1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:04,799
Speaker 1: Imagine waking up, you're completely paralyzed, totally conscious, but well

2
00:00:04,960 --> 00:00:08,839
terrified in your own home. That's exactly what Charmaine Dasario

3
00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:11,359
sayj described happening to her. This is back in two

4
00:00:11,400 --> 00:00:15,480
thousand and eight in Hove, England. But the paralysis, horrifying

5
00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:18,160
as it is, wasn't even the main event. It was

6
00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:23,079
what she saw staring down at her, a reptilian humanoid chilling.

7
00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:25,480
Speaker 2: And the account doesn't stop there, does it, not at all?

8
00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:29,719
Speaker 1: She claims she was taken transported somewhere, not up into

9
00:00:29,760 --> 00:00:33,359
the sky like you might expect, but deep underground, into

10
00:00:33,399 --> 00:00:37,240
some kind of cave system, and there, surrounded by these beings,

11
00:00:37,359 --> 00:00:40,159
some sort of procedure was performed on her. And here's

12
00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:44,280
the bit that's just almost unbelievable. She looked down, she says,

13
00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:48,679
and watched her own skin shifting, morphing into scales, a

14
00:00:48,719 --> 00:00:51,200
full physical transformation, even growing a tail.

15
00:00:51,399 --> 00:00:55,200
Speaker 2: Wow. I mean that kind of highly personal, deeply visceral account.

16
00:00:55,920 --> 00:00:57,640
It throws it straight into the deep end, doesn't it.

17
00:00:58,119 --> 00:01:01,640
Regarding human origins, Because if you takes charmain story, or

18
00:01:01,759 --> 00:01:06,000
you know, the thousands of others like it as potentially factual, well,

19
00:01:06,120 --> 00:01:07,599
they start to build a case for one of the

20
00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:10,959
most radical claims about our history, the idea that maybe

21
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:16,280
all modern humans are in some way byproducts of alien genetic.

22
00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:18,079
Speaker 1: Manipulation, not just a one off event. Then.

23
00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:21,879
Speaker 2: No, the sources we're diving into today suggest this wasn't

24
00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:25,799
like a single intervention way back when, it's potentially a systematic,

25
00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:30,640
maybe even ongoing process, different et races, they claim, targeting

26
00:01:30,680 --> 00:01:32,719
specific human groups across.

27
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:36,000
Speaker 1: History, treating us like a long term experiment.

28
00:01:36,159 --> 00:01:40,000
Speaker 2: Essentially, Yes, our genetics are bodies a canvas from millennial

29
00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:41,719
long experimentation.

30
00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:44,159
Speaker 1: That just fundamentally flips the script on human history, doesn't it. It

31
00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:47,840
suggests our ancestry isn't this neat evolutionary ladder exactly.

32
00:01:47,959 --> 00:01:53,000
Speaker 2: It's messy, maybe interrupted, profoundly complex, right, and potentially involves

33
00:01:53,040 --> 00:01:54,120
outside interference.

34
00:01:54,239 --> 00:01:56,319
Speaker 1: So to try and get our heads around this massive claim,

35
00:01:56,359 --> 00:01:58,799
we're digging into a whole range of sources today, personal

36
00:01:58,840 --> 00:02:03,799
accounts like Shermain's yes, but also unexpected data from DNA analysis,

37
00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:06,359
ancient myths, strange artifacts. Right.

38
00:02:06,640 --> 00:02:11,280
Speaker 2: The mission is to follow these frankly unsettling threads and

39
00:02:11,360 --> 00:02:14,199
see what kind of evidence actually exists for this non

40
00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:15,639
terrestrial origin idea.

41
00:02:15,719 --> 00:02:18,800
Speaker 1: We're definitely stepping outside the comfort zone of standard history

42
00:02:18,800 --> 00:02:19,639
and biology here.

43
00:02:19,719 --> 00:02:22,080
Speaker 2: We have to we're asking the question, what if those

44
00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:27,520
foundational stories about how we developed are well incomplete or

45
00:02:27,599 --> 00:02:31,159
just plain wrong. What if our rapid advancement wasn't entirely

46
00:02:31,280 --> 00:02:31,960
self driven?

47
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:33,000
Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack this.

48
00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:37,439
Speaker 2: So first things first, if we entertain this possibility, this

49
00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:40,960
long term genetic project, you have to ask why, what's

50
00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:41,639
the motivation?

51
00:02:41,919 --> 00:02:45,719
Speaker 1: Good point, Why would advanced ets bother tinkering with us

52
00:02:45,759 --> 00:02:46,960
on this little blue planet?

53
00:02:47,039 --> 00:02:49,400
Speaker 2: Well, Linda Moulton Howe, who's a major voice in this area,

54
00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:53,800
she suggests a pretty grim, very pragmatic reason. Territorial wars

55
00:02:54,080 --> 00:02:55,400
fought way beyond Earth.

56
00:02:55,159 --> 00:02:59,240
Speaker 1: Of course, so Earth is just a battleground or a resource.

57
00:02:58,960 --> 00:03:01,560
Speaker 2: Kind of both. Into her research, she argues Earth as

58
00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:04,800
a zone of conflict, and these conflicts use populations of

59
00:03:05,719 --> 00:03:07,400
created and manipulated life.

60
00:03:07,199 --> 00:03:09,479
Speaker 1: And that includes us humans and animals.

61
00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:15,000
Speaker 2: Explicitly, that's the theory. It frames us as maybe proxies, bioresources,

62
00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:19,639
perhaps even unwitting soldiers in some vast interstellar dispute over

63
00:03:19,759 --> 00:03:21,439
territory we don't even know exists.

64
00:03:21,479 --> 00:03:25,439
Speaker 1: Wow, that's cold. It shifts the whole alien agenda from

65
00:03:26,080 --> 00:03:31,240
curiosity or benevolence to something intensely strategic, our genes as

66
00:03:31,439 --> 00:03:32,919
assets in a war.

67
00:03:32,879 --> 00:03:35,840
Speaker 2: Precisely, and if this has been going on for millennia,

68
00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:38,759
you expect to find echoes right in our oldest stories.

