Speaker 1: Welcome to the Three Stories version of The Todd Herman Shows.
Story number one, Jasmine Crockett's crew begs to be arrested,
plus Eric Solwall It's the bench Press. Story number two,
The killer satellite attacking Canada, Flee Ontario. Story number three,
The AI debate over Jesus. We'll talk about this with
the help of God Almighty himself. Thank you Lord.
Speaker 2: The Todd Herman Show is one percent disapproved by big
pharma technocrats in tyrans everywhere from the high mountains of
Free America. Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made in These
are the times to which God is to said, we
shall live. And Jasmine Crockett's crew they demand to be arrested.
And you can think of this as a publicity scent.
Sometimes it's helpful to get arrested. Remember President Trump's mug shots.
Sometimes it's not, particularly for a party that could be
described as having hit rock bottom. I'm not saying it.
I try not to speak in cliches, although that is
an underappreciated kiss song. Come on now a live one
hit rock Bottom, Come on so on CNN. They actually
go to a Pulser, who from time to time delivers
shock news about Democrats, and this bit of shock news
shocked Democrats into changing their I is gonna say, changing
their behaviors. But of course it didn't take a look
at this.
Speaker 3: Oh woof.
Speaker 4: I mean my god. You know we mentioned CNN we
had that poll come out a little while ago on
their net favorle rating, they were twenty six points underwater.
You think that's low enough.
Speaker 1: How about we go even lower. We'll go to this
the screen.
Speaker 4: I'm gonna walk over here. We go to the Wall
Street Journal minus thirty points, thirty points underwar.
Speaker 5: Several saying Democrats don't have a masculine politician except for Obama.
I think being a masculine leader is like outlawed in
the Democratic Party right now. One participant said, come on now,
what about our friend Tim Waltz.
Speaker 1: Remembody fried a chicken on the hood of his cheap
I said, I should be working right now instead, I'm probably.
Speaker 2: Nine at the gym.
Speaker 1: You're lifting one hundred and thirty five pounds.
Speaker 6: You're doing the equivalence of less than a push up
for less than a plat. You don't even have to
hold your body at a plank brother soul. Well, no,
I think this is a great big hole with them.
So they're turning two women in the Democrat Party to
be the masculine ones. I show it didn't mean here
in a and then it comes straight no, and I'm
saying comes straight out of Hollywood. It's a TikTok video
done by a state representative in Texas. One of the
people begging to be arrested flood the state have turned
over their job. The governor appears to have legal basis
to say, you have abandoned your job, so we're going
to issue a warrant for your arrest because you're not showing.
Speaker 1: Up for work. It appears that you illegally took money
in the form of perhaps a bribe to fly to Chicago,
the state that's done its own share of jerrymandering more
than Texas, and this is all about the changing of
the voting districts, et cetera, jerrymandering, balancing them out. So
she's fled the state. She's facing arrest. This is Jasmine
Crockett's party is Jasmine Crockett State. She's from Texas. So
I'll show you this little film. Linda Garcia made being
a very masculine member of the Democrat Party at a
second film is powerful. We all know this. Angel Studios
knows this. They've made Sound of Freedom, which brought attention
to the evils of trafficking, and the left pretended that
wasn't happening, and then when it was happening, they tried
to say, oh, it's a good thing. I think that
quite that far. There was then the movie that really
destroyed snow White, King of Kings, the story of Jesus
Christ as told through a fictional Charles Dickens. Now there's
a new series. It's called Testament. This takes the historical
happenings in the Book of Acts Luke writing about how
the Church was formed, how the Church that Jesus built
was formed, and how they did it during their time.
But in Testament, they relocate those people into our era,
a surveillance state, a censorship state, a state that hates
the truth. Then you get to watch as they build
christ Church in a timeline like ours. Great chance for
you to examine your own heart. Will you stand for
Jesus as the world stands with their boots ready to
go on your neck? Go to angel dot com slash
Todd stream testament today. When you become an Angel Studio
Premium Guild member, you also get two free tickets to
all of the theatrical releases, Plus you will get to
vote on the movies that they distribute to create and promote.
