WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and three, Paramount Pictures spent fifty million

2
00:00:04.400 --> 00:00:06.879
<v Speaker 1>dollars on a movie. Yeah, and it's a movie where

3
00:00:06.919 --> 00:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>two people just you know, professionally and psychologically torture each other.

4
00:00:11.279 --> 00:00:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Right for workplace promotions.

5
00:00:13.679 --> 00:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Basically exactly for promotions. And it went on to make

6
00:00:16.839 --> 00:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>nearly one hundred and eighty million dollars worldwide.

7
00:00:19.960 --> 00:00:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Which is I mean, that's just a staggering return.

8
00:00:23.480 --> 00:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It's huge. And today, you know, in twenty twenty six,

9
00:00:26.440 --> 00:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the Hollywood studio system is essentially betting billions of dollars

10
00:00:29.960 --> 00:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that you and I are absolutely desperate to watch them

11
00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>do it all over again.

12
00:00:33.079 --> 00:00:33.679
<v Speaker 2>They really are.

13
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:37.399
<v Speaker 1>So Okay, let's unpack this because a brand new exclusive

14
00:00:37.399 --> 00:00:40.759
<v Speaker 1>report from Variety has just revealed that Paramount is officially

15
00:00:41.000 --> 00:00:43.719
<v Speaker 1>in the early stages of developing a sequel to the

16
00:00:43.759 --> 00:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>massive hit romantic comedy How to Lose a Guy in

17
00:00:46.679 --> 00:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Ten Days Wow. Yeah, and the studio is intending to

18
00:00:50.320 --> 00:00:53.759
<v Speaker 1>bring back original stars Kate Hudson and Matthew McConaughey to

19
00:00:54.039 --> 00:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, reprise their roles as Andy and Benjamin.

20
00:00:57.039 --> 00:00:59.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it is a headline that is just engineered

21
00:00:59.479 --> 00:01:01.759
<v Speaker 2>to break the end Internet, right, Oh, totally. But if

22
00:01:01.759 --> 00:01:04.480
<v Speaker 2>we look under the hood, we are looking at a

23
00:01:04.640 --> 00:01:10.680
<v Speaker 2>brilliant case study in modern Hollywood economics. Right Like, this

24
00:01:10.719 --> 00:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>isn't a whimsical creative reunion. This is a highly calculated

25
00:01:15.319 --> 00:01:18.840
<v Speaker 2>reaction to well, to algorithmic destiny.

26
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Algorithmic destiny.

27
00:01:20.359 --> 00:01:22.959
<v Speaker 2>I like that because the entertainment landscape right now, it's

28
00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:26.359
<v Speaker 2>operating under a very specific set of financial pressures. Sure

29
00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:30.680
<v Speaker 2>and reviving a twenty three year old intellectual property is

30
00:01:31.159 --> 00:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's one of the few ways a major

31
00:01:32.959 --> 00:01:34.560
<v Speaker 2>studio can actually mitigate.

32
00:01:34.319 --> 00:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Risk, Which is exactly why this matters to whoever is

33
00:01:37.079 --> 00:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>listening right now, exactly because whether you have the original

34
00:01:41.120 --> 00:01:43.719
<v Speaker 1>movie poster framed in your bedroom or you've literally never

35
00:01:43.760 --> 00:01:45.799
<v Speaker 1>watched a rom com in your life, you need to

36
00:01:45.879 --> 00:01:48.319
<v Speaker 1>understand the mechanics of this announcement.

37
00:01:48.040 --> 00:01:49.519
<v Speaker 2>Right because it affects everything else that.

38
00:01:49.519 --> 00:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Gets messed exactly. Every time you log into a streaming

39
00:01:52.040 --> 00:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>platform on like Tuesday night and watch a movie from

40
00:01:55.040 --> 00:01:57.959
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands, your data is being weaponized.

41
00:01:58.079 --> 00:01:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Weaponized is the right word.

42
00:01:59.280 --> 00:02:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's spinized to dictate massive billion dollar corporate investments.

43
00:02:05.040 --> 00:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Your comfort watching is it's feeding an algorithm that tells

44
00:02:09.840 --> 00:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>executives exactly what to green light.

45
00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:14.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the Variety report it lays out the early

46
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:18.039
<v Speaker 2>mechanics of the deal, which is fascinating. Oh yeah, So

47
00:02:18.120 --> 00:02:21.719
<v Speaker 2>paramount is they're driving the vehicle, but they haven't chosen

48
00:02:21.759 --> 00:02:22.919
<v Speaker 2>the destination.

49
00:02:22.560 --> 00:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Yet, meaning they don't have a script, right.

50
00:02:25.199 --> 00:02:28.080
<v Speaker 2>They are currently on the hunt for a screenwriter, and

51
00:02:28.280 --> 00:02:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the article notes that casting, you know, actually getting Hudson

52
00:02:31.319 --> 00:02:35.120
<v Speaker 2>and McConaughey to sign the final contracts that ultimately depends

53
00:02:35.159 --> 00:02:35.680
<v Speaker 2>on the take.

54
00:02:35.919 --> 00:02:36.319
<v Speaker 1>The take.

