WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:02.919
<v Speaker 1>So there's this whole little mini news cycle going on

2
00:00:03.040 --> 00:00:07.559
<v Speaker 1>right now. It seems to already be losing oxygen. This

3
00:00:07.919 --> 00:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>claim from a writer in the Atlantic that Trump once

4
00:00:12.599 --> 00:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>vented that he said one time he wishes he had

5
00:00:20.079 --> 00:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>generals like Adolf Hitler had, that you want generals who

6
00:00:25.600 --> 00:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>will be loyal to him. Now, this quote seems poorly sourced.

7
00:00:35.079 --> 00:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these sort of random one off quotes

8
00:00:37.359 --> 00:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>from Trump allegedly saying nasty things about the American military.

9
00:00:44.119 --> 00:00:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I kind of view them with skepticism, a mixture of

10
00:00:52.280 --> 00:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between skepticism too. That's unsavory, But I don't know

11
00:00:56.240 --> 00:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that I fundamentally care to just flat out who cares.

12
00:01:03.280 --> 00:01:06.159
<v Speaker 1>And this one in particular, I find to be sort

13
00:01:06.200 --> 00:01:09.719
<v Speaker 1>of a non story, but it highlights things that were

14
00:01:09.920 --> 00:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>actually genuine problems during the Trump administration, where I think

15
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:21.599
<v Speaker 1>we have this assumption and conservatives can lean into this

16
00:01:21.599 --> 00:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>assumption that the top military brass. You know, conservatives respect

17
00:01:26.680 --> 00:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the military. We like the military. We want to respect

18
00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>people who are generals and admirals. We like them, you know,

19
00:01:35.480 --> 00:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we read Tom Clancy books. We think those guys are cool,

20
00:01:39.200 --> 00:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and many of them are quite cool. But it was

21
00:01:44.680 --> 00:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>also true that there are a lot of problems during

22
00:01:50.400 --> 00:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration of these people ignoring Trump because they

23
00:01:54.000 --> 00:02:05.519
<v Speaker 1>disagreed with him on policy. So there were whole stories

24
00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>from the Trump years about diplomatic and military personnel just

25
00:02:13.919 --> 00:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>ignoring Trump's wishes. There were a lot of you know,

26
00:02:16.360 --> 00:02:20.439
<v Speaker 1>as admirable a person as James Mattis was, there were

27
00:02:20.520 --> 00:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>several stories about him just kind of ignoring Trump's orders,

28
00:02:26.840 --> 00:02:33.599
<v Speaker 1>giving Trump defense officials limited options for what they could

29
00:02:33.599 --> 00:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do in response to something where Mattis had sort of

30
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:43.599
<v Speaker 1>his own opinions and disagreed with Trump and with other

31
00:02:43.599 --> 00:02:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump's subordinates like hr McMaster who was serving as Trump's

32
00:02:47.560 --> 00:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>National Defense advisor John Bolton, and other times where Mattis

33
00:02:53.840 --> 00:02:55.759
<v Speaker 1>just kind of flat out didn't do what Trump told

34
00:02:55.840 --> 00:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>him to do for reasons that seemed to have more

35
00:03:00.319 --> 00:03:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to do with policy than anything else. Here's a whole

36
00:03:06.199 --> 00:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>story from twenty twenty. It was published in a couple

37
00:03:08.960 --> 00:03:12.039
<v Speaker 1>of different places. This was in The New York Post,

38
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:17.719
<v Speaker 1>written by Ebony Bowden. Retiring diplomat says defense officials misled

39
00:03:17.759 --> 00:03:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Trump on troop count in Syria. US defense officials routinely

40
00:03:23.840 --> 00:03:27.759
<v Speaker 1>misled President Trump into believing the American troop count in

41
00:03:27.840 --> 00:03:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Syria was a lot lower than it actually was is,

42
00:03:31.520 --> 00:03:34.759
<v Speaker 1>a retiring US diplomat said in a bombshell interview this week.

43
00:03:35.639 --> 00:03:38.439
<v Speaker 1>We were always playing shell games to not make clear

44
00:03:38.479 --> 00:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to our leadership how many troops we had there, James Jeffrey,

45
00:03:42.120 --> 00:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>US Special Representative for Syria Engagement said in an interview

46
00:03:45.280 --> 00:03:49.759
<v Speaker 1>with Defense One, which is sort of military focused publication.

47
00:03:51.719 --> 00:03:54.479
<v Speaker 1>In October of twenty nineteen, Trump ordered the withdrawal of

48
00:03:54.560 --> 00:03:58.599
<v Speaker 1>US troops from northern Syria, a decision controversial among lawmakers,

49
00:03:58.680 --> 00:04:02.599
<v Speaker 1>defense officials, and dippls. Pentagon officials convinced the President to

50
00:04:02.680 --> 00:04:05.199
<v Speaker 1>leave approximately two hundred troops behind to protect oil fields

51
00:04:05.240 --> 00:04:07.199
<v Speaker 1>in the country's east there were at risk of falling

52
00:04:07.240 --> 00:04:09.719
<v Speaker 1>under ISIS control. Jeffrey said. However, the real number of

53
00:04:09.759 --> 00:04:12.599
<v Speaker 1>troops in northeast Syria is a lot more than the

54
00:04:12.639 --> 00:04:15.879
<v Speaker 1>two hundred Trump agreed to leave behind, Jeffrey said, with

55
00:04:15.919 --> 00:04:20.319
<v Speaker 1>some officials putting the numbers high as nine hundred. What

56
00:04:20.519 --> 00:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Syria withdrawal? There was never a Syria withdrawal, Jeffrey told

57
00:04:24.199 --> 00:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the publication. When the situation northeast Syria had been fairly

58
00:04:27.720 --> 00:04:30.399
<v Speaker 1>stable after we defeated. Isis Trump was inclined to pull out,

59
00:04:30.839 --> 00:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>He went on in each case, we then decided to

60
00:04:33.120 --> 00:04:35.319
<v Speaker 1>come up with five better arguments for why we needed

61
00:04:35.360 --> 00:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to stay, and we succeeded both times. That's the story.

