Speaker 1: Okay, we may or may not be live on Twitter.
Speaker 1: We'll see what happens there. But today is the one
Speaker 1: year anniversary of the subterfuge that was a completely organic
Speaker 1: attack on Israel. Right, sure, it was totally not helped,
Speaker 1: totally not in conjunction with the idea of or should
Speaker 1: we call them the iof is really offense force killing
Speaker 1: their own people to make it more dramatic, kind of
Speaker 1: like they did in World War Two.
Speaker 2: Okay, so Hurricane Helene, we've talked about this eight hh.
Speaker 1: Right, you've talked about how Lehina let's hit on eight
Speaker 1: eight August eighth, and that eight eight is what they
Speaker 1: call the lions Gate, Right, lions Gate is this thing
Speaker 1: that has to do a serious and blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: and it's a manifestation day. You're supposed to tell the
Speaker 1: universe what you want and it becomes more materialist in
Speaker 1: a what do you call it manifest for you if
Speaker 1: you think really hard about it and all this other stuff, right,
Speaker 1: it's all esoteric and occult stuff. Interesting day for that
Speaker 1: to be, because if there was an actual they call
Speaker 1: it a portal, a portal opening that day, according to them, naturally,
Speaker 1: I guess I don't know. But like I had said
Speaker 1: prior to this, if you think about it in practical terms,
Speaker 1: if you put I don't know, kindness, wonderful feelings and
Speaker 1: positive emotions as your bait, what do you think you
Speaker 1: attract from a different side from another realm, something possibly
Speaker 1: positive that is attracted to that sort of thing when
Speaker 1: you give them a bunch of burnt children, what do
Speaker 1: you think you attract through that portal? Right, So there's that.
Speaker 2: And also on.
Speaker 1: In nineteen fifty eight, that is when the first Hurricane
Speaker 1: Helene had hit, same Cat four category four hurricane in
Speaker 1: nineteen fifty eight, that's the same year that hurricane that Lehina.
Speaker 1: Actually the whole area of why I adopted the eight
Speaker 1: eight area code they.
Speaker 2: Get hit on eight eight eight eights Lionsgate.
Speaker 1: Eight O eight is the areo code, And in nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty eight, same as the Hurricane Helene, they adopted the
Speaker 1: area code. Sure, it's all coincidental matrix math, right, just
Speaker 1: to remind you that you're in a simulation I don't know,
Speaker 1: or was all deliberate and very o hell along in
Speaker 1: advanced planned out who knows. It seems a little, it
Speaker 1: seems a little off for human hands, but we'll see
Speaker 1: we don't know, all right. So before we get into
Speaker 1: today's topic, which is going to be the continuation of
Speaker 1: talking about the microzymas and the amazing human being that
Speaker 1: was a race from history by the name of Antoine
Speaker 1: bay Champ, I was inspired by some videos and looking
Speaker 1: into survival gear, right, what you would need?
Speaker 2: What have people been requesting mostly.
Speaker 1: In their survival or whatever, any kind of relief in
Speaker 1: these areas in Tennis in North Carolina, the most right
Speaker 1: Wrangler star did a video on it. I'm probably gonna
Speaker 1: show you that.
Speaker 2: Long ago.
Speaker 1: There was a video called Tiatiwaki or the End of
Speaker 1: the World as we know it, and it was a
Speaker 1: Paul Harrold video. Okay, I'm gonna scroll up to see
Speaker 1: if I can find it. If it might be easier
Speaker 1: that way. Now, I'll just go read to YouTube and
Speaker 1: do it.
Speaker 2: Because it should be my list. Here, we'll pull up
Speaker 2: the Ringle Star.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna play the two hour long Tiatiwakie, but
Speaker 1: you should take a look at that.
Speaker 2: I'll show you where it is if they show it
Speaker 2: to me.
Speaker 3: All right.
Speaker 1: So there's one called the Government and that's the Hurricane
Speaker 1: Helene one.
Speaker 2: Let me pull up the other one here real quick.
Speaker 1: We gotta do a little bit of a news today too,
Speaker 1: kind of catch up with what has been going on
Speaker 1: on the highly controlled GEdward differn need to know news.
Speaker 1: But like I said, why do I use that one?
Speaker 1: Because it's nice to understand that the control the opposition
Speaker 1: is out there and understand how to read it right,
Speaker 1: how to read between the lines, and how to understand
Speaker 1: what they're saying and what their intent is and trying
Speaker 1: to tell you something a certain way. So you get that,
Speaker 1: plus you get the story as well, the news part
Speaker 1: of it. Do not underestimate the thirty thirty I will not, sir,
Speaker 1: Thank you for telling me that.
Speaker 2: Alright. Let's see.
Speaker 1: Top five guns are Tiatawaki? All right, So let me
Speaker 1: go ahead and show you this real quick. And I'm
Speaker 1: going to tell you this right now because practicality is important, right,
Speaker 1: It's imperative if you go into any of this blindly.
Speaker 1: And Paul Harrold makes this point right here, I have
Speaker 1: a survival kit, so they say. Here, I have what
Speaker 1: they consider a water filtration device. Depending out what angle
Speaker 1: show what you can either see it or not see it. Now,
Speaker 1: two things happen prior to you receiving any water from this.
Speaker 1: One would be an aneurysm, and the other would be
Speaker 1: an embolism. No child would ever be able to drink
Speaker 1: out of this. And this isn't really for storage for later.
Speaker 1: This is for immediate drinking. Pull this off right here.
Speaker 1: There's a filter right all the way through it, which
Speaker 1: is basically like trying to suck something through a styro
Speaker 1: from solid piece.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: Yes it has holes in it, Yes it has very
Speaker 1: fine holes in it, and good luck trying to get
Speaker 1: water off to the other side. This is not a
Speaker 1: practical means for as they call this the life straw,
Speaker 1: because that's exactly what it takes from you when you
Speaker 1: try to use it, all right, and they show you
Speaker 1: on there, it's a little picture.
Speaker 2: You're not gonna be able to see it, but a
Speaker 2: little little uh. This is from vesterre Garde.
Speaker 1: So it sounds German, and it sounds like it would
Speaker 1: be useful, but I don't. I have not yet been
Speaker 1: able to bring water from here to there without extreme
Speaker 1: pain in my head and getting really dizzy, so that
Speaker 1: might be in a pinch. The best choice for water
Speaker 1: filtration it's like having nothing at all so here, and
Speaker 1: I cannot I can assure you, being that water is heavy,
Speaker 1: you're not gonna be able to carry very much with you.
Speaker 1: Five gallons is about forty pounds. You're gonna throw that
Speaker 1: in your backpack, all right? So do I have this
Speaker 1: thing here?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: These little blankets, there's a I don't know, maybe one
Speaker 1: or two in here. This is what makes you look
Speaker 1: like a baked potato when you curl up in it.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: I've used I've used these when I did my survival hike.
Speaker 1: I wrote a book about it while back, called The
Speaker 1: Divided Highway. And it is Maybe there's more than one
Speaker 1: in there.
Speaker 2: I don't know. There could be, and it looks like
Speaker 2: it's folded many times, but there could be up to
Speaker 2: five in here. I know. I can't really tell.
Speaker 1: But these are emergency blankets. They work, it's hard to
Speaker 1: reuse them. A lot of times they tear in the
Speaker 1: middle of night. But if you ever want to look
Speaker 1: like you're an alien who landed and is just laying
Speaker 1: in a field, this would be the nice, big, break
Speaker 1: shiny thing to use. And if you're trying to stay
Speaker 1: I don't know, hidden might not be the best way,
Speaker 1: but it is.
Speaker 2: Allegedly thermal radiation. It keeps your body heating a little bit.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: This is plastic, so you're not being able to sweat
Speaker 2: out of it. This is I don't know what.
Speaker 1: This is a compass with a little bit of a
Speaker 1: striker and something you can possibly start a fire with.
Speaker 1: Right there, there's some wicks, which I think are good.
Speaker 1: That's good to have. There's four thick wicks in here.
Speaker 2: There is a knife.
Speaker 1: I was surprised to see that there's a knife in here,
Speaker 1: and it looks like there need to also be what
Speaker 1: else is in here?
Speaker 2: This knife isn't too bad either.
Speaker 3: See that?
Speaker 2: What else?
Speaker 4: We got.
Speaker 1: One of those wire saws for cutting very small things, right,
Speaker 1: get the two rings you know like that. Now, this
Speaker 1: is something that Paul Harrett was mentioning. We got fish
Speaker 1: shocks that would be big enough to maybe a minnow
Speaker 1: wouldn't swallow them. And this is why it's important to
Speaker 1: put together your own pack, right, don't just buy something
Speaker 1: off the shelf that says survival kit.
Speaker 2: Make your own.
Speaker 1: You know, little tiny fishing mowers and a little bit
Speaker 1: of wire, a little bit of string, tiniest tiniest little
Speaker 1: sinkers in there on the little those are about the
Speaker 1: size of a microsyma right there.
Speaker 2: You can't even see him in this screen. Now, these
Speaker 2: are cool. To pull these open.
Speaker 1: This a spork, gotta have that and a knife, so
Speaker 1: how cool is that? This is nice?
Speaker 3: I like this.
Speaker 2: Very cool knife. Part has a little sheath you can eat.
Speaker 2: So this is an actual pen. I wasn't I was
Speaker 2: kind of surprised. I was a natural pen. But it's
Speaker 2: also like a glass breaker if you're stuck in a
Speaker 2: car or something like that. And I want to say, this.
Speaker 1: Is a magnet with a telescopic thang right there. So
Speaker 1: I guess if you are, oh wait, no, it's not.
Speaker 1: What the hell does this add to something else? There's
Speaker 1: nothing on the end of that that's hollow. I don't
Speaker 1: know what this is for. Maybe it would be good
Speaker 1: if there was like a mirror, you could like hold
Speaker 1: it off to the side and see you around corners
Speaker 1: so you don't get shot.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 5: I'm not really sure what this is for now. If
Speaker 5: I lose a piece, doesn't look like it some string
Speaker 5: that goes to something else, probably the one of these
Speaker 5: little things here.
Speaker 2: And then we got excuse the noise. Sorry, this was
Speaker 2: gifted to me, I think by my mom, or maybe
Speaker 2: maybe was.
Speaker 1: Rebecca's father, I can't really remember. Here's another striker got
Speaker 1: this part here. Obviously you'd take it off the string
Speaker 1: because you can't really, I can't really do it from here, like, but.
Speaker 2: There's a flint. And then right our good friend see,
Speaker 2: you have to.
Speaker 1: Take it off the string, or you have to make
Speaker 1: the string longer, which is something I can could do
Speaker 1: if it was not just tightening the knot by doing that.
Speaker 2: But you get the point. So there's a striker in there,
Speaker 2: and then this last thing it looks like, I don't
Speaker 2: know what the hell this is. Oh, look at.
Speaker 1: That's a little multitude here.
Speaker 2: I saw on the side can openers and stuff like that.
Speaker 2: There's some use to this, it's not.
Speaker 1: It's not the worst kay that I've seen, but again,
Speaker 1: you want to look at it over, not just buy
Speaker 1: one and wait for something to happen and then see
Speaker 1: if it how useful it is. Right, And of course
Speaker 1: there was a compass on this thing. We don't know
Speaker 1: if it works or not. And then there's also this
Speaker 1: compass here, which again it looks neat, but I don't know.
Speaker 2: If it works. I have to test it.
Speaker 1: And Paul Harrow actually showed any one of those it's like, okay,
Speaker 1: this is west and he goes, okay, now this is west.
Speaker 1: So that's not going to help you out too much.
Speaker 1: And there is a little mini flashlight in here. I
Speaker 1: just got to get a battery for it. Maybe there's
Speaker 1: one inside. There is not, but it's neat. It's got
Speaker 1: a little bettery in it. I mean it's got a
Speaker 1: little uh flashlight in it. So they did think this
Speaker 1: went through a little bit a little bit. It's not again,
Speaker 1: Like like I said, it's not the most.
Speaker 2: Horrible kit in the world that you could get.
Speaker 1: But there's things you want to add to it. Maybe
Speaker 1: some starting sticks, which I have a bunch of those
Speaker 1: campers starting sticks.
Speaker 2: There's some.
Speaker 1: There's like a flathead and a Phillip's head in here too,
Speaker 1: with a little ring in it, and they're flat on
Speaker 1: one end. So I guess everything when you are out
Speaker 1: in the woods or on the run or whatever has
Speaker 1: to be more difficult. So instead of having a handle
Speaker 1: you could grip, you have to pinch it with your
Speaker 1: finger and your thumb and twist.
Speaker 2: That's always fun. But this is cool.
Speaker 3: I like this.
Speaker 2: Then.
Speaker 1: Also, if you're being assaulted while you're eating, you can
Speaker 1: always just you know, I'll see if I can close this.
Speaker 1: I had a hard time last time. Oh yeah, So
Speaker 1: what have I learned already? I've learned that I need
Speaker 1: to get something better for water filtration than that straw
Speaker 1: because in a pinch, there's no way my daughter could
Speaker 1: suck water through that. There's no way I can barely fuck.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I could not.
Speaker 2: If I tried hard enoughing long enough, I think i'd
Speaker 2: pass out before anything happened liquid wise. So there we are,
Speaker 2: and it looks like we are on Twitter because I see,
Speaker 2: yes we are awesome. Good.
Speaker 1: At first it gave me another air, but I had
Speaker 1: seen that I was out of under review status.
Speaker 2: So yeah, we're back on Twitter. It might just be
Speaker 2: better to be on Bridie on.
Speaker 1: But I know I've got a couple of people over
Speaker 1: there that I actually know a little bit, so I
Speaker 1: don't want to, you know, cut them out by changing.
Speaker 1: Will we broadcast?
Speaker 2: All right?
Speaker 1: So now I'm gonna show you this video because I
Speaker 1: think this is important. It kind of helps you put
Speaker 1: your head in the mind in the get you get
Speaker 1: you thinking about situations like this and what would happen
Speaker 1: and what you would do and what you would need.
Speaker 2: Because you can put the fantasy in your head all
Speaker 2: you want.
Speaker 1: And this is something Paul hit said, whatever your fantasy
Speaker 1: is about the end of the world as you know it,
Speaker 1: w rol you know, without rule of law or s HTF,
Speaker 1: shit hits the fan, whatever, whatever scenario you're playing through
Speaker 1: your head. Oh, I'm gonna do this, and I'm gonna
Speaker 1: do that, where I'm gonna get that and I'm gonna Yeah.
Speaker 1: You want to see how it's been playing out first
Speaker 1: before you get too excited about your big plans, and
Speaker 1: then be practical and be able to adapt according to
Speaker 1: what happens in reality. So let's watch this real quick.
Speaker 1: It's nineteen minutes long. We'll watch the whole thing. Maybe not,
Speaker 1: but let's just take a look.
