Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. And it starts
Speaker 1: the show today with a true national treasure, and that
Speaker 1: is Andy McCarthy of National Review. He is by light
Speaker 1: years the top legal analyst in the country right now,
Speaker 1: and he's able to bring a depth of knowledge to
Speaker 1: so many different issues, including the lawfare against Trump, that
Speaker 1: simply nobody else in the country has. That's not a
Speaker 1: knock on them, that this guy just has a unique
Speaker 1: background and skill set and the ability to translate. Andy,
Speaker 1: welcome back to the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 2: And that's very kind of you.
Speaker 3: Thank you well.
Speaker 1: It's kind of you to do what you do because
Speaker 1: I learn so much from you and I appreciate your
Speaker 1: intellectual courage as well. And listen, we disagree a bit
Speaker 1: on Trump. I think I think you're at times negative
Speaker 1: about President Trump. But but at the same time, Andy,
Speaker 1: you're able to go out there and you're.
Speaker 4: Able to speak openly and freely.
Speaker 1: And wisely about all of the wrongs being done to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, even though you're not a fan of him,
Speaker 1: which is one of the many reasons I respect you well.
Speaker 2: I appreciate that.
Speaker 3: I think that if you're going to.
Speaker 2: Do legal analysis, your lawyer should the politics or your
Speaker 2: lawyer shouldn't be any different from the politics your plumber,
Speaker 2: you know, you should be able to I've always tried
Speaker 2: to be clinical about legal stuff.
Speaker 1: You know well you are, and you're intellectually honest and courageous.
Speaker 1: And that leads us to your most recent work over
Speaker 1: the last few days. So thank you for sharing your
Speaker 1: thoughts with folks on really two big developments and among
Speaker 1: many others. And that is obviously Jack Smith is back
Speaker 1: and you wrote I thought brilliantly today about you know how,
Speaker 1: and the Supreme Court left the door open to it.
Speaker 1: He's trying to bring in, you know, the alleged undue
Speaker 1: influence of President Trump on Mike Pence. But if you
Speaker 1: would speak more broadly to what just happened and where
Speaker 1: you think this latest round from Jack Smith and DJ
Speaker 1: is going.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, I guess the quickest thing is to answer
Speaker 2: the last part first, which is I think it's going
Speaker 2: nowhere fast. And the reason for that is, let's just
Speaker 2: remember that no matter what happens here, what the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court told Judge Chuckkin to do is resolve the immunity issue.
Speaker 2: That is, go through the indictment, examine it, figure out
Speaker 2: what's you know, immune behavior official acts versus what's private
Speaker 2: acts that can be prosecuted. And what people need to
Speaker 2: understand about that, I think is no matter how she rules,
Speaker 2: whether she rules against President Trump or not, I think
Speaker 2: she probably rule against them. For the most part, it's
Speaker 2: still an immunity issue, which means Trump gets to appeal
Speaker 2: to the DC Circuit and then ultimately the Supreme Court,
Speaker 2: and at the same time, dan that that's out there.
Speaker 2: We have this other issue floating around too, about Jack
Speaker 2: Smith's status as a special counsel and whether he's constitutionally
Speaker 2: appropriate in that role under the appointments clause of the Constitution.
Speaker 2: That's another issue that can get appealed pre trial.
Speaker 1: And can you give us another layer on that because
Speaker 1: obviously Judge Cannon went there. But for those who aren't
Speaker 1: familiar with the issue, what's up with that?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Sure?
Speaker 2: So Jack Smith was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland
Speaker 2: basically under Justice Department regulations that have been in effect
Speaker 2: since the Clinton administration. But in order to wield the
Speaker 2: kind of power that Garland gave him, under the Constitution,
Speaker 2: you have to qualify as an officer of the United States,
Speaker 2: and there's only two ways of doing that. One is
Speaker 2: to be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate,
Speaker 2: which Smith hasn't been. And the other way is to
Speaker 2: be appointed to a position that was created by Congress
Speaker 2: by statute, and then to fulfillation to the statute. Smith
Speaker 2: is not appointed by statute, He's appointed by regulation. He's
Speaker 2: trying to claim that some statutes are relevant, but I
Speaker 2: think if you read, for example, Justice Thomas's concurrence in
Speaker 2: the Community case, he goes through those statutes and he
Speaker 2: has profound questions about whether Smith is a valid prosecutor.
Speaker 2: So she found that. Judge Cannon found that he's not
Speaker 2: a valid prosecutor under the Constitution. And I really think
Speaker 2: they're being very stubborn about this, Dan, because if they
Speaker 2: really wanted to get that case up and running, they
Speaker 2: could do it in five minutes. All Marland would have
Speaker 2: to do. Who would be transfer Smith to work under
Speaker 2: the chain of command of the Biden appointed US Attorney
Speaker 2: in the District of the Southern District of Florida. He
Speaker 2: won't do that and said he's going to appeal to
Speaker 2: the Eleventh Circuit.