It is angel dot com. Slash Tood. Become a Premium
Angel Studio Guild member at Angel dot com. Slash Todd
making her own little mini movie and it's a quick one.
State Representative Lynda Garcia is making a video. She's lip
syncing here and it might be hard to hear the lyrics.
We're gonna hurt some people here. You go, a masculine
Democrat woman. I need your help. I can't tell you
what it is. You can never ask me about it later.
And We're gonna hurt some people. I'm gonna hurt some people.
Gotta go hurt some people, says a woman who was
one of the Democrats who fled Texas, many of them
wearing shirts saying let the people vote, Let the people vote. Well,
the people voted, and the governor of Texas is gonna
redistrict like governors everywhere. Do do you notice that the
mockingbird media has suddenly discovered redissearting. I will never forget
being in Maryland. And it was at a crab bake.
By the way, don't come to me with the Maryland
crabs are delicious. Soft shelled crabs are disgusting, so disgusting. Hey,
what a crab embryo? So and I expected something. I
was telling my friends, and I called my beloved wife.
I'm having soft shelled crab. My wife says, oh, that's interesting.
I'm changing a diaper. Oh that's right, because you're back
home and I'm doing this great adventure and standing there
with a congressman who said, you know what you see
across the river there, way across that river. Doesn't that
river look like a natural bearrier to you? Yeah, it's
a natural bear Yeah. That's interesting because that's all of
a sudden, the same district what was over here, Yeah,
used to be a different district, but they didn't have
enough Democrats. This has been going on forever. So this
party that lacks any masculinity, Jasmine Crockett's party, here's what
they here's what they can bring up for masculinity. Do
you remember when Baraco was saying Obama throughout the first
pitch kind of I mean, we've got that video. Look,
I mean, here's here's Obama throwing out the first pitch.
Watch watch the plate so matter that doesn't look that masculine.
But what about dimestar Obama. This is dimestore Obama, Hakeem
jeffries Man, and he is laying it down. This is
bigger than one hundred and thirty five pound bench presce
Eric Solwell.
Speaker 7: They have one big, ugly bill which is now law,
is deeply unpopular. It rips away healthcare from millions of Americans,
steals food from the mouths of children. All of this
is being done in terms of hurting everyday Americans so
they can reward their billionaire donors.
Speaker 1: What I love about this Dimestore Obama is a party
that said you can't go to school if you will
not wear this thing on your face. You can't work
if you'll not take this thing in your skin. There
a party that is pushing to continue to keep sugar
water on the snap benefits. They're a part play that
pretends men or women and this is what passes for hardcore.
I'm going to tell it like it is masculinity. In
Jasmine Crockett's party, God made men and women for a
reason we compliment one another. The fact that the Democrats
can't seem to conjure up any real masculine men is
a sign of something much, much, much different and much
worse than simple politics. It's the fact that they're having
trouble garnering godly men because godly masculinity is somewhat different
than ungodly somewhat, No, it's distinctly different. Story number two,
There is a killer satellite attacking Canada. And I don't
mean to get ahead of any of my colleagues who
share conspiracy theories from time to time, such as well,
I won't name names, but I'm breaking news here. I've
learned that the the premiere of Ontario, has canceled a
satellite service for all of Ontario. Well, he's not trying
to fix that. He's talking with other big companies to
bring it back so that people can have internet access.
Right they don't right now, they don't because of an
attack on Canada. Can you imagine all the small businesses
being affected by this. I'll show you what he said
here in the seconds, and then I'm going to compare
this to something actually happening in Australia. That really is
an attack. Now, if you're a small business or medium
sized business, there's a bunch of things you need to
do your job. You probably need internet access, you need
to be able to get to work, et cetera. But
what about when things get really really tough? Have you
ever been sued? Lawsuits can be super scary, particularly in
an era of lawfare. If you're a smaller, medium sized
business and someone sued you, thank the Lord. You've got
that firewall of protection. You know. They can't sue your assets,
they can't go after your retirement account or your home,
thank god, because you've got an LLC or a corporation sapped.
What if your LLC or corporation isn't real. I mean,
sure it's legally a corporation, but what if that's actually
just you? What if from a legal perspective, there's no difference.
