WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.680 --> 00:00:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Hi, this is Michael Connolly with part two of our

2
00:00:06.799 --> 00:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>roundtable discussion. This is Killer in the Code Solving the Black,

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Dahia and Zodiac cases. All right, we're gonna get back

4
00:00:16.519 --> 00:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to the questions. Do you think it's possible that other

5
00:00:20.559 --> 00:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>unsolved cold cases in Chicago, Kansas, Atlanta, Arizona, et cetera,

6
00:00:26.039 --> 00:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>could have been Margolis as well? And the list of

7
00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>those cities are places we have traced Marvin Margolis or

8
00:00:34.640 --> 00:00:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Merrill or under his other names. Places he didn't stay

9
00:00:38.399 --> 00:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a long time other than Chicago, where he grew up.

10
00:00:42.600 --> 00:00:44.679
<v Speaker 1>But this was a guy who seemed to always be

11
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>moving until he came back to California. But anyway, obscuring

12
00:00:49.280 --> 00:00:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the question, I remember early on in a discussion I

13
00:00:53.159 --> 00:00:59.679
<v Speaker 1>had with you, Mitzie Roberts, that the killing of the

14
00:00:59.719 --> 00:01:05.079
<v Speaker 1>Black was so brutal, so calculated. He said, it would

15
00:01:05.079 --> 00:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if this person, if this was like a

16
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>single case, that the killer this was his only murder anyway,

17
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:15.519
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know who wants to start with that,

18
00:01:16.359 --> 00:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's a very general question.

19
00:01:19.640 --> 00:01:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, just as an investigator, and when you're looking at

20
00:01:24.439 --> 00:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>somebody that is killed, what we believe is repeatedly in

21
00:01:28.599 --> 00:01:35.480
<v Speaker 2>different locations within California as far north as the Bay Area,

22
00:01:36.079 --> 00:01:41.719
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles. I feel Oceanside is very very likely his

23
00:01:42.040 --> 00:01:46.959
<v Speaker 2>I feel that the Riverside case of Sherry Joe Bates

24
00:01:47.040 --> 00:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>is probably a very likely case based on the letter

25
00:01:49.760 --> 00:01:54.959
<v Speaker 2>that was received. So it would not surprise me that

26
00:01:55.079 --> 00:01:58.280
<v Speaker 2>anywhere he's gone. He started killing it roughly twenty one

27
00:01:59.040 --> 00:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen forty Heaven with Elizabeth Short, so he began

28
00:02:03.519 --> 00:02:07.359
<v Speaker 2>at a fairly young age, and then in the early

29
00:02:07.400 --> 00:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>forties he was the Zodiac case. So anywhere in between

30
00:02:11.240 --> 00:02:15.879
<v Speaker 2>or even after wouldn't surprise me if he was in

31
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:21.000
<v Speaker 2>locations that had murders, not necessarily the same mos, but

32
00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:25.039
<v Speaker 2>really any because he was evolving during this whole period

33
00:02:25.080 --> 00:02:28.719
<v Speaker 2>of time. If they couldn't connect other cases to him

34
00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:30.080
<v Speaker 2>wherever he lived.

35
00:02:30.159 --> 00:02:33.759
<v Speaker 3>In the serial cases that serial killer cases that I've identified,

36
00:02:34.159 --> 00:02:34.840
<v Speaker 3>and if.

37
00:02:34.639 --> 00:02:38.680
<v Speaker 4>You believe that Marvin Margolis.

38
00:02:38.039 --> 00:02:40.159
<v Speaker 3>Is the suspect here, which I do, and if you

39
00:02:40.199 --> 00:02:43.280
<v Speaker 3>believe he's the Zodiac, which I do, these type of

40
00:02:43.360 --> 00:02:48.520
<v Speaker 3>perpetrators don't stop usually, you know, they can't take a

41
00:02:48.560 --> 00:02:52.840
<v Speaker 3>break for different reasons and things like that. But for

42
00:02:52.960 --> 00:02:57.840
<v Speaker 3>somebody like him that's mobile and moving around what would

43
00:02:57.879 --> 00:03:01.680
<v Speaker 3>drive them to stop. If you believe that he is

44
00:03:01.719 --> 00:03:06.360
<v Speaker 3>a suspect in these cases, then it would be smart

45
00:03:06.879 --> 00:03:11.479
<v Speaker 3>to trace where he's lived, where he's been, and to

46
00:03:11.560 --> 00:03:14.639
<v Speaker 3>look into unsolved murders there. I don't know enough about

47
00:03:14.759 --> 00:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>the famous unsolved with the key names, the Ellipstick murders

48
00:03:19.280 --> 00:03:20.400
<v Speaker 3>and the Torso murders.

49
00:03:20.479 --> 00:03:23.159
<v Speaker 4>I don't know about enough about those to say look

50
00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:23.759
<v Speaker 4>into those.

51
00:03:23.840 --> 00:03:28.199
<v Speaker 3>But if you have a killer that goes from place

52
00:03:28.280 --> 00:03:32.319
<v Speaker 3>to place to place to place, and you're convinced that

53
00:03:32.360 --> 00:03:36.319
<v Speaker 3>he's killed in one place, it's just smart detective work

54
00:03:36.360 --> 00:03:39.280
<v Speaker 3>to look into can he have killed, would he have

55
00:03:39.400 --> 00:03:41.719
<v Speaker 3>killed in another place? And to compare him against some

56
00:03:41.759 --> 00:03:44.000
<v Speaker 3>of your cold cases, and.

57
00:03:44.560 --> 00:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>That Mitchy and I did that on another case that

58
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>was at the end of my career with the guy

59
00:03:49.360 --> 00:03:52.280
<v Speaker 2>that is the most prolific serial killer in US history,

60
00:03:52.560 --> 00:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Sam Wittle. We traveled the country pretty much for the

61
00:03:56.080 --> 00:04:01.719
<v Speaker 2>last year my career, connecting him to other murders, and

62
00:04:02.400 --> 00:04:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean all over multiple states, five six, seven, eight

63
00:04:06.319 --> 00:04:09.520
<v Speaker 2>states we were in And it's just part of the

64
00:04:09.560 --> 00:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>process of what you do. And obviously Meryl Margol was

65
00:04:15.280 --> 00:04:21.279
<v Speaker 2>like killing the first one that we know of Anyway,

66
00:04:21.319 --> 00:04:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Elizabeth Short was a very personal murder, and so I

67
00:04:26.160 --> 00:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>can understand how that can happen without necessarily loving murder.

68
00:04:30.519 --> 00:04:35.600
<v Speaker 2>It was, you know, it was a payback. He was jolted, humiliated,

69
00:04:35.639 --> 00:04:37.959
<v Speaker 2>and he wanted to the same to her. But once

70
00:04:38.079 --> 00:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>you get into the other killings where there's no direct

71
00:04:41.360 --> 00:04:45.279
<v Speaker 2>personal motive, random people and lover's lanes, a cab driver

72
00:04:45.399 --> 00:04:50.759
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco, a cab driver in Oceanside, that shows

73
00:04:50.759 --> 00:04:53.160
<v Speaker 2>that he enjoyed killing, and so he's not going to

74
00:04:53.240 --> 00:04:57.079
<v Speaker 2>stop enjoying killing when he's living in Kansas or Chicago

75
00:04:57.319 --> 00:05:01.680
<v Speaker 2>or Georgia. It's going to go on if you felt

76
00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:03.680
<v Speaker 2>like the opportunity. The only thing I would say is

77
00:05:03.720 --> 00:05:07.439
<v Speaker 2>that at some point age factors does factor in.