Speaker 6: The East Coast right now is of biblical proportions. The
Speaker 6: mainstream media is not covering it hardly at all. When
Speaker 6: I click on there, all I see them talking about
Speaker 6: is the filthy sodomites of Hollywood and p Diddy, and
Speaker 6: not about the people that are dying of thirst and
Speaker 6: starving and just suffering terribly. If you haven't followed this
Speaker 6: or know what's going on, or just out of the loop,
Speaker 6: I encourage you to go on and look at some
Speaker 6: videos on x or on TikTok. It seems like the
Speaker 6: only place where you can actually get information on this.
Speaker 6: I'm getting first hand information because three of the war
Speaker 6: band members are in the mix right now, and I'm
Speaker 6: getting real live intel.
Speaker 3: I just got the link.
Speaker 1: Here's a thought right there. Do you have a community
Speaker 1: of a few people that could work together, that are
Speaker 1: of the same mindset, That'll be the most invaluable thing
Speaker 1: you could possibly have. And he just said his war band, right.
Speaker 1: I mean it's good when you have influence in a
Speaker 1: channel and your two million plus subscribers, it's good to
Speaker 1: make It's easy to make friends, right. But yeah, he
Speaker 1: is called the POH or the professor pro ho, the
Speaker 1: professional homeowner, right. And he's got a simple green right there.
Speaker 1: We use that in the coast Guard on everything. There's
Speaker 1: a prop be tank tank there. It looks like and.
Speaker 6: Yeah, list this is this is called the Urgent New Critical.
Speaker 1: Technically, I think the blue canisters are supposed to be
Speaker 1: for diesel. I'm not don't quote me on that. I'm
Speaker 1: plastic is plastic right, as long as you know what's
Speaker 1: in it.
Speaker 6: Supply list immediate frontline supply needs. Now, this gives us
Speaker 6: a really rare opportunity today to learn the lessons that
Speaker 6: are being I guess learned right now in real time
Speaker 6: about what people really need and what is essential, what
Speaker 6: is the essential equipment in it when you're really in
Speaker 6: the mix. And I've laid everything out here, We're going
Speaker 6: to go over these items there in five categories and
Speaker 6: then I'll give you my final thoughts and I'll give
Speaker 6: you some options for those of you who are interested
Speaker 6: in donating money as well as time or any of
Speaker 6: your special skills. So let's jump into category number one.
Speaker 6: We're going to go into the tools that is on
Speaker 6: the urgent front line list. None of this is my think.
Speaker 6: So these are the actual items on the critical need list.
Speaker 6: This is not by any means comprehensive. This is just
Speaker 6: what they're asking for. And this would you would do
Speaker 6: very well to wake up and pay attention to this
Speaker 6: and make sure you have these things in your items,
Speaker 6: because this is what is lacking. Chainsaw tools, chainsaw tools
Speaker 6: primarily chainsaw wrenches, files and sharpening systems. There are so
Speaker 6: many trees, it's a heavily wooded area that there are
Speaker 6: people that are still trapped going on a week now
Speaker 6: that have no access and they won't for weeks, maybe
Speaker 6: even months because of down trees and for lack of
Speaker 6: a chainsaw, for lack of a sharpener. They're trapped in
Speaker 6: there with no food and no water and it is
Speaker 6: absolutely getting dire.
Speaker 3: So have yourself a good set of files. Is interesting.
Speaker 6: They also ask for in addition to files was chainsaw chains.
Speaker 6: Twenty inch bars seem to be the most popular. Now
Speaker 6: we run bigger bars than that out here, obviously, but
Speaker 6: I just found that interesting. Chainsaw chains of both pitches,
Speaker 6: of the three eighths and the smaller ones.
Speaker 3: They said have them.
Speaker 6: They're really really desperate for them, as well as bar
Speaker 6: oil and mix.
Speaker 3: They seem to have gasoline. I haven't heard.
Speaker 6: I didn't see that on the list, but they definitely
Speaker 6: had a need for bar oil in mix, as well
Speaker 6: as leather gloves and chainsaw safety chaps. You know, you
Speaker 6: get a lot of people, especially professional homeowners that don't
Speaker 6: spend a lot of time cutting. You know, you can
Speaker 6: get into you really hurt yourself and get into a
Speaker 6: bad situation. So having chainsaw chaps is really essential for
Speaker 6: running that type of equipment. But as far as tools go,
Speaker 6: this is what they're requesting right now. Also in the
Speaker 6: C list is shovels, square point for cleaning up scooping mud,
Speaker 6: and a round point.
Speaker 3: There are actually volunteers and local.
Speaker 6: Folks that are digging their neighbors out of mud slides
Speaker 6: sides by hand. It's sad to say that we can
Speaker 6: spend we can send billions or hundreds of billions over
Speaker 6: to Ukraine and to Israel, but when it comes to
Speaker 6: our own people and our own needs, uh, it's left
Speaker 6: to the people of the local community, uh to offer support.
Speaker 3: It is.
Speaker 6: I guess that's just the world that we live in now.
Speaker 6: I've been telling you for years, they're not coming.
Speaker 7: To see Hold on, hold on, what's going on?
Speaker 2: If you you're gonna have to I'm not sure what
Speaker 2: there it goes. There is a double going on there.
Speaker 2: Sorry about that.
Speaker 3: Take these steps for yourself. Perfect example.
Speaker 6: As we move into the thing is one thing it's
Speaker 6: a real critical need is generators. Generators and power banks,
Speaker 6: battery banks, whether it be gas or electric solar generators
Speaker 6: with solar panels like the Eco flow here. I was
Speaker 6: talking to the middleman and which you know, they're all equipped.
Speaker 6: One of them was telling me that, you know, because
Speaker 6: of a video that I did, that they invested in
Speaker 6: one hundred gallon fuel cube. He said that when he
Speaker 6: bought it, his wife got mad at him. But now
Speaker 6: that they've been running their generator, and because they have
Speaker 6: that fuel cube, they're able to keep their refrigerators, freezers running,
Speaker 6: they have running water, all that. That's what I'm saying
Speaker 6: is that these things are really important. And if you
Speaker 6: think that someone's going to come and.
Speaker 3: Save you, you get on.
Speaker 6: A mass scale or a devastation on a mass scale
Speaker 6: like this, and if you live rurally, you know, we
Speaker 6: were told by the Red Cross not too long ago,
Speaker 6: by emergency managers in our area here, if we had
Speaker 6: the big earthquake that they've been predicting forever, that we
Speaker 6: could probably expect six months to a year before we
Speaker 6: would even see any help. And that's if the bridges
Speaker 6: were out. So that's how long you'd have to sustain yourself.
Speaker 6: So really take heed. Also, there's been a lot of
Speaker 6: concerns about security risks with those guys that are running
Speaker 6: gas generators. One of the comments was made to one
Speaker 6: of my buddies was, well, I guess we know who's
Speaker 6: prepared to where we're going to go to get supplies,
Speaker 6: because that gas generator is just running and just screaming
Speaker 6: the whole time, and it's a red flag for everyone
Speaker 6: around that hasn't prepped that you've thought of it, and
Speaker 6: you've probably got supplies. So having a backup system like
Speaker 6: a solar generator, a solar panel, these can charge all
Speaker 6: the things that you want and they're absolutely silent. So
Speaker 6: that to me is going to be critical is to
Speaker 6: have the ability to charge your radios and phones. Communication
Speaker 6: has been a big, big problem.
Speaker 1: And just know if you're communicating, it doesn't matter what
Speaker 1: you think is happening.
Speaker 2: People are hearing what you're saying, and that's what we're
Speaker 2: moving people who have ill intent for you to next.
Speaker 6: The lack of communications has been a huge, huge problem
Speaker 6: right now. It's just absolutely heartbreaking watching the videos of
Speaker 6: family members that are not able to get in touch,
Speaker 6: especially with elderly relatives that have been isolated that live
Speaker 6: in small towns.
Speaker 3: They have no way of getting hold of them self.
Speaker 6: Services down and they're completely in the dark, and the
Speaker 6: worst thing in life is just not knowing because your
Speaker 6: mind automatically assumes the worst.
Speaker 3: So having good reliable communications.
Speaker 6: Evan from Radio Made Easy Bless Him has been giving
Speaker 6: radios out to search and rescue teams from his own
Speaker 6: personal stock. I'm going to put a link down below
Speaker 6: to his website if you want to help contribute to that.
Speaker 6: Missus W and I are sending money to these charities
Speaker 6: to help them with that. He's programming them. Him and
Speaker 6: his whole family are making it possible for these search
Speaker 6: and rescue teams, these private citizens that are doing the
Speaker 6: hard work to stay in touch with one another because
Speaker 6: the cell phones are absolutely out. So man, you've got
Speaker 6: to get these radios. Gentlemen, you got to get the radios.
Speaker 3: You got to have get one of these three radio kits.
Speaker 6: Put them together. You've got one for your family. You
Speaker 6: can hand one out to a neighbor, you can set
Speaker 6: up watch. I watched a video from one guy that
Speaker 6: was living in a rural area and there was a
Speaker 6: rider truck parked out in the front of his long
Speaker 6: driveway just sitting out there. Now he's got no power,
Speaker 6: no cell service, he's isolated in a rural town. He
Speaker 6: drives out there into his squad that confronts the guy
Speaker 6: and he makes up some story about, oh yeah, I'm
Speaker 6: waiting for someone. I'm here to deliver a package, while
Speaker 6: he said, I've got no package coming. The guy took
Speaker 6: off down the road. He got on his radio, was
Speaker 6: able to call his neighbor, which they stay in communication
Speaker 6: with each other, and they met in the middle and
Speaker 6: box this guy in and he went around and ran off.
Speaker 3: Probably a looter.
Speaker 6: So those guys were able to communicate and form a
Speaker 6: perimeter and a little have kind of a little bit
Speaker 6: of security because they had got these radios. I would
Speaker 6: personally do this. I would also look at getting a scanner.
Speaker 6: If you got a scanner like this one that I bought.
Speaker 3: What was this. This is the unit in the Bearcat.
Speaker 6: You're able to at least hear the radio traffic. You
Speaker 6: can pick up what the hams are broadcasting and find
Speaker 6: out what going on. At least, no, even if you
Speaker 6: can't communicate, but at minimum I would have a pair
Speaker 6: or a trifecta of those radios because not being able
Speaker 6: to communicate with your family and no cell phones, I mean,
Speaker 6: you just have no idea how scary that is. Also
Speaker 6: two other electronic items that are on the critical list.
Speaker 6: One of them kind of surprised me was they were
Speaker 6: asking for carbon monoxide sensors. Why would they want that
Speaker 6: of all the things, And I realized, well, they're all
Speaker 6: running gas generators and people die every year.
Speaker 3: I used to be a career firefighter.
Speaker 6: I was an engineer, and I know of cases where
Speaker 6: folks during power outages took their generators, rolled them outside
Speaker 6: on the front in front of the garage door, and
Speaker 6: thought that that would be good. But the whole family
Speaker 6: suffocated from carbon monoxide because the cold air intakes sometimes
Speaker 6: are in the garage and the furnace is in the garage.
Speaker 6: It sucked all that exhaust in there and put the
Speaker 6: whole family to sleep and they never woke up. So
Speaker 6: having carbon monoxide sensors is on the critical list as
Speaker 6: well as batteries, and they just said all types, so
Speaker 6: have a good selection of batteries. I just don't know
Speaker 6: how many times I can go over this double A
Speaker 6: triple A, CR one two, three's, nine volts.
Speaker 3: That's going to be for your detectors.
Speaker 6: And I would even have d's and c's because some
Speaker 6: of the older folks are going to have those antiquated
Speaker 6: flashlights and just have a full set when next time
Speaker 6: you go to Costco, just load up on the fifty
Speaker 6: pack of all the brands and just put them away
Speaker 6: and want it done and you're good. Next up also
Speaker 6: kind of surprised me, which was cleaning supplies. These are
Speaker 6: the cleaning supplies that made the critical frontline list. What
Speaker 6: they're asking for disinfected with spray bottles, something like the
Speaker 6: simple Green, something to clean because once you if you
Speaker 6: can't disinfect, you can clean up the mud and you
Speaker 6: can wash the walls down with water, but you got
Speaker 6: to disinfect or what's going to come as mold and disease.
Speaker 6: And once you have that, then you really have a problem.
Speaker 6: So cleaning supplies beach shop towels on there, as well
Speaker 6: as brooms and dust pans, and that's something that I
Speaker 6: wouldn't have really thought of it considered. But if you're
Speaker 6: trying to clean up your house and you don't have
Speaker 6: these things or they've washed away, who knows what.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 6: As I said, this is not my list. I'm just
Speaker 6: showing you the things that they're putting on there. This
Speaker 6: is what they're asking for and this is what's important
Speaker 6: to them right now, as well as drum liners, trash
Speaker 6: bags for put you know.
Speaker 3: It's just terrible what's going on over there.
Speaker 6: I've been watching on TikTok some of the frontline stories
Speaker 6: from the linemen that are going in, and the linemen
Speaker 6: are actually going into some of these places for the
Speaker 6: very first time, and they're saying that the stench of
Speaker 6: the of the decay, and you can imagine what that
Speaker 6: is from from folk people and animals is just overwhelming.
Speaker 6: What the body count will be when everything is said
Speaker 6: and done, it's hard to imagine. But for various reasons,
Speaker 6: trash bags, drum liners, some place to put this stuff,
Speaker 6: things that are contaminated, as well.
Speaker 3: As big tarps. Tarps are so essential.
Speaker 6: We're coming into wintertime and that thousands of these houses
Speaker 6: have had trees fall on them.
Speaker 1: They've got you can also not only just patch holes
Speaker 1: with them, like he's kind of saying right here, with
Speaker 1: trees falling and use the tarp over the top, but
Speaker 1: you can put heavy things on top of them and
Speaker 1: drag them right and if they are bodies that you're moving,
Speaker 1: or big logs or anything like that, you can roll
Speaker 1: them onto there and then pull the tarp and get
Speaker 1: a few people and help drag it out of the.
Speaker 3: Way holes in the roof.
Speaker 6: If you can get up there with the chainsawed, if
Speaker 6: you can get that off there and get that whole
Speaker 6: patch before you get a bunch of extra water and
Speaker 6: stuff in there, that can make the difference between your
Speaker 6: house being inhabitable or infested with mold.
Speaker 3: So tarps and trash bags and drop.
Speaker 1: Now, this is all under the assumption that you're gonna
Speaker 1: be able to maintain your dwelling after this, and they've
Speaker 1: already been saying that that's not going to happen. That
Speaker 1: the reason why they're gonna to take their sweet ass
Speaker 1: time getting there, because they're maximizing the casualties. I'm surprised
Speaker 1: anybody has gotten it anywhere. And also because they're not
Speaker 1: planting on doing a whole lot of work there for
Speaker 1: the next year and when they do. That property because
Speaker 1: it's declared by FEMA to be such that it's now
Speaker 1: the property of the federal government, which obviously is just
Speaker 1: like saying it's the property of the IMF.
Speaker 2: Is the property of Blackrock, that property of not.
Speaker 6: You thumb liners and the other thing that they asked
Speaker 6: for was small bottles of pro paine and large twenty
Speaker 6: pound bottles and regular bottles. Most people have camp stoves,
Speaker 6: most people have lanterns, but they hadn't bought enough of these,
Speaker 6: and there's an urgent need for pro pain as well
Speaker 6: as traffic cones, which I thought was kind of funny.
