: Anyway.
Speaker 2: They quietly posted it. Officier vowed not to pursue any matters,
including those involving mister Trump's tax return, that are currently pending.
Todd Blantz was at congressional hearings today and I got
to tell you, folks, it was we can just go
right to it. I'm getting myself out of the order
that I thought I was going to do. But let's
just go ahead and get to it. This exchange cut
seven by Todd. This will show you how it went.
When I tell you they're losing their cookies today, they
are losing their poop today, the Democrats, they are totally
losing their poop. Listen to Chris van Holland, he of
the Margaritaville down there with the MS thirteen game banger.
Here is Chris van Holland with Acting Attorney General Todd
Blanche today.
Speaker 9: And I have there's tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands
of quote people, name.
Speaker 3: How about Julay Maxwell.
Speaker 10: Can you commit that you will?
Speaker 9: Yeah, second, commit to that.
Speaker 11: Of course, let me go back to this slush fund,
because there's also an individual who, after being pardoned by
the president, went on to molest two children, and that
person actually tried to buy the silence of these children
by saying that he would pay them some of the
funds that he was hoping to get from your slush fund.
Can you commit to making the rules so that that
person is not eligible for a payout under this fund.
Speaker 9: Well, you're obviously lying in your question, because there's no
way that this person committed to that the slush fund
as you call it, which is not didn't I can't
commit stir.
Speaker 3: Terry, General, don't ever do that again. I am reporting
to it again.
Speaker 11: But he said, he said on the expectation they hoped
to get some of the funds from a payout.
Speaker 3: He's been you said.
Speaker 9: In the slush fund, Senator, and that didn't exist when
he said.
Speaker 11: That this is the fund that the president and all
of you have been telegraphing all along, that you're going
to use to help the President's friends.
Speaker 9: Can you point to telegraph a last ques Well, telegraph that.
Speaker 11: I have a last question from you. Do you know
that it is a criminal offense to lie to Congress?
Speaker 3: I am very well aware of that.
Speaker 11: I'm glad to hear that.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 2: That was just one and let us listening to Senator Murkley.
Another one here has cut eight another one of these
senators with it. Don't ever say that you're obviously lying
with your question. Don't ever why you were lying. Nobody
knew about this fund back then. It was only quietly
posted last night, well the night before, I mean, goodness, gracious,
and well here's Murkley.
Speaker 9: Department of Justice and the FBI have evidence that the
crime has been committed.
Speaker 3: And that doesn't I mean you're talking about it.
Speaker 12: If you commit to pursue regardless of political affiliation, excuse me,
you commit to pursuing investigations free of prejudice about party affiliation.
Of course, Yes, well you say, of course, but this
enemy has repeatedly, this president has repeatedly spoken of an
enemy's list that he wants to go after. And I
must say it's one of the symbols of the breakdown
of a democratic republic when a president uses his Department
of Justice, which you now had, to go after his
perceived political enemies. I hope you won't be party to that,
thank you.
Speaker 3: I mean, I couldn't agree with you more.
Speaker 9: And that's why what happened when during the Biden administration
was so disgusting.
Speaker 12: That is completely inappropriate and wrong. There is no comparison
to the absolute, fair minded pursuit of justice under the
previous administration and this administration's pursuit of an enemy's list.
Speaker 3: Thank you, sinner, Marie.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well he cut them off there. There was absolutely
you know, Joe Biden's Justice department has been demonstrated. Look
at everything the Biden administration did, and we could keep
going over the same laundry list time and time and
time and time again, but Democrats won't want to talk
about it. Going from the way that the intelligence and
the law enforcement agencies were used with this phony Russia hoax,
going on to them spying on Trump's campaign, going on
to the Justice Department weaponized trying to attack their political foes, including,
as we all remember, or most of us do, traditional
Catholics said to be the army. Also pro life people
prosecuted just for being pro life and protesting. Come on,
and Merkley can stand up. Democrats can stand up all
they want to and say that the Democrats didn't weaponize
the DOJ. Of course they did, and there's rampant evidence
of it. Anyway, JD. Vance did depress secretary the press
secretary role today you know, uh, Press Secretary's out on
maternity leave and he was asked by reporters about this fund.
I'll tell you what we're gonna do. First, though, we're
gonna take a break so that we can actually hear
from without rushing into the next break. James Golden is
nerdly keep it right here. Fastest hour in American media.
Speaker 3: Rush. This is the rush hour with James Golden.
Speaker 11: James Golden known popularly as both nedly.
Speaker 3: This is the rush hour with.
