1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:04,759
Speaker 1: Imagine this a silent massive visitor, basically a ghost ship

2
00:00:04,799 --> 00:00:08,640
from another star system is rushing past us right now, right, and.

3
00:00:08,560 --> 00:00:10,599
Speaker 2: It's moving faster than anything we've got, sort of a

4
00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:14,000
cosmic package that just shows up no return address.

5
00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:17,519
Speaker 1: For centuries, we've all wondered, right, are we alone? And

6
00:00:17,600 --> 00:00:19,920
now we might have something right here in our own

7
00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:21,920
backyard that proves we're not.

8
00:00:22,239 --> 00:00:23,800
Speaker 2: And it's not just a signal. It could be an

9
00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:27,039
actual artifact, something you know, tangible.

10
00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:30,000
Speaker 1: It's a compelling and honestly a kind of chilling thought.

11
00:00:30,120 --> 00:00:32,079
Speaker 2: It is. This is that moment where you know, all

12
00:00:32,119 --> 00:00:35,520
the abstract theories crash right into hard data, and it's

13
00:00:35,560 --> 00:00:39,079
forcing scientists to ask what happens when something just refuses

14
00:00:39,119 --> 00:00:41,079
to fit in the neat little boxes we've made.

15
00:00:41,159 --> 00:00:43,719
Speaker 1: Welcome to Thrilling Threads. This is the show where we

16
00:00:43,759 --> 00:00:46,640
take a whole stack of sources, articles, expert commentary, you

17
00:00:46,719 --> 00:00:49,640
name it, and we pull out those pure, concentrated nuggets

18
00:00:49,679 --> 00:00:51,759
of insight to get you truly up to speed.

19
00:00:51,880 --> 00:00:56,039
Speaker 2: And today our source material is from a really provocative discussion,

20
00:00:56,359 --> 00:00:59,079
a video from Sky News, and it's all focused on

21
00:00:59,119 --> 00:01:01,079
an interstellar object called three.

22
00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:03,759
Speaker 1: Eyat lists that's a three eye out lists.

23
00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:05,840
Speaker 2: Right, that's the one, and this is a big deal

24
00:01:05,879 --> 00:01:09,480
because it's only the third interstellar object we have ever confirmed,

25
00:01:09,760 --> 00:01:12,239
and it's kicking up a ton of controversy.

26
00:01:12,359 --> 00:01:14,959
Speaker 1: So our mission today is to really dig into the

27
00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:17,760
specifics of three iyout lists. We want to look at

28
00:01:17,799 --> 00:01:21,680
these really unusual characteristics that have led some, i mean

29
00:01:21,719 --> 00:01:26,319
some of the world's top space experts to question the standard.

30
00:01:25,840 --> 00:01:29,280
Speaker 2: Story, the standard story being that it's just a comet exactly.

31
00:01:29,519 --> 00:01:32,640
Speaker 1: Instead, they're suggesting we might be looking at an artifact.

32
00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:34,680
So we're going to unpack the evidence for it being

33
00:01:34,719 --> 00:01:36,920
you know, manufactured technology.

34
00:01:36,439 --> 00:01:39,680
Speaker 2: And then the really big part, we're going to analyze

35
00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:41,719
what it all means if that turns out to be true.

36
00:01:41,799 --> 00:01:44,760
Speaker 1: Well, let's start with just defining this thing. It's an outlier,

37
00:01:44,879 --> 00:01:47,079
a visitor that started breaking the rules from the moment

38
00:01:47,079 --> 00:01:50,040
it arrived. Okay, so let's set the scene right now,

39
00:01:50,120 --> 00:01:52,879
three I at list is getting closer to Earth on

40
00:01:52,959 --> 00:01:54,400
its way through our system, and.

41
00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:57,319
Speaker 2: The immediate, you know, the consensus view, the safest bet

42
00:01:57,560 --> 00:02:01,799
is that it's a natural icy object, a comet, just like.

43
00:02:01,799 --> 00:02:04,439
Speaker 1: The two that came before it, umar Mua and two

44
00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:05,480
Iboris off.

45
00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:08,759
Speaker 2: Right, and statistically that makes sense. The vast majority of

46
00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:12,039
stuff lying around in space is you know, rocks and comets.

47
00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:17,800
But that high probability, it can't become a scientific guarantee.

48
00:02:17,919 --> 00:02:19,360
Yeah not with this one.

49
00:02:19,439 --> 00:02:19,759
Speaker 1: Why not?

50
00:02:20,319 --> 00:02:23,280
Speaker 2: Well, the expert in our source material makes this point

51
00:02:23,319 --> 00:02:27,000
really clearly. The moment there's even a tiny chance of

52
00:02:27,000 --> 00:02:30,080
something radically different, something that could change everything for us,

53
00:02:31,080 --> 00:02:34,080
scientists have a totally different kind of responsibility.

54
00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:37,159
Speaker 1: Ah, so that's the pause for thought exactly.

55
00:02:37,400 --> 00:02:40,400
Speaker 2: Yeah, the threat level is low, nobody's running for the hills,

56
00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:43,599
but you absolutely have to monitor it. You have to

57
00:02:43,759 --> 00:02:46,039
verify everything. You have to rule out what he calls

58
00:02:46,319 --> 00:02:47,560
a black Swan event.

59
00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:49,599
Speaker 1: You can't just assume your first guess is right when

60
00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:52,319
the object itself is sending back such weird data.

61
00:02:52,400 --> 00:02:56,840
Speaker 2: Precisely, a black Swan event is by definition, something rare,

62
00:02:57,120 --> 00:02:59,599
something with huge impact, and something you can only really

63
00:02:59,599 --> 00:03:01,319
explain after it's already happened.

64
00:03:01,479 --> 00:03:03,639
Speaker 1: So our job is to look closely enough now so

65
00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:05,599
we don't say, you know, ten years from now, wow,

66
00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:07,080
we really should have paid more attention.

67
00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:08,960
Speaker 2: Exactly, So what's triggering all this doubt?

68
00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:11,360
Speaker 1: The first thing, and this is a big one is

69
00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:14,120
its trajectory. The source calls it improbable.

70
00:03:14,319 --> 00:03:17,080
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is key three. I Atlas came in traveling

71
00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:18,360
in a plane of the planets.

72
00:03:18,360 --> 00:03:20,479
Speaker 1: Okay, so what does that mean? The plane of the planets.

73
00:03:20,599 --> 00:03:23,439
Speaker 2: So, if you picture our Solar system like a giant

74
00:03:23,520 --> 00:03:27,159
flat vinyl record spinning on a turntable, Uh huh, the

75
00:03:27,319 --> 00:03:30,639
ecliptic plane is the surface of that record. All the

76
00:03:30,680 --> 00:03:36,439
major planets, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, they all orbit on that

77
00:03:36,479 --> 00:03:39,800
flat disc. Most of our local asteroids and comets do too.

78
00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:42,280
Speaker 1: But a visitor from another star shouldn't care about our

79
00:03:42,319 --> 00:03:42,919
record player.