Speaker 6: But then when I saw the streets and I saw
Speaker 6: how many hazards that the local folks had to navigate,
Speaker 6: that made sense too. To be able to put a
Speaker 6: traffic cone. They asked for traffic cones, and they ask
Speaker 6: for marking ribbon where they could mark hazards. You know,
Speaker 6: people are gonna be coming in at night. There's no power,
Speaker 6: there's no street lights in the rural areas, and one
Speaker 6: wrong mistake and you can get yourself over the edge
Speaker 6: of a cliff. Everything's washed out. So I found that
Speaker 6: interesting as well traffic cones. And I'll add this, whenever
Speaker 6: you have marking tape, always have a sharpie with you.
Speaker 6: Marking tape really stands out. And if you tie a
Speaker 6: bunch of this stuff around a tree, if you need
Speaker 6: to leave a message for someone, most people will stop
Speaker 6: and investigate it, and you can write right on this
Speaker 6: with the sharpie, you can give a message and it
Speaker 6: gets a lot of people's attention. So I found that
Speaker 6: very interesting as well. Also, the last two things on
Speaker 6: the list were water containers. Water containers and the way
Speaker 6: to see you.
Speaker 7: Know is wrong.
Speaker 1: Again, that's a BPA free water container and BPA free
Speaker 1: is important, especially if it's being stored, and if there's
Speaker 1: any heat involved. You don't want the stuff that leaches
Speaker 1: into your water filter.
Speaker 6: The water all of their water is contaminated. I mean,
Speaker 6: these people are in dire straits. I heard the statistic
Speaker 6: this morning that they're going through ten thousand cases of
Speaker 6: water per day and just in three counties. And that
Speaker 6: is not enough so to be able to have some
Speaker 6: long term storage store it in your bathtub, but you
Speaker 6: should have about six of these, six of these Jerry cans.
Speaker 1: And let's be fair though, especially with the X on
Speaker 1: the side, it totally looks like a freaking guest.
Speaker 2: Again it does.
Speaker 6: On the eve of any sort of a hurricane or tornado.
Speaker 3: Make sure that stuff is full. Make sure it's full
Speaker 3: and filled up.
Speaker 6: And then finally, blankets, blankets and warm clothing. People's things
Speaker 6: have washed away. There's stories of little kids walking around
Speaker 6: naked looking for their parents. I mean, it is the
Speaker 6: most pitiful, tragic thing in the world, and no one
Speaker 6: is talking about it outside of the two sources that
Speaker 6: I shared with you. It's just unbelievable. So have some
Speaker 6: wool blankets and some extra clothing. We're coming into fall
Speaker 6: and my heart just breaks for those families. Can you imagine,
Speaker 6: just imagine having your whole life, your house washed off
Speaker 6: its foundations, and there you're standing there in the wreckage.
Speaker 3: What do you do?
Speaker 6: Do you even have a car to live in? And
Speaker 6: it's just unimaginable, unimaginable.
Speaker 2: You even have a car above water?
Speaker 3: Let me close with a few links.
Speaker 1: And if you had an electric one, did it explode
Speaker 1: on the moment the water came over the wheel level?
Speaker 2: I mean, we're talking about a lithium battery here.
Speaker 6: Of some folks that are working hard over there, If
Speaker 6: you have the ability to donate or donate special time
Speaker 6: or skills, there's a few that are really in need.
Speaker 6: And I'll let me get that list and I'll cover that.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 6: I'm going to share three organizations with you that all
Speaker 6: three of them that I personally vouch for. We are
Speaker 6: donating missus W is actually doing it right now.
Speaker 1: I think we can skip past that. You can look
Speaker 1: at the description of this video. It's called Hurricane Helene
Speaker 1: Exposed its government failure, Critical supplies lessons if you want
Speaker 1: to donate, but if you want to also if you're
Speaker 1: trying to get your mindset around going over there to
Speaker 1: help out or whatever. I know that Mike Adams is
Speaker 1: doing a lot to get stuff over there, organic food
Speaker 1: and stuff like.
Speaker 2: That as well.
Speaker 1: We're talking like truck loads, palettes and palettes of food.
Speaker 2: So that's that's a positive. And let's hope that.
Speaker 1: You know, they're saying that the best way to get
Speaker 1: stuff to people is to not use the roads, not
Speaker 1: use the places where their as you know, the access
Speaker 1: is being denied, but to take it in, you know,
Speaker 1: by foot on trails or no trail and find your
Speaker 1: way into the place, because that's the best way to
Speaker 1: get things to people without having to you know, run
Speaker 1: into interference.
Speaker 6: Donating to these three first off is going to be
Speaker 6: Evan radio made easy. He is offering radios to search
Speaker 6: and rescue into the local folks out of his own supply.
Speaker 6: He's not asked for this, and I hope. I don't
Speaker 6: mean to embarrass him. He's never asked. I'm just we're
Speaker 6: offering this. I would like to put his side up there.
Speaker 6: Missus w asked him if he had a PayPal or
Speaker 6: anything like that, and if he does have one right
Speaker 6: now is that they have links from Amazon and Sam's
Speaker 6: Club is helpful in that situationuation, But they also need people.
Speaker 6: And this isn't a fly by night organization. They have
Speaker 6: a lot of top tier people. They're recognized by local
Speaker 6: counties and they are legitimate. And if you're going to
Speaker 6: be donating time, you're a competent operator, there's an avenue
Speaker 6: for you to tie in with them and to deploy
Speaker 6: right now and put that to use. I'll tell you,
Speaker 6: North Carolina is so far away from where we're at.
Speaker 3: I was telling mister Duria.
Speaker 6: I mean I would go as far as the western
Speaker 6: slope of the Rockies, load up some equipment, go over there.
Speaker 6: But just going to North Carolina, the logistics for us,
Speaker 6: it's just too much. It's too much for us. I
Speaker 6: wish it was I wish I was closer. So equipment
Speaker 6: operators radials and offer relief to these folks that are
Speaker 6: completely landlocked and are going to be They're running out
Speaker 6: of water and food before rescuers are going to be
Speaker 6: able to get there and help them. And it really
Speaker 6: seems to be falling on the shoulders of the local
Speaker 6: people and folks like.
Speaker 3: Evan as well as bear Over there at Grinds some
Speaker 3: minutes streets.
Speaker 6: Also the third a personal one, our friend Josh over family.
Speaker 6: He had insurance and apparently there was a clause in
Speaker 6: there that they said, we're not going to pay out
Speaker 6: because we don't cover mud slides, and mudslide took out
Speaker 6: half of everything that they have there, and it's it's
Speaker 6: just tragic.
Speaker 1: Yeah, when you're living on a twenty three hundred you
Speaker 1: know what, above sea level elevation, you probably didn't have
Speaker 1: flood insurance.
Speaker 3: I know times are tough.
Speaker 2: I it was mandatory, but I don't know if it would.
Speaker 3: Be I get it.
Speaker 6: But I know also there are people that have a
Speaker 6: little bit of extra and their hearts they want to
Speaker 6: give it and to help out these people and help them.
Speaker 1: Like I said, you see the name up here if
Speaker 1: you want to look for this video and look at
Speaker 1: the stuff that I kind of skimmed through and Pocus said,
Speaker 1: you're spot on with the VPA com it. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: don't want to poison yourself just to drink, and some
Speaker 1: people are doing that anyway because they're desperate. They're eating,
Speaker 1: they're drinking that water full of everything, including dead body.
Speaker 1: So they're going to be not living for very long.
Speaker 1: All right, So let's go look at this couple things here.
Speaker 1: I just want to point out. So this is local
Speaker 1: authorities threaten to arrest volunteers saving hurricane victims. Rescuer explains
Speaker 1: why fed's reject help. And then we saw this video
Speaker 1: yesterday but or the last time we were on here,
Speaker 1: but I just wanted you to see this. Keep the
Speaker 1: stuff in mind, right, and then SpaceX engineer says Biden Harris,
Speaker 1: FEMA actively blocking shipments for relief, So there's they're not
Speaker 1: allowing the uh. They're also not allowing people in with
Speaker 1: any type of communications. So this kind of ties into
Speaker 1: the starlink stuff.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: If you're trying to drop off stuff like that so
Speaker 1: people can communicate it is being taken, you're donating it
Speaker 1: to the government.
Speaker 2: Same thing with a lot of the food.
Speaker 1: That's why it's really important to like bypass them or
Speaker 1: just not stop. How to steer hurricanes, floods, flood homes,
Speaker 1: and steal lithium. Greg Grease makes a case. There's that
Speaker 1: Greg Grease stuff.
Speaker 2: There you go.
Speaker 1: Project Serius is the first official attempt to modify a hurricane.
Speaker 1: It was run by General Electric. Oh yeah, the people
Speaker 1: who brought us everything wonderful, like you know, the denouncing
Speaker 1: and suppression of Tesla free energy right with the support
Speaker 1: of the US military. The official theory was that by
Speaker 1: changing the temperature outside the eyeball of the hurricane, which
Speaker 1: they did by seating the clouds with various compounds such
Speaker 1: as silver riot eyede, it decreased in stronger and strong
Speaker 1: winds will result. On October thirteenth, nineteen forty seven, Product
Speaker 1: Serious targeted a hurricane headed out to see. Approximate one
Speaker 1: hundred d pounds of dry ice was dropped into the cloud.
Speaker 1: Crude then reported a pronounced modification of the cloud deck
Speaker 1: and the hurricane hadbroptly changed direction and made landfall near Savannah, Georgia.
Speaker 1: The public blamed the government. The public was aware of that. Well,
Speaker 1: we got more, we got less intelligent over time. Irving Langmuir,
Speaker 1: who pioneered General Electric's atmospheric Research department and admired that
Speaker 1: the project was about learning how to weaponize the weather.
Speaker 1: Also claimed the reversal of the hurricane had been caused
Speaker 1: by the project, but the government denied it for twelve years. Yeah, oh,
Speaker 1: look at Cohen A Cohen. Isn't that nice. In nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety seven, US Defense Security Sorry, US Defense Secretary William
Speaker 1: Cohen admitted that we have the technology to control the weather,
Speaker 1: including earthquakes of volcanos. The US government has placed gag
Speaker 1: orders on employee of the National Weather Service in October
Speaker 1: of twenty twelve, after Hurricane Sandy weekend to a tropical
Speaker 1: storm microwave imagery show is a thick red beam immediately
Speaker 1: followed by Sandy growing into a Category one hurricane and
Speaker 1: taking an unexplained left turn into New Jersey. I pushed
Speaker 1: towards alternative energy band of lithium. Yeah, we already know
Speaker 1: about that. People in Cherryville have been pushing against a
Speaker 1: proposed lithium mind for the last several years, but everyone
Speaker 1: we spoke with here said it's too divisive of an
Speaker 1: issue to share their opinion on camera. Cherryville is a small,
Speaker 1: quiet town. Yeah, you don't. Everything's fall fine and well
Speaker 1: until you try to. You know, it's nice to have
Speaker 1: that illusion of rights and the freedom of a constitutional
Speaker 1: republic right up until you try to have to try
Speaker 1: to exercise it, and then you start to realize it's
Speaker 1: not so. And just to put this in relative terms
Speaker 1: to what's been going on over in Israel, and then
Speaker 1: you have to ask yourself full is the same entity
Speaker 1: in charge of both US government agencies found Israel was
Speaker 1: blocking Gaza AID, oh, look what they're doing here, blinking
Speaker 1: ignored them to keep weapons flowing.
Speaker 2: And what's Blincoln?
Speaker 1: He is an Irish, He's not Eskimo, although I don't
Speaker 1: trust the ES most either. The US Agency for International
Speaker 1: Development USAID, Oh, that's wonderful, and the US State Department
Speaker 1: Refugee Bureau.
Speaker 2: Why do we have?
Speaker 1: One of those concluded this spring that Israel had deliberately
Speaker 1: blocked deliveries of food and medicine to Gaza. You may
Speaker 1: as well, you know, make this into a mad libs
Speaker 1: and just change Gaza to North Carolina and Tennessee, where hunger, disease,
Speaker 1: and displacement have wreaked havoc aboon a civilian population. Although
Speaker 1: US law requires the government to stop armshipments and countries
Speaker 1: that prevent the delivery of US backed aid. Secretary of
Speaker 1: State Anthony Blinkoln ignored the findings and told Congress Israel
Speaker 1: was not restricting humanitarian assistants helping to keep weapons flowing
Speaker 1: to the Israeliti are military to continue.
Speaker 2: It's sault on Gaza. This is all cat and mouse.
Speaker 1: The ones who actually control the government are the same
Speaker 1: that control Israel, that founded Israel. It's the same banking system,
Speaker 1: it's the same Rothschild family. They've owned us for a
Speaker 1: long time. We are a satellite Israel. There's one official Israel.
Speaker 1: Every place else that has a central bank controlled by
Speaker 1: the same banking conglomerate is a satellite of said. It
Speaker 1: has the same nature, with the same type of people
Speaker 1: calling the shots. Why do you think there's an APAC
Speaker 1: in the first place. The only thing that they're trying
Speaker 1: to fool are the are the public, and they don't
Speaker 1: care too much about that anymore, which should be concerning
Speaker 1: if the if it's not even worth putting up the
Speaker 1: facade of of an actual separate nation anymore, then that
Speaker 1: means that the United Nations also controlled by the IMF,
Speaker 1: which means it's controlled by those same banks they're going
Speaker 1: they're switching from and they said they would do this
Speaker 1: from covert control to overt control. You can go into
Speaker 1: the if you hold a pale horse from more around that.
Speaker 1: You can look into the protocols for some of that
Speaker 1: you'll you'll find it. And this, uh, this appeal to authority,
Speaker 1: this uh, you know rise of the expert that we
Speaker 1: talk about with Duane. That's the same thing as having elders. Now,
Speaker 1: if they're of good nature and they cared about the people,
Speaker 1: that might be a different that's that's a different mindset
Speaker 1: than you know, say a sanhedron or a cahal. When
Speaker 1: they have your demise in mind, and you have a
Speaker 1: council of elders that you call the rise of you
Speaker 1: know they call the experts, then things don't go so
Speaker 1: well because you are the target.
Speaker 2: Where am I going next? Okay? So to ease ourselves
Speaker 2: into the next category here, let's go to mm hmm.
Speaker 2: There's two ways I could do this. First, let me
Speaker 2: just get to of the.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, top top five guns for Tea Tiwaki. If
Speaker 1: you want to look at that. That's a it's two
Speaker 1: hours long. When it goes into a lot of information
Speaker 1: and it's Paul Herrald. So it's entertaining at the same time.
Speaker 1: But let's go with this.
Speaker 2: You guys can see that. Yeah, okay, good, all right.
Speaker 1: So it's scientism, the religion known as science with doctor
Speaker 1: Stephan Lanka. Now again, I think he makes a couple
Speaker 1: of mistakes because I don't think he's fully aware of
Speaker 1: the microzeimer. But at least he's got the right attitude towards.
Speaker 2: What's real and what's not.
