Speaker 1: Higher numbers of earthquakes, solar storms, higher costs for electricity
Speaker 1: and water. What are some of the man-made causes behind
Speaker 1: these particular phenomena? What part does geoengineering have in this?
Speaker 1: And what can we separate as separate from fact from
Speaker 1: fiction in these stories? We ask you to call us
Speaker 1: in the theater of the mind at 1-800-848-9222. And let's
Speaker 1: dig right into it. A person we've had many times
Speaker 1: by popular demand. And my email is drsky, drsky, at wabcradio.com.
Speaker 1: He is Dane Whittington, lead researcher administrator for geoengineeringwatch.org, the
Speaker 1: executive producer of the climate engineering documentary, The Dimming, that
Speaker 1: we request each and every one to take a look at.
Speaker 1: To separate fact from fiction as we go about our
Speaker 1: busy daytime lives ruled by the sun, now we welcome
Speaker 1: Dane Whittington to the Dr. Sky Experience. How are you, sir?
Speaker 1: And thank you for being on the show.
Speaker 2: Hello, Dr. Skye. Thank you for the opportunity to continue
Speaker 2: to disseminate data on the dire threat of what's taking
Speaker 2: place in our skies that far too few are aware of,
Speaker 2: and too many are, without investigation, accepting official denial, which
Speaker 2: we would expect with operations that alter the climate, because
Speaker 2: the liability issues are beyond calculation if the public were
Speaker 2: to wake up to these operations being ongoing all over
Speaker 2: the world and understand the degree to which it's disrupted
Speaker 2: global climate systems. And you're familiar with the butterfly effect.
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
Speaker 2: Yes, we are. You have this many hands pushing and
Speaker 2: pulling the sky now becoming not just a physics lab
Speaker 2: for ongoing experiments, but literally a battlefield between opposing interests.
Speaker 2: We can't really call any weather, quote, natural at this point.
Speaker 2: And we believe if the population were to really investigate,
Speaker 2: wake up, understand what's being conducted above their heads without
Speaker 2: their knowledge or consent, that there would be a shockwave
Speaker 2: around the world. You're absolutely right.
Speaker 1: And the butterfly effect, for those that are not familiar
Speaker 1: in a simplistic way, not reading this, the flapping of
Speaker 1: a small butterfly wing, could be eventually the causation of
Speaker 1: many things weather-wise that happen on the Earth and otherwise
Speaker 1: as we talk about it. Dane, exciting to have you
Speaker 1: for the two hours, 1-800-848-9222. We always pose a question
Speaker 1: to the audience, at least to get us in the
Speaker 1: right mindset in our theater of the mind, and it
Speaker 1: is something like this. What of these things that are
Speaker 1: we talking about are of grave concern to you, and
Speaker 1: with our special guest, your questions as to what we
Speaker 1: might be able to do about it. Let's go around
Speaker 1: the other side of the earth, and I'd like to
Speaker 1: have you helping us about the 2026 Nepal floods that
Speaker 1: are so horrific. August the 26th is the dateline Talk
Speaker 1: to us about this, because I've seen the videos. Some
Speaker 1: claim a 5.2 quake, which released a good portion of
Speaker 1: a glacier on a mountain, actually produced that type of
Speaker 1: a seismic event, thus causing the beginning of this horrific flood.
Speaker 1: What say you about that from the geoengineering side that
Speaker 1: you can add to the story?
Speaker 2: First, I want to make clear that there are many
Speaker 2: factors in this equation, of course. We know that we
Speaker 2: have a exceptional thawing of permafrost in high-altitude locations, and
Speaker 2: that's destabilizing strata. We know that. In the case of
Speaker 2: the catastrophic flooding in Nepal, we did have the initial
Speaker 2: statement from experts that there was a 5.2 quake that
Speaker 2: caused the slide. We then shortly afterwards saw a walking
Speaker 2: back of that statement by the USGS, US Geological Survey,
Speaker 2: that then stated the slide caused the quake. That's a
Speaker 2: very significant reading for a seismic event, even from a
Speaker 2: landslide of that size. This is a chicken or the
Speaker 2: egg scenario. And we've seen this in the past, Steve. Steve,
Speaker 2: do you remember when the record flooding in Dubai in 2023,
Speaker 2: we had two years of rain in six hours? Do
Speaker 2: you remember that?
Speaker 1: I do not, and I appreciate you being our guest
Speaker 1: to enlighten us on this. This is something that I
Speaker 1: have no knowledge on, and I'm sure many listeners would
Speaker 1: love to hear the details.
