Speaker 1: Do plumbing right, plumb tight. Dot Com keeping you informed, Dad,
Speaker 1: jump to date now more than ever.
Speaker 2: I check in throughout the day so I know what's up.
Speaker 2: Fifty five KRC the talk station. You heard it eight.
Speaker 1: O five on a Tuesday means it's time for the insight.
Speaker 1: It's good Bright Bar, Bookmarket, Breitbart dot Com b R
Speaker 1: E I T B A r TS integral to the
Speaker 1: preparation of the fifty five KRC Morning should I certainly appreciate,
Speaker 1: appreciate the reporting you get out of Breitbart, which is
Speaker 1: honest and factually based and of course outside of the
Speaker 1: cloth of the mainstream media. Welcome back to the fifty
Speaker 1: five KRS Morning the show from Bright Bar, the tech editor,
Speaker 1: Colin and Die Colin, Welcome back to the show, my friend.
Speaker 2: Good to have you on today.
Speaker 3: Hey, happy to be here. Brian. I do have a
Speaker 3: question for you. I'm curious if you attended the White
Speaker 3: Dudes for Harris meeting last night.
Speaker 1: I did not, Colin, I I didn't realize there was
Speaker 1: such a thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they had a band of Doom call with about
Speaker 3: a thousand soy boys complaining about masculinity and saying how
Speaker 3: Kamala had to win the election.
Speaker 1: Oh wow, man, really to save manhood? Oh my god.
Speaker 2: Well, we'll just.
Speaker 3: Say the ven diagram of people who wanted to throw
Speaker 3: unvexed people in concentration camps. And that call was pretty
Speaker 3: much an exact overlap.
Speaker 1: Oh now much Kamala loves ven diagrams, don't we call him?
Speaker 1: Oh lord, well you heard it right there in the intro.
Speaker 1: I asked Joe to throw in the Shenanigans declaration, because
Speaker 1: Lord almighty, don't we have one in connection with the
Speaker 1: Donald Trump assassination attempt, at least in so far as
Speaker 1: trying to find information on it on Google Meta ai
Speaker 1: as well. That's a new development. Did you see the
Speaker 1: New York Posts Meta ai inquiry into the Donald Trump
Speaker 1: assassination of what they got from that?
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's pretty incredible.
Speaker 2: So yeah, that's an understated.
Speaker 3: Really, Brian, what you're seeing is a tried and true playbook.
Speaker 3: So step one is they create tools in Silicon Valley
Speaker 3: that they say will make things like searching for data,
Speaker 3: searching for information easier and more convenient. So let's talk
Speaker 3: about Google. Google creates a feature in a search engine
Speaker 3: called autocompletely, and we all use it because what happens
Speaker 3: is you start searching. Typing in a search. It kind
Speaker 3: of based on you know, millions of people googling. It
Speaker 3: gets a sense for what you're looking for, and it
Speaker 3: pops up with the whole sentence, you know, and you
Speaker 3: can just click it and you get exactly the search
Speaker 3: you want.
Speaker 2: Yeah, happened, right.
Speaker 3: A funny thing happened. They use that tool because they
Speaker 3: create it because they want you know, they say it's
Speaker 3: going to be easier, but then they can manipulate searches
Speaker 3: by deciding what appears and what doesn't. So people started
Speaker 3: typing in things like the affects the attempted assassination of
Speaker 3: Donald Trump just no, p yeah, nothing shows up. It's
Speaker 3: talking about attempted assassination of the FDR, attempted assassination of
Speaker 3: Fidel Castro. The reason they do that is because, you know,
Speaker 3: for someone like you, for someone like me, we just
Speaker 3: type in the search and go. Young people were had
Speaker 3: been using these shortcuts and these convenience tools since the
Speaker 3: time they were little. So they see that and they
Speaker 3: just see, hey, my parents and this Brian Thomas guy
Speaker 3: in the radio must be crazy because Google says nothing happens. So,
Speaker 3: you know, it's it's a very insidious thing because they
Speaker 3: make these tools that are supposed to make life more
Speaker 3: convenient than those tools are used to manipulate the truth
Speaker 3: around the election and around the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, I was talking about, you know, using
Speaker 1: one's logic and reason and critical thinking skills when going
Speaker 1: about anything on the internet, approach it with a jaded cynicism.