69
00:03:38,879 --> 00:03:42,240
Makes sense, and Sabina Maglioko, a fullklorist, points out this

70
00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:48,039
almost universal theme you find everywhere powerful otherworldly beings, gods, demons,

71
00:03:48,080 --> 00:03:50,199
whatever you call them, mating with humans.

72
00:03:50,360 --> 00:03:53,840
Speaker 1: You see that in Greek myths, Mesopotamian texts.

73
00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:57,039
Speaker 2: Exactly all over the place, tribal legends too. The common

74
00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:01,240
thread is always these non human powerful entities having well

75
00:04:01,319 --> 00:04:03,360
literal sexual encounters with mortals.

76
00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:06,560
Speaker 1: Which often results in hybrid offspring, right, the heroes, demigods,

77
00:04:06,599 --> 00:04:07,639
founders of dynasties.

78
00:04:07,719 --> 00:04:10,439
Speaker 2: Yes, and this is where people like Georgia at Suculos

79
00:04:10,879 --> 00:04:14,319
urge us to maybe drop the academic safety inknit of symbolism.

80
00:04:14,479 --> 00:04:17,839
Speaker 1: Ah, the idea that's all just metaphor for cultural exchange

81
00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:18,839
or natural events.

82
00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:21,319
Speaker 2: Right, We're kind of trained to default to that. But

83
00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:24,560
Suculo says, what if you take these texts literally, eliminate

84
00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:28,439
the suggested symbolism. Suddenly they're not metaphors. They might be

85
00:04:28,480 --> 00:04:30,360
read as historical records.

86
00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:34,920
Speaker 1: Records of actual visitation, interaction and interbreeding with beings we'd

87
00:04:34,959 --> 00:04:36,399
now call extraterrestrial.

88
00:04:36,519 --> 00:04:40,279
Speaker 2: That's the interpretation, yes, But to move beyond myth, you

89
00:04:40,399 --> 00:04:44,439
need physical evidence, something tangible.

90
00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:47,120
Speaker 1: Which brings us to the Peter Curie hair sample. This

91
00:04:47,199 --> 00:04:50,319
is a really famous case in abduction research, isn't it.

92
00:04:50,319 --> 00:04:53,439
Speaker 2: It is mainly because it left behind trace evidence. This

93
00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:57,040
happened in Sydney, Australia, July nineteen ninety two. Okay Curry

94
00:04:57,079 --> 00:05:00,519
woke up in that classic sleep paralysis state, weight on him,

95
00:05:00,519 --> 00:05:03,920
couldn't move, but fully conscious, and as his eyes adjusted,

96
00:05:04,279 --> 00:05:06,879
he saw a female figure straddling him, and he described

97
00:05:06,879 --> 00:05:10,319
her very vividly milky white skin color, eyes two to

98
00:05:10,360 --> 00:05:13,959
three times larger than human, protruding keek bones, pointy chin,

99
00:05:14,519 --> 00:05:15,600
a very distinct look.

100
00:05:15,639 --> 00:05:17,800
Speaker 1: And then she just vanished, vanished.

101
00:05:17,639 --> 00:05:22,000
Speaker 2: But left something behind, a single blonde hair on his skin.

102
00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:24,040
Speaker 1: Wow. And he collected it.

103
00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:28,040
Speaker 2: He did carefully, and eventually it went to an independent

104
00:05:28,079 --> 00:05:32,079
genealogy lab, analyzed by a biochemist named Horace Drew.

105
00:05:32,439 --> 00:05:33,680
Speaker 1: And what did they find?

106
00:05:34,079 --> 00:05:37,199
Speaker 2: Well, even the physical properties were weird from the get go.

107
00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:42,079
Drew described the hair as optically clear like nylon fishing.

108
00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:45,240
Speaker 1: Line, optically clear like transparent.

109
00:05:44,759 --> 00:05:48,360
Speaker 2: Apparently so, which is really unusual human hair. Whatever. The

110
00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:51,680
color has pigments melanin, right, it makes it opaque or

111
00:05:51,720 --> 00:05:55,600
at least translucent, not perfectly clear like glass or plastic.

112
00:05:55,720 --> 00:05:58,759
Speaker 1: Okay, that strange on its own defies normal human biology.

113
00:05:58,879 --> 00:06:01,920
Speaker 2: But the real bombshell was the DNA. Usually a single

114
00:06:01,959 --> 00:06:05,279
hair strand from one person has a consistent DNA signature,

115
00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:08,680
makes sense this sample, though it showed an impossible mosaic.

116
00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:11,959
In the shaft, they found a very rare Chinese lineage,

117
00:06:12,279 --> 00:06:14,480
like found in only point one percent to one percent

118
00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:15,879
of ethnic Chinese people.

119
00:06:15,920 --> 00:06:17,040
Speaker 1: Okay, very specific.

120
00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:19,199
Speaker 2: But then testing another part of the same strand, they

121
00:06:19,199 --> 00:06:22,759
found it totally different lineage, blue eyed, Celtic, light skinned,

122
00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:25,079
consistent with Western European heritage.

123
00:06:25,120 --> 00:06:27,879
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, the same strand of hair had DNA

124
00:06:27,959 --> 00:06:30,480
from a rare Chinese group and from a European group.

125
00:06:30,759 --> 00:06:32,079
How is that not just contamination?

126
00:06:32,279 --> 00:06:35,519
Speaker 2: That's the critical question, right eh? And why the analysis

127
00:06:35,519 --> 00:06:38,079
was so specific about where the DNA was found. If

128
00:06:38,079 --> 00:06:40,600
it was just surface contamination, you'd expect it well on

129
00:06:40,680 --> 00:06:43,079
the surface right, but this was reported as being in

130
00:06:43,120 --> 00:06:46,800
the hair shaft itself, suggesting it grew that way biologically.

131
00:06:47,319 --> 00:06:51,920
This specific genetic mix a rare East Asian mitochondrial marker

132
00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:55,240
and a Northern European marker in the same hair filament,

133
00:06:55,959 --> 00:06:58,360
it just doesn't happen with normal human inheritance.