80
00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:46,080
Speaker 2: It shouldn't care at all. A random object ejected from

81
00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:50,039
another star system statistically, it should come at us from any.

82
00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:51,960
Speaker 1: Angle, from above, from below, right.

83
00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,520
Speaker 2: Screaming in at a thirty degree angle, sixty even a

84
00:03:54,599 --> 00:03:57,520
ninety degree angle to our orbits. The chance of a

85
00:03:57,639 --> 00:04:01,039
truly random visitor just happening to line up perfectly within

86
00:04:01,080 --> 00:04:05,000
that tiny five degree band of our ecliptic is It's

87
00:04:05,039 --> 00:04:05,960
just minuscule.

88
00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:08,240
Speaker 1: It's the kind of thing that makes you go hmm.

89
00:04:08,319 --> 00:04:09,759
You know, if you were trying to send a probe

90
00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:11,120
to our solar system to check.

91
00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:13,759
Speaker 2: Out the planets, you would aim it directly at the

92
00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:16,759
ecliptic plane. It's how you'd get the most bang for

93
00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:23,720
your buck. It suggests well, it could suggest intentionality, not randomness.

94
00:04:23,879 --> 00:04:26,680
Speaker 1: So the source material flags this as the first big

95
00:04:26,759 --> 00:04:29,600
question mark. Is it just a one in a billion

96
00:04:29,720 --> 00:04:31,680
cosmic coincidence.

97
00:04:31,240 --> 00:04:33,240
Speaker 2: Or is it evidence that this thing was launched with

98
00:04:33,279 --> 00:04:36,959
a purpose. We don't know, but the improbability is a

99
00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:37,600
warning light.

100
00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:40,800
Speaker 1: But the stuff it's made of that's maybe even more

101
00:04:40,839 --> 00:04:43,959
wild than its path. First off, its size. It's described

102
00:04:43,959 --> 00:04:46,399
as having an unusually large size and mass.

103
00:04:46,439 --> 00:04:48,160
Speaker 2: And we have to be honest here, our sample size

104
00:04:48,199 --> 00:04:50,720
is tiny. We've only ever seen three of these things, right,

105
00:04:50,920 --> 00:04:54,279
Umomua was weird and cigar shaped, Borsov was more like

106
00:04:54,279 --> 00:04:56,920
a normal comment. Now this one three I at Liss

107
00:04:57,199 --> 00:04:59,199
is way bigger, So it kind of throws our whole

108
00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:01,959
idea of a tip interscollar object out the window.

109
00:05:02,079 --> 00:05:04,000
Speaker 1: It's like if the first three people you ever met

110
00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:06,519
from a foreign country were all seven feet tall, you'd

111
00:05:06,519 --> 00:05:08,279
start to think everyone there is a giant.

112
00:05:08,360 --> 00:05:11,040
Speaker 2: Right, even though it's a terrible sample size, But it's

113
00:05:11,079 --> 00:05:14,160
this large size combined with the next detail that really

114
00:05:14,279 --> 00:05:16,240
kicks this d high gear and this is.

115
00:05:16,240 --> 00:05:18,959
Speaker 1: The part that just blew my mind. The technical detail

116
00:05:19,040 --> 00:05:22,199
that is the core of this whole artificial object idea.

117
00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:24,040
It's what the object is shedding.

118
00:05:25,439 --> 00:05:29,600
Speaker 2: It's shedding nickel, but with and this is the key part,

119
00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:31,160
very little iron.

120
00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:33,480
Speaker 1: Okay, that's the moment that makes you sit up and listen.

121
00:05:33,720 --> 00:05:36,879
Because nickel and iron they're everywhere in space. They're usually

122
00:05:36,959 --> 00:05:41,079
found together in meteorites. So why is this specific ratio

123
00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:43,000
a potential smoking gun.

124
00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:46,519
Speaker 2: It all comes down to metallurgy really, in nature, iron

125
00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:51,160
nickel alloys, like in meteorites, they form under incredible heat

126
00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:55,279
and pressure. Inside planets, they're usually mostly iron with nickel

127
00:05:55,319 --> 00:05:56,600
as a secondary.

128
00:05:56,199 --> 00:05:58,519
Speaker 1: Ingredient, so they're mixed together, right, But the.

129
00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:01,560
Speaker 2: Source material points out that shed nickel with very little iron.

130
00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:05,680
That is a signature of industrially produced nickel alloys.

131
00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:08,639
Speaker 1: You mean like something we would make like specialty steel

132
00:06:08,720 --> 00:06:10,040
or something for a jet engine.

133
00:06:10,079 --> 00:06:13,120
Speaker 2: Exactly. We manufacture high nickel alloys for things that need

134
00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:15,680
to be super tough and resist corrosion and high temperatures,

135
00:06:15,879 --> 00:06:18,639
spacecraft parts, nuclear reactors, things like that.

136
00:06:18,839 --> 00:06:21,680
Speaker 1: So if this was a natural rock breaking up, you'd

137
00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:23,959
expect to see a lot of iron mixed in with

138
00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:24,879
that nickel.

139
00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:27,959
Speaker 2: You'd expect a much more balanced ratio reflecting what's common

140
00:06:27,959 --> 00:06:30,639
in the cosmos. The fact that the nickel seems to

141
00:06:30,639 --> 00:06:36,600
be separated, it suggests someone or something process these elements deliberately.

142
00:06:36,680 --> 00:06:39,959
Speaker 1: So you're left with two options. Either nature somehow figured

143
00:06:39,959 --> 00:06:42,959
out how to do advanced industrial smelting in deep.

144
00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:45,600
Speaker 2: Space, or you're looking at something that was built. And

145
00:06:45,639 --> 00:06:47,879
given how massive this thing is, if it is a

146
00:06:47,920 --> 00:06:50,839
manufacturer structure, we are talking about engineering on a scale

147
00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:52,600
that's just hard to even.

148
00:06:52,480 --> 00:06:56,079
Speaker 1: Comprehend, designed to survive for maybe billions of years in

149
00:06:56,079 --> 00:06:57,040
interstellar space.

150
00:06:57,519 --> 00:06:59,720
Speaker 2: So you take that improbable path, you add this very

151
00:07:00,519 --> 00:07:04,120
very suspicious material composition, and you have to start treating

152
00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:07,720
three eye at lists not as just another comet, but

153
00:07:07,759 --> 00:07:09,680
as a potential historical artifact.

154
00:07:09,759 --> 00:07:12,319
Speaker 1: Okay, so its path is weird and its ingredients list

155
00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:15,079
is suspicious. Let's talk about what the object is actually

156
00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:17,399
doing as it flies by, because this moves us from

157
00:07:17,399 --> 00:07:19,639
what it's made of to its actual behavior.

158
00:07:19,759 --> 00:07:22,040
Speaker 2: And this is where three Eye Outlasts throws us another

159
00:07:22,120 --> 00:07:22,879
huge curve ball.

