1
00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:08,439
Speaker 1: What is up, fella, Siko's I am Dana Valley coming

2
00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:11,039
at you with what I think is the first NBA

3
00:00:11,119 --> 00:00:13,519
trade deadline primer from us that you will be listening

4
00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:17,519
or watching to, not including the Hawks, Washington Wizards, Trey

5
00:00:17,600 --> 00:00:20,519
Young trade reaction. We got up. We're on too. We're

6
00:00:20,559 --> 00:00:23,239
beginning with the Denver Nuggets. However, whatever order this is

7
00:00:23,239 --> 00:00:26,480
releasing in, Before we get started, I'd like to ask

8
00:00:26,519 --> 00:00:28,960
my certified fantabulous co host, mister Grant Hughes, how the

9
00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:29,440
heck are you?

10
00:00:30,039 --> 00:00:32,200
Speaker 2: I am more flexible than the Denver Nuggets will be

11
00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:34,600
at the trade deadline Dan, So that's not saying much,

12
00:00:34,799 --> 00:00:38,719
but so I guess that's good. Could be worse, Like

13
00:00:38,880 --> 00:00:40,679
maybe put it that way, could.

14
00:00:40,479 --> 00:00:42,640
Speaker 1: Be worse is always a nice thing to hear. Let's

15
00:00:42,679 --> 00:00:45,560
get into the Denver Nuggets' is trade deadline vitals? Would

16
00:00:45,560 --> 00:00:46,600
you like to take us through something?

17
00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:50,399
Speaker 2: Police? Certainly, they are about four hundred grand over the tax,

18
00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:54,679
so they can take back more money than they send out. However,

19
00:00:54,759 --> 00:00:57,000
they do not have any first round picks to trade.

20
00:00:57,799 --> 00:01:01,479
They can swap this year first rounder their twenty twenty

21
00:01:01,479 --> 00:01:04,599
six first rounder. Your mileage you may vary on that

22
00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:07,159
one as Denver, well, maybe it's a little more valuable

23
00:01:07,159 --> 00:01:09,799
now since all the injuries will result in their record

24
00:01:09,840 --> 00:01:13,359
being worse regular season wise, So that's not nothing. It's

25
00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:17,920
also not something spectacular. They can offer conditional swaps in

26
00:01:17,959 --> 00:01:21,319
twenty eight, thirty and thirty one. They have a couple

27
00:01:21,519 --> 00:01:24,920
trade exceptions worth at least putting on the radar six

28
00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:27,359
point nine million from the Michael Porter junior deal that

29
00:01:27,400 --> 00:01:30,480
expires in July and five point four million from the

30
00:01:30,519 --> 00:01:34,680
Dario Sarich trade that expired July as well. Yeah, I

31
00:01:34,680 --> 00:01:39,159
mean to have anything to show for just really impressive work.

32
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:43,640
So Dan, that's That's the long and short of a

33
00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:50,359
Denver situation that is inflexible because they've been contending for

34
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:52,640
a long time and because they've been willing to move

35
00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:58,000
distant future picks like the MPJ deal would be an

36
00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:01,719
example of. So not a lot to get through here

37
00:02:01,799 --> 00:02:04,319
other than maybe starting here, the first thing to talk

38
00:02:04,359 --> 00:02:07,760
about is their tax situation, because they're so close to

39
00:02:07,799 --> 00:02:11,759
getting under They're so close, except it's not that easy.

40
00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:15,280
If your concern is like, we would like to have

41
00:02:15,319 --> 00:02:18,240
the best team possible once everybody's healthy and we try

42
00:02:18,280 --> 00:02:20,439
to go on or run through the West, so like

43
00:02:20,479 --> 00:02:23,639
a full salary dump like you might otherwise see in

44
00:02:23,639 --> 00:02:27,919
the situation. Uh, not really in the cards. Most likely

45
00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:29,360
it would be disappointing if that's the way.

46
00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:31,599
Speaker 1: Isn't getting traded straight up?

47
00:02:31,759 --> 00:02:33,879
Speaker 2: That doesn't get you a first He had a game

48
00:02:33,919 --> 00:02:35,800
the other day as we're recording this.

49
00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:38,280
Speaker 1: I mean, like you got to strike while the iron's hot.

50
00:02:38,479 --> 00:02:40,840
Speaker 2: See if you can do anything there. Do you think that?

51
00:02:40,879 --> 00:02:42,879
I mean, the answer seems pretty obvious, like do you

52
00:02:42,919 --> 00:02:45,000
think they'll try to duckt the tax from four hundred

53
00:02:45,039 --> 00:02:45,599
grand above it?

54
00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:48,280
Speaker 1: Yes, but I do think we need to clarify why

55
00:02:48,319 --> 00:02:50,840
they're actually gonna duckt the tax. It doesn't and if

56
00:02:50,879 --> 00:02:53,159
we've said it, we were mistaken. I don't think we did.

57
00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:57,960
It's not to reset the repeater clock. It's because they're

58
00:02:58,039 --> 00:03:01,000
basically in the second Aprin next year. Like it's just

59
00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:04,159
guaranteed unless there's some major changes, even if you don't

60
00:03:04,159 --> 00:03:07,840
have yonas valent If you're keeping yonas Valentunis and or

61
00:03:07,879 --> 00:03:10,199
Peyton Watson, who's about to come up as well in

62
00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:13,080
the next season, you are almost assuredly a second Apron team.

63
00:03:13,639 --> 00:03:18,560
Speaker 2: And by the way, Peyton Watson looking increasingly like, oh no, expensive,

64
00:03:18,960 --> 00:03:22,680
that's right, expensive, increasingly like maybe he should have been

65
00:03:22,719 --> 00:03:25,120
the guy to get paid instead of Christian Brown. A

66
00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:26,240
lot of oopsie is happening.

67
00:03:26,479 --> 00:03:30,400
Speaker 1: Christian Brown recording this on Friday is probable for Friday's game,

68
00:03:30,439 --> 00:03:33,919
though he's coming back. He's coming back to show Peyton Watson.

69
00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:35,599
Speaker 2: Not his work cut out for him, if he's gonna

70
00:03:35,879 --> 00:03:38,680
eclipse what people have been seeing from Peyton Watson lately.

71
00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:41,639
Speaker 1: But the reason you ducked the tax if you're Denver,

72
00:03:42,520 --> 00:03:44,639
is yes, they have proven they will pay the tax.

73
00:03:44,719 --> 00:03:47,560
They've proven they will pay their own players. You duck

74
00:03:47,639 --> 00:03:50,080
the tax now because one, you're just so fucking close,

75
00:03:50,439 --> 00:03:53,439
but also you then get the revenue from the other

76
00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:55,560
teams that are paying into the tax. And if you're

77
00:03:56,080 --> 00:03:58,840
the cronkeys and you're just looking at this from a

78
00:03:58,879 --> 00:04:01,960
business perspective, you're about to go into the second apron

79
00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:06,879
and just pay gobs of tax next year, you want

80
00:04:06,919 --> 00:04:09,120
to get some revenue this year while you can it's

81
00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:11,319
feasible to get it this year. And so that's why

82
00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:15,199
I'd be fairly surprised if they don't duck the tax now.

83
00:04:15,560 --> 00:04:17,720
The scale at which they do it will be as

84
00:04:17,759 --> 00:04:20,160
part of a larger move or is it something you know?

85
00:04:20,160 --> 00:04:22,439
Are they so desperate that if you can't find someone

86
00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:25,920
to take on hunter Tyson alone, that you would attach

87
00:04:25,959 --> 00:04:28,879
a second round pick to him, like you're only is

88
00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:30,560
it their only second round pick? They could trade the

89
00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:34,240
twenty thirty two second round pick is I wouldn't put

90
00:04:34,279 --> 00:04:37,399
it past them because I think that's how Again, financially,

91
00:04:37,439 --> 00:04:40,759
speaking from an asset perspective, No, that's not the right

92
00:04:40,759 --> 00:04:45,040
thing to do. But because you are, like you're gonna

93
00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:47,399
be a repeater payer next year, you want to get

94
00:04:47,399 --> 00:04:49,279
the revenue this season while you can, And I think

95
00:04:49,319 --> 00:04:51,759
that's that's what we need to understand about their text.