Speaker 3: Right, he's going to lose.
Speaker 2: Why Because I think he thinks he's going to win
Speaker 2: this issue in Washington, Okay, okay, and he wants to
Speaker 2: say that that's the more accurate assessment of the law.
Speaker 2: And I think he also thinks there's no real way
Speaker 2: of getting the Florida case to trial prior to the
Speaker 2: election anyway, So why push it.
Speaker 1: Andy McCarthy, our guest author of Ball of Collusion, the
Speaker 1: plot to riggan election and destroy a presidency, Fox News contributor,
Speaker 1: featured all the Time on Fox for Good Reason and
Speaker 1: National Review senior fellow. Also, Andy, I want to mention
Speaker 1: because I spend a lot of time on the road
Speaker 1: visiting my clients in Colorado, and I've come to use
Speaker 1: that time to listen to your pots cast the McCarthy Report,
Speaker 1: which is absolutely brilliant. I learned so and I've been
Speaker 1: practicing law for forty years and I learned so much
Speaker 1: listening to your podcast on these long trips and makes
Speaker 1: the trip a lot shorter.
Speaker 4: So thank you.
Speaker 1: For that also, And I've heard you on the podcast
Speaker 1: talk at length about what I consider to be one
Speaker 1: of the worst outrages I've seen in the law in
Speaker 1: my forty years, and that is what's being done to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: In New York.
Speaker 1: You've been three steps ahead on this case throughout. What
Speaker 1: do you think happens next.
Speaker 2: I think he gets to appeal. I guess I should
Speaker 2: say preliminarily between the two of us, and we've been
Speaker 2: practicing law for eighty years or maybe at some point,
Speaker 2: well we'll get we'll get good at it.
Speaker 4: I hope too practice.
Speaker 2: But you know, the thing with the with the New
Speaker 2: York case is I think Braggs prosecutors recklessly, in my view,
Speaker 2: introduce evidence of Trump's official acts as president at trial.
Speaker 2: They didn't need it to prove the things that they charged,
Speaker 2: but they decided to introduce that evidence anyway, even though
Speaker 2: they knew the Supreme Court was considering this issue. And
Speaker 2: as a result, you know, the Supreme Court finds not
Speaker 2: only that Trump has immunity, but there's a derivative evidence
Speaker 2: privilege in that immunity.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: It's not just that you can't charge a president with
Speaker 2: a crime that is an official act. You can't use
Speaker 2: evidence of official acts in order to prove other crimes.
Speaker 2: So there's no doubt that Bragg did that and that
Speaker 2: Trump kindly objected to it, and even Bragg agrees that
Speaker 2: the sentencing should be postponed because Trump has a right
Speaker 2: to litigate the community, not only in front of Judge Merchon,
Speaker 2: but on appeal in the courts of New York and
Speaker 2: then up to the Supreme Court, and nothing else should happen,
Speaker 2: including sentencing, until that's resolved. So I don't see how
Speaker 2: that sentencing takes place.
Speaker 1: And what do you think Judge Mrchon will announce publicly
Speaker 1: whether that's going to take place.
Speaker 2: Well, that's an interesting question because he has said that
Speaker 2: he's going to decide it on September sixteenth, and I
Speaker 2: think insidiously he scheduled sentencing to September eighteenth, So I
Speaker 2: think what he knows he's going to rule against Trump,
Speaker 2: and he's trying to frustrate Trump's ability to appeal by
Speaker 2: waiting till the last second. So I think Trump, if
Speaker 2: march On hasn't acted by the end of this week,
Speaker 2: I would think Trump's got to start thinking about perhaps
Speaker 2: going into federal Court and trying to force him to
Speaker 2: either postpone the sentencing or make a ruling prior to
Speaker 2: the sixteenth, so he has a reasonable time to appeal.
Speaker 2: Otherwise he's got to do an emergency appeal right after
Speaker 2: march On decides on the sixteenth. Otherwise the sentencing will
Speaker 2: go forward on the eighteenth.
Speaker 3: And I think this.
Speaker 2: Whole thing has always been about the politic right. It's
Speaker 2: not like Trump is actually going to jail, right, but
Speaker 2: they want they want to be able to say he's
Speaker 2: a convicted sellon facing a stiff prison sentence. You want
Speaker 2: that for the campaign?
Speaker 4: Insidious.
Speaker 1: My last question, Andy, and again so grateful for your time.
Speaker 4: Is that.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's say that despite the prosecutor coming out and
Speaker 1: not opposing putting off the sentence scene, Judge Merchan says, no,
Speaker 1: we're going ahead anyway. What are the chances the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court steps in to block that sentence scene.