Speaker 4: The Only thing is really to look to the theory
Speaker 4: of infectious diseases, to watch it the virus, and to
Speaker 4: realize this is our history, that's our society, that's the
Speaker 4: belief of our society. Then it's a belief system. If
Speaker 4: you watch deeper, you'll find no trace of science, only
Speaker 4: of course tific institute and scientific tools which you can
Speaker 4: use to do some real signs. They are there, but
Speaker 4: they are misused to claim there is real signs out there. Okay, ready, Hello,
Speaker 4: My name is Stephen Lanka. I am born here in
Speaker 4: this nice village of Langaran, just one hundred and fifty
Speaker 4: meters from here, and I have a lot of things
Speaker 4: to set to, you know, dissolve the folk, not only
Speaker 4: of Corona, and I would say, let's start and ring
Speaker 4: the bell. This is a big chance for everybody to
Speaker 4: understand on one side what is real. Science has a
Speaker 4: way important tool for human beings, for humankind, but then
Speaker 4: slowly to learn well, they are not following the laws
Speaker 4: of science. And in the end, it's it's really it's
Speaker 4: it's hard to hear, but it's it's a religion. It's
Speaker 4: all depending on the theory of infectious diseases. And if
Speaker 4: you are believing it that human being is getting ill
Speaker 4: because of a virus or bacteria, and that you are
Speaker 4: even spreading it, then it makes completely sense to wear
Speaker 4: masks to protect others, to protect you. And then it
Speaker 4: makes more or less sense, you know. And it's but
Speaker 4: if you.
Speaker 1: Go he said to wear a mask in case you
Speaker 1: didn't catch his accent. There it makes sense to wear
Speaker 1: a mask if what they say is true, but we
Speaker 1: know it's not true, then it makes no sense whatsoever.
Speaker 4: Dimensioned deeper, and you are questioning, hey, is the theory proven?
Speaker 4: Is their basis? Is there a real scientific base for it?
Speaker 4: And then you quickly understand is not I not consider
Speaker 4: any virality as criminal, but as I did before, but
Speaker 4: I'm convinced they are completely anti scientific and who is
Speaker 4: And it's easy to see, it's easy to prove. Just
Speaker 4: read their publications. You see it, you know, and who
Speaker 4: is anti scientific is in the same time antisocial because
Speaker 4: the wrong measurements the wrong you know, decisions are taken
Speaker 4: out of it. And this is the basis of what
Speaker 4: we have.
Speaker 8: You know, if I say to you the words faith
Speaker 8: and assumption, what comes to mind.
Speaker 4: Well, I mean this all Corona crisis is based on
Speaker 4: faith that you can't trust nature, that nature is producing
Speaker 4: viruses and virus entities just aim to destroy to self replica.
Speaker 4: So that's the principle of a self replicating devil, you know,
Speaker 4: And that's the faith. And that was still the maturity
Speaker 4: of people believing it. When I was looking starting to
Speaker 4: watch into HIV, I thought, there is no virus in
Speaker 4: the paper. They are trust characteristics of dying cells, and
Speaker 4: they were misinterpreted as.
Speaker 1: So what that means basically is you are being tested
Speaker 1: for something that's already in you and that's giving you
Speaker 1: positive And then they start throwing their therapies at you,
Speaker 1: the drugs at you, condemning your mind to make you
Speaker 1: think that you're going to die, and you will if
Speaker 1: you continue to take their drugs. But it's all based
Speaker 1: on something that you're going to positive for eventually, because
Speaker 1: it's part of you.
Speaker 4: Part of a virus. The whole thing has never been seen,
Speaker 4: no isolated and all the photos claim to be a virus.
Speaker 4: It's all artifacts in cell culture, in the test tube.
Speaker 4: There's no single photograph of a virus in the blood,
Speaker 4: in sperm, or in cells in organs of their body.
Speaker 4: No single It's incredibly easy like this, you know. So
Speaker 4: of course I was aware that I was looking left
Speaker 4: and right to other viruses, and then I realized, I'm
Speaker 4: not stubbing that. Well, that's that's true what I was reading.
Speaker 4: I mean, it was a nightmare for me to come
Speaker 4: across this. I could not speak out to anybody for
Speaker 4: high a year because I thought I am stupid. You know,
Speaker 4: a virus is thought to be a piece of genetic
Speaker 4: material enveloped in a shell. That's the definition of a virus,
Speaker 4: A piece of day.
Speaker 1: That's their definition of virus. Right, virus just means poison Latin.
Speaker 4: Typically liquid poisons genetic matire, so it's not the tox scene,
Speaker 4: but dangerous genetic material. That's the definition of a virus,
Speaker 4: and they have it only in mind because it doesn't
Speaker 4: exist in reality. They believe that when cells are dying
Speaker 4: in the test tube, they transform themselves in the virus
Speaker 4: because they added the virus now from from the mouth
Speaker 4: of a deceased person, you know, measle case or now
Speaker 4: with corona. They take a swab putting into the test tube.
Speaker 4: Oh and then if the cells are dying, they believe
Speaker 4: we isolated the virus, and they speak about the isolate
Speaker 4: and they freeze the dying cell culture, use it for
Speaker 4: the production of a vaccine or you know, or take
Speaker 4: it then new into uninfected cell culture and they say, look,
Speaker 4: we reproduce the infection, you know. But it's just just
Speaker 4: self betraying. There's because they are not following the strict
Speaker 4: rules to prove every step by a control experiment, and
Speaker 4: the control experiment would be easy. Is the dying of
Speaker 4: the cells in the test tube really induced by a
Speaker 4: vous or by the condition of the test tube? And
Speaker 4: of course I carried out these control experiments. They're dying
Speaker 4: because of the condition and the test tube, and it's
Speaker 4: easy like this, they staff the cells to death. They
Speaker 4: put highly toxic antibiotics which eventually kill those cells, and
Speaker 4: then they believe it's a vous because then they just
Speaker 4: add seemingly infected material. But if you took the same material,
Speaker 4: sterilize the material, it would die in the same way.
Speaker 4: If you use other organic materials into decay completely non effect,
Speaker 4: they die in the same manner. And this is when
Speaker 4: they came up and they speak about isolation. They speak
Speaker 4: about isolate what they have in the fridge. And this
Speaker 4: is self self fooling, This is self you know.
Speaker 8: So let's just emphasize that point. What they're doing is actually,
Speaker 8: in the process of believing that they are proving the
Speaker 8: existence and isolating a virus, they are actually themselves killing
Speaker 8: the tissue.
Speaker 4: That's it.
Speaker 3: They're killing the tissue. That's it.
Speaker 4: Look, this is funny, you know. This is saying at attention,
Speaker 4: danger of slippery you know, danger of you know. And
Speaker 4: it's because this is not so visible the scientists could
Speaker 4: not read it and they were not being aware to
Speaker 4: question themselves always. This is the first rule of science,
Speaker 4: to question yourself, you know. And if you're not dream
Speaker 4: you are in slippery ground.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 4: This is a collective warning for every notion which comes
Speaker 4: of science. Check the evidence, check everything, question everything. That's
Speaker 4: the first rule in science, to cushing yourself and the
Speaker 4: others constantly to avoid misconception, to and to realize.
Speaker 1: And this is the problem too, because they take from
Speaker 1: where the last person's you know, stepped off, so precedents
Speaker 1: and this whole again you're bowing to the experts of
Speaker 1: the past, as if they were somehow not in error,
Speaker 1: or that they weren't deliberately fraudulent. So once these statements
Speaker 1: are made and they become solid in the minds of
Speaker 1: the public or whatever, then you start manipulating that data
Speaker 1: to add more conclusions on top of something that's already incorrect.
Speaker 2: And here we are.
Speaker 4: It's wrong going on, I keep saying, you know, and
Speaker 4: this sounds cruel to everybody who lost a member, family, friend,
Speaker 4: neighbor to what they called cancer. You know, if you
Speaker 4: digested this concept that you can't trust your body, and
Speaker 4: that nature itself is manualizing the bad, and the bad
Speaker 4: is eating up yourself, you know, multiplying itself in a body,
Speaker 4: moving inside a body and moving out, you know, I
Speaker 4: mean then and the suffering which is there, that's the
Speaker 4: proof that it's like this and In fact, if you
Speaker 4: have no better understanding, you are in the trap. And
Speaker 4: this trap was set on various stages in history and
Speaker 4: in its modern form that we are believing in this concept.
Speaker 4: This was said in the year eighteen hundred and fifty eight.
Speaker 4: And if you don't know it, you stay in the
Speaker 4: trap in the matualistic good bad system, and you have
Speaker 4: no way to get out. The assumption was that virus
Speaker 4: is a toxin which is causing disease.
Speaker 1: Isn't it funny that in German the word for poison
Speaker 1: or toxin is gift.
Speaker 2: I always fine, that interesting.
Speaker 4: That's the way basic assumption. And this goes back to
Speaker 4: the theory of life.
Speaker 1: I had somebody coming in the store one time because
Speaker 1: we had a little sticker on our on our wall
Speaker 1: as it makes a great gift. And that person was German,
Speaker 1: and they started laughing and they told me, yeah again,
Speaker 1: and gift means poisoned or do.
Speaker 4: Of Rudolf Brokoff in the year eighteen hundred and fifty eight,
Speaker 4: and this assumption that life and cells especially are producing
Speaker 4: the toxine of disease, and you only get healthy if
Speaker 4: you let your blood with the disease porson of disease
Speaker 4: out or if you take the antitoxine, or the body
Speaker 4: has time to produce the antitoxine the antibody. So you
Speaker 4: see Buddy Roos antibody. And he realized and you see
Speaker 4: it in his theory. He said, the smallest indivisible unit
Speaker 4: of life is the cell.
Speaker 2: And that is wrong, and we will we will hopefully
Speaker 2: sort that out soon.
Speaker 4: Everything it's alternated out of a cell, and all disease
Speaker 4: is alterinating out of a cell when the cell is
Speaker 4: building the toxine of disease and doing so. Establishing his
Speaker 4: theory of cellular pathology, he re vitalized this old idea
Speaker 4: in a modern form with all the results we have.
Speaker 4: This is setting our imagination. And if you have no
Speaker 4: other ideas how life could work, then we are in
Speaker 4: a prison. We are imprisoned in this system of thinking,
Speaker 4: you know, and this is this is really dangerous questioning.
Speaker 4: It's a conspiracy against the state. Because since verreof in
Speaker 4: eighteen hundred and fifty eight state and this.
Speaker 2: Is very half I think that's also verco Ver.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's different people with Verca was in ninety fifty
Speaker 1: eight fifty two, and that was the free Mason that
Speaker 1: he was discussing in the video that I played for
Speaker 1: you last video where it's being dubed olver in English
Speaker 1: by Stephen Steve Falconer. He saw him in the Salmon colorture.
Speaker 1: In that video he was talking about I believe it
Speaker 1: was pronounced vehicle there.
Speaker 2: It's probably the same name in medicine.
Speaker 4: That science became one and crushing them is a conspiracy
Speaker 4: against the state. I can only recommend you to read
Speaker 4: the book of Irvin Chaka's Outlook Out of the thirteenth Floor.
Speaker 4: In this book you'll find the sentences that he said,
Speaker 4: when you are taking away imagination from the children, you
Speaker 4: are destroying the way base of humankind, hey man. And
Speaker 4: that's true. That's deep.
Speaker 2: There you go.
Speaker 1: There, and since we're here, yeah, Jesse Bliss, but there's
Speaker 1: also what does that mean?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: So I say, he says, the microbe is nothing, the
Speaker 1: terrain is everything. Okay, but what is the terrain? And
Speaker 1: what are we talking about when we talk about that?
Speaker 1: And that's where we get into the micro simus. So good,
Speaker 1: good segue Jesse Bliss and element just real quick, you
Speaker 1: saw this thing right here? We're we were here right,
Speaker 1: We're slowly approaching this guy right here with the smiley face.
Speaker 1: So we're at about fifteen fifty or something like that,
Speaker 1: I think now, So it's actually about four to fifty
Speaker 1: more to go, okay, and that's because I had to,
Speaker 1: you know, look at the current prices of these components,
Speaker 1: and they have gone up unfortunately from the last time
Speaker 1: I looked at it. So we're at a two K
Speaker 1: mark for the for the goal instead of the eighteen.
Speaker 2: Which isn't a whole lot more.
Speaker 1: But once we get there, I'm gonna start grabbing all
Speaker 1: the stuff and throw out the itemized list and show
Speaker 1: everybody what I've done and what I'm gonna.
Speaker 2: Be putting together.
Speaker 1: It's probably gonna be like a four hour process for me,
Speaker 1: maybe two hours or one hour for people who have
Speaker 1: done it before. But it's it's gonna be weird. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be an interesting little game. But here, if you
Speaker 1: look right here, click that. So fifteen thirty nine is
Speaker 1: the actual number, and bush Master wants again thank you,
Speaker 1: and this gives it and go dot com backslash Ballbusterers.
Speaker 1: That's for the computer drive fund, okay. And also if
Speaker 1: we go back to where we were, this is more
Speaker 1: and more important every moment I get into this information
Speaker 1: on bay Shomp and what he was trying to tell
Speaker 1: the world, trying to explain the world how to stop
Speaker 1: things that were happening, including the silkworm issue, what they
Speaker 1: were doing with these inoculations. He was dead set against
Speaker 1: what they were doing. And it's all about these microzyme
Speaker 1: and these granules, these units of life that are not
Speaker 1: there to harm. But if you change their environment, then
Speaker 1: they adapt to that. It's a new food source that
Speaker 1: comes around. Then they're doing they change themselves to adapt
Speaker 1: to that, and that could cause you problems. And so
Speaker 1: what do you do. You fortify with the ninety essentials.
Speaker 1: You keep yourself strong, and that's one of the biggest
Speaker 1: defenses you can have. You can keep your microzyma happy
Speaker 1: and you have more resistance, and that's where your train
Speaker 1: comes in. It's about those things that cause the fermentation
Speaker 1: in your body that is not essential for life. You
Speaker 1: don't want to give them a different food source because
Speaker 1: then they will have to adapt to that and they
Speaker 1: will have to also rid themselves with whatever toxins you're
Speaker 1: putting in there, and that can overtax them and it
Speaker 1: can change their nature. So this is doctor Gooden's site,
Speaker 1: and the code for fifty percent off is right here.
Speaker 1: Make it happen for yourself, and we will discuss more
Speaker 1: of how this ties in together with doctor Glidden. I've
Speaker 1: sent him the links to the books and I'm hoping
Speaker 1: that he has time to get to them at some point,
Speaker 1: and it's gonna be.
Speaker 2: It's gonna it tells.
Speaker 1: It explains the connection, It explains why these things work together,
Speaker 1: why the law of potentization works because you're you're at
Speaker 1: the marker's i'm a level with this stuff. And once
Speaker 1: you get that, and once you understand it and you
Speaker 1: see it for yourself, it all makes so much more sense.
Speaker 1: How the homeopathic remedies, you know, they say law is
Speaker 1: similars something similar.
Speaker 2: To the issue that you have right.