Speaker 2: Us. Wait, I don't understand, I don't wanna say, how
what do you mean it costs five hundred and something
something dollars to get a ticket to go see the
New York Knicks play.
Speaker 3: Who's paying?
Speaker 2: And that's if you're up in the nosebleed section, way
up there at the top, near the roofline. You have
to pay five hundred and forty three dollars for a ticket. Yeah,
close to six hundred probably, So if you take a
I started to say something, but then that would be
in this is New York w time. So I was
about to say, if you take your girl, which you
would assume, you know, the two tickets, Yeah, that's over,
geez to go see the Knicks play. And then you're
up in the cheap seats and she's gonna be looking
at you like you like you're Joe cheapskate. You're not
getting under night because you invite me on a date,
and the seats are the worst seats in the place,
and you think you're gonna get some for that. And
then and so you're up at the top and it
costs you five one hundred plus dollars to go at
the top to see how much if you are just
sitting in a regular seat, if you were like sitting
somewhere who's paying that kind of money to go see
the Knicks and why.
Speaker 3: And why?
Speaker 2: Folks. I'm sorry, there's a lot that I didn't know.
I'm trying to catch up because apparently the Knicks are
actually having a postseason this year, and it's been since
the seventies, and so I'm just curious. And then they're
telling me that their teams out there in the West Coast,
some people that have spurs on or something, and then
some bunch of thunder people, and I'm like, when did
the thunder people come? And apparently the thunder people are
the champions and I didn't even know that there were
thunder people, but then I found out that they came
from Seattle and they're the Supersonic so it must be
they wanted to escape Seattle because all the homeless people
were probably blocking their stadium and nobody could get in
to go or their field. And you know, less time
I was in Seattle, it was scary. And it's getting
worse than what I hear. It's not as bad as La,
but it's getting close. And so and then you told
me that if the Knicks actually win this time around,
how much is it going to cost? To go see
them in the finals.
Speaker 8: It's gonna be close to three dollars.
Speaker 2: Thirty five hundred dollars a ticket to go to a
basketball game. This is crazy. How is this? How is
this allowed to happen?
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: And you say that they're sold out with those prices, Oh,
you can get tickets. They're not sold out. And then
if they are sold out, then people are going to
be doing what they usually do and trying to sell
the tickets for a profit. Oh boy, is that guy
with the glasses that movie guys? He's still there every
time front row Spike Lee. Yeah, he must be having
a good year. Okay, Anyway, I took up all the
time talking about basketball. I'm sorry, folks, but I was curious,
not knowing. I wonder what Sid thinks about all this,
because you know, Sid is a sports guy. I wonder
if Sid is all for the Knicks doing is he
going to go to any of the games? Rosenberg? Anyway?
Speaker 9: J d.
Speaker 2: Vance was asked about this fund, and I think we
have time to know. We don't. Yes, we do. We'll
try cut five. Let's see if we can just get
started with it. Anyway, we may have to cut it off.
Speaker 4: Everybody is eligible to apply for this one. I mean
you're eligible, but I assume you're not gonna apply, and
you don't think you should get money out of this course.
So isn't it just as easy to say that people
that attacked police officers should not get taxpayer money from
this film?
Speaker 10: Well, look, John, we're not trying to give money to
anybody who attacked a police officer. We're trying to give money,
not give money. We're trying to compensate people where the
book was thrown at them. They were mistreated by the
legal system sometimes, you know, we are. We do have
John in this in this country innocent until proven guilty.
We do have people who were accused of attacking law
enforcement officers. That doesn't that that that that that doesn't
that doesn't mean that we're going to completely ignore some
of the claims that they're going to make. We're going
to evaluate these things on a case by case basis.
And if we think that somebody whatever they were accused of,
if we think that somebody was unfairly prosecuted and deserves
just compensation, then that's what this fund is going to
exist to provide. It's just going to correct a wrong,
and I think that's a good thing, and I'd encourage
everybody Democrat, Republican, Independent, let's turn the page on this
thing that we did under the last administration where we
try to throw people in prison because they had the
wrong politics.
Speaker 2: My friend is there is a ticket. There are two
tickets left, seven thousand dollars in change.
Speaker 7: The Rush Hour with James Golden on the Red Apple
podcast network.
Speaker 13: James Golden, known popularly as vos Nerdly.
Speaker 3: This is the Rush Hour with James Golden Rush.
Speaker 2: James Golden, Surly fans is our on American media. Princess
Diana is going to be on the show with me tomorrow.