Speaker 2: I think the Appellate Division in New York would step
Speaker 2: up to stop it, and you know, just to put
Speaker 2: people at some ease. The Appellate Division is a much
Speaker 2: more serious court than some of these New York trial
Speaker 2: courts are, and they actually did reverse Judge and goern
Speaker 2: a number of times in connection with the civil case.
Speaker 2: So I think that if march On tries to do
Speaker 2: something wild and crazy, I think Trump can go to
Speaker 2: the Appellate Division and get them to stop it, or
Speaker 2: add or he can go to the Federal court and
Speaker 2: try to get them to stop it. But the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court has made it very clear that if there's an
Speaker 2: immunity issue, that has to be resolved first, so nothing
Speaker 2: else should happen until that's done.
Speaker 1: Well, Andy, thank you for the time today for all
Speaker 1: you do The McCarthy Report a must listen podcast, and
Speaker 1: look forward.
Speaker 4: To the next visit.
Speaker 2: Thanks so much, Dan, thank you, my friend.
Speaker 1: Take care of that is Andy McCarthy and I am
Speaker 1: I am dead serious this guy. This guy's the best
Speaker 1: I've ever seen. Is a legal expert, and I worked
Speaker 1: as I think a very well regarded national legal expert
Speaker 1: for years and nobody has been as good as this guy.
Speaker 1: So check out his work, including the McCarthy Report.
Speaker 4: You're on the Dan Caplas Show.
Speaker 6: And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 1: ML's God be absolutely perfect happens to be the cu
Speaker 1: Buff's home opener. I'm can have some good football in
Speaker 1: color out of this fall, So look forward to that.
Speaker 1: But so many reasons to be happy today if like me,
Speaker 1: you want President Trump to be reelected and you look
Speaker 1: at the polling and we'll get into it in more
Speaker 1: detail later, but a lot of encouragement on the polling front, right.
Speaker 1: I think it's clear, unequivocal, undebatable at this point that
Speaker 1: there has not been any convention bounce for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody is even trying to claim there was.
Speaker 1: And think about how significant Daddy is. Think about how
Speaker 1: when you've got the entire media, could you imagine having
Speaker 1: the media on your side. I think you've got to
Speaker 1: get extra points in heaven for spending your whole life
Speaker 1: fighting uphill against the media. There was that one two
Speaker 1: or three week period where the media was kind of
Speaker 1: on our side because for that one brief shining moment
Speaker 1: they were telling the truth about an elected Democrat. But
Speaker 1: that's because they wanted Biden out. But that was quite
Speaker 1: an experience for two or three weeks. But you've got
Speaker 1: the entire media just bubble wrapping Kamala Harrison, the Democrats,
Speaker 1: just a total beatification. And yet if anything, the Democrats
Speaker 1: lost ground during their own convention.
Speaker 4: So what a welcome surprise that is.
Speaker 1: I'd been predicting all along that, Hey, you know, she's
Speaker 1: gonna peak after the convention, then she's gonna start dropping,
Speaker 1: and unless something weird happens in one of the debates,
Speaker 1: then at that point Trump's gonna win. But she didn't
Speaker 1: get that bounce, which puts us in an even better position.
Speaker 7: And now, yes, just to follow up real quick with
Speaker 7: some details that are recent and current. They are on
Speaker 7: a bus tour Harris Walls through Georgia, which makes sense
Speaker 7: because CNN is headquartered in Atlanta and that's where both
Speaker 7: of them will be tomorrow night for their sit down
Speaker 7: interview joint interview with Dana Bash Fox newspolling just out
Speaker 7: Dan Arizona has Harris plus one with or without the
Speaker 7: third party candidates, and Georgia Harris plus two with or
Speaker 7: without the third party candidates.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and all of this is tremendous news for Trump,
Speaker 1: right because first of all, the Fox News poll tends
Speaker 1: to skew left, but beyond that, there is nowhere to
Speaker 1: go for her. But now, I mean, this has all
Speaker 1: been so inflated, and I don't want to go walky
Speaker 1: on you right now. And I haven't seen the internals
Speaker 1: of the Fox poll, but what you're seeing in many, many,
Speaker 1: many of these polls is they're way, way, way over
Speaker 1: sampling liberal seniors.
Speaker 4: And it's a problem.
Speaker 1: The polling industry has acknowledged that liberal seniors are far
Speaker 1: more likely to talk to pollsters than conservative seniors. And
Speaker 1: the proof of this is you've seen an election after
Speaker 1: election where the polls show that the Democrat is going
Speaker 1: to win seniors or Trump's going to win them by
Speaker 1: a narrow margin, and then Trump runs away with seniors, right.
