Speaker 1: How do you think it'll be before somebody blames Trump
Speaker 1: for Joe's prostate issue. I'm thinking by Thursday, somebody's gonna
Speaker 1: blame it all on Trump.
Speaker 2: Well, cutting funding everywhere, So maybe maybe so I have
Speaker 2: something that's somewhat similar. So you know that Mexican training
Speaker 2: ship or what a boat or whatever it was it
Speaker 2: crash the Brooklyn Bridge. Chuck Schumer came out and blamed
Speaker 2: that on Donald Trump because he had fired the commandant
Speaker 2: of the Coastguard to put in a new commandant of
Speaker 2: the Coastguard. Schumer says, it's all Trump's fault. Now, I
Speaker 2: can't draw a straight line between the commandant of the
Speaker 2: Coast Guard and you know, a Mexican boat was crashing
Speaker 2: into the Brooklyn Bridge. Isn't it interesting though that I
Speaker 2: know there's a difference, But isn't it interesting that a
Speaker 2: I'm not I'm just trying to be an ass here.
Speaker 2: Isn't it interesting how you can have a Mexican training
Speaker 2: boat crash into the Brooklyn Bridge, and the Brooklyn Bridge,
Speaker 2: which is what more than a one hundred years old? Just
Speaker 2: like what was that doesn't even respond? Well, yeah, you
Speaker 2: have the Key Bridge across the Chesapeake Bay, that a
Speaker 2: boat whatever it was, a tanker boat or whatever, hits
Speaker 2: at the entire bridge comes crashing down. It just built different,
Speaker 2: really dragging Redbeard Master the obvious this morning. I'll be
Speaker 2: here all week. I don't want to spend a I
Speaker 2: don't want to spend a lot of time on this,
Speaker 2: but I because of the cancer diagnosis, I want to
Speaker 2: go back and revisit the whole audio tape situation, the
Speaker 2: her audio tapes, because when you think about the two
Speaker 2: of these together now, it really does if you don't
Speaker 2: have a profound concern for the future of the country,
Speaker 2: regardless of who or even ear regardless of who the
Speaker 2: president is, whatever Trump is trying to accomplish right now,
Speaker 2: there is still a deep state, an administrative state that
Speaker 2: at all levels, there's still a judicial system that at
Speaker 2: the trial level and even to some degree at the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court level, is trying to and I say this
Speaker 2: more so for the federal district courts that I do
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court that are playing politics and trying to
Speaker 2: block Trump. What is it about when you when you
Speaker 2: step back and you and you just if we could
Speaker 2: just you know, get into some fighter jet and or
Speaker 2: maybe get into one of Musk's uh satellites or one
Speaker 2: of his spaceships and look down on just you know,
Speaker 2: get in geosynchronous orbit with the United States and just
Speaker 2: look down on the country. Can we survive when there's
Speaker 2: no accountability, when you had four years of a demented
Speaker 2: old fart that wasn't running the country, when you had
Speaker 2: a previous president Barack Obama using his staffers to make decisions.
Speaker 2: And and I say, that's probably the least of our
Speaker 2: worries because how many ultra wealthy Democrat donors were ineing decisions. Now,
Speaker 2: I know wealthy donors influence decisions a lot, but I'm
Speaker 2: talking about not not a congressman. I'm not talking about
Speaker 2: a senator. You know, would you vote this way or
Speaker 2: that way, which I mean could have to make a difference.
Speaker 2: But I'm talking about the commander in chief, the guy
Speaker 2: that's got his thumb on the on the button, the
Speaker 2: guy that walks around that has the naval officer with
Speaker 2: him carrying the nuclear football all the time. I'm talking
Speaker 2: about the guy that's the ostensibly the leader of the
Speaker 2: free world. I'm talking about the person who who can
Speaker 2: influence world affairs just by simple words let alone by deeds,
Speaker 2: do we have any accountability in the country at all?
Speaker 2: And then pile on top of that, as we're on
Speaker 2: this in this spaceship looking down, we have the fourth estate,
Speaker 2: the media, which somebody says on the text line on Saturday.
