Speaker 1: You've got questions, O'Reilly Auto Parts has answers, NITA pro.
You can trust We've got that too. No matter what
do you need, our professional parts people have the training
and expertise to help you do things right. Deep automotive
knowledge just one part that makes O'Reilly stand apart the
professional parts people.
Speaker 2: Auto Parts ever wondered why people behave the way they
do today, We're diving into the mind bending world of
social psychology. Welcome to the vast, intricate labyrinth of the
human mind, where every turn reveals a new facet of
our behavior. At its core, social psychology is the scientific
study of how our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are swayed
by the real or imagined presence of others. It's a
fascinating look into our social interactions, our group dynamics, and
the subtle influences that shape our actions and attitudes. Think
about it. Why did you choose to wear the clothes
you're wearing today, or why did you decide to eat
what you ate for breakfast? It might seem like a
personal choice, but social psychology suggests that these decisions are
often influenced by those around us, consciously or unconsciously. From
the mundane to the profound. Social psychology permeates every aspect
of our daily lives. Stay tuned as we delve into
the top ten most mind boggling social psychology experiments ever conducted.
Number ten, Imagine yourself in a room full of people
who believe in something that you clearly know is wrong.
Would you stand your ground or sway with the crowd.
This is the question that psychologist Solomon Ashe wanted to
answer in his groundbreaking conformity experiment. Ash gathered a group
of participants and asked them to match line lengths. The
catch All but one were confederates in on the experiment,
and they deliberately chose the wrong answers. The results were startling.
A significant number of the unknowing participants conformed to the
group's incorrect answer, even when it blatantly contradicted their own senses.
Why you ask, The fear of being outcast, of being different,
can sway our judgment, pushing us to conform even when
we know the crowd is wrong. This experiment underscored the
powerful influence of group pressure on individual behavior. Now that's
the surprising power of conformity. Number nine, would you go
against your moral compass if an authority figure told you to.
Let's dive into the infamous Milgrim experiment, a social psychology
study that left the world dumbfounded. Stanley Milgram, a psychologist
at Yale University, set out to answer a question that
haunts humanity. Could it be that Eichmann and his million
accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders. To explore this,
Milgram designed an experiment where participants were instructed to administer
electric shocks to another person who was actually an actor.
As the experiment progressed, the severity of the shocks increased.
Here's the kicker. Despite the actor pleading for mercy, two
thirds of the participants cantinued to administer the shocks simply
because an authority figure told them to. It's a harsh
reality to swallow, isn't it. This experiment shed light on
the chilling truth that ordinary people can commit unthinkable acts
if an authority figure instructs them to do so. It's
worth noting, however, that the Milgram experiment has been the
subject of ethical scrutiny. The mental distress caused to the
participants was significant, and many have argued that the ends
did not justify the means, but controversies aside, the experiment
has had an enduring impact on our understanding of human behavior.
Chilling isn't it, but it's a stark reminder of the
influence of authority on our behavior. Number eight. If you
saw someone in distress, would you help? You'd like to
think so, right, but social psychology suggests otherwise. Let's step
back to the mid sixties, to the infamous murder of
Kitty Genevez, a young woman. Genevez was brutally attacked in
her neighborhood while thirty eight witnesses reportedly did nothing. This
shocking event sparked the exploration of a cycle logical phenomenon
known as the bystander effect. The bystander effect posits that
the more people present at an emergency, the less likely
any one person is to intervene. It's a strange paradox, right,
you'd think that with more people around, the chances of
someone stepping in would increase, But no, it's quite the contrary.
The responsibility gets diffused among the crowd, leading to an action.
Psychologists John Darley and bib Latane were the first to
study this effect. They propose that two things happen when
people are in a group. First, there's a diffusion of
responsibility each person thinks someone else will step in. Second,
people look to others for cues on how to behave
a concept known as social referencing. So the bystander effect
is not about people being cold or heartless. It's about
how our brains respond to group dynamics and social cues.