Speaker 2: I want to make a comparison with what just happened
Speaker 2: in Nepal. So initially, again, two years' worth of rain
Speaker 2: in six hours is not a small event. That's multiple
Speaker 2: magnitudes past any baseline. That's a once-in-1,000- or 2,000-year event statistically.
Speaker 2: So initially we had the experts stating that there was
Speaker 2: weather intervention operations happening in the region at the time,
Speaker 2: which they quickly walked backward and then denied. Again, the
Speaker 2: liability issues are off the scale. They certainly don't want
Speaker 2: this out. We have countries all over the globe actively
Speaker 2: or passively participating in climate intervention operations behind the scenes. So...
Speaker 2: It's understandable that they would try to walk this back,
Speaker 2: but we at Geoengineering Watch, we watch the NASA satellite
Speaker 2: feeds very closely, and we captured the day before and
Speaker 2: the day of in the Persian Gulf, right off the
Speaker 2: coast of Dubai, frequency signature patterns on cloud cover, inarguable.
Speaker 2: That's part of climate engineering. Frequency transmissions from installations like HAARP,
Speaker 2: there's about 100 around the globe, they're called ionosphere heaters.
Speaker 2: And we have ground-based frequency transmitters, too. These are patented processes,
Speaker 2: so we're not speculating about this. So is it just
Speaker 2: a coincidence we saw those patterns day before and day of?
Speaker 2: They admitted to it at first, and they walked it back.
Speaker 2: So let's go back to the Nepal scenario. We have
Speaker 2: multiple potential geopolitical conflicts there, friction between Tibet, China, between
Speaker 2: Tibet and even the citizens of Tibet and even Israel.
Speaker 2: There's multiple... potential interest for different geopolitical scenarios. And here's
Speaker 2: where we need to ponder what really happened here. Ionosphere
Speaker 2: heaters like HAARP can transmit millions of watts of power,
Speaker 2: bounce it off in a now-reflective atmosphere because it's being
Speaker 2: saturated with reflective particles. We know that jets are dispersing
Speaker 2: those because we've measured that with the NOAA Flying Lab.
Speaker 2: So we know that the technology exists to bounce this
Speaker 2: frequency signal off off the reflective atmosphere and back down
Speaker 2: in a seismically sensitive or geological unstable zone and create
Speaker 2: seismic activity. We know that technology exists. So can we
Speaker 2: say with any certainty that event is a natural phenomenon?
Speaker 2: The answer is no. And we now have even major
Speaker 2: sources stating they really aren't sure what happened.
Speaker 1: That's amazing, Dane. You know, what's also interesting, if you
Speaker 1: read into the reports here, many people may know this,
Speaker 1: many may not, bodies from this event, Along the Tershuli River,
Speaker 1: when the giant mudslide came down, allegedly, some say, and
Speaker 1: you're correcting us or giving us another option, maybe a 5.2 quake,
Speaker 1: a piece of glacier breaks off, causes this event, at
Speaker 1: least for seismic activity. But, Dane, bodies swept 150 miles away.
Speaker 1: We're talking thousands and thousands of people. And this is
Speaker 1: a fascinating story because what if it were to happen
Speaker 1: right here? And we're going to get into so many
Speaker 1: other things. All lives are important. And especially in that area,
Speaker 1: as you mentioned, lots of tensions between China, Tibet, India,
Speaker 1: through that whole very mountainous region of the world. But
Speaker 1: in quick summation, I mean, what would you think? You've
Speaker 1: given us some potential ideas. In a short version, what
Speaker 1: do you think really was the causation from your side,
Speaker 1: talking about this and studying it?
Speaker 2: We can say this with certainty that, again, back to
Speaker 2: the butterfly effect, no weather phenomenon is natural at this point.
Speaker 2: And even in that scenario... We have to remember it's
Speaker 2: an all-of-the-above equation. We have trashed this planet in the
Speaker 2: geologic blink of an eye. There's no rationally denying that.
Speaker 2: We're not even counting the carbon output of the atmosphere
Speaker 2: from the off-the-charts forest incinerations, but simply the outright, known, calculated,
Speaker 2: daily incineration of carbon fuels into the atmosphere. It's about
Speaker 2: 110 million tons a day. And we're cutting down the forest,
Speaker 2: we're paving the planet, we're poisoning oceans, and we're climate
Speaker 2: engineering on top of that. So how can we consider
Speaker 2: anything natural at this point? And again, when we see
Speaker 2: this initial statement of a seismic event that triggered a
Speaker 2: slide and then immediately walking back of that without any
Speaker 2: really time to investigate, that's suspect to us.