WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.050 --> 00:00:03.690
<v Speaker 1>Higher numbers of earthquakes, solar storms, higher costs for electricity

2
00:00:03.710 --> 00:00:06.809
<v Speaker 1>and water. What are some of the man-made causes behind

3
00:00:07.209 --> 00:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>these particular phenomena? What part does geoengineering have in this?

4
00:00:12.619 --> 00:00:15.220
<v Speaker 1>And what can we separate as separate from fact from

5
00:00:15.279 --> 00:00:18.339
<v Speaker 1>fiction in these stories? We ask you to call us

6
00:00:18.379 --> 00:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in the theater of the mind at 1-800-848-9222. And let's

7
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:25.719
<v Speaker 1>dig right into it. A person we've had many times

8
00:00:25.780 --> 00:00:32.299
<v Speaker 1>by popular demand. And my email is drsky, drsky, at wabcradio.com.

9
00:00:33.000 --> 00:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>He is Dane Whittington, lead researcher administrator for geoengineeringwatch.org, the

10
00:00:38.579 --> 00:00:43.609
<v Speaker 1>executive producer of the climate engineering documentary, The Dimming, that

11
00:00:43.630 --> 00:00:46.670
<v Speaker 1>we request each and every one to take a look at.

12
00:00:47.210 --> 00:00:49.850
<v Speaker 1>To separate fact from fiction as we go about our

13
00:00:49.890 --> 00:00:53.829
<v Speaker 1>busy daytime lives ruled by the sun, now we welcome

14
00:00:53.890 --> 00:00:57.500
<v Speaker 1>Dane Whittington to the Dr. Sky Experience. How are you, sir?

15
00:00:57.520 --> 00:00:58.799
<v Speaker 1>And thank you for being on the show.

16
00:00:59.579 --> 00:01:04.090
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Dr. Skye. Thank you for the opportunity to continue

17
00:01:04.170 --> 00:01:08.890
<v Speaker 2>to disseminate data on the dire threat of what's taking

18
00:01:08.930 --> 00:01:11.379
<v Speaker 2>place in our skies that far too few are aware of,

19
00:01:11.769 --> 00:01:16.689
<v Speaker 2>and too many are, without investigation, accepting official denial, which

20
00:01:16.709 --> 00:01:21.290
<v Speaker 2>we would expect with operations that alter the climate, because

21
00:01:21.329 --> 00:01:24.599
<v Speaker 2>the liability issues are beyond calculation if the public were

22
00:01:24.620 --> 00:01:27.849
<v Speaker 2>to wake up to these operations being ongoing all over

23
00:01:27.890 --> 00:01:30.359
<v Speaker 2>the world and understand the degree to which it's disrupted

24
00:01:30.379 --> 00:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>global climate systems. And you're familiar with the butterfly effect.

25
00:01:35.040 --> 00:01:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

26
00:01:36.459 --> 00:01:40.969
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we are. You have this many hands pushing and

27
00:01:41.060 --> 00:01:45.390
<v Speaker 2>pulling the sky now becoming not just a physics lab

28
00:01:45.409 --> 00:01:49.650
<v Speaker 2>for ongoing experiments, but literally a battlefield between opposing interests.

29
00:01:49.730 --> 00:01:52.329
<v Speaker 2>We can't really call any weather, quote, natural at this point.

30
00:01:53.189 --> 00:01:55.730
<v Speaker 2>And we believe if the population were to really investigate,

31
00:01:55.849 --> 00:01:58.349
<v Speaker 2>wake up, understand what's being conducted above their heads without

32
00:01:58.370 --> 00:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>their knowledge or consent, that there would be a shockwave

33
00:02:01.900 --> 00:02:04.420
<v Speaker 2>around the world. You're absolutely right.