78
00:05:07.920 --> 00:05:09.959
<v Speaker 5>And I can't say what age, but.

79
00:05:11.519 --> 00:05:15.319
<v Speaker 2>Age does factor in and does cause people to eventually stop.

80
00:05:16.720 --> 00:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Next question is you say some members of the family

81
00:05:20.160 --> 00:05:23.319
<v Speaker 1>have cooperated with you and turned over the sketch as

82
00:05:23.319 --> 00:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>well as two boxes of property and documents. Is there

83
00:05:27.040 --> 00:05:33.399
<v Speaker 1>any evidence connecting to the murders found in those belongings,

84
00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>such as weapons or trophies.

85
00:05:36.600 --> 00:05:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, of course the sketch, I mean, which Michael and

86
00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I took that sketch that was sent to us and

87
00:05:45.079 --> 00:05:50.720
<v Speaker 3>had it analyzed by an expert that was not familiar

88
00:05:50.720 --> 00:05:53.439
<v Speaker 3>with this case or what we've been doing, and verified

89
00:05:53.480 --> 00:05:57.120
<v Speaker 3>that hidden the hidden word zodiac in the shading or

90
00:05:57.160 --> 00:05:59.519
<v Speaker 3>at least some of the letters that he did see

91
00:05:59.519 --> 00:05:59.920
<v Speaker 3>show up.

92
00:06:00.600 --> 00:06:03.040
<v Speaker 4>And so yes, in that sense that was there.

93
00:06:03.360 --> 00:06:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure about the I think some of the

94
00:06:05.519 --> 00:06:09.360
<v Speaker 3>handwriting exhibits and a lot of stuff is just corroborating evidence.

95
00:06:09.399 --> 00:06:12.480
<v Speaker 4>It's not like DNA on knives or anything like that.

96
00:06:12.600 --> 00:06:18.759
<v Speaker 3>It's eyeglass prescriptions and knowing that the zodiac wore eyeglasses

97
00:06:19.000 --> 00:06:27.040
<v Speaker 3>and handwriting exemplars that have been compared to the letters

98
00:06:27.079 --> 00:06:28.720
<v Speaker 3>and have matched things like that.

99
00:06:29.560 --> 00:06:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Since we were talking about the things that family turned

100
00:06:33.360 --> 00:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>over to us, let's stay on that for a minute.

101
00:06:37.279 --> 00:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>With the last episode, chapter six, we talked about Marvin

102
00:06:43.959 --> 00:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Margolis's report card from USC and we put it on

103
00:06:49.319 --> 00:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the website, and readers have pointed out that that report

104
00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:57.519
<v Speaker 1>card shows a different spelling for his net last name.

105
00:06:57.600 --> 00:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It's and middle name. It's the work cards from Marvin

106
00:07:02.079 --> 00:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Henry Margolie's not Marvin Skipton Margolis. And the question is,

107
00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:13.839
<v Speaker 1>how do you know you don't have the grades for

108
00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:18.879
<v Speaker 1>someone else. And I'll start us off by just saying

109
00:07:19.040 --> 00:07:21.959
<v Speaker 1>that report card that we put on the website came

110
00:07:22.360 --> 00:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>from Marvin Merrell's property turned over to us by his family.

111
00:07:30.199 --> 00:07:33.839
<v Speaker 1>So it's a I think it's a clear or you guys,

112
00:07:33.839 --> 00:07:36.519
<v Speaker 1>if you're the investigators taken from there. To me, it's

113
00:07:36.560 --> 00:07:42.319
<v Speaker 1>a clear indication that he was engaged in manipulating his identity.

114
00:07:43.120 --> 00:07:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I have that report card in the boxes that I

115
00:07:46.120 --> 00:07:48.959
<v Speaker 2>have with me that we're turning back over to the

116
00:07:49.000 --> 00:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>family tomorrow, And yeah, what are the chances that there's

117
00:07:54.439 --> 00:07:58.920
<v Speaker 2>some differences from a person that's gone through his life

118
00:07:59.120 --> 00:08:02.680
<v Speaker 2>changing name and it's a close name. What's the chance

119
00:08:02.800 --> 00:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>is it's going to be did he pick up the

120
00:08:04.720 --> 00:08:07.639
<v Speaker 2>wrong report card, you know, and just happened to be

121
00:08:07.720 --> 00:08:10.839
<v Speaker 2>very close to his I doubt it's it's just another

122
00:08:10.879 --> 00:08:16.560
<v Speaker 2>indication that he's using, for whatever reason, one more alias,

123
00:08:16.839 --> 00:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's really a pretty close name obviously.

124
00:08:19.560 --> 00:08:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

125
00:08:19.759 --> 00:08:22.319
<v Speaker 3>And I just like when you get like that that's

126
00:08:22.319 --> 00:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>given from the family like that, there's no there's no

127
00:08:26.040 --> 00:08:30.439
<v Speaker 3>better source to give us something like that than it

128
00:08:30.519 --> 00:08:33.720
<v Speaker 3>came from the person who's report card it is. I mean,

129
00:08:33.720 --> 00:08:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I would trust that even more than the academic institution

130
00:08:38.320 --> 00:08:42.240
<v Speaker 3>only because they have no way to verify the report

131
00:08:42.279 --> 00:08:46.320
<v Speaker 3>card they're giving us is the same individual who were investigating.

132
00:08:46.639 --> 00:08:50.000
<v Speaker 3>But even more than that, I even when you're going

133
00:08:50.039 --> 00:08:54.440
<v Speaker 3>back through the grand jury investigation, they got his name wrong.

134
00:08:54.759 --> 00:08:57.360
<v Speaker 3>They're in testimony and spelled it wrong. And is that

135
00:08:57.440 --> 00:09:01.080
<v Speaker 3>because that's the information they had that he gave them.

136
00:09:01.200 --> 00:09:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Is the way he spelled it or they just spelled

137
00:09:03.200 --> 00:09:03.639
<v Speaker 4>it wrong.

138
00:09:04.200 --> 00:09:07.759
<v Speaker 3>So that's just a common theme throughout this investigation that

139
00:09:08.080 --> 00:09:11.759
<v Speaker 3>there are different names being used, different spellings, different middle names,

140
00:09:12.320 --> 00:09:16.080
<v Speaker 3>and it's part of his signature, part of the way

141
00:09:16.200 --> 00:09:17.919
<v Speaker 3>he plays the game.

142
00:09:18.960 --> 00:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting in the reader listener pointed out was if

143
00:09:24.159 --> 00:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at this thing, it appears that he may

144
00:09:26.519 --> 00:09:30.639
<v Speaker 1>have taken classes in the year of fifty two to

145
00:09:30.759 --> 00:09:36.279
<v Speaker 1>fifty three if we read this correctly, and that question

146
00:09:36.399 --> 00:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>says it was there a chance he came back to

147
00:09:39.080 --> 00:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>la because we know we can put him in Chicago.

148
00:09:42.200 --> 00:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>He was actually prosecuted for a crime during this period.

149
00:09:45.799 --> 00:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>But he's also we've also established that he moves around

150
00:09:49.039 --> 00:09:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and his family doesn't know where he is a lot.