62
00:04:42.439 --> 00:04:46.079
<v Speaker 1>According to the Washington Post report published last October, Pentagon officials,

63
00:04:46.199 --> 00:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>unhappy with the withdrawal appealed to Trump's interest in oil

64
00:04:49.720 --> 00:04:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to convince him not to withdraw troops. Blah blah blah,

65
00:04:52.439 --> 00:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>they can just keep going. So that they were like

66
00:04:54.879 --> 00:05:00.079
<v Speaker 1>lying to Trump about the number of troops there. So

67
00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>here you have Trump wanting to do certain kinds of

68
00:05:04.319 --> 00:05:09.879
<v Speaker 1>military and foreign policy and generals in his orbit. And

69
00:05:10.000 --> 00:05:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the other thing was Trump appointed all these generals to

70
00:05:12.319 --> 00:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>all these different positions, is chief of Staff and Defense

71
00:05:15.160 --> 00:05:18.199
<v Speaker 1>secretary and this and that and the other, and a

72
00:05:18.240 --> 00:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of them were conniving snakes who and you know,

73
00:05:24.639 --> 00:05:29.639
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to be, you know, too critical of James Mattis,

74
00:05:29.720 --> 00:05:34.639
<v Speaker 1>this incredibly distinguished military career, But the reality is he

75
00:05:34.680 --> 00:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>was not really obeying what Trump told him to do.

76
00:05:41.279 --> 00:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>In various instances, he was kind of not really doing

77
00:05:45.720 --> 00:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>what Trump was asking him. And then he eventually resigned

78
00:05:49.839 --> 00:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>after Trump and after Trump's decision to withdraw from Syria.

79
00:05:55.399 --> 00:06:00.639
<v Speaker 1>So for Trump to say he wants jenerals who are

80
00:06:00.680 --> 00:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>loyal to him, I don't think in a vacuum, I

81
00:06:06.639 --> 00:06:11.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's some awful thing. I think it's

82
00:06:11.480 --> 00:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>actually far more problematic that you had generals sort of

83
00:06:16.360 --> 00:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>blowing the president off or like lying to the administration

84
00:06:20.839 --> 00:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>about the troop numbers. I think that's actually a far

85
00:06:24.759 --> 00:06:27.639
<v Speaker 1>more problematic thing than Donald Trump saying, Hey, I want

86
00:06:27.759 --> 00:06:30.519
<v Speaker 1>generals who are loyal to me. Why would Donald Trump

87
00:06:30.560 --> 00:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>want generals loyal to him? Allow me to direct you

88
00:06:35.839 --> 00:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to this little document that this legal document that has

89
00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>something to say about this question of the president and

90
00:06:42.680 --> 00:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the level of control he's supposed to influence over the military.

91
00:06:48.160 --> 00:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>It's called the United States Constitution. Specifically Article two. Article

92
00:06:57.759 --> 00:07:00.319
<v Speaker 1>two is about the powers of the President of the

93
00:07:00.360 --> 00:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>executive branch. Allow me to direct your attention to Article two,

94
00:07:06.360 --> 00:07:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Section two. The President shall be Commander in chief of

95
00:07:13.000 --> 00:07:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the Army and Navy of the United States and of

96
00:07:16.879 --> 00:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the militia of the several States, when called into the

97
00:07:19.079 --> 00:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>actual service of the United States. That's it. That's he's

98
00:07:26.959 --> 00:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the commander in chief. He directs the Army and the Navy.

99
00:07:32.560 --> 00:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>He directs the military, He is in charge of it,

100
00:07:35.040 --> 00:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he oversees it, not the Secretary of Defense, not anyone

101
00:07:41.079 --> 00:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that Constitutionally, it doesn't legally, it doesn't even make sense

102
00:07:45.040 --> 00:07:49.399
<v Speaker 1>for anyone else to have the authority to not do

103
00:07:49.480 --> 00:07:52.759
<v Speaker 1>what the President tells him with regards to the military,

104
00:07:52.839 --> 00:08:01.399
<v Speaker 1>short of something that's flat out illegal. And so I

105
00:08:01.519 --> 00:08:06.639
<v Speaker 1>could see Trump in a moment of peaque venting that

106
00:08:06.879 --> 00:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Jesus for Hitler as generals did what they told him. Now,

107
00:08:10.759 --> 00:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it's an unsavory comparison, but you know, we're talking about

108
00:08:13.920 --> 00:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>some private conversation. Look how many times have I, maybe

109
00:08:17.040 --> 00:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in private conversation, said something stupid that I wouldn't necessarily

110
00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>want printed in a newspaper. Here's Trump. Did he actually

111
00:08:26.600 --> 00:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>say it or not? It seems highly disputable. But even

112
00:08:29.560 --> 00:08:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the general principle of what he's saying I don't think

113
00:08:31.959 --> 00:08:36.799
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. Yes, his generals should be loyal to him

114
00:08:37.600 --> 00:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>if he is president of the United States, because that's

115
00:08:40.720 --> 00:08:46.519
<v Speaker 1>the oath to obey the Constitution, the oath that officers

116
00:08:46.519 --> 00:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>of the United States swear to follow the Constitution, and

117
00:08:52.720 --> 00:08:55.279
<v Speaker 1>right there in Article two, Section two, one of those

118
00:08:55.559 --> 00:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>provisions of the Constitution, is the commander in chief of

119
00:09:00.120 --> 00:09:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the military being the president, the president being the one

120
00:09:02.799 --> 00:09:10.919
<v Speaker 1>who directs the military. So I find this whole controversy

121
00:09:10.960 --> 00:09:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to be ridiculous. Now, is it crazy to think Trump

122
00:09:16.799 --> 00:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>might have said it? Again, I don't think it's actually

123
00:09:19.200 --> 00:09:22.039
<v Speaker 1>that crazy to think he might have said it. I'm

124
00:09:22.080 --> 00:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>guessing he would have had it with the proviso of

125
00:09:24.440 --> 00:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, not to the extent of me,

126
00:09:26.679 --> 00:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>like ordering them to do the Holocaust and them doing

127
00:09:28.720 --> 00:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a Holocaust or something, but the general principle being I

128
00:09:33.320 --> 00:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>would like my generals to do what I tell them

129
00:09:37.279 --> 00:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to do and not lie to me, which clearly happened

130
00:09:45.240 --> 00:09:50.399
<v Speaker 1>several times during Trump's first term. And it's not like

131
00:09:50.559 --> 00:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the Biden administration, where a lot of

132
00:09:53.120 --> 00:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>these guys kept their jobs. But like Mark Milly and

133
00:09:56.480 --> 00:09:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in the Joint chiefs who have

134
00:09:59.039 --> 00:10:06.039
<v Speaker 1>shown themselves to be incompetent boobs in various other respects.

135
00:10:07.879 --> 00:10:11.039
<v Speaker 1>So I and a lot of these guys who are

136
00:10:11.080 --> 00:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>far more interested in DEEI and various kinds of liberal

137
00:10:16.639 --> 00:10:19.919
<v Speaker 1>buzzwords that probably were helpful to them in their ascent

138
00:10:20.639 --> 00:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to the top of the military heap than actual fighting

139
00:10:26.360 --> 00:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and killing. So I guess I just find the whole.