160
00:07:22,959 --> 00:07:23,279
Speaker 1: The tail.

161
00:07:23,399 --> 00:07:26,639
Speaker 2: Yeah, the observations of its tail. The source says it

162
00:07:26,680 --> 00:07:30,800
shows an anti tail and This is the really bizarre part.

163
00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:33,079
A jet pointing directly towards the Sun.

164
00:07:33,360 --> 00:07:35,959
Speaker 1: And this isn't a one off observation. It's been seen

165
00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:38,879
again and again, even in the latest Hyras images from

166
00:07:38,959 --> 00:07:39,839
Hubble right.

167
00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:43,319
Speaker 2: And this just fundamentally challenges basic comet physics.

168
00:07:43,480 --> 00:07:45,879
Speaker 1: Let's break that down for everyone. A normal comet a

169
00:07:45,879 --> 00:07:48,839
dirty snowball as it gets close to the sun. Right,

170
00:07:48,959 --> 00:07:50,160
what's supposed to happen.

171
00:07:50,279 --> 00:07:53,279
Speaker 2: The Sun's heat hits the ice and it sublimates, it

172
00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:56,480
turns straight into gas. That gas and dust then get

173
00:07:56,519 --> 00:07:59,480
pushed away from the Sun by what two forces, mainly

174
00:07:59,800 --> 00:08:02,600
the solar wind, which is a stream of charged particles,

175
00:08:02,879 --> 00:08:05,759
and solar radiation pressure, which is literally the pressure from

176
00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:08,839
sunlight itself. So a commet's tail always points away from

177
00:08:08,839 --> 00:08:09,160
the Sun.

178
00:08:09,279 --> 00:08:10,879
Speaker 1: That's the picture we all have in our heads. But

179
00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:13,680
three I Atlas is doing the exact opposite. It's shooting

180
00:08:13,720 --> 00:08:16,120
a jet towards the giant fusion reactor in the sky.

181
00:08:16,319 --> 00:08:19,480
Speaker 2: Precisely to have a jet pointing towards the Sun, it

182
00:08:19,519 --> 00:08:23,319
implies there's some internal force that's strong enough to overpower

183
00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:26,160
all that pressure from solar radiation. This isn't just a

184
00:08:26,199 --> 00:08:28,839
small anomaly, it completely breaks the model.

185
00:08:29,040 --> 00:08:31,879
Speaker 1: Could there be a natural explanation, like is it tumbling

186
00:08:31,959 --> 00:08:32,720
in a weird way?

187
00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:36,639
Speaker 2: It could be, but the expert in the source leans

188
00:08:36,679 --> 00:08:42,200
towards something more deliberate. A jet pointing towards the Sun

189
00:08:42,679 --> 00:08:44,519
could be a sign of controlled.

190
00:08:44,080 --> 00:08:46,919
Speaker 1: Thrust, like it's maneuvering using propulsion.

191
00:08:47,080 --> 00:08:51,159
Speaker 2: Exactly. It suggests a solid, structured object that can vent

192
00:08:51,279 --> 00:08:55,720
material in a specific direction, defying the incredible external forces.

193
00:08:55,879 --> 00:08:58,759
Speaker 1: I find that so fascinating because it's not just about

194
00:08:58,759 --> 00:09:01,080
what it's made of anymore. It's about what it's doing,

195
00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:04,679
and if it's maneuvering, that implies purpose, which leads.

196
00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:08,200
Speaker 2: Us right to this philosophical idea the expert proposes, thinking

197
00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:12,320
of this whole encounter as a blind date of interstellar proportions.

198
00:09:12,519 --> 00:09:15,919
Speaker 1: That's such a perfect analogy. It completely captures that feeling

199
00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:18,000
of terrifying uncertainty.

200
00:09:17,600 --> 00:09:20,360
Speaker 2: Because when you meet a total unknown, you can't assume

201
00:09:20,399 --> 00:09:24,480
their intentions. The expert frames it really starkly. You don't

202
00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:26,519
know if there's a friendly visitor here to say hello,

203
00:09:26,799 --> 00:09:29,519
or their words a serial.

204
00:09:29,240 --> 00:09:31,279
Speaker 1: Killer, and all you can do is watch. You can't

205
00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:33,559
let hope or fear dictate your actions.

206
00:09:33,639 --> 00:09:36,639
Speaker 2: But of course we're human. We immediately jump to the

207
00:09:36,639 --> 00:09:38,320
most dramatic scenario.

208
00:09:38,240 --> 00:09:41,440
Speaker 1: Right, But the expert in the video strongly pushes back

209
00:09:41,519 --> 00:09:45,639
on that idea and offers this a really humbling take

210
00:09:45,759 --> 00:09:47,039
on our place in the universe.

211
00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:51,159
Speaker 2: We really need that dose of cosmic perspective. The expert

212
00:09:51,159 --> 00:09:54,200
points out that our species, homost sapiens, we've only been

213
00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:55,840
around for a few million years.

214
00:09:55,639 --> 00:09:57,799
Speaker 1: Which sounds like a long time to us.

215
00:09:57,639 --> 00:10:00,080
Speaker 2: But compared to the four point five billion years the

216
00:10:00,159 --> 00:10:02,879
Solar System has been here, we're just one part in

217
00:10:02,919 --> 00:10:06,639
a thousand of that timeline. Compared to the universe's thirteen

218
00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:11,039
point eight billion years, We're just a blink and evolutionary

219
00:10:11,120 --> 00:10:11,799
rounding error.

220
00:10:11,879 --> 00:10:14,480
Speaker 1: It's the ultimate reality check. We tend to think that

221
00:10:14,519 --> 00:10:16,840
if someone comes to visit, it must be about us.

222
00:10:16,879 --> 00:10:19,080
That's just pure anthropocentric arrogance.

223
00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:21,320
Speaker 2: It's a hangover from when we thought the Sun revolved

224
00:10:21,360 --> 00:10:22,000
around the Earth.

225
00:10:22,279 --> 00:10:25,600
Speaker 1: Why would a civilization that has mastered interstellar travel, one

226
00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:28,440
that could be billions of years old, even care about us,

227
00:10:28,519 --> 00:10:32,480
this tiny, noisy, brand new species on one little planet.

228
00:10:32,559 --> 00:10:35,879
Speaker 2: They might be completely oblivious to our existence. The object

229
00:10:35,879 --> 00:10:38,320
could be focused on something else. Entirely. Maybe it's interested

230
00:10:38,360 --> 00:10:40,399
in Jupiter, you know, the biggest thing in the neighborhood,

231
00:10:40,519 --> 00:10:42,320
for resources or data, or.

232
00:10:42,759 --> 00:10:45,559
Speaker 1: As the source says, for a completely different reason that

233
00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:46,759
has nothing to do with us.

234
00:10:47,159 --> 00:10:50,000
Speaker 2: I love that idea that we might just be late

235
00:10:50,039 --> 00:10:53,679
to the cosmic party and nobody would ask us to dance.

