Speaker 1: Kitties The Jesse Kelly Show. Another hour of The Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly Show on a Magnificent Friday. As we churned through
Speaker 1: all the questions. By the way, Jewish producer Chris didn't
Speaker 1: look it up. I brought up last hour, how these
Speaker 1: in these hostile foreign city states, the blue areas of
Speaker 1: the country. The Democrats have to have these foreigners because
Speaker 1: the foreigners keep them elected. And I mentioned that Minnesota
Speaker 1: it's a red state without foreigners. Probably other states too,
Speaker 1: maybe even California, Oregon undoubted they're red states without foreigners.
Speaker 1: You know how many votes Dome beat Donald Trump with
Speaker 1: last election one hundred and thirty eight thousand, one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand Somalis alone in Minnesota. What happens if the foreigners
Speaker 1: are actually arrested, deported, some denaturalized. What happens, well, Democrats
Speaker 1: lose power in this country Without them, Democrats become nothing.
Speaker 1: Before I go to the questions, I should probably give
Speaker 1: Caroline Levitt some credit. I love this is how we
Speaker 1: treat these hacks.
Speaker 2: Now. Why was Renee good unfortunately and tragically killed? Oh
Speaker 2: you're asking me my opinion because an I shapen doctor
Speaker 2: recklessly and killed the own Justice Bible. Oh okay, so
Speaker 2: you're a biased reporter with a left wing opinion.
Speaker 1: What do you want me to do?
Speaker 2: Yeah, because you're a left wing hack. You're not a reporter.
Speaker 2: You're posing in this room as a journalist. And it's
Speaker 2: so clear by the premise of your question, and you
Speaker 2: and the people in the media who have such biases
Speaker 2: but fake like you're a journalist. You shouldn't even be
Speaker 2: sitting in that seat. But you're pretending that you're a journalist.
Speaker 2: But you're a left wing activist. And the question that
Speaker 2: you just raised and your answer proves your bias. You
Speaker 2: should be reporting on the facts. You should re reporting
Speaker 2: on the cases. Do you have the numbers of how
Speaker 2: many American citizens were killed at the hands of illegal
Speaker 2: aliens who Ice is trying to remove from this country?
Speaker 2: I bet you don't.
Speaker 1: Pretty good, Pretty freaking good. Hey Jesse, the Mighty Jesse.
Speaker 1: This guy says, I just emailed my new congressional representative
Speaker 1: expressing my outrage on this one hundred and eighty billion
Speaker 1: dollars spending bill. Pause. He's talking about the spending bill
Speaker 1: making its way through Congress as we speak. A bunch
Speaker 1: of people are raising a stink about it very understandably,
Speaker 1: because there's all kinds of things that are in it
Speaker 1: that are still awful, absolutely awful. We're talking about money
Speaker 1: for quote, refugee resettlement. I mean, the things that are
Speaker 1: in the spending bill are terrible, and Republicans are voting
Speaker 1: for it. Anyway, My question to him is why are
Speaker 1: we sending money to Washington so it can be stolen
Speaker 1: by Minnesota, New York and New Jersey. First we heard
Speaker 1: it was millions, Now we're hearing it's billions. That's twelve
Speaker 1: digits to the left of the decibel point. There are
Speaker 1: also reports saying the fraud could hit trillions. Why hasn't
Speaker 1: anyone introduced a bill to suspend taxes? All right, so
Speaker 1: it's a very good point. Your anger is justified completely.
Speaker 1: But remember this, and this is one of those things
Speaker 1: that we don't want to hear. You're going to not
Speaker 1: enjoy hearing this. I'm just gonna give you a heads
Speaker 1: up ahead of time. This won't be lovely to hear.
Speaker 1: We do not have enough power in Congress. When I
Speaker 1: say we, I'm not just talking about Republicans. You already
Speaker 1: know Republicans have a super slim majority in the House.