140
00:10:34.919 --> 00:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>The whole sort of mini controversy, which I think this

141
00:10:38.799 --> 00:10:44.519
<v Speaker 1>was their grand October surprise. Was some quote that some

142
00:10:44.600 --> 00:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>poorly sourced quote from several years ago that John Kelly's

143
00:10:48.600 --> 00:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of saying Trump one time said, I wish I

144
00:10:50.679 --> 00:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>had generals as loyal to me as Hitler as Hitler's

145
00:10:53.639 --> 00:10:55.879
<v Speaker 1>generals were, which, by the way, I'm not sure if

146
00:10:55.960 --> 00:10:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Hitler's generals were that loyal to him even, I mean

147
00:11:00.639 --> 00:11:04.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure didn't one of them try to assassinate him anyway?

148
00:11:06.440 --> 00:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>The guy with one eye, the guy with one eye

149
00:11:09.480 --> 00:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that Tom Cruise played in that one movie. Yeah, I

150
00:11:11.480 --> 00:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think he tried to assassinate him anyway. That this is

151
00:11:15.360 --> 00:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the Great October Surprise, which I feel like is not

152
00:11:18.480 --> 00:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>having any effects whatsoever. Everyone knows Trump says crazy things,

153
00:11:24.639 --> 00:11:29.919
<v Speaker 1>nobody cares at this point, Like I think my wife

154
00:11:29.960 --> 00:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and I have been laughing, We're like, gosh, after ten

155
00:11:33.559 --> 00:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>years or whatever, the Trump's been in kind of public life,

156
00:11:36.120 --> 00:11:38.519
<v Speaker 1>like they've just run out of things to throw at

157
00:11:38.559 --> 00:11:43.399
<v Speaker 1>him when it comes to like October Surprise esque allegations

158
00:11:43.759 --> 00:11:46.399
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. I mean, I feel like they've got nothing left.

159
00:11:46.399 --> 00:11:55.919
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing, no more bullets left in the chamber. But

160
00:11:56.000 --> 00:11:59.039
<v Speaker 1>I think it does shed light on, you know, how

161
00:11:59.159 --> 00:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is this Trump and Minute stration going to be staffed

162
00:12:02.600 --> 00:12:08.919
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the military and diplomatic side. On

163
00:12:08.960 --> 00:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the diplomatic side, Trump got impeached the first time, I

164
00:12:12.399 --> 00:12:17.039
<v Speaker 1>think on incredibly specious grounds. Why In large part, I mean,

165
00:12:17.200 --> 00:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the underlying reason for it was a bunch of people

166
00:12:22.919 --> 00:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>within the foreign policy and defense blob who were terrified

167
00:12:27.519 --> 00:12:30.919
<v Speaker 1>at the idea that Trump might not give the Ukrainians

168
00:12:30.919 --> 00:12:35.759
<v Speaker 1>all the weaponry that they thought they needed. And they

169
00:12:35.799 --> 00:12:38.639
<v Speaker 1>were so angry and upset about that that people leaked

170
00:12:39.440 --> 00:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>confidential discussions Donald Trump had with foreign leaders, with no

171
00:12:45.399 --> 00:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>one having the consideration of, like, hey, don't you think

172
00:12:48.879 --> 00:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad thing for the United States in general

173
00:12:52.360 --> 00:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if we have executive branch officials leaking private conversations that

174
00:12:57.639 --> 00:13:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States is having with the

175
00:13:00.840 --> 00:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>president of another foreign country. I mean the guy Alexander Vinman,

176
00:13:05.519 --> 00:13:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the guy who started the whole and then turned into

177
00:13:08.039 --> 00:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>just a flat out left wing activist who started the

178
00:13:11.480 --> 00:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>whole Trump Ukraine impeachment thing. The thing in retrospect, I

179
00:13:19.440 --> 00:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>think the whole thing was a joke. I think Trump

180
00:13:21.480 --> 00:13:26.159
<v Speaker 1>was actually one hundred percent within his rights to say

181
00:13:26.159 --> 00:13:28.799
<v Speaker 1>to the President of Ukraine, Hey, maybe you should investigate

182
00:13:28.840 --> 00:13:33.039
<v Speaker 1>this Hunter Biden thing, because clearly Hunter is guilty as

183
00:13:33.200 --> 00:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>sin or at the very least, there is a lot

184
00:13:36.159 --> 00:13:39.279
<v Speaker 1>of smoke there and seems highly likely that there's fire.

185
00:13:43.840 --> 00:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I just find so. Basically, though, the Trump administration the

186
00:13:50.000 --> 00:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>first time around was staffed by just an absolute snake

187
00:13:54.440 --> 00:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>pit of people who in the foreign policy side and

188
00:13:59.600 --> 00:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the deploy almacy saw the State Department people who did

189
00:14:02.799 --> 00:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>not want to do the things Trump wanted to do.

190
00:14:08.200 --> 00:14:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Appointing John Bolton was a disastrously dumb idea on Trump's part.

191
00:14:14.679 --> 00:14:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Bolton never saw a country he didn't want to invade,

192
00:14:17.159 --> 00:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and Trump didn't want to invade any countries. That's why

193
00:14:20.200 --> 00:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Bolton only lasted a short time and then immediately got fired.

194
00:14:25.399 --> 00:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope the Trump administration the next time around, if

195
00:14:29.639 --> 00:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he wins, which is still I feel like it's about

196
00:14:32.360 --> 00:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a fifty to fifty proposition, if he wins, that he

197
00:14:37.080 --> 00:14:41.759
<v Speaker 1>can staff this his administration with competent people who actually

198
00:14:41.879 --> 00:14:44.799
<v Speaker 1>like agree with his foreign policy, which for the most part,

199
00:14:44.799 --> 00:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I looking at the end result, I think I really

200
00:14:48.080 --> 00:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>liked what happened in foreign policy during the Trump years

201
00:14:51.480 --> 00:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for the most part. So I find again I find

202
00:14:59.000 --> 00:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this argument, Oh, Trump once general's loyal to him like

203
00:15:01.440 --> 00:15:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Hitler's generals. I find that whole. I think it's a

204
00:15:05.960 --> 00:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>silly story. Oh, it comes out just happens to come

205
00:15:09.320 --> 00:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>out the October, you know, two weeks before the election

206
00:15:11.600 --> 00:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Not buying it. And also from a constitutional

207
00:15:15.840 --> 00:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>point of view, I think his generals should be loyal