236
00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:58,519
It just shatters that Hollywood story where humanity is always

237
00:10:58,519 --> 00:10:59,240
the main character.

238
00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:01,440
Speaker 1: We might just be the extras in the background of

239
00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:03,320
someone else's epic movie.

240
00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:07,080
Speaker 2: Which forces us to think, what is purpose on that

241
00:11:07,159 --> 00:11:10,080
kind of timescale. If they aren't here to invade us

242
00:11:10,159 --> 00:11:13,960
or even spy on us, what kind of massive, long

243
00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:17,879
term goal could possibly drive something like three Eye Atlass

244
00:11:17,879 --> 00:11:18,799
across the galaxy?

245
00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:21,159
Speaker 1: Right Trying to figure out the why behind three Eye

246
00:11:21,159 --> 00:11:23,639
at List means we have to just throw out all

247
00:11:23,639 --> 00:11:26,679
our human ideas about quick results in instant communication.

248
00:11:26,799 --> 00:11:29,440
Speaker 2: Absolutely, we have to grapple with the single biggest problem,

249
00:11:29,799 --> 00:11:33,000
the timescale. It's just mind boggling.

250
00:11:33,120 --> 00:11:36,159
Speaker 1: The source material really hammers this home. A trip across

251
00:11:36,200 --> 00:11:38,440
the Milky Way could take what billions of years?

252
00:11:38,519 --> 00:11:41,960
Speaker 2: Billions, and even if it came from a relatively close

253
00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:44,559
neighbor on the other side of the galaxy. A radio signal,

254
00:11:44,879 --> 00:11:47,440
the fastest thing there is, would take tens of thousands

255
00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:48,879
of years to get back to them, So that.

256
00:11:48,919 --> 00:11:51,960
Speaker 1: Just completely kills the idea of real time spying instantly.

257
00:11:52,759 --> 00:11:56,360
Speaker 2: If three I at lists Scanderous right now and send

258
00:11:56,399 --> 00:12:00,600
a message home saying, hey, there's life here, the civilization

259
00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:03,720
that sent it would get that message fifty thousand years from.

260
00:12:03,559 --> 00:12:08,039
Speaker 1: Now, by which point we could be long gone or

261
00:12:08,080 --> 00:12:08,840
completely different.

262
00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:12,440
Speaker 2: So the mission can't be about immediate benefit for the

263
00:12:12,519 --> 00:12:14,799
generation that launched it. It has to be something else,

264
00:12:15,240 --> 00:12:15,960
a legacy.

265
00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:18,159
Speaker 1: And that's where the expert brings in that really beautiful

266
00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:19,039
postcard analogy.

267
00:12:19,159 --> 00:12:20,960
Speaker 2: I love that. It's like sending your kids out into

268
00:12:20,960 --> 00:12:23,159
the world. You don't expect them to call every day.

269
00:12:23,279 --> 00:12:25,399
Speaker 1: You just hope for a postcard every now and then, right,

270
00:12:25,720 --> 00:12:27,600
a little sign that the mission is still going, that

271
00:12:27,639 --> 00:12:28,159
they're okay.

272
00:12:28,320 --> 00:12:33,200
Speaker 2: Exactly. The purpose is longevity. You launch the next generations

273
00:12:33,200 --> 00:12:36,080
so that their ambitions or your original ambitions, can be

274
00:12:36,080 --> 00:12:38,360
fulfilled by them long after you're gone.

275
00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:42,279
Speaker 1: The whole motivation changes. It goes from immediate gratification to

276
00:12:42,679 --> 00:12:48,799
pure existential legacy. Projecting your influence across just unimaginable stretches

277
00:12:48,840 --> 00:12:49,399
of time.

278
00:12:49,240 --> 00:12:51,279
Speaker 2: Which opens the door to some of the most fascinating

279
00:12:51,320 --> 00:12:54,279
ideas about what a really advanced civilization might.

280
00:12:54,200 --> 00:12:56,679
Speaker 1: Do, like leaving a monument, leaving.

281
00:12:56,480 --> 00:12:59,799
Speaker 2: A monument to say we were here, or and this

282
00:12:59,879 --> 00:13:04,519
is the really potent idea, creating self replicating probes, ah.

283
00:13:04,200 --> 00:13:07,879
Speaker 1: The von Neumann probes. This is classic sci fi stuff,

284
00:13:07,879 --> 00:13:09,440
but it's based on real theory.

285
00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:12,200
Speaker 2: It is. The idea is, you don't just send one ship,

286
00:13:12,519 --> 00:13:13,919
you send a technological seed.

287
00:13:14,240 --> 00:13:17,080
Speaker 1: So this probe arrives in a new solar system and.

288
00:13:17,039 --> 00:13:21,519
Speaker 2: It uses local raw materials, asteroids, comets, gas from a

289
00:13:21,559 --> 00:13:23,480
giant planet to build copies of.

290
00:13:23,399 --> 00:13:25,679
Speaker 1: Itself, and then those copies go off to other star

291
00:13:25,759 --> 00:13:26,960
systems and do the same thing.

292
00:13:27,080 --> 00:13:30,399
Speaker 2: Right, it's an exponential spread. The original civilization could be

293
00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:33,840
gone for a billion years, but their technology, their purpose

294
00:13:34,200 --> 00:13:38,679
just keeps going autonomously exploring or colonizing the galaxy.

295
00:13:38,799 --> 00:13:41,320
Speaker 1: That's a kind of technological immortality, it really is.

296
00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:44,200
Speaker 2: And when you think about that weird nickel alloys shedding

297
00:13:44,200 --> 00:13:47,279
we talked about a material design for extreme durability, The

298
00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:50,480
idea of a self replicating multi billion year old probe

299
00:13:51,200 --> 00:13:54,600
suddenly sounds well chillingly plausible.

300
00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:57,360
Speaker 1: If your goal is to seed the entire galaxy, it's

301
00:13:57,360 --> 00:13:59,399
really the only way to do it. It's the only

302
00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:01,279
way to beat the speed of light and the tyranny

303
00:14:01,279 --> 00:14:01,720
of time.

304
00:14:02,039 --> 00:14:06,440
Speaker 2: So three I Atlas could be this ancient technological ancestor

305
00:14:06,919 --> 00:14:09,159
carrying out a program that was written by a species

306
00:14:09,240 --> 00:14:10,720
that's been extinct for eons.

307
00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:12,879
Speaker 1: It's just so hard for us even wrap our heads

308
00:14:12,919 --> 00:14:16,200
around that. We think in terms of quarterly reports and

309
00:14:16,440 --> 00:14:17,720
five year plans, and we.

310
00:14:17,679 --> 00:14:20,519
Speaker 2: Try to apply those same short term motives to something

311
00:14:20,519 --> 00:14:23,200
that could be billions of years old. Yeah, and that's

312
00:14:23,240 --> 00:14:26,679
the final point here from the source that nature and

313
00:14:26,759 --> 00:14:31,320
I would add, technology is far more imaginative than scriptwriters

314
00:14:31,320 --> 00:14:31,919
in Hollywood.

