Speaker 1: Wouldn't you know it.
Speaker 2: The GOP loves the mark of the beast, and most
of them don't even know it. Julie Barrett's Conservative Ladies
of America joins us to talk about the coming surrender.
Speaker 1: To a digital ID.
Speaker 2: We'll talk about this with renewed dot Healthcare and thanks
to God Almighty.
Speaker 3: But Todd Herman show is one hundred percent disapproved by
big pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere from the high mountains
of Free America. Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 2: Today is the day the Lord has made, and these
are the times.
Speaker 1: Through which God has decided we shall live.
Speaker 2: Julie Barrett's my friends who joins this Conservative Ladies of America.
Speaker 1: Welcome back, Julie. Good to see you.
Speaker 4: Hi, Todd, thanks for having me back. It's always fun
to join in. And it's been a while.
Speaker 2: It has been way way too long, and we're just
visiting my wife and you having interesting back channel conversations.
All about me, I actually know about the world events,
not with.
Speaker 1: Me at all.
Speaker 4: About you is just telling me how amazing you are.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, that's a good one.
Speaker 1: That's a good one.
Speaker 2: Appreciate that let's listen to a guy who knows a
thing or two about buying governments and forcing things through.
Speaker 1: This is Bill Gates.
Speaker 5: Well, we believe having UH, the ability to save and
transact is something that should be universal, and a lot
of forms have adopted that goal. We won't be able
to do that with traditional systems. That is the cost
of bank branches and paperwork. It's just too high.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: But fortunately, starting with countries like Kenya, UH and more
recently with a robust system in places like India, we
see that you can have digital financial inclusion inclusion. India
is a great example. They did a lot of their
own technology which won't be possible for other countries. And
so the role of the Gates Foundation is an advocate
for those who don't have access today is to make
sure there's technology and standards like.
Speaker 2: A digital ID platform. Let's just cut to the chase.
A digital ID platform. It's inclusion. It's nice of him
to think of us.
Speaker 4: I like that digital inclusion. I hadn't heard that before.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that's a new one.
Speaker 2: Because you know, people didn't have access to the shots
or anything like that, and they don't have access to
the plastic meats and all that.
Speaker 1: So bill's looking up for us.
Speaker 2: And I know there's a lot of people who expected
Republicans to jump up against this and oppose this because
President Trump said no central bank digital currencyenter my watch.
You've been looking into this, what have you found?
Speaker 4: Yeah, well, this really slipped under the radar, and it's
been going on for are actually over a year now.
There's a model policy called the App Store Accountability Act,
and it passed this year in Texas, Louisiana, and Utah.
All of those are red states, Republican majorities, especially Texas,
like Texas is the like we think of that as
the Republican stronghold, right, and these slipped really kind of
under the radar. Recently, though, I've been seeing some media attention,
a lot of op eds coming from some right leaning
organizations in groups about this App Store Accountability Act is
a is a tool for parents, and so I started
digging into it. There's a bill, there's legislation proposed in
Congress in both the House and the Senate. On the
Senate side as Senator Mike Lee and on the House
side it's a representative from Florida, Gus I forget his
last name, and John James, I believe it's from Michigan,
both Republicans, So obviously if it passes at a federal level,
it'll impact the entire country. This is not a tool
for parents. It is a government mandate that would require
parental permission for children to download any apps on their
smartphone or devices.
Speaker 2: Right, So that's that's being sold, and that's what's being
explained it and that's true. But the second I want
you to tell, as Paul Harvey would say, the rest
of the story, because there's a big, big, big iceberg
below the tip of that thing.
Speaker 1: And Julie, do that a second.
Speaker 2: In our country, you can go into a surgeon and
the surgeon can look at you and say, back, surgery
is the way, and they're probably going to say no.
By the way, in about fifteen percent of cases you're
going to end up with follow up surgeries for a
condition like this. In a condition like this, it might
be more and you're probably not likely to get a
surgeon saying well, you could, in fact try something before
you have full new repeliccepment surgery, say, if you're lacking cartilage.
This is very very common in people my age and
sometimes people younger if they've done a lot of sports.
Renew dot Healthcare can look at your MRIs now and
they can give you a second opinion, and you can
balance this out. You have your doctor, your surgeon who's
part of the insurance company Farmer roll up, and you
have completely independent renew They can look at your knee,
your back, they can look at your shoulder and they
can say there's enough cartilage or there's enough intact tissue.