96
00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:53,480
Is that no, just because they're out of the tax

97
00:04:53,519 --> 00:04:55,120
this year. No, they're not all of a sudden restarting

98
00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:57,879
the repeater clock. They need to do it for two seasons.

99
00:04:57,480 --> 00:05:00,560
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, No, I think I don't know my reaction

100
00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:02,720
whenever I see we've had a couple of these. Actually

101
00:05:02,720 --> 00:05:05,800
we've spoiler. We've recorded other teams before you're hearing this,

102
00:05:05,920 --> 00:05:09,639
but sorry, hey listen, they can listen. This is the

103
00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:11,879
behind the paywall tier, right, so people get to know,

104
00:05:11,959 --> 00:05:14,240
like how this works. Is that not a thing? But like,

105
00:05:14,759 --> 00:05:17,920
if you're this close to the tax line and you're

106
00:05:18,000 --> 00:05:20,120
over it, I'm always kind of like you messed up

107
00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:22,279
somewhere because you see a lot of other teams that

108
00:05:22,319 --> 00:05:25,279
are like a couple hundred grand under and you're like,

109
00:05:25,279 --> 00:05:27,519
good job, fellas, that's like a very Miami heat thing

110
00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:30,480
to do, or like like other teams seem like they

111
00:05:30,519 --> 00:05:33,680
really count every penny. You can't be this close and

112
00:05:33,759 --> 00:05:36,839
then not get under that, that's just forget the like, yes,

113
00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:38,680
are you going to be over the apron?

114
00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:40,720
Speaker 1: But are you saying if they don't get under it,

115
00:05:40,720 --> 00:05:42,480
it's a failure. Are you saying they failed by not

116
00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:43,720
already being under it?

117
00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:48,399
Speaker 2: Both the bigger failure would be not getting under it

118
00:05:48,439 --> 00:05:51,120
now to me, But like because you've kind of something

119
00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:53,319
got weird if you're this close but you're not under.

120
00:05:53,199 --> 00:05:55,879
Speaker 1: It, Because so forget about how the Cam Johnson trade

121
00:05:55,879 --> 00:05:58,480
has panned out. But like the steps they took to

122
00:05:58,560 --> 00:06:01,560
get here, I would almost applau where it's okay, what

123
00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:03,079
was the thing we said, let's see how you use

124
00:06:03,160 --> 00:06:05,639
this additional flexibility by getting camp Johnson. You went out

125
00:06:05,639 --> 00:06:07,720
and you did the Jonus founcun his trade and then

126
00:06:07,759 --> 00:06:10,560
what they could have done is not signed Tim Hardaway

127
00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:13,319
Junior or Bruce Brown, who it turns out just in

128
00:06:13,399 --> 00:06:19,319
terms of being bodies are, but Tim Hardaway Junior certainly matters. Yeah,

129
00:06:19,480 --> 00:06:21,920
what would you be willing to wrap up the tax stuff?

130
00:06:22,720 --> 00:06:25,360
Peyton Watson has graduated from we're using him to duck

131
00:06:25,399 --> 00:06:27,360
the town that you're getting value if you're doing that,

132
00:06:27,680 --> 00:06:30,279
Oh yeah, you would absolutely, I think trade even though

133
00:06:30,319 --> 00:06:33,199
challeng Picket's important now too, I think you would move

134
00:06:33,240 --> 00:06:35,399
Picket if a team wants some Hunter Tyson for sure.

135
00:06:35,879 --> 00:06:40,800
Here's here is an interesting question. What if it's Julian Strawther.

136
00:06:42,279 --> 00:06:45,319
Speaker 2: I mean, I think obviously he's you would be more

137
00:06:45,360 --> 00:06:48,680
reluctant to move him than any of any of Like

138
00:06:48,720 --> 00:06:51,639
you just went through the Pickett TII de Ron Holmes.

139
00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:53,879
Speaker 1: I think, oh would you move those guys?

140
00:06:55,519 --> 00:06:57,600
Speaker 2: I think if your whole, if you count on the

141
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:00,680
roster being fully held, like yeah, I think I think

142
00:07:00,720 --> 00:07:03,439
Strather is someone that and maybe Strather is someone that

143
00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:08,000
has enough value that moving him for somebody. What does

144
00:07:08,040 --> 00:07:10,600
he make? I mean nothing?

145
00:07:11,720 --> 00:07:16,120
Speaker 1: Getting under by more than four hundred thousand dollars, Well,

146
00:07:16,399 --> 00:07:18,720
that's the thing like, I think you can you could

147
00:07:18,720 --> 00:07:20,519
stomach losing any of those guys we've mentioned.

148
00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:24,519
Speaker 2: You can't. It can't be Watson obviously. Holmes, I don't know.

149
00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:27,079
Maybe would you be more willing to move homes than

150
00:07:27,279 --> 00:07:30,319
than Strather, just because if you assume Jokics is back

151
00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:32,240
healthy and then you got Valancies.

152
00:07:32,240 --> 00:07:34,839
Speaker 1: I don't know what's gonna happen with Jonas valentiunis after

153
00:07:34,839 --> 00:07:37,560
the season. It feels like he's just gone. Probably, so

154
00:07:37,920 --> 00:07:40,680
I rather have the cost controlled big there and then

155
00:07:41,199 --> 00:07:43,839
I don't I don't even think the Nuggets. No, they

156
00:07:43,879 --> 00:07:45,600
say this about Holmes too, but the fact that Julian

157
00:07:45,639 --> 00:07:48,319
Strather is now in year three, I don't think the

158
00:07:48,439 --> 00:07:52,199
Nuggets know what they have or understand how they should

159
00:07:52,279 --> 00:07:53,279
value Julian Strather.

160
00:07:53,399 --> 00:07:53,639
Speaker 2: He is.

161
00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:56,439
Speaker 1: I've seen games where it's he really feels like he

162
00:07:56,480 --> 00:07:58,920
could be an offensive firecracker, and it's all like even

163
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:01,879
something on the ball, pops. I've watched games and it's, oh,

164
00:08:01,920 --> 00:08:03,920
he went to a four from the foul line and

165
00:08:03,959 --> 00:08:06,439
I felt like, I he like, what was he doing?

166
00:08:06,519 --> 00:08:09,879
So I would move? I would dumb Julian Strather if

167
00:08:09,879 --> 00:08:10,879
push came to show.

168
00:08:11,079 --> 00:08:13,800
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think another thing to think about this maybe

169
00:08:13,839 --> 00:08:18,319
isn't fair, but like it took Watson until a week ago,

170
00:08:18,439 --> 00:08:23,000
two weeks ago, I mean certainly told for the Nuggets

171
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:26,680
to be like, oh, okay, obviously they didn't. They didn't

172
00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:29,439
who knows, who knows if what the negotiations were like

173
00:08:29,839 --> 00:08:33,240
on an extension for him, But like it took until now.

174
00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:35,279
And sometimes on a really good team where roles are

175
00:08:35,320 --> 00:08:37,360
super defined and like touches are hard to come by,

176
00:08:37,399 --> 00:08:39,639
it just takes longer for a young player to show

177
00:08:39,679 --> 00:08:42,000
you like what he might be able to do. So

178
00:08:42,039 --> 00:08:45,200
Strawther's a year behind in terms of of like development

179
00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:49,120
wise and contracts stuff, you'd be no. I think the

180
00:08:49,159 --> 00:08:52,480
reason I asked you about Holmes versus Strawther is like,

181
00:08:52,759 --> 00:08:55,159
I think those are the two that you could actually,

182
00:08:55,639 --> 00:08:59,120
you know, get you might actually get something you can't

183
00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:01,600
probably not get anything. You're just dumping the money.

184
00:09:02,279 --> 00:09:03,480
Speaker 1: I would.

185
00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:07,399
Speaker 2: I think if it's just this year, I might rather

186
00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:11,279
move Ah, that's so hard. I think I might rather

187
00:09:11,360 --> 00:09:12,960
move homes if it's just this year.

