Speaker 1: Imagine waking up, you're completely paralyzed, totally conscious, but well
terrified in your own home. That's exactly what Charmaine Dasario
sayj described happening to her. This is back in two
thousand and eight in Hove, England. But the paralysis, horrifying
as it is, wasn't even the main event. It was
what she saw staring down at her, a reptilian humanoid chilling.
Speaker 2: And the account doesn't stop there, does it, not at all?
Speaker 1: She claims she was taken transported somewhere, not up into
the sky like you might expect, but deep underground, into
some kind of cave system, and there, surrounded by these beings,
some sort of procedure was performed on her. And here's
the bit that's just almost unbelievable. She looked down, she says,
and watched her own skin shifting, morphing into scales, a
full physical transformation, even growing a tail.
Speaker 2: Wow. I mean that kind of highly personal, deeply visceral account.
It throws it straight into the deep end, doesn't it.
Regarding human origins, Because if you takes charmain story, or
you know, the thousands of others like it as potentially factual, well,
they start to build a case for one of the
most radical claims about our history, the idea that maybe
all modern humans are in some way byproducts of alien genetic.
Speaker 1: Manipulation, not just a one off event. Then.
Speaker 2: No, the sources we're diving into today suggest this wasn't
like a single intervention way back when, it's potentially a systematic,
maybe even ongoing process, different et races, they claim, targeting
specific human groups across.
Speaker 1: History, treating us like a long term experiment.
Speaker 2: Essentially, Yes, our genetics are bodies a canvas from millennial
long experimentation.
Speaker 1: That just fundamentally flips the script on human history, doesn't it. It
suggests our ancestry isn't this neat evolutionary ladder exactly.
Speaker 2: It's messy, maybe interrupted, profoundly complex, right, and potentially involves
outside interference.
Speaker 1: So to try and get our heads around this massive claim,
we're digging into a whole range of sources today, personal
accounts like Shermain's yes, but also unexpected data from DNA analysis,
ancient myths, strange artifacts. Right.
Speaker 2: The mission is to follow these frankly unsettling threads and
see what kind of evidence actually exists for this non
terrestrial origin idea.
Speaker 1: We're definitely stepping outside the comfort zone of standard history
and biology here.
Speaker 2: We have to we're asking the question, what if those
foundational stories about how we developed are well incomplete or
just plain wrong. What if our rapid advancement wasn't entirely
self driven?
Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack this.
Speaker 2: So first things first, if we entertain this possibility, this
long term genetic project, you have to ask why, what's
the motivation?
Speaker 1: Good point, Why would advanced ets bother tinkering with us
on this little blue planet?
Speaker 2: Well, Linda Moulton Howe, who's a major voice in this area,
she suggests a pretty grim, very pragmatic reason. Territorial wars
fought way beyond Earth.
Speaker 1: Of course, so Earth is just a battleground or a resource.
Speaker 2: Kind of both. Into her research, she argues Earth as
a zone of conflict, and these conflicts use populations of
created and manipulated life.
Speaker 1: And that includes us humans and animals.
Speaker 2: Explicitly, that's the theory. It frames us as maybe proxies, bioresources,
perhaps even unwitting soldiers in some vast interstellar dispute over
territory we don't even know exists.
Speaker 1: Wow, that's cold. It shifts the whole alien agenda from
curiosity or benevolence to something intensely strategic, our genes as
assets in a war.
Speaker 2: Precisely, and if this has been going on for millennia,
you expect to find echoes right in our oldest stories.
Makes sense, and Sabina Maglioko, a fullklorist, points out this
almost universal theme you find everywhere powerful otherworldly beings, gods, demons,
whatever you call them, mating with humans.
Speaker 1: You see that in Greek myths, Mesopotamian texts.
Speaker 2: Exactly all over the place, tribal legends too. The common
thread is always these non human powerful entities having well
literal sexual encounters with mortals.
Speaker 1: Which often results in hybrid offspring, right, the heroes, demigods,
founders of dynasties.
Speaker 2: Yes, and this is where people like Georgia at Suculos
urge us to maybe drop the academic safety inknit of symbolism.
Speaker 1: Ah, the idea that's all just metaphor for cultural exchange
or natural events.
Speaker 2: Right, We're kind of trained to default to that. But
Suculo says, what if you take these texts literally, eliminate
the suggested symbolism. Suddenly they're not metaphors. They might be
read as historical records.