134
00:06:58,439 --> 00:07:00,759
Speaker 1: It's not like having parents from different backs. This is

135
00:07:00,839 --> 00:07:06,439
like two distinct lineages expressed simultaneously in one biological structure exactly.

136
00:07:06,439 --> 00:07:09,680
Speaker 2: It points towards some kind of genetic chimerism or hybridization

137
00:07:10,199 --> 00:07:13,360
that frankly shouldn't exist in modern Homo sapiens.

138
00:07:13,800 --> 00:07:17,839
Speaker 1: So theorists see this unique DNA plus the weird physical

139
00:07:17,879 --> 00:07:19,160
clarity of the hair.

140
00:07:19,240 --> 00:07:24,199
Speaker 2: As potentially undeniable proof, tangible evidence of human et interbreeding,

141
00:07:24,879 --> 00:07:28,519
a biological entity with non human genetics interacting.

142
00:07:28,120 --> 00:07:30,839
Speaker 1: With us, and that kind of evidence, that biological signature

143
00:07:30,839 --> 00:07:32,920
that doesn't quite fit. It gets even more interesting when

144
00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:35,439
you put it next to our own evolutionary timeline, doesn't it.

145
00:07:35,439 --> 00:07:39,199
Speaker 2: It gains enormous weight. Yeah, because for decades we had

146
00:07:39,240 --> 00:07:42,879
that clean linear model of human evolution, you know, the

147
00:07:42,920 --> 00:07:45,439
diagram one hominid smoothly leading to the next.

148
00:07:45,560 --> 00:07:47,399
Speaker 1: The classic textbook image, but that.

149
00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:52,399
Speaker 2: Got completely upended. Around twenty ten, researchers led by Sante

150
00:07:52,399 --> 00:07:55,920
Beebo at the Max Planck Institute made a stunning announcement.

151
00:07:56,160 --> 00:07:56,800
Speaker 1: What was it?

152
00:07:57,160 --> 00:08:00,560
Speaker 2: They found that early modern humans didn't just coexist with enderthals,

153
00:08:00,639 --> 00:08:04,000
they actively mated with them. But more than that, their

154
00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:09,480
findings strongly suggested interbreeding with another completely unidentified species.

155
00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:14,519
Speaker 1: Unidentified meaning not ne Anerthal, not Denisovin, not us exactly.

156
00:08:14,839 --> 00:08:18,439
Speaker 2: They found these archaic DNA sequences in modern human genomes

157
00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:20,839
that they just couldn't trace back to any known human

158
00:08:20,959 --> 00:08:23,680
or proto human group. The media jumped on it, calling

159
00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:25,279
it the mystery species.

160
00:08:25,439 --> 00:08:27,680
Speaker 1: So evolution wasn't a neat ladder at all. It was

161
00:08:27,680 --> 00:08:30,160
more like a genetic melting pod, a.

162
00:08:30,160 --> 00:08:32,799
Speaker 2: Genetic free for all, as you put it earlier, multiple

163
00:08:32,799 --> 00:08:34,639
groups mixing in ways we hadn't realized.

164
00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:36,759
Speaker 1: But the real kicker, the thing that makes you pause,

165
00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:40,240
is the speed of change in our own genome. More recently, ah.

166
00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:43,840
Speaker 2: Yes, doctor John Hawks's work University Wisconsin. He did this

167
00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:48,320
huge analysis looking at human DNA changes over thousands of years.

168
00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:51,240
Speaker 1: And what he found was well, pretty staggering.

169
00:08:51,440 --> 00:08:55,240
Speaker 2: Absolutely between roughly three thousand BC and today, So the

170
00:08:55,279 --> 00:08:57,879
last five thousand years or so, human DNA has changed

171
00:08:57,919 --> 00:09:00,360
by a massive seven percent.

172
00:09:00,519 --> 00:09:02,919
Speaker 1: That sounds like a huge shift for a whole species

173
00:09:02,919 --> 00:09:04,919
in such a short evolutionary timeframe.

174
00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:08,039
Speaker 2: It is huge. It's not minor tweaking. It's a significant

175
00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:11,600
structural overhaul of the species blueprint. And it's the rate

176
00:09:11,639 --> 00:09:15,320
that baffles conventional thinking. Doctor Hawks calculated that our DNA

177
00:09:15,360 --> 00:09:18,039
evolved one hundred times faster in the last five thousand

178
00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:20,840
years than in any previous five thousand year period.

179
00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:24,000
Speaker 1: One hundred times faster. That's insane. It completely blows up

180
00:09:24,039 --> 00:09:27,000
the idea of slow gradual evolution driven by environment.

181
00:09:27,039 --> 00:09:28,600
Speaker 2: It does it forces you to ask, what.

182
00:09:28,720 --> 00:09:32,320
Speaker 1: On Earth happened around three thousand BC. What monumental event

183
00:09:32,360 --> 00:09:35,320
could possibly trigger a seven percent structural shift across the

184
00:09:35,440 --> 00:09:38,480
entire human species and accelerate evolution by a factor of

185
00:09:38,519 --> 00:09:39,000
one hundred.

186
00:09:39,159 --> 00:09:42,879
Speaker 2: What were the biological results of that change, even increased intelligence,

187
00:09:43,279 --> 00:09:47,360
disease resistance, something else entirely. The sources we're looking at

188
00:09:47,399 --> 00:09:50,000
suggest it had to be an external catalyst.

189
00:09:49,799 --> 00:09:52,679
Speaker 1: And the ancient astronaut theory offers a direct explanation.

190
00:09:52,840 --> 00:09:56,039
Speaker 2: It does. They argued that this accelerated evolution. This one

191
00:09:56,080 --> 00:09:59,720
hundred x speed boost is the direct result of widespread

192
00:09:59,720 --> 00:10:02,519
into breeding with extraterrestrial humans.

193
00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:04,639
Speaker 1: Beings who were maybe more genetically advanced.