315
00:14:32,159 --> 00:14:35,279
Speaker 1: The most obvious explanation isn't always the right one, not

316
00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:36,120
on this scale.

317
00:14:36,200 --> 00:14:38,440
Speaker 2: The true purpose could be something we don't even have

318
00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:39,240
a word for.

319
00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:41,879
Speaker 1: Which sets up this great tension. We have all this specific,

320
00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:43,919
weird evidence on one hand, and.

321
00:14:43,840 --> 00:14:46,799
Speaker 2: On the other experts who are trained to categorize things

322
00:14:46,840 --> 00:14:49,720
based on what they've already seen, limited by their data.

323
00:14:49,919 --> 00:14:52,159
Speaker 1: And that tension is really the heart of the intellectual

324
00:14:52,200 --> 00:14:54,600
battle here, isn't it. The Source frames it as this

325
00:14:54,679 --> 00:14:59,200
conflict between humility and the arrogance of expertise.

326
00:14:59,320 --> 00:15:01,399
Speaker 2: It's a perfect to put it on one side. You

327
00:15:01,440 --> 00:15:04,320
have the mainstream argument NASA a lot of astronomers.

328
00:15:04,360 --> 00:15:06,440
Speaker 1: They look at the object, they see the dust and

329
00:15:06,480 --> 00:15:07,399
gas coming off.

330
00:15:07,279 --> 00:15:11,000
Speaker 2: It, and they say, very simply, it looks like a comet.

331
00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:12,440
It behaves like a comet.

332
00:15:12,720 --> 00:15:16,120
Speaker 1: It is a comet, which on the surface sounds totally reasonable.

333
00:15:16,200 --> 00:15:19,080
Speaker 2: It's completely rational if you only consider the things you've

334
00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:23,159
seen before. Comets shed dust and gas. This thing is

335
00:15:23,159 --> 00:15:28,519
shedding gust and gas. Conclusion, it's a comet. It's Okham's razor.

336
00:15:28,799 --> 00:15:31,919
Speaker 1: But the expert in our source has this razor sharp

337
00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:34,519
criticism of that whole approach. They argue it has a

338
00:15:34,559 --> 00:15:35,600
fatal flaw.

339
00:15:35,480 --> 00:15:37,000
Speaker 2: A limited training data set.

340
00:15:37,080 --> 00:15:39,440
Speaker 1: It's such a brilliant analogy from the world of AI.

341
00:15:39,799 --> 00:15:41,799
Speaker 2: It is, and AI is only as good as the

342
00:15:41,879 --> 00:15:44,320
data you train it on, and a human expert is

343
00:15:44,360 --> 00:15:47,320
the same. If every single piece of data you've ever

344
00:15:47,399 --> 00:15:50,960
analyzed is an icy rock, then your brain's algorithm will

345
00:15:51,000 --> 00:15:54,600
always always default to classifying the next new thing as

346
00:15:54,679 --> 00:15:55,480
an icy rock.

347
00:15:55,639 --> 00:15:57,840
Speaker 1: You're just seeing what you expect to see, and I

348
00:15:57,840 --> 00:16:00,720
can see why the expert calls that the arrogance of expertise,

349
00:16:00,960 --> 00:16:02,720
your own knowledge can blind you.

350
00:16:02,720 --> 00:16:05,240
Speaker 2: You stop looking for different answers because your training has

351
00:16:05,240 --> 00:16:07,159
convinced you that you already have the right one.

352
00:16:07,360 --> 00:16:09,360
Speaker 1: And this is where the expert really goes for it.

353
00:16:09,879 --> 00:16:13,240
They talk about the sheer hubris of assuming that someone

354
00:16:13,279 --> 00:16:16,639
like Elon Musk is the most accomplished space entrepreneur since

355
00:16:16,679 --> 00:16:17,320
the Big Bang.

356
00:16:17,519 --> 00:16:21,039
Speaker 2: When you stop and think about that claim, it's just staggering.

357
00:16:21,200 --> 00:16:24,360
Speaker 1: I mean, our entire history of spaceflight is what's seventy

358
00:16:24,440 --> 00:16:28,360
years old. If there are other civilizations out there, our siblings,

359
00:16:28,399 --> 00:16:30,840
as the expert calls them, they could have a head

360
00:16:30,840 --> 00:16:33,120
start of millions or even billions of years.

361
00:16:33,679 --> 00:16:36,720
Speaker 2: To just dismiss the possibility that their artifacts are out

362
00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:40,919
there simply because our current catalog only has rocks and

363
00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:45,080
ice in it. That isn't scientific caution. It's a failure

364
00:16:45,120 --> 00:16:45,799
of imagination.

365
00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:48,799
Speaker 1: So when an astronomer says the dust cloud proves it's

366
00:16:48,799 --> 00:16:51,440
a comet, the expert says, they're making a huge leap,

367
00:16:51,720 --> 00:16:54,159
and they use the dust cloud analogy to explain why.

368
00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:56,279
Speaker 2: And this analogy is so important for getting the point.

369
00:16:56,440 --> 00:17:00,679
Imagine you see a big cloud of dust on the horizon. Okay, experience,

370
00:17:00,799 --> 00:17:03,480
your training data set tells you that dust clouds are

371
00:17:03,559 --> 00:17:06,480
usually kicked up by animals, So you say that must

372
00:17:06,480 --> 00:17:07,359
be a running.

373
00:17:07,039 --> 00:17:09,480
Speaker 1: Horse, a natural object, right.

374
00:17:09,319 --> 00:17:12,759
Speaker 2: But then the object gets closer and you realize it's

375
00:17:12,759 --> 00:17:16,200
a car, a piece of technology. The key insight is this,

376
00:17:17,839 --> 00:17:20,519
The dust cloud itself doesn't tell you the nature of

377
00:17:20,559 --> 00:17:21,400
the thing making it.

378
00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:23,440
Speaker 1: It just tells you that something is moving and kicking

379
00:17:23,519 --> 00:17:24,039
up dust.

380
00:17:24,319 --> 00:17:27,640
Speaker 2: A piece of interstellar technology could easily be shedding dust

381
00:17:27,680 --> 00:17:30,640
and gas. It could be propellant. It could be material

382
00:17:30,880 --> 00:17:33,359
it's collected over a billion years of travel. It could

383
00:17:33,359 --> 00:17:37,759
be slowly falling apart. The cloud doesn't automatically mean natural.

384
00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:40,359
Speaker 1: Bo. Wait, let me play Devil's advocate here. Isn't there

385
00:17:40,359 --> 00:17:43,200
a burden of proof? I mean, isn't it more responsible

386
00:17:43,240 --> 00:17:46,279
for scientists to assume it's natural until the evidence for

387
00:17:46,440 --> 00:17:48,960
artificial is completely overwhelming.

388
00:17:49,279 --> 00:17:53,400
Speaker 2: That's a fair question, and yes, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

389
00:17:53,920 --> 00:17:57,200
But the experts point isn't that we should conclude its technology,

390
00:17:57,480 --> 00:17:59,559
is that we shouldn't pre conclude it's a comet.