188
00:09:13,480 --> 00:09:16,279
Speaker 1: Well, you know that you're not gonna get homes back

189
00:09:16,360 --> 00:09:18,159
next year, right, It's how you get to move him

190
00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:18,480
this year?

191
00:09:18,519 --> 00:09:20,039
Speaker 2: And he come, No, I'm just thinking of like the

192
00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:23,960
Nuggets maximal competitive, Like I'm straw the might matter more.

193
00:09:24,120 --> 00:09:26,000
Speaker 1: Then you go yeah, then you just go with the

194
00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:29,240
big because if Yo Kich isn't healthy, what, there's no point.

195
00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:32,120
Speaker 2: In doing it well. And like Aaron, even if Valentnis

196
00:09:32,159 --> 00:09:34,559
is if he for the point, like yeah, Valentin is

197
00:09:34,559 --> 00:09:36,399
coming off the books whatever, But like Aaron Gordon can

198
00:09:36,399 --> 00:09:38,480
play center. Aaron Gordon has played center in the past.

199
00:09:38,519 --> 00:09:40,480
Like you're okay depth wise, I don't know. It's a

200
00:09:40,480 --> 00:09:42,440
tough call. You could talk to me one way or

201
00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:42,759
the other.

202
00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:45,559
Speaker 1: I can tell you're a professional podcaster because you segued

203
00:09:45,639 --> 00:09:48,759
us into the Peyton Watson talk. Graham, what do they

204
00:09:48,799 --> 00:09:51,639
do with Peyton? Now it's you. You could just say

205
00:09:51,759 --> 00:09:53,639
you keep him and you figure it out this summer

206
00:09:53,720 --> 00:09:57,480
stupid And that's probably the answer. But he's headed to

207
00:09:57,559 --> 00:10:00,759
restricted free agency. They could technically be in the second

208
00:10:00,759 --> 00:10:04,120
apron without him, depending on what happens with Jonas valentiunis

209
00:10:04,480 --> 00:10:06,919
how much are you will let and how much there

210
00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:08,919
will be teams with more money around. And I know

211
00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:12,679
people joke about free agency, including myself, turning into a farce,

212
00:10:13,159 --> 00:10:16,399
especially restricted free agency. This is my favorite. Who's who's

213
00:10:16,399 --> 00:10:18,919
the last RFA to get an offer sheeet grant? You

214
00:10:18,919 --> 00:10:19,240
know they.

215
00:10:19,279 --> 00:10:22,600
Speaker 2: Oh, Paul Reid yep.

216
00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:26,960
Speaker 1: So that's why it's funny. But Peyton Watson, especially this

217
00:10:27,080 --> 00:10:30,120
version of Peyton Watson. You look at, oh, some ball

218
00:10:30,159 --> 00:10:33,159
handling stuff, three pointer going down in a higher clip,

219
00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:35,480
the stuff he still does, disruptive defense, It's like, oh, like,

220
00:10:35,679 --> 00:10:37,440
that's a guy who can make plays at the rim,

221
00:10:37,559 --> 00:10:40,679
who can stick with guys on the perimeter. Someone's gonna

222
00:10:40,679 --> 00:10:43,559
give him an offer sheet. And I think if we

223
00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:45,360
were recording this at the start of the season, you

224
00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:47,039
could have said, well, maybe they could keep him for

225
00:10:47,159 --> 00:10:50,759
like something twelve to fourteen million annually. I don't think

226
00:10:50,799 --> 00:10:53,840
he's gonna get more than Christian Brown, but I think

227
00:10:53,879 --> 00:10:57,639
that we've entered like eighteen plus million dollars if he

228
00:10:57,759 --> 00:11:00,639
keeps this up. And I'm not saying score points a game.

229
00:11:01,039 --> 00:11:04,399
If this is just the season he has, we're firmly

230
00:11:04,559 --> 00:11:08,159
in like probably eighteen plus million dollar territory, right, which

231
00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:09,320
is less than Christian Brown.

232
00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:12,559
Speaker 2: To be clear, I'm I'm bumping on is he gonna

233
00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:13,840
get more than Christian Brown?

234
00:11:14,960 --> 00:11:16,519
Speaker 1: I mean, like, so you know what, the Bulls could

235
00:11:16,559 --> 00:11:19,000
have cap space, So you're right, there's definitely there's that's.

236
00:11:18,879 --> 00:11:22,200
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I guess, like and the Wizards, I mean,

237
00:11:22,480 --> 00:11:22,840
why not.

238
00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:24,919
Speaker 1: Well, I was more so trolling the Bulls that they're

239
00:11:24,919 --> 00:11:27,080
gonna down Patrick Williams special.

240
00:11:27,159 --> 00:11:32,279
Speaker 2: But I mean at this point, like what does Brown

241
00:11:32,559 --> 00:11:34,159
do better than Watson?

242
00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:36,159
Speaker 1: I thought I thought you were gonna say it, what

243
00:11:36,200 --> 00:11:37,240
does Brown do for you?

244
00:11:37,879 --> 00:11:41,639
Speaker 2: Talk you by well, I mean it's kind of like

245
00:11:41,679 --> 00:11:44,080
an unfair thing because there are different positionally, and like

246
00:11:44,120 --> 00:11:47,240
maybe you trust Brown on smaller guards more.

247
00:11:47,720 --> 00:11:49,320
Speaker 1: I think it comes down to this for me, I

248
00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:51,759
shouldn't boil it down to it. Who do you trust

249
00:11:51,759 --> 00:11:54,759
to guard Anthony Edwards more, Christian Brown or Peyton Watson.

250
00:11:56,360 --> 00:11:58,720
Speaker 2: I mean, I guess it's Brown. I'm sure there's Nuggets

251
00:11:58,759 --> 00:12:01,080
fans some of them are screaming like, well, Watson's length

252
00:12:01,240 --> 00:12:04,120
just an athleticism matters more. But yeah, I thinks Brown

253
00:12:04,159 --> 00:12:06,320
has the track record, I guess in the consistency, and

254
00:12:06,360 --> 00:12:08,759
he's been in a larger role for longer. But if

255
00:12:08,799 --> 00:12:11,600
Watson really is I like, the the thirty nine percent

256
00:12:11,679 --> 00:12:14,000
three point shooting, it's low volume. But if Watson is

257
00:12:15,600 --> 00:12:18,120
league average or better from three, like that's just and

258
00:12:18,159 --> 00:12:20,519
like some of the in between stuff he's shown lately

259
00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:25,080
with with more opportunities. Watson looks, I that's like, you

260
00:12:25,200 --> 00:12:26,960
really can't let that guy go. I think, so, what

261
00:12:26,960 --> 00:12:29,480
are they gonna do with him? Why isn't this just

262
00:12:29,519 --> 00:12:34,120
a at worst like preserve the asset restrictive free agency,

263
00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:35,320
come on back situation?

264
00:12:35,360 --> 00:12:38,279
Speaker 1: Now? I think what gets interesting? And I'm not saying

265
00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:40,679
this is the reason you do it, but if he

266
00:12:40,759 --> 00:12:42,919
is now someone who can get you off of Zeke

267
00:12:43,000 --> 00:12:47,440
Nagy's contract, whereas the trade that we've thrown I'm not

268
00:12:47,480 --> 00:12:49,879
saying just that, but the trade that we have thrown

269
00:12:49,919 --> 00:12:55,279
out is Peyton Watson Zeke Nagy for iod Soon MoU

270
00:12:55,799 --> 00:12:59,519
or if you want to go a step above, what

271
00:12:59,600 --> 00:13:03,720
if you could now do a swap Peyton Watson Nausey

272
00:13:04,320 --> 00:13:07,039
smaller salary X throw it in there and you're getting

273
00:13:07,080 --> 00:13:07,679
Kobe White.

274
00:13:09,320 --> 00:13:15,120
Speaker 2: I would say, I think Watson has moved past the

275
00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:18,279
point of he's something we're gonna use to get off

276
00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:22,600
a contract for in nause that is like it's not

277
00:13:22,720 --> 00:13:25,600
good money, but it's all what is it? Seven million dollars?