194
00:10:04,720 --> 00:10:09,159
Speaker 2: That's the idea they introduced new, perhaps dominant genetic sequences

195
00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:13,600
into the human population during that specific timeframe, sparking this

196
00:10:13,919 --> 00:10:16,120
sudden species wide genetic revolution.

197
00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:18,960
Speaker 1: So it ties the old myths about God's mating with

198
00:10:19,039 --> 00:10:22,279
humans directly to the physical changes we see in our DNA, and.

199
00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:26,120
Speaker 2: It reframes that mystery species. The max Plank Institute found

200
00:10:26,639 --> 00:10:29,399
maybe it wasn't just another lost homitted relative.

201
00:10:29,200 --> 00:10:33,279
Speaker 1: But the actual biological signature of an off world civilization

202
00:10:33,559 --> 00:10:35,240
embedded in our own genes.

203
00:10:34,879 --> 00:10:37,399
Speaker 2: Which takes the theory even further to the claim that

204
00:10:37,440 --> 00:10:41,080
this influence isn't just in the gaps, it's actively encoded,

205
00:10:41,279 --> 00:10:44,120
like a hidden message or instruction manual planted in our

206
00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:45,159
DNA long ago.

207
00:10:45,559 --> 00:10:48,519
Speaker 1: This brings us to that fascinating research out of Kazakhstan

208
00:10:48,559 --> 00:10:55,080
in twenty thirteen Vladimir Scherbach a mathematician and Maximikukov, an astrobiologist.

209
00:10:55,320 --> 00:10:58,240
Speaker 2: Right, and they weren't initially looking for aliens, were they.

210
00:10:58,279 --> 00:11:02,600
They were doing rigorous mathematical analysis of the human genome.

211
00:11:02,399 --> 00:11:05,759
Speaker 1: Exactly looking for structure, and they concluded there is a

212
00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:09,679
complex hidden code embedded within our DNA. They called it

213
00:11:09,720 --> 00:11:11,480
an extraterrestrial stamp.

214
00:11:11,919 --> 00:11:14,200
Speaker 2: Extraterrestrial stamp, what do they mean by that?

215
00:11:14,399 --> 00:11:19,360
Speaker 1: They found precise mathematical patterns, an unknown symbolic language they

216
00:11:19,440 --> 00:11:22,600
termed it. It didn't look random. It functioned like a

217
00:11:22,679 --> 00:11:26,919
deliberately inserted mathematical code, too structured, too organized to be

218
00:11:27,039 --> 00:11:28,480
like just an evolutionary accident.

219
00:11:28,519 --> 00:11:31,720
Speaker 2: Okay, structure is one thing, But how unlikely did they

220
00:11:31,720 --> 00:11:32,240
think it was?

221
00:11:32,399 --> 00:11:35,879
Speaker 1: That's the mind blowing part. They calculated the odds of

222
00:11:35,919 --> 00:11:40,879
this specific complex mathematical pattern appearing randomly nine times in

223
00:11:40,919 --> 00:11:44,600
our genetic code, and the number one in ten trillion

224
00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:45,440
one intentionally.

225
00:11:45,559 --> 00:11:48,480
Speaker 2: Statistically, that's basically impossible in a random universe. Right, it

226
00:11:48,559 --> 00:11:50,519
means it's far more likely to be designed.

227
00:11:50,759 --> 00:11:55,159
Speaker 1: That's the argument for ancient astronaut theorists. This bypasses the

228
00:11:55,200 --> 00:11:58,759
need for crashed ships or artifacts. The proof, they say,

229
00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:04,279
is written into life itself. The sheer improbability screams intelligent design.

230
00:12:04,039 --> 00:12:07,600
Speaker 2: Which implies our DNA wasn't just influenced by outside forces.

231
00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:12,039
Speaker 1: This is deliberately manipulated by some advanced intelligence way back when,

232
00:12:12,600 --> 00:12:16,039
possibly through what they called an artificial mutation of our genes.

233
00:12:16,279 --> 00:12:19,279
Speaker 2: Okay, that concept our complexity resulting from a kind of

234
00:12:19,320 --> 00:12:24,080
technological insertion. That leads to the really radical idea, the

235
00:12:24,240 --> 00:12:28,120
organic robot concept. Explain that, well, if our intelligence, our

236
00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:32,120
accelerated evolution, wasn't purely natural selection, but came via an

237
00:12:32,159 --> 00:12:35,519
artificial maybe technological update to our genes. M hm, then

238
00:12:35,559 --> 00:12:39,159
what are we really programmed? In effect? Yeah, organic robots

239
00:12:39,200 --> 00:12:43,120
programmed by an earlier, highly advanced intelligence. The original Seating

240
00:12:43,120 --> 00:12:46,840
civilizations are the ultimate programmers. They engineered our sentience, maybe

241
00:12:46,879 --> 00:12:49,240
wrote our initial software. That's a heavy thought, And what's

242
00:12:49,240 --> 00:12:51,759
really thought provoking is how this theory is then used

243
00:12:51,759 --> 00:12:55,600
to explain modern human behavior. It argues that our intense drive,

244
00:12:55,720 --> 00:13:02,080
our almost compulsive need to create and merge with technology, AI, cybernetics,

245
00:13:02,399 --> 00:13:06,120
digital life. It's not just curiosity, it's the program running.

246
00:13:06,159 --> 00:13:08,919
It's a compulsion. Yes, we're continuing the agenda. The original

247
00:13:09,000 --> 00:13:12,200
programmer started our drive to merge with tech or create

248
00:13:12,240 --> 00:13:15,360
ever more advanced AI. It stems from the genetic template

249
00:13:15,360 --> 00:13:18,639
they left us. We have to innovate technologically because our

250
00:13:18,679 --> 00:13:20,720
core being is founded on an artificial template.

251
00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:24,720
Speaker 1: So we're not just inventing AI, we're executing ancient code.

252
00:13:24,799 --> 00:13:26,279
That's incredibly meta.

253
00:13:26,360 --> 00:13:28,480
Speaker 2: Essentially, Yeah, the programming runs deep. Wow.