Speaker 1: We don't have that much of a majority in the
Speaker 1: Senate either. We don't have sixty votes. You need that
Speaker 1: sixty vote limit to pass whatever you want. But even
Speaker 1: if we did boom, have sixty votes in the Senate tomorrow,
Speaker 1: we still have a small cabal of swampy rhino low
Speaker 1: t Republicans who stop us every time we're about to
Speaker 1: make real reforms. Therefore, and I'll come back to that
Speaker 1: in a minute, but therefore, the bills that actually get
Speaker 1: through the House and the Senate, they can't really be
Speaker 1: new laws. They have to be, for instance, spending bills.
Speaker 1: You always hear that we have to do a continuing resolution.
Speaker 1: We need a continuing resolution has to be a continuing resolution?
Speaker 1: All right, what's that mean? That means we're going to
Speaker 1: take all the spending we've been doing. Okay, this group
Speaker 1: gets fifty million a year, and this group gets one
Speaker 1: hundred million a year, and that group, we're gonna take
Speaker 1: all the spending we've been doing, and we just keep
Speaker 1: doing that. Hey, let's just do what we've been doing
Speaker 1: for another six months. Sound good, Sound good? That's what
Speaker 1: we've been doing, over and over and over and over
Speaker 1: and over again. Why have we been able to get
Speaker 1: that through because of the way Congress is, because of
Speaker 1: the basically the rules the laws around Congress. They may
Speaker 1: not have the votes, anybody may not have the votes
Speaker 1: to pass a new law, but you don't need, for instance,
Speaker 1: sixty votes in the Senate to do a continuing resolution.
Speaker 1: Just a simple majority allows you to keep doing what
Speaker 1: you're doing. That does not mean we can't make any
Speaker 1: improvements to the spending. I'm not saying that, and I'm
Speaker 1: not making excuses for the GOP. But what I am
Speaker 1: saying is this. Let's say, and this is I'm just
Speaker 1: going to do a simple number. Let's say one hundred
Speaker 1: million dollars a year is what we've been spending. Obviously
Speaker 1: it's a lot more than that, but let's say one
Speaker 1: hundred million dollars year. One hundred million dollars a year
Speaker 1: is what we've been spending. You, because you're a sane
Speaker 1: human being who has to budget for your house, you
Speaker 1: look at all the line items under that there's ten
Speaker 1: million here, and five million of this and six million
Speaker 1: to this, and it's a fairly simple thing for you.
Speaker 1: For me, we say, okay, well that's got to go. Now,
Speaker 1: put a line through that, and that's got to go,
Speaker 1: oh gosh, that's there. We'll put a line through that,
Speaker 1: and that's got to go, well, we don't want to
Speaker 1: fund that. That's simple, isn't it very simple? How you
Speaker 1: do it? It's how I do it. But that one
Speaker 1: hundred million a year to overly simplify it. If we
Speaker 1: change that number too much, if we put too many
Speaker 1: lines underneath it, then it becomes not a continuing resolution.
Speaker 1: Now we're probably we can. We can cross out so
Speaker 1: much that it becomes, quote, a new bill that needs
Speaker 1: a big majority to pass it, and it doesn't get passed.
Speaker 1: That was a long way of me telling you we
Speaker 1: kind of have to nibble around the edges right now
Speaker 1: when it comes to spending and stuff, and I hate
Speaker 1: that we can't have We don't have access to the
Speaker 1: hatchet you want. And I want to start chunking off
Speaker 1: big hunks of this what Chris Chris said, even with
Speaker 1: all three branches, both houses. Yeah, Congress is designed, the
Speaker 1: House and Senate. They're designed so that you don't just
Speaker 1: need fifty one percent of whatever well of either house
Speaker 1: to pass whatever you want. The Founders wanted it to
Speaker 1: be difficult to pass laws. They wanted it to be difficult.
Speaker 1: They wanted an overwhelming majority of the House and Senate
Speaker 1: to be on board before any law can pass. Therefore,
Speaker 1: that creates this in people. Jewish producer Chris just said it. Well,
Speaker 1: why don't we then remove the filibuster? Okay, understandable. Let's
Speaker 1: just remove the filibuster. That would mean we need fifty
Speaker 1: one senators to pass whatever law we want. Sounds good, right, Okay,
Speaker 1: tell me which law Lisa Murkowski of Alaska is going
Speaker 1: to sign on for. Do you think Lisa Murkowski of
Speaker 1: Alaska always willing to be a trader to our cause?
