Speaker 1: And we are back with another edition of the Federalist
Radio Hour. I'm Matt Kittle, senior elections correspondent at the
Federalist and your experienced Shirpa on today's quest for knowledge.
As always, you can email the show at radio at
the Federalist dot com, follow us on x at FDR LST,
make sure to subscribe wherever you download your podcast, and
of course to the premium version of our website as well.
Our guest today is Katie Faust, author of the great
new book pro Child Politics. It challenges the selfish quo
by centering children in all cultural and political conversations. Katie,
Welcome to the Federalist Radio Hour. And let me say
it is about time.
Speaker 2: Oh well, it's about time you and I met, Matt.
I've been on a couple other times for a few
other projects, but this one is very, very timely, especially
with your foot in the election coverage. I think that
this is going to be of serious interest to your listeners.
Speaker 1: As we said before we started the podcast today, there's
nothing quite like the smell of a freshly printed book.
And you have them, and they are moving out in
full scale right now. Let's talk about the background behind
the book. I guess why you decided, and I think
I can fully understand. But why you decided to take
on this project, Well, it.
Speaker 2: Was not on my twenty twenty four Bingo card, that's
for sure. I wasn't thinking we were going to do
this book at the turn of the year. I run
the nonprofit Them Before Us, which largely centers the child
in conversations around marriage and family, and have been on
the Federals Radio Hour. I'm a frequent contributor at the
Federalist in related matters, things like definition of family, redefinition
of marriage. So that's typically where I put the thrust
of my attention. But I have broadened that out to
defending children in all different cultural issues, defending their life, family, mind,
and body, which pretty much sums up the culture wars.
But I have long hypothesized that we could take this
perspective of putting children before adults, putting them before us,
and apply it to all of politics. Because the incredible
thing about putting.
Speaker 3: Them before us in matters of marriage and family is you.
Speaker 2: Get personal decisions correct, and you get the best policy
decisions as well. You certainly see that on the cultural
issues if you prioritize the protection of children, you end
up with great policy. And so we sort of thought,
what if we applied this to every major political, economic,
and national issue, what would happen? And that's what resulted
is this project to in essence, conscript nineteen subject matter
experts on every evergreen political topic and ask them to
write about their issue through the lens of putting children
before adults and what would happen? Like what would you
get as a result? And the answer is incredible policy
that not only safeguards the least of these, prioritizes the
next generation, but also leads to fiscal, national, and cultural.
Speaker 4: Health the least of these.
Speaker 1: I think that is at the core of your book,
it's the core of the movement. But it is interesting, Katie,
to me, I'm an old Wisconsin guy, emphasis on old,
and I think about the two elections, two election victories
of a guy like Tony Evers in Wisconsin, far left,
far leftist, marxist who's his slogan, his campaign slogan was
something to the effect of putting children first, putting kids
first in his colloquial phrasing of it. And this is
a guy who, of course, who has been backed by
millions of dollars in the child, the baby killing industry,
planned parenthood, the abortionist. He's not alone. We have a
vice president now freshly anointed as the Democrat figurehead for
the Democratic Party in this presidential campaign. She likes to
talk about children as well, and emphasizing policy to put
children first. It is to me, based on their records,
their political resumes a very perverse notion where they are
coming from. You take that on in some ways in
this book.
Speaker 2: Well, we take it on in I hope every single
way in Yeah, that you know at the very outset,
this is a collaboration, Right, I got nineteen subject matter
experts to explain in three thousand words religious liberty or
the economy, or energy or ESG and DEI, or debt
or taxes, or femininity or masculinity. I mean, you could
write an encyclopedia on these topics, and I said, give
to me in three thousand words. And what happens is
you recognize that in almost every one of these issues,
the left will push bad policy in the name of children.