151
00:09:51.840 --> 00:09:55.759
<v Speaker 1>What do we take from that little notation? It looks

152
00:09:55.840 --> 00:10:01.759
<v Speaker 1>like two classes taken between fifty two and fifty four.

153
00:10:01.840 --> 00:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Could he have come back to try to finish his

154
00:10:04.159 --> 00:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical degree.

155
00:10:06.519 --> 00:10:09.759
<v Speaker 6>Well, we know that his eldest daughter was born in

156
00:10:09.879 --> 00:10:15.919
<v Speaker 6>Chicago in nineteen fifty two. If I look at my records,

157
00:10:15.960 --> 00:10:17.759
<v Speaker 6>have to verify that. I think it's nineteen fifty two,

158
00:10:17.960 --> 00:10:19.000
<v Speaker 6>early February.

159
00:10:19.039 --> 00:10:22.039
<v Speaker 7>I believe that. Being said, however, we do know that

160
00:10:22.039 --> 00:10:22.679
<v Speaker 7>there's window there.

161
00:10:22.720 --> 00:10:24.240
<v Speaker 6>We can't account for him up until the end of

162
00:10:24.279 --> 00:10:26.559
<v Speaker 6>fifty three where he's arrested for a cong game for

163
00:10:26.679 --> 00:10:31.039
<v Speaker 6>doing contracts that are blank and filling in additional information.

164
00:10:30.559 --> 00:10:31.399
<v Speaker 7>That numbers right.

165
00:10:31.720 --> 00:10:32.799
<v Speaker 1>So that's in Chicago.

166
00:10:33.320 --> 00:10:35.360
<v Speaker 6>Dad's in Chicago. So we got a buffer there of

167
00:10:35.360 --> 00:10:37.159
<v Speaker 6>about a year and a half that we can't account for.

168
00:10:37.639 --> 00:10:40.759
<v Speaker 6>So I'm not saying that he did. What I'm saying, though,

169
00:10:40.799 --> 00:10:44.679
<v Speaker 6>is there's an open opportunity there unless we find something

170
00:10:44.720 --> 00:10:47.440
<v Speaker 6>else that we can use to place him somewhere other

171
00:10:47.519 --> 00:10:48.720
<v Speaker 6>than the USC.

172
00:10:49.960 --> 00:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we seem to be talking about his family and

173
00:10:52.039 --> 00:10:56.879
<v Speaker 1>how a few of them have cooperated with us, mostly

174
00:10:56.919 --> 00:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>through well, actually all three of you have talked to

175
00:10:59.159 --> 00:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>family members. I have talked to family members. Is there

176
00:11:02.240 --> 00:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>anyone in the family who is saying they agree with us,

177
00:11:07.480 --> 00:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>or they're saying this explains a lot, or there are

178
00:11:10.559 --> 00:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>people that are saying, there's no way this was that

179
00:11:14.159 --> 00:11:19.799
<v Speaker 1>our father was that this killer the serial killer.

180
00:11:20.799 --> 00:11:22.519
<v Speaker 7>I've experienced both firsthand.

181
00:11:22.559 --> 00:11:24.799
<v Speaker 6>I've got people like the son that says, all, this

182
00:11:24.840 --> 00:11:27.759
<v Speaker 6>can't be my father in no way. However, he is

183
00:11:27.799 --> 00:11:30.279
<v Speaker 6>shifted from one side to the other since I've had

184
00:11:30.320 --> 00:11:32.960
<v Speaker 6>the opportunity to speak with him. And then we have

185
00:11:33.000 --> 00:11:36.799
<v Speaker 6>other members that we've I've spoken to directly three that

186
00:11:36.840 --> 00:11:41.559
<v Speaker 6>have stated that they've found this very likely or possible

187
00:11:41.799 --> 00:11:43.799
<v Speaker 6>that he is who we believe he is.

188
00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:47.919
<v Speaker 3>The family members that I've spoke to, I've only spoken

189
00:11:47.960 --> 00:11:54.279
<v Speaker 3>to two. There's more of a curiosity and a and

190
00:11:54.360 --> 00:11:59.639
<v Speaker 3>a willingness to cooperate, cooperate because they believe that it's

191
00:11:59.639 --> 00:12:06.679
<v Speaker 3>an in case and that any surviving family members deserve answers,

192
00:12:06.720 --> 00:12:09.600
<v Speaker 3>whether that be that Marvin is the guy or is not.

193
00:12:09.799 --> 00:12:13.879
<v Speaker 3>And they also want to participate because we've told them that.

194
00:12:16.720 --> 00:12:19.279
<v Speaker 4>This could give you answers either way. We're not, you know,

195
00:12:19.360 --> 00:12:19.720
<v Speaker 4>we don't.

196
00:12:19.759 --> 00:12:23.000
<v Speaker 3>We're definitely not trying to fabricate a case on anybody.

197
00:12:23.480 --> 00:12:26.320
<v Speaker 3>The evidence is going to point where they evidence points

198
00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:29.440
<v Speaker 3>and it could point to this is the wrong guy,

199
00:12:29.759 --> 00:12:33.480
<v Speaker 3>and then that is something that they'd want to know too.

200
00:12:33.919 --> 00:12:37.840
<v Speaker 4>And so I haven't really gotten an opinion one way

201
00:12:37.960 --> 00:12:38.360
<v Speaker 4>or the other.

202
00:12:38.639 --> 00:12:45.840
<v Speaker 3>We've gotten some information about Margolis's background, about his temper,

203
00:12:45.919 --> 00:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>about the way he treated the family. That the fact

204
00:12:50.519 --> 00:12:55.200
<v Speaker 3>that they're willing to give items to us that could

205
00:12:55.200 --> 00:13:00.720
<v Speaker 3>be of evidence of evidentiary value at least says to

206
00:13:00.759 --> 00:13:04.039
<v Speaker 3>me that they're open to the possibility that this that

207
00:13:04.080 --> 00:13:08.519
<v Speaker 3>he that he could be capable of doing something like this.

208
00:13:08.559 --> 00:13:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Because I know if somebody came to me and said,

209
00:13:11.000 --> 00:13:12.919
<v Speaker 3>you think your father's a murderer and we want you

210
00:13:13.000 --> 00:13:16.519
<v Speaker 3>to give us any information that you may have, I'd

211
00:13:16.519 --> 00:13:19.759
<v Speaker 3>be like, there's no way, you know, I don't have anything.

212
00:13:20.039 --> 00:13:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't have anything because there's no way that this

213
00:13:22.080 --> 00:13:24.840
<v Speaker 3>my father could have been this, or or if my

214
00:13:24.960 --> 00:13:27.759
<v Speaker 3>father had stuff and I always had a suspicion in

215
00:13:27.759 --> 00:13:30.559
<v Speaker 3>my mind that he could be capable, then I would

216
00:13:30.600 --> 00:13:30.960
<v Speaker 3>give that.

217
00:13:31.080 --> 00:13:33.080
<v Speaker 4>So the fact that they gave.

218
00:13:32.919 --> 00:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Us items to be verified leads me to believe that

219
00:13:39.480 --> 00:13:41.080
<v Speaker 3>it's a possibility in their mind.