278
00:13:25,600 --> 00:13:27,519
I know, I know the tax and apron stuff, so

279
00:13:27,559 --> 00:13:32,440
it's not really just seven next year. But like what

280
00:13:32,480 --> 00:13:35,960
if Watson is I mean, he's like a two way

281
00:13:36,039 --> 00:13:40,559
starter with athleticism and upside and like maybe some shot creation.

282
00:13:40,720 --> 00:13:42,720
Like that's not a guy you used to get off

283
00:13:42,919 --> 00:13:45,480
seven million bucks for next year, it's a guy you

284
00:13:45,559 --> 00:13:48,039
trade for. Like, yeah, we'll take two firsts after we

285
00:13:48,120 --> 00:13:51,120
signed this next deal, we'll take two first back. And

286
00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:54,600
I don't know, like right, like, am i I'm keeping him?

287
00:13:54,639 --> 00:13:56,240
Speaker 1: I don't know what I mean? And that could be.

288
00:13:56,360 --> 00:13:58,639
So let's talk about what Denver need. But I'm my

289
00:13:58,799 --> 00:14:03,039
default is I'm not looking. I'm not trading Peyton Watson

290
00:14:03,080 --> 00:14:05,440
because of his free agency, or I'm not trading Peyton

291
00:14:05,440 --> 00:14:07,879
Watson because it gets me off of Zeke Nasci. No way,

292
00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:11,600
I'm officially at that point. Yeah, yeah, what does Denver need?

293
00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:15,000
You look at this roster aside from healthier bodies? But

294
00:14:15,399 --> 00:14:17,519
oh wait, can I ask another awkward question? This this

295
00:14:17,600 --> 00:14:22,200
falls and needs I guess please, would you like, do

296
00:14:22,240 --> 00:14:24,960
you consider if the if the front office use it

297
00:14:24,960 --> 00:14:27,120
as well? How can we afford that they could just

298
00:14:27,159 --> 00:14:29,240
pay Watson and be done with it? But do you

299
00:14:29,279 --> 00:14:32,840
would all consider should we investigate like does Cam Johnson

300
00:14:32,879 --> 00:14:34,519
have any value left? Like are we more are we

301
00:14:34,559 --> 00:14:36,559
more prepared to pay Peyton Watson and Christian Brown?

302
00:14:36,639 --> 00:14:40,080
Speaker 2: Then that was one of my like one of my

303
00:14:40,200 --> 00:14:42,320
notes coming into this on my own docs, so you

304
00:14:42,360 --> 00:14:44,759
can't see it, but it's like, why aren't we like

305
00:14:44,799 --> 00:14:47,639
can we talk about It's funny, like we're both me

306
00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:52,720
like pretend like off the injury kind of throws it

307
00:14:52,879 --> 00:14:55,399
injury and it's like so, but then you would also say,

308
00:14:55,440 --> 00:14:58,279
like if we're talking about needs, which we are, you'd say, like,

309
00:14:58,440 --> 00:15:00,919
I'd be nice to have like a like MPG level

310
00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:03,399
shooter that we could really count, And like Cam Johnson's

311
00:15:03,399 --> 00:15:05,879
supposed to be that guy. So if you trade him

312
00:15:05,919 --> 00:15:08,600
because you're worried about tax and whatever, it's like, I

313
00:15:08,600 --> 00:15:12,320
guess if Watson doubles his volume and stays at this percentage,

314
00:15:12,360 --> 00:15:14,200
then you're good. But you know what I mean, like

315
00:15:14,559 --> 00:15:17,960
I think their needs still might be Now that's well

316
00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:21,440
backing up Denver's needs are just get healthy because I

317
00:15:21,440 --> 00:15:24,000
think we both agree that, like if they're fully stocked,

318
00:15:24,360 --> 00:15:27,240
it's it's it's the thunder who have been mortal for

319
00:15:27,279 --> 00:15:30,480
a month now and it's them, And then you you

320
00:15:30,519 --> 00:15:32,840
slot in Minnesota has been hotter than anybody. But I

321
00:15:32,879 --> 00:15:35,519
still like Denver better. Just if I got to pick one,

322
00:15:37,240 --> 00:15:43,039
maybe maybe shooting still, but I guess it's I don't know.

323
00:15:43,279 --> 00:15:45,679
Speaker 1: Who's the last player they had where the shooting could

324
00:15:45,679 --> 00:15:48,679
be folded into, like you, because they either have players

325
00:15:48,679 --> 00:15:52,159
who provide the defense or the high volume shooting. Who's

326
00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:55,799
the last guy that provided them with both in.

327
00:15:55,799 --> 00:15:58,879
Speaker 2: One as the Warriors earlier this year when he hit

328
00:15:59,080 --> 00:15:59,799
like eleven of them.

329
00:16:00,159 --> 00:16:02,279
Speaker 1: Gordon against the Thunder in the playoffs last year.

330
00:16:02,320 --> 00:16:06,039
Speaker 2: Yeah, there you go. Yeah, well, I mean right, I

331
00:16:06,039 --> 00:16:09,159
mean maybe again, Maybe that's Watson's value is if he

332
00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:11,120
could do both of those things going forward. I don't know,

333
00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:13,879
we probably should stop talking about Watson. We've already made them.

334
00:16:13,919 --> 00:16:15,759
Speaker 1: Well. I think this is your Maine too, because I

335
00:16:15,759 --> 00:16:17,639
would agree with you on the shooting. I could see.

336
00:16:17,679 --> 00:16:21,240
I like the idea of I like another ball handler here,

337
00:16:21,600 --> 00:16:24,240
Like it's cool that you could trust Peyton Watson to

338
00:16:24,279 --> 00:16:26,759
do some things, or you have Bruce Brown, but someone

339
00:16:26,840 --> 00:16:29,639
like even I would assume getting downhill, getting two feet

340
00:16:29,639 --> 00:16:31,440
in the paint, that type of guy, somebody who's gonna

341
00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:33,840
give you more than or you would expect to give

342
00:16:33,840 --> 00:16:36,279
you more than Jail and Pickett in a playoff series.

343
00:16:36,559 --> 00:16:39,759
Those are the two things I have circled. The problem

344
00:16:39,799 --> 00:16:42,440
is is that if you're not willing to move Peyton Watson,

345
00:16:42,919 --> 00:16:46,200
how are you dressing any of these needs? Because I

346
00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:50,080
don't think could you use swaps and Zeke Nausey's salary

347
00:16:50,279 --> 00:16:55,039
to get anybody. I don't know if swaps. Honestly, I

348
00:16:55,080 --> 00:16:57,080
think even if you weren't getting anybody, I don't know

349
00:16:57,080 --> 00:17:00,200
if that swaps or getting you off of the Zeke Nausey.

350
00:17:00,639 --> 00:17:03,399
Speaker 2: Well, maybe they do. If you go out as far

351
00:17:03,440 --> 00:17:06,440
as possible, which would be thirty and thirty one, I

352
00:17:06,480 --> 00:17:08,200
think you could find a team that might want to

353
00:17:08,240 --> 00:17:14,000
buy into the potential post Jokic prime section of Denver's future.

354
00:17:14,680 --> 00:17:17,319
So like, if you view Nausea as just dead money, again,

355
00:17:17,319 --> 00:17:20,839
it's not that much. If I'm like if I'm Brooklyn,

356
00:17:21,200 --> 00:17:24,160
or if I'm Washington or Utah or whatever, teams with

357
00:17:24,200 --> 00:17:28,279
a little bit of flexibility and a history of some

358
00:17:28,480 --> 00:17:31,599
in some cases wanting those distant shares of a team's

359
00:17:31,599 --> 00:17:35,119
potential downside, Like I'm taking nausea, I'm taking a seven

360
00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:38,200
million dollar hit next year for a shot at if

361
00:17:38,200 --> 00:17:41,400
they're like depending on the protections of swapping with Denver

362
00:17:41,480 --> 00:17:43,599
in like the twenty thirties, aren't you like that's I

363
00:17:43,599 --> 00:17:45,799
think that's worth it if you've got the flexibility.