Speaker 2: I don't have it in front of me, but something
Speaker 2: to the effect. The fourth the state has become the
Speaker 2: fifth column. If you understand your history and you know
Speaker 2: what that means, that that's that's I thought that was brilliant.
Speaker 2: The fourth of states become the fifth column? When when
Speaker 2: and I know that there are media sources that I trust,
Speaker 2: I still try to verify them, but I don't read
Speaker 2: them with a constant challenging or thinking every single word
Speaker 2: I read is the word the true or not? Is
Speaker 2: is the preposition they're using correct or not? Is the
Speaker 2: subject matter really, you know? Valid or not? I still verify,
Speaker 2: but there are some that I look at and I
Speaker 2: don't believe anything. I don't believe anything, which is a
Speaker 2: sad state of affairs because and not that I know
Speaker 2: that Walter Cronkite was once described as the most trusted
Speaker 2: man in the world. But despite maybe him being indeed
Speaker 2: the most trusted man in the world at the time.
Speaker 2: Walter Cronkite did try when he was the anchor of
Speaker 2: the CBS Evening News, did try to just objectively say
Speaker 2: here's what's going on. Although I know he was a lefty,
Speaker 2: he was a liberal, he did try to keep that out.
Speaker 2: Now when he retired and he became a special correspondent
Speaker 2: started doing kind of things on his own, all that
Speaker 2: liberalism really came out Huntley and Brinkley. I know I'm
Speaker 2: dating myself, but I was a nerd as a kid too.
Speaker 2: That they did try to just objectively present the news,
Speaker 2: and while you would still it would still be somewhat
Speaker 2: of a left word tilt, there was an attempt to
Speaker 2: be objective. Today we had none of that, and then whatsoever,
Speaker 2: So that when I'm reading sites that I trust, I
Speaker 2: still verify them because I know they're coming at it
Speaker 2: from a conservative perspective. And while I believe the conservative
Speaker 2: perspective is the correct perspective, I also know that it's
Speaker 2: not the only perspective. So when we think about her
Speaker 2: audio tape, the disclosure of metastasized prostate cancer, we know that, wow,
Speaker 2: things are really a lot worse than we thought they were.
Speaker 2: Now We've all witnessed moments that raised doubts about Biden's
Speaker 2: mental film fitness, and most distinct of all, I think
Speaker 2: which kind of brought it to You know, everything kind
Speaker 2: of DC kind of operates this way. Everything is kind
Speaker 2: of at a hum, a low level hum, kind of
Speaker 2: like you know, they used to be out of house,
Speaker 2: New Mexico. Everybody talked about the low level hum. They
Speaker 2: really couldn't identify the source. Oh it was a spaceship.
Speaker 2: Oh it was something secret underground. Oh it was all
Speaker 2: sorts of things. But you could and sometimes I think
Speaker 2: people heard it because it had been planted in their
Speaker 2: brains to hear it. They heard it. But nonetheless that
Speaker 2: was But there's a low level hum that goes on
Speaker 2: in DC, and then it will get progressively a little louder,
Speaker 2: a little more distinct. Whatever that hum is, it might
Speaker 2: be a story about an individual. It might be a
Speaker 2: policy decision. It might be something that Congress is doing,
Speaker 2: or is the White House is doing. It might be
Speaker 2: something happening in one of the cabinet departments. It might
Speaker 2: be happening something happening then out in the consultancy class,
Speaker 2: you know, out in all of the people that make
Speaker 2: money off the government, that are out there on K Streeter,
Speaker 2: out there in this in the continy of the suburbs,
Speaker 2: out in Alexandria, Arlington, out in Tyson's Corner, And then
Speaker 2: it gets progressively louder, and then boom, something just happens.