Speaker 1: Records of actual visitation, interaction and interbreeding with beings we'd
now call extraterrestrial.
Speaker 2: That's the interpretation, yes, But to move beyond myth, you
need physical evidence, something tangible.
Speaker 1: Which brings us to the Peter Curie hair sample. This
is a really famous case in abduction research, isn't it.
Speaker 2: It is mainly because it left behind trace evidence. This
happened in Sydney, Australia, July nineteen ninety two. Okay Curry
woke up in that classic sleep paralysis state, weight on him,
couldn't move, but fully conscious, and as his eyes adjusted,
he saw a female figure straddling him, and he described
her very vividly milky white skin color, eyes two to
three times larger than human, protruding keek bones, pointy chin,
a very distinct look.
Speaker 1: And then she just vanished, vanished.
Speaker 2: But left something behind, a single blonde hair on his skin.
Speaker 1: Wow. And he collected it.
Speaker 2: He did carefully, and eventually it went to an independent
genealogy lab, analyzed by a biochemist named Horace Drew.
Speaker 1: And what did they find?
Speaker 2: Well, even the physical properties were weird from the get go.
Drew described the hair as optically clear like nylon fishing.
Speaker 1: Line, optically clear like transparent.
Speaker 2: Apparently so, which is really unusual human hair. Whatever. The
color has pigments melanin, right, it makes it opaque or
at least translucent, not perfectly clear like glass or plastic.
Speaker 1: Okay, that strange on its own defies normal human biology.
Speaker 2: But the real bombshell was the DNA. Usually a single
hair strand from one person has a consistent DNA signature,
makes sense this sample, though it showed an impossible mosaic.
In the shaft, they found a very rare Chinese lineage,
like found in only point one percent to one percent
of ethnic Chinese people.
Speaker 1: Okay, very specific.
Speaker 2: But then testing another part of the same strand, they
found it totally different lineage, blue eyed, Celtic, light skinned,
consistent with Western European heritage.
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, the same strand of hair had DNA
from a rare Chinese group and from a European group.
How is that not just contamination?
Speaker 2: That's the critical question, right eh? And why the analysis
was so specific about where the DNA was found. If
it was just surface contamination, you'd expect it well on
the surface right, but this was reported as being in
the hair shaft itself, suggesting it grew that way biologically.
This specific genetic mix a rare East Asian mitochondrial marker
and a Northern European marker in the same hair filament,
it just doesn't happen with normal human inheritance.
Speaker 1: It's not like having parents from different backs. This is
like two distinct lineages expressed simultaneously in one biological structure exactly.
Speaker 2: It points towards some kind of genetic chimerism or hybridization
that frankly shouldn't exist in modern Homo sapiens.
Speaker 1: So theorists see this unique DNA plus the weird physical
clarity of the hair.
Speaker 2: As potentially undeniable proof, tangible evidence of human et interbreeding,
a biological entity with non human genetics interacting.
Speaker 1: With us, and that kind of evidence, that biological signature
that doesn't quite fit. It gets even more interesting when
you put it next to our own evolutionary timeline, doesn't it.
Speaker 2: It gains enormous weight. Yeah, because for decades we had
that clean linear model of human evolution, you know, the
diagram one hominid smoothly leading to the next.
Speaker 1: The classic textbook image, but that.
Speaker 2: Got completely upended. Around twenty ten, researchers led by Sante
Beebo at the Max Planck Institute made a stunning announcement.
Speaker 1: What was it?
Speaker 2: They found that early modern humans didn't just coexist with enderthals,
they actively mated with them. But more than that, their
findings strongly suggested interbreeding with another completely unidentified species.
Speaker 1: Unidentified meaning not ne Anerthal, not Denisovin, not us exactly.
Speaker 2: They found these archaic DNA sequences in modern human genomes
that they just couldn't trace back to any known human
or proto human group. The media jumped on it, calling
it the mystery species.
Speaker 1: So evolution wasn't a neat ladder at all. It was
more like a genetic melting pod, a.
Speaker 2: Genetic free for all, as you put it earlier, multiple
groups mixing in ways we hadn't realized.
Speaker 1: But the real kicker, the thing that makes you pause,
is the speed of change in our own genome. More recently, ah.
Speaker 2: Yes, doctor John Hawks's work University Wisconsin. He did this
huge analysis looking at human DNA changes over thousands of years.