Speaker 1: Do you think she's going to sign on for national
Speaker 1: voter ID. Susan Collins is a allegedly Republican senator from Maine.
Speaker 1: Now I give her more grace than I give others
Speaker 1: because Maine is a blue state, so she can't be
Speaker 1: as right wing as you or I want her to be.
Speaker 1: I get that, So I really I'm not killing her
Speaker 1: when I say this, But do you think Susan Collins,
Speaker 1: who has to get elected in Maine, is going to
Speaker 1: pass a mass deportation bill. We have a tiny cabal
Speaker 1: of Republicans. They may may not be the supermajority anymore,
Speaker 1: but there are enough of them that stop us currently
Speaker 1: from making major changes or passing any kind of a
Speaker 1: decent law. I've said it before, I'll say it again.
Speaker 1: The Trump administration keeps saying remove the filibuster, Remove the philibuster.
Speaker 1: You see people all over the country, including on our side,
Speaker 1: saying remove the filibuster. I will once again ask a
Speaker 1: very simple question. You want me to sign on for
Speaker 1: removing the filibuster. I'm all in, provided you give me
Speaker 1: the law that has the votes to pass that will
Speaker 1: crush communism in some way in this country. If you
Speaker 1: told me right now you could pass a national voter
Speaker 1: ID law and we had the votes in the Senate
Speaker 1: to do it right now, I'd say, get rid of
Speaker 1: that friggin filibuster and pass the law. We don't have
Speaker 1: those votes, So why are you removing the philibuster? If
Speaker 1: you don't have the votes to pass a good law,
Speaker 1: what are you just doing it to do it? We
Speaker 1: don't have the votes, We don't have enough power to
Speaker 1: pass whatever we want to pass. Sucks, but that's the
Speaker 1: world in which we live. It is the Jesse Kelly
Speaker 1: Show on a wonderful, fantastic, fantastic Friday. Remember you can
Speaker 1: email this show Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com. Now
Speaker 1: I need to just spare my soul for a minute,
Speaker 1: and then we'll get back to the questions and talk
Speaker 1: about civil wars and commies and then all the World
Speaker 1: War three. You're all in the war today apparently. But
Speaker 1: now something happened. All right. First, I've told you that
Speaker 1: I'm trying to make twenty twenty six the healthiest year ever,
Speaker 1: and you can mock me all you want, Chris, I've
Speaker 1: been doing pretty well so far. The workouts have increased,
Speaker 1: and my eating has gotten so much much better. I'm
Speaker 1: not going to be eating kale salads. That's not going
Speaker 1: to happen. But for instance, yesterday, yesterday it was super
Speaker 1: protein heavy, eating more beef and beef sticks and beef
Speaker 1: jerky and protein shakes instead of cheese curds and stuff
Speaker 1: like that. Add two or three. What I was not judging, Corey,
Speaker 1: I was just saying I didn't eat cheese curds like
Speaker 1: you ate cheese curds last night. Either way, I told
Speaker 1: you that we recently had to travel and we had
Speaker 1: to go into this iHeart building. Well, we're used to
Speaker 1: just working in our studio where we do our thing
Speaker 1: and we have our kitchen. In this iHeart building where
Speaker 1: there's all these iHeart people. Remember they don't work for
Speaker 1: the show. Many don't even know who we are. I
Speaker 1: mean many do. But there's a large snack area. And
Speaker 1: when I say snack area, they're free, not to make
Speaker 1: myself sound like Chris, they're free. And we're talking top
Speaker 1: tier gas station snacks. You want Miss Vicki's jalapeno chips,
Speaker 1: they're there, Doritos boom there. Maybe you're a peanut butter
Speaker 1: cracket guy, cracker guy there, fruit roll ups there, they
Speaker 1: have son chips there. It's a money snack rack money,
Speaker 1: and then a fridge right by it with all kinds
Speaker 1: of stuff with sodaes. They even have one pack full
Speaker 1: of beer. It's amazing. I've been eating really, really good.