It's a reminder that we're social creatures influenced by those
around us. So next time you're in a crowd and
see someone in need, remember the bystander effect and be
the change number nine. Wow, these experiments are mind boggling,
aren't they. But hold on, we're just getting started. We've
just delved into the perplexing world of the bystander effect,
where group dynamics and social cues can lead to enaction
in emergencies. And coming up next, we're about to embark
on a chilling journey back to Stanford University in nineteen
seventy one. There we'll witness how an intense roleplay experiment
revealed the dark side of human behavior. As we continue
to peel back the layers of social psychology, we'll explore
more such intriguing phenomena, experiments and theories. So brace yourselves,
stay curious, and stay tuned as we continue our journey
into the fascinating world of social psychology. Number seven, In
the wake of understanding the bystander effect, let's delve deeper
into the dark side of human behavior. We'll transport you
back to the corridors of Stanford University nineteen seventy one,
where a notorious experiment took place, an experiment that turned
everyday students into prisoners and guards. Imagine this, a simulated
prison environment right in the heart of a university students
randomly assigned to play the roles of prisoners and guards.
Sounds like an intense roleplay, doesn't it. But what unfolded
was far beyond anyone's expectations. In less than a week,
the guards began to display shocking levels of aggression, while
the prisoners showed signs of extreme stress and trauma. The
lines between reality and role play blurred frighteningly fast. The
experiment had to be halted prematurely due to the disturbing
dynamics that unfolded. This experiment, known as the Stanford Prison Experiment,
was led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo, It served as a
stark reminder of how quickly people can adapt to roles,
even when they are destructive. The finding sparked a storm
of controversy and ethical debate. Critics argue that the experiment
was fundamentally flawed, that it lacked ecological validity, and that
the guards simply acted in a way they believed was expected.
Despite these criticisms, the State Sanford prison experiment remains a
chilling exploration of the power of roles and situational influences
on our behavior. It's a harsh reminder that we may
not be just playing a part, but we might become
the part. Number six. From the disturbing quarters of the
Stanford prison experiment, we transition into the seemingly harmless setting
of a summer camp. But don't let the tranquility fool you.
This is the stage for yet another fascinating study in
human behavior, the Robbers Cave Experiment. It was a hot
summer in the nineteen fifties when psychologist Muzafre Sharif and
his team invited a group of eleven year old boys
to a camp in Robbers Cave State Park, Oklahoma. The boys,
unaware of the experiment, were divided into two separate groups,
the Rattlers and the Eagles. The groups were kept apart,
allowed to bond within their own circles and develop their
own norms and cultures. But when the two groups were
made aware of each other's existence, things took a dark turn.
What started as competitive games and harmless pranks quickly escalated
into hostility and prejudice. The US versus them mentality set in,
leading to destructive behaviors. But the story doesn't end there.
Sharif then introduced superordinate goals, tasks that required cooperation from
both groups. As they worked together, the hostility began to
fade and friendships started to form. The robbers Cave experiment
is a classic demonstration of how easily group conflict can
arise and how it can be resolved. It gives us
valuable insights into the nature of prejudice, inner group conflict,
and the power of cooperation. It reminds us that while
our group identities can lead us to conflict, they can
also be the key to resolving it. Number five, we
move from the wild outdoors of robbers Cave to the
bustling factory floors of the nineteen twenties. Welcome to Western
Electrics Hawthorn works in Chicago. Here, a series of studies
known as the Hawthorn Experiments were conducted to explore the
impact of various environmental conditions on workers productivity. The researchers
modified lighting conditions, adjusted work hours, and even altered break times,
expecting these changes to influence the worker's output. However, they
stumbled upon something unexpected. The researchers found that no matter
what changes were made, whether the lights were bright or dim,
whether the work hours were long or short, the worker's
productivity increased. This surprising result led to the discovery of
a new psychological phenomenon, the Hawthorn effect. The Hawthorn effect
suggests that people change their behavior, specifically improved their performance
when they know they are being observed. It was not
the changes in the physical conditions that were boosting productivity,
but rather the attention and the fact that the workers
felt observed and important. This phenomenon has far reaching implications
beyond the factory floor. It's used in various settings, from
management strategies that focus on employee engagement and recognition to
educational techniques that involve active observation and feedback. It has
even influenced research methodologies, reminding us that the mere act
of observation can influence the subject's behavior. The Hawthorn effect
is yet another fascinating chapter in our exploration of human behavior,
shedding light on how our awareness of being observed can
mysteriously elevate our performance. Number four. As we continue our
journey into the fascinating realm of human behavior, let's lighten
the mood a bit. Picture this a small child, a table,
and a single, tantalizingly fluffy marshmallow. This is the setting
of one of the most famous studies in the world
of psychology, the Stanford Marshmallow experiment. In the nineteen sixties
and seventies, psychologist Walter Mitchel conducted a series of studies
on delayed gratification. The children were given a simple choice.