Speaker 1: And what he found was well, pretty staggering.
Speaker 2: Absolutely between roughly three thousand BC and today, So the
last five thousand years or so, human DNA has changed
by a massive seven percent.
Speaker 1: That sounds like a huge shift for a whole species
in such a short evolutionary timeframe.
Speaker 2: It is huge. It's not minor tweaking. It's a significant
structural overhaul of the species blueprint. And it's the rate
that baffles conventional thinking. Doctor Hawks calculated that our DNA
evolved one hundred times faster in the last five thousand
years than in any previous five thousand year period.
Speaker 1: One hundred times faster. That's insane. It completely blows up
the idea of slow gradual evolution driven by environment.
Speaker 2: It does it forces you to ask, what.
Speaker 1: On Earth happened around three thousand BC. What monumental event
could possibly trigger a seven percent structural shift across the
entire human species and accelerate evolution by a factor of
one hundred.
Speaker 2: What were the biological results of that change, even increased intelligence,
disease resistance, something else entirely. The sources we're looking at
suggest it had to be an external catalyst.
Speaker 1: And the ancient astronaut theory offers a direct explanation.
Speaker 2: It does. They argued that this accelerated evolution. This one
hundred x speed boost is the direct result of widespread
into breeding with extraterrestrial humans.
Speaker 1: Beings who were maybe more genetically advanced.
Speaker 2: That's the idea they introduced new, perhaps dominant genetic sequences
into the human population during that specific timeframe, sparking this
sudden species wide genetic revolution.
Speaker 1: So it ties the old myths about God's mating with
humans directly to the physical changes we see in our DNA, and.
Speaker 2: It reframes that mystery species. The max Plank Institute found
maybe it wasn't just another lost homitted relative.
Speaker 1: But the actual biological signature of an off world civilization
embedded in our own genes.
Speaker 2: Which takes the theory even further to the claim that
this influence isn't just in the gaps, it's actively encoded,
like a hidden message or instruction manual planted in our
DNA long ago.
Speaker 1: This brings us to that fascinating research out of Kazakhstan
in twenty thirteen Vladimir Scherbach a mathematician and Maximikukov, an astrobiologist.
Speaker 2: Right, and they weren't initially looking for aliens, were they.
They were doing rigorous mathematical analysis of the human genome.
Speaker 1: Exactly looking for structure, and they concluded there is a
complex hidden code embedded within our DNA. They called it
an extraterrestrial stamp.
Speaker 2: Extraterrestrial stamp, what do they mean by that?
Speaker 1: They found precise mathematical patterns, an unknown symbolic language they
termed it. It didn't look random. It functioned like a
deliberately inserted mathematical code, too structured, too organized to be
like just an evolutionary accident.
Speaker 2: Okay, structure is one thing, But how unlikely did they
think it was?
Speaker 1: That's the mind blowing part. They calculated the odds of
this specific complex mathematical pattern appearing randomly nine times in
our genetic code, and the number one in ten trillion
one intentionally.
Speaker 2: Statistically, that's basically impossible in a random universe. Right, it
means it's far more likely to be designed.
Speaker 1: That's the argument for ancient astronaut theorists. This bypasses the
need for crashed ships or artifacts. The proof, they say,
is written into life itself. The sheer improbability screams intelligent design.
Speaker 2: Which implies our DNA wasn't just influenced by outside forces.
Speaker 1: This is deliberately manipulated by some advanced intelligence way back when,
possibly through what they called an artificial mutation of our genes.
Speaker 2: Okay, that concept our complexity resulting from a kind of
technological insertion. That leads to the really radical idea, the
organic robot concept. Explain that, well, if our intelligence, our
accelerated evolution, wasn't purely natural selection, but came via an
artificial maybe technological update to our genes. M hm, then
what are we really programmed? In effect? Yeah, organic robots
programmed by an earlier, highly advanced intelligence. The original Seating
civilizations are the ultimate programmers. They engineered our sentience, maybe
wrote our initial software. That's a heavy thought, And what's
really thought provoking is how this theory is then used
to explain modern human behavior. It argues that our intense drive,
our almost compulsive need to create and merge with technology, AI, cybernetics,
digital life. It's not just curiosity, it's the program running.