55
00:02:36.479 --> 00:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>So the pitch, yes, this specific angle or story the

56
00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:43.639
<v Speaker 2>writer pitches has to be absolutely bulletproof interested and the

57
00:02:43.680 --> 00:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>actors representatives haven't commented, which is standard procedure when the

58
00:02:47.599 --> 00:02:48.879
<v Speaker 2>script doesn't actually exist yet.

59
00:02:48.919 --> 00:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Sure, they're not going to commit to a blank page exactly.

60
00:02:51.800 --> 00:02:54.039
<v Speaker 2>But the sheer fact that this is public knowledge tells

61
00:02:54.120 --> 00:02:56.759
<v Speaker 2>us everything we need to know about the current cinematic climate.

62
00:02:57.039 --> 00:03:00.759
<v Speaker 1>The climate is basically just a monsoon of millennial nostalgia

63
00:03:00.840 --> 00:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>right now.

64
00:03:01.360 --> 00:03:02.439
<v Speaker 2>It really is a monsoon.

65
00:03:02.719 --> 00:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the article explicitly places this sequel within a

66
00:03:06.680 --> 00:03:10.039
<v Speaker 1>massive y two K wave that's currently dominating the twenty

67
00:03:10.120 --> 00:03:13.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty six box office. Yeah, we have already seen outside

68
00:03:13.400 --> 00:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hits this year with the devilwares Prata to the New

69
00:03:17.680 --> 00:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Scary Movie reboot, oh right, and Toy Story five, which

70
00:03:21.400 --> 00:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>is just yeah, I know, and the future slate is

71
00:03:24.039 --> 00:03:26.319
<v Speaker 1>just as heavy, like we are looking down the barrel

72
00:03:26.400 --> 00:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of practical magic too, Fokker in Law, which you know

73
00:03:29.800 --> 00:03:33.879
<v Speaker 1>is wild and in twenty twenty seven Shrek five and

74
00:03:33.960 --> 00:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Grete Gerwig's take on Narnia.

75
00:03:36.080 --> 00:03:38.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, if we connect this to the bigger picture,

76
00:03:39.439 --> 00:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the mechanism driving this isn't just a cultural yearning for

77
00:03:42.280 --> 00:03:45.680
<v Speaker 2>the past, right, it's the sheer cost of audience acquisition today.

78
00:03:45.800 --> 00:03:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, break that down for me.

79
00:03:47.120 --> 00:03:50.039
<v Speaker 2>Well, Marketing the theatrical release in twenty twenty six often

80
00:03:50.080 --> 00:03:52.400
<v Speaker 2>costs much, if not more than the production.

81
00:03:52.159 --> 00:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Budget itself, really like one to one.

82
00:03:54.240 --> 00:03:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes even more, because audience attentions just fractured across thousands

83
00:03:58.240 --> 00:04:01.120
<v Speaker 2>of platforms, apps and you know micro trends.

84
00:04:00.960 --> 00:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, everyone's on a different TikTok algorithm exactly.

85
00:04:04.120 --> 00:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>So if Paramount green lights an original romantic comedy today,

86
00:04:08.479 --> 00:04:11.240
<v Speaker 2>they have to spend thirty to forty million dollars just

87
00:04:11.280 --> 00:04:15.039
<v Speaker 2>to explain to the public who the characters are, oh wow, yeah,

88
00:04:15.080 --> 00:04:17.519
<v Speaker 2>what the tone is and why they should actually leave

89
00:04:17.560 --> 00:04:18.639
<v Speaker 2>their houses to see it.

90
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I see, so it's I look at it like tech

91
00:04:21.120 --> 00:04:22.319
<v Speaker 1>backward compatibility.

92
00:04:22.439 --> 00:04:23.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I like that.

93
00:04:23.319 --> 00:04:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Like studios are trying to run a massive, expensive, twenty

94
00:04:26.360 --> 00:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty six operating system, you know, the modern theatrical distribution model, right,

95
00:04:30.879 --> 00:04:34.199
<v Speaker 1>but to justify the server costs, they have to run

96
00:04:34.360 --> 00:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>legacy two thousand and three software.

97
00:04:36.759 --> 00:04:37.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's exactly it.

98
00:04:38.079 --> 00:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>The brand awareness of how to lose a guy in

99
00:04:40.399 --> 00:04:43.079
<v Speaker 1>ten days is the legacy code. They don't have to

100
00:04:43.120 --> 00:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>explain who Andy Anderson or Benjamin Barry.

101
00:04:45.319 --> 00:04:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Are, right, you already know.

102
00:04:46.519 --> 00:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But I have to push back on the studio logic here. Okay,

103
00:04:49.040 --> 00:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>are they doing this because they're just completely out of

104
00:04:51.759 --> 00:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>original ideas and terrified of risk? Or is the audience

105
00:04:55.160 --> 00:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>actually driving this?

106
00:04:56.199 --> 00:04:57.959
<v Speaker 2>It's a chicken and egg scenario.

107
00:04:57.720 --> 00:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Right, Like it's like finding a perfectly broken in pair

108
00:05:00.879 --> 00:05:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of vintage genes. It's comfortable, it's guaranteed to look good.

109
00:05:04.879 --> 00:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>But if Paramount poured fifty million dollars into a completely original,

110
00:05:09.199 --> 00:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>mid budget romcom tomorrow, would anyone even buy a ticket?