Speaker 1: With, causing the same symptoms, and a healthy person will
Speaker 1: correct somebody who is suffering those things, and you match
Speaker 1: it up with that homeopathic but you do it at
Speaker 1: the law potentization level of the smallest amount, because too
Speaker 1: much will harm the person too. And it starts to
Speaker 1: all make sense when you understand that what you're addressing,
Speaker 1: what you're communicating with, are these microzimas. So starting on page. Well,
Speaker 1: let's see, there's a there's a point by point here
Speaker 1: I might go through.
Speaker 2: That's not the right one.
Speaker 1: There's so much to be said here, and there's so
Speaker 1: much to look at, I mean there we can tackle
Speaker 1: this from so many different directions. But what's essentialist to understand?
Speaker 1: So let's go ahead and look at from page three
Speaker 1: O eight and this phajosytosis, which I think is what
Speaker 1: doctor Wonka kind of stumbles on. And this is kind
Speaker 1: of I don't think is accurate because I don't think
Speaker 1: he's aware of the the micros. I'm a element to
Speaker 1: all this. Hopefully this one will kick me from not
Speaker 1: having to Hopefully you can see that. Hopefully I'm in
Speaker 1: the right spot. I'm not where you go, all right,
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna start with this. We're gonna jump around
Speaker 1: a little bit out on this. But this is bi
Speaker 1: shomp or Pastor originally written by Ethel Hume, and it
Speaker 1: was rewritten with more what do you call it, modernized language.
Speaker 2: But originally this.
Speaker 1: Was in the thirties, I want to say, and then
Speaker 1: it was they kind of took two books and put
Speaker 1: them together here and the other one came out in
Speaker 1: nineteen forty two. But this came after the fact, because
Speaker 1: the author of this particular rendition of it talks about
Speaker 1: post war so it's it doesn't go too far into
Speaker 1: history after the World War two, but it does talk
Speaker 1: about after the war, and you'll see the ell this,
Speaker 1: this barrage of medical stupidity really started to take hold
Speaker 1: after World War two.
Speaker 2: And there's a reason behind that too.
Speaker 1: But with all right, so it says, without phaso sites,
Speaker 1: what would become of the whole doctrine of invasion and
Speaker 1: resistance and all the other popular theories. One likely reason
Speaker 1: for the popularity of the German of disease has been
Speaker 1: the explanation that has been supposed to provide for the
Speaker 1: problem of infection. It is so easy to conjure up
Speaker 1: arrays of malignant micros passing from one disease subject to another.
Speaker 1: Such an idea has become prevalent even among men of science.
Speaker 1: For instance, we find that before the Royal Commission on vivissection,
Speaker 1: that's an awful, horrible thing they do to animals. Doctor C. J.
Speaker 1: Martin of the Lister Institute. Yeah Lister, by the way,
Speaker 1: Lister listenine because he went with Pasteur's idea. His misunderstanding
Speaker 1: of concepts. He ignored bey shamp saying, you don't need
Speaker 1: high amounts because it's dangerous. He killed a bunch of
Speaker 1: his patients and they would die of the effects of
Speaker 1: this concoction that was supposed to be sanitizing right from
Speaker 1: mercury poisoning and some other potent substance. Days or weeks
Speaker 1: later after the surgery and the joke became the operation
Speaker 1: was a success, but the patient died of Listener Institute
Speaker 1: is reported to have stated because Pasteor said, he didn't
Speaker 1: sink any any reason behind you know why why such
Speaker 1: a small dose?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: And this is the whole thing behind the idea of
Speaker 1: homeopathy too, with they when they were discovering that these
Speaker 1: these elements have to be in the more diluted content
Speaker 1: otherwise they're they're harmful.
Speaker 2: Reporteds say that his meaning.
Speaker 1: Pasteur's experience on the subject of fermentation led him to
Speaker 1: a great generalization that infectious disease might themselves be interpreted
Speaker 1: as particular fermentations and as due to a specific micro
Speaker 1: or due to specific microorganisms. By a series of masterly
Speaker 1: experiments on it animals, he established the truth of his
Speaker 1: hypothesis in the case of anthrax, chicken colera, and swine erycipilious.
Speaker 1: These results of a pastor may be regarded as the
Speaker 1: foundation of the whole modern study of contagious diseases and
Speaker 1: both man and animals. This is obviously wrong, and their
Speaker 1: extension by Pastewer and his pupils and the bacteriologists and
Speaker 1: pathologists all over the civilized world has led to the
Speaker 1: discovery of the causes of most of the infectious diseases
Speaker 1: to which man is liable. Nope, we have already compared
Speaker 1: bishop and pastors work on fermentation, and in regards to
Speaker 1: pasteurs masterly experiments on animals, we have seen something of
Speaker 1: the truth of his hypothesis in the case, for instance,
Speaker 1: of anthrax. Finally, in respect of most infectious diseases such
Speaker 1: as scarlet fever, measles, and smallpox, those specific microorganisms are
Speaker 1: found in association, though that does not stop pastures followers
Speaker 1: from claiming that they are there all the same, but
Speaker 1: our ultra microscopic, even if this is hardly in accord
Speaker 1: with of the cautiousness addicated by a pasture. As Professor
Speaker 1: Bechamp once said, if virulent germs were normal in the atmosphere,
Speaker 1: how numerous would be the occasions for their penetration independently
Speaker 1: by way of the lungs and intestinal mucus would be
Speaker 1: There would not be a wound, however, slight the prick
Speaker 1: even of a pen that would not be the occasion
Speaker 1: for infecting us with smallpox, typhus, syphilis, or gon rhea.
Speaker 1: In regard to this, we will quote a passage from
Speaker 1: mister Alexander Paul's summary of the preface of the Theory
Speaker 1: de Marcresama. Mister Paul writes.
Speaker 2: M.
Speaker 1: Bechamp's Bechamp argues that if the simple or evolved microzyma,
Speaker 1: which may be found in certain humors of the body,
Speaker 1: came from the air and penetrated so easily the cells
Speaker 1: of the human body, there is one humor in ceciless
Speaker 1: contact of the air we breathe, which in which we
Speaker 1: should find them always the same in all animals.
Speaker 2: This is the saliva of the mouth.
Speaker 1: It is found, however, that the properties of human saliva
Speaker 1: and that of animals are different, and Beichamp says that
Speaker 1: the epithelial cells, the microzymes, and the bacterial of the
Speaker 1: thought of the tongue of man may have certain chemical
Speaker 1: action unique to themselves and altogether different from those of
Speaker 1: the tongue of a cow, the pig, the horse, or
Speaker 1: the dog. Now, if the germs of the air do
Speaker 1: not operate to modify the function of a humor which
Speaker 1: is so unceasingly, so largely, and so direct in contact
Speaker 1: with the common air, it is difficult to understand how
Speaker 1: they operate to modify the functions of the inner tissues
Speaker 1: and humors, protected as they are by so many barriers.
Speaker 1: Were it not that the art of thinking is so
Speaker 1: rarely practiced, reflections such as these should have established long
Speaker 1: ago something to be at fault with the Pastorian notion
Speaker 1: of the germ theory. And even in cases where the
Speaker 1: germ hunters seems sure of his microbe in a little while,
Speaker 1: dire confusion is apt to overtake his certainty. Never, for instance,
Speaker 1: did there seem to be a better bolstered case than
Speaker 1: Sir David Bruce's arraignment of the mucosis sorry micro microcosis
Speaker 1: miltinsis mil tennis.
Speaker 2: I don't know in.
Speaker 1: Goat's milk as the cause of malta fever. Yet, when
Speaker 1: doctor Walter r. Had When of Gloucester took up the defense.
Speaker 1: He proved the supposed offending germs to be innocent. After all,
Speaker 1: the decline of the fever in the navy was found
Speaker 1: to have had nothing to do with abstinence from goat's milk,
Speaker 1: but to have been gradual and to have coincided with
Speaker 1: the dredging of the harbor at Malta. Neither was the
Speaker 1: sudden drop in the army disease right to be accounted
Speaker 1: for by avoidance of milk, for it had already taken
Speaker 1: place before that beverage was banned when the troops were
Speaker 1: mostly removed from the insanitary Saint Almo Barracks to new quarters.
Speaker 2: At high altitude higher altitude.
Speaker 1: To these measures, the improvement in our sailors and soldier's
Speaker 1: health was clearly traced by doctor Hadwin's investigations, and the
Speaker 1: main effect of microcas Micrococcus milititus was to gain a
Speaker 1: knighthood for its false accuser, while incidentally it occasioned a
Speaker 1: great deal of discontent among the Maltese population connected with
Speaker 1: the milk industry.
Speaker 2: This is why we have raw milk or don't have
Speaker 2: raw milk.
Speaker 1: I mean doctor Agui of Malta, who had at the
Speaker 1: time went into the matter very thoroughly found that bad
Speaker 1: sanitation was invariably the cause of the outbreaks of fever
Speaker 1: and private houses which were sometimes the quarters of British officers.
Speaker 1: On one occasion, it was only after a floor had
Speaker 1: been taken up that the real cause of the trouble
Speaker 1: was discovered, probably mold. Yet upon a theory so constantly
Speaker 1: at fault with the thoroughly examined. When thoroughly examined, there
Speaker 1: has been erected an entire system of inoculation. Or perhaps
Speaker 1: the facts may be stated conversely, had it not been
Speaker 1: for the sale of sierra and vaccines nowadays grown to
Speaker 1: such vast proportions, Pastor's germ theory of disease might before
Speaker 1: this have collapsed into well deserved obscurity.
Speaker 2: But there was involved, right money.
Speaker 1: It can hardly be denied that he committed an offense
Speaker 1: and dragging medical science down to a commercial level. Moreover,
Speaker 1: he has besmirched the name of science by associating it
Speaker 1: with cruelty. In this also, he was merely an imitator.
Speaker 1: He was the friend of men like Claude Bernard, who,
Speaker 1: in the words of Professor Metchenkov, feel no scruples in
Speaker 1: opening bodies and submitting the animals to the most cruel sufferings. Hey,
Speaker 1: that makes me think of the fleas that are evil.
Speaker 1: Evil doctor Fauci had terrorizing and eating up the faces
Speaker 1: of dogs. Did you ever see that experiment? What was
Speaker 1: the point of that? They had them so that they
Speaker 1: couldn't bark, laying on their basically, uh, you know.
Speaker 2: Whatever.
Speaker 1: They were just laying there being by bugs, drugged up
Speaker 1: so they didn't do too much resisting, and they just
Speaker 1: had these things boxes over their heads with all these
Speaker 1: insects eating their faces apart. That was Fauci, but atrocious
Speaker 1: as is their torment. Victims of the knife were are, were,
Speaker 1: and are few in number compared with the millions of
Speaker 1: animals that suffer in pathological laboratories sometimes undergoing tests. As
Speaker 1: fantastic and misleading as they are, as as they are cruel,
Speaker 1: they can never furnish real evidence of disease under natural conditions.
Speaker 1: As examples might be mentioned birds and rats kept in
Speaker 1: cramped cages slowly devoured by fleas. Hey, this is all
Speaker 1: I was just talking about, kind of so that some
Speaker 1: scientists can deduce whether the fleas canvey sleeping sickness without
Speaker 1: regard to the fact that the inevitable bad health of
Speaker 1: creatures thus tormented cannot with certainty guarantee anything other than
Speaker 1: the callousness of their tormentors. Or again, the test of milk,
Speaker 1: by its injection into guinea pigs which kept in covered tins,
Speaker 1: would by the mere fact of such unhealthy captivity, be
Speaker 1: made liable to tuberculosis. Yeah, tuberculosis is a term, right.
Speaker 1: This is a condition of the body from within that
Speaker 1: is causing this. And that's why they say that advanced
Speaker 1: age is a lot like tuberculosis. It's because your body
Speaker 1: does a certain thing in a certain way. That's oh,
Speaker 1: flu like symptoms. Well, when you're sick, it does certain
Speaker 1: things in a certain way. There's not a whole lot
Speaker 1: of very variety there, right, Yeah, for this, And then
Speaker 1: they say, oh, see, these are the symptoms of blah
Speaker 1: blah blah that we just made up, so therefore it
Speaker 1: must be virus because we said so.
Speaker 2: It's all self deception every step of the way.
Speaker 1: You know, when somebody dies, we didn't get there on time,
Speaker 1: or it mutated, not because the actual injection killed them,
Speaker 1: of course, not, or the therapy. Yeah, for this, the
Speaker 1: rape pairer dips into his pocket for all he can
Speaker 1: tell the milk. The milk he consumes may have come
Speaker 1: from a consumptive cow wading through a filthy farmyard, and
Speaker 1: milk by a diseased individual into a dirty Utensil hygienis
Speaker 1: in some part averts such conditions, leaving pasturians to torment
Speaker 1: their getting pegs. The amount of harm that has ensued
Speaker 1: from the diversion all of attention from real to false factors,
Speaker 1: and the causation of ill health is probable is probably
Speaker 1: incalculable an exam self deception. An example in this connection
Speaker 1: with regard to plague in India is the amount of
Speaker 1: time and money wasted over fleas and rats that might
Speaker 1: be expended upon the insanitary hut standing in filth, trod
Speaker 1: and soil, which doctor Charles Crichton, in a treatisey on
Speaker 1: the subject, has clearly shown to be breeding grounds for
Speaker 1: the pestilence. The return to the subject of milk. Admirers
Speaker 1: of Pastor may point in pride to the preservative method
Speaker 1: named after him, pasteurization, But even here the praise is
Speaker 1: so faint as to be damning. If we turn to
Speaker 1: the Journal of the Royal Society of Arts for September nineteenth,
Speaker 1: nineteen nineteen, we find an article entitled Problems of Food
Speaker 1: and our Economic Policy by Professor Henry E. Armstrong, where
Speaker 1: he here we are told that the great reformer of
Speaker 1: recent times has been the chemist Pasture. To extend the sorry,
Speaker 1: the extent to which he has influenced our doings is astounding.
Speaker 1: Professor Armstrong then shows how thanks to Pasture, wines were sterilized,
Speaker 1: and the Grand vin vineyard right, the result of a
Speaker 1: fortuitous concourse of organisms, became a great rarity. The quality
Speaker 1: of wine was reduced to a low general average, though
Speaker 1: of course much was saved from the sewer.
Speaker 2: Beer suffered a.
Speaker 1: Like fate, though on the whole the changes were much
Speaker 1: to the public advantage, of course they were, but the
Speaker 1: real harm was done when milk was tampered with. Dilution
Speaker 1: became a general practice, and the public suffered from occasional
Speaker 1: dishonest tradesmen. This is why this is such a good
Speaker 1: thing right, and was in some instances deprived of the
Speaker 1: advantages up till then derived from the dealing with the
Speaker 1: majority of purveyors who were honest. The blow was made
Speaker 1: all the heavier by the introduction of new engineering techniques
Speaker 1: for the separation of the cream. Then Pasture's teachings became
Speaker 1: operative once more, aided this time by Coke, another criminal
Speaker 1: who did the tuberculin and killed a bunch of people
Speaker 1: with that injection. Milk was not only diluted, but was
Speaker 1: also sterilized. Some lives may have been saved, but the
Speaker 1: step has undoubtedly been productive of untold misery. So let's
Speaker 1: hear that again. Some lives may have been saved, but
Speaker 1: the step has undoubtedly been productive of untold misery. Now,
Speaker 1: a few of us have long held on general grounds
Speaker 1: that the material product, the material produced as milk, is cannot.