Speaker 1: So so listen, if she's only got a one or
Speaker 1: two point lead in the swing states right now, that's
Speaker 1: a very good sign for Trump because it's it's all
Speaker 1: about the trend line, right and the trend line right now,
Speaker 1: not everywhere. First of all, the industry media lies in
Speaker 1: lots of ways in order to help Democrats, and they
Speaker 1: lie through polls in order to help democrats. We've seen
Speaker 1: that in the past over and over again. Doesn't mean
Speaker 1: every polls alive, but it means an awful lot of
Speaker 1: them have political motive behind them and they're skewed. But
Speaker 1: you look at the trend line, and the trend line
Speaker 1: right now says she has peaked, And no, are we
Speaker 1: seeing or drop off a cliff right now? No, I'm
Speaker 1: not trying to say that. I'm just trying to say
Speaker 1: there's tremendous importance in her having plateaued, because where does
Speaker 1: she go from there? I mean, Trump was grossly outspent
Speaker 1: in August in the Swing States, grossly outspent, and he
Speaker 1: has so much legitimate Amma on Harris in her own
Speaker 1: words coming out of her mouth on videotape, they start
Speaker 1: to saturate the Swing States. Now with that, she has
Speaker 1: nowhere to go but down again unless the debate changes
Speaker 1: that eight f five forour zero five eight two five
Speaker 1: five round. You've got to find me because I put
Speaker 1: a rule into effect on this show that we're not
Speaker 1: allowed to refer to the Kamala Harris speech on September
Speaker 1: ten as a debate. It's a speech where she'll be
Speaker 1: protected by ABC. Now what I'd love to hear from
Speaker 1: people on is tomorrow and it won't be I can't
Speaker 1: say tomorrow night. It'll air tomorrow night whatever CNN editors
Speaker 1: and executives decide to show you.
Speaker 4: Because Harris is so weak.
Speaker 1: As you know, she wouldn't sit down without her emotional
Speaker 1: support Walls there with her, but won't sit down live.
Speaker 1: It's not a town hall, so it's going to be edited,
Speaker 1: and that gives CNN executives, politics, et cetera, lots of
Speaker 1: time and opportunity to shape that anyway they want to.
Speaker 1: So what do you want? I won't even pose the
Speaker 1: question to you, what do you want Bash to ask her?
Speaker 1: Because that's meaningless. As I point out all the time,
Speaker 1: it's like when I cross examine witnesses a trial. It's
Speaker 1: not the first question that matters, it's the follow up questions,
Speaker 1: Because any witness in this case, Harrison Walls can dodge
Speaker 1: a tough question. It's about whether Bash is going to
Speaker 1: follow up and make them answer or look stupid by
Speaker 1: not answering. So what do you want to see Bash pursue?
Speaker 1: That's a better word than ask what do you want
Speaker 1: to see her pursue? With Harris and Walls tomorrow eight
Speaker 1: five five for zero five A two five five text
Speaker 1: d A N five seven seven three nine. And then
Speaker 1: I want to throw this out as well. And this
Speaker 1: is not a pejorative, this is literal. There's obviously something
Speaker 1: significantly wrong with Vice President Harris, and the Democrats are
Speaker 1: admitting that by sending her in tomorrow with walls. Listen,
Speaker 1: these are smart people on the left. There's more on
Speaker 1: smart people who do a lot of moronic things, but
Speaker 1: they understand how bad, how weak it looks. And and
Speaker 1: you know, on the level the Party of Women, they
Speaker 1: can't send their female presidential candidate in without a guide
Speaker 1: to help her. They understand how bad this looks. So
Speaker 1: they're only doing it because they absolutely have to. What
Speaker 1: is wrong with her that makes this necessary for them?
Speaker 1: I'd love your thoughts on that eight five five for
Speaker 1: zero five A two five five text DA five seven
Speaker 1: seven three nine. Governor Huckabee Sanders, why do.
Speaker 8: You think they have to do this together? I mean,
Speaker 8: I understand it's vice president, she's running for president with
Speaker 8: Tim Wallace, But do you think there is a motivation
Speaker 8: Why would they put them together for this first interview?
Speaker 4: Of course there's motivation.
Speaker 9: They know that Kamala Harris can't get through an interview
Speaker 9: all by herself. There is not a lot of confidence
Speaker 9: in somebody to become the leader of the free world
Speaker 9: and ask people to make her president of the United
Speaker 9: States when she can't even sit down with an interview.
Speaker 9: And this isn't even a tough interview. This is on CNN.
Speaker 4: This is yeah, and listen, that's not a pejorative.
Speaker 1: Any honest person knows that what the governor said is true,
Speaker 1: that the cabal would not be sending her in there
Speaker 1: like this with Walls with her unless they absolutely had to.