It's a compulsion. Yes, we're continuing the agenda. The original
programmer started our drive to merge with tech or create
ever more advanced AI. It stems from the genetic template
they left us. We have to innovate technologically because our
core being is founded on an artificial template.
Speaker 1: So we're not just inventing AI, we're executing ancient code.
That's incredibly meta.
Speaker 2: Essentially, Yeah, the programming runs deep. Wow.
Speaker 1: Okay, that idea that our biggest ambitions might just be
software execution is mind bending. And speaking of codes and blueprints,
there's a number that keeps popping up, isn't there? Both
in genetics and weirdly in theology, the number three.
Speaker 2: It's a remarkable convergence.
Speaker 1: Let's start with the theology. In Christianity, for instance, you
have the Holy Trinity, Father's Son, Holy Spirit. It's central,
but it's also a kind of mathematical puzzle, right, how
can one entity be three distinct persons?
Speaker 2: For many believers it's purely a matter of faith, a
divine mystery you don't necessarily try to solve logically.
Speaker 1: But the theory we're exploring suggests this isn't just spiritual symbolism.
It might be rooted in the actual physical reality of
our genetic blueprint exactly.
Speaker 2: Now, jump from ancient theology to nineteen sixty six Huntington,
New York, a massive scientific breakthrough. Scientists finally decipher the
genetic code.
Speaker 1: The moment we learn the language of life itself, and
what they found was.
Speaker 2: This universal operating system DNA codes. The instructions for building
life are always found in clusters of three molecule combinations.
Speaker 1: They called them codons or triplets.
Speaker 2: Right, they had to figure out if the instructions were
read one letter at a time or in pairs or threes.
It was definitively proven the genetic language is read in threes.
Speaker 1: So it doesn't matter if you're a human, a fungus,
a whale. The number three is the fundamental rule for
how DNA works. It's the core mechanism for life on Earth.
Speaker 2: So if you connect the dots, the implication is pretty profound.
Speaker 1: Does the triune native described in theology, reflected in the
universal triplet structure of our DNA suggest a link, a
biological connection between our genetic blueprint and whatever divine or
extraterrestrial force initiated life.
Speaker 2: That's the question it raises. If three is the signature
of the creator and it's embedded at the deepest level
of our biological language, it suggests we were designed using
that signature. The religious concepts might be reflections of the
creator's actual coding mechanism.
Speaker 1: Okay, moving from these invisible codes inside us, let's talk
about very visible, very controversial evidence dug up from the ground,
the physical remains that seem to defy standard human anatomy.
I'm talking about the elongated.
Speaker 2: Skulls right first stop er In Southeaster Roc. Nineteen twenty seven,
the British archaeologist Leonard Woolley discovered the royal cemetery.
Speaker 1: There, including Queen Pooabe Yes, and.
Speaker 2: Her remains, along with others found nearby, reportedly had unusually
large elongated skulls. It's a feature sometimes seen or claimed
for certain Egyptian pharaohs, and also Peruvian.
Speaker 1: Mummies, and for ancient astronaut theorists. This is huge. Puabi
was a First dynasty queen or priestess. That means she
lived really close in time to the supposed original reign
of the Unnaki.
Speaker 2: The beings often cited as the genetic engineers of humanity
in Sumerian texts.
Speaker 1: Exactly so, the skull shape suggests you might have been
a hybrid, maybe not full in anachi, but closer to
that original bloodline.
Speaker 2: That's the interpretation, and the specific shape matters too. David
Childers points out this large, elongated, almost cone head shape.
It's supposedly how the inanachi are described in ancient texts
and depicted on.
Speaker 1: Tablets, So these royal remains are seen as physical evidence
linking human power structures back to a non human, possibly
et physical presence.
Speaker 2: But maybe the most abundant and certainly perplexing evidence comes
from Peru, the Paracus region. Starting also in nineteen twenty seven,
archaeologist Julio Tello found hundreds of these strange elongated skulls.
They date from around eight hundred BC to one hundred BC.
Speaker 1: Now mainstream science has an explanation for this, right, cranial deformation.
Head binding.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's a known practice in various ancient cultures. You
wrap an infant soft skull tightly with boards or cloth
to deliberately change its shape, often done to imitate revered
visitors or gods perhaps.
Speaker 1: But researchers like brain Forster, who studied these skulls extensively,
argue that some of the process skulls show anomalies that
go way beyond what simple headbinding can achieve.