364
00:17:46,359 --> 00:17:52,519
Speaker 1: Yeah, I I think we over romanticize the rights to

365
00:17:52,559 --> 00:17:55,039
those distant picks because the front officers who are trading

366
00:17:55,039 --> 00:17:57,240
for them probably understand that they're not going to be

367
00:17:57,279 --> 00:17:59,640
the front office. Yeah, we're exercising them, and that's that's

368
00:17:59,640 --> 00:18:02,079
the p and no in a vacuum. I agree with you,

369
00:18:02,559 --> 00:18:05,640
But I think that's why swaps alone wouldn't be enough

370
00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:08,000
to get off of contract.

371
00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:10,559
Speaker 2: Maybe not right because if it is a human who

372
00:18:10,599 --> 00:18:13,920
is employed making that decision, ultimately, like at the ownership level,

373
00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:16,279
you should do that. But if it's a general manager,

374
00:18:16,279 --> 00:18:19,759
they're not exactly incentivized to set the next guy up

375
00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:23,079
for a good draft pick potentially coming in. I mean,

376
00:18:23,279 --> 00:18:25,799
the nuggets are tricky. Well, let me ask you a

377
00:18:25,920 --> 00:18:27,559
more global question. I know we have a couple of

378
00:18:27,559 --> 00:18:31,400
other topics to hit here, but like of the teams

379
00:18:31,960 --> 00:18:35,799
that we they just seem like a team that duck

380
00:18:35,880 --> 00:18:37,799
the tax by moving off one of these two million

381
00:18:37,839 --> 00:18:42,720
dollar guys and attaching a something and call it good, right, Like,

382
00:18:42,799 --> 00:18:45,440
realistically this is not a team, Like, wouldn't you be

383
00:18:45,480 --> 00:18:48,200
shocked if if they're not trading Watson? I don't think,

384
00:18:48,279 --> 00:18:50,960
because that would logically would be something you'd consider normally

385
00:18:51,000 --> 00:18:53,640
with free agency approaching. But like that, I think that's

386
00:18:53,640 --> 00:18:55,599
off the table. And then after that it's like what

387
00:18:55,680 --> 00:18:56,480
are we talking about?

388
00:18:57,119 --> 00:19:00,720
Speaker 1: But with the RFA stuff, you could probably average signing

389
00:19:00,720 --> 00:19:04,319
trade scenarios. So that's also why you don't. The only

390
00:19:04,359 --> 00:19:06,920
reason I could think of is we think Spencer Jones

391
00:19:06,960 --> 00:19:10,039
is ready, We're gonna convert him, and that's how But that, like,

392
00:19:10,160 --> 00:19:11,319
is that more of a reason to get rid of

393
00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:13,039
Christian Brown at this point? I think it's just we've

394
00:19:13,039 --> 00:19:14,799
been so long since we saw Christian Brown play, it's

395
00:19:14,839 --> 00:19:17,759
kind of unfair. But to your point, the other issue

396
00:19:17,759 --> 00:19:19,559
you run into is even if you can do something,

397
00:19:20,160 --> 00:19:25,759
if the Nuggets are healthy, like how deep, like how much?

398
00:19:26,079 --> 00:19:27,759
How good does the player need to be so you

399
00:19:27,759 --> 00:19:32,000
have Aaron Gordon, Christian Brown, Jamal Murray, Nicole Jokic, Peyton Watson,

400
00:19:32,559 --> 00:19:34,440
Cam Johnson has to be in there are all just

401
00:19:34,559 --> 00:19:37,519
locks to be in the rotation, So you have to

402
00:19:37,559 --> 00:19:40,640
be better than like are you getting a seventh best

403
00:19:40,640 --> 00:19:42,359
player or an eighth best player when you're in the

404
00:19:42,400 --> 00:19:46,519
Spencer Jones, Tim Hardaway, Junior, Bruce Brown, Jonas Valencunas territory,

405
00:19:46,559 --> 00:19:49,920
it needs to be better than like most like the

406
00:19:49,960 --> 00:19:51,960
player you're getting, I think for it to be worthwhile

407
00:19:52,160 --> 00:19:53,960
needs to be better than most of those players that

408
00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:54,960
I just named.

409
00:19:55,039 --> 00:19:57,720
Speaker 2: Right and given the tools they have to like sweeten

410
00:19:57,799 --> 00:20:02,279
things which are few, Like how do you do? How

411
00:20:02,359 --> 00:20:05,519
is that even possible? Like maybe maybe like fit wise,

412
00:20:05,559 --> 00:20:08,400
you could find someone who's like roughly as valuable on

413
00:20:08,519 --> 00:20:15,160
balance as Brown or Hardaway Bruce Brown, But like it

414
00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:17,079
feels like it would be like, well, he's close to

415
00:20:17,119 --> 00:20:19,480
his good he's just different, like we want this box

416
00:20:19,559 --> 00:20:22,480
checked and we don't care about it'd be like lateral

417
00:20:22,519 --> 00:20:26,400
moves I think in most cases. So so yeah, like

418
00:20:27,319 --> 00:20:29,839
that's part of the reason is like it's hard to envision,

419
00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:33,799
beyond the tax ducking, what a move would look like.

420
00:20:33,839 --> 00:20:36,319
And if you don't think that nause is movable for

421
00:20:36,319 --> 00:20:38,200
for what Denver would be willing to pay to move him,

422
00:20:38,240 --> 00:20:40,759
then it's then it's you're making little lateral moves in

423
00:20:40,799 --> 00:20:45,440
your eight through eleven spots in your rotation maybe do.

424
00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:49,640
Speaker 1: You have any targets specifically that would be like, so

425
00:20:49,839 --> 00:20:52,480
I have I have a trade like throw logistics out

426
00:20:52,480 --> 00:20:54,440
the window, like don't say Luka Doncics or something, but

427
00:20:54,559 --> 00:20:56,319
just like anyone you think that fits some of the

428
00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:58,279
needs that we that we outlined.

429
00:20:58,680 --> 00:21:00,759
Speaker 2: I mean, if you brought it up and I was

430
00:21:00,799 --> 00:21:05,359
going to who's like the it's got to be what's

431
00:21:05,400 --> 00:21:08,160
Cam Johnson make twenty one this year, twenty three next?

432
00:21:08,200 --> 00:21:11,480
So who's like the nineteen ish or nineteen to twenty

433
00:21:11,519 --> 00:21:15,519
million dollar player that maybe has longer on his deal

434
00:21:15,759 --> 00:21:17,759
or something that you could turn Cam Johnson?

435
00:21:19,000 --> 00:21:22,359
Speaker 1: Who I don't know. I don't I would be curious

436
00:21:22,359 --> 00:21:25,000
as to what Cam Johnson's value is right.

437
00:21:24,880 --> 00:21:27,920
Speaker 2: Now, right right? I mean the contract's reasonable for like

438
00:21:28,000 --> 00:21:33,359
I think he still is a starter, like Jeremy Grant

439
00:21:33,359 --> 00:21:36,440
makes way too much that he's not under that like

440
00:21:36,559 --> 00:21:39,079
Kobe White again, but like what does Kobe White do

441
00:21:39,160 --> 00:21:41,039
for you if you're Denver? Because there's your other ball

442
00:21:41,039 --> 00:21:43,640
handler he makes less than Johnson?

443
00:21:44,440 --> 00:21:46,839
Speaker 1: Are you ever is he part? Does he ever have?

444
00:21:47,039 --> 00:21:48,480
He's not closing going to be a free agent. He's

445
00:21:48,519 --> 00:21:50,400
not closing, and then you have to pay him that's weird.

446
00:21:51,279 --> 00:21:53,279
Speaker 2: Well, maybe you do it because you're cleaning up next

447
00:21:53,319 --> 00:21:55,400
year's books two and you're saying some of that money's

448
00:21:55,440 --> 00:21:58,160
going to be allocated for Watson and his next deal.

449
00:21:58,920 --> 00:22:02,759
I don't know, it's it's all like trick.

450
00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:05,759
Speaker 1: I wonder. I think he's probably too cheap for them

451
00:22:05,799 --> 00:22:09,400
to be like vit Crachy would be good for Denver's.