254
00:13:28,559 --> 00:13:32,120
Speaker 1: Okay, that idea that our biggest ambitions might just be

255
00:13:32,679 --> 00:13:36,480
software execution is mind bending. And speaking of codes and blueprints,

256
00:13:36,519 --> 00:13:38,759
there's a number that keeps popping up, isn't there? Both

257
00:13:38,759 --> 00:13:41,759
in genetics and weirdly in theology, the number three.

258
00:13:42,679 --> 00:13:44,039
Speaker 2: It's a remarkable convergence.

259
00:13:44,159 --> 00:13:46,840
Speaker 1: Let's start with the theology. In Christianity, for instance, you

260
00:13:46,840 --> 00:13:50,879
have the Holy Trinity, Father's Son, Holy Spirit. It's central,

261
00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:54,159
but it's also a kind of mathematical puzzle, right, how

262
00:13:54,200 --> 00:13:56,960
can one entity be three distinct persons?

263
00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:01,039
Speaker 2: For many believers it's purely a matter of faith, a

264
00:14:01,080 --> 00:14:04,159
divine mystery you don't necessarily try to solve logically.

265
00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:08,200
Speaker 1: But the theory we're exploring suggests this isn't just spiritual symbolism.

266
00:14:08,279 --> 00:14:11,039
It might be rooted in the actual physical reality of

267
00:14:11,039 --> 00:14:12,840
our genetic blueprint exactly.

268
00:14:13,120 --> 00:14:17,120
Speaker 2: Now, jump from ancient theology to nineteen sixty six Huntington,

269
00:14:17,159 --> 00:14:22,200
New York, a massive scientific breakthrough. Scientists finally decipher the

270
00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:23,200
genetic code.

271
00:14:23,039 --> 00:14:25,440
Speaker 1: The moment we learn the language of life itself, and

272
00:14:25,480 --> 00:14:26,120
what they found was.

273
00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:30,200
Speaker 2: This universal operating system DNA codes. The instructions for building

274
00:14:30,240 --> 00:14:33,559
life are always found in clusters of three molecule combinations.

275
00:14:33,600 --> 00:14:35,440
Speaker 1: They called them codons or triplets.

276
00:14:35,519 --> 00:14:37,200
Speaker 2: Right, they had to figure out if the instructions were

277
00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:40,480
read one letter at a time or in pairs or threes.

278
00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:44,679
It was definitively proven the genetic language is read in threes.

279
00:14:44,559 --> 00:14:47,039
Speaker 1: So it doesn't matter if you're a human, a fungus,

280
00:14:47,240 --> 00:14:50,240
a whale. The number three is the fundamental rule for

281
00:14:50,279 --> 00:14:53,639
how DNA works. It's the core mechanism for life on Earth.

282
00:14:53,799 --> 00:14:58,279
Speaker 2: So if you connect the dots, the implication is pretty profound.

283
00:14:58,600 --> 00:15:02,480
Speaker 1: Does the triune native described in theology, reflected in the

284
00:15:02,600 --> 00:15:07,159
universal triplet structure of our DNA suggest a link, a

285
00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:11,240
biological connection between our genetic blueprint and whatever divine or

286
00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:13,720
extraterrestrial force initiated life.

287
00:15:13,799 --> 00:15:16,960
Speaker 2: That's the question it raises. If three is the signature

288
00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:19,919
of the creator and it's embedded at the deepest level

289
00:15:19,919 --> 00:15:23,279
of our biological language, it suggests we were designed using

290
00:15:23,360 --> 00:15:26,559
that signature. The religious concepts might be reflections of the

291
00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:28,320
creator's actual coding mechanism.

292
00:15:28,559 --> 00:15:31,480
Speaker 1: Okay, moving from these invisible codes inside us, let's talk

293
00:15:31,519 --> 00:15:34,840
about very visible, very controversial evidence dug up from the ground,

294
00:15:34,919 --> 00:15:38,240
the physical remains that seem to defy standard human anatomy.

295
00:15:38,360 --> 00:15:40,320
I'm talking about the elongated.

296
00:15:39,720 --> 00:15:43,720
Speaker 2: Skulls right first stop er In Southeaster Roc. Nineteen twenty seven,

297
00:15:43,840 --> 00:15:46,919
the British archaeologist Leonard Woolley discovered the royal cemetery.

298
00:15:46,559 --> 00:15:49,320
Speaker 1: There, including Queen Pooabe Yes, and.

299
00:15:49,279 --> 00:15:53,519
Speaker 2: Her remains, along with others found nearby, reportedly had unusually

300
00:15:53,639 --> 00:15:57,960
large elongated skulls. It's a feature sometimes seen or claimed

301
00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:01,399
for certain Egyptian pharaohs, and also Peruvian.

302
00:16:00,960 --> 00:16:05,320
Speaker 1: Mummies, and for ancient astronaut theorists. This is huge. Puabi

303
00:16:05,559 --> 00:16:09,279
was a First dynasty queen or priestess. That means she

304
00:16:09,320 --> 00:16:12,240
lived really close in time to the supposed original reign

305
00:16:12,360 --> 00:16:13,759
of the Unnaki.

306
00:16:13,360 --> 00:16:16,639
Speaker 2: The beings often cited as the genetic engineers of humanity

307
00:16:16,639 --> 00:16:17,600
in Sumerian texts.

308
00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:19,679
Speaker 1: Exactly so, the skull shape suggests you might have been

309
00:16:19,679 --> 00:16:22,480
a hybrid, maybe not full in anachi, but closer to

310
00:16:22,480 --> 00:16:23,600
that original bloodline.

311
00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:27,360
Speaker 2: That's the interpretation, and the specific shape matters too. David

312
00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:31,159
Childers points out this large, elongated, almost cone head shape.

313
00:16:31,320 --> 00:16:34,000
It's supposedly how the inanachi are described in ancient texts

314
00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:34,639
and depicted on.

315
00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:37,440
Speaker 1: Tablets, So these royal remains are seen as physical evidence

316
00:16:37,480 --> 00:16:40,840
linking human power structures back to a non human, possibly

317
00:16:40,879 --> 00:16:42,120
et physical presence.