Speaker 2: This is where the specific biology gets crucial. Well, yeah,
many skulls could be explained by deformation. Forceter estimates, about
five percent are just too complex in shape and size
for that to be the sole explanation.
Speaker 1: Let's look at the specifics paracae. Skull number forty four.
Speaker 2: Skull forty four is a standout anomaly. First weight, it's
about two point eight pounds. That's roughly twenty five percent
heavier than an average adult male skull.
Speaker 1: Heavier binding would make it heavier exactly.
Speaker 2: And then there's cranial capacity. The volume inside skull forty
four measured around fifteen hundred cubic centimeters. That's twenty percent
larger than the average modern human capacity. Again, you can
squish a skull's shape, but you can't significantly increase his
internal volume words mass just by wrapping it right.
Speaker 1: Deformation just reshapes the existing volume. It doesn't add more
space or bone density like that. But the really killer anomaly,
the one that's hard to explain away.
Speaker 2: Is the skull's actual structure. Many parakhas skulls, including skull
forty four, are missing the sagital suture.
Speaker 1: Okay, pause there, explain why that's so important.
Speaker 2: The sagital suture is the main joint running along the
top of your skull, connecting the two big parietal bones.
It's a fundamental universal feature in all known human skulls,
from the enfols right up to US Homo sapiens. It
allows the skull to grow as the brain develops.
Speaker 1: So if a skull is missing that suture.
Speaker 2: It's fundamentally different. It's not just a deformed human skull.
It suggests a different biological blueprint altogether. You can bind
a skull reshape it, but you can't make a major
anatomical joint simply vanish. It implies these beings weren't even
human enough to share That basic cranial structure.
Speaker 1: Points to genetic difference, not just cultural practice.
Speaker 2: And there's more. These skulls often have much larger eye
sockets than humans, two small holes foramina in the back,
possibly for nerves or blood flow, and very robust jaws,
all features inconsistent with typical human variation.
Speaker 1: And didn't they do DNA testing on skull forty four?
Speaker 2: They did back in twenty fourteen, and the results were
controversial but intriguing. The analysis found segments of DNA that
reportedly did not match anything known to be human, couldn't
be classified as Neanderthal, Denesavin, or any known Homo sapiens line.
Speaker 1: So the conclusion drawn from all that, the weight, the volume,
the missing suture, the DNA is.
Speaker 2: Wide that the Paracus people, or at least some of
them represented by these skulls, might have been an ancient
bloodline related to us, Yes, but demonstrably not us. A
distinct branch, maybe a hybrid lineage with genetic and physical
features that challenge our understanding of human evolution.
Speaker 1: Providing potentially concrete DNA testable evidence that non standard human
types existed along side our ancestors.
Speaker 2: So we have the genetics, the myths, the skeletons. Now
let's pivot to objects, non biological artifacts that some theorists
believe were designed to carry forward this hidden knowledge. The
crystal skulls.
Speaker 1: Ah, Yes, the crystal skulls. They're wrapped in legend, aren't
they central to prophecies, especially from meso America?
Speaker 2: That's right. The lure often talks about them holding great knowledge,
immense wisdom, and that their power could be used to
avert catastrophe, especially if all thirteen authentic skulls were brought together.
Many believe twelve have already been.
Speaker 1: Found well there's a huge problem with dating them, isn't.
Speaker 2: There a massive one? Skeptics often dismiss them as modern fakes,
partly because scientifically, you can't carbon date quartz. Crystal quartz
is pure silicon dioxide. It contains no carbon, no radioactive
elements that decay at a known rate, so standard dating
methods are useless. You literally can't help they're five hundred
years old or fifteen thousand years old using those techniques.
Speaker 1: That technical hurdle is key because mainstream science often looks
at tool marks and jumps to modern tools, therefore modern fake, right.
Speaker 2: But researchers like Chris Morten push back on that. They
point out that ancient cultures like the Maya did have
sophisticated grinding and polishing techniques using sand water, maybe even
rudimentary wheels, working with crystal over potentially decades or centuries.
Speaker 1: So just seeing a tool mark doesn't automatically mean it's
a nineteenth century hoax. The sheer effort involved in carving
hard courts with ancient tools suggests these were incredibly important,
deliberate creations.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and to understand their potential purpose, we could look
at modern tech. Think about Atachi in Japan. Back in
twenty twelve, they unveiled this amazing data storage device, quartz
glass chip exactly, a chip made of quartz glass that
can store incode of digital information basically forever, for millions
of years.