220
00:13:42.480 --> 00:13:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, that it wouldn't be shocking. Yeah, if if

221
00:13:47.000 --> 00:13:51.279
<v Speaker 2>it the evidence revealed that this is true, it would

222
00:13:51.440 --> 00:13:53.639
<v Speaker 2>not be shocking based on his behavior.

223
00:13:55.039 --> 00:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So that leads to one of the questions that we've

224
00:13:58.000 --> 00:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>gotten several of out of the proximity question, how are

225
00:14:02.600 --> 00:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>we putting him in proximity to the Zodiac killings? What

226
00:14:08.840 --> 00:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is the let's see where? What is the evidence that

227
00:14:13.000 --> 00:14:15.519
<v Speaker 1>he lived or had a place in the Bay area

228
00:14:15.639 --> 00:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>during the Zodiac murder spree? Is the exact question.

229
00:14:20.279 --> 00:14:24.879
<v Speaker 2>We do know there was documentation, Alex found it, and

230
00:14:24.919 --> 00:14:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I've driven by the house that he had showed he

231
00:14:30.120 --> 00:14:33.279
<v Speaker 2>lived at in the late sixties, early seventies and then

232
00:14:33.320 --> 00:14:36.399
<v Speaker 2>again in the late seventies and early eighties, same location.

233
00:14:37.120 --> 00:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>We know he worked at Intel. Back then, they didn't

234
00:14:41.080 --> 00:14:46.080
<v Speaker 2>have this let's work from home kind of situation and

235
00:14:46.279 --> 00:14:50.399
<v Speaker 2>telecommuting and all this kind of stuff. You showed up

236
00:14:50.440 --> 00:14:53.600
<v Speaker 2>in the office unless you were a travel kind of person.

237
00:14:53.960 --> 00:14:57.159
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing, it's fifty five years later. You're

238
00:14:57.159 --> 00:15:00.840
<v Speaker 2>not going to be able to put somebody in a

239
00:15:00.960 --> 00:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>specific place unless there's something very unique that happened, like

240
00:15:05.399 --> 00:15:08.879
<v Speaker 2>an arrest or something like that. On a day by day,

241
00:15:08.960 --> 00:15:11.879
<v Speaker 2>week by week, even a month by month basis, we don't.

242
00:15:12.080 --> 00:15:14.600
<v Speaker 2>We do know he has connections to the Bay Area.

243
00:15:15.639 --> 00:15:17.960
<v Speaker 2>And then the other one again, Mike, you just found

244
00:15:17.960 --> 00:15:21.120
<v Speaker 2>his son went to school up there. Now did he

245
00:15:21.200 --> 00:15:23.080
<v Speaker 2>live with his son at that point or did he

246
00:15:23.519 --> 00:15:26.519
<v Speaker 2>visit his son? Maybe, but we know that he had

247
00:15:26.559 --> 00:15:28.960
<v Speaker 2>a reason to be up in the area during that

248
00:15:29.039 --> 00:15:33.039
<v Speaker 2>period of time. And another thing is there wouldn't be

249
00:15:33.200 --> 00:15:35.519
<v Speaker 2>concern about the lack of middle put.

250
00:15:35.440 --> 00:15:36.320
<v Speaker 5>Him in the area.

251
00:15:36.879 --> 00:15:40.399
<v Speaker 2>If this was a DNA hit or a fingerprint match,

252
00:15:41.200 --> 00:15:43.840
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't matter where he lived anywhere in the world.

253
00:15:44.200 --> 00:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>You're going to say, Okay, you're gonna do You're going

254
00:15:46.679 --> 00:15:49.799
<v Speaker 2>to check the DNA and sometimes believe it or not.

255
00:15:49.960 --> 00:15:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But from a detective standpoint and from a prosecutor standpoint,

256
00:15:53.600 --> 00:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>and from a legal standpoint, circumstantial evidence, depending on how

257
00:15:58.639 --> 00:16:04.519
<v Speaker 2>substantial it is, can be just as identifying as DNA

258
00:16:04.840 --> 00:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>or a fingerprint. And people might look at that and

259
00:16:07.360 --> 00:16:09.799
<v Speaker 2>shake their head and they don't understand it. But this

260
00:16:09.879 --> 00:16:15.600
<v Speaker 2>world has gotten so dependent on court using DNA and science.

261
00:16:16.240 --> 00:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes you revert back to circumstantial evidence. It's very legal.

262
00:16:20.360 --> 00:16:24.440
<v Speaker 2>There's convictions based on nothing but circumstantial evidence all the time.

263
00:16:25.039 --> 00:16:27.759
<v Speaker 2>And so the fact that we couldn't put him in

264
00:16:27.799 --> 00:16:31.519
<v Speaker 2>the Bay Area on a regular basis. Isn't that concerning

265
00:16:31.559 --> 00:16:35.559
<v Speaker 2>to me? The other evidence that we have is overwhelming,

266
00:16:35.720 --> 00:16:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and I keep saying overwhelming. It's overwhelming. And I was

267
00:16:40.120 --> 00:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>at an event the other day, unfortunately it was a

268
00:16:42.759 --> 00:16:46.120
<v Speaker 2>celebration of life, and there were many das there that

269
00:16:46.200 --> 00:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>had been listening to this podcast that are blown away

270
00:16:49.679 --> 00:16:52.000
<v Speaker 2>by how.

271
00:16:51.080 --> 00:16:52.519
<v Speaker 5>Convincing the evidence is.

272
00:16:53.399 --> 00:16:57.679
<v Speaker 2>And I know Mitzi and I and my work partner

273
00:16:57.720 --> 00:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Dave Trismont, we wouldn't have entertained moving into this unless

274
00:17:02.879 --> 00:17:05.599
<v Speaker 2>we totally believed it. We're not going to get involved

275
00:17:05.640 --> 00:17:09.759
<v Speaker 2>in something that was a hair brain scheme, and we've cooperated.

276
00:17:09.799 --> 00:17:12.240
<v Speaker 2>We give media interviews, and I should say there was

277
00:17:12.279 --> 00:17:15.640
<v Speaker 2>one particular writer who said that I went to Michael

278
00:17:15.720 --> 00:17:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Conley with a far fetched theory. This guy must not

279
00:17:20.920 --> 00:17:23.799
<v Speaker 2>know anything about crime if he considered this a far

280
00:17:23.880 --> 00:17:28.759
<v Speaker 2>fetched theory, because prosecutors and people in investigated positions, Mitzi,

281
00:17:28.839 --> 00:17:32.720
<v Speaker 2>me and Dave tresmontin say it's overwhelming evidence. So the

282
00:17:32.759 --> 00:17:35.039
<v Speaker 2>far fetched stuff, I don't know if he just had

283
00:17:35.079 --> 00:17:37.599
<v Speaker 2>a bone to pick with this, or wanted to be

284
00:17:37.920 --> 00:17:43.480
<v Speaker 2>personally abrasive and throw a lot of landmines toward us,

285
00:17:43.559 --> 00:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>or what, But the fact that he said it's a

286
00:17:46.039 --> 00:17:47.880
<v Speaker 2>far fetched game is ridiculous.