Speaker 1: And what I do when I go through this is
Speaker 1: sometimes I'll eat good for a couple of days, two
Speaker 1: three days, and then I will break and I will
Speaker 1: destroy every ounce of gain I have made. And last
Speaker 1: night I had some cravings. And so when the show
Speaker 1: ended and there were still people in the building all
Speaker 1: over the building, people who don't know us, and some
Speaker 1: do know us, but that's probably worse. I went over
Speaker 1: to the snack rack and I did not grab one
Speaker 1: bag of chips. I didn't grab two bags of chips.
Speaker 1: And we don't have to go into the number, but
Speaker 1: there was there were a lot of chips. And I
Speaker 1: grabbed all of the remaining fruit roll ups, and I
Speaker 1: did not have a bag or a case of any
Speaker 1: kind and had to walk through the entire building by
Speaker 1: everybody out the front door, past the secretary and buy
Speaker 1: security and out the front door. And it took me
Speaker 1: both hands to carry all the snacks. And what Chris
Speaker 1: was at least it's not cheese curds. Chris, you can
Speaker 1: say cheese curds are loaded with protein. Okay, do you
Speaker 1: have any idea how fantastic those doritos were last night?
Speaker 1: And now today, I don't feel good about myself. I
Speaker 1: feel like I've failed in some way, But really the
Speaker 1: failure is probably Chris. Listen, Chris, you should have known
Speaker 1: ahead of time. It's your job to hide that stuff
Speaker 1: when I'm trying to be healthy so I don't make
Speaker 1: bad decisions. Isn't that the whole point? What do you
Speaker 1: guys even do here? You sit in front of these
Speaker 1: computers and press buttons. I know you're not actually working.
Speaker 1: Maybe you could see the future and know that that's
Speaker 1: going to create temptation. And that's why ZipRecruiter exists. ZipRecruiter
Speaker 1: is there so you can get people who work for you,
Speaker 1: who make your life easier, Not people who allow doritos
Speaker 1: to be put in front of you and fruit roll ups,
Speaker 1: people who actually make your life easier. Are you an employer,
Speaker 1: are you looking for somebody better? Or maybe you have
Speaker 1: an empty spot, maybe you're expanding, Maybe it's seasonal, Maybe
Speaker 1: you're looking for something permanent you need, you need a star.
Speaker 1: It's assistant manager time. The best people are all on ZipRecruiter.
Speaker 1: It's number one for a reason, and I'm not asking
Speaker 1: you to give it give it a month. Four out
Speaker 1: of five employers find somebody the first day you want
Speaker 1: to try it free. Speaking of Chris, ZipRecruiter dot com
Speaker 1: slash Jesse, ZipRecruiter dot com slash Jesse, Don Jesse the
Speaker 1: vest yesterday you mentioned the USSR was the longest lasting
Speaker 1: COMMI country, but by my math, China must be just
Speaker 1: as old with no signs of uh showing no signs
Speaker 1: of collapse. What has made China more successful than the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union in this long javity Metrics says his name
Speaker 1: is Zach. He said, PS. Longevity metric means a measurement
Speaker 1: of how long something lasts. You know, I know what
Speaker 1: longevity metric means. You guys, don't have to keep explaining
Speaker 1: words to me. That's one two, nineteen forty nine, fifty
Speaker 1: seventy five. No, China, right now, they're probably about equal
Speaker 1: to how member to how long the Soviet Union lasted. Remember,
Speaker 1: China did not collapse in a nineteen seventeen revolution like
Speaker 1: Russia did. China. Pre World War Two, China was having
Speaker 1: a huge internal war between the nationalists led by a
Speaker 1: man great man by the name of Chang Kai Shek,
Speaker 1: and the Communists who in the end they were led
Speaker 1: of course by mal z A Dung and Chang Kai
Speaker 1: Shek and the Communists came to a easy truce when
Speaker 1: the Japanese were killing all those Chinese people. But the
Speaker 1: dirty comedies did what dirty comedies always do, and they
Speaker 1: acted like they were gonna help. Instead, they stood back
Speaker 1: and let the nationalists take all the casualties against the
Speaker 1: Japanese and then as soon as the war was over,
Speaker 1: then the communists had more power, they beat the nationalists
Speaker 1: took over the country nineteen forty nine. So you're not
Speaker 1: necessarily right on your dates. There's just a confusion on
Speaker 1: the dates. Russia fell nineteen seventeen, China fel to communism
Speaker 1: nineteen forty nine. Now, how are they still holding themselves up?