208
00:15:18.639 --> 00:15:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to him up to the point of doing something that's

209
00:15:22.679 --> 00:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>flat out illegal. Yes, they should be loyal to him

210
00:15:25.879 --> 00:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and should do what he tells them to do when

211
00:15:30.000 --> 00:15:33.639
<v Speaker 1>we return. How this idea of the executive branch being

212
00:15:33.639 --> 00:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>completely run by the president is not actually the fascist

213
00:15:38.600 --> 00:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>threat to democracy that people think it is. Next on

214
00:15:42.000 --> 00:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the John Girardi Show, beyond this little mini panic that

215
00:15:48.279 --> 00:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>liberals are trying, this is just you know, the October surprise,

216
00:15:52.159 --> 00:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the attempt to throw spaghetti against the wall and see

217
00:15:54.360 --> 00:15:59.919
<v Speaker 1>if it sticks. With this alleged again, this alleged claim

218
00:16:00.200 --> 00:16:02.679
<v Speaker 1>that Trump one time in private said I wish my

219
00:16:02.759 --> 00:16:06.919
<v Speaker 1>generals were as loyal to me as Hitler's generals, which

220
00:16:06.960 --> 00:16:10.679
<v Speaker 1>is both I think historically kind of laughable. I think

221
00:16:10.679 --> 00:16:14.519
<v Speaker 1>one of Hitler's generals tried to kill him. And also,

222
00:16:15.159 --> 00:16:19.759
<v Speaker 1>like stepping back from the unsavoriness of any comparison with Hitler,

223
00:16:20.559 --> 00:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily a wrong thing for a president to

224
00:16:24.320 --> 00:16:27.919
<v Speaker 1>want generals to be loyal to him. I mean, short

225
00:16:28.000 --> 00:16:33.759
<v Speaker 1>of doing something illegal, generals are supposed to obey the

226
00:16:33.799 --> 00:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States. He's the commander in chief,

227
00:16:38.519 --> 00:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>not the generals. Okay, the general's job is to do

228
00:16:42.240 --> 00:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>what the commander in chief tells them to do. Again,

229
00:16:45.720 --> 00:16:53.279
<v Speaker 1>short of something illegal, generals should be loyal to the

230
00:16:53.320 --> 00:16:57.799
<v Speaker 1>president in that respect. Now, loyalty to like an individual

231
00:16:57.840 --> 00:17:00.799
<v Speaker 1>personality is maybe not really the spirit of it. But again,

232
00:17:01.000 --> 00:17:04.759
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about some quote poorly sourced in private from

233
00:17:04.839 --> 00:17:07.599
<v Speaker 1>several years ago that John Kelly kind of remembers Trump saying,

234
00:17:09.079 --> 00:17:11.759
<v Speaker 1>without the full context of exactly what did Trump mean

235
00:17:12.960 --> 00:17:16.759
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah blah. Also in the context of

236
00:17:16.799 --> 00:17:20.039
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of generals around Trump who blew him off

237
00:17:20.720 --> 00:17:22.799
<v Speaker 1>and kind of flat out did disobey him. There were

238
00:17:22.839 --> 00:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>stories after the fact that basically diplomatic officials and military

239
00:17:28.680 --> 00:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>folks were lying to the president about troop counts in Syria.

240
00:17:33.680 --> 00:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It's this like, yeah, like there were demonstrated instances where

241
00:17:40.680 --> 00:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Trump's generals or the generals that he appointed to different posts,

242
00:17:45.400 --> 00:17:48.319
<v Speaker 1>like the Secretary Defense bl blah blah blah, blew him

243
00:17:48.359 --> 00:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>off and didn't do what he wanted. This leads me

244
00:17:52.440 --> 00:17:55.559
<v Speaker 1>to there have been a number of stories about how

245
00:17:55.640 --> 00:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>terrifying it is that Trump wants to institute various kinds

246
00:17:59.480 --> 00:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of plans to give him greater latitude to fire executive

247
00:18:03.759 --> 00:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>branch officials. Executive branch employees basically to reschedule if you will,

248
00:18:10.440 --> 00:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the federal employees who work within the various executive branch departments,

249
00:18:15.480 --> 00:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the EPA, the FDA, the DOJ, this that, but all

250
00:18:20.359 --> 00:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the alphabet soup of all the federal executives, all the

251
00:18:23.599 --> 00:18:27.079
<v Speaker 1>different federal agencies that are under the authority of the

252
00:18:27.119 --> 00:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>executive branch. Basically at the moment, it's sort of divided

253
00:18:34.920 --> 00:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>into career employees and political appointees. So let's take the

254
00:18:41.920 --> 00:18:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Department of Health and Human Services. A lot of people

255
00:18:45.200 --> 00:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>who work at the Department of Health and Human Services

256
00:18:47.880 --> 00:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>are career employees. They stay in their job and it

257
00:18:52.720 --> 00:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily depend on who is president. They oversee certain things.

258
00:18:56.160 --> 00:18:58.279
<v Speaker 1>They help with drafting regulations, They do this, that and

259
00:18:58.279 --> 00:19:03.039
<v Speaker 1>the other. Then there are the political appointees. These are

260
00:19:03.039 --> 00:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the people at the top who oversee things, who take

261
00:19:05.759 --> 00:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>guidance from the administration ultimately from the president, and set policy.

262
00:19:12.640 --> 00:19:17.559
<v Speaker 1>The political appointees come and go with different presidential administrations.

263
00:19:17.559 --> 00:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>If a Republican administration comes in, all the Democrats leave.

264
00:19:21.640 --> 00:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrat administration comes in, all the Republican appointees leave. Republicans

265
00:19:26.920 --> 00:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>have noted, particularly in the first Trump term, how a

266
00:19:29.160 --> 00:19:33.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of the career employees, who are protected in various

267
00:19:33.319 --> 00:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>ways under federal law and federal regulations from being fired.