Most people who set up small and medium sized businesses
do not have corporate credit. You can have a debit card,
even a credit card with your business name on it.
It doesn't mean it's corporate credit. That means that firewall
you are thanking the Lord for isn't there. In a
quick nabligation. Meeting with my friends at Bisible. You can
find out if you actually have corporate credit. Their website
is go bisible dot com with a Z go bisible
dot com. If you do not have corporate credit, and
I bet you don't, they can help you build it
in seven easy steps and understand this, they will be
ready to get started. So once you commit, make a
plan and get it done and get that protection you
were just thanking God for, so you can then go
back and truly thank God for that protection. It's gobisible
dot com. The premiere of Ontario, Doug Ford has canceled
Starlink for all of Ontario because he says Elon Musk
was attacking Canada. Here he is trying to make it
seem just a little bit better.
Speaker 3: So I'm talking to the other big companies, the Rogers
and the Bells, had meetings with them actually last week
and saying, hey, we got to get moving on this,
and it's unfortunate we had to cancel that. But I
can't deal with a guy that you know, well, I
guess the divorce happened between him and Trump, but the
guy who was attacking our country, and I just couldn't
do it. So we're going to continue working to make
sure that they have reliable broadband internet service as quickly
as we can.
Speaker 1: We're going to continue working to try to bring them
back to the modern world once we get around to it.
Having already eliminated the being competition, so these big companies
can charge us more knowing that the population is furious
at them. And Elon Musk I do remember that. And
I didn't know he had it in him. I mean,
he knew he was a smart guy. But when he
took that army of two hundred and fifty thousand merks
up across the border and seized Vancouver and then Toronto,
and he was near to what oh he met rhetorically
attacking Canada. Oh got it? So that never happens, and
starlink is not attacking Canada, but there is something attacking us.
This is from a woman named Katie Gallagher. I don't
see doug Ford panniking about this. I mean it's Australia,
it could never happen in Canada. Her actual name is
Catherine Ruth Gallagher. She is an Australian politician and she's
been the Minister of Finance and Minister for Women, Minister
for the Public Service, vice President of the Executive Council
in the Albanese government since twenty twenty two, since twenty
twenty five as Minister for Government Services. She wrote this
on Twitter, which of course is owned by a white supremacist.
Digital ID is not compulsory. It's voluntary, secure and convenient
way for you to access online services safely without having
your person or documents started by third parties. I'm proud
to have it introduced our digital ID build this week.
This technology will transform our economy. No, it's not compulsory. Well,
unless you want to use the internet. I mean, if
you want to use the Internet, you have to have
digital ID. But it's not compulsory. So if you want
to be able to email a person, you'll need digital
i D. If you want to post on social media,
you'll need a digital ID. If you want to read
this tweet or argue with her, you'll need a digital ID.
But it's not compulsory, just like the shots. We're not compulsory.
Remember this, Katie Gallagher. Unlike you, God is pro free speech.
How do I know? Because why speech came out of
my speaking hole? Because God gave me the speaking hole
and the ability to use it. He's also pro accountability.
Everybody understands what you're doing here. You're building a wall
between you, who can say whatever you want, protected by government,
and us who cannot. It's not just about making anonymous
people reveal who they are. It's about taking a digital
ID which is attached your identity, so you can do
exactly what they've done in China, which is to build
a social credit system so that you are, you know,
properly using your free speech, meaning being sufficiently enthusiastic about
everything the government does. Everybody sees where this is going,
and what should wear you most is it God sees
where it's going, and he's already judged you and your motives.
And I'm gonna guess I can't speak for God because
he's God and I'm not. His ways are far above
mind and far above everyone else's. But I'm gonna guess
he may not like you deciding that the people he
created in his image no longer get to I have
the free speech that he's given them. Because that's where
this has headed. Story number three, the AI debate over Jesus.
I've asked some Ais what are the most common debates
about Jesus. So I asked GROC and I got to
tell you, the GROC results were sad. They pointed to
some tweets that actually had no retweets and no comments,
So I'm not going to use that. So I'm going
to turn to Google Gemini and how they define this. Now,
I'd expect debates like this to be going on, and
I really praise God that they're going on, that Jesus
is still being discussed. His word will never pass away.