We're doing this for the kids, right. We're going to
tax the rich, We're going to increase economic burdens, and
it's for the kids. But really what you're doing is
you are stealing parents time away from their children because
you're taxing them at greater rates. You know, you're not
doing it for the kids. You know, the kids that
are coming over the border. Those children, as we just
recently learned, are largely being forgotten and trafficked. And we
make that very very clear, the connection between child victimization
around our border policies and that this is this is
headlining the Democrats' priorities around border security. And so the
other side will co opt and will label every.
Speaker 3: One of their policies as being for the.
Speaker 2: Kids, and they smuggle in some of the most child
destroying ideas and policies in the name of things like
children's rights and doing it for the needs of children
and safeguarding children. And unfortunately, there really isn't anything that.
I mean, I've got a chance to peek at their
very long platform, and sometimes they talk about kids, but
even when they say they're doing it for the kids,
the actual on the ground result is child destruction. And
so there are a lot of people on the left
who talk about children's rights doing it for the kids. Unfortunately,
either they are so disconnected from reality, that they don't
understand how their policies are harming kids, or they're simply
psychopaths and power hungry bongers that are trying to advance
their own political gain at the expense of the least
of these.
Speaker 1: I think it's the former and the ladder, and I
think it's too much of the ladder in today's society,
today's culture. Speaking of which, how do you say you're
standing up for the children while you're arresting parents for
trying to stop the children from being mutilated. That's where
we are in America today, and I just it's a
very hard argument to make.
Speaker 4: But let's go back. How did we get.
Speaker 1: To this point in America today?
Speaker 2: Well, I'll give you Katie's answer, and then I'm going
to give you the answer of the two authors that
that authored chapters in our book that addressed that. So
Katie's answers how did we get here? Is you have
to go way back and answer this primary fundamental pre
political question, and the question is to whom do children belong?
I mean, that is the question that especially when you
look at a lot of the different parental rights, the
areas that parental rights are being manifested and attacked right now.
Speaker 3: It ultimately comes back to whom do children belong?
Speaker 2: Who gets to determine the upbringing, the medical care, and
the education of the child, And the other side says, well,
it's the state, it's the schools, it's the doctors, it's
the counselors, it's the activists. They belong to us. Children
belong to us. And you could hear echoes of that
through even Hillary Clinton's campaign of the village. You could
hear it through Joe Biden, who said those children belong
to all of us. That's just a way of saying
they don't belong to their parents. Now, that is a
problem because, as I outline in the family chapter of
Pro Child Politics, parents are, by every available data point,
in every different way that you can measure this, the
most connected to, invested in, and protective of their own children.
That is exactly why children belong to parents, because they're
the ones with the greatest amount of investment in those kids.
The teachers didn't even know who the kids were last year.
The doctor didn't understand, you know, the identity of the
child until you paid the call pay. The state doesn't
even know your kid's name, So no, the kids don't
belong to the state. But there's two different authors of
this in this book that really touch on the parental
rights issue. First is Billboard Chris Chris Elson, who wrote
our transgender Identity chapter, transgender ideology chapter, and of course
he has made himself rightly well known by simply walking
around with a sandwich board over him in cities across
the world, asking and telling people kids can't consent to
purity blockers. And ultimately this comes down to who are
you going to trust, right the doctors who are making
bank off of these procedures or the parents who are
trying to keep those needles in those scalpels away from
the kids. Second is Moms for Liberty co founder Tiffany Justice,
who wrote our education chapter and much of the war
around to whom do children belong are being fought on
the grounds of our schools today, and specifically she fingers
the teachers' unions who have been absolutely complicit in advancing
their own interests over and be of over and beyond
not just the well being of children, but parental rights,
children's rights, and just the sake of a good education
for our kids at all.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's amazing.
Speaker 1: I have written extensively in this area in schools across
the country, and you hear these stories and you report
on these stories about teachers. There's one case that is
particularly galling to me. It's been replicated across the country.
In what we're talking about is a teacher putting on
her classroom door. If your parents don't want to accept
you for who you are, I'm your mother. Now, that
is exactly what we're talking about. But this has been
inculcated in the education system, the public education system in
America for more than a generation. Now, how do you
go about getting rid of this kind of indoctrination that's
so deeply rooted?