They could eat one marshmallow immediately, or if they could
wait while the researcher stepped out of the room, they
would be rewarded with two marshmallows upon the researcher's return.
Sounds simple, doesn't it, But this seemingly playful experiment provided
profound insights into the concept of self control. Mitchell found
that the children who were able to delay their gratification
tended to have better life outcomes, such as higher SAT
scores and healthier lifestyles years later. This experiment underscores the
importance of impulse control and the ability to delay gratification,
not just in children, but also in adults, whether it's
resisting that extra slice of cake, studying for an exam
instead of watching TV, or saving money for the future
instead of splurging. Now, the lessons from the marshmallow experiment
apply to all aspects of life, So next time you're
faced with a marshmallow moment, remember this sweet lesson in
self control and think twice before you reach for that
immediate reward. Ever wondered what's lurking in the depths of
your unconscious mind. As we've just seen, our actions can
be influenced by the power of self control. But what
if I told you there's more to our decisions than
meets the eye. There's a hidden layer, a shadowy world
of biases and prejudices that we may not even be
aware of. They silently sway our every day a decisions,
our reactions, even our relationships. Intriguing, isn't it? How can
we uncover these hidden biases? How do they affect our lives,
and most importantly, can we learn to control them. Stay
tuned as we dive into the fascinating world of unconscious
biases next number three from the Marshmallow experiment. We understand
the power of self control, but what about the biases
and prejudices that we may not even be aware of.
Let's delve into another groundbreaking psychological experiment, the implicit Association
Test or IAT. Developed by psychologists Mazarin Banaji and Anthony
Greenwald in the nineteen nineties. The IAT measures our unconscious
biases by examining our reaction times to certain stimuli. Picture this.
You're sitting at a computer, clicking keys as fast as
you can. Images and words flash on the screen, and
you're asked to associate them with positive or negative concepts.
Sound simple enough, but here's the catch. The test is
designed in such a way that it measures how quickly
you make these associations, revealing your implicit biases. The results
of the IAT can be eye opening. Many of us
like to think that we're free from biases, but the
IAT often uncovers unconscious prejudices and stereotypes. You might find,
for example, that you're quicker to associate positive words with
images of young people than with older ones, or quicker
to link negative words with certain racial or ethnic groups.
These unconscious biases can have real world implications, influencing our
attitudes and behaviors towards different social groups. They can contribute
to societal discrimination and inequality, even when we consciously believe
in fairness and equality. Understanding our implicit biases is the
first step towards challenging and changing them. So next time
you're quick to judge or make an assumption, remember the
IAT and consider the unconscious biases that may be at
play number two. As we navigate through the labyrinth of
our implicit biases, let's take a moment to understand how
our decisions can be subtly influenced. Have you ever wondered
why you ended up buying that expensive watch after initially
agreeing to just try it on, or why you volunteered
for a week long community service after helping out at
a single event. Welcome to the fascinating world of the
foot in the door technique, a classic persuasion strategy that
involves getting a person to agree to a large request
by first setting them up with a much smaller one.
Imagine this a salesperson asks you to try on a watch.
It's a small, seemingly insignificant request. You try it on,
it looks good, You start to like it. Then comes
the real deal. The salesperson suggests you buy it. Suddenly,
the idea doesn't seem so outrageous. You're already wearing it.
You've already envisioned owning it. The small request trying on
the watch has opened the door for the larger one
buying it. This tactic isn't just limited to sales and marketing.