Speaker 1: So what is it about her that makes this necessary?
Speaker 1: Knowing how badly it hurts her?
Speaker 4: And then what do you want to see?
Speaker 1: Data Bash pursue Dana Bash pursued tomorrow with Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: and Tim Walls eight five five for zero five A
Speaker 1: two five five the number text d an five seven
Speaker 1: seven three nine.
Speaker 4: I have my own ideas and that.
Speaker 1: I'm walking through the lobby today getting ready for trial
Speaker 1: and come up for a little aira. I'm walking to
Speaker 1: the lobby. Who's on Fox News? We keep it on
Speaker 1: our big screen in the lobby. Danielle Jerinsky talking about
Speaker 1: Aurora being taken over of event by Venezuelan gangs.
Speaker 4: That next.
Speaker 6: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 4: I think we need to push back on this.
Speaker 7: There's no guaranteed of free speech on misinformation or or
Speaker 7: hate speech, and especially around our democracy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, who gets to decide what's misinformation what's hate speech?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, Tim Walla Walla, Kamala Harris, and think about
Speaker 1: it for a second.
Speaker 4: This is the guy.
Speaker 1: This is the guy the cabal feels they have to
Speaker 1: send in there to help Kamala Harris with CNN.
Speaker 4: This guy.
Speaker 1: Think about how bad that is, so they know how
Speaker 1: bad it looks that she can't go in on her own.
Speaker 1: She has to have this guy as a crutch. And
Speaker 1: he's never been the sheriffest knife in any drawer. Hey,
Speaker 1: let's go to the VIP line and welcome Eors City
Speaker 1: Council Member Danielle Jarinsky back to the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 4: Danielle, I was.
Speaker 1: Walking through my lobby today. I'm buried in trial preps,
Speaker 1: so I rarely get out of my office. But I'm
Speaker 1: walking through the lobby. We have this huge screen always
Speaker 1: has Fox News on it, and I look and I say,
Speaker 1: that's Danielle. You were on Fox today. Weren't you on
Speaker 1: this Aurora story?
Speaker 8: It was actually yesterday, but they keep airing it.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, because I know I saw it today and
Speaker 1: it had this satelline on Aurora, Colorado facing wave of
Speaker 1: Venezuelan gang activities.
Speaker 4: So will can you update us on that?
Speaker 2: Sure?
Speaker 8: You know, I have been doing everything in my power
Speaker 8: to fight against a city police leadership and local media
Speaker 8: that has been trying to cover this up and then
Speaker 8: trying to downplay this. There are entire apartment complex complexes,
Speaker 8: I'm sorry, that have been taken over and today I
Speaker 8: don't know if you've seen yet Fox thirty one, you know,
Speaker 8: just briefly broke the story, but there's a huge story
Speaker 8: coming out. I have been able to actually move some
Speaker 8: of the original tenants out of one of these properties.
Speaker 8: Is a very intense situation today, but there is a
Speaker 8: whole bunch of video footage now coming out and eyewitness
Speaker 8: firsthand accounts from folks that have been living trapped under
Speaker 8: this gang control.
Speaker 1: So Danielle Jerinski with us, and Danielle, you're telling us
Speaker 1: that you have these what are believed to be or
Speaker 1: you know to be Venezuelan gangs. You tell us, but
Speaker 1: you have gangs taking over apartment complexes in Aurora, and
Speaker 1: then you have some not associated with the gangs, so
Speaker 1: you say are trapped in there.
Speaker 8: Absolutely people folks that are you know, original tenants that
Speaker 8: have lived there, some of them two three years, you know,
Speaker 8: maybe longer than that. And Dan, to be clear, this
Speaker 8: is not just an Aurora problem. This is not just
Speaker 8: in Aurora. I can only speak to Aurora while the
Speaker 8: rest of the Denver metro area and our state government
Speaker 8: tried to downplay this. This is not just in Aurora.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, not where else is it happening?
Speaker 8: You know, I can't again, right, I'm in Aurora. So
Speaker 8: I have information, you know, in a war, but I
Speaker 8: don't hear, you know, anybody from the Denver City Council
Speaker 8: speaking out the Denver mayor. But but you know.
Speaker 1: It would be against political interest if it was happening
Speaker 1: happening there, right And and so Danielle, how does this happen?
Speaker 1: For example, these gang members you tell us are taking
Speaker 1: over apartment complexes. Do they force tenants out? Do they
Speaker 1: pay rent? What does all that look like?