Speaker 2: Well, and unfortunately it's not just teachers. The DNC has
platformed an activist named Jeffrey Marsh, who is I mean,
is just the most underselling way to put his online persona.
But he is an autogynophilic I assume man, you know,
man whose non binary wears lipstick makeup, whispers to kids.
Speaker 1: I mean, and he's the one we have a penshon
for women's luggage.
Speaker 2: No, it is not that one. But unfortunately, in relation
to people connected to the DNC, There's a lot of
different options about who I could be describing right now.
But Jeffrey Marsh is this absolute creep who is constantly
talking about how, hey, kids, if your parents don't love you,
I'll be your parents.
Speaker 3: I'll love you.
Speaker 2: You can come be with me any whispers like that.
He makes videos directly for kids that are widely shared
on TikTok. I mean, ultimately, when you get the answer
to the question to whom do children belong wrong, you
get victimized kids. We're absolutely seeing that in the transgender debate. Unfortunately,
we're seeing it in pretty much every area of progressive
policies at this point. So what do we do well?
The meta answer, I would say is start to prioritize children.
The meta answer is start to elevate the rights and
well being of children above the desires, agendas, identities, and
priorities of adults. And when you do that, miraculously, you
actually get clear eyed thinking and great policy, whether you're
talking about the economy, debt, or education. And so what
we need to do is we need to take those
child centric realities back into the culture, back into politics,
and we need to retake the institutions, retake the institutions. Obviously,
I think that should begin with institutions that have the
most direct contact with children, and education is certainly the
one that springs to the forefront of most of our minds.
But the reality is the economy needs to be scaling
itself in a way that actually rewards parents who are
building their life in a way that is child friendly.
And we need to craft our foreign policy and our
immigration policy in ways that elevate and prit the future
of the children that are here, as well as the
children that are wanting to come, whether legally or illegally,
and so like to me, one of the reasons why
this resource is so valuable is it really simplifies a
lot of things. We do this on the marriage and
family issue, and simply it's asking the question who's doing
hard things? Are adults doing hard things on behalf of children,
in which case that's called justice, or are children doing
hard things on behalf of adults, in which case that's
called injustice. And so what you can see is you
can apply this very very simple template to pretty much
any issue.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 3: We talk about it in the pornography chapter.
Speaker 2: Written by John Schweppie at the American Principles project. We
do it in the economy chapter written by Christopher Bedford,
who I know is a voice that a lot of
your listeners are going to recognize.
Speaker 3: We do it in the taxes chapter written.
Speaker 2: By Grover Norquist, whose like the name is synonymous with taxes, Like,
if you actually center your your priorities around children, you
will retake a lot of the institutions, you will retake
a lot of the leavers of power, and you're going
to The effect is going to be justice for children.
And if you get justice for children, you know what,
you also get national thriving. So I feel like this book,
especially for even people like me who are pretty well
versed on the cultural issues, don't quite know as much
about like religious liberty, digital technology, and policing, it helps
me understand how I can think clearly about and advocate
for children on all these different areas. And you know,
a convenient byproduct of that is actually, we're going to
secure our nation too.
Speaker 6: Indeed, have you ever noticed it's only called a recession
after we're already in it or pasted it? The Watched
Out on Wall Street podcast with Chris Markowski. Every day,
Chris helps unpack the connection between politics and the economy
and how it affects your wallet. Economists are all in
search of a recession like letter nimoy. If they find one,
it's already too late. Always be prepared by putting money
away and investing accordingly. Whether it's happening in DC or
down on Wall Street, it's affecting you financially.
Speaker 4: Be informed.
Speaker 6: Check out the Watchdot on Wall Street podcast with christ
Markowski on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Katie Faust, author of the fantastic new book pro Child Politics,
joining us in this edition of the Federalist Radio Hour.
You talk about a lot of these things, obviously involving
government and politics, and everything is politics, and everything is local,
of course, but we cannot have this conversation with talking
about the private sector and what vast swaths of the
private sector have done in this dangerous culture that our
children face. Now there is free market liberty.