452
00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:11,319
Like it's like a ball hand. He chucks a bunch

453
00:22:11,319 --> 00:22:14,559
of boxes on certain nights, depending on whether the shots falling.

454
00:22:14,920 --> 00:22:16,519
Speaker 2: What are you giving up to? Are you in a

455
00:22:16,640 --> 00:22:17,319
Johnson deal?

456
00:22:18,119 --> 00:22:20,039
Speaker 1: Oh? No, No, I wasn't saying I was in general

457
00:22:20,079 --> 00:22:24,480
at yeah, just in general, I mean Cam Johnson deal specifically?

458
00:22:24,599 --> 00:22:29,839
Do you trade him to No, that's tupid. Like what

459
00:22:29,839 --> 00:22:34,079
about Cam Johnson for for KCP and Cam Spencer? That'd

460
00:22:34,119 --> 00:22:34,759
be really funny.

461
00:22:34,759 --> 00:22:39,720
Speaker 2: He'd be coming back? Is Cam Spencer? Cam Spencer clearly

462
00:22:39,759 --> 00:22:42,680
the best like dollar for production value player in that group?

463
00:22:43,079 --> 00:22:43,200
Speaker 1: Right?

464
00:22:46,160 --> 00:22:49,519
Speaker 2: Yeah, we run into the same thing. Uh, Like again,

465
00:22:49,680 --> 00:22:52,559
I like Cam Spencer a lot, and CACP I would

466
00:22:52,599 --> 00:22:56,599
just assume would be better once back in Denver. Are

467
00:22:56,640 --> 00:22:59,880
either of them gonna get rotation minutes over Johnson? This?

468
00:23:00,680 --> 00:23:03,279
I don't know, maybe no, like that wud be hard

469
00:23:03,519 --> 00:23:04,720
something even here I'm.

470
00:23:04,559 --> 00:23:06,599
Speaker 1: Trying to think of, let's say you're willing to attach

471
00:23:06,680 --> 00:23:10,599
the twenty thirty two second first round swaps. I don't know,

472
00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:15,599
like what's the upgrade that you like, the realistic upgrade

473
00:23:15,759 --> 00:23:19,200
upgrade you'd be chasing in that salary range. That's what's

474
00:23:19,200 --> 00:23:22,119
tough because they have to be better then, because you

475
00:23:22,119 --> 00:23:24,440
could talk about there might be ones who're better defensively,

476
00:23:24,480 --> 00:23:29,640
but it comes with an offensive trade off there then it's.

477
00:23:29,160 --> 00:23:32,000
Speaker 2: With no sweeteners. It's like, yeah, I mean, I'm the

478
00:23:32,079 --> 00:23:34,119
cam Johnson thinks starts. The more you look at it

479
00:23:34,200 --> 00:23:36,119
kind of feels like a dead end. I don't know

480
00:23:36,160 --> 00:23:36,920
what they do there.

481
00:23:37,160 --> 00:23:37,599
Speaker 1: I don't.

482
00:23:37,640 --> 00:23:39,319
Speaker 2: I don't have a lot on this team, honestly, Like

483
00:23:39,359 --> 00:23:42,640
it's I think it's Picket or Tyson or whatever, and

484
00:23:42,680 --> 00:23:44,559
you duck the tax and you probably call it good,

485
00:23:44,799 --> 00:23:47,839
like I don't. I mean, maybe you want to free

486
00:23:47,920 --> 00:23:49,279
up money for Watson.

487
00:23:49,079 --> 00:23:52,119
Speaker 1: Well, and could you also if we're looking additively, kean

488
00:23:52,200 --> 00:23:55,359
Ellis is so cheap that is that twenty thirty two

489
00:23:55,480 --> 00:23:57,559
second enough to get you there with the Kings or

490
00:23:57,599 --> 00:24:00,839
can they do better a first round swap and that second.

491
00:24:01,119 --> 00:24:03,440
Speaker 2: Don't they have to do better than that? For Ellis?

492
00:24:03,559 --> 00:24:06,519
I would assume Elie's market will be pretty Uh.

493
00:24:06,880 --> 00:24:09,680
Speaker 1: They're not gonna get a first round pick for him standalone, though,

494
00:24:09,680 --> 00:24:10,279
do you think will?

495
00:24:10,319 --> 00:24:14,240
Speaker 2: They Probably not a real one. It could see, I

496
00:24:14,279 --> 00:24:16,920
could see like a one that turns into a couple seconds.

497
00:24:16,960 --> 00:24:20,839
Speaker 1: Maybe I'm contractually obligated to mention him for every team,

498
00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:24,920
but this salary range wise, he would certainly fit justin Champenne.

499
00:24:24,960 --> 00:24:27,640
If Washington looks and sees how many wings they have

500
00:24:27,680 --> 00:24:29,519
and decides, hey, we could we could move this guy.

501
00:24:31,680 --> 00:24:34,680
Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, I could see that. I have you

502
00:24:34,720 --> 00:24:36,200
did you bring up the soon MoU yet?

503
00:24:36,920 --> 00:24:39,960
Speaker 1: So I have a trade that evolves assummu? That's the

504
00:24:39,960 --> 00:24:42,319
one like it would have to be. So you're giving

505
00:24:42,759 --> 00:24:44,759
I'll say all the swaps, even though twenty twenty six

506
00:24:44,799 --> 00:24:46,440
doesn't matter. We could say all the swaps to make

507
00:24:46,519 --> 00:24:50,319
it sound splash. Here, all the swaps your second round pick,

508
00:24:50,880 --> 00:24:57,039
Doron Holmes, Zeke Nagy, Julian Strawther for Jallen Smith and

509
00:24:57,079 --> 00:24:57,839
Io Desumu.

510
00:24:58,319 --> 00:25:02,079
Speaker 2: Hmm, what there swaps against this? You're give him three

511
00:25:02,119 --> 00:25:04,440
swaps this year? Though?

512
00:25:04,519 --> 00:25:06,400
Speaker 1: The are the Bulls swapping with the Nuggets are really

513
00:25:06,440 --> 00:25:09,240
like two swaps. Oh right.

514
00:25:09,279 --> 00:25:12,599
Speaker 2: I was looking at the condition So the conditional twenty eight,

515
00:25:12,640 --> 00:25:14,000
thirty and thirty one's.

516
00:25:14,519 --> 00:25:17,880
Speaker 1: And those are conditional upon the Nuggets conveying their first

517
00:25:17,960 --> 00:25:20,680
round pick, like to okay sees that they have that

518
00:25:20,759 --> 00:25:22,000
pick availble to swap.

519
00:25:23,720 --> 00:25:26,160
Speaker 2: God, if we entered the era where it's like even

520
00:25:26,240 --> 00:25:29,359
swaps are like, I don't know, we'll see just because

521
00:25:29,440 --> 00:25:31,400
every tea. I guess the Nuggets are unusual in that

522
00:25:31,440 --> 00:25:32,640
they're so leveraged with pick.

523
00:25:32,680 --> 00:25:34,680
Speaker 1: So let's just let's frame it this way. Two swaps

524
00:25:35,039 --> 00:25:38,599
a second round pick. Zeke Nagy's contract is going out,

525
00:25:39,079 --> 00:25:42,759
and you're getting Holmes and Strawther as the Bulls, and

526
00:25:42,759 --> 00:25:44,599
you're sending out Jalen Smith and Iota Summu.

527
00:25:45,799 --> 00:25:49,720
Speaker 2: I think you probably, I think both sides probably do that.

528
00:25:49,759 --> 00:25:52,759
I mean again, it's the Bulls so like they rarely

529
00:25:52,759 --> 00:25:55,359
do what they should. I think the Bulls should do that.

530
00:25:55,960 --> 00:25:58,000
Speaker 1: I like the other thing you do if you were

531
00:25:58,039 --> 00:26:01,119
looking to consolidate salary, is that instead of Zeke Najy,

532
00:26:01,680 --> 00:26:04,359
if you think that Gordon's gonna play center in the playoffs,

533
00:26:04,759 --> 00:26:08,720
you'll get just healthy. You could trade Jonas Valentiunis instead

534
00:26:08,720 --> 00:26:10,119
of Zeke nag and then hope.