34
00:02:05.620 --> 00:02:07.599
<v Speaker 1>And the butterfly effect, for those that are not familiar

35
00:02:07.640 --> 00:02:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in a simplistic way, not reading this, the flapping of

36
00:02:10.800 --> 00:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a small butterfly wing, could be eventually the causation of

37
00:02:14.620 --> 00:02:17.810
<v Speaker 1>many things weather-wise that happen on the Earth and otherwise

38
00:02:17.849 --> 00:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>as we talk about it. Dane, exciting to have you

39
00:02:20.379 --> 00:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for the two hours, 1-800-848-9222. We always pose a question

40
00:02:25.120 --> 00:02:26.719
<v Speaker 1>to the audience, at least to get us in the

41
00:02:26.759 --> 00:02:29.210
<v Speaker 1>right mindset in our theater of the mind, and it

42
00:02:29.280 --> 00:02:31.789
<v Speaker 1>is something like this. What of these things that are

43
00:02:31.810 --> 00:02:34.830
<v Speaker 1>we talking about are of grave concern to you, and

44
00:02:34.949 --> 00:02:37.669
<v Speaker 1>with our special guest, your questions as to what we

45
00:02:37.710 --> 00:02:39.930
<v Speaker 1>might be able to do about it. Let's go around

46
00:02:39.969 --> 00:02:41.449
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the earth, and I'd like to

47
00:02:41.490 --> 00:02:46.050
<v Speaker 1>have you helping us about the 2026 Nepal floods that

48
00:02:46.090 --> 00:02:49.710
<v Speaker 1>are so horrific. August the 26th is the dateline Talk

49
00:02:49.729 --> 00:02:52.830
<v Speaker 1>to us about this, because I've seen the videos. Some

50
00:02:52.889 --> 00:02:56.370
<v Speaker 1>claim a 5.2 quake, which released a good portion of

51
00:02:56.409 --> 00:03:00.219
<v Speaker 1>a glacier on a mountain, actually produced that type of

52
00:03:00.310 --> 00:03:04.319
<v Speaker 1>a seismic event, thus causing the beginning of this horrific flood.

53
00:03:04.740 --> 00:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>What say you about that from the geoengineering side that

54
00:03:07.879 --> 00:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you can add to the story?

55
00:03:10.539 --> 00:03:13.030
<v Speaker 2>First, I want to make clear that there are many

56
00:03:13.120 --> 00:03:15.870
<v Speaker 2>factors in this equation, of course. We know that we

57
00:03:15.909 --> 00:03:21.550
<v Speaker 2>have a exceptional thawing of permafrost in high-altitude locations, and

58
00:03:21.569 --> 00:03:25.389
<v Speaker 2>that's destabilizing strata. We know that. In the case of

59
00:03:25.449 --> 00:03:31.289
<v Speaker 2>the catastrophic flooding in Nepal, we did have the initial

60
00:03:31.439 --> 00:03:35.180
<v Speaker 2>statement from experts that there was a 5.2 quake that

61
00:03:35.300 --> 00:03:39.020
<v Speaker 2>caused the slide. We then shortly afterwards saw a walking

62
00:03:39.099 --> 00:03:42.180
<v Speaker 2>back of that statement by the USGS, US Geological Survey,

63
00:03:42.939 --> 00:03:45.759
<v Speaker 2>that then stated the slide caused the quake. That's a

64
00:03:45.819 --> 00:03:51.310
<v Speaker 2>very significant reading for a seismic event, even from a

65
00:03:51.949 --> 00:03:54.409
<v Speaker 2>landslide of that size. This is a chicken or the

66
00:03:54.469 --> 00:03:57.569
<v Speaker 2>egg scenario. And we've seen this in the past, Steve. Steve,

67
00:03:57.590 --> 00:04:02.740
<v Speaker 2>do you remember when the record flooding in Dubai in 2023,

68
00:04:02.729 --> 00:04:05.210
<v Speaker 2>we had two years of rain in six hours? Do

69
00:04:05.229 --> 00:04:05.729
<v Speaker 2>you remember that?

70
00:04:06.360 --> 00:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I do not, and I appreciate you being our guest

71
00:04:08.719 --> 00:04:10.740
<v Speaker 1>to enlighten us on this. This is something that I

72
00:04:10.800 --> 00:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have no knowledge on, and I'm sure many listeners would

73
00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:14.219
<v Speaker 1>love to hear the details.