That at least that's the plan. We're gonna talk about China.
And also, I'm sure there's slush fund that they're calling
the slush fund. I am still laughing myself, silly, these
people a losing their minds. I'm losing my mind, folks.
I'm not kidding. There's a ticket tonight. They're two left,
only two left. So if you're in the New York
area and you want to take your lady out tonight,
you can go to the Garden and there are two
tickets left. You'll have good seats, and you only have
to pay seven four hundred and forty four dollars per ticket,
and there are two left at seven. Just call it
seventy five hundred bucks apiece. By the time you leave
a tip probably for the person that sells you the ticket.
They probably want a tip anyway, So just seventy five
hundred apiece. Now again, if you're if you're a guy
and you are looking to impress your lady, and you
say your budget is maybe twelve hundred dollars, I don't know,
because you could pay, For instance, you could pay six
hundred and seventy dollars per ticket, so that's over twelve
hundred bucks. And you could be sitting at the absolute
top top of Madison Square Garden up so high everything
on bill Little looks like a bunch of ants. You
need binoculars, you might need a telescope to really see
individuals down there, and you're paying six hundred and seventy
dollars a piece for those. And if you take a girl,
let's say your first date, I'm gonna take you somewhere nice.
I'll take you to see your nick game. First date,
she gets all dressed up you take her and then
you're sitting at the top of Madison Square Garden and
you think you're gonna get some when you take her home,
you're gonna get the door slams in your face. How
dare you take me for a first date and you
take me to the cheapest freaking seats that there are
where I can't even see anything, but maybe baby, these
tickets will twelve hundred dollars get out, cheapskate, loser man.
And I was just saying, so for the if they
actually win this stuff and they're going to the finals,
Carlos said, the tickets, then you tell me everything here
is gonna be doubled. So there para will be tickets
going for about fourteen thousand dollars apiece, and if you're
in the cheap seats, maybe twelve hundred dollars apiece, just
to set up near the top where you can't even see.
What a racket. Threw me off my game. I had
never intinued to talk about this stuff today, but because
see what you started, Carlos. Anyway, let's get back to
the politics of the day, folks. Jd Vance Okay, we're
not trying to you know this is not a slush
fun blah blah blah. As I said, Democrats are losing
their losing their stuff. Let's go to CNN. Scott Jennings
uncomfortable with it. Cut nine. This is on a naviral.
She was having a meltdown. They all are on the
on the the the MSM channels. They're totally totally losing
their stuff.
Speaker 14: Here you go a one point seven billion slush fund
to pay his supporters and the people who feel victimized.
I mean, I'm so old. I remember when most Republicans
used to balk and be shocked and outraged by the
idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're
going to be giving money to January sixth insurrectionists. That
part's okay, Yeah, it's It's disgusting.
Speaker 6: God, is this reparations.
Speaker 3: Look, I think there's a lot about it.
Speaker 13: We don't know.
Speaker 15: I don't know who's on the committee. I don't know
exactly who's going to be applying for it.
Speaker 14: The people that Trump, the people that Trump.
Speaker 15: Approves, well, they say anybody can apply for it, and
you know, I don't think.
Speaker 2: Okay, I'll apply for it.
Speaker 15: You think I'll get it have you ever been unfairly
targeted by the Department of Justice?
Speaker 14: I have been unfairly targeted by this administration.
Speaker 15: Yet have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice?
Speaker 14: Are those the people that are going to be in
this The answer is no, you haven't.
Speaker 15: So the issue is the question is has anyone in
the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted
by the Department of Justice? Of course they have, and
there ought to be, just at a top line, a
way for people to seek recourse if they have been
unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by
the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly
and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started.
And he was initially seeking damages for that, which he
has given up. He'll receive no money, as I understand it.
And now it is morphed into this idea that there
have been people that have been unfairly targeted. All of
this makes me a little uncomfortable because it's a lot
of money and it didn't go through the US Congress.
Speaker 2: That's number one.
Speaker 15: Number two. I don't want to see a president necessarily
hand picking people to get payments that could where he
could be accused of just picking people out who are
political allies. But I want do I want a world
where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government
and it was truly unfair, and you truly we had
something done to you that should not have been done,
do I think people should be able to seek recourse
for that.
Speaker 3: Absolutely.