111
00:05:13.160 --> 00:05:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, the data suggests they wouldn't really, or at least

112
00:05:16.040 --> 00:05:19.879
<v Speaker 2>not numbers that satisfy a publicly traded conglomerate. That's depressing,

113
00:05:20.079 --> 00:05:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I know, But the box office returns for things like

114
00:05:22.879 --> 00:05:27.040
<v Speaker 2>The Devilwar's Prota too. They prove that audiences are actively

115
00:05:27.120 --> 00:05:29.160
<v Speaker 2>voting with their wallets for familiarity.

116
00:05:29.319 --> 00:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess that makes sense.

117
00:05:30.480 --> 00:05:34.319
<v Speaker 2>The global climate is complex, economic pressures are high, and

118
00:05:34.360 --> 00:05:37.600
<v Speaker 2>consumers view an expensive night out at the movies as

119
00:05:37.639 --> 00:05:38.279
<v Speaker 2>an investment.

120
00:05:38.439 --> 00:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a babysitter parking popcorn. It's easily one hundred.

121
00:05:42.480 --> 00:05:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Bucks, exactly. They want a guaranteed return on that investment,

122
00:05:45.639 --> 00:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>which means they want a known commodity.

123
00:05:47.639 --> 00:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So they want the vintage genes, right.

124
00:05:50.439 --> 00:05:53.839
<v Speaker 2>But the danger in the studio's logic is assuming that

125
00:05:53.959 --> 00:05:56.360
<v Speaker 2>simply slapping a Y two K brand name on a

126
00:05:56.439 --> 00:05:58.120
<v Speaker 2>marquee guarantees success.

127
00:05:58.279 --> 00:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, for sure.

128
00:05:59.040 --> 00:06:02.319
<v Speaker 2>The underlying archet texture of the film still has to function.

129
00:06:02.319 --> 00:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Which forces us to look at the architecture of the

130
00:06:04.839 --> 00:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three blueprint. Yeah, let's do that, because

131
00:06:07.680 --> 00:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>why this specific movie. There were dozens of rom comms

132
00:06:11.480 --> 00:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the early two thousands, but the Variety article calls

133
00:06:14.160 --> 00:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this one an essential title. They call it an anchor

134
00:06:16.639 --> 00:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the genre. It really is, and the economics alone

135
00:06:19.560 --> 00:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>are staggering nearly one hundred and eighty million dollars globally

136
00:06:24.560 --> 00:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on a fifty million dollar budget.

137
00:06:26.639 --> 00:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that kind of return on investment is it's what

138
00:06:29.720 --> 00:06:31.199
<v Speaker 2>built the modern studio system.

139
00:06:31.399 --> 00:06:32.079
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy.

140
00:06:32.199 --> 00:06:35.399
<v Speaker 2>It's a phenomenal margin. Yeah, and directed by Donald Petrie,

141
00:06:35.959 --> 00:06:39.519
<v Speaker 2>the film cracked a very specific code that allowed it

142
00:06:39.600 --> 00:06:43.600
<v Speaker 2>to transcend, you know, standard genre fare and achieve that

143
00:06:43.759 --> 00:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>level of cultural and financial penetration.

144
00:06:46.279 --> 00:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>So what does this all mean? Like when you actually

145
00:06:47.879 --> 00:06:50.759
<v Speaker 1>break down the plot, the premise is completely unhinged.

146
00:06:50.839 --> 00:06:51.439
<v Speaker 2>It is wild.

147
00:06:51.680 --> 00:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Right. We have Kate Hudson playing Andy Anderson. Right, She's

148
00:06:54.639 --> 00:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a how to columnist for a women's magazine who pitches

149
00:06:57.360 --> 00:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>an article about modern dating, and her research methodology is

150
00:07:01.600 --> 00:07:05.079
<v Speaker 1>to find a guy, seduce him, and then deliberately act

151
00:07:05.160 --> 00:07:09.759
<v Speaker 1>like the most toxic, clingy, nightmare girlfriend imaginable to document

152
00:07:09.800 --> 00:07:10.959
<v Speaker 1>how fast he dumbs her.

153
00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:14.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a premise that is frankly matched in its sociopathy

154
00:07:14.319 --> 00:07:15.759
<v Speaker 2>by Matthew McConaughey's character.

155
00:07:15.920 --> 00:07:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Seriously.

156
00:07:16.639 --> 00:07:19.959
<v Speaker 2>Benjamin Barry is an advertising executive who makes a bet

157
00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>with his boss that he can make any woman fall

158
00:07:22.759 --> 00:07:24.959
<v Speaker 2>in love with him in ten days. Just any woman,

159
00:07:25.360 --> 00:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>any woman, and if he pulls it off, he wins

160
00:07:28.160 --> 00:07:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the lead on a massive, career defining diamond advertising campaign.

161
00:07:33.160 --> 00:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So Andy and Benjamin target each other.

162
00:07:35.639 --> 00:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, meaning neither of them is operating in reality.

163
00:07:38.519 --> 00:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They are fundamentally lying to each other for professional game

164
00:07:41.560 --> 00:07:42.959
<v Speaker 1>for the entire run time of the movie.