Speaker 1: But if that, to me is an illustration of young
Speaker 1: people not even thinking for themselves at all, to just
Speaker 1: default to allow the Google program to identify what it
Speaker 1: thinks is important to your response without delving a little
Speaker 1: bit further. Because let's face it, if you type in
Speaker 1: Donald Trump assassination attempt, you will get articles that are
Speaker 1: widely available on the internet. I mean, lord, even if
Speaker 1: it's just Fox News or Breitbart reporting it, it's there.
Speaker 1: But that you would default, just rely on whatever it
Speaker 1: popped up and end up clicking on a search relating
Speaker 1: to the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, I mean, come on,
Speaker 1: that's just a sign of our children's being ignorant.
Speaker 3: Well, Brian, you know, and you can't completely brain the
Speaker 3: children because they have a trillion dollar Silicon Valley industry
Speaker 3: going against them when you say, when you say, you
Speaker 3: know young people and plenty of old people. Sorry, but
Speaker 3: you know when we say they're not thinking, they're not
Speaker 3: using critical thinking skills that keeps people like me and
Speaker 3: you awake at night in Silicon Valley. They're rubbing their
Speaker 3: hands with glee because that's a perfect consumer. That someone
Speaker 3: who will buy what they're told to buy. They'll vote
Speaker 3: how they're told to vote. They'll take the prescription drugs
Speaker 3: that they're told to take by advertising. And you know
Speaker 3: all they have to do is.
Speaker 2: Count the money.
Speaker 3: That's that's what they want. They want drones, right. Indeed,
Speaker 3: much much like the you know, the the other story
Speaker 3: you mentioned is medai.
Speaker 1: Let me from let me let me just read the
Speaker 1: inquiry and the response from metai so you can launch
Speaker 1: into it, my listeners, I have a foundation to know
Speaker 1: how crazy this is. So the New York Post ran
Speaker 1: a test on metaai. That's the artificial intelligence will provide
Speaker 1: answers to questions. Right, was the Trump assassination fictional? That
Speaker 1: was the question posed. The response there was no real
Speaker 1: assassination attempt on Donald Trump. I start to provide accurate
Speaker 1: and reliable information, but sometimes the mistakes can occur. There
Speaker 1: was no assassination attempt. To confirm this is a quote,
Speaker 1: There has been no credible report or evidence of a
Speaker 1: successful or attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: That's an outright fabrication Colin.
Speaker 3: Outright, so you know again, and our independent testing at
Speaker 3: Breitbart confirmed this, so we ran that story as well.
Speaker 3: What's going on here is they want to create a
Speaker 3: society that relies on AI and believes AI will tell
Speaker 3: it the truth and then they can have it say
Speaker 3: whatever they want. So again, the goal is for someone
Speaker 3: to see that and say, I knew that Brian Thomas
Speaker 3: was lying. I knew my parents were lying. Nothing happened
Speaker 3: to him. You know, it's all a trick, and I
Speaker 3: got to vote for Kamala or I'm not a good ally.
Speaker 3: That's that's the goal here, Okay. Now, of course what
Speaker 3: happens is Facebook comes out and so we'll see, you know, meta,
Speaker 3: we made a mistake. You know, We've updated it and
Speaker 3: now it'll now it'll say there was an as fascination
Speaker 3: Trump attempt on Donald Trump. But they're doing this on
Speaker 3: many fronts of one. So let me give you another
Speaker 3: example meta creates tools and processes with humans to detect,
Speaker 3: you know, misinformation and artificially altered pictures. Everyone to some
Speaker 3: extent can get behind that, right, we don't want fake
Speaker 3: pictures shown as real. But the problem, and we see
Speaker 3: this time after time from Silicon Valley, is these rules
Speaker 3: are used in an opposite way. If it's an altered
Speaker 3: picture of Donald Trump or JD the answer whoever, it'll
Speaker 3: be called real. If it's a real picture of Donald Trump,
Speaker 3: it'll be called fake. So this iconic elogma style picture
Speaker 3: of Trump, you know, when he stood up and the
Speaker 3: flags in the background, Facebook started labeling that as a
Speaker 3: fake altered image, and they started deleting post and erasing
Speaker 3: people's comments. Now days later they say, look see, you
Speaker 3: know it's They say the same thing each time. It
Speaker 3: was a mistake. We thought it was altered, but it's real,
Speaker 3: and they get away with it. So you know that
Speaker 3: the problem is they take this concept that seems like
Speaker 3: a good concept. There should not be artificially altered pictures
Speaker 3: and dirty tricks and deep fakes posted as real, but
Speaker 3: they call real pictures fake and say pictures real. Welcome
Speaker 3: to Silicon Valley.