318
00:16:42,240 --> 00:16:45,600
Speaker 2: But maybe the most abundant and certainly perplexing evidence comes

319
00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:49,679
from Peru, the Paracus region. Starting also in nineteen twenty seven,

320
00:16:49,960 --> 00:16:54,000
archaeologist Julio Tello found hundreds of these strange elongated skulls.

321
00:16:54,360 --> 00:16:56,759
They date from around eight hundred BC to one hundred BC.

322
00:16:57,080 --> 00:17:01,000
Speaker 1: Now mainstream science has an explanation for this, right, cranial deformation.

323
00:17:01,519 --> 00:17:02,159
Head binding.

324
00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:05,480
Speaker 2: Yes, it's a known practice in various ancient cultures. You

325
00:17:05,559 --> 00:17:08,680
wrap an infant soft skull tightly with boards or cloth

326
00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:12,720
to deliberately change its shape, often done to imitate revered

327
00:17:12,839 --> 00:17:15,079
visitors or gods perhaps.

328
00:17:14,799 --> 00:17:18,200
Speaker 1: But researchers like brain Forster, who studied these skulls extensively,

329
00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:21,720
argue that some of the process skulls show anomalies that

330
00:17:21,799 --> 00:17:24,440
go way beyond what simple headbinding can achieve.

331
00:17:24,680 --> 00:17:28,799
Speaker 2: This is where the specific biology gets crucial. Well, yeah,

332
00:17:28,799 --> 00:17:32,079
many skulls could be explained by deformation. Forceter estimates, about

333
00:17:32,079 --> 00:17:34,640
five percent are just too complex in shape and size

334
00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:36,279
for that to be the sole explanation.

335
00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:39,359
Speaker 1: Let's look at the specifics paracae. Skull number forty four.

336
00:17:39,440 --> 00:17:42,599
Speaker 2: Skull forty four is a standout anomaly. First weight, it's

337
00:17:42,599 --> 00:17:45,319
about two point eight pounds. That's roughly twenty five percent

338
00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:47,359
heavier than an average adult male skull.

339
00:17:47,519 --> 00:17:49,720
Speaker 1: Heavier binding would make it heavier exactly.

340
00:17:49,880 --> 00:17:53,319
Speaker 2: And then there's cranial capacity. The volume inside skull forty

341
00:17:53,319 --> 00:17:56,920
four measured around fifteen hundred cubic centimeters. That's twenty percent

342
00:17:57,000 --> 00:18:00,200
larger than the average modern human capacity. Again, you can

343
00:18:00,200 --> 00:18:03,920
squish a skull's shape, but you can't significantly increase his

344
00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:07,119
internal volume words mass just by wrapping it right.

345
00:18:07,240 --> 00:18:10,759
Speaker 1: Deformation just reshapes the existing volume. It doesn't add more

346
00:18:10,799 --> 00:18:14,680
space or bone density like that. But the really killer anomaly,

347
00:18:14,799 --> 00:18:16,720
the one that's hard to explain away.

348
00:18:16,680 --> 00:18:21,000
Speaker 2: Is the skull's actual structure. Many parakhas skulls, including skull

349
00:18:21,039 --> 00:18:23,400
forty four, are missing the sagital suture.

350
00:18:23,680 --> 00:18:26,000
Speaker 1: Okay, pause there, explain why that's so important.

351
00:18:26,119 --> 00:18:28,440
Speaker 2: The sagital suture is the main joint running along the

352
00:18:28,480 --> 00:18:31,559
top of your skull, connecting the two big parietal bones.

353
00:18:31,799 --> 00:18:35,039
It's a fundamental universal feature in all known human skulls,

354
00:18:35,400 --> 00:18:38,000
from the enfols right up to US Homo sapiens. It

355
00:18:38,039 --> 00:18:40,039
allows the skull to grow as the brain develops.

356
00:18:40,359 --> 00:18:42,680
Speaker 1: So if a skull is missing that suture.

357
00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:45,279
Speaker 2: It's fundamentally different. It's not just a deformed human skull.

358
00:18:45,599 --> 00:18:49,079
It suggests a different biological blueprint altogether. You can bind

359
00:18:49,079 --> 00:18:52,039
a skull reshape it, but you can't make a major

360
00:18:52,160 --> 00:18:56,920
anatomical joint simply vanish. It implies these beings weren't even

361
00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:00,160
human enough to share That basic cranial structure.

362
00:19:00,039 --> 00:19:02,559
Speaker 1: Points to genetic difference, not just cultural practice.

363
00:19:02,599 --> 00:19:05,559
Speaker 2: And there's more. These skulls often have much larger eye

364
00:19:05,599 --> 00:19:09,519
sockets than humans, two small holes foramina in the back,

365
00:19:09,640 --> 00:19:12,680
possibly for nerves or blood flow, and very robust jaws,

366
00:19:13,279 --> 00:19:15,839
all features inconsistent with typical human variation.

367
00:19:16,119 --> 00:19:18,799
Speaker 1: And didn't they do DNA testing on skull forty four?

368
00:19:18,920 --> 00:19:21,480
Speaker 2: They did back in twenty fourteen, and the results were

369
00:19:21,559 --> 00:19:25,279
controversial but intriguing. The analysis found segments of DNA that

370
00:19:25,319 --> 00:19:28,359
reportedly did not match anything known to be human, couldn't

371
00:19:28,359 --> 00:19:32,640
be classified as Neanderthal, Denesavin, or any known Homo sapiens line.

372
00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:35,240
Speaker 1: So the conclusion drawn from all that, the weight, the volume,

373
00:19:35,319 --> 00:19:37,000
the missing suture, the DNA is.

374
00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:39,200
Speaker 2: Wide that the Paracus people, or at least some of

375
00:19:39,240 --> 00:19:42,079
them represented by these skulls, might have been an ancient

376
00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:47,079
bloodline related to us, Yes, but demonstrably not us. A

377
00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:51,000
distinct branch, maybe a hybrid lineage with genetic and physical

378
00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:54,079
features that challenge our understanding of human evolution.