165
00:07:43.040 --> 00:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>They time movie.

166
00:07:43.639 --> 00:07:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I reread the plot summary for this, and honestly,

167
00:07:45.920 --> 00:07:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I was stunned. It is essentially a movie about two

168
00:07:49.480 --> 00:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>people ruining each other's lives for a promotion.

169
00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:52.480
<v Speaker 2>It really is.

170
00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:55.639
<v Speaker 1>How did this not alienate audiences in two thousand and three?

171
00:07:55.759 --> 00:07:58.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does a plot build on such bizarre borderline

172
00:07:58.519 --> 00:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>cruel deception actually translate to a modern audience or is

173
00:08:02.040 --> 00:08:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the charm entirely trapped in the amber of two thousand

174
00:08:04.399 --> 00:08:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and three?

175
00:08:05.040 --> 00:08:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, the deception is exactly what makes the engine run,

176
00:08:08.000 --> 00:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>how so, because it creates a high stakes, dramatic irony. Okay,

177
00:08:12.920 --> 00:08:16.839
<v Speaker 2>the audience does both secrets, which turns every standard romantic

178
00:08:16.879 --> 00:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>trope into a battlefield.

179
00:08:18.680 --> 00:08:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Like when she brings the love Fern.

180
00:08:20.519 --> 00:08:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Exactly when Andy acts terribly, Benjamin can't leave because of

181
00:08:24.199 --> 00:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>his bet right.

182
00:08:25.279 --> 00:08:27.319
<v Speaker 1>He has to just sit there and take it.

183
00:08:27.319 --> 00:08:30.639
<v Speaker 2>It forces the characters into a confined space. But the

184
00:08:30.759 --> 00:08:33.679
<v Speaker 2>reason it didn't alienate the audience and the reason it

185
00:08:33.720 --> 00:08:36.360
<v Speaker 2>made one hundred and eighty million dollars comes down to

186
00:08:36.399 --> 00:08:37.720
<v Speaker 2>two specific mechanisms.

187
00:08:37.720 --> 00:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what's the first one?

188
00:08:38.720 --> 00:08:40.600
<v Speaker 2>First, the casting of the supporting ensemble.

189
00:08:40.720 --> 00:08:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh, this source mentions this a wildly talented bench. We're

190
00:08:43.879 --> 00:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>talking Catherine Hahn, Adam Goldberg, Thomas Lennon, Michael Michelle, and

191
00:08:48.639 --> 00:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Shalom Harlowe.

192
00:08:49.879 --> 00:08:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Incredible cast, and that supporting cast acts as the grounding

193
00:08:53.440 --> 00:08:54.600
<v Speaker 2>wire for the absurdity.

194
00:08:54.639 --> 00:08:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Grounding wire that makes sense.

195
00:08:56.000 --> 00:09:00.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you have phenomenal comedic actors reacting to the chaos.

196
00:09:00.600 --> 00:09:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Andy and Benjamin are creating.

197
00:09:02.240 --> 00:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Like Adam Goldberg and Thomas Lennon just watching Benjamin suffer.

198
00:09:06.200 --> 00:09:09.639
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, which signals to the audience that the universe of

199
00:09:09.679 --> 00:09:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the film recognizes how crazy this behavior is.

200
00:09:13.120 --> 00:09:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I see. So it's not like the movie thinks

201
00:09:14.960 --> 00:09:15.639
<v Speaker 1>this is normal.

202
00:09:15.840 --> 00:09:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, the movie knows they're crazy. And the second and

203
00:09:18.399 --> 00:09:22.919
<v Speaker 2>probably more vital mechanism is the chemistry between Hudson and McConaughey. Right,

204
00:09:23.159 --> 00:09:26.440
<v Speaker 2>the film only works if the audience believes that beneath

205
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the layers of mutual manipulation, a genuine connection is forming. Yeah,

206
00:09:31.120 --> 00:09:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the friction of the lie creates the heat of the romance.

207
00:09:34.120 --> 00:09:39.159
<v Speaker 1>The chemistry overrides the toxicity perfectly said. Even McConaughey refers

208
00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to the film the article as an anchor in the

209
00:09:41.879 --> 00:09:42.759
<v Speaker 1>rom com cannon.

210
00:09:42.879 --> 00:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>He knows how important it was.

211
00:09:44.360 --> 00:09:48.519
<v Speaker 1>But trying to recreate that highly specific alchemy twenty three

212
00:09:48.639 --> 00:09:52.159
<v Speaker 1>years later without making the characters deeply unlikable by modern

213
00:09:52.200 --> 00:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>standards requires absolute precision behind the camera, total precision, which

214
00:09:56.559 --> 00:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is where the Variety report pivots from a standard nostalgic

215
00:09:59.480 --> 00:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>announcement to a genuinely fascinating industry maneuver.

216
00:10:03.639 --> 00:10:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the architecture of the production team is shifting in

217
00:10:06.879 --> 00:10:09.600
<v Speaker 2>a big way. Well, the driving force here isn't just

218
00:10:09.639 --> 00:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>a studio executive dusting off a script, right. Kate Hudson

219
00:10:13.120 --> 00:10:16.120
<v Speaker 2>is officially attached to produce the sequel through her banner

220
00:10:16.399 --> 00:10:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Shiny Penny.