391
00:18:00,119 --> 00:18:03,720
Speaker 1: Not being cautious, we're being lazy intellectually lazy.

392
00:18:03,759 --> 00:18:07,599
Speaker 2: We're cherry picking the evidence the dust cloud that fits

393
00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:10,720
our existing story of icy rock, and that brings us

394
00:18:10,759 --> 00:18:13,319
back to the very foundation of science itself.

395
00:18:13,119 --> 00:18:15,480
Speaker 1: Which the expert says is the humility to learn.

396
00:18:15,799 --> 00:18:19,440
Speaker 2: Humility is admitting that your training data set might be incomplete,

397
00:18:20,119 --> 00:18:23,000
that the universe might be bigger and weirder than your

398
00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:24,279
current models can explain.

399
00:18:24,599 --> 00:18:30,720
Speaker 1: And the historical comparison they draw is it's really unsettling. Galileo.

400
00:18:31,119 --> 00:18:34,359
Speaker 2: Galileo and his telescope. The authorities at the Vatican knew

401
00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:37,200
how the heavens worked. They had their dogma. They didn't

402
00:18:37,200 --> 00:18:39,480
need to look through his silly telescope because they already

403
00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:40,119
had the answer.

404
00:18:40,319 --> 00:18:43,279
Speaker 1: And that's the danger today. It's not a conspiracy, it's

405
00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:46,039
just the risk of not bothering to collect enough data

406
00:18:46,079 --> 00:18:49,079
to challenge your own assumptions because we're too comfortable. We

407
00:18:49,119 --> 00:18:51,559
could miss the biggest discovery in human history because we

408
00:18:51,680 --> 00:18:53,319
labeled it commet and moved on.

409
00:18:54,119 --> 00:18:56,160
Speaker 2: So we can't just leave it as a simple choice

410
00:18:56,319 --> 00:19:00,400
rock or spaceship because there are so many unknowns.

411
00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:02,279
Speaker 1: Right, which is why the expert created a way to

412
00:19:02,359 --> 00:19:04,880
actually quantify that doubt, the lobe scale.

413
00:19:04,960 --> 00:19:07,359
Speaker 2: It's a way to manage the uncertainty and figure out

414
00:19:07,400 --> 00:19:09,920
where to point our telescopes. It runs from zero to ten.

415
00:19:10,160 --> 00:19:13,519
Zero means zero is a one hundred percent natural object,

416
00:19:13,880 --> 00:19:18,039
the boring consensus view, and ten is a technological visitor

417
00:19:18,319 --> 00:19:20,279
that is an immediate threat to all of us.

418
00:19:20,319 --> 00:19:22,640
Speaker 1: So it's a spectrum of possibility exactly.

419
00:19:22,720 --> 00:19:26,000
Speaker 2: It forces you to actually justify your position, and based

420
00:19:26,039 --> 00:19:29,559
on everything we've talked about, the nickel, the trajectory, that

421
00:19:29,640 --> 00:19:32,680
weird sunword jet, where do you think three I at

422
00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:33,319
liss Lands.

423
00:19:33,799 --> 00:19:35,079
Speaker 1: Where does the expert put it?

424
00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:36,519
Speaker 2: He ranks it at a three to four.

425
00:19:36,839 --> 00:19:40,079
Speaker 1: Wow, okay, so that's significant. It's definitely not a zero.

426
00:19:40,200 --> 00:19:42,079
It's not being dismissed, not at all.

427
00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:45,960
Speaker 2: A three or four means this is not a routine object.

428
00:19:46,279 --> 00:19:50,200
It requires serious, dedicated investigation. It's nowhere near a ten,

429
00:19:50,279 --> 00:19:52,839
so no need to panic. But it's firmly in that

430
00:19:53,079 --> 00:19:57,400
potentially artificial let's get more data now category.

431
00:19:57,440 --> 00:20:00,279
Speaker 1: That feels like a really responsible position to take. That's

432
00:20:00,359 --> 00:20:03,240
the weird data without jumping to crazy conclusions.

433
00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:05,519
Speaker 2: But the whole analysis is made so much harder by

434
00:20:05,599 --> 00:20:08,480
that statistical sample problem. We've only seen three of these

435
00:20:08,519 --> 00:20:10,240
things ever, three is nothing.

436
00:20:10,319 --> 00:20:13,079
Speaker 1: It's a joke of a sample size. The source compares

437
00:20:13,119 --> 00:20:14,119
it to going on a first date.

438
00:20:14,319 --> 00:20:17,160
Speaker 2: Right, you can't draw any conclusions about an entire population

439
00:20:17,279 --> 00:20:18,319
based on one person.

440
00:20:18,599 --> 00:20:21,720
Speaker 1: If the first three interstellar objects we see are all

441
00:20:21,759 --> 00:20:24,759
wildly different from each other, we have no baseline, We

442
00:20:24,799 --> 00:20:28,160
have no idea what normal is, which means we can't

443
00:20:28,200 --> 00:20:30,319
know for sure if this one is the anomaly.

444
00:20:30,839 --> 00:20:33,440
Speaker 2: So we have to see dozens, maybe hundreds of them

445
00:20:33,720 --> 00:20:37,559
before we can say with any confidence that three I

446
00:20:37,720 --> 00:20:41,079
at lists is or is not an outlier. The uncertainty

447
00:20:41,200 --> 00:20:43,759
is precisely why a three or four in the lob

448
00:20:43,839 --> 00:20:45,400
scale needs so much attention.

449
00:20:45,920 --> 00:20:48,559
Speaker 1: And this leads to that whole danger of confirmation bias.

450
00:20:48,839 --> 00:20:51,880
And the expert tells this fantastic story to illustrate it,

451
00:20:52,079 --> 00:20:53,559
the SpaceX Roadster example.

452
00:20:53,720 --> 00:20:56,839
Speaker 2: This is an amazing story. So on January second, astronomers

453
00:20:56,880 --> 00:20:59,160
bought a new object, track it and log it as

454
00:20:59,160 --> 00:21:01,039
a near Earth asteroid, just another rock.

455
00:21:01,359 --> 00:21:03,279
Speaker 1: They watched it for a day, business as usual.

456
00:21:03,359 --> 00:21:06,559
Speaker 2: Then someone realized, wait a minute, its path perfectly matches

457
00:21:06,599 --> 00:21:09,640
the trajectory of the Tesla Roadster that SpaceX launched into

458
00:21:09,680 --> 00:21:11,039
space back in twenty eighteen.

459
00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:11,799
Speaker 1: Oh wow.

460
00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:14,079
Speaker 2: The second they had that piece of information, the prior

461
00:21:14,160 --> 00:21:16,319
knowledge that a man made object was supposed to be there,

462
00:21:16,480 --> 00:21:20,119
the classification changed instantly. They basically said, Oops, not a rock,

463
00:21:20,200 --> 00:21:20,759
it's a car.