Speaker 2: I don't know. I think that's a mistake.
Speaker 1: Let's just get rid of the is material produced as
Speaker 1: milk cannot be heated above blood heat without diminishing its
Speaker 1: dietary value. Recent observations show indeed that the anti scorbutic
Speaker 1: ad event, which is none to abundant a constituent, is affected,
Speaker 1: although apparently the fat siable anti rachitic and the water
Speaker 1: anti neurritic factors are not destroyed. But difficulties have been
Speaker 1: encountered in localities where the milk supply has been systematically sterilized,
Speaker 1: and it may well be that it suffers in quality
Speaker 1: in ways not yet elucidated. The inquiries thus far held
Speaker 1: into the effect of sterilizing are in no way satisfactory
Speaker 1: and are open to criticism on account of their incompleteness
Speaker 1: and unscientific character. The risks from typhoid and other similar
Speaker 1: infections are now slight, and the main object of sterilizing
Speaker 1: milk is to secure the destruction of the organism which
Speaker 1: isn't there, which is held to be responsible for tubercular disease.
Speaker 1: It's not proper thought process whatsoever, but it may well
Speaker 1: be in destroying someone or other mysterious that it may
Speaker 1: well be in destroying some one or other mysterious constituent
Speaker 1: of the adavant class. The food value is so lowered
Speaker 1: that effects are produced which render the systems especially sensitive
Speaker 1: to dubercular infections, so it could cause the same problem.
Speaker 1: Such infections seems always to be with us apart from milk. Moreover,
Speaker 1: when milk is sterilized, the lactic organism is destroyed and
Speaker 1: it becomes a particularly favorable nitas need us for the
Speaker 1: growth of future factive organisms is therefore a potent cause
Speaker 1: of infantile diarrhea, so causing more problems than the solved,
Speaker 1: and it's not really useful at all. Thus, the verdict
Speaker 1: of time and unbiased criticism continue to produce judgment on
Speaker 1: the works of pasture. But if the mere consumption of
Speaker 1: improvised food can be believed to be so injurious to
Speaker 1: the consumer, what must be the effect of the deluge
Speaker 1: of sarah and vaccines introduced directly into the bloodstream. In
Speaker 1: spite of the modern medical mania of for inoculations, a
Speaker 1: remarkable ignorance on the subject prevails among most among most,
Speaker 1: among those most ready to submit to inoculation. Let me
Speaker 1: just say that again, because I stumbled all over it.
Speaker 1: In spite of the modern medical menia for inoculations, a
Speaker 1: remarkable ignorance on the subject prevails among those most ready
Speaker 1: to submit to inoculation. Many cannot even distinguish between a
Speaker 1: serum and a vaccine serum. The colorless part of the
Speaker 1: blood is usually for use in inoculation, taken from the
Speaker 1: blood of a horse into which disease matters have previously
Speaker 1: been injected. The strength of the serum is generally tested
Speaker 1: upon guinea pigs, that is to say, by their recovery
Speaker 1: or death from the sickness created by its injection into
Speaker 1: their bodies. Animal suffering comes into play in disconnection from
Speaker 1: start to finish, while as regards to the human race,
Speaker 1: considering the danger of the introduction of the serum of
Speaker 1: one species into that of another, it is perhaps fortunate
Speaker 1: that serum therapy, although originally acclaimed as the panacea for
Speaker 1: all ills, has yielded in popularity to vaccine therapy. The latter,
Speaker 1: needless to say, has no connection with cows. Under pastor tutelage,
Speaker 1: precision in nomenclature was as much lost as precision in theories.
Speaker 1: The name vaccine is now applied to microorganisms and their
Speaker 1: surrounding medium attracted from a sick body, the organisms being
Speaker 1: left to multiply in a suitable nutritive substance known as
Speaker 1: a culture, afterwards being usually killed by heat and prepared
Speaker 1: in various ways according to the prevalent fashion. The nostrum
Speaker 1: is finally sold as a cure, or more often a preventative,
Speaker 1: against the disease which with which the microorganisms were originally associated,
Speaker 1: which is not what they do in the first place.
Speaker 1: We are here reminded of the homeopathic law of cure.
Speaker 1: Here we go that like cures like, though what a
Speaker 1: contrast is presented in Hannemann's scientific precision in allowing for
Speaker 1: individual idios idiosyncrasies, whereas he applied his drugs by way
Speaker 1: of Nature's laboratory, the stomach. The Pastorian system, on the contrary,
Speaker 1: introduces substances directly into the blood, regardless of Nature's precaution
Speaker 1: i e. The efficient coverings with which she has protected
Speaker 1: this life stream against all external intrusions. It is not
Speaker 1: natural to inject yourself with anything. And I've been saying
Speaker 1: that over and over and over and over. It has
Speaker 1: indeed become the fashion for humanity to consider itself wiser
Speaker 1: than choose which name you will Nature or Providence. We
Speaker 1: are well aware of the array of statistics with which
Speaker 1: when you get rid of God, when you get a creator,
Speaker 1: when you bring in the theory of evolution that happened
Speaker 1: in eighteen fifty eight ish eight fifty nine. I think
Speaker 1: the publication may have been.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: When you replace God with materialism, then you can outthink
Speaker 1: God because there isn't one anymore. So now it's up
Speaker 1: to man to solve all the problems, and this is
Speaker 1: how he does it through fraud, through arrogance. We are
Speaker 1: well aware of the array of statistics with which the
Speaker 1: pastorians confront the critics of the system of inoculation and reply,
Speaker 1: we would say that statistics are worthless to improving results
Speaker 1: without full investigation and thorough allowance for the specific conditions
Speaker 1: from which they are derived.
Speaker 2: You can't appeal to the.
Speaker 1: Expert because they are built off of faulty foundations and
Speaker 1: inaccurate bullshit on what do you call it?
Speaker 2: What's that word? Non controlled experiments?
Speaker 1: For instance, it is easy to parade a fall in
Speaker 1: the diph theoria of fatality rate since the introduction of antitoxin,
Speaker 1: Yet that fall does not confirm the merits of the
Speaker 1: serum if it is seemed merely to be the result
Speaker 1: of a case rate inflated by a batteriological as opposed
Speaker 1: to a clinical diagnosis and inclusion of as diphtheria of
Speaker 1: cases which in the past would have been considered to
Speaker 1: be merely sore throat, tonsilites, laryngitis, et cetera.
Speaker 2: The grouping of symptoms.
Speaker 1: So now they're going to say it's something else, because
Speaker 1: that when we just decided we've fixed, so now it's
Speaker 1: something else, or when you want it to be more dramatic,
Speaker 1: you say everything's covid right, because that scares people into
Speaker 1: getting the inoculation.
Speaker 2: They use it both ways.
Speaker 1: This altered diagnosis in itself prevents proper comparison between past
Speaker 1: and present case rates. But if with an inflated case
Speaker 1: rate there is an increase instead of a decrease in
Speaker 1: the death rate, such an increase is surely highly significant.
Speaker 1: For instance, if we find that for the fifteen years
Speaker 1: subsequent to the introduction of anti toxin, the number of
Speaker 1: deaths in England and Wales from diphtheria became twenty percent
Speaker 1: greater than they had been in for the fifteen years
Speaker 1: prior to the serum treatment. Yes, right, so why more
Speaker 1: people dying after they introduced it. Though the Metropolitan Asylum
Speaker 1: Boards report of cases may seem to show at first
Speaker 1: sight by a decreased death rate that advantaged a cruise
Speaker 1: from the use of the antiitoxin, their detailed particulars showed
Speaker 1: the opposite to be the case. Whereas for years eighteen
Speaker 1: ninety five to nineteen oh seven there were sixty two
Speaker 1: hundred and forty nine cases a dipteria treated with antiitoxin,
Speaker 1: of which eighty nine hundred and seventeen died, giving a
Speaker 1: fatality rate of fourteen percent. There were, for the same
Speaker 1: years eleven seven hundred and sixteen cases not treated with
Speaker 1: anti toxin, of which only seven hundred and three died
Speaker 1: versus eight nine and seventeen, giving the fatality rate of
Speaker 1: six percent. Footnotes to the tables show that for the
Speaker 1: late latter cases, fifty five were morban when they when admitted,
Speaker 1: and twelve died of diseases other than diphthereis so that
Speaker 1: the fatality rate should in reality be under six percent,
Speaker 1: and that's of the people who were non inoculated and none.
Speaker 1: You can take this and apply it to coal morbidities,
Speaker 1: right four or five co morbidities.
Speaker 2: But it was COVID that got them, surely it was.
Speaker 1: It is to be regretted that these cases treated with
Speaker 1: and without anti toxin are no longer listed separately in
Speaker 1: the Metropolitan Asylum Boards reports. So within RelA within without
Speaker 1: are no longer listed separately, so you can't compare them
Speaker 1: because they don't want you to see it. And since
Speaker 1: nineteen thirty the board itself has ceased to exist. From
Speaker 1: those cases that have been particularized, there seems to be
Speaker 1: no denying that improved methods of nursing in medical treatment,
Speaker 1: which should reduce deaths, accomplish this to a lesser degree
Speaker 1: when anti toxin is administered. The following table supplies proof
Speaker 1: of this view. With gard to the iffatile diseases, We're
Speaker 1: probably not going to look at this.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to do that.
Speaker 1: The claim for immediate injection and the advantage for first
Speaker 1: day inoculation as compared with second day and so forth
Speaker 1: may surely be dismissed for the following reasons. Before clinical
Speaker 1: symptoms are manifested, is impossible to tell whether the trouble
Speaker 1: would ever be serious, if indeed that the theory be genuine,
Speaker 1: And if, on the one hand, it is it be
Speaker 1: asserted that the prompt administration of anti toxin has prevented
Speaker 1: dangerous illness, it is easy to assert on the other
Speaker 1: that through anti tooxin, a mere mild sore throat has
Speaker 1: been aggravated into a severe sickness, sometimes complicated by heart
Speaker 1: trouble and paralysis.
Speaker 2: Well, that's wonderful.
Speaker 1: Got to have that anti toxin, because how else are
Speaker 1: you going to turn a sore throat into a severe
Speaker 1: sickness and paralysis. The one method of argument is no
Speaker 1: more inexact it's unscientific than the other. Also, one may
Speaker 1: ask why, if they antiitoxin is such a reliable remedy,
Speaker 1: should it have been found necessary to introduce the shick
Speaker 1: system of preliminary tests and subsequent immunization. The supposedly susceptible
Speaker 1: children should run small risk if provided with an infallible cure.
Speaker 1: If in an answer to this, it is argued that
Speaker 1: the immunization is for the prevention of diphtheria for all time,
Speaker 1: it may be retorted that statistics show no improvement upon
Speaker 1: natural immunity, while moreover, in many cases the preventative has
Speaker 1: proved far more dangerous than the disease. And this is
Speaker 1: I wanting you to see this history, because there hasn't
Speaker 1: ever been a successful inoculation vaccination scheme ever, never ever,
Speaker 1: It's always been in the opposite and then sold to
Speaker 1: us in the reverse or the inverted inversion of reality.
Speaker 1: It has never been a good practice, but it's the
Speaker 1: hell of a business model. Over and above these mass disasters,
Speaker 1: there are too many tragic cases of injury and death
Speaker 1: falling inoculation for space to be allotted to more than
Speaker 1: a few of them in this volume, and as a
Speaker 1: John Gordon Baker, aged seven, of Saxon Way Bassett died
Speaker 1: five days after his inoculation against Etheria. Dennis Hiller, age eleven,
Speaker 1: a healthy boy from London, excelled in games. He died
Speaker 1: two months after his second inoculation. William Martin Graham, aged
Speaker 1: four years of Baumann with Wigton, died in Birmingham Children
Speaker 1: Hospital two days after being inoculated with alum precipitated toxoid.
Speaker 1: Mary Jane Webb, Ernest Ayles, Joan Hudgson Hudgion, and many
Speaker 1: more swell the lists of young victims who might be alive,
Speaker 1: but for the Pastorian medical methods, neither has freedom from
Speaker 1: diptheria resulted as a reward for the grave risks taken.
Speaker 1: During the forty years nineteen forty one to forty four,
Speaker 1: the Ministry of Health and the Department of Health for
Speaker 1: Scotland reported almost twenty three thousand cases of they in
Speaker 1: immunized in in immunized children, of which more than one
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty prove fatal. With regard to the decline
Speaker 1: of dip theoria in Great Britain during forty three and
Speaker 1: forty four. We are reminded that fifty eight British physicians
Speaker 1: who signed a statement in nineteen thirty eight against compulsory
Speaker 1: immunization in Germany were able to point to the virtual
Speaker 1: disappearance of diph theoria in Sweden without any immunization. On
Speaker 1: the other hand, if we turn to Germany, we find
Speaker 1: that after doctor Frick's order in April nineteen forty for
Speaker 1: the compulsory mass immunization of children, this country in nineteen
Speaker 1: forty five have come to be regarded as the storm
Speaker 1: center of diphtheria in Europe. From some forty thousand cases
Speaker 1: there had been an increase to two hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: thousand cases. What was the difference mass immunization to two
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand. Because of this, an article in the
Speaker 1: March nineteen forty four edition of Publication put a femil
Speaker 1: documents the rise in cases of diphtheria after compulsory immunization.
Speaker 1: For instance, the increase in Paris was as much as
Speaker 1: thirty percent, and in Lyons the number of diphtheria cases
Speaker 1: rose from one hundred and sixty two to nineteen forty
Speaker 1: two to two hundred and thirty nine and nineteen forty three.
Speaker 1: In Hungary, where immunization has been compulsory since nineteen thirty eight,
Speaker 1: the rise in cases was thirty five percent in two
Speaker 1: years in the in the canton of Geneva. This is
Speaker 1: also a self fulfilling thing, too, right, because as the
Speaker 1: cases increase.
Speaker 2: We have an epidemic on our hands.
Speaker 1: Order more shots the things that's actually causing the problem
Speaker 1: in the first place, right, hurry, we need more shots.
Speaker 1: There's an outbreak. It's getting worse. Keep giving them the
Speaker 1: same thing that's causing it, more and more of it.
Speaker 2: Please. It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.
Speaker 1: It would make for a dark humor, right, if it
Speaker 1: wasn't children and us being murdered in the process. A
Speaker 1: startling tragedy of past and preventive methods was the murder
Speaker 1: of innocence at Lubec during the early summer of nineteen
Speaker 1: thirty from BCG or the camelet tuberculosis vaccine and a
Speaker 1: culture administered by mouth to newborn infants. So it's not
Speaker 1: so much better if you take the quarrel. The Health
Speaker 1: Department of the city made an emotional appeal to parents
Speaker 1: to allow immunization of their children. The Health Department told
Speaker 1: them to do it. They're supposed to be the experts, right.