268
00:19:36.400 --> 00:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>They can't be fired at will necessarily. They can only

269
00:19:43.160 --> 00:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>be fired for cause that a lot of the career

270
00:19:46.720 --> 00:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>employees of the federal government, well, I mean, this is

271
00:19:50.200 --> 00:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>an undisputed fact that the vast majority of them are

272
00:19:53.039 --> 00:20:03.799
<v Speaker 1>huge liberals, and that their presence can hinder stemy thwart

273
00:20:04.119 --> 00:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Republican priorities. I think one of the greatest examples of

274
00:20:09.920 --> 00:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>this was when during COVID Congress passed the legislation for

275
00:20:14.759 --> 00:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the PPP loans. They specifically drafted the language to exclude

276
00:20:20.440 --> 00:20:24.519
<v Speaker 1>planned parenthood and other big national abortion provider chains from

277
00:20:24.599 --> 00:20:29.279
<v Speaker 1>getting PPP loans. They specifically wrote it so that Planned

278
00:20:29.319 --> 00:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Parenthood wouldn't get the money, and Planned Parenthood still got

279
00:20:33.880 --> 00:20:38.279
<v Speaker 1>all the money. Why because the Small Business Administration approved

280
00:20:38.319 --> 00:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>all their applications. So Trump has floated this idea of

281
00:20:44.440 --> 00:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>basically putting these career employees in a different kind of

282
00:20:48.079 --> 00:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>schedule of federal employees to allow the executive branch leadership,

283
00:20:53.359 --> 00:20:56.799
<v Speaker 1>i e. The President to fire more of them and

284
00:20:56.880 --> 00:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>replace them with people who will do what he wants

285
00:21:00.799 --> 00:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>more effectively. This has been deemed by the left to

286
00:21:04.200 --> 00:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be fascism. This is a horror, this is a threat

287
00:21:07.000 --> 00:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to democracy. No, the president is elected through a part

288
00:21:18.640 --> 00:21:24.279
<v Speaker 1>democratic part, sort of giving representation to states part, you know,

289
00:21:24.319 --> 00:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the electoral college system. It's not pure democracy, but it

290
00:21:28.279 --> 00:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is a democratic system. The president is elected in a

291
00:21:35.440 --> 00:21:41.759
<v Speaker 1>democratic system. The career employees of the federal government should

292
00:21:41.839 --> 00:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>do what he says, because in the constitution, who has

293
00:21:46.160 --> 00:21:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the executive power of the United States. It's not the

294
00:21:48.759 --> 00:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>president sharing it with career employees of the federal government.

295
00:21:52.039 --> 00:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>It's just the president. All of the career employees of

296
00:21:57.160 --> 00:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the federal government are using the president's delegated power. Every

297
00:22:04.519 --> 00:22:07.519
<v Speaker 1>single one of them are in an org chart that

298
00:22:07.720 --> 00:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>has at the very top the president. If you're some

299
00:22:13.319 --> 00:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>career flunky working for the Department of hhs', you're under

300
00:22:18.400 --> 00:22:21.839
<v Speaker 1>this manager, who's under this manager, who's under this under secretary,

301
00:22:22.000 --> 00:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this under super subsecretary, who's under this secretary, wh's under

302
00:22:25.000 --> 00:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of Health and Human Services, who is under

303
00:22:27.640 --> 00:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the president. That is true of every single executive branch employee.

304
00:22:34.440 --> 00:22:37.799
<v Speaker 1>If you're not doing, or if you are slow rolling,

305
00:22:38.200 --> 00:22:45.039
<v Speaker 1>or if you are subtly thwarting what the president i e.

306
00:22:45.160 --> 00:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Your boss wants done, then you shouldn't work there. End

307
00:22:51.119 --> 00:22:55.319
<v Speaker 1>of story. Just as a question of kind of constitutional order,

308
00:22:55.960 --> 00:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the president should have the ability to ensure that all

309
00:22:59.759 --> 00:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of his employees, exercising his authority, are doing what he wants.

310
00:23:07.720 --> 00:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Executive branch officials thwarting the president, that is the threat

311
00:23:10.960 --> 00:23:17.599
<v Speaker 1>to democracy. The president was elected, not this flunky. So

312
00:23:17.839 --> 00:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>should Trump's generals be loyal to him? They absolutely should,

313
00:23:21.079 --> 00:23:23.599
<v Speaker 1>up to the point of doing something illegal. Trump's generals

314
00:23:23.599 --> 00:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>should do what he tells them. Should career officials of

315
00:23:28.279 --> 00:23:31.079
<v Speaker 1>the federal government be loyal to the president, to President

316
00:23:31.119 --> 00:23:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Trump if he gets elected, yes, they should up to

317
00:23:34.119 --> 00:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the point of doing something illegal. They should do what

318
00:23:36.720 --> 00:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>he tells them, end of story. And if they don't

319
00:23:46.359 --> 00:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>do what he tells them, I think Trump should one

320
00:23:48.440 --> 00:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent of the authority to fire them. As a

321
00:23:50.519 --> 00:23:53.039
<v Speaker 1>question of constitutional order, I think Joe Biden should have

322
00:23:53.039 --> 00:23:56.039
<v Speaker 1>the ability to fire. If there's some right wing nut

323
00:23:56.079 --> 00:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>job working at HHS who's actively thwarting President Biden, makes

324
00:24:00.440 --> 00:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sense for President Biden to be able to fire him.

325
00:24:03.000 --> 00:24:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I would love that person. But as a question

326
00:24:06.880 --> 00:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>of constitutional order, the president should direct the executive branch

327
00:24:10.160 --> 00:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>when we return. When we return Kamala Harris the anti

328
00:24:15.200 --> 00:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Catholic slash other threats to the Democratic Order. Next on

329
00:24:19.240 --> 00:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the John Girardi Show, jd Vance had an op ed

330
00:24:24.559 --> 00:24:29.039
<v Speaker 1>published in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette. I think this is

331
00:24:29.079 --> 00:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strategic thing on his slash the Trump administration's

332
00:24:35.039 --> 00:24:39.519
<v Speaker 1>part to go after Kamala Harris for what they view

333
00:24:39.559 --> 00:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>as an anti Catholic prejudice. I think it's accurate, and

334
00:24:46.720 --> 00:24:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I could discuss it on my own without jd Vance's.

335
00:24:50.160 --> 00:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've been following Kamala Harris's career with great interest,

336
00:24:54.079 --> 00:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>and particularly her sort of various forays into anti Catholic activity.

337
00:25:00.640 --> 00:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>There have been some particularly bizarre recent things. Gretchen Whitmer,

338
00:25:06.759 --> 00:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>who's a top Harris surrogate. It's hard to sort of

339
00:25:09.480 --> 00:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>blame Harris for this. I'm pretty sure she was not

340
00:25:12.039 --> 00:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>aware this was happening. Whitmer did this bizarre skit with

341
00:25:17.160 --> 00:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a left wing podcaster who was interviewing her, where Whittmer

342
00:25:20.680 --> 00:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>looked like she was basically she fed this other woman

343
00:25:26.200 --> 00:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a looked like a tortilla chip or something, but did

344
00:25:30.000 --> 00:25:33.599
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that looked very similar to a

345
00:25:33.680 --> 00:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>priest giving someone holy communion. It was this weird, kind

346
00:25:40.480 --> 00:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of bizarre skit, which Whitmer says, Oh, I didn't at

347
00:25:45.519 --> 00:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>all intend for that to be offensive to Catholic, sort

348
00:25:48.279 --> 00:25:51.279
<v Speaker 1>to mark the Catholic, but Catholic bishops were like, well,

349
00:25:51.559 --> 00:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that was super weird. Harris then skipped this thing called

350
00:25:57.720 --> 00:26:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the Al Smith Dinner, which I've never particularly liked myself.