535
00:26:09,960 --> 00:26:12,200
Speaker 2: That then you and the team gets off the hook

536
00:26:12,240 --> 00:26:15,519
because that's fully non guaranteed next year, right the ten million.

537
00:26:15,880 --> 00:26:19,720
Speaker 1: For Yeah, and I don't think he wants to be

538
00:26:19,839 --> 00:26:21,000
in the NBA anymore.

539
00:26:21,039 --> 00:26:25,079
Speaker 2: Still, he's here begrudgingly after Maybe he just didn't want

540
00:26:25,079 --> 00:26:26,480
to be on the Kings. You ever thought of that?

541
00:26:27,240 --> 00:26:28,680
Speaker 1: Didn't seem like you wanted to be on the Nuggets

542
00:26:28,680 --> 00:26:30,720
at one point either, But I guess they was.

543
00:26:31,240 --> 00:26:32,920
Speaker 2: That was a weird stretch, Okay. I I kind of

544
00:26:32,960 --> 00:26:35,039
like that, and I like you get Smith adds a

545
00:26:35,200 --> 00:26:37,599
kind of a different element for them. For for Denver,

546
00:26:37,640 --> 00:26:40,359
I should say, and who is the other guy you're

547
00:26:40,400 --> 00:26:41,119
getting with Smith?

548
00:26:42,519 --> 00:26:42,640
Speaker 1: Uh?

549
00:26:43,920 --> 00:26:45,680
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm in. I'm in on that for Denver.

550
00:26:45,759 --> 00:26:50,200
Speaker 1: Now here's would you like the would you like the problem?

551
00:26:51,200 --> 00:26:52,160
Speaker 2: I'd love the problem?

552
00:26:52,279 --> 00:26:54,599
Speaker 1: So the problem if you're the if you're the Nuggets,

553
00:26:54,599 --> 00:26:56,960
do you push to include Jonas Valentnis because you would

554
00:26:56,960 --> 00:27:00,160
be able to like because you're adding money in that trade,

555
00:27:00,440 --> 00:27:02,720
you're going into the tax by you're all of a sudden,

556
00:27:02,720 --> 00:27:05,440
like three million dollars into the tax rather than half

557
00:27:05,480 --> 00:27:07,039
a million dollars away from ducking it.

558
00:27:07,599 --> 00:27:12,119
Speaker 2: I would say you maybe, because like how many minutes

559
00:27:13,319 --> 00:27:16,680
is is Valentunis gonna play with Jokic in the postseason,

560
00:27:16,880 --> 00:27:19,759
Like if you think that's like one of your one

561
00:27:19,759 --> 00:27:23,240
of your weapons, you might hesitate, But I think realistically

562
00:27:23,680 --> 00:27:27,000
you'll get You'll play forty three minutes in all the

563
00:27:27,039 --> 00:27:29,400
games that really matter in the playoffs, and then Aaron

564
00:27:29,400 --> 00:27:32,240
Gordon probably plays some more of those, or maybe Valentunis

565
00:27:32,279 --> 00:27:35,960
is playing less than ten and Smith he's so right,

566
00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:38,319
so like you you would, He's not that big of

567
00:27:38,359 --> 00:27:39,759
a lot. He's not as big of a loss as

568
00:27:39,759 --> 00:27:40,519
it might seem.

569
00:27:41,000 --> 00:27:44,160
Speaker 1: You're actually still adding money in that trade by two

570
00:27:44,240 --> 00:27:48,960
hundred thousand dollars. Honestly, if I can get off Zeke

571
00:27:49,039 --> 00:27:53,519
Naugy like I'm doing it, and then it's just you

572
00:27:53,519 --> 00:27:55,319
know what you missed out on the revenue this year,

573
00:27:55,319 --> 00:27:58,279
and you Reckoncile, that's and you if you really wanted to,

574
00:27:58,440 --> 00:28:02,079
you could probably Well you're going three for two here already,

575
00:28:02,359 --> 00:28:04,400
So I'm gonna say you could just send like one

576
00:28:04,440 --> 00:28:10,640
of your someone would take Bruce Brown or Tim Hardaway Junior. Yeah,

577
00:28:10,680 --> 00:28:12,720
well you could just do a separate trade for Valentunis.

578
00:28:12,720 --> 00:28:14,400
Is it a trade that you get you a cheaper

579
00:28:14,440 --> 00:28:17,279
player or something, so you could still figure out wheys

580
00:28:17,440 --> 00:28:20,160
if you trade zechnology as part of this deal, it'd

581
00:28:20,160 --> 00:28:21,839
be easier to figure out how to get out of

582
00:28:21,839 --> 00:28:24,160
the tax. Honestly, then maybe if you trade Valentunis and

583
00:28:24,279 --> 00:28:27,839
only have that two hundred, like to shave the half

584
00:28:27,880 --> 00:28:30,880
a million dollars just because you're out of you unless

585
00:28:31,000 --> 00:28:32,799
just some team really wants to jail, like you're just

586
00:28:32,839 --> 00:28:35,839
sort of out of moves that you've traded every single

587
00:28:35,960 --> 00:28:36,880
like out of.

588
00:28:36,920 --> 00:28:39,720
Speaker 2: Moves is how I would describe Denver just generally speaking.

589
00:28:40,119 --> 00:28:43,440
Speaker 1: But I just made one you're welcomes how much?

590
00:28:43,759 --> 00:28:47,640
Speaker 2: Isn't there real value though, from Denver's perspective in just

591
00:28:47,799 --> 00:28:51,920
not bringing Valentunis back and earmarking the ten million dollars

592
00:28:51,960 --> 00:28:53,839
you would have paid him for the twenty five you're

593
00:28:53,839 --> 00:28:55,440
gonna have to give Peyton Watson.

594
00:28:56,720 --> 00:28:58,640
Speaker 1: For sure. So I'm saying, like, if you get off

595
00:28:58,640 --> 00:29:00,799
of his echnology and then you let I'm just saying

596
00:29:01,200 --> 00:29:04,079
this deal makes it harder for the Nuggets to get

597
00:29:04,119 --> 00:29:05,680
out of the tax. Is how are you getting out

598
00:29:05,680 --> 00:29:08,039
of the tax if you've now you could either move

599
00:29:08,079 --> 00:29:12,599
Oununus for a cheaper player or what like you've traded

600
00:29:12,680 --> 00:29:14,759
he not, but you have nothing to attach to anybody

601
00:29:14,799 --> 00:29:17,880
to say here and at that point, because they're at

602
00:29:17,920 --> 00:29:21,920
fifteen players right now, right and you're also want to

603
00:29:21,920 --> 00:29:25,039
convert Spencer Jones. So that's like the that's the challenge.

604
00:29:25,079 --> 00:29:26,759
I mean, I would do it. That's I just feel

605
00:29:26,759 --> 00:29:28,519
like that's I don't know if the Bulls would. I

606
00:29:28,519 --> 00:29:31,319
think the even with Denver's tax situation, I think the

607
00:29:31,359 --> 00:29:33,000
Bulls are the team here that would say no.

608
00:29:33,640 --> 00:29:36,279
Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe it's hard to say. I mean, one of

609
00:29:36,319 --> 00:29:38,160
the things we're running up against here when we're looking

610
00:29:38,200 --> 00:29:41,319
for like options for Denver is that it doesn't it

611
00:29:41,359 --> 00:29:43,920
feel kind of like, I guess Brown is really the

612
00:29:43,920 --> 00:29:45,920
player I'm talking about, Like, I don't know that other

613
00:29:46,000 --> 00:29:48,440
teams around the league value Christian Brown at the dollar

614
00:29:48,440 --> 00:29:50,640
amount the Nuggets are paying him. Does that does that

615
00:29:50,680 --> 00:29:52,480
seem fair? Like? I think I don't know.

616
00:29:52,480 --> 00:29:54,160
Speaker 1: And the other thing the other thing that we have

617
00:29:54,359 --> 00:29:56,960
and I totally forgot, is that he's poison pilled, so

618
00:29:57,039 --> 00:29:57,640
moving him as he.