Speaker 8: They have forced tenants out? And then they go in
Speaker 8: and they what I am told and what is coming
Speaker 8: out as first uh, first hand testimony from from the
Speaker 8: folks that I was able to get moved out. Today
Speaker 8: they someone is acting like the broker. They go in
Speaker 8: the apartment, they take photos of it, and within hours
Speaker 8: a Venezuelan migrant family is moved in. And what I
Speaker 8: am told is that this gang is essentially a sort
Speaker 8: extorting these migrants. They're paying them rent. It's a lot, Dan,
Speaker 8: it's the name of the gang, Trend de Aragua.
Speaker 1: And Danielle, we know and I know you heard it
Speaker 1: that Mayor Kaufman was on the show and he had
Speaker 1: mentioned to me. I think I'm quoting this verbatim that
Speaker 1: there are entire blocks the city of Aurora has to
Speaker 1: take back, and the mayor has been very generous at
Speaker 1: this time. I think we're going to have men's studio
Speaker 1: for a full hour next week. But is that what
Speaker 1: he's referring to when he talks about entire blocks that
Speaker 1: have to be taken back.
Speaker 8: That's exactly what he's referring to. And it's really unfortunate
Speaker 8: Dan that he came on your show and he said that,
Speaker 8: and he told the truth, but then he turned around
Speaker 8: and he went on nine years with Kyle Clark and
Speaker 8: downplayed this entire situation.
Speaker 2: So that's very sad.
Speaker 8: But what he told you is absolutely the truth.
Speaker 1: Danielle, How can people follow you get more information. I
Speaker 1: know you post a lot.
Speaker 2: Sure.
Speaker 8: I'm on Twitter x at Danny Jorinski. I am on Facebook,
Speaker 8: daniel Jorinsky at Aurora City Council. I have a website
Speaker 8: Danielle for Aurora dot com. Folks can email me. I
Speaker 8: am reachable in so many ways, and I believe more
Speaker 8: and more people are going to continue to reach out
Speaker 8: American citizens that are trapped living under this gang control.
Speaker 1: And if you could waive the magic wand what would
Speaker 1: be done right now to end this gang control?
Speaker 8: Well, I think our federal person this is too much
Speaker 8: for any one local law enforcement agency to handle. Our
Speaker 8: federal partners. But Dan, that starts with admitting there's a problem.
Speaker 8: Do you think that just a sheer few months before
Speaker 8: a presidential election, anybody is going to stop playing politics
Speaker 8: for one second and come help these people that are suffering?
Speaker 1: No right, certainly not the left, but well, Danielle, thank you,
Speaker 1: thank you, and the Meryl Beyond next week and we
Speaker 1: look forward to getting you back on absolutely.
Speaker 8: Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Dan, Thank you take care of that is Danielle. Duran's
Speaker 1: kind enough to join us. What do you think is
Speaker 1: going on up there?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 7: Well, there's a lot of obfuscation. I was really disappointed
Speaker 7: to hear what Danielle just said about me or Mike Kaufman.
Speaker 7: You know, I like Mike Kaufman a lot. I think
Speaker 7: he's a great choice for mayor and Aurora. But for
Speaker 7: him to go on nine News and tell a totally
Speaker 7: different story to Comrade Kyle than he tells to you,
Speaker 7: that's disheartening.
Speaker 6: He told you the truth.
Speaker 7: They're going door to door trying to take back this city,
Speaker 7: Aurora from this Venezuelan gang. I just spoke with John Fabricatory.
Speaker 7: Nobody knows this issue, this subject better than John does
Speaker 7: as a former ice agent himself, and he confirmed that
Speaker 7: all of this is going on the kind of ransoming out.
Speaker 7: It's like Poulyy walnuts On behalf of Tony Soprano going
Speaker 7: in to take over an apartment complex and now you're
Speaker 7: paying him rent.
Speaker 6: I mean, that's what's going on here.
Speaker 7: And then they're threatening the landlords and their families if
Speaker 7: they try to do anything about it. So this is
Speaker 7: absolutely happening. None of the local television stations here in
Speaker 7: Denver are covering it. They're downplaying it or dismissing it
Speaker 7: out of hand as political propaganda, that's race baiting and
Speaker 7: trying to gin up this hatred of Venezuelan immigrants when
Speaker 7: that's anything but the case. And again, this is very concerning,
Speaker 7: I think, you know, for Mayor Kaufman to go on
Speaker 7: and have that opportunity with nine News to set the
Speaker 7: record straight and tell exactly what's happening, and for him
Speaker 7: not to do it again, that's a vast disappointment.
Speaker 1: And he's going to be in studio with us next week.
Speaker 1: We're working on that, yeah, And the Mayor would have
Speaker 1: been in studio with us earlier, but I had to
Speaker 1: cancel that because of something that came up in my
Speaker 1: law practice. So he is available to us and we
Speaker 1: look forward to having him soon and we will dle
Speaker 1: down on that texture.
Speaker 4: Says Dan.