Then an injection of the world class stem cells that
come from donor cells from umbilical cords, only the Wharton's
jelly portion, only only the twenty percent of the cells
they accept, because they reject eighty percent, the exact opposite
of the junk in America. An injection to that time
of the hyperbred chambers and some ivs. You could avoid
surgery all together and be back doing what you love.
Maybe that's just moving around. Go to renew r E
nue dot Healthcare. They'll tell you if they can help
you or not. Please tell them you're part of the
Todd Hermannshaw Family. Renew r E n u E dot
Healthcare and Julie Barrett is with us, so Julie Conservative
Ladies of America.
Speaker 1: You looked into.
Speaker 2: This, this this thing, this gift they're giving us the
App Store Accountability Act. Man, we're going to make sure
the kids prove who they are. They need parents of
permission to download the apps. And Senator Mike Lee, who's
actually pretty good on liberty, he's behind this, apparently sponsoring this.
Speaker 1: So what laid beneath the iceberg.
Speaker 2: That leads you to believe this is a digital ID push?
Speaker 4: So they have to verify the parent child relationship, and
the way they do this is by you and your
child are going to have to provide that identification.
Speaker 2: Okay, So in order for my kid to be able
to download an app, I need to give the app
stores my ID and then they can verify that they
had this relationship. But what if my kid wants my
wife to do this, then she needs to do this,
and all of a sudden, we have a whole family identified.
Speaker 1: But it's just to the app store. They'd never share
this with government.
Speaker 4: Right, Well, so you're giving it to the app developer.
Oh that bunch of different app developers. How many app
developers todd are overseas?
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, any right, so probably most of them? Right,
A whole bunch, so.
Speaker 4: And there they can't the per the legislation, they cannot
sell the data, but they're not prohibited from storing it
or sharing it or utilizing it data farming. So they're
getting this on your kids, they're getting this on you,
they're getting this on your wife, and this is all
to protect children.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 4: So let's say your child wants to download Snapchat and
you're really trying to protect your your child from you know,
these these uh chat bots and predators that are in
these social media apps. But you think, okay, I gave
her permission to download it, so it's so then it's
going to be okay, Well, all you're giving is permission
to download, and what happens within the app nothing changes there.
There's no regulation there. So they know it's this all
sense of security that parents are protecting their kids by
giving them permission to download the app.
Speaker 2: Right, and they're building a database of who we are
and who they are. And they can't sell it, but
they can rent it. If they can't sell it, that
means changing possession. They can rent it. They can use
it any number of ways to identify who you are,
such as an ID cookie, cookie or a device ID
IP addresses if they're fixed IPS.
Speaker 1: There's a whole bunch of ways they.
Speaker 2: Can use is to know now who you are. And
when you have this database built because people have done
this because of what kids have access to the stores,
all of a sudden you have let's say a third
of Americans into these databases.
Speaker 1: It makes it a lot easier to push everybody else.
Speaker 2: Over the top because there's multiple ways they're trying to
do this, Like Apple will not give up trying to
get me to do biometrics.
Speaker 1: That that's I was forced fundly to buy.
Speaker 2: A new phone, and it will not stop trying to
get me to take a picture of my face and
use face ID. I can't make it go away. So
what you are looking at is you see this as
a precursor.
Speaker 4: Move absolutely, And in Utah, the Republicans in you know,
Republicans in Utah are already proposing for expanding digital ID
in their twenty twenty six legislative sessions. So they've passed
the app store accountability that they've also passed some kind
of digital driver's license type of IDEP, and now they
want to expand that further in twenty twenty six. So
this is absolutely a gateway. Plus, you're conditioning the children
that when they want something, when they want some kind
of good, they have to give up their identity, you know,
they and it's you know, we're talking biometrics, government issued ID,
social security numbers. Nothing, there's no guardrails on what forms
of identification you have to provide. And so where I
see this not only as a gateway, but as a
we're conditioning children that this is just the way that
life works.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and if you look at the way that they're
selling this, and this comes from some work Brian Lenny
did at Substack.
Speaker 1: You sent this to me.