221
00:10:17.320 --> 00:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And we really need to look at Kate Hudson's current

222
00:10:20.159 --> 00:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>industry capital because she is in the middle of a

223
00:10:22.519 --> 00:10:23.879
<v Speaker 1>massive career resurgence.

224
00:10:23.960 --> 00:10:24.600
<v Speaker 2>It really is.

225
00:10:24.759 --> 00:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>The article notes she recently earned her second Oscar nomination

226
00:10:28.080 --> 00:10:31.759
<v Speaker 1>for the twenty twenty five film song sung Blue. Yeah,

227
00:10:32.039 --> 00:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>her first being her iconic role as Penny Lane and

228
00:10:35.080 --> 00:10:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Crow's Almost Famous.

229
00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, which was decades ago exactly.

230
00:10:39.320 --> 00:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And she's also leading a high profile Netflix sports comedy

231
00:10:43.000 --> 00:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>series called Running Point.

232
00:10:44.679 --> 00:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

233
00:10:45.120 --> 00:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>She is not a fading star desperately trying to relive

234
00:10:47.639 --> 00:10:50.879
<v Speaker 1>her glory days. She has immense momentum.

235
00:10:50.440 --> 00:10:54.519
<v Speaker 2>Right now, immense momentum, and her attachment as a producer

236
00:10:54.879 --> 00:10:58.320
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally changes the power dynamics of the development process. Why

237
00:10:58.399 --> 00:11:01.919
<v Speaker 2>is that because in two thousand and three, actors, even

238
00:11:01.960 --> 00:11:05.399
<v Speaker 2>a listers, were largely hired guns who showed up, hit

239
00:11:05.440 --> 00:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>their marks and let the studio dictate the final cut.

240
00:11:08.080 --> 00:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure, you hit your mark and say your lines exactly.

241
00:11:10.639 --> 00:11:14.320
<v Speaker 2>But by attaching her production company, Shiny, Penny Hudson is

242
00:11:14.320 --> 00:11:18.799
<v Speaker 2>installing a contractual mechanism of creative control. Oh wow, she

243
00:11:18.879 --> 00:11:22.320
<v Speaker 2>has video power over the writer, the director, and the

244
00:11:22.320 --> 00:11:23.080
<v Speaker 2>final script.

245
00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:24.279
<v Speaker 1>That's huge.

246
00:11:24.639 --> 00:11:26.759
<v Speaker 2>The piece notes she is waiting in the wings for

247
00:11:26.799 --> 00:11:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the right deal, which means she is protecting the brand

248
00:11:29.879 --> 00:11:34.000
<v Speaker 2>asset of Andy Anderson until the narrative meets her standards.

249
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So she won't just sign off on anything exactly. And

250
00:11:36.159 --> 00:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the protective layer she's building gets even thicker when you

251
00:11:39.240 --> 00:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>look at who she brought in to co produce.

252
00:11:41.440 --> 00:11:42.279
<v Speaker 2>This is the best part.

253
00:11:42.480 --> 00:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>The source confirms Stacy Shrr is on board. Yeah, and

254
00:11:45.279 --> 00:11:47.039
<v Speaker 1>when I read that name, my jaw.

255
00:11:46.879 --> 00:11:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Actually dropped same. It's unbelievable for.

256
00:11:49.399 --> 00:11:53.039
<v Speaker 1>Those who don't aggressively track Hollywood producers, Stacey Sherr's credits

257
00:11:53.080 --> 00:11:55.519
<v Speaker 1>are a masterclass in prestige cinema.

258
00:11:55.639 --> 00:11:56.159
<v Speaker 2>Yes they are.

259
00:11:56.200 --> 00:12:01.919
<v Speaker 1>We are talking about pulp fiction Gataka Brokovich, Vanilla Sky,

260
00:12:02.799 --> 00:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Django Unchained.

261
00:12:04.159 --> 00:12:07.000
<v Speaker 2>I know it is the most telling detail in the

262
00:12:07.159 --> 00:12:11.120
<v Speaker 2>entire report because it completely recontextualizes the ambition of the project.

263
00:12:11.399 --> 00:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>It's staggering. Like bringing the producer of Quentin Tarantino's most violent,

264
00:12:17.159 --> 00:12:20.799
<v Speaker 1>morally complex films onto a sequel to a two thousand

265
00:12:20.799 --> 00:12:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and three rom com is like it's like hiring a

266
00:12:24.960 --> 00:12:28.039
<v Speaker 1>Michelin Star steakhouse chef to come to your kitchen to

267
00:12:28.039 --> 00:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>make a grilled cheese sandwich.

268
00:12:29.480 --> 00:12:30.799
<v Speaker 2>That is exactly what it's like.

269
00:12:30.799 --> 00:12:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Like, you know it's going to be the most intense

270
00:12:32.440 --> 00:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>grilled cheese of your life. But what is she doing there?

271
00:12:36.000 --> 00:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>What specific tactics does a producer like Stacy sher bring

272
00:12:39.799 --> 00:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to a high concept romantic comedy.

273
00:12:41.960 --> 00:12:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's fascinating here is how Sure structured a film

274
00:12:45.519 --> 00:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>like Aaron Brockovich. Okay, that was a movie about an

275
00:12:48.440 --> 00:12:51.120
<v Speaker 2>absurdly large, almost unbelievable true story.