Speaker 1: These people need to be arrested and deported back to Venezuela,
Speaker 1: and if that's not going to happen, then you'd be
Speaker 1: putting a bus and taking to Jared Polis's front yard.
Speaker 1: Interested we'll ask the mayor about that possibility as well.
Speaker 1: And to your point, Ryan, obviously, you know when you
Speaker 1: talk about these gangs, there are no reflection on the
Speaker 1: Venezuelan people who are here because Joe Biden allowed him
Speaker 1: into the country and are not violating other laws, but
Speaker 1: it's obviously a problem that has to be dealt with.
Speaker 1: Any time you have the mayor of the city come
Speaker 1: on this show and say there are entire blocks we
Speaker 1: have to take back. Yeah, yes, something has to be
Speaker 1: done and has to be done right away. Eight five
Speaker 1: five for zero five eight two five five the number.
Speaker 1: What do you want Dana Bash to ask Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: and her emotional support companion Tim Walls tomorrow You're on
Speaker 1: the Dan Capla.
Speaker 6: Show and now back to the Dan Taplas Show podcast.
Speaker 10: There's the reason that Dana is maybe the best person
Speaker 10: to do this interview. She's covered both of them in
Speaker 10: the Capitol. And I can tell you when working in
Speaker 10: house leadership, when Dana calls you and you don't have
Speaker 10: a good answer, you don't answer the phone because you
Speaker 10: don't have a good answer, and Dana's.
Speaker 4: Going to get you.
Speaker 10: And if I'm Tim Walls and if I'm Kamala Harris,
Speaker 10: I'm really nervous about doing this one with Dana because
Speaker 10: she knows where all the bodies are buried in the
Speaker 10: House and in the Senate and a lot of the
Speaker 10: people who have been talked about at other networks who
Speaker 10: are qualified hosts and all that, they don't have that
Speaker 10: depth of knowledge that she has.
Speaker 1: One of the most ludicrous self contradictory statements ever made
Speaker 1: on air. If you really think Harris and Walls are
Speaker 1: nervous because it's Dana Bash now, they're nervous because they're lying.
Speaker 1: They're lying about what their positions are. They've got to
Speaker 1: keep straight in their heads. Okay, what have they said before,
Speaker 1: which is what they really believe versus what are they
Speaker 1: saying now, So they're nervous about all that. And they're
Speaker 1: nervous because obviously Kamala Harris has some kind of challenge.
Speaker 1: She has some kind of difficulty which is so profound
Speaker 1: that her handlers will not let her go out there alone,
Speaker 1: or she's refusing to go out there alone. So they
Speaker 1: got that to worry about. But they don't have Dana
Speaker 1: Bash to worry about or drop the mic. They wouldn't
Speaker 1: have chosen Dana Bash. They could have interviewed with anybody.
Speaker 1: They chose Dana Bash because one way or the other,
Speaker 1: directly or indirectly or implicitly, they are very very confident
Speaker 1: that Dana Bash will do it the way they want
Speaker 1: it done. And the way they want it done is
Speaker 1: they want Dana Bash to ask all the tough questions
Speaker 1: but not the follow up questions because they want to
Speaker 1: be able to say, Hey, all the tough questions were asked,
Speaker 1: but all that matters is the follow up questions. So
Speaker 1: I think they have a very high level of confidence
Speaker 1: that Dana Bash will not be pursuing the tough follow
Speaker 1: up questions. We have a texture Andy who says, but
Speaker 1: do you think Kamala's team will also have the questions
Speaker 1: in advance before the editing and taping, taping, editing and
Speaker 1: a good question. They won't be handed to them by
Speaker 1: CNN or slip to them for their back door. But
Speaker 1: they don't need that. They know the questions that are coming.
Speaker 1: They are so obvious. All they need is the interviewer
Speaker 1: to not ask the follow up questions.
Speaker 4: That's what they need.
Speaker 1: And listen, I'm not saying Dana Bash won't ask a
Speaker 1: single follow up question. What I'm saying is she won't pursue.
Speaker 1: Like I have a witness on the stand, you know,
Speaker 1: they evade me. Sometimes it may take two, three, four,
Speaker 1: five follow ups to get them to either admit the
Speaker 1: truth or look so stupid that it's even better for me.
Speaker 1: But you can't do it with most witnesses in a
Speaker 1: single follow up. So will Dana Bash really pursue?
Speaker 4: You can bet.
Speaker 1: You can bet Harrison Walls are supremely confident she will
Speaker 1: not pursue, or they would not be there with her. Hey,
Speaker 1: let's go to the phone lines. They'll start with the
Speaker 1: Brian and Arvada. You're on the Dan Kaplis, you'll.