464
00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:23,200
Speaker 1: And the only reason they admitted it was artificial was

465
00:21:23,240 --> 00:21:25,519
because they already knew it was ours exactly.

466
00:21:25,599 --> 00:21:29,319
Speaker 2: It's a perfect illustration of bias. If we hadn't known

467
00:21:29,400 --> 00:21:33,680
its trajectory, it would probably still be cataloged as near

468
00:21:33,759 --> 00:21:37,119
Earth asteroid something or other because that's the easier box

469
00:21:37,160 --> 00:21:37,640
to put it in.

470
00:21:37,880 --> 00:21:39,920
Speaker 1: It shows that if you assume something is a rock,

471
00:21:40,000 --> 00:21:42,160
you stop looking for evidence that it's a car.

472
00:21:42,599 --> 00:21:46,000
Speaker 2: And it makes you wonder how many other asteroids have

473
00:21:46,079 --> 00:21:49,599
we mislabeled over the years because we just weren't willing

474
00:21:49,640 --> 00:21:50,960
to consider the alternative.

475
00:21:51,279 --> 00:21:55,200
Speaker 1: This all points to one thing. We desperately need more data.

476
00:21:55,319 --> 00:21:58,279
We need to be watching the skies way more effectively, and.

477
00:21:58,279 --> 00:22:00,880
Speaker 2: There's good news on that front. The source points to

478
00:22:00,920 --> 00:22:04,440
the new Reuben Observatory in Chile. It has this incredible

479
00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:07,880
three point two gigapixel camera and it's going to survey

480
00:22:07,920 --> 00:22:10,240
the entire southern sky every four nights.

481
00:22:10,440 --> 00:22:14,799
Speaker 1: That's a game changer for finding these fast moving interstellar objects.

482
00:22:14,880 --> 00:22:16,880
Speaker 2: It is, but it only covers the southern sky. We're

483
00:22:16,880 --> 00:22:17,799
missing half the picture.

484
00:22:17,960 --> 00:22:19,640
Speaker 1: So the big suggestion is we need to fund a

485
00:22:19,680 --> 00:22:21,000
copy of it for the northern sky.

486
00:22:21,279 --> 00:22:23,759
Speaker 2: If we had a twin observatory, we could monitor the

487
00:22:23,799 --> 00:22:26,160
whole sky all the time. We can make sure that

488
00:22:26,279 --> 00:22:28,640
we catch every single one of these visitors and give

489
00:22:28,680 --> 00:22:31,400
them the scrutiny they deserve. That's how you solve this

490
00:22:31,440 --> 00:22:32,319
ample sized problem.

491
00:22:32,400 --> 00:22:35,160
Speaker 1: Okay, let's shift gears to the really big What if

492
00:22:35,480 --> 00:22:37,920
this is where it stops being just an intellectual exercise

493
00:22:37,960 --> 00:22:41,480
and becomes well urgent. What happens if the evidence becomes

494
00:22:41,559 --> 00:22:42,480
undeniable a.

495
00:22:42,519 --> 00:22:46,240
Speaker 2: High resolution photo that is clearly not a rock, or

496
00:22:46,359 --> 00:22:50,680
spectroscopic data that confirms manufactured alloys beyond any doubt.

497
00:22:50,799 --> 00:22:53,200
Speaker 1: What happens to us down here on Earth the next day?

498
00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:57,880
Speaker 2: Society changes Overnight. The entire geopolitical structure of our world

499
00:22:57,920 --> 00:23:01,200
would be transformed. That sense of safe of isolation we've

500
00:23:01,200 --> 00:23:03,680
always had would just shatter.

501
00:23:03,759 --> 00:23:06,160
Speaker 1: People would immediately turn to their governments and say, what

502
00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:07,359
are you going to do to protect us?

503
00:23:07,440 --> 00:23:11,519
Speaker 2: Right? This external existential question would force us to completely

504
00:23:11,559 --> 00:23:13,640
change our priorities as a species.

505
00:23:13,200 --> 00:23:16,319
Speaker 1: We'd need a cosmic warning system, and the expert estimates

506
00:23:16,359 --> 00:23:19,480
that could cost a trillion dollars a year.

507
00:23:19,799 --> 00:23:22,559
Speaker 2: A trillion dollars, I mean, that sounds like a completely

508
00:23:22,599 --> 00:23:26,279
impossible number right now, we'd never spend that on space defense.

509
00:23:26,440 --> 00:23:28,759
Speaker 1: But then the source gives this one piece of context

510
00:23:28,759 --> 00:23:31,319
that just puts everything into a shocking new perspective.

511
00:23:31,799 --> 00:23:36,079
Speaker 2: Right now, globally we spend two point four trillion dollars

512
00:23:36,119 --> 00:23:37,680
a year on military budgets.

513
00:23:37,759 --> 00:23:40,440
Speaker 1: At that sink in two point four trillion.

514
00:23:40,160 --> 00:23:43,000
Speaker 2: And as the expert says, that money is for killing

515
00:23:43,039 --> 00:23:46,279
other people or protecting ourselves from others killing us.

516
00:23:46,480 --> 00:23:50,480
Speaker 1: It's all for internal conflict defense against ourselves. If we

517
00:23:50,519 --> 00:23:54,599
suddenly had an undeniable external reason to cooperate.

518
00:23:54,240 --> 00:23:57,599
Speaker 2: That trillion dollars for a cosmic defense system suddenly doesn't

519
00:23:57,640 --> 00:24:00,880
seem so impossible. We already have the money. Our priorities

520
00:24:00,920 --> 00:24:02,279
are just radically misaligned.

521
00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:05,839
Speaker 1: An external factor would make all our internal squabbles look

522
00:24:05,920 --> 00:24:08,880
so petty, so meaningless. It could force the kind of

523
00:24:08,960 --> 00:24:11,920
global cooperation we've only ever seen in movies.

524
00:24:11,720 --> 00:24:15,119
Speaker 2: And the upheaval wouldn't just be geopolitical. The financial markets

525
00:24:15,160 --> 00:24:16,200
would go into a tail spin.

526
00:24:16,319 --> 00:24:18,680
Speaker 1: Because they're built on predictability.

527
00:24:18,160 --> 00:24:21,039
Speaker 2: And this would be the biggest unknown variable ever introduced

528
00:24:21,039 --> 00:24:23,880
into the human equation. How do you price that in

529
00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:28,519
the markets? Which is reflect this profound sense of uncertainty

530
00:24:28,519 --> 00:24:29,240
about our future?

531
00:24:29,559 --> 00:24:32,440
Speaker 1: But maybe the deepest change would be in our beliefs,

532
00:24:32,680 --> 00:24:34,200
our religions, our philosophy.

533
00:24:34,359 --> 00:24:37,799
Speaker 2: Oh absolutely, The source suggests it would fundamentally rewrite our

534
00:24:37,839 --> 00:24:40,680
religious stories. God is no longer a parent with just

535
00:24:40,720 --> 00:24:41,359
one child.