Speaker 1: You say there's no signs of collapse, but maybe there are,
Speaker 1: and we'll talk about that next. It is the Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly Show on a Fantastic Friday. You can email us
Speaker 1: Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com. This is some good news,
Speaker 1: I should say out of Kevin Hassett, n EC director.
Speaker 3: It's our expectation.
Speaker 1: You know what NEEC stands for, Chris so.
Speaker 3: And so our expectation is that you're going to have
Speaker 3: the biggest refund season ever, which is going to be
Speaker 3: a significant positive stimulus for the economy. But I will
Speaker 3: add non inflationary stimulus because we've got all the supply
Speaker 3: going up too. We've got eighteen trillion dollars in new
Speaker 3: factory construction and so on, and so I think that
Speaker 3: it's really you know, the Trump Golden Age is going
Speaker 3: to be tested the theory of it this year, and
Speaker 3: I think it's looking pretty good.
Speaker 1: How about that, showgun. I've listened to you for years now.
Speaker 1: We have seen a steady societal decline over this illegal crap,
Speaker 1: and now find we have a federal government passing out
Speaker 1: money to illegals while we rely on tunnel to towers
Speaker 1: to help our wounded veterans. Is this new thing with
Speaker 1: paid protesters fighting ice are new South versus North pending
Speaker 1: civil war? Has not? The federal government lost all of
Speaker 1: its legitimacy finally because of all this fraud. His name
Speaker 1: is Chris, A good Chris. Is this our new civil war?
Speaker 1: It depends on It depends on when you think the
Speaker 1: Civil War, the one we already fought. It depends on
Speaker 1: when you think it started. If you think it started
Speaker 1: at Fort Sumter in South Carolina, when we started shooting
Speaker 1: cannons at each other, then no. If you think the
Speaker 1: Civil War began when Americans started turning against other Americans,
Speaker 1: thinking other Americans were treasonous, and then started killing each
Speaker 1: other in low level forms, not army against army, but
Speaker 1: in low level forms, then of course it has already started. Remember,
Speaker 1: we're already we're already dying. We're already dying. It's mostly
Speaker 1: people on the right. But we just had a dirty
Speaker 1: communist die because she tried to run over an Ice agent.
Speaker 1: She won't be the last one. Look, we've had it's
Speaker 1: not just Charlie Kirk. We've had people on our side,
Speaker 1: many of them die get killed at the hands of
Speaker 1: communist street animals in this country. Now, what's happening, Well,
Speaker 1: we are fracturing. We are fracturing. That doesn't mean though,
Speaker 1: that does not mean that it's inevitable. We will continue
Speaker 1: to snowball and will end up with armies shooting at
Speaker 1: each other. Let me give you the good and bad
Speaker 1: scenarios that this can work out. Here's a bad one.
Speaker 1: I'll start with the bad, but because it's Friday, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna end with the good because I don't want to
Speaker 1: leave you feeling like crap. The worst case scenario that
Speaker 1: could happen. We have heard in recent days Democrat politicians
Speaker 1: and people in the media. They sure sound like they're
Speaker 1: encouraging a serious physical pushback against federal law enforcement. When
Speaker 1: the mayor of many Appolis says things like this.