Speaker 2: Let me just say this about that all these complaints
about slush funds, Democrats have been slushing funds forever. And
you go back to we talked about the other day
the infrastructure bills seven hundred and sixty semi billion dollars
three quarters of a trillion dollars when Obama was president
that Joe Biden was supposed to look after, and then
another trillion dollars when Biden was president. So you have
almost two trillion dollars in infrastructure spending. And I dare
anybody to come up with the comprehensive list and say, yep,
this is what we got out of the Now you
can find one or two road projects here and there
that happened, but you cannot account for almost all. I
would bet, I bet most people would have a hard
time trying to account for where that money was spent.
You look at the deals that have been made with
environmentalist groups where we later learned that the courts were
involved with these groups and they were riddled with conflicts
of interest in some of these multi billion dollar settlements
in terms of the environment, nobody says a word. Look
at the fraud that's been uncovered in just Minnesota, in California, Longe.
In fact, you know, I read today's story. California is
the only state that has refused to pay back their
COVID area loans and that's some twenty billion dollars and
there's no outrage over it. So you get this one
point eight billion dollar things here, and everybody's losing their
minds everybody. I don't necessarily like the deal to be
totally candid, but I find it humorous and funny the
reaction to the deal, So to me, I will put
my mild sort of I don't know about this aside
for the humor of it all, because watching liberals lose
their poop over this is truly entertaining. Moving on, you
heard President has nominated Ken Paxton. Ken Paxton has been
talking about his opponent John Cornyn Soon came out today
and I read I don't know whether we even have
it here. Soon says, you know, Cornyn is such a
great conservative and all of that if he was a
great conservative. Anyway, here's Ken Paxon talking about his opponent
in that Texas race, Cut fifteen. And Ken Paxson has
a lot of detractors, including one of my very very
dear he's like a brother to me, Louis Gomert out
of Texas. And I'm gonna tell you Louis is not
a fan of Ken Paxton at all. And he's in
Texas and he knows the ins and out to the
political system there. But all of that aside, I am
not a fan of Corning too many times. Cornyn has
been to me the epitome of a rin on too
many occasions. But anyway, here's the interesting point raised by
Ken Paxton cut fifteen on his opponent in that race,
John Cornyn.
Speaker 16: So then the question is, and I've asked this in
every meeting I've been in since April the eighth of
last year, whether it's fifty people, one person, thousands of people,
the question is, is John corn has been in office
not just twenty four years in the Senate. But I'm
going to give him the whole forty two years. He
was a state dissert judge, he was a Supreme Court
justice for Texas, he was Attorney general. Can anybody name
one significant accomplishment in those forty two years?
Speaker 2: Do you know?
Speaker 16: I've never had anybody give me an answer. In a
year and two months, we've let this guy stay and
represent us. Now, look, if he was in Massachusetts, I'd
accepted if he's a Republican. But for Texas to not
have it's like we have one hand tied behind our back.
We've got Ted Cruz over here punching with his right hand.
I know it's right handed, and John Corny, we don't
have that punch. As a matter of fact, we have
just the opposite. So I've also said to people, look
at any two weeks I've been in office as Attorney
General except for Christmas and Thanksgiving, and I guarantee you
we've accomplished more in two weeks. Any two weeks, and
John can pick the two weeks, then he's accomplished in
forty two years.
Speaker 3: Now, that's pathetic. Interesting.
Speaker 2: Interesting, Carlos took the initiative and found John Thune Thank you, Carlos.
Let's hear from John Thune and his statement after this
announcement from President Trump.
Speaker 17: You've spent months trying to encourage persuade the President to
endorse John Corny in the Texas primary, and given that
the NRSC has invested heavily to help Cornyan win that primary,
how personally disappointed or frustrate are you with the President's
decision to endorse Ken Paxton today?
Speaker 13: Well, I think you all know my position on this issue.
I've made it very clear for months now, and Senator
Cornyn is a principal conservative. He is a very effective
Senator for the state of Texas. But I don't none
of us control what the president does. He made his
decision about that. That doesn't change the way I feel,
and I am certainly supportive. I will continue to be
supportive of Senator Cornyn in his real liction.
Speaker 17: Jority, how much heart has a president's decision here made
it for you?
Speaker 2: Is your number one job to keep the Republican majority.
Giving your concerns about Ken Paxson's viability.
Speaker 13: As a candidate, we look at, you know, lots of
races around the country, and the majority runs through a
lot of different states. We have twenty four seats up
this time. The Democrats have only nine, so we've got
a lot more ground to defend. We also have a
couple of offensive opportunities, so you know, one state doesn't
determine the outcome of this election, but obviously we care
about every state and we care about helping see art
incumbents succeed. That being said, I feel very good about
where we are. As I've said before, I think when
it comes to winning elections.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, blads are blads are blouse. He's not
answering the question enough of that. That's add to a
blake because we got to get to the clip of
the day. Coming back is a doozy, folks. They're always
are a doozy for the clip of the day. That's
why they are the clip of the day, et cetera,
et cetera. Both normally's Rush Hours of the Tuesday edition.