287
00:17:48.240 --> 00:17:53.319
<v Speaker 3>That's what's so irritating about that is that people expect

288
00:17:53.599 --> 00:17:59.039
<v Speaker 3>us as investigators to throw away the entire theory or

289
00:17:59.039 --> 00:18:04.359
<v Speaker 3>the entire game case against Margolis because we can't prove

290
00:18:04.400 --> 00:18:07.279
<v Speaker 3>he was in San Jose. He can't be the Zodiac

291
00:18:07.319 --> 00:18:11.279
<v Speaker 3>because we can't prove he lived in San Jose. So

292
00:18:11.519 --> 00:18:16.880
<v Speaker 3>everything else that we have proven, the cryptology and you know,

293
00:18:17.000 --> 00:18:19.200
<v Speaker 3>all the other things that we have, we're just supposed

294
00:18:19.240 --> 00:18:23.759
<v Speaker 3>to put that aside because one or two things we

295
00:18:23.799 --> 00:18:26.440
<v Speaker 3>don't have definitive answers, or we can't prove that he

296
00:18:26.680 --> 00:18:30.599
<v Speaker 3>was positive, you know, that his alibi, that he didn't

297
00:18:30.599 --> 00:18:33.240
<v Speaker 3>have an alibi, So we're just supposed to throw away

298
00:18:33.279 --> 00:18:36.440
<v Speaker 3>all the other evidence. And that is just not what

299
00:18:36.720 --> 00:18:37.720
<v Speaker 3>detectives do.

300
00:18:38.279 --> 00:18:42.920
<v Speaker 4>So it's quite irritating on some levels when that happens.

301
00:18:43.279 --> 00:18:47.480
<v Speaker 2>And even completed cases and myths will tell me the

302
00:18:47.480 --> 00:18:50.640
<v Speaker 2>same thing or tell you the same thing. You're never

303
00:18:50.680 --> 00:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>going to get an answer to every question you want.

304
00:18:53.279 --> 00:18:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Even when there's admissions or confessions or convictions, there are

305
00:18:58.400 --> 00:19:04.480
<v Speaker 2>always unknown things because in a confession, oftentimes suspects will

306
00:19:04.519 --> 00:19:09.559
<v Speaker 2>admit things because they know it's overwhelming evidence. But they

307
00:19:09.640 --> 00:19:14.839
<v Speaker 2>always will mitigate some aspects or leave out parts, or

308
00:19:14.880 --> 00:19:20.359
<v Speaker 2>not remember certain parts because to admit certain things make

309
00:19:20.440 --> 00:19:25.119
<v Speaker 2>it tough because it's very very bad behavior. They mitigate

310
00:19:25.160 --> 00:19:27.799
<v Speaker 2>it to be seen in the best light possible that

311
00:19:27.839 --> 00:19:31.160
<v Speaker 2>they think they can get away with. And so there

312
00:19:31.200 --> 00:19:32.680
<v Speaker 2>are going to be things in we're not going to

313
00:19:32.759 --> 00:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>have answers to. But overall it's a very very strong case.

314
00:19:38.640 --> 00:19:41.039
<v Speaker 7>Let me add one more piece, guys. So if we

315
00:19:41.160 --> 00:19:42.160
<v Speaker 7>fast forward.

316
00:19:41.839 --> 00:19:45.039
<v Speaker 6>From sixty nine to seventy to seventy eight, when the

317
00:19:45.119 --> 00:19:49.240
<v Speaker 6>son who said he never resided in San Jose, and

318
00:19:49.279 --> 00:19:52.960
<v Speaker 6>we know I knew Michael's independent researcher discovered that the

319
00:19:53.039 --> 00:19:55.920
<v Speaker 6>Sun was in high school in San Jose actually at

320
00:19:55.920 --> 00:19:58.279
<v Speaker 6>that time, so at the time that they moved there,

321
00:19:58.319 --> 00:19:59.559
<v Speaker 6>and this is documented.

322
00:19:59.119 --> 00:20:01.599
<v Speaker 7>For anybody to see online if you know how to research.

323
00:20:01.880 --> 00:20:04.640
<v Speaker 6>At the exact moment that Martin Margos can be placed

324
00:20:04.680 --> 00:20:08.440
<v Speaker 6>in San Jose in nineteen seventy eight. Zodiac reappears and

325
00:20:08.480 --> 00:20:11.000
<v Speaker 6>emails in April Letter April twenty fourth, ninety seventy eight.

326
00:20:11.359 --> 00:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>So somebody mentioned hair brained and so this next question

327
00:20:17.079 --> 00:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>was first directed to me but handed off to Mitzi

328
00:20:22.240 --> 00:20:28.079
<v Speaker 1>after I make but it says, Connelly, you once endorsed

329
00:20:28.079 --> 00:20:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the theory that George Hodell was the Black Dalia Avenger.

330
00:20:31.920 --> 00:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>What made you change your mind? And why should we

331
00:20:34.279 --> 00:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>believe you? Now? What that listener is referencing is that

332
00:20:38.240 --> 00:20:42.559
<v Speaker 1>I blurbed, which is I endorsed a book called Black

333
00:20:42.640 --> 00:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Dalua Avenger that fingered George Hodell as the killer of

334
00:20:47.400 --> 00:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Short and he is on the top suspect's list.

335
00:20:51.680 --> 00:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the book was written by Hodell's son,

336
00:20:54.480 --> 00:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Steve Hodell, who was formerly an LAPD homicide investigator, which

337
00:20:59.480 --> 00:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was one of the reasons I felt compelled to read

338
00:21:02.440 --> 00:21:05.519
<v Speaker 1>it and then endorse it. And I read that book

339
00:21:05.599 --> 00:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>knowing very little about the case, and I found it convincing.

340
00:21:09.799 --> 00:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, what's the harm in saying I agree?

341
00:21:14.319 --> 00:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I even said case closed or something like that.

342
00:21:16.960 --> 00:21:20.079
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember exactly what I said in endorsing that book,

343
00:21:20.359 --> 00:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but I did live to regret this, and I've made

344
00:21:23.000 --> 00:21:25.559
<v Speaker 1>my maya copa in the very first episode I think

345
00:21:25.920 --> 00:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast. And because the newly formed cold Cation

346
00:21:33.319 --> 00:21:37.519
<v Speaker 1>it investigated the claims in that book and their report

347
00:21:37.920 --> 00:21:43.079
<v Speaker 1>was that that is a flawed investigation, and that it's

348
00:21:43.119 --> 00:21:46.519
<v Speaker 1>a good theory, but there's no evidence that Hodell was

349
00:21:46.559 --> 00:21:49.079
<v Speaker 1>the killer. And I think Rick and Mitzi you may

350
00:21:49.079 --> 00:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have had part in that investigation or aware of it,

351
00:21:51.759 --> 00:21:54.400
<v Speaker 1>or have reports. So if one of you wants to

352
00:21:55.440 --> 00:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bail me out here, please do. Yeah.

353
00:21:58.519 --> 00:22:03.799
<v Speaker 3>I think it's very easy and is exactly what's different

354
00:22:03.799 --> 00:22:07.240
<v Speaker 3>in what we're doing here is that Hoodell's theory is

355
00:22:07.759 --> 00:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>a great theory, and it's supported by some of the

356
00:22:10.480 --> 00:22:13.599
<v Speaker 3>facts in the case. In that George Hodell there was

357
00:22:13.720 --> 00:22:14.960
<v Speaker 3>wiretaps into him.

358
00:22:15.440 --> 00:22:17.279
<v Speaker 4>He you know, he was a doctor.