Speaker 1: What happened where there whether likely to grow up in
Speaker 1: a tubercular environment.
Speaker 2: Or otherwise, whether you're even at risk.
Speaker 1: Of the two hundred fifty three babies subjected to the
Speaker 1: Camelt treatment, sixty nine died of it, and one hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty were made seriously ill. So basically all of them.
Speaker 1: Do your math on one hundred and thirty plus sixty nine.
Speaker 1: We're looking at over two hundred people children, and what
Speaker 1: was the difference between the other fifty or forty children
Speaker 1: that didn't get sick? They had a really good, strong
Speaker 1: microzyma environment in their body, and they had a plenty
Speaker 1: of proper nutrition. In view of such a calamity, it
Speaker 1: is not surprising that the Reich Health Office decided that
Speaker 1: such prophylactics were not to be recommended. And the Reich
Speaker 1: Health Console considers an extension and tightens and tightening up
Speaker 1: of the existing regulations for the production, issue and employment
Speaker 1: of vaccines of all kinds to be desirable. So they're
Speaker 1: going to tighten up the restriction and regulations on vaccines. Finally,
Speaker 1: we have to remember what wonderful statistics both have been
Speaker 1: demolished when genuine epidemics have made their appearance for some
Speaker 1: considerable time. One of the trump cards, so to speak,
Speaker 1: of the Research Defense Society was the anti meningitis theorem
Speaker 1: of doctor Flexner Oh Flexner Eh and doctor Jobbling of
Speaker 1: the Rockefeller Institute, New York. Remarkable statistics were produced without explanation.
Speaker 1: The serum, first tried in the spring of nineteen oh seven,
Speaker 1: was acclaimed as bringing about a complete revolution. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: the Marxist revolution killing people by a different means. I agree,
Speaker 1: I agree, it was a revolution. It wasn't a revolution
Speaker 1: at science. It was a revolution in killing people, just
Speaker 1: like most revolutions of the Marxist type are Communist Bolshevik style.
Speaker 2: Yeah what.
Speaker 1: Yet, what use was this wonderful cure or what a
Speaker 1: terrible outbreak of minted gitis in New York with a
Speaker 1: death told death role that says there of seven hundred
Speaker 1: and forty five for a single month of July nineteen
Speaker 1: sixteen transformed American capital into a city of mourning. Flexer's
Speaker 1: marvelous serrium was so useless, that we find it barely
Speaker 1: gated mentioned, and its discoverer confessed that there exists at
Speaker 1: present no specific or curative treatment. That's the guy with
Speaker 1: the shot that he's selling right. It transpired further that
Speaker 1: this complaint, known also as spotted fever, is at any rate,
Speaker 1: according to the bacteriological diagnosis fast losing its limitation to childhood.
Speaker 2: Outbreaks of it are.
Speaker 1: Said to have been frequent among young men in the
Speaker 1: military training camps. What do they get there? They get shots.
Speaker 1: It has followed so suspiciously in the wake of the
Speaker 1: anti typhoid and other inoculations, that instead of such measures
Speaker 1: having provided safeguards for health, it would seem far more
Speaker 1: probable that they can be directly implicated in causing sickness
Speaker 1: epidemic by shots. Give them a shot.
Speaker 2: Oh there's an epidemic again. Well, it looks like we
Speaker 2: need more shots.
Speaker 1: And now this brings us to a few lessons that
Speaker 1: we have that we may be able to derive from
Speaker 1: the inoculation experience that were practiced upon our fighting men
Speaker 1: during the course of two World Wars. It is constantly
Speaker 1: asserted that the comparative freedom from epidemic disease and armies.
Speaker 1: Of the armies fighting on the Western Front during World
Speaker 1: War One is demonstrated the value of preventative inoculations. We,
Speaker 1: on the contrary, believe that the study of the subject
Speaker 1: through such a conclusion to be based upon only superficial observation.
Speaker 1: It has to be remembered that every sanitary and hygienic
Speaker 1: precaution possible was attended to on the Western Front. And
Speaker 1: here we made pause to notice that World War One
Speaker 1: was not without accompanying up epidemics, providing an interesting illustration
Speaker 1: of the substitution theory of disease conditions to which we
Speaker 1: have already did. Throughout history, we find that plagues have
Speaker 1: followed in the wake of war with a systematic diminution
Speaker 1: in intensity according to the establishment of sanitary and hygienic
Speaker 1: conditions among the populations. So they start to get better
Speaker 1: once sanitation and hygiene are improved. Thus, the Black Death
Speaker 1: of the Middle Ages was in later times replaced by smallpox,
Speaker 1: which in our own day.
Speaker 2: Oh and what happened in.
Speaker 1: The Black Death was that a poisoning of wells with
Speaker 1: dead bodies and poisons.
Speaker 2: Yeah, probably who did that? Small hats? Yeah?
Speaker 1: In later times replaced by smallpox, which in our own
Speaker 1: day has found its substitute and mysterious outbreaks of influenza.
Speaker 1: In reference to World War One, we read as follow
Speaker 1: as the war ended with the outbreak of influenza epidemic
Speaker 1: of nineteen eighteen nineteen, such as that of eighteen seventy
Speaker 1: seventy one ended with a pandemic of smallpox, an epidemic which,
Speaker 1: without including South America, China, Japan, and the Great tracts
Speaker 1: of Asia and Africa, is estimated to have claimed eight
Speaker 1: million lives. Thus, it can be suggested that the war
Speaker 1: involved the inevitable aftermath of disease, whose far reaching ravages
Speaker 1: may perhaps be explained by the distribution of campaigns in
Speaker 1: widely diversified areas. To return to this subject of inoculation,
Speaker 1: its success as a preventative of disease can only be
Speaker 1: tested under conditions where sanitary and hygienic measures fail, and
Speaker 1: as wherever these were wanting, whether in East Africa, Galipoli,
Speaker 1: Palestine or Mesoptamia, disease conditions ran riot. We confess that
Speaker 1: we failed to see where the success of inoculations has
Speaker 1: been demonstrated. Nevertheless, the press is inundated with medical arguments
Speaker 1: such as the falling statement by Lieutenant Colonel S. Copeman,
Speaker 1: officer in charge of the Ram College, which appeared in
Speaker 1: The Times for the fifteenth of February nineteen seventeen as
Speaker 1: the typhoid fever, contrasting admissions to hospitals and deaths of
Speaker 1: the South African Campaign and in France. For the first
Speaker 1: two years of the war, there had been a marvelous
Speaker 1: effect of prophylactic inoculation in the prevention of attack and
Speaker 1: to an even greater extent, in the saving of life.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is called marketing.
Speaker 1: A similar result had followed the later introduction of inoculation
Speaker 1: in the French army, which suffered heavily from typhoid fever
Speaker 1: in the early muscle of the war. No better criticism
Speaker 1: of the above can be found than that of mister E.
Speaker 1: McCormick in the Vaccination Inquirer for March of nineteen seventeen.
Speaker 1: The implication here is that conditions during the South African
Speaker 1: and European Wars were similar apart from the time at
Speaker 1: which inoculation was introduced during the campaigns Now nobody denies
Speaker 1: that sanitary conditions are a governing factor, or at least
Speaker 1: an important one in the prevalence of typhoid. It is
Speaker 1: well known that sanitary conditions were deplorable in South Africa,
Speaker 1: whereas in France they have been in Sir Frederick's Tree's
Speaker 1: words without parallel and in the history of the war.
Speaker 2: What are we to think.
Speaker 1: Of medical logic which, in special into special pleading for inoculation,
Speaker 1: continues to ignore this vital factor when we remember further
Speaker 1: that the two campaigns are not even fully differentiated in
Speaker 1: respect to inoculation, but that four hundred thousand doses of
Speaker 1: Sir l Ross's writes Poison so Sir Elmoth Writes Poison,
Speaker 1: were sent to South Africa for the army, and that
Speaker 1: in the first part of the campaign in France inoculation
Speaker 1: was hardly practiced at all amongst British troops. The grotesque
Speaker 1: inadequacy of Lieutenant Colonel Copeman's line of argument is apparent
Speaker 1: and directly deliberately misleading. Right that his accuracy on points
Speaker 1: of fact is on par with it with his logic
Speaker 1: is demonstrated by his suggestion that the introduction of inoculation
Speaker 1: was later in the French army than in ours, whereas
Speaker 1: the fact is that it was not only introduced earlier,
Speaker 1: but was made compulsory by law in nineteen thirteen, whereas
Speaker 1: ours is still nominally optional. The admission that the French
Speaker 1: army suffered heavily from typhoid in their early months of
Speaker 1: the war is therefore worth noting. The shots made them sick,
Speaker 1: as they always do. Where can it's anything that's an
Speaker 1: epidemic is an epidemic of needles. That's the epidemic, pandemic,
Speaker 1: pandemic and needles. Where we can make something of a
Speaker 1: comparison is in the respect to the Japanese troops who
Speaker 1: in the Russo Japanese War, which was also speared and
Speaker 1: poked and product along by who Jacob Schiff Yes, inaugurated
Speaker 1: the sanitary and hygienic measures that have since been followed
Speaker 1: in the European War, where they were rigorously carried out
Speaker 1: on the Western Front. As regards inoculation, the conditions that
Speaker 1: are diametrically of opposite, Yes, At the time of the
Speaker 1: Russo Japanese War, it was stated that no prophylactic inoculations
Speaker 1: are being practiced in the army. With regard to energetic fever,
Speaker 1: Professor Kitasato has advised them but the army medical authorities
Speaker 1: refuse to allow them until they are better satisfied as
Speaker 1: to the results of rights prophylactic treatment. Smart Yet, among
Speaker 1: those inoculated troops, the cases of energetic oh sorry, the
Speaker 1: cases of enteric numbered only one six of those that
Speaker 1: occurred among the partly inoculated British troops of the Boer War.
Speaker 1: The Japanese cases were almost entirely in the First Army,
Speaker 1: in which sanitary and hygienic regulations were less adhere to,
Speaker 1: whereas in the Second and Third Armies enteric was almost eliminated.
Speaker 1: Although these armies were uninoculated, these Japanese experienced. This Japanese
Speaker 1: experience surely supports the argument that sanitary and hygienic precautious
Speaker 1: not inoculation, with the cause of the good health rate
Speaker 1: of the Western Front. Foremost among safeguards for the health
Speaker 1: of the troops was undoubtedly the care exercised in regard
Speaker 1: to the water supply on occasion houses in the outskirts
Speaker 1: of Lily and along the men in Road, German notices
Speaker 1: still remain to indicate where good drinking water may be obtained.
Speaker 1: Such was the Teutonic attention to details The history of
Speaker 1: water purification for our own troops has been described by
Speaker 1: Captain J. Stanley Arthur in a paper read before the
Speaker 1: Institution of Medical Engineers on November nineteenth, nineteen twenty and
Speaker 1: published in The Engineer of November twenty sixth and December third,
Speaker 1: nineteen twenty. Here we are told how bleaching powder or
Speaker 1: chloride of the line was first used to sterilize drinking
Speaker 1: water in eighteen ninety seven at Maidstone, where an epidemic
Speaker 1: of typhoid was raging. Its use was attended with very
Speaker 1: successful results, typhoid being rapidly stamped out. Further note Further
Speaker 1: we read that chlorine in the gaseous condition, although used
Speaker 1: in America to a small extent for some time, has
Speaker 1: only come to come into general use during the last
Speaker 1: few years. The amount of chlorine, either as a gas
Speaker 1: or from bleaching powder, required to sterilize water is quite small.
Speaker 1: At the outbreak of the war, the only method of
Speaker 1: water purification other than that involving the use of tablets
Speaker 1: of acid sodium sulfate that could be carried out in
Speaker 1: the field was embodied in the water cart. We move
Speaker 1: ahead a little bit, we get the idea clean water's good, right,
Speaker 1: thirty shirts in this one. There should be twenty four
Speaker 1: points about the micro sign. If it's not done this
Speaker 1: the other.
Speaker 2: Book, I got to pull it up.
Speaker 1: It might be in the other book. It's not a
Speaker 1: bean bag, isn't the other book? Huh No, it wouldn't
Speaker 1: be in the other book. It would be in this one.
Speaker 2: The running on the wall.
Speaker 1: All right, let's see, I want to hear from pastor
Speaker 1: from a bay shops bey Sean for long ago. All
Speaker 1: is danger in this kind of experimentation for the reason
Speaker 1: that is not anything inert that is acted upon, but
Speaker 1: that there is a modification more or less injurious of
Speaker 1: the microzymas of the inoculated.
Speaker 2: So read that again.
Speaker 1: All is danger every shot anything you inject past your
Speaker 1: gut in your natural defenses. As I've been saying one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand times already, all is danger in this kind
Speaker 1: of experimentation, which is what it is if you inject
Speaker 1: something into yourself and have somebody else inject something into
Speaker 1: you and say.
Speaker 2: Let's see what happens.
Speaker 1: For the reason that it is not anything inert that
Speaker 1: is acted upon, but that there is a modification more
Speaker 1: or less injurious of the microzymas of the inoculated. Many
Speaker 1: years after this statement, a remarkable confirmation has been provided
Speaker 1: by outbreaks of a disease of the central nervous system
Speaker 1: commonly known as encephalitis, the spelling and inflammation of the
Speaker 1: brain right and which has us, which has so often
Speaker 1: followed vaccination that compulsory vaccination was suspended in Holland and
Speaker 1: its abolition suggested by a medical congress in Sweden, while
Speaker 1: even in Germany its dangerous possibilities have been officially recognized.
Speaker 1: The cases of post vaccination encephalitis and England resulted in
Speaker 1: the appointment of two committees of investigation, whose reports, published
Speaker 1: July nineteen twenty eight, dealt with ninety cases, fifty two
Speaker 1: of which ended in death. In answer to a question
Speaker 1: in Parliament on February twenty sixth, nineteen thirty two, the
Speaker 1: Minister of Health gave as the latest figures one hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety seven cases with one hundred two deaths. As
Speaker 1: a consequence of this serious development, the Ministry of Health
Speaker 1: in August nineteen twenty nine issued a new vaccination order,
Speaker 1: reducing the vaccination marks from four to one and in
Speaker 1: accompanying circular referring to as this danger, suggested that it
Speaker 1: was inexpedient to vaccinate for the first time adolescents or
Speaker 1: children of school age.
Speaker 2: Controversy what the you know what I mean?
Speaker 1: Controversy continues as to the cause of the malady, Professor
Speaker 1: James McIntosh of London University and of Middlesex Hospital attributing
Speaker 1: it to the actual vaccine, while other investigators consider that
Speaker 1: the vaccine simply arouses some of the existent but hitherto
Speaker 1: that late in trouble, of course, Oh, it's just agitating
Speaker 1: something that's already wrong with you. It's not the shot itself.
Speaker 1: It's something that's wrong with you, because it's your fault.
Speaker 1: What a bunch of assholes during the because that's and
Speaker 1: they go, well, not everybody died, well, not everybody had
Speaker 1: a weakened and compromised system before they got the shot.