Speaker 4: That's the battle that I.
Speaker 1: Think Republicans who talk about protecting children they kind of
get stalled at because, well, we can't touch the sacred
free market.
Speaker 4: And I get it.
Speaker 1: I understand that as a free market capitalist, an espouser
of free markets and free people. But what in the
name of whatever you want to call it, woke, dumb
or identity politics, however you phrase this, what about the
private sector, the Disneys of the world, the netflixes and
the list goes on and on.
Speaker 2: So this is a really important point because the free
market serves children. It serves children. The problem is when
the government meddles with the free market. And I think
that right now we're seeing that the most powerfully in
the ESG Dei realm, because it really is outside force,
is tinkering with influencing and actually seeking to overhaul society
in a progressive image. That is the lever that they
are using to do it is ESG and Dei. And
Justin dan Hoff, who is one of the originators of Strive,
which which is Viva k Ramaswami's organization, wrote our ESG
chapter and he talks about how same thing as what
you mentioned at the offset of the show, that they're
doing it for the children.
Speaker 3: I mean, we're doing this so that children can be represented,
children can have equality. We are going to be able
to include them. And they are doing so much of
their messaging on platforms and through mediums directly targeting children.
But as he makes very very clear children are the
ultimate victims of DEI and ESG priorities. Now, another distinctive
of this book, which I love and that Justin did
so so well, is we on the right often will
we've got the right information.
Speaker 2: We have principles founded in natural law. We always have
the research and the data on our side. We rarely
tell the best stories humanize our victims. And so when
I requested that these nineteen contributors craft their three thousand
words on their various area of expertise, I said, non negotiable.
Everybody begins with the real life story of a child
who is victimized because we believed progressive lies about your topic.
And so Justin shares the story of a little girl
in Sri Lanka who was from a middle class family.
Parents were employed, doing fairly well, and then Sri Lanka
imposed all the ESG requirements. You know, they wanted that
perfect Corporate Equality Index style score, and as a result,
they completely wreck their economy and plunged these little girls,
these little children, into utter poverty. But they have a
perfect Corporate Equality Index score, their children are just begging
for food. And so, like he does a great job
of connecting the dots between what happens when we use
the economy, when we use the free markets means of
social overhaul through ESG and DEI, well, children are victimized.
How is it that we create an economy that actually
works for parents and that means it works for children.
We get the government out.
Speaker 1: And the government has been such an incredible force in
this whole diversity, equity inclusion movement. It is you know,
the battlegrounds have been clear for the last several years.
We are seeing some pushback. We're seeing Moms for Liberty,
We're seeing just individual parents going to their school board
meetings and saying enough is enough. We have had it.
This is not right. This is not putting children first.
This is division first and foremost. And it's very harmful
in the way that you are clearly carrying this out.
But then what happens, Katie when they go to their
local school boards and how often do we see this,
certainly in the early part of the Biden administration. Now
they're on an FBI danger watch list. Now they're being
intimidated by federal DOJ agents. This is a very clear
battle based on what we're seeing in terms of the response,
how is the movement faring these days? What's the psychology
like of the movement fighting back?
Speaker 2: Well, that situation is something that Tiffany Justice Mentions outlines
in her chapter on education, because absolutely what happened is
the people that said those kids don't belong to you,
they belong to me. They're absolutely being demonized and criminalized.
And so we do need to understand that parents have
a right to their own children, to the upbringing, education,
medical care of their kids. And I love that. You know,
as Governor Youngkin said, you know that election created a
new voting block, and the voting block with parents, Pavlujah glory,
and that is picking up steam because more and more
parents are realizing you're encroaching on a territory that you
have no business even touching. Get away from my kids.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 2: I am a huge supporter of parental rights. I just
think it doesn't go far enough. I mean, I love
that parents need to direct the upbringing, education, in medical
care of their own children. That's awesome for the kids
that have parents to understand that their rule is to
protect them. It's not awesome for kids that are outside
of that protection of adults who have that kind of
protective lens for them. So that's why I'm an advocate
for children. That's why I think that we need to
advance policies and ideas that advocate on behalf of children,
not just parental rights, which is important, but child protection
because then you're going to cover the kids who don't
necessarily have parents to understand that they need to protect them.