359
00:22:17.680 --> 00:22:20.559
<v Speaker 3>There's things that make you look at him as a

360
00:22:20.599 --> 00:22:23.799
<v Speaker 3>suspect and buy into him as a suspect.

361
00:22:23.799 --> 00:22:26.160
<v Speaker 4>That it's a good theory in the case.

362
00:22:26.519 --> 00:22:29.440
<v Speaker 3>But there were a lot of good theories, and so

363
00:22:29.599 --> 00:22:33.039
<v Speaker 3>I can see how somebody on the outsides can can

364
00:22:33.079 --> 00:22:36.720
<v Speaker 3>read that book and buy into it. I mean, there's

365
00:22:36.759 --> 00:22:41.799
<v Speaker 3>still many many people that believe. You know, I get

366
00:22:41.799 --> 00:22:42.559
<v Speaker 3>that question a lot.

367
00:22:42.640 --> 00:22:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's all. Isn't it wasn't it? That wasn't it

368
00:22:44.960 --> 00:22:49.359
<v Speaker 4>that detective's father, wasn't it that doctor? But as Michael.

369
00:22:49.240 --> 00:22:52.799
<v Speaker 3>Mentioned, because the theory did look so good, that's what

370
00:22:52.839 --> 00:22:57.039
<v Speaker 3>investigators do we then go in and fact check it

371
00:22:57.119 --> 00:22:59.920
<v Speaker 3>for evidentiary value. And a lot of the stuff that

372
00:23:00.920 --> 00:23:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Steve Odell wrote in that first book just was not accurate.

373
00:23:04.799 --> 00:23:09.000
<v Speaker 3>It was not true. It was actually disproven. So that

374
00:23:09.200 --> 00:23:13.240
<v Speaker 3>is hindsight. That is information that Michael didn't have and

375
00:23:13.279 --> 00:23:15.480
<v Speaker 3>that the listeners and the readers didn't have at the

376
00:23:15.519 --> 00:23:20.400
<v Speaker 3>time that we were able to disprove. And I think

377
00:23:20.480 --> 00:23:23.839
<v Speaker 3>that flip side is why when it came to this

378
00:23:23.960 --> 00:23:27.599
<v Speaker 3>investigation we were so I was so skeptical because I

379
00:23:28.039 --> 00:23:30.160
<v Speaker 3>think I even mentioned to Michael, I don't want to

380
00:23:30.200 --> 00:23:32.920
<v Speaker 3>be the person that gets stuck in something like that

381
00:23:32.920 --> 00:23:36.039
<v Speaker 3>that has to turn around five years from now and say, yeah,

382
00:23:36.200 --> 00:23:37.039
<v Speaker 3>I got that wrong.

383
00:23:37.640 --> 00:23:40.839
<v Speaker 4>And so is why we are doing that. We are

384
00:23:40.920 --> 00:23:42.440
<v Speaker 4>being upfront.

385
00:23:42.039 --> 00:23:45.920
<v Speaker 3>With the listeners and with the people with the when

386
00:23:45.920 --> 00:23:49.799
<v Speaker 3>we're interviewed on these stories. Is if we have a

387
00:23:49.920 --> 00:23:53.640
<v Speaker 3>case where the evidence doesn't fit or we're unsure of

388
00:23:53.680 --> 00:23:55.880
<v Speaker 3>the evidence, we have double checked it.

389
00:23:55.920 --> 00:23:57.240
<v Speaker 4>We have triple checked.

390
00:23:56.920 --> 00:24:00.000
<v Speaker 3>It by independent experts and came up with the same

391
00:24:00.079 --> 00:24:04.079
<v Speaker 3>information that Alex has, which makes it makes it more

392
00:24:04.160 --> 00:24:06.880
<v Speaker 3>viable as evidence in the case.

393
00:24:08.119 --> 00:24:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in my perspective on the Hodel that was ordered

394
00:24:12.000 --> 00:24:14.640
<v Speaker 2>by an assistant Chief of police that the cold case

395
00:24:14.759 --> 00:24:21.400
<v Speaker 2>unit looked through Hodell's claims in his book and make

396
00:24:21.440 --> 00:24:25.440
<v Speaker 2>a determination if it is it legitimate, is it not legitimate,

397
00:24:26.119 --> 00:24:30.559
<v Speaker 2>or in between somewhere. My part of that was to

398
00:24:30.720 --> 00:24:33.920
<v Speaker 2>look at an array of other women in the LA

399
00:24:34.039 --> 00:24:38.759
<v Speaker 2>area during the late forties and early fifties that Steve

400
00:24:39.680 --> 00:24:42.599
<v Speaker 2>claimed Steve Hodell claimed.

401
00:24:43.960 --> 00:24:45.519
<v Speaker 5>His father also murdered.

402
00:24:46.119 --> 00:24:49.759
<v Speaker 2>And as I went through those cases in the archives,

403
00:24:50.559 --> 00:24:54.119
<v Speaker 2>and I learned that many of them were already solved

404
00:24:54.599 --> 00:24:57.680
<v Speaker 2>or had been solved. Steve probably didn't have access to

405
00:24:57.720 --> 00:25:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of those because they were internal investig natives

406
00:25:01.200 --> 00:25:06.119
<v Speaker 2>as investigations, but several of them, there were a couple

407
00:25:06.240 --> 00:25:11.319
<v Speaker 2>where there were convictions of other people, some confessions on

408
00:25:11.359 --> 00:25:14.799
<v Speaker 2>some of them compelling confessions, and there was a plea

409
00:25:15.000 --> 00:25:18.200
<v Speaker 2>in some of them. So just the fact that he's

410
00:25:18.279 --> 00:25:23.359
<v Speaker 2>naming cases that we know weren't his father's hurts the

411
00:25:23.440 --> 00:25:27.599
<v Speaker 2>carrelibility of the overall investigation. And I worked with Steve Hodell.

412
00:25:27.920 --> 00:25:30.319
<v Speaker 2>I was a young homicide detective in Hollywood in the

413
00:25:30.359 --> 00:25:32.319
<v Speaker 2>early eighties and Steve.

414
00:25:32.079 --> 00:25:33.279
<v Speaker 5>Hodell was there.

415
00:25:33.279 --> 00:25:36.640
<v Speaker 2>He was a good detective, And that's the interesting aspect

416
00:25:36.720 --> 00:25:42.079
<v Speaker 2>of that Steve knows what evidence is, and it would

417
00:25:42.079 --> 00:25:44.799
<v Speaker 2>be hard. I can guarantee you it would be hard

418
00:25:44.880 --> 00:25:50.519
<v Speaker 2>for him to discount Alex Baber's investigation because he knows evidence.

419
00:25:51.000 --> 00:25:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Whether he'd be willing to admit that, probably not, because

420
00:25:54.839 --> 00:26:00.720
<v Speaker 2>he's so invested with his many books and his reputation

421
00:26:00.920 --> 00:26:03.480
<v Speaker 2>and so on and so forth, that it would be

422
00:26:03.519 --> 00:26:07.799
<v Speaker 2>hard for him to in my thinking, to say, yes,

423
00:26:07.880 --> 00:26:12.160
<v Speaker 2>this is a good investigation. But inwardly I think he

424
00:26:12.279 --> 00:26:17.359
<v Speaker 2>probably knows it's a very a very strong case. Yeah,

425
00:26:17.519 --> 00:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>as he knows evidence.