We know this. The world will pass away, but no
word that he spoke will ever do that. I'd expect
this debate, but many people are not going to expect
a debate that's going on in the Elka Lutheran Church,
things like redefining marriage cleverly, you know, by removing the
phrase man, woman, et cetera. It is trying to strike
down God's intent, trying to seize that. And if you're
not Christian, I get that. I hope that you'll reconsider
because Jesus Christ is the way, the truth of life.
It's the only way to the Father, it's the only
way to have eternity with God. So I hope you
reconsider that. But if you're not Christian, but you're an
observer American politics or American culture, then you need to
be able to recognize what's going on with American politics
in American culture, because this is aimed not just quote
just at faith, but it's aimed at culture. It's aimed
at destroying the American culture, because American culture is stronger
with families built into it then without it. So these
are some of the most commonly debated topics about Jesus Christ,
according to Gemina, and they do a decent job of
introducing this. Debates about Jesus Christ have been a central
part of religious and scholar discord for centuries. The most
commonly debated topics can be seen broadly categorized into three areas.
His historical existence, his divine nature, and the veracity of
the events described in the Gospels. The historical Jesus versus
the biblical Jesus. The debate center is unseparating the historical
figure of Jesus of Nazareth from Christ of Faith portrayed
in the New Testament. Well, let's answer that there is
no divorce. They're one and the same. Even people who
criticized Jesus and his followers that they named Us Christians,
because people would never stop talking about Jesus. They had
one Jesus. They wrote about the fact that Jesus' followers
believed he performed miracles, that he rose from the dead,
that he healed the sick, that he caused the blind
to see. These were not things a few people said
they saw many many people said they saw this and
reported it, And in fact, the Pharisees criticized him for this.
They factually criticized Jesus for healing on the Sabbath. So
the historical Jesus versus the biblical Jesus is a red herring.
It doesn't exist. And here's what Google writes historosity. While
the vast majority of historians and scholars agree that a
Jewish man named Jesus existed in the first century, a
fringe view known as christ myth theology, argued that he
was purely mythological figure. I appreciate them mentioning the fact
that that is truly a fringe view. It is because
more than one contemporary writer around Roman culture and Jewish
culture mention Jesus often demanding that the emperors do something
about his followers. Also looks at this against this is
from Google Gemini, and you expect this to be twisted
because Google is such a leftist entity. The Gospels as
historical documents, Scholars debate the extent to which the Gospels
can be trusted as accurate historical records. Some see them
as a theological narrative meant to persuade readers, while others
argue they contain valuable historical information. The Gospel of John,
for example, is often viewed by historians as a ladder
text with more theological and less historical focus compared to
the Synoptic Gospels. Matthew Mark and Luke True, I don't
think John made any argument to the contrary. And John
who wrote in the beginning was the word the words
with God, and the word was God. He's describing Jesus
in in what we would think of as an existence
before ours. But that's not really accurate, because God has
always existed and always will exist. The Synoptic Gospels take
different approaches. Luke never met Jesus. Luke went back as
a historian and physician and put together the history of
how things happened. He talked to all of the apostles.
He talked to people who weren't apostles about what they
saw with Jesus. He also wrote the Book of Acts.
Matthew wrote from a Jewish perspective, and as a Jew,
he found it very, very important to trace the lineage
of Jesus. Mark, on the other hand, wrote from a
respective of faith and current events. So these gospels are different. Now,
It's great that these things are going on, that this
debate is happening, and that Google is tracking this, and
I'm actually kind of impressed with how Google, how they
summarize this for me. Miracles and supernatural events the America's
events contributed to Jesus, such as the healing of the sick,
walking on water, raising the dead, are a major point
of contention. Many religious believers except these accounts as literal
historical events. However, many scholars, especially those operating from a
naturalist or materialist perspective, view them as theological symbols or
later editions that serve to emphasize Jesus' divine nature. Let's
pause on this. Naturalists or materialists do not believe anything
miraculous can happen. And it's a foolish statement because if
you're a naturalist or materialist, you actually believe the following statement.