379
00:19:54,160 --> 00:19:58,759
Speaker 1: Providing potentially concrete DNA testable evidence that non standard human

380
00:19:58,799 --> 00:20:01,319
types existed along side our ancestors.

381
00:20:01,519 --> 00:20:04,599
Speaker 2: So we have the genetics, the myths, the skeletons. Now

382
00:20:04,680 --> 00:20:08,759
let's pivot to objects, non biological artifacts that some theorists

383
00:20:08,799 --> 00:20:12,960
believe were designed to carry forward this hidden knowledge. The

384
00:20:13,039 --> 00:20:13,880
crystal skulls.

385
00:20:13,960 --> 00:20:16,960
Speaker 1: Ah, Yes, the crystal skulls. They're wrapped in legend, aren't

386
00:20:16,960 --> 00:20:19,720
they central to prophecies, especially from meso America?

387
00:20:19,839 --> 00:20:23,359
Speaker 2: That's right. The lure often talks about them holding great knowledge,

388
00:20:23,720 --> 00:20:26,519
immense wisdom, and that their power could be used to

389
00:20:26,559 --> 00:20:30,880
avert catastrophe, especially if all thirteen authentic skulls were brought together.

390
00:20:31,400 --> 00:20:32,880
Many believe twelve have already been.

391
00:20:32,759 --> 00:20:35,240
Speaker 1: Found well there's a huge problem with dating them, isn't.

392
00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:39,119
Speaker 2: There a massive one? Skeptics often dismiss them as modern fakes,

393
00:20:39,359 --> 00:20:43,519
partly because scientifically, you can't carbon date quartz. Crystal quartz

394
00:20:43,640 --> 00:20:48,160
is pure silicon dioxide. It contains no carbon, no radioactive

395
00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:51,640
elements that decay at a known rate, so standard dating

396
00:20:51,640 --> 00:20:54,599
methods are useless. You literally can't help they're five hundred

397
00:20:54,720 --> 00:20:58,200
years old or fifteen thousand years old using those techniques.

398
00:20:58,319 --> 00:21:01,839
Speaker 1: That technical hurdle is key because mainstream science often looks

399
00:21:01,839 --> 00:21:06,519
at tool marks and jumps to modern tools, therefore modern fake, right.

400
00:21:06,720 --> 00:21:09,559
Speaker 2: But researchers like Chris Morten push back on that. They

401
00:21:09,559 --> 00:21:12,400
point out that ancient cultures like the Maya did have

402
00:21:12,480 --> 00:21:17,640
sophisticated grinding and polishing techniques using sand water, maybe even

403
00:21:17,759 --> 00:21:22,240
rudimentary wheels, working with crystal over potentially decades or centuries.

404
00:21:21,799 --> 00:21:24,240
Speaker 1: So just seeing a tool mark doesn't automatically mean it's

405
00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:27,440
a nineteenth century hoax. The sheer effort involved in carving

406
00:21:27,519 --> 00:21:31,119
hard courts with ancient tools suggests these were incredibly important,

407
00:21:31,160 --> 00:21:32,839
deliberate creations.

408
00:21:32,440 --> 00:21:35,160
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and to understand their potential purpose, we could look

409
00:21:35,160 --> 00:21:38,039
at modern tech. Think about Atachi in Japan. Back in

410
00:21:38,079 --> 00:21:41,920
twenty twelve, they unveiled this amazing data storage device, quartz

411
00:21:41,960 --> 00:21:45,160
glass chip exactly, a chip made of quartz glass that

412
00:21:45,240 --> 00:21:49,480
can store incode of digital information basically forever, for millions

413
00:21:49,519 --> 00:21:49,960
of years.

414
00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:51,039
Speaker 1: How do they do that?

415
00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:54,759
Speaker 2: They use high powered lasers to burn tiny dots, ones

416
00:21:54,799 --> 00:21:58,720
and zeros binary code directly into the crystal structure. It's

417
00:21:58,759 --> 00:22:00,200
like a time capsule for data.

418
00:22:00,359 --> 00:22:03,000
Speaker 1: Okay, so that's incredible longevity. How does that relate to

419
00:22:03,200 --> 00:22:04,720
the ancient skulls.

420
00:22:04,559 --> 00:22:08,640
Speaker 2: Well, ancient astronaut theorists connect the dots. If crystal is

421
00:22:08,720 --> 00:22:12,880
the ultimate long term storage medium today, capable of holding

422
00:22:12,880 --> 00:22:18,160
information for eons, why did ancient civilizations, perhaps guided by ets,

423
00:22:18,799 --> 00:22:21,880
choose crystal to make these complex skull objects.

424
00:22:22,160 --> 00:22:25,160
Speaker 1: The suggestion being they were made of crystal specifically to

425
00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:27,799
contain information knowledge.

426
00:22:27,359 --> 00:22:30,880
Speaker 2: That's the hypothesis. But then you hit the access problem.

427
00:22:31,160 --> 00:22:34,319
As Giorgio Suclos often points out, even with that modern

428
00:22:34,359 --> 00:22:37,960
Natachi chip, you need the right reader, the specific device

429
00:22:38,000 --> 00:22:39,920
to decode that million year old data.

430
00:22:39,960 --> 00:22:42,440
Speaker 1: So with the ancient crystal skulls, we might just lack

431
00:22:42,480 --> 00:22:45,680
the key, the technology, the on button needed to access

432
00:22:45,720 --> 00:22:48,559
whatever vast knowledge might be stored inside. Maybe it's not

433
00:22:48,599 --> 00:22:49,759
even binary data.

434
00:22:49,680 --> 00:22:52,920
Speaker 2: Precisely, which leads to the most provocative ideas stemming from

435
00:22:52,920 --> 00:22:54,960
those prophecies, the motherboard theory.

436
00:22:55,039 --> 00:22:57,359
Speaker 1: Why did the legends insist all the skulls need to

437
00:22:57,359 --> 00:22:58,000
be brought together?