Speaker 2: The Digital Childhood Alliance claims the current system place is
an impossible burden on parents. So it's simply impossible as
parents to say, yeah, you can't have Snapchat. And by
the way, if I were to do it all again,
I would have said to my young daughter, yeah, the
day you turn eighteen and purchase your own phone, God
bless you go have a phone and you pay for
your own data. I would have never, ever, ever fallen
for this stuff. And I feel bad that I did that,
But it is an impossible burden for parents to say
you can't have Snapchat and if I catch it on
your phone, the phone's gone, and we'll just disable phones
from having it.
Speaker 1: We'll just buy phones that don't put that on.
Speaker 2: So when they're going to pitch it that way, that
needs me to believe that it has nothing to do
with actually doing anything for parents, because you just said
nothing changes in the app. So this they said that
in regard to the growth of this stuff. It's not
just Bill Gates saying this. And I want to finish
the whole Bill Gates piece we started the beginning. Once
you hear this whole thing, Christy Gnome is coming at
adults from another angle.
Speaker 1: I have a real idea.
Speaker 2: I had touch a travel and I guide an Idaho,
so I felt relatively safe on this. But now they're
doing everything they can to make you, if you want
to travel, go into those biometrical and so let's go
through the whole thing.
Speaker 5: Bill Gates sit here, Julie, including open source work that
we're providing through the financial switch which is called Moja loop,
and through the digital identity system, which is extremely valuable
not just for financial activities but for health and voting education,
and that's called most SIP.
Speaker 6: So since there isn't going to be a one size
it's all solution. What is the role that you see
the private sector playing and being able to collaborate with
different governments Enshaw that we move forward.
Speaker 5: Well, once you have the digital money system, then there's
all sorts of services and applications that can be built
on top of that, whether it's helping with health or
education or agriculture, you know, giving people visibility into their
financial status, giving them advice, you know, should they take
a loan, should they buy insurance? What makes sense?
Speaker 2: All of these things are available now. All of these
things are available. You can buy apps that do this
for you. Now, you can buy financial planning apps, you
can get them for free.
Speaker 1: All this is available.
Speaker 2: So when you start stacking benefits on top of this,
and then you look at the pushdown and Julie, you
brought this to our attention, there's a reason that the
app stores Meta doesn't want to be responsible for verification.
Apple doesn't want to. Google doesn't want to. Why do
you think they don't want to be responsible for verification?
Speaker 4: Julie, Well, I mean then they have to put in
all the guardrails, right, I mean, yep, they had that's
the responsibility on on these these big tech companies. You're
you're adding a whole other layer, right.
Speaker 2: And there's one other thing. They're now libel if there's
a hack. So they want to push this down on
a whole bunch of small developers, which means us as
parents or US as citizens, we don't.
Speaker 1: Know who hazard data. You're not going to track down
every maker of every app that's under this LLC or
that LLC and then has a corporation that owns it
and then passes the data on. So this comes at
the same.
Speaker 2: Time as we're seeing this push to get people into
the biometrics, the safe fireless at airports, et cetera. So
are we just handwaving like conspiracy theorists all over this
or does this look very much like a bottleneck?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 4: I think it is, And we're not conspiracy theorists. I
mean you you made the point yourself. You got a
real ID in Idaho. We had to get rid I
here in Florida. So this isn't This isn't conspiracy. They
are doing it. I know that DeSantis back in the
summer of twenty twenty four kind of put a pause
on some kind of digital ID that they were doing
with the Florida real IDs. But this is this is happening,
and I think you know, I mean, we know that
this is coming. We know this is going to happen.
But why are people who call themselves Republicans or conservatives,
why are they the ones ushering it in?
Speaker 2: Well, the people go to ushered in are the people
who are going to get on the back end benefits
from tech companies, right, and tech companies can buy a lot.
The real ID is one issue, and this is this
is one database. Eventually understand all this, this is your
health database. Obamacare took care of that, you like it
or not, your health information went into a federal healthcare database.
Speaker 1: That was one big step.
Speaker 2: Other big steps now are having Facebook and the tech
companies have gobs of data on.
Speaker 1: This that the government already uses.
Speaker 2: They use this to find people after January sixth, they
use this to target ads. Have the Israeli government using
data like this to target ads at church goers. And
then we have Christy Nome in this ad helpfully reminding
everybody that you have to get ready to have a
real ID.
Speaker 1: Which is a precursor.
Speaker 2: Now they're going to be serious about this at airports
and this is a problem, the federal government a cause,
and now they're pretending to solve it.