It's used in various spheres of life, from political campaigns
to social psychology experiments, and even in our daily interactions.
The key to this technique lies in the human tendency
to maintain consistency in our behaviors. Once we've agreed to
a small request, we're more likely to agree to subsequent
larger requests to maintain this consistency. So how can we
resist this persuasive technique? Awareness is the first step. Now
that you know about the foot in the door technique,
you'll be more likely to recognize it when it's being
used on you. Ask yourself, am I agreeing to this
larger request because I genuinely want to, or because I
feel obliged to maintain consistency with my earlier, smaller agreement.
By being mindful of our decision making processes, we can
make choices that truly align with our wants and needs,
not just those prompted by clever persuasion tactics. All right,
we've been on quite a journey, haven't we. We've delved
into the power of conformity, the influence of authority, and
the bystander effect. We've taken a dark journey into role
play and revisited the infamous robbers Cave experiment. We've explored
the power of observation and the science of self control
into the unconscious mind, dive deep into implicit biases, and
learned about the foot in the door technique. Now we're
on the brink of the grand reveal, the pinnacle of
our psychological thrill ride. What could be the number one
social psychology experiment that's going to top it all. The
suspense is building, the anticipation is palpable. We're just seconds
away from the reveal that will undoubtedly blow your mind.
So hold on to your seats and stay tuned for
the grand finale. This is one experiment you don't want
to miss. As we near the end of our journey,
we're about to explore a psychological experiment that has captured
the imagination of many, an experiment so simple yet so profound,
it has become a cultural reference point. Can you guess
what it is? The number one mind bending social psychology
experiment is drum roll please, it's the modern marshmallow test.
But hold on, don't be too quick to think you
know it all this time. We're looking at this test
with a modern and updated twist. After examining the foot
in the door technique, were now shifting our gaze to
this classic experiment. This test, traditionally a measure of self
control in children, involved offering a child a choice between
one marshmallow immediately or two marshmallows if they could wait
for a period of time. The results suggested that those
who could delay gratification had better life outcomes. However, time
and replication have added a new layer of complexity to
this test. Recent studies suggest that a child's socioeconomic background
may significantly impact their ability to delay gratification. Children from
lower socioeconomic backgrounds may be less likely to delay gratification,
not necessarily due to a lack of self control, but
because of an ingrained uncertainty about the future. When you're
not sure if the second marshmallow will actually be there later,
it makes sense to take the one in front of
you now. These findings challenge our traditional understanding of the
marshmallow test and illuminate the multifaceted nature of self control.
They also highlight the importance of addressing socioeconomic inequalities to
fall to resilience in children. As we navigate through our
complex world, it's essential to remember that our behaviors are
not just the result of individual characteristics, but also the
circumstances that surround us. So next time you find yourself
reaching for that proverbial marshmallow, remember there might be more
to it than just a simple test of self control.
Moving on from our modern perspective, let's dive into the
present scenario. These psychological experiments and principles aren't merely historical footnotes.
They're very much alive in shaping the world we live
in today. From the influence of conformity and authority in
our political systems to the bystander effect in social justice issues,
these principles are more relevant today than ever. The robbers
Cave experiment, for instance, echoes in the divisive group dynamics
we see on social media platforms. The power of observation
is at play when we mimic behaviors from influencers or celebrities.
And let's not forget about the implicit biases, those subtile
prejudices that still pervade our society, affecting everything from hiring
decisions to law enforcement. We've also seen a resurgence in
discussions about self control, like in debates about screen time
and digital detoxes. And of course, the revised understanding of
the Marshmallow test reminds us that our behaviors are deeply
intertwined with our socioeconomic contexts. But the beauty of understanding
these principles is that we can use them to spark change,
to challenge biases, to question authority, to break the bystander effect,
and to foster a more empathetic and inclusive society. But
what about you? Have you seen these principles at play
in your life? Have you ever caught yourself or someone
else falling into these psychological patterns. We'd love to hear
your experiences and thoughts, so don't hesitate to share them
in the comments section below. Remember, the study of human
behavior is ongoing and you're a part of it.