276
00:12:51.440 --> 00:12:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the water contamination exactly.

277
00:12:53.639 --> 00:12:57.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but Shares producing tactics grounded it in gritty, working

278
00:12:57.559 --> 00:12:59.960
<v Speaker 2>class reality, making it an oscar head.

279
00:13:00.480 --> 00:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>That's true, it felt very real.

280
00:13:02.159 --> 00:13:06.320
<v Speaker 2>She specializes in morally gray characters and sharp grounded stakes.

281
00:13:06.320 --> 00:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I see where you're going with this.

282
00:13:07.600 --> 00:13:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Her presence signals to the industry that this sequel

283
00:13:10.559 --> 00:13:13.759
<v Speaker 2>is not aiming for fluffy, disposable nostalgia.

284
00:13:13.799 --> 00:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not just a cash grab.

285
00:13:15.440 --> 00:13:20.799
<v Speaker 2>No. When you pair Andy and Benjamin's inherently toxic manipulative

286
00:13:20.840 --> 00:13:23.879
<v Speaker 2>origins from two thousand and three with a producer known

287
00:13:23.919 --> 00:13:27.879
<v Speaker 2>for pulp fiction and Django unchained, yeah, it suggests they

288
00:13:27.879 --> 00:13:31.559
<v Speaker 2>are aiming for a much sharper, elevated, and perhaps more

289
00:13:31.600 --> 00:13:32.440
<v Speaker 2>cynical tone.

290
00:13:32.480 --> 00:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Because a call from Stacy shr hits a top

291
00:13:36.240 --> 00:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>tier screenwriter very differently than a standard pitch from a paramount.

292
00:13:39.840 --> 00:13:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Executive completely differently.

293
00:13:41.480 --> 00:13:44.759
<v Speaker 1>It elevates this from a cash grab to a legacy.

294
00:13:44.360 --> 00:13:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Sequel, and it creates a halo of prestige, which they

295
00:13:48.000 --> 00:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>absolutely need to execute the most difficult phase of this development. Okay,

296
00:13:52.120 --> 00:13:56.440
<v Speaker 2>what's that, Well, Hudson's producer, Cloud Ensure's prestige backing are

297
00:13:56.519 --> 00:13:59.679
<v Speaker 2>strategic lures designed for one specific.

298
00:13:59.200 --> 00:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Target, Matthew conaughey.

299
00:14:00.720 --> 00:14:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Yes, because this movie simply does not exist without the

300
00:14:03.799 --> 00:14:06.759
<v Speaker 2>actor who has spent the last decades sprinting away from

301
00:14:06.799 --> 00:14:08.159
<v Speaker 2>the romantic comedy genre.

302
00:14:08.360 --> 00:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Sprinting is the right word. Let's get into the Matthew

303
00:14:10.919 --> 00:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>McConaughey paradox.

304
00:14:12.159 --> 00:14:13.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's talk about it.

305
00:14:13.200 --> 00:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>The article states that if Hudson is involved, McConaughey would

306
00:14:16.279 --> 00:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>presumably follow suit, right, presumably, But we have to look

307
00:14:19.879 --> 00:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>closely at that word presumably, because the Matthew McConaughey of

308
00:14:22.840 --> 00:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three, you know, the guy leaning back

309
00:14:25.120 --> 00:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to back on a movie poster in a yellow dress. Yeah, well,

310
00:14:28.200 --> 00:14:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Kate was in the yellow dress. He was in the suit.

311
00:14:31.039 --> 00:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>But that guy is functionally a different human being in

312
00:14:34.519 --> 00:14:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of Hollywood today.

313
00:14:36.000 --> 00:14:39.200
<v Speaker 2>His career trajectory is one of the most studied transformations

314
00:14:39.240 --> 00:14:40.279
<v Speaker 2>in modern cinema.

315
00:14:40.279 --> 00:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>The source breaks down this incredible pivot. Like in the

316
00:14:44.159 --> 00:14:48.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty tens, he deliberately abandoned the Broyish rom com persona

317
00:14:48.840 --> 00:14:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that made him famous.

318
00:14:49.919 --> 00:14:51.480
<v Speaker 2>He completely turned his back on it.

319
00:14:51.559 --> 00:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>He completely rebranded himself by diving into incredibly dense, critically

320
00:14:56.480 --> 00:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>acclaimed dramas. We're talking Mud, The Wolf of wals Street,

321
00:15:00.720 --> 00:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Intersteller and Dallas Buyer's Club, which won him the Best

322
00:15:04.559 --> 00:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Actor Oscar in twenty fourteen.

323
00:15:06.120 --> 00:15:08.000
<v Speaker 2>And the culture labeled it the mcconnaissance.

324
00:15:08.080 --> 00:15:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Mcconnaissance exactly.

325
00:15:09.159 --> 00:15:11.159
<v Speaker 2>It was a masterclass in market scarcity.

326
00:15:11.240 --> 00:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, explain that he stopped.