Speaker 7: Hi, I'm Christine Holm, the United States Secretary of Homeland Security.
If you plan on traveling, we need your help to
prevent delays and to prove your identity.
Speaker 4: Get a real ID.
Speaker 7: Starting May seventh, you will need a real ID to
travel by error or to visit federal buildings in the
United States. These IDs keep our country safe because they
help prevent fraud and they enhance security.
Speaker 4: Please do your part to protect our country. Go today
and don't delay.
Speaker 7: To learn more, go to DHS dot gov slash real
dash ID.
Speaker 4: Thank you.
Speaker 2: I guess I'd love to see the instances where our
terrorists have used IDs to come in and be super
super harmful to us. It doesn't seem to me that
Antifa is bothering that, or their drug cartels are bothering
or that it doesn't seem to me that this is
being used in elections at all. So I guess I'm
just looking at this as another pressure point. Does that
seem fair?
Speaker 4: Absolutely? And you know what it sounds like. It sounds
exactly like the pressure point that they used with COVID.
Get the vaccine you want to be healthy, you want
to keep schools open, you want to see Grandma, you know,
you want to be able to do all these things.
So you have to get the vaccine. It sounds exactly
the same, yeah, with the get your real IDs so
you can be safe and you can keep America safe
and you can go where you want to go. Absolutely,
it's a pressure point. It's just a different flavor.
Speaker 1: Right, And it's the same players.
Speaker 2: See when Bill Gates is involved in this, and he's
looking at this is a platform, and he looked at
COVID as a platform, and he's looked at fake meat
as a platform, and he's looked at seequestering carbon carbon
dioxide in the ground to build proteins with and to
fund is you know, to drive Carbadox said into his
big greenhouses for his fake meat. It always comes with
these kill shoots and then they don't want to talk
about this. This is from the Brian Lenny article when
Casey Stemanski, executive director of the Digital Childhood Alliance, So
the're the ones who said that it's just parents can't
possibly tell kids not to have an app on the phone.
Speaker 1: It's just insurmountable.
Speaker 2: Refuse to name big tech backers in Louisiana. She refused
to name who are the companies who are giving money
to the Digital Childhood Alliance. Why would she not want
to be proudly saying, Oh, it's Meta in its Facebook,
and it's Google, and its Apple, and it's defense contractors.
That should also raise our curiosity about this. So what
are you doing at Conservative Ladies of Americas to.
Speaker 1: Help fight this?
Speaker 4: So it's what's interesting about the Digital Childhood Alliance. And
I've really tried to dig into who they are and
who's funding them, and there's really not a lot of
information available. There are five oh ones, so you can't
see who their donors are. But they came online as
an organization in January of twenty twenty five, and they
created this model policy, the App Store Accountability Act. And
so for your viewers, a model policy is, you know,
they create the legislation and then it basically gets you know,
copy pasted to all these states and at a federal level,
and then they bring online an alliance, a coalition of
advocacy groups. You know, they've got like big groups like
the Heritage Foundation, Moms for Liberty, Family Policy Alliance, big
groups that I think a lot of citizens on the
right trust that are pushing this out there and writing
op eds and giving testimony for these bills. But there's
like this this organization, as you point out, we don't
know who's backing them. Is it big Tech? Although big
tech is against this bill, who was backing I have
not been able to track who is behind this because
the Texas bill, which is Senate Bill twenty four to
twenty already has a federal lawsuit by a tech organization
that's representing Apple Google for First Amendment claims. And it looks,
based on the original findings of the court that they
are going to have standing for the constitutionality of this bill.
And you've got a Republican, the only Republican in Texas.
His name's represented Brian Harrison. He was the only one
to vote know and he excuse me, he has asked
Governor Abbott to call a special session to repeal this bill.
Speaker 2: Well, there's also, as you point out, there's people that
people listening, like Moms for Libery, et cetera. I can
understand the desire to protect kids from online harm because
I happen to have a daughter who's no longer a kid,
and God's done amazing worker her life and she's doing
very very well. She was harmed by stuff online and
we lived with a generation of kids who've been harmed
by this.
Speaker 1: Then you have partnerships like this.
Speaker 2: Senators Kristen Cinema, she's the so called independent from Arizona.
Speaker 1: She is pretty independent.
Speaker 2: Cynthia Lummis, Republican of Wyoming, have introduced to Senate Bill
eight eighty four, known as the Improving Digital Identity Act
of twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: This is a twin bill. Look at this. This came
about in twenty twenty three.