74
00:04:14.699 --> 00:04:17.399
<v Speaker 2>I want to make a comparison with what just happened

75
00:04:17.740 --> 00:04:22.279
<v Speaker 2>in Nepal. So initially, again, two years' worth of rain

76
00:04:22.300 --> 00:04:29.459
<v Speaker 2>in six hours is not a small event. That's multiple

77
00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:33.509
<v Speaker 2>magnitudes past any baseline. That's a once-in-1,000- or 2,000-year event statistically.

78
00:04:36.459 --> 00:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>So initially we had the experts stating that there was

79
00:04:41.339 --> 00:04:44.000
<v Speaker 2>weather intervention operations happening in the region at the time,

80
00:04:44.620 --> 00:04:48.050
<v Speaker 2>which they quickly walked backward and then denied. Again, the

81
00:04:48.089 --> 00:04:51.689
<v Speaker 2>liability issues are off the scale. They certainly don't want

82
00:04:51.730 --> 00:04:54.189
<v Speaker 2>this out. We have countries all over the globe actively

83
00:04:54.230 --> 00:04:59.170
<v Speaker 2>or passively participating in climate intervention operations behind the scenes. So...

84
00:04:59.680 --> 00:05:01.860
<v Speaker 2>It's understandable that they would try to walk this back,

85
00:05:01.899 --> 00:05:04.379
<v Speaker 2>but we at Geoengineering Watch, we watch the NASA satellite

86
00:05:04.430 --> 00:05:08.649
<v Speaker 2>feeds very closely, and we captured the day before and

87
00:05:08.689 --> 00:05:11.110
<v Speaker 2>the day of in the Persian Gulf, right off the

88
00:05:11.189 --> 00:05:19.149
<v Speaker 2>coast of Dubai, frequency signature patterns on cloud cover, inarguable.

89
00:05:19.230 --> 00:05:24.420
<v Speaker 2>That's part of climate engineering. Frequency transmissions from installations like HAARP,

90
00:05:24.439 --> 00:05:27.019
<v Speaker 2>there's about 100 around the globe, they're called ionosphere heaters.

91
00:05:27.550 --> 00:05:30.470
<v Speaker 2>And we have ground-based frequency transmitters, too. These are patented processes,

92
00:05:30.509 --> 00:05:33.509
<v Speaker 2>so we're not speculating about this. So is it just

93
00:05:33.769 --> 00:05:36.490
<v Speaker 2>a coincidence we saw those patterns day before and day of?

94
00:05:36.939 --> 00:05:38.740
<v Speaker 2>They admitted to it at first, and they walked it back.

95
00:05:38.759 --> 00:05:42.600
<v Speaker 2>So let's go back to the Nepal scenario. We have

96
00:05:42.660 --> 00:05:50.860
<v Speaker 2>multiple potential geopolitical conflicts there, friction between Tibet, China, between

97
00:05:50.959 --> 00:05:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Tibet and even the citizens of Tibet and even Israel.

98
00:05:54.660 --> 00:06:00.110
<v Speaker 2>There's multiple... potential interest for different geopolitical scenarios. And here's

99
00:06:00.149 --> 00:06:04.009
<v Speaker 2>where we need to ponder what really happened here. Ionosphere

100
00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:08.279
<v Speaker 2>heaters like HAARP can transmit millions of watts of power,

101
00:06:09.199 --> 00:06:12.319
<v Speaker 2>bounce it off in a now-reflective atmosphere because it's being

102
00:06:12.360 --> 00:06:16.100
<v Speaker 2>saturated with reflective particles. We know that jets are dispersing

103
00:06:16.120 --> 00:06:18.879
<v Speaker 2>those because we've measured that with the NOAA Flying Lab.

104
00:06:19.040 --> 00:06:22.720
<v Speaker 2>So we know that the technology exists to bounce this

105
00:06:22.759 --> 00:06:26.149
<v Speaker 2>frequency signal off off the reflective atmosphere and back down

106
00:06:26.230 --> 00:06:30.949
<v Speaker 2>in a seismically sensitive or geological unstable zone and create

107
00:06:30.990 --> 00:06:35.629
<v Speaker 2>seismic activity. We know that technology exists. So can we

108
00:06:35.939 --> 00:06:39.500
<v Speaker 2>say with any certainty that event is a natural phenomenon?