327
00:15:13.000 --> 00:15:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Giving the audience the lightweight charm they expected, right, He

328
00:15:16.159 --> 00:15:19.240
<v Speaker 2>just stopped, and that forced them to accept him as

329
00:15:19.240 --> 00:15:20.279
<v Speaker 2>a dramatic heavyweight.

330
00:15:20.440 --> 00:15:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

331
00:15:20.639 --> 00:15:23.960
<v Speaker 2>You couldn't just go see a goofy Matthew McConaughey movie anymore, Right, You.

332
00:15:23.919 --> 00:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Had to watch him lose forty pounds for Dallas Buyer's Club.

333
00:15:26.600 --> 00:15:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Furthermore, the article highlights a crucial current detail his

334
00:15:32.000 --> 00:15:36.320
<v Speaker 2>market scarcity has only increased. Oh right, He only recently

335
00:15:36.440 --> 00:15:39.639
<v Speaker 2>ended a six year big screen hiatus with the film

336
00:15:39.759 --> 00:15:41.440
<v Speaker 2>The Rivals of im Ziah King.

337
00:15:41.759 --> 00:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Six years away from the big screen. Yeah, so here's

338
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:47.639
<v Speaker 1>where it gets really interesting. Okay, After winning an OSCAR,

339
00:15:48.120 --> 00:15:51.639
<v Speaker 1>working with directors like Christopher Nolan and Martin Scorsese and

340
00:15:51.679 --> 00:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>taking a half decade hiatus, is returning to Benjamin Barry

341
00:15:55.399 --> 00:15:58.519
<v Speaker 1>a step backward. It's a great question, like does returning

342
00:15:58.559 --> 00:16:01.799
<v Speaker 1>to the genre he fled finish the dramatic credibility he

343
00:16:01.840 --> 00:16:04.879
<v Speaker 1>fought so hard to build? Or is it the ultimate

344
00:16:04.919 --> 00:16:07.679
<v Speaker 1>flex of a movie star who has nothing left to prove?

345
00:16:08.039 --> 00:16:10.720
<v Speaker 2>This raises an important question about the psychology and the

346
00:16:10.759 --> 00:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>market value of the modern a lister. Yeah, and I

347
00:16:13.519 --> 00:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>argue it is the ultimate flex precisely because of the

348
00:16:16.519 --> 00:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>leverage he now holds. Right, the psychological shift required to

349
00:16:20.039 --> 00:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>return to Benjamin Barry after winning an Academy award is immense. Sure,

350
00:16:24.240 --> 00:16:26.200
<v Speaker 2>he isn't taking this role to pay the mortgage or

351
00:16:26.240 --> 00:16:26.879
<v Speaker 2>stay relevant.

352
00:16:27.240 --> 00:16:28.519
<v Speaker 1>No, he doesn't need the money.

353
00:16:28.679 --> 00:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>If he signs on, he is doing it from a

354
00:16:30.960 --> 00:16:35.399
<v Speaker 2>position of absolute power, total power. But that power dictates

355
00:16:35.639 --> 00:16:38.320
<v Speaker 2>that the script cannot just be a rehash of a

356
00:16:38.320 --> 00:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>goofy bet.

357
00:16:39.240 --> 00:16:42.919
<v Speaker 1>No, of course not. You cannot have a fifty something

358
00:16:43.320 --> 00:16:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Oscar winning Matthew McConaughey making a frat boy bet with

359
00:16:46.720 --> 00:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>his advertising boss. No, the fundamental mechanics of the character

360
00:16:51.559 --> 00:16:55.559
<v Speaker 1>have to evolve to match the gravity the actor now carries.

361
00:16:55.320 --> 00:16:59.279
<v Speaker 2>Which underscores exactly why Paramount, Kate Hudson and Stacy Shirr

362
00:16:59.279 --> 00:17:01.840
<v Speaker 2>are searching so desperately for the perfect writer.

363
00:17:02.000 --> 00:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>They need a genius.

364
00:17:03.440 --> 00:17:06.119
<v Speaker 2>The script has to honor the dramatic weight McConaughey has

365
00:17:06.160 --> 00:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>cultivated over the last decade while still delivering this specific

366
00:17:10.079 --> 00:17:12.759
<v Speaker 2>comedic friction that made the two thousand and three film

367
00:17:12.759 --> 00:17:13.200
<v Speaker 2>a hit.

368
00:17:13.240 --> 00:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>That sounds almost impossible.

369
00:17:15.240 --> 00:17:17.680
<v Speaker 2>They have to thread a nearly impossible needle to justify

370
00:17:17.720 --> 00:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>his return.

371
00:17:18.440 --> 00:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It is a high wire act of legacy management, it

372
00:17:20.920 --> 00:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>really is, which brings us to the ultimate synthesis of

373
00:17:23.400 --> 00:17:26.799
<v Speaker 1>what we've unpacked today. The sequel to How To Lose

374
00:17:26.839 --> 00:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a Guy in Ten Days isn't just happening because someone

375
00:17:29.240 --> 00:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>at Paramount was feeling nostalgic.

376
00:17:31.079 --> 00:17:31.839
<v Speaker 2>No, definitely not.

377
00:17:32.119 --> 00:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It is the result of a massive convergence of forces.