Speaker 2: The bill was introduced March twenty first order to proceed
out of committee March twenty nine, without amendments and with
a favorable recommendation.
Speaker 1: Here's what they were pitching back then. The lack of an.
Speaker 2: Easy, affordable, reliable, and secure way for organizations, businesses, and
government agencies to identify whether individuals who they claim to
be online creates an attack factor that is widely exploited
by adversaries in cyberspace and precludes many high value transactions
being available online. Incidents of identity theft and identity fraud
continued to rise in the United States, where more than
two hundred and ninety three million people were impacted by
data bridges in twenty twenty one. So they're calling for
a public privates partnership here based upon private see choice, equity, accessibility,
and innovation, Julie, because no one protects government.
Speaker 1: Data like government?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 2: Oh hold it wait? How many times has government been
hacked for information? So now it's about being more secure.
So anytime you have organizations that have proven themselves to
be insecure hackable coming along and saying this time we
mean it, We're going to be super secure and super hackable,
that raises the question. I have a theory as to
why big tech says they don't want this, and it
has to do with what they already have, and I'll
explore that with you in just a second. So, how
can people get in touch with Conservative Ladies for America
Conservative Ladies of America Sorry I said four?
Speaker 4: Oh, sorry Conservative? They can reach us at Conservative Ladies
of America dot com. And we're also on substack Conservative
Ladies of America dot substack dot com.
Speaker 2: Okay, I'm going to play a little bit more from
Bill Gates this second, and then this theory on why
the big tech companies don't want to be seen as
being for this. My friends at Angel Studios did what
HBO refused to do that Netflix refused to accept. I
know there were people who pitched documentaries about Fauci and
what he did to people and what he is.
Speaker 1: They didn't do that. They had a celebratory movie.
Speaker 2: There's been Showtime at ceter a whole bunch of movies
about Fauci the hero. Well, Angel Studios decided to go
and take an actual look at Fauci in the entire
COVID period of time. So they got an award winning
director named Jenner. First, he got exclusive interviews with government whistleblowers,
intelligence experts, dissident meaning truth telling scientists, and doctors, and
they went back to the very origin of the COVID
flu and their theory is we may well be in
a arms race for bioterra weapons with China and we
use the Wuhan Lab experiment to see what they would do.
It's a fascinating theory. This movie deserves to be watched
by you right now because demanding movies like this. Go
to Angel dot com slash hermon, you join the Angel Guild.
You can immediately stream. Thank you Doctor Fauci, and in
doing so, you will empower them to make more movies
like this at demand accountability of people like Tony Fauci.
It's angel dot Com slash Herman. A little bit more
from Bill Gates here Julia Verrett's Considered Ladies of America.
Bill Gates praises India's public infrastructure. And I know when
I think of countries in equity and fairness, I think
of India.
Speaker 5: Every country struggling to find that boundary. The US is
a tough one because you know, we have the notion
of the First Amendment, and so what are the no sentims,
you know, like yelling fire in the theater? You know,
and because you're anonymous online, you know it can be worse.
I do think over time, you with things like deep bakes.
Most of the time you're online, You're gonna want to
be in an environment where the people are truly identified,
that as they're connected to a real world identity that
you trust, instead of just people saying whatever they want.
And so the idea of Providence who sent me this email,
was that really them. You know, we're gonna have to
have systems and behaviors that we're more aware of Okay,
who says that? Who created this?
Speaker 2: So now, why do you think big tech wants to
be against this bill because it's already being built, because
they already have a whole bunch of this data. So
having all these little app stores do this, Okay, Now,
it's all diffuse.
Speaker 1: It's not in one place. They want that.
Speaker 2: They want the big one and this is a precursor
in behavior in getting to that.
Speaker 1: Does that make sense as a theory?
Speaker 4: Oh, I think you're right. And you know, if you're
monetized on any of these platforms, you've already given them
your government ID.
Speaker 1: Oh, I know, to get payouts.
Speaker 4: So a lot of people, you know, an x X,
now that it's monetized. You know, I think most people
probably on X at least the ones that we see
in our feed are all all monetized. They've all already
given their ID. So you know, I think in that regard,
that's why you already have people are conditioned to give that.