Speaker 1: During the very period in which sanitation and hygiene have
Speaker 1: played a part unknown before and recorded history, a disappointing
Speaker 1: deterioration seems discernible in the human physique, the phenomenon of
Speaker 1: crowding into cities, the strain of wear and tear of
Speaker 1: modern existence, and the breeding of the unfits and the
Speaker 1: breeding of the hey they said it are no doubt
Speaker 1: contributing causes, and we must include with these the introduction
Speaker 1: into bodies of poisons who these far reaching effects are
Speaker 1: entirely beyond knowledge and control.
Speaker 2: On the face of it, how.
Speaker 1: Futile is it to attempt to safeguard the individual against
Speaker 1: disease like smallpox, which can only be eliminated in the
Speaker 1: general population by wholesome, wholesale cleanliness, while gruesome dangers such
Speaker 1: as cancer are a hideous warning against playing with unknown
Speaker 1: quantities talking about the shots cancer causing it right being
Speaker 1: caused by it. We do not attempt to theorize upon
Speaker 1: the cause of malignant grows, but we can certainly point
Speaker 1: to their alarming increase since they've been shooting people up
Speaker 1: with crap. According to the statement put forward by the
Speaker 1: Cancer Research Fund, one man in twelve and one man
Speaker 1: in eight, this is old, old, old figures. There's everybody's
Speaker 1: getting cancer, you know, all right, zibzeps you on that.
Speaker 1: I want to get to the twenty four points and
Speaker 1: if it's not at the end here, then I have
Speaker 1: to look for it some more. Okay, So here is
Speaker 1: doctor Bessudka of the pastor institute. Now this is the
Speaker 1: pastor institute. So this is important, which is which the
Speaker 1: British Medical Journal as described as subversive of the ideas
Speaker 1: hitherto held by the bacteriologists. That are saying that he's
Speaker 1: subversive to the ideas held by the bacteriologists. The Times
Speaker 1: of the twenty eighth of August, which is my birthday
Speaker 1: nineteen twenty sands up best Redkah's teaching.
Speaker 2: As followers, Here.
Speaker 1: Then, was the idea that immunity or protection against dysentery
Speaker 1: is not an affair of the blood at all, but
Speaker 1: an affair of those special parts of the body in
Speaker 1: which the dysentery germs live and act. In short, that
Speaker 1: salvation is not by atidue, but by some local effect.
Speaker 1: The intestinal barrier becomes unbreakable. Whatever the nature of the
Speaker 1: barrier may be, This, it will be seen, is a
Speaker 1: concept as a conception of an absolutely different kind from
Speaker 1: that to which we are accustomed. The one result for
Speaker 1: the work applies also to typhoid fever, is that vaccination
Speaker 1: as now practice is unnecessary.
Speaker 2: And that's why they're like, oh, he's the battie.
Speaker 1: Thus overboard goes the whole pastoring and theory of immunity
Speaker 1: and with the system of inoculation. For according to doctor
Speaker 1: bez Redka, vaccination is only efficacious when the vaccine finally
Speaker 1: reaches the intestine or certain zones of it. The mode
Speaker 1: of vaccination to be preferred is the oral route.
Speaker 2: Not shots.
Speaker 1: At times of he says, the results turn attention positively
Speaker 1: from the seed of the soil, from germs to the
Speaker 1: men and animals who harbor them, and in so doing
Speaker 1: the advice is followed that was given so long ago.
Speaker 2: By Professor Bayshop.
Speaker 1: So much of the stufflings of those who have based
Speaker 1: their work on the teachings of Lee Passteur, and we
Speaker 1: cannot but sympathize with the innocent among the public, who
Speaker 1: blindly submit their bodies to the shifting fashions of Pastorian treatment.
Speaker 1: The victimization of animals has brought about its logical sequence,
Speaker 1: the victimization of human beings.
Speaker 2: For this we have to thank.
Speaker 1: The imitator of Edward Jenner, the chemistry pastor, who by
Speaker 1: a majority vote of one gained his place among the
Speaker 1: free Associates of the Academy of Medicine. He won by
Speaker 1: he got in by one vote. That's how many people
Speaker 1: post him. Thus has the most jealous trade union in
Speaker 1: the world, that of Orthodox medicine. The religion of medicine
Speaker 1: been completely brought under this way of a fraud.
Speaker 2: In Charlatan.
Speaker 1: Conclusion on the Autun Day, nineteen eighteen ninety five. Okay,
Speaker 1: they're talking about all the things that they say that
Speaker 1: he's done so well. He has not, and that's they're
Speaker 1: comparing it today, Shaan. But the twenty four steps I
Speaker 1: gotta find is not here. This is the end of
Speaker 1: the book, so I gotta go figure out where I
Speaker 1: saw it.
Speaker 2: It's not there. Poop, all right.
Speaker 1: Yesterday we were reading from the front of the book.
Speaker 1: There's so much in here. I mean, it's hard to
Speaker 1: I don't have this book that in my hand to
Speaker 1: tab it, so it kind of sucks. And as I'm
Speaker 1: on the elliptical and reading it, it's.
Speaker 2: Like, what am I gonna do? Stop?
Speaker 1: And what I'm I gonna do after that? You know,
Speaker 1: grab a pen and paper. My sweaty palms, sweaty dripping
Speaker 1: all of my It doesn't make any sense to try
Speaker 1: to footnote this stuff. But we can get into the
Speaker 1: there's so many there's so many different varieties of approach
Speaker 1: here and tomorrow, what we're gonna do is we're gonna
Speaker 1: look at the case studies and where bis Shomp talks
Speaker 1: more about this micro's IIMA because let me just type
Speaker 1: that in real quick.
Speaker 2: Let me see. Oh all right, all right, I'll have
Speaker 2: to try it differently. Let's see. Come on, uh.
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, I'm pulling up the other book to see
Speaker 1: if it's in here. He wrote this book, but if
Speaker 1: somebody else kind of like redid it, so maybe that's
Speaker 1: where I saw the twenty four points at the end.
Speaker 2: I was reading two books at the same time, so well, shit,
Speaker 2: it's because you're not looking at it. This thing's still
Speaker 2: trying to find its ass though, so hold there you go.
Speaker 2: You're not gonna take me to it. I think's supposed
Speaker 2: to navigate with the Wow. Okay, well I'm getting technical
Speaker 2: difficulties on that end, so that's not gonna help, all right,
Speaker 2: So well let me just go ahead and do this.
Speaker 2: Then what the hell are you doing right?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 1: Because the word microsigma isn't this book at all, So
Speaker 1: this control find is bullshit. All right, that's great, that's
Speaker 1: even more fun. Yeah, good times. We've already been on
Speaker 1: for two hours anyway, and I'm kind of done talking, so.
Speaker 2: Let's just go through it again. Yeah, Elon is monkey.
Speaker 1: Neuro links too, exactly. So we're going to get into
Speaker 1: more of the actual micros. I have a thing tomorrow
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna have to just do some work on that.
Speaker 1: But we're seeing right now the dangers of this stupid
Speaker 1: idea of going bypassing your natural defenses and injecting something
Speaker 1: directly into you where there's no way to filter out
Speaker 1: poisons of any sort, the dumbest thing, and Bechamp says
Speaker 1: this over and over again, how against all of this
Speaker 1: he is, and so many times was he ignored when
Speaker 1: he was giving great advice of how to get rid
Speaker 1: of parasitic infections and how not to kill the plant
Speaker 1: in the process when they're talking about the grape, because
Speaker 1: there are micros imas that are that are that are
Speaker 1: that are helpful nine nine percent of time. But if
Speaker 1: you change their environment within your body, then they have
Speaker 1: something new to eat and they have to change themselves.
Speaker 2: They have to. They will create the bacteria.
Speaker 1: They will also reduce back to the microzymic granule when
Speaker 1: that when the conditions improve and the bacteria isn't bad either.
Speaker 1: It's just the thing that they will produce to make
Speaker 1: whatever food source is available that they permit. Animal seriotology
Speaker 1: and anthrax that was another blunder by a pasture.
Speaker 2: This this goes on and on like it's it is
Speaker 2: what it is.
Speaker 1: This is a really important book though, so the results
Speaker 1: clear demonstrated varying effects of different salts upon the medium,
Speaker 1: which Beichhamp himself has pointed out in the second paper
Speaker 1: of Late Microzymas. And I gotta find that it might
Speaker 1: all be in French though that might be the problem,
Speaker 1: and I don't I'm not that good in French. So
Speaker 1: a lot of this, some of this is like jar again,
Speaker 1: like when I was reading his actual The Blood and
Speaker 1: its third anatomical Element. A lot of it is experimental
Speaker 1: and a lot of people won't be able to follow it.
Speaker 1: So getting to the actual end result conclusion as to
Speaker 1: what he's talking about is something that you have to
Speaker 1: fill throughout and if you have to read it more
Speaker 1: than once or whatever. But Bechamp tells us in the
Speaker 1: preface to The Blood that these different observations impressed them
Speaker 1: in the same way as the swing of the cathedral
Speaker 1: Lamp had impressed Galley Lao in the sixteenth century. At
Speaker 1: the time, it was commonly believed that fermentation could not
Speaker 1: take place except in the presence of albuminoid matter. We
Speaker 1: have already seen that Pasture operated with yeast broth, a
Speaker 1: complex albuminoid solution, and the media prepared by Benchamp. There
Speaker 1: were only, on the contrary, no albuminoid substances. He had
Speaker 1: operated with carefully distilled water and pure cane sugar, which,
Speaker 1: so he tells us, when heated with fresh slake slime,
Speaker 1: did not disengage ammonia. Yet molds, obviously living organisms and
Speaker 1: thus necessarily containing albuminate matter, had appear in his chemical
Speaker 1: solutions where they come from. He was all struck by
Speaker 1: his discovery, his intellect already affording him hints of all
Speaker 1: it portended. Had he been paste or the country would
Speaker 1: have rung with the news of it, he would have
Speaker 1: described the facts by a letter to all the acquaintances.
Speaker 1: Instead being bise Schamp without a thought of self, without
Speaker 1: being selfish. His only anxiety was to start new experiments
Speaker 1: and consider fresh revelations. He didn't want to come forward
Speaker 1: with it until he knew for sure that he didn't
Speaker 1: make a mistake. He recorded his results of these observations
Speaker 1: of the memoir, which he's sent up to immediately in
Speaker 1: December eighteen fifty seven, to the Academy of Science, which
Speaker 1: published an extract of it among its reports of the
Speaker 1: fourth January eighteen fifty eight. So again, all these a
Speaker 1: lot of these things that Pastor took portions of and
Speaker 1: plagiarized the hell out of them and never gave any
Speaker 1: credit to bay Shomp And the only thing that was
Speaker 1: fueling pastures know popularity was what he was stealing from him.
Speaker 1: And then he wo had come to some bad conclusion
Speaker 1: about what that meant because he didn't understand Beyshamp or
Speaker 1: his experiments, and then he would end up killing a
Speaker 1: bunch of people, or screwing something else up, or doing
Speaker 1: a bunch of experiencements that were unnecessary, or just basically
Speaker 1: completely being wrong and claiming that he was right because
Speaker 1: he was so sure that of himself, but he did
Speaker 1: not actually understand the process of what he was looking
Speaker 1: at when he was stealing. And ten twenty years after,
Speaker 1: you know, Beaychamp had said something, you would all a
Speaker 1: sudden be brand new because because Pastor said it, the
Speaker 1: full publication of this important document was deferred, for some
Speaker 1: unknown reason for eight months, when it appeared in September
Speaker 1: eighteen fifty eight in the NL de Simi and I Physique.
Speaker 2: Alright, let's see.
Speaker 1: So by its title the memoir was of work of
Speaker 1: pure chemistry, which had at first no other object than
Speaker 1: to determine whether or not pure cold water could invert
Speaker 1: gain sugar, and if for the salts had any influence
Speaker 1: on the inversion. But soon the question, as I had foreseen,
Speaker 1: became complicated. It became at once physiological and dependent upon
Speaker 1: the phenomena of fermentation and the question of spontaneous generation. Thus,
Speaker 1: from the study of simple chemical facts, I was led
Speaker 1: to investigate in turn, the cause of information fermentation, the
Speaker 1: nature and origin of fermat somebody's finding out is that
Speaker 1: these microzymas.
Speaker 2: Are they're eating right. It's a digestion process.
Speaker 1: So when you shot the system, when you give it
Speaker 1: something that doesn't like, if you're giving it bad foods,
Speaker 1: if you're not getting enough nutrients, the environment inside you changes,
Speaker 1: and so to do the microzymis. When you're healthy, they're healthy,
Speaker 1: and everybody is symbiotic.
Speaker 2: You get it.
Speaker 1: That's your terrain it's the microzymis bolts did not development
Speaker 1: where they're develop where there is no contact with air,
Speaker 1: and that no change can contemic saying about So I
Speaker 1: will be back tomorrow. We'll get more into this book.
Speaker 1: And uh yeah, I'm not reading comments when I'm reading books,
Speaker 1: So I apologize if you're didn't get something answered, but
Speaker 1: I can't do the two things like that. Yeah, all right,
Speaker 1: last thing. You know it, you've seen it. Let's do
Speaker 1: it again. You are here probably oh you're on until Twitter.
Speaker 1: But this is the link right here for doctor Peter
Speaker 1: Glinnon get on the membership you want it, and fifty
Speaker 1: percent off with ballbusters right there, all right click that,
Speaker 1: use this link right there, fifty percent off all right
Speaker 1: right there, right there, and you will be able to
Speaker 1: understand more thoroughly why his homeopathy, the law, potentization laws, similars,
Speaker 1: and a healthy, well neutrified body are essential and key
Speaker 1: and you don't need anything injected into you. In fact,
Speaker 1: you need to prevent that from happening to you and
Speaker 1: your family at all costs, and I mean at all costs.
Speaker 1: That's a tempted murder. Whether the idiot with the shot
Speaker 1: knows that or not. You know it, and you know
Speaker 1: what's behind these people at the very top who have
Speaker 1: convinced these morons after twelve years of college that they're
Speaker 1: doing something good. You know who they are, you know
Speaker 1: what they are. Don't let it happen to you just
Speaker 1: because oh I'm going to go with the flow. Well,
Speaker 1: then you just committed You committed suicide and murder to
Speaker 1: your own children.
Speaker 2: So don't do that.
Speaker 1: If that doesn't sound good to you, if that makes
Speaker 1: you mad, good good. Don't let it happen. And this
Speaker 1: is the campaign fund.
Speaker 2: If you hate me, but you save your child and yourself,
Speaker 2: then good.
Speaker 1: You can hate me all you want, but here you go.
Speaker 1: That's Gibson to Go dot com backslash Ballbusters.
Speaker 2: Okay, thank you, Dan da dah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's it. Now we're off to see the Wizard.
Speaker 1: And I might to go take a wizard because it's
Speaker 1: been two hours of me sitting here and I had
Speaker 1: two cups.
Speaker 2: Of coffee later.
Speaker 1: No, I don't have an aultro, but that reminds me
Speaker 1: I have to get an intro a n outro and
Speaker 1: I can just play him here afterwards.
Speaker 2: It's kind of cool.