Speaker 2: One day there's one line in a story in the
Speaker 2: Washington Post, or the President of the United States makes
Speaker 2: one comment about it, or some you know, one of
Speaker 2: the congressional leaders does, or some experts says something about it,
Speaker 2: and then boom, it blows up and it becomes a
Speaker 2: in Biden's vernacular, it becomes a BFD. When when that happens,
Speaker 2: you I would think you, I would hope you would
Speaker 2: stop and say, well, how did we get to this point,
Speaker 2: and what led up to that point? And is there
Speaker 2: anything that we should have known about sooner, that should
Speaker 2: have popped up earlier, that should have risen to the
Speaker 2: surface a lot earlier. And depending on what the matter is,
Speaker 2: who's going to be held accountable? Will heads roll? What
Speaker 2: will be the consequences for us going forward? So many
Speaker 2: questions about so many things, because Washington, d c. Has
Speaker 2: consumed so much of our cultural attention span. Washington d C.
Speaker 2: Has become the center of the universe. Sorry, New York,
Speaker 2: but you may still be the financial capital of the world.
Speaker 2: But in terms of the center of the universe, I
Speaker 2: think that shifted to Washington, d C. Which is a shame.
Speaker 2: The founding fathers never expected that to be the center
Speaker 2: of the universe. They expected all these state capitals be
Speaker 2: the center of the universe. So when the audio came
Speaker 2: out and I listened to it, I was alarmed about,
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, what was going on inside the Oval Office,
Speaker 2: the West Wing, the East wing, what was happening, Where
Speaker 2: was the cabinet, What was the cabinet doing? What was
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris doing? Now I know she's a dits. I've
Speaker 2: called her an airhead. I still think she's an airhead.
Speaker 2: And I said over the weekend that I think that
Speaker 2: one of the things that Kamala Harris could have done. Now,
Speaker 2: I know some people disagree with me because I say
Speaker 2: that she would have been seen as a political opportunist. Opportunist, well,
Speaker 2: that's probably what many Republicans would have claimed, but I
Speaker 2: think some Democrats would have breathed a deep sigh of
Speaker 2: relief and thought, oh good, we don't have to deal
Speaker 2: with Joe anymore. Of course, they would have then realized, oh,
Speaker 2: she is a dits, she is an airhead, and so
Speaker 2: now we're stuck with her. Or but at least they
Speaker 2: could have and here's the key, at least the Democrats
Speaker 2: could have had an open primary and somebody could have emerged.
Speaker 2: Whether that would have been a Gretchen Win or Gavin
Speaker 2: Newsom or you know, a Pritzker from Illinois. It could
Speaker 2: have been anybody. But it could have been anybody but
Speaker 2: Joe Biden. And it could have been anybody but Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: But she could have started that process, but she didn't,
Speaker 2: and they ended up in the situation that they were in.
Speaker 2: And by all of that, I mean she could have
Speaker 2: invoked the twenty fifth Amendment. She could have gone to
Speaker 2: I bet she could have gone to Pete Buddhajig. She
Speaker 2: probably should certainly probably could have gone to maybe not
Speaker 2: Anthony Blincoln because Anthony Blincoln and Joe Biden were close friends,
Speaker 2: but the Defense Secretary. Yeah, probably could have gone to
Speaker 2: Lloyd Austin, maybe could have gone maybe to Merrick Garland,
Speaker 2: but nah, I don't know. But any other members of
Speaker 2: the cabinet and I think with Kamala Harris and Lloyd
Speaker 2: Austin leading the charge on the twenty fifth Amendment, I
Speaker 2: think that the rest of the cabinet would have fallen
Speaker 2: in place, and I think they would have removed the
Speaker 2: president and for a time being, whether it be a
Speaker 2: short or a long period. Kamala Harris, once we saw
Speaker 2: how bad Joe Biden really was, because that might have
Speaker 2: spurred a release of the her audio tapes even earlier.
Speaker 2: So all of this subterfuge took place, and we all
Speaker 2: saw what was going on. We all heard what was
Speaker 2: going on, and yet that fifth column, the fourth Estate,
Speaker 2: kept lying to us. Kareem Abdul Jabbar kept lying to
Speaker 2: us from the briefing room. Every cabinet member that was
Speaker 2: ever asked, every member of Congress that was ever he asked.