619
00:29:57,720 --> 00:30:00,079
Speaker 2: He's not going anywhere. I'm just saying in general, like

620
00:30:00,519 --> 00:30:03,200
the Nuggets because of the way they've conducted business over

621
00:30:03,240 --> 00:30:05,079
the years. I feel like, I mean, Jamal Murray is

622
00:30:05,079 --> 00:30:08,240
an example of this, probably like they and Gordon. Gordon's

623
00:30:08,319 --> 00:30:11,279
kind of a universal fit enough that maybe he's that's

624
00:30:11,279 --> 00:30:14,319
his market value on that extension he signed. But like

625
00:30:14,359 --> 00:30:16,160
in general, I feel like the Nuggets and keeping this

626
00:30:16,200 --> 00:30:17,799
team together the way they have, they have a lot

627
00:30:17,839 --> 00:30:20,640
of guys that it's like they're being paid more than

628
00:30:21,000 --> 00:30:24,039
another team would be willing to pay them. Brown in particular,

629
00:30:24,039 --> 00:30:27,480
but yeah, he's going nowhere because the outgoing money is

630
00:30:27,519 --> 00:30:30,680
like well or in like four point nine or something,

631
00:30:30,759 --> 00:30:33,640
and then coming in it's like twenty one not happening.

632
00:30:34,079 --> 00:30:36,759
So I think, So, who are the players you're thinking

633
00:30:36,799 --> 00:30:38,640
of when you're saying that the Nuggets are paying them

634
00:30:38,640 --> 00:30:39,279
more than other team?

635
00:30:39,359 --> 00:30:40,240
Speaker 1: Is that Cam Johnson?

636
00:30:40,279 --> 00:30:40,440
Speaker 2: Now?

637
00:30:40,480 --> 00:30:42,880
Speaker 1: Is that where you're at? Because Murray Murray, I think

638
00:30:43,880 --> 00:30:46,400
other teams might be, like, Murray's having a hell of

639
00:30:46,440 --> 00:30:46,759
a year.

640
00:30:47,440 --> 00:30:50,920
Speaker 2: Let me pull up there. Zeke Zeke nag is seven.

641
00:30:51,680 --> 00:30:55,599
Speaker 1: Even player Aaron Gordon moving forward after this year is

642
00:30:55,599 --> 00:30:56,680
probably Yeah, that's what I mean.

643
00:30:56,799 --> 00:30:59,759
Speaker 2: So next year he's thirty two, then thirty four and

644
00:30:59,799 --> 00:31:02,440
a half than thirty seven, and those will be his

645
00:31:02,519 --> 00:31:05,720
age thirty one, thirty two to thirty three seasons, and

646
00:31:05,799 --> 00:31:07,839
already it's like pretty clear he can't make it through

647
00:31:07,880 --> 00:31:10,519
a full year and postseason healthy. So as much as

648
00:31:10,559 --> 00:31:13,559
I love him, he he's I'm just listen. It's not

649
00:31:13,640 --> 00:31:18,240
no judgment, just just saying I think maybe he is.

650
00:31:18,319 --> 00:31:20,720
I think Brown definitely is probably paid more than the

651
00:31:20,759 --> 00:31:23,960
market would pay Johnson I just said earlier, is it

652
00:31:24,200 --> 00:31:28,440
seems okay just because of the shooting track record? Yeah,

653
00:31:28,559 --> 00:31:31,640
Murray making fifty to fifty three, fifty seven the next

654
00:31:31,839 --> 00:31:34,440
three years after this one, Murray's not a thirty percent

655
00:31:34,480 --> 00:31:35,720
of the cap player, I don't think.

656
00:31:36,920 --> 00:31:40,079
Speaker 1: Two. Finally, just adjust my trade if you're Denver, isn't

657
00:31:40,079 --> 00:31:42,599
more palatable if you're attaching the stuff to his Ike

658
00:31:42,640 --> 00:31:46,039
Nagy to get Io desum Wu alone rather than getting

659
00:31:46,559 --> 00:31:47,960
Jalen Smith and Io Desummu.

660
00:31:48,400 --> 00:31:54,119
Speaker 2: Hmm. I think I think probably. But then the question

661
00:31:54,240 --> 00:31:58,519
is just where, like what Nause's impact is zero when

662
00:31:58,519 --> 00:32:00,960
they're fully healthy? What's just soon moves? Like? Is he

663
00:32:01,039 --> 00:32:04,440
gonna play fi? Yeah?

664
00:32:04,480 --> 00:32:06,160
Speaker 1: I was gobna say, because he probably eats into minutes

665
00:32:06,160 --> 00:32:10,039
for Brown Hardway Junior Strawther depending It's probably depending on

666
00:32:10,079 --> 00:32:11,119
the matchup thing.

667
00:32:11,240 --> 00:32:12,920
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, I mean.

668
00:32:12,799 --> 00:32:15,359
Speaker 1: Honestly, the deal, if you want to save maximum money,

669
00:32:15,920 --> 00:32:18,640
you're gonna have to convert Spencer Jones after that. But

670
00:32:18,680 --> 00:32:21,319
that's what they're gonna want to do is attached Strawther

671
00:32:21,480 --> 00:32:24,000
to Nause. Hope he's viewed as like a mini sweetener,

672
00:32:24,119 --> 00:32:26,119
and then use the swaps and the second round pick

673
00:32:26,160 --> 00:32:27,599
and or maybe you keep.

674
00:32:27,680 --> 00:32:29,920
Speaker 2: You keep some of the swaps and stuff out of

675
00:32:29,920 --> 00:32:32,160
there since you have so little to move, like maybe

676
00:32:32,200 --> 00:32:34,799
you create enough flexibility with that stuff thing.

677
00:32:34,880 --> 00:32:37,319
Speaker 1: Well, for sure you keep this one. But if you're Chicago,

678
00:32:38,319 --> 00:32:40,799
you're just taking Strowther in a twenty thirty two second

679
00:32:40,839 --> 00:32:42,400
round pick to give up to Soon Moo and take

680
00:32:42,440 --> 00:32:42,839
on Nase.

681
00:32:43,039 --> 00:32:46,359
Speaker 2: That's like well if yeah, right, But if you're Chicago, like,

682
00:32:46,400 --> 00:32:49,279
how confident are you that Dessum Mouve's coming back? You know?

683
00:32:49,559 --> 00:32:49,880
Is he?

684
00:32:50,720 --> 00:32:54,400
Speaker 1: I think? Would you rather have Nause off the books

685
00:32:54,400 --> 00:32:56,599
for two more years or just let eye out to

686
00:32:56,680 --> 00:32:58,240
super Walk for well?

687
00:32:58,480 --> 00:33:00,799
Speaker 2: Right, okay, yeah, so the sweeteners still have to be there.

688
00:33:01,559 --> 00:33:03,359
I guess it just depends on their view of Strawther.

689
00:33:03,759 --> 00:33:07,200
Maybe they think Strawther is gonna be something I don't know.

690
00:33:09,759 --> 00:33:11,519
Speaker 1: Do you have anything else? Are you ready to take

691
00:33:11,559 --> 00:33:11,839
us out?

692
00:33:11,880 --> 00:33:15,160
Speaker 2: I think we very clearly exhausted our Denver Nuggets thoughts.

693
00:33:15,559 --> 00:33:20,200
Thanks everybody for listening, for watching. Remember rate review, subscribe, Share,

694
00:33:20,359 --> 00:33:22,640
Share with all your friends, with all your Nuggets fans,

695
00:33:22,880 --> 00:33:25,240
even though they probably like us or like I don't

696
00:33:25,240 --> 00:33:27,079
know what Denver is gonna do at the deadline. Maybe

697
00:33:27,200 --> 00:33:34,079
very little discord links for that in the YouTube podcast. Yeah, basically,

698
00:33:34,119 --> 00:33:37,119
like the takeaway here for me was you need to

699
00:33:37,160 --> 00:33:40,119
find ways to keep Payton Watson, and that probably means

700
00:33:40,160 --> 00:33:43,880
you should just trade everybody else. I hope I convey that.

701
00:33:45,799 --> 00:33:47,839
Shouts Frank no Keen. Apologies, Jared Allen