I mean, especially on things like gender ideology. For example,
we want to protect parents' rights to refuse transgender treatments
for their kids, but parental rights does not allow a
mother or a father to chemically castrate their children through
cross sex hormones or quote unquote gender affirmation surgery where
they're having healthy organs removed from their bodies.
Speaker 3: No children have a right to an.
Speaker 2: Intact, unmedicalized body. And so this perspective of pro child
politics putting kids first will actually check supposed parental rights.
If there is an adult that says, well, I really
do believe my five year old is non binary, and
I really want to get them on puberty blockers, you know,
right before they get to that Tanner stage A or
whatever it is. No, we need to go into all
of politics with the posture of child protection. That is
obviously going to reinforce parental rights, but it is also
going to go farther and say all children deserve protection,
not just the ones whose parents have their head screwed
on straight.
Speaker 1: You raise a very good point. We have seen this
over and over again, and I think it goes back
to this DEI movement, and that has been going on
for a long time, longer than a lot of folks
have acknowledged. It's ingrained, and so what are we producing
in this society? But in some cases, parents who believe
it is their absolute right to know to mutilate their children,
to mutilate thirteen, fourteen, fifteen year old girls and boys,
We've seen the consequences of that, and so that is
why this book emphasizes parents writes certainly, but putting children
before all of.
Speaker 7: That warmer sunnier days are calling fuel up for them
with factors, no prep, no mess, meals meet your wellness
schools in time for summer. Thanks to the menu of
chef crafted meals with options like calorie smart, protein plus
and keto factors. Fresh never frozen meals are Dietitian approved
and ready to eat in just two minutes, so no
matter how busy you are, you'll always have time to
enjoy nutritious, great tasting meals make today to day you
kick start a new healthy routine. What are you waiting for?
With thirty five different meals and more than sixty add
ons to choose from every week, you'll always have new
flavors to explore. You can crush your wellness goals this
month with dietitian approved meals and ingredients that you can trust.
Make your day delicious from breakfast to dessert. Stay fueled
with easy nutritious options. Treat yourself to restaurant quality meals
that feature premium ingredients like filet mignon, shrimp, and black
and salmon. Keep kitchen time to a minimum. Factor meals
are ready in just two minutes, no shopping, no prepping,
no cooking or cleaning up. Enjoy effortless support for your
lifestyle by choosing from six menu preferences to help you
manage calories, maximize protein intake, or simply eat well balanced.
Head to Factor Meals dot com. Slash Federalist fifty and
use code Federalist fifty to get fifty percent off your
first box plus twenty percent off your next month. That's
code Federalists fifty at factor meals dot com slash Federalists
fifty to get fifty percent off your first box plus
twenty percent off your next month while your subscription is active.
Speaker 1: And let us address something that has become a significant
issue in this election, at least one of those side
issues that has taken I think more of a front
and center position, and that's the ivy fertilization. You know,
we talk about kids who are going through the school system,
you know, growing up in challenging economic times, whatever the
case may be. But this all begins, of course, long
before we get there. And what is happening with a
mega industry that is reshaping the conversation around this front.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and this is obviously something that we spend a
lot of time on them before us. And so if
you go to the Federalist, you'll see that I've authored
several articles critiquing big fertility. But this book features Abby Johnson,
who wrote my chapter on life, and she did an
excellent job of outlining the parallels between the baby making
industry of IVF and the baby taking industry of abortion,
and she makes it very clear that both of these
industries are built upon lies about life, lies about children,
and both of them need to be forcefully critiqued and
rejected if we really believe that children have a right
to life. Now, this is something that I think a
lot of people on the right struggle with because obviously
we are sickened by abortion because of the very clear
victimization of children the hands of abortion doctors. We Scratcher
had a little bit more about why anybody would oppose
IVF or service or other forms of reproductive technologies, and
the answer is, well, big fertility victimizes more children every
year in terms of the loss of life than the
abortion industry does. That because of the way that big
fertility is currently practiced. And now I just want to
shout out to the Federalists because they are one of
the few conservative outlets that gets this right one hundred
percent of the time.