Speaker 2: Everybody kept saying, Oh, you don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 2: Why even when I talked about the Fourth of State,
Speaker 2: remember Joe Scarborough talking about this is the best Biden ever, Jill,
Speaker 2: what do you think about that today? Having heard what
Speaker 2: we have all now heard, what do you think about
Speaker 2: that today? Listen to this. At this point, Robert her
Speaker 2: the Special Counsel now before I play this, I want
Speaker 2: to make a couple of comments about maybe you'll hear
Speaker 2: this in the next break, after the next break, because
Speaker 2: here's something that's important for you to understand. Robert her
Speaker 2: ask questions in a way that you may find too
Speaker 2: easy or trying to be too gentle or whatever. But
Speaker 2: Robert Hurr already knows the answers to the questions. He
Speaker 2: already knows what the truth is. He's simply trying to
Speaker 2: get the President of the United States to say it
Speaker 2: on the record. So when he asked this question, it's
Speaker 2: not the first question, but it's the first question in
Speaker 2: the audio tape that's been released, which is only about
Speaker 2: four minutes long. He's doing so because he knows what
Speaker 2: the answer is, because Biden has alluded to the answer
Speaker 2: earlier in response to another question about at some point
Speaker 2: I told my ghostwriter that I had found the classified
Speaker 2: documents I was looking for in the basement or in
Speaker 2: the garage, I forget which it was. It doesn't make
Speaker 2: any difference. So Her knows that that's the answer, that's
Speaker 2: the truth. So he tries to lead the President to
Speaker 2: get him to that point to say that on the record.
Speaker 2: So he has that information and her recognizes that he's
Speaker 2: got a bumbling, demented old man in front of him
Speaker 2: that under the pressure of and look it. I don't
Speaker 2: know if you've ever been in a deposition. I'd been
Speaker 2: as a lawyer and as a opponent in a lot
Speaker 2: of depositions. When you when you're the under Secretary of Homelandsecurity,
Speaker 2: you get deposed a lot. Post Katrina, I attended lots
Speaker 2: of depositions on Capitol Hill where committee lawyers would, you know,
Speaker 2: even on weekends, would go in and we'd sit in
Speaker 2: a in a hearing room somewhere, just sit in a
Speaker 2: giant hearing room down at the table where the witnesses
Speaker 2: usually stand with members of Congress and their lawyers. Members
Speaker 2: of Congress wouldn't ask any questions, just the lawyers. And
Speaker 2: it's it's a pressure cooker because you know that if
Speaker 2: you answer one thing one way the first time, and
Speaker 2: then the second time you remember, you remember it slightly different,
Speaker 2: or you use you know, oh no, that wasn't on
Speaker 2: a Wednesday, that was on a Tuesday, they could really
Speaker 2: twist that around and claim that you committed perjury. So
Speaker 2: you have to be very careful about what you say.
Speaker 2: And that's what I think we saw with her. He
Speaker 2: wasn't trying to capture him in perjury. He was really
Speaker 2: trying to get at the truth. Now, there's one more
Speaker 2: point I want to make about this audio that you'll
Speaker 2: hear after the break. Where's the rest of it? And
Speaker 2: by the way, how did Jake Tapper and Alex Johnson
Speaker 2: from axioms how did they get this audio? I've not
Speaker 2: heard anybody. Maybe you have, I just haven't heard. Haven't
Speaker 2: heard anybody. Ask mister Tapper, how and when did you
Speaker 2: get this audio? Who? Where, when and why did you
Speaker 2: get it? I'd like to know that answer. And where's
Speaker 2: the rest of them?
Speaker 1: From your morning guys?
Speaker 2: A soul?
Speaker 1: Biden has cancer prostect cancer?
Speaker 2: Whoa?
Speaker 1: I mean, there's millions of older men that had it
Speaker 1: in the world. Okay, And let's not forget that this
Speaker 1: dude is an evil dude, someone that uses as the
Speaker 1: death of his son every single time.