Follow this with me. There was nothing and then something
acted upon that nothing to create everything, including all the
rules that govern life and the cosmos. Let's think of
that again. There was nothing and then something acted upon it,
namely something that can exist when there's nothing. Name is
something that can create itself or that has always existed.
They're describing something either with the power to create itself
or something that always existed. And by the way, if
a thing has the power to create itself, how could
it have had that power were it not a thing?
It was a thought? Okay, it was a thing in
the form of a thought. Naturalists and materials fall all
over themselves in this regard, and they discount anything divine
because they simply have set a rule. Divine can't happen. That, guys,
that's a religious faith. So I asked Google Jemini. What
are the most common debates about Jesus? The divinity of Jesus?
The question of whether Jesus was merely a human prophet,
a divinely inspired teacher, or God incarnate has been a
fundamental point of debate since the early days of Christianity. Yeah,
except for his apostles, except for the people who walked
with him, except for the people who on the spot,
after Jesus had been taken to the cross, after he
had died, after he had risen, after he'd gone to heaven,
And we begin with Peter's first sermon. He spoke those
sermons in front of five thousand men, which would probably
mean ten to fifteen thousand people because he didn't count
women and children at the time, and right in front
of the same technocratic religious authorities who took Jesus to
the cross. Peter called them out, this, Jesus, whom you killed,
was the son of God. That's a huge difference. If
you don't believe Jesus rose from the dead, if you
have any doubts at all, are you truly going to
stand on a rooftop and speak this in front of
the people who took Jesus to the cross, when three
days prior, or a few days prior, you'd been hiding
out from the Jews and the religious authorities, that is,
the Jewish religious authorities, the Satastes and the Pharisees and
the Roman authorities, hiding in the upstairs room to a
rooftop preaching in front of fifteen thousand people, that Jesus
had risen. There's every reason to believe he rose. There
were people who were at the cross who witnessed the
shaking and the darkness and the tearing of the temple curtain,
who truly said this was the son of God, and
they went home and told people, just as there are
about five hundred people at one time who saw the
risen Jesus the Council of Nicea. While some popular views
suggested that the divinity of Jesus was quote invented at
the Council of Nicea in the fourth century, historical evidence
shows that this was a debate within Christianity from its
earliest years. The Council's purpose was to settle the precise
nature of jesus divinity, not to create the idea from scratch.
And to say it was a debate, that's somewhat misleading.
It was a debate among people who didn't believe in Jesus.
It was not debated among his followers. They were all
firmly convinced that Jesus Christ rose from the dead, so
much so that they themselves were willing to go to
their own deaths. Eleven of them died martyrs, Peter, who
gave that sermon, that first public sermon, in front of
the fifteen thousand people, almost certainly in front of the
people who killed Jesus. He went to the cross. Tradition
tells us he refused to be crucified standing up. He
wasn't worthy of that, so they crucified him upside down.
This after they took his wife's life in front of him,
and Peter was said to have said to her, think
of the Lord, Think of the Lord. Jesus' claims, according
to Google Gemini, are debated very commonly. A key aspect
of this debate is whether Jesus himself claimed to be God.
While some interpret his words and actions as explicit claim
to divinity, others argue this was a later interpretation by
his followers. He except for this. Peter again confessed Jesus
as the Messiah, the son of the Living God, and
Jesus himself said, I and the Father are one. If
you know me, you know the Father. I and the
Father are one. Is a claim of divinity. And there's
much more to that. As Jesus went through and healed
the sick, he cured the blind, the lame walked again.
He rose people from the dead. He did tasks that
only God could do. He conquered death. It's not really
a debate. The trinity. The concept of the trinity, that
God is one being in three co equal persons, the Father,
the Son, and the Holy Spirit, is central often debated
tenet of mainstream Christianity. It attempts to reconcile the belief
in one God with the belief in Jesus' diffinity. It
doesn't really attempt to do it, it does it. God
so loved the earth that he sent his only son,
that whoever believes in him will be saved. That is
an active statement of God sending his son. And if
you go back in the beginning, was the word, The
word is with God. The word was God. That's John
explaining Jesus was with God from the very beginning. And
in Genesis the spirit of God moved upon the waters.