Speaker 3: They were so early to this fight, they were so dialed.
Speaker 2: In to what was coming down the pike. And Jordan
Bird has done tons of work on this, I mean
every single time, is he a great article in my house?
Probably Jordan, and it is most of you.
Speaker 1: Yes, I want to particularly shout out Jordan. She has
done extensive work in this area and She's had her
share of battles with the industry and others or advocates
thereof of this death industry, and she is faced at
front on as you folks have as well.
Speaker 4: And I'm so.
Speaker 1: Glad that your book does include this very important chapter
that ties all of this together, you know, the iv
fertilization industry as well as the abortion industry in America.
Speaker 2: Let me just say that the other side, the Democrats,
completely understand that these two issues are connected.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 2: They are already talking about IVF protection, IVF access, surrogacy
rights under the same umbrella as reproductive rights. I mean,
this is about reproductive autonomy, reproductive justice. And when they
talk like that, they're not just talking about permissive abortion policy.
They are also talking about unfettered, often government subsidized access
to IVF sperm and egg donation and some woman's womb.
So they understand that baby making and baby taking are
two sides of the same child commodifying coin. It tends
to be the people on the right who say, oh,
abortion is bad, but IVF is good. I'm sorry. Both
of them determine a child rights based on wantedness. You
know what abortion says is if a child is unwanted,
they can be you can force them out of existence
by violating their right to life, and idea big fertility
reproductive technology says, if a child is very wanted, you
can force them into existence, very often at the expense
of dozens of children's right to life. So this is
a hard one for us. But those people who are
listening to this and principled and really do understand and
believe that life begins at conception, you have to both
fight the abortion industry and the big fertility industry.
Speaker 1: One area that is deeply concerning, I think for anybody
with eyes and ears, is how the left in this country,
the DEI left, how it has divided our children against
our children. DEI policies have done that with everyone, adults, voters,
and it's by design, but you see it in schools,
this division that has gone on because no other reason
than power and identity politics behind that power.
Speaker 4: I believe your book, as.
Speaker 1: We've talked about, squarely, addresses this particular issue as well well.
Speaker 2: And there's two chapters that jump right to the forefront
of my mind when you brought this up. First was
the chapter that was authored by Delano Squires at the
Heritage Foundation on race and the lies that we tell
children about race. And that's the other distinctive of the
book that I really love is I said, listen, here's
the template all of you guys that are coming in
with your very very diverse topics that people say these
things should have nothing to do with each other, and
generally they don't. I said, here's how I want this
to go. I want you to tell me the story
of a real life child who was victimized because we
believed progressive lies. Then I want you to identif find
those lies, what are the lies about pornography or religious liberty,
or immigration or national security. Then tell me how those
lies harm kids. And then I want you to tell
me the truth about immigration, foreign policy, religious liberty, and
then tell me what would happen if how would children
be protected if we believed and acted on those truths.
So the lies that Delano explains in the Race chapter,
I think are so helpful. And number one, the number
one lie says is that race exists, right, that that's like,
there is a thing such as race that actually defines
who we are. And he's like, oh, there's a human race,
but genetically there's really not a whole lot of race
other than.
Speaker 5: That, And then he says the second li is that
race is essential, that it's an essential part of who
you are, and you know that this really tells you
your true identity.