Speaker 4: Oh, imagine if that city or that town was suddenly
Speaker 4: invaded by thousands of federal agents that do not share
Speaker 4: the values that you hold.
Speaker 1: Dear invaded, my neighbors are saying that the police should
Speaker 1: stand up the ice. Now, let's assume maybe we shouldn't
Speaker 1: assume this, but let's assume that it's not going to
Speaker 1: get to that point right now. And I don't know
Speaker 1: that that's the case, by the way, but let's assume
Speaker 1: we're not going to get to the point where we
Speaker 1: have United States Marines squaring off against the Minneapolis Police Department.
Speaker 1: Let's hope we don't get there. And let's assume we're
Speaker 1: not going to get there. Let's assume I don't want
Speaker 1: to say cooler heads will prevail, but maybe one sidle
Speaker 1: back off a little bit. Now, how long do we
Speaker 1: have to go before that stops happening, Before a Demomocrat politician,
Speaker 1: encouraged by their street animal base, doesn't back off. How
Speaker 1: long do we have to go? I think it would
Speaker 1: be naive to think we'll never get to the place
Speaker 1: where there is that square off. In ways, it almost
Speaker 1: seems inevitable. I think we're going to get there now.
Speaker 1: I mean, maybe not today, but I already told you
Speaker 1: that's my prediction. I think there are Democrat politicians, maybe
Speaker 1: not in Minnesota, they are going to push this to
Speaker 1: the brink and we're going to have a very ugly
Speaker 1: situation I believe, between American law enforcement in some state
Speaker 1: or city in the federal government. I think it's going
Speaker 1: to get bad. But beyond that, that's the bad. You
Speaker 1: can see this snowball and get us to that point.
Speaker 1: Governor Gavin Newsom, it probably wouldn't be MC wants to
Speaker 1: be president, but Governor Gavin Newsom calls in the National
Speaker 1: Guard to surround and apprehend ICE agents because they're deporting foreigners.
Speaker 1: That's not outside of the realm of possibility at all.
Speaker 1: They threaten it all the time. But that's the bad.
Speaker 1: Let's go to the good part of this. Let's talk
Speaker 1: about something hopeful. When it comes to this, and I've
Speaker 1: discussed this before, what does the Democrat Party exist on
Speaker 1: cheating in elections? Fraud? And when I say fraud, I
Speaker 1: mean using tax payer money to pay voters, essentially pay
Speaker 1: their support base, and foreigners, foreigners voting in elections, Foreigners
Speaker 1: who have eight thousand kids who are American citizens, who
Speaker 1: vote Democrats. Those are the three things that hold up
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party. The Trump administration has begun, just begun.
Speaker 1: Remember Trump is step one. He's not the end. The
Speaker 1: Trump administration has begun the fight on all three of
Speaker 1: those fronts. They're digging into fraud, they are they're cleaning
Speaker 1: up voter rules, They're suing states to clean up their
Speaker 1: voter rules. They're starting to deport foreigners. We have negative well,
Speaker 1: we had negative net migration last year in twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: first time in fifty years. I believe we are starting
Speaker 1: the process now of if you think about the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party and you think about those three things as being
Speaker 1: the three huge concrete pillars that hold up the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: we have started to chip away at all three of
Speaker 1: those pillars. If we can get to the point where
Speaker 1: we weaken those pillars enough one, two, or Lord willing,
Speaker 1: all three of them, the Democrat Party collapses on itself.
Speaker 1: And we don't never have to have some kind of horrible,
Speaker 1: hot civil war that has Americans killing each other again.
Speaker 1: And I pray to God we never get to that place. Yes,
Speaker 1: this could continue to snowball and get really really really bad.
Speaker 1: Me on as part of me thinks that it will.
Speaker 1: But we also might be able to kneecap the three
Speaker 1: pillars of the Democrat Party and win without firing a shot,
Speaker 1: or very many shots. I guess we've already fired some shots,
Speaker 1: asked Renee Goods girlfriend. There have already been shots fired.