Speaker 3: Welcome, Hey, Dan, Yeah, the whole thing's a joke. She
Speaker 3: won't go on live. I mean, they get to edit everything,
Speaker 3: and that's going to be your president. Is there really
Speaker 3: people out there? I mean, we got to start spreading
Speaker 3: the message a little better, evidently, because if if there's
Speaker 3: anybody out there at this point that's buying any of
Speaker 3: this nonsense, I mean they're obviously you know, they're not
Speaker 3: paying the tension, or they're just straight stupid, I don't know,
Speaker 3: or do you listen, how do we get the word
Speaker 3: out a little better?
Speaker 4: I guess well, and you know, if you know people
Speaker 4: in swing states.
Speaker 1: But but the Trump campaign, they obviously need to be
Speaker 1: running these spots with all of these terrible things Harris
Speaker 1: has said, video of her in her own words, you know,
Speaker 1: saturating the swing states. But in the end, listen, the
Speaker 1: cabal knows that Harris is really getting hurt tomorrow by
Speaker 1: needing Walls out there with her. They know that, they
Speaker 1: know that every reasonable person is going to see that
Speaker 1: on their own. So why do you think, what is
Speaker 1: the problem with Harris that is so severe that they
Speaker 1: have to put those out there with her, or that
Speaker 1: she refuses to go out without them.
Speaker 3: I mean, Dan, she's in over her head. She's a puppet.
Speaker 3: We already know. Biden wasn't president for the last three years.
Speaker 3: There's a puppet master behind them all. So they picked
Speaker 3: the weakest. They picked the people, the yes people.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't think they too, Brian appreciate the call,
Speaker 1: my friend. I don't think they picked her. I think
Speaker 1: that Biden forced her on them. Clearly Obamas didn't want her,
Speaker 1: they said so, they said they wanted an open process,
Speaker 1: and then they fell in line. But I think Joe
Speaker 1: Biden wants the people who humiliated and deposed him to lose.
Speaker 1: He wants them to fail, So he forced Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: on him, And I think he did it very effectively,
Speaker 1: and we should be grateful for that because if it
Speaker 1: was somebody else, if it was Whitmer, Shapiro, Shapiro Whitmer,
Speaker 1: Michelle Obama, etc. This would be a much tougher race
Speaker 1: ahead than Kamala Harris, Mary and Aurora. You're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 4: Welcome.
Speaker 2: Hi.
Speaker 5: I just wanted to know if there's anybody that thinks
Speaker 5: that maybe Kamala Harris might be taking some kind of
Speaker 5: medication like antibee presidants or edibles or CBD or something,
Speaker 5: because I mean the perfect example is her quote the
Speaker 5: burden of time or whatever that quote is. I mean
Speaker 5: that sounds like somebody something somebody would say when they're
Speaker 5: on Yeah listen, besides all the flip flopping stuff.
Speaker 3: And I mean yeah, I mean, there's just not right.
Speaker 5: I mean, there's a what do you think? I mean,
Speaker 5: there's a lot of people that are not that are
Speaker 5: terrible public speakers. But if you want to be in
Speaker 5: that kind of position, you have to, you know, you
Speaker 5: have to suck it up and you have to let
Speaker 5: people know what your views are. She's afraid to even
Speaker 5: talk to anybody by herself. Yeah, something's not right. Yeah,
Speaker 5: I mean, I'm just throwing that out there. I know
Speaker 5: nothing about nothing. I'm just I've just been listening to
Speaker 5: this for days and I'm thinking there's something else is
Speaker 5: going on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Mary, that last part is the perfect way to
Speaker 1: put it.
Speaker 4: Thank you. Mary.
Speaker 1: There's something wrong. We can't know what it is, but
Speaker 1: we know it's disqualifying. That's what it comes down to.
Speaker 1: There's something seriously wrong there, and unless you have subpoena
Speaker 1: power and access to her medical records, you can't know
Speaker 1: what that is.
Speaker 4: I can't know what that is.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: Maybe there'll be some leak from Biden or his team
Speaker 1: because they want her to lose, But we don't even
Speaker 1: have to know what it is. We just know there's
Speaker 1: something really wrong and it disqualifies her from serving in
Speaker 1: this job. It could be a lot of different things, right,
Speaker 1: but we know there's something really wrong. And if there
Speaker 1: wasn't something really wrong there, then she'd be acting differently.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't be sending her out to CNND.
Speaker 4: Tomorrow with Tim Wallas.
Speaker 1: They know how weak that looks, but for any candidate,
Speaker 1: but to send her out there, to send your female
Speaker 1: presidential candidate out there with a man who himself is
Speaker 1: obviously not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
Speaker 4: There's something wrong.
Speaker 1: We're just we're probably never going to know what it is,
Speaker 1: but we know it's a disqualifier.
Speaker 4: You're on The Dan Kapla Show.