438
00:22:58,279 --> 00:23:01,799
Speaker 2: The theory suggests each skull isn't just a standalone library.

439
00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:06,720
It's more like an individual computer chip, a component. They

440
00:23:06,720 --> 00:23:10,519
need to be assembled, perhaps in a specific configuration.

441
00:23:10,279 --> 00:23:14,799
Speaker 1: To activate some kind of extraterrestrial motherboard, a master device

442
00:23:14,839 --> 00:23:16,519
that unlocks the combined knowledge.

443
00:23:16,559 --> 00:23:20,599
Speaker 2: That's the concept. It perfectly merges ancient mythology with high

444
00:23:20,640 --> 00:23:24,000
tech thinking. The prophecies about finding the last skull to

445
00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:27,519
gain great wisdom suddenly sound like completing an electrical circuit.

446
00:23:27,559 --> 00:23:31,759
Speaker 1: The ultimate knowledge isn't mystical energy, it's encoded data thousands

447
00:23:31,799 --> 00:23:34,319
of years old, waiting for the final piece to complete

448
00:23:34,359 --> 00:23:38,079
the system, maybe executing that ancient program we talked about earlier.

449
00:23:38,160 --> 00:23:40,920
Speaker 2: It certainly paints a picture where the whole planet might

450
00:23:40,960 --> 00:23:43,960
have these activation points just waiting for the right conditions

451
00:23:44,119 --> 00:23:47,839
or perhaps the right evolved species yeah, to finally complete

452
00:23:47,839 --> 00:23:48,319
the circuit.

453
00:23:48,519 --> 00:23:50,359
Speaker 1: So let's try and tie this all together. What does

454
00:23:50,400 --> 00:23:53,000
it all mean We've covered a really challenging range of

455
00:23:53,039 --> 00:23:54,000
material here today.

456
00:23:54,039 --> 00:23:54,640
Speaker 2: We really have.

457
00:23:54,920 --> 00:23:58,279
Speaker 1: We started with those intense personal accounts. The physical claims

458
00:23:58,319 --> 00:24:01,200
of interbreeding may be backed up by that strange Kori

459
00:24:01,319 --> 00:24:03,359
hair sample with its impossible DNA.

460
00:24:03,640 --> 00:24:06,480
Speaker 2: Then we look at the sheer speed, that one hundred

461
00:24:06,519 --> 00:24:09,720
fold acceleration in human DNA evolution over the last five

462
00:24:09,759 --> 00:24:13,160
thousand years, suggesting some kind of major intervention around three

463
00:24:13,200 --> 00:24:13,920
thousand BC.

464
00:24:14,279 --> 00:24:16,839
Speaker 1: We dove right down to the molecular level, that hidden

465
00:24:16,880 --> 00:24:20,440
mathematical code Schuurbach and Makukov found in our genome, that

466
00:24:20,599 --> 00:24:25,279
extraterrestrial stamp with its one in ten trillion probability.

467
00:24:25,599 --> 00:24:28,000
Speaker 2: Move back to the macro level with the physical evidence

468
00:24:28,039 --> 00:24:32,880
the elongated skulls defying human anatomy, especially the missing sagital

469
00:24:32,880 --> 00:24:36,599
suture in the Paraka skulls, a profound biological mystery.

470
00:24:36,920 --> 00:24:40,920
Speaker 1: And finally we considered the crystal skulls not just artifacts,

471
00:24:40,960 --> 00:24:45,000
but potentially ancient high tech data storage devices made of quartz,

472
00:24:45,200 --> 00:24:47,960
designed to last for ages, just waiting for the right key.

473
00:24:48,400 --> 00:24:50,839
Speaker 2: When you look at all these threads together, what stands

474
00:24:50,839 --> 00:24:55,319
out is this consistent suggestion of a coordinated long term agenda.

475
00:24:55,720 --> 00:24:57,759
This doesn't feel like a series of random accidents.

476
00:24:58,000 --> 00:25:01,640
Speaker 1: No, the sources imply it was intentional, a seeding, a manipulation,

477
00:25:01,759 --> 00:25:04,440
maybe even a programming of humanity that stretches from way

478
00:25:04,480 --> 00:25:07,720
back in our history right up to today, influencing our biology,

479
00:25:07,759 --> 00:25:11,240
our evolution, maybe even our current drive towards technology and AI.

480
00:25:11,559 --> 00:25:14,200
Speaker 2: It really forces you to rethink the origins of our

481
00:25:14,240 --> 00:25:15,440
deepest beliefs, doesn't it?

482
00:25:15,519 --> 00:25:19,039
Speaker 1: Absolutely If those ancient prophecies about a return didn't originate

483
00:25:19,039 --> 00:25:23,839
with gods or spirits, but maybe with literal extraterrestrials promising

484
00:25:23,880 --> 00:25:26,880
to come back and check on their project. And if

485
00:25:26,960 --> 00:25:29,599
traditional stories sometimes say the army of the missile will

486
00:25:29,680 --> 00:25:32,079
rise up not from the heavens but from inner Earth,

487
00:25:32,440 --> 00:25:35,960
those same kinds of underground places charmain described to eventually

488
00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:37,279
dominate the surface world.

489
00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:40,160
Speaker 2: Well, that raises a pretty unsettling final thought, doesn't it?

490
00:25:40,160 --> 00:25:44,240
Speaker 1: It does? Does it suggest that some massive future event,

491
00:25:44,759 --> 00:25:48,839
maybe finding that last crystal skull, maybe a simultaneous revelation

492
00:25:48,960 --> 00:25:52,640
of hidden et life subterranean or otherwise, isn't just myth?

493
00:25:53,279 --> 00:25:57,079
Could it be a scenario already meticulously encoded in our

494
00:25:57,119 --> 00:26:01,960
oldest stories and perhaps most profoundly waiting for activation within

495
00:26:02,000 --> 00:26:03,160
our very genes.

496
00:26:03,240 --> 00:26:05,720
Speaker 2: What if our ultimate destiny isn't entirely up to us.

497
00:26:05,759 --> 00:26:08,559
What if it's just the final execution of the original program.