426
00:26:19.240 --> 00:26:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I just want to add on that. I tend to

427
00:26:21.200 --> 00:26:26.079
<v Speaker 3>agree with you on that, Rick, because years ago I

428
00:26:27.200 --> 00:26:31.039
<v Speaker 3>was sort of ordered to do an interview and it

429
00:26:31.079 --> 00:26:34.279
<v Speaker 3>was related to Steve Hodell's claims.

430
00:26:35.640 --> 00:26:37.079
<v Speaker 4>I believe it was a radio interview.

431
00:26:37.119 --> 00:26:41.160
<v Speaker 3>It may have been KNX or something, and I gave

432
00:26:41.200 --> 00:26:43.519
<v Speaker 3>a statement on the case, and that something to the

433
00:26:43.559 --> 00:26:47.519
<v Speaker 3>fact that Steve had a good theory. Well, when our

434
00:26:47.559 --> 00:26:50.119
<v Speaker 3>theory came out, And that's the difference I think with

435
00:26:50.240 --> 00:26:53.160
<v Speaker 3>us is we're willing to look at other theories when

436
00:26:53.200 --> 00:26:54.440
<v Speaker 3>our case came out.

437
00:26:54.519 --> 00:26:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Now it's no longer theory. I believe it is factual.

438
00:26:57.359 --> 00:27:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Steve went back and and brought up that old interview

439
00:27:01.799 --> 00:27:06.079
<v Speaker 3>and said, well, you know, what is it, Mitsi's here

440
00:27:06.200 --> 00:27:08.960
<v Speaker 3>during you know, twenty twelve or twenty fourteen, whatever.

441
00:27:08.799 --> 00:27:11.319
<v Speaker 4>It was, she said that she believed my theory.

442
00:27:11.680 --> 00:27:15.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, that was really misleading because he gave part of

443
00:27:15.319 --> 00:27:16.079
<v Speaker 3>that interview.

444
00:27:16.400 --> 00:27:17.920
<v Speaker 4>He gave the part where I said it was a

445
00:27:17.960 --> 00:27:20.960
<v Speaker 4>good theory. What I actually said was that it was

446
00:27:21.000 --> 00:27:25.279
<v Speaker 4>a very good theory and it could actually be factual.

447
00:27:26.000 --> 00:27:28.680
<v Speaker 3>The problem with the theory is there's no evidence to

448
00:27:28.720 --> 00:27:32.119
<v Speaker 3>back it up, and so it couldn't be proven. And

449
00:27:32.319 --> 00:27:34.559
<v Speaker 3>that was the problem I was having at the time,

450
00:27:34.759 --> 00:27:38.359
<v Speaker 3>was there were several very good theories, but they weren't

451
00:27:38.759 --> 00:27:41.640
<v Speaker 3>They couldn't be proven by the evidence, and so then

452
00:27:41.680 --> 00:27:44.920
<v Speaker 3>it's just what theory do you choose, if any.

453
00:27:45.559 --> 00:27:47.920
<v Speaker 4>And so the fact that he is.

454
00:27:47.880 --> 00:27:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Now bringing that up and trying to use my portions

455
00:27:53.519 --> 00:27:57.039
<v Speaker 3>of my statement to bolster his case should tell you

456
00:27:57.079 --> 00:28:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a lot about his motives and not really wanting to

457
00:28:01.400 --> 00:28:05.200
<v Speaker 3>objectively look at these cases and solve a.

458
00:28:05.079 --> 00:28:09.799
<v Speaker 4>Crime, but push forward his narrative.

459
00:28:09.880 --> 00:28:16.880
<v Speaker 6>Still, We've actually had my findings verified independently by experts

460
00:28:16.880 --> 00:28:20.359
<v Speaker 6>in their fields across the board that have done this

461
00:28:21.759 --> 00:28:26.319
<v Speaker 6>at no cost, with no skin in the game, with

462
00:28:26.400 --> 00:28:28.839
<v Speaker 6>the exception of our most recent handwriting analysis, which we

463
00:28:28.920 --> 00:28:30.880
<v Speaker 6>went above and beyond because we already had one, but

464
00:28:30.960 --> 00:28:35.480
<v Speaker 6>we wanted another independent party, so we did endorse paying

465
00:28:35.480 --> 00:28:38.119
<v Speaker 6>them for their opinion just to have a second opinion,

466
00:28:38.480 --> 00:28:42.240
<v Speaker 6>But that was not influenced by monetary gain by any means.

467
00:28:42.599 --> 00:28:46.279
<v Speaker 6>It's a very respected and sought after expert in this field.

468
00:28:46.640 --> 00:28:49.599
<v Speaker 6>But every other piece that I have presented to youth

469
00:28:49.640 --> 00:28:53.519
<v Speaker 6>detectives as well as Michael, and as far as law

470
00:28:53.559 --> 00:28:56.880
<v Speaker 6>enforcement goes, I have not had one single representative of

471
00:28:56.880 --> 00:29:01.759
<v Speaker 6>any jurisdiction tell me that my suspect is not viable

472
00:29:01.960 --> 00:29:05.440
<v Speaker 6>or that the evidence I have presented is bogus or

473
00:29:05.480 --> 00:29:06.839
<v Speaker 6>they can eliminate it.

474
00:29:06.920 --> 00:29:09.480
<v Speaker 7>Not one, not a single detective.

475
00:29:10.119 --> 00:29:12.680
<v Speaker 6>And that includes all the North majurisdictions I met with,

476
00:29:12.680 --> 00:29:16.079
<v Speaker 6>including the FBI as well as though I haven't spoke

477
00:29:16.119 --> 00:29:20.640
<v Speaker 6>with LAPD personally, they know of me and they know

478
00:29:20.799 --> 00:29:24.039
<v Speaker 6>they've been interacting with both Rick and MISSI obviously, but

479
00:29:24.559 --> 00:29:26.319
<v Speaker 6>not one individual has said.

480
00:29:26.119 --> 00:29:28.400
<v Speaker 7>That this doesn't this isn't fit, it doesn't align.

481
00:29:29.039 --> 00:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>That kind of brings us to the last question, and

482
00:29:31.559 --> 00:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very related, and it was did you realize that

483
00:29:35.039 --> 00:29:38.319
<v Speaker 1>you would be stepping into a hornet's nest of criticism

484
00:29:39.200 --> 00:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>when you came out with a suspect in both cases

485
00:29:42.720 --> 00:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that was not one of the more established suspects that

486
00:29:46.599 --> 00:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>amateur experts on the cases favor. Let me start this

487
00:29:51.359 --> 00:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>off because a lot of this amount of invective has

488
00:29:55.000 --> 00:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>been aimed at me, So I'm going to say yes

489
00:29:58.480 --> 00:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and no. We were well away that there were many

490
00:30:02.519 --> 00:30:05.559
<v Speaker 1>so called experts out there, most of them self anointed,

491
00:30:06.039 --> 00:30:08.759
<v Speaker 1>and that they would have invested their time and belief

492
00:30:08.799 --> 00:30:12.319
<v Speaker 1>in other suspects and theories. But the facts are facts

493
00:30:12.359 --> 00:30:17.599
<v Speaker 1>and we cannot avoid them. We also add two professional

494
00:30:17.799 --> 00:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>homicide investigators, including one who had the Black Value case

495
00:30:21.440 --> 00:30:24.599
<v Speaker 1>for many years. But it is a very interesting cultural

496
00:30:24.720 --> 00:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon where you have so many people invested in unwilling

497
00:30:29.079 --> 00:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear or consider anything else, which is completely and

498
00:30:33.519 --> 00:30:35.599
<v Speaker 1>MITCHI I want to hear you talk about this part.