Speaker 1: It's gonna have what, Chris Well, We can't say there
Speaker 1: have been no shots fired. There have definitely been shots fired.
Speaker 1: You don't believe me. Ask the guy who has to
Speaker 1: clean up that up pool Street. Dear Jesse, give all
Speaker 1: the given all the bloody attacks. Lately, the Pope has
Speaker 1: expressed the thought that we're in World War three being
Speaker 1: fought piecemeal again. You guys are so dark today. I
Speaker 1: have thought that for quite some time. Do you feel
Speaker 1: the same way world War three? I don't know that
Speaker 1: I would say world War three? And here's why. Between
Speaker 1: powerful countries. If you look historically, there always seems to
Speaker 1: be tension between the powerful countries of a world or
Speaker 1: a region. You know, we talk about Alexander the Great,
Speaker 1: and one knows Alexander the Great, and he invaded the
Speaker 1: achemenited Persian Empire, and he started conquering it and beating
Speaker 1: it up. He essentially defeated the achiemenited Persian Empire. But
Speaker 1: those two empires, the Greeks and the Persians, well, the
Speaker 1: Macedonians and the Persians, they've been fighting each other for
Speaker 1: a very long time. Why well, proximity there were two
Speaker 1: major powers. Inevitably they're going to clash over things like location, resources,
Speaker 1: stuff like that. Inevitably there are going to be tensions
Speaker 1: at at any given moment in the world, major superpowers
Speaker 1: are going to be at odds with each other. It
Speaker 1: is the Jesse Kellicho on a wonderful, Wonderful Friday. If
Speaker 1: you missed any part of the show, you can download
Speaker 1: the whole thing on iHeart, Spotify iTunes. Right the question
Speaker 1: was are we already in a World War three being
Speaker 1: fought piecemeal? And I explained before we went into the
Speaker 1: break that I don't know that. I don't think that.
Speaker 1: I think that there have always been tensions between major
Speaker 1: political powers right now globally, China, Russia, America, those are
Speaker 1: probably the three superpowers that are trying to get some
Speaker 1: dominance globally. We're competing over locations, interests, resources. Just because
Speaker 1: we're competing and just because there are tensions, that doesn't mean,
Speaker 1: we're almost about to have a world war. That's inevitable.
Speaker 1: The United States of America is the number one global superpower.
Speaker 1: China has admitted they're not quite about it. They prefer
Speaker 1: that they become the world's number one superpower. They intend
Speaker 1: to become the world's number one superpower. And I'm going
Speaker 1: to finish my China talk. I wanted to wait on
Speaker 1: it and finish it now, but so we're at odds.
Speaker 1: That's going to create odds. Now, let's talk about China.
Speaker 1: I wanted to have this talk before I finished the
Speaker 1: China communist talk. China is not fully communist anymore. A
Speaker 1: lot of people don't realize that after Mao was done. Remember,
Speaker 1: Mao killed so many people in China and destroyed so
Speaker 1: many things by trying to implement full communism, that he
Speaker 1: had so many enemies inside China, but he had been
Speaker 1: so effective at murdering and intimidating all of his potential
Speaker 1: political opponents that nobody could make serious moves and changes
Speaker 1: until Mao was gone. They had to wait until he died.
Speaker 1: Mao died and China changed course. China attempted, and it's
Speaker 1: still attempting, to implement some sort of a capitalist, communist
Speaker 1: hybrid society. No, no, no, no, you can run your business,
Speaker 1: of course, now it's your business. I mean, you're not
Speaker 1: gonna be allowed to do anything we don't want you
Speaker 1: to do, and we can take over your business whenever
Speaker 1: we want. And if the state needs things, you have
Speaker 1: to do those things. But either way, I run your own.
Speaker 1: They're attempting it. Well this now you understand why I
Speaker 1: waited to finish that thought on China in World War three.
Speaker 1: China is having a very very very difficult time right now,
Speaker 1: more difficult than people think for many of the same reasons.