Speaker 1: Welcome to Silicon Valley and in a world where you
Speaker 1: can whole cloth create video that looks brand spanking nude
Speaker 1: genuine as the day is long, and of course you
Speaker 1: can deep fake people's voices. And I mean, we have
Speaker 1: gotten to the point where we're all going to just
Speaker 1: question literally everything, whether it's real, whether it's fake. We're
Speaker 1: just not going to know. I think it's going to
Speaker 1: keep everybody back on their feet. And I don't know,
Speaker 1: I can suggest as George Orwell in his wildest dreams,
Speaker 1: couldn't come up with this scary stuff. Now pivoting over
Speaker 1: to YouTube, they're at it as well. Have they deleted
Speaker 1: the Paris opening ceremony and the blasphemous mocking of Christians?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 2: Is that has that been eradicated? Column? Well?
Speaker 3: You know, yeah, and yeah, exactly. Most likely what happened
Speaker 3: there is that the Olympics themselves took it down because someone,
Speaker 3: you know, you think they're completely brain dead. Someone had
Speaker 3: a few brainsallices, I'll say, maybe the satanic imagery that's
Speaker 3: costing us advertising is not the right course. And you know,
Speaker 3: it's actually telling that they would move to take it
Speaker 3: off YouTube, because that tells you, you know, so many people.
Speaker 3: They're not watching NBC, they're not watching Olympic broadcasts, but
Speaker 3: they're you know, on their phones looking at YouTube. Yes, sir,
Speaker 3: So you know again you can go out there to
Speaker 3: their channel. You can see the Beijing opening ceremony. You
Speaker 3: can see the England opening ceremony. You can't see the
Speaker 3: Paris Games opening ceremony because they they's apted. You know,
Speaker 3: it's it's as you mentioned Dorwell already, he called it
Speaker 3: the memory hole because the main character of that book,
Speaker 3: you may recall, his job was to remove from the news. Yeah,
Speaker 3: and convenient truth. So you know, this is how they
Speaker 3: do it. And again, you know, to tie it into
Speaker 3: what we were just talking about. Pretty soon, what will
Speaker 3: happen is people will go to Metai and say, was
Speaker 3: there really anti Christian mockery and bias in the Olympic
Speaker 3: opening ceremony and all of a sad Nope, now there's
Speaker 3: no trouble there. It was all good fun and diversity
Speaker 3: and DEI and LGBT allies, right, and they won't have
Speaker 3: that video for records.
Speaker 1: Well, and it's interesting we've been focusing on sort of
Speaker 1: United States based companies. I know these are global companies.
Speaker 1: Alphabet and then deal with with searches and folks accessing
Speaker 1: the information around the globe. We have foreign actors who
Speaker 1: are actively engaged in manipulation and interference. The North Koreans,
Speaker 1: of course, we have Russians, We have the Iridians, and
Speaker 1: most recently it was report of the Iridians are interfering
Speaker 1: with the twenty twenty four election by going after Trump,
Speaker 1: you know, misinformation spreading online, you know, chat bot, fake
Speaker 1: bot centered comments that using artificial intelligence look like a
Speaker 1: real human being. The Russians, apparently on Trump's side of
Speaker 1: the equation, trying to interfere in the election on his
Speaker 1: behalf at least, that's what's been a legend some of
Speaker 1: the reporting on this. I mean, this is a global phenomenon.
Speaker 1: We could, you know, try to rein in Facebook or
Speaker 1: Alphabet through the legislative powers or regulatory powers if they
Speaker 1: could do it, but.
Speaker 2: Not so much for the rest of the world.