Those are the three persons Jesus spoke of. When he
went back to the Father. The Father would provide a
special helper that in the personage of the Holy Spirit,
and Jesus breathe that into them. The resurrection, according to Gemini,
is debated. The resurrection of Jesus considered the cornerstone of
the Christian faith. But it's also one of the most
heavily debated topics. Not among his followers, not among the
people who went to go risk their lives. Eleven of
them were martyred, and they tried to Martyr John. They
just couldn't get the job done. This some other things
that are debated. These are the tops. It's good to
see this debate going on. You'd expect this in popular culture,
but maybe not in an Elkat church. Well, a Lutheran church,
and there is such a debate going on. I'll share
this with you in just a second. As there is
a war over Christianity. There are wars of all sorts.
Sometimes there's wars that are fought on battlefields, such as
the wars in the Middle East. My friend Tim Krukshank
is a retired Navy seal. He was a medic attached
to the seal teams. In three deployments overseas. He came
back and found the Bone Frog Coffee Bonefrogoffee dot com
slash todd you get teen percent off your first purchase
fifteen percent off subscription coffee. Unless you think that this
is just a cool brand with Soso coffee in it,
Tim recruited a coffee legend named Dave Stewart to help
run the company by way of mentoring Tim on how
to make coffee and in fact creating many of the roasts.
Unless you think he's left his seal background behind, he hasn't.
Tim just sent two of his employees to Buds to
go become seals themselves, and may God help them on
their journey. Go to Bonefrog Coffee dot com slash todd
He's promo code todd to get tempercent off your first
purchase fifteen percent off subscription coffee. Bonefrog Coffee dot com
slash todd. There's a debate going on in the Elka Church.
This is the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, which is
a fallen subsect of something that used to be Christianity.
A woman submitted an amendment to change the definition of marriage.
Speaker 8: To amend to strike the phrase to be a covenant
between a man and a woman and replace it with
the word as the goal of my amendment is to
remove language that has been especially harmful, while at the
same time it retains the reference to scripture and tradition
in the original statement and keeping with the process this
church has adopted. This may seem like a small, unimportant change,
yet I can still recall reading Gift and Trust for
the first time many years ago and thinking at first, wow,
this is actually kind of good. And then I got
to these words, and I still remember the sting of
those specific words. They did not represent my or many
faithful Christian people's understanding or lived experience of marriage and covenant.
Speaker 1: She was hurt because God's plan is not hers. God's
design for humanity is not hers. So she was hurt.
When the Elka Church made a decision to begin to
toss the word of God, they started an irrevocable march.
This can never be turned around because once you begin
to take portions of the Bible that hurts your feelings,
you're going to take the entire Bible, because guess what,
there's going to be pieces of it that hurt other
people's feelings. You're hurt because God, who created us in
his image, who loved us so much that he sent
his only son that whoever believes in him will be saved,
He designed us, therefore knows what's good for us. It's
like someone saying to you, hey, remember don't put normal
gas in a diesel engine. It'll screw it up. God saying, hey,
do not put in place for my plan your un
fleshly desires. Be that fornication, be that adultery, be that
same sex so called marriage. When you started down this
path of saying, hey, let's take the portions of the
Bible that hurt our feelings out, you can come right
down to you shall not cut, but you can write
down to parenting. You know what I made mistakes as
a parent, big ones. Praise God for what he's done
in my child's life. But I will tell you sometimes
it is hurtful for me to read the Bible describing
how fathers are to act with their kids, because it
reminds me of things I failed to do. Sometimes it's hurtful.
I should not then say strike this down. This doesn't
stand up to my lived experience. I should instead be saying,
how can I use the messes I made to be
a message for other people? In other words, how can
I make my test my testimony. It's good to see
the debate going on online about who Jesus is because
he will win. He's already won, and Google can't stop them.
They can try, but they can't. It's less good to
see this going on at the Elka Church. This is
the Todd Hermann Show. Please go, be well, be strong,
be kind, and please make every effort to walk in
the light of Christ.