Speaker 1: You cannot have centralized control of an economy, especially a
Speaker 1: large economy, and have any amount of success. You might
Speaker 1: be able to have centralized control of an economy in
Speaker 1: a ten tiny country like Luxembourg. You ever heard of Luxembourg?
Speaker 1: You ever looked up Luxembourg on a map. I don't
Speaker 1: know how big it is. According to my map, it's
Speaker 1: about the size of my thumbnail. You can probably, if
Speaker 1: you're a central government, control a lot large part of
Speaker 1: that economy because it's not that diverse. You don't have
Speaker 1: that many people. It's not a big place. A country
Speaker 1: the size of China can't do that, so their currency
Speaker 1: is in trouble. Now back to the World War three talk,
Speaker 1: this is the part that does concern me. China is
Speaker 1: on very shaky ground right now, and they know it.
Speaker 1: We've talked about this before that there are experts who
Speaker 1: think that China believes they have a window twenty twenty
Speaker 1: seven to twenty thirty five. What is that window? China
Speaker 1: believes that is the window they have have to take
Speaker 1: Taiwan and honestly probably the Philippines and other things in
Speaker 1: that area because of the one child policy they used
Speaker 1: to have. China, we think about them as having endless people,
Speaker 1: is facing a population collapse. Because of that population collapse,
Speaker 1: China thinks they've got a window. So shaky economy, you
Speaker 1: think you have a short amount of time, you are Jijinping,
Speaker 1: You're always under threat from a different communist trying to
Speaker 1: take power away from you. It's easy to see that
Speaker 1: China could make a desperate move for Taiwan or something
Speaker 1: that could spark something else, possibly kicking off a World
Speaker 1: War three. That's the only thing I'll say about World
Speaker 1: War three that what I believe is happening, though globally
Speaker 1: is changing of the guard. Worlds change. Sometimes things change.
Speaker 1: The world has gone through this multiple times. Eventually, I
Speaker 1: mean this was really World War One era. Eventually countries
Speaker 1: got tired of having kings, monarchs, royal families. Right around
Speaker 1: that time, countries decided enough of this. Russia, We're done
Speaker 1: being ruled by the czars. I mean, you don't like
Speaker 1: who took over after not that, do why? But we're
Speaker 1: done being ruled by the czars. Germany, this kaiser business,
Speaker 1: it's gotta go. The world's change right now. The world
Speaker 1: is changing. You are seeing societies become very, very angry
Speaker 1: with their governments, certainly Western societies. As Western governments have
Speaker 1: massively imported foreign barbarians who are killing and raping people
Speaker 1: in their own countries. You're seeing a lot of anger
Speaker 1: bubble up. We in America have a brief reprieve from this,
Speaker 1: so maybe we don't appreciate that anger so much. But
Speaker 1: do remember how angry you were under Joe Biden, how
Speaker 1: angry you were under Donald under Joe Biden's four years
Speaker 1: of twenty million foreigners and all the anarchy. Well, they're
Speaker 1: still going through that in New UK. That hasn't stopped
Speaker 1: and Germany. People can't afford power. We now have their
Speaker 1: big cheese, the Chancellor. It's kind of funny they still
Speaker 1: have a chancellor. That's isn't that a little anyway? They
Speaker 1: still have a Chancellor Merz. He's talking about how they
Speaker 1: Germany phased out their nuclear power. Now people can't afford power.
Speaker 1: People are angry. I saw a video yesterday French farmers
Speaker 1: are dumping potatoes on the road. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: anger right now that I don't know. I would call
Speaker 1: it World War three, But I think in the next
Speaker 1: fifty years, one hundred years, you're going to see governments
Speaker 1: change non violently. I don't know. I don't know about that.
Speaker 1: I don't know se non violently. Normally, governments don't just
Speaker 1: walk away without visiting some sort of violence on the people.
Speaker 1: Governments will usually kill their own people if it means
Speaker 1: staying in power. Who knows. This is all really heavy stuff.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about some other things, shall we. Let's talk
Speaker 1: about well ice agents, how do they know where they're operating.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the Republican Party. Let's talk about target shopping.
Speaker 1: There next