351
00:26:00.799 --> 00:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>But the Al Smith Dinner is this big New York

352
00:26:03.839 --> 00:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>City charitable dinner raise money for different kinds of Catholic

353
00:26:08.279 --> 00:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>aid causes, and traditionally in presidential election years, the two

354
00:26:14.440 --> 00:26:18.799
<v Speaker 1>main presidential candidates show up and tell jokes and Harris

355
00:26:18.839 --> 00:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>just didn't go. It's sort of the first time in

356
00:26:22.079 --> 00:26:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I think decades that one of the two major presidential

357
00:26:25.799 --> 00:26:30.279
<v Speaker 1>party candidates did not go. She sent in some incredibly

358
00:26:30.279 --> 00:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>cringey video and that was it. You know, is that

359
00:26:37.960 --> 00:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>a super anti Catholic thing. I don't know. I think

360
00:26:40.119 --> 00:26:42.599
<v Speaker 1>it was more of a campaign thing of Kamala Harris

361
00:26:42.720 --> 00:26:45.079
<v Speaker 1>is not very personable and is not good at telling

362
00:26:45.160 --> 00:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>jokes and is not funny and it's not relatable. And

363
00:26:48.039 --> 00:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>her team basically was like, Eh, let's just skip that,

364
00:26:53.599 --> 00:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but let's get into her genuine record towards Catholics, because

365
00:26:58.039 --> 00:27:02.599
<v Speaker 1>I I think given the states that are at play

366
00:27:03.160 --> 00:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in the election, what are the battleground states? Pennsylvania huge

367
00:27:08.920 --> 00:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Catholic population, Wisconsin and Michigan huge Catholic populations, Georgia not

368
00:27:15.079 --> 00:27:19.079
<v Speaker 1>so much, North Carolina not so much, Arizona, Nevada large

369
00:27:19.079 --> 00:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Catholic populations. So and it's no coincidence that JD Vance

370
00:27:24.160 --> 00:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this op ed is published in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.

371
00:27:28.160 --> 00:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So they need to win Pennsylvany. Pennsylvania is clearly the

372
00:27:30.920 --> 00:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>most important state in the whole election. If you win Pennsylvania,

373
00:27:34.480 --> 00:27:38.279
<v Speaker 1>I think odds are you're going to win the presidency,

374
00:27:39.079 --> 00:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Vance writes. As a US Senator from California, Miss Harris

375
00:27:42.519 --> 00:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>racked up a record of bigotry towards Catholics and Catholic teachings.

376
00:27:45.680 --> 00:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>In twenty eighteen, she attacked Brian Buscher, a federal District

377
00:27:49.440 --> 00:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Court judicial nominee, over his membership in the Knights of Columbus,

378
00:27:54.799 --> 00:27:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a one hundred and forty two year old Catholic paternal

379
00:27:56.880 --> 00:28:01.839
<v Speaker 1>organization dedicated to public service. This was now just commentary.

380
00:28:01.920 --> 00:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>This was a hilarious thing. So this is when Harris

381
00:28:04.240 --> 00:28:07.559
<v Speaker 1>was a senator. She's on the Senate Judiciary Committee. One

382
00:28:07.559 --> 00:28:10.319
<v Speaker 1>of the big things the Judiciary Committee does is it

383
00:28:10.599 --> 00:28:16.599
<v Speaker 1>vets the judges that the President appoints to the various

384
00:28:16.640 --> 00:28:21.759
<v Speaker 1>different federal judicial openings throughout the country. So whether that's

385
00:28:21.799 --> 00:28:24.799
<v Speaker 1>a federal district court judge who's you know, trying cases,

386
00:28:25.240 --> 00:28:28.279
<v Speaker 1>a federal appellate court judge, so a judge who hears

387
00:28:28.319 --> 00:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>appeals from the district court. So someone on the first Circuit,

388
00:28:31.240 --> 00:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the second Circuit, the third Circuit in California were under

389
00:28:33.440 --> 00:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the Ninth Circuit Court of the of Appeals, or someone

390
00:28:36.839 --> 00:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>being appointed to the Supreme Court, the Judiciary committee's job

391
00:28:40.000 --> 00:28:44.359
<v Speaker 1>is to vet them. Harris was on the Judiciary Committee,

392
00:28:44.559 --> 00:28:48.599
<v Speaker 1>and this one judge was nominated to be a federal

393
00:28:48.640 --> 00:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>District Court judge. He was a member of the Knights

394
00:28:50.680 --> 00:28:54.279
<v Speaker 1>of Columbus, and the Knights of Columbus, as was saying,

395
00:28:54.279 --> 00:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a Catholic fraternal organization. The Knights of Columbus don't

396
00:28:58.720 --> 00:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>believe anything other than what the Catholic Church believes, and

397
00:29:03.720 --> 00:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>she was trying to say that, Oh, here it is.

398
00:29:05.400 --> 00:29:07.359
<v Speaker 1>His membership of the Knight in the Knights of Columbus

399
00:29:07.440 --> 00:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is very controversial and questionable. The Knights of Columbus have

400
00:29:11.359 --> 00:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>supported lots of political things. Well, no, there's nothing that.

401
00:29:17.000 --> 00:29:21.279
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing the Knights of Columbus believe other than

402
00:29:22.279 --> 00:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what the Catholic Church believes. That's it. That's the limit

403
00:29:26.319 --> 00:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of what they think and believe, of the ideology whatever

404
00:29:31.480 --> 00:29:34.279
<v Speaker 1>of the Knights of Columbus. It's not like, you know,

405
00:29:35.039 --> 00:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not like I don't know some group that has

406
00:29:39.319 --> 00:29:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh they have a couple of renegade teachings they believe

407
00:29:41.640 --> 00:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>outside of normal Catholic belief. In practice, no, their belief

408
00:29:46.880 --> 00:29:51.559
<v Speaker 1>is entirely delineated as the beliefs of the Catholic Church.