109
00:06:39.519 --> 00:06:41.899
<v Speaker 2>The answer is no. And we now have even major

110
00:06:41.939 --> 00:06:44.620
<v Speaker 2>sources stating they really aren't sure what happened.

111
00:06:45.240 --> 00:06:48.019
<v Speaker 1>That's amazing, Dane. You know, what's also interesting, if you

112
00:06:48.079 --> 00:06:50.370
<v Speaker 1>read into the reports here, many people may know this,

113
00:06:50.449 --> 00:06:54.579
<v Speaker 1>many may not, bodies from this event, Along the Tershuli River,

114
00:06:55.060 --> 00:06:58.079
<v Speaker 1>when the giant mudslide came down, allegedly, some say, and

115
00:06:58.100 --> 00:07:02.079
<v Speaker 1>you're correcting us or giving us another option, maybe a 5.2 quake,

116
00:07:02.139 --> 00:07:05.550
<v Speaker 1>a piece of glacier breaks off, causes this event, at

117
00:07:05.579 --> 00:07:10.470
<v Speaker 1>least for seismic activity. But, Dane, bodies swept 150 miles away.

118
00:07:11.009 --> 00:07:14.149
<v Speaker 1>We're talking thousands and thousands of people. And this is

119
00:07:14.189 --> 00:07:17.170
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating story because what if it were to happen

120
00:07:17.230 --> 00:07:18.889
<v Speaker 1>right here? And we're going to get into so many

121
00:07:18.910 --> 00:07:22.990
<v Speaker 1>other things. All lives are important. And especially in that area,

122
00:07:23.029 --> 00:07:27.290
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, lots of tensions between China, Tibet, India,

123
00:07:27.370 --> 00:07:30.350
<v Speaker 1>through that whole very mountainous region of the world. But

124
00:07:30.370 --> 00:07:32.750
<v Speaker 1>in quick summation, I mean, what would you think? You've

125
00:07:32.790 --> 00:07:36.430
<v Speaker 1>given us some potential ideas. In a short version, what

126
00:07:36.449 --> 00:07:38.769
<v Speaker 1>do you think really was the causation from your side,

127
00:07:38.949 --> 00:07:40.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about this and studying it?

128
00:07:41.709 --> 00:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>We can say this with certainty that, again, back to

129
00:07:44.019 --> 00:07:48.220
<v Speaker 2>the butterfly effect, no weather phenomenon is natural at this point.

130
00:07:48.579 --> 00:07:51.970
<v Speaker 2>And even in that scenario... We have to remember it's

131
00:07:52.009 --> 00:07:55.889
<v Speaker 2>an all-of-the-above equation. We have trashed this planet in the

132
00:07:55.949 --> 00:07:58.579
<v Speaker 2>geologic blink of an eye. There's no rationally denying that.

133
00:07:58.620 --> 00:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>We're not even counting the carbon output of the atmosphere

134
00:08:02.220 --> 00:08:09.279
<v Speaker 2>from the off-the-charts forest incinerations, but simply the outright, known, calculated,

135
00:08:09.420 --> 00:08:12.589
<v Speaker 2>daily incineration of carbon fuels into the atmosphere. It's about

136
00:08:12.589 --> 00:08:17.250
<v Speaker 2>110 million tons a day. And we're cutting down the forest,

137
00:08:17.259 --> 00:08:20.089
<v Speaker 2>we're paving the planet, we're poisoning oceans, and we're climate

138
00:08:20.110 --> 00:08:22.949
<v Speaker 2>engineering on top of that. So how can we consider

139
00:08:22.990 --> 00:08:26.319
<v Speaker 2>anything natural at this point? And again, when we see

140
00:08:26.360 --> 00:08:32.190
<v Speaker 2>this initial statement of a seismic event that triggered a

141
00:08:32.710 --> 00:08:35.049
<v Speaker 2>slide and then immediately walking back of that without any

142
00:08:35.090 --> 00:08:37.710
<v Speaker 2>really time to investigate, that's suspect to us.