But as far as to your point of why tech
companies are against this, I think absolutely they already have
in their own apps, their own platforms, They've already developed
a system, so they don't need to have this in
the in the app stores itself, right, and.
Speaker 2: They'd rather have it diffused and have all the little
individual app companies have to take care of their verification
because that's going to cost them money. That scale, they
can do that scale. Facebook, Google, those guys.
Speaker 1: Can do this as scale.
Speaker 2: Secondly, they're behind this platform that Gates wants to build
because it's this all in one thing. Now they're just
going to fight for who owns what sector.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 2: If the Gates Foundation is willing to go out and
spend the time to build the platform, that's just argument
who's going to have the apps? And in case everybody
thinks that this is just me handwaving or Julie handwaving,
I went and found can we agree that the World
Economic Forum is a pretty good place to look into
what they intend to do to us in the future? Okay, absolutely,
So I went and found from the World Economic Form
how they describe digital ID and I'll share that with
you to second and Julian, we'll go through this together.
You know that coffee is a very very very precious
thing and Bone Frog Coffee is aware of that. Now
they're not just in it to make big ly highly
caffeinated to coffee they're in it to make coffee that
tastes great. And we're entering in now, specifically into post
Thanksgiving Christmas season, and I can't stress enough how good
a gift getting a subscription to bone Frog Coffee will
be for your friends. Go look at the many roasts
that are available. If you need manyse recommendations, I can
tell you in order of my preference, Golden Age right
now for tastes is my favorite, and consider it sort
of a creamy mellow. Blends has a lot of though
caffeine and it loved that. Probably after that, I would
say my second favorite maybe Extortion seventeen. I love that
that Blends. That recognizes the biggest loss of life in
Special Forces history. There's a lot to that mission. And
Tim Crookshank, the founder CEO Bone Frog Coffee, he still
has his non disclosure agreement with the Department of Defense,
so he can't tell us everything you can read about it,
but Tim hints at it in the way that he's
allowed to do.
Speaker 1: That's on the bag. All the bags say.
Speaker 2: God Country Team. So if you've got friends who are
cacup people, boom, that's in. You got people who drink
the decaf because they can't have caffeine. Make sure they can't,
and if they won't, shame them like you've never been
shamed for not drinking the caffeine. Now if they can't,
that's another thing. There is a decafit a blend called Zenfrog.
You can get this in French roast. You can get
this and drip coffee. You can get it in an espresso.
You get it in a hole being whatever you need.
Go to Bonefrog Coffee dot com slash todd use promo
cotaide to get ten percent off all their products in
fifteen percent off subscription coffee.
Speaker 1: Bonefrog Coffee dot Com slash.
Speaker 2: Todd, So, Julie, this is a digital identity graphic that
the people at the World Economic Form put together.
Speaker 1: So it starts right at the top. The top item
is healthcare.
Speaker 2: Look at that for United for users to access insurance, treatment,
et cetera, to monitor their.
Speaker 1: Health devices, all their financial services.
Speaker 2: Oh, look at that your money. Food, sustainability for farmers
and consumers to verify products, the providence of products, the
purity of products, travel and mobility, humanitarian responses, e commerce,
social platforms, e government, telecommunications on a personal basis, telecommunications
on a government basis to monitor all of this, powered
by digital identity, people, things.
Speaker 1: Devices, entities.
Speaker 2: All of this tied into precursor steps like Christy Nome
pushing is to real ID and then a.
Speaker 1: Real ID that we have to use outside of travel to.
Speaker 2: Get into government buildings and then to open bank accounts.
And we already see Caro Starmer announcing in the UK
you will have a digital idea if you want to work.
So this doesn't seem to me to be handwaving, etcetera.
What's been the response since you've been talking about this.
You're often yelled at by conservatives for saying, why are
you coming after our side? You're conservative, ladies of America?
Why are you coming after Republicans?
Speaker 4: Well, you know, I got into all of this policy
stuff really because of what happened to our family back
in twenty twenty one and through my my connect really,
I think you kind of inspired me to like figure
out where did these laws come from? And so it's
it's really a gift from God that I have this
sort of obsession or passion to dig into the details
of the legislation. And so when I saw this and
I saw I saw kind of two different viewpoints, and
so I pulled up the legislation and I read through
it myself, and I sent it to you pretty much
right away because you're you're kind of the only person
that I can think of that is actually willing to
tell the truth. And I'm I'm so grateful that that
God connected us and put you in my life as
sort of a mentor and friend to kind of help
guide me through this, because you have actually, you know,
really been a good source of courage for me.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 4: Absolutely Praise God. And so I sent this to you
so because I knew, I thought this sounds up your alley,
and I know you're, you know, wanting to share the
truth with your your viewers and your listeners. And and
that was when I sent it to you last week.