409
00:29:51.720 --> 00:29:53.559
<v Speaker 1>That's it. If you're going to say someone can't be

410
00:29:53.599 --> 00:29:56.119
<v Speaker 1>a judge because they're in the Knights of Columbus, you're

411
00:29:56.160 --> 00:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>effectively saying they can't be a judge because they're Catholic,

412
00:29:59.319 --> 00:30:02.799
<v Speaker 1>which is against the rules. The rules in this thing

413
00:30:02.839 --> 00:30:06.079
<v Speaker 1>called the Constitution. We're not supposed to do religious tests

414
00:30:06.119 --> 00:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>for office. As Vance says, any first year law student

415
00:30:13.240 --> 00:30:15.759
<v Speaker 1>would tell you that her line of questioning qualifies as

416
00:30:15.759 --> 00:30:19.799
<v Speaker 1>an unconstitutional religious test for public office. That same year,

417
00:30:19.799 --> 00:30:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Miss Harris condemned the Masterpiece Cake Shop Supreme Court decision,

418
00:30:23.559 --> 00:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in effect arguing that the government should be able to

419
00:30:26.039 --> 00:30:29.759
<v Speaker 1>compel Catholics or believers of any faith to perform services

420
00:30:29.759 --> 00:30:34.079
<v Speaker 1>that violate their sincerely held religious beliefs, or indeed, anyone's

421
00:30:34.119 --> 00:30:38.279
<v Speaker 1>conscientious belief She disagrees with. Miss Harris's legislative record as

422
00:30:38.279 --> 00:30:41.559
<v Speaker 1>a Senator was similarly antagonistic towards Catholics. She was an

423
00:30:41.599 --> 00:30:43.839
<v Speaker 1>early co sponsor of the Equality Act, a bill that

424
00:30:43.880 --> 00:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>would render the Constitution's protections for religious liberty effectively null

425
00:30:47.920 --> 00:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and void. Among many potential consequences, this legislation would demand

426
00:30:52.200 --> 00:30:57.319
<v Speaker 1>that Catholic church's host same sex weddings, require Catholic schools

427
00:30:57.319 --> 00:31:00.599
<v Speaker 1>in all federally funded education institutions to allow men to

428
00:31:00.640 --> 00:31:03.119
<v Speaker 1>compete in women's sports and share women's restroom and locker

429
00:31:03.240 --> 00:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>room facilities, and strip faith based charities of their tax

430
00:31:06.400 --> 00:31:10.799
<v Speaker 1>exempt status. In twenty nineteen, Miss Harris also introduced the

431
00:31:10.920 --> 00:31:15.039
<v Speaker 1>equally misnamed Do No Harm Act, which would force Catholic

432
00:31:15.039 --> 00:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>hospitals to perform abortions and even transgender surgeries. If this

433
00:31:19.559 --> 00:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>bill were to become law, Catholic doctors and medical professionals

434
00:31:22.720 --> 00:31:25.319
<v Speaker 1>who refused to perform late term abortions or subject miners

435
00:31:25.359 --> 00:31:28.279
<v Speaker 1>to dangerous life altering surgeries could lose their license in

436
00:31:28.279 --> 00:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>face federal discrimination lawsuits. It gets worse. In twenty sixteen,

437
00:31:32.759 --> 00:31:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a whistleblower in California provided evidence that Planned Parenthood was

438
00:31:35.799 --> 00:31:40.039
<v Speaker 1>illegally trafficking organs and tissue from aborted babies. Miss Harris,

439
00:31:40.079 --> 00:31:42.319
<v Speaker 1>then the Attorney General of California, ordered a raid on

440
00:31:42.359 --> 00:31:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the home of the whistleblower to seize the evidence. In

441
00:31:46.400 --> 00:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the White House, Miss Harris has been an integral part

442
00:31:48.480 --> 00:31:51.799
<v Speaker 1>of the most anti Catholic administration in living memory. Ironic

443
00:31:51.839 --> 00:31:55.759
<v Speaker 1>given President Joe Biden's Catholic faith last year, multiple FBI

444
00:31:55.799 --> 00:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>field offices were tied to a coordinated effort to target

445
00:31:58.240 --> 00:32:02.559
<v Speaker 1>traditional Catholics as potent shall quote, racially or ethnically motivated

446
00:32:02.680 --> 00:32:07.039
<v Speaker 1>violent extremists. Despite this apparent clear cut instance of anti

447
00:32:07.039 --> 00:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Catholic prejudice, a Biden Heron's Department of Justice declared that

448
00:32:12.000 --> 00:32:16.319
<v Speaker 1>there was no malicious intent behind the memo. Then there's

449
00:32:16.359 --> 00:32:19.559
<v Speaker 1>the case of Mark Howck, a Catholic pro life activist

450
00:32:19.680 --> 00:32:22.359
<v Speaker 1>father of seven, who had his homes swarmed by more

451
00:32:22.400 --> 00:32:25.519
<v Speaker 1>than a dozen heavily armed FBI agents in a twenty

452
00:32:25.559 --> 00:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty two dawn raid that terrorized his wife and young children.

453
00:32:29.440 --> 00:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Houck's crime shoving an aggressive, expltive hurling pro abortion activist

454
00:32:34.240 --> 00:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>away from his young son, charges which a jury unanimously

455
00:32:37.920 --> 00:32:41.839
<v Speaker 1>acquitted him of. But while the Biden Harris DOJ wanted

456
00:32:41.839 --> 00:32:44.079
<v Speaker 1>to throw Mark Howck in jail for more than a decade,

457
00:32:44.079 --> 00:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>they recommended no jail time for an unhinged pro abortion

458
00:32:47.440 --> 00:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>activist who attacked a church employee, smashed windows, and defaced

459
00:32:51.000 --> 00:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>religious statues in Washington. It's an absurd double standard. While

460
00:32:56.720 --> 00:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this administration has been busy targeting suburban Catholic dads, it

461
00:33:00.519 --> 00:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>has essentially ignored the nearly three hundred attacks on Catholic

462
00:33:03.759 --> 00:33:06.559
<v Speaker 1>churches since the leak of the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme

463
00:33:06.559 --> 00:33:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Court decision in twenty twenty two, and he keeps on going.