499
00:30:36.000 --> 00:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It's really anesthetical to what real detectives do. They have

500
00:30:39.759 --> 00:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a saying in LAPD homicide, it goes where it goes,

501
00:30:43.319 --> 00:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but the people out there are really unwilling to do that.

502
00:30:46.440 --> 00:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Not everybody, but there's a lot of people potshotting us

503
00:30:49.720 --> 00:30:54.039
<v Speaker 1>and exaggerating things and getting a lot of stuff wrong.

504
00:30:54.160 --> 00:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>People who blindly say we're wrong. But I'm not even

505
00:30:57.880 --> 00:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>going to listen to what they have to say. You

506
00:31:00.279 --> 00:31:03.279
<v Speaker 1>know what we have to say. So it's kind of ridiculous,

507
00:31:03.359 --> 00:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But really, how can you say you're an expert in

508
00:31:05.720 --> 00:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>anything if you do not know everything about it, including

509
00:31:09.000 --> 00:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the consideration of opposite opinions and facts.

510
00:31:12.960 --> 00:31:17.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I absolutely knew that I was going to face

511
00:31:17.440 --> 00:31:20.319
<v Speaker 3>this because I had the case for fifteen years, and

512
00:31:20.359 --> 00:31:22.880
<v Speaker 3>I've been on the other side, and I've been a

513
00:31:22.920 --> 00:31:25.759
<v Speaker 3>nasayer and I have been amongst the naysayers.

514
00:31:26.480 --> 00:31:27.599
<v Speaker 4>But the thing is.

515
00:31:27.400 --> 00:31:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Is that in detective work, if you do the right

516
00:31:29.960 --> 00:31:32.880
<v Speaker 3>thing for the right reasons, like you said, it leads

517
00:31:32.960 --> 00:31:33.680
<v Speaker 3>where it leads.

518
00:31:34.240 --> 00:31:36.559
<v Speaker 4>So I didn't really care what they said because.

519
00:31:37.119 --> 00:31:41.160
<v Speaker 3>I believe in backs backed by the evidence, and I

520
00:31:41.160 --> 00:31:44.799
<v Speaker 3>think we have that in this case, and so it

521
00:31:44.880 --> 00:31:45.759
<v Speaker 3>goes where it goes.

522
00:31:45.920 --> 00:31:47.160
<v Speaker 4>And every time.

523
00:31:47.119 --> 00:31:50.599
<v Speaker 3>We've been weary about some of the facts in this case,

524
00:31:50.640 --> 00:31:55.039
<v Speaker 3>we've checked it and sometimes triple checked it, and been very.

525
00:31:54.839 --> 00:31:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Transparent on things that have gone our.

526
00:31:59.119 --> 00:32:02.039
<v Speaker 3>Way and things that perhaps didn't go our way, but

527
00:32:02.960 --> 00:32:07.519
<v Speaker 3>backed it up with reasonable explanations of why that occurred,

528
00:32:07.799 --> 00:32:11.079
<v Speaker 3>which is different from the naysayers that I'm seeing and

529
00:32:11.279 --> 00:32:15.000
<v Speaker 3>that I'm with you Michael in that it's it's extremely

530
00:32:16.039 --> 00:32:26.000
<v Speaker 3>irritating and disconcerting that these so called Internet type investigators

531
00:32:26.240 --> 00:32:29.359
<v Speaker 3>have come up with their own theories and lack the

532
00:32:29.400 --> 00:32:32.440
<v Speaker 3>ability to step aside for a minute from their theory

533
00:32:33.079 --> 00:32:36.640
<v Speaker 3>and even look into evidence.

534
00:32:36.519 --> 00:32:41.279
<v Speaker 4>Or facts that may hold something that may be true.

535
00:32:41.559 --> 00:32:46.119
<v Speaker 3>And that's something we've always done, is I've always looked

536
00:32:46.119 --> 00:32:46.680
<v Speaker 3>at other.

537
00:32:46.519 --> 00:32:49.559
<v Speaker 4>Theories, looked into other theories given my input.

538
00:32:50.079 --> 00:32:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I know Larry Harnish has had a theory that I

539
00:32:53.240 --> 00:32:55.759
<v Speaker 3>thought when I looked into it, there were a lot

540
00:32:55.799 --> 00:32:58.799
<v Speaker 3>of facets of his theory that I thought that were

541
00:32:59.799 --> 00:33:04.599
<v Speaker 3>very compelling, but again could not be backed by any

542
00:33:04.720 --> 00:33:06.160
<v Speaker 3>concrete evidence.

543
00:33:06.960 --> 00:33:09.519
<v Speaker 4>But that's exactly the reason.

544
00:33:09.759 --> 00:33:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Why I decided and in retirement, met with Alex is

545
00:33:15.279 --> 00:33:19.359
<v Speaker 3>because this is a fascinating case. I'm an investigator by heart,

546
00:33:19.400 --> 00:33:22.559
<v Speaker 3>you can't take it away from me, and who wouldn't

547
00:33:22.559 --> 00:33:25.400
<v Speaker 3>want to hear something that.

548
00:33:27.599 --> 00:33:29.799
<v Speaker 4>At the least will be an interesting story.

549
00:33:30.200 --> 00:33:33.839
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that I was willing to even listen

550
00:33:33.920 --> 00:33:39.079
<v Speaker 3>to Alex is what is so irritating about those naysayers

551
00:33:39.200 --> 00:33:42.200
<v Speaker 3>is they won't even and some of them have publicly

552
00:33:42.240 --> 00:33:43.680
<v Speaker 3>said I won't listen to the podcast.

553
00:33:43.920 --> 00:33:45.640
<v Speaker 4>I won't because of this or because of that.

554
00:33:45.680 --> 00:33:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, that is not You're not an investigator. You don't

555
00:33:50.200 --> 00:33:54.559
<v Speaker 3>want to find the answers. You want to further your.

556
00:33:54.480 --> 00:33:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Theory in the case.

557
00:33:56.039 --> 00:33:59.559
<v Speaker 3>And that's the difference between me and you, and so

558
00:34:00.039 --> 00:34:03.160
<v Speaker 3>let the naysayers come. I don't care because I believe

559
00:34:03.200 --> 00:34:10.239
<v Speaker 3>in in facts backed by evidence, and until I come

560
00:34:10.320 --> 00:34:13.079
<v Speaker 3>up with something in this case that says differently, I

561
00:34:13.159 --> 00:34:14.920
<v Speaker 3>think we're on the right path and.

562
00:34:16.400 --> 00:34:19.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm dedicated to continue forward.

563
00:34:20.800 --> 00:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Killer in the Code Solving the

564
00:34:23.519 --> 00:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Black Dahlia and Zodiac cases. We'll be back with chapter

565
00:34:27.480 --> 00:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>nine soon. This episode was produced by me Michael Connelly

566
00:34:31.760 --> 00:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and edited by Terall Lee Langford. Be sure to subscribe

567
00:34:36.000 --> 00:34:39.199
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast so you'll be alerted when new episodes

568
00:34:39.320 --> 00:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>are available. Thank you for listening.