Speaker 2: That he has the occasion.
Speaker 1: It's not worth any sort of PD or.
Speaker 2: Or feeling bad for Oh. Look, I think Joe Biden
Speaker 2: is an evil individual. I think he's a base on
Speaker 2: my interaction with him, I think he's a horrible human being,
Speaker 2: but I still I just feel sorry if anybody gets cancer.
Speaker 2: You know, you know Terry Nichols sitting down at Supermax
Speaker 2: gets cancer and dies. Well, sorry, now do I care?
Speaker 2: Caring and feeling badly best somebody having a debilitating disease
Speaker 2: or two different things. Let's go to the audio. There
Speaker 2: is no definitive of information in any of the provided
Speaker 2: sources that identify fies who specifically released the Robert Special
Speaker 2: counsel Robert her audio recordings of the then president to Axios.
Speaker 2: All the sources of every source you find in the
Speaker 2: case that Axios obtained the recordings, but nobody clarifies the
Speaker 2: source of the leak or the release, whichever it is.
Speaker 2: There's one source that notes quote it is not clear
Speaker 2: how Axios obtained the recording. There's another source that speculates
Speaker 2: about how Axios has the audio in connection obviously with
Speaker 2: the book promotion, but doesn't confirm the origin. You can
Speaker 2: search through x and you can find posts to speculate
Speaker 2: about the Trump administration's involvement or obviously lost speculation about
Speaker 2: Axios's motives tied to the release of the book, but
Speaker 2: none are substantiated with any sort of concrete evidence. So
Speaker 2: without any clear evidence, the identity of the who, what, where,
Speaker 2: when and why about the release of the recordings to
Speaker 2: Axios remains unknown. I want to know, and I find
Speaker 2: it interesting that none of the other media want to know.
Speaker 2: Maybe they do and they're not telling, but I'd like
Speaker 2: to know how just before and Dragon says, the release
Speaker 2: of the Taper Johnson book is tomorrow, So I'd like
Speaker 2: to know. Okay, guys, wow, pretty damn good marketing material.
Speaker 2: How did you accomplish that? And why is no one
Speaker 2: asking that question? So when ask a straightforward question, where
Speaker 2: do you? Where did you keep papers that related to
Speaker 2: those things that you were actively working on? That's what
Speaker 2: he's asked in this particular portion of the audio, and
Speaker 2: it is we find that where where did I put
Speaker 2: the audio? Here? It is where did you have those papers?
Speaker 2: Listen to this theighbers dead ly its those things that
Speaker 2: you were actually working.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't know.
Speaker 2: This is what.
Speaker 3: Twenty seventeen eighteen.
Speaker 2: That there is.
Speaker 3: Remember in this time, my son, it is either been deployed.
Speaker 1: Or is dying.
Speaker 2: Remember how Biden came out, walked into the Brady briefing room,
Speaker 2: and you know in that loud voice, where he rah
Speaker 2: was so offended that how dare Robert Her ask me
Speaker 2: about my son's death. That's none of his business, that
Speaker 2: I had nothing to do with anything. Oh so we
Speaker 2: find out in the first well I've actually fast forward,
Speaker 2: but in the first less than two minutes, it wasn't
Speaker 2: Robert Her that broke that brought up Bo's death. He
Speaker 2: was the president himself. Now, as many of you have
Speaker 2: alluded to earlier, and I agree with you, that's because
Speaker 2: Bo's death is always a fallback position. This is his
Speaker 2: crutch he always uses whenever he's in a tough spot.
Speaker 2: But even more interesting here is he wasn't sure whether
Speaker 2: it was even at a time when Bo was serving
Speaker 2: or when Bow had died. He wasn't really clear about whicheveryone.