464
00:33:13.799 --> 00:33:16.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the I think the biggest thing was in

465
00:33:16.079 --> 00:33:18.759
<v Speaker 1>a recent interview, you know, well, you know, we'll say

466
00:33:18.799 --> 00:33:23.279
<v Speaker 1>this to the next break, but Harris staking out basically

467
00:33:23.359 --> 00:33:26.839
<v Speaker 1>a position that is more extreme when it comes to

468
00:33:27.960 --> 00:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>religious institutions and the provision of abortion, more extreme than

469
00:33:32.240 --> 00:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>basically any position you could possibly have. That is next

470
00:33:34.480 --> 00:33:38.559
<v Speaker 1>on the John Girardi Show. So Harris the other day

471
00:33:38.960 --> 00:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>has this interview where they're talking about abortion, and she's, oh,

472
00:33:42.480 --> 00:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>abortion's going, you know, blah blah, blah, blah blah, doing

473
00:33:45.200 --> 00:33:49.559
<v Speaker 1>her whole spiel, and the interviewer asks her, you know,

474
00:33:49.680 --> 00:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>are there any points where you would maybe moderate, where

475
00:33:53.079 --> 00:33:55.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'd work together with Republicans or try to

476
00:33:55.079 --> 00:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>get something done, like religious exemptions and things like that. Now,

477
00:34:00.559 --> 00:34:06.079
<v Speaker 1>religious exemptions, first of all, I object to the question

478
00:34:08.800 --> 00:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea that religious exemptions are a thing that Kamala

479
00:34:13.039 --> 00:34:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Harris would compromise on. Religious exemptions are kind of like

480
00:34:17.679 --> 00:34:21.119
<v Speaker 1>required by the Constitution, not forcing someone to violate their

481
00:34:21.159 --> 00:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>deeply held religious beliefs. That the norm, the baseline political

482
00:34:25.480 --> 00:34:31.199
<v Speaker 1>norm in this country is to respect the religious exemption

483
00:34:32.400 --> 00:34:37.519
<v Speaker 1>of say a Catholic hospital not to do abortions, of

484
00:34:37.559 --> 00:34:43.559
<v Speaker 1>an individual healthcare provider who is Christian, to not do

485
00:34:43.599 --> 00:34:48.519
<v Speaker 1>abortions all right. Obviously, Catholic hospitals are sort of the

486
00:34:48.519 --> 00:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>most prominent, the most common religious hospitals in the country.

487
00:34:53.719 --> 00:34:56.199
<v Speaker 1>About one fifth of all hospitals in America are run

488
00:34:56.280 --> 00:34:58.639
<v Speaker 1>by the Catholic Church. But there's also I mean there

489
00:34:58.679 --> 00:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>are There's a Ventis Health. There's a lot of different

490
00:35:02.400 --> 00:35:08.320
<v Speaker 1>religious run healthcare systems throughout this country, and tons of

491
00:35:08.440 --> 00:35:12.519
<v Speaker 1>doctors who, for ethical reasons, religious reasons, just don't want

492
00:35:12.519 --> 00:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to do abortions. And Harris says, I don't see why

493
00:35:17.440 --> 00:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>we should compromise on a fundamental right of a woman

494
00:35:20.280 --> 00:35:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to do what she wants with her body, which means

495
00:35:24.800 --> 00:35:29.079
<v Speaker 1>one of two things. Either Kamala Harris is an idiot

496
00:35:30.559 --> 00:35:36.199
<v Speaker 1>distinctly possible who doesn't realize exactly what she's saying. Is

497
00:35:36.239 --> 00:35:40.679
<v Speaker 1>she actually saying, yes, I want to force every Catholic

498
00:35:40.800 --> 00:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>hospital to perform abortions. Yes, I want to force every

499
00:35:45.840 --> 00:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>doctor to do abortions, even if they conscientiously object to it,

500
00:35:50.519 --> 00:35:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Is that actually what she's so she's either stupid and

501
00:35:54.440 --> 00:35:58.159
<v Speaker 1>just trying to do the most pro abortion sounding thing

502
00:35:58.400 --> 00:36:01.519
<v Speaker 1>she could say, because I mean, that's an extent to

503
00:36:01.559 --> 00:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>which even I don't think President I don't even think

504
00:36:03.960 --> 00:36:09.519
<v Speaker 1>President Biden's going to that extent. Is she saying that

505
00:36:11.800 --> 00:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and just being stupid and not understanding the impact of

506
00:36:14.960 --> 00:36:17.280
<v Speaker 1>her words and just trying to dance in the way

507
00:36:17.320 --> 00:36:19.199
<v Speaker 1>that her donors want her to dance. That's the other

508
00:36:19.199 --> 00:36:25.320
<v Speaker 1>thing about abortion stuff. The big pushers of abortion in

509
00:36:25.360 --> 00:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party is the donor class. The super elite

510
00:36:30.440 --> 00:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>donors like Mackenzie Scott, Jeff Bezos's ex wife who gave

511
00:36:35.480 --> 00:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like Planned Parenthood one hundred gazillion dollars. They're the ones

512
00:36:40.400 --> 00:36:45.599
<v Speaker 1>who really want abortion, and that's what really pushes Democrat

513
00:36:45.639 --> 00:36:49.280
<v Speaker 1>politicians to the super hardcore pro abortion stances. It's a

514
00:36:49.320 --> 00:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>donor driven thing, and Harris is more a creature of

515
00:36:52.840 --> 00:36:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the donor class than anybody before. I genuinely think, like

516
00:36:58.440 --> 00:37:02.119
<v Speaker 1>not that Obama or Hillary Biden like ignored the donors,

517
00:37:02.360 --> 00:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but there was some sense to which they were their

518
00:37:04.840 --> 00:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>own person like Obama had ideas independent of the donor class.

519
00:37:09.280 --> 00:37:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Biden had thoughts independent of the donor class. Maybe doesn't

520
00:37:12.559 --> 00:37:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have as many thoughts these days. Hillary had, and his

521
00:37:14.840 --> 00:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>thoughts were never that sharp. Hillary had thoughts independent of

522
00:37:17.960 --> 00:37:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the donor class. Harris has none. She is Her whole

523
00:37:21.199 --> 00:37:27.079
<v Speaker 1>career is as this avatar for the donor class, propped

524
00:37:27.159 --> 00:37:32.039
<v Speaker 1>up by pushed by the donors. As you can see

525
00:37:32.079 --> 00:37:35.119
<v Speaker 1>by her clearly not quite ready for prime time performance

526
00:37:35.719 --> 00:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>as the Democratic nominee. The donor class wants all this

527
00:37:44.519 --> 00:37:49.800
<v Speaker 1>pro abortion stuff. If she knows what she's saying, she's

528
00:37:49.840 --> 00:37:57.119
<v Speaker 1>staking out the most insane, conscious violative position on abortion

529
00:37:57.400 --> 00:38:03.559
<v Speaker 1>humanly possible. That'll do it for John Gerardy show. See

530
00:38:03.599 --> 00:38:04.599
<v Speaker 1>you next time on Power Talk