536
00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:44,359
Speaker 1: Suddenly we find out we have siblings all over the galaxy,

537
00:24:44,680 --> 00:24:47,480
and God has to attend to all these multiple kids.

538
00:24:47,240 --> 00:24:50,319
Speaker 2: Which doesn't diminish God, the expert argues, It makes God

539
00:24:50,519 --> 00:24:53,440
much much bigger, a true cosmic shepherd.

540
00:24:53,839 --> 00:24:55,920
Speaker 1: It forces us to grow up as a species. We're

541
00:24:55,920 --> 00:24:57,920
no longer the center of the story where just one

542
00:24:58,039 --> 00:25:01,920
voice in a giant celestial acquire. But there's a psychological

543
00:25:02,039 --> 00:25:03,240
danger in that, Isn't there.

544
00:25:03,119 --> 00:25:05,680
Speaker 2: A huge one? The expert brings up the risk of

545
00:25:05,759 --> 00:25:06,559
human jealousy.

546
00:25:06,640 --> 00:25:09,759
Speaker 1: What if our siblings are not just older, but better?

547
00:25:09,839 --> 00:25:12,880
What if they've solved war and poverty and climate change?

548
00:25:12,920 --> 00:25:15,039
Speaker 2: How do we react to that? Do we react with

549
00:25:15,119 --> 00:25:18,440
awe and a desire to learn or with a massive

550
00:25:18,480 --> 00:25:21,799
species wide inferiority complex with envy.

551
00:25:22,039 --> 00:25:24,920
Speaker 1: Our whole story is built on being special. Finding out

552
00:25:25,000 --> 00:25:28,759
we're actually the messy, chaotic, youngest kid on the block. Yeah,

553
00:25:28,839 --> 00:25:30,920
that could be a huge blow to our collective ego.

554
00:25:31,319 --> 00:25:34,160
Speaker 2: Or it could be the kick we need to finally

555
00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:37,640
get our act together, Which brings us to the expert's

556
00:25:37,680 --> 00:25:39,079
personal motivation for all of this.

557
00:25:39,440 --> 00:25:41,839
Speaker 1: They call the object a very wanted gift.

558
00:25:41,960 --> 00:25:46,519
Speaker 2: Yeah, they admit that reading the news, focusing on all

559
00:25:46,559 --> 00:25:49,039
the matters down to Earth, all the conflict and politics,

560
00:25:49,720 --> 00:25:50,920
it's just depressing.

561
00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:54,119
Speaker 1: And that leads to this incredibly sharp final line. They're

562
00:25:54,119 --> 00:25:57,079
seeking a higher intelligence in outer space because they don't

563
00:25:57,119 --> 00:25:58,400
often find it here on Earth.

564
00:25:58,599 --> 00:26:01,279
Speaker 2: It's such a powerful commentary on our world right now.

565
00:26:01,440 --> 00:26:04,720
The search for alien tech isn't just astronomy. It's a

566
00:26:04,759 --> 00:26:07,079
hope that there's a better way to be a civilization.

567
00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:09,720
Speaker 1: It's a search for a better model for ourselves, driven

568
00:26:09,759 --> 00:26:13,279
by a deep frustration with our own priorities. Hashtag tag outro.

569
00:26:13,640 --> 00:26:16,480
Speaker 2: So this has been a really really thrilling dive into

570
00:26:16,480 --> 00:26:19,480
three i AT lists. We've wrestled with these startling pieces

571
00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:23,440
of evidence, that improbable trajectory, the weird Nickel alloys, that

572
00:26:23,480 --> 00:26:24,880
bizarre jet pointing at.

573
00:26:24,759 --> 00:26:27,920
Speaker 1: The sun, and we've put that evidence up against the

574
00:26:28,119 --> 00:26:32,519
understandable pushback from the mainstream, you know, the experts whose

575
00:26:32,759 --> 00:26:36,000
icy rock training data makes it really hard to accept

576
00:26:36,000 --> 00:26:36,920
something so different.

577
00:26:37,079 --> 00:26:40,160
Speaker 2: We talked about that risk of the arrogance of expertise,

578
00:26:41,000 --> 00:26:43,880
that powerful warning from Galileo's.

579
00:26:43,160 --> 00:26:45,799
Speaker 1: Time, and we looked at the incredible stakes. If this

580
00:26:45,960 --> 00:26:50,000
is confirmed, it would trigger geopolitical chaos, financial panic, and

581
00:26:50,079 --> 00:26:52,200
a complete rewrite of who we think we are in

582
00:26:52,240 --> 00:26:53,240
the universe.

583
00:26:53,039 --> 00:26:56,480
Speaker 2: Which brings us to I think the most profound takeaway.

584
00:26:57,279 --> 00:27:00,279
Confirming alien technology or even just the need for a

585
00:27:00,319 --> 00:27:02,839
cosmic defense system would instantly change us.

586
00:27:02,960 --> 00:27:05,680
Speaker 1: If we shifted even a tiny fraction of that two

587
00:27:05,720 --> 00:27:08,519
point four trillion dollars we spend on fighting each other

588
00:27:08,559 --> 00:27:12,079
towards exploring the cosmos and protecting our planet, that change

589
00:27:12,079 --> 00:27:14,799
in perspective would be the real gift from three i

590
00:27:14,960 --> 00:27:15,359
AT lists.

591
00:27:15,400 --> 00:27:17,519
Speaker 2: It wouldn't be about their technology, It would be about

592
00:27:17,559 --> 00:27:20,079
the urgent realization that we need to change our focus

593
00:27:20,119 --> 00:27:21,720
and finally grow up as a species.

594
00:27:22,000 --> 00:27:24,160
Speaker 1: So it leaves us with a question, are we actually

595
00:27:24,160 --> 00:27:27,119
prepared for the truth or are we just too comfortable

596
00:27:27,119 --> 00:27:28,359
assuming we already know all.

597
00:27:28,200 --> 00:27:30,599
Speaker 2: The answers, So we want to ask you, given all

598
00:27:30,599 --> 00:27:35,519
this evidence, the nickel, the jet, the trajectory, and thinking

599
00:27:35,519 --> 00:27:38,119
about that load scale where zero is a normal commet

600
00:27:38,200 --> 00:27:41,599
and ten as a threat, where would you rate this object?

601
00:27:41,680 --> 00:27:44,839
Speaker 1: Are you a firm zero, convinced it's just a weird commet,

602
00:27:45,519 --> 00:27:48,920
or do the strange characteristics and the massive implications make

603
00:27:48,960 --> 00:27:51,039
you think it's a three to four something We have

604
00:27:51,119 --> 00:27:53,240
to investigate with an open mind until we.

605
00:27:53,240 --> 00:27:55,559
Speaker 2: Know for sure, Leave us a comment and let us

606
00:27:55,559 --> 00:27:57,279
know you're rating. We'd love to hear what you think.

607
00:27:57,400 --> 00:27:59,799
Speaker 1: Stay tuned for the next thrilling threads