Speaker 2: It was just for some clarification, Bo died in May
Speaker 2: thirtieth of twenty fifteen. He's talking about twenty seventeen, seventeen eighteen,
Speaker 2: that it's the seventeen eighteen, that that that era. So
Speaker 2: it's it's just utterly interesting to me that when all
Speaker 2: of this is going on, he doesn't even remember the
Speaker 2: dates and decides that I'm going to use Bo's death
Speaker 2: as an excuse.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't know.
Speaker 2: This is what.
Speaker 3: Twenty seventeen eighteen. That here, remember in this time, my son,
Speaker 3: it is either that deployed or has dyed, and and so.
Speaker 2: It was.
Speaker 3: And by the way, there were still a lot of
Speaker 3: people at the times when I got out.
Speaker 2: Of the center. I find this what's sad, but it's
Speaker 2: also really fascinating to me. The question was where were
Speaker 2: the documents? And so he's he's wandered around. You know,
Speaker 2: this was what twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen. Her says something other. Yeah, yeah, yes, sir,
Speaker 2: And you know, you know I was dealing with Bo's
Speaker 2: death and there were people in the Senate so and
Speaker 2: arguably grief can hit you for quite a while. I
Speaker 2: don't hear any grief in this voice whatsoever. I don't detect.
Speaker 2: I don't detect any grief at all. What I detect
Speaker 2: dragon is a brain that cannot, is unable, cannot, and
Speaker 2: is unable to answer a simple question that he is
Speaker 2: already answered. I had told my ghostwriter I had found
Speaker 2: the documents that we need to use that are classified
Speaker 2: to write this book. I had found them in either
Speaker 2: the basement or the garage, and hers trying to find out,
Speaker 2: you know, tell me where you and when you found
Speaker 2: the documents? And now we're going to go back in time.
Speaker 3: Or encouraging me to run in this period accept the president.
Speaker 2: Man, he just thought that she had a better shot
Speaker 2: of winning prey and I did.
Speaker 3: And so I hadn't. I hadn't at this point, even
Speaker 3: I have a pen. I hadn't walked away from the
Speaker 3: idea and that I may run for office again, if
Speaker 3: our brand again, if you're running for president, and and so.
Speaker 2: What was happening?
Speaker 3: Thought guy crazy?
Speaker 2: Now you heard an aide interrupt him at that point,
Speaker 2: he's wandered off into back into two thousand and fifteen, sixteen,
Speaker 2: when Trump was running and Obama had jogged Biden's side. Well,
Speaker 2: he wasn't being mean. He just thought she, she, meaning Clinton,
Speaker 2: had a better What is that? What does that have
Speaker 2: to do with anything about the documents? Nothing at all?
Speaker 2: Twenty fifteen and I was twenty fifteen. He was twenty
Speaker 2: fifteen much of the months. So he goes, yeah, that's right.
Speaker 2: And by the way, that's an aid helping him answer
Speaker 2: the questions, which I found interesting. I mean, it could
Speaker 2: have been the lawyer, but all the sources that I've
Speaker 2: read said that that was an aid that he had
Speaker 2: with him.
Speaker 3: What happened in the meantime is that.
Speaker 2: Has and.
Speaker 3: Trump gets elected in November of twenty seventeen, sixteen, twenty sixteen.
Speaker 2: All right, so.
Speaker 1: Have twenty seventeen here, that's when the last office January
Speaker 1: jers okay, now.
Speaker 3: Posession because Hoornon would quite okay, yeah, and uh.
Speaker 2: In twenty seventeen.
Speaker 3: Bow had passed had uh Man.
Speaker 2: This this personal.
Speaker 3: The genesis.
Speaker 1: Of the book.
Speaker 3: And the title promised me Dad was a uh.
Speaker 2: I know they're all close to yourselves and dogs, but
Speaker 2: Bo is like my right arm, and that was my.
Speaker 3: These guys were a year and a day apart, and
Speaker 3: they could finish each endi sentences.
Speaker 2: And this is an old man reminiscent probably doesn't even
Speaker 2: remember what the question is. He's just reminiscing, he's just rambling.