378
00:17:35.279 --> 00:17:37.720
<v Speaker 2>You have the structural economics of the twenty twenty six

379
00:17:37.759 --> 00:17:42.359
<v Speaker 2>box office, where fragmented audiences make original ideas too expensive

380
00:17:42.359 --> 00:17:46.039
<v Speaker 2>to market, which forces studios to rely on the backward

381
00:17:46.039 --> 00:17:49.960
<v Speaker 2>compatibility of proven ip and you have the original films

382
00:17:50.200 --> 00:17:53.519
<v Speaker 2>staggering one hundred and eighty million dollar blueprint proving the

383
00:17:53.559 --> 00:17:54.440
<v Speaker 2>concept works.

384
00:17:54.720 --> 00:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you have Kate Hudson leveraging a massive career

385
00:17:58.240 --> 00:18:02.039
<v Speaker 1>resurgence to seize creative control through her production company. Yes,

386
00:18:02.200 --> 00:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you have Stacey Shure injecting prestige level producing tactics into

387
00:18:07.079 --> 00:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>a historically lightweight genreact, and hovering above it all, you

388
00:18:11.200 --> 00:18:13.599
<v Speaker 1>have the challenge of writing a script good enough to

389
00:18:13.640 --> 00:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>pull Matthew McConaughey out of his dramatic era and back

390
00:18:16.759 --> 00:18:17.799
<v Speaker 1>into the romcom arena.

391
00:18:17.880 --> 00:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>It is a perfect storm of algorithmic demand meeting incredibly

392
00:18:21.480 --> 00:18:23.279
<v Speaker 2>calculated talent negotiation.

393
00:18:23.680 --> 00:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>So the next time you see a headline announcing a

394
00:18:26.400 --> 00:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>sequel to a movie you loved twenty years ago, I

395
00:18:29.440 --> 00:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>want you to remember the machinery operating just out of frame.

396
00:18:32.960 --> 00:18:34.079
<v Speaker 2>There's always machinery.

397
00:18:34.400 --> 00:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>You are watching billions of dollars being mobilized based on

398
00:18:37.599 --> 00:18:41.599
<v Speaker 1>market trends, star psychology, and your own streaming habits.

399
00:18:41.799 --> 00:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>The business of Hollywood is rarely as romantic as the

400
00:18:44.720 --> 00:18:45.599
<v Speaker 2>films it produces.

401
00:18:45.680 --> 00:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a great way to put it. But I want

402
00:18:47.480 --> 00:18:49.079
<v Speaker 1>to leave you with a final thought to chew on

403
00:18:49.200 --> 00:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>something that builds directly on the source material we analyze today.

404
00:18:52.440 --> 00:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's hear it.

405
00:18:53.480 --> 00:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So. The catalyst for the entire two thousand and three

406
00:18:56.240 --> 00:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>movie was Kate Hutsinger's character Andy writing a magazine article

407
00:19:00.559 --> 00:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>exploring modern dating. Right, it was an exploration of how

408
00:19:04.240 --> 00:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>people connected and disconnected twenty three years ago, as Stacey Shirr,

409
00:19:09.599 --> 00:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Kate Hudson, and Paramount search for the writer who can

410
00:19:12.519 --> 00:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>deliver the perfect take. Consider this, How in the world

411
00:19:16.799 --> 00:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>does a script define modern dating for Benjamin and Andy today?

412
00:19:20.920 --> 00:19:23.839
<v Speaker 2>Wow? The narrative hurdle is immense.

413
00:19:23.960 --> 00:19:26.519
<v Speaker 1>It's massive. If we assume they ended up together at

414
00:19:26.519 --> 00:19:29.599
<v Speaker 1>the end of the original, what kind of relationship crisis

415
00:19:29.640 --> 00:19:33.279
<v Speaker 1>could possibly reignite that aggressive, high stakes cat and mouse

416
00:19:33.359 --> 00:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>dynamic between two people now in their fifties.

417
00:19:35.720 --> 00:19:36.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what does that even look like?

418
00:19:36.960 --> 00:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Are they navigating a bitter divorce and trying to

419
00:19:40.000 --> 00:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>destroy each other's dating lives on new apps?

420
00:19:43.000 --> 00:19:44.519
<v Speaker 2>Oh? That would be dark, right?

421
00:19:44.640 --> 00:19:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Or are they trying to outmaneuver one another in a

422
00:19:46.599 --> 00:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>marriage that has become a corporate boardroom?

423
00:19:48.880 --> 00:19:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, competing for the same CEO.

424
00:19:50.640 --> 00:19:54.519
<v Speaker 1>Job or something exactly. It forces us to wonder if

425
00:19:54.559 --> 00:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this new project can even function as a traditional romantic comedy,

426
00:19:59.000 --> 00:20:01.799
<v Speaker 1>or if the sheer pass time forces it to evolve

427
00:20:01.799 --> 00:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>into a dark, comedic exploration of the survival of long

428
00:20:05.519 --> 00:20:06.039
<v Speaker 1>term love.

429
00:20:06.279 --> 00:20:07.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a really compelling thought.

430
00:20:07.880 --> 00:20:10.599
<v Speaker 1>You might recognize the characters stepping out of that Hollywood

431
00:20:10.599 --> 00:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>time machine, but the emotional landscape they are standing on

432
00:20:14.359 --> 00:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>has fundamentally changed.