That was really kind of the first that I started
to get into it. And I saw these op eds
going out around the country, especially here in Florida, And
after seeing that this passed in Texas, I thought, I
really have to be vocal about what's going on here
in Florida, and I'm going to have to write a
rebuttal to some of these op eds that have been
written by people, you know, moms for Liberty or Heritage Foundation,
and that might ruffle some feathers. And you know, I
had conversations with my husband and should I name names
in the article, and he said, well, they're the ones
writing these opinion pieces, and so it doesn't seem wrong
for you to cite their work and why you oppose
what they're saying. And so I haven't gotten too much
backlash just yet. You will, I will.
Speaker 1: And you know, one of.
Speaker 4: The things is todd Conservative Ladies of America is a
very small grassroots organization. We're small, but mighty. I mean,
God has been great in using our voice. I'm essentially
a volunteer and my team are all volunteers, and I
know that he will, he will spread the word as
he wants it to be, as he wants it to
be heard. But because of that, I don't have any
donors to lose. I have no thing to lose. Yeah,
and I am truly committed to telling the truth. I
believe that I am in this space because God put
me here, and God opens the doors and he leads
me to what he wants me to see. And so
you know, I'm I'm obligated only to God. And so
you know, if if these groups on the right say
we aren't going to work with conservative lays of America
because of your position on such a belt, well, then
so be it. I'm really here to alert other citizens
and try to wake people up so that the laws
don't impact them in negative ways as it has impacted.
You know, you and I both our families have been
directly impacted by big government.
Speaker 2: Big government, big pharma rights, big media, and so many
families have.
Speaker 1: And you know, I had a friend of mine say
to me the other day.
Speaker 2: We're talking about the business and growing audience in the podcast,
and you know, it made this investments in YouTube, and
that's sort.
Speaker 1: Of paid off. But I think YouTube hats our guts.
Speaker 2: And one of the things he said was, you know,
I can see you as part of a network, you know,
like joining one of these big network sites with concerned hostis. Oh,
that's never gonna happen. You know, look, I love you, brother,
that's never gonna happen. I am full on idd as
the guy you don't bring into a network because when
the network says, hey, we're gonna go ahead and stay
away from the election was stolen.
Speaker 1: I'm the guy who says you might but I'm not
or you know what, we're gonna go ahead and play games.
Speaker 2: We're gonna play big Pharmer's game on this, or we're
just gonna listen to the public health officials. Okay, three days,
I'll keep my mouth shut. On the fourth day, I'm
gonna come out and say this is a swindle. And
that's so I'm not going to be part of a network.
And in a way that's a disadvantage because of scope
and size and we're a small shop and et cetera.
That's where we rely on listeners from viewers for growth.
Only way the growth the show grows.
Speaker 1: It's for you guys.
Speaker 2: But but the same token, I don't have an executive
director putting me on the phone and saying, hey, listen,
you can't do this. In the digital ID thing. You
can talk about anything you want, but not the digital
ID thing. You cannot question Israel's move in the West
Bank or Gaza. You can choose not to talk about,
but you cannot question it. And I'm here to tell
you there are plenty of great, big conservative networks, great big,
huge ones.
Speaker 1: And I assure you because I know their hosts are
under orders.
Speaker 2: These are things you don't talk about so Julie, stay
independent and keep God as the boss. That's my advice
as your mentor. Keep God is the books, all right?
Appreciate you coming on. There's a link to your work
in the show notes Julie Barrett's hoantor to claim my
friend Conservative Ladies of America. I'm sure your wife or
my wife and I have a follow up call about
how great I am.
Speaker 1: Something we will for sure.
Speaker 4: Thank you so much for your attention to this and
thanks for your friendship, and appreciate the opportunity to be
on your show.
Speaker 1: Oh it's a great opportunity to have you here. This
is the Todd Herman Show.
Speaker 2: Please go, be well, be strong, be kind, and go
make every effort to walk in the light of Christ.
And I get to go see aforementioned beloved wife now