Speaker 2: But this is the commander. I want you to remember. This
Speaker 2: is the commander in chief at the time, at a
Speaker 2: time when you know Russia is going to invade Ukraine,
Speaker 2: at a time when China is an egg still is
Speaker 2: an existential threat, at a time when he's implemented all
Speaker 2: of this outrageous spending all of this inflation is going on.
Speaker 2: We're told it's just transitory inflation. We have all of
Speaker 2: these problems in the country, and this is the guy
Speaker 2: in charge. And what astounds me is the rambling gets worse. Now,
Speaker 2: those of you who heard me talk about this on Saturday,
Speaker 2: we actually ramble on into a kid's parade, mongolia, any
Speaker 2: number of totally, completely, wholly irrelevant subjects while he sits
Speaker 2: there just wandering around, to the point that Robert Hurt
Speaker 2: at one point says, mister President, do we need to
Speaker 2: take a break? Oh? No, I want to continue?
Speaker 1: Or Mike, remember when Joe Biden was going to cure
Speaker 1: cancer He's sitting in find cancer in his own body apparently?
Speaker 2: Wow, Or as someone mentioned in the text line, perhaps
Speaker 2: when Obama knew that he already had some sign of
Speaker 2: cancer of some sort at that time. Completely plausible. Here's
Speaker 2: a greater, I think, more pertinent question, not not compared
Speaker 2: to yours, but just said, this is a great pertinent question.
Speaker 2: Uh sixteen forty one, writes Mike. Why didn't her just say, quote,
Speaker 2: let's go back to my question, where did you find
Speaker 2: the documents? Close quote? Because this is a deposition and
Speaker 2: a deposition is all about out what lawyers call discovery.
Speaker 2: You're trying you want now the judgment never allow this
Speaker 2: in the courtroom. But remember this is not in the courtroom.
Speaker 2: But deposition is a form of discovery, so it's outside
Speaker 2: the courtroom. I could object to a lawyer asking my
Speaker 2: client a question, but all I can do is just
Speaker 2: put the objection on the record. My client still has
Speaker 2: to answer the question whether the objection is full, is
Speaker 2: ultimately sustained in the courtroom or not. So outside the courtroom,
Speaker 2: all you're doing is just trying to get everything you
Speaker 2: can possibly get out out of this man's brain, everything
Speaker 2: he can possibly remember. And there's also a tactic to this,
Speaker 2: and the tactic is let him ramble, because he might just,
Speaker 2: in that rambling say something that is absolutely devastating. That
Speaker 2: means that Robert Herr has just made his case, and
Speaker 2: while he won't be able to indue the sitting President,
Speaker 2: he's able to go back in his Special Council report
Speaker 2: and say unequivocally, this guy knew exactly what he was doing,
Speaker 2: or I discovered other crimes in this rambling. Biden could
Speaker 2: have admitted to other crimes. You know, we might have
Speaker 2: had a house of Tards moment where Biden admitted to
Speaker 2: pushing somebody off the platform in the DC Metro and
Speaker 2: having one of his political enemies killed. That's why you
Speaker 2: let the rambling go on. But at some point her
Speaker 2: thinks to himself, Wow, this really is bad. Maybe I
Speaker 2: ought to give this guy a five minute break.
Speaker 3: Oh I used to go home from the trade.
Speaker 2: In isay. I'n't you just talking thinking about just thinking about
Speaker 2: the train. Here's Biden talking about one of his favorite things,
Speaker 2: the train. That tells me, I know, well, maybe you haven't,
Speaker 2: but I've seen this in elderly grandparents, elderly aunts and uncles,
Speaker 2: where you're sitting there and you're just talking and they
Speaker 2: just ramble off and pretty soon they're talking about something that,
Speaker 2: you know, something they used to do that they really liked.
Speaker 2: They had nothing to do with the conversation at him.
Speaker 2: And that is a form of dementia. And this is
Speaker 2: at the time this recording was made, he was the
Speaker 2: commander in chief of the United States of America. This
Speaker 2: audio is utterly devastating and it begs the question who
Speaker 2: was in charge