Speaker 1: How do they do that?
Speaker 2: They use high powered lasers to burn tiny dots, ones
and zeros binary code directly into the crystal structure. It's
like a time capsule for data.
Speaker 1: Okay, so that's incredible longevity. How does that relate to
the ancient skulls.
Speaker 2: Well, ancient astronaut theorists connect the dots. If crystal is
the ultimate long term storage medium today, capable of holding
information for eons, why did ancient civilizations, perhaps guided by ets,
choose crystal to make these complex skull objects.
Speaker 1: The suggestion being they were made of crystal specifically to
contain information knowledge.
Speaker 2: That's the hypothesis. But then you hit the access problem.
As Giorgio Suclos often points out, even with that modern
Natachi chip, you need the right reader, the specific device
to decode that million year old data.
Speaker 1: So with the ancient crystal skulls, we might just lack
the key, the technology, the on button needed to access
whatever vast knowledge might be stored inside. Maybe it's not
even binary data.
Speaker 2: Precisely, which leads to the most provocative ideas stemming from
those prophecies, the motherboard theory.
Speaker 1: Why did the legends insist all the skulls need to
be brought together?
Speaker 2: The theory suggests each skull isn't just a standalone library.
It's more like an individual computer chip, a component. They
need to be assembled, perhaps in a specific configuration.
Speaker 1: To activate some kind of extraterrestrial motherboard, a master device
that unlocks the combined knowledge.
Speaker 2: That's the concept. It perfectly merges ancient mythology with high
tech thinking. The prophecies about finding the last skull to
gain great wisdom suddenly sound like completing an electrical circuit.
Speaker 1: The ultimate knowledge isn't mystical energy, it's encoded data thousands
of years old, waiting for the final piece to complete
the system, maybe executing that ancient program we talked about earlier.
Speaker 2: It certainly paints a picture where the whole planet might
have these activation points just waiting for the right conditions
or perhaps the right evolved species yeah, to finally complete
the circuit.
Speaker 1: So let's try and tie this all together. What does
it all mean We've covered a really challenging range of
material here today.
Speaker 2: We really have.
Speaker 1: We started with those intense personal accounts. The physical claims
of interbreeding may be backed up by that strange Kori
hair sample with its impossible DNA.
Speaker 2: Then we look at the sheer speed, that one hundred
fold acceleration in human DNA evolution over the last five
thousand years, suggesting some kind of major intervention around three
thousand BC.
Speaker 1: We dove right down to the molecular level, that hidden
mathematical code Schuurbach and Makukov found in our genome, that
extraterrestrial stamp with its one in ten trillion probability.
Speaker 2: Move back to the macro level with the physical evidence
the elongated skulls defying human anatomy, especially the missing sagital
suture in the Paraka skulls, a profound biological mystery.
Speaker 1: And finally we considered the crystal skulls not just artifacts,
but potentially ancient high tech data storage devices made of quartz,
designed to last for ages, just waiting for the right key.
Speaker 2: When you look at all these threads together, what stands
out is this consistent suggestion of a coordinated long term agenda.
This doesn't feel like a series of random accidents.
Speaker 1: No, the sources imply it was intentional, a seeding, a manipulation,
maybe even a programming of humanity that stretches from way
back in our history right up to today, influencing our biology,
our evolution, maybe even our current drive towards technology and AI.
Speaker 2: It really forces you to rethink the origins of our
deepest beliefs, doesn't it?
Speaker 1: Absolutely If those ancient prophecies about a return didn't originate
with gods or spirits, but maybe with literal extraterrestrials promising
to come back and check on their project. And if
traditional stories sometimes say the army of the missile will
rise up not from the heavens but from inner Earth,
those same kinds of underground places charmain described to eventually
dominate the surface world.
Speaker 2: Well, that raises a pretty unsettling final thought, doesn't it?
Speaker 1: It does? Does it suggest that some massive future event,
maybe finding that last crystal skull, maybe a simultaneous revelation
of hidden et life subterranean or otherwise, isn't just myth?
Could it be a scenario already meticulously encoded in our
oldest stories and perhaps most profoundly waiting for activation within
our very genes.
Speaker 2: What if our ultimate destiny isn't entirely up to us.
What if it's just the final execution of the original program.