If you just joined us, Princess Diana is going to
be on tomorrow. At least that's what we're play. I
think its could always change, you know how that goes.
James Golden snurly with you here. Clip of the Day coming.
Speaker 7: Up, The Rush Hour with James Goldish on the Red
Apple podcast network.
Speaker 5: It's the Rush Hour with James Golden. Now yours James Golden.
You know these two conservatives when it's not a joke.
Speaker 2: These two conservatives went into a Panda Express uh in
near Seattle, Washington state. It's in Lakeland, and the guys
had on red hat Make America Great hat. Well, that
was enough. The employees of this Panda Express called the
police because these guys wore a Make America Great captain
to the store and gave him a thumbs up. When
they were like, they said, it's a problem. Your hat's
a problem. They gave him a thumbs up. So they
called the cops on these guys and told the cops
apparently falsely that these customers were refusing to leave, but
they were outside of the restaurant, and then they were
filming it. Police came in and tell the staff, look,
these guys didn't do anything wrong. The girl that calls
nine to one one starts crying and goes back in,
and then Panda Express gives some lame expression to all
of this. At what happened in their restaurant. We went
everyone who walks into a Panda Express to feel welcome
and treated with respect. Well, that didn't happen, and apparently
these employees are not no sanctions against them either. Great
Panda Express. That's going clip of the day very quickly.
Thirteen Democrats refusing to release their autopsy on what happened.
Speaker 3: This is getting this arm Stuart.
Speaker 18: And for a while, one of the theories was maybe
it's going to be very embarrassing to Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: I don't want to bring you that.
Speaker 18: To her because she might run again, Gary, but she's
come out and said released this thing. I don't really
believe that that theory makes sense, at least in my mind.
So I've got a new one and I'm going to
lay it on you, and it might be the only
one that I can really compute that would explain why
they continue to hold this thing close to the vest,
even though the parties in revolt, the base wants to
see it. Why withhold it? I suspect I could be wrong,
but I suspect it would be very embarrassing to the
Democratic National Committee and some of the recommendations that they
may have put out after the loss. I think maybe
the explanation is they said we've got to moderate on immigration, crime,
trans issues, those types of things.
Speaker 3: Having lost, they.
Speaker 18: Realize, well, we've just been in full resistance mode and
it seems to be working for us. Our base will
be furious if they see that we wanted us to
cooperate with Donald Trump. Let's keep that under wraps. To me,
that's the explanation that at least holds some water. That
would explain the self preservation instinct of the people doing
the withholding.
Speaker 2: That makes sense. Guy Benson may be right as to
why the Democrats refuse to release their autopsy report on
what happened to them in the last presidential cycle. They
don't want to start a revolt now with what they
thought then.
Speaker 3: Huh.
Speaker 2: On this day, my friends, In nineteen sixty seven, the
Beatles held a press party at Brian Epstein's house no
relation to the other Epstein that we know of, in
London for the launch of the Sergeant Pepper album. About
a dozen journalists broadcasters came along with several photographers, include
Linda Eastman, who had met Paul McCartney just four days
before them would later marry him. Of course, they chomped
on Pote, Salomon and Keviat and we serve Champagne, the
Sergeant Pepper album with a little Help for my friends,
Lucy and the Skies with Diamonds and one of my favorites,
She's leaving home, speaking of leaving time for us to
depart for the day. May God bless and protect each
and every I love this song, every single one of you,
your family's, your loved ones. God willing my friends will
be back tomorrow, perhaps even with Princess Die. For the
Wednesday edition of both neurlei'es Rush Hour. There are two
tickets left if you want, I think for the seven
grand tickets at Madison Square tonight. If you're in the
New York area until tomorrow, I bit you, I do.
Speaker 3: Bye.
Speaker 19: Thanks for listening to Bo Stirdley's Rush Hour. You can
hear Bo Snirdley's Rush Hour weekdays at four on seventy
seven WABC. If you like the podcast, share it with
your friends and listen anytime at wabcradio dot com and
download the WABC Radio app. Hit that subscribe button on
all major podcast platforms. Plus follow WABC on social on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook,
and X see you next time for a new episode,
so you never have to wonder
Speaker 3: What the heck is going on here