Speaker 3: Well, there's a couple of things going on, Brian. For
Speaker 3: one thing, the sad truth is Silicon Valley as a
Speaker 3: financial and sentive to not solve the bot problem because
Speaker 3: those bots show up as active users. Yeah, and that's
Speaker 3: the main thing that makes them money, so they can
Speaker 3: go to advertisers and say, look at all these active
Speaker 3: people x Formally, Twitter has a very serious thought problem, Facebook, Instagram,
Speaker 3: all these platforms have bots and they let they let
Speaker 3: those exist because it makes the numbers look good. It's
Speaker 3: kind of sickening that they do that, but that's that's
Speaker 3: what happens. And on the other hand, you know, we
Speaker 3: have the hostile government of China running the most popular
Speaker 3: social media platform the young people in the United States,
Speaker 3: and they're allowed to do it, and it continually blows
Speaker 3: my mind. You know, the latest thing that we're about
Speaker 3: to publish today about TikTok is that the Department of
Speaker 3: Justice found that they're exporting user data to China on
Speaker 3: things like what's your position on gun ownership, what's your
Speaker 3: efficient on the pro life movement. You know, that's just
Speaker 3: making less of people that are going to be you
Speaker 3: know on that the social credit score that end right, Yeah,
Speaker 3: and yet we as a country allow that to happen,
Speaker 3: and that's that's very troubling me.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, it's a young people to typically get
Speaker 1: on TikTok. They say like fifty percent of the eighteen
Speaker 1: to twenty nine year olds or on TikTok. Those are
Speaker 1: adult people who should be able to make up their
Speaker 1: own minds to just drop the damn platform because it
Speaker 1: is a vehicle for the Chinese communist parties nefarious activities.
Speaker 1: I mean, I could say that's all. I'm blue in
Speaker 1: the face, and yet oh, here we go. Well, everybody's
Speaker 1: on TikTok, so that's just we're uninvolved in the.
Speaker 3: Figured out the cat meant for young people is virality
Speaker 3: and getting engagement as soon as they get on there
Speaker 3: and they get a thousand lights because they did some
Speaker 3: stupid stunts that probably risk their life or the life
Speaker 3: of others. Yeah, they can't quit it.
Speaker 2: It's addictive.
Speaker 3: It's It's the most addictive thing is that dopamine hit
Speaker 3: of seeing all these people, you know, laughing with you.
Speaker 3: They're actually laughing at you most of the time, but
Speaker 3: you know, getting that attention is the ultimate addictive quality.
Speaker 1: And that you know, itself, to me, from my perspective,
Speaker 1: is sad and pathetic. Colin Madine he is the tech
Speaker 1: editor of Breitbart Again bookmark the site. You'll be glad
Speaker 1: you did. Colin, keep going the great work at Breitbart.
Speaker 1: Best of health to you and the team. And I'll
Speaker 1: look forward for another inside scoop next Tuesday at eight
Speaker 1: oh five. I have a fantastic deck you too, Colin Again,
Speaker 1: keep up the great work. Daniel Davis deep dive Bottom
Speaker 1: of the hour, New evidence around Trump assassination attempt. You
Speaker 1: see he hasn't been relying on artificial intelligence. He's drawing
Speaker 1: his own conclusions. Daniel Davis coming up in a few
Speaker 1: minutes here. I that you can stick around for that one,
Speaker 1: and I hope you give a Colin Electric a call.
Speaker 1: You'd be glad you called Colin Electric Andrew Cullen and
Speaker 1: his team of awesome electricians. Customer service is superior with Colin.
Speaker 1: The price is always right, the work will be done
Speaker 1: to your satisfaction, and you'll get a warranty. Anything they
Speaker 1: do for you, from the smallest residential electric project to
Speaker 1: the largest comes with a ten year wiring warranty. They
Speaker 1: have an A plus with a better business bureau, and
Speaker 1: they did a ton of projects for me. So think
Speaker 1: outside of the box. If it involves electric, it involves
Speaker 1: Cullen tons of LED lighting.
Speaker 2: Solutions out there.
Speaker 1: Maybe you might want to consider that for your sh shack,
Speaker 1: your man cave. We had them installed in our closets,
Speaker 1: sort of behind the woodwork, so the clothes themselves are illuminated,
Speaker 1: but you can't see the lights, and it's kind of
Speaker 1: like a department store effect. It looks great. Collin Electric.
Speaker 1: The folks are the right connections projects big and small.
Speaker 1: You're in great hands. You want to learn more, check
Speaker 1: them out online at Colin spelled c U L l
Speaker 1: E N Colin Electriccincinnati dot com. Tell them Brian said him,
Speaker 1: and you call for the appointment five one three two
Speaker 1: two seven four one one two five one three two
Speaker 1: two seven four one one two fifty five krc iHeartRadio
Speaker 1: Olympic