Speaker 2: And then line number three is different outcomes are always
caused by racism. So then he debunks what you just said,
that sort of dei lens of looking at the inequities
and fingering that this lie that obviously there's some kind
of systemic injustice if things are not completely equitable. And
then the fourth lie is that we need good discrimination. Right,
the way to combat racism is a discrimination, just the
good kind. And he talks about the way that this
pits children against each other. When we are communicating these
kinds of lies to kids, it doesn't lead to like
sweet unity in the classroom. It leads to viewing one
another with suspicion. The other chapter that really touches on
this is by Ashley Maguire, who is formerly of the
Beckett Fund, so the law firm that fights a lot
of the religious liberty battles, and she wrote about why
religious liberty is a matter of justice for children and
how a culture that preserves and values religious liberty is
a truly tolerant culture, one where children can have differences
of religion or belief or convictions, but not necessarily look
at one another as enemies. But when we strip our
culture of religious liberty protections, when we demonize people for
their strongly held convictions, we do get children looking at
one another with levels of suspicion and really afraid to
or advised against interacting with other kids.
Speaker 1: Powerful powerful stories in here, and I love the fact
that you do this, putting faces on this issue the people,
the children who have been most negatively impacted by these
horrible and horrifying policies we've seen take shape in this
country for too long. Final question for you, are you
hopeful that Americans in this election and beyond will indeed
put children first and we can write this republic ship.
Speaker 2: I want to be realistic and say right now, I
think that we have conditioned our entire society to think
about me first. And what we're talking about with a
pro child politics is putting them before us, putting children
before adults.
Speaker 3: But I will say is that everybody that is looking at.
Speaker 2: The fraying corners of our social fabric, or those that
are looking at the massive amount of debt that we
are accumulating. Are those looking at how we have weakened
our foreign policy in terms of our military readiness and
the internal protections of our society based on our immigration policy.
All of them are understanding that something alarming is taking place.
And what I am here to say is you don't
have to come up with disparate responses to all of
those different issues.
Speaker 3: You just put kids first.
Speaker 2: If you put kids first, as and I'll just quote
Molly Hemingway who kind of blurbed this for me right
at the beginning. You know, she said, thumbing to it.
A strange thing happens when you examine every cultural, economic,
and national issue through the lens of child protection. You
end up with conservatism, but not a rigid or academic conservatism.
Conservatism that speaks about who we are for, not what
we are against. Pro child politics is not only good
for kids, but smart policy. So for those people that
are alarmed by the direction of this country, whether it's economic,
whether we're talking about military readiness, whether we're talking about
the transing of the kids, I will tell you the
way forward, and it is to put kids first on
all these topics. So there is some education to be done,
but I believe that this is the way to do it.
A Because it's accessible. We have made this very very accessible.
You don't have to be an expert on energy to
read Neil Chatterjee's chapter on this and come away feeling
like an expert on energy. B. It really does tap
into that universal gut response of don't touch the kids,
leave the kids alone. And there really are people on
the left and the right that feel that, and I
really think that's something we can capitalize on. And it's holistic.
You know, we don't have to figure out, well, this
is an issue of individual liberty, and while this is
an issue of you know, economic savvy, no, put the
kids first. It's a very simple template that we can
apply to every evergreen issue, not just for this election,
which I absolutely think you should consider, but this is
going to be relevant in five years, in fifteen years,
and in fifty years. Why because kids don't change. Kids
don't change. They always have needed the same thing that
I always will need, the same thing, protection from the
only demographic powerful enough to give it to them, and
that is adults. So that is the point of this
book is to say, do you want individual justice for
children and therefore social and national justice. Just put kids first.
Speaker 1: As we started, the least among us, let us, for
God's sake, protect the least among them. Katie, thanks so much.
The powerful book with powerful stories that I think will
really connect with our listening audience, our readers in this country.
Speaker 2: Yeah, thanks so much for having me Matt anytime.
Speaker 1: As you know, thanks to my guest today, Katie Faust,
author of the new book pro Child Politics. It is
challenging the selfish quo by centering children in all cultural
and political conversations. You've been listening to another edition of
The Federalist Radio Hour. I'm Matt Kittle's senior correspondent at
the Federalist. We'll be back soon with more. Until then,
stay lovers of freedom and anxious for the fray